Produced by Anne Soulard, Charles Aldarondo, Tiffany Vergon,
Eric Casteleijn and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team









THE GERMANY AND THE AGRICOLA OF TACITUS.

THE OXFORD TRANSLATION REVISED, WITH NOTES.

By Tacitus

With An Introduction By Edward Brooks, Jr.




INTRODUCTION.


Very little is known concerning the life of Tacitus, the historian,
except that which he tells us in his own writings and those incidents
which are related of him by his contemporary, Pliny.

His full name was Caius Cornelius Tacitus. The date of his birth can
only be arrived at by conjecture, and then only approximately. The
younger Pliny speaks of him as _prope modum aequales_, about the same
age. Pliny was born in 61. Tacitus, however, occupied the office of
quaestor under Vespasian in 78 A.D., at which time he must, therefore,
have been at least twenty-five years of age. This would fix the date of
his birth not later than 53 A.D. It is probable, therefore, that Tacitus
was Pliny's senior by several years.

His parentage is also a matter of pure conjecture. The name Cornelius
was a common one among the Romans, so that from it we can draw no
inference. The fact that at an early age he occupied a prominent
public office indicates that he was born of good family, and it is not
impossible that his father was a certain Cornelius Tacitus, a Roman
knight, who was procurator in Belgic Gaul, and whom the elder Pliny
speaks of in his "Natural History."

Of the early life of Tacitus and the training which he underwent
preparatory to those literary efforts which afterwards rendered him a
conspicuous figure among Roman literateurs we know absolutely nothing.

Of the events of his life which transpired after he attained man's
estate we know but little beyond that which he himself has recorded in
his writings. He occupied a position of some eminence as a pleader at
the Roman bar, and in 77 A.D. married the daughter of Julius Agricola,
a humane and honorable citizen, who was at that time consul and was
subsequently appointed governor of Britain. It is quite possible that
this very advantageous alliance hastened his promotion to the office of
quaestor under Vespasian.

Under Domitian, in 88, Tacitus was appointed one of fifteen
commissioners to preside at the celebration of the secular games. In the
same year he held the office of praetor, and was a member of one of the
most select of the old priestly colleges, in which a pre-requisite of
membership was that a man should be born of a good family.

The following year he appears to have left Rome, and it is possible
that he visited Germany and there obtained his knowledge and information
respecting the manners and customs of its people which he makes the
subject of his work known as the "Germany."

He did not return to Rome until 93, after an absence of four years,
during which time his father-in-law died.

Some time between the years 93 and 97 he was elected to the senate, and
during this time witnessed the judicial murders of many of Rome's best
citizens which were perpetrated under the reign of Nero. Being himself a
senator, he felt that he was not entirely guiltless of the crimes which
were committed, and in his "Agricola" we find him giving expression to
this feeling in the following words: "Our own hands dragged Helvidius
to prison; ourselves were tortured with the spectacle of Mauricus and
Rusticus, and sprinkled with the innocent blood of Senecio."

In 97 he was elected to the consulship as successor to Virginius
Rufus, who died during his term of office and at whose funeral Tacitus
delivered an oration in such a manner to cause Pliny to say, "The
good fortune of Virginius was crowned by having the most eloquent of
panegyrists."

In 99 Tacitus was appointed by the senate, together with Pliny, to
conduct the prosecution against a great political offender, Marius
Priscus, who, as proconsul of Africa, had corruptly mismanaged the
affairs of his province. We have his associate's testimony that Tacitus
made a most eloquent and dignified reply to the arguments which were
urged on the part of the defence. The prosecution was successful, and
both Pliny and Tacitus were awarded a vote of thanks by the senate for
their eminent and effectual efforts in the management of the case.

The exact date of Tacitus's death is not known, but in his "Annals"
he seems to hint at the successful extension of the Emperor Trajan's
eastern campaigns during the years 115 to 117, so that it is probable
that he lived until the year 117.

Tacitus had a widespread reputation during his lifetime. On one occasion
it is related of him that as he sat in the circus at the celebration of
some games, a Roman knight asked him whether he was from Italy or the
provinces. Tacitus answered, "You know me from your reading," to which
the knight quickly replied, "Are you then Tacitus or Pliny?"

It is also worthy of notice that the Emperor Marcus Claudius Tacitus,
who reigned during the third century, claimed to be descended from the
historian, and directed that ten copies of his works should be published
every year and placed in the public libraries.

The list of the extant works of Tacitus is as follows: the "Germany;"
the "Life of Agricola;" the "Dialogue on Orators;" the "Histories," and
the "Annals."

The following pages contain translations of the first two of these
works. The "Germany," the full title of which is "Concerning the
situation, manners and inhabitants of Germany," contains little of value
from a historical standpoint. It describes with vividness the fierce and
independent spirit of the German nations, with many suggestions as to
the dangers in which the empire stood of these people. The "Agricola"
is a biographical sketch of the writer's father-in-law, who, as has been
said, was a distinguished man and governor of Britain. It is one of the
author's earliest works and was probably written shortly after the
death of Domitian, in 96. This work, short as it is, has always been
considered an admirable specimen of biography on account of its grace
and dignity of expression. Whatever else it may be, it is a graceful and
affectionate tribute to an upright and excellent man.

The "Dialogue on Orators" treats of the decay of eloquence under the
empire. It is in the form of a dialogue, and represents two eminent
members of the Roman bar discussing the change for the worse that had
taken place in the early education of the Roman youth.

The "Histories" relate the events which transpired in Rome, beginning
with the ascession of Galba, in 68, and ending with the reign of
Domitian, in 97. Only four books and a fragment of a fifth have been
preserved to us. These books contain an account of the brief reigns of
Galba, Otho and Vitellius. The portion of the fifth book which has been
preserved contains an interesting, though rather biased, account of the
character, customs and religion of the Jewish nation viewed from the
standpoint of a cultivated citizen of Rome.

The "Annals" contain the history of the empire from the death of
Augustus, in 14, to the death of Nero, in 68, and originally consisted
of sixteen books. Of these, only nine have come down to us in a state
of entire preservation, and of the other seven we have but fragments of
three. Out of a period of fifty-four years we have the history of about
forty.

The style of Tacitus is, perhaps, noted principally for its conciseness.
Tacitean brevity is proverbial, and many of his sentences are so brief,
and leave so much for the student to read between the lines, that in
order to be understood and appreciated the author must be read over and
over again, lest the reader miss the point of some of his most
excellent thoughts. Such an author presents grave, if not insuperable,
difficulties to the translator, but notwithstanding this fact, the
following pages cannot but impress the reader with the genius of
Tacitus.




A TREATISE ON THE SITUATION, MANNERS AND INHABITANTS OF GERMANY. [1]


1. Germany [2] is separated from Gaul, Rhaetia, [3] and Pannonia, [4] by
the rivers Rhine and Danube; from Sarmatia and Dacia, by mountains [5]
and mutual dread. The rest is surrounded by an ocean, embracing broad
promontories [6] and vast insular tracts, [7] in which our military
expeditions have lately discovered various nations and kingdoms. The
Rhine, issuing from the inaccessible and precipitous summit of the
Rhaetic Alps, [8] bends gently to the west, and falls into the Northern
Ocean. The Danube, poured from the easy and gently raised ridge of Mount
Abnoba, [9] visits several nations in its course, till at length it
bursts out [10] by six channels [11] into the Pontic sea; a seventh is
lost in marshes.

2. The people of Germany appear to me indigenous, [12] and free from
intermixture with foreigners, either as settlers or casual visitants.
For the emigrants of former ages performed their expeditions not by
land, but by water; [13] and that immense, and, if I may so call it,
hostile ocean, is rarely navigated by ships from our world. [14] Then,
besides the danger of a boisterous and unknown sea, who would relinquish
Asia, Africa, or Italy, for Germany, a land rude in its surface,
rigorous in its climate, cheerless to every beholder and cultivator,
except a native? In their ancient songs, [15] which are their only
records or annals, they celebrate the god Tuisto, [16] sprung from the
earth, and his son Mannus, as the fathers and founders of their race.
To Mannus they ascribe three sons, from whose names [17] the people
bordering on the ocean are called Ingaevones; those inhabiting the
central parts, Herminones; the rest, Istaevones. Some, [18] however,
assuming the licence of antiquity, affirm that there were more
descendants of the god, from whom more appellations were derived; as
those of the Marsi, [19] Gambrivii, [20] Suevi, [21] and Vandali; [22]
and that these are the genuine and original names. [23] That of Germany,
on the other hand, they assert to be a modern addition; [24] for that
the people who first crossed the Rhine, and expelled the Gauls, and
are now called Tungri, were then named Germans; which appellation of a
particular tribe, not of a whole people, gradually prevailed; so that
the title of Germans, first assumed by the victors in order to excite
terror, was afterwards adopted by the nation in general. [25] They
have likewise the tradition of a Hercules [26] of their country, whose
praises they sing before those of all other heroes as they advance to
battle.

3. A peculiar kind of verses is also current among them, by the recital
of which, termed "barding," [27] they stimulate their courage; while the
sound itself serves as an augury of the event of the impending combat.
For, according to the nature of the cry proceeding from the line, terror
is inspired or felt: nor does it seem so much an articulate song, as the
wild chorus of valor. A harsh, piercing note, and a broken roar, are
the favorite tones; which they render more full and sonorous by applying
their mouths to their shields. [28] Some conjecture that Ulysses, in the
course of his long and fabulous wanderings, was driven into this ocean,
and landed in Germany; and that Asciburgium, [29] a place situated on
the Rhine, and at this day inhabited, was founded by him, and named
_Askipurgion_. They pretend that an altar was formerly discovered here,
consecrated to Ulysses, with the name of his father Laertes subjoined;
and that certain monuments and tombs, inscribed with Greek characters,
[30] are still extant upon the confines of Germany and Rhaetia. These
allegations I shall neither attempt to confirm nor to refute: let every
one believe concerning them as he is disposed.

4. I concur in opinion with those who deem the Germans never to have
intermarried with other nations; but to be a race, pure, unmixed, and
stamped with a distinct character. Hence a family likeness pervades the
whole, though their numbers are so great: eyes stern and blue; ruddy
hair; large bodies, [31] powerful in sudden exertions, but impatient of
toil and labor, least of all capable of sustaining thirst and heat. Cold
and hunger they are accustomed by their climate and soil to endure.

5. The land, though varied to a considerable extent in its aspect, is
yet universally shagged with forests, or deformed by marshes: moister on
the side of Gaul, more bleak on the side of Norieum and Pannonia. [32]
It is productive of grain, but unkindly to fruit-trees. [33] It abounds
in flocks and herds, but in general of a small breed. Even the beeve
kind are destitute of their usual stateliness and dignity of head: [34]
they are, however, numerous, and form the most esteemed, and, indeed,
the only species of wealth. Silver and gold the gods, I know not whether
in their favor or anger, have denied to this country. [35] Not that I
would assert that no veins of these metals are generated in Germany; for
who has made the search? The possession of them is not coveted by these
people as it is by us. Vessels of silver are indeed to be seen among
them, which have been presented to their ambassadors and chiefs; but
they are held in no higher estimation than earthenware. The borderers,
however, set a value on gold and silver for the purpose of commerce,
and have learned to distinguish several kinds of our coin, some of which
they prefer to others: the remoter inhabitants continue the more simple
and ancient usage of bartering commodities. The money preferred by the
Germans is the old and well-known species, such as the _Serrati_ and
_Bigati_. [36] They are also better pleased with silver than gold; [37]
not on account of any fondness for that metal, but because the smaller
money is more convenient in their common and petty merchandise.

6. Even iron is not plentiful [38] among them; as may be inferred from
the nature of their weapons. Swords or broad lances are seldom used; but
they generally carry a spear, (called in their language _framea_, [39])
which has an iron blade, short and narrow, but so sharp and manageable,
that, as occasion requires, they employ it either in close or distant
fighting. [40] This spear and a shield are all the armor of the cavalry.
The foot have, besides, missile weapons, several to each man, which they
hurl to an immense distance. [41] They are either naked, [42] or lightly
covered with a small mantle; and have no pride in equipage: their
shields only are ornamented with the choicest colors. [43] Few are
provided with a coat of mail; [44] and scarcely here and there one with
a casque or helmet. [45] Their horses are neither remarkable for beauty
nor swiftness, nor are they taught the various evolutions practised with
us. The cavalry either bear down straight forwards, or wheel once to
the right, in so compact a body that none is left behind the rest. Their
principal strength, on the whole, consists in their infantry: hence
in an engagement these are intermixed with the cavalry; [46] so Well
accordant with the nature of equestrian combats is the agility of those
foot soldiers, whom they select from the whole body of their youth,
and place in the front of the line. Their number, too, is determined; a
hundred from each canton: [47] and they are distinguished at home by a
name expressive of this circumstance; so that what at first was only an
appellation of number, becomes thenceforth a title of honor. Their line
of battle is disposed in wedges. [48] To give ground, provided
they rally again, is considered rather as a prudent strategem, than
cowardice. They carry off their slain even while the battle remains
undecided. The greatest disgrace that can befall them is to have
abandoned their shields. [49] A person branded with this ignominy is not
permitted to join in their religious rites, or enter their assemblies;
so that many, after escaping from battle, have put an end to their
infamy by the halter.

7. In the election of kings they have regard to birth; in that of
generals, [50] to valor. Their kings have not an absolute or unlimited
power; [51] and their generals command less through the force of
authority, than of example. If they are daring, adventurous, and
conspicuous in action, they procure obedience from the admiration they
inspire. None, however, but the priests [52] are permitted to judge
offenders, to inflict bonds or stripes; so that chastisement appears not
as an act of military discipline, but as the instigation of the god whom
they suppose present with warriors. They also carry with them to battle
certain images and standards taken from the sacred groves. [53] It is
a principal incentive to their courage, that their squadrons and
battalions are not formed by men fortuitously collected, but by the
assemblage of families and clans. Their pledges also are near at hand;
they have within hearing the yells of their women, and the cries of
their children. These, too, are the most revered witnesses of each man's
conduct, these his most liberal applauders. To their mothers and their
wives they bring their wounds for relief, nor do these dread to count
or to search out the gashes. The women also administer food and
encouragement to those who are fighting.

8. Tradition relates, that armies beginning to give way have been
rallied by the females, through the earnestness of their supplications,
the interposition of their bodies, [54] and the pictures they have drawn
of impending slavery, [55] a calamity which these people bear with more
impatience for their women than themselves; so that those states who
have been obliged to give among their hostages the daughters of noble
families, are the most effectually bound to fidelity. [56] They even
suppose somewhat of sanctity and prescience to be inherent in the female
sex; and therefore neither despise their counsels, [57] nor disregard
their responses. [58] We have beheld, in the reign of Vespasian, Veleda,
[59] long reverenced by many as a deity. Aurima, moreover, and several
others, [60] were formerly held in equal veneration, but not with a
servile flattery, nor as though they made them goddesses. [61]

9. Of the gods, Mercury [62] is the principal object of their adoration;
whom, on certain days, [63] they think it lawful to propitiate even with
human victims. To Hercules and Mars [64] they offer the animals usually
allotted for sacrifice. [65] Some of the Suevi also perform sacred rites
to Isis. What was the cause and origin of this foreign worship, I have
not been able to discover; further than that her being represented with
the symbol of a galley, seems to indicate an imported religion. [66]
They conceive it unworthy the grandeur of celestial beings to confine
their deities within walls, or to represent them under a human
similitude: [67] woods and groves are their temples; and they affix
names of divinity to that secret power, which they behold with the eye
of adoration alone.

10. No people are more addicted to divination by omens and lots. The
latter is performed in the following simple manner. They cut a twig [68]
from a fruit-tree, and divide it into small pieces, which, distinguished
by certain marks, are thrown promiscuously upon a white garment. Then,
the priest of the canton, if the occasion be public; if private, the
master of the family; after an invocation of the gods, with his eyes
lifted up to heaven, thrice takes out each piece, and, as they come up,
interprets their signification according to the marks fixed upon them.
If the result prove unfavorable, there is no more consultation on the
same affair that day; if propitious, a confirmation by omens is still
required. In common with other nations, the Germans are acquainted with
the practice of auguring from the notes and flight of birds; but it is
peculiar to them to derive admonitions and presages from horses also.
[69] Certain of these animals, milk-white, and untouched by earthly
labor, are pastured at the public expense in the sacred woods and
groves. These, yoked to a consecrated chariot, are accompanied by the
priest, and king, or chief person of the community, who attentively
observe their manner of neighing and snorting; and no kind of augury
is more credited, not only among the populace, but among the nobles
and priests. For the latter consider themselves as the ministers of
the gods, and the horses, as privy to the divine will. Another kind of
divination, by which they explore the event of momentous wars, is to
oblige a prisoner, taken by any means whatsoever from the nation with
whom they are at variance, to fight with a picked man of their own, each
with his own country's arms; and, according as the victory falls, they
presage success to the one or to the other party. [70]

11. On affairs of smaller moment, the chiefs consult; on those of
greater importance, the whole community; yet with this circumstance,
that what is referred to the decision of the people, is first maturely
discussed by the chiefs. [71] They assemble, unless upon some sudden
emergency, on stated days, either at the new or full moon, which they
account the most auspicious season for beginning any enterprise. Nor do
they, in their computation of time, reckon, like us, by the number of
days, but of nights. In this way they arrange their business; in this
way they fix their appointments; so that, with them, the night seems to
lead the day. [72] An inconvenience produced by their liberty is, that
they do not all assemble at a stated time, as if it were in obedience
to a command; but two or three days are lost in the delays of convening.
When they all think fit, [73] they sit down armed. [74] Silence is
proclaimed by the priests, who have on this occasion a coercive power.
Then the king, or chief, and such others as are conspicuous for age,
birth, military renown, or eloquence, are heard; and gain attention
rather from their ability to persuade, than their authority to command.
If a proposal displease, the assembly reject it by an inarticulate
murmur; if it prove agreeable, they clash their javelins; [75] for the
most honorable expression of assent among them is the sound of arms.

12. Before this council, it is likewise allowed to exhibit accusations,
and to prosecute capital offences. Punishments are varied according to
the nature of the crime. Traitors and deserters are hung upon trees:
[76] cowards, dastards, [77] and those guilty of unnatural practices,
[78] are suffocated in mud under a hurdle. [79] This difference of
punishment has in view the principle, that villainy should be exposed
while it is punished, but turpitude concealed. The penalties annexed
to slighter offences [80] are also proportioned to the delinquency. The
convicts are fined in horses and cattle: [81] part of the mulct [82]
goes to the king or state; part to the injured person, or his relations.
In the same assemblies chiefs [83] are also elected, to administer
justice through the cantons and districts. A hundred companions, chosen
from the people, attended upon each of them, to assist them as well with
their advice as their authority.

13. The Germans transact no business, public or private, without being
armed: [84] but it is not customary for any person to assume arms till
the state has approved his ability to use them. Then, in the midst of
the assembly, either one of the chiefs, or the father, or a relation,
equips the youth with a shield and javelin. [85] These are to them the
manly gown; [86] this is the first honor conferred on youth: before this
they are considered as part of a household; afterwards, of the state.
The dignity of chieftain is bestowed even on mere lads, whose descent is
eminently illustrious, or whose fathers have performed signal services
to the public; they are associated, however, with those of mature
strength, who have already been declared capable of service; nor do
they blush to be seen in the rank of companions. [87] For the state of
companionship itself has its several degrees, determined by the judgment
of him whom they follow; and there is a great emulation among the
companions, which shall possess the highest place in the favor of their
chief; and among the chiefs, which shall excel in the number and valor
of his companions. It is their dignity, their strength, to be always
surrounded with a large body of select youth, an ornament in peace,
a bulwark in war. And not in his own country alone, but among the
neighboring states, the fame and glory of each chief consists in being
distinguished for the number and bravery of his companions. Such chiefs
are courted by embassies; distinguished by presents; and often by their
reputation alone decide a war.

14. In the field of battle, it is disgraceful for the chief to be
surpassed in valor; it is disgraceful for the companions not to equal
their chief; but it is reproach and infamy during a whole succeeding
life to retreat from the field surviving him. [88] To aid, to protect
him; to place their own gallant actions to the account of his glory, is
their first and most sacred engagement. The chiefs fight for victory;
the companions for their chief. If their native country be long sunk in
peace and inaction, many of the young nobles repair to some other state
then engaged in war. For, besides that repose is unwelcome to their
race, and toils and perils afford them a better opportunity of
distinguishing themselves; they are unable, without war and violence,
to maintain a large train of followers. The companion requires from the
liberality of his chief, the warlike steed, the bloody and conquering
spear: and in place of pay, he expects to be supplied with a table,
homely indeed, but plentiful. [89] The funds for this munificence
must be found in war and rapine; nor are they so easily persuaded
to cultivate the earth, and await the produce of the seasons, as to
challenge the foe, and expose themselves to wounds; nay, they even think
it base and spiritless to earn by sweat what they might purchase with
blood.

15. During the intervals of war, they pass their time less in hunting
than in a sluggish repose, [90] divided between sleep and the table.
All the bravest of the warriors, committing the care of the house, the
family affairs, and the lands, to the women, old men, and weaker part
of the domestics, stupefy themselves in inaction: so wonderful is the
contrast presented by nature, that the same persons love indolence,
and hate tranquillity! [91] It is customary for the several states to
present, by voluntary and individual contributions, [92] cattle or grain
[93] to their chiefs; which are accepted as honorary gifts, while they
serve as necessary supplies. [94] They are peculiarly pleased with
presents from neighboring nations, offered not only by individuals,
but by the community at large; such as fine horses, heavy armor, rich
housings, and gold chains. We have now taught them also to accept of
money. [95]

16. It is well known that none of the German nations inhabit cities;
[96] or even admit of contiguous settlements. They dwell scattered and
separate, as a spring, a meadow, or a grove may chance to invite
them. Their villages are laid out, not like ours in rows of adjoining
buildings; but every one surrounds his house with a vacant space, [97]
either by way of security against fire, [97] or through ignorance of
the art of building. For, indeed, they are unacquainted with the use
of mortar and tiles; and for every purpose employ rude unshapen timber,
fashioned with no regard to pleasing the eye. They bestow more than
ordinary pains in coating certain parts of their buildings with a kind
of earth, so pure and shining that it gives the appearance of painting.
They also dig subterraneous caves, [99] and cover them over with a great
quantity of dung. These they use as winter-retreats, and granaries; for
they preserve a moderate temperature; and upon an invasion, when the
open country is plundered, these recesses remain unviolated, either
because the enemy is ignorant of them, or because he will not trouble
himself with the search. [100]

17. The clothing common to all is a sagum [101] fastened by a clasp, or,
in want of that, a thorn. With no other covering, they pass whole days
on the hearth, before the fire. The more wealthy are distinguished by a
vest, not flowing loose, like those of the Sarmatians and Parthians, but
girt close, and exhibiting the shape of every limb. They also wear the
skins of beasts, which the people near the borders are less curious in
selecting or preparing than the more remote inhabitants, who cannot by
commerce procure other clothing. These make choice of particular skins,
which they variegate with spots, and strips of the furs of marine
animals, [102] the produce of the exterior ocean, and seas to us
unknown. [103] The dress of the women does not differ from that of the
men; except that they more frequently wear linen, [104] which they stain
with purple; [105] and do not lengthen their upper garment into sleeves,
but leave exposed the whole arm, and part of the breast.

18. The matrimonial bond is, nevertheless, strict and severe among them;
nor is there anything in their manners more commendable than this. [106]
Almost singly among the barbarians, they content themselves with one
wife; a very few of them excepted, who, not through incontinence, but
because their alliance is solicited on account of their rank, [107]
practise polygamy. The wife does not bring a dowry to her husband, but
receives one from him. [108] The parents and relations assemble, and
pass their approbation on the presents--presents not adapted to please
a female taste, or decorate the bride; but oxen, a caparisoned steed, a
shield, spear, and sword. By virtue of these, the wife is espoused; and
she in her turn makes a present of some arms to her husband. This they
consider as the firmest bond of union; these, the sacred mysteries,
the conjugal deities. That the woman may not think herself excused from
exertions of fortitude, or exempt from the casualties of war, she is
admonished by the very ceremonial of her marriage, that she comes to her
husband as a partner in toils and dangers; to suffer and to dare equally
with him, in peace and in war: this is indicated by the yoked oxen, the
harnessed steed, the offered arms. Thus she is to live; thus to die.
She receives what she is to return inviolate [109] and honored to her
children; what her daughters-in-law are to receive, and again transmit
to her grandchildren.

19. They live, therefore, fenced around with chastity; [110] corrupted
by no seductive spectacles, [111] no convivial incitements. Men and
women are alike unacquainted with clandestine correspondence. Adultery
is extremely rare among so numerous a people. Its punishment is instant,
and at the pleasure of the husband. He cuts off the hair [112] of the
offender, strips her, and in presence of her relations expels her from
his house, and pursues her with stripes through the whole village. [113]
Nor is any indulgence shown to a prostitute. Neither beauty, youth, nor
riches can procure her a husband: for none there looks on vice with
a smile, or calls mutual seduction the way of the world. Still more
exemplary is the practice of those states [114] in which none but
virgins marry, and the expectations and wishes of a wife are at once
brought to a period. Thus, they take one husband as one body and one
life; that no thought, no desire, may extend beyond him; and he may be
loved not only as their husband, but as their marriage. [115] To limit
the increase of children, [116] or put to death any of the later progeny
[117] is accounted infamous: and good habits have there more influence
than good laws elsewhere. [118]

20. In every house the children grow up, thinly and meanly clad, [119]
to that bulk of body and limb which we behold with wonder. Every mother
suckles her own children, and does not deliver them into the hands of
servants and nurses. No indulgence distinguishes the young master from
the slave. They lie together amidst the same cattle, upon the same
ground, till age [120] separates, and valor marks out, the free-born.
The youths partake late of the pleasures of love, [121] and hence
pass the age of puberty unexhausted: nor are the virgins hurried into
marriage; the same maturity, the same full growth is required: the sexes
unite equally matched [122] and robust; and the children inherit the
vigor of their parents. Children are regarded with equal affection by
their maternal uncles [123] as by their fathers: some even consider
this as the more sacred bond of consanguinity, and prefer it in the
requisition of hostages, as if it held the mind by a firmer tie, and the
family by a more extensive obligation. A person's own children, however,
are his heirs and successors; and no wills are made. If there be no
children, the next in order of inheritance are brothers, paternal and
maternal uncles. The more numerous are a man's relations and kinsmen,
the more comfortable is his old age; nor is it here any advantage to be
childless. [124]

21. It is an indispensable duty to adopt the enmities [125] of a father
or relation, as well as their friendships: these, however, are not
irreconcilable or perpetual. Even homicide is atoned [126] by a certain
fine in cattle and sheep; and the whole family accepts the satisfaction,
to the advantage of the public weal, since quarrels are most dangerous
in a free state. No people are more addicted to social entertainments,
or more liberal in the exercise of hospitality. [127] To refuse any
person whatever admittance under their roof, is accounted flagitious.
[128] Every one according to his ability feasts his guest: when his
provisions are exhausted, he who was late the host, is now the guide
and companion to another hospitable board. They enter the next house
uninvited, and are received with equal cordiality. No one makes a
distinction with respect to the rights of hospitality, between a
stranger and an acquaintance. The departing guest is presented with
whatever he may ask for; and with the same freedom a boon is desired in
return. They are pleased with presents; but think no obligation incurred
either when they give or receive.

22. [129] [Their manner of living with their guest is easy and affable]
As soon as they arise from sleep, which they generally protract till
late in the day, they bathe, usually in warm water, [130] as cold
weather chiefly prevails there. After bathing they take their meal, each
on a distinct seat, and a a separate table. [131] Then they proceed,
armed, to business, and not less frequently to convivial parties, in
which it is no disgrace to pass days and nights, without intermission,
in drinking. The frequent quarrels that arise amongst them, when
intoxicated, seldom terminate in abusive language, but more frequently
in blood. [132] In their feasts, they generally deliberate on the
reconcilement of enemies, on family alliances, on the appointment of
chiefs, and finally on peace and war; conceiving that at no time the
soul is more opened to sincerity, or warmed to heroism. These people,
naturally void of artifice or disguise, disclose the most secret
emotions of their hearts in the freedom of festivity. The minds of all
being thus displayed without reserve, the subjects of their deliberation
are again canvassed the next day; [133] and each time has its
advantages. They consult when unable to dissemble; they determine when
not liable to mistake.

23. Their drink is a liquor prepared from barley or wheat [134] brought
by fermentation to a certain resemblance of wine. Those who border on
the Rhine also purchase wine. Their food is simple; wild fruits, fresh
venison, [135] or coagulated milk. [136] They satisfy hunger without
seeking the elegances and delicacies of the table. Their thirst for
liquor is not quenched with equal moderation. If their propensity to
drunkenness be gratified to the extent of their wishes, intemperance
proves as effectual in subduing them as the force of arms. [137]

24. They have only one kind of public spectacle, which is exhibited
in every company. Young men, who make it their diversion, dance naked
amidst drawn swords and presented spears. Practice has conferred skill
at this exercise; and skill has given grace; but they do not exhibit for
hire or gain: the only reward of this pastime, though a hazardous one,
is the pleasure of the spectators. What is extraordinary, they play at
dice, when sober, as a serious business: and that with such a desperate
venture of gain or loss, that, when everything else is gone, they set
their liberties and persons on the last throw. The loser goes into
voluntary servitude; and, though the youngest and strongest, patiently
suffers himself to be bound and sold. [138] Such is their obstinacy in
a bad practice--they themselves call it honor. The slaves thus acquired
are exchanged away in commerce, that the winner may get rid of the
scandal of his victory.

25. The rest of their slaves have not, like ours, particular employments
in the family allotted them. Each is the master of a habitation and
household of his own. The lord requires from him a certain quantity
of grain, cattle, or cloth, as from a tenant; and so far only the
subjection of the slave extends. [139] His domestic offices are
performed by his own wife and children. It is usual to scourge a slave,
or punish him with chains or hard labor. They are sometimes killed by
their masters; not through severity of chastisement, but in the heat
of passion, like an enemy; with this difference, that it is done with
impunity. [140] Freedmen are little superior to slaves; seldom filling
any important office in the family; never in the state, except in those
tribes which are under regal government. [141] There, they rise above
the free-born, and even the nobles: in the rest, the subordinate
condition of the freedmen is a proof of freedom.

26. Lending money upon interest, and increasing it by usury, [142] is
unknown amongst them: and this ignorance more effectually prevents
the practice than a prohibition would do. The lands are occupied
by townships, [143] in allotments proportional to the number of
cultivators; and are afterwards parcelled out among the individuals
of the district, in shares according to the rank and condition of each
person. [144] The wide extent of plain facilitates this partition. The
arable lands are annually changed, and a part left fallow; nor do they
attempt to make the most of the fertility and plenty of the soil, by
their own industry in planting orchards, inclosing meadows, and watering
gardens. Corn is the only product required from the earth: hence their
year is not divided into so many seasons as ours; for, while they
know and distinguish by name Winter, Spring, and Summer, they are
unacquainted equally with the appellation and bounty of Autumn. [145]

27. Their funerals are without parade. [146] The only circumstance to
which they attend, is to burn the bodies of eminent persons with some
particular kinds of wood. Neither vestments nor perfumes are heaped upon
the pile: [147] the arms of the deceased, and sometimes his horse, [148]
are given to the flames. The tomb is a mound of turf. They contemn the
elaborate and costly honours of monumental structures, as mere burthens
to the dead. They soon dismiss tears and lamentations; slowly, sorrow
and regret. They think it the women's part to bewail their friends, the
men's to remember them.

28. This is the sum of what I have been able to learn concerning the
origin and manners of the Germans in general. I now proceed to mention
those particulars in which they differ from each other; and likewise
to relate what nations have migrated from Germany into Gaul. That great
writer, the deified Julius, asserts that the Gauls were formerly the
superior people; [149] whence it is probable that some Gallic colonies
passed over into Germany: for how small an obstacle would a river be
to prevent any nation, as it increased in strength, from occupying or
changing settlements as yet lying in common, and unappropriated by the
power of monarchies! Accordingly, the tract betwixt the Hercynian forest
and the rivers Rhine and Mayne was possessed by the Helvetii: [150] and
that beyond, by the Boii; [151] both Gallic tribes. The name of
Boiemum still remains, a memorial of the ancient settlement, though
its inhabitants are now changed. [152] But whether the Aravisci [153]
migrated into Pannonia from the Osi, [154] a German nation; or the Osi
into Germany from the Aravisci; the language, institutions, and manners
of both being still the same, is a matter of uncertainty; for, in their
pristine state of equal indigence and equal liberty, the same advantages
and disadvantages were common to both sides of the river. The Treveri
[155] and Nervii [156] are ambitious of being thought of German origin;
as if the reputation of this descent would distinguish them from the
Gauls, whom they resemble in person and effeminacy. The Vangiones,
Triboci, and Nemetes, [157] who inhabit the bank of the Rhine, are
without doubt German tribes. Nor do the Ubii, [158] although they have
been thought worthy of being made a Roman colony, and are pleased
in bearing the name of Agrippinenses from their founder, blush to
acknowledge their origin from Germany; from whence they formerly
migrated, and for their approved fidelity were settled on the bank of
the Rhine, not that they might be guarded themselves, but that they
might serve as a guard against invaders.

29. Of all these people, the most famed for valor are the Batavi; whose
territories comprise but a small part of the banks of the Rhine, but
consist chiefly of an island within it. [159] These were formerly a
tribe of the Catti, who, on account of an intestine division, removed
to their present settlements, in order to become a part of the Roman
empire. They still retain this honor, together with a memorial of their
ancient alliance; [160] for they are neither insulted by taxes, nor
oppressed by farmers of the revenue. Exempt from fiscal burthens and
extraordinary contributions, and kept apart for military use alone,
they are reserved, like a magazine of arms, for the purposes of war. The
nation of the Mattiaci [161] is under a degree of subjection of the same
kind: for the greatness of the Roman people has carried a reverence
for the empire beyond the Rhine and the ancient limits. The Mattiaci,
therefore, though occupying a settlement and borders [162] on the
opposite side of the river, from sentiment and attachment act with us;
resembling the Batavi in every respect, except that they are animated
with a more vigorous spirit by the soil and air of their own country.
[163] I do not reckon among the people of Germany those who occupy the
Decumate lands, [164] although inhabiting between the Rhine and Danube.
Some of the most fickle of the Gauls, rendered daring through indigence,
seized upon this district of uncertain property. Afterwards,
our boundary line being advanced, and a chain of fortified posts
established, it became a skirt of the empire, and part of the Roman
province. [165]

30. Beyond these dwell the Catti, [166] whose settlements, beginning
from the Hercynian forest, are in a tract of country less open and
marshy than those which overspread the other states of Germany; for
it consists of a continued range of hills, which gradually become more
scattered; and the Hercynian forest [167] both accompanies and leaves
behind, its Catti. This nation is distinguished by hardier frames, [168]
compactness of limb, fierceness of countenance, and superior vigor of
mind. For Germans, they have a considerable share of understanding
and sagacity; they choose able persons to command, and obey them when
chosen; keep their ranks; seize opportunities; restrain impetuous
motions; distribute properly the business of the day; intrench
themselves against the night; account fortune dubious, and valor
only certain; and, what is extremely rare, and only a consequence of
discipline, depend more upon the general than the army. [169] Their
force consists entirely in infantry; who, besides their arms, are
obliged to carry tools and provisions. Other nations appear to go to
a battle; the Catti, to war. Excursions and casual encounters are rare
amongst them. It is, indeed, peculiar to cavalry soon to obtain, and
soon to yield, the victory. Speed borders upon timidity; slow movements
are more akin to steady valor.

31. A custom followed among the other German nations only by a few
individuals, of more daring spirit than the rest, is adopted by general
consent among the Catti. From the time they arrive at years of maturity
they let their hair and beard grow; [170] and do not divest themselves
of this votive badge, the promise of valor, till they have slain an
enemy. Over blood and spoils they unveil the countenance, and proclaim
that they have at length paid the debt of existence, and have proved
themselves worthy of their country and parents. The cowardly and
effeminate continue in their squalid disguise. The bravest among them
wear also an iron ring [171] (a mark of ignominy in that nation) as a
kind of chain, till they have released themselves by the slaughter of a
foe. Many of the Catti assume this distinction, and grow hoary under
the mark, conspicuous both to foes and friends. By these, in every
engagement, the attack is begun: they compose the front line, presenting
a new spectacle of terror. Even in peace they do not relax the sternness
of their aspect. They have no house, land, or domestic cares: they
are maintained by whomsoever they visit: lavish of another's property,
regardless of their own; till the debility of age renders them unequal
to such a rigid course of military virtue. [172]

32. Next to the Catti, on the banks of the Rhine, where, now settled in
its channel, it is become a sufficient boundary, dwell the Usipii and
Tencteri. [173] The latter people, in addition to the usual military
reputation, are famed for the discipline of their cavalry; nor is
the infantry of the Catti in higher estimation than the horse of the
Tencteri. Their ancestors established it, and are imitated by posterity.
Horsemanship is the sport of their children, the point of emulation of
their youth, and the exercise in which they persevere to old age. Horses
are bequeathed along with the domestics, the household gods, and the
rights of inheritance: they do not, however, like other things, go to
the eldest son, but to the bravest and most warlike.

33. Contiguous to the Tencteri were formerly the Bructeri; [174] but
report now says that the Chamavi and Angrivarii, [175] migrating into
their country, have expelled and entirely extirpated them, [176] with
the concurrence of the neighboring nations, induced either by hatred of
their arrogance, [177] love of plunder, or the favor of the gods towards
the Romans. For they even gratified us with the spectacle of a battle,
in which above sixty thousand Germans were slain, not by Roman arms,
but, what was still grander, by mutual hostilities, as it were for our
pleasure and entertainment. [178] May the nations retain and perpetuate,
if not an affection for us, at least an animosity against each other!
since, while the fate of the empire is thus urgent, [179] fortune can
bestow no higher benefit upon us, than the discord of our enemies.

34. Contiguous to the Angrivarii and Chamavi backwards lie the
Dulgibini, Chasauri, [180] and other nations less known. [181] In front,
the Frisii [182] succeed; who are distinguished by the appellations of
Greater and Lesser, from their proportional power. The settlements of
both stretch along the border of the Rhine to the ocean; and include,
besides, vast lakes, [183] which have been navigated by Roman fleets. We
have even explored the ocean itself on that side; and fame reports that
columns of Hercules [184] are still remaining on that coast; whether it
be that Hercules was ever there in reality, or that whatever great and
magnificent is anywhere met with is, by common consent, ascribed to
his renowned name. The attempt of Drusus Germanicus [185] to make
discoveries in these parts was sufficiently daring; but the ocean
opposed any further inquiry into itself and Hercules. After a while no
one renewed the attempt; and it was thought more pious and reverential
to believe the actions of the gods, than to investigate them.

35. Hitherto we have traced the western side of Germany. It turns from
thence with a vast sweep to the north: and first occurs the country of
the Chauci, [186] which, though it begins immediately from Frisia, and
occupies part of the seashore, yet stretches so far as to border on
all the nations before mentioned, till it winds round so as to meet the
territories of the Catti. This immense tract is not only possessed, but
filled by the Chauci; a people the noblest of the Germans, who choose
to maintain their greatness by justice rather than violence. Without
ambition, without ungoverned desires, quiet and retired, they provoke
no wars, they are guilty of no rapine or plunder; and it is a principal
proof of their power and bravery, that the superiority they possess has
not been acquired by unjust means. Yet all have arms in readiness; [187]
and, if necessary, an army is soon raised: for they abound in men and
horses, and maintain their military reputation even in inaction.

36. Bordering on the Chauci and Catti are the Cherusci; [188] who, for
want of an enemy, long cherished a too lasting and enfeebling peace:
a state more flattering than secure; since the repose enjoyed amidst
ambitious and powerful neighbors is treacherous; and when an appeal is
made to the sword, moderation and probity are names appropriated by the
victors. Thus, the Cherusci, who formerly bore the titles of just and
upright, are now charged with cowardice and folly; and the good fortune
of the Catti, who subdued them, has grown into wisdom. The ruin of the
Cherusci involved that of the Fosi, [189] a neighboring tribe, equal
partakers of their adversity, although they had enjoyed an inferior
share of their prosperity.

37. In the same quarter of Germany, adjacent to the ocean, dwell the
Cimbri; [191] a small [192] state at present, but great in renown. [193]
Of their past grandeur extensive vestiges still remain, in encampments
and lines on either shore, [194] from the compass of which the strength
and numbers of the nation may still be computed, and credit derived to
the account of so prodigious an army. It was in the 640th year of Rome
that the arms of the Cimbri were first heard of, under the consulate
of Caecilius Metellus and Papirius Carbo; from which era to the second
consulate of the emperor Trajan [195] is a period of nearly 210 years.
So long has Germany withstood the arms of Rome. During this long
interval many mutual wounds have been inflicted. Not the Samnite, the
Carthaginian, Spain, Gaul, or Parthia, have given more frequent alarms;
for the liberty of the Germans is more vigorous than the monarchy of
the Arsacidae. What has the East, which has itself lost Pacorus, and
suffered an overthrow from Ventidius, [196] to boast against us, but
the slaughter of Crassus? But the Germans, by the defeat or capture of
Carbo, [197] Cassius, [198] Scaurus Aurelius, [199] Servilius Caepio,
and Cneius Manlius, [200] deprived the Roman people of five consular
armies; [201] and afterwards took from Augustus himself Varus with three
legions. [202] Nor did Caius Marius [203] in Italy, the deified Julius
[204] in Gaul, or Drusus, [204] Nero, [204] or Germanicus [204] in their
own country, defeat then without loss. The subsequent mighty threats
of Caligula terminated in ridicule. Then succeeded tranquillity; till,
seizing the occasion of our discords and civil wars, they forced the
winter-quarters of the legions, [205] and even aimed at the possession
of Gaul; and, again expelled thence, they have in latter times been
rather triumphed over [206] than vanquished.

38. We have now to speak of the Suevi; [207] who do not compose a single
state, like the Catti or Tencteri, but occupy the greatest part of
Germany, and are still distributed into different names and nations,
although all hearing the common appellation of Suevi. It is a
characteristic of this people to turn their hair sideways, and tie it
beneath the poll in a knot. By this mark the Suevi are distinguished
from the rest of the Germans; and the freemen of the Suevi from the
slaves. [208] Among other nations, this mode, either on account of some
relationship with the Suevi, or from the usual propensity to imitation,
is sometimes adopted; but rarely, and only during the period of youth.
The Suevi, even till they are hoary, continue to have their hair growing
stiffly backwards, and often it is fastened on the very crown of the
head. The chiefs dress it with still greater care: and in this respect
they study ornament, though of an undebasing kind. For their design is
not to make love, or inspire it; they decorate themselves in this manner
as they proceed to war, in order to seem taller and more terrible; and
dress for the eyes of their enemies.

39. The Semnones [209] assert themselves to be the most ancient and
noble of the Suevi; and their pretensions are confirmed by religion.
At a stated time, all the people of the same lineage assemble by their
delegates in a wood, consecrated by the auguries of their forefathers
and ancient terror, and there by the public slaughter of a human victim
celebrate the horrid origin of their barbarous rites. Another kind of
reverence is paid to the grove. No person enters it without being bound
with a chain, as an acknowledgment of his inferior nature, and the power
of the deity residing there. If he accidentally fall, it is not lawful
for him to be lifted or to rise up; they roll themselves out along the
ground. The whole of their superstition has this import: that from this
spot the nation derives its origin; that here is the residence of the
Deity, the Governor of all, and that everything else is subject and
subordinate to him. These opinions receive additional authority from
the power of the Semnones, who inhabit a hundred cantons, and, from the
great body they compose, consider themselves as the head of the Suevi.

40. The Langobardi, [210] on the other hand, are ennobled by, the
smallness of their numbers; since though surrounded by many powerful
nations, they derive security, not from obsequiousness, but from their
martial enterprise. The neighboring Reudigni, [211] and the Avions,
[212] Angli, [213] Varini, Eudoses, Suardones, and Nuithones, [214]
are defended by rivers or forests. Nothing remarkable occurs in any of
these; except that they unite in the worship of Hertha, [215] or Mother
Earth; and suppose her to interfere in the affairs of men, and to visit
the different nations. In an island [216] of the ocean stands a sacred
and unviolated grove, in which is a consecrated chariot, covered with a
veil, which the priest alone is permitted to touch. He becomes conscious
of the entrance of the goddess into this secret recess; and with
profound veneration attends the vehicle, which is drawn by yoked cows.
At this season, [217] all is joy; and every place which the goddess
deigns to visit is a scene of festivity. No wars are undertaken; arms
are untouched; and every hostile weapon is shut up. Peace abroad and
at home are then only known; then only loved; till at length the same
priest reconducts the goddess, satiated with mortal intercourse, to her
temple. [218] The chariot, with its curtain, and, if we may believe it,
the goddess herself, then undergo ablution in a secret lake. This office
is performed by slaves, whom the same lake instantly swallows up. Hence
proceeds a mysterious horror; and a holy ignorance of what that can be,
which is beheld only by those who are about to perish. This part of the
Suevian nation extends to the most remote recesses of Germany.

41. If we now follow the course of the Danube, as we before did that of
the Rhine, we first meet with the Hermunduri; [219] a people faithful to
the Romans, [220] and on that account the only Germans who are admitted
to commerce, not on the bank alone, but within our territories, and in
the flourishing colony [221] established in the province of Rhaetia.
They pass and repass at pleasure, without being attended by a guard; and
while we exhibit to other nations our arms and camps alone, to these
we lay open our houses and country seats, which they behold without
coveting. In the country of the Hermunduri rises the Elbe; [222] a river
formerly celebrated and known among us, now only heard of by name.

42. Contiguous to the Hermunduri are the Narisci; [223] and next to
them, the Marcomanni [224] and Quadi. [225] Of these, the Marcomanni are
the most powerful and renowned; and have even acquired the country which
they inhabit, by their valor in expelling the Boii. [226] Nor are the
Narisci and Quadi inferior in bravery; [227] and this is, as it were,
the van of Germany as far as it is bordered by the Danube. Within our
memory the Marcomanni and Quadi were governed by kings of their own
nation, of the noble line of Maroboduus [228] and Tudrus. They now
submit even to foreigners; but all the power of their kings depends upon
the authority of the Romans. [229] We seldom assist them with our arms,
but frequently with our money; nor are they the less potent on that
account.

43. Behind these are the Marsigni, [230] Gothini, [231] Osi, [232] and
Burrii, [233] who close the rear of the Marcomanni and Quadi. Of these,
the Marsigni and Burrii in language [234] and dress resemble the Suevi.
The Gothini and Osi prove themselves not to be Germans; the first, by
their use of the Gallic, the second, of the Pannonian tongue; and both,
by their submitting to pay tribute: which is levied on them, as aliens,
partly by the Sarmatians, partly by the Quadi. The Gothini, to their
additional disgrace, work iron mines. [235] All these people inhabit but
a small proportion of champaign country; their settlements are chiefly
amongst forests, and on the sides and summits of mountains; for a
continued ridge of mountains [236] separates Suevia from various remoter
tribes. Of these, the Lygian [237] is the most extensive, and diffuses
its name through several communities. It will be sufficient to name
the most powerful of them--the Arii, Helvecones, Manimi, Elysii, and
Naharvali. [238] In the country of the latter is a grove, consecrated to
religious rites of great antiquity. A priest presides over them, dressed
in woman's apparel; but the gods worshipped there are said, according to
the Roman interpretation, to be Castor and Pollux. Their attributes are
the same; their name, Alcis. [239] No images, indeed, or vestiges of
foreign superstition, appear in their worship; but they are revered
under the character of young men and brothers. The Arii, fierce beyond
the superiority of strength they possess over the other just enumerated
people, improve their natural ferocity of aspect by artificial helps.
Their shields are black; their bodies painted: [240] they choose the
darkest nights for an attack; and strike terror by the funereal gloom of
their sable bands--no enemy being able to sustain their singular, and,
as it were, infernal appearance; since in every combat the eyes are the
first part subdued. Beyond the Lygii are the Gothones, [241] who live
under a monarchy, somewhat more strict than that of the other German
nations, yet not to a degree incompatible with liberty. Adjoining
to these are the Rugii [242] and Lemovii, [243] situated on the
sea-coast--all these tribes are distinguished by round shields, short
swords, and submission to regal authority.

44. Next occur the communities of the Suiones, [244] seated in the very
Ocean, [245] who, besides their strength in men and arms, also possess a
naval force. [246] The form of their vessels differs from ours in having
a prow at each end, [247] so that they are always ready to advance. They
make no use of sails, nor have regular benches of oars at the sides:
they row, as is practised in some rivers, without order, sometimes on
one side, sometimes on the other, as occasion requires. These people
honor wealth; [248] for which reason they are subject to monarchical
government, without any limitations, [249] or precarious conditions of
allegiance. Nor are arms allowed to be kept promiscuously, as among the
other German nations: but are committed to the charge of a keeper, and
he, too, a slave. The pretext is, that the Ocean defends them from any
sudden incursions; and men unemployed, with arms in their hands, readily
become licentious. In fact, it is for the king's interest not to entrust
a noble, a freeman, or even an emancipated slave, with the custody of
arms.

45. Beyond the Suiones is another sea, sluggish and almost stagnant,
[250] by which the whole globe is imagined to be girt and enclosed, from
this circumstance, that the last light of the setting sun continues so
vivid till its rising, as to obscure the stars. [251] Popular belief
adds, that the sound of his emerging [252] from the ocean is also heard;
and the forms of deities, [253] with the rays beaming from his head, are
beheld. Only thus far, report says truly, does nature extend. [254] On
the right shore of the Suevic sea [255] dwell the tribes of the Aestii,
[256] whose dress and customs are the same with those of the Suevi, but
their language more resembles the British. [257] They worship the mother
of the gods; [258] and as the symbol of their superstition, they carry
about them the figures of wild boars. [250] This serves them in place of
armor and every other defence: it renders the votary of the goddess safe
even in the midst of foes. Their weapons are chiefly clubs, iron being
little used among them. They cultivate corn and other fruits of the
earth with more industry than German indolence commonly exerts. [260]
They even explore the sea; and are the only people who gather amber,
which by them is called _Glese_, [261] and is collected among the
shallows and upon the shore. [262] With the usual indifference of
barbarians, they have not inquired or ascertained from what natural
object or by what means it is produced. It long lay disregarded [263]
amidst other things thrown up by the sea, till our luxury [264] gave
it a name. Useless to them, they gather it in the rough; bring it
unwrought; and wonder at the price they receive. It would appear,
however, to be an exudation from certain trees; since reptiles, and even
winged animals, are often seen shining through it, which, entangled
in it while in a liquid state, became enclosed as it hardened. [264] I
should therefore imagine that, as the luxuriant woods and groves in the
secret recesses of the East exude frankincense and balsam, so there are
the same in the islands and continents of the West; which, acted upon
by the near rays of the sun, drop their liquid juices into the subjacent
sea, whence, by the force of tempests, they are thrown out upon the
opposite coasts. If the nature of amber be examined by the application
of fire, it kindles like a torch, with a thick and odorous flame; and
presently resolves into a glutinous matter resembling pitch or resin.
The several communities of the Sitones [266] succeed those of the
Suiones; to whom they are similar in other respects, but differ in
submitting to a female reign; so far have they degenerated, not only
from liberty, but even from slavery. Here Suevia terminates.

46. I am in doubt whether to reckon the Peucini, Venedi, and Fenni among
the Germans or Sarmatians; [267] although the Peucini, [268] who are by
some called Bastarnae, agree with the Germans in language, apparel,
and habitations. [269] All of them live in filth and laziness. The
intermarriages of their chiefs with the Sarmatians have debased them
by a mixture of the manners of that people. [270] The Venedi have
drawn much from this source; [271] for they overrun in their predatory
excursions all the woody and mountainous tracts between the Peucini and
Fenni. Yet even these are rather to be referred to the Germans, since
they build houses, carry shields, and travel with speed on foot; in
all which particulars they totally differ from the Sarmatians, who pass
their time in wagons and on horseback. [272] The Fenni [273] live in a
state of amazing savageness and squalid poverty. They are destitute
of arms, horses, and settled abodes: their food is herbs; [274] their
clothing, skins; their bed, the ground. Their only dependence is on
their arrows, which, for want of iron, are headed with bone; [275] and
the chase is the support of the women as well as the men; the former
accompany the latter in the pursuit, and claim a share of the prey. Nor
do they provide any other shelter for their infants from wild beasts and
storms, than a covering of branches twisted together. This is the resort
of youth; this is the receptacle of old age. Yet even this way of life
is in their estimation happier than groaning over the plough; toiling
in the erection of houses; subjecting their own fortunes and those of
others to the agitations of alternate hope and fear. Secure against men,
secure against the gods, they have attained the most difficult point,
not to need even a wish.

All our further accounts are intermixed with fable; as, that the
Hellusii and Oxionae [276] have human faces, with the bodies and limbs
of wild beasts. These unauthenticated reports I shall leave untouched.
[277]




THE LIFE OF CNAEUS JULIUS AGRICOLA.


[This work is supposed by the commentators to have been written before
the treatise on the manners of the Germans, in the third consulship of
the emperor Nerva, and the second of Verginius Rufus, in the year of
Rome 850, and of the Christian era 97. Brotier accedes to this opinion;
but the reason which he assigns does not seem to be satisfactory. He
observes that Tacitus, in the third section, mentions the emperor Nerva;
but as he does not call him Divus Nerva, the deified Nerva, the learned
commentator infers that Nerva was still living. This reasoning might
have some weight, if we did not read, in section 44, that it was the
ardent wish of Agricola that he might live to behold Trajan in the
imperial seat. If Nerva was then alive, the wish to see another in his
room would have been an awkward compliment to the reigning prince. It
is, perhaps, for this reason that Lipsius thinks this very elegant tract
was written at the same time with the Manners of the Germans, in the
beginning of the emperor Trajan. The question is not very material,
since conjecture alone must decide it. The piece itself is admitted to
be a masterpiece in the kind. Tacitus was son-in-law to Agricola; and
while filial piety breathes through his work, he never departs from
the integrity of his own character. He has left an historical monument
highly interesting to every Briton, who wishes to know the manners of
his ancestors, and the spirit of liberty that from the earliest time
distinguished the natives of Britain. "Agricola," as Hume observes, "was
the general who finally established the dominion of the Romans in this
island. He governed, it in the reigns of Vespasian, Titus, and Domitian.
He carried his victorious arms northward: defeated the Britons in every
encounter, pierced into the forests and the mountains of Caledonia,
reduced every state to subjection in the southern parts of the island,
and chased before him all the men of fiercer and more intractable
spirits, who deemed war and death itself less intolerable than servitude
under the victors. He defeated them in a decisive action, which they
fought under Galgacus; and having fixed a chain of garrisons between the
friths of Clyde and Forth, he cut off the ruder and more barren parts
of the island, and secured the Roman province from the incursions of the
barbarous inhabitants. During these military enterprises he neglected
not the arts of peace. He introduced laws and civility among the
Britons; taught them to desire and raise all the conveniences of life;
reconciled them to the Roman language and manners; instructed them
in letters and science; and employed every expedient to render those
chains, which he had forged, both easy and agreeable to them." (Hume's
Hist. vol. i. p. 9.) In this passage Mr. Hume has given a summary of the
Life of Agricola. It is extended by Tacitus in a style more open than
the didactic form of the essay on the German Manners required, but
still with the precision, both in sentiment and diction, peculiar to
the author. In rich but subdued colors he gives a striking picture of
Agricola, leaving to posterity a portion of history which it would be
in vain to seek in the dry gazette style of Suetonius, or in the page of
any writer of that period.]


1. The ancient custom of transmitting to posterity the actions and
manners of famous men, has not been neglected even by the present age,
incurious though it be about those belonging to it, whenever any exalted
and noble degree of virtue has triumphed over that false estimation
of merit, and that ill-will to it, by which small and great states
are equally infested. In former times, however, as there was a greater
propensity and freer scope for the performance of actions worthy of
remembrance, so every person of distinguished abilities was induced
through conscious satisfaction in the task alone, without regard to
private favor or interest, to record examples of virtue. And many
considered it rather as the honest confidence of integrity, than a
culpable arrogance, to become their own biographers. Of this, Rutilius
and Scaurus [1] were instances; who were never yet censured on this
account, nor was the fidelity of their narrative called in question; so
much more candidly are virtues always estimated; in those periods which
are the most favorable to their production. For myself, however, who
have undertaken to be the historian of a person deceased, an apology
seemed necessary; which I should not have made, had my course lain
through times less cruel and hostile to virtue. [2]

2. We read that when Arulenus Rusticus published the praises of Paetus
Thrasea, and Herennius Senecio those of Priscus Helvidius, it was
construed into a capital crime; [3] and the rage of tyranny was let
loose not only against the authors, but against their writings; so that
those monuments of exalted genius were burnt at the place of election
in the forum by triumvirs appointed for the purpose. In that fire they
thought to consume the voice of the Roman people, the freedom of the
senate, and the conscious emotions of all mankind; crowning the deed
by the expulsion of the professors of wisdom, [4] and the banishment of
every liberal art, that nothing generous or honorable might remain. We
gave, indeed, a consummate proof of our patience; and as remote ages saw
the very utmost degree of liberty, so we, deprived by inquisitions of
all the intercourse of conversation, experienced the utmost of slavery.
With language we should have lost memory itself, had it been as much in
our power to forget, as to be silent.

3. Now our spirits begin to revive. But although at the first dawning
of this happy period, [5] the emperor Nerva united two things before
incompatible, monarchy and liberty; and Trajan is now daily augmenting
the felicity of the empire; and the public security [6] has not only
assumed hopes and wishes, but has seen those wishes arise to confidence
and stability; yet, from the nature of human infirmity, remedies are
more tardy in their operation than diseases; and, as bodies slowly
increase, but quickly perish, so it is more easy to suppress industry
and genius, than to recall them. For indolence itself acquires a charm;
and sloth, however odious at first, becomes at length engaging. During
the space of fifteen years, [7] a large portion of human life, how great
a number have fallen by casual events, and, as was the fate of all the
most distinguished, by the cruelty of the prince; whilst we, the few
survivors, not of others alone, but, if I may be allowed the expression,
of ourselves, find a void of so many years in our lives, which has
silently brought us from youth to maturity, from mature age to the
very verge of life! Still, however, I shall not regret having composed,
though in rude and artless language, a memorial of past servitude, and a
testimony of present blessings. [8]

The present work, in the meantime, which is dedicated to the honor of my
father-in-law, may be thought to merit approbation, or at least excuse,
from the piety of the intention.

4. CNAEUS JULIUS AGRICOLA was born at the ancient and illustrious colony
of Forumjulii. [9] Both his grandfathers were imperial procurators, [10]
an office which confers the rank of equestrian nobility. His father,
Julius Graecinus, [11] of the senatorian order, was famous for the study
of eloquence and philosophy; and by these accomplishments he drew on
himself the displeasure of Caius Caesar; [12] for, being commanded to
undertake the accusation of Marcus Silanus, [13]--on his refusal, he
was put to death. His mother was Julia Procilla, a lady of exemplary
chastity. Educated with tenderness in her bosom, [14] he passed his
childhood and youth in the attainment of every liberal art. He was
preserved from the allurements of vice, not only by a naturally good
disposition, but by being sent very early to pursue his studies at
Massilia; [15] a place where Grecian politeness and provincial frugality
are happily united. I remember he was used to relate, that in his
early youth he should have engaged with more ardor in philosophical
speculation than was suitable to a Roman and a senator, had not the
prudence of his mother restrained the warmth and vehemence of his
disposition: for his lofty and upright spirit, inflamed by the charms of
glory and exalted reputation, led him to the pursuit with more eagerness
than discretion. Reason and riper years tempered his warmth; and
from the study of wisdom, he retained what is most difficult to
compass,--moderation.

5. He learned the rudiments of war in Britain, under Suetonius
Paullinus, an active and prudent commander, who chose him for his tent
companion, in order to form an estimate of his merit. [16] Nor did
Agricola, like many young men, who convert military service into wanton
pastime, avail himself licentiously or slothfully of his tribunitial
title, or his inexperience, to spend his time in pleasures and absences
from duty; but he employed himself in gaining a knowledge of
the country, making himself known to the army, learning from the
experienced, and imitating the best; neither pressing to be employed
through vainglory, nor declining it through timidity; and performing
his duty with equal solicitude and spirit. At no other time in truth was
Britain more agitated or in a state of greater uncertainty. Our veterans
slaughtered, our colonies burnt, [17] our armies cut off, [18]--we were
then contending for safety, afterwards for victory. During this period,
although all things were transacted under the conduct and direction of
another, and the stress of the whole, as well as the glory of recovering
the province, fell to the general's share, yet they imparted to the
young Agricola skill, experience, and incentives; and the passion for
military glory entered his soul; a passion ungrateful to the times, [19]
in which eminence was unfavorably construed, and a great reputation was
no less dangerous than a bad one.

6. Departing thence to undertake the offices of magistracy in Rome, he
married Domitia Decidiana, a lady of illustrious descent, from which
connection he derived credit and support in his pursuit of greater
things. They lived together in admirable harmony and mutual affection;
each giving the preference to the other; a conduct equally laudable in
both, except that a greater degree of praise is due to a good wife,
in proportion as a bad one deserves the greater censure. The lot of
quaestorship [20] gave him Asia for his province, and the proconsul
Salvius Titianus [21] for his superior; by neither of which
circumstances was he corrupted, although the province was wealthy and
open to plunder, and the proconsul, from his rapacious disposition,
would readily have agreed to a mutual concealment of guilt. His family
was there increased by the birth of a daughter, who was both the support
of his house, and his consolation; for he lost an elder-born son in
infancy. The interval between his serving the offices of quaestor and
tribune of the people, and even the year of the latter magistracy, he
passed in repose and inactivity; well knowing the temper of the times
under Nero, in which indolence was wisdom. He maintained the same tenor
of conduct when praetor; for the judiciary part of the office did not
fall to his share. [22] In the exhibition of public games, and the idle
trappings of dignity, he consulted propriety and the measure of his
fortune; by no means approaching to extravagance, yet inclining rather
to a popular course. When he was afterwards appointed by Galba to manage
an inquest concerning the offerings which had been presented to the
temples, by his strict attention and diligence he preserved the state
from any further sacrilege than what it had suffered from Nero. [23]

7. The following year [24] inflicted a severe wound on his peace
of mind, and his domestic concerns. The fleet of Otho, roving in
a disorderly manner on the coast, [25] made a hostile descent on
Intemelii, [26] a part of Liguria, in which the mother of Agricola was
murdered at her own estate, her lands were ravaged, and a great part
of her effects, which had invited the assassins, was carried off. As
Agricola upon this event was hastening to perform the duties of filial
piety, he was overtaken by the news of Vespasian's aspiring to the
empire, [27] and immediately went over to his party. The first acts
of power, and the government of the city, were entrusted to Mucianus;
Domitian being at that time very young, and taking no other privilege
from his father's elevation than that of indulging his licentious
tastes. Mucianus, having approved the vigor and fidelity of Agricola
in the service of raising levies, gave him the command of the twentieth
legion, [28] which had appeared backward in taking the oaths, as soon as
he had heard the seditious practices of his commander. [29] This legion
had been unmanageable and formidable even to the consular lieutenants;
[30] and its late commander, of praetorian rank, had not sufficient
authority to keep it in obedience; though it was uncertain whether from
his own disposition, or that of his soldiers. Agricola was therefore
appointed as his successor and avenger; but, with an uncommon degree
of moderation, he chose rather to have it appear that he had found the
legion obedient, than that he had made it so.

8. Vettius Bolanus was at that time governor of Britain, and ruled with
a milder sway than was suitable to so turbulent a province. Under his
administration, Agricola, accustomed to obey, and taught to consult
utility as well as glory, tempered his ardor, and restrained his
enterprising spirit. His virtues had soon a larger field for their
display, from the appointment of Petilius Cerealis, [31] a man of
consular dignity, to the government. At first he only shared the
fatigues and dangers of his general; but was presently allowed to
partake of his glory. Cerealis frequently entrusted him with part of his
army as a trial of his abilities; and from the event sometimes enlarged
his command. On these occasions, Agricola was never ostentatious
in assuming to himself the merit of his exploits; but always, as a
subordinate officer, gave the honor of his good fortune to his superior.
Thus, by his spirit in executing orders, and his modesty in reporting
his success, he avoided envy, yet did not fail of acquiring reputation.

9. On his return from commanding the legion he was raised by Vespasian
to the patrician order, and then invested with the government of
Aquitania, [32] a distinguished promotion, both in respect to the office
itself, and the hopes of the consulate to which it destined him. It is a
common supposition that military men, habituated to the unscrupulous and
summary processes of camps, where things are carried with a strong hand,
are deficient in the address and subtlety of genius requisite in civil
jurisdiction. Agricola, however, by his natural prudence, was enabled to
act with facility and precision even among civilians. He distinguished
the hours of business from those of relaxation. When the court or
tribunal demanded his presence, he was grave, intent, awful, yet
generally inclined to lenity. When the duties of his office were
over, the man of power was instantly laid aside. Nothing of sternness,
arrogance, or rapaciousness appeared; and, what was a singular felicity,
his affability did not impair his authority, nor his severity render him
less beloved. To mention integrity and freedom from corruption in such
a man, would be an affront to his virtues. He did not even court
reputation, an object to which men of worth frequently sacrifice,
by ostentation or artifice: equally avoiding competition with, his
colleagues, [33] and contention with the procurators. To overcome in
such a contest he thought inglorious; and to be put down, a disgrace.
Somewhat less than three years were spent in this office, when he was
recalled to the immediate prospect of the consulate; while at the same
time a popular opinion prevailed that the government of Britain would be
conferred upon him; an opinion not founded upon any suggestions of his
own, but upon his being thought equal to the station. Common fame does
not always err, sometimes it even directs a choice. When consul, [34]
he contracted his daughter, a lady already of the happiest promise,
to myself, then a very young man; and after his office was expired
I received her in marriage. He was immediately appointed governor of
Britain, and the pontificate [35] was added to his other dignities.

10. The situation and inhabitants of Britain have been described by many
writers; [36] and I shall not add to the number with the view of vying
with them in accuracy and ingenuity, but because it was first thoroughly
subdued in the period of the present history. Those things which, while
yet unascertained, they embellished with their eloquence, shall here be
related with a faithful adherence to known facts. Britain, the largest
of all the islands which have come within the knowledge of the Romans,
stretches on the east towards Germany, on the west towards Spain, [37]
and on the south it is even within sight of Gaul. Its northern extremity
has no opposite land, but is washed by a wide and open sea. Livy, the
most eloquent of ancient, and Fabius Rusticus, of modern writers, have
likened the figure of Britain to an oblong target, or a two-edged axe.
[38] And this is in reality its appearance, exclusive of Caledonia;
whence it has been popularly attributed to the whole island. But that
tract of country, irregularly stretching out to an immense length
towards the furthest shore, is gradually contracted in form of a wedge.
[39] The Roman fleet, at this period first sailing round this remotest
coast, gave certain proof that Britain was an island; and at the same
time discovered and subdued the Orcades, [40] islands till then unknown.
Thule [41] was also distinctly seen, which winter and eternal snow had
hitherto concealed. The sea is reported to be sluggish and laborious to
the rower; and even to be scarcely agitated by winds. The cause of this
stagnation I imagine to be the deficiency of land and mountains where
tempests are generated; and the difficulty with which such a mighty mass
of waters, in an uninterrupted main, is put in motion. [42] It is not
the business of this work to investigate the nature of the ocean and
the tides; a subject which many writers have already undertaken. I shall
only add one circumstance: that the dominion of the sea is nowhere more
extensive; that it carries many currents in this direction and in that;
and its ebbings and flowings are not confined to the shore, but it
penetrates into the heart of the country, and works its way among hills
and mountains, as though it were in its own domain. [43]

11. Who were the first inhabitants of Britain, whether indigenous [44]
or immigrants, is a question involved in the obscurity usual among
barbarians. Their temperament of body is various, whence deductions are
formed of their different origin. Thus, the ruddy hair and large limbs
of the Caledonians [45] point out a German derivation. The swarthy
complexion and curled hair of the Silures, [46] together with their
situation opposite to Spain, render it probable that a colony of the
ancient Iberi [47] possessed themselves of that territory. They who are
nearest Gaul [48] resemble the inhabitants of that country; whether from
the duration of hereditary influence, or whether it be that when
lands jut forward in opposite directions, [49] climate gives the same
condition of body to the inhabitants of both. On a general survey,
however, it appears probable that the Gauls originally took possession
of the neighboring coast. The sacred rites and superstitions [50] of
these people are discernible among the Britons. The languages of the two
nations do not greatly differ. The same audacity in provoking danger,
and irresolution in facing it when present, is observable in both. The
Britons, however, display more ferocity, [51] not being yet softened
by a long peace: for it appears from history that the Gauls were once
renowned in war, till, losing their valor with their liberty, languor
and indolence entered amongst them. The same change has also taken place
among those of the Britons who have been long subdued; [52] but the rest
continue such as the Gauls formerly were.

12. Their military strength consists in infantry; some nations also make
use of chariots in war; in the management of which, the most honorable
person guides the reins, while his dependents fight from the chariot.
[53] The Britons were formerly governed by kings, [54] but at present
they are divided in factions and parties among their chiefs; and this
want of union for concerting some general plan is the most favorable
circumstance to us, in our designs against so powerful a people. It
is seldom that two or three communities concur in repelling the common
danger; and thus, while they engage singly, they are all subdued. The
sky in this country is deformed by clouds and frequent rains; but the
cold is never extremely rigorous. [55] The length of the days greatly
exceeds that in our part of the world. [56] The nights are bright, and,
at the extremity of the island, so short, that the close and return
of day is scarcely distinguished by a perceptible interval. It is even
asserted that, when clouds do not intervene, the splendor of the sun is
visible during the whole night, and that it does not appear to rise and
set, but to move across. [57] The cause of this is, that the extreme
and flat parts of the earth, casting a low shadow, do not throw up the
darkness, and so night falls beneath the sky and the stars. [58] The
soil, though improper for the olive, the vine, and other productions of
warmer climates, is fertile, and suitable for corn. Growth is quick,
but maturation slow; both from the same cause, the great humidity of the
ground and the atmosphere. [59] The earth yields gold and silver [60]
and other metals, the rewards of victory. The ocean produces pearls,
[61] but of a cloudy and livid hue; which some impute to unskilfulness
in the gatherers; for in the Red Sea the fish are plucked from the rocks
alive and vigorous, but in Britain they are collected as the sea throws
them up. For my own part, I can more readily conceive that the defect is
in the nature of the pearls, than in our avarice.

13. The Britons cheerfully submit to levies, tributes, and the other
services of government, if they are not treated injuriously; but such
treatment they bear with impatience, their subjection only extending to
obedience, not to servitude. Accordingly Julius Caesar, [62] the first
Roman who entered Britain with an army, although he terrified the
inhabitants by a successful engagement, and became master of the shore,
may be considered rather to have transmitted the discovery than the
possession of the country to posterity. The civil wars soon succeeded;
the arms of the leaders were turned against their country; and a long
neglect of Britain ensued, which continued even after the establishment
of peace. This Augustus attributed to policy; and Tiberius to the
injunctions of his predecessor. [63] It is certain that Caius Caesar
[64] meditated an expedition into Britain; but his temper, precipitate
in forming schemes, and unsteady in pursuing them, together with the
ill success of his mighty attempts against Germany, rendered the design
abortive. Claudius [65] accomplished the undertaking, transporting his
legions and auxiliaries, and associating Vespasian in the direction
of affairs, which laid the foundation of his future fortune. In this
expedition, nations were subdued, kings made captive, and Vespasian was
held forth to the fates.

14. Aulus Plautius, the first consular governor, and his successor,
Ostorius Scapula, [66] were both eminent for military abilities. Under
them, the nearest part of Britain was gradually reduced into the form of
a province, and a colony of veterans [67] was settled. Certain districts
were bestowed upon king Cogidunus, a prince who continued in perfect
fidelity within our own memory. This was done agreeably to the ancient
and long established practice of the Romans, to make even kings the
instruments of servitude. Didius Gallus, the next governor, preserved
the acquisitions of his predecessors, and added a very few fortified
posts in the remoter parts, for the reputation of enlarging his
province. Veranius succeeded, but died within the year. Suetonius
Paullinus then commanded with success for two years, subduing various
nations, and establishing garrisons. In the confidence with which this
inspired him, he undertook an expedition against the island Mona, [68]
which had furnished the revolters with supplies; and thereby exposed the
settlements behind him to a surprise.

15. For the Britons, relieved from present dread by the absence of the
governor, began to hold conferences, in which they painted the miseries
of servitude, compared their several injuries, and inflamed each other
with such representations as these: "That the only effects of their
patience were more grievous impositions upon a people who submitted with
such facility. Formerly they had one king respectively; now two were set
over them, the lieutenant and the procurator, the former of whom vented
his rage upon their life's blood, the latter upon their properties; [69]
the union or discord [70] of these governors was equally fatal to those
whom they ruled, while the officers of the one, and the centurions
of the other, joined in oppressing them by all kinds of violence and
contumely; so that nothing was exempted from their avarice, nothing from
their lust. In battle it was the bravest who took spoils; but those whom
_they_ suffered to seize their houses, force away their children, and
exact levies, were, for the most part, the cowardly and effeminate; as
if the only lesson of suffering of which they were ignorant was how
to die for their country. Yet how inconsiderable would the number of
invaders appear did the Britons but compute their own forces! From
considerations like these, Germany had thrown off the yoke, [71] though
a river [72] and not the ocean was its barrier. The welfare of their
country, their wives, and their parents called them to arms, while
avarice and luxury alone incited their enemies; who would withdraw as
even the deified Julius had done, if the present race of Britons would
emulate the valor of their ancestors, and not be dismayed at the event
of the first or second engagement. Superior spirit and perseverence were
always the share of the wretched; and the gods themselves now seemed to
compassionate the Britons, by ordaining the absence of the general, and
the detention of his army in another island. The most difficult point,
assembling for the purpose of deliberation, was already accomplished;
and there was always more danger from the discovery of designs like
these, than from their execution."

16. Instigated by such suggestions, they unanimously rose in arms, led
by Boadicea, [73] a woman of royal descent (for they make no distinction
between the sexes in succession to the throne), and attacking the
soldiers dispersed through the garrisons, stormed the fortified posts,
and invaded the colony [74] itself, as the seat of slavery. They
omitted no species of cruelty with which rage and victory could
inspire barbarians; and had not Paullinus, on being acquainted with the
commotion of the province, marched speedily to its relief, Britain would
have been lost. The fortune of a single battle, however, reduced it
to its former subjection; though many still remained in arms, whom
the consciousness of revolt, and particular dread of the governor,
had driven to despair. Paullinus, although otherwise exemplary in his
administration, having treated those who surrendered with severity, and
having pursued too rigorous measures, as one who was revenging his own
personal injury also, Petronius Turpilianus [75] was sent in his stead,
as a person more inclined to lenity, and one who, being unacquainted
with the enemy's delinquency, could more easily accept their penitence.
After having restored things to their former quiet state, he delivered
the command to Trebellius Maximus. [76] Trebellius, indolent, and
inexperienced in military affairs, maintained the tranquillity of the
province by popular manners; for even the barbarians had now learned to
pardon under the seductive influence of vices; and the intervention of
the civil wars afforded a legitimate excuse for his inactivity. Sedition
however infected the soldiers, who, instead of their usual military
services, were rioting in idleness. Trebellius, after escaping the fury
of his army by flight and concealment, dishonored and abased, regained a
precarious authority; and a kind of tacit compact took place, of safety
to the general, and licentiousness to the army. This mutiny was not
attended with bloodshed. Vettius Bolanus, [77] succeeding during the
continuance of the civil wars, was unable to introduce discipline into
Britain. The same inaction towards the enemy, and the same insolence in
the camp, continued; except that Bolanus, unblemished in his character,
and not obnoxious by any crime, in some measure substituted affection in
the place of authority.

17. At length, when Vespasian received the possession of Britain
together with the rest of the world, the great commanders and
well-appointed armies which were sent over abated the confidence of
the enemy; and Petilius Cerealis struck terror by an attack upon the
Brigantes, [78] who are reputed to compose the most populous state in
the whole province. Many battles were fought, some of them attended
with much bloodshed; and the greater part of the Brigantes were either
brought into subjection, or involved in the ravages of war. The conduct
and reputation of Cerealis were so brilliant that they might have
eclipsed the splendor of a successor; yet Julius Frontinus, [79] a truly
great man, supported the arduous competition, as far as circumstances
would permit. [80] He subdued the strong and warlike nation of the
Silures, [81] in which expedition, besides the valor of the enemy, he
had the difficulties of the country to struggle with.

18. Such was the state of Britain, and such had been the vicissitudes of
warfare, when Agricola arrived in the middle of summer; [82] at a time
when the Roman soldiers, supposing the expeditions of the year were
concluded, were thinking of enjoying themselves without care, and the
natives, of seizing the opportunity thus afforded them. Not long before
his arrival, the Ordovices [83] had cut off almost an entire corps
of cavalry stationed on their frontiers; and the inhabitants of
the province being thrown into a state of anxious suspense by this
beginning, inasmuch as war was what they wished for, either approved of
the example, or waited to discover the disposition of the new governor.
[84] The season was now far advanced, the troops dispersed through
the country, and possessed with the idea of being suffered to remain
inactive during the rest of the year; circumstances which tended to
retard and discourage any military enterprise; so that it was generally
thought most advisable to be contented with defending the suspected
posts: yet Agricola determined to march out and meet the approaching
danger. For this purpose, he drew together the detachments from the
legions, [85] and a small body of auxiliaries; and when he perceived
that the Ordovices would not venture to descend into the plain, he led
an advanced party in person to the attack, in order to inspire the rest
of his troops with equal ardor. The result of the action was almost the
total extirpation of the Ordovices; when Agricola, sensible that renown
must be followed up, and that the future events of the war would be
determined by the first success, resolved to make an attempt upon the
island Mona, from the occupation of which Paullinus had been summoned
by the general rebellion of Britain, as before related. [86] The
usual deficiency of an unforeseen expedition appearing in the want
of transport vessels, the ability and resolution of the general
were exerted to supply this defect. A select body of auxiliaries,
disencumbered of their baggage, who were well acquainted with the fords,
and accustomed, after the manner of their country, to direct their
horses and manage their arms while swimming, [87] were ordered suddenly
to plunge into the channel; by which movement, the enemy, who expected
the arrival of a fleet, and a formal invasion by sea, were struck with
terror and astonishment, conceiving nothing arduous or insuperable to
troops who thus advanced to the attack. They were therefore induced to
sue for peace, and make a surrender of the island; an event which threw
lustre on the name of Agricola, who, on the very entrance upon his
province, had employed in toils and dangers that time which is usually
devoted to ostentatious parade, and the compliments of office. Nor was
he tempted, in the pride of success, to term that an expedition or a
victory; which was only bridling the vanquished; nor even to announce
his success in laureate despatches. [88] But this concealment of his
glory served to augment it; since men were led to entertain a high idea
of the grandeur of his future views, when such important services were
passed over in silence.

19. Well acquainted with the temper of the province, and taught by the
experience of former governors how little proficiency had been made
by arms, when success was followed by injuries, he next undertook to
eradicate the causes of war. And beginning with himself, and those next
to him, he first laid restrictions upon his own household, a task no
less arduous to most governors than the administration of the province.
He suffered no public business to pass through the hands of his slaves
or freedmen. In admitting soldiers into regular service, [89] to
attendance about his person, he was not influenced by private favor, or
the recommendation or solicitation of the centurions, but considered the
best men as likely to prove the most faithful. He would know everything;
but was content to let some things pass unnoticed. [90] He could pardon
small faults, and use severity to great ones; yet did not always punish,
but was frequently satisfied with penitence. He chose rather to confer
offices and employments upon such as would not offend, than to
condemn those who had offended. The augmentation [91] of tributes and
contributions he mitigated by a just and equal assessment, abolishing
those private exactions which were more grievous to be borne than the
taxes themselves. For the inhabitants had been compelled in mockery to
sit by their own locked-up granaries, to buy corn needlessly, and to
sell it again at a stated price. Long and difficult journeys had also
been imposed upon them; for the several districts, instead of being
allowed to supply the nearest winter quarters, were forced to carry
their corn to remote and devious places; by which means, what was easy
to be procured by all, was converted into an article of gain to a few.

20. By suppressing these abuses in the first year of his administration,
he established a favorable idea of peace, which, through the negligence
or oppression of his predecessors, had been no less dreaded than war.
At the return of summer [92] he assembled his army. On their march, he
commended the regular and orderly, and restrained the stragglers; he
marked out the encampments, [93] and explored in person the estuaries
and forests. At the same time he perpetually harassed the enemy by
sudden incursions; and, after sufficiently alarming them, by an interval
of forbearance, he held to their view the allurements of peace. By
this management, many states, which till that time had asserted their
independence, were now induced to lay aside their animosity, and to
deliver hostages. These districts were surrounded with castles and
forts, disposed with so much attention and judgment, that no part of
Britain, hitherto new to the Roman arms, escaped unmolested.

21. The succeeding winter was employed in the most salutary measures.
In order, by a taste of pleasures, to reclaim the natives from that rude
and unsettled state which prompted them to war, and reconcile them to
quiet and tranquillity, he incited them, by private instigations
and public encouragements, to erect temples, courts of justice, and
dwelling-houses. He bestowed commendations upon those who were prompt
in complying with his intentions, and reprimanded such as were dilatory;
thus promoting a spirit of emulation which had all the force of
necessity. He was also attentive to provide a liberal education for the
sons of their chieftains, preferring the natural genius of the Britons
to the attainments of the Gauls; and his attempts were attended with
such success, that they who lately disdained to make use of the Roman
language, were now ambitious of becoming eloquent. Hence the Roman habit
began to be held in honor, and the toga was frequently worn. At length
they gradually deviated into a taste for those luxuries which stimulate
to vice; porticos, and baths, and the elegancies of the table; and this,
from their inexperience, they termed politeness, whilst, in reality, it
constituted a part of their slavery.

22. The military expeditions of the third year [94] discovered new
nations to the Romans, and their ravages extended as far as the estuary
of the Tay. [95] The enemies were thereby struck with such terror that
they did not venture to molest the army though harassed by violent
tempests; so that they had sufficient opportunity for the erection of
fortresses. [96] Persons of experience remarked, that no general had
ever shown greater skill in the choice of advantageous situations than
Agricola; for not one of his fortified posts was either taken by storm,
or surrendered by capitulation. The garrisons made frequent sallies;
for they were secured against a blockade by a year's provision in their
stores. Thus the winter passed without alarm, and each garrison proved
sufficient for its own defence; while the enemy, who were generally
accustomed to repair the losses of the summer by the successes of the
winter, now equally unfortunate in both seasons, were baffled and driven
to despair. In these transactions, Agricola never attempted to arrogate
to himself the glory of others; but always bore an impartial testimony
to the meritorious actions of his officers, from the centurion to the
commander of a legion. He was represented by some as rather harsh
in reproof; as if the same disposition which made him affable to the
deserving, had inclined him to austerity towards the worthless. But
his anger left no relics behind; his silence and reserve were not to
be dreaded; and he esteemed it more honorable to show marks of open
displeasure, than to entertain secret hatred.

23. The fourth summer [97] was spent in securing the country which had
been overrun; and if the valor of the army and the glory of the Roman
name had permitted it, our conquests would have found a limit within
Britain itself. For the tides of the opposite seas, flowing very far up
the estuaries of Clota and Bodotria, [98] almost intersect the country;
leaving only a narrow neck of land, which was then defended by a
chain of forts. [99] Thus all the territory on this side was held in
subjection, and the remaining enemies were removed, as it were, into
another island.

24. In the fifth campaign, [100] Agricola, crossing over in the first
ship, [101] subdued, by frequent and successful engagements, several
nations till then unknown; and stationed troops in that part of Britain
which is opposite to Ireland, rather with a view to future advantage,
than from any apprehension of danger from that quarter. For the
possession of Ireland, situated between Britain and Spain, and
lying commodiously to the Gallic sea, [102] would have formed a very
beneficial connection between the most powerful parts of the empire.
This island is less than Britain, but larger than those of our sea.
[103] Its soil, climate, and the manners and dispositions of its
inhabitants, are little different from those of Britain. Its ports
and harbors are better known, from the concourse of merchants for the
purposes of commerce. Agricola had received into his protection one
of its petty kings, who had been expelled by a domestic sedition; and
detained him, under the semblance of friendship, till an occasion should
offer of making use of him. I have frequently heard him assert, that
a single legion and a few auxiliaries would be sufficient entirely to
conquer Ireland and keep it in subjection; and that such an event would
also have contributed to restrain the Britons, by awing them with the
prospect of the Roman arms all around them, and, as it were, banishing
liberty from their sight.

25. In the summer which began the sixth year [104] of Agricola's
administration, extending his views to the countries situated beyond
Bodotria, [105] as a general insurrection of the remoter nations was
apprehended, and the enemy's army rendered marching unsafe, he caused
the harbors to be explored by his fleet, which, now first acting in aid
of the land-forces gave the formidable spectacle of war at once pushed
on by sea and land. The cavalry, infantry, and marines were frequently
mingled in the same camp, and recounted with mutual pleasure their
several exploits and adventures; comparing, in the boastful language of
military men, the dark recesses of woods and mountains, with the
horrors of waves and tempests; and the land and enemy subdued, with
the conquered ocean. It was also discovered from the captives, that the
Britons had been struck with consternation at the view of the fleet,
conceiving the last refuge of the vanquished to be cut off, now the
secret retreats of their seas were disclosed. The various inhabitants of
Caledonia immediately took up arms, with great preparations, magnified,
however, by report, as usual where the truth is unknown; and by
beginning hostilities, and attacking our fortresses, they inspired
terror as daring to act offensively; insomuch that some persons,
disguising their timidity under the mask of prudence, were for instantly
retreating on this side the firth, and relinquishing the country rather
than waiting to be driven out. Agricola, in the meantime, being informed
that the enemy intended to bear down in several bodies, distributed
his army into three divisions, that his inferiority of numbers,
and ignorance of the country, might not give them an opportunity of
surrounding him.

26. When this was known to the enemy, they suddenly changed their
design; and making a general attack in the night upon the ninth legion,
which was the weakest, [106] in the confusion of sleep and consternation
they slaughtered the sentinels, and burst through the intrenchments.
They were now fighting within the camp, when Agricola, who had received
information of their march from his scouts, and followed close upon
their track, gave orders for the swiftest of his horse and foot to
charge the enemy's rear. Presently the whole army raised a general
shout; and the standards now glittered at the approach of day. The
Britons were distracted by opposite dangers; whilst the Romans in the
camp resumed their courage, and secure of safety, began to contend for
glory. They now in their turns rushed forwards to the attack, and a
furious engagement ensued in the gates of the camp; till by the emulous
efforts of both Roman armies, one to give assistance, the other to
appear not to need it, the enemy was routed: and had not the woods and
marshes sheltered the fugitives, that day would have terminated the war.

27. The soldiers, inspirited by the steadfastness which characterized
and the fame which attended this victory, cried out that "nothing could
resist their valor; now was the time to penetrate into the heart
of Caledonia, and in a continued series of engagements at length to
discover the utmost limits of Britain." Those even who had before
recommended caution and prudence, were now rendered rash and boastful by
success. It is the hard condition of military command, that a share in
prosperous events is claimed by all, but misfortunes are imputed to
one alone. The Britons meantime, attributing their defeat not to the
superior bravery of their adversaries, but to chance, and the skill of
the general, remitted nothing of their confidence; but proceeded to arm
their youth, to send their wives and children to places of safety, and
to ratify the confederacy of their several states by solemn assemblies
and sacrifices. Thus the parties separated with minds mutually
irritated.

28. During the same summer, a cohort of Usipii, [107] which had been
levied in Germany, and sent over into Britain, performed an extremely
daring and memorable action. After murdering a centurion and some
soldiers who had been incorporated with them for the purpose of
instructing them in military discipline, they seized upon three light
vessels, and compelled the masters to go on board with them. One of
these, however, escaping to shore, they killed the other two upon
suspicion; and before the affair was publicly known, they sailed away,
as it were by miracle. They were presently driven at the mercy of
the waves; and had frequent conflicts, with various success, with the
Britons, defending their property from plunder. [108] At length they
were reduced to such extremity of distress as to be obliged to feed upon
each other; the weakest being first sacrificed, and then such as were
taken by lot. In this manner having sailed round the island, they lost
their ships through want of skill; and, being regarded as pirates, were
intercepted, first by the Suevi, then by the Frisii. Some of them, after
being sold for slaves, by the change of masters were brought to the
Roman side of the river, [109] and became notorious from the relation of
their extraordinary adventures. [110]

29. In the beginning of the next summer, [111] Agricola received a
severe domestic wound in the loss of a son, about a year old. He bore
this calamity, not with the ostentatious firmness which many have
affected, nor yet with the tears and lamentations of feminine sorrow;
and war was one of the remedies of his grief. Having sent forwards his
fleet to spread its ravages through various parts of the coast, in
order to excite an extensive and dubious alarm, he marched with an
army equipped for expedition, to which he had joined the bravest of
the Britons whose fidelity had been approved by a long allegiance, and
arrived at the Grampian hills, where the enemy was already encamped.
[112] For the Britons, undismayed by the event of the former action,
expecting revenge or slavery, and at length taught that the common
danger was to be repelled by union alone, had assembled the strength
of all their tribes by embassies and confederacies. Upwards of thirty
thousand men in arms were now descried; and the youth, together with
those of a hale and vigorous age, renowned in war, and bearing their
several honorary decorations, were still flocking in; when Calgacus,
[113] the most distinguished for birth and valor among the chieftans,
is said to have harangued the multitude, gathering round, and eager for
battle, after the following manner:--

30. "When I reflect on the causes of the war, and the circumstances of
our situation, I feel a strong persuasion that our united efforts on the
present day will prove the beginning of universal liberty to Britain.
For we are all undebased by slavery; and there is no land behind us, nor
does even the sea afford a refuge, whilst the Roman fleet hovers around.
Thus the use of arms, which is at all times honorable to the brave, now
offers the only safety even to cowards. In all the battles which
have yet been fought, with various success, against the Romans, our
countrymen may be deemed to have reposed their final hopes and resources
in us: for we, the noblest sons of Britain, and therefore stationed in
its last recesses, far from the view of servile shores, have preserved
even our eyes unpolluted by the contact of subjection. We, at the
furthest limits both of land and liberty, have been defended to this
day by the remoteness of our situation and of our fame. The extremity of
Britain is now disclosed; and whatever is unknown becomes an object
of magnitude. But there is no nation beyond us; nothing but waves and
rocks, and the still more hostile Romans, whose arrogance we cannot
escape by obsequiousness and submission. These plunderers of the world,
after exhausting the land by their devastations, are rifling the ocean:
stimulated by avarice, if their enemy be rich; by ambition, if poor;
unsatiated by the East and by the West: the only people who behold
wealth and indigence with equal avidity. To ravage, to slaughter,
to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a
desert, they call it peace. [114]

31. "Our children and relations are by the appointment of nature the
dearest of all things to us. These are torn away by levies to serve in
foreign lands. [115] Our wives and sisters, though they should escape
the violation of hostile force, are polluted under names of friendship
and hospitality. Our estates and possessions are consumed in tributes;
our grain in contributions. Even our bodies are worn down amidst stripes
and insults in clearing woods and draining marshes. Wretches born to
slavery are once bought, and afterwards maintained by their masters:
Britain every day buys, every day feeds, her own servitude. [116] And as
among domestic slaves every new comer serves for the scorn and derision
of his fellows; so, in this ancient household of the world, we, as the
newest and vilest, are sought out to destruction. For we have neither
cultivated lands, nor mines, nor harbors, which can induce them to
preserve us for our labors. The valor too and unsubmitting spirit
of subjects only render them more obnoxious to their masters; while
remoteness and secrecy of situation itself, in proportion as it conduces
to security, tends to inspire suspicion. Since then all Lopes of mercy
are vain, at length assume courage, both you to whom safety and you to
whom glory is dear. The Trinobantes, even under a female leader, had
force enough to burn a colony, to storm camps, and, if success had not
damped their vigor, would have been able entirely to throw off the
yoke; and shall not we, untouched, unsubdued, and struggling not for the
acquisition but the security of liberty, show at the very first onset
what men Caledonia has reserved for her defence?

32. "Can you imagine that the Romans are as brave in war as they are
licentious in peace? Acquiring renown from our discords and dissensions,
they convert the faults of their enemies to the glory of their own army;
an army compounded of the most different nations, which success alone
has kept together, and which misfortune will as certainly dissipate.
Unless, indeed, you can suppose that Gauls, and Germans, and (I blush to
say it) even Britons, who, though they expend their blood to establish
a foreign dominion, have been longer its foes than its subjects, will be
retained by loyalty and affection! Terror and dread alone are the weak
bonds of attachment; which once broken, they who cease to fear will
begin to hate. Every incitement to victory is on our side. The Romans
have no wives to animate them; no parents to upbraid their flight. Most
of them have either no home, or a distant one. Few in number, ignorant
of the country, looking around in silent horror at woods, seas, and a
heaven itself unknown to them, they are delivered by the gods, as it
were imprisoned and bound, into our hands. Be not terrified with an idle
show, and the glitter of silver and gold, which can neither protect nor
wound. In the very ranks of the enemy we shall find our own bands. The
Britons will acknowledge their own cause. The Gauls will recollect their
former liberty. The rest of the Germans will desert them, as the
Usipii have lately done. Nor is there anything formidable behind them:
ungarrisoned forts; colonies of old men; municipal towns distempered and
distracted between unjust masters and ill-obeying subjects. Here is
a general; here an army. There, tributes, mines, and all the train of
punishments inflicted on slaves; which whether to bear eternally, or
instantly to revenge, this field must determine. March then to battle,
and think of your ancestors and your posterity."

33. They received this harangue with alacrity, and testified their
applause after the barbarian manner, with songs, and yells, and
dissonant shouts. And now the several divisions were in motion, the
glittering of arms was beheld, while the most daring and impetuous
were hurrying to the front, and the line of battle was forming; when
Agricola, although his soldiers were in high spirits, and scarcely to
be kept within their intrenchments, kindled additional ardor by these
words:--

"It is now the eighth year, my fellow-soldiers, in which, under the high
auspices of the Roman empire, by your valor and perseverance you have
been conquering Britain. In so many expeditions, in so many battles,
whether you have been required to exert your courage against the enemy,
or your patient labors against the very nature of the country, neither
have I ever been dissatisfied with my soldiers, nor you with your
general. In this mutual confidence, we have proceeded beyond the limits
of former commanders and former armies; and are now become acquainted
with the extremity of the island, not by uncertain rumor, but by actual
possession with our arms and encampments. Britain is discovered and
subdued. How often on a march, when embarrassed with mountains, bogs
and rivers, have I heard the bravest among you exclaim, 'When shall
we descry the enemy? when shall we be led to the field of battle?' At
length they are unharbored from their retreats; your wishes and your
valor have now free scope; and every circumstance is equally propitious
to the victor, and ruinous to the vanquished. For, the greater our glory
in having marched over vast tracts of land, penetrated forests, and
crossed arms of the sea, while advancing towards the foe, the greater
will be our danger and difficulty if we should attempt a retreat. We are
inferior to our enemies in knowledge of the country, and less able to
command supplies of provision; but we have arms in our hands, and in
these we have everything. For myself, it has long been my principle,
that a retiring general or army is never safe. Hot only, then, are we to
reflect that death with honor is preferable to life with ignominy, but
to remember that security and glory are seated in the same place. Even
to fall in this extremest verge of earth and of nature cannot be thought
an inglorious fate.

34. "If unknown nations or untried troops were drawn up against you, I
would exhort you from the example of other armies. At present, recollect
your own honors, question your own eyes. These are they, who, the last
year, attacking by surprise a single legion in the obscurity of the
night, were put to flight by a shout: the greatest fugitives of all the
Britons, and therefore the longest survivors. As in penetrating woods
and thickets the fiercest animals boldly rush on the hunters, while the
weak and timorous fly at their very noise; so the bravest of the Britons
have long since fallen: the remaining number consists solely of the
cowardly and spiritless; whom you see at length within your reach, not
because they have stood their ground, but because they are overtaken.
Torpid with fear, their bodies are fixed and chained down in yonder
field, which to you will speedily be the scene of a glorious and
memorable victory. Here bring your toils and services to a conclusion;
close a struggle of fifty years [118] with one great day; and convince
your country-men, that to the army ought not to be imputed either the
protraction of war, or the causes of rebellion."

35. Whilst Agricola was yet speaking, the ardor of the soldiers declared
itself; and as soon as he had finished, they burst forth into cheerful
acclamations, and instantly flew to arms. Thus eager and impetuous, he
formed them so that the centre was occupied by the auxiliary infantry,
in number eight thousand, and three thousand horse were spread in the
wings. The legions were stationed in the rear, before the intrenchments;
a disposition which would render the victory signally glorious, if
it were obtained without the expense of Roman blood; and would ensure
support if the rest of the army were repulsed. The British troops, for
the greater display of their numbers, and more formidable appearance,
were ranged upon the rising grounds, so that the first line stood upon
the plain, the rest, as if linked together, rose above one another upon
the ascent. The charioteers [119] and horsemen filled the middle of the
field with their tumult and careering. Then Agricola, fearing from the
superior number of the enemy lest he should be obliged to fight as
well on his flanks as in front, extended his ranks; and although this
rendered his line of battle less firm, and several of his officers
advised him to bring up the legions, yet, filled with hope, and resolute
in danger, he dismissed his horse and took his station on foot before
the colors.

36. At first the action was carried on at a distance. The Britons, armed
with long swords and short targets, [120] with steadiness and dexterity
avoided or struck down our missile weapons, and at the same time poured
in a torrent of their own. Agricola then encouraged three Batavian and
two Tungrian [121] cohorts to fall in and come to close quarters; a
method of fighting familiar to these veteran soldiers, but embarrassing
to the enemy from the nature of their armor; for the enormous British
swords, blunt at the point, are unfit for close grappling, and engaging
in a confined space. When the Batavians; therefore, began to redouble
their blows, to strike with the bosses of their shields, and mangle the
faces of the enemy; and, bearing down all those who resisted them on
the plain, were advancing their lines up the ascent; the other cohorts,
fired with ardor and emulation, joined in the charge, and overthrew all
who came in their way: and so great was their impetuosity in the pursuit
of victory, that they left many of their foes half dead or unhurt behind
them. In the meantime the troops of cavalry took to flight, and the
armed chariots mingled in the engagement of the infantry; but although
their first shock occasioned some consternation, they were soon
entangled among the close ranks of the cohorts, and the inequalities
of the ground. Not the least appearance was left of an engagement of
cavalry; since the men, long keeping their ground with difficulty, were
forced along with the bodies of the horses; and frequently, straggling
chariots, and affrighted horses without their riders, flying variously
as terror impelled them, rushed obliquely athwart or directly through
the lines. [122]

37. Those of the Britons who, yet disengaged from the fight, sat on the
summits of the hills, and looked with careless contempt on the smallness
of our numbers, now began gradually to descend; and would have fallen on
the rear of the conquering troops, had not Agricola, apprehending this
very event, opposed four reserved squadron of horse to their attack,
which, the more furiously they had advanced, drove them back with the
greater celerity. Their project was thus turned against themselves; and
the squadrons were ordered to wheel from the front of the battle
and fall upon the enemy's rear. A striking and hideous spectacle
now appeared on the plain: some pursuing; some striking: some making
prisoners, whom they slaughtered as others came in their way. Now, as
their several dispositions prompted, crowds of armed Britons fled before
inferior numbers, or a few, even unarmed, rushed upon their foes,
and offered themselves to a voluntary death. Arms, and carcasses, and
mangled limbs, were promiscuously strewed, and the field was dyed in
blood. Even among the vanquished were seen instances of rage and valor.
When the fugitives approached the woods, they collected, and surrounded
the foremost of the pursuers, advancing incautiously, and unacquainted
with the country; and had not Agricola, who was everywhere present,
caused some strong and lightly-equipped cohorts to encompass the ground,
while part of the cavalry dismounted made way through the thickets,
and part on horseback scoured the open woods, some disaster would have
proceeded from the excess of confidence. But when the enemy saw their
pursuers again formed in compact order, they renewed their flight, not
in bodies as before, or waiting for their companions, but scattered
and mutually avoiding each other; and thus took their way to the most
distant and devious retreats. Night and satiety of slaughter put an end
to the pursuit. Of the enemy ten thousand were slain: on our part three
hundred and sixty fell; among whom was Aulus Atticus, the praefect of a
cohort, who, by his juvenile ardor, and the fire of his horse, was borne
into the midst of the enemy.

38. Success and plunder contributed to render the night joyful to the
victors; whilst the Britons, wandering and forlorn, amid the promiscuous
lamentations of men and women, were dragging along the wounded; calling
out to the unhurt; abandoning their habitations, and in the rage of
despair setting them on fire; choosing places of concealment, and then
deserting them; consulting together, and then separating. Sometimes, on
beholding the dear pledges of kindred and affection, they were melted
into tenderness, or more frequently roused into fury; insomuch that
several, according to authentic information, instigated by a savage
compassion, laid violent hands upon their own wives and children. On the
succeeding day, a vast silence all around, desolate hills, the distant
smoke of burning houses, and not a living soul descried by the scouts,
displayed more amply the face of victory. After parties had been
detached to all quarters without discovering any certain tracks of the
enemy's flight, or any bodies of them still in arms, as the lateness
of the season rendered it impracticable to spread the war through the
country, Agricola led his army to the confines of the Horesti. [123]
Having received hostages from this people, he ordered the commander
of the fleet to sail round the island; for which expedition he was
furnished with sufficient force, and preceded by the terror of the
Roman name. Pie himself then led back the cavalry and infantry, marching
slowly, that he might impress a deeper awe on the newly conquered
nations; and at length distributed his troops into their
winter-quarters. The fleet, about the same time, with prosperous gales
and renown, entered the Trutulensian [124] harbor, whence, coasting all
the hither shore of Britain, it returned entire to its former station.
[125]

39. The account of these transactions, although unadorned with the pomp
of words in the letters of Agricola, was received by Domitian, as was
customary with that prince, with outward expressions of joy, but inward
anxiety. He was conscious that his late mock-triumph over Germany, [126]
in which he had exhibited purchased slaves, whose habits and hair [127]
were contrived to give them the resemblance of captives, was a subject
of derision; whereas here, a real and important victory, in which so
many thousands of the enemy were slain, was celebrated with universal
applause. His greatest dread was that the name of a private man should
be exalted above that of the prince. In vain had he silenced the
eloquence of the forum, and cast a shade upon all civil honors,
if military glory were still in possession of another. Other
accomplishments might more easily be connived at, but the talents of a
great general were truly imperial. Tortured with such anxious thoughts,
and brooding over them in secret, [128] a certain indication of some
malignant intention, he judged it most prudent for the present to
suspend his rancor, tilt the first burst of glory and the affections
of the army should remit: for Agricola still possessed the command in
Britain.

40. He therefore caused the senate to decree him triumphal ornaments,
[129]--a statue crowned with laurel, and all the other honors which
are substituted for a real triumph, together with a profusion of
complimentary expressions; and also directed an expectation to be raised
that the province of Syria, vacant by the death of Atilius Rufus,
a consular man, and usually reserved for persons of the greatest
distinction, was designed for Agricola. It was commonly believed that
one of the freedmen, who were employed in confidential services, was
despatched with the instrument appointing Agricola to the government of
Syria, with orders to deliver it if he should be still in Britain; but
that this messenger, meeting Agricola in the straits, [130] returned
directly to Domitian without so much as accosting him. [131] Whether
this was really the fact, or only a fiction founded on the genius and
character of the prince, is uncertain. Agricola, in the meantime, had
delivered the province, in peace and security, to his successor; [132]
and lest his entry into the city should be rendered too conspicuous by
the concourse and acclamations of the people, he declined the salutation
of his friends by arriving in the night; and went by night, as he was
commanded, to the palace. There, after being received with a slight
embrace, but not a word spoken, he was mingled with the servile throng.
In this situation, he endeavored to soften the glare of military
reputation, which is offensive to those who themselves live in
indolence, by the practice of virtues of a different cast. He resigned
himself to ease and tranquillity, was modest in his garb and equipage,
affable in conversation, and in public was only accompanied by one or
two of his friends; insomuch that the many, who are accustomed to form
their ideas of great men from their retinue and figure, when they beheld
Agricola, were apt to call in question his renown: few could interpret
his conduct.

41. He was frequently, during that period, accused in his absence before
Domitian, and in his absence also acquitted. The source of his danger
was not any criminal action, nor the complaint of any injured person;
but a prince hostile to virtue, and his own high reputation, and the
worst kind of enemies, eulogists. [133] For the situation of public
affairs which ensued was such as would not permit the name of Agricola
to rest in silence: so many armies in Moesia, Dacia, Germany, and
Pannonia lost through the temerity or cowardice of their generals; [134]
so many men of military character, with numerous cohorts, defeated and
taken prisoners; whilst a dubious contest was maintained, not for the
boundaries, of the empire, and the banks of the bordering rivers, [135]
but for the winter-quarters of the legions, and the possession of our
territories. In this state of things, when loss succeeded loss, and
every year was signalized by disasters and slaughters, the public voice
loudly demanded Agricola for general: every one comparing his vigor,
firmness, and experience in war, with the indolence and pusillanimity
of the others. It is certain that the ears of Domitian himself were
assailed by such discourses, while the best of his freedmen pressed him
to the choice through motives of fidelity and affection, and the
worst through envy and malignity, emotions to which he was of himself
sufficiently prone. Thus Agricola, as well by his own virtues as the
vices of others, was urged on precipitously to glory.

42. The year now arrived in which the proconsulate of Asia or Africa
must fall by lot upon Agricola; [136] and as Civica had lately been put
to death, Agricola was not unprovided with a lesson, nor Domitian with
an example. [137] Some persons, acquainted with the secret inclinations
of the emperor, came to Agricola, and inquired whether he intended to go
to his province; and first, somewhat distantly, began to commend a life
of leisure and tranquillity; then offered their services in procuring
him to be excused from the office; and at length, throwing off all
disguise, after using arguments both to persuade and intimidate him,
compelled him to accompany them to Domitian. The emperor, prepared to
dissemble, and assuming an air of stateliness, received his petition for
excuse, and suffered himself to be formally thanked [138] for granting
it, without blushing at so invidious a favor. He did not, however,
bestow on Agricola the salary [139] usually offered to a proconsul, and
which he himself had granted to others; either taking offence that it
was not requested, or feeling a consciousness that it would seem a bribe
for what he had in reality extorted by his authority. It is a principle
of human nature to hate those whom we have injured; [140] and Domitian
was constitutionally inclined to anger, which was the more difficult
to be averted, in proportion as it was the more disguised. Yet he was
softened by the temper and prudence of Agricola; who did not think it
necessary, by a contumacious spirit, or a vain ostentation of liberty,
to challenge fame or urge his fate. [141] Let those be apprised, who are
accustomed to admire every opposition to control, that even under a
bad prince men may be truly great; that submission and modesty, if
accompanied with vigor and industry, will elevate a character to a
height of public esteem equal to that which many, through abrupt and
dangerous paths, have attained, without benefit to their country, by an
ambitious death.

43. His decease was a severe affliction to his family, a grief to his
friends, and a subject of regret even to foreigners, and those who had
no personal knowledge of him. [142] The common people too, and the class
who little interest themselves about public concerns, were frequent
in their inquiries at his house during his sickness, and made him the
subject of conversation at the forum and in private circles; nor did any
person either rejoice at the news of his death, or speedily forget it.
Their commiseration was aggravated by a prevailing report that he was
taken off by poison. I cannot venture to affirm anything certain of this
matter; [143] yet, during the whole course of his illness, the principal
of the imperial freedmen and the most confidential of the physicians was
sent much more frequently than was customary with a court whose visits
were chiefly paid by messages; whether that was done out of real
solicitude, or for the purposes of state inquisition. On the day of his
decease, it is certain that accounts of his approaching dissolution were
every instant transmitted to the emperor by couriers stationed for the
purpose; and no one believed that the information, which so much pains
was taken to accelerate, could be received with regret. He put on,
however, in his countenance and demeanor, the semblance of grief: for he
was now secured from an object of hatred, and could more easily conceal
his joy than his fear. It was well known that on reading the will, in
which he was nominated co-heir [144] with the excellent wife and most
dutiful daughter of Agricola, he expressed great satisfaction, as if it
had been a voluntary testimony of honor and esteem: so blind and corrupt
had his mind been rendered by continual adulation, that he was ignorant
none but a bad prince could be nominated heir to a good father.

44. Agricola was born in the ides of June, during the third consulate of
Caius Caesar; [145] he died in his fifty-sixth year, on the tenth of
the calends of September, when Collega and Priscus were consuls. [146]
Posterity may wish to form an idea of his person. His figure was comely
rather than majestic. In his countenance there was nothing to inspire
awe; its character was gracious and engaging. You would readily have
believed him a good man, and willingly a great one. And indeed, although
he was snatched away in the midst of a vigorous age, yet if his life be
measured by his glory, it was a period of the greatest extent. For after
the full enjoyment of all that is truly good, which is found in virtuous
pursuits alone, decorated with consular and triumphal ornaments, what
more could fortune contribute to his elevation? Immoderate wealth did
not fall to his share, yet he possessed a decent affluence. [147] His
wife and daughter surviving, his dignity unimpaired, his reputation
flourishing, and his kindred and friends yet in safety, it may even be
thought an additional felicity that he was thus withdrawn from impending
evils. For, as we have heard him express his wishes of continuing to the
dawn of the present auspicious day, and beholding Trajan in the imperial
seat,--wishes in which he formed a certain presage of the event; so it
is a great consolation, that by his untimely end he escaped that latter
period, in which Domitian, not by intervals and remissions, but by a
continued, and, as it were, a single act, aimed at the destruction of
the commonwealth. [148]

45. Agricola did not behold the senate-house besieged, and the senators
enclosed by a circle of arms; [149] and in one havoc the massacre of so
many consular men, the flight and banishment of so many honorable women.
As yet Carus Metius [150] was distinguished only by a single victory;
the counsels of Messalinus [151] resounded only through the Albanian
citadel; [152] and Massa Baebius [153] was himself among the accused.
Soon after, our own hands [154] dragged Helvidius [155] to prison;
ourselves were tortured with the spectacle of Mauricus and Rusticus,
[156] and sprinkled with the innocent blood of Senecio. [157]

Even Nero withdrew his eyes from the cruelties he commanded. Under
Domitian, it was the principal part of our miseries to behold and to be
beheld: when our sighs were registered; and that stern countenance, with
its settled redness, [158] his defence against shame, was employed in
noting the pallid horror of so many spectators. Happy, O Agricola! not
only in the splendor of your life, but in the seasonableness of your
death. With resignation and cheerfulness, from the testimony of those
who were present in your last moments, did you meet your fate, as
if striving to the utmost of your power to make the emperor appear
guiltless. But to myself and your daughter, besides the anguish of
losing a parent, the aggravating affliction remains, that it was not our
lot to watch over your sick-bed, to support you when languishing, and to
satiate ourselves with beholding and embracing you. With what attention
should we have received your last instructions, and engraven them on our
hearts! This is our sorrow; this is our wound: to us you were lost four
years before by a tedious absence. Everything, doubtless, O best of
parents! was administered for your comfort and honor, while a most
affectionate wife sat beside you; yet fewer tears were shed upon your
bier, and in the last light which your eyes beheld, something was still
wanting.

46. If there be any habitation for the shades of the virtuous; if, as
philosophers suppose, exalted souls do not perish with the body; may
you repose in peace, and call us, your household, from vain regret and
feminine lamentations, to the contemplation of your virtues, which allow
no place for mourning or complaining! Let us rather adorn your memory by
our admiration, by our short-lived praises, and, as far as our natures
will permit, by an imitation of your example. This is truly to honor the
dead; this is the piety of every near relation. I would also recommend
it to the wife and daughter of this great man, to show their veneration
of a husband's and a father's memory by revolving his actions and words
in their breasts, and endeavoring to retain an idea of the form and
features of his mind, rather than of his person. Not that I would reject
those resemblances of the human figure which are engraven in brass or
marbles but as their originals are frail and perishable, so likewise are
they: while the form of the mind is eternal, and not to be retained
or expressed by any foreign matter, or the artist's skill, but by the
manners of the survivors. Whatever in Agricola was the object of our
love, of our admiration, remains, and will remain in the minds of men,
transmitted in the records of fame, through an eternity of years. For,
while many great personages of antiquity will be involved in a
common oblivion with the mean and inglorious, Agricola shall survive,
represented and consigned to future ages.




FOOTNOTES


A TREATISE ON THE SITUATION, MANNERS AND INHABITANTS OF GERMANY.

[1] This treatise was written in the year of Rome 851, A.D. 98; during
the fourth consulate of the emperor Nerva, and the third of Trajan.

[2] The Germany here meant is that beyond the Rhine. The Germania
Cisrhenana, divided into the Upper and Lower, was a part of Gallia
Belgica.

[3] Rhaetia comprehended the country of the Grisons, with part of Suabia
and Bavaria.

[4] Lower Hungary, and part of Austria.

[5] The Carpathian mountains in Upper Hungary.

[6] "Broad promontories." Latos sinus. Sinus strictly signifies "a
bending," especially inwards. Hence it is applied to a gulf, or bay, of
the sea. And hence, again, by metonymy, to that projecting part of the
land, whereby the gulf is formed; and still further to any promontory
or peninsula. It is in this latter force it is here used;--and refers
especially to the Danish peninsula. See Livy xxvii, 30, xxxviii. 5;
Servius on Virgil, Aen. xi. 626.

[7] Scandinavia and Finland, of which the Romans had a very slight
knowledge, were supposed to be islands.

[8] The mountains of the Grisons. That in which the Rhine rises is at
present called Vogelberg.

[9] Now called Schwartzwald, or the Black Forest. The name Danubius was
given to that portion of the river which is included between its source
and Vindobona (Vienna); throughout the rest of its course it was called
Ister.

[10] _Donec erumpat_. The term _erumpat_ is most correctly and
graphically employed; for the Danube discharges its waters into the
Euxine with so great force, that its course may be distinctly traced for
miles out to sea.

[11] There are now but five.

[12] The ancient writers called all nations _indigenae_ (_i.e._ inde
geniti), or _autochthones_, "sprung from the soil," of whose origin they
were ignorant.

[13] It is, however, well established that the ancestors of the Germans
migrated by land from Asia. Tacitus here falls into a very common kind
of error, in assuming a local fact (viz. the manner in which migrations
took place in the basin of the Mediterranean) to be the expression of a
general law.--ED.

[14] Drusus, father of the emperor Claudius, was the first Roman general
who navigated the German Ocean. The difficulties and dangers which
Germanicus met with from the storms of this sea are related in the
Annals, ii. 23.

[15] All barbarous nations, in all ages, have applied verse to the same
use, as is still found to be the case among the North American Indians.
Charlemagne, as we are told by Eginhart, "wrote out and committed to
memory barbarous verses of great antiquity, in which the actions and
wars of ancient kings were recorded."

[16] The learned Leibnitz supposes this Tuisto to have been the Teut or
Teutates so famous throughout Gaul and Spain, who was a Celto-Scythian
king or hero, and subdued and civilized a great part of Europe and Asia.
Various other conjectures have been formed concerning him and his son
Mannus, but most of them extremely vague and improbable. Among the
rest, it has been thought that in Mannus and his three sons an obscure
tradition is preserved of Adam, and his sons Cain, Abel, and Seth; or of
Noah, and his sons Shem, Ham, and Japhet.

[17] Conringius interprets the names of the sons of Mannus into Ingäff,
Istäf, and Hermin.

[18] Pliny, iv. 14, embraces a middle opinion between these, and
mentions five capital tribes. The Vindili, to whom belong the
Burgundiones, Varini, Carini, and Guttones; the Ingaevones, including
the Cimbri, Teutoni, and Chauci; the Istaevones, near the Rhine, part
of whom are the midland Cimbri; the Hermiones, containing the Suevi,
Hermunduri, Catti, and Cherusci; and the Peucini and Bastarnae,
bordering upon the Dacians.

[19] The Marsi appear to have occupied various portions of the northwest
part of Germany at various times. In the time of Tiberius (A.D. 14) they
sustained a great slaughter from the forces of Germanicus, who ravaged
their country for fifty miles with fire and sword, sparing neither age
nor sex, neither things profane nor sacred. (See Ann. i. 51.) At this
period they were occupying the country in the neighborhood of the
Rura (Ruhr), a tributary of the Rhine. Probably this slaughter was the
destruction of them as a separate people; and by the time that Trajan
succeeded to the imperial power they seem to have been blotted out from
amongst the Germanic tribes. Hence their name will not be found in the
following account of Germany.

[20] These people are mentioned by Strabo, vii. 1, 3. Their locality is
not very easy to determine.

[21] See note, c. 38.

[22] The Vandals are said to have derived their name from the German
word _wendeln_, "to wander." They began to be troublesome to the Romans
A.D. 160, in the reigns of Aurelius and Verus. In A.D. 410 they made
themselves masters of Spain in conjunction with the Alans and Suevi,
and received for their share what from them was termed Vandalusia
(Andalusia). In A.D. 429 they crossed into Africa under Genseric, who
not only made himself master of Byzacium, Gaetulia, and part of Numidia,
but also crossed over into Italy, A.D. 455, and plundered Rome. After
the death of Genseric the Vandal power declined.

[23] That is, those of the Marsi, Gambrivii, etc. Those of Ingaevones,
Istaevones, and Hermiones, were not so much names of the people, as
terms expressing their situation. For, according to the most learned
Germans, the Ingaevones are _die Inwohner_, those dwelling inwards,
towards the sea; the Istaevones, _die Westwohner_, the inhabitants of
the western parts: and the Hermiones, _die Herumwohner_, the midland
inhabitants.

[24] It is however found in an inscription so far back as the year of
Rome 531, before Christ 222, recording the victory of Claudius Marcellus
over the Galli Insubres and their allies the Germans, at Clastidium, now
Chiastezzo in the Milanese.

[25] This is illustrated by a passage in Caesar, Bell. Gall. ii. 4,
where, after mentioning that several of the Belgae were descended from
the Germans who had formerly crossed the Rhine and expelled the Gauls,
he says, "the first of these emigrants were the Condrusii, Eburones,
Caeresi and Paemani, who were called by the common name of Germans."
The derivation of German is _Wehr mann_, a warrior, or man of war. This
appellation was first used by the victorious Cisrhenane tribes, but not
by the whole Transrhenane nation, till they gradually adopted it, as
equally due to them on account of their military reputation. The Tungri
were formerly a people of great name, the relics of which still exist in
the extent of the district now termed the ancient diocese of Tongres.

[26] Under this name Tacitus speaks of some German deity, whose
attributes corresponded in the main with those of the Greek and
Roman Hercules. What he was called by the Germans is a matter of
doubt.--_White_.

[27] _Quem barditum vocant_. The word _barditus_ is of Gallic origin,
being derived from _bardi_, "bards;" it being a custom with the Gauls
for bards to accompany the army, and celebrate the heroic deeds of their
great warriors; so that _barditum_ would thus signify "the fulfilment of
the bard's office." Hence it is clear that _barditum_ could not be used
correctly here, inasmuch as amongst the Germans not any particular,
appointed, body of men, but the whole army chanted forth the war-song.
Some editions have _baritum_, which is said to be derived from the
German word _beren_, or _baeren_, "to shout;" and hence it is translated
in some dictionaries as, "the German war-song." From the following
passage extracted from Facciolati, it would seem, however, that German
critics repudiate this idea: "De _barito_ clamore bellico, seu, ut
quaedam habent exemplaria, _bardito_, nihil audiuimus nunc in Germaniâ:
nisi hoc dixerimus, quòd _bracht_, vel _brecht_, milites Germani
appellare consueverunt; concursum videlicet certantium, et clamorem
ad pugnam descendentium; quem _bar, bar, bar_, sonuisse nonnulli
affirmant."--(Andr. Althameri, Schol. in C. Tacit De Germanis.) Ritter,
himself a German, affirms that _baritus_ is a reading worth nothing; and
that _barritus_ was not the name of the ancient German war-song, but
of the shout raised by the Romans in later ages when on the point
of engaging; and that it was derived "a clamore barrorem, _i.e._
elephantorum." The same learned editor considers that the words "quem
barditum vocant" have been originally the marginal annotation of some
unsound scholar, and have been incorporated by some transcriber into the
text of his MS. copy, whence the error has spread. He therefore encloses
them between brackets, to show that, in his judgment, they are not the
genuine production of the pen of Tacitus.--_White_.

[28] A very curious coincidence with the ancient German opinion
concerning the prophetic nature of the war-cry or song, appears in the
following passage of the Life of Sir Ewen Cameron, in "Pennant's Tour,"
1769, Append, p. 363. At the battle of Killicrankie, just before the
fight began, "he (Sir Ewen) commanded such of the Camerons as were
posted near him to make a great shout, which being seconded by those who
stood on the right and left, ran quickly through the whole army, and was
returned by the enemy. But the noise of the muskets and cannon, with the
echoing of the hills, made the Highlanders fancy that their shouts were
much louder and brisker than those of the enemy, and Lochiel cried out,
'Gentlemen, take courage, the day is ours: I am the oldest commander in
the army, and have always observed something ominous and fatal in such
a dull, hollow and feeble noise as the enemy made in their shout, which
prognosticates that they are all doomed to die by our hands this night;
whereas ours was brisk, lively and strong, and shows we have vigor and
courage.' These words, spreading quickly through the army, animated
the troops in a strange manner. The event justified the prediction; the
Highlanders obtained a complete victory."

[29] Now Asburg in the county of Meurs.

[30] The Greeks, by means of their colony at Marseilles, introduced
their letters into Gaul, and the old Gallic coins have many Greek
characters in their inscriptions. The Helvetians also, as we are
informed by Caesar, used Greek letters. Thence they might easily pass
by means of commercial intercourse to the neighboring Germans. Count
Marsili and others have found monuments with Greek inscriptions in
Germany, but not of so early an age.

[31] The large bodies of the Germans are elsewhere taken notice of by
Tacitus, and also by other authors. It would appear as if most of them
were at that time at least six feet high. They are still accounted some
of the tallest people in Europe.

[32] Bavaria and Austria.

[33] The greater degree of cold when the country was overspread with
woods and marshes, made this observation more applicable than at
present. The same change of temperature from clearing and draining
the land has taken place in North America. It may be added, that the
Germans, as we are afterwards informed, paid attention to no kind of
culture but that of corn.

[34] The cattle of some parts of Germany are at present remarkably
large; so that their former smallness must have rather been owing to
want of care in feeding them and protecting them from the inclemencies
of winter, and in improving the breed by mixtures, than to the nature of
the climate.

[35] Mines both of gold and silver have since been discovered in
Germany; the former, indeed, inconsiderable; but the latter, valuable.

[36] As vice and corruption advanced among the Romans, their money
became debased and adulterated. Thus Pliny, xxxiii. 3, relates, that
"Livius Drusus during his tribuneship, mixed an eighth part of brass
with the silver coin;" and ibid. 9, "that Antony the triumvir mixed iron
with the denarius: that some coined base metal, others diminished
the pieces, and hence it became an art to prove the goodness of the
denarii." One precaution for this purpose was cutting the edges like
the teeth of a saw, by which means it was seen whether the metal was
the same quite through, or was only plated. These were the Serrati, or
serrated Denarii. The Bigati were those stamped with the figure of a
chariot drawn by two horses, as were the Quadrigati with a chariot and
four horses. These were old coin, of purer silver than those of the
emperors. Hence the preference of the Germans for certain kinds of
species was founded on their apprehension of being cheated with false
money.

[37] The Romans had the same predilection for silver coin, and probably
on the same account originally. Pliny, in the place above cited,
expresses his surprise that "the Roman people had always imposed a
tribute in silver on conquered nations; as at the end of the second
Punic war, when they demanded an annual payment in silver for fifty
years, without any gold."

[38] Iron was in great abundance in the bowels of the earth; but this
barbarous people had neither patience, skill, nor industry to dig and
work it. Besides, they made use of weapons of stone, great numbers of
which are found in ancient tombs and barrows.

[39] This is supposed to take its name from _pfriem_ or _priem_, the
point of a weapon. Afterwards, when iron grew more plentiful, the
Germans chiefly used swords.

[40] It appears, however, from Tacitus's Annals, ii. 14, that the length
of these spears rendered them unmanageable in an engagement among trees
and bushes.

[41] Notwithstanding the manner of fighting is so much changed in modern
times, the arms of the ancients are still in use. We, as well as they,
have two kinds of swords, the sharp-pointed, and edged (small sword and
sabre). The broad lance subsisted till lately in the halberd; the spear
and framea in the long pike and spontoon; the missile weapons in the war
hatchet, or North American tomahawk. There are, besides, found in the
old German barrows, perforated stone balls, which they threw by means of
thongs passed through them.

[42] _Nudi_. The Latin nudus, like the Greek _gemnos_, does not point
out a person devoid of all clothing, but merely one without an upper
garment--clad merely in a vest or tunic, and that perhaps a short
one.--_White_.

[43] This decoration at first denoted the valor, afterwards the
nobility, of the bearer; and in process of time gave origin to the
armorial ensigns so famous in the ages of chivalry. The shields of the
private men were simply colored; those of the chieftains had the figures
of animals painted on them.

[44] Plutarch, in his Life of Marius, describes somewhat differently
the arms and equipage of the Cimbri. "They wore (says he) helmets
representing the heads of wild beasts, and other unusual figures, and
crowned with a winged crest, to make them appear taller. They were
covered with iron coats of mail, and carried white glittering shields.
Each had a battle-axe; and in close fight they used large heavy swords."
But the learned Eccard justly observes, that they had procured these
arms in their march; for the Holsatian barrows of that age contain few
weapons of brass, and none of iron; but stone spear-heads, and instead
of swords, the wedgelike bodies vulgarly called thunderbolts.

[46] Casques (_cassis_) are of metal; helmets (_galea_) of
leather--_Isidorus_.

[46] This mode of fighting is admirably described by Caesar. "The
Germans engaged after the following manner:--There were 6,000 horse, and
an equal number of the swiftest and bravest foot; who were chosen,
man by man, by the cavalry, for their protection. By these they were
attended in battle; to these they retreated; and, these, if they were
hard pressed, joined them in the combat. If any fell wounded from their
horses, by these they were covered. If it were necessary to advance or
retreat to any considerable distance, such agility had they acquired by
exercise, that, supporting themselves by the horses' manes, they kept
pace with them."--Bell. Gall. i. 48.

[47] To understand this, it is to be remarked, that the Germans were
divided into nations or tribes,--these into cantons, and these into
districts or townships. The cantons (_pagi_ in Latin) were called by
themselves _gauen_. The districts or townships (_vici_) were called
_hunderte_, whence the English hundreds. The name given to these select
youth, according to the learned Dithmar, was _die hunderte_, hundred
men. From the following passage in Caesar, it appears that in the more
powerful tribes a greater number was selected from each canton. "The
nation of the Suevi is by far the greatest and most warlike of the
Germans. They are said to inhabit a hundred cantons; from each of
which a thousand men are sent annually to make war out of their own
territories. Thus neither the employments of agriculture, nor the use of
arms are interrupted."--Bell. Gall. iv. 1. The warriors were summoned
by the _heribannum_, or army-edict; whence is derived the French
arrière-ban.

[48] A wedge is described by Vegetius (iii. 19,) as a body of infantry,
narrow in front, and widening towards the rear; by which disposition
they were enabled to break the enemy's ranks, as all their weapons were
directed to one spot. The soldiers called it a boar's head.

[49] It was also considered as the height of injury to charge a person
with this unjustly. Thus, by the _Salic_ law, tit. xxxiii, 5, a fine
of 600 denarii (about 9_l._) is imposed upon "every free man who shall
accuse another of throwing down his shield, and running away, without
being able to prove it."

[50] Vertot (Mém. de l'Acad. des Inscrip.) supposes that the French
_maires du palais_ had their origin from these German military leaders.
If the kings were equally conspicuous for valor as for birth, they
united the regal with the military command. Usually, however, several
kings and generals were assembled in their wars. In this case, the most
eminent commanded, and obtained a common jurisdiction in war, which did
not subsist in time of peace. Thus Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi.) says, "In
peace they have no common magistracy." A general was elected by placing
him on a shield, and lifting him on the shoulders of the bystanders. The
same ceremonial was observed in the election of kings.

[51] Hence Ambiorix, king of the Eburones, declare that "the nature of
his authority was such, that the people had no less power over him, than
he over the people."--Caesar, Bell. Gall. v. The authority of the North
American chiefs almost exactly similar.

[52] The power of life and death, however, was in the hands of
magistrates. Thus Caesar: "When a state engages either in an offensive
or defensive war, magistrates are chosen to preside over it, and
exercise power of life and death."--Bell. Gall. vi. The infliction of
punishments was committed to the priests, in order to give them more
solemnity, and render them less invidious.

[53] _Effigiesque et signa quaedam_. That effigies does not mean the
images of their deities is proved by that is stated at chap. ix., viz.
that they deemed it derogatory to their deities to represent them in
human form; and, if in human form, we may argue, _a fortiori_, in the
form of the lower animals. The interpretation of the passage will be
best derived from Hist. iv. 22, where Tacitus says:--"Depromptae silvis
lucisve ferarum imagines, ut cuique genti inire praelium mos est." It
would hence appear that these effigies and signa were images of wild
animals, and were national standards preserved with religious care in
sacred woods and groves, whence they were brought forth when the clan or
tribe was about to take the field.--_White_.

[54] They not only interposed to prevent the flight of their husbands
and sons, but, in desperate emergencies, themselves engaged in battle.
This happened on Marius's defeat of the Cimbri (hereafter to be
mentioned); and Dio relates, that when Marcus Aurelius overthrew the
Marcomanni, Quadi, and other German allies, the bodies of women in armor
were found among the slain.

[55] Thus, in the army of Ariovistus, the women, with their hair
dishevelled, and weeping, besought the soldiers not to deliver them
captives to the Romans.--Caesar, Bell. Gall. i.

[56] Relative to this, perhaps, is a circumstance mentioned by Suetonius
in his Life of Augustus. "From some nations he attempted to exact a new
kind of hostages, women: because he observed that those of the male sex
were disregarded."--Aug. xxi.

[57] See the same observation with regard to the Celtic women, in
Plutarch, on the virtues of women. The North Americans pay a similar
regard to their females.

[58] A remarkable instance of this is given by Caesar. "When he inquired
of the captives the reason why Ariovistus did not engage, he learned,
that it was because the matrons, who among the Germans are accustomed
to pronounce, from their divinations, whether or not a battle will be
favorable, had declared that they would not prove victorious, if they
should fight before the new moon."--Bell. Gall. i. The cruel manner in
which the Cimbrian women performed their divinations is thus related
by Strabo: "The women who follow the Cimbri to war, are accompanied
by gray-haired prophetesses, in white vestments, with canvas mantles
fastened by clasps, a brazen girdle, and naked feet. These go with drawn
swords through the camp, and, striking down those of the prisoners that
they meet, drag them to a brazen kettle, holding about twenty amphorae.
This has a kind of stage above it, ascending on which, the priestess
cuts the throat of the victim, and, from the manner in which the blood
flows into the vessel, judges of the future event. Others tear open
the bodies of the captives thus butchered, and, from inspection of the
entrails, presage victory to their own party."--Lib. vii.

[59] She was afterwards taken prisoner by Rutilius Gallicus. Statius, in
his Sylvae, i. 4, refers to this event. Tacitus has more concerning her
in his History, iv. 61.

[60] Viradesthis was a goddess of the Tungri; Harimella, another
provincial deity; whose names were found by Mr. Pennant inscribed on
altars at the Roman station at Burrens. These were erected by the German
auxiliaries.--Vide Tour in Scotland, 1772, part ii. p. 406.

[61] Ritter considers that here is a reference to the servile flattery
of the senate as exhibited in the time of Nero, by the deification of
Poppaea's infant daughter, and afterwards of herself. (See Ann. xv.
23, Dion. lxiii, Ann. xiv. 3.) There is no contradiction in the present
passage to that found at Hist. iv. 61, where Tacitus says, "plerasque
feminarum fatidicas et, augescente superstitione, arbitrantur deas;"
_i.e._ they deem (_arbitrantur_) very many of their women possessed of
prophetic powers, and, as their religious feeling increases, they deem
(_arbitrantur_) them goddesses, _i.e._ possessed of a superhuman nature;
they do not, however, make them goddesses and worship them, as the
Romans did Poppaea and her infant, which is covertly implied in
_facerent deas_.--_White_.

[62] Mercury, _i.e._ a god whom Tacitus thus names, because his
attributes resembled those of the Roman Mercury. According to Paulus
Diaconus (de Gestis Langobardorum, i. 9), this deity was Wodun, or
Gwodan, called also Odin. Mallet (North. Ant. ch. v.) says, that in
the Icelandic mythology he is called "the terrible and severe God, the
Father of Slaughter, he who giveth victory and receiveth courage in
the conflict, who nameth those that are to be slain." "The Germans drew
their gods by their own character, who loved nothing so much themselves
as to display their strength and power in battle, and to signalize their
vengeance upon their enemies by slaughter and desolation." There remain
to this day some traces of the worship paid to Odin in the name given by
almost all the people of the north to the fourth day of the week, which
was formerly consecrated to him. It is called by a name which signifies
"Odin's day;" "Old Norse, _Odinsdagr_; Swedish and Danish, _Onsdag_;
Anglo-Saxon, _Wodenesdaeg_, _Wodnesdaeg_; Dutch, _Woensdag_; English,
Wednesday. As Odin or Wodun was supposed to correspond to the Mercury of
the Greeks and Romans, the name of this day was expressed in Latin _Dies
Mercurii_."--_White_.

[63] "The appointed time for these sacrifices," says Mallet (North. Ant.
ch. vi.), "was always determined by a superstitious opinion which
made the northern nations regard the number 'three' as sacred and
particularly dear to the gods. Thus, in every ninth month they renewed
the bloody ceremony, which was to last nine days, and every day they
offered up nine living victims, whether men or animals. But the most
solemn sacrifices were those which were offered up at Upsal in Sweden
every ninth year...." After stating the compulsory nature of the
attendance at this festival, Mallet adds, "Then they chose among the
captives in time of war, and among the slaves in time of peace, nine
persons to be sacrificed. In whatever manner they immolated men, the
priest always took care in consecrating the victim to pronounce certain
words, as 'I devote thee to Odin,' 'I send thee to Odin.'" See Lucan i.
444.

  "Et quibus immitis placatur sanguine diro
  Teutates, horrensque feris altaribus Hesus."

Teutates is Mercury, Hesus, Mars. So also at iii. 399, &c.

  "Lucus erat longo nunquam violatus ab aevo.
  ... Barbara ritu
  Sacra Deum, structae diris altaribus arae,
  Omnis et humanis lustrata cruoribus arbor."

[64] That is, as in the preceding case, a deity whose attributes
corresponded to those of the Roman Mars. This appears to have been
not _Thor_, who is rather the representative of the Roman Jupiter, but
_Tyr_, "a warrior god, and the protector of champions and brave men!"
"From _Tyr_ is derived the name given to the third day of the week in
most of the Teutonic languages, and which has been rendered into Latin
by _Dies Martis_. Old Norse, _Tirsdagr_, _Tisdagr_; Swedish, _Tisdag_;
Danish, _Tirsdag_; German, _Dienstag_; Dutch, _Dingsdag_; Anglo-Saxon,
_Tyrsdaeg_, _Tyvesdag_, _Tivesdaeg_; English, _Tuesday_"--(Mallet's
North. Ant. ch. v.)--_White_.

[65] The Suevi appear to have been the Germanic tribes, and this also
the worship spoken of at chap. xl. _Signum in modum liburnae figuration
_corresponds with the _vehiculum_ there spoken of; the real thing being,
according to Ritter's view, a pinnace placed on wheels. That _signum
ipsum _("the very symbol") does not mean any image of the goddess, may
be gathered also from ch. xl., where the goddess herself, _si credere
velis_, is spoken of as being washed in the sacred lake.

[66] As the Romans in their ancient coins, many of which are now extant,
recorded the arrival of Saturn by the stern of a ship; so other nations
have frequently denoted the importation of a foreign religious rite by
the figure of a galley on their medals.

[67] Tacitus elsewhere speaks of temples of German divinities (e.g. 40;
Templum Nerthae, Ann. i. 51; Templum Tanfanae); but a consecrated grove,
or any other sacred place, was called templum by the Romans.

[68] The Scythians are mentioned by Herodotus, and the Alans by Ammianus
Marcellinus, as making use of these divining rods. The German method of
divination with them is illustrated by what is said by Saxo-Grammaticus
(Hist. Dan. xiv, 288) of the inhabitants of the Isle of Rugen in the
Baltic Sea: "Throwing, by way of lots, three pieces of wood, white in
one part, and black in another, into their laps, they foretold good
fortune by the coming up of the white; bad by that of the black."

[69] The same practice obtained among the Persians, from whom the
Germans appear to be sprung. Darius was elected king by the neighing
of a horse; sacred white horses were in the army of Cyrus; and Xerxes,
retreating after his defeat, was preceded by the sacred horses
and consecrated chariot. Justin (i. 10) mentions the cause of this
superstition, viz. that "the Persians believed the Sun to be the only
God, and horses to be peculiarly consecrated to him." The priest of the
Isle of Rugen also took auspices from a white horse, as may be seen in
Saxo-Grammaticus.

[70] Montesquieu finds in this custom the origin of the duel, and of
knight-errantry.

[71] This remarkable passage, so curious in political history, is
commented on by Montesquieu, in his Spirit of Laws. vi 11. That
celebrated author expresses his surprise at the existence of such a
balance between liberty and authority in the forests of Germany; and
traces the origin of the English constitution from this source. Tacitus
again mentions the German form of government in his Annals, iv. 33.

[72] The high antiquity of this made of reckoning appears from the Book
of Genesis. "The evening and the morning were the first day." The Gauls,
we are informed by Caesar, "assert that, according to the tradition of
their Druids, they are all sprung from Father Dis; on which account they
reckon every period of time according to the number of nights, not of
days; and observe birthdays and the beginnings of months and years in
such a manner, that the day seems to follow the night." (Bell. Gall.
vi. 18.) The vestiges of this method of computation still appear in the
English language, in the terms se'nnight and fort'night.

[73] _Ut turbae placuit_. Doederlein interprets this passage as
representing the confused way in which the people took their seats in
the national assembly, without reference to order, rank, age, &c.
It rather represents, however, that the people, not the chieftains,
determined when the business of the council should begin.--_White_.

[74] And in an open plain. Vast heaps of stone still remaining, denote
the scenes of these national councils. (See Mallet's Introduct. to Hist.
of Denmark.) The English Stonehenge has been supposed a relic of this
kind. In these assemblies are seen the origin of those which, under the
Merovingian race of French kings, were called the Fields of March;
under the Carlovingian, the Fields of May; then, the Plenary Courts of
Christmas and Easter; and lastly, the States General.

[75] The speech of Civilis was received with this expression of
applause. Tacitus, Hist. iv. 15.

[76] Gibbeted alive. Heavy penalties were denounced against those who
should take them down, alive or dead. These are particularized in the
Salic law.

[77] By cowards and dastards, in this passage, are probably meant those
who, being summoned to war, refused or neglected to go. Caesar (Bell.
Gall. vi. 22) mentions, that those who refused to follow their chiefs
to war were considered as deserters and traitors. And, afterwards, the
emperor Clothaire made the following edict, preserved in the Lombard
law: "Whatever freeman, summoned to the defence of his country by his
Count, or his officers, shall neglect to go, and the enemy enter the
country to lay it waste, or otherwise damage our liege subjects,
he shall incur a capital punishment." As the crimes of cowardice,
treachery, and desertion were so odious and ignominious among the
Germans, we find by the Salic law, that penalties were annexed to the
unjust imputation of them.

[78] These were so rare and so infamous among the Germans, that barely
calling a person by a name significant of them was severely punished.

[79] Incestuous people were buried alive in bogs in Scotland. Pennant's
Tour in Scotland, 1772; part i. p. 351; and part ii. p. 421.

[80] Among these slighter offences, however, were reckoned homicide,
adultery, theft, and many others of a similar kind. This appears from
the laws of the Germans, and from a subsequent passage of Tacitus
himself.

[81] These were at that time the only riches of the country, as was
already observed in this treatise. Afterwards gold and silver became
plentiful: hence all the mulcts required by the Salic law are pecuniary.
Money, however, still bore a fixed proportion to cattle; as appears from
the Saxon law (Tit. xviii.): "The Solidus is of two kinds; one contains
two tremisses, that is, a beeve of twelve months, or a sheep with its
lamb; the other, three tremisses, or a beeve of sixteen months. Homicide
is compounded for by the lesser solidus; other crimes by the greater."
The Saxons had their Weregeld,--the Scotch their Cro, Galnes, and
Kelchin,--and the Welsh their Gwerth, and Galanus, or compensations for
injuries; and cattle were likewise the usual fine. Vide Pennant's Tour
in Wales of 1773, pp. 273, 274.

[82] This mulct is frequently in the Salic law called "fred," that is,
peace; because it was paid to the king or state, as guardians of the
public peace.

[83] A brief account of the civil economy of the Germans will here be
useful. They were divided into nations; of which some were under a
regal government, others a republican. The former had kings, the latter
chiefs. Both in kingdoms and republics, military affairs were under the
conduct of the generals. The nations were divided into cantons; each of
which was superintended by a chief, or count, who administered justice
in it. The cantons were divided into districts or hundreds, so called
because they contained a hundred vills or townships. In each hundred
was a companion, or centenary, chosen from the people, before whom small
causes were tried. Before the count, all causes, as well great as small,
were amenable. The centenaries are called companions by Tacitus, after
the custom of the Romans; among whom the titles of honor were, Caesar,
the Legatus or Lieutenant of Caesar, and his comites, or companions. The
courts of justice were held in the open air, on a rising ground, beneath
the shade of an oak, elm, or some other large tree.

[84] Even judges were armed on the seat of justice. The Romans, on
the contrary, never went armed but when actually engaged in military
service.

[85] These are the rudiments of the famous institution of chivalry. The
sons of kings appear to have received arms from foreign princes. Hence,
when Audoin, after overcoming the Gepidae, was requested by the Lombards
to dine with his son Alboin, his partner in the victory, he refused;
for, says he, "you know it is not customary with us for a king's son
to dine with his father, until he has received arms from the king of
another country."--Warnefrid, De gestis Langobardorum, i. 23.

[86] An allusion to the _toga virilis_ of the Romans. The German youth
were presented with the shield and spear probably at twelve or fifteen
years of age. This early initiation into the business of arms gave them
that warlike character for which they were so celebrated. Thus, Seneca
(Epist. 46) says, "A native of Germany brandishes, while yet a boy,
his slender javelin." And again (in his book on Anger, i. 11), "Who are
braver than the Germans?--who more impetuous in the charge?--who fonder
of arms, in the use of which they are born and nourished, which are
their only care?--who more inured to hardships, insomuch that for the
most part they provide no covering for their bodies, no retreat against
the perpetual severity of the climate?"

[87] Hence it seems that these noble lads were deemed _principes_ in
rank, yet had their position among the _comites_ only. The German word
_Gesell_ is peculiarly appropriated to these comrades in arms. So highly
were they esteemed in Germany, that for killing or hurting them a fine
was exacted treble to that for other freemen.

[88] Hence, when Chonodomarus, king of the Alamanni, was taken prisoner
by the Romans, "his companions, two hundred in number, and three friends
peculiarly attached to him, thinking it infamous to survive their
prince, or not to die for him, surrendered themselves to be put in
bonds."--Ammianus Marcellinus, xvi. 13.

[89] Hence Montesquieu (Spirit of Laws, xxx, 3) justly derives the
origin of vassalage. At first, the prince gave to his nobles arms and
provision: as avarice advanced, money, and then lands, were required,
which from benefices became at length hereditary possessions, and were
called fiefs. Hence the establishment of the feudal system.

[90] Caesar, with less precision, says, "The Germans pass their whole
lives in hunting and military exercises." (Bell. Gall, vi. 21.) The
picture drawn by Tacitus is more consonant to the genius of a barbarous
people: besides that, hunting being the employment but of a few months
of the year, a greater part must necessarily be passed in indolence
by those who had no other occupation. In this circumstance, and those
afterwards related, the North American savages exactly agree with the
ancient Germans.

[91] This apparent contradiction is, however, perfectly agreeable to the
principles of human nature. Among people governed by impulse more than
reason, everything is in the extreme: war and peace; motion and rest;
love and hatred; none are pursued with moderation.

[92] These are the rudiments of tributes; though the contributions
here spoken of were voluntary, and without compulsion. The origin of
exchequers is pointed out above, where "part of the mulct" is said to
be "paid to the king or state." Taxation was taught the Germans by the
Romans, who levied taxes upon them.

[93] So, in after-times, when tributes were customary, 500 oxen or cows
were required annually from the Saxons by the French kings Clothaire
I. and Pepin. (See Eccard, tom. i. pp. 84, 480.) Honey, corn, and other
products of the earth, were likewise received in tribute. (Ibid. p.
392.)

[94] For the expenses of war, and other necessities of state, and
particularly the public entertainments. Hence, besides the Steora, or
annual tribute, the Osterstuopha, or Easter cup, previous to the public
assembly of the Field of March, was paid to the French kings.

[95] This was a dangerous lesson, and in the end proved ruinous to
the Roman empire. Herodian says of the Germans in his time, "They
are chiefly to be prevailed upon by bribes; being fond of money, and
continually selling peace to the Romans for gold."--Lib. vi. 139.

[96] This custom was of long duration; for there is not the mention of a
single city in Ammianus Marcellinus, who wrote on the wars of the Romans
in Germany. The names of places in Ptolemy (ii. 11) are not, therefore,
those of cities, but of scattered villages. The Germans had not even
what we should call towns, notwithstanding Caesar asserts the contrary.

[97] The space surrounding the house, and fenced in by hedges, was that
celebrated Salic land, which descended to the male line, exclusively of
the female.

[98] The danger of fire was particularly urgent in time of war; for,
as Caesar informs us, these people were acquainted with a method of
throwing red-hot clay bullets from slings, and burning javelins, on the
thatch of houses. (Bell. Gall. v. 42.)

[99] Thus likewise Mela (ii. 1), concerning the Sarmatians: "On account
of the length and severity of their winters, they dwell under ground,
either in natural or artificial caverns." At the time that Germany was
laid waste by a forty years' war, Kircher saw many of the natives who,
with their flocks, herds, and other possessions, took refuge in the
caverns of the highest mountains. For many other curious particulars
concerning these and other subterranean caves, see his Mundus
Subterraneus, viii. 3, p. 100. In Hungary, at this day, corn is commonly
stored in subterranean chambers.

[100] Near Newbottle, the seat of the Marquis of Lothian, are some
subterraneous apartments and passages cut out of the live rock, which
had probably served for the same purposes of winter-retreats and
granaries as those dug by the ancient Germans. Pennant's Tour in 1769,
4to, p.63.

[101] This was a kind of mantle of a square form, called also _rheno_.
Thus Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi. 21): "They use skins for clothing, or the
short rhenones, and leave the greatest part of the body naked." Isidore
(xix. 23) describes the rhenones as "garments covering the shoulders
and breast, as low as the navel, so rough and shaggy that they are
impenetrable to rain." Mela (iii. 3), speaking of the Germans, says,
"The men are clothed only with the sagum, or the bark of trees, even in
the depth of winter."

[102] All savages are fond of variety of colors; hence the Germans
spotted their furs with the skins of other animals, of which those
here mentioned were probably of the seal kind. This practice is still
continued with regard to the ermine, which is spotted with black
lamb's-skin.

[103] The Northern Sea, and Frozen Ocean.

[104] Pliny testifies the same thing; and adds, that "the women
beyond the Rhine are not acquainted with any more elegant kind of
clothing."--xix. 1.

[105] Not that rich and costly purple in which the Roman nobility shone,
but some ordinary material, such as the _vaccinium_, which Pliny says
was used by the Gauls as a purple dye for the garments of the slaves,
(xvi. 18.)

[106] The chastity of the Germans, and their strict regard to the laws
of marriage, are witnessed by all their ancient codes of law. The purity
of their manners in this respect afforded a striking contrast to the
licentiousness of the Romans in the decline of the empire, and is
exhibited in this light by Salvian, in his treatise De Gubernatione Dei,
lib. vii.

[107] Thus we find in Caesar (Bell. Gall. i. 53) that Ariovistus had
two wives. Others had more. This indulgence proved more difficult to
abolish, as it was considered as a mark of opulence, and an appendage of
nobility.

[108] The Germans purchased their wives, as appears from the following
clauses in the Saxon law concerning marriage: "A person who espouses a
wife shall pay to her parents 300 solidi (about 180_l._ sterling);
but if the marriage be without the consent of the parents, the damsel,
however, consenting, he shall pay 600 solidi. If neither the parents nor
damsel consent, that is, if she be carried off by violence, he shall pay
300 solidi to the parents, and 340 to the damsel, and restore her to her
parents."

[109] Thus in the Saxon law, concerning dowries, it is said: "The
Ostfalii and Angrarii determine, that if a woman have male issue, she
is to possess the dower she received in marriage during her life, and
transmit it to her sons."

[110] _Ergo septae pudicitiâ agunt_. Some editions have _septâ
pudicitiâ_. This would imply, however, rather the result of the care and
watchfulness of their husbands; whereas it seems the object of Tacitus
to show that this their chastity was the effect of innate virtue, and
this is rather expressed by _septae pudicitiâ_, which is the reading of
the Arundelian MS.

[111] Seneca speaks with great force and warmth on this subject:
"Nothing is so destructive to morals as loitering at public
entertainments; for vice more easily insinuates itself into the heart
when softened by pleasure. What shall I say! I return from them more
covetous ambitious, and luxurious."--Epist. vii.

[112] The Germans had a great regard for the hair, and looked upon
cutting it off as a heavy disgrace; so that this was made a punishment
for certain crimes, and was resented as an injury if practised upon an
innocent person.

[113] From an epistle of St. Boniface, archbishop of Mentz, to
Ethelbald, king of England, we learn that among the Saxons the women
themselves inflicted the punishment for violated chastity; "In ancient
Saxony (now Westphalia), if a virgin pollute her father's house, or a
married woman prove false to her vows, sometimes she is forced to put an
end to her own life by the halter, and over the ashes of her burned body
her seducer is hanged: sometimes a troop of females assembling lead her
through the circumjacent villages, lacerating her body, stripped to
the girdle, with rods and knives; and thus, bloody and full of minute
wounds, she is continually met by new tormenters, who in their zeal for
chastity do not quit her till she is dead, or scarcely alive, in order
to inspire a dread of such offences." See Michael Alford's Annales
Ecclesiae Anglo-Saxon., and Eccard.

[114] A passage in Valerius Maximus renders it probable that the
Cimbrian states were of this number: "The wives of the Teutones besought
Marius, after his victory, that he would deliver them as a present to
the Vestal virgins; affirming that they should henceforth, equally with
themselves, abstain from the embraces of the other sex. This request not
being granted, they all strangled themselves the ensuing night."--Lib.
vi. 1.3.

[115] Among the Heruli, the wife was expected to hang herself at once at
the grave of her husband, if she would not live in perpetual infamy.

[116] This expression may signify as well the murder of young children,
as the procurement of abortion; both which crimes were severely punished
by the German laws.

[117] _Quemquam ex agnatis_. By _agnati_ generally in Roman law were
meant relations by the father's side; here it signifies children born
after there was already an heir to the name and property of the father.

[118] Justin has a similar thought concerning the Scythians: "Justice is
cultivated by the dispositions of the people, not by the laws." (ii.
2.) How inefficacious the good laws here alluded to by Tacitus were
in preventing enormities among the Romans, appears from the frequent
complaints of the senators, and particularly of Minucius Felix; "I
behold you, exposing your babes to the wild beasts and birds, or
strangling the unhappy wretches with your own hands. Some of you, by
means of drugs, extinguish the newly-formed man within your bowels, and
thus commit parricide on your offspring before you bring them into the
world." (Octavius, c. 30.) So familiar was this practice grown at Rome,
that the virtuous Pliny apologises for it, alleging that "the great
fertility of some women may require such a licence."--xxix. 4, 37.

[119] _Nudi ac sordidi_ does not mean "in nakedness and filth," as most
translators have supposed. Personal filth is inconsistent with the daily
practice of bathing mentioned c. 22; and _nudus_ does not necessarily
imply absolute nakedness (see note 4, p. 293).

[120] This age appears at first to have been twelve years; for then a
youth became liable to the penalties of law. Thus in the Salic law it is
said, "If a child under twelve commit a fault, 'fred,' or a mulct, shall
not be required of him." Afterwards the term was fifteen years of
age. Thus in the Ripuary law, "A child under fifteen shall not be
responsible." Again, "If a man die, or be killed, and leave a son;
before he have completed his fifteenth year, he shall neither prosecute
a cause, nor be called upon to answer in a suit: but at this term, he
must either answer himself, or choose an advocate. In like manner with
regard to the female sex." The Burgundian law provides to the same
effect. This then was the term of majority, which in later times, when
heavier armor was used, was still longer delayed.

[121] This is illustrated by a passage in Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi. 21):
"They who are the latest in proving their virility are most commended.
By this delay they imagine the stature is increased, the strength
improved, and the nerves fortified. To have knowledge of the other
sex before twenty years of age, is accounted in the highest degree
scandalous."

[122] Equal not only in age and constitution, but in condition. Many of
the German codes of law annex penalties to those of both sexes who marry
persons of inferior rank.

[123] Hence, in the history of the Merovingian kings of France, so many
instances of regard to sisters and their children appear, and so many
wars undertaken on their account.

[124] The court paid at Rome to rich persons without children, by the
Haeredipetae, or legacy-hunters, is a frequent subject of censure and
ridicule with the Roman writers.

[125] Avengers of blood are mentioned in the law of Moses, Numb. xxxv.
19. In the Roman law also, under the head of "those who on account of
unworthiness are deprived of their inheritance," it is pronounced, that
"such heirs as are proved to have neglected revenging the testator's
death, shall be obliged to restore the entire profits."

[126] It was a wise provision, that among this fierce and warlike
people, revenge should be commuted for a payment. That this intention
might not be frustrated by the poverty of the offender, his whole family
were conjointly bound to make compensation.

[127] All uncivilized nations agree in this property, which becomes less
necessary as a nation improves in the arts of civil life.

[128] _Convictibus et hospitiis_. "Festivities and entertainments." The
former word applies to friends and fellow-countrymen; the latter, to
those not of the same tribe, and foreigners. Caesar (Bell. Gall. vi. 23)
says, "They think it unlawful to offer violence to their guests, who,
on whatever occasion they come to them, are protected from injury,
and considered as sacred. Every house is open to them, and provision
everywhere set before them." Mela (iii. 3) says of the Germans, "They
make right consist in force, so that they are not ashamed of robbery:
they are only kind to their guests, and merciful to suppliants. The
Burgundian law lays a fine of three solidi on every man who refuses his
roof or hearth to the coming guest." The Salic law, however, rightly
forbids the exercise of hospitality to atrocious criminals; laying a
penalty on the person who shall harbor one who has dug up or despoiled
the dead? till he has made satisfaction to the relations.

[129] The clause here put within brackets is probably misplaced;
since it does not connect well either with what goes before or what
follows.[130] The Russians are at present the most remarkable among the
northern nations for the use of warm bathing. Some of the North American
tribes also have their hypocausts, or stoves.

[131] Eating at separate tables is generally an indication of voracity.
Traces of it may be found in Homer, and other writers who have described
ancient manners. The same practice has also been observed among the
people of Otaheite; who occasionally devour vast quantities of food.

[132] The following article in the Salic law shows at once the frequency
of these bloody quarrels, and the laudable endeavors of the legislature
to restrain them;--"If at a feast where there are four or five men in
company, one of them be killed, the rest shall either convict one as the
offender, or shall jointly pay the composition for his death. And this
law shall extend to seven persons present at an entertainment."

[133] The same custom is related by Herodotus, i. p. 66, as prevailing
among the Persians.

[134] Of this liquor, beer or ale, Pliny speaks in the following
passage: "The western nations have their intoxicating liquor, made of
steeped grain. The Egyptians also invented drinks of the same kind. Thus
drunkenness is a stranger in no part of the world; for these liquors are
taken pure, and not diluted as wine is. Yet, surely, the Earth thought
she was producing corn. Oh, the wonderful sagacity of our vices! we have
discovered how to render even water intoxicating."--xiv. 22.

[135] Mela says, "Their manner of living is so rude and savage, that
they eat even raw flesh; either fresh killed, or softened by working
with their hands and feet, after it has grown stiff in the hides of
tame or wild animals." (iii. 3.) Florus relates that the ferocity of
the Cimbri was mitigated by their feeding on bread and dressed meat, and
drinking wine, in the softest tract of Italy.--iii. 3.

[136] This must not be understood to have been cheese; although Caesar
says of the Germans, "Their diet chiefly consists of milk, cheese and
flesh." (Bell. Gall. vi. 22.) Pliny, who was thoroughly acquainted with
the German manners, says more accurately, "It is surprising that the
barbarous nations who live on milk should for so many ages have been
ignorant of, or have rejected, the preparation of cheese; especially
since they thicken their milk into a pleasant tart substance, and a fat
butter: this is the scum of milk, of a thicker consistence than what is
called the whey. It must not be omitted that it has the properties of
oil, and is used as an unguent by all the barbarians, and by us for
children."--xi. 41.

[137] This policy has been practised by the Europeans with regard to the
North American savages, some tribes of which have been almost totally
extirpated by it.

[138] St. Ambrose has a remarkable passage concerning this spirit
of gaming among a barbarous people:--"It is said that the Huns, who
continually make war upon other nations, are themselves subject to
usurers, with whom they run in debt at play; and that, while they live
without laws, they obey the laws of the dice alone; playing when drawn
up in line of battle; carrying dice along with their arms, and perishing
more by each others' hands than by the enemy. In the midst of victory
they submit to become captives, and suffer plunder from their own
countrymen, which they know not how to bear from the foe. On this
account they never lay aside the business of war, because, when they
have lost all their booty by the dice, they have no means of acquiring
fresh supplies for play, but by the sword. They are frequently borne
away with such a desperate ardor, that, when the loser has given up his
arms, the only part of his property which he greatly values, he sets the
power over his life at a single cast to the winner or usurer. It is a
fact, that a person, known to the Roman emperor, paid the price of a
servitude which he had by this means brought upon himself, by suffering
death at the command of his master."

[139] The condition of these slaves was the same as that of the vassals,
or serfs, who a few centuries ago made the great body of the people
in every country in Europe. The Germans, in after times, imitating the
Romans, had slaves of inferior condition, to whom the name of slave
became appropriated; while those in the state of rural vassalage were
called _lidi_.

[140] A private enemy could not be slain with impunity, since a fine
was affixed to homicide; but a man might kill his own slave without
any punishment. If, however, he killed another person's slave, he was
obliged to pay his price to the owner.

[141] The amazing height of power and insolence to which freedmen
arrived by making themselves subservient to the vices of the prince,
is a striking characteristic of the reigns of some of the worst of the
Roman emperors.

[142] In Rome, on the other hand, the practice of usury was, as our
author terms it, "an ancient evil, and a perpetual source of sedition
and discord."--Annals, vi. 16.

[143] All the copies read _per vices_, "by turns," or alternately; but
the connection seems evidently to require the easy alteration of _per
vicos_, which has been approved by many learned commentators, and is
therefore adopted in this translation.

[144] Caesar has several particulars concerning this part of German
polity. "They are not studious of agriculture, the greater part of
their diet consisting of milk, cheese, and flesh; nor has any one
a determinate portion of land, his own peculiar property; but the
magistrates and chiefs allot every year to tribes and clanships forming
communities, as much land, and in such situations, as they think proper,
and oblige them to remove the succeeding year. For this practice they
assign several reasons: as, lest they should be led, by being
accustomed to one spot, to exchange the toils of war for the business of
agriculture; lest they should acquire a passion for possessing extensive
domains, and the more powerful should be tempted to dispossess the
weaker; lest they should construct buildings with more art than was
necessary to protect them from the inclemencies of the weather; lest
the love of money should arise amongst them, the source of faction
and dissensions; and in order that the people, beholding their own
possessions equal to those of the most powerful, might be retained by
the bonds of equity and moderation."--Bell. Gall. vi. 21.

[145] The Germans, not planting fruit-trees, were ignorant of the proper
products of autumn. They have now all the autumnal fruits of their
climate; yet their language still retains a memorial of their ancient
deficiencies, in having no term for this season of the year, but one
denoting the gathering in of corn alone--_Herbst_, Harvest.

[146] In this respect, as well as many others, the manners of the
Germans were a direct contrast to those of the Romans. Pliny mentions a
private person, C. Caecilius Claudius Isidorus, who ordered the sum of
about 10,000_l._ sterling to be expended in his funeral: and in another
place he says, "Intelligent persons asserted that Arabia did not produce
such a quantity of spices in a year as Nero burned at the obsequies of
his Poppaea."--xxxiii. 10, and xii. 18.

[147] The following lines of Lucan, describing the last honors paid by
Cornelia to the body of Pompey the Great, happily illustrate the customs
here referred to:--

  Collegit vestes, miserique insignia Magni.
  Armaque, et impressas auro, quas gesserat olim
  Exuvias, pictasque togas, velamina summo
  Ter conspecta Jovi, funestoque intulit igni.--Lib. ix. 175.

  "There shone his arms, with antique gold inlaid,
  There the rich robes which she herself had made,
  Robes to imperial Jove in triumph thrice display'd:
  The relics of his past victorious days,
  Now this his latest trophy serve to raise,
  And in one common flame together blaze."--ROWE.

[148] Thus in the tomb of Childeric, king of the Franks, were found
his spear and sword, and also his horse's head, with a shoe, and gold
buckles and housings. A human skull was likewise discovered, which,
perhaps, was that of his groom.

[149] Caesar's account is as follows:--"There was formerly a time when
the Gauls surpassed the Germans in bravery, and made war upon them;
and, on account of their multitude of people and scarcity of land, sent
colonies beyond the Rhine. The most fertile parts of Germany, adjoining
to the Hercynian forest, (which, I observe, was known by report to
Eratosthenes and others of the Greeks, and called by them Orcinia,) were
accordingly occupied by the Volcae and Tectosages, who settled there.
These people still continue in the same settlements, and have a high
character as well for the administration of justice as military prowess:
and they now remain in the same state of penury and content as the
Germans, whose manner of life they have adopted."--Bell. Gall. vi. 24.

[150] The inhabitants of Switzerland, then extending further than at
present, towards Lyons.

[151] A nation of Gauls, bordering on the Helvetii, as appears from
Strabo and Caesar. After being conquered by Caesar, the Aedui gave them
a settlement in the country now called the Bourbonnois. The name of
their German colony, Boiemum, is still extant in Bohemia. The aera at
which the Helvetii and Boii penetrated into Germany is not ascertained.
It seems probable, however, that it was in the reign of Tarquinius
Priscus; for at that time, as we are told by Livy, Ambigatus, king of
the Bituriges (people of Berry), sent his sister's son Sigovesus into
the Hercynian forest, with a colony, in order to exonerate his kingdom
which was overpeopled. (Livy, v. 33; _et seq._)

[152] In the time of Augustus, the Boii, driven from Boiemum by the
Marcomanni, retired to Noricum, which from them was called Boioaria, now
Bavaria.

[153] This people inhabited that part of Lower Hungary now called the
Palatinate of Pilis.

[154] Towards the end of this treatise, Tacitus seems himself to decide
this point, observing that their use of the Pannonian language, and
acquiescence in paying tribute, prove the Osi not to be a German nation.
They were settled beyond the Marcomanni and Quadi, and occupied the
northern part of Transdanubian Hungary; perhaps extending to Silesia,
where is a place called Ossen in the duchy of Oels, famous for salt and
glass works. The learned Pelloutier, however, contends that the Osi were
Germans; but with less probability.

[155] The inhabitants of the modern diocese of Treves.

[156] Those of Cambresis and Hainault.

[157] Those of the dioceses of Worms, Strasburg, and Spires.

[158] Those of the diocese of Cologne. The Ubii, migrating from Germany
to Gaul, on account of the enmity of the Catti, and their own attachment
to the Roman interest, were received under the protection of Marcus
Agrippa, in the year of Rome 717. (Strabo, iv. p. 194.) Agrippina, the
wife of Claudius and mother of Nero, who was born among them, obtained
the settlement of a colony there, which was called after her name.

[159] Now the Betuwe, part of the provinces of Holland and Guelderland.

[160] Hence the Batavi are termed, in an ancient inscription, "the
brothers and friends of the Roman people."

[161] This nation inhabited part of the countries now called the
Weteraw, Hesse, Isenburg and Fulda. In this territory was Mattium, now
Marpurg, and the Fontes Mattiaci, now Wisbaden, near Mentz.

[162] The several people of Germany had their respective borders, called
marks or marches, which they defended by preserving them in a desert and
uncultivated state. Thus Caesar, Bell. Gall. iv 3:--"They think it the
greatest honor to a nation, to have as wide an extent of vacant land
around their dominions as possible; by which it is indicated, that a
great number of neighboring communities are unable to withstand them.
On this account, the Suevi are said to have, on one side, a tract of
600 (some learned men think we should read 60) miles desert for their
boundaries." In another place Caesar mentions, as an additional reason
for this policy, that they think themselves thereby rendered secure from
the danger of sudden incursions. (Bell. Gall. vi. 13.)

[163] The difference between the low situation and moist air of Batavia,
and the high and dry country of the Mattiaci, will sufficiently justify
this remark, in the opinion of those who allow anything to the influence
of climate.

[164] Now Swabia. When the Marcommanni, towards the end of the reign
of Augustus, quitting their settlements near the Rhine, migrated to
Bohemia, the lands they left vacant were occupied by some unsettled
Gauls among the Rauraci and Sequani. They seem to have been called
Decumates (Decimated), because the inhabitants, liable to the incursions
of the Germans, paid a tithe of their products to be received under
the protection of the Romans. Adrian defended them by a rampart, which
extended from Neustadt, a town on the Danube near the mouth of the river
Altmühl, to the Neckar near Wimpfen; a space of sixty French leagues.

[165] Of Upper Germany.

[166] The Catti possessed a large territory between the Rhine, Mayne and
Sala, and the Hartz forest on this side of the Weser; where are now
the countries of Hesse, Thuringia, part of Paderborn, of Fulda, and
of Franconia. Learned writers have frequently noted, that what Caesar,
Florus and Ptolemy have said of the Suevi, is to be understood of the
Catti. Leibnitz supposes the Catti were so called from the active
animal which they resemble in name, the German for cat being _Catte_, or
_Hessen_.

[167] Pliny, who was well acquainted with Germany, gives a very striking
description of the Hercynian forest:--"The vast trees of the Hercynian
forest, untouched for ages, and as old as the world, by their almost
immortal destiny exceed common wonders. Not to mention circumstances
which would not be credited, it is certain that hills are raised by the
repercussion of their meeting roots; and where the earth does not follow
them, arches are formed as high as the branches, which, struggling, as
it were, with each other, are bent into the form of open gates, so wide,
that troops of horse may ride under them."--xvi. 2.

[168] _Duriora corpora_. "Hardier frames;" _i.e._ than the rest of
the Germans. At Hist. ii 32. the Germans, in general, are said to have
_fluxa corpora_; while in c. 4 of this treatise they are described as
_tantùm ad impetum valida_.

[169] Floras, ii. 18, well expresses this thought by the sentence "Tanti
exercitus, quanti imperator." "An army is worth so much as its general
is."

[170] Thus Civilis is said by our author (Hist. iv. 61), to have let his
hair and beard grow in consequence of a private vow. Thus too, in Paul
Warnefrid's "History of the Lombards," iii. 7, it is related, that "six
thousand Saxons who survived the war, vowed that they would never cut
their hair, nor shave their beards, till they had been revenged of their
enemies, the Suevi." A later instance of this custom is mentioned by
Strada (Bell. Belg. vii. p. 344), of William Lume, one of the Counts
of Mark, "who bound himself by a vow not to cut his hair till he had
revenged the deaths of Egmont and Horn."

[171] The iron ring seems to have been a badge of slavery. This custom
was revived in later times, but rather with a gallant than a military
intention. Thus, in the year 1414, John duke of Bourbon, in order to
ingratiate himself with his mistress, vowed, together with sixteen
knights and gentlemen, that they would wear, he and the knights a gold
ring, the gentlemen a silver one, round their left legs, every Sunday
for two years, till they had met with an equal number of knights and
gentlemen to contend with them in a tournament. (Vertot, Mém. de l'Acad.
des Inscr. tom. ii. p. 596.)

[172] It was this nation of Catti, which, about 150 years afterwards,
uniting with the remains of the Cherusci on this side the Weser, the
Attuarii, Sicambri, Chamavi, Bructeri, and Chauci, entered into the
Francic league, and, conquering the Romans, seized upon Gaul. From them
are derived the name, manners, and laws of the French.

[173] These two tribes, united by a community of wars and misfortunes,
had formerly been driven from the settlements on the Rhine a little
below Mentz. They then, according to Caesar (Bell. Gall. iv. 1, _et
seq._), occupied the territories of the Menapii on both sides the Rhine.
Still proving unfortunate, they obtained the lands of the Sicambri,
who, in the reign of Augustus, were removed on this side the Rhine by
Tiberius: these were the present counties of Berg, Mark, Lippe, and
Waldeck; and the bishopric of Paderborn.

[174] Their settlements were between the rivers Rhine, Lippe (Luppia),
and Ems (Amisia), and the province of Friesland; now the countries of
Westphalia and Over-Issel. Alting (Notit. German. Infer, p. 20) supposes
they derived their name from _Broeken_, or _Bruchen_, marshes, on
account of their frequency in that tract of country.

[175] Before this migration, the Chamavi were settled on the Ems,
where at present are Lingen and Osnaburg; the Angrivarii, on the Weser
(Visurgis), where are Minden and Schawenburg. A more ancient migration
of the Chamavi to the banks of the Rhine is cursorily mentioned
by Tacitus, Annal. xiii. 55. The Angrivarii were afterwards called
Angrarii, and became part of the Saxon nation.

[176] They were not so entirely extirpated that no relics of them
remained. They were even a conspicuous part of the Francic league, as
before related. Claudian also, in his panegyric on the fourth consulate
of Honorius, v. 450, mentions them.

            Venit accola sylvae
  Bructerus Hercyniae.

  "The Bructerian, borderer on the Hercynian forest, came."

After their expulsion, they settled, according to Eccard, between
Cologne and Hesse.

[177] The Bructeri were under regal government, and maintained many wars
against the Romans. Hence their arrogance and power. Before they were
destroyed by their countrymen, Vestricius Spurinna terrified them into
submission without an action, and had on that account a triumphal statue
decreed him. Pliny the younger mentions this fact, book ii. epist. 7.

[178] An allusion to gladiatorial spectacles. This slaughter happened
near the canal of Drusus, where the Roman guard on the Rhine could be
spectators of the battle. The account of it came to Rome in the first
year of Trajan.

[179] As this treatise was written in the reign of Trajan, when the
affairs of the Romans appeared unusually prosperous, some critics have
imagined that Tacitus wrote _vigentibus_, "flourishing," instead of
_urgentibus_, "urgent." But it is sufficiently evident, from other
passages, that the causes which were operating gradually, but surely, to
the destruction of the Roman empire, did not escape the penetration of
Tacitus, even when disguised by the most flattering appearances. The
common reading is therefore, probably, right.--_Aikin_.

[180] These people first resided near the head of the Lippe; and then
removed to the settlements of the Chamavi and Angrivarii, who had
expelled the Bructeri. They appear to have been the same with those whom
Velleius Paterculus, ii. 105, calls the Attuarii, and by that name they
entered into the Francic league. Strabo calls them Chattuarii.

[181] Namely, the Ansibarii and Tubantes. The Ansibarii or Amsibarii are
thought by Alting to have derived their name from their neighborhood to
the river Ems (Amisia); and the. Tubantes, from their frequent change of
habitation, to have been called _Tho Benten_. or the wandering troops,
and to have dwelt where now is Drente in Over-Issel. Among these
nations, Furstenburg (Monum. Paderborn.) enumerates the Ambrones,
borderers upon the river Ambrus, now Emmeren.

[182] The Frieslanders. The lesser Frisii were settled on this side, the
greater, on the other, of the Flevum (Zuyderzee).

[183] In the time of the Romans this country was covered by vast meres,
or lakes; which were made still larger by frequent inundations of the
sea. Of these, one so late as 1530 overwhelmed seventy-two villages; and
another, still more terrible, in 1569, laid under water great part
of the sea-coast of Holland, and almost all Friesland, in which alone
20,000 persons were drowned.

[184] Wherever the land seemed to terminate, and it appeared impossible
to proceed further, maritime nations have feigned pillars of Hercules.
Those celebrated by the Frisians must have been at the extremity of
Friesland, and not in Sweden and the Cimmerian promontory, as Rudbeck
supposes.

[185] Drusus, the brother of Tiberius, and father of Germanicus, imposed
a tribute on the Frisians, as mentioned in the Annals, iv. 72, and
performed other eminent services in Germany; himself styled Germanicus.

[186] The Chauci extended along the seacoast from the Ems to the Elbe
(Albis); whence they bordered on all the fore-mentioned nations, between
which and the Cherusci they came round to the Catti. The Chauci were
distinguished into Greater and Lesser. The Greater, according to
Ptolemy, inhabited the country between the Weser and the Elbe; the
Lesser, that between the Weser and Ems; but Tacitus (Annals xi. 19)
seems to reverse this order. Alting supposes the Chauci had their name
from _Kauken_, signifying persons eminent for valor and fidelity, which
agrees with the character Tacitus gives them. Others derive it from
_Kauk_, an owl, with a reference to the enmity of that animal to cats
(_Catti_). Others, from _Kaiten_, daws, of which there are great numbers
on their coast. Pliny has admirably described the country and manners of
the maritime Chauci, in his account of people who live without any trees
or fruit-bearing vegetables:--"In the North are the nations of Chauci,
who are divided into Greater and Lesser. Here, the ocean, having a
prodigious flux and reflux twice in the space of every day and night,
rolls over an immense tract, leaving it a matter of perpetual doubt
whether it is part of the land or sea. In this spot, the wretched
natives, occupying either the tops of hills, or artificial mounds
of turf, raised out of reach of the highest tides, build their small
cottages; which appear like sailing vessels when the water covers the
circumjacent ground, and like wrecks when it has retired. Here from
their huts they pursue the fish, continually flying from them with the
waves. They do not, like their neighbors, possess cattle, and feed on
milk; nor have they a warfare to maintain against wild beasts, for every
fruit of the earth is far removed from them. With flags and seaweed they
twist cordage for their fishing-nets. For fuel they use a kind of mud,
taken up by hand, and dried, rather in the wind than the sun: with this
earth they heat their food, and warm their bodies, stiffened by the
rigorous north. Their only drink is rain-water collected in ditches at
the thresholds of their doors. Yet this miserable people, if conquered
to-day by the Roman arms, would call themselves slaves. Thus it is that
fortune spares many to their own punishment."--Hist. Nat. xvi. 1.

[187] On this account, fortified posts were established by the Romans
to restrain the Chauci; who by Lucan are called Cayci in the following
passage:

  Et vos crinigeros bellis arcere Caycos
  Oppositi.--Phars. i. 463.

  "You, too, tow'rds Rome advance, ye warlike band,
  That wont the shaggy Cauci to withstand."--ROWE

[188] The Cherusci, at that time, dwelt between the Weser and the Elbe,
where now are Luneburg, Brunswick, and part of the Marche of Brandenburg
on this side the Elbe. In the reign of Augustus they occupied a more
extensive tract; reaching even this side the Weser, as appears from
the accounts of the expedition of Drusus given by Dio and Velleius
Paterculus: unless, as Dithmar observes, what is said of the Cherusci
on this side the Weser relates to the Dulgibini, their dependents. For,
according to Strabo, Varus was cut off by the Cherusci, and the people
subject to them. The brave actions of Arminius, the celebrated chief
of the Cherusci, are related by Tacitus in the 1st and 2d books of his
Annals.

[189] Cluver, and several others, suppose the Fosi to have been the same
with the ancient Saxons: but, since they bordered on the Cherusci, the
opinion of Leibnitz is nearer the truth, that they inhabited the banks
of the river Fusa, which enters the Aller (Allera) at Cellae; and were
a sort of appendage to the Cherusci, as Hildesheim now is to Brunswick.
The name of Saxons is later than Tacitus, and was not known till the
reign of Antoninus Pius, at which period they poured forth from the
Cimbric Chersonesus, and afterwards, in conjunction with the Angles,
seized upon Britain.

[191] The name of this people still exists; and the country they
inhabited is called the Cimbric Chersonesus, or Peninsula; comprehending
Jutland, Sleswig, and Holstein. The renown and various fortune of
the Cimbri is briefly, but accurately, related by Mallet in the
"Introduction" to the "History of Denmark."

[192] Though at this time they were greatly reduced by migrations,
inundations and wars, they afterwards revived; and from this storehouse
of nations came forth the Franks, Saxons, Normans, and various other
tribes, which brought all Europe under Germanic sway.

[193] Their fame spread through Germany, Gaul, Spain, Britain, Italy,
and as far as the Sea of Azoph (Palus Maeotis), whither, according
to Posidonius, they penetrated, and called the Cimmerian or Cimbrian
Bosphorus after their own name.

[194] This is usually, and probably rightly, explained as relating to
both shores of the Cimbric Chersonesus. Cluver and Dithmar, however,
suppose that these encampments are to be sought for either in Italy,
upon the river Athesis (Adige), or in Narbonnensian Gaul near Aquae
Sextiae (Aix in Provence), where Florus (iii. 3) mentions that the
Teutoni defeated by Marius took post in a valley with a river running
through it. Of the prodigious numbers of the Cimbri who made this
terrible irruption we have an account in Plutarch, who relates that
their fighting men were 300,000, with a much greater number of women and
children. (Plut. Marius, p. 411.)

[195] Nerva was consul the fourth time, and Trajan the second, in the
85lst year of Rome; in which Tacitus composed this treatise.

[196] After the defeat of P. Decidius Saxa, lieutenant of Syria, by the
Parthians, and the seizure of Syria by Pacorus, son of king Orodes, P.
Ventidius Bassus was sent there, and vanquished the Parthians, killed
Pacorus, and entirely restored the Roman affairs.

[197] The Epitome of Livy informs us, that "in the year of Rome 640, the
Cimbri, a wandering tribe, made a predatory incursion into Illyricum,
where they routed the consul Papirius Carbo with his army." According
to Strabo, it was at Noreia, a town of the Taurisci, near Aquileia, that
Carbo was defeated. In the succeeding years, the Cimbri and Teutonia
ravaged Gaul, and brought great calamities on that country; but at
length, deterred by the unshaken bravery of the Gauls, they turned
another way; as appears from Caesar, Bell. Gal. vii. 17. They then
came into Italy, and sent ambassadors to the Senate, demanding lands to
settle on. This was refused; and the consul M. Junius Silanus fought
an unsuccessful battle with them, in the year of Rome 645. (Epitome of
Livy, lxv.)

[198] "L. Cassius the consul, in the year of Rome 647, was cut off with
his army in the confines of the Allobroges, by the Tigurine Gauls,
a canton of the Helvetians (now the cantons of Zurich, Appenzell,
Schaffhausen, &c.), who had migrated from their settlements. The
soldiers who survived the slaughter gave hostages for the payment of
half they were worth, to be dismissed with safety." (Ibid.) Caesar
further relates that the Roman army was passed under the yoke by the
Tigurini:--"This single canton, migrating from home, within the memory
of our fathers, slew the consul L. Cassius, and passed his army under
the yoke."--Bell. Gall. i. 12.

[199] M. Aurelius Scaurus, the consul's lieutenant (or rather consul,
as he appears to have served that office in the year of Rome 646), was
defeated and taken by the Cimbri; and when, being asked his advice,
he dissuaded them from passing the Alps into Italy, assuring them the
Romans were invincible, he was slain by a furious youth, named Boiorix.
(Epit. Livy, lxvii.)

[200] Florus, in like manner, considers these two affairs
separately:--"Neither could Silanus sustain the first onset of the
barbarians; nor Manlius, the second; nor Caepio, the third." (iii. 3.)
Livy joins them together:--"By the same enemy (the Cimbri) Cn. Manlius
the consul, and Q. Servilius Caepio the proconsul, were defeated in an
engagement, and both dispossessed of their camps." (Epit. lxvii.) Paulus
Orosius relates the affair more particularly:--"Manlius the consul, and
Q. Caepio, proconsul, being sent against the Cimbri, Teutones,
Tigurini, and Ambronae, Gaulish and German nations, who had conspired to
extinguish the Roman empire, divided their respective provinces by the
river Rhone. Here, the most violent dissensions prevailing between them,
they were both overcome, to the great disgrace and danger of the Roman
name. According to Antias, 80,000 Romans and allies were slaughtered.
Caepio, by whose rashness this misfortune was occasioned, was condemned,
and his property confiscated by order of the Roman people." (Lib. v.
16.) This happened in the year of Rome 649; and the anniversary was
reckoned among the unlucky days.

[201] The Republic; in opposition to Rome when governed by emperors.

[202] This tragical catastrophe so deeply affected Augustus, that, as
Seutonius informs us, "he was said to have let his beard and hair grow
for several months; during which he at times struck his head against the
doors, crying out, 'Varus, restore my legions!' and ever after kept
the anniversary as a day of mourning." (Aug. s. 23.) The finest history
piece, perhaps, ever drawn by a writer, is Tacitus's description of the
army of Germanicus visiting the field of battle, six years after,
and performing funeral obsequies to the scattered remains of their
slaughtered countrymen. (Annals, i. 61.)

[203] "After so many misfortunes, the Roman people thought no general
so capable of repelling such formidable enemies, as Marius." Nor was the
public opinion falsified. In his fourth consulate, in the year of Rome
652. "Marius engaged the Teutoni beyond the Alps near Aquae Sextiae (Aix
in Province), killing, on the day of battle and the following day, above
150,000 of the enemy, and entirely cutting off the Teutonic nation."
(Velleus Paterculus, ii. 12.) Livy says there were 200,000 slain, and
90,000 taken prisoners. The succeeding year he defeated the Cimbri, who
had penetrated into Italy and crossed the Adige, in the Raudian plain,
where now is Rubio, killing and taking prisoners upwards of 100,000 men.
That he did not, however, obtain an unbought victory over this warlike
people, may be conjectured from the resistance he met with even from
their women. We are told by Florus (iii. 3) that "he was obliged to
sustain an engagement with their wives, as well as themselves; who,
entrenching themselves on all sides with wagons and cars, fought from
them, as from towers, with lances and poles. Their death was no less
glorious than their resistance. For, when they could not obtain from
Marius what they requested by an embassy, their liberty, and admission
into the vestal priesthood (which, indeed, could not lawfully be
granted); after strangling their infants, they either fell by mutual
wounds, or hung themselves on trees or the poles of their carriages in
ropes made of their own hair. King Boiorix was slain, not unrevenged,
fighting bravely in the field." On account of these great victories,
Marius, in the year of Borne 652, triumphed over the Teutoni, Ambroni,
and Cimbri.

[204] In the 596th year of Rome, Julius Caesar defeated Ariovistus, a
German king, near Dampierre in the Franche-Comte, and pursued his routed
troops with great slaughter thirty miles towards the Rhine, filling all
that space with spoils and dead bodies. (Bell. Gall. i. 33 and 52.)
He had before chastised the Tigurini, who, as already mentioned, had
defeated and killed L. Cassius. Drusus: This was the son of Livia, and
brother of the emperor Tiberius. He was in Germany B.C. 12, 11. His loss
was principally from shipwreck on the coast of the Chauci. See Lynam's
Roman Emperors, i. 37, 45, Nero; _i.e._ Tiberius, afterwards emperor.
His name was Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero. See Lynam's Roman Emperors,
i. 51, 53, 62, 78. Germanicus: He was the son of Drusus, and so nephew
of Tiberius. His victories in Germany took place A.D. 14-16. He too,
like his father, was shipwrecked, and nearly at the same spot. See
Lynam's Roman Emperors, i. 103-118.

[205] In the war of Civilis, related by Tacitus, Hist. iv. and v.

[206] By Domitian, as is more particularly mentioned in the Life of
Agricola.

[207] The Suevi possessed that extensive tract of country lying between
the Elbe, the Vistula, the Baltic Sea, and the Danube. They formerly had
spread still further, reaching even to the Rhine. Hence Strabo, Caesar,
Florus, and others, have referred to the Suevi what related to the
Catti.

[208] Among the Suevi, and also the rest of the Germans, the slaves,
seem to have been shaven; or at least cropped so short that they could
not twist or tie up their hair in a knot.

[209] The Semnones inhabited both banks of the Viadrus (Oder); the
country which is now part of Pomerania, of the Marche of Brandenburg,
and of Lusatia.

[210] In the reign of Augustus, the Langobardi dwelt on this side the
Elbe, between Luneburg and Magdeburg. When conquered and driven beyond
the Elbe by Tiberius, they occupied that part of the country where are
now Prignitz, Ruppin, and part of the Middle Marche. They afterwards
founded the Lombard kingdom in Italy; which, in the year of Christ
774, was destroyed by Charlemagne, who took their king Desiderius, and
subdued all Italy. The laws of the Langobardi are still extant, and may
be met with in Lindenbrog. The Burgundians are not mentioned by Tacitus,
probably because they were then an inconsiderable people. Afterwards,
joining with the Langobardi, they settled on the Decuman lands and the
Roman boundary. They from thence made an irruption into Gaul, and seized
that country which is still named from them Burgundy. Their laws are
likewise extant.

[211] From Tacitus's description, the Reudigni must have dwelt in part
of the present duchy of Mecklenburg, and of Lauenburg. They had formerly
been settled on this side the Elbe, on the sands of Luneburg.

[212] Perhaps the same people with those called by Mamertinus, in
his Panegyric on Maximian, the Chaibones. From their vicinity to the
fore-mentioned nations, they must have inhabited part of the duchy of
Mecklenburg. They had formerly dwelt on this side the Elbe, on the banks
of the river Ilmenavia in Luneburg; which is now called Ava; whence,
probably, the name of the people.

[213] Inhabitants of what is now part of Holstein and Sleswig; in which
tract is still a district called Angeln, between Flensborg and Sleswig.
In the fifth century, the Angles, in conjunction with the Saxons,
migrated into Britain, and perpetuated their name by giving appellation
to England.

[214] From the enumeration of Tacitus, and the situation of the other
tribes, it appears that the Eudoses must have occupied the modern Wismar
and Rostock; the Suardones, Stralsund, Swedish Pomerania, and part
of the Hither Pomerania, and of the Uckerane Marche. Eccard, however,
supposes these nations were much more widely extended; and that
the Eudoses dwelt upon the Oder; the Suardones, upon the Warte; the
Nuithones, upon the Netze.

[215] The ancient name of the goddess Herth still subsists in the German
_Erde_, and in the English _Earth_.

[216] Many suppose this island to have been the isle of Rugen in the
Baltic sea. It is more probable, however, that it was an island near
the mouth of the Elbe, now called the isle of Helgeland, or Heiligeland
(Holy Island). Besides the proof arising from the name, the situation
agrees better with that of the nations before enumerated.

[217] Olaus Rudbeck contends that this festival was celebrated in
winter, and still continues in Scandinavia under the appellation of
Julifred, the peace of Juul. (Yule is the term used for Christmas season
in the old English and Scottish dialects.) But this feast was solemnized
not in honor of the Earth, but of the Sun, called by them Thor or
Taranium. The festival of Herth was held later, in the month of
February; as may be seen in Mallet's "Introduction to the History of
Denmark."

[218] _Templo_ here means merely "the consecrated place," _i.e._ the
grove before mentioned, for according to c.9 the Germans built no
temples.

[219] It is supposed that this people, on account of their valor, were
called Heermanner; corrupted by the Romans into Hermunduri. They were
first settled between the Elbe, the Sala, and Bohemia; where now
are Anhalt, Voightland, Saxony, part of Misnia, and of Franconia.
Afterwards, when the Marcomanni took possession of Bohemia, from which
the Boii had been expelled by Maroboduus, the Hermunduri added their
settlements to their own, and planted in them the Suevian name, whence
is derived the modern appellation of that country, Suabia.

[220] They were so at that time; but afterwards joined with the
Marcomanni and other Germans against the Romans in the time of Marcus
Aurelius, who overcame them.

[221] Augusta Vindelicorum, now Augsburg; a famous Roman colony in the
province of Rhaetia, of which Vindelica was then a part.

[222] Tacitus is greatly mistaken if he confounds the source of the
Egra, which is in the country of the Hermuduri, with that of the Elbe,
which rises in Bohemia. The Elbe had been formerly, as Tacitus observes,
well known to the Romans by the victories of Drusus, Tiberius, and
Domitius; but afterwards, when the increasing power of the Germans kept
the Roman arms at a distance, it was only indistinctly heard of. Hence
its source was probably inaccurately laid down in the Roman geographical
tables. Perhaps, however, the Hermunduri, when they had served in the
army of Maroboduus, received lands in that part of Bohemia in which
the Elbe rises; in which case there would be no mistake in Tacitus's
account.

[223] Inhabitants of that part of Bavaria which lies between Bohemia and
the Danube.

[224] Inhabitants of Bohemia.

[225] Inhabitants of Moravia, and the part of Austria between it and
the Danube. Of this people, Ammianus Marcellinus, in his account of the
reign of Valentinian and Valens, thus speaks:--"A sudden commotion arose
among the Quadi; a nation at present of little consequence, but
which was formerly extremely warlike and potent, as their exploits
sufficiently evince."--xxix. 15.

[226] Their expulsion of the Boii, who had given name to Bohemia, has
been already mentioned. Before this period, the Marcomanni dwelt near
the sources of the Danube, where now is the duchy of Wirtemburg; and, as
Dithmar supposes, on account of their inhabiting the borders of Germany,
were called Marcmanner, from _Marc_ (the same with the old English
_March_) a border, or boundary.

[227] These people justified their military reputation by the dangerous
war which, in conjunction with the Marcomanni, they excited against the
Romans, in the reign of Marcus Aurelius.

[228] Of this prince, and his alliance with the Romans against Arminius,
mention is made by Tacitus, Annals, ii.

[229] Thus Vannius was made king of the Quadi by Tiberius. (See Annals,
ii. 63.) At a later period, Antoninus Pius (as appears from a medal
preserved in Spanheim) gave them Furtius for their king. And when they
had expelled him, and set Ariogaesus on the throne, Marcus Aurelius, to
whom he was obnoxious, refused to confirm the election. (Dio, lxxi.)

[230] These people inhabited what is now Galatz, Jagerndorf, and part of
Silesia.

[231] Inhabitants of part of Silesia, and of Hungary.

[232] Inhabitants of part of Hungary to the Danube.

[233] These were settled about the Carpathian mountains, and the sources
of the Vistula.

[234] It is probable that the Suevi were distinguished from the rest
of the Germans by a peculiar dialect, as well as by their dress and
manners.

[235] Ptolemy mentions iron mines in or near the country of the Quadi.
I should imagine that the expression "additional disgrace" (or, more
literally, "which might make them more ashamed") does not refer merely
to the slavery of working in mines, but to the circumstance of their
digging up iron, the substance by means of which they might acquire
freedom and independence. This is quite in the manner of Tacitus. The
word _iron_ was figuratively used by the ancients to signify military
force in general. Thus Solon, in his well-known answer to Croesus,
observed to him, that the nation which possessed more iron would be
master of all his gold.--_Aikin_.

[236] The mountains between Moravia, Hungary, Silesia, and Bohemia.

[237] The Lygii inhabited what is now part of Silesia, of the New
Marche, of Prussia and Poland on this side the Vistula.

[238] These tribes were settled between the Oder and Vistula, where
now are part of Silesia, of Brandenburg, and of Poland. The Elysii are
supposed to have given name to Silesia.

[239] The Greeks and Romans, under the name of the Dioscuri, or Castor
and Pollux, worshipped those meteorous exhalations which, during a
storm, appear on the masts of ships, and are supposed to denote an
approaching calm. A kind of religious veneration is still paid to this
phenomenon by the Roman Catholics, under the appellation of the fire
of St. Elmo. The Naharvali seem to have affixed the same character of
divinity on the _ignis fatuus_; and the name Alcis is probably the same
with that of Alff or Alp, which the northern nations still apply to the
fancied Genii of the mountains. The Sarmatian deities Lebus and Polebus,
the memory of whom still subsists in the Polish festivals, had, perhaps,
the same origin.

[240] No custom has been more universal among uncivilized people than
painting the body, either for the purpose of ornament, or that of
inspiring terror.

[241] Inhabitants of what is now Further Pomerania, the New Marche and
the Western part of Poland, between the Oder and Vistula. They were a
different people from the Goths, though, perhaps, in alliance with them.

[242] These people were settled on the shore of the Baltic, where
now are Colburg, Cassubia, and Further Pomerania. Their name is still
preserved in the town of Rugenwald and Isle of Rugen.

[243] These were also settlers on the Baltic, about the modern Stolpe,
Dantzig, and Lauenburg. The Heruli appear afterwards to have occupied
the settlements of the Lemovii. Of these last no further mention occurs;
but the Heruli made themselves famous throughout Europe and Asia, and
were the first of the Germans who founded a kingdom in Italy under
Odoacer.

[244] The Suiones inhabited Sweden, and the Danish isles of Funen,
Langlaud, Zeeland, Laland, &c. From them and the Cimbri were derived
the Normans, who, after spreading terror through various parts of the
empire, at last seized upon the fertile province of Normandy in France.
The names of Goths, Visigoths, and Ostrogoths, became still more famous,
they being the nations who accomplished the ruin of the Roman empire.
The laws of the Visigoths are still extant; but they depart much from
the usual simplicity of the German laws.

[245] The Romans, who had but an imperfect knowledge of this part of
the world, imagined here those "vast insular tracts" mentioned in the
beginning of this treatise. Hence Pliny, also, says of the Baltic sea
(Codanus sinus), that "it is filled with islands, the most famous
of which, Scandinavia (now Sweden and Norway), is of an undiscovered
magnitude; that part of it only being known which is occupied by the
Hilleviones, a nation inhabiting five hundred cantons; who call this
country another globe." (Lib. iv. 13.) The memory of the Hilleviones is
still preserved in the part of Sweden named Halland.

[246] Their naval power continued so great, that they had the glory
of framing the nautical code, the laws of which were first written at
Wisby, the capital of the isle of Gothland, in the eleventh century.

[247] This is exactly the form of the Indian canoes, which, however, are
generally worked with sails as well as oars.

[248] The great opulence of a temple of the Suiones, as described by
Adam of Bremen (Eccl. Hist. ch. 233), is a proof of the wealth that
at all times has attended naval dominion. "This nation," says he,
"possesses a temple of great renown, called Ubsola (now Upsal), not far
from the cities Sictona and Birca (now Sigtuna and Bioerkoe). In this
temple, which is entirely ornamented with gold, the people worship the
statues of three gods; the most powerful of whom, Thor, is seated on a
couch in the middle; with Woden on one side, and Fricca on the other."
From the ruins of the towns Sictona and Birca arose the present capital
of Sweden, Stockholm.

[249] Hence Spener (Notit. German. Antiq.) rightly concludes that the
crown was hereditary, and not elective, among the Suiones.

[250] It is uncertain whether what is now called the Frozen Ocean is
here meant, or the northern extremities of the Baltic Sea, the Gulfs
of Bothnia and Finland, which are so frozen every winter as to be
unnavigable.

[251] The true principles of astronomy have now taught us the reason
why, at a certain latitude, the sun, at the summer solstice, appears
never to set: and at a lower latitude, the evening twilight continues
till morning.

[252] The true reading here is, probably, "immerging;" since it was a
common notion at that period, that the descent of the sun into the ocean
was attended with a kind of hissing noise, like red hot iron dipped into
water. Thus Juvenal, Sat. xiv, 280:--

  Audiet Herculeo stridentem gurgite solem.
  "Hear the sun hiss in the Herculean gulf."

[253] Instead of formas deorum, "forms of deities," some, with more
probability, read equorum, "of the horses," which are feigned to draw
the chariot of the sun.

[254] Thus Quintus Curtius, speaking of the Indian Ocean, says, "Nature
itself can proceed no further."

[255] The Baltic Sea.

[256] Now, the kingdom of Prussia, the duchies of Samogitia and
Courland, the palatinates of Livonia and Esthonia, in the name of which
last the ancient appellation of these people is preserved.

[257] Because the inhabitants of this extreme part of Germany retained
the Scythico-Celtic language, which long prevailed in Britain.

[258] A deity of Scythian origin, called Frea or Fricca. See Mallet's
Introduct. to Hist. of Denmark.

[259] Many vestiges of this superstition remain to this day in Sweden.
The peasants, in the month of February, the season formerly sacred to
Frea, make little images of boars in paste, which they apply to various
superstitious uses. (See Eccard.) A figure of a Mater Deum, with the
boar, is given by Mr. Pennant, in his Tour in Scotland, 1769, p.
268, engraven from a stone found at the great station at Netherby in
Cumberland.

[260] The cause of this was, probably, their confined situation, which
did not permit them to wander in hunting and plundering parties, like
the rest of the Germans.

[261] This name was transferred to _glass_ when it came into use. Pliny
speaks of the production of amber in this country as follows:--"It is
certain that amber is produced in the islands of the Northern Ocean, and
is called by the Germans _gless_. One of these islands, by the natives
named Austravia, was on this account called Glessaria by our sailors in
the fleet of Germanicus."--Lib. xxxvii. 3.

[262] Much of the Prussian amber is even at present collected on the
shores of the Baltic. Much also is found washed out of the clayey cliffs
of Holderness. See Tour in Scotland, 1769, p. 16.

[263] Insomuch that the Guttones, who formerly inhabited this coast,
made use of amber as fuel, and sold it for that purpose to the
neighboring Teutones. (Plin. xxxvii. 2.)

[264] Various toys and utensils of amber, such as bracelets, necklaces,
rings, cups, and even pillars, were to be met with among the luxurious
Romans.

[265] In a work by Goeppert and Berendt, on "Amber and the Fossil
Remains of Plants contained in it," published at Berlin, 1845, a passage
is found (of which a translation is here given) which quite harmonizes
with the account of Tacitus:--"About the parts which are known by the
name of Samland an island emerged, or rather a group of islands, ...
which gradually increased in circumference, and, favored by a mild sea
climate, was overspread with vegetation and forest. This forest was the
means of amber being produced. Certain trees in it exuded gums in such
quantities that the sunken forest soil now appears to be filled with
it to such a degree, as if it had only been deprived of a very trifling
part of its contents by the later eruptions of the sea, and the
countless storms which have lashed the ocean for centuries." Hence,
though found underground, it appears to have been originally the
production of some resinous tree. Hence, too, the reason of the
appearance of insects, &c. in it, as mentioned by Tacitus.

[266] Norwegians.

[267] All beyond the Vistula was reckoned Sarmatia. These people,
therefore, were properly inhabitants of Sarmatia, though from their
manners they appeared of German origin.

[268] Pliny also reckons the Peucini among the German nations:--"The
fifth part of Germany is possessed by the Peucini and Bastarnae, who
border on the Dacians." (iv. 14.) From Strabo it appears that the
Peucini, part of the Bastarnae, inhabited the country about the mouths
of the Danube, and particularly the island Peuce, now Piczina, formed by
the river.

[269] The habitations of the Peucini were fixed; whereas the Sarmatians
wandered about in their wagons.

[270] "Sordes omnium ac torpor; procerum connubiis mixtis nonnihil in
Sarmatarum habitum foedantur." In many editions the semicolon is placed
not after _torpor_, but after _procerum_. The sense of the passage so
read is: "The chief men are lazy and stupid, besides being filthy, like
all the rest. Intermarriage with the Sarmatians have debased." &c.

[271] The Venedi extended beyond the Peucini and Bastarnae as far as the
Baltic Sea; where is the Sinus Venedicus, now the Gulf of Dantzig. Their
name is also preserved in Wenden, a part of Livonia. When the German
nations made their irruption into Italy, France and Spain, the Venedi,
also called Winedi, occupied their vacant settlements between the
Vistula and Elbe. Afterwards they crossed the Danube, and seized
Dalmatia, Illyricum, Istria, Carniola, and the Noric Alps. A part of
Carniola still retains the name of Windismarck, derived from them. This
people were also called Slavi; and their language, the Sclavonian, still
prevails through a vast tract of country.

[272] This is still the manner of living of the successors of the
Sarmatians, the Nogai Tartars.

[273] Their country is called by Pliny, Eningia, now Finland. Warnefrid
(De Gest. Langobard. i. 5) thus describes their savage and wretched
state:--"The Scritobini, or Scritofinni, are not without snow in the
midst of summer; and, being little superior in sagacity to the brutes,
live upon no other food than the raw flesh of wild animals, the hairy
skins of which they use for clothing. They derive their name, according
to the barbarian tongue, from leaping, because they hunt wild beasts by
a certain method of leaping or springing with pieces of wood bent in
the shape of a bow." Here is an evident description of the snow-shoes or
raquets in common use among the North American savages, as well as the
inhabitants of the most northern parts of Europe.

[274] As it is just after mentioned that their chief dependence is on
the game procured in hunting, this can only mean that the vegetable
food they use consists of wild herbs, in opposition to the cultivated
products of the earth.

[275] The Esquimaux and the South Sea islanders do the same thing to
this day.

[276] People of Lapland. The origin of this fable was probably the
manner of clothing in these cold regions, where the inhabitants bury
themselves in the thickest furs, scarcely leaving anything of the form
of a human creature.

[277] It is with true judgment that this excellent historian forbears to
intermix fabulous narrations with the very interesting and instructive
matter of this treatise. Such a mixture might have brought an
impeachment on the fidelity of the account in general; which,
notwithstanding the suspicions professed by some critics, contains
nothing but what is entirely consonant to truth and nature. Had Tacitus
indulged his invention in the description of German manners, is it
probable that he could have given so just a picture of the state of a
people under similar circumstances, the savage tribes of North America,
as we have seen them within the present century? Is it likely that his
relations would have been so admirably confirmed by the codes of law
still extant of the several German nations; such as the Salic, Ripuary,
Burgundian, English and Lombard? or that after the course of so many
centuries, and the numerous changes of empire, the customs, laws and
manners he describes should still be traced in all the various people
of German derivation? As long as the original constitution and
jurisprudence of our own and other European countries are studied, this
treatise will be regarded as one of the most precious and authentic
monuments of historical antiquity.


THE LIFE OF CNAEUS JULIUS AGRICOLA.

[1] Rutilius was consul B.C. 104; and for his upright life and great
strictness was banished B.C. 92. Tacitus is the only writer who says he
wrote his own life. Athenaeus mentions that he wrote a history of the
affairs of Rome in the Greek language. Scaurus was consul B.C. 114, and
again B.C. 106. He is the same Scaurus whom Sallust mentions as having
been bribed by Jugurtha. As the banishment of Rutilius took place on the
accusation of Scaurus, it is possible that, when the former wrote his
life, the latter also wrote his, in order to defend himself from charges
advanced against him.

[2] _Venia opus fuit_. This whole passage has greatly perplexed the
critics. The text is disputed, and it is not agreed why Tacitus asks
indulgence. Brotier, Dronke, and others, say he asks indulgence for the
inferiority of his style and manner _(incondita ac rudi voce_, c. 3), as
compared with the distinguished authors (_quisque celeberrimus_) of an
earlier and better age. But there would have been no less occasion to
apologize for that, if the times he wrote of had not been so hostile to
virtue. Hertel, La Bletterie, and many French critics, understand
that he apologizes for writing the memoir of his father-in-law so late
(_nunc_), when he was already dead (_defuncti_), instead of doing it,
as the great men of a former day did, while the subject of their memoirs
was yet alive; and he pleads, in justification of the delay, that he
could not have written it earlier without encountering the dangers of
that cruel age (the age of Domitian). This makes a very good sense.
The only objection against it is, that the language, _opus fuit_, seems
rather to imply that it was necessary to justify himself for writing
it at all, by citing the examples of former distinguished writers of
biography, as he had done in the foregoing introduction. But why would
it have been unnecessary to apologize for writing the life of Agricola,
if the times in which he lived had not been so unfriendly to virtue?
Because then Agricola would have had opportunity to achieve victories
and honors, which would have demanded narration, but for which the
jealousy and cruelty of Domitian now gave no scope. This is the
explanation of Roth; and he supports it by reference to the fact,
that the achievements of Agricola in the conquest of Britain, though
doubtless just as Tacitus has described them, yet occupy so small
a space in general history, that they are not even mentioned by any
ancient historian except Dio Cassius; and he mentions them chiefly out
of regard to the discovery made by Agricola, for the first time, that
Britain was an island (Vid. R. Exc. 1.) This explanation answers all the
demands of grammar and logic; but as a matter of taste and feeling, I
cannot receive it. Such an apology for the unworthiness of his subject
at the commencement of the biography, ill accords with the tone of
dignified confidence which pervades the memoir. The best commentary I
have seen on the passage is that of Walther; and it would not, perhaps,
be giving more space to so mooted a question than the scholar requires,
to extract it entire:--"_Venia_," he says, "is here nothing else than
what we, in the language of modesty, call an apology, and has respect
to the very justification he has just offered in the foregoing exordium.
For Tacitus there appeals to the usage, not of remote antiquity only,
but of later times also, to justify his design of writing the biography
of a distinguished man. There would have been no need of such an apology
in other times. In other times, dispensing with all preamble, he would
have begun, as in c. 4, 'Cnaeus Julius Agricola,' &c., assured that no
one would question the propriety of his course. But now, after a long
and servile silence, when one begins again 'facta moresque posteris
tradere,' when he utters the first word where speech and almost
memory (c. 2) had so long been lost, when he stands forth as the first
vindicator of condemned virtue, he seems to venture on something so new,
so strange, so bold, that it may well require apology." In commenting
upon _cursaturus--tempora_, Walther adds: "If there is any boldness in
the author's use of words here, that very fact suits the connection,
that by the complexion of his language even, he might paint the audacity
'cursandi tam saeva et infesta virtutibus tempora'--of running over (as
in a race, for such is Walther's interpretation of _cursandi_) times
so cruel and so hostile to virtue. Not that those times could excite
in Tacitus any real personal fear, for they were past, and he could now
think what he pleased, and speak what he thought (Hist. i. 1). Still
he shudders at the recollection of those cruelties; and he treads with
trembling footstep, as it were, even the path lately obstructed by them.
He looks about him to see whether, even now, he may safely utter his
voice, and he timidly asks pardon for venturing to break the reigning
silence."--_Tyler_.

[3] A passage in Dio excellently illustrates the fact here referred
to: "He (Domitian) put to death Rusticus Arulenus, because he studied
philosophy, and had given Thrasea the appellation of holy; and Herennius
Senecio, because, although he lived many years after serving the office
of quaestor, he solicited no other post, and because he had written
the Life of Helvidius Priscus." (lxvii. p. 765.) With less accuracy,
Suetonius, in his Life of Domitian (s. 10), says: "He put to death
Junius Rusticus, because he had published the panegyrics of Paetus
Thrasea and Helvidius Priscus, and had styled them most holy persons;
and on this occasion he expelled all the philosophers from the city,
and from. Italy." Arulenus Rusticus was a Stoic; on which account he was
contumeliously called by M. Regulus "the ape of the Stoics, marked with
the Vitellian scar." (Pliny, Epist. i. 5.) Thrasea, who killed Nero, is
particularly recorded in the Annals, book xvi.

[4] The expulsion of the philosophers, mentioned in the passage above
quoted from Suetonius.

[5] This truly happy period began when, after the death of Domitian,
and the recision of his acts, the imperial authority devolved on Nerva,
whose virtues were emulated by the successive emperors, Trajan, Hadrian,
and both the Antonines.

[6] _Securitas publica_, "the public security," was a current expression
and wish, and was frequently inscribed on medals.

[7] The term of Domitian's reign.

[8] It appears that at this time Tacitus proposed to write not only the
books of his History and Annals, which contain the "memorial of past
servitude," but an account of the "present blessings" exemplified in the
occurrences under Nerva and Trajan.

[9] There were two Roman colonies of this name; one in Umbria, supposed
to be the place now called Friuli; the other in Narbonnensian Gaul, the
modern name of which is Frejus. This last was probably the birth-place
of Agricola.

[10] Of the procurators who were sent to the provinces, some had the
charge of the public revenue; others, not only of that, but of the
private revenue of the emperor. These were the imperial procurators. All
the offices relative to the finances were in the possession of the Roman
knights; of whom the imperial procurators were accounted noble. Hence
the equestrian nobility of which Tacitus speaks. In some of the lesser
provinces, the procurators had the civil jurisdiction, as well at the
administration of the revenue. This was the case in Judaea.

[11] Seneca bears a very honorable testimony to this person, "If," says
he, "we have occasion for an example of a great mind, let us cite that
of Julius Graecinus, an excellent person, whom Caius Caesar put to death
on this account alone, that he was a better man than could be suffered
under a tyrant." (De Benef. ii. 21.) His books concerning Vineyards are
commended by Columella and Pliny.

[12] Caligula.

[13] Marcus Silanus was the father of Claudia, the first wife of Caius.
According to the historians of that period, Caius was jealous of him,
and took every opportunity of mortifying him. Tacitus (Hist. iv. 48)
mentions that the emperor deprived him of the military command of the
troops in Africa in an insulting manner. Dion (lix.) states, that when,
from his age and rank, Silanus was usually asked his opinion first in
the senate, the emperor found a pretext for preventing this respect;
being paid to MS worth. Suetonius (iv. 23) records that the emperor one
day put to sea in a hasty manner, and commanded Silanus to follow him.
This, from fear of illness, he declined to do; upon which the emperor,
alleging that he stayed on shore in order to get possession of the
city in case any accident befell himself, compelled him to cut his own
throat. It would seem, from the present passage of Tacitus, that there
were some legal forms taken in the case of Silanus, and that Julius
Graecinus was ordered to be the accuser; and that that noble-minded
man, refusing to take part in proceedings so cruel and iniquitous, was
himself put to death.

[14] Of the part the Roman matrons took in the education of youth,
Tacitus has given an elegant and interesting account, in his Dialogue
concerning Oratory, c. 28.

[15] Now Marseilles. This was a colony of the Phocaeans; whence it
derived that Grecian politeness for which it was long famous.

[16] It was usual for generals to admit young men of promising
characters to this honorable companionship, which resembled the office
of an aide-de-camp in the modern service. Thus, Suetonius informs us
that Caesar made his first campaign in Asia as tent-companion to Marcus
Thermus the praetor.

[17] This was the fate of the colony of veterans at Camalodunum, now
Colchester or Maldon. A particular account of this revolt is given in
the 14th book of the Annals.

[18] This alludes to the defeat of Petilius Cerialis, who came with the
ninth legion to succor the colony of Camalodunum. All the infantry were
slaughtered; and Petilius, with the cavalry alone, got away to the camp.
It was shortly after this, that Suetonius defeated Boadicea and her
forces.

[19] Those of Nero.

[20] The office of quaestor was the entrance to all public employments.
The quaestors and their secretaries were distributed by lot to the
several provinces, that there might be no previous connections between
them and the governors, but they might serve as checks upon each other.

[21] Brother of the emperor Otho.

[22] At the head of the praetors, the number of whom was different at
different periods of the empire, were the Praetor Urbanus, and Praetor
Peregrinus. The first administered justice among the citizens, the
second among strangers. The rest presided at public debates, and had the
charge of exhibiting the public games, which were celebrated with
great solemnity for seven successive days, and at a vast expense. This,
indeed, in the times of the emperors, was almost the sole business of
the praetors, whose dignity, as Tacitus expresses it, consisted in the
idle trappings of state; whence Boethius justly terms the praetorship
"an empty name, and a grievous burthen on the senatorian rank."

[23] Nero had plundered the temples for the supply of his extravagance
and debauchery. See Annals, xv. 45.

[24] This was the year of Rome 822; from the birth of Christ, 69.

[25] The cruelties and depredations committed on the coast of Italy by
this fleet are described in lively colors by Tacitus, Hist. ii. 12, 13.

[26] Now the county of Vintimiglia. The attack upon the municipal town
of this place, called Albium Intemelium, is particularly mentioned in
the passage above referred to.

[27] In the month of July of this year.

[28] The twentieth legion, surnamed the Victorious, was stationed in
Britain at Deva, the modern Chester, where many inscriptions and other
monuments of Roman antiquities have been discovered.

[29] Roscius Caelius. His disputes with the governor of Britain,
Trebellius Maximus, are related by Tacitus, Hist. i. 60.

[30] The governors of the province, and commanders in chief over all the
legions stationed in it.

[31] He had formerly been commander of the ninth legion.

[32] The province of Aquitania extended from the Pyrenean mountains to
the river Liger (Loire).

[33] The governors of the neighboring provinces.

[34] Agricola was consul in the year of Rome 830, A.D. 77, along with
Domitian. They succeeded, in the calends of July, the consuls Vespasian
and Titus, who began the year.

[35] He was admitted into the Pontifical College, at the head of which
was the Pontifex Maximus.

[36] Julius Caesar, Livy, Strabo, Fabius Rusticus, Pomponius Mela,
Pliny, &c.

[37] Thus Caesar: "One side of Britain inclines towards Spain, and the
setting sun; on which part Ireland is situated."--Bell. Gall. v. 13.

[38] These, as well as other resemblances suggested by ancient
geographers, have been mostly destroyed by the greater accuracy of
modern maps.

[39] This is so far true, that the northern extremity of Scotland is
much narrower than the southern coast of England.

[40] The Orkney Islands. These, although now first thoroughly known to
the Romans, had before been heard of, and mentioned by authors. Thus
Mela, in. 6: "There are thirty of the Orcades, separated from each other
by narrow straits." And Pliny, iv. 16: "The Orcades are forty in number,
at a small distance from each other." In the reign of Claudius, the
report concerning these islands was particularly current, and adulation
converted it into the news of a victory. Hence Hieronymus in his
Chronicon says, "Claudius triumphed over the Britons, and added the
Orcades to the Roman empire."

[41] Camden supposes the Shetland Islands to be meant here by Thule;
others imagine it to have been one of the Hebrides. Pliny, iv. 16,
mentions Thule as the most remote of all known islands; and, by placing
it but one day's sail from the Frozen Ocean, renders it probable that
Iceland was intended. Procopius (Bell. Goth, ii. 15) speaks of another
Thule, which must have been Norway, which many of the ancients thought
to be an island. Mr. Pennant supposes that the Thule here meant was
Foula, a very lofty isle, one of the most westerly of the Shetlands,
which might easily be descried by the fleet.

[42] As far as the meaning of this passage can be elucidated, it would
appear as if the first circumnavigators of Britain, to enhance the idea
of their dangers and hardships, had represented the Northern sea as
in such a thickened half solid state, that the oars could scarcely be
worked, or the water agitated by winds. Tacitus, however, rather chooses
to explain its stagnant condition from the want of winds, and the
difficulty of moving so great a body of waters. But the fact, taken
either way, is erroneous; as this sea is never observed frozen, and is
remarkably stormy and tempestuous.--_Aiken_.

[43] The great number of firths and inlets of the sea, which almost cut
through the northern parts of the island, as well as the height of the
tides on the coast, render this observation peculiarly proper.

[44] Caesar mentions that the interior inhabitants of Britain were
supposed to have originated in the island itself. (Bell. Gall. v. 12.)

[45] Caledonia, now Scotland, was at that time overspread by vast
forests. Thus Pliny, iv. 16, speaking of Britain, says, that "for thirty
years past the Roman arms had not extended the knowledge of the island
beyond the Caledonian forest."

[46] Inhabitants of what are now the counties of Glamorgan, Monmouth,
Brecknock, Hereford, and Radnor.

[47] The Iberi were a people of Spain, so called from their neighborhood
to the river Iberus, now Ebro.

[48] Of these, the inhabitants of Kent are honorably mentioned by
Caesar. "Of all these people, by far the most civilized are those
inhabiting the maritime country of Cantium, who differ little in their
manners from the Gauls."--Bell. Gall. v. 14.

[48] From the obliquity of the opposite coasts of England and France,
some part of the former runs further south than the northern extremity
of the latter.

[50] Particularly the mysterious and bloody solemnities of the Druids.

[51] The children were born and nursed in this ferocity. Thus Solinus,
c. 22, speaking of the warlike nation of Britons, says, "When a woman
is delivered of a male child, she lays its first food upon the husband's
sword, and with the point gently puts it within the little one's mouth,
praying to her country deities that his death may in like manner be in
the midst of arms."

[52] In the reign of Claudius.

[53] The practice of the Greeks in the Homeric age was the reverse of
this.

[54] Thus the kings Cunobelinus, Caractacus, and Prasutagus, and the
queens Cartismandua and Boadicea, are mentioned in different parts of
Tacitus.

[55] Caesar says of Britain, "the climate is more temperate than that of
Gaul, the cold being less severe." (Bell. Gall. v. 12.) This certainly
proceeds from its insular situation, and the moistness of its
atmosphere.

[56] Thus Pliny (ii. 75):--"The longest day in Italy is of fifteen
hours, in Britain of seventeen, where in summer the nights are light."

[57] Tacitus, through the medium of Agricola, must have got this report,
either from the men of Scandinavia, or from those of the Britons who had
passed into that country, or been informed to this effect by those who
had visited it. It is quite true, that in the further part of Norway,
and so also again in Iceland and the regions about the North Pole, there
is, at the summer solstice, an almost uninterrupted day for nearly two
months. Tacitus here seems to affirm this as universally the case, not
having heard that, at the winter solstice, there is a night of equal
duration.

[58] Tacitus, after having given the report of the Britons as he had
heard it, probably from Agricola, now goes on to state his own views
on the subject. He represents that, as the far north is level, there is
nothing, when the sun is in the distant horizon, to throw up a shadow
towards the sky: that the light, indeed, is intercepted from the surface
of the earth itself, and so there is darkness upon it; but that the sky
above is still clear and bright from its rays. And hence he supposes
that the brightness of the upper regions neutralizes the darkness on the
earth, forming a degree of light equivalent to the evening twilight or
the morning dawn, or, indeed, rendering it next to impossible to decide
when the evening closes and the morning begins. Compare the following
account, taken from a "Description of a Visit to Shetland," in vol.
viii. of Chambers' Miscellany:--"Being now in the 60th degree of north
latitude, daylight could scarcely be said to have left us during the
night, and at 2 o'clock in the morning, albeit the mist still hung about
us, we could see as clearly as we can do in London, at about any hour in
a November day."

[59] Mr. Pennant has a pleasing remark concerning the soil and climate
of our island, well agreeing with that of Tacitus:--"The climate of
Great Britain is above all others productive of the greatest variety and
abundance of wholesome vegetables, which, to crown our happiness, are
almost equally diffused through all its parts: this general fertility
is owing to those clouded skies, which foreigners mistakenly urge as a
reproach on our country: but let us cheerfully endure a temporary gloom,
which clothes not only our meadows, but our hills, with the richest
verdure."--Brit. Zool. 4to. i. 15.

[60] Strabo (iv. 138) testifies the same. Cicero, on the other hand,
asserts, that not a single grain of silver is found on this island. (Ep.
ad Attic, iv. 16.) If we have recourse to modern authorities, we
find Camden mentioning gold and silver mines in Cumberland, silver in
Flintshire, and gold in Scotland. Dr. Borlase (Hist. of Cornwall, p.
214) relates, that so late as the year 1753, several pieces of gold
were found in what the miners call stream tin; and silver is now got in
considerable quantity from several of our lead ores. A curious paper,
concerning the Gold Mines of Scotland, is given by Mr. Pennant in
Append. (No. x.) to his second part of a "Tour in Scotland in 1772," and
a much more general account of the mines and ores of Great Britain in
early times, in his "Tour in Wales of 1773," pp. 51-66.

[61] Camden mentions pearls being found in the counties of Caernarvon
and Cumberland, and in the British sea. Mr. Pennant, in his "Tour in
Scotland in 1769," takes notice of a considerable pearl fishery out of
the fresh-water mussel, in the vicinity of Perth, from whence 10,000_l._
worth of pearls were sent to London from 1761 to 1764. It was, however,
almost exhausted when he visited the country. See also the fourth volume
of Mr. Pennant's Br. Zool. (Class vi. No. 18), where he gives a much
more ample account of the British pearls. Origen, in his Comment. on
Matthew, pp. 210, 211, gives a description of the British pearl, which,
he says, was next in value to the Indian;--"Its surface is of a gold
color, but it is cloudy, and less transparent than the Indian." Pliny
speaks of the British unions as follows:--"It is certain that small and
discolored ones are produced in Britain; since the deified Julius has
given us to understand that the breastplate which he dedicated to Venus
Genitrix, and placed in her temple, was made of British pearls."--ix.
35.

[62] Caesar's two expeditions into Britain were in the years of Rome
699 and 700. He himself gives an account of them, and they are also
mentioned by Strabo and Dio.

[63] It was the wise policy of Augustus not to extend any further the
limits of the empire; and with regard to Britain, in particular, he
thought the conquest and preservation of it would be attended with more
expense than it could repay. (Strabo, ii. 79, and iv. 138.) Tiberius,
who always professed an entire deference for the maxims and injunctions
of Augustus, in this instance, probably, was convinced of their
propriety.

[64] Caligula.

[65] Claudius invaded Britain in the year of Rome 796, A.D. 43.

[66] In the parish of Dinder, near Hereford, are yet remaining the
vestiges of a Roman encampment, called Oyster-hill, as is supposed from
this Ostorius. Camden's Britain, by Gibson, p. 580.

[67] That of Camalodunum, now Colchester, or Maldon.

[68] The Mona of Tacitus is the Isle of Anglesey, that of Caesar is the
Isle of Man, called by Pliny Monapia.

[69] The avarice of Catus Decidianus the procurator is mentioned as the
cause by which the Britons were forced into this war, by Tacitus, Annal.
xiv. 32.

[70] Julius Classicianus, who succeeded Decidianus, was at variance with
the governor, but was no less oppressive to the province.

[71] By the slaughter of Varus.

[72] The Rhine and Danube.

[73] Boadicea, whose name is variously written Boudicea, Bonduca,
Voadicea, &c., was queen of the Iceni, or people of Suffolk, Norfolk,
Cambridgeshire, and Huntingdonshire. A particular account of this revolt
is given in the Annals, xiv. 31, and seq.

[74] Of Camalodunum.

[75] This was in A.D. 61. According to Tac. Hist. i. 6, Petronius
Turpilianus was put to death by Galba, A.D. 68.

[76] The date of his arrival is uncertain.

[77] He was sent to Britain by Vespasian, A.D. 69.

[78] The Brigantes inhabited Yorkshire, Lancashire, Westmoreland,
Cumberland, and Durham.

[79] The date of his arrival in Britain is uncertain. This Frontinus
is the author of the work on "Stratagems," and, at the time of his
appointment to the lieutenancy of Britain, he was _curator aquarum_ at
Rome. This, probably, it was that induced him to write his other work on
the aqueducts of Rome.

[80] This seems to relate to his having been curtailed in his military
operations by the parsimony of Vespasian, who refused him permission to
attack other people than the Silures. See c. 11.

[81] Where these people inhabited is mentioned in p. 355, note 5.

[82] This was in the year of Rome 831, of Christ 78.

[83] Inhabitants of North Wales, exclusive of the Isle of Anglesey.

[84] _I.e._ Some were for immediate action, others for delay. Instead
of _et quibus_, we read with Dr. Smith's edition (London, 1850), _ut
quibus_.

[85] _Vexilla_ is here used for _vexillarii_. "Under the Empire the name
of Vexillarii was given to a distinct body of soldiers supposed to have
been composed of veterans, who were released from the military oath and
regular service, but kept embodied under a separate flag (_vexillum_),
to render assistance to the army if required, guard the frontier,
and garrison recently conquered provinces; a certain number of these
supernumeraries being attached to each legion. (Tac. Hist. ii. 83, 100;
Ann. i. 36.)"--Rich, Comp. to Dict. and Lex. s. v. Vexillum.

[86] A pass into the vale of Clwyd, in the parish of Llanarmon, is still
called Bwlch Agrikle, probably from having been occupied by Agricola, in
his road to Mona.--_Mr. Pennant_.

[87] From this circumstance it would appear that these auxiliaries were
Batavians, whose skill in this practice is related by Tacitus, Hist. iv.
12.

[88] It was customary for the Roman generals to decorate with sprigs of
laurel the letters in which they sent home the news of any remarkable
success. Thus Pliny, xv. 30: "The laurel, the principal messenger of joy
and victory among the Romans, is affixed to letters, and to the spears
and javelins of the soldiers." The _laurus_ of the ancients was probably
the baytree, and not what we now call laurel.

[89] _Ascire_, al. _accire_, "To receive into regular service." The
reference is to the transfer of soldiers from the supernumeraries to
the legions. So Walch, followed by Dronke, Both, and Walther. The next
clause implies, that he took care to receive into the service none but
the best men (_optimum quemque_), who, he was confident, would prove
faithful (_fidelissimum_).

[90] In like manner Suetonius says of Julius Caesar, "He neither noticed
nor punished every crime; but while he strictly inquired into and
rigorously punished desertion and mutiny, he connived at other
delinquencies."--Life of Julius Caesar, s. 67.

[91] Many commentators propose reading "exaction," instead of
"augmentation." But the latter may be suffered to remain, especially as
Suetonius informs us that "Vespasian, not contented with renewing some
taxes remitted under Galba, added new and heavy ones: and augmented the
tributes paid by the provinces, even doubling some."--Life of Vesp. s.
19.

[92] In the year of Rome 832. A.D. 79.

[93] Many vestiges of these or other Roman camps yet remain in different
parts of Great Britain. Two principal ones, in the county of Annandale,
in Scotland, called Burnswork and Middleby, are described at large by
Gordon in his Itiner. Septentrion, pp. 16, 18.

[94] The year of Rome 833, A.D. 80.

[95] Now the Firth of Tay.

[96] The principal of these was at Ardoch, seated so as to command the
entrance into two valleys, Strathallan and Strathearn. A description
and plan of its remains, still in good preservation, are given by Mr.
Pennant in his Tour in Scotland in 1772, part ii. p. 101.

[97] The year of Rome 834, A.D. 81.

[98] The Firths of Clyde and Forth.

[99] The neck of land between these opposite arms of the sea is only
about thirty miles over. About fifty-five years after Agricola had left
the island, Lollius Urbicus, governor of Britain under Antoninus Pius,
erected a vast wall or rampart, extending from Old Kirkpatrick on the
Clyde, to Caeridden, two miles west of Abercorn, on the Forth, a space
of nearly thirty-seven miles, defended by twelve or thirteen forts.
These are supposed to have been on the site of those of Agricola. This
wall is usually called Graham's dike; and some parts of it are now
subsisting.

[100] The year of Rome 835, A.D. 82.

[101] Crossing the Firth of Clyde, or Dumbarton Bay, and turning to the
western coast of Argyleshire, or the Isles of Arran and Bute.

[102] The Bay of Biscay.

[103] The Mediterranean.

[104] The year of Rome 836, A.D. 83.

[105] The eastern parts of Scotland, north of the Firth of Forth, where
now are the counties of Fife, Kinross, Perth, Angus, &c.

[106] This legion, which had been weakened by many engagements, was
afterwards recruited, and then called Gemina. Its station at this affair
is supposed by Gordon to have been Lochore in Fifeshire. Mr. Pennant
rather imagines the place of the attack to have been Comerie in
Perthshire.

[107] For an account of these people see Manners of the Germans, c. 32.

[108] Mr. Pennant had a present made him in Skye, of a brass sword and a
denarius found in that island. Might they not have been lost by some of
these people in one of their landings?

[109] The Rhine.

[110] This extraordinary expedition, according to Dio, set out from the
western side of the island. They therefore must have coasted all that
part of Scotland, must have passed the intricate navigation through the
Hebrides, and the dangerous strait of Pentland Firth, and, after coming
round to the eastern side, must have been driven to the mouth of the
Baltic Sea, Here they lost their ships; and, in their attempt to proceed
homeward by land, were seized as pirates, part by the Suevi, and the
rest by the Frisii.

[111] The year of Rome 837, A.D. 84.

[112] The scene of this celebrated engagement is by Gordon (Itin.
Septent.) supposed to be in Strathern, near a place now called the
Kirk of Comerie, where are the remains of two Roman camps. Mr. Pennant,
however, in his Tour in 1772, part ii. p. 96, gives reasons which appear
well founded for dissenting from Gordon's opinion.

[113] The more usual spelling of this name is Galgacus; but the other is
preferred as of better authority.

[114] "Peace given to the world" is a very frequent inscription on the
Roman medals.

[115] It was the Roman policy to send the recruits raised in the
provinces to some distant country, for fear of their desertion or
revolt.

[116] How much this was the fate of the Romans themselves, when, in
the decline of the empire, they were obliged to pay tribute to the
surrounding barbarians, is shown in lively colors by Salvian:--"We call
that a gift which is a purchase, and a purchase of a condition the most
hard and miserable. For all captives, when they are once redeemed,
enjoy their liberty: we are continually paying a ransom, yet are never
free."--De Gubern. Dei, vi.

[118] The expedition of Claudius into Britain was in the year of Rome
796, from which to the period of this engagement only forty-two years
were elapsed. The number fifty therefore is given oratorically rather
than accurately.

[119] The Latin word used here, _covinarius_, signifies the driver of
a _covinus_, or chariot, the axle of which was bent into the form of
a scythe. The British manner of fighting from chariots is particularly
described by Caesar, who gives them the name of _esseda_:--"The
following is the manner of fighting from _essedae_: They first drive
round with them to all parts of the line, throwing their javelins, and
generally disordering the ranks by the very alarm occasioned by the
horses, and the rattling of the wheels: then, as soon as they have
insinuated themselves between the troops of horse, they leap from their
chariots and fight on foot. The drivers then withdraw a little from the
battle, in order that, if their friends are overpowered by numbers,
they may have a secure retreat to the chariots. Thus they act with
the celerity of horse, and the stability of foot; and by daily use and
exercise they acquire the power of holding up their horses at full speed
down a steep declivity, of stopping them suddenly, and turning in a
short compass; and they accustom themselves to run upon the pole, and
stand on the cross-tree, and from thence with great agility to recover
their place in the chariot."--Bell. Gall. iv. 33.

[120] These targets, called _cetrae_, in the Latin, were made of
leather. The broad sword and target were till very lately the peculiar
arms of the Highlanders.

[121] Several inscriptions have been found in Britain commemorating the
Tungrian cohorts.

[122] The great conciseness of Tacitus has rendered the description of
this battle somewhat obscure. The following, however, seems to have been
the general course of occurrences in it:--The foot on both sides began
the engagement. The first line of the Britons which was formed on the
plain being broken, the Roman auxiliaries advanced up the hill after
them. In the meantime the Roman horse in the wings, unable to withstand
the shock of the chariots, gave way, and were pursued by the British
chariots and horse, which then fell in among the Roman infantry, These,
who at first had relaxed their files to prevent their being out-fronted,
now closed, in order better to resist the enemy, who by this means were
unable to penetrate them. The chariots and horse, therefore, became
entangled amidst the inequalities of the ground, and the thick ranks
of the Romans; and, no longer able to wheel and career as upon the open
plain, gave not the least appearance of an equestrian skirmish: but,
keeping their footing with difficulty on the declivity, were pushed off,
and scattered in disorder over the field.

[123] People of Fifeshire.

[124] Where this was does not appear. Brotier calls it Sandwich, making
it the same as _Rutupium_: others Plymouth or Portsmouth. It is clear,
however, this cannot be the case, from the subsequent words.--_White_.

[125] This circumnavigation was in a contrary direction to that of the
Usipian deserters, the fleet setting out from the Firth of Tay on the
eastern coast, and sailing round the northern, western, and southern
coasts, till it arrived at the port of Sandwich in Kent. After staying
here some time to refit, it went to its former station, in the Firth of
Forth, or Tay.

[126] It was in this same year that Domitian made his pompous expedition
into Germany, from whence he returned without ever seeing the enemy.

[127] Caligula in like manner got a number of tall men with their hair
dyed red to give credit to a pretended victory over the Germans.

[128] Thus Pliny, in his Panegyric on Trajan, xlviii., represents
Domitian as "ever affecting darkness and secrecy, and never emerging
from his solitude but in order to make a solitude."

[129] Not the triumph itself, which, after the year of Rome 740 was no
longer granted to private persons, but reserved for the imperial family.
This new piece of adulation was invented by Agrippa in order to gratify
Augustus. The "triumphal ornaments" which were still bestowed, were a
peculiar garment, statue, and other insignia which had distinguished the
person of the triumphing general.

[130] Of Dover.

[131] Domitian, it seems, was afraid that Agricola might refuse to obey
the recall he forwarded to him, and even maintain his post by force. He
therefore despatched one of his confidential freedmen with an autograph
letter, wherein he was informed Syria was given to him as his province.
This, however, was a mere ruse: and hence it was not to be delivered
as Agricola had already set out on his return. In compliance with these
instructions, the freedman returned at once to Domitian, when he found
Agricola on his passage to Rome According to Dion (liii.), the emperor's
lieutenants were required to leave their province immediately upon
the arrival of their successor, and return to Rome within three
months.--_White_.

[132] Agricola's successor in Britain appears to have been Sallustius
Lucullus, who, as Suetonius informs us, was put to death by Domitian
because he, permitted certain lances of a new construction to be palled
Lucullean.--Life of Domitian, s. 10.

[133] Of this worst kind of enemies, who praise a man in order to render
him obnoxious, the emperor Julian, who had himself suffered greatly by
them, speaks feelingly in his 12th epistle to Basilius;--"For we live
together not in that state of dissimulation, which, I imagine, you have
hitherto experienced: in which those who praise you, hate you with a
more confirmed aversion than your most inveterate enemies."

[134] These calamitous events are recorded by Suetonius in his Life of
Domitian.

[135] The Rhine and Danube.

[136] The two senior consulars cast lots for the government of Asia and
Africa.

[137] Suetonius relates that Civica Cerealis was put to death in his
proconsulate of Asia, on the charge of meditating a revolt. (Life of
Domitian, s. 10.)

[138] Obliging persons to return thanks for an injury was a refinement
in tyranny frequently practised by the worst of the Roman emperors. Thus
Seneca informs us, that "Caligula was thanked by those whose children
had been put to death, and whose property had been confiscated." (De
Tranquil, xiv.) And again;--"The reply of a person who had grown old in
his attendance on kings, when he was asked how he had attained a thing
so uncommon in courts as old age? is well known. It was, said he, by
receiving injuries, and returning thanks."--De Ira, ii. 33.

[139] From a passage in Dio, lxxviii. p. 899, this sum appears to have
been _decies sestertium_, about 9,000_l._ sterling.

[140] Thus Seneca: "Little souls rendered insolent by prosperity have
this worst property, that they hate those whom they have injured."--De
Ira, ii. 33.

[141] Several who suffered under Nero and Domitian erred, though nobly,
in this respect.

[142] A Greek epigram still extant of Antiphilus, a Byzantine, to the
memory of a certain Agricola, is supposed by the learned to refer to the
great man who is the subject of this work. It is in the Anthologia, lib.
i. tit. 37.

[143] Dio absolutely affirms it; but from the manner in which Tacitus,
who had better means of information, speaks of it, the story was
probably false.

[144] It appears that the custom of making the emperor co-heir with the
children of the testator was not by any means uncommon. It was done in
order to secure the remainder to the family. Thus Prasutagus, king of
the Iceni in Britain, made Nero co-heir with his two daughters. Thus
when Lucius Vetus was put to death by Nero, his friends urged him to
leave part of his property to the emperor, that his grandsons might
enjoy the rest. (Ann. xvi. 11.) Suetonius (viii. 17) mentions that
Domitian used to seize the estates of persons the most unknown to him,
if any one could be found to assert that the deceased had expressed an
intention to make the emperor his heir.--_White_.

[145] Caligula. This was A.D. 40, when he was sole consul.

[146] According to this account, the birth of Agricola was on June 13th,
in the year of Rome 793, A.D. 40; and his death on August 23d, in the
year of Rome 846 A.D. 93: for this appears by the Fasti Consulares
to have been the year of the consulate of Collega and Priscus. He
was therefore only in his fifty-fourth year when he died; so that the
copyists must probably have written by mistake LVI. instead of LIV.

[147] From this representation, Dio appears to have been mistaken in
asserting that Agricola passed the latter part of his life in dishonor
and penury.

[148] Juvenal breaks out in a noble strain of indignation against this
savage cruelty, which distinguished the latter part of Domitian's reign:

  Atque utinam his potius nugis tota illa dedisset
  Tempora saevitiae: claras quibus abstulit Urbi
  Illustresque animas impune, et vindice nullo.
  Sed periit, postquam cerdonibus esse timendus
  Coeperat: hoc nocuit Lamiarum, caede madenti.--Sat. iv. 150.

  "What folly this! but oh! that all the rest
  Of his dire reign had thus been spent in jest!
  And all that time such trifles had employ'd
  In which so many nobles he destroy'd!
  He safe, they unrevenged, to the disgrace
  Of the surviving, tame, patrician race!
  But when he dreadful to the rabble grew,
    Him, who so many lords had slain, they slew."--DUKE.

 [149] This happened in the year of Rome 848.

[150] Carus and Massa, who were proverbially infamous as informers,
are represented by Juvenal as dreading a still more dangerous villain,
Heliodorus.

  --Quem Massa timet, quem munere palpat
  Carus.--Sat. i. 35.

  "Whom Massa dreads, whom Carus soothes with bribes."

Carus is also mentioned with deserved infamy by Pliny and Martial. He
was a mimic by profession.

[151] Of this odious instrument of tyranny, Pliny the younger thus
speaks: "The conversation turned upon Catullus Messalinus, whose loss
of sight added the evils of blindness to a cruel disposition. He was
irreverent, unblushing, unpitying, Like a weapon, of itself blind and
unconscious, he was frequently hurled by Domitian against every man of
worth." (iv. 22.) Juvenal launches the thunder of invective against him
in the following lines:--

  Et cum mortifero prudens Vejento Catullo,
  Qui numquam visae flagrabat amore puellae,
  Grande, et conspicuum nostro quoque tempore monstrum,
  Caecus adulator, dirusque a ponte satelles,
  Dignus Aricinos qui mendicaret ad axes,
  Blandaque devexae jactaret basia rhedae.--Sat. iv. 113.

  "Cunning Vejento next, and by his side
  Bloody Catullus leaning on his guide:
  Decrepit, yet a furious lover he,
  And deeply smit with charms he could not see.
  A monster, that ev'n this worst age outvies,
  Conspicuous and above the common size.
  A blind base flatterer; from some bridge or gate,
  Raised to a murd'ring minister of state.
  Deserving still to beg upon the road,
  And bless each passing wagon and its load."--DUKE.

[152] This was a famous villa of Domitian's, near the site of the
ancient Alba, about twelve miles from Rome. The place is now called
Albano, and vast ruins of its magnificent edifices still remain.

[153] Tacitus, in his History, mentions this Massa Baebius as a person
most destructive to all men of worth, and constantly engaged on the
side of villains. From a letter of Pliny's to Tacitus, it appears that
Herennius Senecio and himself were joined as counsel for the province
of Boetica in a prosecution of Massa Baebius; and that Massa after his
condemnation petitioned the consuls for liberty to prosecute Senecio for
treason.

[154] By "our own hands," Tacitus means one of our own body, a senator.
As Publicius Certus had seized upon Helvidius and led him to prison,
Tacitus imputes the crime to the whole senatorian order. To the same
purpose Pliny observes: "Amidst the numerous villanies of numerous
persons, nothing appeared more atrocious than that in the senate-house
one senator should lay hands on another, a praetorian on a consular man,
a judge on a criminal."--B. ix. ep. 13.

[155] Helvidius Priscus, a friend of Pliny the younger, who did not
suffer his death to remain unrevenged. See the Epistle above referred
to.

[156] There is in this place some defect in the manuscripts, which
critics have endeavored to supply in different manners. Brotier seems to
prefer, though he does not adopt in the text, "nos Mauricum Rusticumque
divisimus," "we parted Mauricus and Rusticus," by the death of one
and the banishment of the other. The prosecution and crime of Rusticus
(Arulenus) is mentioned at the beginning of this piece, c. 2. Mauricus
was his brother.

[157] Herennius Senecio. See c. 2.

[158] Thus Pliny, in his Panegyr. on Trajan, xlviii.: "Domitian was
terrible even to behold; pride in his brow, anger in his eyes, a
feminine paleness in the rest of his body, in his face shamelessness
suffused in a glowing red." Seneca, in Epist. xi. remarks, that "some
are never more to be dreaded than when they blush; as if they had
effused all their modesty. Sylla was always most furious when the blood
had mounted into his cheeks."









End of Project Gutenberg's The Germany and the Agricola of Tacitus, by Tacitus