Produced by David Edwards and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This book was
produced from scanned images of public domain material
from the Google Print project.) Music files created by
Linda Cantoni.











GUIDE TO THE KINDERGARTEN AND INTERMEDIATE CLASS,


BY

ELIZABETH P. PEABODY;

AND

MORAL CULTURE OF INFANCY,

BY

MARY MANN.

REVISED EDITION.

        NEW YORK:
        E. STEIGER.
        1877.

The present volume is a revised edition of the book which under the
title

Moral Culture of Infancy

and

Kindergarten Guide

has been in the market since 1860, latterly published by MESSRS. J. W.
SCHERMERHORN & CO. of New York.

    Cambridge,               Elizabeth P. Peabody.
    October 1st, 1877.       Mary Mann.

  Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1869, by

  J. W. SCHERMERHORN & CO.,

  in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States
  for the
  Southern District of New York.

  COPYRIGHT, 1877, BY E. STEIGER.




PREFACE.


                              CAMBRIDGE, Mass., March 1, 1869.

SINCE publishing the first edition of what I meant to be a Guide to
those who undertake to give Kindergarten culture, I have been in Europe,
and made a special study of the Kindergartens established in Hamburgh,
Berlin, and Dresden, by Froebel himself, and his most distinguished
scholars.

This study has more and more confirmed the conviction I derived from
reading Froebel's "Essay on the Education of the Human Race;" viz., that
no greater benefit could be conferred on our country, than the far and
wide spread of Kindergartens, _as an underpinning_, so to say, of our
noble public-school system, giving adequate moral foundation,
thoroughness, and practicality to the national education.

But I also learned that no book could be written that would make an
expert Kindergartner. It was the careful observations and earnest
experiments of half a century, that gave to Froebel himself that
profound knowledge of childhood which enabled him to formulate the
principles, deduce the rules, and call forth the spirit of a genuine art
of education. But though no genius and industry less than his own could
have originated this art, any soundly cultured, intelligent,
genial-tempered young woman, who loves children, can appreciate and
practise it, if--and only if--she is trained by a living teacher engaged
in the work at the moment.

This, I myself have proved experimentally also; for _my_ knowledge was
first obtained only from books. I had the best manuals and guides, but
did not know that they were intended merely for the convenience of
already trained teachers; and that they necessarily omitted the
characteristic peculiarity of the method, because _written words_
cannot do justice to the fine steps by which the child is led to
gradually carry its total spontaneity forwards, on every plane of its
little life,--artistic, moral, and intellectual.

For there is nothing merely mechanical and imitative in true
Kindergarten culture: the child acts "from within outwards" in every
thing it does, however seemingly trifling; and, if we use the word
_artist_ in its most general sense, becomes an artist from the
beginning. Thus is prevented that too common divorce between the powers
of thinking and acting, whose harmony ensures ability in a strict
proportion to intellectual capacity. Consciousness of aim, and enjoyment
of success, at every step develop new ideas and power, and fulfil that
law of nature by which thought tends to rush into act instantly, as in
childish play. Nothing is more melancholy in experience than to see
people _drifting_ instead of _living_; but this general failure of human
life is owing to the fact, that the unassisted child is baffled in its
will and balked of its desires, by a want of that steadiness of aim,
perseverance, and knowledge of how to adapt means to ends, which adult
sympathy and wisdom should supply; and from want of which it loses the
original harmony of its being in the process of its growth. Kindergarten
culture is the adult mind entering into the child's world, and
appreciating nature's intention as displayed in every impulse of
spontaneous life; and so directing it that the joy of success may be
ensured at every step, and artistic things be actually produced, which
gives the self-reliance and conscious intelligence that ought to
discriminate human power from blind force.

The only mistake in idea which I see that I made in my "Guide," was
making it the object of the teacher to cultivate the _individualities_
of each pupil especially. This is not even desirable, and would require
the intuitive genius of Froebel in every single teacher. In a true art
of education, individualities will be tenderly respected; but it is not
what is individual, but what is common to all (or that universal of
human nature which rises into the divine creative), which is to be
cultivated especially. Every process of Froebel's Kindergarten is good
for all children, and, interfering with nothing original, leaves their
individualities free to express themselves _sufficiently_. For
individual varieties are irrefragable, and give piquancy and beauty to
human life, except they are pampered,--when they become deformities. To
follow universal laws in their orderly development, ensures a necessary
harmony with others, while a margin is always to be left for
_invention_, which is what gives conscious freedom, and makes obedience
no longer blind and passive, but intelligent and active; every healthy
instinct and affection becoming at last spiritual law.

Nevertheless, I gladly meet the demand of the public for a second
edition of the "Guide," because its defect is not in its spirit and
general idea, seeing that it has awakened an interest in Kindergartens
all over the United States, as numerous letters from all parts have
proved to me; but in my having somewhat confused what belongs to the
second and third stages of primary education, with a preliminary
process, which it is necessary not only to begin with, but to keep
distinct for a considerable time, until the habit of mind is formed of
asking clearly what is going to be done before attempting to do it. What
I missed cannot be supplied by any book; for this preliminary process
can only be learned from the living teaching of the Normal class. I make
some revisory notes, also change some thirty pages, and gladly embrace
the opportunity, which the popularity of my "Guide" gives me, to make
known, as far as it goes abroad, that, when I came home from Europe, I
found what I had seen to be the indispensable condition of an effective
introduction of Froebel's art into either the private or public
education of America; viz., a training-school for Kindergartners,
actually established by Madame Kriege in Boston (127 Charles Street), in
connection with a Kindergarten to be taught by her daughter, fresh from
the school of Berlin, founded by the Baroness Marienholtz, a noble lady
who has devoted her pen, her fortune, the prestige of her rank, and even
her personal services, to the diffusion of Kindergarten culture on the
continent of Europe.

The so-called Kindergarten which I had established, was gladly given up
to make room for this genuine one; and I have the highest expectations
from the Normal training. Already several teachers, who had made
experiments of their own, which had taught them the need of this special
instruction, have engaged themselves as Madame Kriege's pupils; and the
spread of the demand for Kindergartners will, I think, keep her Normal
class always full. I cannot but hope that the time may come when the
Normal schools of all our States may be endowed with a professorship of
Kindergarten culture adequately filled.

Omitting my own preface to my first edition, I retain as explanation of
the origin of the letters on moral culture, which make the last part of
the "Guide," and give it its greatest value to mothers, Mrs. Mann's


POSTSCRIPT.

"I have been urged to publish these letters, written twenty years ago,
as an appendix to a Kindergarten Guide, because the school herein
described was a groping attempt at something of the same kind, and had
left very pleasant memories in the hearts of the children referred
to--now no longer children, but some of them men and women nobly and
beautifully acting their parts on earth as parents; and others,--having
died martyrs' deaths for human freedom in the desolating war that now
ravages our beloved country,--angels in heaven.

"If an inborn love of children and of school-keeping are qualifications
for judging of the best means of educating them, I may claim to have
known something of the theory and practice best adapted to that end. My
object was to put them in possession of all their faculties. Many
improvements in methods, and many facilities in means, have been added
to the resources of teachers since these letters were written. Physical
training is felt to be of the greatest importance, in preference to the
ancient mode of shutting children up many hours in close rooms, and
repressing all natural and joyous life. The principle is discovered of
educating by _directing the activities_. Hence the Kindergarten.

                                                       "M. M.

"CONCORD, MASS., 1863."




CONTENTS.


    CHAP.                                    PAGE
       I. KINDERGARTEN--WHAT IS IT?            9
      II. ROOMS, ETC.                         19
     III. MUSIC                               22
      IV. PLAYS, GYMNASTICS, AND DANCING      28
       V. THE KINDERGARTNER                   35
      VI. KINDERGARTEN OCCUPATIONS            43
     VII. MORAL AND RELIGIOUS EXERCISES       54
    VIII. OBJECT LESSONS                      58
      IX. GEOMETRY                            65
       X. READING                             71
      XI. GRAMMAR AND LANGUAGES               98
     XII. GEOGRAPHY                          103
    XIII. THE SECRET OF POWER                104

    MORAL CULTURE OF INFANCY                 105


    SONGS.




AMERICAN KINDERGARTEN.




CHAPTER I.

KINDERGARTEN--WHAT IS IT?


WHAT is a Kindergarten? I will reply by negatives. It is not the
old-fashioned infant-school. That was a narrow institution,
comparatively; the object being (I do not speak of Pestalozzi's own, but
that which we have had in this country and in England) to take the
children of poor laborers, and keep them out of the fire and the
streets, while their mothers went to their necessary labor. Very good
things, indeed, in their way. Their principle of discipline was to
circumvent the wills of children, in every way that would enable their
teachers to keep them within bounds, and quiet. It was certainly better
that they should learn to sing _by rote_ the Creed and the "definitions"
of scientific terms, and such like, than to learn the profanity and
obscenity of the streets, which was the alternative. But no mother who
wished for anything which might be called the _development_ of her child
would think of putting it into an infant-school, especially if she lived
in the country, amid

              "the mighty sum
        Of things forever speaking,"

where any "old grey stone" would altogether surpass, as a stand-point,
the bench of the highest class of an infant-school. In short, they did
not state the problem of infant culture with any breadth, and
accomplished nothing of general interest on the subject.

Neither is the primary public school a Kindergarten, though it is but
justice to the capabilities of that praiseworthy institution, so
important in default of a better, to say that in one of them, at the
North End of Boston, an enterprising and genial teacher has introduced
one feature of Froebel's plan. She has actually given to each of her
little children a box of playthings, wherewith to amuse itself according
to its own sweet will, at all times when not under direct
instruction,--necessarily, in her case, on condition of its being
perfectly quiet; and this one thing makes this primary school the best
one in Boston, both as respects the attainments of the scholars and
their good behavior.

_Kindergarten_ means a garden of children, and Froebel, the inventor of
it, or rather, as he would prefer to express it, _the discoverer of the
method of Nature_, meant to symbolize by the name the spirit and plan of
treatment. How does the gardener treat his plants? He studies their
individual natures, and puts them into such circumstances of soil and
atmosphere as enable them to grow, flower, and bring forth fruit,--also
to renew their manifestation year after year. He does not expect to
succeed unless he learns all their wants, and the circumstances in which
these wants will be supplied, and all their possibilities of beauty and
use, and the means of giving them opportunity to be perfected. On the
other hand, while he knows that they must not be forced against their
individual natures, he does not leave them to grow wild, but prunes
redundancies, removes destructive worms and bugs from their leaves and
stems, and weeds from their vicinity,--carefully watching to learn what
peculiar insects affect what particular plants, and how the former can
be destroyed without injuring the vitality of the latter. After all the
most careful gardener can do, he knows that the form of the plant is
predetermined in the germ or seed, and that the inward tendency must
concur with a multitude of influences, the most powerful and subtile of
which is removed in place ninety-five millions of miles away.

In the Kindergarten, _children_ are treated on an analogous plan. It
presupposes gardeners of the mind, who are quite aware that they have as
little power to override the characteristic individuality of a child, or
to predetermine this characteristic, as the gardener of plants to say
that a lily shall be a rose. But notwithstanding this limitation on one
side, and the necessity for a concurrence of the Spirit on the
other,--which is more independent of our modification than the remote
sun,--yet they must feel responsible, after all, for the perfection of
the development, in so far as removing every impediment, preserving
every condition, and pruning every redundance.

This analogy of education to the gardener's art is so striking, both as
regards what we can and what we cannot do, that Froebel has put every
educator into a most suggestive Normal School, by the very word which he
has given to his seminary,--Kindergarten.

If every school-teacher in the land had a garden of flowers and fruits
to cultivate, it could hardly fail that he would learn to be wise in his
vocation. For suitable preparation, the first, second, and third thing
is, to

        "Come forth into the light of things,
          Let Nature be your teacher."

The "new education," as the French call it, begins with children in the
mother's arms. Froebel had the nurses bring to his establishment, in
Hamburg, children who could not talk, who were not more than three
months old, and trained the nurses to work on his principles and by his
methods. This will hardly be done in this country, at least at present;
but to supply the place of such a class, a lady of Boston has prepared
and published, under copyright, Froebel's First Gift, consisting of six
soft balls of the three primary and the three secondary colors, which
are sold in a box, with a little manual for mothers, in which the true
principle and plan of tending babies, so as not to rasp their nerves,
but to amuse without wearying them, is very happily suggested. There is
no mother or nurse who would not be assisted by this little manual
essentially. As it says in the beginning,--"Tending babies is an art,
and every art is founded on a science of observations; for love is not
wisdom, but love must act _according to wisdom_ in order to succeed.
Mothers and nurses, however tender and kind-hearted, may, and oftenest
do, weary and vex the nerves of children, in well-meant efforts to amuse
them, and weary themselves the while. Froebel's exercises, founded on
the observations of an intelligent sensibility, are intended to amuse
without wearying, to educate without vexing."

Froebel's Second Gift for children, adapted to the age from one to two
or three years, with another little book of directions, has also been
published by the same lady, and is perhaps a still greater boon to every
nursery; for this is the age when many a child's temper is ruined, and
the inclination of the twig wrongly bent, through sheer _want of
resource and idea_, on the part of nurses and mothers.

But it is to the next age--from three years old and upwards--that the
Kindergarten becomes the desideratum, if not a necessity. The isolated
home, made into a flower-vase by the application of the principles set
forth in the Gifts above mentioned, may do for babies. But every mother
and nurse knows how hard it is to meet the demands of a child too young
to be taught to read, but whose opening intelligence and irrepressible
bodily activity are so hard to be met by an adult, however genial and
active. Children generally take the temper of their whole lives from
this period of their existence. Then "the twig is bent," either towards
that habit of self-defence which is an ever-renewing cause of
selfishness, or to the sun of love-in-exercise, which is the exhaustless
source of goodness and beauty.[A]

The indispensable thing now is a sufficient society of children. It is
only in the society of equals that the social instinct can be gratified,
and come into equilibrium with the instinct of self-preservation.
Self-love, and love of others, are equally natural; and before reason is
developed, and the proper spiritual life begins, sweet and beautiful
childhood may bloom out and imparadise our mortal life. Let us only give
the social instinct of children its fair chance. For this purpose, a few
will not do. The children of one family are not enough, and do not come
along fast enough. A large company should be gathered out of many
families. It will be found that the little things are at once taken out
of themselves, and become interested in each other. In the variety,
affinities develop themselves very prettily, and the rough points of
rampant individualities wear off. We have seen a highly-gifted child,
who, at home, was--to use a vulgar, but expressive word--pesky and
odious, with the exacting demands of a powerful, but untrained mind and
heart, become "sweet as roses" spontaneously, amidst the rebound of a
large, well-ordered, and carefully watched child-society. Anxious
mothers have brought us children, with a thousand deprecations and
explanations of their characters, as if they thought we were going to
find them little monsters, which their motherly hearts were persuaded
they were not, though they behaved like little sanchos at home,--and,
behold, they were as harmonious, from the very beginning, as if they had
undergone the subduing influence of a lifetime. We are quite sure that
children begin with loving others quite as intensely as they love
themselves,--forgetting themselves in their love of others,--if they
only have as fair a chance of being benevolent and self-sacrificing as
of being selfish. Sympathy is as much a natural instinct as self-love,
and no more or less innocent, in a moral point of view. Either principle
alone makes an ugly and depraved form of natural character. Balanced,
they give the element of happiness, and the conditions of spiritual
goodness and truth,--making children fit temples for the Holy Ghost to
dwell in.

A Kindergarten, then, is children in society,--a commonwealth or
republic of children,--whose laws are all part and parcel of the Higher
Law alone. It may be contrasted, in every particular, with the
old-fashioned school, which is an absolute monarchy, where the children
are subjected to a lower expediency, having for its prime end quietness,
or such order as has "reigned in Warsaw" since 1831.

But let us not be misunderstood. We are not of those who think that
children, in any condition whatever, will inevitably develop into beauty
and goodness. Human nature tends to revolve in a vicious circle, around
the idiosyncrasy; and children must have over them, in the person of a
wise and careful teacher, a power which shall deal with them as God
deals with the mature, presenting the claims of sympathy and truth
whenever they presumptuously or unconsciously fall into selfishness. We
have the best conditions of moral culture in a company large enough for
the exacting disposition of the solitary child to be balanced by the
claims made by others on the common stock of enjoyment,--there being a
reasonable oversight of older persons, wide-awake to anticipate,
prevent, and adjust the rival pretensions which must always arise where
there are finite beings with infinite desires, while Reason, whose
proper object is God, is yet undeveloped.

Let the teacher always take for granted that the law of love is quick
within, whatever are appearances, and the better self will generally
respond. In proportion as the child is young and unsophisticated, will
be the certainty of the response to a teacher of simple faith:

        "There are who ask not if thine eye
           Be on them,--who, in love and truth,
         Where no misgiving is, rely
           Upon the genial sense of youth.

        "And blest are they who in the main
         This faith even now do entertain,
         Live in the spirit of this creed,
         Yet find another strength, according to their need."

That "other strength" is to be found in recognition of the Eternal laws
of order, and reverent application of them to human action. But children
must receive this from the Kindergartner, who shall give them such help
in embodying their ever-springing fancies as shall prevent "the weight
of chance desires," and issue in a tangible success, by entering into
and carrying forward their total, spontaneous activity, without
destroying its childishness.

One of the most important exercises for children in the Kindergarten is
block building. A box of eight little cubes is so managed that it will
unfold in the child's mind the law of symmetry, by means of series of
forms which the children are led to make in a way rather difficult to
describe here. So quick are the fancies of children, that the blocks
will serve also as symbols of every thing in Nature and imagination. We
have seen an ingenious teacher assemble a class of children around her
large table, to each of whom she had given the blocks. The first thing
was to count them, a great process of arithmetic to most of them. Then
she made something and explained it. It was perhaps a light-house,--and
some blocks would represent rocks near it to be avoided, and ships
sailing in the ocean; or perhaps it was a hen-coop, with chickens
inside, and a fox prowling about outside, and a boy who was going to
catch the fox and save the fowls. Then she told each child to make
something, and when it was done hold up a hand. The first one she asked
to explain, and then went round the class. If one began to speak before
another had ended, she would hold up her finger and say,--"It is not
your turn." In the course of the winter, she taught, over these blocks,
a great deal about the habits of animals. She studied natural history in
order to be perfectly accurate in her symbolic representation of the
habitation of each animal, and their enemies were also represented by
blocks. The children imitated these; and when they drew upon their
imaginations for facts, and made fantastic creations, she would
say,--"Those, I think, were fairy hens" (or whatever); for it was her
principle to accept everything, and thus tempt out their invention. The
great value of this exercise is to get them into the habit of
representing something they have thought by an outward symbol. The
explanations they are always eager to give, teach them to express
themselves in words. Full scope is given to invention, whether in the
direction of possibilities or of the impossibilities in which children's
imaginations revel,--in either case the child being trained to the habit
of embodiment of its thought.

Froebel thought it very desirable to have a garden where the children
could cultivate flowers. He had one which he divided into lots for the
several children, reserving a portion for his own share in which they
could assist him. He thought it the happiest mode of calling their
attention to the invisible God, whose power must be waited upon, after
the conditions for growth are carefully arranged according to _laws_
which they must observe. Where a garden is impossible, a flower-pot with
a plant in it, for each child to take care of, would do very well.

But the best way to cultivate a sense of the presence of God is to draw
the attention to the conscience, which is very active in children, and
which seems to them (as we all can testify from our own remembrance)
another than themselves, and yet themselves. We have heard a person say,
that in her childhood she was puzzled to know which was herself, the
voice of her inclination or of her conscience, for they were palpably
two; and what a joyous thing it was when she was first convinced that
one was the Spirit of God, whom unlucky teaching had previously embodied
in a form of terror on a distant judgment-seat. Children are consecrated
as soon as they get the spiritual idea, and it may be so presented that
it shall make them happy as well as true. But the adult who enters into
such conversation with a child must be careful not to shock and profane,
instead of nurturing the soul. It is possible to avoid both discouraging
and flattering views, and to give the most tender and elevating
associations.

But children require not only an alternation of physical and mental
amusements, but some instruction to be passively received. They delight
in stories, and a wise teacher can make this subservient to the highest
uses by reading beautiful creations of the imagination. Not only such
household-stories as "Sanford and Merton," Mrs. Farrar's "Robinson
Crusoe," and Salzmann's "Elements of Morality," but symbolization like
the heroes of Asgard, the legends of the Middle Ages, classic and
chivalric tales, the legend of Saint George, and "Pilgrim's Progress,"
can in the mouth of a skilful reader be made subservient to moral
culture. The reading sessions should not exceed ten or fifteen minutes.

Anything of the nature of scientific teaching should be done by
presenting _objects_ for examination and investigation.[B] Flowers and
insects, shells, etc., are easily handled. The observations should be
drawn out of the children, not made to them, except as corrections of
their mistakes. Experiments with the prism, and in crystallization and
transformation, are useful and desirable to awaken taste for the
sciences of Nature. In short, the Kindergarten should give the
beginnings of everything. "What is well begun is half done."

We must say a word about the locality and circumstances of a
Kindergarten. There is published in Lausanne, France, a newspaper
devoted to the interests of this mode of education, in whose early
numbers is described a Kindergarten which seems to be of the nature of a
boarding-school; at least, the children are there all day. Each child
has a garden, and there is one besides where they work in common. There
are accommodations for keeping animals, and miniature tools to do
mechanical labor of various kinds. In short, it is a child's world. But
in this country, especially in New England, parents would not consent to
be so much separated from their children, and a few hours of
Kindergarten in the early part of the day will serve an excellent
purpose,--using up the effervescent activity of children, who may
healthily be left to themselves the rest of the time, to play or rest,
comparatively unwatched.

Two rooms are indispensable, if there is any variety of age. It is
desirable that one should be sequestrated to the quiet employments. A
pianoforte is desirable, to lead the singing, and accompany the plays,
gymnastics, frequent marchings, and dancing, when that is taught,--which
it should be. But a hand-organ which plays fourteen tunes will help to
supply the want of a piano, and a guitar in the hands of a ready teacher
will do better than nothing.

Sometimes a genial mother and daughters might have a Kindergarten, and
devote themselves and the house to it, especially if they live in one of
our beautiful country-towns or cities. The habit, in the city of New
York, of sending children to school in an omnibus, hired to go round the
city and pick them up, suggests the possibility of a Kindergarten in one
of those beautiful residences up in town, where there is a garden before
or behind the house. It is impossible to keep Kindergarten _by the way_.
It must be the main business of those who undertake it; for it is
necessary that every individual child should be borne, as it were, on
the heart of the _gardeners_, in order that it be _inspired_ with order,
truth, and goodness. To develop a child from within outwards, we must
plunge ourselves into its peculiarity of imagination and feeling. No one
person could possibly endure such absorption of life in labor
unrelieved, and consequently two or three should unite in the
undertaking in order to be able to relieve each other from the enormous
strain on life. The compensations are, however, great. The charm of the
various individuality, and of the refreshing presence of conscience yet
unprofaned, is greater than can be found elsewhere in this work-day
world. Those were not idle words which came from the lips of Wisdom
Incarnate:--"Their angels do always behold the face of my Father:" "Of
such is the kingdom of heaven."

FOOTNOTES:

[A] Frœbel's Building Blocks are in a Series of six, each one to be
introduced after the previous one has been in a measure exhausted. But
there is a specific way in which they are to be used, and exact
directions for this are to be found in Mrs. KRAUS-BŒLTE'S _Kindergarden
Guide_.

[B] Calkin's _Object Lessons_ will give hints.




CHAPTER II.

ROOMS, ETC.


I HAVE made an article, which I published in the "Atlantic Monthly" of
November, 1862, my first chapter, because I cannot, in any better way,
answer the general question,--What is a Kindergarten? I will now proceed
to make a Guide for the conduct of a Kindergarten; in which I shall
freely make use of what Madame Rongé has said in her "English
Kindergarten," and Madame Marienholtz in her "Jardin des Enfans;" but I
shall not confine myself to them, for an American Kindergarten
necessarily has its peculiarities.

In the first place, we must think of the accommodations. These are not
to be in the open air, as has been supposed by many, through
misapprehension of the use of the word Kindergarten. But it is desirable
that there should be a good play-ground attached to the rooms; and
Froebel thought it of very important religious influence that every
child should have earth to cultivate, if it were only a foot square.

Two rooms are indispensable, and if possible there should be three, all
of good size, with good light and air: one room for music and plays,
gymnastics, dancing, &c.; another for the quieter mechanical
employments,--pricking, weaving, sewing, moulding, folding,
paper-cutting, sticklaying, and block-building; and still another for
drawing, writing, object-teaching, and learning to read. It is desirable
that every child should have a box, if not a little desk, in order to
learn to keep things in order. When this cannot be done, the teachers
must so arrange matters, as to have everything ready for every change;
that no time may be lost and no confusion arise. In my own Kindergarten,
I arrange beforehand the chairs in the play-room in a solid square, into
which the children march at the commencement of the exercises. Sitting
in them, they sing their morning prayer or hymn, hear the reading, and
take a singing lesson on the scale. Then they rise, and, taking up their
chairs, march into the other room for their reading lessons, which are
always in two classes, sometimes in three. They bring their chairs back
again for luncheon, and then take them out for another lesson; for in
this room they have gymnastics, dancing, and the play, and need a clear
space for all. They come back with their chairs, at the close of the
exercises, to sing songs together before they disperse. Two of my rooms
are carpeted. The other is smooth-floored for dancing, playing, and
gymnastics. And, for the convenience of the gymnastics, it is well to
paint, at convenient distances, _little feet in the first position_, as
Dr. Dio Lewis has done in his gymnastic hall.

When Kindergarten accommodations can be built expressly, I would suggest
that there should be a house with glass walls and partitions, at least
above the wainscoting; and that the wainscoting should be rather high
and painted black, so that every child might have a piece of the
blackboard; for it is easier for a child to draw with a chalk on a
blackboard than with a slate and pencil.

A house of glass, on the plan of the crystal palace, would be no more
expensive than if built of brick. It would secure the light and
sunshine, and make it easy for the superintendent to overlook the whole.
It should be equably warmed throughout. My own Kindergarten is not in a
glass house, but is the lower floor of a house which has three rooms,
with a hall between two of the rooms; a large china closet which I use
for the children's dressing, as well as to store many things; and beyond
the third room, a bathing room, with every convenience. Rooms, hall,
closet, and bathing room have all an east-south aspect, and are amply
lighted. The room between the china closet and bathing room is longer
than it is wide, and has blackboard painted on three sides of it, so
that each child has a piece of blackboard.

It is possible to keep a Kindergarten in two rooms, but not possible to
keep it in one, if it is of any desirable size, or there is any variety
of age in the children. A large play-ground and some garden is
desirable. I am so fortunate as to have these in my house in Boston.

The tables for the children to sit at should be low; and it is a good
plan to have them painted in squares of an inch; chequered, or ruled by
lines, so that they may be able always to set their blocks down with
perfect accuracy.

One of the rooms it would be well to provide with _flat_ box-desks, in
which can be kept all the materials which each child uses,--slates and
pencils, blocks, sticks, weaving and sewing materials,--and the children
should be required to keep these in order.

In my own Kindergarten I provide all the materials for their work and
instruction, thus securing uniformity; and it is better to do so always,
and to charge a price covering the expense. It should be understood,
from the first, that Kindergarten education is not cheap.

As a Kindergarten requires several persons to keep it properly, a genial
family, consisting of a mother and daughters, of various
accomplishments, might devote their whole house to it, preparing for the
writing and drawing one large room with blackboards all round, whose
area could be used for the playing, gymnastics, and dancing.

When this new culture shall be appreciated for its whole worth, it will
not be deemed extravagant for a whole family thus to devote their house,
as well as their time, to make a Kindergarten the temporary home of a
large company of children.




CHAPTER III.

MUSIC.


THE first requisite to the Kindergarten is Music. The voice of melody
commands the will of the child, or rather disarms the caprice, which is
the principle of disorder. Two hymns are given in this Guide with which
to commence school,--one being the Lord's Prayer, set to cheerful music.

But there should be regular scale singing, and if conducted by a teacher
of tact, a ten minutes lesson may be given every day, and the interest
be kept undiminished. The first lesson should be preceded by the
teacher's drawing on the blackboard a ladder of eight steps, and then
saying to the pupils, "Now listen to my voice, and see how it goes up
these steps." She then sings the eight notes very clearly, pointing to
each step of the ladder; and runs her voice, with equal distinctness,
down the descending scale. The children can then be asked to accompany
the teacher in going up and down the ladder, singing the numbers 1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, instead of _do_, _re_, _mi_. There will doubtless be
enough discords to be palpable to all ears, and these can be spoken of
by the teacher, and a proposition made that every one who thinks he can
go up and down the ladder alone, shall hold up a hand. Some may be able
to do so, but a majority will fail. Some will not try at all.

The teacher can then say, "Now I am going to teach you all to do
it,--one step at a time. Let us all sing _one_." The piano is struck,
and teacher and pupils all sing _one_. "Now let us go up a step,--one,
two." Let this be repeated several times. Then stop, and say, "Now I am
going to strike one of these notes and see if you know it." Strike two,
and ask, "What is that, 1 or 2?" There may be difference of opinion; in
which case, ask all to "hold up their hands who think it is 2, and then
all who think it is 1." Tell which is right, and say, "Now let us all
sing 2." Then say, "Now let us go down that step,--2, 1; and now up
again,--1, 2; now all hold up their hands who can sing 1, 2, 1?" Select
one after another to sing it alone with the piano, and after each has
tried, let all sing with the teacher 1, 2, 1, before another is asked to
sing it. Then let all sing 1, 1, 1; 2, 2, 2; 1, 1, 1. Go on in this way
till all the eight notes are learned. They will be able to tell these
notes, when struck upon the piano, much sooner than they will be able to
strike them with their voices. And other exercises, every day calling
upon them to name notes struck,--at first one note, afterwards
combinations of notes.

The following exercises were given in my Kindergarten in one year, which
resulted in nearly all the children being able to sing them alone, and
tell any notes struck.

1st.--1 2 1; 1 1, 2 2, 1 1; 1 1 1 1, 2 2 2 2, 1 1 1 1 2 1 2, &c.

2d.--1 2 3, 3 2 1; 1 3 3 1, 1 2 1, 2 3 2, 3 2 1.

3d.--1 2 3 4 5, 5 4 3 2 1. 1 3 5, 5 3 1, 1 5 5 1.

4th.--1 2 3 4 5 6; 6 5 4 3 2 1; 1 6, 6 1; 1 3 5 6.

5th.--1 2 3 4 5 6 7, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1; 1 3 5 8, 8 5 3 1.

6th.--1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, 8 7 5 6 4 3 2 1; 1 3 5 8.

This exercise can be varied by repeating each note one two, three, or
four times.

7th.--1 1 2, 2 2 3, 3 3 4, 4 4 5, 5 5 6, 7 7 8, 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.

8th.--1 1 2, 3 3 4, 5 5 6, 7 7 8; 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.

9th.--1 2, 1 2 1; 2 3, 2 3 2; 3 4, 3 4 3; 4 5, 4 5 6; 5 6, 5 6 7; 6 7, 6
7 8; 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

10th.--1 1, 2 2, 1; 2 2, 3 3, 2; 3 3, 4 4, 3; 4 4, 5 5, 4; &c.

11th.--1 3; 2 4; 3 5; 4 6; 5 7; 6 8; 8, 6; 7, 5; 6, 4; 5, 3; 4, 2; 3,
1.

12th.--1 3 5 8, 8 5 3 1; 1 4 6 8, 8 6 4 1; 1 8 8 1.

13th.--1 1, 3 3; 5 5, 8 8; 8 8, 7 7, 6 6, 5 5, 4 4, 3 3, 2 2, 1 1.

14th.--1 2 3 2 1; 2 3 4 3 2; 3 4 5 4 3; 4 5 6 5 4; 5 6 7 6 5; 6 7 8 7 6;
7 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.

15th.--1 2 1 2 3 3; 2 3 2 3 4 4; 3 4 3 4 5 5; 4 5 4 5 6 6; 5 6 5 6 7 7;
6 7 6 7 8 8; 8 8 8 8; 7 7 7 7; 6 6 6 6; 5 5 5 5; 4 4 4 4; 3 3 3 3; 2 2 2
2; l l l l; 1 8; 8 1.

Besides these ten minutes on the scale, (which should not occur next to
singing the hymn, but after some other exercise has intervened,) it is
an excellent plan to let the Kindergarten close with singing songs by
rote. The words should be simple, such as "The Cat and the Sparrow," and
other pretty melodies to be found in the Pestalozzian Singing Book and
the many compilations prepared for children. For it is well for the
child not to go out of the natural octave, and to have the words of
songs adapted to the childish capacity. Besides this singing, the
piano-forte should be used to play marches, as the children go from one
room to another to their different exercises. "Order is Heaven's first
law," and music is the heavenly voice of order, which disposes to
gentleness and regularity of motion. As all the exercises change every
quarter of an hour at least, this brings the marching to music as often;
and it will last one or two minutes, sometimes longer. The children get
accustomed to rise at the sound of the piano, and it will be easy to
make them silent during the music, especially if it is hinted to them
that _soldiers_ always march in silence. Besides this, the piano is
necessary for the gymnastics, and for the fanciful plays, which are
always to be accompanied by descriptive songs.

A few songs and plays are given in this Guide which, if taken in turn,
will recur not oftener than once in ten days. We subjoin a description
of the plays.

I will finish this chapter by a translation from a notice of
"Enseignement Musical, d'aprés Froebel, par Fred. Stern, prix, 2
francs: En vente à Bruxelles, rue de Vienne, 16, et à Paris, rue Fossés
St. Victor, 35." "A man to be complete, should be master of linear and
musical expression. Most of our education aims only to give him lingual
expression; and drawing and music are considered accomplishments merely!
The divine art which enables us to reproduce the human figure
illuminated with the expression of the spirit, a mere accomplishment![C]
Music, the melodious expression of our most intimate thoughts, the
colored reflection of the heart,--a mere accomplishment!

"Life is sad, monotonous, earthy, without the arts. If a woman of the
middle and higher classes especially, does not daily realize the higher
life by knowledge of truth and love of beauty, what shall save her from
the frivolity and _ennui_ that gnaws away the heart, tarnishes the soul,
and brings misfortune to the fireside? Every woman should be an artist,
and make artists of her children, if she would do a woman's whole duty.
Especially should the mother teach her children to _improvise_ music,
which can be done by pursuing this method.

"He commences by the study of the three sounds constituting the major
triad, and, as in the model gamut, _or gamut of do_, there are three
similar triads, three perfect major chords, do-mi-sol, fa-la-do, and
sol-si-re, we begin naturally with the central chord, do-mi-sol, which
we name the master chord; for, in the model gamut of do, it is around
this, as around a centre, that the two other triads balance themselves,
the lower fifth, fa-la-do, and the higher fifth, sol-si-re. We can show
the unity of plan between these three established notes, in all the
possible changes. We thus introduce a fine variety into the exercises,
which permits the repetition of the same sounds and intervals, without
causing fatigue or weariness to the child.

"Scarcely have our pupils learned to sing or to repeat alone, at will,
the three sounds do-mi-sol, when we have them mark them with pencils on
the staff (key of sol); only as in the unity of tone there are yet the
two other perfect chords, fa-la-do and sol-si-re, we let them write the
three notes of the central chord with a red pencil, and reserve the
three sounds of the chord on the left, (the lower or subdominant,) to be
written with a yellow pencil, and the chord on the right, (higher or
dominant,) with a blue pencil. On the other hand, for the appellative
chords (dissonant,) made by the combination of the chord sol-si-re, with
one, two, and even three notes of the chord fa-la-do, we use green
pencils (mixture of blue and yellow). For we would keep the theory in
mind by visible signs, which act most powerfully upon the minds of
children.

"Then we pass to perfect minor chords, and terminate this first branch
of our method by the study of the gamut.

"Our pupil knows as yet only a single tone,--the tone of _do_, which we
designate by the name of model tone;--but all musicians are aware that
to know well one tone, is to know them all, since they are all
calculated on the model tone with which we began. The second part of our
method will treat of the other tones, but it will prove no serious
difficulty to our pupil.

"We have carefully avoided scientific terms, though doubtless, by a
learned terminology, we should have struck superficial minds more. But
we address ourselves to the serious, who know that it is better to know
a thing in itself, (in what constitutes it essentially,) without knowing
its technology, than to know obscure terms and be ignorant of the thing.

"Later, we shall initiate our pupil into the language generally adopted
by all treatises on harmony. We wish that one day he may be a
distinguished harmonist, knowing musical grammar at the foundation. It
is strange that the study of grammar, so vigorously recommended for all
other languages, is so entirely neglected in respect to musical
language. The study of harmony seems to be reserved exclusively to
artists; and even among them, only the few who are occupied with
composing devote themselves to it with any profoundness. It is to this
culpable negligence that we must attribute the difficulties of musical
education. Where is the intelligent musician who would dare to deny the
happy results inseparable from the most profound study of music? The
scholar would necessarily have to give much less time to know the art in
the best manner, which is now accessible only to remarkable persons of
strong will. The grammatical study of music should begin at the same
time as all other studies, and soon music would become the language of
all, instead of being reserved exclusively to the privileged.

"Doubtless great reforms will be necessary to arrive at this result, and
the spirit of routine which unhappily reigns everywhere will render such
reforms difficult.

"However, we found great hopes on the inevitable development of the
method of Froebel, for the principles he lays down are of general
application."...

I am myself so profoundly impressed with the importance of little
children's beginning music in this manner, that, having found a teacher
who is capable of it, I intend, another year, to have extra hours for
those who will commence instrumental music, in my own Kindergarten; so
that each child can have a lesson _every day_, and only play under the
eye of the teacher until quite expert.

      I do not cast out these pages about instrumental
      music; but I will say, for the comfort of those
      Kindergartners, who cannot command an instrument, that
      in German Kindergartens I never found one. All the
      plays were done to vocal singing, unaccompanied.

FOOTNOTE:

[C] There is no excuse for its being so considered in Boston, now that
Dr. Rimmer, the remarkable sculptor of the Falling Gladiator, has
founded the true method of teaching to draw the human figure. It is
indeed a method which it is not probable any person of less profound
knowledge of the human figure than himself, (a practical surgeon as well
as artist,) together with genius less bold and original, can conduct as
he does; unless he shall train such teachers.




CHAPTER IV.

PLAYS, GYMNASTICS, AND DANCING.


IN playing THE PIGEON-HOUSE, the teacher, who should always play with
the children, takes three quarters of the number, and forms them into a
circle, while the other quarter remains in the middle, to represent the
pigeons.

The circle is the pigeon-house, and sings the song, beginning with the
words:

        "We open the pigeon-house again,"

while, standing still, they all hold up their joined hands, so as to let
all the pigeons out at the word "open;" and, as the circle goes round
singing,

        "And let all the happy flutterers free,
        They fly o'er the fields and grassy plain.
          Delighted with glorious liberty,"

the pigeons run round, waving their hands up and down to imitate flying.
At the word "return," in the line

        "And when they return from their joyous flight,"

the joined hands of those in circle are lifted up again, and the pigeons
go in. Then the pigeon-house closes round them, bowing their heads, and
singing,

        "We shut up the house and bid them good-night,"

which is repeated while the circle swings off and again comes together
bowing.

The play can be done over until all in turn have been pigeons.

In playing HARE IN THE HOLLOW, a fourth of the children sit in the
middle, on their hands and feet, while the rest, in circle, go round
singing the three verses, and when the words "jump and spring," in the
last verse, occur, the circle stops, and the joined hands are lifted up,
and all the children leap out and around, on their hands and feet, (not
knees,)--while the last lines are repeated twice.

In THE CUCKOOS, a circle is formed, or two concentric circles, and four
children are put in the four corners of the room to enact cuckoos. The
cuckoos sing "cuckoo," and those children in the circle answer; and when
the words of the song indicate that the cuckoos should join the
children, all four burst into the circle, and those who are found at
their right hands become cuckoos the next time.

Almost like this last is the play of THE BEES; one child being put in
the corner as a drone, and at the word "_Beware_," the drone breaks into
the circle.

THE WINDMILL is done by dividing the children into companies of four,
and letting them cross right hands and go round, and then cross left
hands and go round the opposite way. By a change of the word _windmill_
to _water-wheel_, the same music will serve for another play, in which
there is a large circle formed, and then four or six spokes are made by
six crossing hands in the middle, and then one or more children
lengthening each spoke, and joining it to the circle, which forms the
rim of the wheel. This is a more romping play than either of the
foregoing, as the different velocities of those who are at the centre
and circumference make it nearly impossible to have the motions
correspond in time; but it is great fun, and serves for a change.

THE CLAPPERS IN THE CORN-MILL is made by one or by two concentric
circles, going round as they sing the words; and the beauty of it
consists in their minding the pauses and clapping in time. Whenever
there are concentric circles, as is often necessary, when there are many
children, the circles should move in different directions, and all
circular motions must be frequently reversed.

In THE SAWYERS, the children stand facing each other in couples, in a
circle, and move their joined hands from shoulder to shoulder in time to
the music of the first verse. In singing the second verse, they skip
round with their partners.

In THE WHEEL-BARROW, they are also arranged in couples, back to front;
the front child leaning over to imitate the barrow, and stretching his
hands behind him, which the child at his back takes as if to wheel. When
the words are repeated the children reverse.

In THE COOPERS, the children, who form the barrels or hogshead, stand
back to front in a circle, each taking hold of the waist of the one
before him. The coopers walk round outside in time, at every third step
pounding on the shoulder of the child nearest him in the barrel. When
the word "around" comes, the barrel must begin to turn, and the coopers
stand still, pounding on the shoulders of each child as he passes.

In THE LITTLE MASTER OF GYMNASTICS, each child in turn stands in the
middle of the circle, and makes any motion he chooses, which all the
rest imitate.

EQUAL TREADING is done in a circle, or in two concentric circles.

In WE LIKE TO GO A-ROVING, the children march round freely within sound
of the music, singing and keeping time carefully.

In THE FISHES, the children are arranged as in the pigeon-house; and at
the words "swimming," "above," "below," "straight," and "bow," the
fishes must make corresponding motions, while the circle that forms the
pond goes round singing.

In THE PENDULUM, the children follow each other in a circle, moving one
arm before them, like a pendulum, in time to the music, and with a
strongly marked motion, while they all sing the song. When one arm is
tired, the other can be used for the pendulum.

Let the children also follow one another in a circle to play THE
WEATHERCOCK. Beforehand, the points of the compass should be defined in
the room, and the children must point, as they sing, "North, South,
East, West."

The prettiest of all the plays is THE PEASANT. All join hands and sing,
going round in time with the music, when they come to the words, "Look,
'tis so--so does the peasant," they must make the corresponding motion.
In the first verse, they make believe, as the children say, to hold up
the apron with one hand, and throw the seed with the other. In the
second verse, they kneel on one knee at the same words, and make believe
hold the corn with one hand and cut with the other. In the third verse,
they put the doubled fists at the left shoulder, and make the motion of
thrashing. In the fourth verse, they make the motion of holding and
shaking a sieve. In the fifth, they kneel on one knee and rest the head
in the hand; in the sixth, they jump straight up and down, turning to
each point of the compass, till the chorus, "la, la," begins, when each
takes his next neighbor for a partner, and they skip round the room.

Some other plays, accompanied by musical words, can be found in the
guide-books of European Kindergartens; and the music, with English
words, will be shortly published in this country by Ditson, of Boston,
to meet the growing demand of Kindergartens.

But the above description of the plays gives no adequate idea of what
can be made of them, such as the Kindergartner obtains at the Normal
class; for they are much more than bodily exercises. It is wonderful to
see what is made of them, in such a Kindergarten as that of Madame
Vogler in Berlin, where the conversations before beginning, and in the
pauses for rest, call the children's attention to the facts and
processes of nature and art, symbolized by the plays.

The words and music are taught very carefully, and the dancing is
gentle, so that there may be exhilaration without fatigue.

The object-lessons involved in the plays are those which especially
belong to the Kindergarten, because their aim is not so much to open the
intellect to science, as to give moral training. The latter is ever to
be kept in advance of the former; for it is the _tree of life_, whose
fruits--if they are first eaten--will render harmless and salutary those
of the tree of knowledge.

I was not unaware of this when I began my own Kindergarten; and the very
first thing I did, was to give an object lesson, which was, as I
afterwards found, exactly in the spirit of Froebel. When the children
were assembled the first day, in my very pleasant room, looking full of
expectation, I went forward with a beautiful rose-tree in a little
flower-pot, and said, "Come, and I will show you what is beautiful. It
is a rose fully blown. Now say the words--all of you--after me; and I
said again, 'It is a rose fully blown.'" They all repeated these words
with glad voices, and then each following sentence of that beautiful
prose hymn of Mrs. Barbauld. I especially noted the smiling eyes and
lips, as they repeated,--

"He who made the rose is more beautiful than the rose.

"It is beautiful, but He is beauty."

Another day a basket of roses was handed round to the children; and,
when each had one in hand, this recitation was renewed.

After it was over, I said, "What did God make the rose for?" They all
smiled, as if conscious of knowing; and one, more courageous than the
rest, said, "To give us pleasure;" followed by a dear little
utilitarian, who said, "To make rose-water." I added, "Yes; and the
rose-water gives us pleasure, too, because it has a sweet smell, and a
sweet taste, besides. Is not God very good to give us roses to look at
and smell; and to make into rose-water, after they are all faded and
fallen to pieces? What is the reason that God makes things to give us
pleasure? Could we not have lived very comfortably without flowers?"
They answered spontaneously, "Because God loves us." "What else does
the dear God give us to make us happy?" Different children answered, and
spoke of different flowers, and of other things which gave them
pleasure, and thus they were put into a grateful mood, without a word
said about the _duty_ of gratitude to God; for love of God comes
spontaneously, when he is conceived aright, and forecloses the thought
of duty. But duty to our fellow-creatures should always be suggested
when the heart is overflowing with gratitude to the common Father. I
went on asking such questions as "Do _you_ love anybody? what do you do
to make people happy that you love? what would you like to do with your
rose? Do sick people like to have flowers? do you know any sick person?
do you like to do the same kind of things God does? do you think God
wants you to make your friends happy? and all happy whom he loves?" The
roses were then gathered into a shallow basin of water, to be preserved
till school should be over, and they could go and bestow them as they
had severally suggested; for it is important to make children _do_
whatever of kindness they think of, not idly sentimentalize.

Other lessons, on the material origin of the rose, the planting, the
process of growth, and even the making of rose-water, opened up; and
Mrs. Barbauld's prose hymns afforded other subjects for similar lessons,
as well as whatever other hymns they learned to recite or sing; and I
took great care that no hymns should be sung that did not admit of being
made intelligible to their hearts and imaginations.

Moral training is effected by taking care in the plays to keep the
children in the mood of mutual accommodation, by showing them how this
is necessary for the beauty of the play. There is also a great
opportunity in the playing, to check all selfish movements, by appeals
to sympathy and conscience, which is the presentiment of reason, and
forefeeling of moral order, for whose culture material order is
indispensable; and order must be kept by the child intentionally, that
it may cultivate the intellectual principle of which it is the
manifestation. Some plan of play prevents the little creatures from
hurting each other, and fancy naturally furnishes the plan,--the mind
unfolding itself in fancies, which are easily quickened and led in
harmless directions by an adult of any resource. Children delight to
personate animals; and a fine genius could not better employ itself than
in inventing a great many more plays, setting them to rhythmical words,
describing what is to be done. Kindergarten plays are easy intellectual
exercises; for to do anything whatever with a thought beforehand,
develops the heart or quickens the intelligence; and thought of this
kind does not tax intellect, or check physical development, which last
must never be sacrificed in the process of education.

There are enough instances of marvellous acquisition in infancy, to show
that imbibing with the mind is as natural as with the body, if suitable
beverage is put to the lips; but in most cases the mind's power is
balanced by instincts of body, which should have priority, if they
cannot certainly be in full harmony. The mind can better afford to wait
for the maturing of the body, for it survives the body, than the body
can afford to wait for the mind; for it is irretrievably stunted, if the
nervous energy is not free to stimulate its special organs, at least
equally with those of the mind.

There is not, however, any need to sacrifice the culture of either mind
or body, but to harmonize them. They can and ought to grow together.
They mutually help each other.




CHAPTER V.

THE KINDERGARTNER.


THE first requisite to a Kindergarten is, of course, the Kindergartner,
fully intelligent of childhood, and thoroughly trained herself in
everything that the child is to do.

The first Kindergartner was Froebel himself; who, in the course of a
long life, studied into the science of childhood, and worked out a
series of artistical exercises, which aim to educate--that is, _draw_
forth---the powers of children from a more profound depth than ordinary
education respects. But instead of beginning with putting checks upon
childish play, he took the hint of his method from this spontaneous
activity; and began with genially directing it to a more certainly
beautiful effect than it can attain when left to itself. A large part of
the art of primary school-teaching hitherto, has consisted in keeping
children still, and preventing them from playing.

It was Froebel's wisdom to accept the natural activity of childhood as a
hint of the Divine Providence, and to utilize its spontaneous play for
education. And it is this which takes away from his system that element
of baneful antagonism which school discipline is so apt to excite, and
which it is such a misfortune should ever be excited between the young
and old. Nothing is worse for the soul, at any period of life, than to
be put upon self-defence; for humility is the condition of the growth of
mind as well as morals, and ensures that natural self-respect shall not
degenerate into a petty wilfulness and self-assertion. The divine
impulse of activity in children should not be directly opposed, but
accepted and guided into beautiful production, according to the laws of
creative order, which the adult has studied out in nature, and genially
presents in _playing_ with the child.

But such playing is a great art, and founded on the deepest science of
nature, within and without; and therefore Froebel never established a
Kindergarten without previously preparing Kindergartners by a normal
training, which his faithful disciples have scrupulously kept up. And if
only genius and love like his own could in one lifetime have discovered
the science and worked out the processes of this culture, yet hundreds
of pupils of these normal classes have proved, that any fairly gifted,
well-educated, genial-tempered young woman, who will devote a reasonable
time to training for it, can become a competent Kindergartner.

Nothing short of this will do; for none of the manuals which have been
written to guide already trained experts, can supply the place of the
living teacher. Written words will not describe the fine gradations of
the work, or give an idea of the conversation which is to be constantly
had with the children. It would be less absurd to suppose that a person
could learn to make watches by reading a description of the manufacture
in an encyclopædia, than to suppose a person could learn to educate
children by mere formulas.

Indeed, it is _infinitely_ less absurd. For a child is not finite mass
to be moulded, or a blank paper to be written upon, at another's will.
It is a living subject, whose own coöperation--or at least
willingness--is to be conciliated and made instrumental to the end in
view. Would a Cremona violin be put into the hands of a person ignorant
of music, to be tuned and made to discourse divine harmonies? How is it,
then, that the "harp of a thousand strings"--which God puts into the
hands of every mother, in perfect tune--is so recklessly committed,
first to ignorant girl-nurses, and then to the least educated teachers?
Looking at children's first schools, it would seem that anybody is
thought skilful enough to begin a child's education! It takes a long
apprenticeship to learn to play on the instrument with seven strings,
in order to bring out music. But it is stupidly thought that anybody
can play on the greater instrument, whose strings thrill with pleasure
or pain, and discourse good or evil, as they are touched wisely or
unwisely!

Froebel struck the key-note of the music of the spheres, which human
life is destined to become, when he announced, as a first principle,
that the well-thought-out wisdom of the ideal mother's love is the
science of education; and that this science of sciences is founded on
self-knowledge; by which he did not mean (any more than did Socrates, or
that older sage who engraved "know thyself" upon the temple of Delphi)
individual idiosyncrasy, but the very self which Jesus Christ said all
men must _become_, when he set a little child in the midst, and declared
that no one could enter his kingdom, that did not _become_ as _one_; and
when, another time, he called and blessed little children, because, as
he said, of such was the kingdom of heaven; and again, more
significantly still, when he warned from "_offending_ (it might be
better rendered _perverting_) these little ones; _because_," as he
added, "_their spirits do always behold the face of my Father who is in
heaven_." To know the soul before it has been warped by individual
caprice and circumstance, is the science of sciences, on which is to be
founded the art of arts; viz., that of educating the child so that its
individuality may develop, not destroy, its sense of universal
relations. And here I must pause to say, that it is simply astonishing
that when most of us believe, as our religion, that Jesus Christ
embodied in himself the wisdom, as well as love, and even power of
God,--"without measure,"--his words about children are passed over with
so little inquiry into the depths of their _meaning_. What can it
mean--that their spirits always behold the face of the Father--short of
the very philosophy of Gioberti,--that the newly-created soul commences
its consciousness in the eternal world, with a reciprocal vision of God
_remembered in the heart_ through life, and constituting the divine term
of conscience, which is the CONSTANT, while the human term is of only
fitful growth. As Wordsworth says,--

                        "Our Life's Star
        Hath had elsewhere its setting,
          And cometh from afar!
          Not in entire forgetfulness
          And not in utter nakedness,
        But trailing clouds of glory do we come
          From God who is our home.
        Heaven lies about us in our infancy!
        Shades of the prison-house begin to close
          Upon the growing boy,
        But he beholds the light and whence it flows;
          He sees it _in his joy_:
        The youth, who daily from the East
        Must travel, still is nature's priest,
          And by the vision splendid
          Is on his way attended."

But Froebel does not, like Wordsworth, make it strictly inevitable,
however it may have hitherto been common, that

        "The man perceives it die away
         And fade into the light of common day;"

for he teaches that the parental sympathy and instruction of those
adults who have attained

        "The faith that looks through death
         In years that bring the philosophic mind"

should intervene; which is just Kindergarten culture; preserving the
heart's vision of the truths that

        "We are toiling all our lives to find"

unshadowed; while the organs of the human mind gradually bring to bear
God's manifestation in nature, which, point by point, forms the human
understanding, by making an intellectual consciousness of what the heart
knows.

Because the science of education is the analysis and gauging of love by
intellect, Froebel sought the true form of the art of education in the
method of the mother's love, which he studied out with a philosophic
earnestness. Not that any mother could _tell_ him the secret. It cannot
be put into formulas, nor does it come by intuition into the scientific
form in which a Kindergartner needs to have it. Froebel, in watching the
mother, saw that she was "led in a way she knew not." But he divined the
meaning of that way, and its issues, and gives it to the Kindergartner.

The beginning of a child's life is its learning the fact and uses of its
body. Here, as everywhere, human action blindly gropes for knowledge.
The child cannot even find the breast to suck, but sucks what is
nearest, compelling the mother to give it the breast by automatic
motions which she understands; or by cries which awaken her heart.
Gradually these reciprocal instincts open upon the child the first thing
it knows; namely, that it is dependent for the means of life. For a
child knows, in its heart, for a long time before it reflects and gets
the thought, that not in itself, but outside of itself, is the source of
its life. Of course, it is bodily life merely that it seeks at first,
trying to incorporate the without with the within by eating every thing;
the organs for this action on the outward world being first developed.
But if it is regularly fed and kept comfortable, the eye will be
satisfied with seeing, the ear with hearing, the hand with handling.

Now it is no less the instinct of the mother to make the baby's body the
first plaything, than to feel its own body is the first pleasure of the
child. To use its organs in play is the first action in which the
voluntary combines with the instinctive animal impulse.

The first distinctive human intelligence a child _expresses_, is the
recognition of its mother's smile. Its higher life begins in the
reciprocation of that smile. _No mere animal smiles!_ The mother's heart
also goes to meet the child's faith with vocal expressions of tender
joy; the heart of the child is awakened by tones which emparadise it,
and it answers by like tones. There is nothing among the lower animals
like this conversation of mother and child, by looks and tones,
emparadising both. By and by, it notices light and colors, and begins to
play with its hands and feet.

Hence the most characteristic work of Froebel is "The Mother's Cosseting
Songs." In this imperfect world, mothers are not always true to ideal
motherhood; but ignorance, and often indolence, and other forms of
self-indulgence, superinducing stupidity,--even a tyrannous sense of
property in the child, and sometimes mere timidity, interferes. And, in
general, Froebel saw how little most mothers reflect on the great work
they are doing when they play with their children. He wished them to
study into the laws they are obeying, in order to discover their scope
and meaning, that they may be able to supplement with thought the
short-comings of their too often spoilt instincts. Mothers taught him
more than they knew themselves; and he repaid the debt by telling them
what they taught him in these "Cosseting Songs," which he gathered from
many lips and brought together for the enriching of all.

First may be seen in the pictured illustrations which accompany the
songs, that the plays are merely the sympathetic furtherance of the
child's own motions. The mother enjoys the sight of her baby kicking up
its little legs, fumbling its little hands, and enjoying its bodily
existence generally; and she sympathizingly intervenes, and draws the
child to forget itself in its heart-sense of her sympathetic presence.
She feeds the instinctive putting forth of its own joy, the first form
of its faith, with the expression of her joy; and thus the heart grows
with the body, and the mind opens to expect boundless love, which it
reciprocates without reserve. A healthy child

        "Loves whate'er it looks upon."

If it is not happy and loving, it is the condemnation of its
environment. Some one in relation with it, perhaps more than one, has
failed to show the necessary love; and "better were it for such," as
Jesus Christ has said "that a millstone were hung about their necks,
and they were cast into the uttermost depths of the sea." If these words
mean any thing,--and who will dare say they are mere rhetoric?--then let
us take care that we do not rush into the work of education, without
being sure that we shall not do so immense a mischief; and let mothers
see to it, that they do not put their children into the care of persons
who do not combine love and knowledge of childhood in measures not to be
expected of the common run of children's nurses and primary teachers.

Not only because every mother is not an ideal mother, but because
sometimes children are consigned, by inevitable circumstance, to other
nursing than a wise mother's, such a manual as the "Cosseting Songs" is
indispensable _to instruct nurses_.

And nurses ought always to be instructed. When Froebel was in Hamburg,
he received nurses into normal training. Both mothers and nurses brought
their infants of six months old to his house, and he taught them how to
play with--without fatiguing--them, by carefully respecting those
indications of pleasure and pain which are the child's only means of
communication.

And as lectures on _child-nature_ are a part of the Kindergarten
training, those preparing to be children's nurses, even to this day, are
admitted to the Hamburg training-school, which was not relinquished when
Froebel died, but is now instructed by the best teachers of the
Volks-Kindergartens, who go into it by turns. It has its sessions in the
evenings; and the normal pupils pay for their instruction, at least in
part, by assisting in the morning in the Volks-Kindergarten, which forms
also an important part of their training.

But at all events, there can be no adequate Kindergarten culture
anywhere, unless a specific normal training is constantly kept up to
supply the ever-increasing demand which tends to outgo the supply,
especially when nurses are admitted, as at Hamburg.

Having thus indicated the source whence must be drawn the Kindergarten
culture, it is not our purpose to attempt the impossible, by stating it
abstractly; for a series of abstractions is more apt to conceal than to
reveal a living science. No book can train a Kindergartner, but only at
best serve as a convenient reminder to educated experts, and instruct
parents that there is one necessary condition of their children's
receiving the benefit of Kindergarten culture; viz., a thoroughly
educated Kindergartner.

And this may be obtained even in America, from a lady of _the apostolic
succession_; a pupil of the training-school of the Baroness Marienholtz,
of Berlin, who has devoted her talents, her fortune, the prestige of her
rank, and her personal services, to spread the art of her revered master
on the continent of Europe. Miss Kriege not only has studied a year in
this training-school, but all the while frequented the Kindergarten of
Madame Vogler, as observer and assistant; and,--together with her
mother, a lady who is the equal of the Baroness Marienholtz in every
thing but the fortune which enables the latter to teach without
price,--combines every qualification, with enthusiasm, for the spread of
a method of education that unquestionably has a great future in this
country, inasmuch as it makes a true base to the grand harmonies of our
national constitution.

As one feature of the normal class is a series of lectures on _the being
of the child_, which are given on one day of the week, it would be
desirable that Madame Kriege should admit mothers and sisters who have
no intention of making teaching their vocation, but who may thus
understand and be able to co-operate in spirit with the Kindergartner,
in the education of the children; for it is a great hindrance to the
Kindergarten when it is not understood at home. All the educators of the
child should understand each other, and co-operate, if the highest
results are to be attained.




CHAPTER VI.

KINDERGARTEN OCCUPATIONS.


THERE is a kind of thing done in Kindergarten, which retains the best
characteristics of childish play, and yet assumes the serious form of
occupation.

Fancy-work, if Froebel's method be strictly followed, is the best
initiation of industry; for it can serve to a perfect intellectual
training.

Childish play has all the main characteristics of art, inasmuch as it is
the endeavor to "conform the shows of things to the desires of the
mind,"--Bacon's definition of poetry. A child at play is histrionic. He
personates characters, with costume and mimic gesture. He also
undertakes to represent whatever thing interests his mind by embodiment
of it in outward form. Advantage is taken of this, by Froebel, to
initiate exquisite manipulation, in several different materials; a
veritable artistic work, which trains the imagination to use, and
develops the understanding to the appreciation of beauty, symmetry, or
order,--"Heaven's first law."

Froebel's first two Gifts, as they are called, are a box of colored
worsted balls, and a box containing the cube, the sphere, and the
cylinder. These two Gifts belong more especially to the nursery series,
and were published some years since in Boston, with little books of
rhymes, and suggestions for playing with babies.

But they can be used, in some degree, in the Kindergarten: the first, to
give lessons on the harmonies of colors; and the second, to call
attention to fundamental differences of form.

It is possible, however, to omit these, and begin a Kindergarten with
the Third Gift, which is a little wooden box, containing eight cubes of
an inch dimension.

The first plays with these blocks, especially if the children are very
young, will be to make what Froebel calls forms of life; that is,
chairs, tables, columns, walls, tanks, stables, houses, &c. Everybody
conversant with children knows how easily they will "make believe," as
they call it, all these different forms, out of any materials whatever;
and are most amused, when the materials to be transformed by their
personifying and symbolizing fancy are few, for so much do children
enjoy the exercise of imagination, that they find it more amusing to
have simple forms, which they can "make believe,"--first to be one
thing, and then another,--than to have elaborately carved columns, and
such like materials, for building. There is nothing in life more
charming to a spectator, than to see this shaping fancy of children,
making everything of nothing, and scorning the bounds of probability,
and even of possibility. It is a prophecy of the unending dominion which
man was commanded, at his creation, to have over nature; and gives
meaning to the parable of the Lord God's bringing all creatures before
Adam, that he might give them their names.

Wordsworth felicitously describes, in that ode which he calls
"Intimations of Immortality in Childhood," this victorious play of--

                      "The seer blest,
         On whom those truths do rest,
         Which we are toiling all our lives to find."

        "Behold the child among his new-born blisses;
         A six years' darling of a pigmy size;
         See where, mid work of his own hand, he lies,
         Fretted by sallies of his mother's kisses,
         With light upon him from his father's eyes!
         See at his feet some little plan or chart,
         Some fragment of his dream of human life,
         Shaped by himself with newly learned art,--
           A wedding or a festival,
           A mourning or a funeral;
         And this hath now his heart,
         And unto this he frames his song.
         Then he will fit his tongue
         To dialogues of business, love, or strife;
             But it will not be long
             Ere this be thrown aside,
             And with new joy and pride,
         The little actor cons another part;
         Filling from time to time his humourous stage
         With all the persons down to palsied age
         That life brings with her in her equipage."

That this is a literal picture, every mother knows; and, in this
childish play, there is all the subjective part of a genuine work of
art; the effort being to dramatize, or embody in form, the inward fancy,
no less than in the case of the most mature and successful artist. The
child seizes whatever materials are at hand to give objectivity to what
is within; and he is only baffled in the effect, because he is not
developed enough in understanding, and has not knowledge enough to
discover or appreciate means appropriate to his ends. It is for the
adult to show him that the universe is a magazine of materials given to
the human race, wherewith each is to build an image of God's creative
wisdom, into which he shall inwardly grow by the very act of
accomplishing this destiny.

As the child is satisfied at first with a symbolical representation of
his inward thought, a row of chairs and footstools, arranged in a line,
makes a railroad to his imagination; and no less a row of cubes, one
being piled on another for the engine.

In using the blocks in a Kindergarten, the child at first is left to his
own spontaneity, as much as possible; but the teacher is to suggest
means of carrying out whatever plan or idea he has. What is cultivating
about the exercise is, that the child makes or receives a plan, and then
executes it; has a thought, and embodies it in a form.

But something more can be done with the blocks. They can be made
symbolical of the personages and objects of a story. Thus even with the
eight blocks, five may be a flock of sheep, one the shepherd, one a wolf
who is seen in the distance, and who comes to steal a sheep, and one
the shepherd's dog who is to defend the sheep against the wolf.

When all the Gifts come to be used, much more complicated dramas may be
represented. The teacher should set an example; as, for instance, thus:
"I am going to build a light-house, so;" (she piles up some blocks and
leaves openings near the top, which she says are) "the lantern part
where the lights are put;" near the light-house are a number of blocks,
rather confusedly laid together, of which she says, "These are rocks,
which are very dangerous for ships, but which are scarcely ever seen,
because the water dashes over them, especially when there is a storm, or
when the night is dark; and that is the reason the light-house is put
here. Whenever sailors see a light-house, they know there is danger
where it stands; and so they steer their ships away from the place. Look
here! here is a ship" (and she constructs with other blocks something
which she calls a ship, or schooner, or sloop, representing respectively
the number of masts which characterize each kind of vessel), "and there
is a pilot standing upon it who has seen the light-house, and is turning
the ship another way."

Having built her story, she will now call upon the children to build
something. Some will imitate her; others will have plans of their own.
As soon as one has finished, he or she must hold up a hand; and the
teacher will call upon as many as there is time for, to explain their
constructions. There is no better way for a teacher to learn what is in
children, their variety of mental temperament and imagination, than by
this playing with blocks. Some will be prosaic and merely imitative;
some will show the greatest confusion, and the most fantastic operations
of mind; others, the most charming fancies; and others, inventive
genius. But there will always be improvement, by continuing the
exercise; and it is a great means of development into self-subsistence
and continuity of thought.

But to return to Froebel's Third Gift, consisting of eight blocks. In
making things with the blocks, a great deal is to be said about setting
them accurately upon each other, and upon the squares drawn on the table
(if it is so painted). I was both amused and instructed, when I was in
Hamburg, by seeing a little table full of children taking a first lesson
in making two chairs, by piling three blocks on each other for the back,
and putting one in front for the seat; the Kindergartner going round so
seriously to see if each block was adjusted exactly, and stood squarely.
When, at length, the chairs were done, the children took hold of hands,
and recited, simultaneously with the Kindergartner, a verse of poetry;
and then sang it. I could not understand the words; but the
conversation, while they were making the chairs, had helped the several
children's fancy to seat their fathers, mothers, or grandparents, or
some other favorite friends, in them; each child having been asked for
whom he wished to make his chairs, which developed a good deal of the
domestic circumstances. None of the class was more than four years old.
But the most important use of the eight blocks is to lead the children
through a series of symmetrical forms, which Froebel calls forms of
beauty.

As a preparation for this work, the children are questioned, till they
understand which is the right, and which the left side of the cube made
by the eight blocks; which the front, and which the back side; which the
upper, and which the under side; and are able to describe a cube by its
dimensions; also to know how to divide the whole cube into two, four, or
eight parts; how to divide the length, how the breadth, and how the
height, into two parts,--lessons of analysis sufficiently amusing, and
giving precision to their use of words.

Dividing the height, they get a simple fundamental form; and the four
blocks taken off can be arranged around the others symmetrically.

For instance: tell them, first, to take an inch cube and place it in
front of the square that the four lower blocks make, so that one-half
shall be on one block, and the other half on the other; then tell them
to take another small cube, and place it opposite, in the same way,
one-half on one cube, and the other half on the other. Already they will
find the figure is symmetrical, or, as they may phrase it, even. Then
tell them to put a cube on the right hand of the fundamental figure in
the same way as before, and then another opposite on the left side; and
the figure will be still more symmetrical.

When this has been recognized all round, tell them to move the front
block just half a block to the right; then the opposite one half a block
to the left; then the right-hand block half a block farther back; and,
on the opposite side, the left-hand block half a block towards the
front. This will make again a symmetrical form. Again, they may be told
to move the front block half a block farther to the right; and then move
the opposite one to the left, and so on,--which will make another
figure. Their attention must be drawn to the fact that always--if the
symmetry is to be retained--all four of the movable blocks must be
moved; demonstrating to the eyes, by otherwise placing them, that
symmetry is more pleasing than confusion, and order than disorder.

In going on, through the large number of forms which are given in the
manuals of Madame Rongé and the Baroness Marienholtz, for the
convenience of the Kindergartners, the children can be asked in turn to
suggest rules for new figures, and then directed how to apply the rule,
and adjust each of the four blocks to make a symmetry. Often, a form of
the series given, is anticipated; but, if no suggestion is made by the
children, the Kindergartner must choose, and ask if so and so would not
be pretty. But in no case must the engraved forms be given as a pattern.
Imitation is mechanical, and children soon tire of working by patterns;
while to work from a rule, whether it is suggested by another, or is
one's own fancy, will keep up the interest a long while, and stimulate
invention; for it is real intellectual work, though less abstract than
geometry.

The great secret of the charm of working out symmetrical forms is, that
the mind is created to make, like the divine mind. "God geometrizes,"
says Plato; and therefore man geometrizes. The generation of forms by
crystallization, and by vegetable and animal organization, follows the
law of polarity, which is alike the law of the human and the mode of the
divine creation. It was amusing to hear a little child cry out, "I
cannot find an opposite;" and, when another said, "No matter, take
this," reply, "But then it will not make anything."

In going through the series of forms, made first by the eight blocks,
then by those of the Fourth Gift, and afterwards by the larger number of
the Fifth and Sixth Gifts, the child comes, by being led perpetually to
put down _opposites_, in order to make symmetry, to learn the value of
the law of polarization, which obtains alike in thought, and in the
created universe.

But, besides the boxes of solids, there are boxes of triangles, one of
equilateral, one of right angle, and two of isosceles triangles--one
acute and one obtuse--affording means for an infinity of forms of
beauty; so that this amusement of making symmetrical forms is not
exhausted in the whole four years of the Kindergarten course.

The same principle of polarity is brought out in the combination of
colors, as well as of forms.

In weaving bookmarks and mats, with strips of different colored papers,
the series of forms becomes more attractive by observing the harmonies
of color. The children are taught, by the colored balls of the First
Gift, to distinguish the primary and secondary colors, and to arrange
them harmoniously. Children acquire very soon a very exquisite taste in
color, and, if carefully called to attend to harmonies, detect an
incongruity at once.

Calkins, of New York, has published sheets of diagrams, if they may be
so called, of the harmonies of colors.

The Kindergartner, while at the training-school, gets a series of
several hundred woven forms, to relieve her from the fatigue of
constantly inventing, when she is full of care. But children soon begin
to invent of themselves, and are recreated--not fatigued--by it. This
weaving may be turned to much account for innumerable ornamental
articles which the children are delighted to make, in order to have
something of their own, to give to their friends, at Christmas, New
Year's, and birthdays. Our woodcut gives the beginning of the series of
woven forms. Children of three years old can begin these; and those of
five will make beautiful things. But a series of forms may perhaps be
most easily begun by little children, by sewing colored worsted threads
into pricked paper.

One essential furniture of the Kindergarten is paper ruled in squares of
a sixteenth of an inch, which can be done wherever paper is ruled. Every
child should have a piece of this paper, pricked in the crossings of the
squares, and be taught to use the needle and colored thread, so as first
to make parallel lines, then diagonals, then right angles, then squares;
and then other more complex but still symmetrical figures.

This squared paper may also be used to teach pricking, first at the
crossings of the lines, preparing sheets for sewing, and then making a
series by pricking symmetrical forms; following the same general law as
produced beauty with the blocks and triangular planes.

Also, simultaneously with these occupations, the children should be
induced to draw, by means of this squared paper. A very small child can
be taught to use the pencil, so far as to draw a line of an eighth of an
inch over the blue line, or the water-mark of the squared paper.
Immediately these lines must be so drawn as to correspond and make
forms; and it is perfectly wonderful to the child himself, to find how,
by following the rules given, he goes straight on to make the most
complicated forms and beautiful designs. When I was in Dresden, I bought
of Madame Marquadt hundreds of drawings made in series by children
between three and seven years of age, where no stroke was longer than an
eighth of an inch. I was told that every one was the _invention_ of some
child; for only inventions were carefully preserved.

But another manipulation must not be forgotten; viz., the folding of
paper.

Here, a square piece of paper, of four or five inches, is given to the
child, who had previously been exercised in building with solids, in
making forms with sticks, and in pea-work; which last is done by having
sharp-pointed sticks of various lengths, and constructing squares,
triangles, and the frames of chairs, and other articles of furniture,
uniting the sticks by means of dried peas, soaked in water. (See
woodcut.)

As the sticks and peas were used to teach the properties of geometrical
lines and points, which they clumsily represent, so the square of paper
can be used to develop ideas of surface and geometrical planes; without,
however, using any abstract geometrical language.

Folding paper develops the value of the law of polarity, just as all
other symmetrical work does; but there is the additional charm to
children, of making, by means of this folded paper, a multitude of forms
of life as well as of beauty; involving a great instruction. For always
the folding begins with nothing but a square piece of paper, which, by
following their thought, is made into hundreds of beautiful forms; and
thus they learn to respect in themselves the power of thought applied to
work, which is nothing less than _creative_. By cutting off a piece of
the folded paper, while still it is folded, a new series of forms can be
made, of unimagined symmetrical forms, which the children, when they
unfold the paper, are electrified to find they have caused; and, with
the pieces cut out, they can also enrich the figures with new varieties
of symmetrical beauty.

I have seen, in one of the Kindergartens, five hundred different figures
made out of the simple square, variously folded and cut. The attention
of the children should be called to the fact of this endless capacity of
development of the simplest and most uninteresting form, by the exercise
of human ingenuity, acting according to law. Thus they will realize that
beauty is not an outward thing, but an inward power, which they exert.

This cutting and folding of paper can only be learned in a Kindergarten
training-school. It cannot be described in a book.

Modelling is the highest form of manipulation of solids, and one which
is very fascinating to children, who often make forms with mud and snow
in their out-door play.

The material, whether clay, rice, wax, or whatever else may be employed,
must be previously prepared, and always kept in a plastic state.

Clay is the least expensive material, but it must always be kept wet,
and it is cold to the hands. Wax, prepared with oil, is more expensive,
but far cleaner than clay; and it has the advantage of preserving the
forms moulded, while the clay shrinks and cracks when it dries.

The material being prepared, each child is supplied either with a small
flat board, slate, cloth, or strong paper, to cover the part of the
table used; a small blunt elastic knife, and a portion of the plastic
material. The child is first left to pursue the bent of its own
inclinations, generally the roller and the ball are the first objects
attempted. In their formation the child finds great delight. Irregular
forms are, however, the easiest. The children are encouraged to imitate
birds' nests, baskets, candlesticks, and various fruits: apples, pears,
strawberries, also some vegetables, and especially flowers;--whenever it
is possible let them have the natural objects before them. Afterwards
models of animals _couchant_ are given for imitation; and they are
encouraged to make parts of the human figure,--fingers, hands, ears,
noses, for which they have models in each other. I have known a boy not
twelve years old, who would take an engraved head, and mould one by it,
in which the likeness would be remarkable;--he used wax and a pin.

To make forms from the hint of an engraving, is a little above
imitation; and it is to be remembered that we do not wish the children
to stop with imitations. Let them go on and invent forms, beautiful
vases, pitchers, &c. When they begin to make heads and human figures, a
teacher, who understands the principles of drawing, can bring to their
notice the proportions of the human figure and face found in nature,
which make ideal beauty. Many a heaven-destined sculptor will find
himself out, in the Kindergarten.

In Germany, at the quadrennial meetings of the Froebel Union, it is the
custom to carry specimens of the children's work in all these kinds. A
series of each kind is made up by taking the best work of all the
children. The six meetings which have already taken place, have all been
signalized by impressing upon the commissioners of education of some
State, the value of Froebel's culture to the interests of art,--fine and
mechanical,--followed by its adoption. And yet its value to art is of
secondary importance to its influence on character, which must needs be
lifelong,--leading away from temptation, and delivering from evil, the
activity secured to the production of use and beauty.

In America, where the excitements of opportunity are literally infinite,
the importance of training the speculative mind and immense energy of
the people to law, order, beauty, and love (which are all one in the
last analysis), is incalculable; and that it can be done most easily and
certainly by beginning with the child's mind while he is still
"beholding the face of the Father in heaven" with his heart, no one who
has ever faithfully tried Kindergarten culture will doubt.




CHAPTER VII.

MORAL AND RELIGIOUS EXERCISES.


HARMONIOUS development is Froebel's idea. Hence, although the physical
should never be sacrificed, and comes first into view, in the scheme of
Kindergarten culture, it is not to be exclusive. Children grow in
stature and physical force, all the better for having their hearts and
minds opened in the beginning. It is desirable to have a child become
conscious of right and wrong, in reference to eating and drinking, quite
early; though temptation to excess should be removed, as a general
thing, by giving them simple wholesome food. In any case where children
may not go home at noon, and there is a luncheon, some simple fruit,
like apples or grapes, together with milk biscuits, or plain bread and
butter, make the best repast, satisfying hunger, and not stimulating the
palate unduly. I am sometimes shocked at the kind of luncheon children
bring to the Kindergarten, it shows such lamentable ignorance of
physiological laws. The practical value of the beautiful symbol of the
origin of evil, which stands as the first word of the sacred volume, is
enhanced, by its having the form in which temptation first assails the
child. No deeper interpretation of it is foreclosed by our presenting it
at first, to children, just as it stands. The forbidden fruit is that
which will hurt the child; _i. e._, give it the disease which by and by
may make death a merciful release from pains intolerable to bear.
Serpents have no higher function than eating; but human beings live to
know and love and do good, and so ought not to eat everything that is
pleasant to the eyes,--but to stop, as Eve did not, and inquire whether
it is God or the mere animal which is man's proper adviser. Our appetite
is the serpent, our thought is from God. A child understands all this
very early, if it is thus simply presented; and it suggests the
beginning of his moral life. The lesson can soon be generalized.
Whatever wrong things he is tempted to do, whatever his conscience tells
him not to do, is "forbidden fruit;" his desire to do it is the serpent,
and if he falls, it is the old folly of Eve, who preferred the advice of
the lower being to the command of God, always given in the Conscience.

I have known a child, to whom this story was early read and interpreted,
to whom it seemed to become a "guard angelic" over her life. The moral
nature responded to it at once, and a suggestion that a desire was
perhaps the voice of the serpent, was always quite enough to arouse the
guardian angel--Conscience--to a watch and ward of the severest
character. It precluded the necessity of present punishment and the fear
of future retribution, (with which a child should never be terrified.)

There is such a thing as making children, I will not say too
conscientious, but too conscious; and this is often done by well-meaning
parents and teachers, who make them look upon themselves personally as
objects of God's pleasure or displeasure. This will be avoided by using
a symbol, like the story of Adam and Eve, which touches the imagination,
and saves them from the reactions of personal pique. A judicious
teacher, who knows how to paraphrase as she reads, and to skip what is
mere prosaic statement, (and no one who cannot do this, is fit to read
to children,) can make use of many other passages of the Old and New
Testament, and of "Pilgrim's Progress," to give to children the whole
doctrine of religious self-control, and inspire them to the highest
moral issues.

_Spiritual_ life, strictly speaking, can only be _prepared for_ by the
_best_ education. Its characteristic and essence consists in that action
of the heart and reason which does not come from human prompting. But
it _can_ be prepared for, by awakening in the child such an aspiration
and felt necessity for virtue, as well as general idea of God, as makes
prayer to the Father of Spirits spontaneous and inevitable. I am in the
habit of speaking of God to children as the Giver of love and goodness,
and of the power of thought and action, rather than as the Creator of
the outward world, and have found that the tyrannizing unity of the
soul's instinct did the rest.

In what is called religious education, teachers often do great harm,
with the best intentions, to finely strung moral organizations.
Encouragement to good should altogether predominate over warning and
fault-finding. It is often better, instead of blaming a child for
short-coming, or even wrong-doing, to pity and sympathize, and, in a
hopeful voice, speak of it as something which the child did not mean to
do, or at least was sorry for as soon as done; suggesting at the same
time, perhaps, how it can be avoided another time. Above all things, an
invariable rule in moral education is not to throw a child upon
self-defence. The movement towards defending one's self and making
excuses, is worse than almost any act of overt wrong. Let the teacher
always appear as the friend who is saving or helping the child out of
evil, rather than as the accuser, judge, or executioner. Another
principle should be, not to confound or put upon the same level the
trespasses against the by-laws of the Kindergarten, made for the
teacher's convenience, and those against the moral laws of the universe.
The desirableness of the by-laws that we make for our convenience can be
shown at times when the children are all calm, and their attention can
be drawn to the subject; and if these regulations are broken, all that
is necessary will be to ask if it is kind and loving to do such things?
But it must never be forgotten that natural conscience always suffers
when artificial duties are imposed. Hence the immoral effect of
formality and superstition.

In a well-regulated Kindergarten there should be no punishments, but an
understanding should be had with parents that sometimes the child is to
be sent home for a day, or at least for some hours. The curtailment of
the Kindergarten will generally prove an effectual restraint upon
disorder, and it will not be necessary to repeat the penalty in a school
year.

But I shall say no more upon moral and religious exercises, Mrs. Mann
having treated this part of the subject so exhaustively. It is to be
remembered, however, that she had in her school children who had strayed
much farther from the kingdom of heaven than those who will generally
make up the Kindergarten. But she shows the _spirit_ that should pervade
all that is done to children at all times.

      I saw, in observing the Kindergartens of Germany, that
      there was great moral education involved in the mutual
      consideration of each other, which the children learn
      to practise, in order to make the plays beautiful; and
      also in the constant idea kept before them, of making
      beautiful things for the purpose of giving pleasure to
      their parents and other friends, by giving them away
      on birthdays and Christmas and New-Year's Days. Moral
      education does not come by the hearing of the ear, but
      by generous life.




CHAPTER VIII.

OBJECT LESSONS.


I NOW come to Object Lessons, which should begin simultaneously with all
the above exercises; for mental exercises are not only compatible with
physical health, but necessary to it. The brain is not to be
overstrained in childhood, but it is to be used. Where it is left to
itself, and remains uncultivated, it shrinks, and that is disease. A
child is not able to direct its own attention; it needs the help of the
adult in the unfolding of the mind, no less than in the care of its
body. Lower orders of animals can educate themselves, that is, develop
in themselves their one power. As the animals rise in the scale of
being, they are related more or less to their progenitors and posterity,
and require social aid. But the human being, whose beatitude is "the
communion of the just," is so universally related, that he cannot go
alone at all. He is entirely dependent at first, and never becomes
independent of those around him, any further than he has been so
educated and trained by his relations with them, as to rise into union
with God. And this restores him again to communion with his
fellow-beings, as a beneficent Power among its peers.

The new method of education gives a gradual series of exercises,
continuing the method of Nature. It cultivates the senses, by giving
them the work of discriminating colors, sounds, &c.; sharpens perception
by leading children to describe accurately the objects immediately
around them.

Objects themselves, rather than the verbal descriptions of objects, are
presented to them. The only way to make words expressive and
intelligible, is to associate them sensibly with the objects to which
they relate. Children must be taught to translate things into words,
before they can translate words into things. Words are secondary in
nature; yet much teaching seems to proceed on the principle that these
are primary, and so they become mere counters, and children are brought
to hating study, and the discourse of teachers, instead of thirsting for
them. To look at objects of nature and art, and state their colors,
forms, and properties of various kinds, is no painful strain upon the
mind. It is just what children spontaneously do when they are first
learning to talk. It is a continuation of learning to talk. The
object-teacher confines the child's attention to one thing, till all
that is obvious about it is described; and then asks questions, bringing
out much that children, left to themselves, would overlook, suggesting
words when necessary, to enable them to give an account of what they
see. It is the action of the mind upon real things, together with
clothing perceptions in words, which really cultivates; while it is not
the painful strain upon the brain which the study of a book is. To
translate things into words, is a more agreeable and a very different
process from translating words into things, and the former exercise
should precede the latter. If the mind is thoroughly exercised in
wording its perceptions, words will in their turn suggest the things,
without painful effort, and memory have the clearness and accuracy of
perception. On the other hand words will never be used without feeling
and intelligence. Then, to read a book will be to know all of reality
that is in it.

I am desirous to make a strong impression on this point, because, to
many persons, I find object-teaching seems the opposite of teaching!
They say that to play with things, does not give habits of study. They
think that to commit to memory a page of description about a wild duck,
for instance, is better than to have the wild duck to look at, leading
the child to talk about it, describe it, and inquire into its ways and
haunts! They do not see that this study of the things themselves
exercises the perception, and picturesque memory, which is probably
immortal, certainly perennial, while the written description only
exercises the verbal memory. Verbal memory is not to be despised; but it
is a consequence, and should never be the substitute for picturesque
memory. It is the picturesque memory only which is creative.

There is another and profound reason why words should follow, and not
precede things, in a child's memory. It will have a tendency to preclude
the unconscious sophistry which takes the place of real logic in so many
minds; and at all events will give the power to detect sophistry; for it
necessitates the mind to demand an image, or an idea, for every word. It
gives the habit of thinking things and principles, instead of thinking
words merely;--of looking through rhetoric after truth and reality.
There is nothing perhaps which would conduce more to sound morality and
earnestness of character, in this country, than that object-teaching, as
proposed in Mr. Sheldon's "ELEMENTARY INSTRUCTION," should pervade the
primary schools. It would require a volume to go into object-teaching,
in such detail as to serve as a manual for teachers; and happily the
work of Mr. Sheldon's, just named, precludes the necessity of my doing
so. It is published broadcast over our northern States; and every
teacher, especially every Kindergarten teacher, should procure it, and
give days and nights to the study of it, until its methods and matter
are completely mastered. I have one or two exceptions to take, in
respect to it myself, as will be seen in the sequel; yet I consider it
not only an invaluable manual, but that it goes far to supply the place
of the training school for teachers on the Pestalozzian plan, "for whose
use I believe it was primarily intended."

Object-teaching should precede as well as accompany the process of
learning to read. In Germany, even outside of Kindergarten, _thinking
schools_ have long preceded _reading schools_, and yet learning to read
German, in which every sound is represented by a different letter, and
every letter has one sound, cultivates the classifying powers, as
learning to read English cannot. With children whose vernacular is
English, it is absolutely injurious to the mind to be taught to read the
first thing. I must speak of the reasons of this in another place, my
purpose here being to show that object-teaching is necessary, in order
to make word-teaching, whether by teacher's discourse, or by the reading
of books, a means of culture at any period.

Every child should have the object to examine, and in turn each should
say what is spontaneous. Out of their answers series of questions will
be suggested to the teacher, who should also be prepared with her own
series of questions,--questions full of answers.

The first generalization to which children should be led is into the
animate and inanimate,--what lives and what exists without manifestation
of life. The next generalization will be into mineral, vegetable,
animal, and personal.

But you can begin with chairs, tables, paper, cloth, &c., coming as soon
as possible to natural objects. Mrs. Agassiz's "First Lesson in Natural
History" is an excellent hint. Sea anemones, star-fishes, clams, and
oysters are easily procured. If sea anemones, taken into a bottle of
salt water, clinging to stones, look like mere mosses at first, on the
second day it is pretty certain, that in their desire for food they will
spread themselves out, displaying their inward parts in the most
beautiful manner. Every child in the class should have his turn at the
object, if there are not objects enough for each,--should tell what he
sees, and be helped to words to express himself. This, I must repeat, is
the true way of learning the meaning of words; and leaves impressions,
which no dictionary, with its periphrases and mere approximations to
synonymes can give. Let a child himself hammer out some substance with a
mallet, and he will never forget the meaning of malleable; and so of
other words. As far as possible we should always use Saxon words, but it
is the words that come from the Latin and Greek, which it is most
necessary to teach the meaning of; and they should be taught by things
themselves, which have them for names or qualities.

A good linguist will have an advantage here, by being able to trace the
words through the original language up to nature; for every word is, in
the last analysis, either a picture, whose original in nature is its
definition, or a poem, which can be recognized by the general
imagination. A child whose vernacular is English will easily see that a
_bit_ is something bitten off, and so is smaller than the mouth; but
that _morsel_ means a bit is not so obvious to one who does not know
that _morsus_, also, is the perfect participle of the Latin verb for
bite. That _acute_ means _sharp_ is plainer to a child who knows that
_acu_ is the Latin for needle.

No time is lost which is given to this definition of words by the
objects of nature and art, from which, or from whose attributes, words
are derived. In words are fossilized the sciences, that is, the
knowledge mankind has already attained of nature; and he who understands
all the words in use, would know all that is known, nay, much that has
been once known and long forgotten. But the study of objects not only
gives significance to words, it educates the senses, and produces the
habit of original attention and investigation of nature. These do not
come of themselves, as we see in the instance of country children, who
are ignorant of what is around them, because left to grow up among the
objects of nature, without having their attention called to things in
their minutiæ, or their relations in extensu; nor led to clothe with
words their perceptions, impressions, and reasonings.

Besides Mr. Sheldon's "Elementary Instruction," there is the "Child's
Book of Nature," by Worthington Hooker, in three parts, which will be a
great help to an object-teacher. It is published by the Harpers, and is
the very best introduction of children to flowers.[D] Mrs. Mann's
"Flower People" is also full of facts, carefully studied out. This is a
charming book for children to read in, when they shall come to read. It
is a great pity that the latest edition, published by Ticknor and Fields
in 1862, is not illustrated by the flowers spoken of. But perhaps these
may be lithographed, and published in a card-case, to accompany it. Both
the science and cultivation of flowers comes very naturally into the
Kindergarten.

The greatest difficulty about object-teaching is, that it requires
personal training, and wide-awake attention in teachers, of a character
much more thorough than they commonly have. When it shall become
general, as it certainly must, it will no longer be supposed that any
ordinary person who can read and write, and is obliged to do something
for a living, will be thought fit to keep a school for small children!
The present order of things will be reversed. Ordinary persons, with
limited acquirements, will be obliged to confine themselves to older
pupils, who are able to study books and only need to have some one to
set their lessons and hear them recited; while persons of originality
and rich culture will be reserved to discover and bring out the various
genius and faculty which God has sown broadcast in the field of the
race, and which now so often runs into the rank vegetation of vice, or
wastes into deserts of concentrated mediocrity. Then this season of
education will command the largest remuneration, as it will secure the
finest powers to the work; and because such work cannot be pursued by
any one person for many years, nor even for a short time without
assistance, relieving from the ceaseless attention that a company of
small children requires, for little children cannot be wound up to go
like watches; but to keep them in order, the teacher must constantly
meet their outbursting life with her own magnetic forces; while their
employments must be continually interchanged, and mingled with their
recreations.

Children ought to continue these Kindergarten exercises from the age of
three to nine; and if faithfully taught, they could then go into what is
called scholastic training, in a state of mind to receive from it the
highest advantages it is capable of giving; free from the disadvantages
which are now so obvious as to have raised, in our practical country, a
party prejudiced against classical education altogether.

      The preceding chapter and the one on Geometry, which
      succeeds, are rather for the direction of children in
      the last than the first years of the Kindergarten; for
      they go over into the second stage of education.
      Object-lessons, addressed more to the heart and
      imagination, grow directly out of the plays, as we
      have seen.

      And, without any of the terms of Geometry, the
      sticklaying and the folding of paper give the child
      geometrical facts in a practical way; as well as
      counting, and all of arithmetic that precedes
      Colburn's "First Lessons," some of which can be taught
      even before teaching to read.

FOOTNOTE:

[D] Gray's _How Plants Grow_, is invaluable for a teacher.




CHAPTER IX.

GEOMETRY.


REV. DR. HILL, the present President of Harvard College, in his articles
in Dr. Barnard's "Journal of Education," has set forth the importance of
Geometry in the earliest education, giving the Science of Form
precedence to that of numbers. Of course he does not mean that logical
demonstration is to form one of the exercises of little children! but
that observation of differences and resemblances of shape, and the
combination of forms, should be inwoven with the amusements of children.
He invented a toy on the principle of the Chinese tanagram, (published
by Hickling, Swan & Co., in Boston,) to further an exercise which begins
in the cradle with the examination of the hands and feet.

The blocks are the first materials. Take the cube and ask how many faces
it has; how many corners; and whether one face is larger than another or
equal; and finally, lead the child to describe a cube as a solid figure
with six equal sides, and eight corners. Then take a solid triangle from
the box and draw out by questions that it has five sides and six
corners, that three of its sides are equal, and two others equal; that
the three larger sides are four-sided, and the two smaller sides are
three-sided; and that the corners are sharper than those of a cube.

Make analogous use of all the blocks, and of the furniture of the room,
of the sphere and its parts, the cylinder, &c. Do not require the
definition-formulas at first, but content yourself with opening the
children's eyes to the facts which the formula afterwards shall
declare.

Paper-folding can be made subservient to another step, just short of
abstraction.

Give each one of a class a square piece of paper, and proceed thus: What
is the shape of this paper? How many sides has it? Which is the longest
side? How many corners has it? Have in hand, already cut, several acute
and obtuse angled triangles, and showing them, ask if the corners of the
square are like these corners? If they are as sharp as some of them; or
as blunt as some? Spreading out the triangle before them say, which is
the sharpest corner, and which the bluntest? and let the children
compare them with the corners of the square, by laying them upon the
square. They will see that the square corners are neither blunt nor
sharp, but as they will perhaps say, _straight_. Let them look round the
room, and on the furniture and window-sashes, find these several kinds
of corner. At least they can always find right angles in the furniture.
Then tell them there is another word for corners, namely, _angles_, that
a square corner is a _right_ angle, a sharp corner a sharp angle, and a
blunt corner a blunt angle.

If the teacher chooses she can go farther and tell them that _acute_ is
another word for sharp, and _obtuse_ another word for blunt; (or these
two _Latin words_ may be deferred till by and by, one new word _angle_
being enough to begin with.)

You can then say, "Now tell me how you describe a square, supposing
somebody should ask you that did not know;" and give them more or less
help to say: "A square is a figure with four equal sides and four
straight corners (or right angles)." To prove to them that it is
necessary to mention the right angles in describing a square, you can
make a rhombus, and show them its different shape with its acute and
obtuse angles. Having thus exhausted the description of a square, let
every one double up his square, and so get an oblong. Ask if this is a
square? What is it? How does it differ from a square? Are all four sides
different from each other? Which sides are alike? How are the corners
(or angles)? In what, then, is it like a square? In what does it
differ? Bring out from the child at last the description of an oblong,
as a four-sided figure with straight corners (or right angles), and its
opposite sides equal. Contrast it with some parallelogram which is not a
rectangle, and which you must have ready. Let them now fold their
oblongs again, and crease the folds; then ask them to unfold and say
what they have, and they will find four squares. Ask them if every
square can be folded so as to make two oblongs, and then if every oblong
can be so divided as to make two squares? If they say yes to this last
question, give them a shorter oblong, which you must have ready, and
having made them notice that it is an oblong, by asking them to tell
whether its opposite sides are equal, and its angles right angles, ask
them to fold it, and see if it will make two squares. They will see that
it will not. Then ask them if all oblongs are of the same shape; and
then if all squares are of the same shape?

The above foldings will be enough for a lesson, and if the children are
small it will be enough for two lessons.

Beginning the next time, ask them what is the difference between an
oblong and square? and if they have forgotten, do not tell them in
words, but give them square papers and let them learn it over again as
before, by their own observations. Then give them again square pieces of
paper, and ask them to join the opposite corners, and crease a fold
diagonally (but do not use the word diagonally). Then ask them what
shape they have got? They will reply, a three-sided figure. Ask them how
many corners or angles it has, and then tell them that, on account of
its being three-cornered, it is called a _triangle_. Now let them
compare the angles, and they will find that there is one straight corner
(right angle) and two sharp corners (acute angles). Ask them if the
sides are equal, and they will find that two sides are equal and the
other side longer. Set up the triangle on its base, so that the equal
sides may be in the attitude of the outstretched legs of a man; call
their attention to this by a question, and then say, on account of this
shape this triangle is called equal-legged, as well as right-angled--a
right-angled equal-legged triangle. By giving them examples to compare
it with, you can demonstrate to them that all right-angled triangles are
not equal-legged, and all equal-legged triangles are not right-angled.
Show them an equal-legged right-angled triangle, an equal-legged
acute-angled triangle, and an equal-legged obtuse-angled triangle, and
this discrimination will be obvious. The word _isosceles_ can be
introduced, if the teacher thinks best; but I keep off the Greek and
Latin terms as long as possible.

Now tell the children to put together the other two corners of their
triangles, laying the sharp corners on each other, and crossing the
fold; unfolding their papers they will find four right-angled
equal-legged triangles creased upon their square paper. Are all these of
the same shape, and of the same size? Now fold the unfolded square into
oblongs, and make a crease, and they will find, on unfolding again, that
they have six isosceles triangles, two of them being twice as large as
any one of the other four. Ask, are all these triangles of equal size?
Are all of them similar in shape? leading them to discriminate the use
in geometry of the words equal and similar. Can triangles be large and
small without altering the shape? Then similar and equal mean
differently? Are all squares similar? are all squares equal? are all
triangles equal? are all triangles similar? What is the difference
between a square and oblong? What is the difference between a square and
a triangle? What is the difference between a square and a rhombus? What
kind of corners has a rhombus? In what is a square like a rhombus? How
do you describe a triangle? What is the name of the triangles you have
learnt about? They will answer right-angled, equal-legged triangles.
Then give them each a hexagon, and ask them what kind of corners it has?
Whether any one is more blunt than another? Whether any side is greater
than another? How many sides has it? And then draw out from them that a
hexagon is a figure of six equal sides, with six obtuse angles, just
equal to each other in their obtuseness. Having done this, direct the
folding till they have divided the hexagon into six triangles, meeting
at the centre. Ask them if these are right-angled triangles, and if they
hesitate, give them a square to measure with. Then ask them if they are
equal-legged (isosceles) triangles. They may say yes, in which case
reply yes, and more than equal-legged, they are equal-_sided_. All three
sides are equal, and so they have a different name,--they are called
_equilateral_. Ask, what is the difference between equilateral and
isosceles, if you have given them these names, and help them, if
necessary, to the answer, "equilateral triangles have all the sides
equal, isosceles triangles have only two sides equal." Are equilateral
triangles all similar, that is, of the same shape? Are isosceles
triangles all similar? and if they hesitate or say yes, show two
isosceles triangles, one with the third side shorter, and one with it
longer than the other two sides.

Now give to each child a square, and tell them to fold it so as to make
two equal triangles; then to unfold it, and fold it into two equal
oblongs. Unfold it again, and there will be seen, beside the triangles,
two other figures, which are neither squares, oblongs, or triangles, but
a four-sided figure of which no two sides are equal, and only two sides
are parallel, with two right angles, one obtuse and one acute angle. Let
all this be brought out of the children by questions. As there is no
common name for this figure, name it trapezoid at once. Then let them
fold the paper to make two parallelograms at right angles with the first
two, and they will have two equal squares, and four equal isosceles
triangles, which are equal to the two squares. Now fold the paper into
two triangles, and you will have eight triangles meeting in the centre
by their vertices, all of which are right-angled and equal-legged. Ask
them if they are equal-sided? so as to keep them very clear of
confounding the isosceles with the equilateral, but use the English
terms as often as the Latin and Greek, for the vernacular keeps the mind
awake, while the foreign _technical_ puts it into a passiveness more or
less sleepy. Then give all the children octagons, and bring out from
them its description by sides and angles; and then fold it so as to make
eight isosceles triangles.

Another thing that can be taught by paper-folding is to divide polygons,
regular or irregular, into triangles, and thus let them learn that every
polygon contains as many triangles as it has sides, less two.

Proportions can also be taught by letting them cut off triangles,
similar in shape to the wholes, by creases parallel to the base. Grund's
"Plane Geometry" will help a teacher to lessons on proportion, and can
be almost wholly taught by this paper-folding. Also Professor Davies's
"Descriptive Geometry," and Hay's "Symmetrical Drawing."

Of course it will take a teacher who is familiar with geometry to do all
that may be done by this amusement, to habituate the mind to consider
and compare forms, and their relations to each other. Exercises on
folding circles can be added. It would take a volume to exhaust the
subject. Enough has been said to give an idea to a capable teacher. Care
must be taken that the consideration should be always of concrete not of
abstract forms. Mr. Hill says his "First Lessons in Geometry" were the
amusements of his son of five years old. Pascal and Professor Pierce
found out such amusements for themselves, which had the high end of
preparing them for their great attainments in logical geometry.

Sometimes surprising applications of Geometry, thus practically
appreciated, will be made by very small people. A boy of eight years of
age, with whom I read over Mr. Hill's "Geometry for Beginners" for his
amusement, in two months after invented a self-moving carriage for his
sister's dolly, that would give it a ride of ten feet! A neighboring
carpenter made it from his drafted model.




CHAPTER X.

READING.


THIS art should be taught simultaneously with writing, or, more
properly, printing; and I should certainly advise that it do not come
till children are hard upon seven years old, if they have entered the
Kindergarten at three. For it properly belongs to the second stage of
education, after the Kindergarten exercises on the blocks, sticks, peas,
&c., are entirely exhausted; and the children have become very expert in
sewing, weaving, pricking, and drawing. They will then have received a
certain cultivation of intellect which will make it possible to teach
Reading on a philosophical method, which will make the acquisition a
real cultivation of mind, instead of the distraction it now is to those
whose vernacular is English, the _pot pourri_ of languages, and whose
_orthography_ should be called _Kakography_, it is so lawless.

Though we repudiate phonography, so far as to deprecate its being
applied to the English language, and reducing all our libraries to a
dead language as it were, we are not insensible to the truth that
_phonography_ is the true principle of writing; and this method of ours
takes advantage of it to a certain extent, as we shall proceed to show:
for if we pronounce the vowel-characters as in the Italian language, and
the letters c and g hard, it is a fact that the largest number of
syllables in English will be found strictly phonographic. It was on this
hint, given by a great philologist, that the "First Nursery Reading
Book" was written, which has no word in it that makes an exception to
the letters so sounded. In my own Kindergarten, where I began to teach
reading when I was yet ignorant of the necessity for the previous
training of which I have just given account, I began to teach on this
method, reading and writing at the same time; thus:--

All the children were set before the black-board, with their slates and
pencils; and I said, "What does the cat say?" The answer was immediately
ready,--"mieaou." Now this sound goes from the highest to the lowest of
the Italian vowels, beginning with the consonant m.

I said, "Now we will learn to print 'mieaou.' How does it begin?" I
answered myself,--shutting my lips, and sounding m. They all imitated
the sound, which, being a semi-vowel, was continuous.

I said, "We will write m," putting down three short perpendiculars, and
joining them on top by a horizontal; and I made the letter myself,
according to this direction, and they imitated with more or less
success.

I then said, "_mi_," sounding the i as in mach_i_ne; and adding, "Now we
must write i,--and that is one little short perpendicular with a dot
over it." I did it, and they imitated.

Then I said "mie," sounding e as in egg, only making it long; "and this
e is made by a curve and straight line,"--at the same time making it on
the black-board, which they imitated.

Then I said "miea," sounding a as in ah; and, as I made it on the
black-board, I said, "We will make a little egg; and over the egg we
will make a dot, and that is a snake's head; and this is the body," I
continued, as I made the curve that completed the a. They imitated with
indifferent success, but I did not criticise their scrawls.

Then I said, "miĕa_o_," and making the o, they imitated it easily.

Then I said, "mieao_u_," sounding the u not _yu_, but like u in Peru;
and they imitated sound and character.

It proved quite an entertainment to repeat this lesson, till they were
very expert. The next day I made them tell me the sounds, one by one, as
I had done to them; and I wrote the letters. I also would write it,
letter by letter; and they would sound first, m, then the syllable mi,
then mie, then miea, then mieao, then mieaou. When they were perfectly
familiar with these sounds and characters, I told them these letters
were called vowels, or vocals, because they were the sounds of the
voice.

In another lesson, I asked them how they made the sound m, and helped
them to say that they did it by putting their lips together, and
sounding without opening them; for I wanted the power of the character
and not the name,--_em_; and then I said, "Now tell me how shall I write
mama?" which they also wrote on their slates.

I then said that the lips made another motion when they began to say
papa; that they were put together and opened without any sound of the
voice at all,--at the same time showing it myself on my own lips. And I
told them to write the letter p by making a straight perpendicular line,
twice as long as the lines that made m; and then, at the upper right
hand, drawing their upper lip,--also doing it myself for them to
imitate. I then told them to put on an a after it, then another p, and
then another a; and now they had papa.

I said, "You have now _articulated_ with your lips two sounds, but you
can make more articulations with your lips. You can put your lips just
as you do to make p; and then, if you sound a little, you will make b;
and when you write b, you can make a perpendicular line as you did to
make p, but instead of putting an upper lip to it, put an under lip on
the lower right-hand side of it;" and I showed how to do it on the
black-board, and saw that they imitated it on the slate.

The next day I began with calling on them to write the vowels, dictating
by the sounds I had given them; and then the lip letters, m, p, and b.

I then said, "But there are two more articulations with lips--Put your
upper teeth on your lower lip and breathe" (articulating f at the same
time). They imitated, and I said, "Now make a perpendicular line and
cross it, and then make the top of the line bend over a little; that is
the letter f" (I gave the power, not name, ef). "Now put your lip as
before and breathe again, making a little sound, and instead of f it
will be v. The letter v is printed by two short obliques meeting at the
bottom. Now you can make all the lip letters, m, p, b, f, v."

For exercise in printing, and to make sure of these letters and sounds,
I told them to write ma, pa, ba, fa, va, always keeping the Italian
sounds of the vowel; also, me, pe, be, fe, ve; mi, pi, bi, fi, vi; mo,
po, bo, fo, vo; and mu, pu, bu, fu, vu.

Another lesson was the tooth letters d, t, s. Here the teeth must be set
together, and a sound made for d; and the lip put behind the
perpendicular in printing it; the teeth put together, the articulation t
is made without putting any voice to it. The teeth put together, and a
hissing sound makes s. The letter can be described as a snake, the head
on the right and the tail on the left of the curl: z is still more
easily made by three lines.

These letters can be made fast in the memory, by dictating di, de, da,
do, du; ti, te, ta, to, tu; si, se, sa, so, su; and zi, ze, za, zo, zu.

Then attention is drawn to throat letters. The easiest to make is h. Let
them see that the sound is breathed out of their throats, and do not
give it the name of _aitch_. They can write ha, hi, he, ho, and hu; and
then make the sound k, and show them how it is written: sometimes k,
sometimes q, and sometimes c; and do not call c _see_. Make them write
ca, co, cu; ka, ke, ki, ko, ku; and qua, que, qui, quo.

Show them how to write the sonorous throat letter in go, ga, gu. It will
be very easy for them to make the nose sound n, and write the letter by
two short perpendiculars, joined on top by a horizontal line; the tongue
sound l and the rolling r are also easily sounded and written. In a
week's lessons, or possibly a fortnight's, these letters can all be
learned; but it is of no consequence if it takes a month.

Another way of learning the letters is given on a subsequent page (the
79th); but this has the advantage of being a little more scientific, and
exercising the classifying instinct, which has been considerably
developed by the exercises involved in the occupations.

On account of the irregularity of what is called English orthoepy and
orthography, the written language is a chaos--into which, when the
child's mind is introduced in the usual way, all its natural attempts at
classification are baffled. The late Horace Mann, in a lecture on the
alphabet, has with great humor and perspicacity shown this; and he
recommended that children should be taught to read by _words_ purely.
But when some years afterwards his attention was drawn to the phonic
method, he accepted it fully; and wrote for Mrs. Mann the preface to her
Philadelphia edition of the Primer of Reading and Drawing. This was not
until after it had been tested in his own family and some others, where
I had introduced the phonic method.

On the details of my method I must enlarge all the more, because I find
myself differing in some respects from Mr. Sheldon's plan, which loses a
large part of the advantages of the phonic method by not having one
definite sound for each letter. As I have taught on my plan successfully
for fifteen years, I am prepared to defend it at all points, from the
ground of a various experience. But I can adduce also the highest
philologic authority for my mode of sounding the alphabet,[E] as well as
an argument of common sense from the nature of the case.

The primal cause of the chaotic condition of English orthography, is the
fact that the Roman alphabet, which was a perfect phonography of the old
Latin language, lacked characters for four English vowels and four
English consonants. The Latin monks had not the wit to invent new
characters for these additional sounds; but undertook to use the Roman
letters for them also. Hence for the vowel heard in the words irk, err,
work, and urge, they used indifferently all four characters; for truly
one would do as well as another. But if they had put a dot into the
middle of the o, and added it to the alphabet, it would have been better
than either. Also, if for the vowel sound of pun, they had put a dot
under the u; and for the vowel sound of man, they had put a dot under
the a; and for the vowel sound of not, a dot under the o; they would
have had four more letters in their alphabet, which would have completed
the phonography of the English vowels. Similar dots under d t s c would
have made a phonography of consonants, and avoided the awkward
combinations of sh, ch, and the ambiguity of th, which now stands for
the differing initials of _then_ and _thin_.

But as they did not do this, a certain divorce took place between the
ideas of the sounds and the letters; and hence the long uncertainty of
the English orthography, and the stereotyped absurdities which now mark
it.

It is so nearly impossible to remedy a difficulty which has passed into
print so largely, that we have to accept the evil, and remedy as best we
may the disadvantage it is to young minds to have all this confusion
presented to them on the threshold of their literary education.[F]

It was suggested to me by Dr. Kraitsir, that I should take a volume of
any book, and count the times that each of the vowels, and c and g, were
sounded as the Romans sounded them, and how many times they were sounded
otherwise, and thus see whether it was true, as he said, that these
Roman sounds were the most frequent, even in the English language. I did
so on a few pages of Sir Walter Scott's novels, and found that the
letter i sounded as in _ink_ 240 times, to one that it sounded as in
_bind_; and though the proportion was not quite so great with any other
vowel, yet there was a large majority for the Roman sound, in each
instance, as well as for the hard sounds of c and g. Indeed I found g
was hard, even before e and i, in the case of every Saxon word; and that
all the soft gs, which are not many, were derived from the
Norman-French.

I then set myself to find what words in English were written entirely
with the Roman-sounding letters; and, to my surprise, found a large
number,--enough to fill a primary spelling-book;--while most of the
syllables of the rest of the words in the language yielded on analysis
the same sounds. It immediately occurred to me to begin to teach
children to read by these words, whose analysis would always yield them
the Roman sounds, and reserve, till afterwards, the words which are
exceptions, leaving the anomalies to be learnt by rote.

I tried my first experiment on a child a little more than four years
old, by printing on a black-board certain words, letter by letter, until
he had learned the whole alphabet, both to know each character at sight,
and to print it on the black-board, and it was a signal success.

For the convenience of those who do not know the old Roman pronunciation
of Latin, for which our alphabet is a perfect phonography, I will give
the sounds of the letters here.

In the case of the vowels (_voice letters_),

  i is pronounced    ĭh    as in ink,     (not eye.)
  e        "         ĕh    as in ell,     (not as in be.)
  a        "         ăh    as in arm,     (not as in may.)
  o        "         ŏh    as in old,
  u        "         ŭh    as in ruin,    (not as in unit.)

in the case of the consonants, giving the power of the letter by making
them finals, and obscuring the e as much as possible for the lip
letters, ĕb, ĕf, ĕp, ĕv, while the semi-vowels m, n, l, r, require not
even the obscure ĕ to their being sounded perfectly, shutting the lips
and sounding m, opening them and shutting the palate to sound n, holding
the tongue still to sound l, shaking it to sound r, (ĕl, ĕm, ĕn, ĕr;)
the tooth letters ĕd, ĕt, ĕss, ĕzz--and the throat letters ĕc, ĕk,
eq,[G] eg, and a breathing from the throat for h. Often children will
come to the Kindergarten knowing the letters, in which case it is best
to begin with the letters according to the organs, as is suggested in my
first chapter, and when they give the old names--you can say, "No, I do
not want that name but the sound."

The whole alphabet in order will then be ăh, ĕb, ĕc, ĕd, ĕh, ĕf, ĕg, h
(breathed), ĭh, ĕj, ĕk, ĕl, ĕm, ĕn, ŏh, ĕp, ĕq, ĕr, ĕss, ĕt, ŭh (oo) ĕv,
w (breathed) ĕx, y, just like ĭh, and not called wye, ĕz. Also the sign
& for the word _and_.

In the first part of this chapter, I have detailed one method of
beginning with a class,--that of giving the sounds of the letters first,
classed according to the organs.

But my common way is to begin with whole words, which are more sure to
interest a child. A limited number of words arranged in sentences,
teaches them to know and write the whole alphabet. For the convenience
of teachers who may not have either my "First Nursery Reading-Book," or
Mrs. Mann's "Primer of Reading and Drawing" on hand, I will give here
some sentences that contain the whole alphabet, which the teacher can
teach by printing them on the black-board, and letting the children
imitate them with pencil on the slate, or chalk on the black-board.

O puss, puss, pussy; O kitty, kitty, kitty; Kitty sings miu, miu; pussy
sings mieaou; pussy is old, pussy is cold; put pussy into mamma's
basket; mamma is singing to papa; papa is kissing mamma; pussy, go to
kitty, go, go, go; kitty is in mamma's basket; go into mamma's garden,
and pick roses, anemones, tulips, and pinks; mamma's velvet dress fits
well; bells ring and cars go; cars go very quickly; hens sit; hens eggs;
eggs in lark's nest; eggs in linnet's nest; larks sing tralala, tralala;
fill mamma's basket full of roses, anemones, pinks, tulips, crocuses;
Lizzy is dizzy, very dizzy; Helen is rosy red; Alexis sent his mamma a
jar full of jelly; Barbara kisses Cora; Dora is spinning yarn; Flora is
spinning yarn; Gilbert sent Henry a jar of guava jelly; Isabella is
kissing Julia; Karlito sent a linnet's egg to Lilian; Margaret picks
roses; Nina picks tulips in Olivia's garden; Penelope plants pinks in
Ellen's garden; Rosalind sings to Quasi-modo; Susan puts eggs into
mamma's basket; Tina brings roses to Vivian; Willy brings crocuses to
mamma.

The above sentences, written over and over again, will teach all the
letters; others must be added, but after certain letters are learnt, it
is useful, and a pleasant variety, for the children to write columns of
words, with only one letter differing; thus, old, cold, fold, gold,
hold, sold, told, wold; ell, bell, dell, fell, hell, quell, sell, tell,
well; art, cart, dart, hart, mart, part, tart, start; in, binn, din,
fin, jin, kin, pin, sin, tin, win, &c., &c.

My "First Nursery Reading-Book" is entirely made up of such columns,
after half a dozen pages of words in sentences; and long before the
children have written it half through, they can pronounce the words on
first sight, though many of them are five and six syllables long.

And here I must foreclose some criticisms which have been made on this
book.

First,--that the sentences are not interesting or important. That is of
no moment. Children are interested in separate words; especially if they
are to write them as well as read them. I have never seen children tired
of the words, and of making them.

Some persons have disputed the pronunciation of some of the words. There
are, perhaps, half a dozen inadvertencies in the book which can be
corrected in a second edition.

I indicate no difference between the s when it is sounded sharp, and
when soft like z. But I think this will never lead to any practical
error; because the language is vernacular, and the child has a teacher.

I affirm that the article _a_ is sounded ah in the _spoken_ language,
when it is not accented. Also that in such words as deject, reject, &c.,
the two e's sound alike, like most unaccented e's in the language.

For a time, there is no need for the children to have a book at all. Let
them have a lesson fifteen minutes long in which they write the words
after the dictation of the teacher.

Let the written words remain on the black-board, and after some other
employments have intervened, let them read the words off the
black-board.

When they have mastered all the letters, it is a good plan to give them
the book, and let them find the words. Showing them a line, ask them to
look along and find a certain word.

They will be pleased to find that they can read in a book, and will like
to copy on their slates the columns of words, which may be made another
exercise of a quarter of an hour. In my Kindergarten, they write the
words, after the teacher, on their blackboards; and afterwards write out
of the printed books upon the slate. I have hitherto had more time, in
proportion, given to the reading than my own judgment quite approves;
because parents are so urgent, and measure their children's progress so
exclusively by their power of reading; and, if they do not learn a great
deal faster than children usually learn to read, distrust the system,
and interfere.

Even if this method did prove longer than other methods of learning to
read, I should wish to pursue it, because to find that the same letter
always represents the same sound, cultivates the mind's power of
classification, and gives it confidence in its own little reasoning. But
I have found that it is a shorter, not a longer, process. I have known a
child of three years old, who was found to know how to read, when there
was no thought of teaching him, but his brother of five years old had
been taught to read upon the black-board in his presence. A child of
seven years old learnt to read and write print beautifully, in three
months, in lessons of ten minutes, given only when she asked for them.
And in those cases there was not the additional advantage of a class.
Several children in my own Kindergarten, in my first season, when I
never gave half an hour in the day to reading, not only mastered my
first Nursery Reading-Book, but got upon the anomalous words, and learnt
to read so far, that the second season they could read fluently. If as
much time was given, in the Kindergarten, to mere reading, as is given
in the public schools, they would, doubtless, have learnt in three
months, but I would not give the time; for I believe it is so much
better for the whole nature, _i. e._, all the powers of sense and
apprehension, to be cultivated by examining objects.

I have also another difficulty to contend with. Children are taught
their letters at home, and the parents interfere to help, and really
hinder by bringing in the old sounds of the letters and the anomalous
words, before I am ready for them. There is no objection to the
children's having the First Nursery-Book at home to use and copy on
their slates, provided those at home will confine themselves to
pronouncing the words to them instead of attempting to spell them.

The question, however, comes at last, But how are they to attain the
rest of the language? Before I had any experience, I myself thought this
was to be a great difficulty. In the first instance, after I had brought
my little pupil to the point that he could print correctly any word that
I pronounced to him, and could read at sight any of my selected words, I
gave him a piece of poetry to read, beginning--

"Sleep, baby, sleep."

He read it _slay-ape bahby, slay-ape_.

I said, "No, that first word is _sleep_." He was surprised, and wondered
why it was written so.

I said, "Perhaps they used to say _slayape_, but they say _sleep_ now;
and in books there are a good many such words. Now I will rub out sl (I
pronounced this combination with one impulse of the voice) and put a
_w_, and say, now, what is that?" "O, That is _weep_." Now I rubbed out
the _w_, and put _d_. He immediately said, "That is deep." I said, "Now
you write sleep, and under it put weep, deep, peep, keep, steep, sweep,
creep." He did so, at once, and then he took great pleasure in getting a
paper and lead-pencil, and writing the whole column, which, of course,
he never forgot. I proceeded in the same manner, till he had not only
written all the song, but all the analogues of each word,--and it was
wonderful how soon he could read. The scientific habit of mind which was
attained by classing the words as he learned them, has shown itself
throughout his education. He never learned a so-called spelling-lesson,
but he scarcely ever wrote a word wrongly spelled; and it has been a
uniform observation that children taught on this method always write
without errors. Each variation from the standard so strongly fixed in
their minds makes a great impression; and to write the words in groups,
makes these anomalies remembered in groups.

In my own Kindergarten, I give to my class "Mother Goose's Melodies."
They know many of them by heart; but I make them sit in class, and each,
in turn, read one word, in order to teach them to keep the place, and
when they finish a verse, I ask them to find some word, and often make
it the nucleus of a group of words of the same kind, to be written upon
the black-board and slates as above. But I think it is a good plan,
before giving a book, to call their attention to the initial sounds of
_thin_, _then_, _shin_, _chin_, and ask them what letter stands for
these. Of course they will say they do not know. Then you can say "There
is none; for the people who made these letters did not have these sounds
in their language; and so, when they came to write English, they put a
_t_ and _h_ together to stand for one sound; and _c_ and _h_ for
another; and _s_ and _h_ for another."

Lists of words should then be dictated and written: such as thin, think,
thing, thrift, thrill, thick, bath, lath, doth, sloth, quoth, pith,
smith, fifth, filth, width, depth, tenth, truth, thresh, threshold,
methodist, synthetic, pathetic, cathartic, then, them, with, this,
hither, thither, nether, tether, hitherto, farthing, withhold, brethren,
char, chart, charm, chaff, chant, larch, march, parch, starch, chest,
chess, chin, chick, chill, chit, chink, chintz, rich, chirrup, inch,
pinch, clinch, flinch, winch, finch, filch, milch, clinch, trench,
bench, wrench, quench, shin, ship, sharp, shark, shed, shell, shelf,
shaft, shorn, shred, shrift, shrimp, shrill, flesh, mesh, fresh, dish,
fish, wish, harsh, marsh, sheriff, shiver, relish, cherish, perish,
freshet, finish, prudish, bluish, garnish, tarnish, varnish, blemish,
refresh. Attention can then be called to the words beginning with _wh_,
which are pronounced (as they were _written_ in Saxon) by uttering the
_h_ before the _w_; as when, whet, whelk, whelp, whelm, wherry, whiz,
whig, whip, whiff, whist, whisk, whirl, which, whimper, pronounced hwen,
hwet, &c.

I suppose I need not say that the consideration of one of the extra
consonants will be enough for one lesson.

The next step is to learn the diphthongs, that is, the proper--which I
consider the only--diphthongs. Make the children pronounce oi, and see
that two sounds are slid together; and then let them write on their
slates, in different columns, boil, coil, foil, soil, toil, moil, spoil,
coin, join, groin, point, joint, joist, hoist, foist, moist, cloister,
surloin, exploit, void, &c.; also boy, coy, joy, toy, cloy, loyal,
royal, envoy, enjoy, &c.

Then let them pronounce the diphthong _ou_, and write in one column the
words out, our, thou, loud, proud, cloud, noun, bound, found, hound,
mound, pound, round, sound, wound, bout, clout, flout, lout, gout, pout,
rout, sprout, spout, shout, snout, stout, mouth, south, couch, crouch,
slouch, pouch, vouch, roundabout, bounty, county, amount, abound,
scoundrel, discount, expound, about, &c.; and in another, how, cow, bow,
mow, now, vow, owl, scowl, brow, prow, howl, gown, brown, crown, drown,
cowl, fowl, crowd, clown, frown, vowel, towel, trowel, prowess. Call
attention to the proper diphthong, which we write with what we call i
long, (but it is no sound of ĭh at all,) and which the Romans wrote as a
diphthong with two letters, ae and ai, pronouncing it as we do the i in
ire. Then let them write in columns bind, find, grind, hind, blind,
kind, mind, rind, wind, violet, dialect, inquiry, horizon, &c.

This same diphthong is also written with the Greek y,--in my, thy, cry,
try, fry, wry, fly, ply, asylum, dynasty, petrify, signify, vilify,
vivify, simplify, rectify, edify, notify, &c.

Call attention lastly, to the diphthong yu, written first with the
letter u simply, as in unit, humid, fuel, cubic, stupid, putrid, mutual,
funeral, singular, bitumen, acumen, nutriment; and secondly with ew, as
few, chew, pew, new, mew, mewl, eschew, sinew; thirdly with iew, as
view; fourthly with eu, as in eulogy, European, &c.; sometimes with eau,
as in beauty and its compounds.

There is no propriety in calling _au_ a diphthong, as it is one sound,
and not two sounds. It is one of the extra vowels of the English
language, written when short with o (though it is no sound of o proper)
a, aw, and oa.

And now we come to the consideration of the extra vowels, beginning with
this sound heard short in _not_, and long in the name of a carpenter's
tool, awl.

Explain that there is no character for this vowel in the Roman alphabet,
because the sound was not in the Latin language, and then proceed to
show how it is written in various ways: first with an o, as in bob, cob,
fob, gob, job, mob, nob, rob, sob, cock, dock, hock, lock, clock, flock,
mock, pock, frock, rock, crock, shock, sock, cod, hod, nod, pod, odd,
shod, rod, sod, trod, doff, off, of, (pronounced ov,) cog, dog, fog,
hog, jog, log, nog, doll, loll, poll, on, don, ton, pond, fond, blond,
won, fop, drop, crop, lop, mop, pop, sop, top, chop, shop, stop, swop,
prop, ox, box, fox, pox, moth, loth, froth, broth, lot, cot, dot, got,
hot, jot, not, pot, rot, sot, tot, wot, grot, clot, shot, spot, boss,
cross, dross, floss, loss, moss, toss, gloss, cost, frost, lost, tost,
bond, fond, pond, pomp, romp. Then show that it is written sometimes
with an a, as in all, fall, call, hall, gall, tall, wall, small, stall,
ball, thrall, squall, squash, squad, squat, quart, war, dwarf, scald,
bald, salt, halt, swab, ward, sward, warn, warp, warm, wand, want, was,
wast, wash, swan, watch, swamp, waltz, wasp; sometimes with _au_, as in
daub, fraud, gaudy, fault, vault, paunch, craunch, laurel, haul, caul,
maul, augury, autumnal; and sometimes with _aw_, as in caw, daw, draw,
haw, hawk, jaw, law, maw, paw, claw, straw, raw, thaw, squaw, saw, flaw,
awl, shawl, bawl, brawn, drawn, awning, tawny, awkward, tawdry, sawyer,
mawkish, lawful; also with oa in broad.

Another extra vowel, heard in the word man, is written, in default of a
character for it, with a, as in cab, dab, gab, jab, nab, hack, back,
jack, lack, pack, rack, crack, clack, black, bad, gad, glad, had, lad,
mad, pad, sad, shad, bag, cag, fag, gag, hag, lag, nag, rag, crag, shag,
sag, tag, wag, mall, shall, am, dam, flam, ham, sham, jam, an, ban, can,
fan, clan, man, pan, ran, band, hand, land, stand, strand, grand,
brand, cap, flap, gap, chap, lap, clap, map, nap, pap, sap, tap, at,
bat, cat, fat, gat, hat, that, mat, pat, rat, brat, sat, spat, sprat,
tat, vat. This same vowel is heard in the word plaid.

A third extra vowel is heard in _pun_, and written generally with an u;
as cub, dub, hub, nub, rub, scrub, drub, tub, buck, duck, luck, cluck,
muck, pluck, suck, stuck, truck, tuck, chuck, bud, cud, dud, mud, suds,
stud, scud, buff, cuff, luff, bluff, muff, puff, stuff, ruff, scuff,
bug, dug, drug, hug, jug, lug, slug, shrug, mug, snug, tug, cull, dull,
gull, hull, mull, null, scull, gum, hum, drum, glum, plum, mum, rum,
sum, bun, dun, gun, pun, run, sun, tun, stun, shun, up, cup, sup, bump,
crump, dumps, gump, hump, jump, lump, mumps, pump, rump, us, buss, fuss,
muss, rush, crush, gush, hush, mush, tush, bust, dust, gust, just, lust,
must, rust, crust, but, cut, gut, hut, jut, nut, rut, tut, bunk, funk,
sunk, drunk, trunk, hunt, punt, blunt, grunt, brunt, lunch, bunch,
hunch, munch, punch, bulk, sulk, skulk, gulp, pulp, gulf, tuft, bung,
hung, lung, clung, rung, stung, swung, strung, musk, rusk, dusk, tusk,
busk, mulct, buskin, musket, runlet, bucket, public. This same sound is
written with o in mother, brother, some, come, &c., and ou in touch, and
in rough, tough, enough, in which _gh_ sounds like ff.

The fourth extra vowel in English having no character for it is written,
first, with i, as irk, shirk, dirk, kirk, mirk, quirk, bird, gird,
whirl, quirl, girl, firm, first, chirp, shirt, sir, fir, stir, flirt,
spirt, squirt, squirm, girdle, &c. Secondly, with e, as in err, her,
herd, term, fern, pert, wert, overt, clerk, sperm, stern, insert,
vermin, perhaps, perplex, persist, expert, divert, superb, sterling,
verdict, pervert, ferment, fervent, servant, perfect, serpent, partner,
sever, several, inter, internal, fraternal, paternal, maternal,
external, infernal, interdict, intermix, infer; and generally the final
er, as silver, toper, &c. Thirdly, this vowel is written with o, as in
work, worm, word, worst, world, worth; and the final or, as in arbor,
ardor, vigor, &c. Fourthly, with an _u_, as in urn, burn, turn, churn,
spurn, cur, fur, blur, bur, purr, spur, curb, suburb, surd, curd, surf,
scurf, turf, turk, lurk, curl, furl, hurl, hurdle; and the finals ur,
or, and ture, as arbor, honor, perjure, injure, &c.

Another anomaly of English orthography is the silent e, at the end of so
many words; as doe, foe, hoe, roe, toe, cue, clue, blue, glue, flue,
give, live, lucre, axle, noble, ogle, reptile, fertile, sterile,
sextile, flexible, futile, missile, famine, jasmine, destine, pristine,
frigate, senate, reptile, legate, pensive, missive, active, captive,
festive, motive, sportive, illusive, defective, objective, elective,
invective, perspective, defensive, expensive, preventive, retentive,
progressive, vindictive, restrictive, instinctive, descriptive,
explosive, corrosive, delusive, exclusive, inclusive, preclusive,
intensive, palliative, narrative, relative, privative, lucrative,
intuitive, infinitive, explicative, figurative, imitative, indicative,
superlative, diminutive, retrospective, barnacle, spectacle, miracle,
pinnacle, article, particle, ventricle, edible, credible, flexible,
audible, enoble, ignoble, sensible, senile, juvenile, feminine,
eglantine, multiple, dissemble, assemble, quadrille, clandestine,
intestine, determine, illumine, calibre, ferule, marble, pebble, treble,
tremble, nibble, quibble, scribble, nimble, meddle, peddle, kindle,
spindle, fiddle, riddle, griddle, quiddle, middle, twinkle, gargle,
single, mingle, sparkle, speckle, sickle, tickle, trickle, dimple,
simple, pimple, ripple, triple, pickle, grizzle, little, brittle,
spittle, whittle, nettle, settle, kettle, startle, tinkle, sprinkle,
valise, marine, ravine, machine, Alexandrine, creditable, and other
words having the final syllable _ble_.

This silent e final is found also in words which have the diphthong i;
as bide, glide, hide, chide, ride, side, slide, tide, wide, bride, fife,
life, wife, rife, strife, bribe, jibe, dike, like, bile, file, mile,
pile, tile, vile, wile, smile, while, style, dime, time, mime, chime,
rime, prime, crime, dine, fine, thine, line, nine, mine, pine, spine,
shine, wine, swine, twine, vine, kine, chine, pipe, wipe, ripe, gripe,
snipe, tripe, stripe, type, vie, dire, fire, hire, mire, shire, sire,
tire, lyre, wire, spire, squire, tribe, scribe, bribe, jibe, bite, kite,
mite, smite, kite, write, white, trite, wise, lithe, blithe, writhe,
strive, thrive, drive, wive, alive, size, prize, agonize, paralyze,
sympathize, symbolize, &c.

E may also be considered silent, it is so obscure, in many words ending
in el and en; as harden, bidden, golden, garden, sicken, quicken,
thicken, stricken, broken, spoken, token, swollen, stolen, open, kitten,
mitten, smitten, bitten, given, molten, driven, woven, frozen, mizzen,
dizzen, tinsel, morsel, swivel, drivel, novel, model, level, bevel,
eleven, seven, &c.

U and e are both silent in the words rogue, brogue, fugue, eclogue,
prologue, apologue, epilogue, intrigue, fatigue, synagogue, demagogue,
pedagogue, decalogue, catalogue, mystagogue, picturesque, burlesque,
grotesque, pique, casique.

U is silent in guess, guest, guard, gaunt, flaunt, taunt, daunt, avaunt,
launch, staunch, laundry, laundress, liquor, piquet, coquette, paroquet,
exchequer, palanquin, guarantee, gauntlet, saunter, guilt, guitar,
built, build, biscuit, four, pour, court, gourd, mould, bourn, soul,
moult, shoulder, poultry, coulter; and w final, when preceded by vowels,
except when ow stands for ou diphthong, is silent.

I is silent in fruit, suit, recruit, bruise, cruise, heifer, surfeit,
forfeit, counterfeit, Madeira, and y in they, prey, whey, obey, heyday,
convey, survey, purvey.

W is silent in bow, low, mow, row, sow, tow, slow, blow, glow, flow,
snow, row, crow, grow, throw, bowl, own, blown, flown, grown, sown,
mown, growth, owner, toward, below, lower, disown, arrow, barrow,
farrow, harrow, marrow, fallow, gallows, hallow, shallow, sallow,
tallow, bellow, fellow, yellow, shadow, burrow, furrow, billow, pillow,
willow, widow, minnow, winnow, follow, hollow, morrow, sorrow.

A is silent in boat, coat, goat, doat, moat, groat, bloat, throat,
loath, oath, boast, coast, roast, coax, hoax, oak, soak, cloak, coach,
poach, roach, broach, goad, load, coal, foal, goal, shoal, oaf, loaf,
foam, loam, roam, loan, moan, groan, soap, oar, boar, soar, board,
hoard, hoarse, hoary, cocoa, gloaming, encroach, reproach, approach.

The silent consonants are k before n--(doubtless pronounced in Saxon
times,) in knit, knee, knell, kneel, knave, knife, knack, know, knead,
knives, knock, knuckle.

Also, g before n, as gnat, gnaw, gnarl, gnome, gnash, reign, deign,
sign, consign, assign, design, condign, benign, impugn, oppugn, arraign,
campaign.

Also, g before m, as phlegm, paradigm, &c.

Also, ch in schism and drachm.

Also, l before m, k, v, f, and d--as in alms, balm, calm, qualm, calf,
half, talk, balk, stalk, chalk, walk, folks, salve, halves, calves,
could, would, should, almond, salmon.

Also, p before s, and sh, as in pshaw, pseudo, psalm, psalter.

Also, b before t, as debt, doubt, subtle, indebted, undoubted, &c.

And b after m is silent, as lamb, jamb, climb, tomb, womb, numb, thumb,
crumb, dumb, plumb, comb, hecatomb, catacomb, currycomb, coxcomb,
succumb.

Also, n after m, as column, solemn, autumn, condemn, hymn, &c.

And d before t in stadtholder.

K is often unnecessarily used after c, and t before ch.

T after s is silent in listen, glisten, hasten, chasten, christen,
fasten, moisten, thistle, whistle, bristle, castle, nestle, pestle,
gristle, jostle, justle, hustle, bustle, rustle, epistle, apostle,
mistletoe, forecastle.

C after s is silent in scion, scent, scythe, muscle, sceptre, science,
sciatica, sciolism, scissure, scission, scissors, scenery, transcend,
descend, descent, viscid, crescent, proboscis, fascinate, viscera,
ascetic, excrescence, corpuscle, acquiesce, coalesce, rescission,
abscission, putrescence, ascendency, susceptible, irascible, viscidity,
eviscerate, lascivious, resuscitate, scimitar, scintillate,
phosphoresce, deliquesce, effloresce, effervesce, transcendent,
condescend, condescension, convalescence, concupiscence, reminiscence,
acquiescent, iridescent, arborescent, susceptibility, scenography,
sciography.

The initial h is often silent, as in hour, herbage, huge, honest, honor,
humor; also, after r, rhomboid, rheum, rhyme, myrrh, ghost, aghast,
catarrh, rhubarb, catarrhal, rheumatic, dishabille, rhapsody,
posthumous, hemorrhage, &c.

W is silent before r in wry, write, writhe, wrath, wreath, wreathe,
wrong, wretch, wright, wrist, wriggle, wrinkle; and before h in who,
whose, whom, whoop, whole.

What is especially puzzling about the English orthography, is the
unnecessary use of the same letter for different sounds. Thus s does not
always sound s--but sometimes sounds like z. (If all the sounds z were
written z, it would make our language look as full of z's as the
Polish.)

After all the sonorous labials, gutturals, and dentals, we cannot help
sounding z--as cabs, hods, rags, etc.; also, before m, as heroism,
paroxysm, somnambulism, materialism, &c.; in monosyllables ending with a
single s, as is, was, as, has, his, hers, ours, theirs; also, in daisy,
reside, desire, noisy, bosom, visage, closet, resign, music, prison,
reason, pansy, tansy, disown, preside, pleasant, peasant, prosaic,
present, presence, Tuesday, measles, cosmos, pleasure, measure,
treasure, leisure, disclosure, enclosure, composure, kerseymere,
resolute, devisor, revisal, reprisal, basilisk, deposit, courtesan,
raspberry, residue, venison, disaster, division, plausible, feasible,
basilicon, presbytery, resolute, deposit, president, visionary,
perquisite, exquisite, composite, resentment, carousal, espousal,
disposal.

Instead of c or k we have in many words ch--as Christ, chasm, chyle,
conch, chrome, ache, scheme, school, chaos, epoch, chorus, chronic,
echo, anchor, tetrarch, trochee, archives, scholar, schooner, monarch,
hierarch, chronicle, chrysalis, technical, mechanic, patriarch,
pentateuch, bacchanal, saccharine, chamomile, eucharist, character,
archetype, orchestra, catechize, catechism, alchemy, chemistry,
schedule, paschal, chaldee, stomach, lilach, sumach, chimera, heptarchy,
lachrymal.

All the above words are from the Greek, and so are those in which f is
written with ph, as sylph, lymph, sphere, sphinx, graphic, phalanx,
phantom, orphan, dolphin, camphor, pamphlet, sulphur, zephyr, hyphen,
trophy, philter, phaeton, spheroid, alphabet, emphasis, prophesy,
prophecy, caliphate, sophistry, &c.

The sound of s is substituted for the Latin guttural (hard c) in acid,
placid, facile, tacit, process, precinct, docile, recipe, illicit,
cinder, fleecy, census, pencil, precept, accede, recede, concede, cite,
pacify, lacerate, macerate, taciturn, oscillate, precede, implicit,
explicit, decimal, precipice, specify, specimen, abbacy, imbecile,
indocile, solicit, felicity, atrocity, ferocity, rapacity, tenacity,
veracity, vivacity, voracity, audacity, precocity, simplicity,
lubricity, rusticity, municipal, medicinal, rhinoceros, publicity,
diocesan, mendacity, mendicity, duplicity, elasticity, pertinacity,
incapacity, electricity, multiplicity, authenticity, duodecimo,
anticipates, necessary, countenance, abstinence, and all other words
which end in ce.[H]

The sound of j is substituted for that of g (the sonorous guttural) in
germ, genus, genius, angel, gentile, pigeon, dungeon, surgeon, sturgeon,
bludgeon, curmudgeon, sergeant, pageant, vengeance, stingy, dingy, &c.,
manger, danger, stranger, religion, badger, budget, gibbet, giblets,
allegiance, plagiarism, gibe, (sometimes and better jibe;) all words
ending in ge, as bilge, huge, barge, large, and all ending in dge, as
wedge, ledge, pledge, hedge, sledge, fledge, ridge, bridge, midge,
drudge, judge, lodge; all words ending gious, as prodigious, egregious,
sacrilegious, &c.; or in geous, as courageous, &c.; or in age, as
cottage, plumage, foliage, &c.

The extra consonant which we sometimes write sh, is written variously;
1st, simply with s, as in sugar, sensual, and sure, and its compounds;
2dly, with ss, in cassia; 3dly, with ci, in magician, logician,
patrician, optician, musician, academician, geometrician, mathematician;
and in a multitude of words ending in ious, as specious, gracious,
spacious, avaricious, auspicious, pertinacious, judicious, suspicious,
loquacious, audacious, sagacious, fallacious, capacious, rapacious,
tenacious, delicious, malicious, pertinacious, officious, capricious,
ferocious, atrocious, precocious, voracious, veracious, and perhaps some
others; also, in words ending with al, as official, judicial,
provincial, commercial, artificial, beneficial; and in sociable,
associate, appreciable and appreciate, enunciate, dissociate,
excruciate, depreciate, emaciate, denunciate, renunciate, prescient,
omniscient; 4thly, with ce, in cetaceous, filaceous, herbaceous,
caduceous, cretaceous, testaceous, crustaceous, argillaceous,
gallinaceous; 5thly, with ti, in factious, fractious, captious,
vexatious, facetious, licentious, factitious, propitious, flagitious,
nutritious, expeditious, superstitious, adventitious; vitiate,
expatiate, ingratiate, insatiate, initiate; partial, martial, nuptial,
initial, essential, substantial, credential, potential, prudential,
solstitial, impartial, penitential, equinoctial, influential,
reverential, pestilential, providential, circumstantial, ratio, and all
words ending in tion, as ration, nation, station, notion, diction,
fiction, friction, fraction, potion, action, junction, suction, section,
mention, libation, vacation, vocation, location, exhalation,
installation, implication, flagellation, appellation, revelation,
education, &c.; 6thly, with ch, as chicanery, seneschal.

In many words is a superfluous t, as in hitch, ditch, pitch, witch,
switch, stitch, flitch, stretch, sketch, etch, fetch, wretch, notch,
botch, hotch, potch, watch, latch, match, batch, catch, hatch, patch,
hutch.

In some words is a superfluous d, as badge, ledge, sledge.

And a superfluous k is very common.

Some of the above substitutions are perhaps natural enough, in
consequence of the fact of extra sounds, having no special characters
for them in the alphabet, which was phonography for the Latin language
only. But there are the same perplexing changes with respect to the
regular vowels.

Thus, in the case of e, when it is long, as in fête,--we find it written
in five ways,--ay, ai, ea, ey, and simply a.

As 1st, aye, day, bay, fay, gay, hay, pay, may, nay, say, ray, dray,
bray, gray, fray, play, pray, array, assay, allay, display, portray,
dismay, mislay.

2d. Aid, braid, laid, maid, paid, afraid, staid, bait, gait, wait, bail,
fail, hail, jail, mail, nail, pail, quail, rail, sail, tail, wail,
frail, flail, snail, trail, avail, entail, assail, fain, gain, lain,
main, pain, rain, vain, wain, train, grain, brain, stain, sprain, swain,
drain, dainty, portrait, saint, faint, paint, quaint, plaint, aim,
claim, maim, tailor, jailer, traitor, sailor, raiment, caitiff,
plaintiff, prevail, contain, chilblain, sustain, upbraid, declaim,
exclaim, proclaim.

3d. Break, steak, great.

4thly. They, convey, survey, &c.

5thly. Any, many, legation, asparagus, virago, volcano, verbatim,
arcanum, potato, octavo, tornado, and words ending in ace, ade, afe,
age, ake, ale, ame, ane, ape, ase, ate, athe, ave, ary, aste, aze, base,
case, face, grace, lace, mace, pace, ace, bade, fade, shade, made, wade,
safe, chafe, cage, sage, rage, gage, stage, page, wage, plumage,
foliage, cottage, bake, cake, lake, make, quake, rake, take, sake,
brake, flake, bale, dale, gale, hale, male, pale, sale, tale, whale,
vale, bane, cane, fane, lane, mane, pane, sane, wane, vane, bathe,
lathe, swathe, cave, gave, lave, nave, pave, rave, drave, grave, shave,
stave, crave, ate, bate, fate, date, gate, hate, late, mate, pate, rate,
sate, crate, prate, plate, state, skate, slate, waste, baste, haste,
paste, chaste, taste, came, blame, dame, fame, frame, game, lame, flame,
name, same, tame, frame, shame, cape, gape, nape, rape, grape, drape,
crape, blaze, daze, gaze, haze, maze, raze, craze, graze, glaze,
honorary, actuary, tributary, sedentary, primary, salutary, solitary,
burglary, contrary, &c.

So for the sound of i long, as in marine, we have sometimes e, sometimes
ee, sometimes ea, sometimes ie, as--

1st.--He, she, we, me, mete, glebe, theme, breve, veto, hero, zero,
negro, ether, theist, deist, edict, fever, lever, metre, zenith,
extreme, supreme, impede, serene, convene, gangrene, austere, cohere,
adhere, revere, severe, interfere, persevere, secret, complete,
concrete, secrete, obsolete, theorem, torpedo, inherent.

2d.--Fee, bee, lee, glee, flee, free, tree, see, three, eel, feel, keel,
reel, peel, wheel, deem, seem, keen, green, queen, teens, ween, deed,
feed, heed, meed, need, reed, seed, bleed, creed, leek, meek, sleek,
seek, week, cheek, beef, reef, keep, sweep, weep, deep, peep, sleep,
beech, speech, leech, spleen, compeer, between, beseech, discreet,
steeple, vaneer, career, tureen, moreen, careen, redeem, agreed, settee,
razee, degree, agree, decree, grandee, linseed, peevish, esteem,
devotee, legatee, referee, repartee, patentee, absentee, privateer,
muleteer, overseer, volunteer, chanticleer, domineer, gazetteer,
genteel, indiscreet, steelyard, thirteen, &c.

3d.--Pea, tea, yea, flee, plea, bohea; each, beach, breach, bleach,
teach, meach, peach; bleak, sneak, streak, speak, squeak, beak, peak,
creak, teak, creak, freak, tweak, weak, bead, lead, read, plead, deaf,
leaf, sheaf, beam, ream, dream, cream, stream, team, steam, seam, deal,
heal, leal, meal, peal, seal, steal, veal, zeal, bean, dean, lean, mean,
wean, yean; heap, cheap, leap, reap; ear, fear, hear, blear, clear,
smear, near, spear, rear, drear, year, beard, east, beast, feast, least,
yeast, eat, beat, feat, heat, meat, neat, peat, seat, wheat, bleat,
cheat, treat, heath, sheathe, breathe, heave, weave, leave, treacle,
eagle, eaglet, squeamish, dreary, weary, creature, impeach, anneal,
appeal, reveal, endear, appear, arrear, besmear, defeat, release,
increase, decrease, beneath, repeat, entreat, retreat, bereave,
bequeath, cochineal, eatable, easterly, deanery.

4th. Where the e is silent; either, neither, seizure, surfeit,
inveigle, forfeit, mullein, fief, chief, thief, brief, grief, field,
shield, wield, yield, fiend, priest, belief, sieve, grieve, belief,
achieve, retrieve, relieve, aggrieve, cashier, brigadier, grenadier,
cannonier, cavalier, cordelier; also receive, conceive, perceive,
deceive, deceit, conceit.

The sound of u is also written oe, o, ew, oo, and ou (silent o), shoe,
canoe, woman, chew, brew, screw, threw, shrew, sew, dew, few, jew, mew,
new, pew, coo, too, loo, woo, tattoo, bamboo, hindoo, food, good, hood,
mood, rood, stood, wood, book, cook, hook, look, nook, rook, took, cool,
drool, fool, stool, wool, spool, boom, broom, doom, bloom, groom, loom,
gloom, room, boon, spoon, coon, swoon, loon, shalloon, moon, picaroon,
noon, soon, poltroon, cocoon, platoon, festoon, monsoon, baboon, coop,
droop, hoop, loop, poop, stoop, boor, moor, poor, goose, moose, noose,
boot, coot, foot, hoot, loot, moot, root, soot, booty, roof, behoof,
aloof, reproof, proof, groove, soothe, smooth, tooth, booth, boost,
roost, pantaloon.

It is also written with a silent o, as in tour, croup, group, youth,
wound, souvenir, surtout, cartouche, contour, amour, uncouth, accoutre,
moustache, tambourine.

I have said that I give to my scholars "Mother Goose," as soon as they
have mastered my first "Nursery Reading-Book." But this is for
recreation; while all the important _work_ is making the groups of
exceptional words upon their slates, at my dictation. Sometimes these
can be written on the blackboard, and copied into little books, by the
children. When there are several ways of writing the same sound, I make
several columns, and put at the head of each a word thus:--

         i,  |  e, | ee,  |   ie,
        pin, | me, | see, | grieve;

and then, mentioning different words, ask in which column they are to be
put? The children are greatly interested in this exercise; and the
effect of it is, to make them know the precise spelling of the words.
When a column is finished, they are called on to read the words, and
sometimes to repeat the group by heart.

I have not put all the words in the language in my groups; but enough
for the purpose,--they can be filled up from the teacher's and
children's memories.

The greater the anomaly, the more easily it is remembered, because the
specimens are few, and the anomaly amuses.

Thus, I sometimes begin (after I have shown them how to write the extra
vowels and consonants, and the diphthongs,) with the word _phthisic_;
asking them all to write it on their slates as they think it should be;
and then writing it myself, as it is, on the board. So I ask them to
write _through_, which they will write _thru_. I then surprise them by
writing it on the black-board, and putting in the silent vowel and
consonants. Then I ask them to write _bough_; and then _though_, and
_dough_; then _trough_, which they will write troth; then laugh,
draught, tough, which they will write with f for the gh. In reviewing
the lesson the next day, all these words can be written in their
manuscript books, with a lead-pencil. The book, which is the best one to
follow Mother Goose, and perhaps might precede it, is Mrs. Mann's
"Primer of Reading and Drawing." This begins with about twenty pages of
words that can be read at once by those who have used the "First Nursery
Reading-Book," because the Roman alphabet is a phonography for it all.
Mrs. Mann's book is full of sentences that have beautiful meanings, and
it contains some attractive stories. It has been out of print a long
time; but a new edition is about being put to press.

But any book can be used by a person of judgment. The mother of the
Wesleys always taught her children to read in the Bible from the
beginning.

In good reading, words are not only to be pronounced, but to be read
with expression; and this end is gained by its coming after
object-learning. Unless a child conceives what a word means, he cannot
have the appropriate emotion, and without the emotion he cannot read
with expression. In hurrying children on to read faster than they can
understand and feel, permanent bad habits are acquired, and especially
the habit of reading without sufficiently filling the lungs with breath;
and this not only makes disagreeable reading for the hearer; but is very
injurious to the health of the reader.

Dr. H. F. Briggs, of New York, who teaches elocution as a means of
health, proposes that there should be exercises of vocalizing,--uttering
each vowel sound to express all kinds of emotion which the special vowel
will express, and in all quantities and accents. Children are all
naturally histrionic and will be amused in doing this. The vowel sounds
educate emotions in those who utter them, and awaken them in those who
hear. When pronounced with feeling, they come from the chest and abdomen
and not from the head merely, and so give a general internal exercise
that is healthy. Bronson's "Elocutionist" will give a teacher much
assistance in this branch, though he has not worked out the thing so
completely as Dr. Briggs has done.

It is proper to remark to those who measure the success of a school by
the _rapidity_ with which it teaches a child to read, that the thorough
attainment of the art here proposed, requires _time_. But when attained,
much is gained besides the mere reading,--namely, development of body,
mind, and heart.

Besides, to those who are hereafter to be taught other languages it will
be found of great advantage to have associated the vowel sounds of ark,
ebb, ill, old, and rue, with the characters a, e, i, o, u, respectively.
See for the proof of this, some articles on "Kraitsir's Significance of
the Alphabet," published in "The North American Review" for 1849.

      The _First Nursery Reading Book_ and Mrs. MANN'S
      _Primer of Reading and Drawing_ being out of print,
      Mr. E. STEIGER is about to print their substance
      together with the foregoing chapter as Preface to a
      _Primer of Reading and Writing, for the Intermediate
      Class_.

FOOTNOTES:

[E] See the _North American Review_ of January and April--articles
_Kraitsir's Significance of the Alphabet_, from the pen of an eminent
philologist; also Kraitsir's _Nature of Language and Language of
Nature_, published in 1851, by George P. Putnam in New York.

[F] The only possible advantage the present spelling has, is the help it
gives to Etymologists, but it also often confuses them. A perfect
alphabet, that is, an alphabet with eight more characters than the
Roman, would have been the right thing to have had in the right place
and time.

[G] k, q, and y were not Roman letters but Greek ones, k being
introduced into the Latin originally as an abbreviation of ca and q as
an abbreviation of cu. J and x were introduced into our alphabet by the
first printers, but we have appropriated j to a new sound, not in the
Latin language; and we have two sounds for x, (as printed Latin has),
one being gs and the other cs. The Latins at first wrote lex legs, and
vox vocs, as we see by the variations of these nouns for case.

[H] Nearly every one of these words are derived from the Latin, but they
come into the English language from the Norman-French in which they were
already corrupted. All nouns in ce are from Latin nouns in tia, and
ought to have been written with se instead of ce, except peace and voice
which come from the Latin pace and voce.




CHAPTER XII.

GRAMMAR AND LANGUAGES.


MRS. MANN has suggested, in the last part of this volume, the first
exercises in grammar. But grammar is the most abstract of sciences.
There are at present few children sent to Kindergartens, who are not too
young for the abstracting processes of classing words into parts of
speech.

But it is a lesson of orthography, to lead the children to make the few
changes which there are in English words, to denote grammatical
modifications. For instance, let them write cat, and then say--"If you
are talking about more than one cat, what do you say?" They will say
_cats_. Let them write at the head of two columns--cat and cats. After
some exercises on words adding s only, tell them to write box, and ask,
"What if there are more than one?" Then go on and get groups of other
irregularities, as changing f into ves, y into ies, &c. Having gone over
the nouns, and told all their changes, for number, also letting the
children write a list of the nouns that do not change for number, go
into verbs, and give the few personal terminations thus: tell the
children to write, _I cry_. Then say, "Would you say George cry?" "No,"
they will reply, "George _cries_." I say, "I have a book; but should I
say, George have a book?" They will say,--"No; George has a book." Also
by asking questions whose answers shall give the comparison of
adjectives, these can be written; and finally the past tense and past
participles of irregular verbs. In my own Kindergarten I have given to
about half a dozen children who know how to read fluently, and can
print very prettily, a little LATIN. It is but a quarter of an hour's
lesson, and is conducted in this wise:--Write down _am_. Now, that means
love in Latin; but if you want to say he loves you, add _at_, which
makes _amat_. Write down _ar_. That means plough; if you want to write
_he ploughs_ you write what? A bright child said _arat_. Now write down
_cant_. That means sing. Now if you want to say he sings, you add what?
_at_, then it is _cantat_. But if you want to say _to love_ you must add
_are_ to _am_. They all said _amare_. Now, if you want to say to plough?
_arare_; and to sing, _cantare_. Now make the whole sentence, he loves
to sing. What is it he loves? They all wrote _amat cantare_. Now write
he loves to plough. They wrote _amat arare_. I took the hint from
Harkness's edition of "Arnold's First Lessons," and gave them six
variations on the four regular conjugations, the infinitive and the
third person singular of the present imperfect and future indicative,
and Latinized their own names; and they were greatly entertained to
improvise sentences, the most complicated of which was, O Helena, Anna
loves to dance, Maria loves to sing. I give them no grammatical terms,
but only English meanings, and shall not give any cases but the
nominative and vocative at present; but I think I shall teach them to
vary verbs throughout all the conjugations. It is perfectly easy to give
so much of Latin grammar to children in the Kindergarten, because it
will not involve the use of a book. They can have a manuscript book into
which they can write their words and sentences, in print-letters.

French, so far as it can be taught by merely conversing with the
children, is legitimate in the Kindergarten; also any other modern
language. But let there be no books used, nor should French be written
by the children, for it will confuse their English spelling, and not,
like Latin words, aid it. In my Kindergarten, about a quarter of an hour
a day is given to making French phrases by all but the smallest
children. They have also been greatly interested in learning the French
words of a play, which is a useful exercise in pronunciation. I will
give the words here:--

L'ESTURGEON (_Sturgeon_).

        Commère Perche,
          Je vous salue!
        Comment vous portez-vous?

LA PERCHE (_Perch_).

        Je me porte très bien, et vous?
          Quelle est l'heure pour le ragoût
        Fait de sole et de morue?

LA SOLE ET LA MORUE (_Sole and Cod_).

        Commère Perche, je vous salue;
        Nous autres ne serons pas un ragoût.

L'ESTURGEON.

          Commère Baleine,
        Comment vous portez-vous?

LA BALEINE (_Whale_).

        Très bien, et vous?

L'ESTURGEON.

        Pouvez-vous sauter en haut
          Comme moi,
        Au dessus de l'eau?

LA BALEINE.

          Je ne puis sauter si haut;
        Mais je saurais faire jeter de l'eau.

L'ESTURGEON.

        Commère Hareng, je vous salue,
        Dites moi, je prie, où allez-vous?

LA HARENG (_Herring_).

        Je vais chez moi, chercher les jeunes,
        Alors nous irons à l'océan.

L'ESTURGEON.

        Commère Brochet, je vous salue!
        Commère Brochet, que mangez-vous?

LE BROCHET (_Pike_).

        Je mange des truites
          Pour mon déjeuner,
        Et des éperlans
          Pour mon diner.

L'ESTURGEON.

        Commère truite,
          Je vous salue!
        Dites moi, je vous prie,
          Qu'avez-vous?

LA TRUITE (_Trout_).

        Ah, par exemple,
          J'ai bien grand peur;
        Voilà le brocheton
        Même si de bonne heure!

L'ESTURGEON.

        Commère Requin,
          Je vous salue!
        Que faites-vous là
          Auprès du bateau.

LE REQUIN (_Shark_).

        Je veux manger
          Le petit garçon,
        Qui pêche dans l'eau.
          Pour l'éperlan.

L'EPERLAN (_Smelt_).

          Petit garçon,
            Je vous salue!
          Voilà la Requin
        Près de moi, et près de vous.

(_Tous les poissons se plongent._)

The play consists in each fish being represented by a child; and the
little boy also. As the Sturgeon asks her questions, she jumps up and
down, and as the fishes answer, they jump up and down, till all are in
motion. But, before it is played, the whole must be learnt,--which is
nearly a winter's work.

      In the Kindergarten connected with Madame Kriege's
      Normal class in Boston, German is taught at the same
      time with English; or at least as soon as the children
      can read English with tolerable fluency.

      And Mrs. Kriege would doubtless, if desired, teach the
      Normal scholars German; but to learn German they would
      need to remain in the training-school more than six
      months, the time she decides to be the least possible
      for preparation to be a Kindergartner.




CHAPTER XIII.

GEOGRAPHY.


MR. SHELDON, in his "Elementary Instruction," has shown the way in which
we may begin to teach geography without books. To proceed in that way,
up to the point of drawing all maps, is feasible in a Kindergarten, if
the children stay long enough. My children learn a great deal about the
geographical locality of animals, from the natural history lessons given
over the blocks. A "Picturesque Geography," compiled by Mrs. Mann, from
the most brilliant descriptions of travellers, may by and by be printed,
and it would be a good book to read to children. It should be read
slowly, requiring them to tell what it makes them see in their fancy.
This comprises a great deal of physical geography, and is a desirable
precursor of political geography, which will be studied to most
advantage by and by, with history. (But history is altogether beyond the
Kindergarten.)

As soon as children know how to read, we advise that they be taught
topography by Mr. Theodore Fay's atlas, according to his method,--which
secures that they learn the maps by looking at the places as
represented, and not by _words_, which can be learned without conveying
the image, or an idea; and are easily forgotten.




CHAPTER XIV.

THE SECRET OF POWER.


IN the foregoing pages I have done what I can, to make a Kindergarten
Guide; not only for the use of those who undertake the new education,
but in order to give parents a definite idea of the value of the new
education to their children, and how they may aid rather than hinder its
legitimate effect. Parents who live in places so isolated as to make a
Kindergarten impossible, may also get some hints how to supply the want
in some measure, by becoming themselves the playmates of their children.

I think it will be readily inferred, from what I have said, that the
secret of power and success is _gradualism_. Any child can learn
anything, if time and opportunity is given to go step by step. Then
learning becomes as easy and agreeable as eating and drinking. Every
degree of knowledge, also, must be practically used as soon as attained.
It then becomes a power; makes the child a power in nature; and prepares
him, when his spirit shall come into union with the God of Nature, and
Father of Human Spirits, to become a power over Nature--"for the glory
of God and relief of man's estate."




MORAL CULTURE OF INFANCY.


LETTER I.

MY DEAR ANNA,--I had heard of your intention of keeping school before
you wrote to me, and had rejoiced for the good cause as only one can do
who knows your peculiar qualifications for it. I have been full of the
purpose of answering your letter, to tell you how joyfully I look
forward to the realization of some of my wishes through your help, such
as that of perfecting some beautiful plan of education, which you and I,
with our faith in perfectibility, might invent, but which I could not
make alone. When we parted many years since, in one of those beautiful
porticos of the temple of knowledge, where we had together been warmed
by the fires of genius, and where our sympathy (perhaps I should say
_yours_) had rekindled a certain torch of enthusiasm that had been long
quenched by adversity--(I sadly fear it is smouldering again under the
ashes of freshly-buried hope)--I little expected to meet you again in my
favorite walk, made fragrant by the breath of little children. If we had
chanced to meet often enough since then, we should have found much to
reunite us, for my best teachers have been certain wise
mothers;--indeed, the only schools in which I have found the instruction
I needed, have been the nurseries and firesides to which I have been
admitted, often through my loving interest in the little flowers that
bloomed around them. I could tell you, if I dared, how many times I have
wished I could be queen of such kingdoms, for the sake of the younger
subjects of those realms, for I have learned quite as much from the
mistakes as from the wisdom I have witnessed.

My desire to gather all I could, from the efforts and experience of
others, once tempted me on an exploring expedition through our much
vaunted Primary Schools. What would you say if I were to tell you that
I met with but one spirit kindred to my own in the whole circuit? Among
all the hard, knotty women, young and old, whom I found presiding over
youthful destinies in this extensive organization, I found one lovely
young creature who _loved_ all her scholars, and who, by the power of
this love, contrived partially to mitigate the horrors of benches
without backs, long rote spelling-lessons, crowded and ill-ventilated
rooms, tedious periods of idleness in which little darlings had to sit
up straight and not speak or fidget (which last I consider one of the
prerogatives of childhood). Her face radiated sunshine, her voice was
music itself, and yet firm, and she often varied her routine of
exercises, prescribed by the primary school committee, with a pleasant
little story to illustrate some principle she wished the children to act
upon. She was the only one who had interpolated a regular entertaining
lesson into the routine, and this she effected by nipping some of the
prescribed lessons five minutes each, so as to save twenty for her
little treatise upon some interesting subject of natural history. I
quite agreed with her that it was a species of petty larceny for which
she would be acquitted in the courts above.

I could describe sad, heart-breaking scenes of youthful misery and
terror, injustice and daily cruelty in these schools. In several cases
my indignation was so much aroused that I was obliged to leave the room
to avoid showing my excited feelings. My sympathy for suppressed yawns,
limbs suddenly outstretched, or wry faces made behind the teachers'
backs; tearful eyes, sleepy little heads nodding on fat shoulders, was
so great, that I often smiled upon them when the teacher did not see
_me_. I returned to my own little free republic, after spending one of
my vacation weeks thus, more resolved than ever not to coerce babes into
the paths of knowledge. Many a spine had its first bend there, I doubt
not, and many a child learned to hate school in such scenes of
discomfort. I have no doubt there were among the teachers many
conscientious ones who did as well as they knew how under such a system.
If such schools could be presided over by genius, and such geniuses
could be left to their own judgment about what to teach and how to teach
it, the experience of Mr. Alcott in his first Infant School among the
poor of the North End proves that primary Education can be made for all,
what we can make it who have the advantage of teaching in our own
parlors.

It is astonishing to me that greater improvements have not already been
made in this public school education. Often when I am sitting in my
pleasant school-room with these favored children of wealthy parents
around me, my thoughts recur to those crowded rooms, and the only remedy
I see is, that school committees shall be formed of _women_. I believe
many of the women I saw teaching in those primary schools would do
better if left to their own instincts about the children. They have no
liberty whatever, except such stolen liberty as I mentioned in the case
of Miss E. What do _men_ know about the needs of little children just
out of nurseries? If I were one of the school committee, with _carte
blanche_, I would have "stir-the-mush" or "puss-in-the-corner" among the
exercises, with singing every hour, and marching and clapping of hands.
And I would have well-ventilated rooms instead of such hot, suffocating
places, warmed by large iron stoves.

And as I see the poor and neglected children in the streets, or in their
own wretched houses, and how they live and grovel in low practices,
gradually losing the sweet innocence of infantile expression, and
becoming coarse and violent, even brutal, I wonder still more at the
torpidity of society upon this subject. Nothing is such a proof of its
selfishness as this neglect. Nothing makes me feel so keenly the need of
a new organization of things. I do not like the thought of merging the
sacred family relation in communities where all live together in public
as it were, but it seems as if something might be done for the children
of the needy that is not yet done. These poor city children are
sequestered even from the influences of Nature. How strange that the
more favored individuals should not seek every means to give them what
culture they can have amid these brick walls. So much might be done by
the help of the salient imagination of childhood, that we should be
helped more than half way by blessed Nature herself. I often take an
unfashionable walk inside the Mall on Sunday afternoon, when the Irish
people bring their babes to play upon the green. I think it is the best
institution in the city, and it would be a good idea to appoint a
Commissioner in each ward to bring all the street children there every
day and watch them while they play, and see that all have fair play. If
school committees were formed of women, I think such an office might be
created.

What faith we need to forgive heaven for the things that are! "How much
that is, is _not_ right," I am sometimes tempted to exclaim. I have no
idea, however, that Pope meant anything but the eternal IS, when he
wrote "Whatever is, is right." It would have been better for superficial
thinkers, if he had never said it however, for I often hear it quoted to
defend what I consider the marring, not the making of God's plans. I
have no doubt there is a remedy for every individual case of misery in
this world, if eyes were only open to see it, but this couching process
is the needful thing, and _that_ God has left us to think out for
ourselves. We know that there are millions who live and die in ignorance
of all that makes God _God_, or a Father. To these he is only the being
that created them, and they may well ask, "Why did he make us? to
suffer? to sin?"--for they are conscious only of the irregularities of
that creation by which they are tortured. They never see the wonderful
adaptation of things to each other;--they know nothing of the harmonies
of their being with the being of others, or with Nature. The sort of
education they get in cities, where life is stirring briskly around
them, and each one seems scrambling to get the best morsel for himself,
only makes them worse, unless something is done to evoke order for them
out of this chaos. Their belief in Deity is a superstitious feeling
about some supernatural power that exercises dominion over them, and
subjects them to an imperious necessity. In the agony of death they cry
aloud for fear; for they know they have made their fellow-men suffer,
and death is a mirror that holds them up to themselves. Conscience
breathes upon the glass, and in the dissolving picture its countenance
is recognized,--but this is a base fear, and cannot be called an
aspiration. To make sure the foundations of faith in God, one must know
what God has done for him. Man must be made acquainted with his own
nature before God's benevolence can be realized. If I did not think
ignorance was at the root of all human evil, I should not have any hope;
but though its kingdom is very large, no despot can be so easily driven
from the throne. I hope all this does not seem irrelevant to the matter
we are discussing; it brings me nearer to the point I wished to reach. I
believe in that redemption which knowledge and principle combined bring
to the soul that has slumbered in darkness. Its recuperative power is
its most glorious attribute. The tendency of the character is so often
imparted in earliest youth, that if this is right, if the first
impressions of life and its author are the true ones, the rest of the
education may almost with impunity be left to what is called chance. But
if a child lives to the age of eight or ten years, without a ray of
light which will explain his existence and position to himself; or lead
him through Nature up to God; it must be difficult to inspire him
afterwards with the true filial feeling toward his heavenly parent. And
if, by a longer period of darkness, he has found that in a certain sense
he can live without God in the world, he will stand a poor chance of
realizing that he cannot do so in ordinary life after the period of
impressible youth is past. I believe the soul will to all eternity have
renewed chances to redeem itself; but I cannot easily give up this first
life. When I think of the beautiful adaptations of the world to our
wants; of the exquisite gratification the knowledge of these brings to
the mind; of the harmonies of our existence with all other existences;
and of the power of virtue to triumph over the earthward tendencies of
this double human nature, and to sacrifice the present to the future
good;--when I think of what the perfect man can be,--I cannot be
reconciled that one should live and not have the keys to unlock this
part of the universe. Childhood is in our power. The helpless little
beings must be taken care of. The world waits upon the babe, as has
truly been said; and is not this one of those beautiful provisions of
Nature which show us how

        "There's a divinity that shapes our ends,
         Rough-hew them as we will!"

"The child is father of the man," indeed; and while the heart bounds
lightly, let us teach this youthful father the religion of Nature, which
he can understand. When he comes to riper years he will be ready to
comprehend the religion of the Spirit, without danger of superstition or
bigotry.

One obstacle to such instruction in Christendom is, doubtless, the very
prevalent feeling that the study of Nature leads to scepticism about
revealed religion. This injury has been done to religion's self by the
fact that a few learned men have been scoffers at Christianity, or
rather at what has been accepted as Christianity, and it is the
association of their names which is the foundation of the prejudice. The
discrepancy also between the discoveries of science and the imagery of
the Hebrew poets who _sang_ about creation, is another cause; but since
Mr. Silliman has ventured to say that there probably were a great many
deluges, the ice of that difficulty has been cracked in _our_ community.

I see no reason why simple religious lessons, like those Mr. Waterston
gives in his Sunday-school, may not be given in the public schools. You
will say, we must have Mr. Waterston to do it, (and that is true indeed,
now,) but when the public mind is ready for such instruction, such
teachers will come up to supply the demand.

My first introduction to natural science was in listening to
instruction of this kind given to children older than myself, under the
sanction of a mother's authority. They were lessons in Astronomy and
Chemistry, given before there were any elementary books upon such
subjects; and they so kindled my imagination, when a very young child,
and gave me such a realizing sense of the presence of God around me,
whom I had already known as a Heavenly Father, who took care of me and
of all men, by night as well as by day, that from that time I never lost
the child's sense of nearness, or felt any of those fears of the
supernatural which haunt the imagination of uninstructed childhood. And
yet I was in the habit of listening to the stories of an old crone who
believed in the witches of Salem, where she had always resided, as
firmly as she believed in the God that made her. When I first heard the
remark that the study of Nature tended to make men atheistic, I resented
it with indignation, though but a child.

This, then, is the kind of teaching that I think adapted to childhood.
It need not be exclusive, but let it predominate. Other faculties,
beside the emotions of wonder and veneration, may be cultivated side by
side with these. Memory, comparison, judgment, and calculation may be
strengthened by a judicious and well-proportioned teaching of the
elements of languages and numbers, thus insuring the tools for future
acquisition. But this is not direct food for the soul. The young heart
is full of love for its parents, of delight at the knowledge of new
things, and these affections may be guided into adoration of Supreme
Intelligence; this love of knowledge turned to its source, as easily and
naturally as the stream flows from the mountain to the sea.

Side by side with this higher cultivation I would teach the eye, the
hand, and the ear to practise, and to work readily. The pencil should
ever be in the hand, the picture before the eye,--especially when the
objects of Nature cannot be, and sweet sounds in the ear. The love of
activity is sufficient aid without the debasing influence of emulation.
Facts are divine teaching, and a clear perception of them the basis of
all theories; therefore they should be clearly and sharply presented and
discriminated. When children are led to see their own ignorance, let
them understand that we, who appear to them the concentration of all
wisdom, ("Pallas-Minervas," as one of my little readers of Homer called
me one day), are also ignorant in presence of the universe, which is
full of things to be known, and they will not be discouraged, but only
more eager to learn what they can of these worlds of knowledge; and will
think of those still to be conquered rather than of any little
acquirements of their own, thus escaping the dangers both of despondency
and vanity. Let children lead this happy life till they are eight or
nine, and let it be so full and blessed by love, sympathy, and the play
of the creative imagination, that it will lift them over the rough
places for many more years, while they shall build stone walls and
towers of facts, as starting-places for future flights. It is the
observation of every experienced heart that the most hardened sinner may
be more easily redeemed, if he can be reminded of an infancy of purity
and golden sunshine. If true, it is an argument for prolonging that
infancy as far as possible, that the recollection of it, if
unfortunately dimmed, may the more surely revive in those deep moments
of existence, when the soul is thrown back upon itself for support and
consolation; whether they be moments of guilt or of sorrow, of
disappointed ambition or disappointed hope, of wounded pride, or wounded
faith.

I am aware that the public schools are the hope of our land and its
glory, and schools are the best world for children to grow up in when
properly regulated; but I wish they need not be so large, so that there
need be but one sovereign in each. Still more desirable is it, however,
that none but living souls should ever have the privilege of unlocking
the treasures of knowledge and thought for children. It is not enough to
have deep and varied acquirements, but there must be a native delight in
communicating, and a sympathy--a living sympathy--with every human
being. These alone will awaken the love of excellence and call forth the
powers of the mind. No one should ever have the care of children who
does not love them because they _are_ children, or who can ever feel the
undertaking an irksome task. I always regret to see the occupation
entered upon as a last resort for a livelihood, or by those whose
spirits can no longer respond to the touch of childhood. It must be a
strong spirit that, in such instances, can rise again to meet the
bounding hopes of fresh being. It is like going back to principles, when
our experience fails to answer our just demands for highest happiness.
In the faith of childhood, which knows no doubt, we can see that one
experience is not the test of what our birthright is; and while we do
not neglect the warnings we have had, we must never think that our
single experience has exhausted the source whence truth flows.

I believe, too, that the germ of everything is in the human soul; and
this faith seems to me essential to a teacher. Education is not the
creation, but only the bringing forth of these germs, and that alone is
a true education which brings them forth in fair proportions. To make
children learn something tangible, if I may so speak, and to keep them
quiet, are the usual aims of a teacher, and success in these is the
usual test of his value; but they seem to me not to be his highest
merit. I have often waited long, and I have learned to wait patiently,
for anything like _results_. There is a certain harmonious play of the
faculties, to the production of which I direct my efforts, and which I
watch for with intense interest in my children, (for they seem to me
mine,) and this can never be cultivated if one is bound by any formulas.
I consider myself fortunate that my own mind has always enjoyed its
birthright of freedom; that no iron habits have bound me to any
mechanical system. My advantage is a negative one, perhaps, for I never
had much training of an intellectual kind, my physical education being
the chief object in my childhood. I was at least saved from such
formality as enabled the teacher of a distinguished school to say in my
presence, that "the less boys understood or were interested in their
lessons, the better the discipline of study." This was surely making the
process as mechanical a one as the motions of a trip-hammer. But there
you have an immense advantage over me. You have been well trained, and
yet measured by no Procrustean bed, for your most living teacher never
wore any fetters herself, and could not impose any. Am I not right? Your
summer retreat has been "twice blessed" in having such advantages of
highest education, added to the influences of Nature, which you so
dearly love. You are bound to open your eyes as beamingly as she does,
upon all who come under their glance, to show your gratitude for such
teachings. I well remember your frequent descriptions of those "large
orbs" that presided over the most interesting part of your youthful
training. I have seen those eloquent eyes myself, and can conceive their
power when animated with the inspiring pleasure of pouring the treasures
of thought into a receiving soil. And you are not the only one whom I
have heard discourse of this source of inspiration. Your best study,
too, was in the season when the reins are generally relaxed. The time
when I received most benefit from study, solitary and unaided, and even
_stolen_ as it was, (for the family decree was that, I being an invalid,
must not study,) was when I pursued my lessons in an orchard, and
generally in a tree, or sitting in the baby's breakfast-chair, in the
midst of a shallow, rushing river, under a sweeping willow. I was
brought up so much out of doors, that walls were oppressive to me.
Indeed, I look back upon it as the only time of my childhood when any
variety of influences acted upon me at once; and one which I ought not
to omit to mention, was a much admired friend, who knew how to point out
to me, leaf and flower in hand, what riches of knowledge were stored up
in Nature for her children. I do not know but what my love of these
hidden treasures was stimulated by the fear of being deprived of them.
Owing to this fear I probably arrived earlier in life at that point
which I have always contended was the great point in education,--the
time when one takes it into one's own hands. But I do not think that
your "two outward advantages" of motherhood and education, constitute
all your qualifications for the task you have undertaken. I know what
soil was warmed into fruitfulness by the rays shed from the sun of
genius. Now, you are bound to fulfil my hopes, and if my own path is not
smoothed by your help, I shall call you to account for my
disappointment. I will give you my small experience, and tell you how I
found out methods, because they were _not_ practised upon me; and I bid
forth your power of deducing theories and improvements that will cheer
us both onward. For want of more interested auditors, I often pour out
my plans for educing order out of the little chaoses committed to my
care, to ears that stretch to their utmost for politeness' sake, and for
my sake, perhaps; but not for the thing I wish to impart.


LETTER II.

MY DEAR ANNA,--I will begin by telling you that I can do the thing
better than I can describe it. You must let me tell you stories out of
my school-room to illustrate the wisdom of my proceedings. I can hardly
tell you my enjoyment of the fresh affections of children, of their love
of knowledge (of _new things_, as it always is to them), of their ready
apprehension of principles, of their quick response to truth, their
activity and buoyancy, their individuality, their promise. Sometimes I
look forward for them, and tremble at what awaits them, when I see
tendencies to evil or weakness. I know that every ill in their various
paths may be made stepping-stones to highest good; but the doubt whether
they will be made so, the certainty of the long and sharp pains of
conflict, the dying down of hope, (that happily, I know, can yet rise
Phœnix-like from its own ashes,) these, and many perils by the way, that
my brooding heart points out to me, often oppress me, and I could wish
them spared. When it is remembered how man has marred the work of God,
how different his part ought to be from what it is, and how long it must
be before the individuals of the race can work themselves free from the
crust of evil that has grown over the whole, I think I may be pardoned
for these heart aches; but I know they are not my highest moments. It
has been deeply said that pain is the secret of Nature. I have that
within me which responds to it. I must feel it for others as well as for
myself, and shall constantly do so when my faith is perfected. I am
grateful that I exist, for I can look upon what we call _this life_ as
only the beginning of a long career, in which I shall ever look back and
rejoice that I have been a human being, whatever may be the ills that I
suffer from just now. The consciousness of the capacities of expanding
intellect and of glorious affections, assure me that the destiny of the
soul will compensate for the heritage of woe, which this life is to many
of us. Thus I try to look beyond the conflicts I see in the future of
these little beings who now dance joyfully around me.

You will wonder, perhaps, that one can conceive such a personal interest
in the children of others; but it will come to you in time. You have
truly said, that it needs all the tenderness of a mother, and her vital
self-forgetting interest in the result, to enable her to find the true
path of Nature from the beginning, and remove all obstacles to free
unfolding. But many a mother sacrifices her elder children, as it were,
to this discovery. As the germ of the maternal sentiment is in all
women, relations may be established between teacher and child that may
take the place of the natural one, so far as to answer all the purposes
required. Such a relation is the only foundation upon which a true
education can go on. It leaves no room for a division of interests
between child and teacher, which division alone has the power forever
to destroy all the best benefits of the communication of mind, and is
generally, indeed, an effectual barrier against any _communication_ at
all. Such a relation as I would have does away with every feeling of
reserve that might check the full and free expression of thought and
feeling. A young child should turn to its teacher, as well as to its
mother, with the undoubting confidence that _there_ is a wealth of love
equal to all occasions. When my little scholars call me "mother," which
they often do from inadvertence, I feel most that I am in the true
relation to them. I have in some instances been preferred before the
mother, because I was the fountain of knowledge and even of tenderness
to starved and neglected little souls. A very sensitive child of seven
years old, who always said "can't," when any task, even the simplest,
was set before her, but who was, nevertheless, so morbidly conscientious
that she was miserable not to be able to accomplish anything that she
thought her duty, took an opportunity one day, when she was alone with
me, to make me the confidant of her domestic sorrows, asking me to
promise I would not tell "mother." This was rather dangerous ground; but
I knew something of the domestic life of the family, and that the tender
mother of it was often exasperated almost to madness by the cruel
tyranny and exactions of the father, and I promised. Then, with burning
cheeks and trembling voice she told me that they did not love her at
home; that her father despised her; that her mother urged her beyond her
strength to meet his requirements; that her eldest sister treated her
with harshness and ridicule because she was so "stupid," and that her
younger sisters did not like to play with her because she was cross. I
saw at a glance why she always said and felt "can't," and I stood
awe-struck before the endowment of conscience in the child which had
stood the test of such trials as these, and made duty the central point
of her being, for that I had already known to be the case. I sympathized
with her, as you may well imagine. I told her what I knew of the
virtues of her mother, whom she tenderly loved, and whose love for
herself she felt, but could not enjoy, because its natural expression
was lost in the impatient endeavor to hold her up to her father's
unreasonable requisitions. From that hour she was my child, and could
work happily in my presence. I told her that I knew she always wished to
do right, and that I should always be satisfied with whatever she could
accomplish; that if I required too much of her, she only need to say so;
that she must not try to do anything more than was pleasant and
comfortable, for only thus could she preserve her powers of mind, which
were good, and which would work well if they could work happily. Through
my influence she passed much time away from her ungenial home, with
friends in whose society she could be happy and unrestrained, and the
burden was lightened so far that she was in the end able to justify
herself, and take a happier place in the family circle; but she was
irretrievably injured both mentally and morally, learning to become
indifferent where she could not assert herself, and the battle of life
will, I fear, ever be a hard one to her.

In such cases one feels the true spirit of adoption, and this should be
the standard for the general relation. I do not feel satisfied till the
most timid and reserved are confiding to me, smile when they meet my
eye, and come to me in the hour of trouble; nor till the most perverse
and reckless take my reproofs in sorrow and not in anger, and return to
me for sympathy when they are good.

Nor am I willing to have anything to do with the education of a child
whose parents I am unable to convince of my vital interest in its
welfare, and into whose heart I cannot find an entering place, while at
the same time I speak candidly of faults; for there is a sort of
magnetism in the coöperation of mother and teacher; and its subtle
influence, or the reverse, is distilled into every detail of the
relation. Sometimes I find parents who do not know enough of their
children to interfere at all, and then I am willing to do what I can to
supply the deficiency. The school should only be the larger family for
them, and the lessons learned should be the least good they receive from
the daily routine. Still worse off are those who are educated at home by
servants who rule in nurseries, and so long as they keep the children
quiet are not questioned much as to the means by which they do it. Quite
aggravated cases of oppression have come under my observation, which I
have discovered by noticing the sway held over children by these
hirelings, who bring them to and from school. I _think_ I should never
risk this evil in a family of my own.

To seize every opportunity to unfold thought in a natural way, to
consider duty, to awaken and keep alive conscience, and cultivate a
mutual confidence and forbearance between the young, should be the aim
in such a little world as a school. The flow of happy spirits should be
unchecked, and no deep memory of faults should remain with a child,
unless they are of the deepest dye, such as falsehood and selfishness. A
serious invasion of each other's rights should be made a prominent
subject of blame, but the only retribution of which a child should be
made to have a permanent consciousness, is that of the injury, or the
danger of injury to _itself_, and I firmly believe if this can be made
apparent to a child, it may be the strongest possible motive to keep it
in the path of rectitude. It seems to me indeed the only legitimate
motive to present to a human soul. I do not mean a selfish regard to the
welfare even of one's own soul, but that regard which includes the
welfare of others as well as of one's own. I do not like to say to a
child, "do not so because if you do I cannot love you," for that is an
outside motive, but rather "because you cannot grow any better if you do
so and then you cannot respect yourself or be worthy of any one's love."
"Do not grieve dear mother by doing wrong, for then she cannot be
happy." "Are you not afraid if you do so, that by and by you can do
something more naughty?" "Is there not something in you, that makes you
feel very uncomfortable when you have done wrong? That is the way God
has made us, so that we may grow better and not worse." I have arrested
_very_ naughty doings by such remarks, where defiance of human authority
was very strong and determined. I have awakened a similar fear in many a
child by relating what a dread I had in my own childhood of growing
worse. Nothing is easier than to make a child false by frightening it or
blaming it too much; but nothing will make a child so ingenuous as to
convince it that you are interested in its progress, and would like to
help it cure its own faults. But we must often wait long before a child
is capable of taking this view so fully as to be influenced by it, in
opposition to the dictates of passion and the weakness or immaturity of
intellect; experience teaches us that the volatile, the obstinate, the
self-indulgent, the crafty, and even the indolent must be influenced by
the apprehension of a nearer penalty or the power of a more direct
authority than that can always be understood to be. Self-control is
often the first virtue to be cultivated, and a fear of present evil must
sometimes be the instrument of its cultivation. A distinguished and most
successful superintendent of an insane hospital once assured me, that in
the majority of cases, self-control was all that was needed as a remedy
for insanity. I asked him if he had ever known of insane children? He
said he had known many; and that it usually appeared in the form of
_unmanageableness_. If we concede that all evil in our race is partial
insanity (and if we believe in the soul, we must finally think that the
crust of organization into which it is built for a time is the only
obstacle to its right action, and to put one parenthesis within another,
which I know is not canonical, does not this point to the duty of
providing against evil organizations?), why should we not treat all evil
as insanity should be treated, and believe that if the power of
self-government is cultivated, the soul will take care of itself? In
this connection I always take health into consideration; for one wise
mother of my acquaintance suggested a new idea to me by once telling me
that for certain faults in her children she always gave medicine, being
convinced that the difficulty lay in the stomach.

I am always very careful to disarm all fear before I use any authority.
I find much timidity in children, as if they had been harshly dealt
with. I have seen fearful looks of terror in little faces when I have
approached them to enforce a request, and in such cases I either take
them gently in my arms or draw them close to me with a caressing motion,
which is sometimes all the punishment they need, if you will allow me
such an Irishism. They are at the same time convinced of my earnestness,
and disarmed of all opposition, and when I approach another time, if
occasion requires, I can lead them to another seat or even out of the
room, and enjoin obedience without exciting either fear or opposition. I
never threaten any penalties, but execute my own requisitions decidedly
at the moment, "because this is the right thing to be done." I think it
is not well to threaten for _next time_; and where punishments are mild,
such as changing a child's seat, or putting it into a room alone, or
going to its mother and talking the matter over in presence of the
child, a repetition of the offence may be avoided. I have one child in
my school who would crouch down upon the floor, if opposed, or required
to do any thing she did not wish to, and go into a sort of hysteric,
protesting that she was dying. I laughed at her a little at first, but I
soon saw she was very obstinate and very passionate, and several times
on such occasions I took her up in my arms, though she was pretty heavy,
and carried her to a bed, where I laid her down and left her to enjoy
her performance alone. After a while she would sneak down into the
school-room again looking very much ashamed, but I took no notice of
this, and after two or three experiments she was entirely cured. I
learned afterward that she had practised this device successfully upon a
doting mother and her nursery-maid, who really feared she would die.
They were much obliged to me for having the courage to meet it
resolutely. She has become a charming little scholar, for she is as full
of talent and affection as of self-will, and has been sent, by my urgent
entreaty, to learn calisthenic exercises, where she expends the extra
fluid which, when bottled up by inaction, works mischief in her. She was
formerly unable to tie her own bonnet or draw on her own gloves, but in
six months she has so changed that she can dress other children as well
as herself, and climbs the banisters and perches herself fearlessly upon
the tops of the doors, greatly to the terror of other little children of
luxury like herself.

We should never prevaricate or in any way deceive a child for the sake
of an immediate result, for that is not being true to principle, but we
may be allowed sometimes, in our characters of mothers and teachers, to
act as that "near Providence," which the mother has so happily been said
to be. In God's government, some penalty, though often a hidden one, is
the consequence of every transgression of law; and do we not in a small
measure act to the child as his representatives? It is a dangerous power
to have dominion over another soul, even for a time; but since it is
actually given to us, are we not bound to make use of it,
conscientiously and tenderly, but still to make use of it? I once knew a
father who thought, because he was not himself perfect, that he had no
right to exact obedience from his children. His retribution for this
morbid conscientiousness was most deplorable. One child became insane
from want of self-control, which he would not allow her to be taught;
and another failed to have any sentiment of duty toward God or man, but
passed many years of life without apparently knowing that any duty was
required of him. Worldly prosperity in his case only increased the evil,
for he was never obliged to make an exertion for himself or others. I
have never heard that he was vicious, but he could not live even with
the parent who had allowed him to grow up unrestrained. The parents
surely are designed to represent to the child the Heavenly Father whom
they cannot see, and who must later become an object of faith through
that beautiful analogy of parental love and care.

I agree too with one of the best and wisest, who has said that it is not
necessary to reward children for doing right, since God has so made man
that doing right is, like loving, its own reward. Only those who have
thought deeply can make such discriminations as these, yet to what noble
mind, when the thing is once said, does it not seem base to give an
outward reward for a lofty action? And is it not a brotherly act to help
our fellow-pilgrims on their way, by giving a friendly warning when a
stumbling-block is in the path? I think children can be made to
understand that a judicious punishment is a friendly warning, if not the
first time we administer it, then the second, or the third, or even the
fiftieth time; for as we should forgive, so we should warn our brother,
"not seven times, but seventy times seven." I learn to feel that if I am
actuated by the right motive in my dealings with their souls, (and one
learns to be very conscientious in meddling with them,) my pupils will
find it out sooner or later; and then they will see all that I have
done, as well as all that I may do, in a new light.

I have a bright little fellow in my school who had acquired a sad habit
of sucking his thumb. I thought he actually began to grow thin upon it.
I had checked him many times, and he was good about it, but the habit
was too strong for him. One day I drew on a little conversation about
helping each other out of difficulties, which all agreed to; and all
professed themselves willing to be helped and to listen to warnings. I
then said there was one in the school whom I wished to cure of a bad
habit, and I had a plan for doing it, but its success must depend upon
whether he was willing, and upon whether the rest would be really
friendly and not laugh at him, or tease him, but help him in every way
they could. They were very desirous to know who and what it was, and
very sure they would do all that was desired. I then spoke to little
W----, who was only six, or at most, seven years old, and asked him if
he was willing to let me tie that hand behind him that he might be cured
of sucking his thumb; for I knew of no other way. I told him it would
try his patience; for it was his right hand, and he would have to be
dependent upon others for many things, and often would find it very
inconvenient and annoying. After I had impressed him fully with the
importance of the matter, he consented, and the rest of the children
promised to be attentive to his wants. I never tied the hand behind him
till he put the thumb into his mouth; but it had to be done every day
for a fortnight. He bore it, and all the inconveniences, like a hero,
and not one child forgot to be considerate and helpful. He was cured of
the trick, and he has been an object of great interest among his
companions ever since, because they helped to do him good.

Perhaps, dear A----, you will think I dwell longer than necessary upon
this subject, knowing as _we_ do that the usual fault of schools is too
much penalty, and too much low motive; but you and I are surrounded by
those who are inclined, by their tendency of thought, to forget
practical wisdom; who, in their lively sense that immortality begins
now, and is not a distant good,--a sort of reward for well-doing, are in
danger of forgetting that we are to be educated by circumstances, and
that circumstances _will_ educate us, whether we direct them or not, in
this beginning of our long career. Those who have most faith in the soul
and its ultimate power to work itself free from all impediments, are
most apt to despise all the minor aids that may help its first steps.

Then there is another class of persons, who do not believe in the soul
enough to think education of any use. They cannot very well tell you
what they do believe; in truth they have no faith in anything, but
finding it hard to control circumstances, and seeing instances of great
failure where there have been most appliances, (they do not consider
whether these appliances were wisely administered,) they give all up to
chance, and believing neither in innate ideas nor in the use of means,
rest satisfied with a low standard of action, and go through life
without ever having a glimpse of anything better than themselves.
Indeed, if they see anything better, they understand it so little, that
they think it must be a delusive appearance, and that an earnest view of
any subject is extravagance, or even insanity. But I do not think so
great a want of faith is very common.

This is too long a letter, so good-by for the present. When I think you
are rested from this, I will write again.

                                                       M.


LETTER III.

MY DEAR ANNA,--Let me introduce you to my little family. It consists of
twenty children, some of whom have been under my care for three years.
These latter are eight in number, and from nine to twelve years of age;
then I have six who are not seven years old, who know how to read pretty
well, but who study no lessons more difficult than a simple bit of
poetry, the names of a few places on the map, a list of words from the
black-board of the parts of a flower, or an interlined Latin fable,
which I give them thus early, because Latin is one of the elements of
our language, and its forms are so definite that it gives definiteness
to ideas. These children print, write, draw from outlined forms and
blocks, as well as from their own fancies, and listen to all sorts of
information which I give them orally, and which they recount to me again
when questioned. I tell a great many stories over maps, which are, in my
dominions, not only lines running hither and thither with a few names
interspersed, but real mountains, rivers, lakes, and seas, which I
clothe with verdure, and people with all kinds of animate forms, such as
beasts, birds, fishes, and William Tells, or other interesting
individuals and tribes. I have a book, called "Wonders of the World,"
which is my Aladdin's lamp, and when I take it down, little hands are
clapped and bright eyes glisten.

But I must not forget to mention my other six, who are sweet little buds
of promise as one can well imagine; who love to hear stories about all
living things, from oysters up through the more intelligent shell-fish
that have heads as well as a foot, to small pink pigs and their mothers,
butterflies, birds, dogs, horses, cows, and fellow-children; and to
learn that their stockings are made of wool that grew on the back of a
lamb, their shoes of the skin of a calf, their ribbons from the cocoons
of a moth, the table of a tree, &c., &c. These little people were
committed to my keeping directly out of their mothers' or their nurses'
arms. I am always diffident about taking the place of the former, but
rejoice to rescue babes from the care of the latter.

The first thing to be taught these, is how to live happily with each
other; the next, how to use language. It is not necessary to wait till
they can read before we begin this last instruction. They love dearly to
repeat the words of simple poetry or of poetic prose, (Mrs. Barbauld is
my classic for babes,) and it is curious to see how synthetical are
their first mental operations, and how difficult they find it to
disentangle the words of a short sentence, which evidently has hitherto
been but one word of many syllables. Names of things can be made to
stand forth distinctly before other words, because the objects of the
senses do; but when I first ask children of three or four years old to
make sentences and put in _the_ and _and_, their pleasure in recognizing
the single word is even greater, and they will amuse themselves a great
deal with the exercise, running to me to whisper, "just now I said
_the_;" or, "Charley said _and_." If the printed word is pointed out at
the same time, it is still more interesting, because then it becomes an
object of the senses, a real thing, just as much as the book it is
printed in. You know I take the royal road to the attainment of this
art, and teach _words_ first, not letters. I find this a much better as
well as happier way, for a word is a whole host of thoughts to a young
child, and three words in a row a whole gallery of pictures. Bird, nest,
tree! If a child has ever played in a meadow, or even in a garden, or
sat on a grassy bank under the window, or has seen pigeons fly down into
a city street, what subject of endless conversation does this
combination of things present! The book that contains such words, and
perhaps a story, of which they form a part, is itself an illuminated
volume, and is immediately invested with a charm it cannot lose, for
what child (or man) was ever tired of the thought of a bird, or a tree,
to say nothing of that more rare and mysterious object, a nest? The
warbled song, the downy breast, the sheltering wing, the snug retreat,
have such an analogy with the mother's carol or lullaby, the brooding
bosom, and the beloved arms, a child's dearest home, that every
sentiment is enlisted, and a thousand things, never to be forgotten, may
be said. There is no need of pictures on such a page as this. I well
remember the shining pages of my childhood's books,--a lustre never
emitted by white paper alone. I doubt not the ancient fancy of
illuminating the works of great minds with gilded and scarlet letters
grew out of some such early association with printed, or rather written
thoughts;--for printing was not known then.

I believe you do not approve of this method of teaching to read; but I
cannot help thinking a variety of experience like mine would make you a
convert to my mode. I claim to have discovered it, and the bright little
six years old rogue, upon whom I tried my first experiment, learned to
read in six weeks, and every word was an experience to him, for I made
up the lessons as we went on from day to day right out of his little
life. He would scream with delight to see what he called _his_ words on
the sheet upon which I daily printed a new lesson. I have no doubt every
name of a thing looked to him like the thing itself, for his
imagination was a very transmuting one. You would have been as amused
at his antics over the word "and" as I was. I only introduced such
oysters of words occasionally into my gallery of pictures, but he never
forgot any such useful members of society, though I think he could not
have made pictures of them. One great point is, that children are always
happy to read in this way; and to work their little brains against their
will, seems to me cruel. It is quite an effort for them to learn to
observe closely enough to distinguish such small particulars even as
words, with which they have such vivid associations, and altogether an
unnatural one to learn arbitrary signs, to which nothing already known
_can_ be attached. Until I was convinced that this was the best method,
I always found myself instinctively helping innocent children along,
through their first steps in reading, by means which, at the time, I
half thought were tricks, and unsafe indulgences. I feared that I was
depriving them of some desirable and wholesome discipline, such as we
often hear of in our extreme youth from nursery-maids, who tell stories
of parents who whip their children every morning that they may be good
all day. But I will never again force helpless little ones, of three or
four years old, to learn the alphabet and the abs, until every letter is
interesting to them from the position it holds in some symbolic word.

When letters are learned in the ordinary way, they are often associated
with some image, as _a_ stands for _apple_, _b_ for _boy_, _c_ for
_cat_; and these associations may be so many hindrances (certainly in
the case of the vowels) to the next step in the process, because they
must all be unlearned before the letters can be applied to other words.
In our language there are so many silent letters in words, so many
sounds for each vowel, and the alphabetic sound of the consonants is so
different from their sound in words, that I do not care how late the
analysis is put off.

After a while, I string columns of little words together, in which the
vowel has the same sound, as _can_, _man_, _pan_, _tan_, and let these
be the first spelling-lessons; but I prefer, even to this mode, that of
letting children write from dictation the words they are familiar with
on a page. One dear little boy came to school three months before he
wished to read, or to look at a book, except for the pictures. At last
he came into the class without an invitation, and has learned very fast,
and can read better than some children who have read longer. He is a
perfect little dumpling, as gay and happy as a lark all day, and I would
not for the world make it a task for him to use his brain, thus risking
the diminution of his rotundity. He is as wise as a judge, though he has
not lost his baby looks; and he might be made to reason subtly at an
early age I doubt not; but I hope all such powers will be allowed to
slumber peacefully as yet. He is in the mean time learning to read
slowly; to print, to draw houses, to repeat poetry, to sing songs about
birds, bees, and lambs, and to have as much fun between these exercises
as I can furnish him with,--the latter in another apartment, of course.
I have taken no pains to teach him his letters. I have a great
repugnance to _letters_, with their many different sounds, so puzzling
to the brain;--but one day, finding he knew some of them, I pointed to
_g_, and asked him if he knew the name of it. He said "grass," which was
the first word in which he had seen _g_. So _w_ he first called "water,"
for the same reason. I gave him their sounds, but not their alphabetical
names. I was obliged to give him two sounds for _g_, one hard, one soft,
and he soon knew all the consonants by their powers. I hope he will not
ask me anything about the vowels at present.[I]

I also cut out the words children first learn, as soon as they can put
together a few in short sentences, and let them arrange them to
correspond with the sentences in the book. I have devoted one copy of my
Primer to this purpose, and keep the words thus separated, and pasted
upon card-board, for such use.

I know all children learn to read, and some children learn rapidly, but
I am always interested to know at what cost. It is a very important
question, I assure you. One may not realize, at the time, the evils
consequent upon the difficulties first encountered. The actual injury to
the brain stands first among these. We grown people know the painful
sensation consequent upon too long and too fixed attention to one
subject, even in the arranging of piles of pamphlets which we are
endeavoring to classify. The brain whirls and experiences chills, and
the whole body feels it. So with children, when made to read too long,
before the eye has learned to discriminate words easily. The child is
told that it is naughty, if it does not continue as long as the
teacher's or the mother's patience holds out (as soon as that is
exhausted, the lesson is sure to be over). How false this is! A little
child should never be required to do anything intellectual as a duty. It
should not be required even to _love_ as a duty, much less to think.
Both should be made inevitable by the interest inspired; its mental
efforts should only be sports. Its habits of self-control, its kindness,
its affection, should be cultivated, and this rather by example than by
precept. When mothers do not succeed in teaching their children to read,
because they have not the resolution to force them to it, they often say
to me, "Do teach the child to read, it will be a great resource;" I
reply, if I think they will believe me, that their instincts have
perhaps been wiser than their understanding; but if I see that they are
unreasonable, I reply that I will try, reserving to myself the privilege
of trying just as much as I please, and no more. I can generally make
the effort to read a voluntary one, if I do not find any previous
painful associations to do away. If I do, I wait patiently till I can
replace them by others, and in the mean time make books vocal of such
enchanting things that the desire will bubble up in the little mind,
through all the rubbish that has gathered over it. The pleasure of
reading together from a black-board, on which the letters should be
printed with great exactness and perfection of form, in order to
resemble those in the book, often gives this desire.

One little fellow, whose perceptive powers are sharper than those of my
dumpling, reflects upon himself more, and although equally fat, appears,
from a certain anxious expression on his face, to have had some trials.
He says his sister sometimes "hurts his feelings." He thinks some words
are beautiful and "full of pictures." He tells very small fibs, such as
"Mother says I must read those words, and those." Do not suppose I let
this fibbing pass. I make a great point of not believing it, and of
comparing it with truth, and of proving to him that his mother knows
nothing about it.

Another little darling, who cannot speak plain, says, "Oh, is 'at
_feathers_? Why! is it _feathers_? Oh, now tell me where _wings_ is! Oh!
is 'at _wings_? Oh! I want to kiss oo."

I hear these little ones read four or five times a day. The lesson
occupies about fifteen minutes each time. All "study" together, as they
call it. I put my pointer on the book of each in turn, making it a habit
that they shall not look off the book for the space of three minutes,
perhaps, during which each reads. They keep within a few sentences of
each other, near enough to think they read together, as I detain them
long upon the repetition of all they know; but I see very clearly which
will start off soon and outstrip the rest. I say nothing of which reads
the best, but sometimes make such remarks as, "L---- will learn to read
very fast, I think, he is so attentive." This makes L---- all the more
attentive, and helps the others to make the effort; for with these four,
to be able to read is the most charming of prospects. I am determined
that no touch of weariness shall break the charm. In three months they
will be able to read the two first stories in the Primer, which occupy
about two pages. Their eyes will by that time become so accustomed to
analyzing the looks of the words, that they will be able to print them
without the book, and soon new words will be learned very rapidly. I
stave off the spelling as long as possible, but you may be sure that
these children will spell well by and by. I am convinced of this by
experience, for the next class above these in age have begun within a
few weeks to write stories of their own, composing instead of copying
them from books, as they have done for two years, and I am myself quite
astonished at their spelling. They have never spelled a word they did
not understand, and their spelling in composition is better than that of
some children still older who learned to spell elsewhere, and who hate
spelling-books.

One of my exercises in thinking is to ask the children to tell me the
names of all the actions they can think of; and to help them I say, for
instance, "What can the bird do?" "What can the fly do?" "How many
things can the fly do?" Another is to ask them what things are made of,
and where they are found, "Are they vegetables, or are they from
animals, or are they minerals?" They are vastly entertained by this, and
one little fellow became so much excited, and wearied himself so much
with his investigations at home, that his mother begged me to suspend
the exercise for a time. Jemmy's head is a little too big for his body;
and the look of research in his great eyes gives evidence of precocity,
the thing of all others to be shunned. His mother has put thick boots
upon him lately, and turned him out into the snow, and he looks like a
butterfly in boots, with his ethereal head and spiritual orbs.

I have but one child under my care that I call a prodigy; and my
influence has not yet been strong enough to check her ardor as it ought
to be checked. She is sent to school because she is happier at school
than in the nursery, to which rich people's children are so often
banished. (I never intend to have a nursery in my house.) This child has
been with me three years, and is but six now. She might be made one of
those wonders of learning that occasionally astonish the world, if the
plan of her education had not been to supply as little food as possible
for her cravings. Fortunately she did not ask to read for a long time,
but I have not a scholar so perseveringly industrious, so absorbed in
whatever she is doing, so full of nervous energy. She is as
conscientious as she is intellectual. I have never had to repeat a
request to her, or to subject her to a rule. She always sees and does
the fitting and the lovely thing. Before she learned to read she would
sit for the hour together with a book in hand, (upside down, perhaps,)
and improvisate stories wonderful to hear, in which the characters
preserved their individuality, and the descriptions of nature were as
vivid as those of a poet of many years. She was quite lost to outward
things while improvisating thus. One day after school, the maid who came
for her not having arrived, she threw herself on the floor, and began a
story about a naughty child. I cannot now remember all the very words,
for it was a year ago; but the qualities of the heroine were a
combination of all the faults she knew anything about. "If people were
ill, she always made a noise; she would shut the door hard if told that
it would make people's heads ache. She hid other people's things, and
would not tell where she had put them. She was very cross to her little
brother, and often hurt the baby. She cut valuable things with the
scissors, tore up her books, and left the pieces of paper on the parlor
carpet. One day it rained very hard, and her mother told her not to go
out, lest she should take cold. She was always disobedient, so she went
up-stairs and put on a very nice dress and her best bonnet, with blue
ribbons, and thin stockings and shoes, and nothing to keep herself warm,
but went out in the rain, and paddled and paddled about, and wet her
dress, and spoilt the blue ribbons on her bonnet; and when she came in
she was very, very sick indeed, and had a dreadful fever, and people
slammed the doors and made a great noise, and she had dreadful, oh,
dreadful pains in her head and her side, and she could not eat or drink
anything; and at last she died and did not go to heaven!" She stopped,
completely out of breath. After a few moments' pause, I said, "Oh, I am
sorry for the poor little girl that was punished so much. Was she so
very naughty she could not go to heaven?"

She made no reply for some time, and then recommenced in a low, solemn
voice: "When she was lying in her bed, she was very sorry she had not
obeyed her mother, and a heavenly angel came down out of the heavenly
sky and took her up into heaven." After a short pause she burst out
again very energetically--"Then how she ramped! She trampled on the
clouds, and put her foot in the sun, moon, and stars!" I made no further
comment. I rarely interrupted her utterances, for they never were
addressed to any one, and seldom indulged in, unless she thought herself
alone. They were picturesque and symbolical, but never vague. The moral
was always very apparent. But her imagination sometimes clothes objects
with a light of its own. I was leading her up-stairs the other day, and
as we stepped into the hall, we saw a large spider running before us.
She dropped my hand and bounded forward, "Oh, you beautiful, smiling
creature!" was her exclamation.

Would not a bird have been her passport into paradise at that moment?

Another of these children was walking in the mall with me one day, when
the sun was shining with an afternoon light upon the bare trees, over
rather a dreary landscape of snow and ice. "Oh, the trees look like
golden twigs," said my little poetess, so full of joy that I could
hardly hold her.

This, dear A----, is the

              "time when meadow, grove, and stream,
        The earth and every common sight,
        To us do seem,
        Apparelled in celestial light,
        The glory and the freshness of a dream."

To return a moment to my little prodigy. When she did not for a long
time ask to read, she wished to print, and it must have been this
practice which gradually so accustomed her eye to the shapes of words,
that when she suddenly conceived the desire to read, she remembered them
with marvellous rapidity. Everything else was abandoned for the time,
and in the course of two or three weeks she could read very well. I had
often seen her take up the books which contained the stories she liked,
and I supposed, at first, that she must have learned to read them
herself in some unaccountable way. She had often repeated such stories
from the book from beginning to end, word for word. But I found it was
not the case,--that she had never actually read them before. However, I
never could trace the steps. Spelling she does not find easy. Even now,
several months after she has been able to read currently, if, when she
comes to a new word, I propose to her to spell it, she will mention the
letters (I never taught her their names, but she doubtless learned them
while printing so industriously), and then say again, "What is it?" as
if that had not helped her at all. But she never forgets a word after it
is once told her. She joins in an exercise I frequently practise with
older scholars, of spelling a few lines of the reading lesson, but she
is not so ready as the others, although none read better, and few as
well. She now composes stories on the slate instead of improvisating
aloud so much; and I am surprised to find how many words she spells
aright. But I try no experiments upon her, as my plan is to clip her
wings. If she was enshrined in as rotund a body as some of the other
children, I might venture a little, but she already looks too
ethereal;--one sees at a glance that the sword of her fervent little
spirit might easily be made to cut its sheath.

Children love to use their fingers, and I give them a slate when they
come to school, and teach them to print, which accelerates the learning
to read. I encourage them also to draw from beautiful outlines, from
things they see in the room, and also from their own fancies. I draw
upon the black-board before them, very slowly, giving directions for
imitation. I never criticise their productions, whether successful or
not. I often see a promise in the freedom of a stroke, or in the child's
appreciation of his own drawing, which an unpractised eye could scarcely
detect. If a little child brings me a slate with three marks drawn upon
it which he calls a horse, or a dog, can I be so unsympathizing as to
question it? Perhaps I add ears, legs or a tail, and my little disciple
does not know the next moment whether he or I completed the picture, but
the next specimen of his art will probably have at least one of these
appendages.

I drew on the black-board to-day, a square house, with a door in the
middle of the front, a window on each side the door, and one in each
chamber over the parlors. Two chimneys surmounted the house, and the
windows were divided each into six panes of glass. These things I
mentioned as I drew them. It was not many minutes before I was called to
look at two houses of four times the size of mine, with the additional
embellishments of stairs to go up into the chambers, one of the windows
open (which I thought decidedly the stroke of genius in this artist),
smoke from the chimneys, steps to the doors (my house had been left
hanging in mid air), pumps with individuals, I cannot call them men,
suspended to their handles, and various other hieroglyphics which I
could not stay to hear explained. These limners are four years old,
their faith in themselves and others yet unshaken, and I should be the
last one to suggest that stairs could not be seen through the walls of a
house, or that men were not lines and dots, or birds as large as
houses, for I have known children to cry at such criticisms, and to be
quite checked in their artistic exploits by a laugh.

After such rude practice as this, the child, by imperceptible advances,
begins at last to see things more as they are, and then a little
criticism is safe, but it must still be guarded, sympathizing, and
helpful. The next thing to be inculcated after this is that objects must
_not_ be drawn just as they are, but only as they appear. I made this
remark to a child of seven to-day for the first time. He had learned too
much to make similar mistakes to those of the little people lately
mentioned, but in attempting to copy the drawing of a stool, he could
not comprehend how the rungs that joined the legs of the stool could be
drawn so as to look right, because one of them could not _really_ be
made to pass behind the leg. I pointed to a chair and told him to
suppose he was drawing it upon the wall near which it stood, for his
paper represented that wall, though for convenience sake it was laid
flat upon the table. I asked him if he could see the whole of the legs
farthest from him, and if the rungs of those legs did not pass behind
the front legs. He saw it clearly. Then I told him we must draw things
as they appeared, not as they really were. Nothing must be drawn which
cannot be seen, although we know more is there than we can see without
going behind it. He was delighted with this discovery. Now he understood
about the rungs of the stool, and also why two legs appeared longer than
the other two. The stool was finished intelligently, though not with
elegance, and the paper was sprinkled with attempts at various chairs
which he could see from his seat, some of which really looked as if one
could sit down in them, and not as if they were flattened out and
hanging against the wall. Some of the legs would have gone through the
floor, to be sure, if they had been real chairs, in order to afford a
comfortable and even seat, but I saw that the idea was seized, which was
quite enough for my unexacting demands. A child much younger and less
practised, drew the same stool right, without a word from me, and
probably would be completely puzzled were I to give her the same
explanation, for art speaks to her without articulate voice. I have one
little girl with eyes which she seems scarcely yet to have used. I took
a great deal of pains to teach her to draw a little upon the black-board
last winter, but if I drew a perpendicular, she thought she imitated me
by drawing a horizontal line. I endeavored to wake up the love and
perception of form by hanging upon the board various exquisitely shaped
vases and leaves, but neither these nor rectangular forms aroused her
imitative powers. I never ceased to make these trials, for I remembered
that a genius in that line once said to me, "the art of seeing must
precede the art of drawing." During the long vacation she resided in the
country, and nature must have opened her eyes, for since she came back
to school (about two months ago), she has actually been able to imitate
quite intelligibly some of those very forms, and prefers some of them to
others. I assure you I enjoy her imperfect performances far more than I
do the successful efforts of many others. A German friend gave me a book
the other day which promises to pour a flood of light upon what I now
look upon as my benighted efforts to simplify to children the art of
drawing. It is the method of a man of genius, discovered after much
groping. He, too, had wooden models made, and stood by them, and pointed
out to his pupils which part to draw first, as I have done, but at last
he has reduced the whole thing to a few lessons upon some rectilinear
blocks, a niche, a cylinder, a grindstone, and a ball. I am revelling in
the perfect adaptation I see in it to the end proposed, which is
practical teaching of perspective without a word being said about
vanishing points, aerial perspective, or any of those technicalities
which weary my unmathematical brain, and which I have faithfully
administered to myself from time to time.[J]

To vary the occupations of my cherubs, I let them write Foster's
prepared copies with a pencil, which helps very much to regulate the
motions of the hand, as there is a great interest felt in tracing each
mark upon the blue line. They also look at pictures in books and on the
wall, where I hang all the pretty things I can find, and tell me what is
in them; and sometimes amuse themselves at a table of shells, where I
hear them recounting in low voices the histories I have given them of
these little tenants of the seas. When I kept caterpillars, or rather
raised butterflies, they never were tired of watching the chrysalides,
hoping to see the expected butterflies. After these came forth in their
glory, we were all poisoned by handling the cocoons, and since that
experience of itching hands, and arms, and swollen eyes, I have been
afraid to venture upon that branch of natural history. Shells are the
most convenient natural objects for children to handle. We talk over
flowers often, and I teach the names of their different parts, and
encourage the children to make collections of leaves, and learn the
names of their shapes, preparatory to learning the art of analyzing them
thoroughly. For this purpose I have drawn all the shapes I can find
named in botanies, into a book, from which I teach them. Flowers are
better for teaching beauty than botany, to little children, as they
object particularly to tearing them to pieces.

I have not said one word about my little Robin, who stands most of the
time at the window watching the horses in the stable opposite, the scene
being often spiritualized by the descent of a flight of pigeons, which
he generally apprises us of by a shout. Occasionally he turns round and
sits down, and watches inside proceedings, and when an interesting story
about living things is in progress, I sometimes find him in my lap, or
behind me in the chair I am sitting in. His eyes are blue, and his long
golden straight hair hangs down from his tall forehead like a cleft
banner of light. Robin will not look inside of a book yet. He is like a
caged bird in the city where he is imprisoned in winter. In summer he
lives out of doors, and rides on horseback on his father's knee, and
holds the reins in driving. His mother says horses are the predominating
idea, and also sentiment of his life, at present, and this stable-peep
into their city life is duly recounted every day at home. I often mourn
over my lost residence by the Common, where the children who looked out
of window could see trees and a lovely landscape, but you must not think
I allow my scholars to be pent up five hours in the house. Twice a day,
I array them all, summer and winter, and take them to our city paradise,
which happily is very near. There we actually see a squirrel once in a
while. One day we saw a butterfly emerging from its chrysalis, and
always the sparkling water and waving trees. And we have clear space and
fresh air for half an hour. If you will not tell, I will confess that I
have sometimes coasted down the least public side of Fox-hill with a
babe in my lap, and I find I have not forgotten how to slide,--an
accomplishment in which I excelled in my youth. In wet weather, I put on
some of the out-door garments, open a window, and have a merry dance or
play. The material for the early cultivation I would give is all nature,
and art taken picturesquely. The nomenclatures of science are not for
children, but its beauties and wonders are, and may be culled for them
by a skilful hand till they have had a peep at the wide range of the
universe. I believe you think it best not to open these store-houses
until the mind is capable of comprehending them more fully, but I cannot
think so, dear Anna. Children's love of nature forbids me to think so. I
once opened a little soul's eyes with a bunch of flowers. It was a child
who had never been to school before, but who had not been cultivated at
home, because her mother had suffered from being over-educated, and
wished to try the experiment of _nature_, as she called it,--by which
she meant, I perceived, total neglect. She had allowed her, therefore,
to grow up in the nursery and in the care of servants, both of which I
consider as far from _nature's_ teachings as possible.

The child was afraid of me and of the children. She looked at us for
about three weeks with a fixed gaze as if we were not living beings, but
perhaps walking pictures, her features only occasionally relaxing, I
should rather say puckering into a woful wail, which expressed utter
desolation and want of comprehension of our natures. She was impervious
to all my blandishments, which I lavished more bountifully than usual to
meet the case. When spoken to, she answered in a monosyllable, or not at
all. When she wanted anything, she spoke one word to convey the idea, as
a savage would, (she was five years old), and these utterances were
never voluntary. She liked to sit close by her brother, who was two
years older than herself, and who treated her with great tenderness and
gentleness, though every manifestation from her was of the roughest
kind. I was sure, however, that I did not see the whole, for his manner
of taking her hand and saying "little sister" was so peculiar, that I
did not doubt she was genial to him when not in this purgatory of
people.

One day I had a beautiful bunch of flowers from a greenhouse on my
table. This child's grandfather owned a greenhouse, but perhaps she had
never been allowed to handle the flowers, which were altogether too
precious for children, and wild pinks and violets had not been
accessible to her. I had been trying many days in vain to interest her
about a bee of which I had a picture. I had told her the bee made honey
out of flowers. On that day I drew the tumbler that contained these
splendid denizens of the greenhouse to the edge of the table, and
said,--

"Did you ever see a little bee making honey?"

"No."

"Did you ever go into the country in summer when the grass is all
green?"

"No."--(I knew she had.)

"Did you ever see pretty flowers growing?"

"No."

"I will tell you how little bees make honey--did you ever eat any
honey?"

"Yes."

"They have a long hair sticking out of their heads, and they put it in
there, where that yellow dust is, and there they find a little sweet
drop that tastes like sugar, and they carry it home, and put it into a
little hole, and then they come and get more, and carry that home, and
they put that yellow dust into a little pocket by the side of their
little leg, and by and by they get enough to make a great deal of
honey."

"Do the bees make it all themselves?" said she, with a brightening look
(the first look of intelligence I had seen), and at the same time making
a plunge at the flowers.

"Yes," I said, and taking them out of the glass I put them all into her
hand, for I did not even know that she could speak plain. She seized
them eagerly, and without taking her eyes from them went on volubly
asking a great many questions. I described the hive and how they all
lived together, and told her God must have taught them how to make
honey, for they could not speak or understand anybody's words, and that
if they wandered ever so far away from their hive, they always knew the
way back again. She held the flowers all the rest of the morning. When
school was done, I told her to put them into the glass, and she should
have them again in the afternoon. As soon as she returned, she very
unceremoniously took possession of them,--the first act of volition she
had ever ventured upon in my presence,--and nestling close to me asked
me the same questions she had asked before, over and over again, and
repeating them, and hearing my answers again and again, whenever she
could secure my attention. As long as the flowers lasted, she seized
upon them every day, and after they were withered to all other eyes,
they retained their charm in hers. I varied the lesson often, by telling
her of the silkworm, of the butterflies, and of many varieties of the
bee family, and from that time a communication was established between
us. She was never afraid of me any more; liked to sit near me; and have
my sympathy in all things, provided I did not express it too openly. It
was curious to see such _mauvaise honte_ in such a tiny thing, for she
was always reserved, and often relapsed into long silences, and was
wholly without enterprise in matters in which the other children were
very active, such as drawing, making block-houses, and even playing. But
I could catch her eye at any time by a story of any living thing, and
she would sometimes surprise me by the intelligence of her questions.
For a long time she could not learn to read, or rather would not. Every
new attempt at anything was begun in tears and despair, not from
weakness, but from pride apparently. Her mother had begun to think it
time to attend to her poor hidden soul a little; and after a long summer
vacation which she passed in the country, she came back to school with
pleasure and with a new face, and though always backward in comparison
with children who had had motherly intercourse, and been taught early to
use their faculties, she went steadily on. There was no competition to
discourage her, and she learned to read immediately when she once wished
to. None but mothers can do justice to little children. She sometimes
made me think of your remark that every child needs _four_ mothers. But
I think the two heaven-appointed parents will do, if they see their
duties and fulfil them.

To disarm your opposition about sending such little tots to school, I
assure you that many of my mothers tell me that the transition from
nursery life to my little community has cured children of fretting and
other faults, and that they repeat the occupations of the school-room in
their home plays.--Read "Christian Nurture," by Dr. Bushnell.


LETTER IV.

DEAR A.,--When I have a collection of children around me to whom I am to
teach things and morals, I always begin by making a simple statement of
the footing on which I wish we shall live together. Prevention is better
than cure, and much is gained with children, as with grown men, by
expecting from them the best and noblest action.

In a school or in a family, I do not like any government but
self-government, yet I wish my scholars to know that I often help the
growth of the latter by interposing my authority when that of the inner
law fails. When I commenced my present school, I had such a conversation
with the children on the first day they were assembled, before there had
been time for any overt acts upon a lower principle than the one I
wished to inculcate.

My school consists of children belonging to one class in a certain sense
of the word, that is, to families of the highest general cultivation
amongst us, and what is still more important, to families in which there
is a general if not well digested belief in the divinity of human
nature. Yet there is a great diversity in the influences upon them. Even
among people of the most liberal views there still lurks a sediment of
the feeling that there is a principle of evil as well as of good in the
human soul, and so people expect their children to be naughty on that
ground. Now I do not believe in this. I think all evil is imperfection.
It is sometimes very bad imperfection, I allow, and I am sometimes
tempted to say poetically, though never literally, that it looks like
innate depravity. But I do really believe in individual perfectibility,
and that "circumstance, that unspiritual god and miscreator," is our
great enemy. Circumstance is a very important personage in my calendar,
and a perfect Proteus in the shapes he takes, for he covers not only the
common surroundings we call circumstances, but organization itself.
Perfection _must_ be in the reach of every one by God's original design,
and it is only man's marring that hinders its progress, and that
temporarily. I hope you have the same instinct about this that I have. I
can remember, even when I was not ten years old, hearing some one very
severely criticised, who I happened to know had had the worst of moral
educations, and I resented the criticism, not because the subject of it
was any friend of mine, for it was a person in whom I had no particular
interest, but I remember the feeling was a sort of vindication of God's
goodness, an _assurance_ that he would not judge that unfortunate person
harshly or unforgivingly, but that the misfortunes she had brought upon
herself, would teach her what her life at home had failed to teach her.
How often I have thought of that poor woman in my life!

To go back to my school. I knew many of the families, some intimately
enough to know the very peculiarities of the children, others only
enough to be able to anticipate the little characters; others were
perfect strangers, whom I was yet to study. Many of them had never been
to school before, and I knew enough of the usual method of governing
schools to be aware that the associations of those who had been in such
scenes, were likely to be those of contention for power, the memory of
penalties, and a division of interests between teachers and taught. Even
at home some of these children had been governed by fixed rules, instead
of the instincts of love, and had never been addressed as if they had
any sense of right and wrong; others had been weakly indulged, others
mostly if not wholly neglected, and left to the care of servants. One
little boy and girl, children of wealthy parents, scarcely saw their
father from one month's end to another, for he never rose till they went
to school; they dined at two and he at five, and before his dinner was
done, to which he never returned till the last moment, these little ones
were put to bed. Even the elder children who also went to school, saw
him only at dinner, for his evenings were usually spent in company, or
at some club. I hope this is an extreme case. I should say that the
mother in this family was an amiable woman, but not sufficiently like
the "near Providence" to counteract the effects of such fatherly
neglect.

There was one child, of truly religious and conscientious parents, whose
moral influence was null, except indirectly, because they really
believed that the human heart was originally depraved, and waited to be
saved by special grace from God, irrespective of the conscience; and
this girl, who was the oldest of my scholars, had less principle to work
upon than any one, and when I first spoke of the cultivation of the mind
as a religious duty, she told me very ingenuously that it was the first
time she had ever heard such a thought, although she was considered
quite remarkable at home for her religious sensibility, and really
prayed aloud sometimes like a little seraph, in imitation of her truly
devout parents; but she was very untruthful.

A few of the children had been made to feel that every human being has a
conscience, which, when enlightened, will guide him right. In these
latter the work of growth had already begun, and to them I looked for my
allies in the work I was about to undertake. I knew that the best I
could do would only come up to the standard that had ever been held up
before them.

I seated them all around me and began by telling them how much I loved
to keep school for little children, when they were good. But children
were not always good, and I was glad to help them cure their little
faults before they grew to be great ones, which was the thing most to be
feared in the world. I hoped the good children here would help me make
the others better, if there were any naughty ones. We must all be
patient with naughty people, just as God was. It took naughty people a
long time to grow better again. If each child would think about himself
a moment, he would remember that he did not always do perfectly right;
but God had given everybody a conscience which was sometimes called "the
voice of God within us," so every one could improve who would listen to
that voice.

There was a right thing to be done in every place. In school it would be
necessary for all to keep good order, else it would be impossible to
study, where there were so many persons; it was just as necessary too
that all should be polite and kind to each other, else there could be no
happiness. One unkind person could make all the rest uncomfortable.

After dwelling upon these points till all seemed to recognize their
importance, I told them that some people kept order in schools by rigid
rules and penalties; for instance, there would be a rule that every
scholar who spoke aloud should have a mark for bad conduct, every one
that kept order, a mark for good conduct; another rule would be, that
every lesson learned well should have a mark of approbation, every
lesson learned ill, a mark of disapprobation. The penalties for
transgressing rules were floggings, bad reports written for parents to
see, keeping lag after school, &c. &c.; the recompense for good marks,
either a good report, or a present,--the handsomest prize being given to
the one who learned lessons best.

But I did not wish to keep school thus. I had no respect for people who
did right only because they feared punishment or hoped for a reward.
Such motives made people selfish. I had known of children who would deny
having done something they had really done, and try to make a teacher
suppose some one else did it; and also of other children who were sorry
when some one else got the present. All these things made people
selfish, and tempted them to be false. We should do right because it was
right, whether it were to bring us pleasure or pain. It was the duty of
all to improve their faculties, because God had given them to us for
that purpose, and had put us into a beautiful world, and given us
parents and teachers to help us prepare for a long existence of which
this life is but a small part,--a kind of school in which we are
educated for another world.

I wished to have but one rule in my school, and that was the Golden
Rule: "do unto others as you wish others to do unto you."

The duty in school was to study well and to keep order, that others
might have a chance to study. It would be necessary for them all to
respect my arrangements, and obey my wishes for the sake of this order,
but they need not think of prizes or marks, for I should give none.

I wished them to govern themselves. This would make it unnecessary for
me to watch them all the time. I should soon learn who was worthy of
being trusted.

Did they not like to be trusted?

They responded warmly to this.

Did they not like to do as they pleased?

There was, of course, but one answer to this question.

I told them none could be allowed to do that in school except those who
pleased to do right, because it was my duty to prevent them from
disturbing each other, or from wasting their own time. But I hoped never
to be obliged to punish any one for doing wrong. I should make no rules
at present, and if I found all were polite, obliging, and industrious, I
should never need to make any; but if there were any in school who did
not obey conscience, and think about other people's convenience, I
should be obliged to make rules for such. I should put the names of such
scholars on a paper, and those children must live by my rules, because
they had none of their own.

I considered proper manners in school to be quietness, no unnecessary
speaking or moving about in study time, politeness to every one, ready
obedience to my wishes and arrangements, and industrious habits of
study.

I should now leave each one to make rules for himself in his own mind;
they might write them down if they pleased. I should like to see what
each one would think it right to do in school. They might imagine
themselves keeping school, and tell how they should govern it, and what
they thought the duties of scholars.

Some of them did this. Their regulations were very strict, their
requisitions very great. Those who were then morally ready to apprehend
my meaning, have never swerved since from the law laid down at that
time.

But it was not long before several names were upon my list. For these I
made specific rules, taking especial pains to say that they were not to
apply to such or such individuals. If E---- or L---- or S----, for
instance, should speak aloud on a pressing occasion, I should not
subject them to the penalty, because I knew their principles were good;
that they thought of the convenience of others, were studious, &c., &c.
I should excuse a particular instance of apparent disorder in them until
I had reason to think they were growing careless or thoughtless.

I made the same remark in regard to an occasional want of success in a
lesson. I might perhaps have erred in judgment by giving too long a
lesson. I might find upon experiment that the mind was not prepared for
a particular thing. I should be inclined to think an industrious and
conscientious scholar did not feel well, rather than to suppose any want
of faithfulness. People must always be judged according to their
characters.

I assure you it was a great punishment to have one's name upon my list.
These children saw the joys of liberty, and that they could be secured
only by doing right. I never saw any system of rewards or punishments
have such a stimulating moral or intellectual effect.

Some of my scholars were too young even to be bound in all cases by this
law of the general convenience, and these I spoke of as children whose
habits were to be formed gradually, and of whom this comprehension of
the convenience of others could not always be expected. I called upon
the rest to help me keep them as quiet as would be consistent with
their good, and took it for granted that none would trouble me by
playing or interfering with them. There must, of course, be exceptions
to all rules.

There were many occasions of recurring to this conversation, and of
repeating its principles. When any overt acts of wrong-doing occurred,
when new scholars came, I called them around me to talk about the
principles on which we must live and act. These conversations were
always interesting to the children, and kept up the government of the
school. When I make rules and penalties for my delinquents, I make the
rules as simple as possible, and the penalties as nearly like the
natural consequences of wrong-doing as is practicable. I never lose an
opportunity of inculcating obedience to the inward law as the only sure
guide of conduct, and if one's eye is fixed upon this point, a thousand
occasions will offer themselves. How can any one who does not believe
this inward law to be the only sure guide of conduct govern children
morally? I have a friend, quite a distinguished teacher, who believes in
original depravity, and that conscience is not an unerring guide, and
therefore that religious principle cannot be made to grow out of a
child's consciousness, but that it is an arbitrary gift of God;
supervened upon the human mind without reference to conscience. He once
asked me if there were any religious exercises in my school; if I ever
presented religious motives, and what they were. I told him I presented
no other, that I made all duty a matter of conscience, and that I never
saw a child who did not understand that motive. He said he had no doubt
it was the noblest way of treating the child, and brought out the
highest morality, but it was not religious education in his opinion!
What an admission! the noblest way, bringing out the highest morality,
and yet not religious education. His school is the constant scene of
religious revivals, and by his own admission the children are told not
to keep company with the children of liberal Christians, or of those who
go to the theatre! I do not believe in a premature Christianity, so
taught as to be able to give an account of itself in early youth.

I once visited an Infant Charity School, composed entirely of children
who were not likely to have any kind of instruction at home, so that
whatever was taught in the school would be likely to make quite an
impression. After a pleasant little exercise in marching and singing,
they were seated for a religious lesson. What do you think of the
following as a basis of Christian charity?--average age of the children,
_eight_.

What are the principles of Christianity?

To love one's neighbor and obey God, to believe in the Bible and the
salvation by Christ.

Who are the heathen?

They are people who never heard of the Christian religion, and who
cannot have salvation by Christ.

Name the heathen nations?

Indians, Hindoos, the people of Asia, Africa, and the islands in the
Pacific Ocean.

What is the difference between Christians and heathen?

Christians serve God, walk humbly, and love their neighbors like
themselves. Heathens lie, steal, commit murder, and are full of revenge.

Are all the people in Christendom true Christians?

No, only those who believe that God the Father took the form of man and
came down to the earth, preached, suffered, and was crucified on the
Cross.

What becomes of all who are not true Christians, and of all the heathen?

They go into everlasting fire.

       *       *       *       *       *

This was a rote-lesson which the children rattled off glibly.

Modifications of such lessons are given in schools where revivals are
considered religious proceedings.

       *       *       *       *       *

Is it not fearful to think that there is a child in Christendom who is
not instructed in the great fundamental truth that God has planted in
every human soul a principle of conscience by which it can distinguish
evil from good, and which, if obeyed, will _save_ it, by some natural
process alike applicable to Christian or heathen? The first principle to
which a child should be pointed is the principle of law in the human
breast. God has so made the human soul that this can be taught to young
children if one only knows how to do it. If truly taught, we may safely
trust that they can never so judge the much-abused _heathen_.

One day when I was walking in the mall with my little scholars, at
recess, some of the children cried out to the others that they must not
run upon the banks, or the constable would fine them. The warning was
not received in a good spirit, and I perceived that the constable was
not in good repute among children. I well remembered the "tidy-man," as
our servant called him, of my childish days, and the apprehensions I
used to entertain lest he should hook me up with his long pole into the
gallery of the church, if I made any noise during service time, and I
saw that these children thought it quite desirable to circumvent the
constable, and get as many runs upon the banks as could be snatched
during his absence.

This was an opportunity not to be lost, and when we returned to the
school-room, I asked why they supposed the constable was ordered to let
no one run upon the banks.

They were curious to hear a reason. It had not occurred to them,
apparently, that there was any other reason than a desire to trouble
children. I told them the history of the Boston Common--how much pains
had been taken ever since the days of the Pilgrims (whom they know), to
keep it inviolate, in order that all the citizens might enjoy its
beauties and its advantages; how much money had been expended upon it;
how it had been secured as a perpetual possession to all the citizens,
and how every attempt to build even very near it, had been resisted for
fear of cutting off the fine prospect; that even the cows that used to
pasture there, had been turned away that the children of the city might
play there undisturbed. I then told them why by-laws were made to
preserve the beauty of the banks, particularly just after they were
repaired and newly laid down with turf.

When they acknowledged that all this was reasonable, I told them that
laws were made for the good of society, and that every _good_ citizen
would respect such laws. Whoever understood what law meant, that is,
whoever knew the law within themselves, would respect the laws of a
country or a city that were made for the good of all. I thought my
lesson was successful.

One who has not been a great deal alone with the unsophisticated natures
of children has little idea how early the highest principles of action
can be instilled into them. It does not need many words, as I well
remember from the few indelibly written upon my mind by a religious
mother, who never comforted my timidity, which was excessive, by
anything but principles which my soul responded to: "Do right always,
and then you need not be afraid of anything;" and, "Your Heavenly Father
will take care of you, and will let nothing happen to you but what is
for your good," comprised the religious inculcations of my childhood,
varied according to circumstances. And when I first fully realized that
Christ, who was held up as a model, was "tempted like as we are," my
religious education was complete, except what _practice_ could give me.
The imagination is as boundless in the images it evokes as imagery
itself, and no specific cure for fears of darkness and unmeasured danger
can ever meet the difficulty. If a timid child cannot be taught that he
is under the eye of a tender and watchful Providence, his childhood may
be one long terror, as I have known to be the case. If to this is to be
added everlasting woe for wrong-doing, there is no wonder that God must
come down from heaven to set things right, and invent a scheme which
will virtually annihilate his own original provisions.

Many of my children have been religiously educated in the right way,
have been made to think of God as their creator, benefactor, and
preserver, and the author of all the beauties of nature that they see,
and the powers they possess. When I say "we must return good for evil as
Christ did, who was the most perfect being that ever lived," they
understand me as speaking of a principle which they can apply directly
to themselves; for I often add, "Christ said things when he was very
young that showed he understood all about right and wrong, and in those
years of his life which we are not told anything about in the Bible, he
must always have obeyed his conscience, or he never could have preached
to others as he did afterwards,"--for the only vital use of Christ's
life to others is to make his spirit of action our own, and to believe
that we _can_ do likewise.

I have been led to think much of this in relation to children, by
hearing my orthodox friend talk; for he is a very conscientious man, and
his admission that to address the child's conscience was the _noblest_
way of treating it, though not the canonical one, let in a world of
light upon me touching the unchristian condition of Christendom. How can
truth prevail where the noblest appeal is not considered the religious
appeal? Truly yours,

                                                       M.


LETTER V.

MY DEAR ANNA,--If you wish to know the practical difficulties that arise
out of my desire to inculcate self-government, and to keep my own out of
sight as much as possible, I will tell you candidly that liberty is
sometimes abused in my school; but I have never repented of my
principles, and have learned not to be frightened by apparent failures,
for I have never known an instance, where I have had an opportunity to
observe the result, in which my plan has not answered somewhat to my
hopes.

And now I must tell you what are my hopes. They are not to make men and
women of children, or to produce perfect consistency of action in youth.
They are to put the mind in the right attitude so that the education of
life will bring forth the character harmoniously; and to make truth,
sincerity, kindly affections, and a conscientious use of the powers of
the mind the prevailing characteristics. Sometimes I wait long for the
dawning of this hope, but I cannot despair of it as long as I believe in
the soul. I do not mean that I think the soul self-existent, independent
of God, but I believe it so created that it can right itself at last
with due effort to realize His presence in vital laws. To induce it to
make this effort is what education is designed to effect, is it not? I
have had some children under my care who have come to me deceitful,
perverse, without delicacy of sensibility, self-conceited, puffed up
with lofty notions of their own importance and that of all who belonged
to them; and these characteristics so prominent and offensive that our
intercourse was for a long time nothing but war. I had no opportunity to
express approbation or sympathy, for the object with them was to defy or
circumvent me, and to accomplish their lessons by trickery instead of
honest application. These faults were constantly recurring, and I was
often strongly tempted to rid myself of the difficulty by declining to
keep such scholars in school with others. If my operations had
necessarily been confined to one apartment, I should have been obliged
to do this sometimes, but in my father's house I had many facilities,
and I felt it my duty, if possible, to do what I could for such
unfortunate children, as long as I was sure that my influence, and not
theirs, prevailed in the school. I saw that vices were made apparent, of
whose existence I could have wished innocent children never to know, but
I knew it was impossible to sequester them wholly from such contact, and
perhaps it had better be under supervision and thus possibly turned to
account. Sometimes the beauty of virtue is better seen by being
contrasted with its opposite. Had not I a right to think the evil might
be overruled for good, since God permits evil (the negative of good) in
his world? To do this, however, requires the greatest vigilance, and
occasionally I have been obliged to suspend very much the intellectual
training of a school, to gain time to investigate its moral state, and
the degree of evil influence that might tend to counteract mine, for
these interlopers among the innocents sometimes had bright parts, and an
activity that never tired. The faults of such children often brought
them into direct collision with their companions whose peace they
invaded, and thus far I was aided by my scholars in my discipline,
though I have had cases where the outward speciousness was only such as
one would imagine to belong to a matured person. I was obliged to take
the greatest pains, however, in order not to destroy the very germ of
delicacy (which yet bore no fruits), that my admonitions should be in
private, whenever no overt acts made it necessary for me to speak before
others. In private I need not speak in measured terms.

It is frightful to feel one's self so directly in contact with the
wrong-doing of a fellow-being, but at such times I have laid open the
heart as well as I was able, and showed the characteristics in all their
hideousness, taking it for granted that the moral judgment was still
alive.

A great man once said to me that we had no second consciousness by which
we could judge ourselves; and Burns, you know, exclaims,--

        "O wad some power the giftie gie us
         To see oursels as ithers see us!"

but I agree neither with the philosopher nor the poet, for conscience is
that second consciousness, which can be evoked if only the right
conjurer speaks. I believe in no other safeguard than that "voice of God
within us" to which I firmly believe no human being is _always_ deaf.
But, dear A----, what is so revolting as a bad child? It seems an
anomaly in nature. I depict no imaginary characters to you. I do not
think I could imagine a bad child. It must be seen and known to be
believed in. I am always inclined to blame the environment of such a
child, but repeated instances that I have known convince me that souls
differ in quality, and that it is unreasonable to expect the loveliest
type of virtue in all. I believe in the remedial power of education, not
that it can change the quality of the soul, but the character of the
individual. A bold, free spirit will not by education be made delicate,
but its boldness may be employed on worthy objects, and so of other
traits. Truth too can be shown to be beautiful to some, but to others to
be only manly, or respectable.

I have known children, who apparently had very little sensibility, to be
touched by the fact of never being unnecessarily exposed to others. This
care awakened in them a perception of delicacy. In one instance, I
learned subsequently that reproof received thus in private made a great
impression, while that administered at the moment of overt acts of
wrong-doing in the presence of the school made very little, or only
provoked defiance. I have sometimes had testimonies of affection from
such naughty children, and have feared they only proved a want of
sensibility, but this instance showed me that my care and painstaking
were appreciated where I least thought of it. I have often realized that
I kept bad manifestations in check, though the frequent outbreaks of
such traits as want of truth, stratagem, attempts at secret influence in
the school, proofs of want of delicacy of taste and of conscience, made
me feel that all I could do in the short period while my influence
lasted, was to hold up my testimony to good principles, and make an
adherence to truth, and sincere and conscientious action in every
particular of life,--the central points round which all other things
must revolve. This I never lose an opportunity of doing by dwelling upon
it to others as well as to the guilty. In a small school like mine--yet
large enough for variety,--I am in such close personal contact with all
my scholars, that the intimacy is nearly as great as in a family;
indeed, my personal intercourse with many of the children includes more
hours and more actual communication of mind than takes place in some
families. It seems to me very important that schools should be of such a
size that this may be the case, if they are to be looked to as a means
of moral, as well as of intellectual culture; and if they are not, I
conceive them to be nurseries of as much evil as good, to say the least.
One of the most melancholy things in life, to me, is seeing children get
used to what is wrong, submitting to it as a necessity of growth; and a
good school, where everything can be talked over, is an immense check
upon this. Happily the world cannot spoil a good soul, but there are
degrees in goodness, and in moral strength, and even good souls get
tarnished by getting used to evil. I would put off the day as long as
possible. In cities, where nearly the whole of youth is passed in
schools, more regard should be had to the moral part of the training.
Knowledge is dangerous power to the unconscientious, and every child
should and can be made to feel it.

In such deplorable instances as I have referred to, every power within
me has been taxed to the utmost to counteract the evil tendencies that
put forth their shoots in every direction. Sometimes a clearness of head
that made it easy for a child to see the bearings of things, or even an
instinctive affectionateness of disposition (not such as would stand the
test of opposition, however), have been the only foundations of my hope.
These do not supply the place of tenderness of conscience, but when one
is endeavoring to help forward that growth, a clear intellect is an
important aid. A natural obtuseness in both departments of the nature
would make one's efforts dark and groping indeed.

Now when I thus confess how small has often been the reward for my
pains, you may smile at my credulity, but I have had some rewards in the
midst of discouragements. I did feel in one instance, before my scholar
was taken from me,--and she was taken away because her mother had not
the moral courage to let her suffer the natural consequences of her
wrong-doing, at a crisis when I felt convinced it might do her radical
good,--that she had a far-off glimpse of what character is; that the
fine saying of Novalis, "character is a well-educated will," had dawned
upon her mind; for she could sometimes tell the truth against her own
interest, and could bear the natural consequences of a fault,
occasionally, without flying into a passion. My "natural consequences"
were, privation from the society of her companions when she had abused
their faith and their peace, &c. The child was _willing_ herself to sit,
for a whole term, in another apartment, and not enter the school-room
except for a recitation, and to have no part in the plays of the school,
but her mother was not willing.

This child I could not call noble-minded, or generous-hearted, or a
lover of truth, or a self-governing being, but I thought she had been
able to discern glimpses of these characteristics in others whom she had
wronged, and that had given me hope. I was thankful that I had given her
principles instead of penalties, and that I had had faith enough to wait
for the dawning of light within herself, without giving her up or
producing a false shine by addressing lower motives. She would have
despised me at that moment, if I had yielded to her mother's wish that I
should reinstate her in school before she had outlived her probation,
which the child and I had agreed to be the best discipline for her. I am
inclined to think she judged her mother unfavorably at that time, for
she often came to see me afterward, to ask me if I thought such and such
things were right--things which she evidently had heard discussed. She
was but eleven, but she had a wonderful power of writing symbolically.
She once wrote a legend in imitation of those of Spenser's "Faëry
Queene," which showed great intellectual insight into the distinctions
between right and wrong, and her sense of her own faults was such that
if anything closely resembling them was read of in school, she would put
her head under the table, as if she knew and felt its application. The
apparent attraction of my society to this child was very significant to
me. She would ask me the most subtle questions in morals, and discourse
as well as I could, so that I felt as if her knowledge of right and
wrong, gained through the intellect, was rather a hinderance than a help
to her moral improvement for she was guilty every day of malicious
falsehoods. Her envy of her companions was sickening to the heart, for
it made her active in injuring them. She had vanity rather than
ambition, for her desire to excel did not spur her to any troublesome
efforts, it only made her hate every pursuit in which others excelled
her, either by natural gift or by conscientious, patient industry. At
such times she would throw her books across the room, and stamp upon the
floor like a little maniac. Her unusual brilliancy of imagination,
unaccompanied by any sedative qualities, was one explanation of her
character. Her wit and fancy gave her great influence over her
companions, by whom she was admired, or feared, or held in great
aversion. She had a passionate attachment to one girl a little older
than herself, who was singularly lovely and delicate in mind and
conscience; but this passionate love alternated with fits of
persecution, arising wholly out of envy, so that I have known her
friend, who was strangely fascinated by her, to be ill for several days,
in consequence of painful scenes of its display. This little Italian
soul, born under our cold skies, was almost a fiend at eleven years old.
Perhaps the intellectual insight she possessed at that early age, will
be useful to her at any period of life when her moral nature shall be
awakened. I have known instances in which the latter slumbered in
childhood, and was roused into vivid action later in life by crushing
and heart-scathing events, consequent upon its early torpor; and I
should not be surprised if she should yet come to me across the wastes
of life for sympathy and help; for she knew I would fain have given her
my time and strength to awaken in her a love of excellence. Such
characters have success in the world from very unscrupulousness, till
they trample too proudly on the rights of others. The charms they do
possess, whether personal or mental, lure them on to greater evils till
they are thrown back suddenly into the presence of eternal truth, and
then what misery must ensue, what a reckoning must come! Do such
children of God see wider and deeper into the eternal truth for having
gone astray? I would fain think so; for in this universe of
compensations we can only _see that one_ for the lost heaven of innocent
childhood. Let those who have not such temptations mourn over, but not
despise the erring!

I would aid many children to conquer temper by a near penalty, or give
courage to confess a fault by taking away the apprehension of all other
punishment than the natural one of self-reproach, reflected from the
mother-confessor; but sometimes I see children who are afraid of nothing
in heaven or earth, the current of whose impertinence I can indeed check
for the moment; the bold, defying glance of whose eye I can quell, but
the coarse texture of whose mind admits none of the more delicate
influences. A large generosity, or a great moral indignation or
self-conquest, may be comprehended by such children, but not a fine
sympathy, or a tender regret.

I have had pupils with as violent passions, as determined will, as much
intellectual insight, and a temperament that made every emotion as keen
as the stroke of a Damascus blade, but a sensibility that would respond
to the gentlest touch, and a conscience whose stings were like a sharp
goad. This keenness of nature made childhood's experience like that of a
matured mind that had seen and felt the consequences of evil; and the
gravity of age took the place of the buoyancy of childhood. A word in
season would bring such a child to repentance and amendment too, for I
think nothing of occasional backsliding, where the desire of
improvement prevails. Such children are subject to abuse of a peculiar
kind, which they seldom escape. This quick sensibility is too often
called forth, and a morbid sensitiveness is produced which too often
takes refuge in recklessness. I have known such instances where the very
words "doing right" became hateful, when uttered by lips that had
invaded too often the sacred sensibility. Such vivid intellects are also
apt to be exercised too strongly for the entertainment of others, and
excited to undue activity by questions of morals which should not be
urged thus early, if we wish for a healthful development. The principle
of self-government is thus impaired, not strengthened. The trial of
strength ought to come later in life; and truthfulness alone will save
one who has such painful associations with virtue. I am thinking now of
a particular child whose peace of mind I have seen thus disturbed
fearfully, and to whom I felt it my duty to secure as much tranquillity
as the hours he passed with me could contain, even if advancement in
literature must be sacrificed to that end.

I know nothing more painful than to see a child of delicate sensibility,
and lively moral sense, growing hardened to the wrong-doing of others,
as it grows older, and even learning to expect it. I have seen this in
more than one child, and it has made me feel that there is a limit
beyond which we should not open the eyes of childhood. Let them live in
happy unconsciousness of all evil but that which is in themselves, as
long as possible, and let the characters of others be mysterious to
them, rather than let them acquire the habit of looking out for
blemishes by hearing low motives attributed to others. I would never
trace out evil in character before children, except where refraining
from doing so might risk the injury of the moral sense. We all know, I
fear, what it is to have our idols cast down, and our ideal desecrated
and sad; bitter indeed is the wakening from our dream of
man-and-woman-worship; but we learn one thing by dwelling upon the
perfection of our ideal, and that is, of what we are capable. No one
can ever realize that who has not worshipped some fellow-mortal, at some
time. I would not forget the passionate loves of my childhood for
anything I have yet realized in life.

Upon the whole, if I find truth in a character, I pass lightly over all
other deficiencies. And even some forms of falsehood do not discourage
me. A child that is managed by strategem will almost inevitably become
artful; but a generous, confiding treatment, in which his honor is
trusted, will probably bring him back to candor and simplicity. I love
to teach children to look upon and understand the virtues of others, to
excite their enthusiasm for fearless truth, self-sacrifice, and
long-suffering patience and kindness. All the experience of my life is
worked up into little stories. When I say "once I knew, &c.," I always
chain attention. I love to tell of one child I knew when very young, who
would never let another child communicate any secret, as children take
such pleasure in doing, without saying in answer to the question, "Will
you never tell?" "Nobody but my mother." This was her invariable answer,
and her sturdiness through all manner of ridicule made a great
impression upon me. We were inseparable companions, and I remember
nothing that bound me to her so strongly as this uprightness. I adopted
the same measure by her advice, and we doubtless escaped much evil in
that way. She went by the name of "_Nobody But_," but she had true moral
courage, and I used to resent, in her behalf, this nickname. My loyalty
to her generally saved me from even the temptation of being asked. This
and other small heroes and heroines are important mythological
personages in my school.

I have one scholar who was brought to me from a very large school where
no child could receive individual attention, and no subject of interest
was either studied or talked about. Certain outward actions brought
certain rewards or punishments. The principles of self-government and
conscience were never addressed. His mind, of fine natural powers,
would have been starved all that time if he had not had intellectual
culture at home. When he came into my school-room I could see that every
association with such scenes was wearisome and disgusting. Before the
study-bell was rung, he would pour into my ear the whole history of his
life, his excursions among the mountains, the stories told him by his
travelled uncles, his knowledge of animals, birds, flowers, and all in a
childlike spirit of confidence in my interest and sympathy, which he
caught from the other children. But when the school-hour came, a
lassitude pervaded all his faculties, and even a spirit of opposition
seemed to take possession of him. It was not the signal for many
pleasant things to happen, as with the rest, but for some stupid effort
to be made. The memory of many thousand spelling lessons, including
countless words to which no idea was attached in his mind, and of dull
readings of the same uninteresting sentences from the beginning to the
end of the year, and the adding, subtracting, and dividing of
inexpressive numbers, came thronging thick upon him. I learned the facts
from outside testimony, first suspecting them from their effects. It
needed only to look at him to see them written in his expressive face.

As soon as I saw clearly how it was, I determined that my school-room
should for a time be as much like the wild woods as I could make it,
consistently with due decorum; that he should enjoy the sweets of
liberty in certain ways, while at the same time I would endeavor gently
to substitute for his previous associations with study, something more
living. I soon saw that he evidently thought he was to do pretty much as
he pleased. I did not always check him when he walked to the window
without any apparent object but to enjoy the prospect in the street,
though I sometimes expressed surprise that he should do it when I had
given him a lesson to learn. He saw no black marks expressive of the
youthful sins of looking up from his book, or treading on the toes of
his neighbors, though after a while I gave him a little table by
himself, because he had not self-control enough to refrain from such
interference with others. I once remarked to him that he was like those
people whom society put into the State-prison, because he violated
social duties. Only those could enjoy freedom who did not interfere with
others' rights and comforts. The taste for liberty soon spread into
other things. He did not like to study anything that required an effort,
and showed a great feeling of discouragement whenever anything new was
required of him. He always said "can't," and often added in a half
whisper, "won't." I did not yield to this, but insisted upon having my
requisitions answered, partly because obedience must be the cardinal
virtue in school, and partly because I knew such despondency would never
be conquered unless by a sense of power to conquer difficulties. Much
time and labor it cost me and him to establish my authority in this
respect, and to induce him to begin to study a hard lesson. After I had
gained these points, however, I gradually set aside those things to
which he had the most aversion, and which had no interest but one
borrowed from a sense of duty, and thought it best to let him choose
more for himself. I could have done this earlier if the aversion to
certain mental efforts had not been accompanied with wilful resistance
to my wishes, and a want of consideration for my duties. Many of the
vile tricks of school-boys, both in school and in play-hours, annoyed me
and his companions.

At last the reaction began to take place. He became interested in Latin
fables and natural history, and when I began to administer less
interesting things in small doses, he would bring his book to me saying,
"I can't tell how to get this lesson," instead of "I shall never get
this, and I am not going to try." When I found he could adopt a
suggestion from me as to the best way to conquer a difficulty, I could
send him into another room to pronounce French phrases aloud, without
the interruption of other recitations. I had no possible penalties for
the recurrence of fits of idleness, and when he interrupted others, I
only expressed my surprise and regret that he should be so childish and
selfish, and occasionally sent him home because he was utterly
disagreeable. These faults seemed to be the result of a morbid activity
where healthful manifestations had been arbitrarily checked, and not an
evil disposition; for he really loved little children, and was
communicating and confiding to me before and after school, quite
courteous and polite to me as Miss P----, but wholly in opposition to
the school-dame. I always took pains to appeal to him for his
traveller's stories when they came in appropriately to the geography
lesson, or could illustrate in any way what was read. School began
gradually to afford him the same sort of pleasure he received from
reading with his mother, which was always agreeable, and had stored his
mind with pleasant knowledge. In morals as well as in lessons I did the
same thing. I called upon him to help me take care of the little
children when we walked, because I saw he could do this with ease and
pleasure. As soon as any other relation took the place of the school
relation, all things went on agreeably. He knew that I respected his
word, and that his story had due weight in the scale when I asked for
various testimony in regard to any subject of difference.

My object was, as you will perceive, to leave him to feel the natural
consequences of doing wrong, instead of fearing any arbitrary
punishment; being confident that the natural sequence of things (that
is, God's arrangements) would enlighten the mind as no mere penalty or
mere precept could do. I often feel that I can see the prominent points
in a case like this, where a mother may not, owing to her position.
Neither do mothers know the faults of the school-room. I give
information of these, as they tell me the faults of the nursery.
Children that cry much in nurseries, seldom cry at all in a school-room,
where a pleasing variety occupies the time, and a seed-grain of
self-control is planted; and temptations arise in the school-room,
where peculiar efforts and sacrifices are called for, that do not assail
the child at home. The mother of this boy could hardly be made to
believe that in school-hours neither his intellect nor his conscience
acted, because she knew they did at other times. It was as if a spell
bound him there. In his previous school-life there had been little but
spelling-lessons, and what is called discipline, which consists, as far
as I can understand, (and I have inquired very particularly of those who
advocate the system,) of teaching as many uninteresting words as can be
crowded into the memory, especial care being taken to keep out of the
way all ideas. It was in such a conversation that the view was advanced
to which I have before alluded, that the less interest, the more
discipline of study. The advocate of such a plan thought everything that
was studied in youth was forgotten, be it what it might, therefore
training (alias misery and waste of time) was alone useful or desirable.
He instanced his own experience as a proof of this, and where it was
gently insinuated that perhaps if those forgotten geography lessons,
Latin lessons, etc., had had any interest of their own, such as
associations with interesting people, or the amusement of a story, they
might have kept their place in his mind, he rejected the idea entirely,
showing, as the Puritans did when they persecuted the Quakers for doing
the very thing they had done, the evils of a bad education. I even
ventured a little story, (that being a lively kind of argument I like to
use,) of a little girl in my school, who, when I was endeavoring to make
her hear the thunder-music and see the rainbow-tinted spray of Niagara
Falls, exclaimed, "Why, I never knew before that Niagara Falls was made
of water!"--but I found he could not be taught "out of the mouth of
babes and sucklings."

I could have told him, if I had not been discouraged, of a dear little
boy of my acquaintance, seven years old, whom his mother wished to send
to my school, but his more ambitious father chose to put him into the
Latin Grammar-School, (the very one of which this gentleman was usher
when I talked with him.) His mother begged me to let him come to me
privately to learn with me the terrible Latin Grammar-lesson of three
pages, which was to be his first lesson in the school, and the language.
So little Georgie and I had a secret session every day for a long time,
in which we got the lesson together--I would hear him say it, and he
would hear me, and I endeavored to extract some hidden meaning from it
for him, but although I saved him from many a feruling, his hatred of
school became so intense, from the impossibility he found of ever
succeeding without penalty and suffering, that he actually broke down in
spirits and health, and was at last taken away and sent to a military
school to save his life. His mother and I knew why he failed, for he was
of delicate organization, easily frightened, and his sensibility, which
was keen and might have opened to him the beauties of the universe, was
poisoned and embittered by unjust severity and the fearful drill of that
model school. Some of my boys who have gone there after having learned
to use their faculties, have succeeded well, and found no difficulties;
but poor little George was taken from what I call a spelling-school, and
put into that tread-mill, as it proved to him. I attribute a subsequent
unhappy career to this mistake in his education, but I hope something
will yet evoke his originally lovely nature.[K]

When one hears such views as these, and many others of similar import
that I could recount, one almost despairs of ever seeing a whole man.
The fact that there is a grain of truth in such heaps of falsehood, only
increases the difficulty, because that grain of truth prevents the
recognition of that mass of error. My observation and experience are
that, not till things are intelligently learned do they begin to
fertilize the mind, or are they even sure to stay in it, and scarcely a
fine intellect will give you any other record of itself than that the
date of its improvement began at that era when either self-education or
the wise teacher showed it the thread of relation that runs through all
things. Not till at least one human fact has exemplified some spiritual
law, does the intellect work intelligently, or begin to arrange its
stores. Do we not know some minds that are mere encyclopedias, which
imagination has never penetrated with its Ithuriel spear? If such have
moral sense in any fair proportion, they are liable to become hopelessly
miserable in this world of shadows because they can see nothing but the
shadows.

I once knew a mother who was a beautiful type to me of the spirit that
should actuate the guardians of the young. She looked upon a soul with
such awe that it was not easy for her to impose her authority upon her
children, for might there not be something in their natures superior to
her own? The possibility of this made her cautious in her requisitions,
lest she should nip some beautiful bud of promise in them. I knew her
when they were all young, and I saw that it was not want of decision,
but the fear of doing harm that often arrested her action. The children
were not always serene and happy, and sometimes not obedient, for they
had strong wills, and what is called a great deal of character. How
could there but be strong individuality in such a family? There was no
fixed pattern by which they were all to be measured. But they reverenced
her as she did them, for she lived and acted simply and genuinely, and
encompassed them round about with her tenderness, practising daily those
virtues of devotion and self-denial which are demanded of the mother of
a large family, and never turning a deaf ear to the wants of those less
favored with earthly happiness than herself. She treated her children
with the respect one human being owes to another, irrespective of age.
Yet she did not commit the error we sometimes see of reasoning out every
point of duty with children, thus teaching them to quibble and catch at
words. She could check that while she showed respect for their reasons.
She had that true humility which makes its possessors question every
step of the way in the path of duty, while they have a trusting faith
that there is something within them to answer to its calls.

She died suddenly, and then her influence, which many might have
doubted, appeared in a wonderful and beautiful manner. Circumstances
were such that no one was able to take the proper care of the family for
a month or two in the absence of the father. The eldest children, two
boys, one fourteen, the other eleven, immediately took the place of
their mother as a matter of course, assumed the personal care which they
had seen their mother take every day, of six little brothers and
sisters, arranging everything as their mother had done, even in such
minutiæ as placing the clothes in the proper drawers, and washing and
dressing the younger children, which the mother had never left to
servants, although the home was well supplied with them. In a quiet and
unostentatious manner a large establishment had been managed by a
superior mind so skilfully, that these boys found no difficulty in
keeping everything in train till their father's return. They had been
inspired by their mother with a sense of order, propriety, and
responsibility, for it was a peculiarity in her that she rather acted
than inculcated principles, and through their great and tender
affection, which had been her happiness in life, her characteristics
flowed naturally and without a break into their lives. Such a mother
should every teacher be, especially of young children.

You need not tell me that mothers and teachers must be wise as well as
tender, courageous as well as reverential. I know it well. I can tell
you of a young mother who risked an essential injury to her child
(humanly speaking, for we cannot injure the _essence_ of another) by
allowing him to quibble upon subjects of right and wrong, and accepting
his excuses when he could found them upon any inadvertence of hers. His
mental motions were more rapid than hers, and a morbid tenderness of
conscience made her hesitate to lay injunctions upon him, lest she might
err in judgment. A natural tendency to subtlety and stratagem was thus
fostered in him, and as he had not much imagination, there was danger
that he would become actually deceitful. He led an innocent life
compared with many boys of his age, for he was kept very much out of
harm's way, but I soon perceived the pleasure he experienced from a
successful trick of fun, and that his great command over his nerves
tempted him to play many such, which he could do with a grave face. I
never saw one that was not in itself innocent fun, and if they had been
practised as some children practise them, who will betray their agency
the next moment from mere artlessness, I should only have battled the
point with him as I do with others who play in school in study hours,
(or rather half hours.) But I saw that this was likely to become a
deeper evil, connected as it was with his habit of excusing himself,
finding flaws in my directions, and quibbling upon words. It was too
serious a matter for penalties of my device, designed as reminders, nor
was I willing to enter the lists with him and vanquish him by my
superior sagacity, for this would be only sharpening his tools.

I took a good opportunity one day to call what he did _mean_, and to
tell him that I thought he was growing cunning, which I was very sorry
for, as that led to deception of all sorts. It was very funny to pull
another boy's hair, and then look grave as if he knew nothing about it,
which I had often seen him do, but I could not laugh at fun, when it was
at the expense of truthfulness, though I enjoyed a good joke as well as
any one. It was wrong, too, for him to play when I was looking the other
way, because it was cheating me and setting a bad example to the other
scholars. I liked to be able to trust people's honor, and when I gave a
direction, and then went to the other side of the room to attend to
others, in the confidence that my wishes would be conscientiously
regarded, I was disappointed and grieved to find that I was cheated. I
did not like to be obliged to watch people. I could not respect any one
I must watch, and I would not watch him. If he would do wrong and teach
others to do so, he must sit entirely by himself. As to himself, no one
else could cure him of his faults. If he was willing to grow deceitful,
no one could help it; but if he had no honor, every one must defend
himself against him, and he could command no respect from any one, nor
have any of his own, which I thought more precious than that of others.
What was a person good for who could not have self-respect? It was a
pleasant thing to make other people laugh, but if he could allow another
to bear the blame of it, and not speak up to say he was the offender, I
could not trust him even when he did speak. I added, that I had long
observed these tricks of his, and had been sure they would at last lead
to meanness, and here was an instance of it just as I had expected. I
also reminded him of an occasion when I saw him take an unfair advantage
in play for the mere pleasure of winning a little game, thus giving up
his honor for the enjoyment of a moment. I hoped he would remember these
instances and the danger to which he was exposing himself. I would not
dare to punish such faults, for I might be suspicious of him when he did
not deserve it, as I could not always read his mind or be sure of his
sincerity. The punishment must be the one God had appointed for such
faults--and that was, a loss of integrity itself, the most dreadful of
all punishments.

The child loved me and thought a great deal of my opinion. He did not
wish the tears in his eyes to fall, and he swallowed them till his face
flushed. I had spoken before all the school, as it was a public offence
not to be passed over; for nothing is more attractive to children than
the wittiness of practical jokes, as I knew one child to confess when
asked which boys he liked best in a certain story, "Oh the bad boys,"
said he, "I like the wittiness of them."

I afterwards took every opportunity to put this little fellow upon his
honor, and often said, so that he might hear it, that if any one wished
to be fair and honorable, they had better not indulge in what seemed
very innocent fun when concealment was necessary, for fear of learning
to deceive. I often appealed to him for testimony, because I knew he had
accuracy of observation, and dwelt particularly on such occasions upon
my wish that he should tell me all his own part in a transaction, very
carefully, both good and bad, for the sake of helping me to do justice,
and urged him not to be cowardly, or keep back anything for fear of
being blamed. Blame, I once told him, was one of our best friends. The
fear of it sometimes kept us from doing wrong even when we had no better
reason, and when we had done wrong, it showed us to ourselves, just as
we were, and waked conscience up to its duty. Only cowards were afraid
to tell the truth against themselves. Yet I checked him whenever he
_told tales_ of others; which is a thing I always carefully discriminate
from telling the truth when asked. I checked him also because one of his
bad habits was to excuse himself, and the temptation that assailed him
was to throw the blame on others.

In every way I could think of, I thus tried to show him how his
particular tendencies would lead him into falsehood, which I _assumed_
to be the greatest of faults.

After three years' continuance in my school, I assure you there was not
a child in it that I would more readily trust, and though he always
annoyed me with his playfulness, it ceased to be tricky. I had frequent
occasions to notice his candor and to refer to his improvement. I never
spoke to him again before the school upon the subject of his mean fault,
but I kept it fresh in his own mind, and long after, when I reproved
another child for symptoms of the same fault, I remarked that one of my
scholars had once given me the same cause to fear for his integrity, but
he had watched himself, and I was glad to say he had resisted temptation
and grown honorable and trustworthy. I saw that he knew who I meant, but
the others had forgotten who it could be. I did not gratify their
curiosity, of course.

I do not know that this boy is above temptation, but I have had many
proofs of his power to resist it; occasions that brought him no glory,
some of which I have recognized by such a remark as "how respectable
honesty is," or "how I like to see moral courage that fears nothing but
doing wrong." Sometimes I took no visible notice, for we need not always
praise well-doing. It is often both unnecessary and unwise, for where
goodness is not wholly spontaneous, it may be vitiated by love of
approbation. It is only _perfect_ goodness, or such measure of that as
mortals may attain, that can always bear praise and grow only more
fervent for it.

Sometimes I leave one scholar to keep school while I go into another
room to hear a lesson, and then I require an account of their
stewardship. I am always careful to select one whom all will concur in
respecting and of whom they will feel no jealousy when they are
censured. I once left this boy in charge, but after a short time he came
and requested to be released, because he felt as if it was like
tale-bearing to tell of his companions, and he did not feel sure that
they would be willing. I saw by this that he meant to be faithful;
indeed, it was not till after I had full confidence in him that I
ventured on so important a step. I presume he did not feel as if I could
say, as I had said of some others, "You know ---- would not find fault
with you if he could help it, or if his conscience did not require it of
him." There is no point that must be managed with such delicacy as this
of discriminating between truth and falsehood. Children live so long in
their ideal worlds, and are so much talked to in symbols, that when they
begin to deal more with realities they must often be reminded to be
accurate. I would lead them gently out of the creations of their
imaginations when this time comes, constantly reminding them that they
must tell things just as they are; and when they embellish their
statements, I go over them quietly, re-stating for them, and leaving out
all the marvellous additions. Little children will often quote their
absent mothers' authority, when it is impossible that the circumstances
can have been anticipated. I always reply to this very decidedly, "Oh!
no; mother did not say so. She does not know anything about it; you must
not tell me so; that is saying what is not true, which is very wrong."
If they persist, I say, "Very well; I will write a little note to mother
when you go home, and tell her I am afraid her little child has said
what is not true, shall I?" This will generally bring out a confession.
I do not punish on such occasions, for there is no surer way of
producing falsehood than by inspiring fear, but I try to produce a
little agony in the conscience and make a child very unhappy for the
moment. This suffering can be referred to afterwards, in private, and
the danger pointed out of growing wicked, which I find the greatest
instrument of awakening the inward monitor.

Some people object to allegories and fairy stories for children, but I
am never afraid of them if they are true to nature, truly imaginative,
or if the impossible is occasionally caught a glimpse of. A fairy that
comes out of a flower, is an imaginary being that will never disturb the
dreams or deceive the intellect of a child. I always call such stories
poetry, and sometimes ask what they teach. If a teaching use cannot be
made of them, they are not written conscientiously and are not good food
for the young. A child of well cultivated imagination will be likely to
be more rather than less truthful than others. But I do not like ogres.
I once had a scholar, a child of eleven years, that had never known the
care of parents. She was a southern child, whose parents died in her
infancy, and she was sent from one boarding-school to another, where she
was made the tool of unscrupulous girls to obtain their ends against
authority. She told untruths _always_, even upon the most trivial
matters, as if she feared being circumvented, or giving any handle to
others by whom she might be blamed. She was so subtle, that it was
almost impossible to obtain a fact from her, although she lived in the
family. Her relations had wholly neglected all personal care of her,
and I found she knew nothing whatever about them. I learned that her
parents were two very lovely young people, both of whom died early of
consumption, and she had an uncle who was a bachelor and a very wealthy
planter. He had been very fond of his sister, and meant to take home
this child and make her his heiress as soon as she was old enough. She
had the precocity of constitution and temperament common to the
southerners, but had no interest in life at all except for present
gratification. It was difficult to interest her in anything, and I
determined to try the experiment of describing her parents and her
uncle, and telling her of her future prospects. I saw when I was talking
to her that she was much moved, but she did not wish me to know it.
During the several months she had been under my care, I had never seen
her off her guard, and she did not mean to be now. She said, "yes, I
know," several times, but in her emotion she had forgotten that she had
told me several times when I had asked her, that she had no relations.
As I went on speaking of the lovely character of her mother, who died at
her birth, I saw the color flash and her lips quiver, but she would
express no interest in the matter in words, and I took no notice of her
natural emotions. But when I went on to speak of the uncle and his
beautiful home, his love for his sister, and for her, whom he had never
seen since her babyhood, and of his wish that she should preside over
his home when old enough, she fairly burst into tears; and when I drew
her into my arms she put her head on my bosom and gave way to violent
sobbing. But still she was cautious in speaking, and I did not convict
her of having concealed the truth. She was naturally very timid, and I
had divined the cause of her phase of falsehood. She had been treated
very cruelly, and was afraid of human beings. After a while she proposed
to write to her uncle and tell him what she was studying; but although I
doubt not life had a new interest to her, I could not tell what was the
characteristic of her interest, owing to her great reserve. It might
have been sordid, for she was very selfish; but she was soon removed,
and I had no opportunity of seeing her for many years. I then found her
still in the family of her guardian, to one of whose sons she was
engaged, but I was told there was no love, only speculation, at the
foundation of the young man's views, and the seeds of consumption,
inherited from her mother, had begun to ripen in her. She was
brilliantly beautiful, and showed a great deal of feeling on seeing me,
but died very soon after. The only evidence I ever had of the existence
of the moral sentiment in her wronged soul, was her fondness for another
child in my family, who was the soul of truth and love, and who had
divine patience with this her little tormentor, whom she watched over
and remonstrated with like a little mother. This companion, of just her
own age, had had a very remarkable moral training, consecrated forever
by the sufferings for conscience' sake of a very dear and gifted mother,
whose persecutions were known to her child, and no one could know her,
not even the most hardened or obtuse, without being affected by her. She
was a little Christ among other children, and so regarded by them, and I
always hoped that the poor little waif had through her a glimpse of the
Heaven into which she seemed to have no passport. At the time, I
rejoiced for my little angel, when her heart was relieved of such a
charge, for certain natural graces as well as the condition of moral
benightment of the little stranger had taken very deep hold of her; but
I think a reform might have been effected with such an aid. The martyr's
child lived long enough to fulfil her promise, and grew happy enough to
blossom out into some buds of lovely promise, intellectual as well as
moral, and then she went too, but could be no more an angel the other
side of the veil than she was on this. How slight the barrier sometimes
seems to be, yet how impervious! Was it the _divine love_ in you which
made you do that? was her mother's form of reproof, always _remembered_.

Is there any danger of inspiring a child with too great self-reliance,
by directing it to the immutable law of God in its own breast as a guide
of conduct? It has been wisely said that we know of the moral nature of
God only what the moral sentiment teaches us, and that the visible world
and revelation only confirm what this sentiment gives primarily. We know
that the sentiment of reverence may be directed to objects unworthy the
homage of the soul. In the fluctuations of human opinion there may be a
higher or lower view of God's nature. He may be looked upon as all
justice without mercy, or as mercy without justice, or as a union of
both, according to the enlightenment of the intellect, but we can
cultivate in every child a reverence for God's voice in conscience, an
allegiance to God as goodness itself, or as a Father, ready to forgive
us when we repent, and to help our efforts. The human being may by turns
worship God as a Father, as a power, or as law; and salvation, or the
redemption of the soul from evil, does not depend upon the form of
belief, but upon the allegiance to that something higher which is a law
to it. I do not say that it is not important what the form is, for we
know that there is all the difference in the world between the savage's
worship of his fetish, and the Christian's of his God, but the savage
may be more loyal to the small glimmer of truth represented by his
fetish, than many a so-called Christian is to his more advanced
conception of Deity. Therefore it is loyalty of soul which is to be
cultivated, and that is done through conscience.

I know no higher motive to be given to a child or to a man, than that
the more he obeys the voice of conscience, the more tender it becomes;
and the more he cultivates his intellect the greater will be its
expansion; and no fear that either can entertain is so salutary as the
fear of losing the delicacy of the conscience, or the power of
increasing insight. Offer no secondary motives, but as high a view as
we can give of the primal one, not judging for our fellow-man, or even
child, what it is ready to receive, for either may be capable of
receiving more than we can give.

This does not interfere with bringing the consequences of wrong-doing
into immediate view, which is in fact all that we do when we punish
judiciously. If a child is selfish he is thrust aside by those who have
the power to do it. This is a direct natural consequence, quite as much
so as that the selfishness grows by indulgence, but weak children in a
school or in a family must not venture to thrust aside an offender. I
must therefore come to their assistance.

I have one child in my school who has so little power of self-control,
that I am obliged to be very peremptory with him every day. It would not
be sufficient for me to say, "You trouble others so that they do not
like to have you sit near them," and wait for that truth to influence
him. I must put him in a seat by himself, and show him that he is not to
approach others now, and that he must make an immediate effort to gain a
better social position. If anything comes into his head, he seems
utterly incapable of refraining from the utterance of it, even in the
midst of a recitation, or be it ever so irrelevant to the matter in
hand. He wishes to tell anecdotes of which he is reminded by something
read or recited. If I tell him he must not take up the time, he is so
earnest to go on, that often I cannot stop him without walking him out
of the room. Then I tell him that since he has no power of self-control,
he must stay there till I call him; or I allow him to return on
condition that he does not open his mouth even to read or to recite. I
impose this privation to teach him self-control, the want of which will
make him annoying to every one. He pours forth many sensible remarks and
more good feelings, but the law of adaptation seems wanting. He has
sensibility and conscience, and a general desire to do right. If not
approved, he is afflicted; if he does not succeed in his undertakings,
he cries with grief, cries aloud often, though a huge boy of nine years
old,--a little giant in form and strength. He generally seems to tell
the truth, though he is weak, and yields easily to the temptation of
gaining his ends. But if he cannot remember easily, he lashes himself
into hysterics. He has quick perceptive powers, but little power of
reasoning. My aim is to show him the connection between his faults and
his sufferings; to let the latter be felt to be the whip that scourges
his faults--not himself; for there is no fair proportion between the
constant punishment he brings upon himself and his wilful wrong-doing. I
am afraid he will always be a trial to his friends. He is one of my
least hopeful cases, because not well gifted. I am afraid there is a
germ somewhere that the sun has not yet shone upon--that some tile that
is now weighing down his brain must be lifted before mortal man can help
him. You remember the story of Descartes, who was an idiot till his
skull was cracked, when suddenly the brain expanded, and the fissure
never closing, he became a great man. Perhaps my obtuse boy will get
some friendly blow, mental or physical, that will let in the light. His
mother turned him out into the street to amuse himself, because she
could not manage him. If she had not, perhaps I should already have
turned him back upon her hands, for he really is the greatest trouble I
have. My hope for him is that maturity and experience will teach him
what others cannot. This is often the case.

Another little fellow appears to have no natural perception of the
rights of others. He does not understand the sentiment of obedience, as
many lively children do. If I keep my eye fixed upon him, he does not do
the things I positively forbid him to do, but he is the very prince of
mischief, and I am obliged to watch him narrowly lest he turn inkstands
upside down, and go to such like extremes. In some cases I merely follow
my instincts, and this is such an one. I feel as if I were to put
principle into this child because I have it myself, much as the
magnetist imposes his will upon his patient by exercising it forcibly.
I find myself looking at him much more than I talk to him, not always
reprovingly, never stealthily, but steadily and gravely. I do not like
to govern, but I am not afraid of children, as some people are. My
nerves can bear their crying, if they do not cry with pain, and they
soon learn that they gain nothing from me by it. They do not put me out
of temper, or exhaust my patience, or my perseverance; but the
determined will, the ever-springing gayety, the wild spirits that tire
most people, are a constant source of pleasure and exhilaration to me.
It seems to me so unnatural that childhood should be naughty, that if
they are obstinate I am very apt to think it the fault of some still
more obstinate grown person, who has turned a stout heart into a wilful
one by unwise opposition; and I love to set myself to disarming the
stubborn will, leaving it only resolute. If they are false, I feel as if
their faith had been broken, or their fears excited, and I love to show
them the beauty of truth, or inspire them with moral courage. If they
are passionate, I love to calm them down, and give them the pleasure of
tranquillity, and the joys of self-conquest,--not "breaking their
spirits," but sympathizing with their ardor while I check its excesses;
for enthusiasm is a boon of which I would not deprive humanity. If they
are phlegmatic, commonly called stupid, I love to find some subject or
object of interest that will startle them into animation; if timid and
easily discouraged, I can give them the pleasures of success by offering
only practicable tasks; if self-conceited, I can point out to them the
kingdoms of knowledge yet to be conquered. I often quote the words of
Linnæus, who once said it would take him all his life to learn
thoroughly what was under his own hand, and what was this compared with
the universe!

I believe I enjoy the youngest of my tribe most, before they know evil
or are accustomed to hear of it with composure; when the wanton killing
of a bird, or even of a spider, excites their weeping indignation; when
the creations of their own fancies are as real to them as the things
before their bodily eyes; and they do not question if the bird in the
story speaks, or the stars sing. One may then imagine that they may be
among the few who love to the end with unbroken faith, who never lose
their primitive innocence, but grow as the tree grows, whose leaves,
when the early frost nips them, turn to scales to protect their sister
growths, adding to the final perfection of the whole, not arresting its
beautiful and symmetrical progress, neither withering in the bud, nor
throwing out gnarled branches to the light and heat that would fain warm
and smile upon them. I would not pin these little inheritors of the
earth to one seat, or always check the wild burst of delight, or the
ringing laugh. I even like to have the older children hear it
occasionally, and recognize it with a smile as I do, for they have
already begun to _remember_ happiness, alas! as if it had already begun
its flight. They have laughed when it was not sympathized with, been
reproved for loving fun, and deprived of innocent sports because they
were not convenient to others. I like to keep up their sympathies with
the spontaneous activity and pure imaginations of these babes. It is out
of order for a little child that catches my eye to run across the room
to say, "Oh, may I come and see 'oo 'ittle while?" but I cannot but nod
assent, and he will come and scramble into my lap, where he is no sooner
fairly settled and hugged than he will scramble down again and go back
to his slate or his window. If he nestles up into his sister's chair,
while she is studying, I put my finger on my lips, but let her put her
arm round him and keep him till he is tired. This little sunbeam begins
to wish to draw on the slate, and the little sister of seven years takes
the greatest interest in what he does, as if expecting some angelic
exploit of the pencil.

But though I wish to have self-government in my scholars instead of my
own, dear Anna, do not for a moment mistake me. I consider obedience an
essential ingredient of order, and order I regard as "heaven's first
law." Indeed I have sent away one scholar of whom I have spoken a
little way back, because I could not command his obedience; and my
authority must not be questioned, although I do not obtrude it. No human
being can be good or happy who cannot obey; and those parents do the
best thing for their children, who successfully cultivate the sentiment.
For, if it is the _sentiment_, it will acknowledge all lawful authority.
When it is merely a practice gained through fear, there is generally no
sentiment in it. The child who will not eat the bit of cake offered in
its mother's absence, because she has refused to let him have it
before,--and I have known many such,--is truly the obedient child.
Children not only respect most but love best those whom they cheerfully
obey. A child that obeys a judicious and affectionate mother, or
teacher, will often, in the midst of its opposition and wilfulness,
acknowledge that the power which rules him is a beneficent power. If I
did not think that a pretty good child would feel that I was in the
right very soon after a conflict of wills, I should suspect myself of
having given some evidence of love of power or want of good temper. I
would not restrain an expression of honest indignation, or strong
disapprobation, if the offence deserved it; but any impatience of
temper, or any personal feeling, except that of sorrow, is a crime in
this relation. It may not be in a mother's or teacher's power to be
always wise, judicious, or intellectually ready for an occasion; but the
virtue of patience is lawfully demanded of them at the tribunal of
conscience always. Corporal punishment I have nothing to do with, for
though I know it is necessary in some extreme cases, I prefer that
parents should exercise that function. No person that has a less vital
interest in a child than a parent, should inflict it; and though as a
principle of government I consider it brutalizing, there are instances
in which I have felt it to be a _holy_ act, and in which I have known
the child to respect it, and to feel hurt for its parent rather than for
itself. But my own influence, to be secure and useful, must be wholly
moral and intellectual. I often tell children that I must inform their
parents when I find them impervious to any influence of mine; and when,
as has sometimes been the case, they have begged me not to do it,
because they should be whipped, I have said that "perhaps that was the
very best possible thing that could be done, and if a parent thought it
necessary to whip his child, it must be because he truly loved him, and
thought it right to do what must be to himself a painful thing: such a
reason must not deter me from doing my duty. I should not act according
to my conscience if I concealed anything from parents, for they are the
guardians God has appointed over children, and I should do wrong to
prevent them from knowing everything that I knew, that would help them
make their children good."

I cannot provide for those exceptional cases illustrated to me by a
little new scholar I once had, who was very refractory. I said to him,
"don't you wish to be good, Lewis?" "No," he cried out in a distressed
voice. He was only six years old, but this seemed to be a new case, so I
put my arm affectionately round him and said, "What does it mean to be
good, Lewis?" He raised his tearful eyes to me and gasped out "ter be
whipped!" I never saw a look of greater infantile woe; but I soon taught
him that that was not what I meant by "being good."

I know one mother who has a family of excitable children, which she
treats wholly on hygienic principles. If they are out of temper, she
administers nauseous doses of medicine, and such has been her power over
their consciences that she can make them grateful to God for such
blessings as ipecacuanha and epsom salts, even when she is holding the
spoon to their mouths. This is a fact within my knowledge; and it was
the first thing I knew that set my thoughts upon the track, which has
led me to a firm conviction that half the ills of temper and perversity
may be traced to physical causes; for her instinct proved to be a
correct one. Her children were honorable and affectionate, but
irritable, and this was owing to an unhappy inheritance of physical
structure, incompatible with serenity till counteracted by judicious
treatment. One of those wise physicians, who sometimes adorn the
profession, was her aid and counsellor. "Her children rise up and call
her blessed," and bless her too.


LETTER VI.

DEAR ANNA,--I have just heard that you think of changing your original
plan, and becoming a governess. At the risk of being impertinent, I must
give you the warning of experience against this course. I know the voice
of experience is not an unerring one, because circumstances differ
almost infinitely, but I think the relation of governess an unnatural
one, and also that the disadvantages of home education, given
exclusively, far overbalance its advantages. Mark me, I say given
exclusively, for I think the early education should always be domestic.
I would have every mother set apart from all the other duties of life to
attend to her children, and be qualified to give them the rudiments of
not only moral but intellectual training. I know only one mother who has
done this absolutely and with all the requisite surroundings, though I
know many who would be glad to do it. Perhaps I should say I know only
one father who has made it possible. Doubtless there are some fathers
who would be glad to have it done, with whom the mothers are not ready
to coöperate. I could branch off here, and tell all I think about
parents not having the right views of their parental duties, but that
would take me still farther back, to the subject of being married on the
right principles, which I have been led to reflect much upon, as I have
circulated through the families of my friends, particularly of those who
have from time to time put their children into my charge. I speak it
with diffidence, but I see many families in which the children are
regarded in the light of annoyances rather than of blessings;
consequently they are penned up in nurseries, put to bed by servants,
fed by them, washed and dressed by them, excused by them, falsely
entertained by them, in fact educated by them, until they are old enough
to be quiet inmates of the parlor, when they are allowed to be present
to listen to conversations about the last new fashion, or comments upon
the party of last night and that of the night to come. I have known the
mothers of children under my care, to promise a sick child she would not
go out in the evening, in order to quiet her querulous complaints of her
nurse or attendant, and then to break the promise as soon as the child
fell asleep, confiding in its mother's sincerity. This is an extreme
case, but it is not so rare for mothers to send their children to bed
under the care of servants, instead of leaving the pleasant fireside to
make the most of that gracious hour when the heart of the child is most
likely to unfold to the tender parent, and to utter its repentant
confession or fervent little prayer.

But this is wandering a little from the point. I begin to think I
indulge in too many digressions; but my vocation leads me into such
observations and reflections.

I know there is much to be said on both sides of this question. I should
give you the sum of my opinion, if I should say that after the age has
arrived at which children are ordinarily sent to school, an alternation
of the home and the school education is the best mode. Here experience
raises her voice again; for the best educations I have known, all other
things being equal, have been in two families where this has been done.
In one of these, the watchful eye of the mother saw the very moment in
which the home influence was becoming too exclusive and oppressive, and
also when the school influence became scattering to the mind from too
much companionship, or when ambition took the place of love of knowledge
and excellence. The school intercourse was occasionally broken in upon
by months of home life, when the mother devoted herself as companion in
study and recreation, and kept alive her daughters' sympathy with her
in her domestic duties. I have often seen the mere school-life kill out
this sympathy with mothers and younger members of the family, and
foreign influences quite counteract the parental ones.

My own favorite mode of education would be to send children to school
after they have been well trained in imagination and self control at
home, at the age when the social feeling seeks variety, and can receive
least injury from indiscriminate contact; and when arrived at the age
when too much companionship becomes dangerous, to call the girls back to
the home influences, and let them there pursue, with judicious
assistance, or even a chosen companion, the studies best adapted to the
peculiarities of character, the mother ever keeping herself the chosen
confidant, and making herself a willing sacrifice, instead of allowing
the social tendencies of her daughters to expend themselves on frivolous
or unworthy companions. Mothers are too apt to indulge their own ease,
and allow their children to frequent, alone, scenes of amusement over
which parents should always preside. I have known marriage relations to
be formed and cemented by daughters so neglected, before parents knew
even the fact of acquaintanceship.

I know how difficult is such practice as I would recommend, in our
present state of society; but one can hardly help following out one's
imaginings of perfect circumstances, and fancying all the good that
might accrue in such millenniums. It was very sensibly remarked to me a
little while since, by one to whom I was speaking of my ideal of
education for girls, that we can rarely begin and go on with them
according to any one system; for they are brought to us in all stages of
development, most frequently, alas, without any. You will please always
to understand me as if everything went on right from the beginning.

To return to your present plans. I think I must have learnt this
rambling habit which so often leads my pen off the track, when roving
the woods and fields in my extreme youth, now resting by the side of the
arrowy river of my favorite valley, where the "sweet waters meet," or
floating with you down the placid Charles at the winds' and the tides'
sweet will.

I anticipate what you will tell me of the advantages under which you
enter upon the career of a governess. I expect a glowing description of
your new life, because I know how you love and admire those friends; but
that will make no difference in my views. I too have a friend with whom
I agree upon the subject of education; a mother whose experience and
wisdom have aided me much, and whose spirit has presided over my
school-room as a sort of tutelary genius, into whose family I should be
willing to go and give all the aid I could furnish for the furtherance
of her plans, (her own book-knowledge not being equal to mine,) if she
constituted the whole influence in her own family. There would be a
perfect coöperation between us two, the intercourse of years having
prepared the way for it. But her husband is not as wise as she is, and I
would not therefore venture. Yours may be a peculiar case of sympathy
with both parents, but let us look upon it in a general way.

We will suppose a good family, and that the parents are conscientious,
and have a general confidence in the judgment and acquirements of the
governess. But if the mother is a person of decided views, and fixed in
her own opinions, and the father also, you might immediately find
insuperable difficulties. You would not like to exert any influence
opposed to the parental, however injudicious you might deem that to be.
You would not like to take sides with either parent. They might, by
amicable discussion, modify each other's views, so as to do just right
by their children; while the influence of another, thrown into either
scale, would produce dissatisfaction. In your school-room, on the
contrary, you can be perfectly independent of either, and without
standing in the attitude of opposition, or running the risk of
encroaching upon the rights of a parent, you can know just as much and
just as little as you please of the difference of views; and having your
scholar in a new scene, and subjected to different influences, you may
be able fully to carry out your own views, without exciting the jealousy
of parents. This is the only way to avoid such collisions as I dread,
and which seem to me almost inevitable in such a union as that of parent
and teacher in the same family. As an independent teacher, your opinions
may be expressed with the utmost freedom; for I would have no tampering
with truth. But few mothers are humble or wise enough to be willing to
be criticised at home when it comes to the point. Then in my opinion
such an inmate spoils a family, which should be a sacred circle where
none intrude. I myself have had the whole care of children in a family,
moral and intellectual, but no one but the parents ought to have had it.
It set up an authority that was more respected than that of the parent.
I have also, in another instance, had the sympathy and confidence of one
parent, and the jealous watchfulness of the other, who would not listen
to the suggestions of a third person. I have also seen children who knew
more of truth than their parents, and who knew that I knew it; and I
would never again put myself in that position. I have seen the wounded
vanity of otherwise good mothers baffle the best intentions and wisest
action on the part of a governess; and even sadder cases, where
conscience itself must have been sacrificed to keep the peace. No
individual should ever step between parents and children, and point out
the errors of the former. Principles alone should do this; nothing less
sacred should intervene. In my school-room, I can dwell upon principles
forever, and apply them to the cases in hand as closely and as skilfully
as I please, and keep clear of personalities, if I find them baneful. If
one is in the family, this seems to me scarcely possible. Often when I
speak of a wrong action, be it the wanton killing of a bird, or the
indulgence of an evil passion, children say to me, "My father does that
sometimes," and even add, "I wish he would not." This moral judgment is
inevitable; it must come sooner or later, and the sooner the child
defines the line by his own observations and reflections the better, but
it must often pass without comment. I should be sorry to be obliged to
be silent upon any point of right and wrong, because there are sinners
at my elbow. In a school-room, which is a separate world within the
great world,--connected with it, yet severed from it,--principles may
reign triumphant. In a family, persons prevail more or less, and this is
one of my chief reasons for objecting to an exclusively private
education. Special modes of thought and standards of action are imposed
by example and habit; and where there is no variety of views presented
for comparison, minds cannot easily expand, still less choose the best
of several good ways. I have seen the victims of private education
perpetuate family faults, and in later life left standing alone in the
world, knowing little of its interests, and having no sympathy from
without. I have seen morbid sensibility thus nourished into insanity
itself.

But you must tell me the result of your experiment. It dashes my hopes
of any brilliant discoveries. I much question whether, under the most
favorable circumstances, you will find yourself able to satisfy yourself
and others too. Those friends who love you so much will perhaps be
unwilling to make demands upon you; and this will make you anxious to do
all you can imagine them to desire. This is the worst of all
slaveries--to be in a situation where one is not sure of all that is
demanded, and where delicacy forbids the free expression of wishes. In
most cases, too great requisitions are made upon the time and thoughts
of a governess. There should be a rigid arrangement in regard to hours
and services, leaving the time which is not employed in instruction
wholly free, independent, and solitary, if desired. For a time you will
be willing to give all your waking hours to your employment, and feel
that you cannot do enough to serve a friend; but real teaching is an
immense tax upon the mind and the health; and you have duties to
yourself, the neglect of which will at last unfit you for the proper
fulfilment of the very engagement you have entered into. Your own
qualities of character may clash with those of the family, and you
cannot be supposed to have the touchstone to their peculiarities, that
members of the same family have,--an innate and fibrous knowledge, as it
were, of the springs of each other's action, and the associations that
govern these springs. I have never seen a more painful tyranny exercised
than that over a governess in one instance; not a palpable tyranny that
could be rebelled against and openly thrown off, but a total ignorance
of another's wants and rights, that made the whole life a bondage. The
lady who presides believes sincerely that she offers a happy home and
easy duties to one whose whole time and thoughts are taxed in such a
manner that she cannot feel at liberty to dispose of an hour, although
many are actually left unoccupied by accident. This is an extraordinary
instance of selfishness, I acknowledge, but it generally taints the
relation, more or less. I have but one counsel to give to such
sufferers. Sacrifice everything but independence, but preserve that
inviolate; for without it one can neither be truthful nor capable of
improvement. We never should allow ourselves to be in a responsible
situation where we cannot express our opinions for fear of giving
offence. There is enough of that servile fear in our common intercourse
with our fellow-beings. Let us keep ourselves out of temptation while
our daily prayer is that God may not lead us into it.

I am prepared for a theoretic refutation of all my positions, but shall
probably be very self-opinionated till you have lived through this
experience, as I have done.

                                   Yours, affectionately, M.


LETTER VII.

MY DEAR ANNA,--I am somewhat reconciled to your being in a less
independent situation than I wished for you, by learning that you are,
after all, in a school-room of your own, surrounded by children educated
thus far under various influences. The range of ages in your little
company appears to me rather too unequal; but I have such confidence in
your resources, that I will not forebode failure. I only hope you will
not be distracted by too various calls. In my own experience, I was
obliged to relinquish older and more advanced pupils in favor of younger
ones, because I found the proper attention to the two classes
incompatible, and in my own case my heart was with the little ones. You
are better fitted to cope with older children, because your force of
will is superior to mine.

I rejoice in your lovely surroundings. I once kept school near a
gurgling brook, whose banks were ornamented with wild flowers, and the
room was always redolent of perfumes, and garlanded with clematis and
other flowers in their season. Not only children's heads, but mine, were
wreathed with them; and many a lesson was given and learned under the
trees, and on the grassy turf, golden with buttercups and dandelions.
But now a few feet of sky, and a glimpse of verdant back-yards from one
window, is all I can boast of when housed. I am blessed with the
proximity of Boston Common, through which I daily wander with my little
flock, and many of my children have country summers to remember,--vacations
at least. Cities are unnatural places for the young. All childhood
should be passed in the country, and in afterlife its memories can be
pitted against the evils the grownup must bear in pursuit of certain
social privileges.

I feel modest about describing my lessons, now you actually have your
classes before you, and are sounding certain depths to meet the
occasion. I wonder if you will begin with creation, as a friend I could
name told me she did, when first meeting face to face a little
disciple, her first pupil.

I am glad you do not begin with a large school. In many schools that I
have visited, I have seen that the teachers were overpowered by numbers.
This is apt to necessitate--no, not necessitate, for that cannot be
necessary which is wrong,--but it is apt to introduce the motive of
emulation, as a part of the machinery. Emulation is a passion--I call it
an evil propensity, so strongly implanted in the natural constitution of
man, that it needs no fostering. It should be checked and restrained
like any appetite, so that its only function may be the desire to
emulate noble deeds, but never to be degraded into competition for
praise or honors. One of the mothers of my children thinks it is a very
useful ally to induce children to study hard spelling-lessons; but I
assure her it cannot be made to play into my spelling-lessons, which are
natural growths out of reading-lessons. No, I banish that evil spirit
from my dominions, and endeavor to teach my scholars to have a deep
interest in "each other's" progress instead of wishing to rise upon the
ruin of others. I have a device which answers all the purpose of a
healthful stimulus, and insures some of the lawful rewards of industry.

In my present school, where the children are all under twelve, I made
one class in arithmetic, including all who could count their fingers and
thumbs, and, arranging them in the order of ages, began with the
youngest, asking the questions in Colburn's first lessons in arithmetic,
and saying that I should take the first section and let each one go
through with it before I went farther. When the youngest missed a
question, I marked the number of it with her name, and began at the
beginning with the next in order. Some of them soon missed, others went
straight through without a mistake. I simply said to the first one who
did this, "You may return to your seat and occupy yourself quietly in
any way you please every day at this hour until this lesson is over."

The lesson was to continue half an hour.

Those who did not go straight through, remained and took another turn
after each had tried.

I had seen the pleasing effect of this mode of hearing a recitation
practised upon older scholars, and knew that its charms would gradually
unfold to these little ones.

The first section was accomplished by all that first day. But I
gradually took longer and longer portions; and soon the pleasure of
getting through, and having the disposal of little times thus gained,
was very animating. I liked the effect much better than that I heard
described by a distinguished German mathematician, who told me that his
father, who was a soldier, had a triangle of wood made, very sharp at
the edges, on which he obliged him to _kneel_ while he studied his
arithmetic lessons. The effect was very stimulating to his mathematical
faculties, and though he hated his father at the time (a consequence I
thought more of than he appeared to), he attributed to it a remarkable
power, second only to Sir Isaac Newton's (who could think a train of
mathematical thoughts consecutively for twenty minutes), of thinking his
mathematical thoughts consecutively _fifteen_ minutes.

My little people were so delighted with their leisure, thus gained, that
they voluntarily studied their lessons beforehand (which I did not
require), and soon I was obliged to set off the older portion into a
separate class, who went on with the mental arithmetic very rapidly,
while the younger ones, who recited on the same plan, and enjoyed
themselves in the same way, were more deliberate. I followed the same
plan with "Fowle's Geographical Questions on the Maps," which is a very
nice book for children's use. It makes them very thoroughly acquainted
with maps. My favorite geography lessons (and the favorite lessons of my
scholars too), are oral; and I now have a course of lectures delivered
on a certain day in the week by the children, which would amuse you, I
am sure. I put my work-table on one end of the long writing-table, and
my little lecturers stand behind i: in turn, sometimes with a written
lecture, sometimes with only a wand to point at maps or pictures,--and
give their little lectures. One little fellow of eight would talk all
the afternoon over a map if I would let him, telling stories of
countries which he has heard of from me or others. Another is very fond
of natural history, and her little lectures are about insects, and
birds, &c. Indeed, these are their chief topics,--geography and animal
life.

In arithmetic I also have many other exercises, such as arranging beans
in certain numerical forms; and on the black-board I teach numeration in
a simple way. I use Shaw's box of arithmetical blocks to teach the
philosophy of carrying tens, and I think it admirable. I also have
Holbrook's frame of balls. All these devices help to make processes
clear. I find a very great difference in children in regard to
arithmetic. I have had one scholar who never could go (she died at
fifteen) beyond a certain section in "Colburn's Mental Arithmetic." She
reached that after repeated trials; for when I found her grounded at any
special point, I always turned back and let her review, and in that way
she would gain a little at every repeated trial. This child found
geometry easier than numbers, and mastered "Grund's Plane Geometry." She
could also write out a reminiscence of Dr. Channing's sermons, or
remember anything interesting in history, natural history, or anything
of an ethical character. I also had one gifted little scholar who could
not learn to spell accurately; but she drew with great power and
beauty,--with "an eye that no teaching could give," as was said of her
by a fine artist. These discrepancies in talent are very curious.
Phrenological philosophy alone explains them.[L]

Having thus disposed of geography and arithmetic, in the last of which I
doubt not your mathematical faculty will strike out something new, you
will expect me to describe my modes of teaching language, as you know
that to be my personal hobby. I think I might have other hobbies if I
knew more. But I do think the teaching of language covers a great deal
of ground, bringing into play, as it certainly does, so many faculties.

The first thing to be aimed at in language is, that it shall be clearly
understood. It is not necessary to go out of one's own language to teach
etymology. I take such words as _funny_, _kindly_, _sweetly_, and ask
from what words those are derived.

"What does funny mean?" The answer will be, "Full of fun," or "Something
that has fun in it." "What is kindly?" "Full of kindness." "What does
agreeable mean?" "Something we like," said a little boy one day in
answer to this question.

"Does every one like the same things?" said I.

"No."

"Then something may be agreeable to you that is not agreeable, to me."

"Yes."

"Can you think now what the word agreeable is made from?"

He could not think.

"A thing agrees with something in me that does not agree with something
in you, perhaps. I do not like the perfume of a narcissus. It does not
_agree_ with my sense of smell, but it agrees with some people's sense
of smell."

He was pleased with this, and saw that _agree_ was the word.

"From what is _lively_ made?" I asked.

He hesitated.

"What does it mean?" said I.

"Oh, _lively_, why it means _very_ lively!"

"Can a table be lively?"

"No, it must be something that is alive. Oh, I know now--_alive_ is the
word."

"What is alive made from?"

"Living," he answered.

"All these words are made from the name of something."

This brought him to the word _life_, and then he sprung up and clapped
his hands and whirled round.

I do not always check these natural gymnastics.

Such lessons as these I am teased for continually. Those who have
studied I can carry still farther in derivation. I sometimes reverse the
process and ask for all the words that are made from _life_, _action_,
&c.

Often when I give the children their slates to amuse themselves a little
while, they bring me lists of words made on this principle of analysis;
and I assure you that when I read to them, I am never allowed to pass by
a word that is not understood. Several times when I have deliberately
pronounced a very long word that I expected to be questioned upon, it
has brought half a dozen of my little audience to their feet.

I was very fond, when a child, of listening to lessons upon figures of
speech, given in my mother's school; and was quite expert in hunting up
metaphors, tropes, hyperboles, and personifications. So I impart the
same pleasure. The spiritual applications of words is pleasantly educed
out of their sensuous qualities, also. "The sweet apple," and "the sweet
child," are equally significant; and it is well to trace back words thus
figuratively used to their original meaning in the sensuous world, for
they are felt to be more significant when thus verified. It leads to
sound thinking. There are so many poetical expressions in common
parlance, that it is very easy to put children upon this track.

I have lately set up a little class in thinking, preliminary to giving
some idea of the construction of sentences. I do not attempt to teach
grammar technically to such little people as mine; but I contrive to
induct it into them by certain devices, not wholly original, for they
are recorded in the "Record of a School." Allow me to repeat the
drilling with which I began.

I called them around me one day to have a _new lesson_, which is always
joyfully acceded to by these little lovers of new things, and nothing
pleases them better than to be set to thinking.

I asked them if they knew what their five senses were.

Not one had ever heard those words used together, apparently.

I enumerated; sight, hearing, smell, touch, taste.

Several individuals jumped up, whirled round, and sat down again.--

I then asked each in turn to name some object, and tell me by which of
their senses they could perceive it; and by how many?

This they did readily again and again. They could see, and smell, and
touch, and taste a rose, but they could not _hear_ it. So of other
things.

I then said, "I have a thought; do you know what it is?"

"No."

"Cannot you see, or hear, or smell, or touch, or taste my thought?"

"No."

"Now each one of you think of some object, but do not speak till I ask
you for your thought."

"Can you see your thought?"

Some answered "No," others "Yes."

I asked each in turn for their thoughts. They were a bird, a house, a
horse, &c., all visible objects.

I said, "All these things can be seen when they are before you; but can
you see the thought?"

Some answered "Yes" to this, which I found meant that they could see the
image of the thing in the mind; others said "No."

"Can you see your thinking?"

"No."

"Can you not send your thoughts out into the country, where you have
sometimes taken a ride?"

"Yes."

"Can you see, smell, hear, taste, or touch your mind?"

"No."

"But is not mind a real thing? Have not you a mind that you think with?"

"Yes."

"There are some real things, then, beside those we can see, hear, smell,
taste, and touch?"

"Yes."

"What other things beside your mind?"

No one answered.

"Have you any love?"

This brought many to their feet, with a shouted "Yes."

"Any happiness?"

"Yes."

"Goodness?"

"Yes."

"Naughtiness?"

"Yes."

"Is truth in the mind, or outside of it where we can see it?"

"In the mind."

I then took Mrs. Barbauld's hymns, in the first of which occur the words
_reason_, _kindness_, _heart_, _life_, beside the names of many objects
of the senses, and made two columns on the black-board, in which I put
down respectively, as they were mentioned, all the names of objects,
both of the senses and of the mind. To the latter list I added the words
_God_ and _soul_, by the direction of the children, upon asking them if
they could think of any more such words.

I then made the same discrimination between actions of the body and
actions of the mind, which they followed very well, sometimes
confounding the two, as older philosophers do.

I endeavored to give them the idea that things which they see, hear,
&c., exist both in the mind and out of it. This I could do by asking
them if the person who made the first chair did not think of it first.
Was it not in his mind before he could make it? So everything in the
world existed in God's mind before he made it.

I then asked, "Which column of words gives the names of real things?"

They all said the objects of the senses were the real things.

"Can they not be broken up, or burnt, or worn out?"

"Yes."

"Can the soul, or love, or goodness, or happiness, be broken, or burnt
up, or worn out?"

"No."

"Which are the things that last forever, then,--these objects of your
senses, or these objects of your mind?"

"The objects of the mind."

"Does your goodness always last?"

"No."

"Where does it go to when you are not good?"

Nobody knew.

"Can you have it again when you wish to?"

"Yes."

"Who do you think keeps it for you?"

"God."

"That is what we mean when we pray to God to help us to be good."

All seemed to understand this.

"Then we find," I said, "that the real things that last forever are in
the mind?"

"Yes."

"Do our bodies last forever?"

"No."

"Do we live forever?"

"Yes."

"Yes, our souls are the real things."

This was enough for one lesson. Another day I asked about the qualities
of things, and added a column for such words as green, white, pretty,
&c. These are the main classes, and I shall go on by degrees to words
expressive of relations, and to words that are substituted for the names
of persons and things which are pronouns. The children are very fond of
making lists of words of this sort, and often bring them to me, divided
off into their respective columns.

I have put the whole school, except the babes, into this class; and of
those who know how to read well I have made a Latin class. For this I
use the interlined translation of "Æsop's Fables," which Mr. G---- T----
first imported into this country. I began with a line of a fable
committed to memory, with the English words beneath them. It is not only
good for spelling to begin Latin early, but it gives precision to
thinking, if used aright. After learning one fable, by degrees, I let
the children vocabularize the words by putting the names of things into
one column, the names of actions into another, as in the analysis of
English; and this has given them quite a vocabulary of Latin, from which
we often make lessons in derivation. Putting the nouns into a column
soon showed the modifications of termination, and then I explained the
difference between that language and ours in that respect, and showed
them how few small words were used in Latin. They have also studied the
indicative mode of the verb _amo_, and have learned to substitute other
verbs in the various tenses. But I confine them at present chiefly to
committing to memory the fables.

Dr. Follen thinks it well to teach German very early also, which gives
the Teutonic element to our language; but I have not done this in my
present school, because the difficulty of the German letter is such a
puzzle to little brains.

French I only teach them colloquially as yet; for the sight of French
words confuses spelling very much with little children. It is well to
exercise their organs in pronouncing the words; and all my children can
say many things in French. By and by I shall show them the words, if
they stay with me till they are ready for them. All these exercises of
mind, if not made fatiguing by too long continuance at one time, are
perennially interesting to children. The new life and vigor a little
hard thinking imparts to them makes one almost a convert to a theory
lately set forth by one of our contemporaries, that the scholar and
thinker should be the longest lived man. I believe it will be found
true, if the brain be healthily, not morbidly worked. I love to see the
eye fixed in thought for a moment, even in a very young child: but I
would have in the next moment a jump or a run, or a laugh; and these
generally alternate with thinking, if nature is left free. I am jealous
of one moment's weariness at this age. I speak particularly now of very
young children, who are only too willing to think, not of the wilful,
playful rogues whom it is hard to fix one moment, because they would
have no work, but all play. There is a great difference, however, in
children of all ages, and I would be careful of them all. Force and
vigor are so essential to health of mind, as well as of body, that I
would secure those first to every child.

I once had a very bright boy of four in my school, who had a very
remarkable memory. He would learn a verse of poetry by my repeating it
once, and learned to read with marvellous rapidity. It was almost
alarming; but I took care not to stimulate him in any way. He was
suddenly seized with a violent influenza, and did not return to school
for two months. When he returned, he had not only forgotten all he had
learned, but never showed the same aptitude again. In a year afterwards
he had not caught up with those first few months. This taught me never
to urge a child to exertion while suffering from a cold; and my
attention having thus been directed to the point, I have often observed
how that malady dulls the action of the faculties.

I have one dear little scholar now, only too willing to exert her mind;
and if I see that anything seems difficult to her earnest spirit, I
advise her at once to put it aside; for the tearful eyes tell me
plainly that there is no need of urgency on my part, and that the danger
is in too great persistence of the will for duty's sake. If it is
necessary to explain the matter to others, I do not hesitate to say that
that little scholar studies too hard for her health, and I do not wish
her to be fatigued. It is necessary for her peace of mind to say as much
as this, and the others only see more clearly what I wish them to see,
that I measure them by the effort they make, not by the results they
achieve. The same persistence of will and earnestness of spirit
sometimes produces a violent shock of feeling in this child, if she is
arrested in any of her purposes, even of play; but a gentle steadiness
on my part soon brings the repentant little head on my bosom.

I often wish I knew how much moral and mental effort I ought to require
of children, to keep the soul in full play and never encroach upon
nature, which adjusts the balances so happily in her own way, when not
constrained. I have to fall back upon my instincts for this, as the
mother undoubtedly does. This adjustment has been very happily and
wisely made in the case of Laura Bridgeman, one proof of which is, that
an obstacle in her path is only met as a joyful occasion for some new
effort. If she finds a stumbling-block in her way, instead of falling
over it, or being discouraged by it, she dances round it, and apparently
hails it as a new proof of the power within her to conquer all things.
If her thread gets tangled when she is sewing, she laughs and adjusts
it. Giant Despair would in vain tempt her, but would try again to hang
himself, as when, in olden time, Truth and Holiness together escaped
from his clutches. Principles, when known to her, seem to be imperative;
and cut off as she is from the deceptive senses, she recognizes only the
power within herself, which laughs at the defiance of insolent brute
matter. It was the plan of her education that she should not be told of
God's existence till she gave indication of some idea of Him; but in
some way or other she became possessed of that name for the existence of
absolute power and goodness (we do not know yet how far that embodiment
of the idea was intuitive); and she already refers all things to His
agency. One suggestion pointing towards that idea would necessarily
fructify in such a mind as hers, and immediately she would have a name
for the law within her which she obeys so wonderfully in conscience, and
exemplifies so remarkably in her intellectual operations. She answers to
me the question which I have heard asked, "Whence do the intuitions of
the mind come?"

But I must go back to my little family once more. These children are
quite expert printers, and have followed their fancies very much as to
what they printed; as, favorite stories or scraps of poetry, for I did
not wish the process to become tedious. One day I let each dictate to me
a short story, which I wrote down as they dictated; and while they were
full of delight I proposed that they should write stories themselves,
instead of copying them. This they subsequently varied with writing what
they could remember of my readings to them; so now I am overwhelmed with
compositions of all sorts, and often very good ones. I have always
thought it well for children to write a good deal, and I have never
found any difficulty in making them like to do it. When I read or tell
them anything I wish them to write, I often put leading words on the
black-board, to suggest the order of the story, or the description; or,
to spell difficult words. One child writes funny stories, and laughs
herself as she writes; another gives descriptions of natural scenery, in
the midst of which her characters find themselves. One writes about
wolves and other horrors. I have a variety of pictures hanging on the
walls, and I sometimes propose that they should write stories about
them. These writings are all printed with lead pencil, or on the slate,
because the mechanical difficulty of writing script with the pen makes
it tedious to children.

I shall look impatiently for your account of your proceedings. I believe
I have told you the principal things I endeavor to teach, but it is
impossible to describe all the occasions on which one can minister to
the inquiring minds of children. I suppose many persons would think I
give too much time to playing and singing, but I do not often invite
people into my school, for my ideas of order are different from the
ordinary one of sitting still and not speaking. I am perfectly content
as long as the lifting of my finger or the tinkling of my little bell
will reduce my subjects to order.

I forgot to mention that one day in the week we resolve ourselves into a
sculptor's studio. I seat the children around one of the long tables and
let them model in clay. They make miniature vases, and even faces, and
who knows but what some genius may be developed?[M] Paper cutting is
also one of my arts. It teaches forms as well as drawing, and some of
these children cut very decent birds and other animals. Sometimes I draw
for them to cut, and I have shown them the properties of a circle by
cutting one and dividing it up into angles, acute and obtuse, and
teaching them to put them together again. I was much pleased myself when
I first understood the relation of angles to a circle, and find that
other children also enjoy it. I let them play with the Chinese puzzle
also, which exercises their inventive faculties.[N]

If all teachers loved to play with children as well as I do, I think
they would discover what I think I have; that children need
superintendence in their plays to defend them against each other. The
only danger is, that the older person may lead too much, and not
sufficiently follow the leading of the children. When children do work
at anything, they should be taught to do it accurately and well; but a
concentrated effort should be very short. I hope everything, as I told
you, from your discoveries in this charming science, of which I am never
tired, I am never weary of talking about my little flock, and all the
little flocks I have from time to time presided over. The last always
seems to me the most interesting; especially the younger ones. A new
little being just waking up to a consciousness of the world environing
it, is a new study to me always, one of which I never tire, as I am very
apt to do of older people. When you have taught a few years, we will
compare notes again.

                                   Very affectionately yours,
                                                              M.

FOOTNOTES:

[I] All these difficulties with which I wrestled so many years in my
character of _champion of childhood_, are entirely solved and done away
with by the more recently introduced method,--introduced by authority of
a distinguished philologist, of teaching the Italian alphabet, and
always calling _c_ and _g_ hard, as the old Romans are supposed to have
done. This mode is made practicable in the "First Nursery Reading-Book,"
and the last edition of the "Primer of Reading and Drawing." Abundant
experience shows that reading taught in this way leaves nothing to be
unlearned in English, and teaches an analysis of words into letters
which contributes very much to the ease of the subsequent study of
European languages, to which the sounds of the letters of the Italian
alphabet apply almost without an exception. Experience upon this subject
has given me confidence in the general rule of _never_ teaching
exceptions to anything until the rule is well understood and mastered.

[J] The work referred to, by Peter Schmid, of Berlin, was subsequently
translated, and published in the 6th vol. of the _Common-School
Journal_, and afterwards in a pamphlet called the _Common-School Drawing
Master_. It is largely used in the public schools of Germany, and formed
a new era in Germany, in the teaching of Perspective Drawing, as truly
as _Colburn's First Lessons_ formed a new era in the teaching of Mental
Arithmetic here.

[K] Since writing the above he has died untimely.

[L] Since these letters were written, the St. William's school
established in Edinburgh by George Combe, Esq., and in which that
distinguished man taught personally during the latter years of his life,
has proved conclusively that the Phrenological philosophy is a fine
basis for education. The principle there practised is, to cultivate
assiduously those faculties which were found naturally deficient in the
pupils; thus aiming to make whole men out of what otherwise would have
been but fragments of men.

[M] One of these children subsequently evinced much talent for the
plastic art, which she traced back to this opportunity. She always kept
it up, and gave fair promise of accomplishing something in this
department of art.

[N] Several years after these letters were written, the Rev. Thomas Hill
issued a series of cards containing geometrical figures composed of
triangles of different sizes. They were very useful in aiding the
development of the mathematical faculty in a private family, and might
be used with advantage in the present Kindergarten-schools, whose
success forever settles the question of the manner in which young
children should be taught. The above letters exemplify the blind
gropings of a true child-lover after that which has now been so
beautifully developed by observation and genius united.




SONGS.




I. Lord's Prayer.

[Illustration: Lord's Prayer Music]


        Our Father, who in heaven art,
        Thy name be hallowed;
        Thy will as 'tis in heaven be done,
        Let thy dear kingdom come;
        Give us this day our daily bread,
        Our trespasses forgive,
        As we forgive the trespasses
        Of those who injure us.
        Deliver us from doing wrong;
        O, lead us from temptation's snare;
        For thine the kingdom and the power,
        And glory evermore.




II. The Fishes.

[Illustration: The Fishes music]

        Happy the fishes now appear,
        Sporting in water bright and clear;
        Now swimming, now diving, above, below;
        Now they are straight, and now they all bow.




III. Brotherly Love.


[Illustration: Brotherly Love music]


1.

        How delightful 'tis to see
        Little children who agree;
        Who from every thing abstain,
        That will give each other pain;
            O, how lovely 'tis to see
            Little children who agree.


2.

        Angry words they never speak,
        Promises they never break;
        Unkind looks they never show;
        Love sits smiling on each brow.
            O, how lovely, &c.


3.

        They are one in heart and mind;
        Courteous, pitiful, and kind;
        Willing others to forgive,
        And make happy all who live.


4.

        When at home, at school, at play,
        They are cheerful, blithe, and gay;
        Always trying to increase
        Human pleasure, social peace.


5.

        If we for each other care,
        All each other's burdens bear,
        Soon the human race will be
        Like one happy family.
            O, how lovely, &c.




IV. AT THE BEGINNING AND CLOSE OF PLAY, IS SUNG:


[Illustration: At the beginning and close of play music]

        Front to back we march away,
        Let us all go out to play.
        Front to back we march away,
        Now we all have done our play.




V. The Pigeon House.


[Illustration: The Pigeon House music]

        We open the pigeon house again,
        And set all the happy flutt'rers free;
        They fly o'er the fields and grassy plain,
        Delighted with joyous liberty;
        And when they return from their merry flight,
        We shut up the house and bid 'em good night.




VI. The Cuckoo.


[Illustration: The Cuckoo music]

  Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo;
  The cuckoo calls the children, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo,
  Let us all call him to us, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo;
  Yes, yes, the cuckoo is alone to-day, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo;
  Yes, yes, he wants to join our merry play, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo;
  You have not been calling your friends in vain,
  We now can play all together again, cuckoo, cuckoo,
  Dear little child, cuckoo, cuckoo, dear child.




VII. The Peasant.


[Illustration: The Peasant music]

    1. Would you know how does the peasant,
         Would you know how does the peasant,
       Would you know how does the peasant,
         Sow his barley and wheat?

      Look, 'tis so, so does the peasant,
        Look, 'tis so, so does the peasant,
      Look, 'tis so, so does the peasant,
        Sow his barley and wheat. La la la la la la
             la la la la la la la la la la la la la
             la la la la la la la la la la la.

    2 Would you know how does the peasant
        Reap his barley and wheat?
      Look, 'tis so, so does the peasant
        Reap his barley and wheat. La, la, la, &c.

    3 Would you know how does the peasant
        Thrash his barley and wheat?
      Look, 'tis so, so does the peasant
        Thrash his barley and wheat. La, la, la, &c.

    4 Would you know how does the peasant
        Sift his barley and wheat?
      Look, 'tis so, so does the peasant
        Sift his barley and wheat. La, la, la, &c.

    5 Would you know how rests the peasant
        When his labor is done?
      Look, 'tis so, so rests the peasant
        When his labor is done. La, la, la, &c.

    6 Would you know how plays the peasant,
        When his labor is done?
      Look, 'tis so, so plays the peasant,
        When his labor is done. La, la, la, &c.




VIII. The Sawyer.


[Illustration: The Sawyer music]

        Let us now begin our sawing;
        Forwards, backwards, pushing, drawing,
          Sawing, sawing wood in two;
        Little pieces, bigger pieces,
          See saw, see saw, see saw, see!

        Let us now leave off our sawing,
        Rest awhile in pretty playing,
          Playing, playing, playing so;
        Playing, playing, playing, playing,
          Till 'tis time to saw again.




IX. The Cooper.


[Illustration: The Cooper music]

  I am a cooper, and barrels I bind;
  And on my brow perspiration I find;
  But happy and merry I always am found,
  While with my big hammer I pace all around, around, around,
        around, round, round, round.




X. The Wheel-barrow.


[Illustration: The Wheel-barrow music]

        Come, take your barrow, neighbor John,
        The clock strikes six, we must be gone;
        The birds are singing in the bower,
        The bees are busy on the flower;
        Come, take your barrow, let us go,
        And call upon our neighbor Joe;
        We've much to do, and time flies on,
        Make haste, make haste, we must be gone.




XI. The Clappers.


[Illustration: The Clappers music]

    The clappers in the cornmill move gently up and down,
    The water gives them motion;
    What heavy sounds,
    Clip, clap, clip clap, clip clap, clip clap, clip clap.




XII. & XIII. Windmill and Water-wheel.


[Illustration: Windmill and Water-wheel music]

        See the windmill, how she goes,
        While the wind so briskly blows;
        Always turning freely round,
        Never idle is she found.


or, XIII.

        See the WATER-WHEEL, how she goes,
        While the water freely flows, &c.




XIV. The Pendulum.


[Illustration: The Pendulum music]

  See it run, see it run,
  See the clock's straight pendulum
  Move its long arm here and there,
  Not across, not in the square;
  Stroke by stroke, both there and back,
  Always tic, and always tac, tic, tac, tic, tac, tic,
        tac, tic, tac,
  Clock be steady, not unruly,
  Pray the right time tell me truly
  For eating, for sleeping, for work and play,
  O tell me the proper time ev'ry day.
  If my life in order be,
  Health and peace will dwell with me.
  Little arm go there and back,
  Always tic and always tac, tic, tac, tac.




XV. The Rovers.


[Illustration: The Rovers music]

        We like to go a-roving,
        From place to place a-moving,
        For wandering is such sweet employ,
        It fills our hearts with quiet joy.
        Wander, we'll wander,
        We hear the warblers singing,
        The air with music ringing;
        We hear the sheep cry bah!
        We hear the sweet bees humming,
        We see the large flies coming,
        See, see, they fly away!
        Wander, we'll wander,
        Wander, we'll wander,
        The flocks move on so stately,
        The fields are dressed so neatly,
        All flowers smell so sweetly;
        Come, wander, we'll wander, wander, we'll wander.




XVI. The Weathercock.


[Illustration: The Weathercock music]

        Like the weathercock I'm going,
        When the stormy wind is blowing;
        While to East and West I'm turning,
        I the compass points am learning.




XVII. The Bees.


[Illustration: The Bees music]

        The bees are flying and humming,
        Why are they all coming?
        Honey they do seek,
        Honey they do seek.

          Hum hum hum hum hum hum hum hum,
          Hum hum hum hum hum hum hum hum.

        Take care, beware, the drone is there;
        Take care, beware, the drone is there.




XVIII. The Ring.


[Illustration: The Ring music]

  Equal treading, equal stepping,
  We dance and sing all in a ring;
  All round we dance and sing.
  La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la,
        la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la.




XIX. The Hares.


[Illustration: The Hares music]

            Hare in the hollow,
              sitting still;
            Poor hare, are you ill,
        that you cannot jump and spring,
        jump and spring, jump and spring.

2.

            Hare now be careful,
              Sit quite still,
            The hunter is near;
        Dogs are running down the hill,
        Sit quite still, sit quite still.

3.

            Hare now be cheerful,
              Jump and spring;
            All danger is past.
        Hare now spring, jump and spring,
        Jump and spring, jump and spring.




XX. The Little Master of Gymnastics.


[Illustration: The Little Master of Gymnastics music]

        Look at little Albert,
        He's happy and glad;
        Look at little Albert,
        what he has just made.

       *       *       *       *       *

Transcriber's Notes:

Text uses both Co-operate and coöperate.

Obvious punctuation errors repaired.

In the text Froebel does not have a ligature, in the footnotes the
ligature is present. This was retained but will only be present in the
utf-8 and HTML versions.

Page 25, "fal" changed to "fa" (fifth, fa-la-do)

Page 78, pronunciation table "oh" changed to "ŏh" to match rest of
usage.

Page 86, two of the proofreaders caught amidst the mind-numbing word
lists that "put" should not belong in the pattern of drunk, trunk, hunt,
blunt ... and should either go a few words before with cut, gut, hut,
jut or be changed to "punt." The transcriber has chosen to change it to
"punt."

Page 88, "ex-except" changed to "except" (preceded by vowels, except)

Page 88, in the list for W, "owner" occurred twice. Once after "growth"
and once after "lower." The second instance was removed.

Page 165, "wont" changed to "won't" (a half whisper, "won't.")