TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE

  Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.

  Footnote anchors are denoted by [number], and the footnotes have been
  placed at the end of the book.

  Some minor changes to the text are noted at the end of the book.




                                 THE

                           PILGRIM FATHERS

                                  OF

                             NEW ENGLAND:

                              A HISTORY.


                         BY W. CARLOS MARTYN,

        AUTHOR OF THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JOHN MILTON, A HISTORY
                    OF THE ENGLISH PURITANS, ETC.


      “What sought they there, whose steps were on the dust
      Of the old forest lords? Not summer skies,
      Nor genial zephyrs, nor the amenities
      Of golden spoils. Their strength was in the trust
      That breasts all billows of the abyss of time,
      The ROCK OF AGES, and its hopes sublime.”
                                      AMERICAN SOUVENIR.


                           PUBLISHED BY THE
                       AMERICAN TRACT SOCIETY,
                     150 NASSAU-STREET, NEW YORK.




Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by the
AMERICAN TRACT SOCIETY, in the Clerk’s Office of the District Court
of the United States for the Southern District of New York.




PREFACE.


Lord Bacon assigns the highest meed of earthly fame to the builders
of states, _conditores imperiorum_. The Pilgrim Fathers were members
of that guild, and their story belongs to the heroic age of America.
“No other state,” remarks Stoughton, “can boast of such an origin,
and adorn its earliest annals with a tale as true as it is beautiful,
as authentic as it is sublime.”

But aside from the honor which attends the Forefathers as the
founders of empire, they march down the ages crowned with richer
and more fragrant laurels; for they built not for themselves or for
posterity alone, in imitation of Romulus, and Cyrus, and Cæsar, and
Ottoman; they planted also for justice and for God.

Therefore they are the rightful heirs of the benedictions of mankind;
while to Americans they are doubly precious as “the parents of
one-third of the whole white population of the Republic.”

Of course, the career of the Pilgrim Fathers has been often painted:
but the interest of the story is inexhaustible, and its thrilling
incidents exhibit the wisdom, the benevolence, the faithfulness of
God in so many glorious and delightful aspects, and are so replete
with facts whose inevitable tendency is to inflame the love,
strengthen the faith, and awaken the wondering gratitude of the human
heart, that it is impossible to wear the “twice-told tale” threadbare
by repetition. Besides, a thoughtful scholar, who has himself laid
his garland of everlasting upon the altar of the Pilgrims, has
reminded us that, “however well history may have been written,
it is desirable that it should be re-written from time to time by
those who look from an advanced position, giving in every age to the
peculiar and marked developments of the past, a simple, compact, and
picturesque representation.”

This sketch runs back to the cradle of Puritanism; summarily
rehearses the causes of which it was begotten; accompanies the
Pilgrim Fathers across the channel, and depicts the salient features
of their residence in Holland, and the reasons which pushed them to
further removal; sails with them in the “Mayflower” over the stormy
winter sea; recites in some detail, the incidents which accompanied
the settlement at Plymouth and the kindred colonies throughout New
England; and closes in the sunshine of that league between the New
England colonies which was the prophecy of the Republic, and the
crowning glory of those who are distinctively called the _Pilgrim
Fathers_.

The volume has been carefully written, and it is fortified by copious
marginal notes and citations from a wide range of authoritative
authors, from the humblest diarist to the most pretentious compiler
who struts in the rustling satin of history.

This is “a round unvarnished tale,” and aims at fairness of
statement, not copying that dealer in history whom Lucian derides
for always styling the captain of his own party an Achilles, and
the leader of the opposition a Thersites. Nor does it enter the
“debateable ground” of sectarian polity; but avoiding alike the
Scylla of indiscriminate encomium, and the Charybdis of controversy,
it merely reproduces the broad and unquestioned facts of an
emigration whose purpose and whose result was to

      “Win the wilderness for God.”

NEW YORK, January, 1867.




CONTENTS.


  CHAPTER I.

  Spiritual Forces and the Motors of Materialism—English
  Puritanism—Its Conflicts with the Dramatic Religion of the
  Popes—Aspiration—The Modern Era—The Recast Ecclesiasticism—Two
  Parties in the New-modelled English Church—The Puritans—The
  Conformists—The Error of the Church-and-state Reformers—The Epic
  of our Saxon Annals—Britain, emancipated from the Pope, hugs the
  _Popedom_—Persecution—The Separatists—Their Disappointment—The
  Separatists of the North of England—Division in the Protestant
  World—The Philosophy of Luther—Calvin’s _Rationale_—The Separatists
  adhere to Calvin—The Raid for Exact Conformity—The PILGRIM
  FATHERS prepare to quit the Island—Pilgrim Traits—Obstacles—The
  Attempted Exodus—Treachery—The Pilgrims “rifled by the Catchpole
  Officers”—Imprisonment—The Second Attempt—The Rendezvous—A Midnight
  Scene by the Sea-shore—Arrival of the Ship—The Stranded Barque—The
  Captain’s Alarm—The Ship sails—The Deserted Dear Ones on Shore—A
  Woful Picture—Captured—The Storm—Holland at last—Reunion
                                                                PAGE 17


  CHAPTER II.

  The Quays of Amsterdam—Quaint Aspect of the City—Its History—The
  Pilgrims and the Dutch Burghers—Strange Characteristics of Dutch
  Social Life—The Pilgrims go to Work—Their Employments—The Removal
  to Leyden—Reason of the Change of Residence—Leyden—Its Thrilling
  Story—The Exiles “raise a Competent and Decent Living”—They “enjoy
  much Sweet Society and Spiritual Comfort together in the Ways of
  God”—John Robinson—Elder Brewster—The Pilgrims grow in Knowledge
  and Gifts—Their Discipline—Robinson’s Wisdom—The Exiles win the
  Cordial Love and Respect of the Dutch—An Illustration—Testimony of
  the Leyden Magistrates—The Controversy—Robinson and Episcopius—The
  Debate—“Famous Victory” of the English Divine—Reformed Churches
  of the Continent—Catholicity of the Pilgrims—Their Bias towards
  Religious Democracy—_Peregrini Deo curæ_                           37


  CHAPTER III.

  Many Circumstances conspire to render the Exiles anxious and uneasy
  in Holland—They “know that They are but Pilgrims”—The Projected
  Removal from the Low Countries—Their “Weighty Reasons”—A Grand Germ
  of Thought—The New World—Career of Maritime Discovery—The Pilgrim
  Council—The Debate—The Argument of the Doubters—The Apostles of the
  Future—Ho, for America—The Decision                                52


  CHAPTER IV.

  Pilgrim Prayers—“Where shall we plant our Colony”—“Large Offers”
  of the Dutch—Determine to settle in “the most Northern Part of
  Virginia”—The two English Emigration Companies—The Envoys—Their
  Return—The Letter of Robinson and Brewster—The Virginia Company
  and King James—Two Questions—The “Formal Promise of Neglect”—The
  “Merchant-adventurers”-Terms of the Compact—Republicanism of
  the Pilgrims—Robinson’s Sermon—Who shall sail with the “Forlorn
  Hope?”—The Past—Robinson’s Farewell—The “Speedwell” and the
  “Mayflower”—“Good-by, Leyden”—“Adieu, Friends”—The “Yo hoy” of the
  Seamen                                                             61


  CHAPTER V.

  At Southampton—The Abortive Departure—The Number of _Voyageurs_
  “winnowed”—Final Embarkation—The “Floating Village”—On the
  Atlantic—Opening of Robinson’s Letter of Advice—The Seaborn
  Government—All Hail, Democracy!—Carver elected Governor—The
  Pilgrims propose to land—The Captain’s Mistake—Geography of the
  Wilderness—The Unseaworthy Shallop—The Sixteen Scouts—Miles
  Standish—On Shore—First Drink of New England Water—The Mysterious
  Mound—The Hidden Corn—Pilgrim Conscientiousness—Return of the
  Explorers—In the Shallop—The Dawn of Winter—Renewed Search for a
  Landing Spot—First Encounter with the Indians—“_Woath wach haha
  hach woach_”—The Breakers—First Christian Sabbath in the New
  World—PLYMOUTH ROCK                                                77


  CHAPTER VI.

  The Pilgrims decide to settle at Plymouth—The Landing—The First
  Law—The Pioneers at Work—Plan of the Town—The Weather—Satisfaction
  of the Pilgrims with the Site of their Colony—The Journal—Pilgrim
  Traits—A Page from Cotton Mather—The Frenchman’s Prophecy—Social
  Arrangements—Standish chosen Captain—Births and Deaths—The
  Block-Citadel—Isolation of the Pilgrims—Combination of
  Circumstances which produced the Settlement of Plymouth in 1620    90


  CHAPTER VII.

  The Early Spring of 1621—The Pilgrims Buoyant and
  Hopeful-Planting—In the Woods—The Tyro Hunters—A Forest
  Adventure—The Storm—On the Skirts of the Settlement—“Welcome,
  Englishmen”—The Solitary Indian—His Entertainment—Samoset’s
  Story—Valuable Information—The Kidnapper—The Nausets—Pilgrim
  Description of Samoset—“What shall we do with our Dusky
  Guest?”—Samoset’s Embassy—His Return—Squanto—His Romantic
  History—Massasoit—The Redman and the Pale-face—Negotiations—The
  Treaty—Its Faithful Observance—A Picture of Massasoit—Billington’s
  Offence—The Lackey duelists—Death—Frightful Mortality—Burial
  hill—Death of Governor Carver—Bradford elected Governor—Departure
  of the “Mayflower”—Feeling of the Pilgrims—The “Orphans of
  Humanity”                                                          98


  CHAPTER VIII.

  The Pilgrim Panacea—The Summer—The Prospect—Wild Fowl, Shell-fish,
  and Berries—A Glimpse at Plymouth in 1621—The Pioneers open
  the Volume of Nature—Lessons in Woodcraft—Bradford and the
  Deer-trap—Explorations—The Embassy to Massasoit—Its Object—The
  Indian Guide—The Pause at Namasket—A New “Kind of Bread”—The
  “Deserted Village”—The Wigwam “Palace” of Massasoit—Presents—The
  Sachem and the Horseman’s Coat—The “Pipe of Peace”—The Sagamore’s
  Cordiality—Massasoit’s Housekeeping—A Full Bed—Indian Games—The
  Feast—The Return—Honorable and Amicable Treatment of the Indians
  by the Pilgrim Fathers—Advantages of this Course—Barbarism makes
  an Obeisance to Civilization—End of the Indian’s Lease of Ages of
  the Forest—The New Tenant takes Possession in the Name of God and
  Liberty                                                           110


  CHAPTER IX.

  The Lost Boy—The Searching Party—In the Shallop—The Water spout—The
  Bivouac—Visitors at the Camp-fire—The Indian Hag—Her Strange
  Emotion—The Riddle solved—_En Route_ again—The Lost Boy found—His
  Adventures—A Startling Rumor—The Hasty Return—Intrigues—The
  Narragansetts—Squanto, Tokamahamon, and Habbamak—Corbitant’s
  Wiles—The Runner’s News—Departure of Standish and his “Army”
  of Fourteen Men—The Forest March—On the War-trail—The Sleeping
  Village—The Bloodless Assault—“Friend, Friend”—Flight of
  Corbitant—Safety of Squanto and Tokamahamon—Homeward—Good Effect
  of the Bloodless Raid—Heroism and Kindness of the Pilgrims—The
  Midnight Expedition of Miles Standish—Boston Bay, and the River
  Charles—The “Harvest Home”—“New England’s First Fruits”—Building
  at Plymouth—The Variety of Game—The First THANKSGIVING—“Free
  Range”                                                            121


  CHAPTER X.

  The Strange Sail—“Is it a Frenchman, or a Buccaneer?”—Warlike
  Preparations—The English Jack—Joy of the Pilgrims—Arrival of the
  “Fortune”—News from Home—The Reinforcement—A Moment of Sadness—The
  Letter Budget—The London Company under a Cloud—Course of the
  King—A Technical Difficulty—The New Patent—Weston’s Complaint and
  Bradford’s Reply—Departure of the “Fortune”—Cushman’s Sermon—The
  Bane of Plantations—Winslow’s Letter Home—Hilton’s Missive—Social
  Life and Wants of the Pilgrim Fathers—The “Fortune’s” Mishap      134


  CHAPTER XI.

  Provisions for the New-comers—Danger of Famine—Hardships—Patient
  Spirit of the Pilgrims—Brewster’s Submission—_Morale_ of the
  Colony—Some “Lewd Fellows of the Baser Sort” get “shuffled”
  into the “Mayflower’s” Company—Character of the Recent
  Reinforcement—Bradford’s Government—The Laws—Bradford and the
  “Tender Consciences”—The Controlling Element—Homogeneity          144


  CHAPTER XII.

  The Salient Features of the Colonial Government—The “Proper
  Democracy”—The Course of England—The Governor—The Council—The
  Legislative Body—Test of Citizenship—Reasons and Excuses for
  It—Early Decrees—The Jury Trial—First Laws—The Digest—Provision
  for Education—The Old Statute Book of the Colony—Unique
  Legislation—First Marriage in New England—Marriage a Civil
  Contract                                                          149


  CHAPTER XIII.

  Second Winter in the Wilderness—Faith as a Motor—Anxiety—The
  Indian and the Package—A Prisoner—The Riddle Solved—The Mysterious
  Rattlesnake Skin—Defensive Measures—First “General Muster” in New
  England—The Expedition and the Alarm—Habbamak’s Confidence—The
  Squaw-scout—No Danger—The Expedition resumed—Squanto’s
  Freaks—The Boast of a Travelled Indian—The Buried Plague—The
  Cheat uncloaked—Hunger—The Boat and the Letter-bag—Cold
  Comfort—Dissensions among the Merchant-adventurers in
  London—Bradford’s Comments                                        156


  CHAPTER XIV.

  Arrival of the “Charity” and the “Swan”—The News—Weston’s
  Desertion—The Situation in England—In a Quandary—The Pilgrims
  entertain Weston’s Rival Colony—Word brought of a Massacre in
  Virginia—Winslow’s Mission to the Coast of Maine—The Double
  Benefit—_Morale_ of the Westonians—They finally settle at
  Wessagusset—Their Lazy Mismanagement—Bradford’s Rebuke—The
  Forayers—Bradford’s Walk of Fifty Miles—Death of Squanto—The
  Lean Harvest—The English Trading Ship—Progress in Building at
  Plymouth—How the Pilgrims went to Church                          168


  CHAPTER XV.

  Affairs at Wessagusset—Expostulations and Appeals of the
  Pilgrims—An Anecdote—Reported Sickness of Massasoit—Pilgrim Embassy
  to visit Him—On the Way—The Death Song—Corbitant’s Lodge—At
  Massasoit’s Wigwam—The Pow-wows—Winslow and the Sachem—The
  Cure—Massasoit discloses a Conspiracy—The Return—The Envoys
  and Corbitant—A Shrewd Sagamore—How the Pilgrims communicated
  Religious Truth—Deliberation at Plymouth—A Frightened Messenger
  from Wessagusset—The Expedition of Miles Standish—Standish and the
  Westonians—Sad Condition of that Colony—The Plot disclosed—Indian
  Braggadocio—The Two Knives—The Little Man and the Big Man—Patience
  of Standish—The Death-grapple—Habbamak’s Comment—The Skirmish—The
  “Capital Exploit” of Miles Standish—The Westonians abandon
  Wessagusset—End of a Colony whose “Main End was to catch
  Fish”—Wetawamat’s Head—A Liberation—News of the Baffled Conspiracy
  reaches Leyden—Robinson’s Fine Comment—Strength and Weakness      178


  CHAPTER XVI.

  The Mysterious Blacksmith—Weston at Plymouth—A
  Favor—Ingratitude—Continued Famine at Plymouth—The Community of
  Interest—How it worked—Its Partial Abandonment—Facts brain Plato’s
  Theory—Bradford’s Argument against the Communal Idea—The Pilgrims
  rest on Providence—Their Shifts to live—The Drought—The Fast—The
  Answered Prayer—Rain at last—Habbamak’s Remarks—Five Kernels of
  Corn—A Package of Home Letters—Pierce’s Patent—He “vomits it
  up”—Captain Francis West—New Recruits—The “Annie” and the “Little
  James”—Feeling among the New-comers—Cushman’s Epistle—A Prescient
  Scribe                                                            193


  CHAPTER XVII.

  The Lading of the “Anne”—Winslow departs for England—Plenty once
  more—Social Arrangements—Robert Gorges—Birth and Death of Another
  Colony at Wessagusset—Morrel’s Latin Poem—Prosperity of Plymouth—An
  Election—The Mishaps of a Fishing Expedition—Preparations for
  Planting—Winslow’s Return—What he brought—The Purpose and
  _Animus_ of the London Company of Merchant-adventurers—John
  Lyford—Circumstances of his Advent—John Oldham—The Pernicious
  League—Onslaught upon the Pilgrim Government—Wolves in
  the Sheepfold—The Intercepted Letters—An Explosion—Oldham
  “tamed”—Lyford’s Trial—The Sentence—Winslow’s _Exposé_ in
  England and America—Running the Gauntlet—Banishment of Lyford
  and Oldham—Effect of the Lyford Troubles—Brewster’s Ministry—An
  Exception to the Indian Doctrine of “Poor Pay, Poor Preach”—Tenets
  of the Plymouth Church—“Brown Bread and the Gospel is Good
  fare”—Liberty                                                     205


  CHAPTER XVIII.

  The Pilgrims initiate Measures to buy out the
  Merchant-adventurers—Standish sails for England on this Errand—His
  Narrow Escape from Capture by a Turkish Rover—His Partial Success
  and Return—Sad News—Death of Cushman in England—Death of Robinson
  at Leyden—Last Hours and Character of the Moses of the Pilgrims   227


  CHAPTER XIX.

  Progress of Population at Plymouth—Smith’s Report—A Leaf from
  Bradford’s Journal—Romulus and Rome; Plymouth and the Pilgrims—The
  Winter of 1626-7—Allerton’s Embassy to England—His Success—The
  “Undertakers”—The New Organization—Plan of Division—Habbamak’s
  Grant—First Coveted Luxury of the Emancipated Colony—Allerton’s
  Second Mission—Provision made for the Transportation of the
  Remainder of the Leyden Congregation—Patent for Land on the
  Kennebec—The New Trading Station—A Crazy Clergyman—Catholicity of
  the Plymouth Church—Wide Range of the Pilgrim Enterprise—Commerce
  opened with the Dutch at New Amsterdam—Isaac de Rasières at
  Plymouth—Wampum—The Pilgrim Settlement as seen through the Eyes
  of a Dutchman—Joyous Arrival of the Leyden Exiles—How They were
  received—Mount Wollaston—Thomas Morton turns it into a Den of Riot
  and Debauchery—Grief of the Pilgrims—Expostulation—Affront—End
  of an _Experimentum Crucis_ of Immorality—The Pilgrims find “All
  Things working together for their Good”                           232


  CHAPTER XX.

  English Politics—The Puritans and the Pilgrims—Multitudes in
  Britain prepare for Emigration—Roger Conant—Old John White
  of Dorchester—The _Point d’Appui_—White’s Message—Conant’s
  Determination—Agitation at London—A New Scheme for Puritan
  Emigration—It is patronized by Men of Substance and “Gentlemen
  born”—The Lock opened by the Silver Key—A Patent—John Endicott
  leads a Colony into New England—Salem settled—The English
  Hermit—Individuality of the Saxon Race—The Explorers colonize
  Charlestown—News of Endicott’s Success in England—Incorporation
  of the Massachusetts Company—Its Powers—An Old Legend             249


  CHAPTER XXI.

  Organization of the Massachusetts Company—A Unique
  Letter of Instruction to Endicott—The Soil ordered to be
  purchased of the Indian Owners—A Blast against Tobacco—The
  Colonial Seal—Preparations for the Embarkation of Fresh
  Emigrants—Buckingham—Strafford—Laud—Puritans Eager to
  Emigrate—The Flotilla—The Plentiful Provision of “Godly
  Ministers”—Bright—Smith—Higginson—Skelton—“Farewell, Dear
  England”—Britain does not know her Heroes—The Landing
  at Salem—Higginson’s Impressions—The Pilgrims plant a
  Church at Salem—Cordial Relations opened with the Plymouth
  Colonists—Endicott’s Letter to Bradford—An Additional Link in
  the Chain of Friendship—Ordination of Higginson and Skelton—The
  Ceremony—Bradford’s Tardy Arrival—The Confession of Faith—Birth
  of the Theocracy—Dissatisfaction of the Church of England men at
  Salem—The Brothers Brown—Breach of the Peace imminent—Endicott
  sends the Browns home to England—Endicott cautioned by the
  Massachusetts Company                                             260


  CHAPTER XXII.

  The New Colony outstrips Plymouth—Intense Interest in the
  Colonies felt in England—Higginson’s Tract—Men of Wealth
  and Position prepare to emigrate—One Thing makes Them
  Hesitate—Character of the Charter—The “Open Sesame”—Alienation
  of the Government of the Company—A Daring Construction changes
  a Trading Corporation into a Provincial Government—Joy of
  the Would-be Emigrants—The Election—An Extensive Emigration
  set Afoot—The Fleet of Ten Vessels—In the Cabin of the
  “Arbella”—Winthrop—Dudley—Humphrey—Johnson—Saltonstall—Eaton—
  Bradstreet—Vassall—The Women of the Enterprise—The Lady Arbella
  Johnson—The Farewell at Yarmouth—On the Atlantic                  274


  CHAPTER XXIII.

  “Land ho!”—The Supper at Salem—Sickness—Explorations—The
  Settlement at Cambridge—Busy Days—Death—The Last Hours of Francis
  Higginson—Death of Arbella Johnson—Grief and Death of her
  Husband—The Mortality List—Cambridge partially Deserted—Settlement
  of Boston—The Original Occupant of Shawmut Peninsula—Blackstone’s
  Oddities—The “Lord-Bishops” and the “Lord-Brethren”—Activity of the
  Colonists—The View from Beacon Hill—Winthrop’s Cheery Letter to his
  Wife                                                              286


  CHAPTER XXIV.

  Fundamental Law of the Colonies of Massachusetts Bay—Earliest
  Legislation—First General Assembly—The Democratic Tendency—The
  Test of Citizenship—Reflections—Animadversions on the Theocratic
  Plan—The Acorn and the Oak                                        293


  CHAPTER XXV.

  Life in the Wilderness—Winthrop’s Adventure—The False Alarm—The
  Settlers and the Wolves well frightened—The Courtship of Miles
  Standish—Alden’s Wedding—Morton once more at “Merry-Mount”—An
  Execution—Radcliff, and his Punishment—The Mysterious Stranger—A
  Knight of the Holy Sepulchre astray in the Wilderness—The Three
  Wives—The Pursuit—An Unmasked Jesuit—The “Italian Method”
  tabooed in New England—Satan’s Ill-manners—Utopia—A Sentence
  from Demosthenes—Great Combat between a Mouse and a Snake—Its
  Significance—Fresh Arrivals—Eliot—Roger Williams-Attachment of
  the Pilgrims to their Rocky Refuge—How New England looked to a
  Puritan—How it looked to a Churchman—A Difference of Standpoint—The
  Brood of _Townlets_—The Western Wilds no longer Tenantless        299


  CHAPTER XXVI.

  The Advance of Civilization—Growth of Plymouth—Ralph Smith—Winthrop
  visits Bradford—Gubernatorial Civilities in the Olden Time—Leaves
  from Winthrop’s Note-book—The Primitive Ferry-boat—Bradford’s
  Mare—The Empty Contribution-box—Boundary Quarrel with the
  French—The Compliments of the Gentlemen from the Isle of Rhé—How
  They were answered—The Valley of the Connecticut—Efforts to
  colonize those Bottom Lands—Bradford solicits Winthrop to organize
  a United Effort for that Purpose—The Sachem’s Offer—Winthrop’s
  Refusal—The Plymouth Pilgrims determine to enter Connecticut
  unassisted—The Dutch attempt to balk Them—The Pilgrims colonize
  Windsor—A few Dutch Oaths—A War-path which ended in a Hug—An
  Infectious Fever at Plymouth—Consequent Mortality—Some “Strange
  Flies”—Ebb and Flow of the Tide of Emigration—Attempted Emigration
  of Hazlerigge, Pym, Hampden, and Cromwell—They are stopped by
  an Order in Council—The King’s _Faux Pas_—Three Famous Men
  embark for New England, and supply The Great Necessities of the
  Colonists—Haynes—Cotton—Hooker—Title by which the Settlers hold
  their Lands—Progress towards Democracy—Cotton’s Sermon against
  Rotation in Office—Its Non-effect—Colonial Authority divided
  between Two Branches—Law against Arbitrary Taxation—Representative
  Republicanism—A Dream broken                                      314


  CHAPTER XXVII.

  The Pilgrim Fathers and the Mosaic Code—Toleration in the
  Seventeenth Century—American and European Thinkers alike
  reject it—Arrival of Roger Williams at Boston—His Motives for
  Emigration—His Hopes and Views—Speedily attracts Attention—His
  Devotion to the Principle of Toleration—His Advocacy of it places
  Him in Direct Opposition to the System on which Massachusetts
  is founded—Under the Frown of the Authorities—Williams refuses
  to join the Boston Church—His Declaration—Statement of his Idea
  of Toleration—The Pilgrims regard Him as a Dangerous Heresiarch
  with “a Windmill in his Head”—Consternation at Boston on the
  Rumor of Williams’ Instalment in the Place of Higginson at
  Salem—Winthrop’s Letter of Expostulation—The Salem Church
  does not heed it—Williams begins to preach—Quits Salem for
  Plymouth—Bradford’s Estimate of the Young Welchman—Williams
  cements a Lasting and Cordial Friendship with the Indians—Returns
  to Salem on Skelton’s Death—Recommencement of his Struggle
  with the Colonial Government—His Pamphlet on the Charter—His
  Retraction—Ought Women to appear Veiled at Church?—Williams says
  Yes, Cotton says No—Cotton convinces the Ladies—The English
  Commission for the Regulation of the Colonies—The Pilgrims
  decide to “avoid and protract”—Endicott cuts the Cross out
  of the English Flag—Williams speaks against the “Freeman’s
  Oath”—Trouble—Williams’ Democracy—Points of Variance between
  the Reformer and the Colonists—The Citation—Williams before
  the Court—His Frank Defence—Banishment—The Flight through the
  Winter Woods—Animadversions—Months of Vicissitude—Settlement
  of Providence—Williams bases his Colony on Toleration and
  Democracy—Mather’s Epigram—Williams makes a Distinction between
  Toleration and License—Williams’ First Visit to England—Intimacy
  with Vane and Milton—The Second Visit—Cromwell and Marvell added to
  his List of Trans-atlantic Friends—Elected on his Return President
  of the Providence Plantations—Excelsior—Williams and the Indians—An
  Incident—Reflections on the Work and Character of Roger Williams  334


  CHAPTER XXVIII.

  Progress of New England in Material Prosperity—Arrival of Three
  Thousand Settlers in a Single Year—An Illustrious _Trio_—Hugh
  Peters—The Younger Winthrop—Sir Harry Vane—A Long Smouldering
  Feud placated—Value which the Pilgrims set on Education—Good and
  Bad Universities—A Public School planted at Cambridge—Harvard
  College—Relations between Learning and Manners—Enlarged
  Colonization of New England—The Plymouth Pilgrims at Windsor—The
  Younger Winthrop at Saybrook—Hooker’s Parishioners at
  Cambridge—Petition for “Enlargement or Removal”—The Advance Guard
  of Civilization—The New Hesperia of Puritanism—Hooker and Haynes
  lead a Colony into Connecticut and settle at Hartford—Pilgrimage
  from the Sea-shore to the “Delightful Banks” of the Inland
  River—Liberality of the New-born Colony—New Haven planted by
  English Puritans—Colonization of Guilford, Milford, and Long
  Island—Character of these Settlers—Commerce and Agriculture as the
  Basis of New States—Constitution of New Haven—The First Political
  Paper ever cradled in a Manger—The Connecticut Colonists and the
  Dutch at New Amsterdam quarrel over their Boundary Line—A Yankee
  _Rûse_—The Dutchmen and the Onion Rows—Isolation of the New
  Settlements—The War-whoop                                         357


  CHAPTER XXIX.

  The Pilgrims and the Indians—Stern Justice with which the
  Forefathers treated the Aborigines—An Illustration—Murder in the
  Woods—Its Punishment—End of the Epoch of Peace—Reason Why—The
  Pequods—Uncas—The Pequod Embassy to the Narragansetts—The Forests
  pregnant with Insurrection—Vane solicits the Intervention of
  Roger Williams—The Solitary Canoe—Williams in the Wigwam of
  Miantonomoh—The Pequod Diplomats at Work—Williams pushes his
  Dangerous Opposition—Old Friendship prevails—The Narragansetts
  refuse to dig up the Hatchet—The Pequods take the War-path
  alone—Sassacus—First Patter of the Coming Storm—A Thrilling Scene
  on the Connecticut River—The Captured Pinnace—Border Gallantry—A
  Unique Naval Battle—How News travelled in the Olden Time—Endicott
  on the Trail—A Pilgrim Friar Tuck—Failure—Pandemonium—New England
  trembles on the Verge of Death—Energy of the Colonists—Mason’s
  Expedition—The Council of War—The Chaplain’s Prayer—Off
  Point Judith—The Landing—The Seaside Bivouac—The Midnight
  March—The Pequod Village—A “Sound of Revelry by Night”—The
  Indian Fort—The Night Attack—Scenes of Horror—The Flight of
  Sassacus—The Pursuit—The Swamp Battle—The Sagamore’s Escape—The
  Gory Scalp-lock—“Sachem’s Head”—Death, and Servitude of the
  Survivors—Civilization Victorious                                 370


  CHAPTER XXX.

  Pilgrim Exclusiveness—The Old Alien Law—Dissenters swarm into
  Massachusetts Bay—Agitation—The Two Parties—Anne Hutchinson—A
  Commendable Practice—Mrs. Hutchinson’s Week-day Lectures—The
  “Covenant of Works” and the “Covenant of Grace”—Heady Current
  of Dissension—Horror of the Pilgrims—Antinomianism—Familism—The
  Female Heresiarch—The “Legalists”—Mutual Exasperation—Vane’s
  Disgust—Wreck of Vane’s Administration—Winthrop’s Law—Vane’s
  Reply—The Founders of the Colony regain their Influence—Trial
  of Anne Hutchinson—Cotton and his _Protégé_—“Immediate
  Revelations”—Banishment of the Antinomians—Roger Williams welcomes
  the Exiles to Providence—Purchase and Settlement of Rhode Island—A
  Happy Result from an Unhappy Cause                                388


  CHAPTER XXXI.

  Law as the Reflection of National Character—Pilgrim Legislation—The
  Homes of New England—Origin of Towns—Town Meetings—Duty of
  voting—“Prudential Men”—An Odd Trait—Pilgrims fined for refusing to
  hold Office—High Character of the Early Governors—Bradford—Edward
  Winslow and Thomas Prince—Winthrop—Dudley—Vane—Endicott—Other
  Pivotal Men—God’s Benediction on New England                      400


  CHAPTER XXXII.

  New England in
  1641—Inhabitants—Villages—Churches—Houses—Agriculture—Commerce—
  Trade—Manufactures—Foreign Influence of the Pilgrims—The Tone of
  New England in treating with the Long Parliament during the
  Civil War—Two Rejected Invitations—Consolidation of Colonial
  Liberty—The Oppressed made Guests of the Commonwealth—The Germ
  of Union—The UNITED COLONIES OF NEW ENGLAND—Character of the
  League—Reflections—Colonial Union the Crowning Service of the
  Pilgrim Fathers to Humanity—The Second Generation—The Work and the
  Lesson of the Pilgrim Fathers                                     415




                                 THE

                           PILGRIM FATHERS

                                  OF

                             NEW ENGLAND.




CHAPTER I.

THE EXODUS.

      “Nothing is here for tears; nothing to wail
      Or knock the breast; no weakness, no contempt,
      Dispraise or blame; nothing but well and fair.”
                          MILTON, _Samson Agonistes_.


The influence of that mysterious triad, the gold eagle, the silver
dollar, and the copper cent, has been overestimated. Spiritual forces
are more potent than the motors of materialism. The Sermon on the
Mount outweighs the law of gravity. Ethics make safer builders than
stocks. Two hundred years ago, commercial enterprise essayed to
subdue the New World in the interest of greedy trade, hungering for
an increase; but though officered by the brightest genius and the
highest daring of the age, backed by court favor and bottomed on the
deepest bank-vaults of London, the effort failed.

Where physical forces balked, a moral sentiment bore off a trophy.
The most prosperous of the American colonies were planted by
religion. New England is the child of English Puritanism; and yet,
paradoxical as it may seem, antedates its birth. Men say that the
history of New England dates from 1620. ’Tis a mistake. New England
was in the brain of Wickliffe when, in the infancy of Britain, he
uttered his first protest against priestcraft and pronounced the
Christianity of Rome a juggle. New England, _in esse_, was born in
that chill December on Plymouth Rock; New England, _in posse_, was
cradled in the pages of the first printed copy of the English Bible.

Soil does not make a state; nor does geographical position. That spot
of ground which men call Athens does not embrace the immortal city.
It bears up its masonry; but the Athens of Socrates and of Plato
exists in the _mind_ of every scholar. The intellectual and moral
elements which enter into and shape it, these are the real state. In
this sense, New England was in the pages of the Puritan publicists,
in the psalms of the Lollards, and in the prayers of Bradwardine,
centuries before that winter’s voyage into the dreary wilderness.

Society, government, law, the graces of civility, the economic
formulas, are growths. “Books, schools, education,” says Humboldt,
“are the scaffolding by means of which God builds up the human soul.”
There are no isolated facts. Events do not occur at hap-hazard.
Each effect has its cause; it may lie buried beneath many blinding
strata, so that it must be dug for, but it exists.

Puritanism was not a sudden creation. It did not crop out of the
sixteenth century unexpectedly, and begin to impeach formalism
without a cause. It was a growth. “It was as old as the truth and
manliness of England. Among the thoughtful and earnest islanders, the
dramatic religion of the popes had never struck so deep root as in
continental soil.”[1] Chafed and weary, the people had long demanded
a purer and more spiritual faith. The strong repressive hand of
the Vatican was not able to stop the mouth of unwearied complaint.
Thinkers were convinced that Rome had paganized Christianity.
Christ was banished from all active influence. He could only be
reached and “touched with the feeling of our infirmities” through
the intercession of saints, who were constantly invoked. The popes
professed to possess a fund of supererogation, which they might
dispense at will; and this became their stock in trade. Salvation
by meritorious works was preached. Brokers in souls hawked their
celestial wares in every market-place. Rome, an incarnate Pharisee,
made broad its phylactery, and hid beneath it a dead religion and a
corrupt church.[2]

From Wickliffe to Tyndale, a few earnest, devout men had impeached
this cheat. But the influence of these teachers was at best but
local. They were barely able to keep the gospel torch aglow, and
to pass it down from hand to hand through the dusky centuries. The
masses were affrighted from the pursuit of knowledge by the jingle of
the rusty and forged keys of St. Peter, which locked the storehouse
of divine revelation, and barred the investigations of the human mind.

The modern era dawned in the sixteenth century. The invention of
printing was the _avant courier_ of reform. The reformers gained a
fulcrum for their lever. Scholars might shake the dust from their
mouldy folios, and by opening the early records, convict Rome of
heresy. Their conclusions might then be scattered broadcast on the
wings of the press. Well might the perturbed ghost of Latin Orthodoxy
exclaim,

      “Ah, fatal age, which gave mankind
      A Luther and a Faustus.”

Bibles were everywhere opened. Reform swept from the mountains of
Bohemia into Germany; crossing the Saxon plains, it entered the
Netherlands; thence it passed the channel into England. In the island
it was received with enthusiasm. The government, from personal
motives, extended to it the hand of fellowship; the people adopted
it, because they felt the inadequacy of Romanism to meet their
religious wants.[3]

Rome did not strike its flag without a struggle. As Demetrius was
shocked when Paul, a wandering preacher from Tarsus, impeached his
Diana, so the Vatican professed to be horrified when the reformers
inveighed against the popedom. “Socrates”—so runs the old Grecian
indictment—“is guilty of crime for not worshipping the gods whom the
city worship, but introducing new divinities of his own.”[4] The
adherents of the ancient faith tacked a similar indictment upon the
front of the reform. Where they dared, they invoked the thumb-screw
and kindled an _auto da fé_. When they could not fight with these
congenial weapons, they made faces at their opponents, and hurled
epithets. The iconoclasts were called “infidels.” Hooker and Hales,
Stillingfleet, and Cudworth, and Taylor were thus stigmatized.[5] And
indeed, “this is a cry which the timid, the ignorant, the indolent,
and the venal are apt to raise against those who, faithful to
themselves, go boldly forward, using the past only to show them what
the present is, and what the future should be.”

These men recast the ecclesiasticism of their age. The essence of
Romanism was extracted from their creed, but many of its forms were
retained. Then, within the new-built temple of the English church,
there arose two parties. The _Puritans_ demanded the complete
divorce of the reformed church from Rome, in its ceremonies and in
its belief. They strove to inaugurate the purity and simplicity of
what they conceived to be the primitive worship. They esteemed the
retained forms to be pregnant with mischief, in that they were the
badges of their former servitude, and because they tended to bridge
over the chasm between Rome and the Reformation.[6]

At the outset, the Puritans did not quarrel with the English
Establishment; they all claimed to be within its pale,[7] and many
of their leaders were men of high ecclesiastical standing, of the
truest lives, and of the loftiest genius; but they held to the spirit
rather than to the letter; to the substance of the church, not to its
forms.[8]

The _Conformists_ considered the ceremonies to be non-essential; but
they desired to retain them, partly because they were enamoured of
those old associations which they symbolized, but chiefly because
they dreaded the effect of too sudden and radical a change upon the
peace of the island. Besides, to facilitate the passage from Romanism
to the reformed church, they were willing to step to the verge of
their consciences in the retention of the old forms, and in the
incorporation of those features of the ancient faith into the outward
structure of the new theology which were not intrinsically bad.[9]

Unquestionably honest minds might differ in this policy. “But
certainly the doctrine of the Puritans concerning the connection
and mutual influence between forms and opinions, so far from being
fanciful or fastidious, had foundations as deep as any thing in moral
truth or in human nature. A sentiment determined their course; but
it was more cogent than all the learned argument which they lavished
in its defence. A man of honor will not be bribed to display himself
in a fool’s cap; yet why not in a fool’s cap as readily as in any
apparel associated in his mind, and in the minds of those whom he
respects, whether correctly or not is immaterial, with the shame of
mummery and falsehood? To these men the cope and surplice seemed
the livery of Rome. They would not put on the uniform of that hated
power, while they were marshalling an array of battle against its
ranks. An officer, French, American, or English, would feel outraged
by a proposal to be seen in the garb of a foreign service. The
respective wearers of the white and tricolor cockades would be more
willing to receive each other’s swords into their bosoms than to
exchange their decorations. A national flag is a few square yards of
coarse bunting; but associations invest it which touch whatever is
strongest and deepest in national character. Its presence commands an
homage as reverential as that which salutes an Indian idol. Torrents
of blood have been poured out age after age to save it from affront.
The rejection of the cope and mitre was as much the fruit and the
sign of the great reality of a religious revolution, as a political
revolution was betokened and effected when the cross of St. George
came down from over the fortresses along fifteen degrees of the North
American coast”[10] in ’76.

The contest which ensued between nascent Puritanism and the
entrenched Conformists was prolonged and bitter. It deeply scarred
the history of the contemporaneous actors; and it has shaped the
ethics and the politics of two centuries; nor is its force yet spent.
Indeed, it may be fitly called the epic of our Saxon annals.

“On the one side, in the outset, were statesmen desiring first
and mainly the order and quiet of the realm. On the other side
were religious men desiring that, at all hazards, God might be
worshipped in purity and served with simplicity and zeal. It is easy
to understand the perplexities and alarms of the former class; but
the persistency of their opponents is not therefore to be accounted
whimsical and perverse. It is impossible to blame them for saying,
‘If a man believes marriage to be a sacrament in the sense of the
popes and the councils, let him symbolize it by the giving of a ring;
if he believes in exorcism by the signing of the cross, let him have
it impressed on his infant’s brow in baptism; if he believes the
bread of the Eucharist to be God, let him go down on his knees before
it. But we do not believe these things, and as honest men we will not
profess so to believe by act or sign any more than by word.’ Theirs
was no struggle against the church, but against the state’s control
over it.”[11]

The fatal error of the church-and-state reformers was, that they
strove to coerce unwilling consciences into exact conformity with a
prescribed formula of worship by penal legislation. No latitude was
even winked at. It was a new edition of the old story of Procrustes
and his iron bed. Britain, emancipated from the pope, still hugged
the _popedom_. The rulers of the island clutched the weapons and
enacted the _rôle_ of the Hildebrandes, the Gregorys, and the
Innocents of ecclesiastical history. Dissent was “rank heresy.”
Liberty was “license.” The measure of a conscience was the length of
a prelate’s foot.

“An act was passed in 1593,” says Hoyt, “for punishing all who
refused to attend the Established Church, or frequented conventicles
or unauthorized assemblies. The penalty was, imprisonment until the
convicted person made declaration of his conformity; and if that was
not done within three months after arrest, he was to quit the realm,
and go into perpetual banishment. In case he did not depart within
the specified time, or returned without license, he was to suffer
death.”[12]

In 1603, when James I. came down from Scotland to ascend the English
throne, so stood the law. Nor did it rest idle in the statute-book.
The parchment _fiat_ was instinct with vicious life. Hecatombs of
victims suffered under it.[13] “Toleration,” remarks Goodrich, “was
a virtue then unknown on British ground. In exile alone was security
found from the pains and penalties of non-conformity to the Church of
England.”[14]

During the pendency of the dissension between the Puritans and the
Conformists within the bosom of the church, many honest thinkers,
feeling hopeless of success in that unequal conflict, broke from
their old communion, and set up a separate Ebenezer.[15] Even so
early as 1592, Sir Walter Raleigh, speaking in the House of Commons,
affirmed that these “Come-outers” numbered upwards of twenty
thousand.[16] Since that date, every year had added new recruits
to their ranks, until, in 1603, they had expanded into a wealthy,
influential, and puissant party in the state.[17]

Though socially tabooed and politically ostracised—though shackled
by fierce prohibitory legislation and by governmental ill-will, the
Separatists, as they were called, still prayed and hoped, walking
through persecution with faith in their right hand and with patience
in their left. At one time they thought they could discern a ray
of light on the sullen horizon which gloomed upon them. James I.
had been educated in Presbyterian Scotland.[18] He had often hymned
the praises of the polity of stout John Knox.[19] When he crossed
the Tweed, jubilant Puritanism cried, “Amen,” and “All hail.” Ere
long, however, the weak and treacherous Stuart deserted his Scottish
creed. From that moment he hated his old comrades with the peculiar
bitterness of an apostate. No epithet was vile enough by which
to paint them. He raked the gutter of the English language for
phrases. “These Puritans,” said he, “are pests in the church and
commonwealth—greater liars and perjurers than any border thieves.”[20]

At the Hampton Court Conference—an intellectual tournament between
the representatives of the opposing religious parties—the royal
buffoon affirmed his determination to make the Puritans “conform, or
harry them out of the land, or else worse.”[21]

It has been truly said that “the friends of religious reform had
never seen so hopeless a time as that which succeeded the period
of the most sanguine expectation. In the gloomiest periods of the
arbitrary sway of the two daughters of Henry VIII., they could turn
their eyes to a probable successor to the throne who would be capable
of more reason or more lenity. Now nothing better for them appeared
in the future than the long reign of a prince wrong-headed and
positive alike from imbecility, prejudice, pique, and self-conceit,
to be succeeded by a dynasty born to the inheritance of the same bad
blood, and educated in the same pernicious school. It is true that,
as history reveals the fact to our age, almost with the reign of
the Scottish alien that nobler spirit began to animate the House of
Commons which ultimately” checkmated tyranny beneath the scaffold
of Charles I. But this astounding blow was then remote. “As yet the
steady reaction from old abuses was but dimly apparent, even to the
most clear-sighted and hopeful minds; and numbers of devout and brave
hearts gave way to the conviction that, for such as they, England had
ceased for ever to be a habitable spot.”[22]

Towards the close of Elizabeth’s reign, a number of yeomen in the
North of England, some in Nottinghamshire, some in Lincolnshire, some
in Yorkshire, and the neighborhood of these counties, “whose hearts
the Lord had touched with heavenly zeal for his truth,” separated
from the English church, “and as the Lord’s free people joined
themselves, by a covenant of the Lord, into a church estate in the
fellowship of the gospel, to walk in all his ways made known or to be
made known unto them, according to their best endeavors, whatsoever
it should cost, the Lord assisting them.”[23]

The Protestant world was at this time divided between two regal
phases of reform. “Luther’s _rationale_,” says Bancroft, “was based
upon the sublime but simple truth which lies at the bottom of
morals, the paramount value of character and purity of conscience;
the superiority of right dispositions over ceremonial exactness;
and, as he expressed it, ‘justification by faith alone.’ But he
hesitated to deny the real presence, and was indifferent to the
observance of external ceremonies. Calvin, with sterner dialectics,
sanctioned by his power as the ablest writer of his age, attacked
the Roman doctrines respecting the communion, and esteemed as a
commemoration the rite which the papists reverenced as a sacrifice.
Luther acknowledged princes as his protectors, and in the ceremonies
of worship favored magnificence as an aid to devotion; Calvin was
the guide of Swiss republics, and avoided in their churches all
appeals to the senses as crimes against religion. Luther resisted
the Roman church for its immorality; Calvin for its idolatry. Luther
exposed the folly of superstition, ridiculed the hair-shirt and the
scourge, the purchased indulgence, and the dearly-bought masses for
the dead; Calvin shrunk from their criminality with impatient horror.
Luther permitted the cross, the taper, pictures, images, as things
of indifference; Calvin demanded a spiritual worship in its utmost
purity.”[24]

The Separatists were ardent Calvinists. They esteemed the “offices
and callings, courts and canons” of the English church “monuments of
idolatry.” Those of the North of England, though “presently they were
scoffed and scorned by the profane multitude, and their ministers
urged with the yoke of subscription,” yet held “that the lordly power
of the prelates ought not to be submitted to.”[25]

In this northern church was “Mr. Richard Clifton, a grave and revered
preacher, who by his pains and diligence had done much good, and
under God had been the means of the conversion of many; also that
famous and worthy man, Mr. John Robinson, who afterwards was their
pastor for many years, till God called him away by death; and Mr.
William Brewster, a reverent man, who afterwards was chosen elder of
the church, and lived with them till old age.”[26]

In the year 1607 these reformers seem to have received the vindictive
attention of the government, for Bradford makes this record: “After
that they could not long continue in any peaceable condition, but
were hunted and persecuted on every side. Some were taken and clapped
up in prison. Others had their houses beset and watched night and
day. The most were fain to fly and leave their houses and goods,
and the means of their livelihood. Yet these things, and many more
still sharper, which afterwards befell them, were no other than
they looked for, and therefore they were better able to bear them
by the assistance of God’s grace and spirit. Nevertheless, seeing
themselves thus molested, and that there was no hope of peace at
home, by joint consent they resolved to go into the Low Countries,
where, they heard, was freedom for all men; as also how sundry from
London and various parts had been persecuted into exile aforetime,
and were gone thither, sojourning at Amsterdam and in other cities.
So, after they had continued together about a year, and kept their
meetings every sabbath in one place and another, exercising the
worship of God despite the diligence and malice of their adversaries,
seeing that they could no longer continue in that condition, they
prepared to pass over into Holland as they could.”[27]

The Pilgrims were preëminently men of action. They were not dreamy
speculators; they were not _dilettanti_ idealists. They never let “I
dare not” wait upon “I would.” With them decision was imperative, and
meant action. They had dropped two words from their vocabulary—doubt
and hesitation. Instantly they prepared for exile; and they accepted
it as serenely when conscience beckoned that way with her imperious
finger, as their descendants would an invitation to attend a halcyon
gala.

Still, in the very outset they met obstacles which would have
unnerved less resolute men. But the heart of their purpose was not
to be broken. In 1607,[28] the Pilgrims made an effort to quit the
shores of this inhospitable country. They had appointed Boston, in
Lincolnshire, the rendezvous, and a contract had been made with an
English captain to convey their persons and their goods to Amsterdam.
The Pilgrims were punctual; the seaman was not. Finally, however,
he appeared. The eager fugitives were shipped; but they were taken
aboard only to be betrayed. The recreant master had plotted with
the authorities to entrap the victims. The unhappy Pilgrims were
taken ashore again in open boats, and there the officers “rifled and
ransacked them, searching them to their shirts for money.”[29] Even
the women were treated with rude immodesty.[30] After this thievish
official raid, they were “carried back into the town and made a
spectacle and wonder to the multitude, which came flocking on all
sides to behold them. Being thus first, by the catchpole officers,
rifled and stripped of their money, books, and much other goods, they
were presented to the magistrates, and messengers were sent to inform
the lords of the council of the matter; meantime they were committed
to ward. The magistrates used the Pilgrims courteously, and showed
them what kindness and favor they could; but they were not able to
deliver the prisoners till order came from the council-table. The
issue was, that after a month’s imprisonment, the greater part were
dismissed, and sent to the places from which they came; but seven
of their chiefs were still left in prison and bound over to the next
assizes.”[31]

In the spring of 1608, these same indomitable Pilgrims, together with
some others, resolved to make another effort to quit the house of
bondage. Dryden says that

      “Only idiots may be cozened twice.”

This time they made a compact with a Dutch captain at Hull—they
would not trust an Englishman.[32] The plan now was, that the men
should assemble on a wild common, between Grimsby and Hull, a place
chosen on account of its remoteness from any town; the women, the
children, and the property of the exiles were to be conveyed to that
part of the coast in a barque. The men made their way thither, in
small companies, by land. The barque reached its destination a day
sooner than the foot travellers; it was also some hours ahead of the
ship.[33] As the short, chop-sea of the channel caused the passengers
in the barque to suffer acutely from seasickness, the sailors ran
into a small creek for shelter. Here the night was passed. How
comfortless! The deep roar of the sullen breakers smote heavily upon
their ears; and while the chill winds swept over them, the ceaseless
pulsing of the sea and the hollow moaning of the waves at midnight,
for the sea continued rough, deepened the melancholy feelings which
could not but agitate their breasts. So huddled on the weird,
strange shore, they counted the hours till dawn.[34]

In the morning the longed-for ship arrived; but through some
negligence of the sailors, the vessel containing the women, their
little ones, and the property, had run aground. The men stood in
groups on the shore; and that no time might be lost, the captain sent
his boat to convey some of them on board, while a squad of sailors
were detailed to help get the grounded barque once more afloat. But
alack, by this time so considerable a gathering in such a place,
and at an hour so unusual, had attracted attention; information
was conveyed to the neighboring authorities; and as the boat which
had already taken the great part of the men to the ship, was again
returning to the shore, the captain espied a large company, some on
horseback, some afoot, but all armed, advancing towards the spot
where the hapless barque still lay aground with the few remaining
men grouped about it. Alarmed, the mariner put back to his vessel,
swore by the sacrament that he would not stay, and deaf to the
importunities of his sad passengers, he spread his sails, weighed
anchor, and was soon out of sight.[35]

We may imagine with what aching hearts the poor exiles in the ship
looked towards the receding shore, to their disconsolate companions,
and to their precious wives and children, who stood there “crying
for fear and quaking with cold.” Those on board the ship had no
property, not even a change of raiment; and they had scarcely a penny
in their pockets. But the loss of their possessions was as nothing to
the cruel stroke which had severed them from those they best loved on
earth.[36]

“Robinson—honest and able general as he was in every sense—had
resolved to be the last to embark. He was therefore a witness of the
scene of distress and agony which ensued on the departure of the
ship. The outburst of grief was not to be restrained. Some of the
women wept aloud; others felt too deeply, were too much bewildered,
to indulge in utterance of any kind; while the children, partly from
seeing what had happened, and partly from a vague impression that
something dreadful had come, mingled their sobs and cries in the
general lamentation. As the sail of the ship faded away upon the
distant waters, the wives felt as if one stroke had reduced them all
to widowhood, and every child that had reached years of consciousness
felt as one who in a moment had become fatherless. But thus dark
are the chapters in human affairs in which the good have often to
become students, and from which they have commonly had to learn their
special lessons.”[37]

On the approach of the officers some of the men escaped, others
remained to assist the helpless. These were apprehended and “conveyed
from constable to constable, till their persecutors were weary of so
large a number of captives and permitted them to go their way.”[38]

As to the voyagers, the very elements seemed to war against them.
They soon encountered foul weather, and were driven far along the
coast of Norway; “nor sun, nor moon, nor stars, for many days
appeared.” Once they gave up all for lost, thinking the ship had
foundered. “But when,” says a writer who was himself on board, “man’s
hope and help wholly failed, the Lord’s power and mercy appeared
for their recovery, for the ship rose again, and gave the mariners
courage once more to manage her. While the waters ran into their very
ears and mouths, and all cried ‘We sink! we sink!’ they also said, if
not with miraculous, yet with a great height of divine faith, ‘Yet,
Lord, thou canst save! yet, Lord, thou canst save!’ And He who holds
the winds in his fist, and the waters in the hollow of his hand, did
hear and save them.”[39]

Eventually the storm-tossed ship dropped anchor in Amsterdam harbor;
and “in the end,” says Young, “notwithstanding all these tortures,
the Pilgrims all got over, some at one time and some at another,
and met together again, according to their desire, with no small
rejoicing.”[40]




CHAPTER II.

THE HALT.

  “Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him; but weep sore for
  him that goeth away: for he shall return no more, nor see his
  native country.” JER. 22:10.


When the Pilgrims stepped from the deck of their vessel upon the
quays of Amsterdam, they felt that sad, aching sense of utter
desolation which always smites exiled hearts in a strange country.
But there was much about Amsterdam which tended to increase this
natural homesickness, and to make the blood pulse still more coldly
through their veins. Every thing was novel; the manners, the costume,
the architecture, the language of the people. Their first steps were
involved in an apparently inextricable maze; they were confounded by
the bewildering confusion of land and water. Canals, crawled with
their sluggish water, before them and behind them, to the right and
to the left. Indeed, the town was so much interwoven with havens,
that the oozy ground was cut up into ninety-five islands or detached
blocks, connected with each other by two hundred and ninety fantastic
bridges. The principal havens, called grachts, were from a hundred to
a hundred and forty feet wide, and extended in semicircular curves
one after the other through the town.

In order to reach the interior of the city, it was necessary to
cross a number of these broad harbors; and in making the necessary
deflections in passing from gracht to gracht, all recollection of
the points of the compass vanished from the minds of the bewildered
Englishmen, so that they received the impression that they were
wandering in a labyrinth from which it was impossible to escape by
their own unaided efforts.

The houses were built of brick, and were generally four or five
stories high, with fantastic, pointed gables in front. Some of them
were elegantly constructed; but the larger number of the citizens
seemed desirous of making their dwellings look as like warehouses as
possible. Almost every house had a piece of timber projecting from
the wall over the uppermost window in the gable, and this was used
for hauling up fuel or furniture to the top story. All the residences
were erected upon piles of wood driven into the soft, marshy ground;
but so insufficient was this precaution in giving stability, that
many of the buildings leaned considerably from the perpendicular, and
seemed as if about to topple over into the street or splash out of
sight through the mud. The roadway between the houses and the water
was so narrow, that in some of the finest streets a coach could not
conveniently turn round.

Such were some of the strange sights which greeted the wondering eyes
of the Pilgrims as they hurriedly trod, on the day of their arrival,
from the quay where they had landed, into the interior of the quaint
old town in search of lodgings.

A brief residence sufficed to familiarize the exiles with the
peculiarities of the city. They soon discovered that Amsterdam
stood upon the southern bank of the Ai, a neck of the sea which
possessed the appearance of a navigable frith. They examined the
quays and piers which rose sheer out of the water, so as to afford
the greatest facility for the shipment of goods from the abounding
warehouses. They wondered at the peculiar form of the town, which was
semicircular, with its straight side on the Ai, while the bow swept
several miles inland. The canals were fed by the river Amstel, from
which the town was named. An immense exterior belt of water, which
the Dutch termed “the cingel,” pursued a zig-zag line round the sites
of ancient bastions, which were then crowned with windmills, whose
long arms and tireless fingers were incessantly employed in snatching
up the ever-encroaching water, and casting it far out into the sea.

From the condition of a fishing-village on the Amstel, in the
thirteenth century, Amsterdam had risen, under the fostering
privileges of the counts of Flanders, to be a commercial town of some
importance even in the fourteenth century. The establishment of the
Dutch independence so greatly accelerated its prosperity, that in
the beginning of the seventeenth century it had attained the first
rank as a maritime city. Antwerp, the old El Dorado, was eclipsed.
Amsterdam became the entrepôt of commerce; ships visited it from all
nations; its merchants were famed for their honesty and frugality;
and its great bank enabled it to take the lead in the pecuniary
concerns of Europe. The city was inhabited by a quarter of a million
of souls; and seated in its swamp, it was the freest town in the
world. It was a city of refuge to the oppressed of all nations; and
therein, perhaps, lay the secret of its wonderful prosperity.

Amsterdam was the Venice of the Netherlands. It was literally a
spot which had been wrung from the grasp of the unwilling and
ever-protesting sea. A perpetual Waterloo conflict was waged between
the persistent Hollander and old Neptune for the possession of
the soil which man’s skill had usurped. The city, and indeed the
Netherlands at large, formed the “debatable ground” of this unique
struggle between humanity and the elements. The whole country was a
morass, whose buildings were constructed on huge piles; and it was
this that gave rise to the saying of Erasmus, that “multitudes of his
countrymen were like birds, living on the tops of trees.” Across the
forehead of the Netherlands brains and persistence had written their
motto, “_Labor omnia vincit_.”[41]

Such was the city in which the Pilgrims now found themselves
domesticated. In some things they found it easy to assimilate with
their new neighbors: a common faith was one strong bond of union; a
passion for liberty was another. But there were not lacking strong
points of dissimilarity. The Pilgrims were orderly and staid; yet
they never could reconcile themselves to that spirit of system,
or precise, long-authorized method, which formed one of the most
remarkable traits in the manners of the Dutch. In all departments of
their social economy they seemed to act upon established rules, from
which it was esteemed a species of heresy to depart. There were rules
for visiting, for sending complimentary messages, for making domestic
announcements, for bestowing alms, for out-of-door recreations—every
thing was required to be done in a certain way, and no other way was
right. Society was an incarnate rule.

Another thing which puzzled the Pilgrims was, that in their various
walks they observed that every house was provided with one or more
mirrors in frames, fastened by wire rods on the outsides of the
windows, and at such an angle as to command a complete view both of
the doorway and of all that passed in the street. They afterwards
found that these looking-glasses were universal in Holland, and were
the solace of the ladies while following their domestic avocations.

But the exiles were too grateful for toleration to be hypercritical.
“They knew that they were _Pilgrims_, and looked not much on these
things, but lifted up their eyes to heaven, their dearest country,
and quieted their spirits.”[42] They spent no time in idleness, but
with stout hearts went to work. They had been bred to agricultural
pursuits; but in Holland they were obliged to learn mechanical
trades. Brewster became a printer;[43] Bradford learned the art of
dyeing silk.[44] Some learned to weave, and found employment in the
cloth guilds and at the looms. But though grim poverty often pinched
them, and their temporal circumstances were never very prosperous,
they yet praised God for what they had; and exile and the bond of a
common misfortune knit their hearts close together, so that their
spiritual enjoyment in each other’s society was precious and full.[45]

Amsterdam was not altogether a city of strangers. There were some
there already, who, like themselves, had left their native island for
conscience’ sake.[46] But though they had formed a church, its vitals
were torn by fierce dissension. The feud blazed when Robinson and his
friends reached Holland; since nothing could placate the resentment
of the hostile parties, the Pilgrims, fearful of the baleful
effect of the quarrel upon themselves, decided, after a sojourn of
twelve months, to remove from Amsterdam to the neighboring city of
Leyden.[47]

“While Amsterdam was rising into mercantile wealth, Leyden was
acquiring literary reputation. By a singular but honorable
preference, the citizens, on being offered by William the Silent, in
1575, as a reward for their valor during the famous siege, either a
remission of taxes or the foundation of a university, at once chose
the university. The city had obtained the appellation of the Athens
of the West. But with its scholastic cloisters it combined busy
manufactures: while in one street the student was engaged with his
books, in another the weaver was seated at his loom. But all breathed
quietude and liberty; and it is difficult to imagine a more inviting
home than that which Leyden presented to these weary, sore-footed
Pilgrims as they trod along the pleasant road from Amsterdam,
‘seeking peace above all other riches.’

“If the history of the city they had left was calculated to stimulate
them to industry, the story of the town they were entering was
adapted to keep alive their love of liberty. Traces might still be
seen of the effects of the heroic deed performed by the citizens
of Leyden, when, contending for their freedom, they preferred to
inundate their city and give it to the sea, rather than submit to the
cruel tyranny of Spain.”[48]

Here, as before at Amsterdam, they fell to work. “Being now
pitched,” says Bradford, “they fell to such trades and employments as
they best could, valuing peace and their spiritual comfort above any
other riches whatsoever; and at length they came to raise a competent
and decent living, but with hard and continual labor.”[49]

In Leyden the Pilgrims remained for many years, “enjoying much sweet
society and spiritual comfort together in the ways of God, under
the able and prudent government of Mr. John Robinson. Yea, such was
the mutual love and respect which this worthy man had to his flock
and his flock to him, that it might be said of them, as it once was
of the famous emperor Marcus Aurelius[50] and the people of Rome,
that it was hard to judge whether he delighted more in having such a
people, or they in having such a pastor. His love was great towards
them, and his care was always bent for their best good, both for soul
and body; for besides his singular ability in divine things—wherein
he excelled—he was very able to give direction in civil affairs, and
to foresee dangers and inconveniences; by which means he was very
helpful to the outward estates of the exiles, and so was in every way
a common father to them.”[51]

Mr. William Brewster was Robinson’s assistant, and “he was now called
and chosen by the church” to fill the place of elder.[52] The
Pilgrims “grew in knowledge and gifts and other graces of the Spirit
of God, and lived together in peace and love and holiness; and as
many came unto them from divers parts of England, they grew to be
a great congregation. If at any time differences arose or offences
broke out—as it cannot be but sometimes there will, even among the
best of men—they were ever so met with and nipped in the bud betimes,
or otherwise so well compassed, as still love, peace, and communion,
were preserved; or else the church was purged of those that were
incorrigible, when, after much patience used, no other means would
serve—which seldom came to pass.”[53]

Though strict in their discipline and strongly attached to their
distinctive principles, the Leyden exiles were far from being bigots.
Robinson, though, in Cotton Mather’s phrase, “he had been in his
younger time—as very good fruit hath sometimes been, ere age hath
ripened it—soured by the principles of rigid separation,”[54] was now
developed into a man of large-hearted benevolence and enlightened
catholicity. Over his flock he breathed this heavenly spirit.
Nothing more offended him than the conduct of those “who cleaved
unto themselves, and retired from the common good.”[55] Nothing more
provoked him than to witness undue rigidity in the enforcement of
subordinate matters, especially when sternness on points of outward
order was associated, as is often the case, with laxity in the
critics. Robinson knew how to estimate “the tithe of mint and anise
and cummin” in their relative value to the weightier matters of the
law. Schism he condemned; division he deplored. From the government
and ceremonies of the English Establishment his conscience compelled
him to dissent, but he was prepared to welcome the disciples of
that and of all other Christian communions to the fellowship of the
Lord’s table. “Our faith,” said he, “is not negative; nor does it
consist in the condemnation of others, and wiping their names out
of the bead-roll of churches, but in the edification of ourselves.
Neither require we of any of ours, in the confession of their faults,
that they renounce or in any one word contest with the Church of
England.”[56]

It is not strange that such a teacher should have won the reverent
regard of his Pilgrim flock. They could not fail to hold him “in
precious estimation, as his worth and wisdom did deserve.” And
“though they esteemed him highly while he lived and labored among
them,” says Bradford, “yet much more after his death,[57] when they
came to feel the want of his help, and saw, by woful experience,
what a treasure they had lost; yea, such a loss as they saw could
not be repaired, for it was as hard for them to find such another
leader and feeder in all respects, as for the Taborites to find
another Ziska.[58] And though they did not, like the Bohemians, call
themselves orphans after his death, yet they had as much cause to
lament their present condition and after-usage.”[59]

Characterized by so much unity, peacefulness, consistency, and
true-hearted love, the Pilgrims could not fail to win the sincere
respect of the Leyden citizens. Though most of them were poor, yet
there were none so poor but if they were known to be of the English
congregation, the Dutch tradesmen would trust them in any reasonable
amount when they lacked money, and this because they had found by
experience how careful they were to keep their word, while they saw
them painful and diligent in their respective callings. The Leyden
merchants even strove to get their custom; and when they required
aid, employed the honest strangers and paid them above others.[60]

The city magistrates testified to the sobriety and peacefulness of
their guests on the eve of their departure from Holland. “These
English,” said they, in reproving the exiled Walloons[61] who were
attached to the French refugee church, “have lived among us now these
twelve years, and yet we never had any suit or action against any one
of them; but your strifes and quarrels are continual.”[62]

The reputation of their pastor for sanctity and learning no doubt
tended to raise the respectability of the English church in the
estimation of the Dutch.

Circumstances afforded him ample scope for the display of his
talents. A heated discussion between the Arminians and the Calvinists
raged in Leyden during his residence in the city, and in that
far-famed controversy the great English divine was finally persuaded
to take part.[63]

In the schools there were daily and hot disputes. Scholars were
divided in opinion. The two professors or divinity readers of the
Leyden university were themselves ranged on opposite sides; one of
them, Episcopius, teaching the Arminian tenets; the other, Polyander,
proclaiming the Calvinistic creed.[64]

Robinson, though he taught thrice a week, besides writing sundry
pamphlets,[65] went daily to listen to the disputations, hearing
first one side, then the other. In this way he became thoroughly
grounded in the controversy, saw the force of the opposing arguments,
and became familiar with the shifts of the inimical disputants. Some
sermons which he delivered in the English church on the contested
issues attracted public attention. Episcopius had just published
certain theses which he had affirmed that he was prepared to maintain
against all opponents. Polyander and the chief preachers of the city
waited upon Robinson, and urged him to pick up the gauntlet. He
was loath, being a stranger; but they beat down the rampart of his
objections, and finally Robinson consented to dispute. Episcopius and
the Pilgrim pastor met, and in this public tilt the English champion
is said to have achieved “a famous victory.”[66]

Ever after this verbal tournament, Robinson was held in the highest
esteem by the learned men of the university, by the Dutch preachers,
and by the republican government of Holland.[67] Indeed, it is said
that nothing but the fear of offending the English king prevented the
bestowal upon him of some mark of national favor.[68]

On their part, the English refugees always treated the reformed
churches of the Continent with honor and fraternal kindness. “We
acknowledge,” remarked Robinson, “before God and man, that we
harmonize so perfectly with the reformed churches of the Netherlands
in matters of religion, as to be ready to subscribe their articles
of faith, and every one of them, as they are set forth in their
confession. We acknowledge these churches as true and genuine; we
hold fellowship with them as far as we can; those among us who
understand Dutch, attend their preaching; we offer the Supper to such
of their members as are known to us and may desire it.”[69]

Yet the Pilgrims did not indorse the system of church government
which received the _imprimatur_ of the Synod of Dort. They
steadfastly maintained that each single church or society of
Christians possessed within itself full ecclesiastical authority
for choosing officers, administering all the ordinances of the
gospel, and settling its discipline; in a word, they held to the
perfect independence of the individual churches, and framed their
ecclesitical polity on the purest democratic model.[70]

“They conceded,” observes Uhden, “that synods and councils might be
useful in healing divisions between churches, and in imparting to
them friendly advice, but not in the exercise of judicial authority
over them, or in the imposition of any canon or any article of faith,
without the free assent of each individual church.”[71]

Sheathed in the panoply of their principles, busied in the
multifarious activities of their daily employments, and solaced
by faith, the Pilgrims “made shift to live in these hard times.”
_Peregrini Deo cura_, runs the old Latin phrase; and this exiled band
of worshippers proved that strangers are indeed peculiar objects of
God’s care.




CHAPTER III.

THE DECISION.

      “Can ye lead out to distant colonies
      The o’erflowings of a people, or your wronged
      Brethren, by impious persecution driven,
      And arm their breasts with fortitude to try
      New regions—climes, though barren, yet beyond
      The baneful power of tyrants? These are deeds
      For which their hardy labors well prepare
      The sinewy arms of Albion’s sons.”
                                        DYER.


Although the Pilgrims resided at Leyden in honor, and at peace with
God and their own consciences, many circumstances conspired to render
them anxious and uneasy. The horizon of the Netherlands grew gloomy
with portents of war. The famous truce between Holland and the
Spaniard drew near its conclusion.[72] The impatient demon of strife
stood knocking at the door. Homesickness gnawed at their hearts.
Dear, cruel England filled their thoughts. The language of the Dutch
had never become pleasantly familiar.[73] Frequently “they saw
poverty coming on them like an armed man.” Many of their little band
were taken from them by death. “Grave mistress Experience having
taught them many things,” some of their “sagest members began both
deeply to apprehend their present dangers and wisely to foresee the
future, and to think of timely remedy.” They inclined to removal,
“not out of any newfangledness or other such like giddy humor, by
which men are oftentimes transported to their great hurt and danger,
but for sundry weighty and solid reasons.”[74]

These have been often recited, and they completely vindicate the
project to remove.

The Pilgrims “saw, and found by experience, the hardness of the place
and country to be such that few in comparison would come to them, and
fewer would bide it out and continue with them; for many that joined
them, and many more who desired to be with them, could not endure
the great labor and hard fare, with other inconveniences which they
underwent and were content to bear. But though they loved the persons
of the exiles, approved their cause, and honored their sufferings,
yet they left them weeping, as Orpah did her mother-in-law Naomi,
and as those Romans did Cato in Utica, who desired to be excused and
borne with, though they could not all be Catos.[75] For many, though
they desired to enjoy the ordinances of God as the Pilgrims did, yet,
alas, chose bondage, with danger of conscience, rather than to endure
these hardships. Yea, some preferred the prisons of England to this
liberty in Holland, with these afflictions. The Pilgrims thought
that if a better and easier place of residence could be had, it would
draw many to them, and take away these discouragements. Yea, their
pastor would often say that many of those who both wrote and preached
against them there would, if they were in a place where they might
have liberty and live comfortably, practise as they did.”[76]

Then again, “they saw that, though the exiles generally bore all
these difficulties very cheerfully and with resolute courage, being
in the best and strength of their years, yet old age began to steal
upon them—and their great and continued labors, with other crosses
and sorrows, hastened it before the time—so it was not only probably
thought, but apparently seen, that within a few years more they
would be in danger to scatter by necessities pressing them, or sink
under their burdens, or both. Therefore, according to the divine
proverb, that ‘a wise man seeth the plague when it cometh, and
hideth himself,’[77] so they, like skilful and tried soldiers, were
fearful to be entrapped and surrounded by their enemies, so as they
should neither be able to fight or fly; so they thought it better to
dislodge betimes to some place of better advantage and less danger,
if any such could be found.”[78]

It was furthermore perceived that, “as necessity was a task-master
over them, so they were forced to be such, not only to their
servants, but in a sort to their dearest children; the which, as it
did not a little wound the tender hearts of many loving fathers and
mothers, so it produced likewise sundry sad and sorrowful effects;
for many of their children, who were of the best disposition and
most gracious inclinations, having learned to bear the yoke in their
youth, and being willing to bear part of their parents’ burden,
were oftentimes so oppressed by their heavy labors, that though
their minds were free and willing, yet their bodies bowed under the
weight, and became decrepit in early youth, the vigor of nature being
consumed in the bud. But that which was more lamentable, and of all
sorrows most heavy to be borne, was, that many of the children, by
these means and the great licentiousness of youth in those countries
and the manifold temptations of the place, were drawn away by evil
example into extravagant and dangerous courses, getting the reins off
their necks, and departing from their parents. Some became soldiers,
others made far voyages by sea, and some walked in paths tending to
dissoluteness and the danger of their souls, to the great grief of
their parents and the dishonor of God. The Pilgrims saw that their
posterity would be in danger to degenerate and be corrupted.”[79]

Still again—“and this was not least”—they were inclined to remove
by the “great hope and inward zeal they had of laying some good
foundation, or at least of making some way thereto, for the
propagation and advancement of the gospel of the kingdom of Christ
in remote parts of the world; yea, though they should be but even
as stepping-stones unto others for the performance of so great a
work.”[80]

These and some other kindred reasons[81] pushed the Pilgrims to
further emigration. The question which each began to ask the other
was, “Whither shall we go?” Soon this query stared all other
considerations out of countenance, and became the all-engrossing
topic of discussion at the hearth-stones and in the chapel of the
exiles.

At this juncture a germ of thought was developed which proved to be
the seed of a mighty empire. All Europe stood a-tip-toe gazing across
the misty and chilling waste of waters towards that new continent
by whose discovery the genius of Columbus had rounded the globe
into perfect symmetry. The glories of the New World flashed in the
brilliant eloquence of Raleigh. Marvellous tales were told of the
fertility of the soil and of the healthful beauty of the skies; while
old sailors, who had gazed with their own eyes upon the legendary
shores, passed from city to city depicting to eager and credulous
crowds the terrors of the wilderness and the wild ferocity of the
Western savages.

Meantime “the career of maritime discovery had been pursued with
daring intrepidity and rewarded with brilliant success. The voyages
of Gosnold, and Smith, and Hudson, the enterprise of Raleigh, and
Delaware, and Gorges, the compilations of Eden, and Willes, and
Hakluyt, had filled the commercial world with wonder. Calvinists
of the French church had already sought, though vainly, to
plant themselves in Brazil, in Carolina, and, with De Monts, in
Acadia;”[82] and now, in 1617, some bold thinker and unshrinking
speaker among the Leyden Pilgrims, perhaps Brewster, perhaps
Bradford, perhaps Robinson himself, proposed to colonize “some of
those vast and unpeopled countries of America which were fruitful and
fit for habitation, but devoid of all civilized inhabitants; where
there were only savage and brutish men, who ranged up and down little
otherwise than as wild beasts.”[83]

At the outset the Pilgrims listened to this proposal, some with
admiration, some with misgiving, some openly aghast. Bradford’s
quaint pages afford us some glimpses of their debates. The doubters
said, “It is a great design, and subject to inconceivable perils; as
besides the casualties of the seas, which none can be freed from, the
length of the voyage is such that the weak bodies of many worn out
with age and travel, as many of us are, can never be able to endure;
and even if they should, the miseries to which we should be exposed
in that land will be too hard for us to bear; ’tis likely that some
or all will effect our ruin. There we shall be liable to famine,
and nakedness, and want of all things. The change of air, diet, and
water, will infect us with sickness; and those who escape these evils
will be in danger of the savages, who are cruel, barbarous, and most
treacherous in their rage, and merciless when they overcome; not
being content only to kill, but delighting to torment men in the most
bloody way, flaying men alive with the shells of fishes, cutting off
the joints by piece-meal, broiling them on coals, and eating collops
of their victims’ flesh while they yet live, and in their very sight.”

As these horrors darkened in their imaginations, the
deeply-interested exiles who thronged the council-chamber shuddered
with affright. Mothers, hearing the shrill war-whoop in advance,
strained their babes yet closer to their breasts. “Surely it could
not be thought but the very hearing of these things must move the
very bowels of men to grate within them, and make the weak to quake
and tremble.”

But the opponents of the project urged still other objections, “and
those neither unreasonable nor improbable.” “It will require,” they
said, “more money than we can furnish to prepare for such a voyage.
Similar schemes have failed;[84] and our experience in removing to
Holland teaches us how hard it is to live in a strange country, even
though it be a rich and civilized commonwealth. What then shall we do
in the frozen wilderness?”

Fear chilled the hearts, doubt paralyzed the nerves of the assembled
exiles. Then the more resolute stood up, and, fixing their eyes on
the sky, exclaimed, “God will protect us; and he points us on. All
great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties,
and must be both undertaken and overcome with answerable courage.
We grant the dangers of this removal to be tremendous, but not
desperate; the difficulties are many, but not invincible; for though
many of them are likely, all are not certain. It may be that sundry
of the things surmised may never happen; others, by provident care
and the use of good means, may be prevented; and all of them, through
the help of God, by fortitude and patience may either be borne or
overcome. True it is that such attempts are not to be undertaken
without good reason; never rashly or lightly, as many have done,
for curiosity or hope of gain. But our condition is not ordinary;
our ends are good and honorable; our calling lawful and urgent;
therefore we may invoke and expect God’s blessing on our proceeding.
Yea, though we should lose our lives in this action, yet may we have
comfort in it, and our endeavor would be honorable. We live here but
as men in exile; and as great miseries may befall us in this place,
for the twelve years of truce are now nigh up, and here is nothing
but beating of drums and preparations for war, the events whereof are
always uncertain. The Spaniard may prove as cruel as the savages of
America, and the famine and pestilence as sore here as there, and our
liberty less to look out for a remedy.”[85]

It was thus that the undaunted apostles of the future pleaded; and
now as always, the policy of active, trustful, and religious courage
overbore the timid pleas of the undecided, the plausible doubts of
the skeptical, and the wailing dissent of the croakers who paused
distrustful of the unknown future and enamoured of the anchored
past. The Pilgrims announced their decision to follow in the wake of
Columbus, and launch boldly across the Atlantic, trusting God.




CHAPTER IV.

FAREWELL.

      “Like Israel’s host to exile driven,
        Across the flood the Pilgrims fled;
      Their hands bore up the ark of heaven,
        And Heaven their trusting footsteps led,
      Till on these savage shores they trod,
        And won the wilderness for God.”
                                     PIERPONT.


Having decided to settle in America, the Pilgrims, “after humble
prayers unto God for his direction and assistance,” held another
general conference, and in this they discussed the location of their
proposed colony. Some were ardent for Guiana,[86] whose tropical
climate and immeasurable mineral wealth Raleigh had painted in
dazzling colors, and whose fertility was such that it was only
necessary to “tickle it with a hoe, and it would laugh with a
harvest.” The Spaniard was already there. It has been well said
that the golden dreams which deluded the first European settlers
of America were akin, alike in object and results, to the old
alchymists’ search after the philosopher’s stone. The painful
alchymist lost not only the gold he sought, but the wealth of
knowledge and of substantial commercial treasure which the researches
of modern chemistry have disclosed; and so the Spanish colonists
slighted the abounding wealth of a genial climate and a fertile
soil, while chasing the illusive phantom of “a land of gold.”[87]

Yet, despite the apparent opening in Guiana, the Pilgrims would
not go thither, partly because the pretensions of England to the
soil were wavering, but chiefly because a horde of intolerant
and ubiquitous Jesuits had already planted themselves in that
vicinity.[88]

“Upon their talk of removing, sundry of the Dutch would have had them
go under them, and made them large offers;” but “the Pilgrims were
attached to their nationality as Englishmen, and to the language
of their fatherland. A deep-seated love of country led them to the
generous purpose of recovering the protection of England by enlarging
her dominions. They were ‘restless’ with the desire to live once more
under the government of their native land.”[89]

This feeling led them to reject the proposal of the Holland
merchants; and, since they had also given up the idea of colonizing
Guiana, they determined to essay a settlement in “the most northern
parts of Virginia,” hoping under the provincial government “to live
in a distinct body by themselves,” at peace with God and man.[90]

There were in 1617 two organized English companies which had been
chartered by James I. to colonize America, and empowered to effect
regular and permanent settlements, extending one hundred miles
inland. The headquarters of one of these was in London, of the
other in Plymouth.[91] The Leyden Pilgrims were impelled to sail
under the auspices of one of these merchant-companies by a double
consideration—a lack of means to effect an independent settlement,
and a desire to emigrate in such shape that they might live under
English protection.[92] Hence on selecting Virginia as the site of
their intended settlement, the exiles at once despatched two of their
number to England, at the charge of the rest,[93] to negotiate with
the Virginia company.[94] They “found God going along with them;” and
through the influence of “Sir Edwin Sandys, a religious gentleman
then living,” they might at once have gained a patent; but the
careful envoys desired first to consult “the multitude” at Leyden.[95]

In their interview with the Leyden merchants, the envoys had
expressly stipulated for freedom of religious worship.[96] On their
return to Holland they told the Leyden congregation that they
“found the Virginia company very desirous to have them go out under
their auspices, and willing to grant them a patent, with as ample
privileges as they could bestow; while some of their chiefs did not
doubt their ability to obtain a guaranty of toleration for them from
the king.”[97]

The Pilgrim agents carried back with them a friendly and sympathizing
letter from Sir Edwin Sandys;[98] and to this a formal answer was
returned. “We verily believe,” wrote Robinson and Brewster, “that the
Lord is with us, unto whom and whose service we have given ourselves
in many trials; and that he will graciously prosper our endeavors
according to the simplicity of our hearts therein. We are well
weaned from the delicate milk of our mother-country, and inured to
the difficulties of a strange and hard land, which yet, in a great
part, we have by patience overcome. Our people are, for the body of
them, industrious and frugal, we think we may say, as any company of
people in the world. We are knit together as a body in a most strict
and sacred bond and covenant of the Lord, of the violation whereof
we make great conscience, and by virtue whereof we do hold ourselves
strictly tied to all care of each other’s good, and of the whole. It
is not with us as with other men, whom small things can discourage,
or small discontentments cause to wish themselves at home again. We
know our entertainment in England, and in Holland; we shall much
prejudice both our arts and means by removal; but once gone, we
should not be won to return by any hope to recover even our present
helps and comforts.”[99]

While these negotiations were pending the Virginia company found
much greater difficulty than they had apprehended in winning from
the silly and pedantic king an assent to the tolerant clauses of the
Pilgrims’ patent; “and though many means were used to bring it about,
it could not be effected.”[100] When the Pilgrims asked that liberty
of worship might be confirmed under the king’s broad seal, they were
asked two questions: “How intend ye to gain a livelihood in the new
country?” The reply was, “By fishing, at first.” “Who shall make your
ministers?” was the next query. The Pilgrims answered, “The power of
making them is in the church;” and this spoiled all. To enlarge the
dimensions of England James I. esteemed “a good and honest motive;
and fishing was an honest trade, the apostles’ own calling,” yet he
referred their suit to the decision of the prelates of Canterbury and
London.[101]

The exiles were advised not to carry their suit before the bishops,
but to rely upon events and the disposition which his majesty had
shown to connive at their enterprise under “a formal promise of
neglect.”[102] Besides, it was considered that if James had confirmed
their titles, nothing could bind him. “If afterwards there should be
a purpose to wrong us,” said they, “though we had a seal as broad
as the house floor, it would not serve the turn; for there would be
means enough found to recall or reverse it.”[103] So they determined
in this, as in other things, to rest on God’s providence.

New agents were at once despatched to England to urge forward the
lagging preparations. But dissensions in the Virginia company
“ate out the heart of action.” At last, in 1619, a patent was
granted,[104] and only “one more negotiation remained to be
completed. The Pilgrims were not possessed of sufficient capital
for the execution of their scheme. The confidence in wealth to be
derived from fisheries had made American expeditions a subject of
consideration with English merchants; and the agents from Leyden
were able to form a partnership between their friends and the men of
business in London. A company called the ‘Merchant-Adventurers’ was
formed. The services of each emigrant were rated as a capital of ten
pounds, and belonged to the company; all profits were to be reserved
till the end of seven years, when the whole amount, and all houses,
lands, gardens, and fields, were to be divided among the shareholders
according to their respective interests. A London merchant who risked
one hundred pounds would receive for his money tenfold more than
the penniless laborer for his entire services. This arrangement
threatened a seven years’ check to the pecuniary prosperity of the
colony; yet as it did not interfere with civil rights or religion, it
did not intimidate the resolved.”[105]

It is peculiarly interesting to us of this generation to notice how
prominent a trait republicanism was in the intellectual character
of the Pilgrims. It crops out constantly. Nothing must be done
without the assent of “the multitude.” When any important matter was
broached, the pastor did not presume to dictate, nor did the elders
assume to control; the decision rested with the majority vote of the
community. Their council was the ideal model of a pure democracy.

So now, when their envoys returned, “they made a public recital,”
and the Pilgrims “had a solemn meeting and a day of humiliation to
seek the Lord for his direction.”[106] Robinson preached, “teaching
many things very aptly and befitting their present occasion and
condition, strengthening them against their fears and perplexities,
and encouraging them in their resolutions.”[107]

This fine incident was at once an illustration and a prophecy; it
illustrated the rugged, self-centred, yet devout independence of the
exiles, and it prophesied from this the twining laurels of success.
The Pilgrims were invincible; and the secret of their strength was
religious democracy. If in their right hand they held an open Bible,
signifying faith and hope, in their left they clutched tenaciously
the fundamental but still crude principles of organized liberty—the
now open secret of later Saxon progress.

At length, in July, 1620, “after much travail and debate, all things
were got ready and provided.”[108] It had been previously decided
who and how many should sail with “the forlorn hope;” “for all that
were willing to have gone could not get ready on account of their
other affairs; neither if they could, had there been means to have
transported them all together. Those that stayed being the greater
number, required the pastor to tarry with them; and indeed for other
reasons Robinson could not then well go, so this was more readily
yielded unto. The others then desired elder Brewster to sail with
them, which was assented to. It was also agreed by mutual consent
and covenant, that those who went should be an absolute church of
themselves, as well as those who remained; seeing that, in such a
dangerous voyage, and removed to such a distance, it might come to
pass that they should, for the body of them, never meet again in this
world; yet this proviso was inserted, that as any of the rest crossed
the water, or any of the Pilgrims returned upon occasion, they should
be reputed as members without any further discussion or testimonial.
It was also promised to those that went first, by the body of the
rest, that if the Lord gave them life and means and opportunity,
they would come to them as soon as they could.”[109]

On the eve of departure a solemn fast was held. “Let us seek of God,”
said these disciples so shortly to be severed by the sullen sea, “a
right way for us and for our little ones and for all our substance.”
Is it strange that New England is moral and well-ordered and devout,
when it was begotten of a fast and a prayer?

Robinson gave the departing members of his exiled flock “a farewell,
breathing a freedom of opinion and an independence of authority such
as then was hardly known in the world;”[110] and this he intermixed
with practical directions for the future guidance of the Pilgrim
voyagers. He chose that beautiful text in Ezra, “And there, at the
river by Ahava, I proclaimed a fast, that we might humble ourselves
before God, and seek of him a right way for us, and for our children,
and for all our substance.”[111]

Unhappily, “but a brief outline of that remarkable sermon has been
preserved. We would gladly give whole shoals of printed discourses in
exchange for that one homily. While, however, the larger part is lost
in the long silence of the past, the fragments of this great man’s
farewell utterances are gathered up and preserved among our richest
relics.”[112]

Never was there a more affecting occasion. A Christian congregation,
welded together alike by a common faith and a common misfortune, was
about to be rent asunder. Some of their number, thrice exiled, were
soon to essay the settlement of an unknown and legendary wilderness.
These dear wanderers they might never see again with their mortal
eyes; and even should they meet them once more on the shores of
time, years must intervene before the greeting. Strange thoughts
and anxious chased each other across the troubled mirror of each
countenance. All eyes were dim with tears; all hands were clasped;
the pastor’s heart was full. Amidst the painful silence, broken by a
frequent sob, the low, sweet voice of Robinson was heard quivering
upon the sympathetic air: “Brethren, we are now ere long to part
asunder, and the Lord knoweth whether I shall live ever to see your
faces more. But whether the Lord hath appointed it or not, I charge
you before God and his blessed angels to follow me no farther than I
have followed Christ. If God should reveal any thing to you by any
other instrument of his, be as ready to receive it as ever you were
to receive any truth of my ministry, for I am very confident the
Lord hath more truth and light yet to break forth out of his holy
word. Miserably do I bewail the state and condition of the reformed
churches, who are come to a period in religion, and will go no
farther than the instruments of their reformation.

“Remember your church covenant, in which you have agreed to walk in
all the ways of the Lord, made or to be made known unto you. Remember
your promise and covenant with God and with one another to receive
whatever light and truth shall be made known to you from his written
word; but withal, take heed, I beseech you, what you receive for
truth, and compare it and weigh it with other scriptures of truth
before you accept it; for it is not possible the Christian world
should come so lately out of such thick antichristian darkness, and
that full perfection of knowledge should break forth at once.”[113]

Much is said now-a-days about the development of Christianity. The
clatter of _pseudo_-philosophers is deafening. We have the German
rationalistic school; the worshippers in the “broad church” of the
humanitarians; the idolaters of a mystic pantheism; the devotees
of the Socinian tenets; the bold blasphemers who reject all faith,
and form a creed in epigrammatic sneers; and the apostles of two
churches, one of which believes that God is too good to damn men,
while the other holds that man is too good to be damned. All this
divinity is quite adrift; it floats rudderless, and rejects the
anchorage of God’s word. Robinson was wiser. He was no friend of
stagnant Christianity; but in all his voyaging after truth he clung
to his Bible anchorage. Inside of that he saw ample room for the
completest development. “The Bible, not the fathers, formed his
text-book; he discerned there the depths of truth and glory, into
which he was persuaded that thoughtful minds might plunge farther and
farther as time rolled on. The Bible was to him like the universe, a
system unchangeable in its great facts and fundamental principles,
but ever opening wider and wider upon devout and studious intellects.
He knew there would be no change in God’s word, no addition to
or subtraction from its contents; but he looked for beautiful
and improving changes in men’s views—for broader, clearer, and
grander conceptions of God’s truth.”[114] This was Robinson’s idea
of “the development of Christianity,” and it was surcharged with
profound philosophy as well as with sound practical direction and
Christian pathos. The great Puritan teacher was neither a Socinian,
a Pantheist, a Rationalist, nor a Mystic; he claimed no kinship
with the money-changers who scourge Christ out of the temple of
his divinity; least of all did he sympathize with those who reject
the sufficiency of the Scripture text, and found their schemes of
progress upon material bases. No; Robinson favored the most radical
Christian progress, but he based his idea upon the Bible, and knew
how to guard his notion of development from misconception and abuse.
The evangelical believers of our day owe the famous Leyden exile a
lasting debt of gratitude for the clear distinction which he has
drawn between the progressive “liberty of the sons of God,” and
the earth-born whims which materialism baptizes with the name of
“progress.”

In this same sermon Robinson pressed one other thing, exhibiting,
in a bigoted and narrow age, rare catholicity of spirit. “Another
thing I commend to you,” he said; “by all means shake off the name
of _Brownist_.[115] ’Tis a mere nickname, a brand to make religion
odious, and the professors of it, to the Christian world. To that
end I should be glad if some godly minister would go over with you
before my coming; for there will be no appreciable difference between
the Puritans who have not renounced the church of England and you,
when you come to the practice of the ordinances out of the British
kingdom. By all means close with the godly party of England, and
rather study union than division; in how nearly we may possibly,
without sin, close with them, than in the least measure to affect
division or separation from them. Nor be ye loath to take another
pastor or teacher; for that flock which hath two shepherds is not
endangered, but secured thereby.”[116]

Thus abruptly ends this precious fragment; and it may justly be
esteemed one of the rarest verbal gems in the trophied casket of our
Saxon tongue.

Two vessels had been chartered for the voyage: the “_Speedwell_,”
a small ship of some sixty tons, and a larger vessel of a hundred
and eighty tons, called the “_Mayflower_.”[117] The “Speedwell”
lay moored at Delft Haven, a little seaport in the vicinity of
Leyden.[118] The Pilgrims were to sail in this ship across the
Channel to Southampton, where the “Mayflower” would join them, and
thence they were to launch in company across the Atlantic.[119]

On the 21st of July, 1620, the exiles quitted Leyden, which had been
their quiet resting-place for eleven years, and journeyed to Delft
Haven. “When the ship was ready to carry us away,” wrote Edward
Winslow, “the brethren that stayed at Leyden, having again solemnly
sought the Lord with us and for us, feasted us that were to go,
at our pastor’s house, a commodious building. Here we refreshed
ourselves, after tears, with singing psalms, making joyful melody
in our hearts, as well as with the voice, there being many of the
congregation very expert in music; and indeed it was the sweetest
melody that ever mine ears heard. After this our friends accompanied
us to Delft Haven, where we were to embark, and there feasted us
again. And after prayer by our pastor, when a flood of tears was
poured out, they accompanied us to the ship; but we were not able to
speak one to another for the abundance of sorrow to part.”[120]

Only a part of the colonists went aboard the “Speedwell” on the day
of their arrival at Delft Haven; the others tarried in the town over
night, spending the hours in conversation and expressions of true
Christian love.[121] “The morning light must have gleamed mournfully
upon their eyes through the windows of the apartments where they
assembled. It told them that the last days of their pleasant
intercourse with old, endeared friends had come, for the wind was
fair, and the vessel was ready to weigh anchor and sail. And so they
went down to the shore, where the scene at Miletus was literally
repeated, save that the people were the voyagers, instead of their
apostolic father. Robinson ‘kneeled down and prayed with them, and
all wept sore, and fell upon his neck and kissed him, sorrowing
most of all for the words which he spake, that they should see his
face no more; then he accompanied them to the ship.’ Even the Dutch
strangers, who saw the parting, stood and wept.”[122]

Then came the shrill “Yo hoy” of the seamen; final caresses were
exchanged; sail was hoisted; a salute was fired from the “Speedwell;”
and while the friends on shore watched the receding vessel and
strained their eye-balls to retain their vision, she glinted below
the horizon, and was gone.

Southampton was safely and speedily reached; “the _Speedwell_ entered
port to join the _Mayflower_—ships whose names have become hallowed,
and are worthy of being placed, with the Argo of the ancients, amid
the constellations of heaven.”




CHAPTER V.

THE FROZEN WILDERNESS.

      “Whoso shrinks or falters now,
      Whoso to the yoke would bow
      Brand the craven on his brow.
      Take your land of sun and bloom;
      Only leave to freedom room
      For her plough, and forge, and loom.”
                                     WHITTIER.


At Southampton the Pilgrims made no lengthened stay, pausing but to
perfect some necessary final arrangements.[123] A fortnight later,
on the 5th of August, 1620, the “Speedwell” and the “Mayflower”
weighed anchor, and hoisting sail, set out in company for America.
The English soil had scarcely dipped below the horizon, when the
“Speedwell” made signals of distress; she was found to leak badly.
After consultation, the voyagers wore ship, and put into Dartmouth
harbor for repairs. Here the Pilgrims passed eight days, “to their
great charge, and loss of time and a fair wind.”[124]

On the 21st of August, a fresh start was made. This time a hundred
leagues of sea were passed, and the vessels were just rounding Land’s
End, when lo, the “Speedwell” again bore up under pretence of
unseaworthiness. Once more the shores of England were regained, and
anchor was dropped in Plymouth harbor. The captain of the recusant
ship, backed by his company, was dismayed at the dangers of the
enterprise, and gave out that the “Speedwell” was too weak for the
voyage. “Upon this,” says Bradford, “it was resolved to dismiss
her and part of the company, and to proceed with the ‘Mayflower.’
This, though it was grievous and caused great discouragement, was
put into execution. So after they had taken out such provision as
the ‘Mayflower’ could stow, and concluded both what number and what
persons to send back, they had another sad parting, the one ship
going back to London, and the other preparing for the voyage. Those
that returned were such as, for the most part, were willing to do so,
either out of discontent or some fear conceived of the ill-success of
a voyage pressed against so many crosses, and in a year-time so far
spent. Others, in regard to their own weakness and the charge of many
young children, were thought least useful, and most unfit to bear the
brunt of this hard adventure; unto which work of God and judgment of
their brethren they were content to submit. And thus, like Gideon’s
army, this small number was divided, as if the Lord thought even
these few too many for the great work he had to do.”[125]

But though Cushman wrote, “Our voyage thus far hath been as full
of crosses as ourselves of crookedness,”[126] no dangers could
appal the dauntless; and “having thus winnowed their numbers, the
little band, not of resolute men only, but wives, some far gone in
pregnancy, children, infants, a floating village, yet in all but one
hundred souls, went on board the single ship, which was hired only to
carry them across the Atlantic; and on the 6th of September, 1620,
thirteen years after the first colonization of Virginia, two months
before the concession of the grand charter of Plymouth, without any
warrant from the sovereign of England, without any useful charter
from a corporate body, the Pilgrims in the ‘Mayflower’ set sail for
the New World, where the past could offer no favorable auguries.”[127]

But these Christian heroes of a grander venture than that classic
voyage which Virgil has sung of old Æneas,

          “Trojæ qui primus ab oris
      Italiam, fato profugus, Lavinaque venit
      Litora,”[128]

unawed by the abounding perils of the sea and land, unchilled by the
desertion of their comrades, kept on their solitary way, and “bated
no jot of heart or hope.”

The “Mayflower” was a small vessel, yet smaller ones had repeatedly
explored the ocean. “Columbus’ ‘ships’ were from fifteen to
thirty-two tons burden, and without decks. Frobisher had traversed
the watery waste with a vessel of twenty-five tons, and Pring
had coasted along the shores of New England in a bark of fifty
tons. Those were manned by hardy seamen, to whom the tempest was a
play-fellow; but these men and women and children knew nothing of the
sea; they only knew that ships sailed, and too often did not return;
they had seen the sea, even along the coasts of England and Holland,
lashed into fury. To trust themselves upon it on an uncertain voyage
to a wilderness harbor” was no gala undertaking; yet serenely
they accepted the situation, thankful to God for civil rights and
untrammelled liberty to hymn his praises.

“The voyage of the pioneer ship,” says Elliot, “was long,
tempestuous, and monotonous, as what sea-voyage is not? yet, with a
firm purpose, she opened a way through the buffeting ocean towards
the setting sun. Already its rays came to them a little shorn; the
autumn solstice was at hand, and winter not far away. In religious
exercises, in hopeful conversation, the exiles passed the weary days.
These were varied by storms, and once by a great danger. In the
straining of the ship, a strong timber threatened to break. Then,
among the lumber which they had brought, a large ‘iron screw was
found, and the ship was saved.’ Their faces were turned westward,
but who can wonder that a lingering look was cast behind, and that
pleasant memories for a moment dimmed their recent sufferings and
present hopes? Men, women, and children suffered the ‘sickness of the
sea,’ that sickness which is inexorable, which weakens the knees,
burdens the heart, and paralyzes the brain. The sailors laughed and
scoffed; but to them it seemed that death was nigh. Yet it was not;
one only of the whole number, William Butten, died during the voyage;
and one was born to take his place, a son of Stephen Hopkins, named
Oceanus, the son of the sea.

“Daily the Pilgrims turned their eyes westward, hoping for a sight of
the new land. They had shaped their course for the Hudson river, of
which the Dutch navigators had made favorable reports. As the voyage
lengthened, their longings for the land increased. They had been
tossed on the sea now sixty-five days, when, on the 9th of November,
the long, low coast-line of the New World gladdened their eyes. They
thanked God for the sight, and took courage. On the 11th of November
they dropped anchor within Cape Cod. Sixty-seven days they had passed
in the ship since their final departure from England, and one hundred
and twelve since the embarkation at Delft Haven. They were weary,
many were sick, and the scurvy had attacked some. They might well
rejoice that they had reached these shores.”[129]

On their departure from Holland, Robinson had handed them a long and
pregnant letter of instruction and advice. In this he counselled,
among other things, the early formation of a body politic, and the
inauguration of a civil government. “As you are not furnished with
persons of special eminence above the rest to be chosen by you into
office of government,” he added, “let your wisdom and godliness
appear not only in choosing such persons as do entirely love and will
to promote your common good, but also in yielding unto them all due
honor and obedience in their lawful administrations.”[130]

In obedience to this sage counsel, the Pilgrims now, before landing,
met to consider how their government should be constituted; and they
formed themselves into a body politic by this formal, solemn, and
voluntary compact:

“In the name of God, Amen; We whose names are underwritten, the loyal
subjects of our dread sovereign King James, having undertaken, for
the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honor
of our king and country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the
northern parts of Virginia, do, by these presents, solemnly and
mutually, in the presence of God and of one another, covenant and
combine ourselves together into a civil body politic, for our better
ordering and preservation, and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and
by virtue hereof, to enact, constitute, and frame such just and equal
laws, ordinances, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as
shall be thought most convenient for the general good of the colony:
unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.”[131]

“This instrument—under which John Carver was immediately and
unanimously chosen governor for one year—was signed by the whole body
of men, forty-one in number; who, with their families, constituted
the one hundred, the whole colony, ‘the proper democracy’ that
arrived in New England. This was the birth of popular constitutional
liberty. The Middle Ages had been familiar with charters and
constitutions; but they had been merely compacts for immunities,
concessions of municipal privileges, or limitations of the sovereign
power in favor of feudal institutions. In the cabin of the
‘Mayflower’ humanity recovered its rights, and instituted government
on the basis of ‘equal laws’ for ‘the general good.’”[132]

Law and order provided for, the Pilgrims next proceeded to select
the precise spot for their settlement. “The first Virginia colony,”
remarks Bancroft, “sailing along the shores of North Carolina,
was, by a favoring storm, driven into the magnificent bay of the
Chesapeake. The Pilgrims, having chosen for their settlement the
country near the Hudson, the best position on the whole coast, were
conducted, through some miscalculation, to the most barren and
inhospitable part of Massachusetts.”[133]

It was a mooted question whether to plant a colony on this frigid
coast, or to hoist anchor anew and set sail for the Hudson. The
captain of the “Mayflower” favored an immediate settlement;[134]
and the voyagers, weary of the sea, and, perhaps, influenced by the
fact that the winter began to breathe upon them, finally determined
to send ashore a reconnoitering squad to sound the disposition of the
natives, and to select a landing-spot.

In 1584, the settlers under Sir Walter Raleigh’s patent had named
the entire southeastern coast of North America Virginia, after Queen
Elizabeth; but in 1614 the name of New England began to be applied to
the more northern portion of this immense extent of territory;[135]
and thus it happened that here, on this wild coast, the Pilgrims had
a dear home word still wrapped around them.

On the 13th of November, the exiles unshipped their shallop. It was
found to want repairs. Sixteen or seventeen days must elapse ere it
could be gotten ready for service, so the carpenter said. Impatient
of delay, sixteen men, “with every man his musket, sword, and
corslet,” went ashore, headed by stout Miles Standish, the military
leader of the Pilgrims.[136]

    “Short of stature he was, but strongly built and athletic,
    Broad in the shoulders, deep-chested, with muscles and sinews of
          iron;
    Brown as a nut was his face, but his russet beard was already
    Flaked with patches of snow, as hedges sometimes in November.”[137]

“On account of the danger,” the expedition “was rather permitted
than approved.” But Standish and his comrades had braved peril too
often to yield it obeisance. They found the shore inexpressibly bleak
and barren. Winter had already set his icy kiss upon the streams.
Nothing greeted their eyes but heavy sand, a few stunted pines, and
some sweet woods, as junipers and sassafras. They made this record
in their journal: “We found the greatest store of fowl that ever we
saw.”[138]

Explorations were at once commenced. “They sent parties along the
coast, and into the forests.” “About ten o’clock one morning,” says
a member of the band, “we came into a deep valley, full of brush,
woodgaile, and tiny grass, through which we found little paths or
tracks, and then we saw a deer, and found springs of fresh water,
of which we were heartily glad, and sat us down and drank our first
New England water.”[139] Continuing their march, they were perplexed
by the frequent forest cross-paths. Once they struck a track “well
nigh ten feet broad,” which they thought might lead to some human
habitation; but eventually they concluded that it was “only a path
made to drive deer in when the Indians hunted.”

Still they found no natives; and wearying of that path they took
another, when, lo, they saw a mound “which looked like a grave, but
was larger.” “Musing what it might be,” they finally determined to
examine. “We found,” says the old chronicler, “first a mat, and
under that a fair bow, and then another mat, and under that a board
about three feet long, finely carved and painted; also between the
mats we found bowls, trays, dishes, and such like trinkets. At length
we came to a fair new mat, and under that two bundles—one bigger the
other less. We opened the greater, and found in it a great quantity
of fine and perfect red powder, and the bones and skull of a man.
We opened the less bundle, and found the same powder in it, and the
bones and head of a little child.

“Once, when examining one of these grave mounds, we found a little
old basket full of fair Indian corn, and on digging farther, found
a fine, great basket full of very fair corn of this year, with some
thirty-six goodly ears of corn, which was a goodly sight; the basket
was round and narrow at the top; it held about three or four bushels,
which was as much as we could lift from the ground, and it was very
handsomely and cunningly made.”[140]

This corn was carefully preserved for seed. “We took it,” says
the conscientious narrator, “proposing, as soon as we could meet
with any of the inhabitants of that place, to make them large
satisfaction.”[141] And afterwards this corn was mentioned to
Massasoit, the Indian king, when the exiles proffered it back to the
owners, and on their refusal of it, paid them in “whatsoever they
might rather choose.”[142]

This exploration was unsuccessful; as was also the first expedition
in the shallop, which had been at length repaired. “Some of the
people that died that winter took the origin of their death” in
this second enterprise; “for it snowed and did blow all the day and
night, and froze withal.” The men who were from time to time set on
shore “were tired with marching up and down the steep hills and deep
valleys, which lay half a foot thick with snow.”[143]

Checkered by these adventures, the days passed away, and meantime
the winter deepened. Nothing had yet been done, the captain was
impatient to be gone, and he threatened to set his passengers ashore
at hap-hazard under the cheerless skies and bitter winds of drear
December.[144]

Pushed to renewed exertion by these considerations, the dauntless
Pilgrims once more launched their shallop, and quitting their
loved ones in the ship, again essayed to find some proper site for
a settlement. This time Carver, Bradford, Winslow, and Standish,
accompanied by eight sailors, made the coasting voyage.[145] Infinite
were the hardships which this little band, sailing in December, in
an open boat, were compelled to undergo. “Some of them were like to
have swooned with cold.” “The water, dashing in spray upon their
clothes, froze, and made them like coats of iron.” For fifteen
leagues they held on their cheerless course upon the winter sea. They
had quitted the “Mayflower” on the 6th of December; two days later
they landed. “Whereupon,” says the old chronicler, “we espied some
Indians, very busy about some black thing; what it was we could not
tell, till, afterwards, they saw us, and ran to and fro as if they
had been carrying away something.” “It was the body of a grampus. Ere
long a great cry was heard, and one of the company came running in,
shouting ‘Indians! Indians!’ This was followed by a flight of arrows;
but Captain Standish was ready, and quickly discharged his musket;
and then another, and another, so that the Indians retreated, and,
except for the fright, no harm was done.” “The cry of our enemies,”
remarks the narrator, “was frightful. Their note was after this
manner: ‘_Woath wach haha hach woach_,’ sounds which we may now utter
with safety—if we can.”[146] This spot was afterwards known as “First
Encounter.”[147]

No convenient harbor had yet been found. But “the pilot of the
boat, who had been in these regions before, gave assurance of a
good one which might be reached before night; and they followed his
guidance. After some hours’ sailing, a storm of snow and rain began;
the sea was swollen; the rudder broke; the boat had to be steered
with oars. Every moment the storm increased; night was at hand; to
reach harbor before dark, as much sail as possible was crowded on:
then the mast broke into three pieces; the sail fell overboard. The
pilot, in dismay, would have run the shallop on shore in a cove
full of breakers. ‘About with her,’ shouted a sailor, ‘or we are
cast away!’ They got her about immediately, and, in passing over the
surf, they entered a fair sound, and found shelter under the lee
of a small rise of land. It was dark, and the rain beat furiously;
yet the men were so wet, and cold, and weak, that they slighted the
danger to be apprehended from the savages, and going ashore, after
great difficulty kindled a fire. Morning, as it dawned, showed the
place to be a small island without the entrance of a harbor. Time was
precious; the season advancing; their companions were left off Cape
Cod in suspense. Yet the day was required for rest and preparation.
It was so spent. The following day was the ‘Christian Sabbath.’
Nothing marks the character of the Pilgrims more fully than that they
kept it sacredly though every consideration demanded haste.”[148]

On Monday, the 11th[149] of December, 1620, the exploring shallop
quitted the island Patmos, and, proceeding up the harbor, landed the
Pilgrim scouting party, on that same immortal day, at Plymouth Rock.
There, in one sense, New England was born; and, as the Forefathers
stepped upon the rock-ribbed shore, it uttered its first baby-cry,
a prayer and a thanksgiving to the Lord—an echo of the old Chaldean
shepherds’ song, “Glory to God in the highest; on earth peace,
good-will to men.”




CHAPTER VI.

THE PILGRIM SETTLEMENT.

      “Quit ye as men; be true then, who would fight
      In this so holy cause; think ye a soul
      Weighed down by beggarly lusts can have a right
      To urge God’s ark of freedom to its goal?
      They must be holy who’re ordained to be
      The high priests of a people’s liberty.”
                                          WILSON.


A short survey of the surrounding country convinced the Pilgrim
pioneers that the long-sought spot had at last been found. They
determined to plant their settlement on Plymouth Rock, with no other
seal than the broad one of the Divine sanction. Entering their
shallop, they soon regained the “Mayflower.” Carver recited the story
of their adventures to the clustering voyagers; and when he said that
a spot had been found where they might erect their Ebenezer, devoutly
all thanked God.

At once the “Mayflower’s” course was shaped for Plymouth harbor,
where she dropped anchor on the 16th of December.[150] The first law
on the Pilgrim statute-book was, that each man should build his own
house.[151]

A few days after the arrival of the ship, “a party of colonists went
ashore to fell timber, to saw, to rive, to carry, and prepare for the
important work of building; and that day every man worked with a
will, hopefully and heartily. A new home, a pleasant refuge, future
security, was the aim of every one, and while each cheered the other,
the axes rang out in harmony with their hopes; their strokes were
as heavy as their hearts were light. The crowned oaks of the forest
did homage, and yielded their riches to found the infant state.”
After sufficient timber had been secured for present want, “many went
to work on an adjacent hill[152] to prepare fortifications; others
measured the land, and allotted the lots for building.”[153]

The houses were ranged in a double row along one street;[154]
and for economic reasons the community was divided into nineteen
families, an arrangement which necessitated fewer buildings and less
outlay.[155] Yet despite the energetic labors of the settlers, they
made haste slowly. At that inclement season it was almost impossible
to build. Happily the weather was moderate for December;[156] but
rain fell incessantly, which was disastrous to the health of men
already wasting away under consumptions and lung-fevers.[157] It was
remembered that “a green Christmas makes a fat church-yard.”

The Pilgrims were well satisfied with the site of their settlement,
hard and sterile as it was. Indeed, they had a devout habit of
looking on the good, rather than the evil of events, and this made
even their crosses easier to be borne. “This harbor,” they said,
“is a bay greater than Cape Cod, compassed with goodly land; and in
the bay are two fine islands,[158] uninhabited, wherein are nothing
but woods, oaks, pines, walnuts, beech, sassafras, vines, and other
trees which we know not. The bay is a most hopeful place, and has
innumerable store of fowl and excellent food; it cannot but contain
fish in their seasons; skate, cod, turbot, and herring, we have
tasted of. Here is abundance of muscles, the greatest and best we
ever saw, also crabs and lobsters in their time, infinite. The place
is in fashion like a sickle or fish-hook. The land for the crust of
the earth is a spit’s depth, excellent black mould, and fat in many
places; and vines are everywhere, and cherry-trees, plum-trees, and
many others whose names we know not. Many kinds of herbs we find in
winter hereabouts, as strawberry-leaves innumerable, sorrel, yarrow,
carrot, brook-lime, liverwort, water-cresses, great store of leeks,
and an excellent strong kind of flax or hemp. Here is sand, gravel,
an excellent clay, no better in the world, exceeding good for pots,
and it will wash like soap; we have the best water that ever we
drank, and the brooks will soon be full of fish.”[159]

So runs the journal of the Pilgrims. Hopeful and thankful for what
they had, they seemed anxious to be pleased, and to make the best
even of their ills. It was in no sour and bitter spirit that they

      “Leaned their cheeks against the thick-ribbed ice,
      And looked up with devout eyes to Him
      Who bade them bloom, unblanched, amid the waste
      Of desolation.”

After all, perhaps it was well even for their present safety that
they had landed on the bleak New England strand. “Had they been
carried, according to their desire, unto Hudson’s river,” says Cotton
Mather, “the Indians in those parts were at this time so many and
so mighty and so sturdy, that in probability all this feeble number
of Christians had been massacred by the bloody savages, as not long
after some others were; whereas the good hand of God now brought
them to a country wonderfully prepared for their entertainment by a
sweeping mortality that had lately been among the natives. ‘We have
heard with our ears, O God, our fathers have told us, what work thou
didst in their days, in the times of old; how thou dravest out the
heathen with thy hand, and plantedst them; how thou didst afflict the
people, and cast them out.’ The Indians in these parts had newly,
even about a year or two before, been visited with such a prodigious
pestilence, as carried away not a tenth, but nine parts of ten; yea,
’tis said, nineteen of twenty among them; so that the woods were
almost cleared to make room for a better growth.

“It is remarkable that a Frenchman, who, not long before the Pilgrim
settlement, had by a shipwreck been made captive among the Indians
of New England, did, as the survivors report, just before he died
in their hands, tell these tawny pagans that ‘God, being angry with
them for their wickedness, would not only destroy them all, but also
people the place with another nation, which would not live after
their brutish manner.’ Those infidels then blasphemously said, ‘God
could not kill them,’ which was confuted by a horrible and unusual
plague, whereby they were consumed in such vast multitudes, that our
first ancestors found the land almost covered with their unburied
carcasses; and they that were alive were smitten into awful and
humble regard of the English by the terrors which the remembrance of
the Frenchman’s prophecy had imprinted on them.”[160]

During the first few months of their wilderness life, little occurred
of special public interest among the Pilgrims. The routine of their
days was undisturbed. Engrossed by the pressing present duties of the
hour, they labored to complete their preparations for the winter.
Their existence was that which is common in all pioneer settlements,
which has been led a thousand times since on our western prairies,
and which is led to-day by the settler who rears his log-cabin under
the shadow of the Rocky mountains.

The country seemed lonely and monotonous.[161] “Among the few
recorded incidents,” says Elliot, “we gather here and there some
facts which serve to illustrate the social and moral condition of
the exiles during these initial months of their western life. On the
21st of January, 1621, they celebrated public worship for the first
time on shore. On the 17th of February, Standish was chosen captain,
and all were arranged in military orders. This may be called their
first legislative act, the first communal life of men who believed in
and were forced to act out the principle of self-government; every
man could vote, and the ballot of the lowest colonist counted the
same as Governor Carver’s. Births and deaths varied the monotony
of existence. Peregrine White, the first born in New England, had
appeared in November, and six persons had died in December, among
whom was Dorothy, Bradford’s wife, who was drowned. This was the
beginning of a mortality which carried dismay and destruction into
the weakened ranks.”[162]

Measures were taken for the military protection of the colony. “A
minion, a saker, and two other guns, were mounted on Fort Hill,”
where a block-citadel had been erected.[163] Standish was the _beau
ideal_ of a soldier—alert, provident, tireless. The words which
Longfellow has put into his mouth exhibit his genial humor and quaint
wisdom:

    “‘Serve yourself, would you be well served, is an excellent adage;
    So I take care of my arms, as scribes of their pens and their
          ink-horns.
    Then, too, there are my soldiers, my great, invincible army,
    Twelve men, all equipped, having each his rest and his matchlock,
    Eighteen shillings a month, together with diet and pillage,
    And, like Cæsar, I know the name of each of my soldiers.’
    This he said with a smile, that danced in his eyes, as the sunbeams
    Dance on the waves of the sea, and vanish again in a moment.”[164]

The peculiar situation of the Pilgrims tended to increase that
rugged individuality, that self-confident earnestness, that somewhat
dogmatic vigor, which already characterized them, and which is still
a salient trait of their descendants. There they stood on a bleak and
desolate shore; bereaved of sympathy at home, without friends in the
wilderness, “with none to show them kindness or to bid them welcome.”
The nearest French settlement was at Port Royal; it was five hundred
miles and more of trackless forest to the English plantation of
Virginia.[165] The exiles were obliged to be self-centred; cut off
from the outer world and isolated, they could entertain no friends
but God and each other.

We can hardly be sufficiently thankful for the singular combination
of circumstances which produced the Plymouth settlement in 1620.
“Had New England been colonized immediately on the discovery of
the American continent, the old English institutions would have
been planted under the powerful influence of the Roman religion;
had the settlement been made under Elizabeth, it would have been
before activity of the public mind in religion had conducted to a
corresponding activity of mind in politics.” God builded better
than men knew; and when the time was ripe, he chose “the Pilgrims,
Englishmen, Protestants, exiles for religion, men disciplined by
misfortune, cultivated by opportunities of extensive observation,
equal in rank as in rights, bound by no code but that of religion and
the public will,”[166] and with these elements He planted a model
state, and bade it grow into a democratic, Christian commonwealth,
that it might be at once an exemplar and a benefactor to mankind.

The Pilgrims cheerfully accepted peril and discomfort to build such
a state. Peace under liberty—_sub libertate quietem_—this was their
aspiration, and they said,

      “We ask a shrine for faith and simple prayer,
      Freedom’s sweet waters, and untainted air.”[167]




CHAPTER VII.

PIONEER LIFE.

           “E’en the best must own,
      Patience and resignation are the pillars
      Of human peace on earth.”
                          YOUNG, _Night Thoughts_.


Happily, God blessed the Pilgrims with an early and mild spring.[168]
By the middle of March the birds began to sing; the streams shook off
their icy cerements; the rills ran laughing to the sea; Nature put on
her gala drapery; the myriad wild-flowers opened their drowsy eyes;
the time had come for the ever-marvellous resurrection of the year.
The forests seemed instinct with life. On every hill-side nature
hymned her praise.

The settlers shared in the buoyant and joyous feeling. They had met
and mastered the New England winter. Their houses were built. Their
family arrangements were completed; and now “the fair, warm days” of
spring, the idyl of the year, were a harbinger of hope.

Careful and provident, the Pilgrims improved this delightful
weather in planting. “On the 19th and 20th of March,” says the old
chronicler, “we digged our grounds and sowed our garden-seed.”[169]
This done, individual members of the community began to stray into
the bordering forest, incited thereto partly by natural curiosity
to familiarize themselves with the salient local features of their
wilderness homes, and partly by the pursuit of game. Sometimes
the tyro hunters were startled by strange sights and noises; for
to them the dim, still woods were a mystery. “John Goodman was
much frightened this day”—so runs the entry in the Journal on one
occasion—“he went abroad for a little walk with his spaniel. Suddenly
two great wolves ran after the dog, which ran to him and betwixt his
legs for succor. He, having nothing with him, threw a stick at one of
them, and hit him, and they presently both ran away; but they came
again. He got a plain board in his hand, and they sat both on their
tails grinning at him a good time. At last they went their way and
left him. He could not move fast, as he had lame feet.”[170]

On another occasion a storm is recorded: “At one o’clock it
thundered. The birds sang most pleasantly before this. The thunder
was strong, and in great claps, followed by rain very sadly till
midnight.”[171]

Thus far they had seen no Indians since landing at Plymouth. Traces
of them abounded. Pale wreaths of smoke, which curled above the
forest-trees, gave certain token that they lurked in the vicinity.
The settlers knew that they must ere long meet the aborigines, and
they awaited the event with mingled hope and apprehension.

On the 16th of March, one of the warmest, pleasantest days of the
early spring, a number of the Pilgrims—Bradford, Winslow, Hopkins,
and Carver, among the rest—were gathered on the skirts of the
settlement, chatting over their plans and projects for the coming
days, when suddenly a guttural shout was heard, and the words
“_Welcome, Englishmen!_” spoken in broken Saxon, fell on their
ears.[172]

The astonished settlers started to their feet, and glancing in the
direction whence the words had seemed to come, discerned on the edge
of the forest a single dusky figure, waving a hand and advancing
boldly towards them. In deep silence the Pilgrims awaited his
approach. On reaching the group, the Indian greeted them warmly,
repeating his welcome. Reassured by his friendly gestures and hearty
repetition of the familiar English phrase in which only kindness
lurked, the settlers cordially returned his greeting; and knowing
that the way to the heart lies through the stomach, they at once gave
their dusky guest “strong water, biscuit, butter, cheese, and some
pudding, with a piece of mallard.”[173]

The heart of the savage was gained; the taciturnity characteristic
of his race gave way, and he told his entertainers many things which
they had long desired to know.

They ascertained that he was a chief of a tribe of Indians whose
hunting-grounds were distant five days’ journey; that the country
in their vicinity was called Pawtuxet; that some years previous a
pestilence had swept off the tribes that inhabited the district, so
that none remained to claim the soil.

When asked how he came to speak English, he replied that he had
picked up what little he knew from the fishermen who frequented the
coast of Maine. In response to inquiries concerning the interior
of the country and the tribes inhabiting the inland plateaus, he
imparted valuable information.[174]

The Pilgrims gleaned these facts from his recital: A sagamore named
Massasoit was their nearest powerful neighbor. He was disposed to
be friendly; but another tribe, called the Nausets, were greatly
incensed against the English, and with sufficient cause. It seems
that a captain by the name of Hunt, who had been left in charge of a
vessel by Captain Smith in 1614, had lured twenty or thirty of their
brother red men on board his ship on pretence of trading; then, when
they accepted his invitation, he set sail for Spain, where he sold
his victims into slavery.[175]

The whole Nauset tribe panted to avenge the atrocious treachery
of “this wretched man, who cared not what mischief he did for his
profit;” and it was with them that the Pilgrims had had their
skirmish when exploring the coast in the December sleet.[176]

The Indian from whose broken English these things were learned was
Samoset. He was the first of the aborigines who held friendly and
intelligent intercourse with the forefathers. His frank, hearty
“welcome” was the only one the Pilgrims received; and his faithful,
life-long attachment to the English interests, which “made him often
go, in danger of his life, among his countrymen,” won the grateful
recognition of the exiles, and deserves the plaudits of posterity.

Samoset was the first Indian whom many of the Pilgrims had ever
seen. He was therefore scanned with no little curiosity. He is
thus described in the Journal of the Pilgrims: “He was a man free
in speech; a tall, straight man; the hair of his head black, long
behind, short before, and no beard. He was stark naked, save only
a strip of leather about his waist, with a fringe a span long or a
little more. He had a bow and two arrows, the one headed, the other
not.”[177]

The settlers treated Samoset with great hospitality, as duty and
sound policy alike demanded. Nevertheless, when night came they
desired him to leave. This he seemed loath to do. They proposed that
he should lodge on board the “Mayflower.” He assented; but the tide
was so low and the wind was so fresh, that the shallop could not gain
the vessel’s side. Nothing remained but to entertain their guest on
shore. He was conducted to the house of Stephen Hopkins,[178] and
was stealthily watched, “as we feared evil,” comments the narrator;
“which, however, did not come.”[179]

On the following morning, Samoset quitted Plymouth, carrying with him
a variety of presents, a knife, a bracelet, a ring; and he promised
to return soon and bring with him some of Massasoit’s Indians, to
open a trade in furs with the colonists.[180] He also said that he
would do his utmost towards securing an interview between the English
and the Indian sagamore, as preliminary to a lasting treaty and a
prosperous peace.[181]

Samoset, true to his promise, did indeed return within three days,
bringing with him five companions. All were cordially welcomed;
but as it was Sunday, no business was transacted, the guests being
dismissed as early as possible. Samoset remained at Plymouth; his
friends affirmed their purpose to come again on the morrow. The
morrow came but the Indians did not. Samoset was sent in quest of
them. The next day he returned again, this time with four other
warriors, each provided with a few skins and dried herrings, which
they were anxious to barter.

One of these Indians was named Squanto. His history was somewhat
romantic. He belonged to the company kidnapped by Hunt and sold in
Spain. There he, with the others, had been liberated through the
exertions of the monks of Malaga, and he had made his way to England.
He dwelt in Cornhill, London, with an English merchant, for some
time; and thence he had finally made his way back to his forest home,
to be, as the event proved, a valuable friend, interpreter, and ally
to the whites.[182]

Samoset and his friends were but the advance guard of a larger host.
An hour later, Massasoit himself appeared on a neighboring slope,
accompanied by his brother, Quadequina, and a cloud of warriors. At
the outset both Englishman and Indian were shy of each other; but at
last, after much passing to and fro, they came to parley. Massasoit
and Standish saluted each other; after which the soldier conducted
the sachem to an unfinished house in the vicinage, where he laid for
his guest a green rug and four cushions.[183]

Presently the Pilgrim governor advanced, in as great state as he
could command, with beat of drum and blare of trumpet, and a squad
of armed men as a body-guard. Salutations, which consisted of mutual
kisses, being over, the governor and the sagamore seated themselves.
Meat was then served, and the new friends drank to each other’s
health and happiness.[184]

Negotiations ensued; and “a treaty of friendship was soon completed
in few and unequivocal terms. The respective parties promised to
abstain from mutual injuries, and to deliver up offenders; the
colonists were to receive assistance if attacked; to render it,
if Massasoit should be assailed unjustly. The treaty included the
confederates of the sachem: it is the oldest act of diplomacy
recorded in New England; it was concluded in a day, and, being
founded on reciprocal interests, was sacredly kept for more than
half a century. Massasoit desired the alliance, for the powerful
Narragansetts were his enemies; his tribe, moreover, having become
habituated to some English luxuries, were willing to establish a
traffic; while the emigrants obtained peace, security, and the
opportunity of a lucrative commerce.”[185]

Massasoit is thus described by the Pilgrim journalist: “In his person
he is a very lusty man, in his best years, an able body, grave of
countenance, and spare of speech; in his attire little or nothing
differing from the rest of his followers, save only in a great chain
of white beads about his neck; behind his neck, attached to the
chain, hangs a pouch of tobacco, which he smoked, and gave us to
smoke. His face was painted with a seal red, and he was oiled both
head and face that he looked greasily.”[186]

The sagamore’s favorite haunts were along the northern shores of
Narragansett Bay, between Taunton and Providence, one of his
principal seats being Mount Hope,[187] that

      ——“throne of royal state, which far
      Outshone the wealth of Ormus or of Ind,
      Or where the gorgeous east, with richest hand,
      Showers on her kings barbaric pomp and gold.”

In the latter part of March, 1621, an event occurred which evinced
alike the promptitude and the decision of the self-governed Puritan
colony. It has been said that “God sifted three kingdoms to get
the Pilgrim wheat” of the New England enterprise; yet despite this
care the chaff was not all gotten rid of. It seems that one John
Billington, a “lewd fellow of the baser sort,” had come from London
and smuggled himself on board the “Mayflower,” for the purpose of
stealing a voyage to the new world. He had no sympathy with the
religious feelings of the Pilgrims, nor did he share their love of
order and civil liberty.[188] He had frequently given offence, and
now he was convicted of “contempt of the captain’s lawful command,
and of making opprobrious speeches.”[189] His sentence was peculiar:
“he was to have his neck and heels tied together.”[190] He begged so
hard that he was forgiven on this occasion; but he continued to be a
profane, ungovernable, vicious knave, and finally came to a bad end.

At about this same time another offence was committed against the
civil peace of the colony. Two servants of Stephen Hopkins met and
fought a duel with sword and dagger. Both combatants were wounded;
but they were immediately seized, convicted, and sentenced “to have
their head and feet tied together, and so to lie for twenty-four
hours without meat or drink.”[191]

The hostile lackeys were bound, in exact accordance with the verdict;
but “after lying an hour they begged piteously for mercy; whereon
the governor, on the entreaty of their master, released them, they
promising to keep the peace in future.”[192]

These sentences convinced the refractory that the colonial government
was something more than the shadow of a name; and it held them in awe
of provoking its severity.

Through all these months disease was busy among the Pilgrims. But
though pain racked many a weakened form, no one spoke of returning to
England. As winter faded into spring the mortality became dreadful.
Every house was a hospital.

      “There was no hearthstone, howsoe’er defended,
         But had one vacant chair.”

“Death,” says Elliot, “had reaped a ripe, fat harvest, and of the
one hundred scarce fifty remained. Six had died in December; eight
in January; seventeen in February; thirteen in March.”[193] Yet the
Pilgrims kissed the rod; and though “the searching sharpness of that
pure climate had crept into the crevices of their crazed bodies,
causing death,”[194] they said “the Lord gave and the Lord hath
taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.”

The dead were buried in a bank, at a little distance from Plymouth
rock; and lest the Indians should learn the weakened condition of
the colony, the graves were levelled, and sown with grass.[195] Over
these the unflinching survivors locked hands, and wiping their eyes,
looked up, firm, devout, hopeful as ever.

In April, 1621, Governor Carver died. “Whilst they were busy about
their seed, he came out of the field very sick, it being a hot day.
He complained greatly of his head, and lay down; within a few hours
his senses failed, and he never spoke more. His death was much
lamented, and caused great heaviness, as there was cause.”[196]
Shortly after, William Bradford, the historian of the colony, was
elected governor, “and being not yet recovered from a severe illness,
in which he had been near the point of death, Isaac Allerton was
chosen to be an assistant unto him.”[197]

On the very day of Carver’s death, the 5th of April, the “Mayflower”
sailed for England.[198] Not a soul returned in her of that devoted
band. It has been well said that the departure of the “Mayflower”
surpasses in dignity, though not in desperation, the burning of
his ships by Cortez. Through the struggles of the winter she had
always been in sight, a place of refuge and relief in any desperate
emergency. While the good ship lay moored in Plymouth harbor, they
had a hold upon the outer world. But now, as grouped upon the shore
they stood and watched her, as she slowly spread her sails and crept
out of the bay and from their sight, they felt inexpressibly dreary
and bereaved: when the sun set in the western forest, the “Mayflower”
had disappeared in the distant blue.[199]

                    “Can ye scan the woe
      That wrings their bosoms, as this last frail link
      Binding to man and habitable earth
      Is severed? Can ye tell what pangs were there,
      What keen regrets, what sickness of the heart,
      What yearning o’er their forfeit land of birth;
      Their distant dear ones?”[200]

But they did not long despair. “The sky was not inky, nor their
future desperate,” says Elliot; “the sun still shone gloriously; the
moon still bathed the earth with light; and the stars kept their
ceaseless vigils. Spring here, as of old, followed winter, the
murmuring of streams was heard, and the song of the turtle; birds
builded their nests, the tender grass sprang up under their feet, and
the trees budded and burst forth in wondrous beauty. God was over
all—God, their God, their Friend—their protector here as in the older
world; nay, more their helper now than ever before,”[201] for they
were the orphans of humanity.




CHAPTER VIII.

THE FIRST SUMMER IN NEW ENGLAND.

      “The spring’s gay promise melted into thee,
        Fair summer; and thy gentle reign is here;
      Thy emerald robes are on each leafy tree;
        In the blue sky thy voice is rich and clear;
      And the free brooks have songs to bless thy reign—
      They leap in music ’midst thy bright domain.”
                                        WILLIS G. CLARK.


God has transmuted the primal curse into a blessing. Labor is a
panacea for many ills; and now the fullness of their new life crowded
out homesickness and all fainting of the heart among the Pilgrim
exiles. They had no time for dreams. The weighty cares of the present
exorcised every fevered phantom of regret and apprehension.

Swiftly and pleasantly in the manifold employments of the field
passed the glowing, pregnant spring. The exiles knew that they were
set to subdue the wilderness, to marry the continent with roads, to
dot the forests with schools and churches and hamlets. Daily and
nightly they invoked God’s blessing on their infant colony; and with
God’s kiss upon their brows, they toiled in the full assurance of
success—they knew that hope would be changed to full fruition.

Thus far they had experienced no lack of food. The variety afforded
by wild fowl, fish, and the native fruits, together with the stores
which they had brought with them in the “Mayflower,” amply sufficed
to supply the cravings of hunger.[202] For the future the presage
was good. The crops promised well. Six acres had been sown with
pease and barley. Twenty acres had been planted with the seed-corn
which it had been the good fortune of the exiles to dig out of the
subterranean Indian storehouses;[203] this Squanto, the friendly
Indian interpreter, had instructed them how to sow and till and
manure with fish.[204]

      “Like the swell of some sweet tune,
      Morning rises into noon,
      May glides onward into June;”

and as the season advanced, native grapes and berries were found in
endless variety and inexhaustible abundance. The Pilgrim journalist
also records that wild-flowers of various hues and “very sweet”
fragrance contributed their beauty and incense to the charming summer
scene.[205]

“A visitor to Plymouth, in this first summer of the Puritan
settlement, as he landed on the southern side of a high bluff, would
have seen, standing between it and a rapid little stream, a rude
log-house, twenty feet square, containing the common property of the
plantation. Proceeding up a gentle acclivity between two rows of
log-cabins, nineteen in number, some of them perhaps vacant since
the death of their first tenants, he would have come to a hill,
encircled by a plank platform for cannon. And glancing thence over
the landscape, he might have counted twenty men at work with hoes
in the enclosures about the huts, or fishing in the shallow harbor,
or visiting the woods or the beach for game; while six or eight
women were busy in household affairs, and some twenty children, from
infancy upward, completed the domestic picture.”[206]

The month of June found the colonists so far advanced in the
necessary labors of the season, that they gained a little leisure
to open the volume of local nature, and to scan its pages more
accurately than had been possible in the haste of the initial
December days.

Many a lesson was taken by the wondering settlers in New England
forestry under the skilful tuition of Squanto or Samoset. “Once,”
says the quaint old record, “a party of us got belated in the forest,
where the night was spent; in the morning, wandering from the track,
we were shrewdly puzzled, and lost the way. As we wandered, we came
to a tree, where a young sprit was bowed down over a bow, and some
acorns strewed underneath; Stephen Hopkins said it had been fixed to
catch deer; so as we were looking at it, William Bradford being in
the rear, when he came up looked also upon it, and as he went about,
it gave a sudden jerk up, so that he was immediately caught fast by
the leg. It was a very pretty device, made with a rope of their own
making, and having a noose as artificially fixed as any roper in
England could make, and as like ours as can be: this we brought away
with us.”[207] This was a pleasant jest to the hunters, in which the
gravest of them doubtless indulged in a laugh at their too curious
governor, thus caught in the Indian deer-trap. The hint, however, was
well worth their study; and often afterwards it served them a good
turn, ere their ringing axes frightened the timid deer into following
the dusky native hunters beyond the encroaching and ever-widening
circle of civilization.

To increase the general stock of information, and to relieve the
routine _tedium_ of the settlement, several expeditions were planned
during this first summer; and these looked into the continent a few
miles distant in the east, the north, and the west.[208]

The first of them took the shape of an embassy to Massasoit. As
the warm weather brought the Indians to the sea-shore in search
of lobsters and to fish, they proved to be a sad annoyance to the
colonists. They were treated with uniform courtesy, and this kindness
furnished a motive for frequent visits, so that men, women, and
children, were always hanging about the village, clamorous for food
and pertinaciously inquisitive. It was partly to abate this nuisance,
and “partly,” says the old chronicle, “to know where to find our
savage allies, if occasion served, as also to see their strength,
explore the country, make satisfaction for some injuries conceived
to have been done on our parts, and to continue the league of peace
and friendship between them and us,”[209] that Stephen Hopkins and
Edward Winslow were now delegated to wait upon the friendly sagamore
in his forest home.

In July, 1621, these earliest negotiators of New England set out
upon their mission, “not with the pomp of modern diplomats, but
through the forest and on foot, to be received, not to the luxuries
of courts, but to share in the abstinence of savage life.” Marks
of the devastation caused by the pestilence which had preceded
their settlement, of “the arrows that flew by night,” were visible
wherever the envoys went, and they witnessed the extreme poverty and
feebleness of the aborigines.[210]

On, on pressed the Englishmen through the intricate mazes of the
woods, and they never ceased to wonder at the ease and certainty
with which Squanto, who accompanied them as guide and interpreter,
picked out the right path from the labyrinthine tracks.[211] A walk
of fifteen miles brought them to an almost “deserted village,” called
_Namasket_, in what is now Middleborough, where the few remaining
natives received them with the most gracious rites of Indian
hospitality, and gave them “a kind of bread,” and the spawn of shad
boiled with old acorns.[212] Here they tarried for an hour in the
afternoon. Eight miles farther inland they bivouacked, with the sky
for a covering and the trees for blankets. A number of Indians had
assembled at this place to fish, but these had erected no shelter.
Around them they discerned under the moonlight the evident marks of
former extensive cultivation. “Thousands of men had lived there,”
says Winslow, the historian of the mission, “who died in the great
plague not long since.”[213]

In the morning, rising early, they resumed their journey. Their
retinue was swollen by six savages who insisted upon bearing them
company, and who bore their arms and baggage. At the various fords
the friendly red men carried the Englishmen across dry-shod upon
their shoulders,[214] a mark of unprecedented complaisance when
coming from the proverbially lazy Indian of the northeast coast.

In due time the envoys reached Pokanoket, the residence of Massasoit.
The sachem was not at home. Ere long, however, he returned. The
Englishmen received him royally, and saluted him by a discharge of
their muskets. Massasoit reciprocated their greeting in true Indian
style.[215]

The Pilgrims had been careful to provide their envoys with a
plentiful supply of those trinkets which the red men so highly
prized; and now, ere any business was opened, these presents were
delivered. The sagamore was given “a horseman’s coat of red cotton,
decked with a slight fringe of lace,” and a copper chain. When he had
put on this scarlet garment, and hung the chain about his neck, he
seemed greatly pleased by his unwonted bravery of attire, while his
warriors appeared to be equally gratified by the grand appearance of
their king.[216]

This ceremony completed, all squatted upon the ground, a circle was
formed, and amid deep silence the pipe of peace was smoked, each
individual taking a whiff and then passing the pipe to his next
neighbor. After this—and it should seem that even among the untamed
children of the forest there existed a “circumlocution office,” where
there was red tape to be cut—the envoys explained the object of their
visit. The sagamore listened courteously to their recital, and was
pleased to grant each and all of their requests.

“To the end that we might know his messengers from others,” writes
Winslow, “we desired Massasoit, if any one should come from him to
us, to send the copper chain, that we might know the savage, and
hearken and give credit to his message accordingly.”[217]

The sagamore seemed well content to renew the alliance with the
English. He promised to promote the traffic in skins, to furnish
a supply of corn for seed, and to ascertain the owners of the
underground granaries which the conscientious Pilgrims had rifled
in the preceding winter, and for which they were anxious to make
restitution.[218] He also warned his allies to beware of the
Narragansetts, a powerful and warlike tribe, inimical to him,
seated on the borders and in the vicinity of Narragansett Bay.[219]
Massasoit said that the Narragansett warriors had not been thinned by
the pestilence, and that they carried on an extensive trade with the
Dutchmen in the west.[220]

Having thus by skilful diplomacy reduced the future political
intercourse between the nascent New England republic and the Indian
sachem to some degree of certainty and mutual confidence, the
ambassadors remained to partake of the hospitality of the forest
lords.

They did not think very highly of Massasoit’s housekeeping. The brave
sagamore chanced to be out of provisions, so his guests were obliged
to go supperless. When they expressed a wish to sleep, they were
conducted into a wigwam, and, as a mark of special honor, allowed
to sleep in the same bed with the sachem and his squaw—one end of a
hard, rude-looking bed, covered with a coarse, thin mat, and raised
three or four inches above the earthen floor, being assigned to them,
while their Indian majesties reposed at the other extremity.[221]
Like other royal favors, this proved somewhat irksome to the
recipients, who had to complain of very straitened accommodation, and
record that they “were worse weary of their lodgings than of their
journey.”[222]

The next day the colonial ambassadors had no breakfast, but the
morning was taken up in receiving visitors—rumors of their presence
having collected several subordinate sachems to do them honor and
cement a friendship—and in witnessing the Indian games, which had
been gotten up for their entertainment.[223]

About noon, Massasoit, who had gone hunting at dawn, returned,
bringing with him two fishes; these were soon boiled and divided
among forty persons;[224] this was the first meal taken by the envoys
for a day and two nights.[225]

Heartily sick of Indian entertainment, in the gray dawn of the
following day they set out for Plymouth. The chief was sorry and
ashamed that he had been able to receive them in no better style;
but while friendship was in his heart, abundance was not in his
cabin.[226] After a dismal and stormy jaunt, they reached the welcome
settlement on the fifth day of their absence. Hard and uncouth as it
was, after their recent experience, it seemed to them an elysium. So
severe had been the hardships incident to their mission, so faint and
giddy were they from hunger and want of sleep and over-exertion, that
several days’ repose was required to recruit them back to health and
strength.[227]

In the course of the excursion just happily ended, the Pilgrims
had acquired considerable knowledge of their Indian neighbors—of
their habits, their motives of action, their social forms. They
saw that rivalry, and enmity begotten of rivalry, stirred constant
feuds among the tribes by whom they were surrounded. The sight of a
strange Indian never failed to fill their dusky guides with alarm and
watchfulness; among the red men, in the most literal sense, “eternal
vigilance” was “the price of liberty.”[228]

The first settlers of Plymouth generally dealt honorably and amicably
with their Indian allies, more so than the later colonists of New
England, as the treaty with Massasoit, unbroken for fifty years,
amply proves. Trade was of course an object with them; but it
was not selfishly paramount. This fair dealing begot in its turn
corresponding friendship and good feeling among the red men; it put
kindliness into their hearts at a time when a revengeful temper might
have led them to combine and sweep the feeble handful of usurping
interlopers, weakened by disease and decimated by death, into the
Atlantic on whose verge they stood.

We can never be sufficiently thankful that God moved both colonists
and savages to cement so long and fair a peace. Yet from the very
outset the Indian recognized the superiority of the white man; he
made a reluctant yet irrepressible obeisance to civilization. Dryden
has well expressed this innate consciousness:

      “Old prophecies foretell our fall at hand,
      When bearded men in floating castles land.”

The sagamore, as he gazed on the Plymouth settlement, stood
grief-stricken to think that his lease of ages of the forests
approached its end. He seemed to see in the recent plague a grant of
the land to another race, engrossed by the hand of the Great Spirit
himself. That rifled burial-mound of the Wampanoags, in which the
Pilgrims found their seed-corn, was typical; it was the new tenant
entering upon the estate, taking possession in the name of God, and
for the common good. Yet

            “Who shall deem the spot unblessed
      Where Nature’s younger children rest,
      Lulled on their sorrowing mother’s breast?
      Deem ye that mother loveth less
      These bronzed forms of the wilderness
      She foldeth in her long caress?
      As sweet o’er them her wild-flowers blow,
      As if with fairer hair and brow
      The blue-eyed Saxon slept below.”[229]




CHAPTER IX.

IN THE WOODS.

      “Actions rare and sudden, do commonly
      Proceed from fierce necessity.”
                             SIR WILLIAM DAVENANT.


Two or three days after the return of Winslow and Hopkins from
Massasoit’s forest rendezvous, the routine life of the colonists was
broken by the sudden disappearance of one of the younger members of
the Plymouth commonwealth. John Billington was nowhere to be found.
Though he was a vicious lad, the pest of the colony, his absence
caused great anxiety. Whither had he gone? Was he drowned? Had he
been kidnapped? Had he wandered away and lost his course in the
tangled cross-paths of the forest?

Though the season, already declining towards autumn, called for
the active labor of the settlers, the supposed peril of the lost
boy swallowed up all other considerations, and a squad of ten men
was recruited to go in search of him.[230] The clumsy shallop was
rigged, and, led by Standish, all embarked. They had not sailed
far ere a sudden squall, accompanied by a severe thunderstorm,
peculiar to the season and the latitude, struck them, as it were,
with clenched fists. A water-spout, the first they had ever seen,
flung up the hissing sea to a sheer height of fifty feet within a
stone’s toss of the shallop, already half capsized.[231] Drenched
and weary, they landed in Cummaquid, now Barnstable harbor, where
they bivouacked.[232] Here an Indian runner, despatched by Massasoit,
met them, and said that the lad they sought might be found at
Nauset, some miles farther down the coast. In the morning, as they
were about to embark, they espied two Indians, strangers, whom
they hailed. Squanto and another friendly sachem named Tokamahamon
were with the scouting party, and they now acted as interpreters.
These natives corroborated Massasoit’s report of the whereabouts of
young Billington; and at their invitation, six of the Englishmen
accompanied them to an interview with their chief, Iyanough, who
lurked in the vicinity. When they met the sagamore, they found him to
be a handsome man, in the May of youth, courteous in his manners, and
unlike an Indian save in his costume.[233] The entertainment to which
he invited his pale-face guests was in harmony with his decorous
appearance, being various and abundant.[234]

While they were feasting, they saw an old, withered squaw, who
seemed bowed down beneath the weight of a hundred years, hobbling
eagerly towards the spot of green sward where they reclined. She
had never seen an Englishman, and was naturally curious to gaze
upon the pale-face strangers. On reaching their vicinage she became
intensely excited, and commenced to howl and rave and weep, pausing
between each sob to curse her chieftain’s guests. The Pilgrims were
astonished. They asked why the old squaw cried and cursed, and were
told that Hunt had kidnapped three of her sons, at the same time that
he had carried Squanto into Spanish servitude. They told the old
squaw, through an interpreter, that Hunt was a bad man, condemned by
all good Englishmen; said that they would not do so wicked an act for
all the skins in New England; and to convince her of their sincerity,
gave her some trinkets, which served to placate her exuberant
wrath.[235]

Taking a friendly leave of Iyanough, the Pilgrims returned to the
shallop, and at once set sail for Nauset, the Indian name of what is
now the pleasant village of Eastham. On their arrival, the shallop
was surrounded by a swarm of natives, who greatly annoyed them by
their officious offers of assistance.[236] Standish was impelled to
keep on the alert by the remembrance that this tribe was the one
which had assailed the English coasting party in December, 1620.[237]
Among these savages the Pilgrims found the long-sought owner of the
corn which they had taken from the burial-mound; he was invited to
visit Plymouth, where he was promised ample payment.[238]

Towards evening, a sagamore named Aspinet came to them, bringing
with him the lost lad. He had wandered over the hills and through
the woods for five days, living upon the berries and wild fruit of
the season. Finally he reached an Indian village at Menomet, where
Sandwich is now located; and here the Indians had sent him to the
Nausets, among whom he was now found.[239]

The boy was decked out in the tawdry Indian style when Aspinet
delivered him to the settlers, and several pounds of beads hung
suspended from his neck.[240]

Standish rewarded the sachem for his care of the boy; he also
distributed some presents among his tribe. Here a rumor of war
between the Narragansetts and Massasoit reached them; and Aspinet
also said that the great sagamore had been captured by his vengeful
foemen.[241] Apprehensive for the welfare of the colony, and
conscious that they ought to render Massasoit assistance in case he
had been unjustly attacked, the Englishmen bade Aspinet a hasty but
cordial farewell, and instantly reëmbarked.[242]

Plymouth was regained without further adventure. Their return was
welcome, for these ten constituted half the martial force of the
commonwealth; and in their absence the remaining settlers had
learned of dangerous intrigues against their peace, stirred by a
sachem called Corbitant, an ally of Massasoit’s, but never a friend
to the Pilgrims.[243]

      “The flying rumors gathered as they rolled;
      Scarce any tale was sooner heard than told;
      And all who told it added something new,
      And all who heard it made enlargement too;
      In every ear it spread, on every tongue it grew.”[244]

At first this startling intelligence was flung into the ears of the
settlers: “The Narragansetts have invaded Massasoit’s territory; the
sagamore is either a prisoner or has fled; an attack upon Plymouth
may immediately be expected.”[245]

Squanto, Tokamahamon, and a warrior named Habbamak, who had come to
live among the colonists, “a proper, lusty man, of great account for
his valor and parts among the Indians,”[246] were at once despatched
to reconnoitre. Hardly had they disappeared in the skirting forests
ere word was brought that Massasoit was safe, that the Narragansetts
were not near, but that Corbitant was using every wile to detach the
sagamore from the English alliance, while he threatened death to
Squanto, Tokamahamon, and Habbamak, the counsellors of the sachem who
were so actively friendly to the Pilgrims.[247]

Events hustled each other; for scarcely had the settlers time to
breathe freer after this recital, ere “Habbamak came running in
all sweating,” and informed the clustering colonists that he and
his two friends had been surprised and overpowered at Namasket by
Corbitant; that he had managed to escape, but that he feared Squanto
and Tokamahamon were dead, as he saw Corbitant press a knife to their
breasts, and say, “If Squanto were dead, these English would lose
their tongue.”[248]

The Pilgrims never appear to greater advantage than in moments of
trial; they are always equal to the occasion;

                        “Like a ball that bounds
      According to the force with which ’twas thrown;
      So in affliction’s violence, he that’s wise,
      The more he’s cast down, will the higher rise.”[249]

’Twas so with the Pilgrims. Danger seemed powerless to abash them.
They “walked softly before the Lord,” but they “feared no evil.” They
were profoundly penetrated with John Marston’s maxim: “Through danger
safety comes; through trouble rest.”

So now in this strait, they wasted no time in technical deliberation.
Justice to themselves, to Squanto, to Massasoit, demanded action,
prompt, efficient. Impunity was a bounty on offence. They were too
weak to dare let an insult go unpunished. Besides, it was remembered
that “if they should suffer their friends and messengers to be thus
wronged, they would have none to cleave unto them, or bring them
intelligence, or do them any good service afterwards, while next
their foes would fall upon themselves. Whereupon it was resolved
to send Standish and fourteen men well armed, and to go and fall
upon the Indian village at Namasket at night; and if they found that
Squanto was killed, to cut off Corbitant’s head, but not to hurt any
not concerned in the murder. Habbamak was asked if he would go and be
their guide. He said he would, and bring them to the very spot, and
point out Corbitant. So they set out on the evening of August 14th,
1621.”[250]

The night was dark and tempestuous. Habbamak himself was often
puzzled to find the path, and at times groped blindly. Towards
midnight the little army halted and made a supper in the dark. As
they were now near Namasket, the final preparations for the assault
were made. Knapsacks were thrown aside, and each man received his
specific directions. The plan was to surround the wigwam of Corbitant
and seize him ere he could escape. None were to be injured unless an
attempt to escape was made.[251]

The march was now resumed. Cautiously and silently they trod in the
footsteps of their dusky guide, casting furtive glances into the
enveloping gloom, and pausing momentarily to listen and to watch.
At length the Indian village was reached. There it lay, calm and
oblivious of danger, the eyes of its inmates sealed in sleep. Softly
but swiftly the assailants stole like spectres half round the
drowsy town, and instructed by Habbamak, the wigwam of the hostile
sachem was surrounded. Then came another brief pause, and each man’s
heart seemed throbbing in his throat, so new and so exciting was the
situation. The signal followed; the hut was entered; its inmates,
still half asleep, were deprived of speech by fright and drowsiness.
Soon, however, they regained their senses, and great commotion
ensued. Standish asked if Corbitant was there. Unable or unwilling to
reply, several of the aroused Indians essayed to pass the guard. Then
the guns of the invaders increased the hubbub, and flashed angrily
in the pitchy darkness. The women, rushing to Habbamak, called him
“Friend, friend!” The boys, noticing that no injury was attempted
against the squaws, shouted, “I am a girl, I am a girl!”[252]

After a time silence was regained. Standish, speaking through the
lips of Habbamak, explained the object of the assault, and again
demanded to know the whereabouts of Corbitant. Reassured, the Indians
said that the wily sachem, fearing some revengeful action, had
decamped; that Squanto and Tokamahamon had not yet been murdered, but
were held as captives in a neighboring wigwam.[253]

The friendly sachems were speedily released, and while their
deliverers heartily rejoiced over their escape, they regretted that
of Corbitant.[254] The whole party breakfasted with Squanto; after
which the Namasket Indians were assembled, and Standish informed
them of his determination to hunt Corbitant, and to punish all who
should plot evil against the colony, or who should presume to contend
against the authority of Massasoit. He also regretted that any had
been wounded in the night attack, and invited those who pleased to
accompany him back to Plymouth, where an English physician would heal
their hurts. Three, two men and a squaw, accepted this invitation,
and tarrying until their wounds were dressed, medicined, and cured,
they were then dismissed in peace.[255]

This expedition, so successful and so bloodless, had a prodigious
effect. By some system of primitive telegraphing, the news of it,
and of the awful fire-weapons of the pale-faces, spread throughout
the forests. The red men did not want such “medicine men” for their
foes. Nine sachems, representing jurisdictions which extended from
Charles River to Buzzard’s Bay, came to Plymouth and made their
submission.[256] The Indians of an island which the settlers had
never seen, sent to sue for their friendship;[257] and Corbitant
himself, though too shy to come near Plymouth in person, used the
mediation of Massasoit to make his peace.[258]

The result was, broader amity and firmer peace. But the Pilgrims
conquered as much by their moderation and self-command as by their
energetic heroism. The anxious care with which they treated the
injured warriors of their midnight raid, and the candor of their
speech, placated resentment and inspired respect. Still the basis
of this feeling was a knowledge that the white men would not suffer
insult; and it has been finely said, that if we justly estimate it,
there was more of sound policy and gallant daring in the midnight
raid of this handful of strangers, than has marked many a deed of
arms which historians have delighted to record, and to which nations
still look back with exultant pride.[259]

Just as autumn began to smile, the Pilgrims made another expedition.
This had a twofold purpose: to explore the country, and to cement a
peace with the northeastern tribes.[260]

Entering the shallop at midnight, Standish and nine others, with
three Indians to interpret, of whom Squanto was one, embarked
with the ebb-tide.[261] They sailed along the coast to the bay on
which Boston now stands, called in the contemporaneous record,
_Massachusetts Bay_.[262] “On the second morning after leaving
Plymouth, they landed upon a beach under a cliff, and received the
submission of a chief on promising to be ‘a safeguard from his
enemies.’ They surveyed the ‘fifty islands’ of Boston harbor; and
passing the night on board their boat, went on shore again the
following day and walked a few miles into the country. They observed
land which had been cultivated, two forts in decay, untenanted
huts, and other tokens of recent depopulation. They noted ‘the fair
entrance’ of the river Charles, and ‘harbors for shipping’ than
which ‘better could not be.’ They conciliated the few natives whom
they met, and traded with them for some skins. They learned that the
principal personage in the neighborhood was the female chief, or
‘squaw sachem’ of the Massachusetts; that this tribe had suffered
from the hostile incursions of the Tarratines, and that its people
owed a certain allegiance to Massasoit. The third evening, by ‘a
light moon,’ the party set sail for home, which they reached before
the following noon. The accounts they brought of the seat of their
explorations naturally led their friends to ‘wish they had been
seated there;’”[263] but “the Lord, who assigns to all men the bounds
of their habitations,” remarks Bradford, “had appointed it for
another use.”[264] The party “found the Lord to be with them in all
their ways, and to bless their outgoings and incomings, for which let
his holy name have the praise for ever to all posterity.”[265]

Standish and his friends had returned on the 22d of September.
Their services were needed; the nodding crops were to be reaped,
and all “began now to gather in the small harvest they had.”[266]
The husbandry of the year proved a prosperous beginning. The
rivers supplied manure in abundance, and the weather had been not
unfavorable.[267] “All the summer there was no want.” While “some
were thus employed in affairs abroad, others were exercised” in
domestic avocations, in “fishing for cod and bass and other fish, of
which they took great store, giving every family its portion.”[268]

When the fields were gleaned, the pease turned out “not worth the
gathering, the sun having parched them in the blossom;” the barley
was “indifferent good;” and there was “a good increase of Indian
corn.” “They had about a peck of meal a week to a person; or now,
since harvest, Indian corn to that proportion.”[269]

Seven substantial dwelling-houses had been built, “and four for
the use of the plantation,” while others were being constructed.
Fowl were so abundant in the autumn, that “four men in one day
killed as much as, with a little help besides, served the community
almost a week.” “There was great store of wild turkeys, of which
they took many, besides venison.” The fowlers had been sent out by
the governor, “that so they might, after a special manner, rejoice
together, since they had gathered the fruit of their labors;” this
was the origin and the first celebration of the national festival
of New England, the autumnal THANKSGIVING. On that occasion of
hilarity they “exercised their arms,” and for three days “entertained
and feasted” Massasoit and some ninety of his people, who made a
contribution of five deer to the festivity. Health was restored;
household fires were blazing brightly; and in good heart and hope the
lonely but thankful settlers disposed themselves to meet the rigor of
another winter.[270]

“Here was free range; the hunter’s instincts could bourgeon and grow;
the deer that browsed, the fish that swam, the fowl that flew, were
free to all—might be captives to each man’s bow and spear. Here were
‘herring, cod, and ling,’ ‘salt upon salt,’ ‘beavers, otters, furs of
price,’ ‘mines of gold and silver,’ ‘woods of all sorts,’ ‘eagles,
gripes, whales, grampus, moose, deer,’ ‘bears, and wolves,’ ‘all in
season, mind you, for you cannot gather cherries at Christmas in
Kent.’ Who then would live at home in degradation, only to eat, and
drink, and sleep and to die?”[271]




CHAPTER X.

REINFORCEMENT.

      “A golden treasure is the tried friend;
      But who may gold from counterfeits defend?
      Trust not too soon, nor yet too soon mistrust;
      Who twines betwixt, and steers the golden mean,
      Nor rashly loveth, nor mistrusts in vain.”
                               MIRROR FOR MAGISTRATES.


On the morning of the 9th of November, 1621, after morning prayer—for
the Pilgrims commenced each fresh day by the solemn invocation of
God’s blessing on its labors, and at evening sealed the record by
devout thanksgiving—when the thrifty settlers had separated each
to his respective task, an Indian runner came breathless into the
settlement, and announced that a vessel might be seen off Cape Cod,
apparently crowding sail for Plymouth harbor.[272]

As no friends were expected at that season, this intelligence caused
great excitement. A rush for the neighboring heights was made. There,
indeed, spotting the dim horizon, a strange ship might be discerned.
Endless were the speculations as to her character and objects. Was
she manned by the inimical Frenchman? Was she a buccaneer, bent
on murderous pillage? Could she be a friend? The Pilgrims were
cautious and provident men. In the wilderness the common law maxim
was reversed—all were necessarily held to be guilty until proved
innocent. So now preparation was made to repel intruders, should
they come with hostile intent. The governor ordered a cannon to be
fired to summon the scattered pioneers home. All were armed; then, in
painful suspense, the colonists waited the approach of the stranger
craft. Nearer she drew and yet nearer. Intently was her every motion
viewed. Her architecture was studied; her rigging was observed; and
all eyes were directed towards the peak where should flap her flag:
it was not there. But, suddenly, it was run up, and, lo, it was the
English jack!

The colonists were delirious with joy, for that flag meant friends
at hand and news from “home;” so their welcoming shouts went echoing
across the water to their incoming reinforcers.

Soon the ship anchored; then the boats passing to and fro bore the
friends to each other’s arms; and amid kindly greetings and warm
welcomings the news was asked and told.

It was the “Fortune” which had just arrived. She brought Cushman and
thirty-five others to reinforce the infant colony.[273] Among this
company were several who had embarked in the “Speedwell,” balked of
a passage then, but now safely arrived.[274] The meeting was not
untinged with sadness. “Death had been busy; Carver was gone, and
more than half of those to whom Cushman had bidden God-speed in the
“Mayflower” rested under the sod, the grass growing on their levelled
graves.”[275]

But as was their wont, the Pilgrims looked on the bright side of
the picture; and all thanked God that some remained to welcome the
new-comers.

When the home budget was opened it was found to contain several items
of moment to the colony. The patent of the London company under which
the emigrants had expected to possess their American homes, was
made to cover Virginia alone, and this was rendered nugatory by the
debarkation in New England.[276]

The London company was now under a cloud. The active prominence of
its chiefs as popular leaders of the Parliamentary reformers against
the royal prerogative, had provoked the pique of James; and his
hostility was increased by the cunning of the Spanish court, with
which he was then on friendly terms, and which desired to repel
English neighbors from the Spanish settlement in Florida.[277]

James exhibited his resentment by favoring the interests of a rival
company of which Gorges, and Sheffield, and Hamilton, were the
leaders. To them a new incorporation was granted, and assuming the
title of the “Plymouth Company,” they were empowered “to order and
govern New England in America.”[278]

Upon the domain of the new corporation the Pilgrims had
settled without leave; they were therefore liable to a summary
ejectment.[279] The company of Merchant-adventurers, under whose
auspices they had sailed, informed of their position by the return of
the “Mayflower,” immediately applied to the Plymouth company for a
patent which should cover the soil now colonized.[280] It was granted
“to John Pierce and his associates,” and was in trust for the benefit
of the colony.[281]

Thomas Weston, the agent of the Merchant-adventurers, sent a copy of
this charter to the Plymouth colonists, accompanying it with a letter
in which, after complaining of the long detention of the “Mayflower”
in America, and of her return without a cargo, he said that “the
future life of the business depended on the lading of the ‘Fortune,’”
which being done, he promised never to desert the Pilgrims, even
if all the other merchants should do so;[282] adding, “I pray you
write instantly for Mr. Robinson to come to you; and send us a fair
engrossment of the contract betwixt yourselves and us, subscribed
with the names of the principal planters.”[283]

While the “Fortune” lay moored in Plymouth harbor, Bradford penned
a weighty and dignified reply to Weston’s animadversions. After
reciting the incidents which had checkered the twelvemonth of their
settlement, including the death of Carver, to whom the agent of
the Merchant-adventurers had directed his missive, he said, with
an unconscious touch of pathos, “If the company has suffered, on
the side of the settlers there have been disappointments far more
serious. The loss of many honest and industrious men’s lives cannot
be valued at any price. It pleased God to visit us with death daily,
and with so general a disease that the living were scarce able to
bury the dead, and the well not in any measure sufficient to tend the
sick. And now to be so greatly blamed for not freighting the ship,
doth indeed go near us, and much discourage us.”[284]

Preëminently conscientious, and earnestly desirous to give the
Merchant-adventurers no just cause of complaint, the Pilgrim
colonists made every effort to secure a speedy and profitable cargo
for the “Fortune’s” homeward voyage. The ship was a small one of
but fifty-five tons burden;[285] but she was at once “laden with
good clapboards, as full as she could stow, two hogsheads of beaver
and other skins, with a few other trifling commodities,” in all to
the value of five hundred pounds.[286] Barely fourteen days elapsed
between her arrival and her readiness to depart.[287]

Just before the “Fortune” sailed, the colonists were busy in
preparing epistles for their friends in England and for the dear
Leyden congregation. These were intrusted to Robert Cushman, who
was to return to London and make a report of the situation of the
Plymouth colony.[288] He himself, just on the eve of his return,
delivered a memorial discourse in the block-citadel on Fort
hill—which was at once church and castle—in which he recited vividly
the cause of the emigration, the incidents attending it, the spirit
of the actors, and the auguries of the future; and this was printed
at London in 1622.[289]

In the dedicatory epistle to this sermon—whose object was to draw
the attention of Puritans at home to the advantages of the Plymouth
settlement as a residence where the virtues of religion might be
more than ordinarily exemplified, as is proved by the fact that it
was so speedily published in England—Cushman says: “If there be any
who are content to lay out their estates, spend their time, labor,
and endeavors for the benefit of those who shall come after, and
who desire to further the gospel among the poor heathen, quietly
contenting themselves with such hardships as by God’s providence
shall fall upon them, such men I should advise and encourage to go
to New England, for in that wilderness their ends cannot fail them.
And whoso rightly considereth what manner of entrance, abiding, and
proceeding we have had among the savages since we came, will easily
think that God hath some great work in store for us. By reason of one
Squanto, who lives amongst us, who can speak English, we can have
daily commerce with the Indian kings; and acquaint them with our
causes and purposes, both human and religious.”[290]

Three things, according to Winslow, are the bane and overthrow of
plantations: The vain expectation of instantaneous profit, without
work; ambition; and the lawlessness of settlers.[291] These rocks
long wrecked the prosperity of the American colonies outside of New
England. Cushman bade emigrants beware of entertaining the too common
error of supposing that the wilderness was an actual Eldorado, as the
Spanish had taught, and as the Virginia colonists had imagined.[292]
“No,” he said, “neither is there any land or possession now like
unto that which the Jews had in Canaan, being legally holy, and
appropriated unto holy people, the seed of Abraham, in which they
dwelt securely, and had their days prolonged, it being by an
immediate voice said, that the Lord gave it to them as a land of rest
after their weary travels, and as a type of eternal rest in heaven.
But now there is no land of that sanctity, no land so appropriated,
none typical, much less any that can be said to be given of God
to any one people, as Canaan was, which they and theirs must dwell
in till God sendeth upon them sword and captivity. Now we are all,
in all places, strangers and pilgrims, travellers and sojourners.
Having no dwelling but in this earthly tabernacle, no residence but a
wandering, no abiding but a fleeting,”[293] where work makes a home,
and labor keeps it.

In a private letter addressed by Edward Winslow to a friend in
London, and which helped to swell the budget which went out by the
“Fortune,” that stout old worthy says: “We have found the Indians
very faithful to their covenant of peace with us, very loving and
ready to pleasure us. We often go to them, and they come to us. Some
of us have been fifty miles by land into the interior with them, the
occasions and relation whereof you shall understand by our general
and more full declaration of such things as are worth noting. Yea,
it hath pleased God so to possess the Indians with fear of us, and
love unto us, that not only the greatest king amongst them, called
Massasoit, but also all the princes and tribes round about us have
sent their messengers to us to make suit for peace, so that there
is now great peace amongst the Indians themselves, which was not
formerly, neither would have been but for us; and we, for our part,
walk as peaceably and safely in the wood as in the highways in
England. We entertain them pleasantly and familiarly in our cabins,
and they as friendly bestow their venison on us. They are a people
without any religion, yet trusty, quick of apprehension, ripe—withal
just.”[294]

By this same opportunity William Hilton, who had come out in the
“Fortune,” thus sums up an account to his “loving cousin” of the
natural wealth and prospects of the country on whose soil he had
recently set foot: “Better grain cannot be than the Indian corn, if
we will plant it upon as good ground as a man may desire. We are
all freeholders; the rent-day doth not trouble us; and of all the
blessings we have, which and what we list we may take in season. Our
company are, for the most part, very honest, religious people. The
word of God is sincerely taught us every Sabbath; so that I know
not any thing a contented, earnest mind can here want. I desire
your friendly care to send my wife and children to me when occasion
serves, where I wish all the friends I have in England.”[295]

Winslow gives us some significant hints of the social life and wants
of the colony by describing to his friends the stores most needful
to send out for their use; and we get no little insight into the
hardships and very homely accommodations of the forefathers through
the glass of his request that the next ship may “bring paper and
linseed oil for the windows, with cotton yarn for the lamps.”[296]

And now, on the 14th of December, 1621, all being ready and
leave-taking said, the little “Fortune,” crammed with the “first
fruits” of the Pilgrim enterprise, set sail for England. But alas,
just as she had almost reached the English coast, she was clutched
by a French privateer, robbed of her precious freight, and sent into
the Thames an empty hull, to the bitter chagrin of the company of
Merchant-adventurers, and the sad disappointment of the Plymouth
colonists, when, at a later day, they learned of the misfortune.[297]




CHAPTER XI.

THE MORALE OF THE COLONY.

      “Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
      Is the immediate jewel of their souls.”
                             SHAKSPEARE, _Othello_.


On the return of the settlers from the shore where they had said
good-by to the “Fortune,” it was arranged that the new-comers should
for the present, in the absence of other accommodations, be received
into the families already provided with cabins.[298] Unhappily, the
“Fortune” had brought out no store; indeed, she was obliged to rely
on the colonists for provisions for her larder on the home voyage.
The emigrants whom she landed were absolutely destitute, having “not
so much as biscuit-cake or any other victuals set aside for present
want. Neither had they any bedding, nor pot nor pan to dress meat in,
nor over-many clothes.”[299]

Though the plantation rejoiced at this increase of strength, yet they
would have been better pleased had many of the emigrants come better
provided and in fitter condition to winter in the wilderness.[300]

With the provident promptness which is so omnipresent a trait in
their character, the Pilgrims at once “took an exact account of all
their provisions in store, and proportioning these to the number
of persons, found that, owing to the arrival of so many unexpected
and necessitous guests, they would not hold out above six months, or
till the spring, on half-allowance; and they could not well give less
this winter-time, till fish came in again. But all were presently
put on half-allowance, which began to be hard, but it was borne
patiently.”[301]

Indeed, the Pilgrims bore this hardship with something better than
mere patience. “I take notice of it as a great favor of God,” wrote
one of the sufferers, “that he has not only preserved my life, but
given me _contentedness_ in our straits; insomuch that I do not
remember ever to have wished in my heart that I had never come into
this country, or that I might be again in my father’s house.”[302] It
was said of Brewster, that “with the most submissive patience he bore
the novel and trying hardships to which his old age was subjected,
lived abstemiously, and after having been in his youth the companion
of ministers of state, the representative of his sovereign, familiar
with the magnificence of courts, and the possessor of a fortune
sufficient not only for the comforts, but the elegances of life,
this humble, devoted Puritan labored steadily with his own hands
in the ‘histie stibble-fields’ of the unkempt wilderness for daily
subsistence; while on the Sabbath, as elder of the church, and in the
absence of an ordained minister, he broke the bread of life for the
Pilgrim flock. Now, destitute of meat, of fish, and of bread, over
his simple meal of clams he would return thanks to the Lord that he
could suck of the abundance of the sea and of treasures hid in the
sand.”[303]

An eminent historian bids us beware of the error of supposing that
the community planted at Plymouth was of a strictly homogeneous
character. “The devoted men who, at Leyden, had debated the
question of emigration, did not constitute the whole company even
of the ‘Mayflower.’ They had been joined in England by several
strangers who, like themselves, had come under engagement to the
Merchant-adventurers of London. That partnership had business
objects, and was by no means solely swayed by religious sympathy with
the Leyden Pilgrims.”[304]

Of the twenty men of the “Mayflower’s” company who survived the
first winter, several are unfavorably known, as Billington, the
foul-mouthed contemner of Standish’s authority, and Dotey and Lister,
the lackey duelists of Hopkins’ quiet household.[305]

So of the reinforcement by the “Fortune.” Some were old and devout
friends of the colonists, as Simonson and De la Noye, members of
the Leyden church; John Winslow, Edward’s brother; Thomas Prince,
afterwards governor; Cushman’s son, and a son of Brewster.[306]
Others were turbulent and restless rovers, impatient of control,
careless in religion, and burning for adventure; in Bradford’s
phrase, “lusty young men, and many of them wild enough, who little
considered whither or about what they went.”[307] Happily for the
peace of the little commonwealth and for posterity, “the advantage
of numbers and the authority of superior character determined
that events should proceed at Plymouth according to the policy
of Bradford, Brewster, and their godly friends. Still internal
tendencies to disturbance are not to be left out of view in a
consideration of the embarrassments with which the forefathers had to
contend.”[308]

Under Bradford’s government, the laws were few and mild, but firm;
and neither the lazy nor the godless received countenance, though
tender consciences were never pinched. Take this incident as an
illustration: “On the day called Christmas day, the governor called
the settlers out to work, as was usual; but the most part of the
new-comers excused themselves, and said it went against their
consciences to work on Christmas. So the governor told them if they
made it a matter of conscience, he would spare them till they were
better informed. On this, he led away the rest, and left them;
but when the laborers came home from work at noon, they found the
scrupulous new-comers in the street at play openly; some pitching the
bar, some at foot-ball, and others at kindred sports. Immediately the
governor went to them, and took away their implements, and told them
that it was against his conscience that they should play while others
worked. If they made the keeping of Christmas matter of devotion, let
them keep their houses; but there should be no gaming or revelling in
the streets; since which time nothing hath been attempted that way,
at least openly.”[309]

In this and kindred ways, the commonwealth was controlled and moulded
into higher courses. Practical consistency was gained, and the
elements out of which homogeneity might grow were planted at every
hearthstone.

                                  “In companions
      That did converse and spend their time together,
      Whose souls did bear an equal yoke of love
      There needs should be a like proportion
      Of lineaments, of manners, and of spirit.”




CHAPTER XII.

THE PILGRIM GOVERNMENT.

      “A free republic, where, beneath the sway
      Of mild and equal laws, framed by themselves,
      One people dwell, and own no lord save God.”
                           MRS. HALE’S _Ormond Grosvenor._


Just here it is perhaps fit that the salient features of the unique
government under which the forefathers lived and prospered should be
briefly sketched; and in order that this exposition may be clear,
claiming the privilege of a chronicler, we shall command the clock of
this narration to stand still, while we peer at times into the then
future, in tracing some law to its result, or in depicting the change
of front of an exploded policy.

At the outset, the arrangements of the Pilgrims were extremely
simple, and grew naturally from their needs, from their crude
ideas of liberty, and their imperfect conception of a model state.
Nominally, the sovereignty of Britain was recognized; in fact, all
through these opening decades of American history, the colonists
were despised by the home government, and left free to plant the
most radical principles of a “proper democracy.” It was only when
the greed of gain squeezed her heart, not repentance nor love,
that England recognized the legitimacy of the neglected child whom
she had pronounced a bastard, and left to freeze in the winter
wilderness. When God wrote success upon the frontlet of the colony,
the Shylocks on the Rialtos of the world were eager to invest in the
enterprise, while England, with motherly pride, patted New England
upon the head and said, “I rocked your cradle; but, bless me, how you
are grown, and how like me you are. You may pay me your earnings, and
I’ll send you a governor.”

But through the bitter months of the incipient settlement Shylock
could see nothing in New England but a barren coast, while Britain
could not discern Plymouth Rock across the water; nor if she had
would any craving governor have itched to set up his chair of state
in a cheerless Eldorado of ice and snow.

So the Pilgrims were left to shift for themselves until, strengthened
by incessant tussles with a rugged climate and the savage foe, they
expanded into robust manhood. In these first months, the Plymouth
colonists regarded themselves as one family, at whose head stood the
governor, _in loco parentis_.[310] But as business increased, the
whole burden of government was felt to be too onerous for the single
shoulders of the governor to bear; and when Bradford stepped into the
gubernatorial chair left vacant by the death of Carver, he was voted
an assistant.[311] In 1624, he was given five assistants. Afterwards,
in 1633, the number was increased to seven; and these, called “the
Governor’s Council,”[312] governed the commonwealth in conjunction
with their primitive executive. The vote of each councillor counted
one, and the vote of the chief magistrate was but double—the only
check he had over the action of the Council.[313]

The governor was chosen annually, by general suffrage,[314] as were
also the councillors.[315] The name of the man who was disposed to
shirk his civil duty we do not know; “but a curious law was passed
in 1632, that whoever should refuse the office of governor, being
chosen thereto, should pay twenty pounds; and that of magistrate, ten
pounds. Very singular, certainly; and we may suppose that that race
has run out even in Massachusetts.”[316]

The legislative body was at first composed of the whole company
of voters.[317] Then, when their numbers grew, church-membership
was made the test of citizenship[318]—a test which endured till
1665, when it was reluctantly yielded at the requisition of
the king’s commissioners.[319] It was not until 1669 that the
increase of population warranted the establishment of a House of
Representatives.[320]

“Narrow as the restriction of citizenship to church-members was, it
is easy to explain it by remembering that toleration, in any large
sense, was hardly entertained by the most liberal religionists
in that twilight age, and that the one idea which inspired this
emigration and nerved these men for the bitterest sacrifices was,
that they and their children might be free from an ecclesiastical
tyranny which, if it followed, would endanger them. It should also
be borne in mind that the history they studied, and the guide they
felt bound to follow, was the Jewish theocracy, ordained by God, as
they doubted not, to be a model in church and state for all time; and
that, under that dispensation, death was the punishment for smaller
errors than dissent. These facts explain and palliate the religious
precision and severity afterwards practised in New England. But the
free idea with which they started gradually grew broader, overcame
the evil customs of the time, and strangled the prejudices of the
Pilgrims themselves.”[321]

So early as the 17th of December, 1623, it was decreed that “all
criminal facts, and all manner of trespass and debt betwixt man and
man, should be tried by the verdict of twelve honest men.”[322] Thus
the jury trial, the distinctive badge of Saxon civilization, a right
which a long line of able lawyers, from Coke and Hale to Mansfield
and Erskine, have united in styling the palladium of civil liberty,
was planted in America.

Previous to the year 1632, the laws of Plymouth colony were little
more than the customs of the people.[323] In 1636 these were
digested, and prefaced with a declaration of rights; and, with
various alterations and additions, the whole manuscript collection
was printed in 1671.[324] Let us open the ponderous old folio, and
cull from the mass a few specimen and characteristic samples. Early
provision was made for the education of youth. Many of the Pilgrims
were men of liberal culture, as Winslow and Brewster,[325] and all
recognized its value and necessity; so, in order that knowledge and
civil liberty might clasp hands, it was enacted, “that twelve pounds
should be raised for the salary of a teacher, and that children
should be forced to attend school.”[326]

Decreed: “For ordering of persons and distributing the lands, That
freemen shall be twenty-one years of age; sober and peaceable;
orthodox in the fundamentals of religion. That drunkards shall be
subject to fines, to the stocks, and be posted; and sellers be
forbidden to sell them liquors.

“Horse-racing is forbidden; so also walking about late o’ nights.

“The minister’s salary shall be paid by rate levied on all the
citizens. Sabbath work and travelling is forbidden; also all visiting
on that day.

“Profane swearing punishable by ‘placing in the stocks; lying, by the
stocks or by fine.’

“Fowling, fishing, and hunting, shall be free.

“Every wolf’s head shall be worth, to an Indian, twelve shillings or
‘a coat of duffels;’ to a white man, twenty shillings.

“Haunters of ale-houses shall be disciplined by the church.

“A motion of marriage to any man’s daughter, if made without
obtaining leave, shall be punished by fine or corporal punishment, at
the discretion of the court, so it extend not to the endangering of
life or limb.

“Women shall not wear short sleeves; nor shall their sleeves be more
than twenty-two inches wide:”[327] an enactment the object of which
was, to prevent indecent extremes and extravagance in dress.

So runs this “quaint old volume of forgotten lore.” If some of these
laws seem severe, as we scan them through the vista of two centuries,
and in an age when sumptuary laws are perhaps too little known, it
may be said in their defence, that they were quite upon a level with
the kindred legislation of Europe, even in their most obnoxious
features, while their progressive and liberal tone is as new and
unique as the colony which gave them birth, and whose ideas they
mirror.

In May, 1621, the first marriage in New England was celebrated.[328]
Edward Winslow espoused the widow of William White, and the mother
of Peregrine White, whose infant lullaby was the first ever sung by
Saxon voice in New England.[329] “According to the laudable custom
of the Low Countries,” says Bradford, “the ceremony was thought
most requisite to be performed by the magistrate, as being a civil
contract upon which many questions of inheritance do depend, with
other things most proper for their cognizance, and most consonant
to the Scriptures,[330] it being nowhere found in the gospel to be
layed on ministers as a necessary part of their office. This practice
continued, not only among them, but it was followed by all the famous
churches of Christ in those parts to the year 1646.”[331]




CHAPTER XIII.

THE COLONIAL ROUTINE.

      “Still to ourselves in every place consigned,
      Our own felicity we make or find;
      With silent course, which no loud storms annoy,
      Glides the smooth current of domestic joy.”
                               GOLDSMITH’S _Traveller._


Now, as their second wilderness winter began to benumb the fingers
and chill the blood of the Pilgrim colonists, they were necessarily
shut out from many of the employments of the spring, the summer,
and the autumn. They were busied chiefly in fishing, hunting, the
collection of fuel, hewing timber, and exploring expeditions, varying
this routine by occasional traffic with Indian trappers.[332]

Devoutly thankful were the forefathers for God’s mercy and protection
in the past, and with tranquil faith they set their faces towards
the future. So full was their devotion, that it constantly cropped
out, even setting its impress upon the seal of the commonwealth,
which represented four men in the midst of a wilderness, each resting
on one knee, and raising his clasped hands towards heaven in the
attitude of prayer.[333]

With the Pilgrims, faith was the spur of labor; and this active
enterprise eased and conquered all obstacles. Still, causes for
solicitude and trials infinite constantly arose. The lean condition
of their larder was a care urgent for the passing time and weighty
in the future; and to this a new source of anxiety was added. In the
depth of winter, a report was bruited that active hostilities might
momentarily be looked for, fomented by the restless enmity of the
Narragansetts.[334]

That the Narragansetts were inimical they soon learned. One day one
of the warriors of that tribe entered Plymouth, and announced himself
to be a messenger from his renowned sagamore Canonicus. He asked for
Squanto, but seemed pleased when told that he was absent. He said he
had a package for Squanto. This consisted of a bundle of new arrows,
wrapped in a rattlesnake’s skin. It was enigmatical to the English;
but, suspicious that it could not be the Indian olive-branch, and
might mean mischief, Standish detained the messenger as he was about
to quit the settlement, and determined to hold him until Squanto’s
return should solve the riddle.[335]

At first the savage was frightened; but after a little, seeing
that his captors meant him no harm, he became quite friendly, and
began to chat. The Pilgrims learned from him, that an envoy whom
they had despatched to negotiate a peace with the Narragansetts, in
the preceding summer, had played Judas, and betrayed his trust.
Withholding from Canonicus the presents which the colonists had
sent him as tokens of amity, he had used his influence to kindle a
war. The imprisoned runner said Canonicus would not have uttered
sinister threats, had he thought the English friendly to him. When he
returned, and informed the Narragansetts of the real sentiments of
the pale-faces, firm peace would come.[336]

Somewhat affected by these representations, Bradford concluded to
release the Indian; previous to which, however, he bade the envoy
inform Canonicus that the pale-faces had heard of his threats, and
were offended; that they desired to live in amity with their red
brothers; yet if any warlike demonstrations were made, they would be
prepared to meet them.[337]

Then the governor urged the savage to take some food; but he was too
anxious to quit the dangerous vicinage to remain a moment after his
liberation; so, after expressing his gratitude, he immediately set
out, in the midst of a driving storm, to find his way through the
white, shivering December woods to his wigwam and his people.[338]

When Squanto came in, the settlers at once crowded about him, and
showing him the sphynx-like Indian package, asked him to spell the
riddle. With a laugh and a shrug, he explained that it expressed
enmity, and was the red man’s declaration of war. The settlers were
startled; all adjourned to the fort; and here, after deliberation,
it was resolved to meet menace by menace. They thought, rightly,
that a determined attitude would in their case be safest; and though
Bradford had no anxiety to pit his fifty-odd men against the five
thousand warriors whom Canonicus could muster, he was bold and
defiant in appearance.[339]

The governor filled the rattlesnake-skin with powder and bullets, and
despatched it to the Narragansetts by a special messenger, with this
word: “If we were supplied with ships, we would save the Narragansett
sagamore the trouble of coming so far to meet us by sailing to him in
his own dominions. As it is, if he will come to the colony, he will
find us ready to receive him.”[340]

When Canonicus heard this message, he was profoundly impressed
with the courage of his pale-face neighbors; and when the skin was
tendered him, he refused to receive it; but the Pilgrim envoy would
not take it back; so it was passed from hand to hand among the
Narragansetts, till finally, pushed from the forest by superstitious
fear, it reached the Plymouth settlement _unopened_.[341]

Though this prompt action cowed the Narragansetts for a time, the
rumor of intended hostilities continued to vex the colonists through
the winter. “This made them the more careful to look to themselves;
so they agreed to enclose their dwellings with a strong pale, with
flankers in convenient spots, and gates to shut, which were every
night locked, and a watch kept; when need required, there was also
warding through the day. The company, by the advice of Standish and
the governor, was divided into four squadrons; and every man had his
position assigned him, to which he was to repair in case of sudden
alarm. If there should be a cry of fire, a squad was appointed for a
guard, with muskets, whilst others quenched the flames. All this was
accomplished very cheerfully; and to prevent Indian treachery, the
whole town was impaled round by the beginning of March, while every
family had a pretty garden-spot secured.”[342]

The Pilgrims were regularly drilled by Standish, who had learned
the science of war in Flanders. On these occasions, part of the
exercises consisted in a general rush, each man to his station, and
a simultaneous discharge of musketry. After this, the men escorted
their officers to their cabins, fired a salute in their honor, and
then dispersed. This may be considered “the first general muster
in New England.” It was the germ of the present militia system of
thirty-six states.[343]

This diligent training ere long moulded the Pilgrims into a finely
disciplined company; and they were quite proud of their proficiency
in arms. Thus

    “Spake, in the pride of his heart, Miles Standish, the captain
          of Plymouth:
    ‘Look at these arms,’ he said, ‘the warlike weapons that hang here,
    Burnished, and bright, and clean, as if for parade or inspection.
    This is the sword of Damascus I fought with in Flanders. This
          breastplate—
    Well I remember the day—once saved my life in a skirmish.
    There in front you can see the very dint of the bullet
    Fired point-blank at my heart by a Spanish Arcabucero.
    Had it not been of shear-steel, the forgotten bones of Miles
          Standish
    Would at this moment be mould in their grave in the Flemish
          morasses.
    Look! you can see from this window my brazen howitzer, planted
    High on the roof of the church—a preacher who speaks to the purpose,
    Steady, straight forward, and strong, with irresistible logic;
    Orthodox, flashing conviction right into the hearts of the heathen.
    Now we are ready, I think, for an assault of the Indians.
    Let them come, if they like, and the sooner they try it the better.
    Let them come, if they like, be it sagamore, sachem, or pow-wow,
    Aspinet, Samoset, Corbitant, Squanto, or Tokamahamon.’”[344]

When, in the preceding summer, the Pilgrims had visited Massachusetts
bay, they had promised the tribes in that vicinity to come again
in the next spring and renew a trade with them. Now, in the latter
part of March, Standish and his friends commenced preparations
for this voyage. Rumors, constantly renewed, still foreboded an
outbreak against the peace and safety of the little commonwealth; and
though the winter had been spent without the yell of the war-whoop,
Bradford’s fast friend, Habbamak, strongly advised against the
expedition of Standish, since he feared that the northeastern
tribes were in close league with the Narragansetts, and anxious to
precipitate a war.[345]

Finally the colonists concluded to undertake the expedition, but to
do so with extreme caution.[346] Accordingly, Standish embarked.
He had not sailed far, ere he was becalmed. Suddenly he heard a
cannon-shot, the signal of danger. Instantly putting about, he bade
his men row with their utmost strength and skill. Soon Plymouth was
reached, and Standish learned that, just as he had sailed, an Indian,
one of Squanto’s family, had brought word that the Narragansetts,
with Corbitant and Massasoit, were marching on the settlement.[347]
Habbamak was confident that, even if this tale were true, Massasoit
was not on the war-path; so confident, that he sent his squaw,
under pretence of some message, to spy out the facts in the great
sagamore’s village.[348]

Meantime watch was kept through the night, and the whole settlement
rested on its arms.[349]

Nothing came of it all; not an Indian appeared; and when Habbamak’s
wife returned, she said that she found Massasoit at home and
quiet.[350] “After this,” says Bradford, “the traders proceeded on
their voyage, and had a good traffic; returning in safety, blessed by
God.”[351]

From various circumstances, the settlers began to suspect that
Squanto “sought his own ends and played his own game” in his
relations with them. He was the most travelled and learned of the
Indians, and with the spirit of braggadocio and the love of great
stories common to his race, and also to his white prototypes, he
was fond of working on the fears of his more ignorant and credulous
brothers of the wood, by boasting of his influence with the
pale-faces, by reciting wild and terror-striking stories of the
magical power of the English, and by offering to insure the peace and
security of all who bought his services.[352]

In this way Squanto drove quite a trade, the patent for his truth
being his knowledge and singular European adventures.

“These English,” he would say to a wondering and superstitious group
of Indians, “are a wise and powerful people. Diseases are at their
command. They have now buried under their storehouse the plague. They
can send it forth to any place or upon any people they please, and
sweep them all away, though they went not a step from home.”[353]
“Ugh! ugh!” would be the responses of the gaping believers. Many
was the skin, many the piece of wampum, given Squanto to purchase
his powerful intercession on their behalf, to lay the plague of the
pale-face magicians.

Once Squanto, being sent for by the governor, entered the house
accompanied by Habbamak and several other Indians. A hole had been
dug in the floor for the purpose of concealing certain articles,
and the ground was left in a broken state. Habbamak, glancing at it,
asked Squanto,

“What does that mean?”

“That,” retorted the wily sachem, “is the place where the plague is
buried that I told you about.”

Habbamak, to satisfy himself of the truth or falsity of this
statement, asked one of the settlers, shortly after, if this was so.

“No,” said the stern, truthful Puritan; “we have not the plague at
our command; but the God whom we worship has, and he can send it
forth to the destruction both of his enemies and ours.”[354]

Having learned these things, the Pilgrims spared no pains to
contradict Squanto’s misstatements; and so angered were the
neighboring tribes, all of whom he had repeatedly swindled and
misled, that Massasoit and Habbamak both strenuously insisted upon
putting him to death; for the American Indian forgave any thing
sooner than an attempt to cheat him; in which he was unlike civilized
communities, which often admire in proportion as they are cozened,
and frown on and resent nothing but a _clumsy_ cheat.

But Squanto, with all his faults, was too useful to the Pilgrims
to be surrendered to the cruel vengeance of his foes; so he was
saved from death, though not without difficulty, and at the risk of
estranging Massasoit.[355]

This made the rescued sachem “walk more squarely, and cleave
unto the English till he died.” There was great jealousy between
Squanto and Habbamak. Both were competitors for the good-will of
the Pilgrims; and of this emulation good use was made. The governor
seemed to countenance the one, and the captain the other, by which
_rûse_ the colonists got better intelligence, and kept the two scouts
more diligent.[356]

Towards the latter part of May, 1622, the scanty provisions of the
Pilgrims quite gave out. Actual hunger began to pinch. The wild fowl,
so plenty in the preceding season, were now grown shy of Plymouth,
and could not be found. Their hooks and seines for fishing were worn
out. It was yet hardly time to plant, as the frost still clutched the
soil in its icy hand; and even if it were, weary weeks must elapse
ere a crop could be reaped. The future looked black, yet even in this
strait they trusted in God, “knowing that he would not desert his
own.”[357]

While the Pilgrims were thus perplexed to know where their next
mouthful was to come from, they espied one day a shallop off their
harbor. It proved to be a boat from a ship sent by Thomas Weston to
fish off the coast of Maine. It contained six or seven passengers and
a parcel of home-letters.[358]

These emigrants, like those who came in the “Fortune,” were destitute
of provisions, and the colonists were requested by Weston to
provide for their necessities. Despite their own wants, “they took
compassion on the needy new-comers, and in this famine gave them as
good as any of their own.”[359]

The Pilgrims got cold comfort from their letter-bag. “Some of the
adventurers,” wrote Weston, “have sent you herewith some directions
for your furtherance in the common good. It seems to me that they are
like those St. James speaks of, that bade their brother eat and warm
himself, but gave him nothing; so they bid you make salt and uphold
the plantation, but send you no means wherewithal to do it. Soon I
purpose to send more people on my own account.”[360]

It seemed from other letters, that the company of
Merchant-adventurers was exhausting its energy in internal
bickerings. Nothing was said about forwarding the remainder of the
congregation at Leyden; nothing was promised for the future; a simple
command was sent, that the colonists should assent to the breakage
of the joint-stock contract, and despatch to them a paper to that
effect, ratified and certified.[361]

“All this,” says Bradford, “was cold comfort to fill their empty
bellies; and on the part of Mr. Weston, but a slender performance
of his late promise never to forsake the colony;[362] and as little
did it fill and warm cold and hungry men, as those the apostle
James spoke of, by Weston before mentioned. Well might it remind the
settlers of what the psalmist saith, ‘It is better to trust in the
Lord than to have confidence in man.’[363] And again, ‘Put not your
trust in princes’—much less in merchants—‘nor in the son of man; for
there is no help in them.’[364] ‘Blessed is he that hath the God of
Jacob for his help, whose hope is in the Lord his God.’[365]

“These things seemed strange to the settlers. Seeing this
inconsistency and shuffling, it made them think there was some
mystery at bottom. Therefore the governor, fearing lest, in their
straits, this news should tend to disband and scatter the colony,
concealed these letters from the public, and only imparting them to
some trusty friends for advice, concluded for the present to keep all
quiet, and await the development of events.”[366]




CHAPTER XIV.

THE RIVAL COLONIES

      “Look here, upon this picture, and on this.”
                                SHAKSPEARE, _Hamlet_.


It was towards the close of May, 1622, that the seven pioneers from
Weston’s fishing-smack had landed at Plymouth. About a month later,
in the end of June or beginning of July, a new colony arrived. Two
vessels, the “Charity” and the “Swan,” rounded Cape Cod and anchored
off the Pilgrim settlement.[367] They brought out a fresh batch of
home letters, which Bradford and his coadjutors eagerly opened,
hoping to discover the hidden meaning of these strange movements.

Weston’s missive was first searched. It was to this effect: “The
‘Fortune’ is arrived, whose good news touching your estate and
proceedings I am very glad to hear. And howsoever she was robbed
on the way by the Frenchmen, I hope your loss will not be great,
for the conceit of a vast return doth animate the merchants. As for
myself, I have sold my adventure and debts unto them, so I am quit
of you and you of me. Now, though I have nothing to pretend as an
adventurer among you, yet I will advise you a little for your good,
if you can apprehend it. I perceive and know as well as any one the
disposition of the Merchant-adventurers, whom the hope of gain hath
drawn on to this they have done; yet that hope will not draw them
much farther. Besides, most of them are against the sending of the
Leyden congregation, for whose cause this business was first begun;
and some of the most religious of the company except against them for
their creed.”[368]

This presaged disaster, and Weston’s desertion after his volunteer
promises, made the Pilgrims profoundly sad. Next a letter from two
of the Merchant-adventurers was read. This warned the colonists to
beware of Weston, as one who sought his own single end, and “whom the
company had bought out and were glad to be quit of.”[369]

Then a letter from their old friend Cushman was opened. “Weston,” he
said, “hath quite broken off from our company, and hath now sent two
small ships on his own venture for a new plantation. The people which
they carry are no men for us, wherefore I pray you, entertain them
not. If they offer to buy any thing of you, let it be such as you can
spare, and make them give the worth of it. ’Tis like they will plant
to the south of the cape. I fear these people will deal harshly with
the savages. I pray you signify to Squanto that they are a distinct
body from us, and that we have nothing to do with them, neither must
be blamed for their faults, nor can warrant their fidelity.”[370]

Weston had overhauled these letters, and so become familiar with
their contents. After criticising them severely, he added: “Now if
you be of the mind of these writers, deal plainly with us, and we
will seek our residence elsewhere. If you are friendly, as we have
thought you to be, give us the entertainment of friends. I shall
leave in the country a little ship—if God send her safe thither—with
mariners and fishermen, who shall coast and trade with the savages
and the old plantation. It may be that we shall be as helpful to you
as you to us. I think I shall see you in person next spring.”[371]

The Pilgrims were in a quandary. They stood on the verge of
starvation. The recent comers had brought out no stock of provisions,
but were dumped destitute upon the charity of those whom they had
come to supplant. “As for the harsh censures and suspicions intimated
in these letters,” remarks Bradford, “they desired to judge as
charitably and wisely of them as they could, weighing them in the
balance of love and reason; and though the epistles of warning came
from godly and loving friends, yet they conceived that many things
might arise from over-deep jealousy and fear, together with unmeet
provocation; though they well saw that Weston pursued his own ends,
and was embittered in spirit. All these things they pondered and well
considered, yet concluded to give his men friendly entertainment;
partly in regard to that gentleman’s past kindness, and partly in
compassion to the people who were now come into the wilderness—as
themselves were—and were by their ships to be presently put ashore;
for they were to carry other passengers into Virginia;[372] and they
were altogether unacquainted, and knew not what to do. So, as they
had received Weston’s former company of seven men, and victualed them
as their own, now they also received these, being about sixty lusty
men, and gave housing for themselves and their goods; and many, being
sick, had the best the place could afford them.”[373]

Of course, so great and unexpected an accession of numbers added
vastly to the embarrassment of the Pilgrims, and “amidst these
straits, and the desertion of those from whom they had expected a
supply, when famine began to pinch them sore they knew not what
course to take.” But God stood behind the cloud, “keeping watch
above his own.” One day a boat came into Plymouth, and brought
word of a massacre in Virginia,[374] and gave a warning to the New
England colonists. The kind sender of this message was captain of a
fishing-smack then fishing off the Maine coast.[375]

When this boat returned, “the governor sent back a thankful answer,
as was meet, and also despatched the shallop of the colony in its
company, in which was Edward Winslow, whose object was to secure
what provisions he could from the fishermen. He was kindly received
by the mentor captain, who not only spared what he could of his own
stock, but wrote others to do the same. By these means Winslow got
some good quantity, and returned in safety; whereby the plantation
had a double benefit; first, a refreshing by the food brought;
and secondly, they knew the way to those parts for their benefit
hereafter. Still, what was got and this small boat brought, being
divided among so many, came but to little, yet, by God’s blessing, it
upheld them till harvest.”[376] The daily allowance was a quarter of
a pound of bread to each person; and this the governor doled out, for
had it not been in his custody, it would have been eaten up and all
had starved; but thus, with what eels they could catch, they “made
pretty shift till corn was ripe.”[377]

The Pilgrims soon perceived the truth of Cushman’s estimate of the
character of Weston’s colonists, and found, indeed, that “they
were not the men for them.” In the lump they were a rude, profane,
improvident, thievish set, and peculiarly unfit to be the founders of
a state.[378] They ate of the bounty of their entertainers, wasted
their corn, brought riot and profanity into the quiet, devout homes
of the Pilgrims, and repaid kindness by backbiting and reviling.[379]
Their coming was purely a business affair. It was a speculation.
It was entirely destitute of every religious element, though it
abounded with irreligious ones. Fearing neither God nor man, they
hated the Puritans, and ought never to be confounded with the
Forefathers.[380] They were, in fact,

                “A lazy, lolling sort,
      Unseen at church, at senate, or at court,
      Of ever-listless loiterers, that attend
      No cause, no trust, no duty, and no friend.”[381]

These godless drones remained at Plymouth most of the summer, until
their ships came back from Virginia.[382] Then, under Weston’s
direction, or that of some one whom he had set in authority over
them, these pests removed into Massachusetts Bay, and selecting a
spot called by the Indians Wessagusset, now Weymouth, they essayed
to plant a settlement.[383] “Yet they left all their sickly folks
with us, to be nursed and cared for,” says Bradford, “till they
were settled and housed. But of their stores they gave us nothing,
though we did greatly want, nor any thing else in recompense of our
courtesy; neither did we desire it, for ’twas seen that they were an
unruly company, having no good government,—sure soon to fall into
want by disorder.”[384]

Such a colony “was not, nor could it come to good.” Mismanagement
and lazy improvidence invited penury. Ere long they ran foul of the
Indians; already the bane of the Pilgrims, they speedily became
a pest among the savages, whom they robbed and swindled without
conscience. In this way they exasperated the Indians, and by their
bad courses were nigh bringing ruin on their neighbors as well as
on themselves.[385] On one occasion they stood provisionless. They
could expect no succor from the natives, and they had despoiled every
Indian corn-field in their vicinity. In this extremity, Sanders,
their chief man, sent to inform Bradford of his intention to get
some corn from the Indians by force. The Pilgrims sent back a strong
protest against the pillage; advised the new planters to make shift
to live, as they did, on ground-nuts, clams, and mussels; and from
their own well-nigh exhausted storehouse sent their disorderly and
wasteful rivals a supply of corn.[386]

This stock was soon gone; then the Westonians desired the Pilgrims
to unite with them in an expedition to the Indian settlements
on the coast-line, in search of corn, beans, and other kindred
commodities. They, not unwilling to assist the needy planters in
all honest ways, assented, and terms of agreement were signed
designating the division of the articles obtained.[387] Detachments
from both colonies embarked in the “Swan,” the smaller of Weston’s
vessels, and the shallop was also taken. Squanto accompanied the
forage as interpreter.[388] The Indians were very shy and could
hardly be approached. But finally the kindness and tact of Bradford
and Standish thawed their icy reserve, so that the enterprise was
crowned with success. Twenty-seven hogsheads of corn and beans were
bought.[389] Owing to the stranding of the shallop, the Plymouth
governor was compelled to foot it home, some fifty miles; but he
“received all the respect that could be from the Indians on the
journey.”[390]

The “Swan” returned, a day or two later, with the provisions, and,
after their distribution, Weston’s men sailed from Plymouth in her to
their plantation.[391]

This was destined to be Squanto’s last service. A violent fever,
which struck him on the expedition, soon laid him low. “Pray for
me,” said the dying Indian to Governor Bradford, “pray for me,
that I may go to the white man’s God in heaven.” Shortly after, he
distributed various trinkets among his English friends as memorials,
and expired.[392] Despite his pranks and vanity, Squanto was a
true friend to the Pilgrims, and his loss was a severe blow to the
colonial interests.[393]

Immediately on recovering from the fatigue incident to the late
voyage, the Pilgrims went out into their fields to reap the
harvest. The crop was slender, owing partly to the ignorance of the
planters of the culture of Indian corn; partly to their many other
employments; but chiefly to their inability properly to attend it,
caused by weakness from want of food.[394]

It was apparent that famine must be entailed upon the next year also,
unless some other source of supply should be opened. This seemed
impossible. There were no markets; and they were out of trinkets for
their Indian traffic. “Behold now another providence of God,” says
Bradford; “a ship sent out by English merchants to discover all the
harbors betwixt Virginia and the shoals of Cape Cod, and to trade
along the coast where it could, entered our bay. She had on board
a store of beads—which were then good trade—and some knives, but
the crew would sell nothing save in the bunch and at high prices.
However, we bought of them, and by this means were fitted again to
trade for beaver and for corn with the red men.”[395]

In this same summer a new fort was built, “both strong and comely,
which was a sure defence.” Isaac De Rasières, who visited Plymouth at
a somewhat later day, has left this description of the block-citadel:
“Upon the hill they have a large square house, with a flat roof,
made of thick-sawn planks, stayed with oak-beams. On the top are
ranged six cannon, which shoot iron-balls of four or five pounds, and
command the surrounding country. The lower part they use for their
church, where preaching is had on Sundays and the usual holidays. The
settlers assemble by beat of drum, each with his musket or firelock,
in front of the captain’s door; they have their cloaks on, and place
themselves in order, three abreast, and are led by a sergeant without
beat of drum. Behind comes the governor, in a long robe; beside
him on the right hand walks the preacher, and on the left hand the
captain, with his side arms and cloak on, and with a small cane in
his hand. So they march in good order, and on reaching the fort each
sets his arms down near him and within easy grasp.”[396]

An open Bible in one hand, a shotted musket in the other—such was the
manner in which the Pilgrim fathers went to church.




CHAPTER XV.

THE EXPLOIT OF MILES STANDISH.

      “And when they talk of him, they shake their heads,
      And whisper one another in the ear;
      And he that speaks doth gripe the hearer’s wrist;
      Whilst he that hears makes fearful action
      With wrinkled brows, with nods, and rolling eyes.”
                                             SHAKSPEARE.


One short twelvemonth witnessed the birth and the death of Weston’s
colony. Its cradle was its grave. The Westonians, by their own
wickedness and folly, beckoned ruin and blood to be their guests. The
ears of the Pilgrims ached with listening to the Indians’ complaints
of their injustice and robberies. Not a day passed which did not
witness some woful scene of outrage.[397] Bradford and his coadjutors
talked themselves hoarse in denunciation; messengers ran themselves
footsore in carrying protests of warning, of expostulation, of
appeal.[398]

“Once,” says Cotton Mather, “in preaching to a congregation there,
one of the Pilgrims urged these settlers to approve themselves a
_religious_ community, as otherwise they would contradict the main
end of planting this wilderness; whereupon a well-known individual,
then in the assembly, cried out, ‘Sir, you are mistaken; you think
you are preaching to the people at Plymouth bay: our _main end_ was
_to catch fish_.’”[399]

The scoffers were soon to learn, under the bitter tuition of
experience, that fish are a slippery foundation for a colony to build
on—not so firm and sure as open Bibles and common schools.

The loose morality and vicious courses of their mischievous
neighbor-colonists caused the Pilgrims infinite trouble and unfeigned
grief. And now, in the midst of their anxiety on this account, a
report gave voice to the dangerous sickness of Massasoit;[400]
it was said that the great sagamore, who had been their faithful
friend, could not survive.[401] The Plymouth settlers were profoundly
sad; they were also somewhat alarmed, for Corbitant, their former
open foe, would, so they were told, clutch Massasoit’s sceptre and
wear his mantle on the chieftain’s death.[402] The Pilgrims at
once decided to send ambassadors to visit Massasoit, see if haply
something might not be done for him, and, in case of his decease, to
negotiate a new peace with the succeeding sachem.[403]

For this service Winslow and Habbamak were selected; and a gentleman
who had wintered in Plymouth, and who was desirous of seeing the
Indians in their wigwam-homes, Mr. John Hampden,[404] was, at his
urgent solicitation, permitted to bear them company.[405]

They set out at once, but had not gone very deep into the forest ere
some Indians, whom they met at a river-ford, told them that Massasoit
was dead. The envoys were shocked; and Habbamak began to wail forth
his chief’s death-song: “Oh, great sachem, Oh, great heart, with
many have I been acquainted, but none ever equalled thee.” Then
turning to his pale-face friend, he said, “Oh, Master Winslow, his
like you will never see again. He was not like other Indians, false
and bloody and implacable; but kind, easily appeased when angry, and
reasonable in his requirements. He was a wise sachem, not ashamed to
ask advice, governing better with mild, than other chiefs did with
severe measures. I fear you have not now one faithful friend left in
the wigwams of the red men.”[406] He would then break forth again in
loud lamentations, “enough,” says Winslow, “to have made the hardest
heart sob and wail.”[407]

But time pressed, and Winslow, bidding Habbamak “leave wringing of
his hands,” trudged on over the patches of snow, through the naked
forests shivering in the gusty winds of March, under the sullen
sky. Corbitant’s lodge was near; here it was hoped that fuller
intelligence might be gained. Corbitant was not at home, but his
squaw informed them that Massasoit was not yet dead, though he
could scarcely live long enough to permit his visitors to close his
eyes.[408]

Reinvigorated by this news, and persuaded that while there was
life there was hope, the envoys again pressed forward with eager
footsteps. Soon Massasoit’s wigwam was reached. A cordon of visitors
surrounded it; and so great was the crowd, that it was with
difficulty that the Pilgrims pushed through and gained an entrance.
“When they succeeded, they beheld a scene so repulsive and so
annoying as to be quite sufficient to banish whatever vitality the
sick sagamore might still possess. Not only was the lodge crammed
with filthy Indians, whose number effectually excluded all fresh air,
but the pow-wows were busied in yelling their magical incantations,
now rubbing the sick sachem, now wailing, now making frantic
gestures; so that, had the disease possessed intelligence and been
cognizant of what was taking place, it would have been effectually
frightened away. Six or eight ‘medicine-men’ were manipulating him at
once, and his ears were dinned with yells, when he should have been
perfectly quiet.”[409]

When the pow-wows had concluded their superstitious spells and
exorcisms, they told Massasoit that Winslow had come to visit him.
The sick Indian, turning on his skin couch, greeted the Englishman
kindly. Disease had almost choked him, and quite robbed him of
sight; he was indeed near death. Winslow at once conveyed the
assurance of the deep grief of the colonists at his sickness,
informed him that the pale-faces had sent physic for his restoration
to health, and offered himself to undertake the cure. These words,
being translated by Habbamak, the Indian at once and cordially
thanked Winslow, and accepted his good offices.[410]

The skilful Englishman, with a “confection of many comfortable
conserves,” soon worked a cure. The convalescent sagamore said, “Now
I know that the English are indeed my friends, and love me; while I
live I will never forget this kindness.”[411] Nobly did he keep his
word; for, after requesting “the pale-face medicine” to exercise his
skill upon others of his tribe, who were down with the same disease
which had laid him low, his gratitude was so warm that he disclosed
to the pale-face leech the fact that a wide-spread and well-matured
conspiracy was afoot to exterminate Weston’s colony, in revenge for
injuries heaped upon the Indians; that all the northeastern tribes
were in the league; and that the massacre was to cover the Pilgrims
also, lest they should avenge the fall of their neighbors. “A chief
was here at the setting of the sun,” added Massasoit, “and he told
me that the pale-faces did not love me, else they would visit me
in my pain, and he urged me to join the war party. But I said, No.
Now if you take the chiefs of the league, and kill them, it will
end the war-trail in the blood of those who made it, and save the
settlements.”[412]

Thankful to Massasoit for this disclosure, and profoundly impressed
with its importance, the envoys speedily bade the sagamore good-by,
and started for Plymouth. Reaching Corbitant’s lodge towards evening,
they decided to sleep with him. “We found him,” says Winslow, “a
notable politician, yet full of merry jests and squibs, and never
better pleased than when the like are turned again on him.”[413]

“If I were sick, as Massasoit has been,” asked he, “would Mr.
Governor send me medicine?”

“Yes,” said Winslow.

“Would you bring it?” queried Corbitant.

“Certainly,” was the reply.

At this the sachem was delighted. He resumed his questions.

“How did you dare to go so far into our hunting-grounds, with only
one pale-face and Habbamak?”

“Because,” said Winslow, “where there is true love, there can be no
fear; my heart is so upright towards the Indians, that I have no
cause to fear to go among them.”

“If you love us so much,” retorted the shrewd chief, “why is it that,
when we go to Plymouth, you stand on guard, and present the mouths of
your big guns at us?”

“Oh,” was the reply, “that’s the most honorable reception we could
give you. ’Tis the English way of saluting distinguished guests.”

“Ugh,” said Corbitant, with the peculiar Indian grunt and shrug,
“perhaps; but I don’t like such ways of shaking hands.”[414]

Having noticed that before and after each meal his guests offered
thanks, Corbitant asked them why they did it. “This led to a long
conversation upon the character and works of the great Father; on the
relations which his creatures sustain to him as their preserver and
constant benefactor, and the duties which all owe to him as such,
with which the chief seemed pleased. When the ten commandments were
recited, he approved of all save the seventh; he saw many objections
to tying a man to one woman.”[415]

“This,” says Banvard, “is a specimen of the manner in which the
Pilgrims endeavored to communicate religious truths to the minds
of their ignorant Indian neighbors. When among them, they observed
religious exercises at their meals; continued the practice of morning
and evening services; strictly regarded the Sabbath; and thus
provoked inquiries. Then, when opportunity was given, they imparted,
in a homely, familiar way, the elementary truths of the Bible.”[416]

After passing a pleasant night in Corbitant’s wigwam, the Pilgrims
resumed their journey, and after twenty-four hours’ walk reached
Plymouth.

They immediately imparted what they knew of the Indian plot to
the governor. Bradford summoned the settlers to deliberate. Upon
examination other evidence was found which corroborated Massasoit’s
disclosure; and even in the midst of this consideration, one of
Weston’s pioneers came in, like Bunyan’s Pilgrim, “with a pack on his
back;” and “though he knew not a foot of the way, yet he got safe to
Plymouth by losing his way,” as he was pursued by the Indians, and
would have been caught had he travelled by the accustomed track.[417]

“He told us,” says Bradford, “how affairs stood at Wessagusset; how
miserable all were; and that he dare not tarry there longer, as, by
what he had observed, he apprehended those settlers would shortly be
all knocked in the head.”[418]

Startled by the imminence of the peril, Bradford at once despatched
Standish with a small squad of men to warn and succor the menaced
colonists. On reaching Wessagusset Standish boarded the “Swan,” which
lay moored in the harbor. Not a soul was on her. Surprised, the
Pilgrim captain fired his musket. Several colonists then ran down to
the shore. “How dare you leave your ship unguarded, and live in so
much security?” asked he. “Why,” was the reply of the colonists, who
were insensible of their peril, “we have no fear of the Indians, but
live with them, and suffer them to lodge with us, without ever having
a gun or sword, or ever needing one.”

“Well, well,” cried Standish, “if you have no occasion for vigilance,
so much the better.” He then went ashore. Pitiful was the situation
of the pioneers; four words paint the picture; filth, hunger,
disease, nakedness. “After they began to come into want,” remarks the
old Pilgrim chronicler, “many sold their clothes and bed-coverings;
others—so base were they—became servants to the Indians, and would
cut wood and fetch water for them, for a cup of corn; some fell to
stealing, and when they found the hiding-places where the natives
stored their corn, they despoiled them, and this night and day,
while the savages complained grievously. Now they were come to such
misery that some starved and some died of cold. One, in gathering
shell-fish, was so weak from hunger that he stuck fast in the mud,
and not being able to pull clear, he was drowned by the incoming
tide. Most had left their cabins and were scattered up and down
through the woods and by the water-side, here six and there ten,
grubbing for nuts and clams. By this carriage they were contemned
and scorned by the Indians as ‘pale-face squaws,’ and they insulted
over them right insolently; insomuch that many times, as they lay
thus scattered abroad, and had set a pot over a fire and filled it
with ground-nuts or shell-fish, when it was ready the natives would
come and, pushing them aside, eat it up; and at night the Indians,
to revenge their thefts, stole their blankets and left them to lie
all night in the cold. Yea, in the end, they were fain to hang one
of their own men, whom they could not reclaim from stealing, at the
dictation of the savages.”[419]

Standish at once assembled the leading colonists, and opened to them
his budget of news. The proposed massacre, the actors, all was laid
bare. As frightened now as they were blinded before, all besought him
to save them, and placed themselves in his hands. All stragglers were
called in and supplied from his stores, a pint of corn a day for each
man. This done, Standish began to dissemble; he wished to lure the
chiefs of the conspiracy into his clutches, and so fight guile with
guile.[420]

Though suspecting that their plot had been discovered, the Indians so
greatly despised the colonists that they came daily into Wessagusset,
uttering gibes and menaces loud and deep. They even ventured to
taunt Standish. One of the braves, Pecksuot, a bold fellow, but
a braggadocio, “went to Habbamak, who was with Standish as his
interpreter, and told him that he had been informed that the captain
had come to ‘kill him and his friends.’ ‘Tell him,’ he said, ‘we know
it, but we neither fear him nor will we shun him; let him attack us
when he pleases, he will not surprise us.’”[421]

At other times the Indians would enter the plantation, and, in the
presence of the captain, sharpen their knives, feel their points,
and jeer. One of their chiefs, Witawamat, often boasted of the fine
qualities of his knife, on the handle of which was cut a woman’s
face; “but,” said he, “I have another at home with which I have
killed both French and English, and that hath a man’s face on it;
by-and-by these two must marry.”[422] Not long after, he said again,
holding up his knife, “By-and-by this shall see and eat, but not
speak,” in allusion to the muskets of the English, which always
reported their doings.[423]

Pecksuot was an Indian of immense muscular size and strength;
Standish was a small man. Once the brave said to the captain: “You
are a great officer, but a little man; and I am not a sachem, yet I
possess great strength and courage.”[424]

Standish quietly pocketed these insults, and awaited his chance.
It soon came. Pecksuot, Wetawamat, and two others, chiefs of the
conspiracy, were finally all entrapped in one cabin. Standish with
three comrades and Habbamak were also present. The door was secured
and a terrific death-grapple at once ensued. There were no shrieks,
no cries, no war-whoops. Nothing was heard save the fierce panting
of the combatants and the dull thud of the blows given and returned.
Habbamak stood quietly by, and meddled not. Soon the Englishmen were
successful; each slew his opponent, and Standish himself closing with
Pecksuot, snatched from the braggadocio’s neck his vaunted knife,
and plunged it into his foeman’s heart. One blow did not kill him;
frenzied and glaring, he leaped on Standish and tugged wildly at his
throat. The struggle was brief but awful, and Standish called his
whole skill into requisition to complete his victory. At length the
death-blow was dealt:

      “See, his face is black and full of blood;
      His eye-balls farther out than when he lived;
      Staring full ghastly, like a strangled man;
      His hair upreared, his nostrils stretched with struggling;
      His hands abroad displayed, as one that grasped
      And tugged for life, and was by strength subdued.”[425]

After the tragedy was over, Habbamak said to Standish, while a smile
played over his swarthy features: “Yesterday, Pecksuot, bragging of
his strength and stature, said you were a great captain, but a little
man; but to-day I see that you are big enough to lay him on the
ground.”[426]

Standish did not pause for congratulation, nor did he care much for
it; knowing the value of promptitude, he at once headed a foray on
the neighboring Indian villages. Several skirmishes ensued; the
savages, beaten and terrified, retreated from morass to morass. The
conspiracy was buried with its originators; and many of the sachems
who had joined the league, Conacum, Aspinet, Iyanough, died from
diseases contracted in their headlong flight.[427]

This was considered the “capital exploit” of Miles Standish. It
struck such wholesome terror into the hearts of the surrounding
tribes, that, in connection with the uniform justice and kindliness
of the Pilgrims, it secured peace for half a century.[428]

The Westonians, discouraged and disgusted, resolved to break their
ranks and give up their settlement. Standish “offered to escort them
to Plymouth, and give them entertainment till Weston or some supply
should come,” says Bradford; “or if they liked any other course
better, he promised to help them all he could. They thanked him, but
most of them desired him to grant them some corn, then they would go
with their ship to the eastward, where, haply, they might hear of
Weston, or of some supply from him. That failing, since it was the
time of year for ships to frequent the fishing waters, they could
work among the fishermen till they could get passage into England. So
they shipped what they had of any value, and the captain gave them
all the corn he could—scarcely leaving himself sufficient to take
him home—and saw the colonists well out of the bay; then he himself
sailed back to Plymouth in triumph.”[429]

There the head of Wetawamat was impaled, and set up prominently in
the fort; and an Indian who had been sent in pursuit of that pioneer
who had first brought word to the Pilgrims of the condition of his
fellow-settlers, and had been himself captured, recognized it. The
Pilgrim Fathers were not revengeful; they did not love to shed blood;
so when Habbamak vouched for the friendship of this captive, he
was liberated, and sent home to tell his tribe that the colonists
loved peace, but that they could fight in case of need. Ere long the
offending red men sent peace-offerings into Plymouth, and sued for
and obtained amity.[430]

Bradford, Winslow, and the rest, kept their friends in England and
Holland as fully informed as possible of the daily history of the
colony; and of course so memorable an event as this conspiracy and
its suppression, received a profuse recital. When Robinson heard of
the rencontre, he wrote back these words, finely illustrative of his
character: “Oh, how happy a thing had it been, that you had converted
some before you killed any.”[431]

As for Weston’s colony, this was the last of it. Some of the better
of the pioneers went to Plymouth; others finally found their way
back to England. They had landed under far better auspices than the
Pilgrims. They were welcomed by fellow-countrymen, and sheltered
throughout the winter. They commenced their settlement in the summer,
when nature laughed, and the hill-sides were gay with flowers, and
the air sweet with the songs of birds. They possessed a ship. They
had been left competently provided in the wilderness. Yet they
were no sooner _settled_ than they were _unsettled_. Bankrupt and
starving, they sought safety in flight. This was the fate of a colony
whose “main end was to fish,” which was founded on no higher law than
the greed of gain.

“‘Certainly the best works, and of greatest merit for the public,’
observed the childless Lord Bacon, with complacent self-love,
‘have proceeded from the unmarried or childless men.’ Weston’s
company, after having boasted of their strength as far superior to
Plymouth, which was enfeebled, they said, by the presence of women
and children, yet owed their deliverance to the colony that had many
women, children, and weak ones, with them.”[432]

Thus it should seem that weakness is sometimes strength. Ethics
are better buoys than numbers. Devout weakness is always stronger
than self-complacent and impious strength. Justice and a helpful
hand—these are the palladiums.

      “Too happy were men, if they understood
      There is no safety but in doing good.”[433]




CHAPTER XVI.

A CHECKERED RECORD.

      “Naught shall prevail against us, or disturb
      Our cheerful faith, that all which we behold
      Is full of blessings.”
                                          WORDSWORTH.


A few weeks after the final abandonment of Wessagusset by Weston’s
colonists, a fishing-smack dropped anchor off Plymouth. A boat was
lowered, and in a trice an Englishman, in the guise of a blacksmith,
was landed. He seemed anxious to learn the condition and prospects
of Weston’s settlement, and was evidently ignorant of its untoward
fate. On being informed of the conspiracy, massacre, and abandonment
of the project, he seemed to be profoundly agitated. This stranger
was Weston himself, once a prosperous London merchant, now alone in
the wilderness, a ruined man. “A strange alteration there was in him
to those who had known him in his former flourishing condition,”
moralizes the old Plymouth governor; “so uncertain are the mutable
things of this unstable world. And yet men set their hearts upon
them, though they daily see the vanity thereof.”[434]

Weston was anxious to know the worst. He also hoped that something
might yet be saved. He sailed in a shallop for the seat of his
downfallen venture. But misfortune dogged him. He was shipwrecked,
and cast ashore with nothing but the clothes upon his person. Soon
after, being discovered by the Indians, he was stripped even of
these, and left to find his way nude to the coast of Maine. This he
did; and borrowing a suit of clothes from the fishermen, he returned
to Plymouth in a pitiable plight, and begged the loan of some
beaver-skins as a stock in trade to commence life anew.[435]

The Pilgrims were themselves in a sad strait, “but they pitied his
case, and remembered former courtesies. They told him he saw their
want, and that they knew not when they should have a supply; also
how the case stood betwixt the Merchant-adventurers and themselves,
which he well knew. They said they had not much beaver, and if they
should let him have it, it might create a mutiny, since the colony
had no other means of procuring food and clothes, both which they
sadly needed. Yet they told him they would help him, considering his
necessity, but must do it secretly; so they let him have one hundred
beaver-skins. Thus they helped him when all the world failed him,
and he was enabled to go again to the ships, buy provisions, and
equip himself. But he requited his benefactors ill, for he proved
afterwards a bitter enemy on all occasions, and repaid his debt in
nothing but reproaches and evil words. Yea, he divulged it to some
that were none of their best friends, while he yet had the beaver in
his boat, and boasted that he could now set them all by the ears,
because they had done more than they could answer in letting him have
the skins. But his malice could not prevail.”[436]

Strangled by this episode, Weston was now dead to the Pilgrims, and
he disappears from the after-history of Plymouth.[437]

Through all these months, hunger continued to gnaw the vitals of
the Pilgrim colony. To secure a plentiful future, they decided to
plant a large grain-crop this spring. But the labor of the settlers
was hampered by an abnormal social arrangement. Plymouth fretted
under an agreement which robbed work of its spur and its crown. Up
to the month of April, 1623, a community of interest was strictly
maintained. This did not arise from any peculiar fantastic notions
among the colonists, but was required by a clause—reluctantly
assented to—of their engagement with the Merchant-adventurers in
England.[438] The contract tied the Pilgrims to the communal plan for
a specified season.[439] Land was not to be owned by individuals;
it was common; each man cultivated what he pleased, and threw the
product of his labor into the general store. From the stock thus
gained overseers supplied the settlers in equal quantities.[440]

Infinite were the vexations, multitudinous were the trials, which
resulted. Now a general meeting was called, and this question was
anxiously discussed. Finally it was decided, though only for reasons
of the sternest necessity, to deviate somewhat from the form of the
contract.

As the communal idea has, in our day, won wide favor with theorists
and ideal dreamers, we subjoin and commend the weighty words of
Bradford, who had experienced the evils of that vicious system, to
the Fourierite philosophers:

“At length, after much debate, the governor, with the advice of the
chiefest among the Pilgrims, gave way that each man should set corn
for his individual benefit, and in that respect trust to himself;
though, remembering the contract, all other things were to go on in
the communal way till time freed them. So to every family a parcel
of land was assigned, but only for present use, no division for
inheritance being made, and all boys and youth were ranged under
some family. This had good success, for it made all hands very
industrious; so that much more corn was planted than otherwise would
have been by any means the governor could have brought to bear. He
was saved a deal of trouble, and the division gave great content.
Even the women went into the field, taking with them their little
ones, who before would allege weakness and inability, and whom to
have compelled would have been thought grievously tyrannical.

“The experience which was had in this common interest and condition,
tried sundry years, and that among godly and sober men, may well
evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato and of other ancients,
applauded by some of later times; that the abolition of individual
property, and the introduction of a community of wealth, would make
men happy and flourishing. This community, so far as it went at
Plymouth, was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and to
retard labor. The young men, that were most able and fit for service,
did repine that they should spend their time and strength in working
for the families of others, without other recompense than a bare
subsistence. The strong man and the man of parts had no greater
share than he that was weak, and not able to do a quarter the other
could. This was thought injustice. The aged and graver sort—ranked
and equalized with the meaner and younger men in the division of
labor and provisions—esteemed it some indignity and disrespect unto
their gray heads. And for men’s wives to be bidden to do service
for others, as dressing meat and washing clothes, they deemed it
a kind of slavery which many husbands could not well brook. So if
this arrangement did not cut off those relations which God hath set
amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take off the
mutual respect that should be preserved amongst them, and destroyed
individuality. And things would have been worse, had the Pilgrims
been more of a different condition. Let none object that this is
man’s corruption, and nothing to the philosophy _per se_. Yes; but
since all men have this corruption in them, God in his wisdom saw
another course fitter for them.”[441]

When the Pilgrims had finished planting, they knew that many weary
weeks must elapse ere they could reap what they had sown. Meantime
“all their victuals were spent, and they rested on God’s providence
alone, many times not knowing at night where to get a bit of any
thing the next day; so that, as has been well said, they, above all
people in the world, had occasion to pray God to give them their
daily bread.”[442]

As the colonists had “but one boat left, and she not over-well
fitted, they were divided into gangs of six or seven each, and so
went out with a net they had bought, to take bass and such like fish
by course, each company knowing its turn. No sooner was the boat
discharged of what she had brought than the next gang took her. Nor
did they return till they had caught something, though it were five
or six days before; for they knew there was nothing at home, and to
return empty-handed would be a great discouragement to the rest. Yea,
they strove which should do best. If the boat was gone over-long or
got little, then all went to the shore to seek shell-fish, which at
low water they dug from the sand. They also got now and then a deer,
one or two of the fittest being appointed to range the woods; and
the meat thus gotten was fairly divided. All these wants were borne
with great patience and alacrity of spirit.”[443] God was thanked for
what he gave, and for the rest all hoped.

The unusually large corn-crop just planted led the Pilgrims to
believe that the approaching harvest would definitively stop the
hungry mouth of their necessities; but, alas, this expectation seemed
about to be blasted. A severe drought met them in the opening months
of the summer. From the middle of May to the middle of July there
was no rain. All nature seemed to pant with thirst. The streams
dwindled, and ceased to laugh. The summer foliage seemed in the “sear
and yellow leaf” of autumn. The flowers held out their parched and
shrivelled tongues. The sprouting corn began to wither in the blade.
Famine seemed inevitable. In this emergency, the devout Pilgrims
resorted to the “mercy-seat,” and besought Him who had so often
appeared to succor them to aid them now. A special day of fasting and
prayer was appointed; and we may still

              “hear the Pilgrims’ peaceful prayer
      Swelling along the silent air,
        Amid the forest wild.”

It has been well said, that answers to prayer do not generally come
with _observation_. They are often sent in a way which is hid from
most persons, and frequently even from those who receive them. There
are, however, instances in which these answers are so striking as to
be visible to all. Some instances of this kind may be found in the
early history of New England.[444]

On this occasion the day, which was kept with marked earnestness and
solemnity, opened with a cloudless sky, while the sun poured its
clear, scorching rays full upon the shrinking plains; but lo, says
Winslow in his recital, ere the close of the services, “the sky was
overcast, the clouds gathered on all sides, and on the next morning
distilled such soft, sweet, and moderate showers of rain, continuing
some fourteen days, and mixed with such seasonable weather, as it was
hard to say whether our withered corn or our drooping affections were
most quickened and revived, such was the bounty and goodness of our
God.”[445]

Habbamak, who was in Plymouth at this time, exclaimed as the rain
began to fall, “Now I see that the Englishman’s God is a good God,
for he has heard you, and sent you rain, and that without storms and
tempests, which we usually have with our rain, and which beat down
our corn; but yours stands whole and erect still; surely your God is
a good God.”[446]

But while these timely and gentle showers saved their crop and
secured the future, the pinching want of the passing days was not
stayed. Indeed, so bitter grew the famine, that on one occasion the
colony was reduced to a single pint of corn; which, when divided
among the Pilgrims, gave each five kernels.[447]

During the height of this suffering, a package of home-letters
was received. From these the settlers gleaned some news which was
of interest to them. It seems that Mr. John Pierce, in whose name
their patent had been taken,[448] had grown covetous, and attempted
to play both the Pilgrims and the Merchant-adventurers false. When
he saw “how hopefully the Plymouth colony was seated,” the trustee
grew desirous of becoming lord-proprietary, and holding them as his
tenants, “to sue in his courts as lord.”[449] So he surreptitiously
sued out a new patent, of much larger extent, in his own name, and
then fitted out an expedition headed by himself, to go and take
possession of his usurped domain.[450] But “God marvellously crossed
him.” “Having sailed no farther than the Downs,” says Cotton Mather,
“his ship sprang a leak; and besides this disaster, which alone
was enough to have stopped the voyage, one strand of the cable was
accidentally cut, by which means it broke in a stress of wind, and
all were in extreme danger of being wrecked upon the sands. Having
with much cost recruited this loss, and increased the number of
emigrants, Pierce again put to sea; but in mid-ocean one of the
saddest and longest storms known since the days of the apostle Paul
drove the ship home to England once more, the vessel well-nigh torn
to pieces, and the emigrants, though all saved, weary and affrighted.
Pierce, by all his tumbling backward and forward, was by this time
grown so sick of his patent that he vomited it up. He assigned it
over to the home company;[451] but they afterwards obtained another,
under the umbrage whereof they could more effectually carry on the
affairs of their colony.”[452]

The letter from the Merchant-adventurers, which recited these facts,
closed with a cheering promise: “We have agreed with two merchants
for a ship of a hundred and forty tons, called the ‘Anne,’ which
is to be ready the last of this month of April, to bring sixty
passengers and sixty tons of goods to you.”[453]

While the Pilgrims, enlivened by this news, were living on hope and
five kernels of corn, they received a visitor. Captain Francis West,
admiral of New England, who sailed under a commission to prevent all
trading and fishing on the coast-line without a license from the
Home Council, called at Plymouth. Of him the necessitous Pilgrims
purchased a few edibles at high prices.[454] The old sailor’s
mission failed; the fishermen were too strong and independent to be
repressed. Ere long, on their petition, Parliament decreed that
fishing should be free.[455]

Two weeks after the departure of West, the promised reinforcements
arrived; the “Anne” landed her recruits, and a goodly store of
provisions besides.[456]

So low was the colonial larder, that “the best dish they could
present their friends with was a lobster or a piece of fish, without
bread, or any thing else but a cup of fair spring water.”[457]

The “Anne” was shortly followed by the “Little James,” a vessel of
forty-four tons burden, “built to stay in the country.”[458]

“Among the pioneers just arrived,” says Cotton Mather, “were divers
worthy and useful men, who were come to seek the welfare of this
little Israel; though at their coming they were as differently
affected as the rebuilders of the temple at Jerusalem; some were
grieved when they saw how bad the condition of their friends was, and
others were glad that it was no worse.”[459]

Among the arrivals at this time “were, Cuthbertson, a member of the
Leyden church, the wives of Fuller and Coake, and two daughters of
Brewster. There were at least twelve ladies. One of these became
the wife of Bradford; Standish married another. Alice Southworth,
Bradford’s second wife, is said to have been his first love. Both
being widowed, a correspondence took place, in the sequel of which
she came out from England, and married her some-time lover at
Plymouth.”[460]

“Some of your old friends go to you with these lines,” wrote Cushman;
“they come dropping to you, and by degrees I hope ere long you shall
enjoy them all.”[461]

Now also this commercial partnership beheld a vision of the immortal
renown to which its humble agents were destined. “Let it not be
grievous to you,” wrote the prescient scribe of the Home Company,
“that you have been instruments to break the ice for others who
came after you with less difficulty; the honor shall be yours to
the world’s end. We bear you always in our hearts, and our cordial
affection is toward you all, as are the hearts of hundreds more who
never saw your faces, but who pray for your safety as for their
own, that the same God who hath so marvellously preserved you from
seas, foes, famine, will still preserve you from all future dangers,
and make you honorable among men and glorious in bliss at the last
day.”[462]




CHAPTER XVII.

WOLVES IN THE SHEEPFOLD.

      “I, under fair pretence of friendly ends,
      With well-placed words of glozing courtesy,
      Baited with reason not unplausible,
      Wind me into the easy-hearted man,
      And hug him into snares.”
                              MILTON’S _Comus_.


The Plymouth colonists were men of active enterprise. They were
miserly of time, and hoarded their hours. They were also anxious to
please the Merchant-adventurers. So now, as quickly as might be, the
“Anne” was laden with clapboards, beaver-skins, and divers furs;
letters whose every line was a loving pulsation, were indited to the
lingering absentees at Leyden and to home circles in England; and on
the 10th of September, 1623, the vessel sailed, carrying with her
Edward Winslow, who was sent over to report progress, and to procure
such necessities as were demanded by the imperious wants of the
expanding colony.[463]

After watching the “Anne” until she dipped below the horizon, the
pilgrims returned from the shore and prepared to go into the harvest
field. This season “God gave them plenty, and the face of things was
changed, to the grateful rejoicing of all hearts.” The granaries were
filled. Some of the abler and more industrious had to spare, and the
perturbed ghost of famine, which had so long haunted Plymouth, was
definitively laid.[464]

Many attributed this plenteous harvest to the partial abandonment
of the communal plan, and in consequence the desire for complete
emancipation from its thraldom became more general and earnest.[465]

Some of the late comers had sailed not under articles of agreement
with the company of Merchant-adventurers, but on their individual
account; so they landed free from those conditions which shackled the
elder settlers. Under these circumstances it was thought fit, ere
these outsiders were received and permitted to settle and build in
Plymouth, to exact of them certain specified conditions precedent.
So reasonable a requisition won ready assent, and an agreement was
signed to this effect: The colony on its part, the outsiders on
theirs, covenanted to show each the other all reasonable courtesies;
all were to be alike subject to such laws and orders as were already
made, or might thereafter be made, for the public good; the outsiders
were freed and exempted from the general employments which the
communal condition required of its participants, except for purposes
of defence and such work as tended to the lasting welfare of the
colony; they were taxed for the maintenance of the government, and
debarred from traffic with the Indians for their individual profit,
until the expiration of the seven years which tied the colonists to
the communality.[466]

Towards the middle of September, while the Pilgrims were in the
midst of their harvest labors, Robert Gorges, a son of Sir Ferdinand
Gorges, famous as a _voyageur_ and discoverer, sailed into Plymouth
bay.[467] He had recently returned from the Venetian wars, and
now came armed with a commission from the New England council as
governor-general of the territory from Acadia to Narragansett
Bay.[468] With him were families of emigrants equipped to commence a
settlement, and a learned and worthy clergyman of the English church,
William Morrel, an important item of whose mission was to “exercise
superintendence over the New England churches.”[469]

Gorges tarried at Plymouth about a fortnight, receiving friendly and
cordial entertainment.[470] He had been advised to select Admiral
West, Christopher Levett, and the existing governor of Plymouth,
as his advisers. This he did; and in this body was vested the full
authority to administer justice in all cases, “capital, criminal, and
civil,” throughout the province of New England.[471] This arranged,
Gorges sailed for Wessagusset, the site of Weston’s discomfiture,
and, landing his colonists, essayed to plant on that inauspicious
coast a permanent settlement.[472]

This colony, like its predecessor, was fated. Hardly surviving its
birth, it lingered through a twelvemonth, and then dissolved. Sir
Ferdinand Gorges and his company, discouraged by the opposition
of the Parliament to their New England schemes, would adventure
nothing.[473] In the spring of 1624 he summoned his son home; and
a little later Morrel, who had made no effort to exercise his
superintendency, followed him, and this gave the second settlement at
Wessagusset its _coup de grâce_.[474]

Morrel was not spoiled by his disappointment. “I shall always be
desirous for the advancement of those colonies,” he said.[475] And in
a Latin poem addressed to the New England Council, he wrote:

      “If these poor lines may win that country love,
      Or kind compassion in the English move,
      Or painful men to a good land invite,
      Whose holy works the natives may enlight,—
      If Heaven grant this, to see there built I trust,
      An English kingdom from the Indian dust.”[476]

But while “unmerciful disaster followed thick and followed faster”
this enterprise of Gorges and several kindred ones,[477] smiting them
into early graves, Plymouth, clasping hands with God, strengthened
daily, and walked forward to assured success. Early in 1624, the
annual election occurred. Governor Bradford, anxious to retire,
pleaded hard for “rotation in office,” and alleged that that was
the “end of annual elections.” But the Pilgrims rightly regarded
him as a pivotal-man, and with rare good sense they reëlected him
unanimously.[478] When the election was over the “Little James”
was well victualed and despatched to the eastward on a fishing
expedition. On reaching Damarin’s cove “there arose such a violent
and extraordinary storm that the seas broke over such places in
the harbor as were deemed absolutely secure, and drove the vessel
against great rocks, which beat a hole in her hulk that a horse and
cart might have gone through, and afterwards drove her into deep
water, where she sank. The master was drowned; the rest of the men,
except one, saved their lives with much ado; and all the provisions,
salt, tackle, and what else was in her, was lost.”[479] Saddened
by this mishap, but undismayed, the Pilgrims now commenced their
preparations for planting. “A great part of liberty,” says Seneca,
“is a well-governed belly, and to be patient in all wants.”[480]
And Corbett, borrowing the same idea, put it into homely English by
affirming that “the stomach is the cause of civilization.” He meant
that hunger begets labor to satisfy its cravings. “Wants awaken
intellect. To gratify them disciplines the mind. The keener the want,
the lustier the growth.”[481]

The famine of the past had revealed to the Pilgrims the weakness
and inefficiency of the communal plan. It educated them; for on
an individual basis they reaped plenty. They overcame hunger by
patience. They flanked famine by a skilful social arrangement. Now,
as before, each man broke ground for himself.[482] There was no
longer an Elysium for sluggards; each reaped as he had sown.

In March, 1624, Winslow returned to Plymouth, after an absence of
eight months.[483] He brought with him three heifers and a bull—the
first neat cattle that came into New England.[484] The exiles could
no longer say, “We are without cattle, and we have no Egypt to go to
for corn.”[485] Cattle they now had, and they created an Egypt.

Winslow also brought some “clothing and other necessaries; a
carpenter, who died soon, but not until he had rendered himself very
useful;” a “salt-man,” who proved “an ignorant, foolish, self-willed
fellow,” and only made trouble and waste; and “a preacher, though
none of the most eminent and rare”—to whose transportation Cushman
wrote that he and Winslow had consented only “to give content to some
in London.”[486] Winslow informed his coadjutors of a sad “report
that there was among the Merchant-adventurers a strong faction
hostile to Plymouth, and especially set against the coming of the
rest from Leyden”[487]—which explains the long tarry of Robinson and
his flock in Holland.

“It will be remembered,” remarks Palfrey, “that the London
adventurers were engaged in a commercial speculation. Several of them
sympathized more or less in religious sentiment with the Pilgrims;
but even with most of these considerations of pecuniary interest were
paramount, and they were, besides, a minority when opposed to the
aggregate of those adventurers who had no mind to interest themselves
in religious dissensions to the damage of their prospect of gain.
Under such circumstances, the policy of the English partners would
naturally be to keep in favor with the court and with the council for
New England, of which Sir Ferdinand Gorges and other churchmen were
leaders. This it was that occasioned the thwarting embarrassments
which were persistently interposed to frustrate Robinson’s wish to
collect his scattered flock in America. Neither the Virginia Company,
nor the Merchant-adventurers as a body, would have preferred to
employ Separatists in founding American colonies, and giving value to
their land. But the option was not theirs. At the moment, no others
were disposed to confront the anticipated hardships, and none could
be relied upon like these to carry the business through. This was
well understood on both sides to be the motive for the engagement
that was made.

“If Separatists were per force to undertake the enterprise, it was
desirable that they should be persons not individually conspicuous,
or obnoxious to displeasure in high quarters; and when Brewster,
and not Robinson, accompanied the first settlers to New England,
it was a result, if not due to the intrigues of the Adventurers,
certainly well according with their policy. Brewster was forgotten
in England; nor had he ever been known as a literary champion of
his sect. The able and learned Robinson was the recognized head of
the _Independents_, a rising and militant power. He had an English,
if indeed it may not be called a European reputation. No name could
have been uttered in courtly circles with worse omen to the new
settlement. The case was still stronger when, having lost their way,
and in consequence come to need another patent, the colony was made
a dependency of the Council for New England, instead of the Virginia
Company. In the Virginia Company, laboring under the displeasure of
the king, and having Sandys and Wriothesley for its leaders, there
was a leaven of popular sentiment. The element of absolutism and
prelacy was more controlling in the councils of the rival corporation.

“From these circumstances the quick instinct of trade took its
lesson. To the favor of the Council for New England, with Sir
Ferdinand Gorges at its head, and the king taking its part against
Sir Edward Coke and the House of Commons, the Merchant-adventurers
were looking for benefits which some of them had no mind to hazard
by encouraging their colony to exhale any offensive odor of schism.
This gives us an insight into the policy of that action to which
Robinson referred when, in a letter to Brewster, now brought by
Winslow, he wrote: ‘I persuade myself that for me, they of all others
are unwilling I should be transported, especially such of them as
have an eye that way themselves, as thinking if I come there their
market will be marred. And for these Adventurers, if they have but
half the wit to their malice, they will stop my course when they see
it intended.’

“In these circumstances, also, we find an explanation of the
selection of a minister ‘not the most eminent and rare,’ and such as
Cushman and Winslow could agree to take only ‘to give content to some
in London.’ To send a clergyman avowedly of the state church was a
course not to be thought of. The colonists could not be expected to
receive him. The best method for their purpose was, to employ some
one of a character and position suited to get possession of their
confidence, and then use it to tone down their religious strictness,
and, if circumstances should favor, to disturb the ecclesiastical
constitution which they had set up.

“As the financial prospects of the colony faded, the more anxious
were the unsympathizing London partners to relieve it and themselves
from the stigma of religious schism. The taunt that their colonists
were Brownists depressed the value of their stock. It was for their
interest to introduce settlers of a different religious character,
and to take the local power, if possible, out of the hands of
those who represented the obnoxious tenets. To this end it was
their policy to encourage such internal disaffection as already
existed, and to strengthen it by the infusion of new elements of
discord. A part even of the ‘Mayflower’ emigrants, without religious
sympathy with their superiors, and jealous of the needful exercise
of authority, were fit subjects for an influence adverse to the
existing organization. The miscellaneous importation in the ‘Fortune’
followed; and the whole tenor of the discourse of Cushman, who came
out and returned in her, shows that there were ‘idle drones’ and
‘unreasonable men’ mixed with the nobler associates of the infant
settlement. The ‘Anne’ and her partner, the last vessels despatched
by the Adventurers, brought new fuel for dissension in those of that
company who came ‘on their particular’ account. Nor does it seem
hazardous to infer, alike from the circumstances of the case and from
developments which speedily followed, that some of these persons, in
concert with the ‘strong faction among the Adventurers,’ came over on
the errand of subverting the existing government and order.”[488]

The clergyman now sent over, and mentioned in the home-letters, was
John Lyford. He was the seed of many and sad disturbances. “When he
first came ashore,” says Bradford, “he saluted the colonists with
such reverence and humility as is seldom seen, and indeed made them
ashamed, he so bowed and cringed unto them; he would have kissed
their hands, if they had suffered it. Yet all the while, if we may
judge by his after-carriage, he was but like him mentioned by the
psalmist,[489] that croucheth and boweth that heaps of poor may fall
by his might. Or like that dissembling Ishmael[490] who, when he had
slain Gedeliah, went out weeping, and met them that were coming to
offer incense in the house of the Lord, saying, ‘Come to Gedeliah,’
when he meant to slay them.”[491]

The Pilgrims received Lyford cordially, giving him the warmest of
welcomes and the heartiest. A larger allowance out of the general
store was allotted him than any other had; and as the governor was
wont, “in all weighty affairs, to consult with Elder Brewster as well
as with his special assistants, so now, from courtesy, he called
Lyford also to advise in all important crises.”[492]

Ere long he professed to desire to unite with the Pilgrim church.
He was accordingly received, and “made a large confession of his
faith, and an acknowledgment of his former disorderly walking and
entanglement with many corruptions, which had been a burden to his
conscience; so that he blessed God for this opportunity of liberty to
enjoy the ordinances of God in purity among His people.”[493]

For a time all things went comfortably and smoothly; but in this
calm, Lyford contracted an intimacy with one John Oldham, who had
come out in the “Anne” on his own account, and had been a factious
bawler from the outset.[494] From so congenial an association, evil
could not but be begotten. The bully and the hypocrite soon nursed it
and set it afoot. Both Oldham and Lyford grew very perverse—though
just before Oldham also had been received as a member of the Plymouth
church, “whether from hypocrisy or out of some sudden pang of
conviction God only knows”—and “showed a spirit of great malignancy,
drawing as many into faction as they could influence. The most idle
and profane they nourished, and backed in all their lawlessness, so
they would but cleave to them and revile the Pilgrim church. Private
meetings and back-stair whisperings were incessant among them, they
feeding themselves and others with what they should bring to pass
in England by the faction of their friends among the Adventurers,
which brought both themselves and their dupes into a fools’ paradise.
Outwardly they set a fair face on things, yet they could not carry
things so closely but much both of their sayings and doings was
discovered.”[495]

Finally, when the vessel in which Winslow had returned was laden,
and ready to hoist anchor and spread sail for home, it was observed
that Lyford and his coadjutors “were long in writing and sent
many letters, and communicated to each other such things as made
them laugh in their sleeves, thinking they had done their errand
efficiently.”[496]

Scenting mischief, Bradford watched them closely; and when the
ship left the harbor, he followed her in the shallop, and demanded
Lyford’s letter-bag. The captain, who was friendly to the colonial
government, and cognizant of the plot afoot, both in Britain and
at Plymouth, to overreach the Pilgrims, at once acceded. Above
twenty letters, many of them long, and pregnant with slanders,
false accusations, and malicious innuendoes, tending not only to
the prejudice, but the ruin and utter subversion of the settlement,
were found. Most of these Bradford let pass, contenting himself with
abstracts. But of the most material true copies were taken, and then
forwarded, the originals being detained, lest their writer should
deny his work, in which case he would now be compelled to eat his own
penmanship.[497]

The ship had sailed towards evening; in the night the governor
returned. Lyford and his faction “looked blank when they saw Bradford
land; but after some weeks, as nothing came of it, they were as
brisk as ever, thinking that all was unknown and was gone current,
and that the shallop went but to despatch some well-nigh forgotten
or belated letters. The reason why Bradford and the rest concealed
their knowledge was, to let affairs drift to a natural development,
and ripen, that they might the better discover the intentions of the
malcontents, and see who were their adherents. And they did this
the rather, because they had learned from a letter written by one
of the confederates, that Oldham and Lyford intended an immediate
reformation of the church and commonwealth, and proposed at once,
on the departure of the ship, to unite their forces, and set up a
worship on the English model.”[498]

The Pilgrims had not long to wait. Oldham, with the natural instinct
of a bully, picked constant quarrels, refused to mount guard, and
pelted Standish with vile epithets. Lyford, a more cautious knave,
had no heart for fisticuffs, but he set up another worship on the
Sabbath, and openly celebrated sacraments[499] which were to the
Pilgrims instinct with vicious tyranny and idolatrous significance;
and to escape from which, they had crossed the channel into Holland,
and plunged across the Atlantic into the winter wilderness.

The colonists at once acted. Oldham was tamed. “After being clapped
up awhile, he came to himself.” Lyford was formally impeached. A
court was convened, and the settlers at large were summoned to
attend. Bradford himself conducted the prosecution in this primitive
trial. He said that, “being greatly oppressed in Britain, the
Pilgrims had come to America, here to enjoy liberty of conscience;
and for that they had passed through frightful hardships, and
planted this settlement on the sterile rocks. The danger and the
charge of the beginning were theirs. Lyford had been sent over at
the general expense, and both himself and his large family[500] had
been maintained from the common store. He had joined their church,
and become one of themselves; and for him to plot the ruin of his
entertainers was most unjust and perfidious. As for Oldham and his
crew, who came at their own charge and for their particular benefit,
seeing they were received in courtesy by the plantation, when they
came only to seek shelter and protection under its wings, not being
able to stand alone, they were like the fable of the hedgehog whom
the cony, in a stormy day, from pity welcomed into her burrow; but
who, not content to take part with her, in the end, with her sharp
pricks forced the poor cony to forsake her own burrow, as these do
now attempt to do with us.”[501]

Here Lyford denied that he had been guilty of any wrong. Bradford
at once “put in” his intercepted letters as evidence. The unmasked
hypocrite was dumb. But Oldham, mad with rage, attempted to rouse an
_émeute_ on the spot.[502] No hand was uplifted at his appeal, and
Bradford caused the whole parcel of letters to be read; after which,
resuming his speech, he reminded Lyford of his humble confession on
being received into the church, of his solemn promise not to attempt
to perform the functions of a clergyman until he had another call
to that sacred office; in open violation of which, he had assumed
the clerical garb, in virtue of his ordination, drawn aside a small
clique, and by attempting to officiate at the Lord’s table on the
Sabbath, broken his solemn pledge and disturbed the public peace.[503]

The proof was so patent, the falsehoods which impregnated the
insolent letters were so bold, that the factionists were absolutely
dumb. No voice was raised in extenuation of the roguery. Conviction
was speedy. Oldham and Lyford were both sentenced to banishment.[504]

Oldham at once left Plymouth, and repaired to Nantasket, where the
Pilgrims had a station to accommodate the Indian trade.[505] But
Lyford, as weak as he was vicious, burst into tears, and “confessed
that he feared he was a reprobate, with sins too heavy for God to
pardon;” and he promised amendment with such emphasis, and pleaded
so piteously for forgiveness, that the kind and merciful settlers
consented to keep him on probation for six months.[506]

But he was an ingrained knave, and amendment was not in him.
Not long after this scene, he wrote a second letter to the
Merchant-adventurers, in which he justified all his former charges,
and elaborated them. Unhappily for him, the messenger to whom he
intrusted this precious missive surrendered it into the hands of
Bradford, who simply filed it for the present, and let his just wrath
accumulate.[507]

In the mean time the ship, with Lyford’s batch of letters aboard,
dropped anchor in the Thames. The lies of their masquerading agent
were eagerly conned by the London partners. A conclave was held. The
inimical adventurers pointed triumphantly to Lyford’s testimony. But,
fortunately for the Pilgrims, Winslow, who had returned to London,
had become acquainted with certain disreputable and damning facts in
Lyford’s home-career, both in England and in Ireland, where he had
officiated as pastor, which proved him to be a lecher and a swindler,
who soiled the surplice and the cope. With these facts, and followed
by grave and unimpeachable witnesses, Winslow hurried into the room
where the merchants were assembled, and made his _exposé_, which
“struck Lyford’s friends with sudden dumbness, and made them shame
greatly.”[508]

But these reports, together with their disappointment in not
harvesting an immediate fortune, impelled two thirds of the original
members of the London Company to withdraw from the venture; “and as
there had been a faction and siding amongst them for two years, so
now there was an utter breach and sequestration.”[509]

Some of the partners, however, remained friendly; and these, assuming
the debt of the colony—amounting to some fourteen hundred pounds
sterling—fitted out a ship for another voyage, wrote in terms of
comfort and cheer, and sent out cattle, tools and clothing, which
they sold to the planters, despite their friendly professions, at an
exorbitant advance on the market value.[510]

In the spring of 1625, Winslow came back with this ship thus
freighted; and he brought with him besides, the news of the
disaffection among the Merchant-adventurers. On landing, he was the
surprised witness of a strange ceremony. In the village street was
drawn up a guard of musketeers in two files, between which a man was
running. As he passed, each soldier gave him a thump behind with
the but of his musket.[511] This was called “running the gauntlet,”
and was a custom borrowed from the Indians. So engrossed were the
settlers in this odd sport, and so convulsed were the soberest of
them with laughter at the victim’s odd grimaces on being struck and
bidden “mend his manners,” that Winslow advanced quite up to the
crowd ere he was discovered and recognized. He then learned that
the sufferer of this singular punishment was Oldham, who, despite
his banishment, had ventured to return to Plymouth and revile his
judges.[512]

Winslow at once informed the clustering colonists of the effect
of Lyford’s letters in England, and repeated his _exposé_ of that
bad man’s abhorrent private character.[513] The Pilgrims were not
surprised. Lyford’s own wife, “a grave matron of good carriage,” had
herself, in the sorrow of her heart, disclosed some secrets and
uncloaked some crimes which led them to believe Lyford capable of
perpetrating any villany.[514]

Now, since his probationary time had expired, and he was a more
dangerous rascal than before, he was ordered to quit the colony.
This he did, joining Oldham at Nantucket; whence, a little later, he
wandered into Virginia, dying there very miserably.[515]

Eventually Oldham repented of his evil conduct, and became reconciled
to the Pilgrims; “so that he had liberty to come and go, and converse
with them at pleasure,” until, some years later, the Indians, in a
petty quarrel, knocked his brains out with a tomahawk.[516]

Thus ended the “Lyford troubles.” Led by God, the Plymouth colonists
safely surmounted one more obstacle, the insidious assault of
masqueraders who “stole the livery of heaven to serve the devil in.”

The winter of 1624-5 had passed without any special occurrence save
this Lyford affair; and here see one strange thing: “Many who before
stood something off from the church,” says Bradford, “now, seeing
Lyford’s unrighteous dealing and malignity against it, came forward
and tendered themselves as members, professing that it was not out of
any dislike of any thing that they had stood so long aloof, but from
a desire to fit themselves better for such a connection, and that
now they saw that the Lord called for their help. So that Lyford’s
crusade had quite a contrary effect from that hoped; which was looked
at as a great work of God, who drew men on by unlikely means, and by
occurrences which might rather have set them farther off.”[517]

Lyford had complained to the Merchant-adventurers that the Pilgrims
had no regularly ordained minister. To this charge Bradford made a
fine retort: “We answer, the more is our wrong, that our pastor is
kept from us by these men’s means, who then reproach _us_ for it.
Yet have we not been wholly destitute of the means of salvation, as
this man would have the world believe; for our reverend elder, Mr.
Brewster, hath labored diligently in dispensing the word of God unto
us; and, be it spoken without ostentation, he is not inferior to Mr.
Lyford—and some of his betters—either in gifts or learning, though he
would never be persuaded to take higher office upon himself.”[518]

Brewster taught twice every Sabbath powerfully and profitably, and
without stipend, which he steadily declined, working for his bread
with his own hands, and earning it in the sweat of his brows, thus
approximating to the early Christian practice. “He did more in one
year,” asserts old John Cotton, “than many who have their hundreds
per annum do in all their lives.” So it seems that there is one
brilliant exception to the Indian maxim, “Poor pay poor preach.” The
good elder had a singular gift in prayer, “yet was seldom wordy or
prolix.” Without the afflatus of ordination, he was so much better
than most ministers with it, that, though destitute of “consecrated
ministrations,” the colonists did not suffer much, and mainly
regretted the absence of sacraments, which Brewster, unordained, was
not competent to celebrate.[519]

Prince gives a summary of the religious tenets of the Plymouth church:

I. “It held that nothing is to be accounted true religion but what is
taught in the Holy Scriptures.”

II. “It held that every man has the right of private judgment, of
testing his belief by the sacred writ, and of worshipping God in his
own way as that text directed.”[520]

On this doctrine the Pilgrims thrived. “Brown bread and the gospel
is good fare,” they said to one another.[521] Indeed it was; and
there on the desolate coast, where wheat froze and the bitter winter
congealed six months of the twelve, men grew. “At last,” says
Elliott, “in the beginning of the seventeenth century, we see a
church with no priest, with no hierarchy, with no forms; none like it
since that at Corinth; none so entirely free to work out its ideas
into life and action. It was a religious democracy. Its doctrines
and practices were the outcome of the time, and were decided on by
the votes of the members as men. In theory, the majority ruled in
the Plymouth church. ’Tis a noticeable thing in human history, and
it has had its influence in both church and state. The day had come
when a few brave men could take this step in advance towards freedom,
and not be swallowed up and lost. The day had come when democracy
was possible in the church, foretelling its speedy coming in the
state.”[522]




CHAPTER XVIII.

SAD NEWS FROM ENGLAND.

      “Thou know’st ’tis common; all that live must die.
      Passing through nature to eternity.”
                                   SHAKSPEARE’S _Hamlet_.


The Pilgrims were fretted by the unsatisfactory and clogging
conditions of their compact with the London partners. Their
prosperity was perpetually menaced by the factions and the chicanery
of a herd of merchants whose only god was mammon, and who cared
nothing for justice and sober living and their plighted word, if only
they might make their heaps high and massy.

Early in 1625, the colonists determined to initiate measures which
should look to their disenthralment, and whose result should be to
give them in fee simple those lands which their patient skill had
wrung from the sturdy hand of unwilling and churlish nature. Standish
was commissioned to go to England, and open negotiations with the
Merchant-adventurers.[523]

Two ships, which had come out on a trading voyage, were now about
to sail for home. In the larger of these the redoubtable captain
embarked. “Being both well laden, they went joyfully home together,
the greater towing the lesser at her stern all the way over. And
they had such fair weather, that they never once cast off till both
were shot deep into the English channel. Yet there the little vessel
was unhappily seized by a Turkish rover, and carried into Sallee,
where master and crew were made slaves; and her cargo of beaver-skins
was sold at sixpence a piece. Thus were their hopes dashed, and
the joyful news they meant to carry home was turned to heavy
tidings.”[524]

Fortunately for Standish, the Turk was satisfied with the morsel he
had already gotten into his capacious maw, and did not pursue the
bigger ship; so that he escaped a life of Eastern servitude, and
safely reached the English soil. Wasting no time, he hastened to meet
the London partners; and so skilful was his diplomacy, that he made
arrangements for the gradual absorption of the Plymouth debt by the
settlers, “taking up a hundred and fifty pounds of it on the spot,
though at fifty per cent. interest, which he bestowed in trading and
in the purchase of such commodities as he knew to be requisite for
colonial use.”[525]

In the spring of 1626, he returned to Plymouth,[526] bringing with
him the mournful intelligence of the death of Cushman in England
and of Robinson in Leyden,[527] a double bereavement to the Pilgrim
pioneers.

The loss of no other two men could have dealt so stunning a blow to
the infant settlement. Plymouth was almost buffeted from its feet.
The loss seemed irreparable to human eyes; but God, who uses his
servants, delights to show the world that they are not indispensable
to him. Cushman had been “as their right hand to the Pilgrims, and
for divers years had done and agitated all their business with the
Adventurers, to the great advantage of his friends.”[528]

But Robinson was mourned with a peculiar sorrow. Attached to their
great teacher by the tenderest personal ties, by many favors rendered
and received, by marriage vows plighted at his altar, by mutual
perils undergone for a common faith, by expectation of his arrival
and reunion on the bleak New England strand, is it strange that
Plymouth at large wept sore for him, and plucked its beard?

“Robinson’s powerful ascendency over the minds of his associates,
acquired by eminent talents and virtues, had been used
disinterestedly and wisely for the common good. With great courage
and fortitude, he had equal gentleness and liberality; and his
intellectual accomplishments and the generosity of his affections
inspired mingled love and admiration. Though he passed his life in
the midst of controversy, it was so far from narrowing his mind, that
his charity towards dissenters distinguished him among the divines
of his day as much as his abilities and learning, while his broad
and tolerant views continued to ripen and expand as he grew towards
age,”[529] and bloomed into the grave.

In especial he won the benediction of the seventh beatitude; for
he was famous as a peacemaker, and there are many instances of
reconciliation between those at variance effected by his fine
Christian tact.[530]

“He fell sick Saturday morning, February 22, 1625. Next day he taught
twice; but in the week, grew feebler every day, and quit this life
on the 1st of March. All his friends came freely to him; and if
prayers, tears, or means, could have saved his life, he had not gone
hence.”[531]

He died in his fifty-first year, “even as fruit falleth before it is
ripe, when neither length of days nor infirmity of body did seem to
call for his end.”[532] The discarded flesh-tabernacle was laid to
rest in the chancel of one of the churches at Leyden,[533] allotted
by the Dutch for the use of the English exiles; and the magistrates,
ministers, professors, and students, followed him to the grave.[534]

Robinson was the Moses of the Pilgrims, and like his prototype, he
looked into the promised land from the top of Pisgah, but he did not
enter it. Intrigue balked him of that felicity, and “hope deferred
made his heart sick.” But ideas cannot be barred out. His entered the
wilderness, and germinated democracy and the representative system.
“His truth, planted at Plymouth, has blossomed on the rocky shores,
in the sheltered valleys, and on the breezy hills of New England, and
borne a grand harvest.”




CHAPTER XIX.

PROGRESS.

        “And when our children turn the page
        To ask what triumphs marked our age—
        What we achieved to challenge praise,
        Through the long line of future days—
      This let them read, and hence instruction draw:
          ‘Here were the many blest,
          Here found the virtues rest,
      Faith linked with Love, and Liberty with Law.’”
                              SPRAGUE’S _Centennial Ode_.


The progress of population at Plymouth was slow for a decade. The
lands in the vicinity were not fertile. Still the plantation had
struck deep root and was bound to spring up and bear a hundred
fold.[535] If the colonial prosperity was not imposing, it was
thriving. A little earlier than this Smith learned in Virginia that
there were on this New England slope “about a hundred and eighty
persons; some cattle and goats; many swine and a good store of
poultry; and thirty-two dwelling-houses; forming a town which was
impaled about half a mile’s compass, with a fort built of wood, loam,
and stone; also a fair watch-tower; and able to freight a ship of a
hundred and eighty tons burden.”[536]

Fifty ships were on the coast engaged in fishing, every one of which
was an enlargement of their market for the sale and purchase of
essential commodities.[537]

“It pleased the Lord,” says Bradford, “to give the plantation peace,
and health, and contented minds, and so bless the labors of the
colonists that they had provisions in plenty, and to spare; and this
without receiving any food from home at any time, except what they
brought out in the Mayflower.”[538]

Owing to the competition in the fishing waters, the Pilgrims esteemed
it wiser now to forego that pursuit and to turn their whole attention
to “trading and planting.” “To every person,” says Bradford, “was
given an acre of land, and only an acre to them and theirs, as near
the town as might be, and they had no more till the contract with the
London partners was bought up. The reason was, that all might be kept
close together both for better safety and defence, and the better
improvement of the common employments. This condition of theirs did
make me think of what I once read in Pliny[539] of the Romans and
their beginnings in Romulus’ time, when every man contented himself
with two acres of land and had no more assigned him; how it was
thought a great reward to receive a pint of corn at the hands of
the Roman people; how, long after, the greatest present given to a
captain who had gotten them a victory over their enemies, was as
much ground as he could till in one day; he being counted not a good
but a dangerous man, who could not content himself with seven acres
of land; as also how they did pound their corn in mortars, as these
colonists did many years before they could get a mill.”[540]

In turning from fishing to agriculture the settlers were decided
gainers, and “ere the close of the year 1626 they had nearly
extricated themselves from debt, including the obligation lately
incurred for them by Standish, and had besides stored ‘some clothing
for the people and some commodities beforehand.’”[541]

The winter of 1626-7 was given to trading, and purchases were made
of merchandise from some Englishmen stationed at Monhegan, and from
a French ship wrecked off their coast. For several months they had
the society of the passengers and crew of a vessel bound to Virginia,
but which, losing her reckoning, and falling short of provisions, had
moored under Cape Cod and sent to them for succor.[542]

Just before winter closed in the Pilgrims had despatched one of
their number, Mr. Allerton, to England with authority to continue
the negotiations for a transfer of title opened by Standish with
the Merchant-adventurers.[543] Allerton found the plague—which had
somewhat retarded the movements of Standish, and carried off some of
the most efficient supporters of the colony[544]—quite abated. He
also learned that James I., the pedantic bigot who had threatened to
“harry” the Puritans out of England, was dead, and that he had been
succeeded by his son Charles I., the fated prince who afterwards fell
under Cromwell’s axe on the Whitehall scaffold.

The Plymouth agent was successful, though “the curse of usury,
which always falls so heavily upon new settlements, did not spare”
the Pilgrims, since they were compelled to borrow money at an
exorbitant interest. Allerton had carried out nine bonds, each for
two hundred pounds—eighteen hundred pounds being the price at which
the partnership held their mortgage. These bonds were given by eight
of the most prominent Pilgrims,[545] and were made payable in nine
equal annual instalments, commencing in 1627.[546] Thus it was that
a bevy of patriotic colonists purchased the rights and assumed the
responsibilities of the “Company of Merchant-adventurers.” They
were known in the phrase of that day as “The Undertakers,” and they
emancipated Plymouth from its harassing thraldom to a greedy horde of
money-changers.

The Pilgrims were much gratified by this success, though they knew
that their undertaking was not without grave hazard. “They knew not
well,” remarks Bradford, “how to raise this yearly payment, besides
discharging their other engagements and supplying their annual wants,
especially since they were forced by necessity to take up money at
such high interest. Yet they undertook it.”[547]

Of course, this purchase of the right of the home company
necessitated a new organization, and a redistribution of property
at Plymouth. After mature deliberation, it was decided to erect a
commonwealth, in which each settler should own a share, but under
an agreement that trade should be managed as before until the total
discharge of the debt incurred for liberty.[548]

The division was at once made of the stock and land heretofore the
joint estate of the adventurers and their partners in the soil.
Every man had a share; and “every father of a family was allowed to
purchase one share for his wife and one for each child living with
him.”[549] One cow and two goats were assigned by lot to every six
shareholders, “and swine, though more in number, yet by the same
rule.” In addition to the land which each already held, “every person
had twenty acres allotted him; but no meadows were to be laid out;
nor were they for many years after, because they were straitened for
meadow land. Every season each was given a certain spot to mow in
proportion to the cattle owned.”[550] The houses became the private
property of their respective tenants by an equitable assignment,[551]
and henceforward there were to be New England freeholders. The
vassalage to foreign merchants was ended.[552]

It should not be forgotten that in the allotment of land, there was a
grant to the Indian Habbamak. He held by the Pilgrims and by their
God, spite of enticements and obstacles, and died “leaving some good
hopes in the settlers’ hearts that his soul had gone to rest.”[553]

“The first coveted luxury of the emancipated plantation was a reunion
with their long-detained comrades in Holland. Hitherto the pleasure
of others might decide who should join them. That embarrassment
was now happily withdrawn. Their tender mutual recollections had
naturally been refreshed by the common moaning for their ‘loving and
faithful pastor;’” so now “the Plymouth governor and some of his
chiefest friends had serious consideration, not only how they might
discharge the engagements which lay so heavily upon them, but also
how they might—if possibly they could—devise means to help their
friends at Leyden over to them, these desiring to come as heartily as
they to have them. To effect this they resolved to run a high course
and of great venture, not knowing otherwise how to compass it; which
was, to hire the trade of the colony for six years, and in that time
to undertake the liquidation of the whole impending debt, so that
when the specified time was ended the plantation should be set free,
with freedom of trade to the generality.”[554]

Allerton was again sent to England with full power “under the hand
and seal” of _the Undertakers_, to close the old bargain and to
negotiate “with some of the special friends of the colony to join
with them[555] in this trade.”[556] The mission was promptly
completed. In the spring of 1628, Allerton returned, “bringing a
reasonable supply of goods.” He reported that he had paid the first
instalment to the Adventurers, delivered the bonds for the residue
of the debt, and obtained the due conveyance and release; also that
he had engaged a quartette of friends[557] to accept an interest
in the six years’ hire of the colonial trade, in return for which
they had agreed to charge themselves with the transportation of the
Leyden congregation. Lastly, he had obtained from the New England
Council a patent for land on the Kennebec, which was at once turned
to account by the erection of a block-house “in that river, in the
most convenient place for Indian trade” and a traffic with the Maine
fishermen.[558]

At this same time Allerton brought out with him a young minister
named Rogers, the first, save Lyford, if we may dignify him by that
name, possessed by the Plymouth Pilgrims.[559] But he proved only
a vexation and an expense; for, being “crazed in the brain,” he
was sent back to Britain ere a twelvemonth had elapsed, and the
plantation had recourse once more to stout old Brewster.[560]

By this time the charge of _Brownism_ and bigoted exclusiveness,
so often levelled at the Pilgrims, was well-nigh laid in England.
Hard-fisted facts had smitten that slander so often in the face that
it lost its hardihood. Indeed, remembering the character of that
age, the Plymouth church was singularly catholic. Winslow cites
many instances of the admission to its communion of communicants of
the French, the Dutch, and the Scotch churches, merely by virtue
of their being so.[561] He says: “We ever placed a wide difference
betwixt those who grounded their practice on the word of God, though
differing from us in their exposition and understanding of it, and
those who hate reformers and reformation, running into anti-Christian
opposition and persecution of the truth.” He adds: “’Tis true, we
profess and desire to practise _separation_ from the world; and as
the churches of Christ are all saints by calling, so we desire to
see the grace of God shining forth—at least _seemingly_, leaving
secret things to God—in all whom we admit to church-fellowship,
and to keep off such as openly wallow in the mire of their sins,
that neither the holy things of God, nor the communion of saints,
may be leavened or polluted thereby. And if any joining us, either
formerly at Leyden, or since our New England residence, have with the
manifestation of faith and the profession of holiness, held forth
therewith separation from the church of England, I have divers times,
both in the one place and in the other, heard either Mr. Robinson,
our pastor, or Mr. Brewster, our elder, stop them forthwith, showing
them that we required no such thing at their hands; but only to hold
forth Christ Jesus, holiness in the fear of God, and a submission to
the Scripture ordinances and appointments.”[562]

Such were the simple tenets of the Plymouth church under the
instructions of Brewster—change of heart and a life regulated by the
sacred writ the only tests.

And now the Pilgrim enterprise began to take a wide range; they
had already acquired rights on Cape Ann, as well as an extensive
domain on the Kennebec, now covered by patent; and they were the
first to plant an English settlement on the banks of the silvery
Connecticut.[563] All around them the lusty shouts of the pioneers
were heard. They no longer stood alone on the verge of the unbroken
and primeval forest. Civilization, pushing restlessly towards the
setting sun, began to supplement this nucleus colony. English
planters were already seated at Saco and at Sagadahoc, in Maine.[564]
The red men who haunted the coast-line of Massachusetts Bay, were
pushed from their marshy hunting-grounds by the Puritan colonists who
followed Endicott into the wilderness. And in the west, the patient,
phlegmatic Dutch, “without haste, without rest,” had founded New
Amsterdam on the island of Manhattan, a town which bathed its feet
in the waters of old Hendrick Hudson’s majestic river, and which has
since expanded to be the metropolis of North America.[565]

No occasion, now, to complain of a lack of company. With all the
settlements amicable and cordial relations were cemented by the
Pilgrim Fathers of Plymouth. With the Dutch planters, especially,
a correspondence was had, by means of which mutually kind wishes
and commercial offices were interchanged.[566] In 1627, Isaac de
Rasières, “a chief merchant at New Amsterdam, and second to the
Dutch governor of the New Netherlands,” visited Plymouth, where he
tarried “some days,” and received friendly entertainment.[567] A
neighborly business intercourse was commenced, and it was at this
time that the Pilgrims became acquainted with the value and the uses
of _wampum_.[568] This was the Indian coin—the dollars and cents of
barbarism. It was made of small pieces of shell, white sometimes,
but often purple, and ground, polished, drilled, and strung or
beaded.[569]

“Neither the English of this plantation nor of any other in these
parts,” remarks Bradford, “had knowledge of wampum till now. But the
settlers bought fifty pounds’ worth of it from De Rasières, who told
them how vendable it was at their Indian stations, and did persuade
them that they would find it so at Kennebec; and so it came to pass,
for though at first it stuck, and they were two years in working off
a small quantity, yet afterwards, when the inland tribes knew of it,
the traders could scarce ever get enough to supply the demand, for
many years together.”[570]

De Rasières was a close and shrewd observer, and nothing escaped
his keen eyes at Plymouth. On his return he wrote a letter in which
he described at length the salient characteristics of the Pilgrim
colony. Let us take a peep into the quaint old manuscript, and see
how New England in its Pilgrim babyhood looked in his eyes:

“New Plymouth lies on the slope of a hill stretching east towards the
sea-shore. It has a broad street about a cannot-shot of eight hundred
feet long, looking down the slope, with a street crossing this in the
middle, and running northward to a rivulet, very rapid but shallow,
which there empties into the sea, and southward to the land. The
houses are built of hewn planks, with gardens, also enclosed behind
and at the sides by hewn planks, so that their gardens, court-yards,
and houses are arranged in very good order, with a stockade against
a sudden attack. At the ends of the streets there are three wooden
gates. Their government is after the English form. The governor is
annually elected. In inheritance they place all children in one
degree, only the eldest has an acknowledgment of seniority. They have
made stringent laws on the subject of adultery and fornication, and
these ordinances they enforce very strictly, even among the savage
tribes which live amongst them.

“Their farms are not so good as ours at New Amsterdam, because they
are more stony, and consequently not so fit for the plough. They have
their freedom without rendering an account to any one; only, if their
king should choose to send them a governor, they would be obliged to
recognize him as sovereign chief. The maize-seed which they do not
require for their own use they deliver over to the governor, at three
guilders the bushel, who, in his turn, sends it in sloops to the
north for the traffic in skins amongst the savages. They reckon one
bushel of maize against one pound of beaver-skins. They have better
means of living than ourselves, since fish swim in abundance before
their very doors. There are also many birds, such as geese, herons,
and cranes, and other small-legged birds, which are seen in flocks
here in the winter.

“The tribes in this neighborhood have the same customs as with us,
only they are better conducted than ours, because the English treat
them fairly, and give them the example of better ordinances and a
better life; and also, to a certain degree, give them laws, by means
of the respect they have from the very first established amongst
them.”[571]

In 1629, the bulk of the long lingering Leyden exiles—among
the rest the wife and two sons of John Robinson[572]—at length
landed at Plymouth.[573] The reunited flock, now sadly thinned
by death, greeted each other with mutual tears and caresses; and
tightly-clasped hands and wet eyes told what the voice was too choked
to say. But in the midst of sadness they were joyous, for

      “Hope was changed to glad fruition;
      Faith to sight, and prayer to praise.”

The expense of transporting these friends was very heavy, amounting
in the aggregate to six hundred pounds, as we learn by opening
Allerton’s charge roll.[574] Nor was this all; destitute and
homeless, they had to be maintained the better part of fifteen months
before they were able to stand on their own feet, and pay their
way. They had no harvest of their own to reap. Land was given them
and block-houses were run up for their shelter. Then they planted
“against the coming of another season.”[575] The Pilgrims, though
already overloaded with debt, did not grudge this large addition to
the budget of expense, but showed herein “a rare example of brotherly
love and Christian care;” for Bradford says that “even thus they
were, for the most part, both welcome and useful, as they feared God
and were sober livers.”[576]

But if the devout colonists of the Plymouth slope were “sober
livers,” all their neighbors were not. It seems that some years
before this time, perhaps in 1625, perhaps a twelvemonth earlier,
an English Captain Wollaston, inoculated with the general rage for
planting settlements, had attempted to drop one on that rocky height
near Boston bay which still bears his name.[577] Like the foolish
architect in the Bible, he built on a sandy foundation, though
his colony was bottomed on a rock—so strange are the paradoxes of
this mortal life. “Not finding things to answer his expectations,”
he did not tarry long in his eyry, but pressed on into Virginia
with a portion of his emigrants, intending soon to return for the
rest.[578] So much for the intention. But in his absence one of
his followers, Thomas Morton, “who had been a kind of pettifogger,
of Fernival’s Inn,” London, and was now broken down into an uneasy
bloat, ripe for mischief, obtained an ascendency over the waiting
colonists, and thereby assumed control. “Then,” says the old recitor,
“they fell into great licentiousness of life, in all profaneness,
Morton becoming lord of misrule, and maintaining, as it were, a
school of atheism. Having gotten some goods into their hands by much
trading with the Indians, they spent all vainly in quaffing both wine
and stronger liquors in great excess—as some have reported, as much
as ten pounds’ worth of a morning. They also set up a May-pole, and
danced and drank around it, frisking about like so many fairies, or
_furies_ rather: and worse practices they had, as if they sought anew
to revive and celebrate the obscene feast of the Roman goddess Flora,
or the beastly practices of the mad Bacchanalians. Morton pretended
withal to be a poet, and composing sundry rhymes and loose verses,
some tending to lasciviousness and others to detraction and scandal,
he affixed these to his idle, or _idol_, May-pole. The name of the
height was changed; it was called ‘Merry-Mount,’ as if this jollity
would have been perpetual.

“Now to maintain this riotous prodigality and profuse expenditure,
Morton, esteeming himself lawless, and hearing what gain the
fishermen made by trading muskets, powder, and shot amongst
themselves, decided, as head of this consortship, to begin the
practice in these parts among the Indians, teaching them how to use,
charge, and fire their pieces, and the kind of shot fitted to be used
for different purposes, as hunting and war. Infinite was the mischief
which came by this wicked man’s greed; in that, despite all laws for
the restraint of selling ammunition and weapons to the natives, base
covetousness so far prevailed, that the Indians became amply provided
with guns, powder, shot, rapiers, and pistols, also well skilled in
their use, and in the repair of defective arms.”[579]

These things, together with the debauchery of Indian women and the
incitement of his flaunting and unwhipped crimes, which drew the
dissolute from all directions to swell his rabble rout, filled the
surrounding colonists with mingled grief and alarm. At the outset
expostulation was essayed. “In a friendly and neighborly way, Morton
was admonished to forbear these courses.” A peculiar characteristic
reveals the man—_Ex pede Herculem._ The anarch refused to desist.

      “Obtaining false rules prankt in reason’s garb,”

he denied the jurisdiction of Plymouth, and answered the remonstrance
with an affront. A second appeal was equally futile. Then, with their
accustomed stern decision, the Pilgrims acted. Standish was sent to
curb this bold blasphemer. “Morton fortified his comrades with drink,
barricaded his house, and defied assault.” But happily no blood was
spilled. The reckless, graceless rake succumbed without a fight.
He was taken first to Plymouth, and thence conveyed to England for
trial. And so ended this experiment of immorality.[580]

This episode, with others, is convincing proof that the Pilgrims had
not wandered into Utopia; nor did they seek that fabled bourne. They
expected trouble, and they serenely accepted toil, thanking God just
as joyfully for a little as for much. And, indeed, they felt that
they walked on mercies. They “found all things working together for
their good.” They had already planted a stable government, which had
been severely tested by open outbreak and by insidious assault. Their
friends had found their way to them across the sea; and since they had

              “Informed their unacquainted feet
      In the blind mazes of this tangled wood,”

their infant state had been emancipated from the mercantile dictation
of unfriendly men. The bitterness was past; the night was nearly
spent. Jocund day stood a-tip-toe on the misty mountain’s top. They
rested on God’s heart. Surely, they had occasion to

      ——“shake the depths of the desert gloom
        With their hymns of lofty cheer.”

They might fitly chant pæans, and sing till

        ——“the stars heard and the sea!
      And the sounding isles of the dim woods rang
        To the anthem of the free.”




CHAPTER XX.

EBENEZER.

      “Behold, they come, those sainted forms,
      Unshaken through the strife of storms;
      Heaven’s darkest cloud hangs coldly down,
      And earth puts on its rudest frown;
      But colder, ruder was the hand,
      That drove them from their own dear land.”
                                          SPRAGUE.

      “These are the living lights,
      That from our bold, green heights,
          Shall shine afar,
      Till they who name the name
      Of freedom, towards the flame
      Come, as the Magi came
          Towards Bethlehem’s star.”
                                      PIERPONT.


While the Plymouth Pilgrims, through these initial years, were
engaged in a stern tussle with unkempt nature, in a wrestling-match
with froward men, and in an essay to survive the “thousand natural
ills that flesh is heir to” in new settlements, writing _victoria
sine clade_ on every page of the struggle, the Scripture party in
England was floundering in a “slough of despond.” Charles I. was
that most strange and baleful of anomalies, a treacherous moralist.
He was the painting of a virtue. Outwardly he was Cato; inwardly
he was Iago. “This prince,” says Bolingbroke, “had sucked in with
his mother’s milk those absurd principles which his father was so
industrious, and, unhappily, so successful in propagating.”[581] Back
of him stood a powerful faction, omnipotent in the church, regnant
in the state, as wedded as himself to the tenets of absolutism,
and eager to cry Amen to his most doubtful acts—often, indeed,
instigating them.

Both the king and his backers were enamoured of that formal
Pharisecism which made broad its phylactery, and wrote “holier
than thou” upon its forehead. Of course, then, they could not but
hate those godly Puritans, both inside and outside of the national
Establishment, who, like a reproving Nathan, constantly inveighed
against self-righteous ceremonialism, and sought to inaugurate a
purer and more spiritual ecclesiasticism. The Conformists had the
power, as they had the will. Elizabeth had commenced this crusade
against the “Gospellers;” James I. had continued the “harry;” but
Charles I. outdid Termagant, and he did out-Herod Herod. Puritanism
was girt with a penal code; and now, choked almost purple, it gazed
with an agony of interest across the water to America, to see if
haply it might here find an asylum. The chances of a successful
colonization of these Western wilds were ardently canvassed.
The progress of the Pilgrim settlement was closely watched, and
the spirits of the English Puritans were at high or ebb tide in
proportion as that test enterprise seemed to oscillate towards
success or eclipse. As yet only the low premonitory moanings of the
revolution of 1641 were heard. Throughout the island, godly men began
to think of seeking safety and freedom of conscience in exile; and in
this they were encouraged by the _experimentum crucis_ of Plymouth.
“I pray you,” wrote Shirley, the English agent of the Pilgrims,
“subordinate all temporal things to success, that you may disappoint
the hopes of our foes, and keep open an asylum into which we may all
soon crowd, unless things mend in this now stricken island.”[582]

But “things did not mend,” and multitudes began to prepare for
emigration. And here mark a singular fact. We have seen how
disastrously those enterprises failed which bottomed colonization
simply on the greed of gain. The victor’s bays were only for the
brow of moral pioneers. It was as though God had said, “No; I will
not plant men in New England who count religion only twelve and the
world thirteen.” The only successful colonists of the northeastern
coast-line of the Atlantic were men whose motive for emigration was
religion, and who based their action on an idea—faith.

It happened, in 1624, that Roger Conant, “a most religious, prudent,
worthy gentleman,” and a Puritan, but not a Separatist, somewhat
dissatisfied with the rigid rule of Bradford, left Plymouth in the
crisis of the Lyford muddle,[583] and entering his pinnace, sailed
across the bay to Nantasket.[584] Tarrying there but a twelvemonth,
he pushed on to Cape Ann; where, finding a knot of fishermen who
resided there permanently, occupying themselves in curing fish in
the absence of the smacks of their fellow-_voyageurs_, he resolved
to pause. While sojourning here, the English merchants who had sent
out these fishermen who here stood huddled together on the cape,
appointed Conant their agent; whereupon he, “not liking the present
site, transported his company to Naumkeag, some five leagues distant,
to the southwest of Cape Ann.”[585]

But neither removal nor Conant’s energy saved this venture from
financial collapse;[586] and the brave pioneer, in 1625, found
himself deserted by most of his companions and without an occupation,
in the midst of the tenantless huts of frustrated trade. Then
religious sentiment came to his rescue. “To the eye of faith,
mountains are crystal, distance may be shaken hands with, oceans are
nothing.” So now old John White of Dorchester, in England, “a famous
Puritan divine of great gravity, presence, and influence,” zealous
to “spread the gospel and to establish his way,” looking across the
Atlantic, descried Conant, a lonely sentinel of Puritanism on the
northern shore.[587] The sagacious pastor saw in Naumkeag a _point
d’appui_. He at once wrote Conant: “I have been apprized of the
failure of the merchants; but do not desert your post. I promise
that if you, with Woodbury, Balch, and Palfrey, the three honest and
prudent men lately employed in the fisheries, will stay at Naumkeag,
I will procure a patent for you, and likewise send you whatever you
write for, either men, or provisions, or goods wherewith to begin an
Indian trade.”[588]

Surprised and reinvigorated, Conant prevailed, though not without
difficulty, on his companions to remain with him, and they all
“stayed at the peril of their lives.”[589]

In 1627, Woodbury sailed for England in quest of supplies.[590]
Meantime “the business came to agitation in London; and being at
first approved by some and disliked by others, by dint of much
argument and disputation, it grew to be well known; insomuch that,
some men showing affection for the work, and offering the help of
their purses if fit men might be procured to go over, inquiry was
made whether any would be willing to engage their persons in the
voyage. Thus it fell out that at last they lighted, among others, on
John Endicott, a man well known to divers persons of good repute.
He manifested much willingness to accept of the offer as soon as it
was tendered, which gave great encouragement to such as were still
doubtful about setting on this work of erecting a new colony on an
old foundation.”[591]

Under the patronage of Dudley, and Saltonstall, and Eaton, and
Pyncheon, and Bellingham, men of substance and “gentlemen born,” men
willing and able to offer “the help of their purses,” reinforced
by the good wishes of Puritanism at large, the new scheme soon got
upon its working feet, and walked forward to success. But so far
the project rested on parchment. It must be vivified, and sheltered
beneath the _imprimatur_ of a hostile government. “Many riddles must
be resolved,” said old Shirley, “and many locks must be opened by the
silver, nay, the golden key.”[592] So they purchased of the Council
for New England “a strip of land, in width three miles, north of the
Merrimack, and three miles south of the Charles river, and running
back from the Atlantic to the Western ocean; so that they were not
likely to be crowded.”[593] Thus, though it might say as the chief
captain Lysias said to Paul, “With a great sum of money obtained I
this freedom,” the new colony had “a local habitation and a name” ere
it was launched.

It has been well said, that Endicott was just the man to lead this
venture; firm, rugged, hopeful, zealous, devout, he knew no such
word as fail. So on the 20th of June, 1628, he took his wife and
children, and “not much above fifty or sixty other persons,” and
plunged across the water.[594]

They reached New England in the autumn[595]—that hazy, glowing,
golden season, when the woods hang out their myriad-tinted banners to
the wind, when the streams gurgle most laughingly, when Nature claps
her hands with joy, and the

      “Hills, rock-ribbed and ancient as the sun,”

smooth their wrinkled fronts into unwonted softness. Endicott must
have had quite a different idea of the western wilds from that which
stern, icy December daguerreotyped upon the minds of Bradford and his
coadjutors.

At once fraternizing with Conant’s sentinel squad—apprized of
their coming by Woodbury, who had returned ere Endicott sailed—the
new-comers proceeded to put up additional cottages; and they called
the nascent hamlet _Salem_, “for the _peace_ which they had and hoped
in it.”[596] Like their brothers at Plymouth, they immediately began
to explore the surrounding country. Imagine their surprise when, on
one occasion, they stumbled across “an English palisaded and thatched
house.” Approaching cautiously, they heard the ringing music of an
anvil. Here, in the heart of the wilderness, lived Thomas Walford, a
hermit smith who had won wide favor with the Indians by his skill in
working metals.[597]

From this and kindred incidents, historians have loved to draw a
moral, depicting the excess of individuality which marks the Teutonic
races. The Saxon inevitably individuates. He can stand alone; is
self-reliant and aggressive; asks only, with the old cynic, that
intruders shall get out of his sunlight. He does not gather into
cities because he is weak, nor because he is social. He is willing,
for a purpose, to go out from men, and to create a society patterned
on his own model. ’Tis a high quality when properly attempered,
making individuals kings and nations independent. It explores and
subdues unknown and dreaded continents, and is the father of that
marvellous enterprise which to-day realizes Puck’s prophecy, and
“puts a girdle round the earth in forty minutes.”

Walford’s hermitage was in Mishawam. The locality seemed favorable
for a settlement. The explorers returned to Salem with their report;
and ere long “a portion of the colonists established themselves
around the forge of the sturdy blacksmith; and with the old patriotic
feeling, which neither wrongs nor sufferings could altogether root
out, they named the new settlement _Charlestown_, in honor of a king
whose severities had driven them from the land of their fathers.”[598]

The report of Endicott’s successful colonization, which reached
England early in 1629, encouraged White, “the main promoter and
chief organizer of this business,” to plant the adventure upon a
broader, firmer foundation. The original company was but a voluntary,
unincorporated partnership.[599] This was now “much enlarged” by
recruits from the Puritans “disaffected to the rulers in church
and state.”[600] The next step was, to get a charter and an
incorporation. This was solicited, and after some little difficulty
and delay, obtained. On the 4th of March, 1629, Charles I. affixed
the royal seal to a parchment which erected White’s coterie into
a body politic, under the title of “The Governor and Company of
Massachusetts Bay, in New England.”[601]

“The patent passed the seals a few days only before Charles I., in a
public state paper, avowed his design of governing England without
a Parliament.”[602] It was cherished by the colonists for more than
half a century as a most precious boon; and the old charter[603]
is the germ of that “bright, consummate flower,” the later
constitution.[604]

“The administration of the affairs of this puissant corporation,”
remarks Bancroft, “was intrusted to a governor, a deputy, and
eighteen assistants, who were to be annually elected by a general
vote of the members of the body politic. Four times a year, or
oftener if desired, a general assembly of the freemen was to be held;
and to these assemblies, which were invested with the necessary
powers of legislation, inquest, and superintendence, the most
important matters were referred. No provision required the assent of
the king to render the acts of the colonial authorities valid. In his
eye it was but a trading corporation, not a civil government. Its
doings were esteemed as indifferent as those of any guild in England;
and if grave powers of jurisdiction in America were conceded, it was
only because successful trade demanded the concession.”[605]

Nothing was said of religious liberty. The crown may have relied on
its power to restrain it; the emigrants may have trusted to distance
or obscurity to protect it.[606] But enough was gained. The charter
necessitated full liberty. “If you plant an oak in a flower-vase,”
says Goethe, “either the oak must wither or the vase must crack.” The
Puritans meant to let it crack. It is singular that neither Charles
nor his lynx-eyed ministers should have detected the freedom or
scented the heresy which lurked in the broad terms of the glorious
old parchment.

In the old legend, a fisherman took a casket out of the sea, and
found on its cover the seal of Solomon. He broke it, and out of the
slender casket rose a giant till he lifted into colossal shape, and
raised his right hand to crash the interloper. So now Charles broke
the Solomon-seal of his coercion, and enabled this young giant of
the West to rise to its legitimate proportions, clutching in its
right hand the wholesome sceptre which should crush all obstacles to
progressive liberty. In the fable, the fisherman, by a cunning story,
lured the giant to go back into the casket, which he then tossed back
again into the sea. But neither Charles nor his successors could ever
persuade America to go back into the box.




CHAPTER XXI.

“FAREWELL, DEAR ENGLAND.”

      “With news the time’s in labor, and throws forth
      Each minute some.”
                                              SHAKSPEARE.

      “Why should we crave a hallowed spot?
      An altar is in each man’s cot;
      A church in every grove that spreads
      Its living roof above our heads.”
                                  WORDSWORTH.


With the precious charter in its pocket, the complacent Massachusetts
Company strode out of the royal antechamber, and proceeded at once
to effect an organization. Matthew Cradock was elected to the
gubernatorial chair; and to Endicott, as deputy, was delegated the
government of New England.[607]

A letter of instructions was indited. It was unique, and highly
illustrative of the benevolent spirit of these builders of
states—_Conditores Imperiorum_—to whose brotherhood Lord Bacon, in
“the true marshalling of the sovereign degrees of honor,” assigns the
highest place.[608] Let us cull some specimen paragraphs from the
old parchment: “If any of the savages”—such were the orders long and
uniformly followed and placed on record more than half a century
before William Penn proclaimed the principles of peace on the borders
of the Delaware[609]—“pretend right of inheritance to all or any part
of the lands granted in our patent, we pray you endeavor to purchase
their title, that we may avoid the least scruple of intrusion.”[610]
Elsewhere the colonial authorities were bidden “particularly to
publish, that no wrong nor injury be offered to the Indians.”[611]

Tobacco was held in especial abhorrence, and denounced as “a trade
by this whole Company disowned, and utterly disclaimed by some of
the chiefest, who absolutely declare themselves unwilling to have a
hand in the plantation, if the intention be to cherish or permit the
culture thereof.”[612]

Endicott was authorized to expel the incorrigible, using force
when necessary. It was also appointed that all labor should cease
at “three o’clock on Saturday afternoon, in preparation for the
Sabbath.”[613]

The colonial seal was an Indian erect, with an arrow in his right
hand, and the motto, “Come over and help us,” peculiarly appropriate
in that age. The old seal has been retained by Massachusetts; but
the motto has been superseded by Algernon Sydney’s famous Latin, _Sub
libertate quietem_.[614]

“No idle drone may live amongst us;” so ran the colonial statute;
and it “was the spirit as well as the law of the dauntless community
which was to turn the sterility of New England into a cluster of
wealthy, cultured, model states.”

The charter had been granted to the Massachusetts Company in March;
in April preparations were hastening for the embarkation of fresh
emigrants.[615] It was not difficult to get recruits; for the
pinchers of tender consciences grew daily more rigorous. Puritanism
saw popery preparing to spring upon it upon one side; it felt the
ravenous bite of the Conformists on the other side. It was worse than
folly to look to the government for redress; that was the engine of
the persecutors. Villiers of Buckingham, that volatile madman, who was

      “Every thing by turns, and nothing long,”

as Pope has painted him, had been recently assassinated. His place in
the king’s confidence was now filled by Strafford, the systematizer
of tyranny in England, whose audacious genius impelled him to attempt
to nationalize despotism, and erected the tenets of absolute power
inside of constitutional forms.[616] By his side stood Laud, his
Siamese twin, a prelate who assumed to ransack the universe—

                  “Whose tongue
      Outvenomed all the worms of Nile.”

The statesman and the priest carried it with a high hand;[617] and
the time was not yet when Cozens could say, “The king has no more
authority in ecclesiastical matters than the boy who rubs my horse’s
heels.”[618]

The suffering Non-conformists, “meted and peeled” at home, heard with
rapture of that Puritan colony in the wilderness, governed by men
whose opinions accorded with their own, and sheltered beneath the
ægis of a royal charter. Emigration began to assume unprecedented
proportions;[619] and the Company might have its pick of the best men
in the island. But much good seed was left; enough to grow Cromwell,
and nourish Hampden, and succor Pym.

By the middle of April, 1629, six ships were ready to sail; and under
license from the Lord Treasurer, these were freighted with “eighty
women and maids and twenty-six children”—hostages of the fixed
attachment of the emigrants to the New World—“and two hundred men,
with victuals, arms, tools, and necessary wearing apparel.”[620] They
also took on board “one hundred and forty head of cattle, and forty
goats.”[621]

As this was a religious enterprise, care was taken “to make
plentiful provision of godly ministers.”[622] Four clergymen now
embarked for Massachusetts Bay. Two of these made no figure on the
north shore of New England. Bright was a strict Conformist; and not
liking the ecclesiastical proceedings of his comrades, he returned
to England in the succeeding summer.[623] Smith was a Separatist;
and since these Puritans were not yet “Come-outers,” they were shy
of him, so that in landing he went to Nantasket,[624] where we shall
meet him again. The remaining two were Mr. Higginson and Mr. Skelton;
the first of Leicestershire, the other of Lincolnshire.[625] They
were both ardent Puritans, who had held livings in the Church of
England, and been silenced for non-conformity.[626] On receiving an
invitation to accompany this expedition, they had “esteemed it a call
from heaven,” and joyfully assented.[627] “Both of these men,” says
Cotton Mather, “were eminent for learning and virtue; and being thus
in a sense driven out of England, they sought graves on the American
strand, whereon the epitaph might be inscribed that was on Scipio’s:
_Ingrata patria, ne mortui quidem habebis ossa._”[628] But unlike
the ill-used pagan, they had no taunts for their erring country.
“We will not say,” cried Francis Higginson, as he stood on deck off
the Isle of Wight, and looked back on the receding shores of the
fast-anchored island—“We will not say, Farewell, Babylon, Farewell,
Rome! but, Farewell, dear England!”[629]

“England did not regret the departure of these Christian heroes,
because she did not know her best men. What nation does? To
materialists and politicians, these Pilgrims seemed to be visionaries
and idealists; impracticable, and in the way. Yet this class is
always the life of a nation. We can look back upon them, and surfeit
them with praise; but we cannot easily see their mates walking
amongst us, treading our own sidewalks, and so learn to cherish, and
not kill the prophets.”[630]

Higginson, Skelton, and their future parishioners, landed at Salem
“in the last days of June.”[631] Their friends already on the spot
gave them a hearty pioneer welcome. Higginson employed his first
leisure moments in writing home a transcript of the situation: “When
we came first to Naumkeag, we found about half a score of cottages,
and a fair house built for the governor. We found also abundance
of corn planted by those here, very good and well-liking. The two
hundred passengers whom we brought were, by common consent of the
old planters, combined together into one body politic, under the
same governor. There are in all of us, both old and new planters,
about three hundred; whereof two hundred are planted at Naumkeag,
now called Salem, and the rest have settled at Massachusetts Bay,
beginning to build a town there, which we call Charlestown. But that
which is our greatest comfort, and our means of defence above all
others, is, that we have here the true religion and holy ordinances
of Almighty God taught amongst us. Thanks be to God, we have here
plenty of preaching and diligent catechizing, with strict and careful
exercise and good and commendable order to bring our people into a
Christian conversation with those with whom we have to do withal. And
thus we doubt not but God will be with us; and if God be with us, who
can be against us?”[632]

On their arrival at Salem, these Massachusetts Pilgrims found no
church. It was their first care to erect one; and in the prosecution
of this work, they had recourse to the devout Plymouth colonists,
their brothers in the faith. Cordial greetings had already been
exchanged between these sister colonies. About the time of the
arrival of Higginson, “an infection had spread among the northern
pioneers, of which many died; some of the scurvy, others of a
hectic fever.”[633] Endicott had sent a missive to Plymouth at this
time, requesting medical aid, as he had no leech with him. Bradford
immediately sent Thomas Fuller, physician to his plantation, and the
first in New England—for he was a comer in the “Mayflower”—to the
relief of the Salem sufferers, and armed him with an affectionate
letter of condolence and Christian sympathy.[634]

These lines, and the prompt despatch of the surgeon, Endicott thus
acknowledged:

  “RIGHT WORTHY SIR—It is a thing not usual that servants to one
  Master and of the same household should be strangers; I assure you,
  I desire it not; nay, to speak more plainly, I cannot be so to you.
  God’s people are all marked with one and the same mark and sealed
  with one and the same seal, and have, in the main, one and the same
  heart, guided by one and the same Spirit of truth; and where this
  is, there can be no discord; nay, here must needs be sweet harmony.
  And the same request, with you, I make unto the Lord—that we may,
  as Christian brethren, be united by a heavenly and unfeigned love,
  bending all our hearts and forces in furthering a work beyond our
  unaided strength, with reverence and fear, fastening our eyes
  always on Him that is able to direct and prosper all our ways.

  “I acknowledge myself much bound to you for your kind love and
  care in sending Mr. Fuller among us, and rejoice much that I am by
  him satisfied touching your judgments of the outward form of God’s
  worship. It is, so far as I can gather, no other than is warranted
  by the evidence of truth, and the same which I have professed
  and maintained ever since the Lord in mercy revealed himself to
  me; being far from the common report that hath been spread of you
  touching this particular.[635] But God’s children must not look for
  less here below than ill-report and slanderous gibes; and ’tis a
  great mercy that he strengthens them to go through with it. I shall
  not need, at this time, to be tedious unto you, for, God willing, I
  purpose to see your face shortly. In the mean time, I humbly take
  my leave of you, committing you to the Lord’s blessed protection
  and rest.

                  “Your assured Friend,
                                                        “JO. ENDICOTT.

  “NAUMKEAG, May 11, 1629.”[636]

The chain of friendship thus early welded had an additional link
added to it when the Leyden exiles, borne to America in company with
Higginson and Skelton, landed from the same flotilla, and pushed
from Salem on to Plymouth. Bradford, in reciting this incident, says
finely, “Their long stay and keeping back was recompensed by the
Lord to their friends here with a double blessing, in that they not
only enjoyed them now beyond their late expectation, but with them
many more godly friends and Christian brothers, as the beginning
of a larger harvest unto the Lord, in the increase of his churches
and people in these waste parts, to the admiration of many and the
wonder of the world; and that here should be a resting-place for so
many of God’s children, when so sharp a scourge came upon their own
land. But it was the Lord’s doing, and it ought to be marvellous in
our eyes.”[637]

Higginson and Endicott had reached Salem in the latter part of June,
1629. Some twenty days later, Endicott “set apart a solemn day of
humiliation for the foundation of a church and the choice of a pastor
and a teacher.”[638] The elder Pilgrims at Plymouth were invited to
be present, and lend their countenance to the unique ceremony.[639]

The 20th of July arrived. The first part of the day was spent
in prayer and preaching; the latter portion was devoted to the
ecclesiastical election.[640] “It was after this manner,” says
Gott—who had come over with Endicott, and was afterwards a deacon in
the Salem church—in a letter to Bradford rehearsing the proceedings:
“the persons thought of, who had been ministers in the English
Establishment, were questioned concerning their calling to preach.
They acknowledged that there was a twofold calling, the one inward,
when the Lord moved the heart of man to take that calling upon him,
and fitted him with gifts for it; the other outward, and from the
people, when a company of believers are united in a covenant to
walk together in all the ways of God, and all the male members are
given a free voice in the choice of their church officers. Now we,
being persuaded that these two men were so qualified as the apostle
speaks to Timothy, ‘A bishop must be blameless, sober, apt to teach,’
we think we may say, as the eunuch said unto Philip, ‘What should
hinder my being baptized, seeing there is water?’ and he believed.
So those servants of God, clearing all things by their answers, and
being thus fitted, we saw no reason why we might not freely give
our voices for their election. Therefore every fit member wrote in
a note the name of him whom the Lord moved him to think fit for a
pastor; and so likewise the name of him whom they would have for a
teacher. Mr. Skelton was chosen pastor, and Mr. Higginson teacher;
and they accepting the choice, Mr. Higginson, with several others,
laid hands on Mr. Skelton, using prayer therewith; after which there
was an imposition of hands on Mr. Higginson by Mr. Skelton and the
rest.”[641]

Bradford, “and some others with him, coming by sea,” and being
“hindered by cross-winds,” could not reach Salem in the beginning of
the ceremony, but “came into the assembly afterwards, and gave them
the right hand of fellowship, wishing all prosperity and a blessed
success unto such good beginnings.”[642]

Some days after this election, Mr. Higginson drew up “A Confession
of Faith and Church Covenant.” Thirty persons assented to it, and
a self-constituted church was planted in the wilderness.[643]
This transaction has determined and colored the whole religious
constitution of New England. It was a bold and aggressive act. But
the Pilgrims had always objected to the ceremonial law of the home
Establishment; and now, being in the Western wilds, they felt free
to form their ecclesiasticism on what they conceived to be a more
authentic model. “In their position, such words as ‘Non-conformity’
and ‘Separatism’ ceased to be significant. It was only important
that they should conform to their view of the Bible; and their
determination to do so was not shaken by the thought that in doing so
they must separate, not in spirit, but in discipline and usage, from
a church three thousand miles away.”[644]

The New England theocracy was begotten of these proceedings.[645]
“The emigrants,” remarks Bancroft, “were not so much a body politic
as a church in the wilderness, with no benefactor around them but
Nature, no present sovereign but God. An entire separation was made
between church and state—at least in theory; religious worship
was established on the basis of the independence of each separate
religious community; and these rigid Calvinists, of whose rude
intolerance the world had been filled with malignant calumnies,
subscribed a covenant cherishing, it is true, the severest virtues,
but without one tinge of fanaticism. It was an act of piety, not
of study; it favored virtue, not superstition; inquiry, and not
submission. The communicants were enthusiasts, but not bigots.”[646]
They declared that “the Holy Scriptures only were to be followed, and
no man’s authority, be he Augustine, Tertullian, or even Cherubim or
Seraphim.”[647]

This entire transaction gave dissatisfaction to some at Salem.
Finally, John and Samuel Brown, “two brothers, the one a merchant,
the other a lawyer, both men of parts, estate, and figure in
the settlement, gathered a company separate from the public
assembly.”[648]

Mutual bickerings ensued. A breach of the peace was threatened.[649]
Then Endicott interposed. He sent the Browns home to England, and
thereby restored quiet.[650]

The brothers Brown, on reaching England, carried a lusty impeachment
to the archiepiscopal throne, then occupied by Laud.[651] The
Massachusetts Company, alarmed by the clamor, wrote letters of
caution to Endicott: “Beware! ’tis possible some undigested
counsels have been too suddenly put in execution, which may have
ill-construction with the state here, and make us obnoxious to any
adversary;”[652] which shows, not that the island Puritans did not
sympathize with bluff Endicott’s action, but that they dreaded lest
it might provoke a hostile government to give their pet colony its
_coup de grâce_.




CHAPTER XXII.

THE ARBELLA.

      “We will renew the times of truth and justice,
      Condensing into a fair free commonwealth,
      Not rash equality, but equal rights,
      Proportioned like the columns of the temple,
      Giving and taking strength reciprocal,
      And making firm the whole with grace and beauty,
      So that no part could be removed without
      Infringement of the general harmony.”
                                BYRON’S _Doge of Venice_.


The success of Endicott and the supplementary success of the
detachments despatched to reinforce him—success which at the very
outset had left the older settlement at Plymouth, plodding on under a
heavy load of debt and odium, far behind—stirred English Puritanism
as with the blast of a trumpet. So intense was the interest in
the new colony, throughout the realm, that a tract descriptive of
New England, written by Higginson, and sent over to England, in
manuscript, was printed, and ran through three editions in as many
months.[653] In every hamlet, on every street-corner, eager groups
met and discussed the right and the policy of emigration; and the
most scrupulous consciences met the query, “Is it permitted that men
fly from persecution?” by responding, “Yes; for persecution may lead
our posterity to abjure the truth.”

Soon this stir had an effect. Some of the purest, wealthiest, and
best-educated men in England agreed to embark for America. One thing
only had made them hesitate; the colonial government resided in
England, and was only sifted into New England by delegation. The
charter empowered the company, and not the colonists, to transport
persons, establish ordinances, and settle government.[654] It was
a chrysalis; it had the face of a commercial corporation, but was
pregnant with the essence of an independent provincial government.
Like the mermaid, it had a human head, but its body was the body of
a fish. This puissant possibility—who should evoke it? Who should
utter the talismanic words fit to set free the hidden spirit of
self-government? Matthew Cradock, the governor of the company,
pronounced the “open sesame.” He saw, as did other sagacious men,
that the residence of the corporate authority in England embarrassed
emigration, barred prosperity, and opened the door to discord. The
colonists sighed for a real governor, not one in masquerade; and all
began to realize that a government three thousand miles away could
not successfully legislate for a settlement whose growing necessities
came as quickly and changed as rapidly as the combinations of a
kaleidoscope.

So Cradock, with generous self-abnegation, himself proposed the
transfer of the charter to such of the freemen of the company
as should themselves inhabit the colony.[655] A heated debate
ensued. Both _pros_ and _cons_ had their say, and the formers of
the project strengthened their argument by pointing to such men as
Winthrop, Saltonstall, Johnson, Dudley, and Humphrey, all of whom
had recently bound themselves at Cambridge to sail for Massachusetts
Bay, accompanied by their families, provided the colonial government
should be transferred to the Plantation.[656]

This decided the company, and a general assent was given to the
alienation of the patent.[657] Then came an obstacle. The crown
lawyers said, “It is not so nominated in the bond; you have no right,
standing under this corporation charter in London, to transfer
your power.” Our fathers replied: “King Charles has granted us
certain authority, but our charter does not bind us to exercise that
authority in England; locality is not specified. We choose to vote
that emigrants shall be freemen, and to summon a meeting beyond
the Atlantic. You say this was not contemplated; but where is it
forbidden? If you can quibble, so can we. If we have not the right,
we will create it. In the light of our success lawyers may read the
reason and hunt up a precedent fifty years hence.”

It was thus that Puritanism, strong in faith, bold in emergencies,
met the exigencies and trod down the difficulties of its epoch. “The
corporation did not sell itself—it emigrated. The patent could not
be assigned; but the patentees could call a legal meeting in the
metropolis, or on board ship in an English harbor; and why not in the
port of Salem as well as at the Isle of Wight? in a cabin or under a
tree at Charlestown as well as at the house of Goffe in London?”

Thus it was that a unique and daring construction transformed a
trading company into a municipality—a change fraught with momentous
consequences. Before this decision all hesitation fell. The
Cambridge friends announced their readiness to sail, and the old
authorities of the Company at once resigned, in order that their
offices might be filled by the chief emigrants.[658] John Winthrop
was elected governor; John Humphrey was appointed deputy; and these
were reinforced by eighteen assistants.[659] Just on the eve of
embarkation, Humphrey’s place was supplied by Thomas Dudley, he being
for a space unavoidably detained in England.[660]

Winthrop at once accepted the charge; and when he informed his son
of the decision, the younger Winthrop replied: “I shall call that
my country where I may most glorify God and enjoy the presence of
my dearest friends. Therefore herein I submit myself to God’s will
and yours, and dedicate myself to Heaven and the Company, with the
whole endeavors both of mind and body. The motives for emigration
are unimpeachable; and it cannot but be a prosperous action which is
so well allowed by the judgment of God’s prophets, undertaken by so
religious and wise worthies in Israel, and indented to God’s glory in
so special a service.”[661]

And now preparations for an extensive emigration were ardently
pushed. The finances of the Company were put on a new basis. All
contributors to the fund were _ipso facto_ entitled to a share in
the profits of the colonial trade and to a grant of Massachusetts
land.[662] “The outlay was distributed in such proportions that it
was not burdensome in any quarter. The richer emigrants submitted to
it joyfully, from public spirit; the poorer as a panacea for existing
evils.”[663]

Early in the spring of 1630, ten vessels were ready to weigh anchor.
Richer than the argosies of the old Venetian or Genoan merchants,
this fleet was freighted with the seed of a future empire; with the
planters of a renovated England, secure in freedom, firm in religion;
with the builders of a transatlantic Saxon state, bound to realize
in its beneficent order the noblest dreams of English patriots and
sages. Troops of ministering angels hovered round it to ward off
danger, and God’s own benediction sealed and sanctified the daring
venture.

Let us descend into the little cabin of the “Arbella,” and scan
the faces and take the hands—if we are worthy—of some of the most
famous personages of this august Company of devout _voyageurs_. The
cabin is long, and low, and dark. But ’tis lighted now, somewhat
dingily, indeed, yet still sufficiently to enable us to discern a
table covered with maps and legal parchments, round which are ranged
a score of deeply-interested talkers.

That tall, handsome, gentlemanly man, who sits at the head of the
table, is John Winthrop, the new governor. See what an easy grace
there is in his every movement; he has the port of one habituated
to command, yet he is very gentle withal. His hair is just touched
with silver, and he is in the prime of life—just forty-two, ripe
and mellow. Winthrop is not a needy, sour adventurer; he comes of
an ancient family long seated at Groton, in Suffolk, where he has
a property whose income yields him six or seven hundred pounds a
year—the equivalent of at least ten thousand dollars now-a-days.
Evidently he quits England from some higher motive than to fatten his
exchequer. This is he whom Cotton Mather terms the “Lycurgus of New
England;” “as devout as Numa, but not liable to any of his heathenish
madnesses; a governor in whom the excellences of Christianity made a
most imposing addition unto the virtues wherein even without these
he would have made a parallel for the great men of Greece and Rome
whom the pen of Plutarch has eternized.”[664] A calm, unobtrusive,
able gentleman, Winthrop had “studied that book, which, professing
to teach politics, had but three leaves, and on each leaf but one
word—MODERATION.” He had been initiated into the mysteries of
state-craft when a boy, for from his youth he had moved in the
circles where the highest questions of English policy were discussed
and elaborated by the familiar associates of Whitgift, and Bacon, and
Essex, and Cecil Burleigh.[665]

At the right of Winthrop and chatting pleasantly with him, stands
Thomas Dudley. He is short and thickset in stature, and stern in
expression; a man fit to lead a forlorn hope. Quick and irascible in
temper, uncompromising when he esteems himself in the right, every
word he utters has the ring of authority. He is a man who speaks
bullets. His head is grayer than Winthrop’s, but he is still robust,
and he walks with a martial air—and no wonder, for he is a soldier.
Thirty years before he had borne arms under Henri Quatre in the ranks
of the Huguenots, a service which had indoctrinated him in the love
of civil and religious liberty;[666] and he was old enough to have
seen Sir Philip Sidney, heard Spencer recite verses to Elizabeth, and
lent a shrill voice to the wild huzza at the defeat of the Spanish
Armada.[667]

But who is this that glides up to Winthrop, and, touching him upon
the shoulder, speaks a word in his ear? It is John Humphrey, “a
gentleman of special parts, of learning and activity, and a godly
man.”[668] He does not sail now, but is here to bid his friends
God-speed.

See, yonder, leaning with graceful negligence against the wainscot
of the cabin, lounges a pale, thoughtful, intellectual young man,
with a fine head and a face whose expression is that of lovable
seriousness. This is Isaac Johnson, the wealthiest of the Pilgrims,
a land-owner in three counties.[669] But profoundly impressed with
the importance of emigration, and aware of the necessity of an
example, he has risen from the lap of artificial and patrician life
and flung away the softness of a luxurious home to battle with the
rigors of a wilderness. Like Humphrey, who now approaches to shake
hands with him, he is a son-in-law of the earl of Lincoln, the head
in that day of the now ducal house of Newcastle,[670] and also, like
his relative, he has been the familiar companion of the patriotic
nobles.[671]

Johnson now goes out as one of Winthrop’s assistants, as does also
Sir Richard Saltonstall, of Halifax, in the West Riding of Yorkshire,
a bountiful contributor to the finances of the emigration.[672]
This little man, whose keen, searching eyes take in every thing
without an effort, as he sits quietly on the left side of the
table, is Theophilus Eaton, an eminent London merchant, but
accustomed to courts, as he had resided at Copenhagen as English
minister to Denmark.[673] That grave, sedate gentleman, directly
opposite Eaton, is Lucien Bradstreet, son of a dissenting minister
in Lincolnshire, and grandson of a “Suffolk gentleman of fine
estate,” and was graduated at Emanuel College, Cambridge. By his
side sits William Vassall, an opulent West India proprietor.[674]
These, and some others known to fame, now stood clustered in the
cabin of the “Arbella”—a little ship of three hundred and fifty tons
burden[675]—forming one of the grandest collections of friends on any
historic canvas.

Nor were they alone. Many of the settlers had their families
with them.[676] The enterprise was still further hallowed by the
unshrinking devotion of unselfish women. These, inspired by piety
and love, gave up all that is most dear and most essential to their
lives, “security and the comfort of homes in England, to brave the
stormy, frightful sea, to land on these bleak, wild shores, to front
the miseries and trials of pioneer life, and to sink into untimely
graves, as so many did. These were the martyrs who laid down their
lives for freedom and for us; to them, therefore, let us uncover our
heads.”[677]

      “By fairy hands their knell is rung,
      By forms unseen their dirge is sung;
      There Honor comes, a Pilgrim gray,
      To bless the turf that wraps their clay;
      And Freedom shall awhile repair
      To dwell, a weeping hermit there.”

Foremost among these noble women, in position, in culture, and in
sacrifice, stood the Lady Arbella[678] Johnson. Her heroism has
thrown a halo of poetry around a venture which needed no additional
ray to make it bloom in immortal verse. The daughter of Earl Lincoln,
the idol of her associates, she was yet a Puritan. Married to Isaac
Johnson, she was indeed a _helpmeet_, sharing in his feelings and
animating him to loftier exertions. When her husband resolved to
emigrate, she determined to share his peril, and though ill-fitted to
brave the rigors of an inclement wilderness by her delicate nature,
she answered all objections by saying, “God will care for me, and
I must do my duty.” An exile voyage was her wedding tour; and so
touched were the Pilgrims by her devotion, that they named their
vessel after her, the “Arbella.”[679]

Such was the character, such the home position, of Winthrop and his
coadjutors. Even the prejudiced and reluctant pen of that high Tory,
Chalmers, though essaying a sneer, had half of its curse turned into
a blessing, for he was compelled to write, “The principal planters
of Massachusetts were English country gentlemen of no inconsiderable
fortunes; of enlarged understandings, improved by liberal education;
of extensive ambition, concealed under an appearance of religious
humility.”[680]

On the 29th of March, 1630, the “Arbella” sailed from Cowes, off the
Isle of Wight, and speeding down the channel, stopped at Yarmouth
to join her consorts, the “Talbot,” the “Jewel,” the “Ambrose,” and
the rest.[681] Here the self-banished devotees penned a farewell to
their brothers in the faith who remained in England. Their noble
letter concludes thus: “Wishing our heads and hearts may be as
fountains of tears for your everlasting welfare, when we shall be in
our poor cottages in the wilderness, overshadowed by the spirit of
supplication, through the manifold necessities and tribulations which
may not altogether unexpectedly, nor, we hope, unprofitably, befall
us, we shall ever rest assured friends and brethren.”[682]

This done, all was done; then, in the early days of April, favored by
the breath of budding spring—fit season in which to sail—the flotilla
lifted anchor and left Yarmouth, where the feet of these Pilgrims
pressed the soil of their dear England for the last time.[683]
“Sadness was in their hearts, and tears dimmed their eyes, for they
loved the land of their fathers; they could not forget the tender
associations of youth, nor the holier associations of manhood, when
leaving it for ever. But ‘as the hart panteth for the water-brook,’
so their souls longed for Liberty and God, and they went out full of
hope. With a fair wind they passed the Needles, St. Albans, Portland,
Dartmouth, and the Eddystone, with its fiery eye, watching for ships
over the broad sea. The Lizard, and at last the Scilly Islands
disappeared, went down day by day in the blue distance, and were left
with the past, till, on Sunday, the 11th of April, 1630, the little
fleet stood out bravely into the stormy Atlantic.”[684]




CHAPTER XXIII.

THE ARRIVAL.

                    “Here the architect
      Did not with curious care a pile erect
      Of carvéd marble touch, or porphyry,
      But built for God and hospitality.”
                                     CAREW.


Nine weeks the “Arbella” tossed on the Atlantic; then the lookout
descried the New England coast-line, and shouted, “Land ho!” “About
four in the morning,” was Winthrop’s entry in his diary under
date of June 12th, “we neared our port, and shot off two pieces
of ordnance.”[685] A little later, Endicott entered a shallop and
was rowed out to the incoming ship.[686] Greeting the new governor
cordially, he at once conducted him to Salem, where all “supped on a
good venison pastry.”

Winthrop found disease stalking among the settlers, and provisions
nearly spent; but all were hopeful, though the winter had been
hard.[687] The stores he brought were not unwelcome, but these were
not more heartily received than were those who brought them; for
pioneer life brings out hospitality and good fellowship; and besides,
these men had common hopes and fears, and were united in faith and
practice.

The governor seems not to have been quite satisfied with Salem as a
definitive settlement; for, pausing there but a week to recruit after
the tedious voyage, he pushed on in search of another place to “sit
down.”[688] Sailing up a bay “made by a great number of islands,
whose high cliffs shoulder out the sea,” the explorers finally
decided upon a spot on the banks of Charles river, and a settlement
was commenced where Cambridge now stands.[689]

Busy days followed. Land was allotted, hunting parties were sent
out; Indians were chatted with; and thanksgivings for the past and
prayers for the future were offered.[690] But, enfeebled by fevers
and enervated by the scurvy, while the deceitful river and the marshy
ground in its vicinity bred contagious and miasmal vapors to enshroud
them nightly, the emigrants made little progress in their most
important work, the erection of a town.

Daily the sickness increased, and it haunted Salem as well as infant
Cambridge. In August there was a large mortality; but September was
the most dreary month. Francis Higginson, who had been for some
time slowly wasting away with a hectic fever, died in this sad
autumn;[691] but “in the hour of his death the future prosperity of
New England and the coming glories of its many churches floated in
cheerful visions before his eyes.”[692] Then death struck another
shining mark. The Lady Arbella Johnson’s fragile frame, coming “from
a paradise of plenty and pleasure into a wilderness of wants,”[693]
succumbed shortly to the dread epidemic,[694] to the infinite sorrow
of her loving friends. Her death broke the heart of her devoted
husband. His sorrow was too full for utterance; or he might have
hymned it in that verse of Dr. Watts, so pregnant with tenderness and
pathos:

      “I was all love, and she was all delight;
        Let me run back to seasons past;
      Ah! flowery days when first she charmed my sight,—
        But roses will not always last.”

Isaac Johnson survived the beautiful victim but a few weeks,[695]
then he followed her to immortality through the grave.

                                  “He tried
      To live without her, liked it not, and died,”

said Mather, quaintly.[696] Winthrop, through his tears, wrote his
assistant’s epitaph: “He was a holy man and wise, and died in sweet
peace.”[697]

And now the mortality was fearful. Eighty of Endicott’s colonists
had been buried ere the coming of Winthrop;[698] in the summer and
autumn succeeding his arrival over two hundred died.[699] Death
reaped its hecatombs and battened on corpses. The Pilgrims wailed
out their grief in God’s ear, and kept fasts and appointed days of
humiliation. But He “who doeth all things well” had his own purpose
to subserve, and his hand was not stayed from smiting till the chill
December skies mantled the earth with snow.[700]

Early in September the colonists determined to desert the
pestilential river banks; a few went back to Salem, some paused at
Charleston; others, led by Winthrop, planted themselves on that neck
of land which is now called Boston.[701]

Ere long this peninsula came to be thought the fittest site for the
erection of a colonial capital, and the 17th of September, 1630,
was formally set apart as the date of its settlement.[702] The spot
was then called _Shawmut_,[703] and it was picturesquely seated on
a surface which swelled into rising grounds of considerable height,
which have since become famous as Copp’s hill, Fort hill, and Beacon
hill.[704] Rome sits upon seven hills; Boston is a trimountain city.

Why was it called Boston? Because Boston in England, a prominent town
in Lincolnshire, some five score miles north of London, had played
no inconsiderable part in the drama of this colonization, giving to
the enterprise some of its chiefest pillars, among others, Dudley,
and Bellingham, and Leverett, and Coddington.[705] The grateful
Pilgrims thought that they owed the old English city a recognition
and a tribute; so they gave to their capital the familiar name of
_Boston_.[706]

Shawmut had an occupant previous to its hasty adoption by the
deserters from Cambridge. William Blackstone, who had come over
with Endicott, found himself cramped even in sparsely-settled
Salem; so he pushed on to Shawmut neck and became sole proprietor
of the whole peninsula, which was afterwards bought of him. Here he
lived ten years, and saw the foundations of society laid. He was an
eccentric character; and though an ordained clergyman of the English
church, he had Puritan proclivities. As he had been pinched at home
by conformity laws, he had exiled himself that he might secure
elbow-room for his sentiments. But he loved liberty so well that he
never would unite with the New England church. “No, no,” he always
replied, when solicited to do so, “I came from England because I did
not like the lord-bishops; and I cannot join you, because I would not
be under the lord brethren.”[707]

The Pilgrims went to work in Boston with a will. Winter impended; a
shelter must be provided against the December sleet and the chilly
braw. But the task was hard; the _vis inertiæ_ of nature was to be
overcome; and, without tools, carts, or experienced joiners, all
hands began to realize that the carpenter was not inferior to the
priest or the poet.[708]

Some few grew discouraged. Of the seven hundred whom Winthrop brought
out, ninety went back to England.[709] But this gap was soon closed
by fresh arrivals. Quite a fleet lay moored in Massachusetts bay;
from Beacon hill seventeen ships might have been counted, all of
which came in 1630;[710] and these had disgorged some fifteen hundred
earnest, devout emigrants, “the best” that Britain could produce.[711]

As a body, the Pilgrims were full of courage, and their faith at all
times bubbled over into song or into prayer. “We here enjoy God and
Jesus Christ,” wrote Winthrop to his wife, whom sickness had detained
in England, “and is not that enough? I thank God I like so well to be
here as not to repent coming. I would not have altered my course,
though I had foreseen all these afflictions. I never had more content
of mind.”[712]

Before such a spirit—the right spirit—all obstacles were certain to
succumb. It was sure to

                ——“sway the future,
      While God stood behind the shadow,
      Keeping watch above his own.”




CHAPTER XXIV.

THE CHARTER POLITY.

      “And then we’ll raise, on these wild shores,
      A structure of wise government, and show
      In our New World a glorious spectacle
      Of social order.”
                     MRS. HALE’S _Ormond Grosvenor_.


The fundamental law of the colonies of Massachusetts Bay was the
charter, which bore the crown seal. The old parchment contained a
permit and a fiat. It gave the corporation the right to enlarge or
decrease its numbers at its option, and to establish the terms on
which new members should be admitted to its franchises. It decreed
that the governor and his assistants should be elected by the
suffrages of the Company at large. Every freeman, as the members of
the corporation were called, was entitled to vote.[713]

On the 3d of August, 1630, at Charlestown, Winthrop convened
his assistants, and held the first court under the transferred
charter.[714] It was the earliest baby-cry of the provincial
government. Administrative functions were at once assumed. Measures
were initiated which looked to the support of ministers; the question
of wages was adjusted; and an order was issued for the arrest of
Thomas Morton,[715] who, through the carelessness of Allerton, the
Plymouth agent, had returned to New England, and once more “hied to
his old nest” at Merry-mount, only to renew his godless pranks.[716]

“Such was the first colonial legislation, and such the first
legislative body. No heralds, no wigs, no cannon, no gilding, were
necessary to impose upon the senses or give majesty and authority to
law.”

Two months later,[717] a general assembly of the freemen of the
colony was convened at Boston.[718] In the Assembly the charter
vested the fundamental legislative authority.[719] It was the
colonial Parliament. At this session more than a hundred planters
were admitted to the franchises of the corporation;[720] and since
this accession increased the preëxisting inconvenience of gathering
the whole Company for purposes of legislation, the freemen ceded to
the governor and his assistants the whole political power, reserving
only the right to supply vacancies.[721] The tenure of office was
unlimited;[722] perhaps it was tacitly understood to be, as in the
old English law, “during good behavior”—_quamdiu se bene gesserint_.
For a season the government was an elective aristocracy. It was
oligarchical, like that of Venice.

This endured but little more than a twelvemonth. In May, 1631, the
freemen met again, “after corn was set,” and revoked a part of the
authority of which they had been too lavish. The government was
curbed by a reservation to the commons of the right to make such
annual changes as the majority should desire.[723]

“At this same time a law was established pregnant with evil, and with
good. ‘To the end that the body of the commons may be preserved of
honest and good men’—so runs the old text—‘it is ordered and agreed
that, for the time to come, no man shall be admitted to the freedom
of this body politic but such as are members of some of the churches
within the corporate limit.’ This rule stood unchanged until after
the Restoration. Thus was the elective franchise narrowed. The polity
was a sort of theocracy; God himself, speaking through the lips of
his elect, was to govern his people. An aristocracy was founded; but
not on wealth, or blood, or rank. The servant, the bondman, might
be a member of the church, and therefore a freeman of the Company.
Other states have limited the possession of political rights to
the opulent, to freeholders, to the first-born. The colonists of
Massachusetts, scrupulously refusing to the clergy the least shadow
of political power, established the reign of the visible church, a
commonwealth of the chosen people in covenant with God.”[724]

But we must not let the boldness and presumption of this act blind
us to its inconsistency and its evil tendency. If men might enjoy
the franchise only by uniting with the church, ambitious men, wicked
men, might become hypocrites, that they might get power. When
church-membership became the road to political authority, there was
danger that audacious and unchastened interlopers might usurp the
government, as they did in England under Whitgift, and Williams, and
Laud.

This law was an inconsistency, because it was a radical departure
from the primal principle of Massachusetts ecclesiasticism, the
separation of church and state, and the complete independence of the
individual churches.[725] Now it was affirmed that the state must
unfold within the church.[726] Indeed, a kind of state church was
developed.[727] This is evident from two facts. The clergy were to be
supported, not merely by the contributions of actual church-members,
but it was decreed that “all who are instructed in the word of
God must contribute for those by whom they are taught in all good
things.”[728] The government was empowered to curb ecclesiastical
errorists; and “if any church should grow schismatical, rending
itself from the communion of other churches, or should walk
incorrigibly and obstinately in any corrupt way, contrary to the word
of God, in such case the civil magistrate was directed to put forth
his coercive power.”[729]

Thus individual religious independence, child of the Protestant
principle, was strangled. Our fathers honestly erred. Purity of
religious worship was their goal; and in order to that, they desired
the unclogged enjoyment of what they esteemed the divinely-appointed
means of grace. Their model was the Mosaic code. They did not
remember that God had superseded it by a new dispensation.

The Pilgrims were wise and devout men, and in most respects they were
a century in advance of their generation; but as a body, they did not
understand the golden rule of toleration. Divorcing church and state
in theory, in practice they married them.

“It is folly,” remarks an English scholar who has himself rehearsed
the story of the Pilgrims, “for either British or American encomiasts
to seek to disguise this fact. It is on record. All may read it.
Impartial history is compelled to acknowledge that very few, even of
the foremost thinkers and moralists of the seventeenth century, had
any just conception of that grand principle, the outgrowth of the New
Testament, which acknowledges God as the sole Judge of human faith,
and interferes with opinions or creeds only when they run to seed
in riot, and develope consequences inimical to social virtue and
political order.”[730]

But notwithstanding the fact that the Pilgrims erected a theocracy,
and by conferring upon the civil arm jurisdiction in religion, opened
the way to unjust persecution, it is also true that they “builded
better than they knew;” for the principles they professed eventually
forced their children to a broader platform. They secured the future.
They were the acorn; let the nineteenth century be the oak.

      “For we doubt not, through the ages
        One increasing purpose runs;
      And the thoughts of men are widened
        With the process of the suns.”




CHAPTER XXV.

INCIDENTS.

      “He cometh unto you with a tale which holdeth
      Children from play and old men from the chimney-corner.”
                                             SIR PHILIP SIDNEY.


The life of the Pilgrim Fathers in these first years of their
settlement was full of incident. They could not assent to Solomon’s
_dictum_, that “there is nothing new under the sun.” Here they found
a new heaven and a new earth; all things were strange. Their only
acquaintance in the western wilds was God; and they never wearied of
investigation. Their first move, after thanking God for preservation
and a safe voyage, was to explore. They loved to “guess” out enigmas.
They were always analyzing the soil, and speculating on the prospects
of storms, and dickering with the Indians. From the homeliest and
most commonplace circumstances, they did not disdain to gather wisdom
or “to point a moral and adorn a tale.” They had a teachable spirit,
and were ardent students in the school of nature.

The unbroken forest especially possessed an unfading charm in their
eyes. They were fascinated both by its freedom and its vastness; for
in England, whatever patches of wood existed were enclosed in the
parks of the exclusive nobles, and a bitter code of game-laws barred
all entrance. But while a source of pleasure, it was also often a
source of anxiety.

One pleasant afternoon Winthrop took his gun and strolled into the
woods for a short walk. He lost his way, and night overtook him.
Kindling a fire, he prepared to “camp out.” He spent the hours till
dawn in walking up and down and “singing psalms.” Next morning he
reached home safely, much to the delight of his neighbors, who had
passed the entire night in the forest, hallooing and shooting off
guns, in the hope that the lost governor might hear them.[731]

On another occasion one of the settlers lost a calf. Hearing the
wolves howl in the night, he got up and shot off his musket several
times in rapid succession, to frighten them away. The wind carried
the report to all the settlements; every one was aroused; drums
were beaten; messengers were despatched to spread the alarm; every
bush was taken for an Indian. “But next morning the calf was found
unharmed, the wolves and the colonists being well frightened. The
former had disappeared, and the latter went ‘merrily to breakfast,’
esteeming their alarm a good joke, and quaintly rallying one another
on the ‘great fear that had come upon them, making all their bones
to shake.’”[732] But their fright was not foolish; it was bred of
caution and a knowledge of their situation. They remembered with old
Ben Johnson, that

                    “A valiant man
      Ought not to undergo or tempt a danger,
      But worthily, and by selected ways;
      He undertakes by reason, not by chance.”

At Plymouth the Pilgrims had been longer in America, and the first
flush of initial excitement had abated. The pulse-beat there was
calmer, for they were more learned in woodcraft than the later
comers. Yet even at Plymouth the jog-trot of events was occasionally
broken. There is a traditionary anecdote, illustrative of the danger
of one gentleman’s commissioning another to do his wooing for him,
which doubtless created an unwonted stir in the sedate old town at
the time. It seems that Miles Standish had buried his wife some time
after his arrival in New England; on which he thus communed with
himself:

    “‘’Tis not good for a man to be alone, say the Scriptures.
    This I have said before; and again and again I repeat it;
    Every hour in the day I think it, and feel it, and say it.
    Since Rose Standish died, my life has been weary and dreary.
    Sick at heart have I been, beyond the healing of friendship.’”

So Standish resolved to wed again. He had already taken a fancy to
Miss Priscilla Mullins, one of the sweetest of the Puritan maidens;
and he said:

    “‘Oft in my lonely hours have I thought of this maiden, Priscilla.
    She is alone in the world. Her father, and mother, and brother,
    Died in the winter together. I saw her going and coming,
    Now to the grave of the dead, and now to the bed of the dying;
    Patient, courageous, and strong, and said to myself, that if ever
    There were angels on earth, as there are angels in heaven,
    Two have I seen and known; and the angel whose name is Priscilla
    Holds in my desolate life the place which the other abandoned.’”

Therefore the captain resolved to woo her. But,

    “Being a coward in this, though valiant enough for the most part,”

he decided to do it by proxy; so he selected John Alden, his
secretary—

    “Fair-haired, azure-eyed, with delicate Saxon complexion,
    Having the dew of youth, and the beauty thereof, as the captives
    Whom St. Gregory saw, and exclaimed, ‘Not Angles, but angels.’
    Youngest of all was he of the men who came in the Mayflower.”

“John,” said he,

    “‘Go to the damsel Priscilla, the loveliest maiden of Plymouth;
    Say that the blunt old captain, a man not of words, but of actions,
    Offers his hand and heart—the hand and heart of a soldier.
    You, who are bred as a scholar, can say it in elegant language,
    Such as you read in your books of the pleadings and wooings of
          lovers;
    Such as you think best adapted to win the heart of a maiden.’”

Now it happened that poor John Alden was himself enamoured of the
lovely Puritan maiden, and he listened to this request aghast. But
Standish, unaware of this fact, urged the unwelcome mission on his
blushing scribe, and demanded his acceptance of it in the name of
friendship. Alden determined to perform the mission, and to do
it faithfully; so he hied him through the forest to Priscilla’s
dwelling. Entering without ado, he at once broached the subject,
and flung forth a glowing record of his master’s virtues. Priscilla
heard him awhile in ominous silence, and then interrupted him by
this query:

    “‘If the great captain of Plymouth is so very eager to wed me,
    Why does he not come himself, and take the trouble to woo me?
    If I am not worth the wooing, I surely am not worth the winning.’”

Alden tried to explain and smooth the matter;

    “But as he warmed and glowed in his simple and eloquent language,
    Quite forgetful of self, and full of praise of his rival,
    Archly the maiden smiled, and, with eyes overrunning with laughter,
    Said in a tremulous voice, ‘Why don’t you speak for yourself,
          John?’”

The bewildered but happy secretary at once took the hint. Returning
to Standish, he reported his failure. Then he _did_ “speak for
himself,” and to such purpose that he was soon married. There were no
horses in the wilderness; so after the nuptials,

    “Alden, the thoughtful, the careful, so happy, so proud of Priscilla,
    Brought out a snow-white bull, obeying the hand of his master,
    Led by a cord that was tied to an iron ring in its nostrils,
    Covered with crimson cloth, and a cushion placed for a saddle.
    She should not walk, he said, through the dust and heat of the
          noonday;
    Nay, she should ride like a queen, not plod along like a peasant.
    Somewhat alarmed at first, but reassured by the others,
    Placing her hand on the cushion, her foot in the hand of her husband,
    Gayly, with joyous laugh, Priscilla mounted her palfrey.
    Like a picture it seemed of the primitive, pastoral ages,
    Fresh with the youth of the world, and recalling Rebecca and Isaac;
    Old, and yet ever new, and simple and beautiful always,
    Love immortal and young, in the endless succession of lovers.
    So through the Plymouth woods passed onward the bridal
          procession.”[733]

But sometimes events of ruder and less joyous significance came to
stir a ripple on the placid sea of frontier life. Even among these
Pilgrims there were laws to be enforced and bad men to be curbed.
Thomas Morton was one. This irrepressible torment was once more
engaged at “Merry-Mount” in selling guns and “fire-water” to the
Indians; nor did he hesitate to “shoot hail-shot into them,” because
they refused to bring him a canoe in which to cross the river. He
was apprehended on their complaint, and because he “discredited the
whites.” His den was burned in the presence of the natives whom he
had maltreated; and he himself, after being for a while “set in the
bilboes,” was sent once more a prisoner to England.[734]

This occurred at Boston. At Plymouth a still more emphatic and
sombre scene was enacted. John Billington, always a pest, of whom
Bradford had said, “He is a knave, and so will live and die,”[735]
was convicted of wilful murder. Conference was held with the most
judicious men of Massachusetts Bay as to the disposition to be made
of him. Winthrop and the rest favored his execution, basing the right
to inflict that penalty, not so much on the English common law as on
the code of Moses: “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his
blood be shed.”[736] Under this decision Billington was hung; and
this was the first capital punishment ever inflicted in New England.

These magisterial rigors did not suffice to quell the evil-doers; for
shortly afterwards Philip Radcliff ventured to revile the “powers
that be;” nor did he scruple to asperse the colonial churches. For
this misdemeanor he was condemned to lose his ears. This did not
subdue him; so he was whipped and banished. All which processes did
not serve to increase his affection for the Pilgrims. Landing in
England, he did them what mischief he could.[737]

Then came another rogue. This was Sir Christopher Gardiner, “one of
those mysterious visitors whose appearance in remote settlements so
easily stimulates the imaginations of men of more staid habits and
better mutual acquaintance.”[738] It was not known who he was, nor
whence he came, nor why. It has been conjectured that he was a spy of
Sir Ferdinand Gorges and other foes of Puritanism in England.[739]
Bradford says, “He came into these parts on pretence of forsaking the
world, and to live a private life in a godly course. He had been a
great traveller, was a Knight of the Holy Sepulchre, and a relative
of that Gardiner who was so bitter a persecutor under “Bloody Mary.”
Now he avowed himself penitent for his past ill life, offered to
join the churches here, and said he was willing to apply himself to
any employment.”[740]

Soon, however, he fell under suspicion at Massachusetts Bay. He
was suspected of living in concubinage with “a comely young woman
whom he had brought over with him,” and whom he called his cousin,
“after the Italian manner.” Being cited to answer these charges,
he decamped. Soon Winthrop received letters which showed that this
“knight” had “two wives living in London.”[741] An order was issued
for his apprehension. Eventually he took refuge at Plymouth. Here he
chanced to drop his diary; and in this was found a “memorial showing
what day he was reconciled to the pope and the church of Rome, and in
what university he took his scapula and such and such degrees.”[742]
So Bradford sent the unmasked Jesuit, with the unfortunate diary,
to Winthrop;[743] who, in his turn, presently sent him back “to the
two wives in Old England, that they might search him further.”[744]
On reaching the island, he was not restrained of his liberty, but
roaming at large, soon found out the enemies of the colonies; and he,
with Radcliff, actively engaged in intrigues to its prejudice.[745]

“So difficult was it,” observes Elliot, “to get away from the
wickedness of Satan, who, even in this virgin land, and among these
godly Puritans, would thrust himself in where his company was in
no way wanted. But now one more rascal was exported and sent home,
where, with his two wives and his ‘Italian manner,’ and his popery,
he would not poison Massachusetts.”[746]

Yet, spite of these isolated instances of riot, insubordination,
and disturbance, the Puritan settlements were in the main models
of industry, sobriety, and good order. “I have read,” says Cotton
Mather, “a printed sermon which was preached before ‘both Houses
of Parliament, the lord-mayor and aldermen of London, and the
Westminster assembly of divines,’ the greatest audience then in the
world; and in that sermon the preacher had this passage: ‘I have
lived in a country where, in seven years, I never saw a beggar, nor
heard an oath, nor looked upon a drunkard.’ That Utopia was New
England.”[747] Mather adds sadly: “But they who go hence now must
tell another story.”[748]

What was the secret of such prosperity? When Demosthenes was asked
what it was that so long preserved Athens in a flourishing state, he
replied, “The orators are men of learning and wisdom; the magistrates
do justice; the citizens are quiet, and the laws are kept among them
all.”[749] ’Twas a glorious record for the immortal city, and the
same secret gave the settlements of the Pilgrim fathers substantial
peace and happy order.

Winthrop relates that once “at Watertown there was, in the view of
divers witnesses, a great combat betwixt a mouse and a snake; and,
after a long fight, the mouse prevailed and killed the snake. The
pastor of Boston, Mr. Wilson, a very sincere, holy man, hearing of
it, gave this interpretation: the mouse was a poor contemptible
people, brought by God hither, who should overcome Satan here, and
dispossess him of his kingdom. Upon the same occasion he added:
‘I dreamed before coming to this country, that I was here and saw
a church rise out of the earth, which gradually expanded into a
colossal shape’—as pray God ours may.”[750]

Winthrop’s prayer seemed even then in the way to exact fulfilment.
Many earnest, devoted Pilgrims, continued to pour into New England.
In 1631, Eliot, the famous apostle to the Indians, landed at
Salem.[751] Full of love and full of hope, he soon entered upon those
labors which have immortalized his name on earth, and enrolled it on
the heavenly records as a teacher and benefactor of his race.[752] A
little earlier, Roger Williams was wafted to these shores, where, in
his May of youth, he found a glorious destiny awaited him.[753]

The Pilgrims made the best of every thing—saw only the good of the
land. Even the climate of New England did not lack encomiasts. Wood
had been “carefully hatched,” yet in England disease sapped his
life. While in America, he wrote: “Scarce do I know what belongs to a
day’s sickness.”[754]

An English churchman, who had not Wood’s motive for liking New
England, saw with different eyes: “The transitions from heat to cold
are short, sudden, and paralyzing. We are sometimes frying, and at
others freezing; and as some men die at their labor in the field of
heat, so some in winter are frozen to death by the cold.”[755] No
doubt.

      “Oh, who can hold a fire in his hand
      By thinking of the frosty Caucasus?”

The Puritans saw New England as the refuge of the godly, and looking
at it through the mirage of sentiment, its sky rivalled that of Italy
in soft beauty. To the churchman it seemed a rugged wilderness in
very deed. It was a difference of standpoint.

But mild or severe, the Pilgrims loved this adopted mother on whose
breast they lay, and their settlements began to increase in number.
A brood of eight little towns, or _townlets_, now nestled under the
wings of the Massachusetts charter;[756] while Plymouth already began
to think of equipping a new colony,[757] and annexing the Connecticut.

The western wilds were no longer tenantless, or what is equivalent
to that, held only by prowling barbarians. The French, who had been
hovering over the coast ever since their rout from L’Acadie, in 1613,
by Sir Samuel Argall, had recently acquired Canada by purchase.[758]
The wise statesmanship of Richelieu had bought from Charles I.—busy
in a fatal attempt to enforce ceremonialism,

      “Rending the book in struggles for the binding,”—

one of the finest provinces in the known world for fishing, masts,
harbors.[759] Already the Latin provinces had begun to string a chain
of citadels westward along the banks of the St. Lawrence and the
borders of the lakes to the valley of the Mississippi,

      ——“toppling round the dreary west
      A looming bastion fringed with fire.”

The Spaniard was in Florida.[760] The Dutchman smoked his pipe on the
banks of the Hudson.[761] English adventurers held Virginia.[762]
The Pilgrims had clutched New England. Labor was vocal on every
hill-side; the whole continent began to echo to the civilizing stroke
of the woodman’s axe.




CHAPTER XXVI.

THE ADVANCE OF CIVILIZATION.

                “So work the honey-bees—
      Creatures that, by a rule of nature, teach
      The art of order to a peopled kingdom.
      They have a head and officers of sorts,
      Where some, like magistrates, correct at home;
      Others, like merchants, venture trade abroad;
      Others, like soldiers, armed in their stings,
      Make boot upon the summer’s velvet buds;
      Which pillage they with merry march bring home
      To the tent royal of their emperor,
      Who, busied in his tent, surveys
      The singing mason building roofs of gold;
      The civil citizens kneading up the honey;
      The poor mechanic porters crowding in
      Their heavy burdens at his narrow gate;
      The sad-eyed justice, with his surly hum,
      Delivering o’er to executors pale
      The lazy, yawning drone.”
                                 SHAKSPEARE’S _Henry V_.


From the year 1630—before that, but more perceptibly after—the
advancing march of civilization carried all before it in New England.
There were, indeed, occasional oscillations in its career of triumph;
but always, when its genius seemed to balk, it ended by bearing off a
trophy.

At Plymouth, all the social and religious forces had “settled down
into fixed ways.” Justice was administered, order was preserved,
education was provided for.[763] The old town began to prosper. The
busy hum of men and the laughter of successful trade echoed through
the streets; and Bradford wrote, “Though the partners have been
plunged into great engagements and oppressed with unjust debts,
yet the Lord has prospered our traffic so that our labor is not
for naught. The people of this plantation begin to grow in their
outward estates, by reason of the flowing of many into the province,
especially into the settlements on Massachusetts Bay; by which means
corn and cattle have risen to a great price, whereby some are much
enriched, while commodities grow plentiful.”[764]

As property and a sense of security increased, the Plymouth Pilgrims
began to show a disposition to disperse, for the convenience
of better pasturage and ampler farm-room. So the three hundred
inhabitants, esteeming themselves crowded, separated, and a new
church and hamlet were planted on the north shore of the shallow
harbor.[765] “The town in which all had lived very compactly till
now,” observes the old Plymouth governor somewhat ruefully, “was left
very thin by this move.” In Bradford’s eyes, it was the beginning of
a movement pregnant with evil.[766] He thought, somewhat plausibly,
that strength and safety lay in the close union of the scattered
colonists. Yet that idea was fatal to colonization, and bolder
theorists determined to educate communities by responsibility, the
best of school-masters. They said,

      “Out of this nettle, danger, we pluck this flower, safety.”

For several years the church at Plymouth had enjoyed the
ministrations of an ordained clergyman. That Separatist, Mr. Smith,
who had crossed the water with Higginson and Skelton in 1629,
perceiving that he was looked upon with some suspicion by his brother
Pilgrims on account of his “come-outism,” an aroma which they
were not then prepared to exhale, went immediately to Nantasket,
sojourning there “with some stragglers” for several months.[767] One
day a Plymouth boat happened to touch at that port, whereupon Mr.
Smith “earnestly besought the crew to give him and his, with such
things as could be readily carried, passage to Plymouth, as he had
heard that there was likelihood that he might there find house-room
until he could determine where to settle; for he said he was weary of
the uncouth place in which he found himself, where his house was so
poor that neither himself nor his goods could keep dry.”[768]

He was brought to Plymouth, where he “exercised his gifts”—which
were rather “low”[769]—being “kindly entertained and sheltered,”
and finally “chosen into the ministry;”[770] so that Brewster once
again found respite. A little later, Smith’s labors and gifts were
supplemented by Roger Williams—why and how long we shall in due time
discover.

In 1632, an event of no little interest occurred. Governor Winthrop
went to Plymouth to exchange fraternal greetings with Governor
Bradford, and mutual inquiries of “What cheer?” were passed. Winthrop
has related the incident. Let us open his record: “The governor
of Massachusetts Bay, with Mr. Wilson, pastor of Boston, and some
others, went aboard the ‘Lion’ on the 25th of October, and thence
Captain Pierce carried then to Wessagusset, where is now a prosperous
settlement of a graver sort than the old ones. The next morning the
governor and his company went on foot to Plymouth, and came thither
within the evening. The governor of Plymouth, Mr. William Bradford,
a very discreet and grave man, with Elder Brewster and some others,
came forth and met them without the town, and conducted them to
the governor’s house, where they were very kindly entertained, and
feasted every day at several houses.

“On the Lord’s Day there was a sacrament, of which they partook;
and in the afternoon Mr. Roger Williams, according to the Plymouth
custom, propounded a question, to which the pastor, Mr. Ralph Smith,
spoke briefly; then Mr. Williams prophesied;[771] and after, the
governor of Plymouth spoke to the question; after him, the elder;
then some two or three more of the congregation. Then the elder
desired the governor of Massachusetts Bay and Mr. Wilson to speak to
it, which they did. When this was done, Mr. Fuller, their surgeon,
put the congregation in mind of their duty of contribution; whereupon
the governors and all the rest went down to the deacon’s seat, and
put into the box, and then returned.

“On Wednesday, the 31st of October, at about five o’clock in the
morning, the governor and his company came out of Plymouth; whose
governor, pastor, elder, and others, accompanied them nearly half
a mile in the dark. Lieutenant Holmes, one of their chiefest men,
with two companions and Governor Bradford’s mare, came along with
them to a great swamp, about ten miles. When they came to the great
river,[772] they were carried over one by one by Luddam, their
guide, as they had been when they came, the stream being very
strong, and up to the crotch; so the governor called that passage
‘Luddam’s Ford.’ Thence they came to a place called ‘Hue’s Cross.’
The governor being displeased at the name, because such things might
hereafter give the papists occasion to say that their religion was
first planted in these parts, changed the name, and called it ‘Hue’s
Folly.’ So they came that evening to Wessagussett, where they were
bountifully entertained, as before; and the next day all came safe to
Boston.”[773]

This was the first interchange of gubernatorial civilities ever known
in America. It was certainly unique. One governor lent the other
his mare to ride home upon, gave him a guide on whose shoulders he
could be ferried across a rapid stream, and entertained his guest by
beseeching him to “prophesy” on the Sabbath, and by gently reminding
him that the contribution-box was empty.

Such was the homely, hearty, frank hospitality of the Pilgrim fathers
over two hundred years ago. Such were the manners and customs of New
England when Brewster “prophesied” and when Winthrop and Bradford
governed. Looking back across two centuries, we smile; but perhaps,
with all its super-refinement, modern hospitality is no whit in
advance of that which contented Winthrop, and of which it may be said,

      “There was no winter in’t; an autumn ’twas,
      That grew the more by reaping.”

In this same year of Winthrop’s visit to Plymouth, the Pilgrims had
their first boundary quarrel with the French. The extent of Acadia to
the west was long a subject of dispute.[774] The lands which bordered
on the rival boundaries became a “debatable” ground. Bradford and
his coadjutors had erected a trading station on the Penobscot. This
was now assaulted, and “despoiled of five hundred pounds worth of
beaver-skins, besides a store of coats, rugs, blankets, biscuits;”
and insult was added to injury; for the cavalier Frenchmen bade the
tenants of the plundered post tell the English that “some gentlemen
of the Isle of Rhé had been there to leave their compliments.”[775]

This taunt was not instantly responded to. Indeed, it was put out at
interest, and remained unsettled until the next century, when these
“religious English” gave the intruders indefinite leave of absence
from Canada, and settled the boundary question by annexing the whole
territory.

As an offset to their loss on the eastern rivers, the Plymouth
Pilgrims began to push their enterprise towards the west. “Rumor,
with its thousand tongues,” had frequently hymned the praises of
the Eldorado of Connecticut. The phlegmatic Dutchman, so cold on
other themes, kindled on this, and actually took his pipe out of his
mouth, that he might speak more freely. The taciturn Indian melted
into profuse and graphic eloquence when he painted the beauty and
fertility of these western bottom-lands.[776]

These glowing reports at length won the Pilgrims, tied at first by
the necessity of overcoming a contiguous wilderness, to scout in that
region. Parties visited the banks of the “Fresh river,” as the Dutch
styled it,[777] or the _Connecticut_, as it soon came to be called,
“not without profit,” finding it “a fine place both for planting and
for trade.”[778]

In 1633, Bradford and Winslow, who had himself bathed in the waters
of the silvery river, went up to Boston to solicit from Winthrop
a united effort to colonize the Connecticut valley. In the first
spring after Winthrop’s landing, a Connecticut sachem, expelled
from his hunting-grounds by the prowess of the Pequods, a fierce
and numerous tribe, as powerful in New England as the “Six Nations”
were in New York,[779] had come across the country to offer the
pale-faces a settlement on the banks of the beautiful river, together
with the alliance of his warriors and a yearly tribute of corn and
beaver.[780] The Indian negotiator was well received, but Winthrop
declined to accede to his request, since, “on account of their so
recent arrival, they were not fit to undertake it.”[781] The Plymouth
diplomats received the same answer; and returning home, they resolved
to push into the Connecticut forests unassisted.[782]

Meantime the Dutch, hearing of this purpose and preparation, decided
to preoccupy the land, and so, by antedating the Pilgrim settlement,
claim the soil by priority.[783] They did indeed purchase, from a
Pequod chief, a spot of land where Hartford now stands, and erecting
a “slight fort” in June, 1633, planted cannon, and forbade any
Englishman to pass.[784]

Undeterred by threats, the Pilgrims perfected their arrangements,
and in October sailed by the “Good Hope” of the Dutch, after a
parley and mutual threats[785]—in which they were struck only by a
few Dutch oaths—and planted at Windsor the first English colony in
Connecticut.[786] A twelvemonth later, a company of seventy Dutchmen
quitted New Amsterdam with the avowed purpose of expelling the
Pilgrim pioneers. But after observing the spirit and preparation
of the little garrison, they concluded to end their war-trail in a
reconciliation, and retired without violence.[787]

In the midst of their hardy enterprise, while the door of
civilization was just ajar in Connecticut, an infectious fever came
to scourge the Pilgrims. “It pleased the Lord to visit those at
Plymouth,” says Bradford, “with a severe sickness this year, of which
many fell sick, and upwards of twenty, men, women, and children,
died; among the rest, several of those who had recently come over
from Leyden; and at the last, Samuel Fuller, their surgeon and
physician. Before his death, he had helped many and comforted all;
as in his profession, so otherwise, being a deacon in the church and
a godly man, forward to do good, he was much missed. All were much
lamented, and the sadness caused the people to humble themselves
and seek God; and towards winter it seemed good to him to stay the
sickness.

“This disease swept away many of the Indians in that vicinage; and
the spring before, especially all the month of May, there was such a
quantity of strange flies, like wasps in size, or bumblebees, coming
out of holes in the ground, spreading through the woods, and eating
up every green thing, as caused the forest to ring with their hum
ready to deafen the hearers.[788] They have not been heard or seen
since; but the Indians then said their presence foretokened sickness,
which indeed came in June, July, August, and the chief heat of
summer.”[789]

At this period in colonial history, the tide of emigration seemed
to flow at one time and to ebb at another. It was governed by the
increase or the slack of persecution in England. In 1630, the date
of the alienation of the provincial government, it was at the
flood; in the succeeding year it actually receded. “Climate and the
sufferings of the settlers were against free emigration; and besides,
Morton, Radcliff, and Gardiner, were busy in the island against the
colonists. In 1631, only ninety persons came over. But in 1632, the
sluggish current quickened, and again set westward. Spite of threats,
the Pilgrims had not been molested, and as Laud’s pesterings grew in
virulence, many ships then prepared to start, and some of Britain’s
noblest sons were about to desert her; among them Lord Say, Lord
Rich, the ‘good Lord Brooke,’ Hazlerigge, Pym, Hampden, and Oliver
Cromwell. But on the 31st of February, 1633, the king, in council,
issued an order to stay the flotilla.”[790]

’Tis a high fact, and shows upon what slight hinges the weightiest
events turn. The very foremost chiefs of the maturing revolution were
at this time not only anxious to emigrate, but had actually embarked
for America. Well would it have been for Charles, had he said to the
disaffected Puritans,

      “Stand not upon the order of your going,
      But go at once.”

Had some good genius nudged the elbow of the king, on that critical
morning when his breathless messenger was hastening to stay the
emigrant flotilla, urged him to say Yes, to its sailing, and foretold
the future, how eagerly the fated monarch would have caught the cue,
and torn that parchment, so pregnant with mischief, which forbade
their departure; and offered the immortal junto jewels of gold and
precious stones as an inducement to be gone, and cried, “Egypt is
glad,” when they set out.

But God made the wrath of man praise him. He struck the besotted
court with judicial blindness. Neither Charles, nor Strafford, nor
Laud could read the hand-writing on the wall. They could not foresee
events which were ere long to

                “Fright the isle
      From her propriety.”

These “fanatics” were not needed in New England. Their fellows had
already commenced to build, at Plymouth and at Massachusetts Bay, for
God and liberty. So they were detained to organize “resistance to
tyrants” in the senate-house, and to give the arbitrary principle its
death-blow at Naseby and Long Marston Moor.

But though the court, frightened at the prodigious extent of an
emigration which threatened to depopulate the kingdom, had fulminated
a decree against colonization, the departure of Pilgrims was only
hindered, not stayed. They continued to cross the water until, in
1640, this pattering emigration had rained four thousand families and
upwards of twenty thousand settlers into New England.[791] Then for
a few glorious years the exodus ceased. The prospect of reform in
England caused men to remain at home, “in the hope of seeing a new
world” without passing the Atlantic.

In the summer of this same year which witnessed the detention of
Cromwell, and Pym, and Hampden, and Hazlerigge, and Lord Brooke,
a ship was freighted for America; and with two hundred other
passengers, it bore to these shores three men who became as famous
on this side the water as the revolutionists did on the other—John
Haynes, John Cotton, and Thomas Hooker.[792] On board the “Griffin”
at this same time was another eminent minister, Mr. Stone; “and this
glorious triumvirate coming together,” remarks Cotton Mather, “made
the poor people in the wilderness say that God had supplied them
with what would in some sort answer their three great necessities;
_Cotton_ for their clothing, _Hooker_ for their fishing, and _Stone_
for their building.”[793]

Haynes, afterwards governor both of Massachusetts and Connecticut,
was “a man of very large estate, and still larger affections;
of a ‘heavenly’ mind and a spotless life; of rare sagacity and
accurate but unassuming judgment; by nature tolerant; ever a friend
to freedom, ever conciliating peace. He was an able legislator,
and dear to the Pilgrims by his benevolence and his disinterested
conduct.”[794]

Cotton and Hooker speedily became the most revered spiritual
teachers of two commonwealths; Cotton shaped and toned Massachusetts
ecclesiasticism; Hooker was the Moses of Connecticut. Both were
well born; both had been clergymen of the English church; both had
been silenced for non-conformity; both were consummate scholars—in
Mather’s strong phrase, _walking libraries_; both had won wide fame
at home, which, like Joseph’s bough, “ran over the wall” of the
Atlantic ocean, and made their names familiar in every cabin on the
eastern coast.

“Cotton was acute and subtile. The son of a Puritan lawyer, he had
been eminent at Cambridge as a student. He was quick in the nice
perception of distinctions, and pliant in dialectics; in manner
persuasive rather than commanding; skilled in the fathers and the
schoolmen, but finding all their wisdom compactly stored in Calvin;
deeply devout by nature as well as habit from childhood; hating
heresy and still precipitately eager to prevent evil actions by
suppressing ill opinions, yet verging in opinion towards progress
in civil and religious freedom. He was the avowed foe of democracy,
which he feared as the blind despotism of animal instincts in the
multitude. Yet he opposed hereditary power in all its forms; desiring
a government of moral opinion, according to the laws of moral equity,
and ‘claiming the ultimate resolution for the whole body of the
people.’”[795]

Cotton was, if not the originator, then the main mover of the
theocratical idea. “When he came,” says Mather, “there were divers
churches in America, but the country was in a perplexed and divided
state; points of church order he settled with exactness; and
inasmuch as no little of an Athenian democracy was in the mould of
the colonial government, by the royal charter which was then acted
upon, he effectually recommended that none should be electors or
elected except such as were visible subjects of Christ personally
confederated in the church. In this way, and in others, he propounded
an endeavor after a theocracy, as near as might be to that which was
the glory of Israel.”[796]

Cotton was a man of much personal humility. “He learned the lesson
of Gregory, ‘It is better, many times, to fly from an injury by
silence, than to overcome it by replying;’ and he used that practice
of Grynæus, ‘To revenge wrongs by Christian taciturnity.’ On one
occasion he had modestly replied to one that would much talk and
croak of his insight into the revelations: ‘Brother, I must confess
myself to want _light_ in these mysteries.’ The man went home and
sent Cotton a _pound of candles_.”[797]

He was iron in his doctrines, but personally he had the _nimia
humilitas_ which Luther sometimes lamented in Staupitz; so much so,
indeed, that Mather marvels that “the hardest flints should not have
been broken on such a soft bag of cotton.”[798]

Cotton, on landing, in 1633, at once assumed that leading position to
which his intellect entitled him, and his pulpit at Boston speedily
became a leading power in Massachusetts.

Hooker was settled, during his sojourn in the Bay plantation, at
Cambridge.[799] He was a man “of vast endowments, a strong will,
and an energetic mind. Ingenuous in temper, he was open in his
professions. He had been trained to benevolence by the discipline of
affliction, and to tolerance by his refuge from home persecution in
Holland. He was choleric in temper, yet gentle in his affections;
firm in faith, yet readily yielding to the power of reason; the
peer of the reformers, without their harshness; the devoted apostle
to the humble and the poor, severe only to the proud, mild in his
soothings of a wounded spirit, glowing with the raptures of devotion,
and kindling with the messages of redeeming love. His eye, voice,
gesture, and whole frame, were animated with the living vigor of
heart-felt religion; he was public-spirited and lavishly charitable;
and ‘though persecution and banishment had awaited him as one wave
follows another,’ he was ever serenely blessed with ‘a glorious peace
of soul’—fixed in his trust in Providence, and in his adhesion to
the cause of advancing civilization, which he cherished always, even
while it remained to him a mystery.

“This was he whom, for his abilities and services, his contemporaries
placed ‘in the first rank’ of men; praising him as the one rich
pearl with which ‘Europe more than repaid America for the treasures
from her coast.’ The people to whom Hooker had ministered in England
had preceded him in exile; as he landed, they crowded about him
with their cheery welcome. ‘Now I live,’ exclaimed he, as with open
arms he embraced his flock, ‘now I live if ye stand fast in the
Lord.’”[800]

Hooker was an apostle of great boldness and of singular charity.
He had fine tact and a habit of discrimination. He had a saying
that “some were to be saved by compassion, others, by fear, being
pulled out of the fire.” He knew how to reach the heart; once, when
a settlement twenty leagues from his habitation was suffering from
hunger, he sent a ship-load of corn to relieve the sufferers, thus
demonstrating his Christianity by what Chrysostom calls “unanswerable
syllogisms.”[801]

Whitfield once said of him: “Hooker is one in whom the utmost
learning and wisdom are tempered by the finest zeal, holiness, and
watchfulness; for, though naturally a man of choleric temper, and
possessing a mighty vigor and fervor of spirit, which as occasion
served was wondrous useful to him, yet he had as much government of
his choler as a man has over a mastiff dog in a chain; he could let
out his dog or pull him in, as he pleased.”[802]

Mather records that some one once, seeing Hooker’s heroism and
persistent goodness, said: “He is a man who, while doing his Master’s
work, would put a king in his pocket.”[803]

Of this there was an instance. It chanced once that on a fast-day
kept throughout England, the judges on their circuit stopped over at
Chelmsford, where Hooker was to preach. Here, before a vast audience,
and in the presence of the judges, he freely inveighed against the
sins of England, and foretold the plagues that would result. Charles
had recently married a papist princess. The undaunted apostle in
his prayer besought God to set in the heart of the king what His own
mouth had spoken by his prophet Malachi, as he distinctly quoted it:
“An abomination is committed; Judah hath married the daughter of a
strange god; the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this.” Though
the judges turned to and noted the passage thus cited, Hooker came to
no trouble; but it was not long before England did.[804]

Hooker and Cotton have been well called the Luther and Melancthon of
New England; each became the oracle of his plantation.

And now “the prophets in exile began to see the true forms of the
house.” They already held the soil by a twofold title: the royal
charter had granted it to the patentees called the “Massachusetts
Company,” “to be held by them, their heirs and assigns, in free and
common soccage; paying, in lieu of all services, one fifth of the
gold and silver that should be found.”[805] And this vestment the
conscientious Pilgrims had been careful to supplement by actual
purchase from the aborigines.[806]

Every day the old trading corporation assumed new prerogatives,
verging more and more towards a representative democracy. Winthrop
was timid, and doubted the legality of this popular movement.
Cotton was alarmed; and on one election day he essayed to check
the democratic tendency by preaching to the assembled freemen
against rotation in office, arguing that an honest magistrate
held his position as a proprietor holds his freehold. But the
voters were deaf to the fears of the government, and careless, for
once, of the decision of the pulpit. Dudley succeeded Winthrop
in the gubernatorial chair;[807] legislation was intrusted to
representatives chosen by the several towns of Massachusetts
Bay;[808] it was decreed that the freemen at large should be
convened only for the election of magistrates.[809] Thus, in 1634,
the electors exercised their “absolute power,” and “established a
reformation of such things as they judged to be amiss in the model of
government.”[810]

Now the colonial authority was divided between two branches. The
representatives were the legislative, the magistrates were the
executive arm. Both sat together in the outset, forming what
was called “The General Court.” Finally, the magistrates grew
discontented; as the towns increased, so did the representatives; and
they found themselves outvoted; so they pressed for separate houses,
each with a veto on the other. It was granted. The _deputies_ and the
_council_ were inaugurated;[811] and these, under the Republic, have
become the Representatives and the Senate.

Next, a law was framed which forbade arbitrary taxation; it was
decreed that “the deputies alone were competent to grant land or
raise money.”[812] Already “the state was filled with the bane of
village politicians; ‘the freemen of every town in the Bay were busy
in inquiring into their liberties.’ With the important exception of
universal suffrage, in our age so happily in process of complete
establishment, representative democracy was as perfect two centuries
ago as it is to-day. Even the magistrates who acted as judges held
their office by annual popular election. ‘Elections cannot be safe
there long,’ sneered an English lawyer, Leckford, with a shrug. The
same prediction has been made these two hundred years. The public
mind, in perpetual agitation, is still easily shaken, even by slight
and transient impulses; but after all its vibrations, it follows the
laws of the moral world and safely recovers its balance.”[813]

The test of citizenship was indeed exclusive. But the conception
which based the ballot on goodness of the highest type, goodness of
such purity and force that nothing save faith in Christ could create
it—which conferred political power on personal character, was noble,
even while impracticable. But God commissioned an American reformer
to plant the seed of a larger growth by a vehement and potent
protest.




CHAPTER XXVII.

ROGER WILLIAMS.

      “I venerate the man whose heart is warm,
      Whose hands are pure, whose doctrine and whose life,
      Coincident, exhibit lucid proof
      That he is honest in the sacred cause.”
                                    COWPER’S _Task_.


The Pilgrim Fathers were enamoured of the Mosaic code. They esteemed
it to be a diamond without a flaw. Their constant, persistent effort
was to naturalize the Jewish ritual in New England. For this their
statesmen planned and their divines dogmatized. They did not remember
that the judicial government which fitted the world in its infancy
had been outgrown, and now sat awkwardly upon Christendom twenty-one
years of age. They did not remember that Christ had “rung out” the
old dispensation and “rung in” a grander and broader one.

Of course, in standing under the Mosaic code they were perfectly
sincere; and to their sincerity they wedded a Titanic earnestness.
They regarded toleration as a snare and a curse. It was either the
badge of indifference or the corslet of Atheism; therefore a vice
entitled to no terms. The advocates of toleration in the seventeenth
century may be counted on the fingers of one’s two hands. The most
advanced thinkers of that epoch scarcely ventured, even in their
most generous moments, to hint at a toleration of all creeds—each
man responsible alone to God. The Romanist denied it amid the
crackling flames of his _auto da fé_, and held with the Sorbonne and
with Bossuét, that the stake is bound to extirpate heresy.[814] The
Protestant urged exceptions when he asked for toleration; and, with
Cartwright, forsook those who came under his ban, “that they might
not corrupt and infect others.”[815]

Tindale appealed not to the Pope, or to councils, or to the king, but
to the Bible. So did Latimer; so did the Ridleys; so did Cranmer; so
did Bradford: all of whom were blessed martyrs: yet none of these
believed in full toleration; they had not yet reached it. They
accepted what was behind them; they had a shadowy conception of what
was in advance; but they feared, and were tolerant only up to their
own position, while they cried “halt!” to a farther progress.

This European wave of sentiment swept in strong eddies to America;
and in New England Cotton wrote: “It was toleration that made
the world anti-Christian; and the church never took harm by the
punishment of heretics.”[816] The cobbler of Agawam[817] responded:
“Yes: to authorize an untruth by a toleration of state, is to build
a sconce against the walls of heaven, to batter God out of his
chair.”[818]

Therefore, the Pilgrim Fathers, backed by the public opinion of
Christendom, tabooed toleration, and gave it no place under the
theocracy. When Roger Williams landed with his wife at Boston, in
1631, this was the sentiment and so stood the law.

He was a Welchman—for he had been cradled in the crags of
Carmarthen—some thirty years of age, ripe for great acts, and though
sometime a minister of the English church, he had thrown up his
living because he could not, in Milton’s phrase, “subscribe him
slave,” by conforming to Laud’s idea.[819]

He had heard of America as a land of splendid possibilities—as the
Holy Land of a grander crusade than that which had been launched to
clutch the East from beneath the Saracenic scimetars; for this meant
not empty sentimentality, it was an effort to win the wilderness
for God. In that essay he longed to share; and his quick-flowing
blood, his bold energy, and what Winthrop called his “godly fervor,”
united to decide him to quit England, cramped in forms and chained in
wrongs, for the young, elastic, unbounded freedom of the west of the
Atlantic.

Roger Williams was an earnest seeker after truth. Like Robinson, he
smiled at the idea that the acme of knowledge had been reached. He
knew, moreover, that his goal was to be run for “not without toil and
heat.” He was romantically conscientious; but he held to his opinions
with grim determination, while the slowly-ripening principles of the
English revolution of 1640 had already flowered in his brain. Now, in
New England, he longed to set his ideas on two feet, and bid them run
across the continent.

Like all positive characters, the young Welchman speedily attracted
attention and made himself felt. His clear, ringing heel had scarce
sounded in Boston streets ere he was cordoned by friends and
surrounded by foes.[820] His opinions were novel; some of them have
been grafted into the fundamental law of our Republic, and are now
justly considered the palladium of religious peace; others are still
unsettled and partly unaccepted, being held by certain sects, and
rejected by several as the _disjecta membra_ of divinity; but to the
Pilgrims they were alike odious and revolutionary.

But the principle upon which hangs his immortality of fame is that of
complete toleration. “He was a Puritan, and a fugitive from English
persecution,” remarks Bancroft, “but his wrongs had not clouded his
accurate understanding. In the capacious recesses of his mind he
had revolved the nature of intolerance, and he, and he alone, had
arrived at the grand principle which is its sole effectual remedy.
He announced his discovery under the simple proposition of the
sanctity of conscience. The civil magistrate should restrain crime,
but never control opinion; should punish guilt, but never violate
the freedom of the soul. The doctrine contained within itself an
entire reformation of theological jurisprudence; it would blot from
the statute-book the felony of non-conformity; would quench the
fires that persecution had so long kept burning; would repeal every
law compelling attendance on public worship; would abolish tithes
and all forced contributions to the maintenance of religion; would
give an equal protection to every form of religious faith; and never
suffer the authority of civil government to be enlisted against the
mosque of the Mussulman, or the altar of the fire-worshipper; the
Jewish synagogue, or the Roman cathedral. It is wonderful with what
distinctness Roger Williams deduced these inferences from his central
tenet, the consistency with which, like Pascal and Edwards, those
bold and profound reasoners on other subjects, he accepted every
fair inference from his doctrine, and the circumspection with which
he repelled every unjust imputation. In the unwavering assertion of
these views he never changed his position; the sanctity of conscience
was the great tenet, which, with all its consequences, he defended
as he first trod the shores of New England; and in his extreme
old age it was the last pulsation of his heart. But it placed the
young emigrant in direct opposition to the whole system on which
Massachusetts was founded; and forbearing and forgiving as was
his temper, prompt as he was to concede every thing which honesty
permitted, he always asserted his belief, however unpalatable it
might be, with temperate firmness and an unbending benevolence.”[821]
And just here, it is only fair to add, that his opponents, on their
part, usually applied their principles without personal animosity.
Between Williams and his great antagonist, Cotton, there was always,
in their most heated moods, a substratum of cordial respect, while
Winthrop, though consenting to the banishment of the pioneer American
reformer, continued his fast friend through all.[822]

This principle of toleration, together with several other obnoxious
tenets, all of which Williams avowed with frank courage, soon brought
him under the frown of the colonial authorities—a frown which
deepened when he refused to unite with the church at Boston “because
its members would not make public declaration of their repentance
for having communion with the church of England before their
emigration.”[823]

This declaration—and the same thing may be said of several of his
tenets—looks narrow and bigoted in our eyes; but Roger Williams had
an undoubted right to cherish his own views under the very principles
which he first of all men in America proclaimed, that “the public or
the magistrate may decide what is due from man to man, but when they
attempt to prescribe a man’s duties to God, they are out of place,
and there can be no safety; for it is clear, that if the magistrate
has the power, he may decree one set of opinions or beliefs to-day
and another to-morrow; as has been done in England by different kings
and queens, and by different popes and councils in the Roman church;
so that belief would become a heap of confusion.”[824]

Be this as it may, the Pilgrims came to regard Roger Williams as a
dangerous heresiarch; as “unsettled in judgment;”[825] as carrying
“a windmill in his head.”[826] Indeed, so strong was this feeling
that many years afterwards Cotton Mather headed his account of
Williams’ advent, in the “Magnalia,” with this Latin: “_Hic se aperit
Diabolus_”—Here the devil shows himself.[827]

Under these circumstances, we may easily imagine the consternation
which reigned in Boston, when, in April, 1631, it was rumored
that Roger Williams was about to be installed in the vacant place
of Francis Higginson at Salem as assistant to Mr. Skelton.[828]
The court was convened; and a letter was at once indited to John
Endicott, “one of the chief promoters of the settlement,” in which,
says Winthrop, the judges “marvelled that he should countenance such
a choice without advising with the Council; and withal desiring him
to use his influence that the Salem church should forbear till all
could confer about it.”[829]

In that day good ministers were not common in New England; and,
moreover, the Salem churchmen liked Williams; so, without heeding
the remonstrance of the authorities, they proceeded to settle the
teacher of their choice. He at once began to preach; but with the
advance of summer the temper of the government grew hot with the
season, and finally he decided to bid Salem farewell and take refuge
at Plymouth.[830] This he did, being soon after elected assistant to
Ralph Smith.[831] At Plymouth as at Salem, he made many friends, and
Bradford bears witness that he was “a man godly and zealous, having
many precious parts.”[832] But his “strange opinions” were not fully
approved; and consequently, when, after the death of Mr. Skelton, in
1633, the Salem church urged their truant pastor to return to them,
Williams acceded. He was dismissed, as Brewster counselled, from the
Plymouth church, but was followed back to Salem by a body-guard of
devoted admirers, “who would have no other preacher.”[833]

It was during his sojourn at Plymouth that Roger Williams began to
cement that famous friendship with the Indians which was one day to
stand him in such good stead.[834] “My soul’s desire,” he said, “was
to do the natives good.”[835] And later, when

                “Declined
      Into the vale of years,”

he wrote again: “God was pleased to give me a painful, patient
spirit, to lodge with them in their filthy, smoky holes, to gain
their tongue.”[836] In this way he became acquainted with Massasoit,
the chief of the Wampanoags, and with Canonicus and Miantonomoh, the
sachems of the Narragansetts, among whom, in after-years, he sought
and found a home.

On his return to Salem his struggle with the government recommenced.
While at Plymouth he had written a pamphlet against the validity
of the colonial charter, and submitted it to Bradford.[837] Now he
published it. He said: “Why lay such stress upon your patent from
King James? ’Tis but idle parchment: James has no more right to
give away or sell Massasoit’s lands, and cut and carve his country,
than Massasoit has to sell James’ kingdom or to send his Indians to
colonize Warwickshire.”[838]

Since the Pilgrims had legalized their title to the land _in foro
conscientiæ_, by actual purchase from the aborigines,[839] it is
somewhat difficult to conceive why Williams, already staggering
under a load of odium, should have added to the pack by a declaration
entirely useless, yet certain to kindle anger because it was looked
upon as treason against the cherished charter.[840]

The fact should seem to be that he had the _certaminis gaudia_—the
joy of disputation; common to intellectual gladiators. Occasionally
this got the better of his prudence; and when it did, like a
skilful rider, he soon recovered the reins of his caution and made
glad amends. On this occasion, he confessed his penitence for the
ill which had arisen from the unfortunate polemic, and offered to
burn the manuscript if the authorities chose to countenance the
bon-fire.[841]

Roger Williams next pronounced himself upon an exciting local
question. It was then a mooted point at Salem whether women were
commanded to appear at church veiled.[842] Singularly enough, the
radical Williams said Yes, and the conservative Cotton said No; the
historic opponents for once changed places; and Cotton, going to
Salem, handled the subject so convincingly in his morning sermon,
that the ladies came to church in the afternoon unveiled; upon which
“Williams, though unconvinced, desisted from opposition.”[843]

Behind these frivolities were graver issues. In 1633, trouble
seemed brewing between England and the Pilgrim colonists. Charles,
Laud, and Strafford, had hinted at a “commission” for the regulation
of the non-conforming American plantations; and the Privy Council
had commanded Cradock to order the colonial charter home, to be
“regulated.” The ex-president of the Massachusetts Company did write
for it in 1634, and in 1635 “quo warranto”[844] was issued. But the
provisional authorities, while answering Cradock’s missive, declined
to return the charter.[845]

Affairs looked black indeed. Resistance was seriously contemplated;
what was called the “freeman’s oath,” which bound the colonists to
allegiance to the colony rather than to the king, was ordered to be
subscribed throughout Massachusetts Bay; and at the same time it was
decided to “avoid and protract.”[846] Nothing prevented England from
launching her cohorts upon the plantations but the presence of those
home troubles which now began to press the royalist party as closely
as the serpents enveloped Laocöon. It was a time of general anxiety,
and men cried Hush! and held their breath to see what should next
occur.

But “Williams could not keep quiet in this seething world,” affirms
Elliot; “nor could Endicott. Both of them saw the inevitable
tendencies of the Roman church; and feeling that such a church was
dangerous to their infant liberties, they decided that the symbol
under which the pope and Laud marched should not be their symbol: so
Endicott cut the cross out of the king’s colors. At such a crisis,
when the aim was to ‘avoid and protract,’ this audacious act of
course made trouble; and Endicott, at the next court, was ‘sadly
admonished,’ and disabled from office for a year.[847] Williams
held peculiar views respecting oaths, and cited the Scripture
command—‘swear not at all.’ And as the freeman’s oath clashed with
the oath to the king, he also spoke against that, and dissuaded some
from taking it.”[848]

Besides this, Roger Williams was an avowed democrat. He proclaimed
this truth: “Kings and magistrates are invested with no more power
than the people intrust to them.”[849] And he said again: “The
sovereign power of all civil authority is founded in the consent of
the people.”[850] Republicanism was the logical sequence of religious
liberty—came from it as naturally as the bud expands into the flower.
Yet it startled the Pilgrims. They were constantly making forays
into the domain of absolutism. They never scrupled, when they had
a chance, at clutching popular prerogatives. They were always busy
in enacting democracy into law; but they were shocked when Roger
Williams put it into propositions.

“Had Cromwell been in power at the time, with his republican
bias,” remarks Felt, “these sentiments would have been crowned
with approbation; but being uttered under one of the Stuarts, they
were hissed as the expression of sedition. It has ever been in
accordance with the spirit of human policy, that principles under the
circumstances of one period are accounted patriotism, which under the
circumstances of another era are denounced as treason.”[851]

Thus it was that the theories of Roger Williams “led him into
perpetual collision with the clergy and the government of
Massachusetts Bay. It had ever been their custom to respect the
church of England, and in the mother-country, they had frequented
its service; yet its principles and its administration were still
harshly exclusive. The American reformer would hold no communion
with intolerance; for, said he, ‘the doctrine of persecution for
conscience’ sake is most evidently and lamentably contrary to the
doctrine of Jesus Christ.’

“The magistrates insisted on the presence of every man at public
worship; Williams reprobated the law; the worst statute in the
English code was that which did but enforce attendance upon the
parish church. To compel men to unite with those of a different
creed, he regarded as an open violation of their natural rights; to
drag to public worship the irreligious and the unwilling, seemed
like requiring hypocrisy. ‘An unbelieving soul is dead in sin’—such
was his argument. ‘And to force the indifferent from one worship
to another, is like shifting a dead man into several changes of
apparel.’ He added: ‘No one should be forced to worship, or to
maintain a worship against his own consent.’ ‘What!’ exclaimed his
antagonists, amazed at his tenets, ‘is not the laborer worthy of his
hire?’ ‘Yes,’ replied he, ‘from those who hire him.’

“The magistrates were selected exclusively from the church-members;
with equal propriety, reasoned Williams, might ‘a doctor of physic
or a pilot’ be selected according to his skill in theology and
his standing in the church. It was objected, that his principles
subverted all good government. ‘Oh no,’ said he; ‘the commander of
the vessel of state may maintain order on board the ship and see
that it pursues its course steadily, even though the dissenters of
the crew be not compelled to attend the public prayers of their
companions.’”[852]

The Pilgrims heard all this aghast. Soon they wearied of discussion;
they invoked the syllogism of the law to rebut the heresies of the
bold declaimer. Williams was cited in 1635, to appear before the
General Court at Boston, for examination. Taking his staff in his
hand, he set out. The session was stormy. Cotton argued; others
scolded; Winthrop pleaded; Endicott was wrenched away from Williams’
side; but Williams, while maintaining some odd opinions, spoke
boldly for God and liberty that day, and “maintained the rocky
strength of his grounds.”[853]

“To the magistrates he seemed the ally of a civil faction; to himself
he appeared only to make a frank avowal of the truth. The scholar
who is accustomed to the pursuits of abstract philosophy, lives in a
region of thought quite remote from that by which he is surrounded.
The range of his understanding is aside from the paths of common
minds, and he is often the victim of the contrast. ’Tis not unusual
for the world to reject the voice of truth, because its tones are
strange; to declare doctrines unsound, only because they are new;
and even to charge obliquity or derangement on a man who brings
forward principles which the average intelligence repudiates. ’Tis
the common history; Socrates, and St. Paul, and Luther, and others of
the most acute dialecticians, have been ridiculed as drivellers and
madmen.”[854]

Roger Williams now evinced his kinship with the martyrs for human
progress, by suffering that rejection common to those who venture to
project their revolutionary thoughts from the front of a century’s
advance. Misunderstood and condemned, he was commanded to abjure his
heresies or else expect “sentence.”[855]

Of course, he could not reject himself; therefore, saying with Job,
“Though I die, I will maintain my integrity,” he uncovered his head
with serene patience to “bide the pelting of the pitiless storm.”
The thunderbolt soon fell. The church at Salem was coerced into
abandoning the immortal pastor; and in November, 1635, he was ordered
“to depart out of the jurisdiction of Massachusetts Bay within six
weeks;”[856] a sentence which is said to have been mainly due to
Cotton’s eloquence.[857]

Finally, Williams was permitted to remain at Salem until the
following spring, as the season then shivered on the verge of
winter.[858] Then the Pilgrims grew alarmed; the reformer’s opinions
were contagious; they thought, after all, that it would be best to
send Williams home to England. A ship was about to sail; a warrant
was issued; officers were despatched to arrest the disturber of that
Israel. But on coming to his house and opening the door, they found
“darkness there, and nothing more.” Roger Williams, apprized of the
change of purpose, had quitted Salem “in winter snow and inclement
weather.”[859] On, on he pressed, for Laud and the Tower of London
were behind him. Without guide, without food, without shelter,
he suffered tortures. “For fourteen weeks I was sorely tossed
in a bitter season”—so he wrote in the evening of his life—“not
knowing what bread or bed did mean.”[860] “But,” said he sweetly,
“the ravens fed me in the wilderness;”[861] and he often made his
habitation in the hollow of a tree. But nothing could daunt him. His
cheerful faith,

                    “Exempt from public haunt,
      Found tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,
      Sermons in stones, and good in every thing.”

So he fled on, on, through the snow, the darkness, the dreary forest;
“fled from Christians to the savages, who knew and loved him, till
at last he reached the kind-hearted but stupid Indian heathen
Massasoit.”[862]

This winter banishment of Roger Williams was cruel and bigoted,
but it was not without palliation. He had run a tilt against the
law and order of his time; he had sneered at the validity of the
charter, then the fundamental law; he had impeached the theocracy;
he had the dangerous advantage of being personally equipped with
those gifts which win and “grapple to the soul with hooks of steel.”
Every motive of worldly prudence seemed to dictate banishment. These
things extenuate, but they do not excuse; because we are bound to
impeach an untrue order. Paul cried, “God is God,” and trampled
wicked laws beneath his feet. The catacombs of Pagan Rome were choked
with martyrs who went against the law and order of their time. Huss
and Wickliffe, Latimer and Ridley, violated law precisely as Roger
Williams did. The law-breaker is not necessarily immoral and a pest.
Society is bound to see that the statute-book does not fetter the
human conscience. If society is recreant to its duty, individuals
must not be false to God. Therefore, in this matter of opposing the
colonial law, we hide Roger Williams behind the apostles, and enclose
him within the leaves of the New Testament.

After months of vicissitude, the great exile reached the shores of
Narragansett Bay, and founded Providence. As he floated down the
stream in his canoe, and neared the site of the beautiful city born
of his piety, the Indians shouted, “Wha-cheer, friend; wha-cheer?”
and grasped his hand with cordial sympathy as he stepped ashore.[863]
A large grant of land was easily obtained from Canonicus and
Miantonomoh—easily obtained because of the love and favor which they
bore him, since Williams says that money could not have bought it
without affection and confidence[864]—and as the whole domain was
his, he might have lived as lord-proprietor; but principle forbade.
“On the hill the forests, just clothed in their full leafage, bowed
their heads to this fugitive, the hero of a great idea, and whispered
‘Liberty!’”[865]

He heeded that whisper, and dedicated the infant state to the
most radical idea of liberty; so that it became the asylum of the
oppressed; and as the Hebrew prophet always prayed with his window
open towards Jerusalem, so distressed consciences, when they felt the
sting of persecution, murmured, Providence.

Roger Williams planted a democracy—a government of the people, by the
people, for the people.[866] He cemented his state by toleration.
“The removal of the yoke of soul-oppression,” said he, “as it will
prove an act of mercy and righteousness to the enslaved nations, so
it is of binding force to engage the whole and every interest and
conscience to preserve the common liberty and peace.”[867]

So it proved; for, spite of Cotton Mather’s epigram, that it was
“_bona terra, mala gens_”[868]—a good land and a wicked people—it
increased and prospered from the outset, justifying the motto of the
commonwealth, _Amor vincet omnia_.[869]

While Roger Williams believed in toleration, he did not believe in
license, but was always earnest for liberty regulated by law. Thus
when the _Ranters_ appeared and railed against all order, he invoked
the judicial arm to suppress their madness.[870] But when the Quakers
invaded the state, he attacked them only with syllogisms. He was
ardently opposed to their tenets; but he essayed to “dig George Fox
out of his burrows” with words only, and returned a stern “No” to the
thrice-repeated request of Massachusetts that they be expelled from
his jurisdiction.[871] “We find,” he wrote, “that where these people
are most of all supposed to declare themselves freely, and are only
opposed by argument, there they least of all desire to come.”[872]

In 1643, Williams went to England to obtain a charter for his
plantation. He “found all in a flame; civil war raging, Hampden just
killed, Charles fled from London, and the city and the government
in the hands of the Parliament.” Here he lived on intimate terms
with Sir Harry Vane and Milton, kindred spirits, who were doing in
England what he had done in America. His mission was successful, and
a twelvemonth later he returned to Providence with a liberal patent,
the free-will offering of jubilant democracy across the water.[873]

Eight years later, under the Protectorate, Roger Williams once
more visited England on colonial business; and his admission and
recognition among the foremost thinkers of the time were general and
hearty. The acquaintance with Vane and Milton was continued, and
Marvell and Cromwell were added to his list of friends.[874] But his
heart was in America, and in 1654 he came back to Providence;[875]
whereupon he was elected president of the cluster of plantations
which, in after-days, were moulded into the little state of Rhode
Island.[876]

For many years Williams and his colony were under the frown of their
brother Pilgrims; but through it all they bore cheerily up, trusting
to God, time, and success, to remove all prejudice, and “keeping
always to that one principle, ‘that every man should have liberty to
worship God according to the light of his own conscience.’”[877]

Roger Williams had learned that most difficult of lessons, to
return good for evil. He never wearied in well-doing; and his
fine tact, broad statesmanship, and friendly zeal, on more than
one occasion came between the colonists who had flung him into
dishonorable banishment and impending harm.[878] With the Indians
he was singularly influential, and frequently his presence at
their camp-fires and in their wigwams served to explode a maturing
conspiracy.[879]

On the Restoration, an event occurred which finely illustrates
the beautiful text, that “He who goeth forth and weepeth, bearing
precious seed, shall doubtless come again with rejoicing, bringing
his sheaves with him.” The American republican had been the warm
friend and coadjutor of Cromwell, and Milton, and Pym. When Charles
II. came to the throne, all looked to see his hand stretched across
the Atlantic to menace and chastise. It was outstretched, but only
to bless; for the foppish Stuart actually renewed the charter which
the wise Protector had first granted to the Providence plantations.
He paid unconscious homage to the principle of Roger Williams, and
assented to what Gammel calls “the freest paper that ever bore the
signature of a king—the wonder of the age.”[880]

Such was one instance of the influence of a man whose beneficent
career is at once an example and an inspiration; not because he was
always right or always wise, but because he was always true to his
own ideal. Roger Williams was the initiator of many changes; and
he, first of all in America, boldly framed the creed of democracy.
But the brightest jewel in his crown is that he, taking his life in
one hand and his good name in the other, “was the first reformer in
modern Christendom to assert in its plenitude the doctrine of the
liberty of conscience, the equality of all opinions before the law.
At a time when Germany was the battle-field for all Europe in the
implacable wars of religion; when even Holland was bleeding with
the anger of vengeful factions; when France was still to go through
a fearful struggle with bigotry; when England was gasping under
the despotism of intolerance; almost half a century before William
Penn became an American proprietary; and two years before Descartes
founded modern philosophy on the basis of free reflection,” Roger
Williams demanded the enfranchisement of the human soul.

“We praise the man who first analyzed the air, or resolved water
into its elements, or drew the lightning from the clouds, even
though the discoveries may have been as much the fruits of time as
of genius. A moral principle has a much wider and nearer influence
on human happiness; nor can any discovery of truth be of more direct
benefit to society than that which establishes perpetual religious
peace, and spreads tranquillity through every community and every
bosom.

“If Copernicus is held in everlasting reverence because, on his
death-bed, he published to the world that the sun is the centre of
our system; if the name of Kepler is preserved in the annals of
human excellence for his sagacity in detecting the laws of planetary
motion; if the genius of Newton has been almost adored for dissecting
a ray of light and weighing heavenly bodies in a balance—let there be
for the name of Roger Williams at least some humble place among those
who have advanced moral science, and made themselves the benefactors
of mankind.”[881]




CHAPTER XXVIII.

AN ARRIVAL, A UNIVERSITY, AND A STATE.

   “Three things are of the first importance—good men, education, and
   a settled commonwealth.”
                                                  LORD BACON.


Spite of internecine struggle and transatlantic intrigue, New England
walked steadily on in the path towards material prosperity. It was
inevitable; for the parents of success were within her borders:
essential godliness was in her right hand, and the habit of thrift
was in her left. It is very probable that prosperity was helped
instead of hindered by the agitation which was begotten of the
official acts of the colonial government. The stir served to keep
Christendom agog for the latest news from America. “What are these
Pilgrims now at?” was the inquiry incessantly on every lip. Thus it
was that the name and action of New England became as prominently
familiar in the _salons_ of the ultramontanists in Europe, and in the
club-rooms of the riotous cavaliers, as in the humble dwellings of
the godly Puritans.

Besides, agitation in its turn begot progress. Where there is silence
there is death. If the Alps, piled in cold, still sublimity, are the
emblem of fat and contented despotism, the ocean is the symbol of
democracy; for it is pure and useful only because never motionless.

At all events, the progress of New England was unique and
unprecedented. “_Nec minor ab exordio_,” says Cotton Mather, “_nec
major incrementis ulla_.”[882] Never was any thing more lowly in
inception or more mighty in increase. In 1635, twenty ships dropped
anchor in Boston and Plymouth harbors;[883] and in that single year
three thousand new settlers were added to the Pilgrim colonies.[884]
Men came over fast and

      “Thick as autumnal leaves that strow the brooks
      In Vallambrosa, where the Etruscan shades,
      High overarched, imbower.”

And these, like their predecessors, were of “the best.”[885]

With them landed an illustrious _trio_—Hugh Peters, the younger
Winthrop, and Sir Harry Vane.[886] The fiery Peters came from one
exile to another; for he had been pastor of an English church at
Rotterdam. He was an enlightened republican, public spirited,
prodigiously energetic, and eloquent, already endowed with those high
qualities which soon afterwards pushed him into prominence in the
English civil war as the coadjutor of Cromwell, the jailor of Charles
I., and an echoer of the regicidal verdict.[887]

During his seven years’ sojourn in New England, Hugh Peters was
settled at Salem as the successor of Roger Williams.[888] At once
his restless and various activity bubbled over into works of
utility.[889] He was minister, he was politician, he was factotum.
He saw the commercial capabilities of America, and set himself to
develop them. He “went from place to place,” says Winthrop, “laboring
both publicly and privately to raise men up to a public frame of
spirit, and so prevailed, that he procured a good sum of money to set
on foot a systematic fishing business.”[890]

The younger Winthrop was Hugh Peters’ _compagnon de voyage_. ’Tis
related of a son of Scipio Africanus that, proving degenerate, the
scoffing Romans forced him to pluck off a signet-ring which he wore,
with his father’s face engraved upon it. There was no occasion for
such public discipline in this case, for young Winthrop was, in
Cotton Mather’s phrase, _Bonus a bono, pius a pio_, the son of a
father like himself. After an exemplary and studious boyhood, he had
followed the elder Winthrop to New England; where, dowered with the
advantages of extensive travel and consummate education, he had been
annually elected one of the gubernatorial assistants—an honor which
was continued even when he returned to Europe for a space.[891]

He now came armed with the authority of Lord Say and the “good
Lord Brooke,” the original patentees of Connecticut, to plant a
new colony, of which he should be governor.[892] “But inasmuch as
many good people from Massachusetts Bay and Plymouth had already
taken possession of a part of his demesne, this courteous and godly
gentleman would give them no molestation; but saying, ‘the land
is broad,’ he accommodated the matter with them, and then sent a
convenient number of men to erect a town and fort at the mouth of the
Connecticut, which he called, after the patrons of the enterprise,
_Say-brook_. By this happy action, the planters farther up the river
had no small kindness done them; while the Indians, who might else
have been even more troublesome than they soon proved, were kept in
some awe.”[893]

Winthrop was one of the few early Pilgrims who had been graduated
at a university, yet was not won to lay aside his layman garb for
the clerical robe. “It is a singular fact,” observes Elliot, “that,
possessed as he was of scholarly and scientific tastes, he took hold
resolutely of the material life of his plantation at Saybrook, and
worked to shape it well, as the base of the superior structure which
he meant to rear upon it. He appreciated what scholars and idealists
are prone to forget, the prime value of a good material foundation.
For many years he was chosen governor of the colony, and in that
position he gave universal satisfaction. For his vices and his
enemies, if he had either, they are forgotten.

“He was too large a man to engage in the persecution of the Quakers,
which he always opposed; and if he believed in witchcraft, a rank
superstition at that time common, it was as a query, not as a fact.
His leisure hours were devoted to science; and his contributions to
the old ‘Royal Society of London,’ of which he was an early member,
were highly valued. Indeed, Boyle and other scientific scholars at
one period had a plan for joining their fellow-student in the New
World, for the purpose of pushing their investigations of natural
knowledge.”[894]

The last member of this famous group, Sir Harry Vane junior, was at
this time but twenty-three,[895] and he came out much against the
wishes of a father who stood as high in the confidence of the queen
of England as Strafford did in the affections of the king.[896] “Let
him go,” said Charles to the perturbed courtier, when he learned
that Harry had turned Puritan and proposed to emigrate—“Let him go;
my word for’t, he’ll soon sicken on’t and be back, if you give him
consent to remain in those parts for three years.”[897]

So the devout boy embarked. On reaching Boston, he was saluted
with enthusiasm. His high birth, his sacrifices, his Puritanism,
his splendid talents, every thing about him, served to enlist the
sober Pilgrims in his favor; and this effect was heightened by his
personal beauty, singular learning, and ingratiating manners.[898]
As the Bostonians knew him better they liked him better; soon he was
the most popular man in the colony; and in 1636 he was elected to
fill the gubernatorial chair—elected over the heads of Winthrop, and
Dudley, and the elders of our Israel, which they might and did look
upon as a freak of democratic strategy quite superfluous.[899]

The first public act of the three friends was, to placate a long
smouldering feud between Winthrop and Dudley. Winthrop was accused
of over-leniency in his politics; Dudley was charged with undue
severity. A friendly convention was held; the questions at issue were
kindly talked over. Vane and Peters counselled mutual forbearance;
and the quarrel ended with a “loving reconciliation” never afterwards
broken.[900]

Some little time after Winthrop and Dudley, under Vane’s auspices,
had given each other the kiss of peace and gone home arm in arm,
with the fire of their differences definitively quenched, measures
were matured to plant a college in New England. Nothing more finely
exhibits the wisdom of the Pilgrim Fathers than their watchful and
ample provision for education, which Bacon has fitly termed the
“sheet-anchor of peaceful commonwealths.” In their estimation, its
importance was second to nothing but religion, whose handmaid it was.

They longed to rear a race of cultured men—to plant a school which
should elbow out of America those wicked universities which were
then the pests of Europe—vicious sinks which Beza called _Flabella
Satanæ_, Satan’s fans; and which Luther styled _Cathedras pestilentiæ
et antichristi luminaria_, seats of pestilence and beacons of
antichrist; where, under the tuition of the Jesuits, immorality was
made a fine art, and ferocity was taught as a cardinal virtue.

With this twofold object, a public school was called into life at
Cambridge in 1636; and in that same year the General Court made a
grant of four hundred pounds, which formed the legs on which the
infant university first toddled.[901] Later, John Harvard bequeathed
eight hundred pounds and his library to help forward the scholastic
venture; whereupon the grateful authorities eternized the donor’s
name by calling the school HARVARD COLLEGE.[902]

Henceforth New England had a “city of books.” Harvard college
speedily became a nursery of piety, and was to America, as Livy said
of Greece, _sal gentium_.[903] In narrating this achievement, the
quaint divine who heaped together the mingled wheat and chaff of
the _Magnalia_, cites triumphantly the language of the orator who
chanted pæans to the English Cambridge: “We have now provided—and let
envy be as far removed from this declaration as is falsehood—that
in popular assemblies stone shall not talk to stone; that the
church shall not lack priests, or the bar jurists, or the community
physicians; for we have supplied the church, the government, the
senate, and the army, with accomplished men.”[904]

Thus the new university was rightly esteemed an ornament and a
civilizer; for learning, as the poet has hymned it,

      “Chastens the manners, and the soul refines.”[905]

The school is at once preserver and benefactor; it is _urbis
medicus_, the physician of the state.

And now the settlements along the coast-line of Massachusetts
were become “like hives overstocked with bees; and many of the
new inhabitants began to entertain the thought of swarming into
plantations farther in the interior.” The fifteen thousand settlers
in Massachusetts felt crowded. They longed to imitate the Plymouth
Pilgrims, who had sent out a forlorn hope to colonize Windsor, and
the venture of the younger Winthrop at Saybrook. They too, longed

                    “To descry new lands,
      Rivers and mountains, in this spotty globe.”

As early as 1634, Hooker’s parishioners, at Cambridge, had petitioned
the General Court to permit them “to look out either for enlargement
or removal.”[906] The authorities withheld their assent at the
outset; but when, in 1636, the motion was renewed, they said Yes.[907]

Hooker—whom Morton calls “a son of thunder”[908]—and Haynes were
the chief promoters of this project to remove.[909] The winter
of 1635-6 was spent in active preparation. Scouting parties were
thrown forward. In the opening of the year, Hartford was settled,
government was organized, civil order was established.[910] At the
same time pioneers went out from Dorchester, and pushing the earlier
Plymouth settlers from the ground, usurped Windsor in the name of
Massachusetts Bay.[911] Others quitted Watertown, and sat down at
Wethersfield;[912] while some left Roxbury, and were enchurched at
Springfield, which was afterwards found to lie within the boundary of
the old Bay State.[913]

But this emigration was merely preliminary; it was the first patter
of the coming shower; it was the scouts of the Pilgrims, making an
initial survey of the new Hesperia of Puritanism. In June, 1636, the
principal caravan, led by Thomas Hooker and John Haynes, began its
march. “There were of the company about one hundred souls, many
of them persons accustomed to the affluence and ease of European
life. They drove before them numerous herds of cattle; and thus they
traversed the pathless forests of Massachusetts, advancing hardly ten
miles a day through the tangled woods, across the swamps and numerous
streams, and over the highlands that separated the intervening
valleys; subsisting, as they slowly wandered along, on the milk of
the kine, who browsed on the fresh leaves and early shoots; having
no guide through the nearly untrodden wilderness but the compass,
and no pillow for their nightly rest but heaps of stones. How did
the hills echo with the unwonted lowing of the herds! How were the
forests enlivened by the fervent piety of Hooker! Never again was
there such a pilgrimage from the seaside ‘to the delightful banks’ of
the Connecticut.”[914]

The Pilgrims paused at Hartford, which the presence of Hooker and
Haynes soon lifted into the foremost importance, and it became the
Jerusalem of the west. The government was similar to that which
Winthrop, and Endicott, and Cotton had shaped at Boston, except that
now the church-membership test was omitted, church and state were
half-divorced, and all freemen were citizens[915]—liberality which
placed the new-born state close beside the Providence plantations in
magnanimous catholicity. Indeed, Haynes, whose plastic hand moulded
the primitive constitution of Connecticut, had gone through a bitter
experience in the trial and banishment of Roger Williams; and his
wiser statesmanship bade him beware lest, in steering clear of the
Scylla of anarchy, he should ground his politics on the Charybdis of
bigotry. His wise tact saved him from both perils, and enabled him,
while never interrupting the _entente cordiale_ with Massachusetts,
to open a friendly intercourse with the Rhode Island “heretics.”[916]

A twelvemonth after the arrival of the Pilgrims at Hartford, the
pioneers were flanked by an invasion of brother Puritans fresh
from England. New Haven was planted; and in 1637, Guilford was
colonized, and then Milford was settled.[917] These were independent
of Connecticut, and for upwards of forty years formed a separate
colony, called New Haven.[918] “The settlers,” says Cotton Mather,
“were under the conduct of as holy, and as prudent, and as genteel
persons, as ever visited these nooks of New England; and though they,
in a manner, stole out of Britain, being forbidden to sail, yet
they dropped here a plantation constellated with many stars of the
first magnitude; for if Theophilus Eaton and John Davenport were not
blazing lights, where shall we hunt for meteors?”[919]

The New-Haveners were traders; they believed more in commerce than
in husbandry, and so they “went down to the sea in ships.” But in
the wilderness traffic did not yield the dividends which it gave on
’change in London, or on the Rialtos of the world; so that in half a
decade their stock was spent, and they so nearly touched bottom that
they gladly turned for help to despised agriculture,[920] the surest
base for new states to build on.

For some months New Haven lacked a charter, and so floated
rudderless. But eventually the settlers formed themselves into a
body politic by mutual consent, and signed a kind of constitution
in a barn;[921] and this is the first political paper that
was ever cradled in a manger. It was generally _secundum usum
Massachusettensem_,[922] to follow Cotton Mather’s barbarous Latin;
or, in plain English, after the model of the Bay State theocracy.

“Thus it was,” exclaims a jubilant old chronicler, “that Jesus
Christ was worshipped in churches of an evangelical character in the
outermost wilderness; and from thence, if the inquirer were inclined
to make a sally across the channel to Long Island, he might have seen
the congregations of our God taking root in those wild wastes.”[923]

The New Haven and Connecticut colonists were for many years on the
verge of a quarrel with the Dutch at New Amsterdam, who felt that in
this territorial race they had been outstripped and outwitted, and
were consequently lifted out of their wonted phlegm by irritation.
The “Yankee” and the Dutchman carried on a lusty war of words about
their boundary lines, and for this good reason, there were none.
Irving tells us that the Dutch disliked the smell of onions; and that
the keen Yankee, knowing this, planted his rows each year a little
farther west, and before this invasion of onions the sad Dutchman
always retired with tearful eyes, leaving the polluted soil to the
onion planters.

But bright as seemed the portents, the colonists soon found
themselves environed by danger—girdled by a wall of fire. The hostile
Dutchman scowled in the west. The untrodden wilderness stretched
away on the north. Scores of weary, pathless miles separated them
from their brothers on the Atlantic coast. The vengeful Pequods
were panting for war in the southeast. They had found, not peace,
but a sword; their painful enterprise seemed but “a lure to draw
victims within the reach of the tomahawk.” Premonitory symptoms gave
warning that danger lurked in the covert beside every log-house
beyond the mountains. Soon the woods were ambuscaded, “and the
darkness of midnight began to glitter with the blaze of the frontier
cabins.” Then shrieked the ghastly Pequod, smeared in his horrid
paint. “Fathers found the blood of their sons fattening the wasted
cornfields; mothers were frozen by the war-whoop which disturbed the
peaceful slumber of the cradle.”




CHAPTER XXIX.

ON THE WAR-TRAIL.

                              “The shout
      Of battle, the barbarian yell, the bray
      Of dissonant instruments, the clang of arms,
      The shriek of agony, the groan of death,
      In one wild uproar and continued din,
      Shake the still air.”
                                 SOUTHEY’S _Madoc_.


’Tis related of a certain keeper of wild beasts at Florence, that,
after he had entertained the spectators in the amphitheatre with
their encounters on the stage, he had a strange device for forcing
them back into their dens. A wooden machine, painted in the image of
a great green dragon, with two lighted torches protruding from its
sockets as eyes, and vomiting sulphurous flame, was wheeled into the
midst of the herd, and before this onset the fiercest animal crawled
howling to his cell.

’Tis an emblem of despotism; it is government coercing men by fraud
and fear, by appeals to the ignorant and brutish instincts. The
Pilgrim Fathers took a long stride away from that ugly ideal. They
developed a nobler type of civil polity; and in nothing was their
temper and Christianity more firmly shown than in their treatment
of the Indians, whom they regarded as the orphaned wards of
civilization. They were uniformly gentle and obliging to the savage
tribes, and they were invariably and inflexibly just in treatment and
in requisition. Take this for an illustration: In 1636, an Indian
who had been on a trading tour to the pale-face settlements, seated
himself towards evening on the day of his return in the woods on the
edge of a swamp. He had with him a parcel of coats, and five pieces
of wampum, the peaceful trophies of his barter. Soon he was accosted
by four white men who happened to pass. A friendly chat ensued; the
pipe of peace was passed; when suddenly the whites saw the coats and
the wampum. At once that meanest, most unscrupulous imp in Satan’s
brood, the devil of avarice, entered their hearts—avarice, of which
Decker has said,

      “When all our sins are old in us,
      And go upon crutches, covetousness
      Does but then lie in her cradle.”

They determined to assassinate the dusky trader and filch his goods.
Under pretence of shaking hands with him, one of the ruffians stabbed
him in the thigh; this blow was followed by another, and yet another;
whereupon the death-smitten savage fled. The murderers also departed;
and when they were gone the Indian crawled back from his forest
hiding-place and stretched himself across the trail, that he might be
discovered and receive help.

This scene was enacted at Pawtucket, near Providence, but then within
the precincts of Plymouth colony. Some hours after the affray, Roger
Williams learned from an Indian runner that some pale faces were
at Pawtucket almost starved. He at once sent the sufferers food and
spirits, and a cordial invitation to visit his cabin. After some
delay they came, enlisting the sympathy of their kind host by a
pitiful tale of loss of way and hunger in the forest. Towards ten
o’clock all retired. At midnight a loud cry was heard. The Indians
clamored at the door for admittance, and to Roger Williams’ queries
they replied by informing him that one of their brothers lay almost
dead in the woods from wounds inflicted by a party of pale-faces.
“Have you seen them?” they shouted.

Meantime, the murderers, awakened by the cries, had fled. They were
pursued, and three of the four were captured, and arraigned for trial
at Plymouth. A jury was empannelled, and among the twelve “good men
and true” were Bradford, and Standish, and Prince, and Winslow.[924]
No delay was suffered, but the trial was fair and open. The guilt
of the assassins was clearly proved, and they were sentenced to be
hung.[925] Three limp forms suspended from the gallows-tree a little
later, gave most palpable evidence that justice covered even the
tangled wilderness morasses with its ægis. It was as certain death to
kill an Indian in the forests of America, as to slay a noble in the
crowded streets of London.

The effect of this execution was salutary. Its strict impartiality
pleased the shrewd red men. It convinced them of the certainty of
the colonial protection. And kindred acts before had won them to
surrender that most prominent trait in their habits, the avenging of
their personal wrongs; they adjourned their injuries to the justice
of the Pilgrim courts and invoked the statute, sure that

      “The good need fear no law;
      It is his safety, and the bad man’s awe.”

But now this old epoch was buried: a new one dawned. The Indian
surveyed the incoming pale-face tide which seemed always to flow and
never to ebb. The hunting-grounds of his people began to disappear.
His own domain was restricted—there was no longer free range. A farm
was here; a clearing was there; yonder stood a settler’s cabin. The
“medicines” of the red men grew alarmed. They asked each other:
“Where will this end?” To be sure, the settlers held their estates by
purchase; but the Indians did not always understand the value of a
bargain from which they reaped no benefit; nor did they at all times
recognize the validity of contracts made by their sachems, perhaps
without the knowledge of the tribe, and which alienated the forest
acres of their immemorial inheritance.

Heated by memory and by fear, and kindled by some occasionally
unfriendly acts of the colonists—for in so large a population it was
impossible that all should be just and honest—many of the New England
tribes grew restless and peevish. A human powder magazine yawned
beneath the feet of the Pilgrims; it needed but some bold hand to
drop the spark to cause an explosion which might unhinge a continent.

This the Pequods essayed to do. They had long been fretful. The
Connecticut colonists had befriended a rival and hated tribe, the
Mohegans.[926] Sassacus, the sachem of the Pequods, and Uncas, the
Mohegan sagamore, were at deadly enmity.[927] Yet Uncas was the
frequent and welcome occupant of pale-face cabins from Providence
in the east to the farthest onion rows which troubled the Dutchmen
in the west. The Pequods panted for revenge. They began to intrigue
for a war of extermination. Embassies were despatched to inveigle
neighboring tribes into an alliance against the ever-encroaching
pale-faces. At the camp-fires of the Wampanoags, and in the wigwams
of the Narragansetts, the Pequod orators pleaded their wrongs,
sneered at the whites, and depicted the ferocious pleasures of the
war-path to many a credulous and eager listener.

The forests became pregnant with insurrection, and at last a faint
whisper of the impending peril reached the settlements. White
Massachusetts shivered. Sir Harry Vane, knowing the influence of
Roger Williams with the Indians, wrote him urgently to balk the
Pequod embassadors among the Narragansetts.[928] At once the founder
of Rhode Island set out; alone in his canoe, through a cutting,
stormy wind, he pulled across the bay to the forest haunt of
Canonicus and Miantonomoh.[929]

“The Pequod diplomats were already at work, urging the dark dangers
which hung over their united tribes, reiterating the tale of the
encroachments of the whites, the chicanery, the insolence, the
cruelty, which some had practised, and appealing to the Indian
pride of possession and of race. For three days and nights Roger
Williams, in the sachem’s lodge, mixed with the bloody-minded Pequod
embassadors, and pushed his dangerous opposition to the war; and at
last his old friendship and superior diplomacy prevailed. Canonicus
and Miantonomoh repudiated the Pequod league and refused to dig up
the tomahawk.”[930]

The Pequods, no whit disheartened by this balk, determined to fight
unassisted, thinking, perhaps, that the precipitation of hostilities
would fire the Indian heart.

Sassacus, followed by seven hundred[931] painted and yelling
warriors, plunged into the woods and opened the war-path. Winding
out of their beautiful nest in southeastern Connecticut, between the
rivers Pawcatuck and Thames,[932] they spread consternation and the
most ghastly form of death north, east, south, west.

According to their habit, the Indians were cautious at the outset.
Isolated instances announced their hostility. In 1634, Captains Stone
and Norton sailed up the Connecticut in a coasting smack, manned by
a crew of eight men. They were steering for a Dutch trading station
on the river side, when their vessel was becalmed. In a flash a
fleet of canoes were launched from either bank of the river, and a
swarm of savages surrounded the smack. Suspecting no danger, twelve
of them were permitted to board, and Stone engaged two of these to
pilot a boat higher up the stream. The guides at night murdered
the two sailors in charge of this shallop, and at the same hour
their companions on the vessel assailed the sleeping crew. Stone
was killed secretly in his cabin, and, to conceal the body, a light
covering was thrown over it. Then the massacre extended to the deck
and forecastle. Soon all were dead save Norton. “He had taken to the
cook-room on the first alarm, and here he made a long and resolute
defence. That he might load and fire with the greatest expedition, he
placed powder in an open bowl, just at hand, which, in the hurry of
action, taking fire, so burned and blinded him that he could fight
no longer; whereupon he too was tomahawked.”[933] Then the smack was
pillaged and sunk.[934]

Two years later, John Oldham,[935] while trading fairly on the
Connecticut, was suddenly set upon and brained. His companions, two
Narragansett Indians and a couple of boys, were kidnapped.[936]

A few days after this sad catastrophe, an old English sailor, John
Gallup, floating on the tranquil bosom of the treacherous river in
his little shallop of twenty tons, manned only by himself, his two
sons, and one old salt, espied Oldham’s pinnace off Block Island. He
tacked for it and hailed. No answer; a closer survey showed him a
deck crowded with Indians. Gallup’s suspicion was aroused, and when
the clumsy savages attempted to make sail and get away, he regarded
the movement as a cover to foul play.

Then one of the most remarkable instances of gallantry recorded in
the annals of border warfare occurred. Gallup, with his single sailor
and his two little boys, armed only with a couple of rusty muskets,
two pistols, and some buck-shot, prepared for action, and this though
fourteen savages, heated by carnage and drunk with blood, stood ready
with guns, and pikes, and swords, to repel his assault. The wind was
fresh, and the audacious captain steered directly for the pinnace,
and striking it stem foremost, nearly upset it; which so frightened
the Indians that six of them jumped overboard and were drowned.
Repeating this manœuvre—in unconscious imitation of the Athenian
naval tactics—he came stem on again; for there were still too many
Indians for him to venture to carry the pinnace by boarding. After
this thump, Gallup had the satisfaction of seeing, as he cleared his
vessel and stood off once more, four more savages leap into a watery
grave—for they all sank. Then he steered for the battered craft for
the third time; whereupon the remaining Indians sought refuge in the
hold beneath the hatches. Gallup sprang on the deck of poor Oldham’s
vessel, and there, stretched out before his eyes, was the late owner
himself, still warm, but with cloven skull and amputated hands and
feet.[937]

The savages in the hold were now anxious to surrender. Two of them
at Gallup’s bidding came up and were bound; and then, maddened by
the sight of Oldham’s disfigured corpse, the sailor plunged the
victims into the river. The two remaining savages would not give up
their arms or come up from under the hatches. Gallup could not dig
them out; so he secured the cargo, buried Oldham, and then tying
the pinnace to the stern of his own victorious shallop, he set sail
to tow her to the settlements. But in the night it blew hard; his
capture was detached, and, drifting to the Narragansett shore, the
secreted warriors escaped—two only out of fourteen[938]—a swift and
sweeping retribution.

The knowledge of these dismal tragedies crept slowly into the
colonies. News was carried only by some coastwise vessel, whose
progress, crab-like, was backwards; by some Indian runner often
interested in being sluggish; or by some pale sufferer who,
traversing forest, morass, and mountain, was frequently his own
messenger of woe; for the Pilgrims had no stage-coaches like their
immediate descendants; no good roads, like the men of ’76; no railway
and no steamboat, like ourselves; and above all, no telegraph,
annihilating space, to

      “Speed the swift intercourse from soul to soul,
      Or waft a sigh from Indus to the Pole.”

But eventually the colonists learned of these spasmodic outrages; and
all promptly decided that justice and the common weal alike dictated
punishment. “After consultation with ‘the magistrates and ministers,’
Sir Harry Vane despatched ninety men down Long Island sound, in three
small vessels, to the seat of war—Block island. The expedition was
under the chief command of John Endicott, who was assisted by four
subordinate officers, one of whom, Captain John Underhill, wrote an
account of the foray and of the succeeding and more effective one. A
sort of Friar Tuck—devotee, bravo, libertine, and buffoon—Underhill
takes a memorable place among the eccentric characters who from time
to time broke what has been altogether too easily assumed to have
been the dead level of New England gravity in those days. He had been
a soldier in Ireland, in Spain, and more recently in the Netherlands,
where he ‘had spoken freely with Count Nassau.’ He came over with
Winthrop, who employed him to train the Pilgrims in military
tactics.”[939]

The expedition, spite of Endicott’s skill and Underhill’s bravery
and the number of men engaged in it, was an essential failure. A
few savages were shot; some lodges were burned; several canoes were
staved; and a number of acres of corn were despoiled. Indeed, just
enough was done to madden the savages, but not enough to intimidate
them.[940]

In the summer of 1636, Endicott sailed into Boston harbor in
bloodless triumph. Meantime, his irritating raid was revenged by a
wide-spread assault upon the isolated Connecticut colonists.[941]
Every tree became a covert. In the long grass, in the morasses, in
the out-buildings of the settlers, lurked the envenomed savages. To
step outside those block citadels to which all flocked for safety,
was certain death. Men were kidnapped and roasted alive.[942] Traders
were waylaid on the rivers and tortured to death; and two victims
especially were cut into two parts lengthwise, each half being
hung up on a tree by the bank of the Connecticut.[943] Women and
children were captured and reserved for a fate worse than death.
In the winter of 1637, thirty of the two hundred settlers who had
colonized Connecticut, fell beneath the hatchets of the Pequods.[944]
Everywhere the whites were worsted; even at Saybrook, their chief
fort, the garrison was held in duress by a besieging band of
demoniacal red men.[945]

New England was trembling on the verge of death. For the distressed
and harassed Pilgrims there seemed no alternative but speedy
extermination, or such an exercise of courage and skill as should
effectually overawe the Indians in the full flush of their success.
Measures were at once matured. Massachusetts Bay acted with her
accustomed vigor. It was declared that “the war, since it was waged
on just grounds and for self-preservation, ought to be vigorously
prosecuted.”[946] Six hundred pounds were levied; one hundred and
sixty men were recruited.[947]

At Plymouth similar activity was displayed; and a levy of forty men
was made.[948] But it was in Connecticut, the menaced spot, that
the most herculean exertions were put forth. Hartford, Windsor, and
Wethersfield, placed ninety men in the field, under the command of
stout John Mason—a sometime soldier in the Low Countries under Sir
Thomas Fairfax, who held him in such esteem that in after-years,
when at the head of the parliamentary muster, he wrote his truant
_protégé_ urging his return to England, that he might lend his
skilful sword to the patriot cause.[949]

Mason, with Hooker’s benediction, immediately opened a vigorous
campaign. Saybrook was reinforced.[950] A subsidiary detachment
of Mohegans, under Uncas, was recruited.[951] The mouth of the
Connecticut was made the base of operations, and thither the united
levies of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Plymouth, were transported.
Here a council of war was held. After Stone, the chaplain, had sought
the divine direction in prayer, it was decided to march directly upon
the Pequod village off Point Judith.[952] All embarked; the objective
point was safely reached. Then a storm intervened; it was impossible
to land. The next day was Sunday; it was spent devoutly on shipboard;
nor was it until Tuesday evening, the third day after they had
dropped anchor, that the eager Pilgrims touched land.[953]

Mason bivouacked on the sea-shore, and in the gray of the next
morning commenced the memorable march. “Seventy-seven brave
Englishmen—the rest were left in charge of the vessels—sixty
frightened Mohegans, and four hundred more terrified Narragansetts,
entered the war-trail, and went twenty miles westward towards the
Pequod country, to a fort occupied by some suspected neutrals. There
a pause for the night was made, and, lest any Indian should give the
doomed Pequods the alarm, the citadel was girt by the sentries of the
shrewd English captain.”[954]

Before noon, on the following morning, they broke camp, and marched
fifteen miles farther inland, pausing at nightfall under a hill
“which, according to information received from their dusky allies—who
had now all fallen in the rear, ‘being possessed with great
fear’—stood the chief stronghold of the Pequods.”[955]

Mason could hear the savage revelry of the ill-fated and unsuspecting
Indians very distinctly, as the wind wafted the laughter, the yells,
the vaunts, from the village over the little hill. The din sank
and fell till midnight. All were enjoying a general guffaw over
the English, whose ships they had seen sail eastward on the sound,
bearing, as they imagined, the pale-face warriors to tell their
squaws of their discomfiture.[956]

The Pequod fort was a citadel of straw. It “was merely a circular
acre or two enclosed by trunks of trees some twelve feet high, set
firmly in the ground, and so closely ranged as to exclude entrance,
while the interstices served as port-holes for marksmen. Within,
ranged along two parallel lanes, were upwards of seventy wigwams,
covered with matting and thatch. At the two points for entrance or
egress, spaces were left between the timbers, the intervals being
protected only by a slighter structure, or by loose branches.”[957]

Something of all this the curious eyes of the Pilgrims took in as
they patiently waited for the midnight order to advance. At length
it came; the camp was broken; prayers were offered; the Indian
allies fell back to a still safer distance. The drowsy Pequod
stronghold was surrounded; Mason was on one side, Underhill was on
the other. Cautiously the girdling band crept on, on, on, towards the
sally-ports, looking like sheeted phantoms in the ghastly moonlight.
Their hands were on the gates, when a dog barked. The Indians were
aroused. “Owanux! Owanux!” “The Englishmen are here!” came in a
hoarse shout from within. Then, with a wild “Huzza!” the Pilgrims
plunged themselves like an avalanche upon the frail and creaking
fortress, firing the straw in fifty different directions. The rest
was death; for it was not a battle—it was a massacre. Shouting the
watchwords of the Israelites in Canaan, the Pilgrims smote the
Pequods hip and thigh, for they knew that safety and peace dwelt in
every blow—that severity was mercy.

Soon the explosion of a powder-train made the village kick the
heavens. Then the flames began to wink, and at last to go out.
Darkness followed—a darkness made more frightful by the moans
of the wounded, the fierce panting of those wretches who still
struggled against fate, and the vindictive yell of the Mohegan and
Narragansett warriors, now in full cry after the dazed and despairing
fugitives.[958]

At last the sad morning dawned. The dead bodies of seven hundred[959]
Pequods were counted amid the _débris_ of the carnage. There lay the
whole nation,

      “In one red burial blent.”

But let us turn from the sickening scene. “Never was a war so just
or so necessary,” remarks Palfrey, “that he who should truly exhibit
the details of its prosecution would not find the sympathy of gentle
hearts deserting him as he proceeded. Between right policy and the
suffering which sometimes it brings upon individuals, there is a
wide chasm, to be bridged over by an argument with which the heart
does not naturally go. When, for urgent reasons of public safety, it
has been determined to take the desperate risk of sending the whole
available force of a community into the field to encounter desperate
odds, and certain to be set on, if worsted, by neutral thousands, the
awful conditions of the venture forbid daintiness in the means of
achieving the victory, or about using it in such a manner as to veto
the chance of incurring the same peril again. At all events, from the
hour of that fatal carnage Connecticut was secure. There could now be
unguarded sleep in the long-harassed cabins of the settlers. It might
be hoped that civilization was assured of a permanent abode in New
England.”[960]

Mason followed up his victory, like an able soldier as he was. After
the fatal night attack, Sassacus and the remnant of his undone
tribe fled westward.[961] They were overtaken, and forced to fight
in a swamp and in a panic. Then there was another massacre; and two
hundred prisoners were captured, besides a booty of trays, kettles,
and wampum.[962] The Pequod chieftain once more baffled fate, and
with a body of twenty warriors sought an asylum among the Mohawks,
on the banks of the Hudson, where the unhappy sagamore, bereaved
of people and of country, was himself treacherously slain, his
scalp-lock being sent as a trophy to the pale-face conquerors.[963]

At the same time two other chiefs were hunted down at a point east of
New Haven. Here they were beheaded; and the spot—now a famous summer
resort—has been called since that day “Sachem’s Head.”[964]

It is sad to relate that this awful slaughter was crowned by the
enslavement of the wretched survivors of the fight. When Mason
returned to Hartford, bringing the retinue of his command with him,
Massachusetts and Connecticut, needing laborers, and blind to the
injustice, divided the human booty; and with Rhode Island, which
purchased some of the victims, they must share the guilt.[965] But
in this the Pilgrims did not sin against the spirit of their age. It
was not an insurrection against the conscience of that epoch, for
the flagitious practice was universal. Human slavery had not yet been
branded as infamous amid the scornful execrations of mankind.

Thus in death and captivity closed the career of a gallant tribe.
They threw themselves before the chariot-wheels of progress, and were
crushed; they essayed to check God, and were overthrown. Like ancient
Agag, they were hewn in pieces. In its first warlike bout with
barbarism, civilization was the victor, and went crowned with bays.




CHAPTER XXX.

DE PROFUNDIS.

      “We have strict statutes and most biting laws,
      The needful bits and curbs to headstrong steeds.”
                                            SHAKSPEARE.


The Pilgrim Fathers were not students of Godefridus de Valle’s odd
book, “_De Arte Nihil Credendi_”—The Art of believing Nothing. They
did believe, from the bottom of their hearts; and, in obedience to
Paul, they strove to “hold fast” that which they esteemed “good.”
They had two passions, devotion to the common weal as citizens,
and to the interests of the church as Christians. “They regarded
themselves, not as individual fugitives from trans-Atlantic
persecution, but rather as confederates in a political association
for religious purposes.”[966] From this idea their mixed government
naturally evolved; and this, in its turn, gave birth to the principle
that the magistrate was armed with power to suppress all phases of
internal opposition to the theocracy; because that type of authority
logically carried in its train the necessary conditions of its
perpetuity.

They neither invited nor desired the intrusion of elements at
variance with their ideas; and to such they said, pointing to the
broad continent, “There is room; leave us in peace.” And to secure
themselves from molestation, it was enacted, in 1637, that “none
should be received into the jurisdiction of Massachusetts Bay but
such as should be welcomed by the magistrates”[967]—a provision
somewhat analogous to the alien law of England and to the European
policy of passports.[968]

Singularly enough, Massachusetts Bay, spite of its exclusive policy,
possessed from the very outset a strong charm in the eyes of those
who dissented from its formulas. Like the _Petit Monsieur_ who found
himself left out of the tapestry which exhibited the story of the
Spanish invasion, they longed to work themselves in the hangings
of colonial history. They soon swarmed in Boston and Salem; and
notwithstanding the banishment of Roger Williams, the “heretics”
continued to thrive.

Ere long the public mind “was excited to intense activity on
questions which the nicest subtlety only could have devised, and
which none but those experienced in the shades of theological opinion
could long comprehend; for it goes with these opinions as with
colors, of which the artist who works in mosaic easily and regularly
discriminates many thousand varieties, where the common eye can
discern a difference only on the closest comparison.”[969]

From this fermentation there bubbled up a profound and bitter
struggle. The strife filled the interstices of the Pequod war, whose
prosecution it sadly crippled; and indeed, at one time it threatened
to rend the colony by civil war.[970]

Two distinct parties were early developed. One was composed chiefly
of the older colonists, headed by Dudley, and Phillips, and Wilson,
and Winthrop, an able coalition of clergymen and politicians. These
were earnest to preserve the state as it was. They discountenanced
innovation, and “dreaded freedom of opinion as the parent of various
divisions.” They said, “These cracks and flaws in the new building of
the Reformation portend a fall.”[971] They were anxious “to confirm
and build up the colony, child of their prayers and sorrows; and
for that they desired patriotism, union, and a common heart.” They
dreaded change, because they knew that,

      “Striving to better, oft we mar what’s well.”

The other party was iconoclastic. It was “composed of men and women
who had arrived in New England after the civil government and
religious discipline of the Pilgrims had been established.”[972]
They felt cramped under the theocracy; and having come self-banished
to the wilderness to enjoy toleration, they resisted every form of
despotism over the human mind, and “sustained with intense fanaticism
the paramount authority of private judgment.” “They came,” observes
Bancroft, “fresh from the study of the tenets of Geneva, and their
pride consisted in following the principles of the Reformation with
logical precision to all their consequences. Their eyes were not
primarily directed to the institutions of Massachusetts, but to the
doctrines of its religious system; so to them the colonial clergy
seemed ‘the ushers of a new persecution,’ ‘a popish faction,’ who had
not imbibed the principles of Christian reform; and they applied to
the influence of the Pilgrim ministers the doctrine which Luther and
Calvin had employed against the observances and pretensions of the
Roman church.”[973]

There is an old Latin proverb,

      “Nulla fere causa est, in quâ non fæmina litem
      Moverit.”[974]

The life and soul of the crusade against the theocracy was Anne
Hutchinson, whom Johnson styled, “the chiefest masterpiece of woman’s
wit.”[975] Antedating the Cordays, the Rolands, and the De Staels by
more than a dozen decades, she was the equal, in tact, and zeal, and
honest conviction, of the best of those brilliant women who, in the
_salons_ of the French capital, inspired the revolution of 1793.

Anne Hutchinson was the wife of a Boston merchant, the daughter of a
Puritan preacher in England, and had been one of John Cotton’s most
devoted parishioners ere he was driven into exile.[976] In 1634
she followed that eminent divine to America, and was received into
his church at Boston,[977] spite of some strange theories which she
had avowed on shipboard.[978] Her active benevolence and unflagging
kindness to the sick soon wedded to her many hearts.[979] She planted
herself deep in the affections of the city.

The male members of the Boston church had a habit of taking notes
of the sermon on Sunday, and then holding week-day meetings for the
recapitulation and discussion of the doctrines advanced[980]—a very
commendable practice. Mrs. Hutchinson, thinking perhaps that woman’s
influence and intellect were not sufficiently recognized in the
church, inaugurated a similar series of week-day conventicles for the
ladies of Boston.[981]

Mrs. Hutchinson’s lectures—for she was ever the chief
speaker—attracted crowds, and they were countenanced by Sir Harry
Vane, who then occupied the gubernatorial chair, and by his host,
John Cotton;[982] below whom stood a crowd of warm adherents, flanked
by John Wheelwright the clerical brother-in-law of the lady speaker,
and by the hearty influence of John Coddington one of the wealthiest
of the colonists.[983] “Thus the women,” says Cotton Mather, “like
their first mother, hooked in the husbands also.”[984]

Soon the vigorous and daring mind of Anne Hutchinson struck off new
watchwords. Much was said of a “Covenant of Works” and a “Covenant of
Grace,” and between these many fine distinctions were made. “Under
these heads she and her friends classified the preachers of the
Bay. Those who were understood to rely upon a methodical and rigid
observance of their religious duties as evidence of acceptance with
God were said to be ‘under a covenant of works.’ Those who held to
certain spiritual tenets were ranged ‘under the covenant of grace.’
These phrases began to be banded to and fro. ‘Justification’ and
‘sanctification’ were in all mouths; even children jeered each other;
and there was no stemming the heady current of discussion as it swept
on.”[985]

Winthrop and his coadjutors looked upon the debate with equal horror
and alarm. Two words, which were then common, expressed to them a
vague but frightful danger; _Antinomianism_ was one, and _Familism_
was the other. The _Antinomians_ were a sect of German extraction,
and their name meant _against the Law_; for they held that “the
gospel of Christ had superseded the law of Moses.”[986] But the word
had been made the shelter of sad excesses and many base acts, so that
it was in bad odor among the Pilgrims, who esteemed Antinomianism to
be a cloak to cover the naked form of license.[987]

_Familism_ had been nursed into vicious life in Holland; where,
in 1555, Henry Nicholas formed a “Family of Love,” who, in their
opinions, “grieved the Comforter, charging all their sins on God’s
Spirit, for not effectually assisting them against themselves.”[988]
The Familists had long been numerous, factious, and dangerous, in
England, and their practice was even worse than their doctrine; for
their laxity of morals made them the sappers of social order.[989]

Anne Hutchinson does not seem to have been inoculated with the
virus of Familism; but she was, of course, an Antinomian, since she
assailed the theocratic law; and therefore, to the heated minds of
the Pilgrims, she might easily appear to be the fleshly tabernacle of
both—the incarnation of heresy.

Meantime the debate grew in bitterness. Mrs. Hutchinson, when taunted
with Familism and Antinomianism, retorted by nicknaming her foes
_Legalists_; “because,” she said, “you are acquainted neither with
the spirit of the gospel nor with Christ himself.”[990] Boston echoed
the phrase with wild delight, and “Legalist! Legalist! Legalist!” was
dinned into the ears of the clergy of the Bay.

Winthrop and his friends were exasperated, and they invoked the
courts to interfere. Several of the Antinomians were heavily
fined.[991] Wheelwright, who, in a fast-day sermon, had strenuously
maintained the Antinomian tenets, was formally censured by the
General Court for sedition.[992]

Then the innovators were, in their turn, angered. “The fear of
God and the love of neighbors was laid by;” Mrs. Hutchinson and
her adherents clamored all the louder; and Vane, disgusted and
dispirited, tendered his resignation, and craved permission to return
to England;[993] but “the expostulations of the Boston church finally
turned him from his design,” and kept him at his post.[994]

Meanwhile Wheelwright, provoked at his censure, had appealed
to England. This wrecked Vane’s administration, and ruined the
Antinomian cause; for the patriotic feeling of the colony ran so
high, that “it was accounted perjury and treason to appeal to
the king.”[995] In the elections of 1637 public opinion was made
manifest; Winthrop, with the towns and the churches at his back,
outvoted Vane, whose sole support was Boston, and the fathers of the
colony once more grasped the helm.[996]

Winthrop originated, enacted, and defended the alien law.[997] This
found in Vane an inflexible opponent; and, using the language of the
time, he left a memorial of his dissent. “Scribes and Pharisees,
and such as are confirmed in any way of error”—these are the
remarkable words of the man who soon embarked for England, where he
afterwards pleaded in Parliament for the liberties of all classes of
dissenters—“all such are not to be denied cohabitation, but are to
be pitied and reformed. Ishmael shall dwell in the presence of his
brethren.”[998]

Now that the founders of the colony had emerged from their brief
eclipse and regained their pristine influence, they decided to
initiate measures which should definitely silence the unseemly
“noise about the temple.” An ecclesiastical synod was convened.[999]
Assembling in the summer of 1637, it branded eighty-two opinions then
in vogue as heretical, and summoned Anne Hutchinson, Wheelwright, and
others of that “ilk,” to their bar for examination.[1000]

They appeared; and Cotton, who had satisfied his brother clergymen
of his orthodoxy, tainted for a space by his connection with the
Antinomians, was set to examine Mrs. Hutchinson; “which was hard
for him to do, and bitter for her to endure; for she had been his
_protégé_.”[1001]

This remarkable woman was now in her element. She was calm, and she
was firm, and she was keen; for,

          “Spirits are not finely touched
      But to fine issues.”

But one bold avowal sealed her doom. “We have,” she said, “a new rule
of practice by immediate revelations; by these we guide our conduct.
Not that we expect any revelation in the way of a miracle; that is a
delusion; but we despise the anathemas of your synods and courts, and
will still follow the whisperings of conscience.”[1002]

This speech caused wide-spread alarm. It seemed to squint towards
anarchy. “The true parents of the brats began to discover
themselves,” quaintly comments old Mather, “when the synod lifted the
sword upon them.”[1003] An insurrection of lawless fanatics, “like a
Munster tragedy,” seemed brewing. The magistrates decided that the
danger was desperate; that Anne Hutchinson was “like Roger Williams,
or worse;”[1004] and so, says Winthrop, “we applied the last remedy,
and that without delay.”[1005]

Anne Hutchinson, Wheelwright, and Aspinwall, were solemnly exiled as
“unfit for the society” of the Pilgrims; and those of their followers
who remained were ordered to deliver up their arms, lest they should,
“upon some revelation, make a sudden insurrection.”[1006]

Thus ended the _ecclesiarum prælia_.[1007] “And thus,” says Cotton
Mather, “was the hydra beheaded—_hydra decapitata_.”[1008] “This
legislation may be reproved for its jealousy, but not for its
cruelty; for it condemned the “heretics” to a banishment not more
severe than many of the best of the Pilgrims had encountered from
choice.” But it is a sad chapter; and perhaps the old divine was
right when he wrote, “What these errors were ’tis needless now to
repeat; they are dead and gone, and buried past resurrection; ’tis a
pity to strive to rake them from their graves.”[1009]

The exiles, followed by great numbers of proselytes, on quitting
Massachusetts Bay, wandered southward, “designing to plant a
settlement on Long Island, or near Delaware Bay. But Roger
Williams welcomed them to his vicinity,” and obtained for them a
resting-place. They colonized Rhode Island, or _Aquitneck_, as it
was then called. “It was not price nor money that got Rhode Island,”
wrote Williams; “it was gotten by _love_; by the love and favor which
that honorable gentleman, Sir Harry Vane, and myself, had with that
great sachem, Miantonomoh.”[1010]

Being thus held by the same tenure that Providence owned, Aquitneck
was based upon the self-same principle of intellectual liberty;
and though the two were not united in one state until after the
Restoration, they clasped hands in equal brotherhood, and were buoyed
by toleration.

Thus the principles of Anne Hutchinson, thrown out of Massachusetts,
sprouted in Rhode Island, and grew a well-ordered, sober state. A
happy result flowed from an unhappy cause.

And now for a season internecine strife was hushed. All eyes were
directed across the water. “The angels of the trans-Atlantic
churches, sounding forth their silver trumpets, heard the sound of
rattling drums” on every European breeze.[1011] Democracy was about
to assert itself in England. The Pilgrim Fathers grasped hands, and
silently marked the lesson; which was, that “courtiers, bishops, and
kings, too, have a joint in their necks.”




CHAPTER XXXI.

THE CHART AND THE PILOTS.

      “And sovereign law, the state’s collected will,
        O’er thrones and globes elate,
      Sits empress, crowning good, repressing ill.”
                                      SIR WILLIAM JONES.

      “To do the genteel deeds—that makes the gentleman.”
                                                   CHAUCER.


’Tis a trite saying, that legislation reflects character. The penal
code of a state mirrors the culture, the thought, and the habits of
its citizens; because laws grow from men’s exigencies. Of course, the
Pilgrims had a legal chart, and they wrote its quaint characters in
the ink of their peculiarities. Unlike our statute-book, it made no
fine distinctions and it used no legal fictions, but was very simple
and very plain; results due to the primitive social customs of the
colonies, to the lack of lawyers, and to the constant effort to avoid
litigation; for in those days they did not mean

          ——“With subtle cobweb cheats,
      To catch in knotted law, like nets;
      In which, when men are once imbrangled,
      The more they stir, the more they’re tangled.”

The founders of New England had little sympathy with, and made no
provision for, legal legerdemain. They were much too earnest and
honest to admire that kind of justice which Pope has satirized:

      “Once—says an author, where I need not say—
      Two travellers found an oyster in their way:
      Both fierce, both hungry, the dispute grew strong,
      When, scale in hand, dame Justice passed along.
      Before her each with clamor pleads the laws,
      Explains the matter, and would win the cause.
      Dame Justice, weighing long the doubtful right,
      Takes, opens, swallows it, before their sight.
      The cause of strife removed so rarely well,
      ‘There take’—says Justice—‘take you each a shell.
      We thrive at Westminster on fools like you:
      ’Twas a fat oyster—live in peace—adieu.’”

But while the Pilgrims knew nothing of law as a vehicle for quarrels
to ride on and for trickery to drive, they made use of it as a bit
to curb disorder. “Some of their enactments exhibit profound wisdom,
sagacity, and forecast; others show their strong attachment to the
precepts of the Bible; and still others descend to matters of such
trivial nature as to appear puerile; yet of these it may be said that
they are preventive. The Pilgrims believed in nipping crime in the
bud. The things forbidden may have been, in themselves, comparatively
unimportant; but their influence, if unchecked, might have led to
gross offences. By destroying the seed of wickedness, they labored to
prevent the fruits.”[1012]

Very evidently the colonists were not free traders, for, three years
after the landing at Plymouth Rock, a protective law was passed,
by which it was enacted that “no handicraftsmen, as shoemakers,
tailors, carpenters, joiners, smiths, and sawyers, belonging to this
plantation, shall work for any strangers and foreigners until the
domestic necessities be served.”[1013] And at the same time, in order
to prevent the return of a famine which had repeatedly visited them,
it was enacted that “until farther orders, no corn, beans, or peas,
be exported, under penalty of a confiscation of such exports.”[1014]

Marriage was held to be a civil contract,[1015] and the intention to
marry was to be published fourteen days, including three Sabbaths,
before the union, and was then to be consummated only on the consent
of the parents or guardian of the lady, if she were under “parental
covert.”[1016]

Denial of the Scriptures as the rule of life, was an indictable
offence, and was punishable by whipping; so were violations of
the Sabbath, the neglecting of public worship, and slander.[1017]
Once a Miss Boulton, on conviction of slander, was condemned to
the humiliating punishment of sitting in the stocks, with a paper
fastened to her breast on which were written the details of her
offence in capital letters.[1018] At another time, two men were
similarly dealt with for having disturbed a meeting;[1019] and this
same court also “sharply reproved John Whitson for writing a note
on common business on the Lord’s day.”[1020] Women who abused their
husbands or who struck their fathers-in-law, were fined or whipped at
the option of the magistrate.[1021]

Very odd and very arbitrary all this seems to us; but it came
naturally from the theocratic idea, which subordinated every other
interest to religion. And with all its singularities, it must be
confessed that the Pilgrim code was, as a whole and at that time,
adapted to secure a higher moral character to the community than
would have been attained by the naturalization of the then existing
laws of any other people.[1022]

Occasionally, “whales used to be driven ashore, whereupon the
Pilgrims would obtain oil from them. Ere long it was ordained that
when such an incident occurred, or when any whale was cut up at sea
and brought into port, one full hogshead of oil should be paid to the
state;”[1023] and this was the first impost, from which have grown
the custom-houses of our age.

The court which framed this law also proposed, “as a thing very
commendable and beneficial to the towns where God’s providence cast
whales, that all should agree to set apart some portion of such fish
or oil for the encouragement of an able, godly ministry.”[1024]

But the chief strength of New England lay in the Puritan homes. These
were the nurseries of Christian freemen. Good could hardly fail to
result when “parents were required to see that their children were
taught to read the Scriptures and to recite some short orthodox
catechism, without the book; and when they ‘brought up’ their
families to some honest calling that made them useful to themselves
and to the commonwealth.”

The New England towns were perfect democracies. “Their formation
was promoted by the dread of, and danger from, Indians, and also
by the demand for churches and schools. The settlers, therefore,
did not scatter widely upon large plantations, but collected in
villages, with their farms around them. The town-meetings were held
annually—usually in the spring—and every voter was expected to be
present to take his part in the direction of affairs; this was looked
upon as a chief duty; and it was held that a man who would not use
his liberty and do this duty was no good citizen. The roll of voters
was often called, and the absentees were each fined eighteen pence.
At first they met in the church; but eventually each town provided
itself with a town-house, in which to conduct its business and hold
its courts. When the meetings came to order, some grave and good
citizen was chosen moderator. Then the town business was brought up
in order. Motions were made, briefly debated, and voted upon. Matters
passed at one meeting were often reversed at a subsequent one, and
the minutes read, ‘Undone next meeting.’ The voters granted lands,
established and repaired mills, roads, and ferries, and took order as
to clearing commons, paying the schoolmaster, raising the salary of
the minister, and electing deputies to the General Court. In every
town from three to seven ‘prudential men,’ afterwards called ‘select
men,’ were appointed to administer the town affairs between the
annual meetings; and these held petty courts, decided minor cases,
and acted as referees in most disputes. Such was the nursing on
which these states grew up a congeries of towns, true and strong and
free.”[1025]

Among the many peculiarities of the Pilgrim Fathers, perhaps the
oddest trait was either their lack of ambition or their sober sense
of the responsibilities of office, whose honors and emoluments so
little tempted them, that even the position of governor went begging.
Indeed, they had to be pricked up to their duty by statute; for
in 1632 it was provided that if any one should refuse to sit in
the gubernatorial chair, after election, he should be fined twenty
pounds.[1026] Winthrop, under the year 1633, makes this record:
“This year, Mr. Edward Winslow was elected governor of Plymouth, and
Mr. Bradford, having been governor about ten years, _now got off by
importunity_.”[1027]

How much happier we are in our age, for now-a-days thousands of
devoted patriots are perfectly willing to lay their privacy upon
the altar of their country by accepting any office, from a snuggery
in the custom-house to the presidency of the Republic. They only
beg to be used. Men no longer cite that speech of the father of
Themistocles, who, in attempting to dissuade his son from government,
showed him the old, discarded oars which the Grecian mariners had
thrown away upon the sea-shore, and said: “See; the people will
certainly treat their old rulers with the same contempt.”

But if the Pilgrims did not accept office readily, they did not hold
it lightly. No; they were real rulers, not cockades masquerading in
the garb of authority. They took high views of their duties, and
believed with Agapetus, that “the loftier the station one reaches
in the government, the truer should be his devotion to the service
of God;”[1028] and they were sensible of what Cotton Mather styles
that “great stroke” of Cicero: “_Nullâ re propiùs hominas ad Deum
accedunt, quam salutem hominibus dando_”—men approach nearest to the
character of God in doing good to mankind.

“The word _government_ properly signifies the _guidance of a ship_.
Tully uses it in that sense; and in Plutarch the art of steering a
vessel is called _government_.[1029] New England is a little ship
that has weathered many storms, and it is but fair that those who
have stood at the helm of the ship should be remembered in its
story.” Let us mention one or two of these honored pilots.

With William Bradford, the eldest of the New England governors, we
are already acquainted. Born in 1588, he had come to America in the
prime of his life, and devoted himself to God and the common weal.
He was “looked on as a common blessing and father to all,” and he
lived long enough to see those high hopes with which he had embarked
in the “Mayflower” more than realized; for the wilderness refuge
was thronged and prosperous beyond his wildest dreams.[1030] He was
fully appreciated at Plymouth; and with the exception of five years’
respite, when he “got off” by his “importunity,” he was reëlected
governor with annual regularity until death promoted him to a higher
station.[1031]

Bradford’s administration of affairs as connected with the
many vexatious questions arising from the difficulty with the
Merchant-adventurers and with the English partners of the
“Undertakers,” was a model of firmness, wisdom, patience,
forbearance, and energy. So also in his benevolent determination to
bring over the rest of the Leyden exiles at whatever cost, he showed
the fineness and beauty of his character. “Under the pressure of
misfortune, his example was a star of hope, for he never yielded to
despondency; and while, with Brewster, he threw the Pilgrims upon God
for support and provision, he never neglected to set in motion every
possible instrumentality for procuring supplies.”[1032] Patient,
sagacious, devout, heroic, he was the very ideal of a Christian ruler.

We are assured by Cotton Mather that Bradford was “a person for study
as well as for action; and hence, notwithstanding the difficulties
through which he passed in his boyhood, he attained a notable skill
in languages. The Dutch tongue was almost as vernacular to him as
the English; the French he could also manage; the Latin and the Greek
he had mastered; but the Hebrew he most of all studied, ‘Because,’
he said, ‘I would see with my own eyes the ancient oracles of God
in their native beauty.’ He was also well skilled in history, in
antiquity, and in philosophy; and for theology, he became so versed
in it, that he was an irrefragable disputant.”[1033]

But the crown of his shining life was not his genius in executive
affairs, or the journal which he has bequeathed to us as a record
of the cost at which he built at Plymouth Rock; it was “his holy,
prayerful, fruitful walk with God,” and this made him, in a better
sense than Plato meant,

      “The shepherd-guardian of his human fold.”

Bradford’s immediate successors at Plymouth were Edward Winslow and
Thomas Prince, men of the same mould, and whose lives exhaled the
self-same fragrance. “Where the rulers are Christians the state
prospers,” was the old proverb, and in their case it was once more
verified.

John Winthrop was the foremost man in Massachusetts. He was educated,
he was gentlemanly, and he had been rich, but he spent his fortune
“in the furtherance of God’s work,” bidding his son not mourn for
it, but “certainly expect a liberal portion in the prosperity and
blessing of the future.”[1034] He was a man of much gentleness and
amiability; and “his private life was charming” as it crops out
in his exquisite letters to his wife, who remained for a time in
England.[1035]

He carried his admirable temper into public life. He had always an
open hand of charity. When Roger Williams was banished, he wrote
him privately to sustain and encourage him, and even suggested
Narragansett Bay as a safe asylum.[1036] He was always inclined to
lenient ways; and when in his later days he was asked to sign an
order for the banishment of an offending minister, he declined,
remarking: “No, I have done too much of that already.”[1037] With
this natural bent towards liberality, it was only with extreme
reluctance that he yielded to the imperious spirit of intolerance
which then reigned.

As governor, he was prudent, patient, courageous, and
energetic—traits which made him the successful pilot of the ship of
state in the unchartered waters on which he floated.

Winthrop never disdained to share equally with his brother Pilgrims.
It is related of him that once, in a famine, he divided his last peck
of meal with a hungry man, and was only not gnawed by hunger himself,
because a ship entered Salem harbor ere night with a well-stocked
larder, and changed the fast which had been appointed for the next
day into a thanksgiving.[1038]

He knew how to conquer hearts by kindness. One hard winter, complaint
was made to him that a man stole regularly to his woodpile and
abstracted fuel. “Does he?” asked Winthrop; “send him to me; I’ll
cure him.” The quaking wretch was brought in and expected to hear
a rigorous sentence. “Friend,” said he, “it is a cold winter, and
I fear you are but poorly provided with wood to meet it. You are
welcome to supply yourself at my pile till winter is over.”[1039]

Winthrop’s “religion shone out through all his life, and gave
a higher lustre to his character. He was zealous for truth and
righteousness. Often he bore witness to the minister in the midst of
the congregation; and frequently he visited the neighboring towns to
prophesy, as it was called, or as we say, exhort. He had admirers not
only in America, but in England and at court. ‘’Tis a pity,’ remarked
Charles I., ‘that such a worthy gentleman should have banished
himself to the hardships of a wilderness life.’”[1040]

In Massachusetts the colonists believed in rotation in office;
consequently, Winthrop was often displaced from the gubernatorial
chair, and then replaced again. He always filled the post with
dignity and with untarnished honor; so that on his death at sixty,
worn out by toil and care, he might have torn his books of account,
as Scipio Africanus did, and said: “A flourishing colony has been
led out and settled under my direction. I have spent my fortune and
myself in its service. Waste no more time in harangues, but give
thanks to God.”[1041]

Winthrop’s great rival in influence and position was stern Thomas
Dudley. His views corresponded far more completely with the
theocratic formulas than did those of his mild and somewhat pliant
friend. Dudley was bold, aggressive, and dogmatic; and he frequently
quarrelled with Winthrop, because that statesman would not hack
dissenters with his harsh hatchet, but was cautious, and temporizing,
and conciliatory, alike from temperament and from discipline. He
was always chosen deputy when Winthrop was elected governor; and on
several occasions he held the chief office himself. “He was a man of
sound sense, sterling integrity, and uncompromising faith. He was
rigid in his religious opinions, and urged the strictest enforcement
of the sedition laws. He considered that the various opinions that
were struggling to manifest themselves from time to time tended to
licentiousness; and he was desirous that his epitaph should be—‘I
died no libertine.’”[1042] To paint him in a word, Dudley was an
upright and downright man—a “piece of living justice.”

Sir Harry Vane did not tarry long in New England; arriving in 1635,
he went home in 1637 to lend his name and brains to the dawning
revolution, and to carve his spirit on the marble of the ages. But
short as was his sojourn on the west of the Atlantic, he stayed long
enough to achieve wide honor and to leave plain traces of his genius.
He, too, was a Pilgrim, and “it is a singular fact in the history of
New England, that, among her pioneers, were such men as Vane, well
born, well bred, and able to command a splendid career at home.”[1043]

“Sir Henry Vane the younger,” remarks Bancroft, “was a man of the
purest mind, and a statesman of the rarest integrity, whose name
the progress of intelligence and liberty will erase from the rubric
of fanatics and traitors, and insert high among the aspirants after
truth and the martyrs for liberty. Almost in his boyhood he had
valued the ‘obedience of the gospel’ more than the successful career
of English diplomacy, and he cheerfully ‘forsook the preferments of
the court of Charles for the ordinances of religion in their purity
in New England.’”[1044]

While here he was the warm friend of Roger Williams and Anne
Hutchinson; and when he went home he carried back with him the same
ardor for Christian truth which had impelled him to grasp hands with
Winthrop in the wilderness. He had a heart, and “he was happy in the
possession of an admirable genius, though naturally more inclined to
contemplative excellence than to action. He was happy, too, in the
eulogist of his virtues; for Milton, ever parsimonious of praise,
reserving the majesty of his verse to celebrate the glories and
vindicate the providence of God, was lavish of his encomiums on the
youthful friend of religious liberty. But Vane was still more happy
in attaining early in life a firmly-settled theory of morals, and
in possessing an energetic will, which made all his conduct to the
very last conform to the doctrines he had espoused, turning his dying
hour into a seal of witness, which his life had ever borne with noble
consistency to the freedom of conscience and the people. ‘If he were
not superior to Hampden,’ says Clarendon, ‘he was inferior to no
other man;’ ‘his whole life made good the imagination that there was
in him something extraordinary.’”[1045]

Bluff John Endicott was another of the famous characters whose
names and fame are impressed on the vellum of colonial history. He
is said to have been perhaps the finest specimen of the genuine
Puritan character to be found among the early governors. “He was
quick of temper, with strong religious feelings; resolute to uphold
with the sword what he had received as gospel truth; and feared no
enemy so much as a gainsaying spirit. He tore the cross out of the
English flag, cut down the May-pole at Merry-Mount, rakish Morton’s
sometime den, published his detestation of long hair in a formal
proclamation, and set dissenters in the pillory. Inferior to Winthrop
in learning—in comprehension to Vane—in tolerance even to Dudley—he
excelled them all in the keen eye to discern the fit moment for
action, in the quick resolve to profit by it, and in the hand always
ready to strike.”[1046]

These are a few of the central figures, the pivotal men, of the
first half dozen Pilgrim decades in New England. There are many more
almost equally eminent and worthy of immortal honor—Bradstreet, and
Hopkins, and Eaton, and the younger Winthrop. Here is an _embarras
des richesses_, and neither time nor space serves to name the
lengthened list of worthies who lent lustre and dignity to the
colonial annals. The best of them were the peers of the first men
of any age or country; and the worst more than met the requirements
of the Latins in their rulers: “The Roman people,” says Cicero,
“selected their magistrates as if they were to be stewards of the
republic. Proficiency in other departments, if it existed, they
gladly tolerated; but if such additional accomplishments were
lacking, they were content with the virtue and honesty of their
public servants.”[1047]

The Pilgrim governors were at least all honest, and virtuous,
and true; and they would have pleased those Thebans who made the
statues of their judges without hands, importing that they were no
takers, for these men too were guiltless of handling bribes. God
blessed colonial New England rarely when he sent her such men as a
benediction. But they are gone—Bradford, and Winthrop, and Carver,
and Dudley, and Vane, and Endicott.

                        ——“Woe the day!
      How mingles mightiest dust with meanest clay.”




CHAPTER XXXII.

EUREKA.

  “Like one who had set out on his way by night, and travelled
  through a region of smooth or idle dreams, our history now arrives
  on the confines, where daylight and truth meet us with a clear
  dawn, representing to our view, though at far distance, true colors
  and shapes.”
                                         MILTON, _History of England_.


When Great Britain, looking through the eyes of the Long Parliament
in 1641, glanced across the Atlantic, she was surprised to see that
the despised bantling of 1620 had, against all discouragements,
staggered to its feet, and stood a nation, self-sustaining, robust,
independent.

Already twenty-one thousand Pilgrims were permanently seated in
New England;[1048] fifty prosperous villages[1049] peeped from the
openings in the long unbroken forests. The steeples of forty churches
pointed their white fingers to the sky.[1050] The rude log-cabins
of the first months of settlement had been replaced by well-built
houses.[1051] Agriculture climbed the hill-sides. Commerce played
by the sea-shore. Trade laughed and chaffed and dickered in the
market-place. The spindle and the loom nodded merrily to each other
over their work, as they labored side by side in the fabrication of
“cotton and woollen and linen cloth;” for manufactures were even thus
early established in New England.[1052]

And the Pilgrims had a foreign influence. When a Madeira merchant
visited Boston in 1642, he told Winthrop that the West Indian Jesuits
taught that the “New-Englanders were the worst of all heretics, and
that they were the cause of the civil war in the British island, and
of the downfall of Archbishop Laud.”[1053]

The Pilgrims in England cordially recognized their kinship to the
exiles. When the Parliament held regal prerogatives, in 1641,
the colonists were urgently advised to solicit the admission of
their delegates to its floor. “But upon consulting about it,” says
Winthrop, “we declined the motion, for this consideration, that if
we should put ourselves under the protection of the Parliament,
we should then be subject to all its laws, or at least to such
as the Commons might be pleased to impose on us; which might be
inconvenient, and prove very prejudicial to us.”[1054] And when, a
twelvemonth later, “letters arrived inviting the colonial churches to
send representatives to the Westminster Assembly of Divines, the same
sagacity led them to neglect the invitation. The love of political
independence declined even benefits. New England spoke almost as one
sovereign to another.”[1055]

The Pilgrims were singularly jealous of their franchises, and they
never neglected an opportunity to consolidate and enlarge their
liberty. And now, since the days had come when England was rent by
the demon of war, when the throne tottered to its fall, when exultant
republicanism, speaking through the lips of Cromwell, shouted, “_Sic
semper tyrannis!_” as the head of a royal despot was struck off, the
colonists had ample time in which to develop and define their rights.

Thus, exciting and momentous as were the scenes enacted on the
European stage, and deeply as the Forefathers were interested in
the issue, they were not won to overlook their own home drama. They
were busy at this very time in reaping the benefits of secure and
liberal domestic legislation. A bill of rights was promulgated; and
under this, “though universal suffrage was not established, every
man, whether citizen or alien, received the right of introducing
any business into any public assembly, and of taking part in its
deliberations. Then Massachusetts, by special law, offered free
welcome and aid, at the public cost, to Christians of any nationality
who might fly beyond the Atlantic ‘to escape from wars or famine,
or the oppression of their persecutors.’ Thus the fugitive and the
downtrodden were, by statute, made the guests of the commonwealth.
Pilgrim hospitality was as wide as misfortune.”[1056]

This noble legislation was but the forerunner of a yet more
significant act. In 1643, after several prior ineffectual
essays, the four chief colonies of New England clasped hands in
a confederacy.[1057] Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Haven, and
Plymouth, by solemn and free agreement, became the “UNITED COLONIES
OF NEW ENGLAND.”[1058] The Dutch Republic was the model of this
union;[1059] and the reasons which impelled the Pilgrims to cement it
are recited in the preamble to the twelve Articles of Agreement:

“Whereas, we all came into these parts of America with one and
the same end and aim, namely, to advance the kingdom of our Lord
Jesus Christ, and to enjoy the liberties of the gospel in purity
and peace; and whereas, in our settling—by a wise providence of
God—we are farther dispersed upon the seacoasts and rivers than was
at first intended, so that we cannot, according to our desires,
with convenience communicate in one government and jurisdiction;
and whereas we live encompassed with people of several nations
and strange languages, which may hereafter prove injurious to
us or our posterity; and forasmuch as the natives have formerly
committed sundry insolences and outrages upon several plantations
of the English, and have of late combined themselves against us;
and seeing, by reason of these sad distractions in England, which
the Indians have heard of, and by which they know we are hindered
from that humble way of seeking advice or reaping those comfortable
fruits of protection which at other times we might well expect; we
hereby conceive it our bounden duty, without delay, to enter into a
present consociation for mutual help and strength in all our future
concernments; that, as in nation and religion, so in other respects,
we be and continue one.”[1060]

The old Hindoo dreamed that he saw the human race led out to its
varied fortune. First, he saw men bitted and curbed, and the reins
went back to an iron hand. But his dream changed on and on, until
at last he saw men led by reins that came from the brain and ran
back into shadowy fingers. It was the type of progress. The first
was despotism; the last was a government of ideas, of morals, of the
normal forces of society.[1061] The New England Confederation was the
forerunner of a mightier union; and when Liberty saw it, she cried,
“Eureka!” and thanked God.

The machinery of the league was very simple, very sensible, and
very effective. The colonies were co-equal. Each appointed two
commissioners, who formed a directory, which was to hold an annual
session. The commissioners were empowered to assemble more frequently
if necessity pressed; and they could deliberate on all matters which
were “the proper concomitants or consequents of confederation.”[1062]
“The affairs of peace and war exclusively belonged to them. They
were authorized to make internal improvements at the common charge,
assessed according to population. They too were the guardians to see
equal and speedy justice assured to all the confederates in every
jurisdiction; but each colony carefully reserved its respective local
rights, as the badges of continued independence; so that, while the
commissioners might decree war and levy troops, they had no executive
power, but were dependent on the states for the execution of the
plans they matured and voted.”[1063]

Two bodies of colonists were rigidly excluded from this union.
Gorges’ pioneers, beyond the Piscataqua, were not admitted,
because “they ran a different course” from the Pilgrims, “both in
their ministry and in their civil administration.” Providence and
Rhode Island were shut out, partly because they were not esteemed
sufficiently strong and settled to add strength to the league,
and also because they were regarded as the haunts of heresy and
fanaticism.[1064] It was thought that the confederacy, in order to be
effective, should be homogeneous. On that basis it was launched; and,
surviving “the jealousies of the Long Parliament, it met with favor
from the Protector, remained safe from censure at the restoration of
the Stuarts,” and walked buoyantly on, scattering its benefactions
on the right hand and on the left, until James II. vacated the New
England charters, in 1686.[1065]

The colonial union was the crowning service of the founders of New
England to humanity. Now they began, one by one, to descend into the
grave, worn to early death by a toilsome grapple with the rough and
grinding forces of nature. But in their footsteps trudged their sons,
succeeding to the same blessed inheritance of faith, and love, and
godly energy.[1066]

Travellers tell us that at Florence there is a rich table, worth a
thousand crowns, made of precious stones neatly inlaid, in whose
construction thirty men were employed daily for fifteen years. The
Pilgrim Fathers were twice that time in carving out and inlaying
New England with churches, and free schools, and printing-presses,
and manufactures. Think of their task. “That gore of land, a few
hundred miles wide and long, which lies between the St. Lawrence and
the Atlantic ocean, and seems to have been formed of the leavings
and fragments after the rest of the continent was made, whose ribs
stick out past all covering; which has sand enough to scour the
world; where there are no large rivers, but many nimble little ones,
which seem to have been busy since the flood in taking exercise over
rifts and rocks. This was their field of action. The only indigenous
productions were ice, Indians, and stunted trees. Trading and
commercial adventurers had essayed to effect a settlement in vain.
The soil was too hard even for Indians and rovers. It was apparently
set apart for a wilderness, and it had peculiar aptitudes for keeping
man away from it. Its summers were short, its winters were long, its
rocks were innumerable, its soil was thin.” Yet the Pilgrims entered
and subdued this waste, making it to bud with churches and to bloom
with schools; cultivating it to the sterile hill-tops; dotting the
landscape with neat farm-houses, factories, mills, the evidences and
the tokens of a ripe, full civilization.

But the fierce struggle with nature left its scars upon the Pilgrims,
and it has marked their children. They had to seize and impress into
their service every help. This begot the inventive faculty, and the
habit of looking at every thing from the angle of its utility. This
it was which strung factories on every stream-side, as gold beads
are hung on a silver cord; which used every drop of water a dozen
times over in turning wheels before it was suffered to run, weary
and fretted, to the sea; which sent the little feet toddling to the
woodpile to pick up chips; which made labor-saving machines, those
gnomes whose cunning fingers were to work up the black earth and the
hard rock into golden grains.

“Looking, therefore, at civilization in New England, we see a
people beginning without aristocracy or hierarchical forms. We see
the leading men among them educated and honorable; the working men
devoted to agriculture and owners of the soil. We see all resisting
the incoming of a state church, persistently opposing a distant but
domineering court; and, singularly enough, through nigh two centuries
of savage and civilized war, steadily refusing to organize a standing
army, trusting to the native valor of the mass. Thus the commonalty
educated themselves by daily practice in self-government, until, at
this present time, rulers there are simply lay-figures for show-days.”

“The Pilgrims were readers. Drunkenness, pauperism, filth, and
dilapidation, nowhere abounded. They were thrifty, and industrious,
and frugal; and so, though the land was poor, they lived in comfort.
Money was hard to get, and carefully spent; no man lavished it,
or lent it except on good security; yet nowhere else was there
such a constant contribution for the relief of suffering or the
cure of secular and religious ignorance; nowhere else would men
more quickly risk life and health to serve a fellow. As there was
no aristocracy, so there was no inferior or pariah class, except
when, at an unguarded moment, negro slavery crept in for a time.
But servitude was so palpably contrary to the genius and principles
of the Pilgrims, that it was banished as soon as the mind and
conscience grappled with it;” for the corner-stone of New England was
religion, and the top-stone was honest, self-respecting, well-paid,
and skilled labor. Religion and labor begot that spirit which has
tamed the continent, cheered it with churches and schools, set the
busy spindles humming and the shuttles flying, plunged into the
earth and into the sea, run over the prairies, talking by lightning
from the Atlantic to the Pacific, until the whole land where men are
intelligent, industrious, and free, seems singing and smiling at its
daily work.

The Pilgrim Fathers literally obeyed the injunction of the great
German poet—they knew the aim and reason of yesterday; they worked
well to-day for worthy things, calmly trusting the future’s hidden
season, and believing with unquestioning faith that their children
would eat of the fruit of the tree which they had planted in a
sterile soil and under wintry skies. Patient in waiting, they never
hurried; they did not dig up their seed every twelve hours to see
whether it had sprouted. Without haste, they were also without rest;
and in their treatment of causes, they never paused to worry and fret
about effects; for they knew that justice was the best policy, and
that the steady every-day bravery which vaunteth not itself is more
than a match for the Hotspur valor which presumes that any cause is
good which is desperately defended.

The Pilgrims were men of conscience; and this they carried with them
into work and into statesmanship. Quincy Adams once, in a happy
moment, called New England “the colony of conscience.” It was a
religious plantation, not an essay for trade. “He that made religion
as twelve and the world as thirteen had not the spirit of a true New
England man.” “Religion was the object of the Pilgrims; it was also
their consolation. With this the wounds of the outcast were healed,
and the tears of exile were sweetened.”

Puritanism has been finely called religion struggling for the
people—evoking, in the logical sequence of events, political
equality. “Those peculiar outward emblems, which were its badges at
first, were of transient duration; like the clay and ligaments with
which the graft is held in its place, made to be brushed away as
soon as the scion is firmly united. The spirit of the Pilgrims was a
life-giving spirit; activity, thrift, intelligence, liberty, followed
in its train; and as for courage, a coward and a Puritan never went
together. ‘He that prays best and preaches best will fight best;’
such was the judgment of Cromwell, the greatest soldier of his age.”

From any enumeration of the elements of the early colonial felicity,
purity of morals must not be omitted. “As Ireland would not brook
venomous serpents, so would not that land vile livers.” One might
dwell there “from year to year, and not see a drunkard, nor hear an
oath, nor meet a beggar.” The consequence was wide-spread health, one
of the chief promoters of social happiness.

As for the soil, it was owned by the colonists. It was bought
and paid for. The little farms, the straggling villages, the
slowly-growing towns, were the absolute private property of
their occupants; and in a time of unusual commotion, when their
settlements, for which they had done and dared so much, seemed
menaced with subversion—seemed liable to be converted into a
receptacle for all the spawn of England—the Pilgrims assumed to
decide, standing on their own grounds, who should be welcomed among
them as fellow-citizens, who should be treated as guests, and who
should be bidden to depart, never to return under the heaviest
penalty.

Yet “on every subject but religion, the mildness of Puritan
legislation corresponded to the popular character of the Puritan
doctrines. Hardly a European nation has as yet made its criminal code
as humane as was that of early New England. The Pilgrims brushed a
crowd of offences at one sweep from the catalogue of capital crimes.
They never countenanced the idea that the forfeiture of human life
may be demanded for the protection of material interests. The
punishment for theft, burglary, highway robbery, was far more mild
than the penalties imposed even by modern American legislation.
Domestic discipline was highly valued; but if the law was severe
against the child who was undutiful, it was also severe against
the parent who was faithless. The earlier laws did not decree
imprisonment for debt, except when there was an appearance of some
estate which the debtor would not produce. Even the brute creation
was not forgotten; and cruelty to animals was a civil offence. The
sympathies of the colonists were wide; a regard for Protestant
Germany was as old as emigration; and during the Thirty Years’ war,
the Pilgrims held fasts and offered prayers for the success of the
Saxon cause”—crowned with the gospel.

But the glory of the Pilgrim Fathers was their faith. They trusted
God, and acted. The secret of their strength and success was the
open Bible and the family altar. They were men, and therefore not
infallible. They sometimes erred grievously, and walked limping and
awry; but they always meant right, and with God’s word as a lamp
to their feet, they could not stray and grope far or long from the
sunlight. To much that the Pilgrim conscientiously believed, and with
his whole heart accepted, the present age has grown careless; we are
lukewarm or indifferent upon some points which he esteemed vital;
but it is small credit to us, if we are tolerant of error simply
because we care little for truth. In former times New England was
not latitudinarian; and, clad in her sparkling snow, crowned with
her evergreen pine, the glory of her brow was justice, the splendor
of her eye was liberty, the strength of her hands was industry,
the whiteness of her bosom was faith; for the Pilgrims were men
of absolute conviction. Moral earnestness was the key with which
they unlocked the treasure-house of success. They were always true
to their highest conceptions; and they could say as Paul said to
Agrippa, “I obeyed the heavenly vision.”

Yet they were not visionaries, but they made that fine distinction
between material nature and spirituality: “giving to Cæsar the things
which are Cæsar’s, and unto God the things which are God’s.” Thus it
was that, though they were the most practical of men, they were also
the most spiritual—wedding a paradox.

The curse of our age is materialism. We kindle only within the
sphere of material interests and pursuits. On higher subjects we
are as cold as an ice-field on the breast of Alp. There is an
apotheosis of dirt. Men do not half believe in what they cannot see,
and feel, and handle. They group about them the tokens of their
skill—steam-engines, and telegraphs, and sewing-machines—and worship
these as the ultimate good, saying, “See, these are the realities of
life.”

The Pilgrim spirit protests against this tendency. It comes to remind
us that the controllers of the present, the moulders of the future,
are not the babblers who plead for an unreal realism; that they are
not the heaviest brains of the epoch, but the heroes of religious
earnestness, men inspired by drinking from the spiritual springs,
men who go forth to fight like the red knight of Odessa, with the
cross emblazoned on their shield, and with Christ buried in their
hearts. Behind intellect there must be a ground-swell of religious
earnestness, else brains are a snare, and useless. Rousseau, and
Voltaire, and Pascal, do not mark the ages. Name them anywhere, and
scores of vacant eyes will ask you, “Who are they?” The Luthers,
the Calvins, the Ridleys, the Brewsters, shake the world, seize
all hearts, and educate the centuries, because they were fired by
conviction, and built for God.

This is the lesson which the story of the Pilgrims teaches us. Let
us heed it; and then, clasping hands with the martyrs and apostles,
we too may press forward with our “garlands and singing-robes about
us,” and by battling for Christ, insure for ourselves in the long
hereafter a blessed rest and a fragrant memory.




FOOTNOTES:

[1] Palfrey, Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 101.

[2] Perhaps this whole chapter of history is nowhere more graphically
treated than in D’Aubigné’s Hist. of the Ref. in the Sixteenth
Century. See also, Ranke’s Hist. of the Popes.

[3] Uhden, New England Theocracy, p. 15.

[4] Grote, Hist. of Greece.

[5] Preface to Warburton’s Divine Legation.

[6] Neale, Hist. of the Puritans. Collier’s Church Hist. Hallam,
Const. Hist. of Eng.

[7] See “An Account of the Principles and Practices of Several
Non-conformists, wherein it appears that their religion is no other
than that which is professed in the Church of England,” etc. By Mr.
John Corbet; London, 1682.

[8] Elliot, Hist. of New Eng., vol. 1, p. 43.

[9] Fuller, Church Hist. Strype, Life of Parker. Heylin, Life of Lord
Clarendon.

[10] Palfrey, Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 113, note.

[11] Palfrey, Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 114.

[12] Hoyt, Antiquarian Researches.

[13] Fuller, Ch. Hist., vol. 3. Rymer’s Fœdera, vol. 16, p. 694.

[14] Goodrich, Ch. Hist.

[15] Neale, History of the Puritans, vol. 1. Rushworth, Clarendon,
etc.

[16] Parliamentary History.

[17] Strype, Life of Whitgift. Bradshaw, English Puritanism, 1605.

[18] Calderwood, True Hist. of the Ch. of Scotland. Perry, Ch. Hist.,
vol. 1.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Fuller, Ch. Hist., vol. 3. Hume, Hist. of Eng., etc.

[21] Barlow’s Account of the Hampton Court Conference. A copy of it
is in Harvard college library. Harrington, Nugæ Antiquæ.

[22] Palfrey, Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 131.

[23] Bradford, Hist. of the Plymouth Plantation, p. 9.

[24] Bancroft, Hist. United States, vol. 1, pp. 277, 278.

[25] Bradford, Hist. Plymouth Plantation.

[26] Ibid., Morton’s Memorial, Founders of New Plymouth, etc.

[27] Bradford, Hist. Plymouth Plantation, pp. 10, 11. See also Neal’s
Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 76.

[28] Some authorities say 1602. Newell, for instance, p. 348, citing
the British Quarterly Review. But so competent an authority as
Bradford gives the date in the text. See also Young’s Chronicles, etc.

[29] Bradford, p. 12.

[30] Ibid. Young’s Chronicles of the Pilgrims.

[31] Bradford, p. 12.

[32] Stoughton, Spiritual Heroes, p. 72.

[33] British Quarterly Review, vol. 1, p. 15.

[34] Stoughton, Young, Bancroft.

[35] Young’s Chronicles, Stoughton, Bradford, etc.

[36] Stoughton.

[37] British Quarterly Review, vol. 1, p. 15.

[38] Stoughton, p. 74.

[39] Young, cited in Stoughton, p. 74.

[40] Young’s Chronicles, p. 29.

[41] The facts in the above description of Amsterdam are taken from
Motley’s Rise of the Dutch Republic, from various accounts of travels
in the Low Countries, and particularly from the very interesting and
instructive “Tour” of W. Chambers. London, 1837.

[42] Bancroft, Hist. United States, vol. 1, p. 303.

[43] Ibid. Bradford, Young, Stoughton, etc.

[44] Bradford, Hist. Plymouth Plantation.

[45] Stoughton, p. 82. Young’s Chronicles.

[46] Morton’s Memorial, Prince, Bradford.

[47] Bradford, Cotton Mather, etc.

[48] Stoughton, p. 82.

[49] Bradford, Hist. Plymouth Plantation, p. 17.

[50] Golden Book of Marcus Aurelius; first printed in English in
1534. Debley’s Typog. Antiq., vol. 3, p. 289.

[51] Bradford, pp. 17, 18.

[52] Bradford, pp. 17, 18. Young, etc.

[53] Bradford, pp. 17, 18.

[54] Cotton Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 47.

[55] Bradford, p. 18. Stoughton.

[56] Cited in Stoughton, p. 84.

[57] Robinson died at Leyden, March 1, 1625.

[58] For an interesting account of Ziska, or Zisca, the blind Hussite
leader of the Bohemian insurgents, who was never defeated, see
Mosheim’s Eccles. Hist., cent. XV., Hallam’s Hist. of the Middle
Ages, vol. 1, p. 463, or the Encyclopædia Americana, article “Zisca.”

[59] Bradford, pp. 18, 19.

[60] Ibid., pp. 19, 20.

[61] The Walloons inhabited the southern Belgic provinces bordering
on France. As they spoke the French language, “they were called
_Gallois_, which was changed, in Low Dutch, into Waalsche, and in
English into Walloon.” Many of them were Protestants, and being
subject to relentless persecution by the Spanish government,
they emigrated in great numbers into Holland, carrying with them
a knowledge of the industrial arts. See Bradford’s Hist. Plym.
Plantation, p. 20, note.

[62] Bradford, p. 20. Stoughton, Young, Ashton’s Life of Robinson.

[63] Stoughton, p. 85.

[64] Bradford, Young, Neal, Mather, etc.

[65] A collection of the Works of John Robinson was printed in London
in 1851, with a memoir and annotations by Mr. Robert Ashton.

[66] Bradford, p. 21. Cotton Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 47.

[67] Bradford, Mather, Stoughton.

[68] Ibid., Young, Ashton’s Life of Robinson.

[69] Robinson’s Apology for the Romanists.

[70] Uhden, New England Theocracy, p. 42. Robinson’s Works, etc.

[71] Uhden, p. 42.

[72] This “famous truce,” so long desired, embraced a period of
twelve years. It was signed in April, 1609, and expired in 1621.
Grattan, Hist. Netherlands.

[73] Bancroft, Hist. United States, vol. 1, p. 303.

[74] Bradford, Hist. Plymouth Plantation, pp. 22, 23.

[75] See Plutarch’s Life of Cato the Younger.

[76] Bradford.

[77] Proverbs 22:3.

[78] Bradford.

[79] Bradford, p. 24.

[80] Bradford, p. 24.

[81] For additional reasons, see Young, p. 385.

[82] Bancroft, Hist. United States, vol. 1, p. 303.

[83] Bradford, p. 24; Young’s Chronicles, etc.

[84] In allusion, probably, to the plantation project at Sagadahoc,
in 1607. See Bancroft and others.

[85] This debate is copied from Bradford, pp. 25-27.

[86] Bradford, Young, Elliot, Bancroft, etc.

[87] Wilson’s Pilgrim Fathers, p. 341.

[88] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 204.

[89] Ibid.

[90] Ibid., Bradford, Young.

[91] Wilson’s Pilgrim Fathers, p. 356.

[92] Ibid., Bradford, Bancroft.

[93] Bradford, p. 29.

[94] Ibid.

[95] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 304.

[96] Bradford, p. 28.

[97] Bradford, p. 28.

[98] For some account of Sir Edwin Sandys, one of the most prominent
members of the Virginia company, see Hood’s Athenæ Oxon., vol. 2, p.
472.

[99] This letter, as also that of Sandys which occasioned it, may be
found _in extenso_ in Bradford, pp. 30, 31, 32, 33.

[100] Bradford, p. 29.

[101] Bancroft, p. 305.

[102] Bancroft.

[103] Bradford.

[104] Ibid. “Being taken in the name of one who failed to accompany
the expedition, the patent was never of the least service.” Bancroft,
vol. 1, p. 303.

[105] Bancroft, pp. 305, 306. The title of the company thus formed
was “The Merchant Adventurers.” See Elliot, vol. 1, p. 49.

[106] Bradford. Winslow in Young’s Chronicles.

[107] Ibid.

[108] Bradford. Winslow in Young’s Chronicles.

[109] Bradford, p. 42.

[110] Bancroft.

[111] Ezra 8:21. This is the version in Bradford’s Narrative.

[112] Stoughton, Spiritual Heroes—The Pilgrim Fathers.

[113] Neale; Winslow in Young; Belknap, Stoughton, etc.

[114] Stoughton, p. 97.

[115] The first separatists were so called after Robert Brown, who,
in the latter part of the sixteenth century, propounded a system of
church government which contained many of the features of modern
Congregationalism. Brown was born in 1549, and was a relative of
Elizabeth’s lord-treasurer, the famous Burleigh. In 1582 he published
his book, “The Life and Manners of True Christians,” and suffered
persecution therefor. Eventually, after a roving life, he conformed
to the church of England, and was made rector in Northamptonshire.
Shortly after, he died very miserably in a jail. Strype’s Annals,
vol. 2. Collier’s Eccl. Hist., part 2, book 7.

[116] Winslow’s account of Robinson’s Sermon.

[117] Wilson’s Pilgrim Fathers. Bradford, Belknap.

[118] Elliot, Hist. of New England, vol. 1. Palfrey, etc.

[119] Ibid., Bradford, Young.

[120] Winslow in Young’s Chronicles.

[121] Stoughton.

[122] Ibid., p. 100.

[123] Young’s Chronicles. Bradford.

[124] Bradford.

[125] Bradford, pp. 69, 70.

[126] Dated Dartmouth, August 17, 1620. Cushman remained in England.
Elliot, vol. 1, p. 57.

[127] Bancroft.

[128] Virgil’s Æneid, book 1.

[129] Elliot, Hist. New England, vol. 1, pp. 58, 59.

[130] See this whole letter in Bradford, pp. 64-67.

[131] Bradford, Young, etc.

[132] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 310. This compact was signed Nov. 11, 1620.

[133] Ibid., p. 309.

[134] “Some have charged that the Dutch bribed the captain to deceive
the Pilgrims. Bradford does not mention it, and the Dutch historians
deny it.” Elliot, vol. 1, p. 59.

[135] Uhden, Wilson, Smith’s Narrative, etc.

[136] Bradford, Elliot, Bancroft.

[137] Longfellow’s Courtship of Miles Standish.

[138] Journal of the Pilgrims.

[139] Ibid.

[140] Journal of the Pilgrims.

[141] Ibid.

[142] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 61.

[143] Bancroft.

[144] Bradford, Winslow.

[145] Ibid. Young, Elliot, Bancroft.

[146] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 62, 63.

[147] Ibid. Bradford, Young.

[148] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 312.

[149] According to the new style of reckoning time, it was the 22d of
December, now kept as “Forefathers’ Day.”

[150] Bradford, Winslow.

[151] Ibid., Elliot, Bancroft.

[152] Fort Hill, now Burial Hill.

[153] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 66.

[154] Now called Leyden-street.

[155] Elliot, Bradford, Young’s Chronicles.

[156] Journal of the Pilgrims.

[157] Ibid., Bancroft.

[158] One of these was Clarke’s Island; the other was probably
Saquish Peninsula.

[159] Young’s Chronicles. Journal of the Pilgrims.

[160] Cotton Mather, Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 51.

[161] Ibid., Elliot, Felt.

[162] Elliot, p. 67.

[163] Ibid. Journal of the Pilgrims. Young, Bradford.

[164] Longfellow’s Miles Standish, p. 11.

[165] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 310.

[166] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 308.

[167]
      “Exiguam sedem sacris, litusque rogamus
      Innocuum, et cunctis undamque; auramque; patentem.”
                       Cotton Mather, Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 52.

[168] Bancroft, Banvard, Elliot, Felt.

[169] Journal of the Pilgrims.

[170] Young’s Chron. of the Pilg’s. Pilgrims’ Jour.

[171] Ibid.

[172] Bradford, Young, Pilgrims’ Journal.

[173] Ibid.

[174] Bradford, Young.

[175] Ibid. Pilgrims’ Journal.

[176] Ibid.

[177] Pilgrims’ Journal.

[178] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 71.

[179] Pilgrims’ Journal.

[180] Bradford, Young.

[181] Ibid. Banvard.

[182] Bancroft, Elliot, Banvard.

[183] Bradford, Pilgrims’ Journal.

“On the 22d of March, the first interview took place between the
Pilgrims and the Indians, with their great chief Massasoit, Squanto
acting as interpreter. This was conducted becomingly on both sides,
and according to the manner of the time. After Gov. Carver had drunk
some ‘strong water’—rum—to the sachem, Massasoit ‘drunk a great
draught that made him sweat all the while after.’ The result of the
conference was an alliance, offensive and defensive, between the
governor and the chief, applauded by the followers of both, and
Massasoit was received as an ally of the dread King James.” Elliot,
vol. 1, p. 72.

[184] Young’s Chronicles, Pilgrims’ Journal.

[185] Bancroft, p. 317.

[186] Pilgrims’ Journal, p. 58.

[187] Elliot, p. 73.

[188] Bancroft, Pilgrims’ Journal.

[189] Ibid.

[190] Ibid.

[191] Pilgrims’ Journal.

[192] Banvard.

[193] Elliot, p. 74.

[194] Bradford’s Journal.

[195] Holmes’ Annals, Thatcher’s Plymouth, p. 37.

[196] Bradford, Hist. Plymouth Plantation, p. 101.

[197] Ibid.

[198] Holmes, Thatcher, Elliot, etc.

[199] Elliot, p. 75.

[200] Sigourney.

[201] Elliot, ut antea.

[202] Bradford, Young, Thatcher.

[203] Pilgrims’ Journal. Winslow.

[204] Ibid.

[205] Pilgrims’ Journal.

[206] Palfrey, Hist. New England, vol. 1, p. 182.

[207] Pilgrims’ Journal.

[208] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 182.

[209] Pilgrims’ Journal.

[210] Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 317, 318.

[211] Chronicles of the Pilgrims.

[212] Ibid., Palfrey.

[213] Winslow in Chronicles of the Pilgrims, p. 201.

[214] Ibid.

[215] Ibid.

[216] Winslow in Chronicles of the Pilgrims, p. 201. Banvard, Wilson.

[217] Chronicles of the Pilgrims.

[218] Ibid. Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 184.

[219] Chronicles of the Pilgrims. Mount, Journal, p. 45.

[220] Ibid.

[221] Wilson, p. 386.

[222] Ibid. Pilgrims’ Journal.

[223] Banvard. Chronicles of the Pilgrims.

[224] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 184. Banvard, p. 55. Wilson, p. 386.

[225] Chronicles of the Pilgrims. Mount, Journal, p. 47.

[226] Banvard, Plymouth and the Pilgrims, p. 55.

[227] Mount, Journal. Chronicles, etc.

[228] Wilson.

[229] Whittier, Ballads and other Poems.

[230] Pilgrims’ Journal, Palfrey, Bradford.

[231] Banvard, p. 56. Prince; Mount in Young, pp. 214-218.

[232] Mount in Young. Banvard.

[233] Bradford, p. 103.

[234] Banvard, p. 56. Mount.

[235] Mount in Young. Banvard.

[236] Ibid.

[237] Bradford, p. 103.

[238] Banvard, p. 58.

[239] Mount in Young. Banvard.

[240] Ibid.

[241] Ibid. Prince, vol. 1, p. 107.

[242] Ibid.

[243] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 185. Bradford, p. 103.

[244] Pope.

[245] Palfrey, Banvard, Bradford, Pilgrims’ Journal.

[246] Bradford, p. 103.

[247] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 185.

[248] Banvard, p. 62.

[249] Nabb’s Microcosmos.

[250] Bradford, pp. 103, 104.

[251] Mount in Young; Banvard, Bradford.

[252] Banvard, p. 64.

[253] Mount in Young.

[254] Ibid.

[255] Bradford, Mount, etc.

[256] Bradford, p. 104. Felt, Hist. of New England, vol. 1, pp. 64,
65. Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 183.

[257] Bradford, ut antea.

[258] Ibid., Felt, Palfrey.

[259] Wilson.

[260] Bradford, p. 104. Palfrey, Banvard.

[261] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 186.

[262] The word _Massachusetts_ signifies an arrow-shaped hill. It is
supposed to have been given to the surrounding country from the Blue
Hills of Milton, which were formerly called Massachusetts Mount. See
Banvard, p. 65.

[263] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 186. For a fuller account of this
expedition, see Mount in Young, pp. 224-229.

[264] Bradford, p. 105.

[265] Ibid.

[266] Bradford, p. 105.

[267] Palfrey.

[268] Bradford.

[269] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 186, 187.

[270] Winslow in Mount, etc., cited in Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 187.

[271] Smith’s Description of New England, cited in Elliot, vol. 1, p.
77.

[272] Russell’s Pilgrims’ Memorial, p. 131. Young’s Chronicles, p.
232.

[273] Mount, in Young, pp. 224-229. Russell’s Pilgrim’s Manual, p.
153.

[274] Bradford, Elliot, Banvard.

[275] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 79.

[276] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 190.

[277] Ibid. Peckham’s Life of Nicholas Ferrar. London, 1852.

[278] Gorge’s Brief Narrative, chap. 16.

[279] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 193.

[280] Ibid.

[281] “It was dated June 1, 1621, and is interesting, as being the
first grant made by the great Plymouth company. ’Twas first printed
in 1854, in 4th Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. 11. The original is now
at Plymouth. ’Tis probably the oldest document in Massachusetts
officially connected with her history,” Bradford, Ed. note, pp. 107,
108.

[282] Bradford, p. 107, Russell, Morton, Young.

[283] Ibid.

[284] Bradford, pp. 108, 109.

[285] Elliot, Felt, Banvard, Mount in Young.

[286] Bradford, p. 108. About twenty-five hundred dollars.

[287] Ibid.

[288] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 197. Bradford.

[289] Dr. Young has reprinted it in his Chronicles, p. 262, et seq.

[290] Cushman, cited in Felt, vol. 1, p. 67.

[291] Winslow’s Good News, London, 1624.

[292] “Captain Smith describes the Virginia settlers as made up of
forty-eight needy ‘gentlemen’ to four carpenters, who were come to do
nothing else ‘but dig gold, make gold, refine gold, and load gold.’”
Elliot, vol. 1, p. 79, note.

[293] Cited in Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 79, 80.

[294] Winslow, in Young’s Chronicles.

[295] Wilson, p. 389. Felt, vol. 1, p. 67.

[296] Smith, New England’s Trials. Prince, vol. 1, p. 115.

[297] Bradford, Young.

[298] Bradford, Mount in Young, Russell.

[299] Ibid. Prince, vol. 1.

[300] Bradford, p. 106.

[301] Bradford, p. 110.

[302] White’s Incidents, etc.

[303] White’s Incidents, etc.

[304] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 187-189.

[305] Chap. 7, p. 106.

[306] Winslow in Brief Narration, in Hypocrisie Unmasked, p. 393.
Also, Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 189, note.

[307] Bradford, p. 106.

[308] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 189.

[309] Bradford, p. 112.

[310] Allen’s Biog. Dict. Thatcher’s Plymouth, p. 77.

[311] Chap. 7, p. 108.

[312] Morton’s Memorial, Prince’s Annals, Hall’s Plymouth Records.

[313] Ibid.

[314] Ibid. Elliot, vol. 1, p. 109.

[315] Hall, Prince, Thatcher.

[316] Elliott, vol. 1, p. 110.

[317] Graham, vol. 1. Massachusetts Historical Records. Hazard, vol. 1.

[318] Ibid.

[319] Thatcher’s Plymouth.

[320] Graham, vol. 1, p. 230.

[321] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 112, 113.

[322] Plymouth Records. Hazard, vol. 1.

[323] Plymouth Records. Hazard, vol. 1. Elliot.

[324] Elliot.

[325] Thatcher’s Plymouth, Morton’s Memorials, etc.

[326] Book of Laws of New Plymouth, 1671.

[327] Laws of New Plymouth, cited in Elliot, vol. 1, p. 111.

[328] Prince, Annals, vol. 1, pp. 76, 98, 103, 105. Bradford, p. 101.

[329] Ibid.

[330] Ruth, chap. 4.

[331] Bradford, p. 101.

[332] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 196.

[333] This seal was dated 1620, and circumscribed with the words,
“Sigillum Societatis Plymouth, Nov. Anglia.”

[334] Winslow’s Good News from New England.

[335] Ibid.

[336] Winslow’s Good News from New England. Banvard, p. 70.

[337] Winslow in Young.

[338] Ibid. Banvard.

[339] Winslow in Young, Banvard, Bradford.

[340] Winslow in Young, Banvard.

[341] Ibid., Bradford.

[342] Bradford, pp. 111, 112.

[343] Banvard, p. 72.

[344] Longfellow’s Miles Standish’s Courtship, pp. 9-12.

[345] Winslow in Young, Bradford.

[346] Ibid.

[347] Bradford, p. 113.

[348] Ibid. Winslow.

[349] Ibid. Young’s Chronicles. Thatcher’s Plymouth.

[350] Ibid.

[351] Prince.

[352] Bradford, p. 113.

[353] Banvard, pp. 76, 77.

[354] Banvard, pp. 76, 77.

[355] Winslow in Young. Banvard.

[356] Bradford, p. 114.

[357] Ibid., p. 124.

[358] Ibid., 114.

[359] Bradford, p. 114.

[360] Cited in Bradford, pp. 115, 116.

[361] Bradford, p. 116. By the third article of the agreement, this
was permitted to be done by general consent. See Bradford, p. 46.

[362] Chap. 10, p. 137.

[363] Psalm 118:8.

[364] Ibid. 146:3.

[365] Ibid. verse 5.

[366] Bradford, pp. 116, 117.

[367] Smith’s General History, folio ed., p. 236. Winslow in Young,
p. 296.

[368] Cited _in extenso_ in Bradford, pp. 118, 119.

[369] Ibid., pp. 119, 120.

[370] Ibid., 122, 123.

[371] Cited _in extenso_ in Bradford ut antea.

[372] The vessels were gone most of the summer.

[373] Bradford, pp. 123, 124.

[374] This massacre occurred on the 22d of March, 1622. Smith says
that three hundred and fifty settlers were slain. General Hist., pp.
144-149.

[375] Bradford.

[376] Bradford, p. 125.

[377] Ibid. Winslow in Young.

[378] Thatcher’s Plymouth, Prince’s Annals, Banvard.

[379] Banvard, p. 82.

[380] Banvard, p. 82.

[381] Pope.

[382] Bradford.

[383] Weston in Young, Thatcher, Prince.

[384] Bradford.

[385] Cotton Mather, Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 58.

[386] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 200. Prince, Thatcher.

[387] Banvard.

[388] Ibid.

[389] Thatcher, Winslow in Young.

[390] Ibid.

[391] Banvard.

[392] Banvard, Bradford.

[393] Thatcher, Winslow in Young.

[394] Bradford.

[395] Ibid.

[396] Cited in Russell’s Guide to Plymouth, p. 143.

[397] Winslow in Young. Thatcher, Bradford.

[398] Prince, Hubbard, Banvard.

[399] Cotton Mather, Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 66.

[400] Winslow in Young. Bradford, p. 131.

[401] Ibid.

[402] Ibid. Banvard, p. 95.

[403] Banvard, Winslow’s Good News, etc.

[404] “Mr. Baylies, in his Memoirs of Plymouth, assumes that this
was the great Hampden, vol. 1, p. 410. I find no facts sufficient to
sustain that opinion.” Elliot, vol. 1, p. 93, note.

[405] Elliot, Banvard, Winslow.

[406] Winslow’s Good News.

[407] Ibid.

[408] Winslow’s Good News.

[409] Banvard, pp. 95, 96.

[410] Winslow’s Good News.

[411] Ibid.

[412] Winslow’s Good News.

[413] Ibid.

[414] Banvard, pp. 101, 102.

[415] Ibid.

[416] Banvard, p. 102.

[417] Winslow’s Good News.

[418] Bradford, p. 131.

[419] Bradford, pp. 130, 131.

[420] Winslow’s Good News.

[421] Banvard.

[422] Banvard, p. 116.

[423] Ibid.

[424] Ibid.

[425] Shakspeare.

[426] Winslow, cited in Banvard, p. 120.

[427] Winslow, Elliot, Palfrey.

[428] Ibid.

[429] Winslow, Bradford, Thatcher.

[430] Winslow, Bradford, Thatcher.

[431] Morton, Young’s Chronicles.

[432] Bancroft, Hist. United States, vol. 1, p. 319.

[433] Fountain’s Rewards of Virtue.

[434] Bradford, p. 133.

[435] Winslow in Young. Banvard.

[436] Bradford, pp. 133, 134.

[437] In the latter part of 1623, Weston went to Virginia; thence he
returned to England, where he disappears from history. Palfrey, vol.
1, p. 207.

[438] Judge Davis, note on Morton’s Memorial.

[439] Winslow in Young, p. 346. Palfrey, Thatcher, etc.

[440] Winslow in Young, p. 346. Palfrey, Thatcher, Banvard, etc.

[441] Bradford, pp. 135, 136.

[442] Ibid., p. 136.

[443] Bradford, p. 136.

[444] White’s Incidents, p. 41.

[445] Winslow in Young.

[446] White’s Incidents, p. 42.

[447] Banvard, Thatcher, Morton’s Memorial.

[448] Chap. 10, p. 137.

[449] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 320. Bradford, p. 138.

[450] Morton’s Memorial, pp. 95-97. Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 210, 211.

[451] “Pierce sold his patent for five hundred pounds; he gave fifty
for it.” Banvard, p. 133. See Palfrey, ut antea, on this point.

[452] Cotton Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 60.

[453] Cited in extenso in Bradford, pp. 139, 140.

[454] Bradford, p. 141. Winslow in Young.

[455] Banvard, p. 134.

[456] Morton’s Memorial, Thatcher, Palfrey.

[457] Bradford, p. 146.

[458] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 211, 212.

[459] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 60.

[460] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 212, note.

[461] Bradford, p. 145.

[462] Ibid., pp. 145, 146.

[463] Prince, Morton’s Memorial, Bradford, Thatcher’s Plymouth.

[464] Bradford, p. 147.

[465] Ibid.

[466] Bradford, p. 148.

[467] Felt, Hist. New England, Prince, Bradford.

[468] Felt, Bradford, Morton’s Memorial, etc.

[469] Felt, vol. 1, p. 77.

[470] Bradford, p. 149.

[471] Ibid. Morton’s Memorial.

[472] Ibid.

[473] Felt.

[474] Ibid. Bradford, Morton’s Memorial.

[475] Felt, vol. 1, p. 78.

[476] Cited in Felt, ut antea.

[477] “There were also this year some scattering beginnings made
in other places, as at Piscataway, by Mr. David Thompson, who was
sent over by Mason and Gorges, at Monhegin, and some other places by
sundry others.” Bradford, p. 154.

[478] Prince, Bradford, Pilgrims’ Journal.

[479] Bradford, pp. 156, 157.

[480] Seneca’s Epis. 123.

[481] Phillips’ Letters and Speeches, p. 372.

[482] Prince, Bradford.

[483] Morton’s Memorial.

[484] Thatcher’s Plymouth, p. 111.

[485] Morton’s Memorial, p. 103.

[486] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 215.

[487] Bradford, pp. 159, 160, 167.

[488] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 216-219.

[489] Psalm 10:10.

[490] Jeremiah 41:6.

[491] Bradford, p. 171.

[492] Ibid.

[493] Ibid., p. 172.

[494] Bradford, p. 172. Morton’s Memorial, p. 112.

[495] Ibid.

[496] Bradford, p. 173.

[497] Bradford, p. 173.

[498] Bradford, p. 175.

[499] Ibid.

[500] He had a wife and four children. Bradford, p. 175, editor’s
note.

[501] Ibid, pp. 175, 176.

[502] Ibid.

[503] Bradford, pp. 175, 176.

[504] Ibid., p. 182.

[505] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 221, note. Morton’s Memorial, p. 117, note.

[506] Ibid.

[507] Bradford.

[508] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 221.

[509] Winslow, quoted in Palfrey, ut antea.

[510] Thatcher, Prince, Palfrey, Bradford.

[511] Bradford, p. 190.

[512] Ibid., p. 192. Morton’s Memorial, p. 120.

[513] Ibid.

[514] Bradford, p. 192. Morton’s Memorial, p. 120.

[515] Ibid.

[516] Cheever’s Journal, p. 327. Morton’s Memorial.

[517] Bradford, p. 189.

[518] Ibid., p. 188.

[519] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 119, 120.

[520] Ibid., p. 116. Prince’s Chronology. Thatcher’s Plymouth.

[521] A Brief Review of the Rise and Progress of New England. London,
1774.

[522] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 135.

[523] Morton, Prince, Hazard, Bradford, Thatcher, Banvard.

[524] Bradford, pp. 202, 203.

[525] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 224.

[526] Hazard, Bradford, Palfrey.

[527] Ibid.

[528] Bradford, p. 207.

[529] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 225.

[530] Banvard, p. 151.

[531] Elliot’s Biog. Dict.

[532] Young’s Chronicles, p. 481.

[533] “It is not certain where he lies buried; George Sumner thinks
in St. Peter’s church, Leyden.” Elliot, Hist. New Eng., vol. 1, p.
125, note.

[534] Stoughton, Heroes of Puritan Times, p. 102.

[535] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 321.

[536] Smith’s General History, p. 247.

[537] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 221, 222.

[538] Bradford, p. 204.

[539] Pliny, lib. 18, chap. 2.

[540] Bradford, p. 168.

[541] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 225.

[542] Ibid.

[543] Bradford, Morton’s Memorial.

[544] Felt, Hist. New England, vol. 1, p. 91.

[545] These were Bradford, Brewster, Standish, Allerton, Fuller,
Jeremy, Alden, Howland. Prince, Bradford, Hazard, etc.

[546] Bradford, pp. 212, 213. Palfrey.

[547] Ibid., p. 214.

[548] Bradford, p. 214.

[549] Ibid., p. 214. Morton’s Memorial.

[550] Ibid.

[551] Ibid.

[552] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 229.

[553] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 85.

[554] Bradford, p. 226.

[555] The names of the formers of the trade were: Bradford, Brewster,
Standish, Prince, Alden, Howland, and Allerton. Prince had come out
in the “Fortune,” all the rest in the “Mayflower.” Palfrey.

[556] Hazard, Prince, Cheever’s Journal, Thatcher.

[557] These were James Shirley—who became their English agent—John
Beauchamp, Richard Andrews, and T. Hathaway—“the glue of the old
company.” Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. 3, p. 34.

[558] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 230.

[559] Thatcher, Prince, Morton’s Memorial.

[560] Cheever’s Journal. Bradford, p. 243.

[561] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 62.

[562] Cited in Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, pp. 62, 63.

[563] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 321.

[564] Felt’s Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 95.

[565] “The Dutch had trading in those southern parts divers years
before the English came, but they began no plantation until after the
Pilgrims came and were here seated.” Morton’s Memorial, p. 133, note.

[566] Davis’ New Amsterdam, Booth’s History of New York City,
Bradford.

[567] Bradford, p. 222, et seq.

[568] In Roger Williams’ Key, wampum is considered as Indian money,
and is described in the twenty-fourth chapter of that interesting
tract. Their _white_ money they called _wampum_, which signifies
_white_; their _black_, _suckawhack_, sucki signifying _black_. Hist.
Col., vol. 3, p. 231.

[569] Mr. Gookin says: “Wampum is made chiefly by the Narragansett
Block Island Indians. Upon the sandy flats and shores of those coasts
the wilk shell are found.” Hist. Col., vol. 1, p. 152.

[570] Bradford, p. 234.

[571] Mr. Brodhead, who obtained this valuable letter, only
summarized in the text, from the archives at the Hague, gives it in
full in the New York Hist. Col., sec. series, vol. 2, p. 343, et seq.

[572] Prince, vol. 1, p. 160. Deane’s Scituate, p. 332. “Mrs.
Robinson, widow of Rev. John Robinson, came over with the latter
company, with her son Isaac, and perhaps with another son.” Editorial
note in Bradford, p. 247. “There was an Abraham Robinson early
at Gloucester, who is surmised to have been a son of the Leyden
minister.” Ibid. It has been thought that Mrs. Robinson did not
remain in Plymouth, but went to Salem, “where was a Mrs. Robinson
very early.” MS. Letters of J. J. Babson, Esq., of Gloucester, Mass.

[573] Bradford, pp. 247, 248.

[574] Bradford, pp. 247, 248.

[575] Ibid., p. 249.

[576] Bradford’s Letter-Book, in Mass. Hist. Col., vol. 3, pp. 69, 70.

[577] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 233.

[578] Bradford, p. 236.

[579] Morton’s Memorial, pp. 137, 138.

[580] Bradford, Morton’s Memorial, etc.

[581] Vide Harris’ Life of Charles I., p. 278.

[582] Bradford’s Letter-book.

[583] “’Tis not known when Conant came over. Nothing appears in any
of the Plymouth documents to confirm Hubbard’s statement, that Conant
was one of Lyford’s party at Plymouth. Though historians have adopted
that _ipse dixit_, it rests on his word alone. But since Hubbard and
Conant were afterwards neighbors and friends, he is likely to have
been well informed.” Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 255, note.

[584] Elliot. Hubbard’s Hist. of New England, chap. 18.

[585] Hubbard, chap. 9. Palfrey, Elliot.

[586] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 286.

[587] Elliott, vol. 1, p. 139.

[588] Hubbard, chap. 17.

[589] Conant’s petition of May 28, 1671, in Mass. Hist. Archives.

[590] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 287.

[591] Planters’ Plea, chap. 9.

[592] Cited in Bradford, p. 251.

[593] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 139, 140.

[594] Planters’ Plea, chap. 9. Johnson’s Wonder-working Providence.
Belknap’s Biography, p. 249. Hubbard’s Hist.

[595] Ibid.

[596] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, pp. 67, 68.

[597] Charlestown Records, Palfrey, Elliot, Everett’s Address.

[598] Wilson’s Pilgrim Fathers, p. 483.

[599] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 290.

[600] Colony Records. Cradock’s Letter in Young’s Chronicles.

[601] Prince; Hazard. Hubbard’s Hist. Memoir of J. Endicott, Salem,
1847.

[602] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 342.

[603] This is filed in the State-House in Boston, and is printed in
Colony Laws, in Hutchinson’s Call, and in Hazard. Bancroft.

[604] Palfrey, Wilson.

[605] Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 342, 343.

[606] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 291.

[607] Young’s Chronicles, Prince, Mass. Hist. Coll.

[608] Bacon’s Works, vol. 2.

[609] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 346.

[610] Prince’s Chronicles, p. 247.

[611] Ibid.

[612] Cited in Elliot, vol. 1, p. 142. “In a subsequent letter this
is reiterated thus: ‘We especially desire you to take care that no
tobacco be planted under your government, unless it be some small
quantity for mere necessity, for physic, or the preservation of
health; and that the same be taken privately by old men, and no
other.’” Ibid.

[613] Young’s Chronicles, p. 141. Hazard, vol. 1.

[614] Bancroft.

[615] Ibid., vol. 1, p. 345.

[616] History of the English Puritans, American Tract Society, N. Y.,
1867.

[617] Hist. of the English Puritans, ut antea.

[618] Hume, Hist. of Eng., vol. 2, p. 253.

[619] Perry, Eccl. Hist., vol. 1.

[620] Mass. Col. Rec., vol. 1. Palfrey.

[621] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 293.

[622] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 293. Mather’s Magnalia.

[623] Higginson’s New England Plantation. Palfrey.

[624] Bradford, p. 263. Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 294.

[625] Mather’s Magnalia.

[626] Ibid., vol. 1, p. 68. Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 294, 295.

[627] Hutchinson’s Coll., 24, 25. Hubbard, Bancroft.

[628] Mather’s Magnalia, ut antea. “_Ungrateful country of my birth,
thou shall not possess even my lifeless bones._”

[629] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 74. Uhden, pp. 63, 64.

[630] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 150.

[631] They landed on the 24th of June, 1629. Uhden, Hutchinson.

[632] Higginson’s New England Plantation, pp. 123, 124.

[633] Bradford, pp. 263, 264.

[634] Bradford, pp. 263, 264.

[635] In allusion to the wide-spread charge of Brownism, and bigoted
exclusion of all other sects from Christian fellowship.

[636] Bradford, pp. 264, 265.

[637] Bradford, p. 245.

[638] Higginson’s New England Plantation. Gott’s letter to Bradford;
cited in Bradford, pp. 265, 266.

[639] Palfrey.

[640] Ibid., Bradford, Gott, etc.

[641] Gott’s Letter to Bradford.

[642] Morton’s Memorial, p. 146. Hubbard, Prince.

[643] See the Covenant in Neale’s History of New England, vol. 1, pp.
141-143. The subordinate church officers were not chosen till later.
See Bradford’s Letter-book.

[644] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 298.

[645] Uhden’s New England Theocracy.

[646] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 348.

[647] Mather’s Magnalia.

[648] Ibid., vol. 1, p. 72.

[649] Ibid., Morton, Prince, Young, Cheever.

[650] Young’s Chronicles, p. 288.

[651] Mass. Col. Rec., vol. 1, p. 408.

[652] Mass. Col. Rec., vol. 1, p. 408.

[653] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 350.

[654] See the _ipsissima verba_ of the charter, Mass. Hist. Col.

[655] Hutchinson’s Hist. of Mass., vol. 1, p. 13. Bancroft, Grahame.

[656] Ibid.

[657] Ibid. Young’s Chronicles, p. 88.

[658] Hutchinson, Winthrop, Palfrey, Bancroft.

[659] Ibid.

[660] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 302.

[661] Cited in Hutchinson, in Winthrop, vol. 1, pp. 359, 360, and in
Bancroft.

[662] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 310.

[663] Ibid.

[664] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 107.

[665] See Winthrop’s Life, by R. C. Winthrop, Boston, 1866. Mather’s
Account, Hutchinson’s Sketch, Palfrey, etc., etc.

[666] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 303.

[667] Ibid. Elliot, Wilson.

[668] Winthrop’s Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 332.

[669] Mass. Hist. Col. Palfrey, Prince, Mather.

[670] Ibid.

[671] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 303.

[672] Ibid.

[673] Hume, Hist. Eng. Mather, Prince.

[674] Archæologia Americana, vol. 3, 47, et seq. From this work most
of the above facts have been cited.

[675] Formerly the “Eagle;” she was a naval vessel, and carried
twenty-eight guns. She had been recently bought by the Company.
Palfrey.

[676] Winthrop’s Hist. of New England.

[677] Elliot, vol. 2, pp. 16, 17.

[678] The most common orthography is _Arabella_, but later writers
almost unanimously reject this spelling, which is founded on the
often erring authority of Mather in the Magnalia, and of Josselyn,
and accept that of John Winthrop in his Diary, of Johnson in the
“Wonder-working Providence,” and of Dudley’s Epistles. All of these
men were personally intimate with Mrs. Johnson, and they must have
known her name. See Winthrop, p. 1, note.

[679] Mather, Winthrop, Palfrey, Elliot, Hutchinson, etc., etc.

[680] Hist. of the Result of the American Colonies, vol. 1, p. 58.

[681] Winthrop’s Diary.

[682] This address is said to have been drawn by Mr. White. Palfrey.

[683] Elliot.

[684] Elliot.

[685] Winthrop’s Diary, p. 31.

[686] Ibid.

[687] Ibid., Palfrey, Bancroft.

[688] Winthrop’s Journal, p. 32.

[689] Dudley’s letter to the countess of Lincoln, cited in Hutchinson.

[690] Hubbard, Mass. Col. Rec., Archæol. Am.

[691] Ibid.

[692] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 350.

[693] Hubbard, p. 133.

[694] Ibid. Prince, Winthrop.

[695] Ibid.

[696] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 77.

[697] Winthrop, vol. 1, p. 34.

[698] Palfrey, Bancroft, Archæol. Am.

[699] Ibid. Mass. Hist. Col.

[700] Dudley’s Letter to the Countess of Lincoln. Prince’s Chronology.

[701] Winthrop’s Hist. of New England. Hutchinson.

[702] Ibid.

[703] Shawmut, or the Settlement of Boston, p. 2.

[704] Drake’s Hist. of Boston.

[705] Ibid. Elliot.

[706] Drake’s Hist. of Boston. Elliot.

[707] “Blackstone retained nothing in America of his ministerial
character but his canonical coat. He devoted himself to the
cultivation of the six or seven acres of land which he retained
in his possession, and planted, it is said, the first orchard of
apple-trees in New England. He left Boston because he was annoyed by
its strict sectarian laws. Banishing himself again to the wilderness,
he settled in a place now called Cumberland, on the banks of the
Pawtucket river. Here he built a house in the midst of a park,
planted an orchard near it, and divided his time between study and
labor. He called his retreat “Study Hill,” and resided there until
his death in May, 1675.

“He was a man of a kind and benevolent heart; and when he went to
Providence to preach, as he did occasionally, notwithstanding his
disagreement in opinion with Roger Williams, he would carry with him
some beautiful apples as a present to the children, who had never
seen such fruit before. Indeed, the kind called Yellow Sweetings were
first produced in his orchard; and the older inhabitants, who had
seen apples in England, had never before seen that sort.” Shawmut, or
the Settlement of Boston, p. 27.

[708] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 152.

[709] Bancroft, p. 359. Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 313.

[710] Hutchinson, Prince, Hubbard.

[711] Ibid. Charlestown Records.

[712] Mass. Col. Rec., Bancroft.

[713] Bancroft, Story, Palfrey. See the Charter, in Massachusetts
Hist. Col.

[714] Winthrop, Hutchinson, Hubbard.

[715] See chap. 19, pp. 245 et seq.

[716] Bradford, Winthrop, Hubbard.

[717] On the 19th of Oct.

[718] Winthrop, Hutchinson.

[719] See the charter.

[720] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 359.

[721] Ibid.

[722] Ibid., p. 360.

[723] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 360.

[724] Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 360, 361.

[725] Uhden’s New Eng. Theocracy, p. 68. Dexter’s Congregationalism.

[726] Ibid., p. 71.

[727] Ibid., Bancroft.

[728] Ibid. Vide Cambridge Platform.

[729] Vide the Cambridge Platform, 1648. “This Confession of Faith
belongs, indeed, to a later period, but it expresses throughout the
principles of the early colonists unchanged.” Uhden, p. 68.

[730] Wilson’s Pilgrim Fathers, pp. 487, 488.

[731] Winthrop’s Journal.

[732] Elliott, vol. 1, pp. 155, 156.

[733] Longfellow’s Courtship of Miles Standish. See, also, Banvard
and Thatcher.

[734] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 154. Winthrop, Bradford, Prince.

[735] Ibid., p. 68. Banvard, Thatcher, Morton.

[736] Elliott, vol. 1, p. 68. Banvard, Thatcher, Morton. This was in
1630.

[737] Winthrop’s Journal.

[738] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 329.

[739] Ibid.

[740] Bradford, p. 294.

[741] Winthrop’s Journal.

[742] Bradford, p. 295.

[743] Ibid.

[744] Winthrop’s Journal.

[745] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 330.

[746] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 155.

[747] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 103.

[748] Ibid., p. 97.

[749] Orations, N. Y., 1855.

[750] Winthrop’s Hist., vol. 1, p. 97.

[751] Ibid., p. 76.

[752] Eliot spent the first years of his transatlantic life as a
preacher at Roxbury. Here he was engaged with Weld and Richard Mather
in compiling the first book published in New England—“The Psalms in
Metre”—which appeared in 1640. In 1645, he became deeply interested
in the work of evangelizing the Indians, “those ruins of mankind.”
Into this labor he threw his whole heart; and he never relinquished
it until God called him home; for he believed with the psalmist, that
Jehovah was perpetually saying, “Ask of me, and I will give thee the
heathen for thine inheritance.”

Going into the wilderness, he preached his first Indian sermon in
October, 1646, in a wigwam at Nonantum, near Watertown. He had
already familiarized himself with the aboriginal languages; and since
the New England tribes—loosely estimated at a united membership of
forty thousand—were a part of the Algonquin race, whose tongues
were similar, this acquisition was not as difficult as it might
seem. Eliot had the happiness to witness several conversions as
the result of his first essay; and from that moment he worked on
with a resolution and self-abnegation above all earthly praise. The
“Apostle,” as he soon came to be called, at once commenced several
translations. Two catechisms were done into the Indian dialects.
A primer, the Psalms, and Baxter’s Call, followed; and finally,
an Indian Bible, a marvellous monument of patience, industry, and
faith, appeared in 1663. Of course, this work necessitated money.
Eliot appealed for aid. The English Parliament granted, in 1649, a
special sum for the promotion of the gospel among the aborigines.
Large collections were made throughout England for the same purpose;
and even infant Boston contributed twenty-five hundred dollars in
its poverty. The zeal of Eliot and the funds of the godly were not
in vain expended. A number of Indians were hopefully converted, and
these were colonized into separate towns. The chief seat of the
“praying Indians” was Natick, settled by them in 1651. There Eliot
erected his headquarters; and he gave his converts “the same advice
as to government that Jethro gave to Moses; so they assembled, and
chose their rulers of hundreds, fifties, and tens, and proclaimed,
‘that God should rule over them.’” Their houses were Indian cabins,
built of bark, except the meeting-house, which was fashioned after
the churches of the pale-faces. In this latter building Eliot had
a bed and a room. Natick then contained one hundred and fifty-two
persons. Eliot saw that civilization was necessary for his dusky
_protégés_, both as a bond of union and as a fulcrum for his gospel
lever. He knew also that responsibility educates. So he was careful
to induct into offices of honor and responsibility those of his
converts who seemed the most trusty, energetic, and intelligent.
Such commissions were highly esteemed by the Indians, and sometimes
they performed their official duty with amusing formality. On one
occasion, a native magistrate named Hihoudi, issued the following
warrant, directed to an Indian constable: “I, Hihoudi, you, Peter
Waterman. Jeremy Wisket,—quick you take him, fast you hold him,
straight you bring him before me. Hihoudi!”

Natick was a nucleus settlement. Soon a number of supplementary
colonies were grouped about it, and these embraced, some sixty, some
seventy, some eighty, “praying Indians,” all provided with churches,
schools, and the rude initial apparatus of civilization. In 1674,
there were eleven hundred Christian Indians who were possessed of
fixed homes within the jurisdiction of Massachusetts. And Eliot
enumerated twenty-five hundred more to Boyle, as settled in Plymouth,
Nantucket, and Martha’s Vineyard. The usual exercises were praying,
reading the Bible, and preaching—sometimes by a white teacher,
sometimes by a native missionary. Then all united in singing; and
we are told that “sundry could manage to do so very well.” After
this, some were catechized. Then, says Eliot, “if there was any act
of public discipline—as divers times there was, since ignorance
and partial barbarism made many stumblers—the offender was called
forth, exhorted to give glory to God, and urged to confess his
sins.” King Philip’s war partially paralyzed these efforts of Eliot
and his compeers; it robbed them of the sympathy of the whites, and
roughened their path; but they persevered; and even after Eliot’s
decease, in 1690, God put it into the hearts of some to carry on his
work, and efforts continued to be made towards the evangelization
of the natives as far down as the year 1754. At that time the Rev.
Mr. Hawley was “set apart” for that special work, in the “Old South
Church,” in Boston, and Deacon Woodbridge and Jonathan Edwards were
enlisted in the same good cause. Roger Williams had been an active
co-worker with Eliot, and a little later the Mayhews gleaned their
rich harvest at Martha’s Vineyard. Indeed, the Mayhews were so
successful that on the single little island where they labored, six
meetings were held in as many different places every Sabbath, and
there were ten native preachers, who, according to the testimony of
Thomas Mayhew, were of “good knowledge and holy conversation.”

But the missionaries did not find it plain sailing. Besides the
incessant jealousy between the whites and the aborigines, they had to
encounter the natural repugnance of the Indian to desert the blind
faith of his fathers and accept the God and Saviour of the white
men. Massasoit, spite of his friendship for the whites, lived and
died a strict unbeliever. Philip, his son, was equally obstinate,
saying on one occasion, after listening to an exhortation from Eliot,
and placing his hand on a button on the Apostle’s coat: “I care no
more for the gospel than I care for that button.” The Narragansetts
went so far as to prohibit preaching within their borders. Yet still
the missionaries went on, and, with God’s blessing, they harvested
many souls, long before good Bishop Berkeley launched his noble but
abortive scheme for the conversion of the red men. Those readers who
are desirous of studying this subject in detail, are referred to
Sparks’ Life of Eliot; Mayhew’s Indian experiences; Mansell’s recent
reprint at Albany of tracts concerning Eliot’s Indian missions; R.
Williams’ Key; Hubbard’s Hist.; Mather’s Magnalia; Gookin, in Mass.
Hist. Col., etc., etc.

[753] Ibid., p. 49. He came February 11, 1630.

[754] Wood’s New England Prospect, p. 4.

[755] J. Macpherson’s America Dissected, 1752.

[756] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 323. These were Salem, Charlestown,
Watertown, Boston, Roxbury, Dorchester, Mystic, and Saugus.

[757] Bradford, p. 311.

[758] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 1.

[759] Prince, Bancroft, Hutchinson.

[760] Bancroft, vol. 1, chap. 2. passim.

[761] Brodhead’s Hist. of New York. Dunlap.

[762] Chalmers, Hening.

[763] Thatcher’s Plymouth.

[764] Bradford, pp. 255-310.

[765] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 336.

[766] Bradford, p. 301.

[767] Chap. 21, p. 264.

[768] Bradford, p. 263.

[769] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 119. Young’s Chronicles, Morton’s Memorials,
etc.

[770] Bradford, p. 263. Morton.

[771] The old form of expression for _exhort_ or _expound_.

[772] Now called “North river,” near Scituate. Massachusetts Hist.
Col. 4.

[773] Winthrop, vol. 1, pp. 108-111.

[774] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 337. Hubbard, Prince.

[775] Bradford, p. 294.

[776] Ibid., p. 311. Winthrop, Hubbard, Thatcher.

[777] Brodhead’s N. Y.; the Dutch claim to have discovered it.
Brodhead.

[778] Bradford, ut antea.

[779] Trumbull’s Connecticut.

[780] Winthrop, vol. 1, p. 52.

[781] Bradford, p. 312.

[782] Ibid.

[783] Brodhead’s N. Y., Bradford, Hubbard.

[784] Ibid., Palfrey.

[785] Brodhead’s N. Y., Bradford, Hubbard, Palfrey.

[786] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 340.

[787] Winthrop, vol. 1, pp. 105-113. Bradford, pp. 311-314. Brodhead,
Hist. N. Y., vol. 1, pp. 235-242.

[788] “The insect here described,” remarks Judge Davis, “is the
_Cicada Septendecim_ of Linnæus, commonly called the _locust_. They
have frequently appeared since, indicated by Linnæus’ specific name.”
Davis’ edition of the Mem., p. 171.

[789] Bradford, pp. 314, 315.

[790] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 160, 161. Hist. Eng. Puritans, Am. Tract
Soc., N. Y., 1866. Arch. Am. Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 97. Rev.
J. S. M. Anderson’s Hist. of the Col. Chh. of the B. Emp., vol. 1,
p. 175, note. The fact of this embarkation of Cromwell and Hampden
has been questioned by some careful writers. See Forster’s British
Statesmen, in loco. Also, Sanford’s Ill. of the Fr. Rev., Lond., 1858.

[791] Hutchinson, vol. 1, p. 93.

[792] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 362.

[793] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 265.

[794] Bancroft, ut antea.

[795] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 363.

[796] Magnalia, vol. 1, pp. 265, 266.

[797] Ibid, p. 277.

[798] Ibid., 276.

[799] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 343. Mr. Stone was his assistant.

[800] Bancroft, ut antea.

[801] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 346.

[802] Ibid., p. 345.

[803] Ibid.

[804] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 345.

[805] See the Charter.

[806] Chap. 21, pp. 260, 261; also chap. 27, p. 342.

[807] Winthrop’s Journal.

[808] Colony Records. Winthrop.

[809] Ibid.

[810] Winthrop, Hutchinson, Hubbard.

[811] Ibid., Elliot.

[812] Elliot, Bancroft.

[813] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 365.

[814] Bossuét.

[815] Reply to Whitgift, cited by Stowell in his History of England.
Puritans.

[816] “Bloody Tenet;” see Cotton’s Controversy with Roger Williams.

[817] Rev. Mr. Ward, in 1647.

[818] Cited in Elliot, vol. 1, p. 190.

[819] Knowles’ Life of Roger Williams.

[820] Knowles, ut antea. Colony Records, C. Mather, etc.

[821] Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 367, 368.

[822] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 188. Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 406, et seq.

[823] Winthrop, vol. 1, p. 53.

[824] See Williams’ “Hireling Ministry.”

[825] Bradford, p. 310.

[826] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 495.

[827] Ibid.

[828] Winthrop, Hubbard, Mather’s Magnalia, Hutchinson.

[829] Winthrop’s Journal, pp. 63, 64.

[830] Knowles’ Life, Savage on Winthrop, Magnalia, etc.

[831] Bradford, p. 310.

[832] Ibid.

[833] Morton’s Memorial, p. 151. Bradford, p. 310.

[834] Prince, Elliot, Banvard.

[835] Cited in Elliot, vol. 1, p. 199. Banvard, p. 160.

[836] Ibid.

[837] Palfrey, Knowles. Winthrop, vol. 1, pp. 143, 144.

[838] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 197, 198.

[839] Knowles’ Life of Williams, Mather’s Magnalia, Dwight’s Tracts,
ante chaps. 21 and 26, pp. 260, 261.

[840] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 368.

[841] Winthrop, vol. 1, pp. 145, 146. Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 409.

[842] See 1 Corinthians 11:5.

[843] Magnalia. Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 409.

[844] A writ requiring a person to show by what right he is doing a
special thing.

[845] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 200. Bancroft, Hubbard.

[846] Ibid., Hutchinson, Knowles.

[847] Williams’ connection with this act is but distant and oblique,
if he had any. See Knowles, Winthrop, Hubbard, Palfrey, etc.

[848] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 201.

[849] Williams’ “Bloody Tenet.”

[850] Ibid.

[851] Felt’s Hist. of New England, vol. 1, p. 175.

[852] Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 372, 373.

[853] Winthrop, Hutchinson, Hubbard, Knowles, Elton’s Life.

[854] Bancroft, ut antea.

[855] Winthrop, Colonial Records, Knowles.

[856] Winthrop, Colony Records, Knowles.

[857] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 377.

[858] Ibid., Hubbard, Hutchinson.

[859] Knowles, Elton’s Life, Hutchinson, etc.

[860] Roger Williams in Mass. Hist. Col., vol. 1, p. 276.

[861] Ibid.

[862] Elliot.

[863] Knowles, Elliot, Judge Durfee’s poem, “What Cheer?”

[864] Knowles, p. 270.

[865] Elliot.

[866] Knowles, p. 120. Elton, Hutchinson.

[867] Cited in Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 371.

[868] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 497.

[869] Love will overcome all things.

[870] Winthrop, Hutchinson, Hubbard.

[871] Knowles, p. 295.

[872] Elton, p. 127. Hutchinson, Elliott.

[873] Ibid. Knowles, Hist. Col., vol. 2, p. 121.

[874] Ibid.

[875] Ibid.

[876] Rhode Island Colony Records.

[877] Morton’s Memorial, p. 154.

[878] See Hutchinson, vol. 1, p. 38.

[879] Elton’s Life of Williams, p. 54. Knowles, Winthrop.

[880] Gammel, p. 182.

[881] Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 376, 377.

[882] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 80.

[883] Ibid., p. 136.

[884] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 383.

[885] Winthrop’s Journal.

[886] Ibid., Bancroft, Elliot, Palfrey, Hutchinson. They landed in
October, 1635.

[887] See Encyclopedia Americana, Appleton’s Encyclopedia, English
Encyclopedia.

[888] Mather’s Magnalia, Palfrey, etc.

[889] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 436.

[890] Winthrop, p. 170.

[891] Ibid., p. 173, Palfrey, Trumbull’s Hist. Conn., Elliot.

[892] Trumbull, Mather’s Magnalia.

[893] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 158.

[894] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 249, 250.

[895] Palfrey, Bancroft, Hubbard.

[896] Palfrey, Winthrop, Elliot, Bancroft.

[897] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 136.

[898] Elliot, Hubbard.

[899] Ibid.

[900] Winthrop, pp. 177-179.

[901] New England’s First Fruits, vol. 1. Quincy’s Boston, etc.

[902] Ibid., Hutchinson, Hubbard, Mather’s Magnalia.

[903] The nation’s safety. See Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 1.

[904] See Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 1.

[905] “Emollit mores, nec sinit esse feros.” HORACE.

[906] Winthrop, p. 132.

[907] Ibid., Palfrey, Bancroft, Trumbull.

[908] Memorial, pp. 239, 240.

[909] Trumbull, Winthrop, Hutchinson.

[910] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 396.

[911] Trumbull, vol. 1. Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 81.

[912] Bradford, Hubbard, Morton.

[913] Magnalia, ut antea.

[914] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 396.

[915] Palfrey, Trumbull, Bancroft. Elliot, etc.

[916] Hubbard, Palfrey, Elliot, Mather.

[917] Trumbull, vol. 1. Hubbard, Hist. Col.

[918] Ibid.

[919] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 88.

[920] Hubbard, p. 321. Hazard.

[921] “The settlers met in Mr. Newman’s barn,” etc. Elliot, vol. 1,
p. 242.

[922] Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 83.

[923] Ibid.

[924] Bradford, Morton’s Memorial, Thatcher, Banvard.

[925] Ibid., Prince, Hazard.

[926] Increase Mather’s Early Hist. of New England, p. 121, et seq.

[927] Ibid.

[928] Elton’s Life of Roger Williams, p. 54.

[929] Elton’s life of Roger Williams, p. 54. Elliot, vol. 1, p. 210.

[930] Elliot.

[931] I. Mather’s Early Hist., etc. Palfrey, Bancroft, Elliot,
Hutchinson.

[932] Ibid.

[933] White’s Incidents, p. 59. I. Mather, Palfrey, Hubbard, Winthrop.

[934] Ibid.

[935] Chap. 17, p. 215, et seq.

[936] Bradford, Morton’s Memorial, Hubbard, White.

[937] Winthrop, pp. 189, 190.

[938] Palfrey, White, Elliot, etc.

[939] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 458, 459.

[940] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 458, 459. I. Mather, Prince, Introduction
to Mason’s Hist. of the Pequod War.

[941] Ibid.

[942] Gardiner’s Relations, etc., in Mass. Hist. Rep., 23.

[943] Ibid., p. 143. Trumbull’s Hist. Connecticut, vol. 1, p. 76.

[944] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 462.

[945] I. Mather, Gardiner in Mass. Hist. Col., 23.

[946] Mass. Hist. Col. Col. Rec., vol. 1, p. 192.

[947] Ibid.

[948] Plym. Col. Rec., vol. 1, pp. 60-62.

[949] Palfrey, ut antea. Prince. Introduction to Mason’s Hist.

[950] Mason’s Brief Hist., etc. Hubbard.

[951] Trumbull, Mather.

[952] Palfrey, vol. 1.

[953] Ibid., Hubbard, Trumbull, Mather.

[954] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 164.

[955] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 465.

[956] Ibid., Mason, Underhill.

[957] Palfrey, ut antea.

[958] Mason’s Brief Account, etc.

[959] Ibid., Palfrey, Elliot, I. Mather, Winthrop, Hubbard,
Hutchinson. Two of the English were killed, and upwards of forty—more
than half of the force—were wounded.

[960] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 467.

[961] Mason, Hubbard, Hazard, Trumbull.

[962] Ibid., Elliot.

[963] Trumbull, Mason, Winthrop, Hist. Coll.

[964] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 257. Trumbull.

[965] Ibid. Hutchinson, vol. 1, p. 80. Winthrop, vol. 1. Palfrey.

[966] Uhden’s New England Theocracy, p. 135.

[967] Winthrop, Hutchinson, Hubbard, Col. Records, etc.

[968] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 389.

[969] Ibid., p. 386.

[970] Uhden, Winthrop, Hutchinson, Hubbard.

[971] Shepherd’s Lamentation, 2.

[972] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 387.

[973] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 387.

[974] There are few controversies where a woman is not at the bottom
of them.

[975] See Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 388.

[976] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 472, et seq.

[977] Winthrop, vol. 1, p. 200.

[978] Ibid., Hubbard.

[979] Palfrey, vol. 1, p. 473.

[980] Ibid. Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 516.

[981] Ibid., Elliot, Hutchinson, Uhden.

[982] Palfrey, Winthrop, Elliot, Hubbard, etc.

[983] Ibid., Col. Records.

[984] Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 509.

[985] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 263.

[986] Ibid.

[987] Ibid.

[988] Fuller’s Ch. Hist. of England, vol. 2, pp. 514, 515, et. seq.

[989] Ibid.

[990] Uhden, p. 98.

[991] Winthrop, vol. 1, p. 203. Hubbard, Palfrey, Hazard.

[992] Winthrop, vol. 1, p. 203. Hubbard, Palfrey, Hazard, Col.
Records.

[993] Palfrey, vol. 1, pp. 475, 476. Winthrop.

[994] Ibid.

[995] Ibid., Bancroft, Elliot, Hutchinson.

[996] Ibid. Uhden, p. 96.

[997] Winthrop, Palfrey.

[998] Cited in Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 390.

[999] C. Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 510. Palfrey, Hubbard.

[1000] Ibid., Hutchinson’s Coll., Neale’s Hist. of New England.

[1001] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 267.

[1002] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 390.

[1003] C. Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 512.

[1004] Winthrop in Hutchinson’s Coll.

[1005] Winthrop’s Journal.

[1006] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 391.

[1007] Battles of the Churches.

[1008] Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 508.

[1009] Magnalia, vol. 2, p. 512.

[1010] Knowles’ Life of Williams, Elton. Mrs. Hutchinson, some years
after her exile, suffered a melancholy fate, being tomahawked by the
savages. See Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 393, 394.

[1011] Johnson’s Wonder-working Providence, p. 96.

[1012] Banvard, p. 200.

[1013] Thatcher’s New Plymouth, Banvard.

[1014] Charter and Laws of New Plymouth.

[1015] Ibid., Banvard.

[1016] Ibid.

[1017] Ibid.

[1018] Ibid.

[1019] Ibid.

[1020] Ibid.

[1021] Ibid.

[1022] Banvard, p. 211.

[1023] Charter and Laws, etc.

[1024] Banvard, ut antea.

[1025] Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 183, 184.

[1026] Chap. 12, p. 151.

[1027] Winthrop, vol. 1.

[1028] “Quo quis in republicâ majorem dignitatis gradum adeptus est,
eo Deum colat submissius.”

[1029] Τέχνη πυβερνητικὴ.

[1030] He died in 1657, in his sixty-ninth year.

[1031] Thatcher, Wilson, Mather, etc.

[1032] Plymouth Pilgrims, p. 227.

[1033] Magnalia, vol. 1, pp. 113, 114.

[1034] Letter to John Winthrop the Younger, cited in Magnalia, vol.
1, p. 161.

[1035] Elliot. Life of J. Winthrop, by R. C. Winthrop. Boston, 1866.

[1036] Williams’ Letter to Mason. Knowles, Elton.

[1037] Wilson, p. 494.

[1038] Hutchinson, vol. 1, p. 23.

[1039] Wilson.

[1040] Shawmut; or the Settlement of Boston, p. 86.

[1041] Hutchinson, vol. 1, p. 40.

[1042] See his Sonnet in Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 134.

[1043] Elliot, vol. 1, p. 170.

[1044] Bancroft, vol. 1, p. 383.

[1045] Bancroft, ut antea.

[1046] Hubbard, cited in Elliot, vol. 1, pp. 173, 174.

[1047] Cicero, Orati Pro. Plan.

[1048] Hutchinson, vol. 1, p. 91. Mass. Historical Coll., vol. 1, 23.
Neale’s New England.

[1049] Johnson, Mather, Bancroft.

[1050] Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. 1, p. 246, et seq.

[1051] Ibid., Bancroft.

[1052] Winthrop, vol. 2, p. 119.

[1053] Felt, vol. 1, p. 481.

[1054] Winthrop, vol. 2, p. 25.

[1055] Bancroft, vol. 1, pp. 416, 417.

[1056] Bancroft, ubi sup.

[1057] Mather’s Magnalia, vol. 1, p. 160. Palfrey, Hubbard, etc.

[1058] Hutchinson, Winthrop, Felt.

[1059] Ibid. Palfrey, Elliot, Bancroft.

[1060] Hubbard, p. 466. Col. Rec., etc.

[1061] W. Phillips.

[1062] Records in Hazard, vol. 2. Winthrop, Hubbard, Morton.

[1063] Bancroft, ut antea.

[1064] Hubbard, Hazard, Hutchinson, Morton, Bradford.

[1065] Hist. Coll., Col. Records, Elliot.

[1066] The half century which succeeded this act of union was
singularly checkered. In this time four momentous events occurred.
The first of these, in point of time, was the persecution of the
Quakers. The early advocates of this sect in New England displayed
little of the mild philosophy and statesmanlike benevolence of
Penn and his modern disciples; and, indeed, “the first and most
noisy exponents of any popular sect are apt to be men of little
consideration.” To this rule the first Quakers of Massachusetts
were no exception. They knew the public opinion of the province;
they knew the laws which were put into the statute-book to curb
heresy; yet they broke through the restraints of sentiment, and
contemned the laws—not mildly, but with harsh, violent, and often
indecent obstinacy. Persecution, under any circumstances, is wrong,
and the theocratic principles of the Massachusetts colonists were
far from being either just or necessary. Yet granting all this,
and it has still been well said that, “if the essential guilt of
persecution would be aggravated when aimed against the quiet,
patient philanthropist of to-day, it does not follow that it would
be attended with like aggravation, however wicked else, when the
subject was the mischievous madman of two centuries ago, who went
raving through the city reviling authority, inveighing against the
law and order of the time, running naked in the streets, and rudely
interrupting divine service in the churches, as many called Quakers,
of both sexes, did in 1656 and onwards. The duty of toleration stops
short of the permission of such indecency; nor does it suffer men,
for conscience’ sake, or to gain a name like Abraham, to sacrifice
their sons, as one of these Friends was proceeding to do in 1658,
when the neighbors, alarmed by the boy’s cries, broke into the house
in time to balk the fanatic.” Still, it must be confessed that there
was a better way than the magistrates of Massachusetts took, and
one more efficient in curbing this fanaticism, than the pillory,
mutilation statutes, and the death penalty; and this Roger Williams
proved in Rhode Island, and the younger Winthrop demonstrated in
Connecticut—in both of which colonies there was freedom of religious
opinion, and yet there were few Quakers.

That furious Indian war, known as “King Philip’s war,” occurred in
1675. It originated in the same deep-rooted feeling of jealousy and
hatred—begotten of dispossession and imagined wrong—that caused
the Pequod war. Massasoit died about 1661. He was succeeded by his
son Alexander, who was, on his death, succeeded by his brother
Philip, the hero of the struggle. This sagacious chieftain saw that
the whites were grasping; that his corn-lands and hunting-grounds
were rapidly being usurped; that rum was poisoning his warriors;
and he panted for revenge. So he gave his days and nights to the
organization of a conspiracy. “He spared no arts; he lived but for
one purpose, and that was to unite the Indians, split into numberless
clans, into one body, for the destruction of the encroaching
pale-faces.” Philip was largely successful, and the ensuing conflict
was bitter, doubtful, and prolonged. But eventually civilization and
discipline triumphed. The great sagamore was slain, and peace once
more brooded over mutilated and wailing New England—peace insured by
the definitive subjection of the Indian tribes.

In 1683, James II. abrogated the Massachusetts charter; three years
later, Sir Edmund Andros arrived, armed with the king’s commission
to take upon himself the absolute government of New England. Andros
at once commenced to play the despot. He shackled the press; he
imprisoned men for their religious opinions; he endeavored to
get possession of the charter of Connecticut—which, however, was
hidden in the “charter-oak” at Hartford, a circumstance which has
made the tree immortal; he denied the colonists the most common
civil rights, and asserted the highest doctrines of arbitrary
taxation. The colonies were ripe for insurrection, when, in 1688,
news came of the landing and coronation of William of Orange.
Instantly Andros was deposed, and flung, broken and dishonored, out
of New England. In 1691, King William granted Massachusetts a new
charter; but in this he reserved the right of appointing a colonial
governor, allowed appeals to be made to the English courts, freed
all Protestant religions, and confirmed the annexation of Plymouth
to Massachusetts—an annexation which Plymouth had decreed in 1690.
This charter robbed the colonists of several prerogatives which had
betokened independence, and was continued in substance until the dawn
of the Revolution. The same policy was pursued throughout New England.

It was in the years 1691-2 that what has been called the “Salem
witchcraft epidemic” occurred. In that age the belief in witches
was general and strong. In 1644, ’5, and ’6, England hanged fifteen
persons accused of witchcraft in one batch at Chelmsford, sixteen at
Yarmouth, and sixty in Suffolk. In Sweden, in 1670, there was a panic
about witches; and in one town, Mahra, seventy persons were charged
with this offence, and spite of their protestations of innocence,
most of them were executed. Fifteen children were hung on their own
confession; and fifty others were condemned to be whipped every
Sunday for a twelvemonth. Even so late as 1697, five years after the
Salem troubles, seven persons were hung in Scotland as witches, and
that too upon the unsupported testimony of a single child eleven
years old.

New England, then, was not alone in her belief in witches, or in her
punishment of them. She merely shared the opinion of such consummate
scholars and noble thinkers as Sir Thomas Browne and Sir Matthew
Hale. Many things combined to increase this belief. James I. had
published a book on demonology. Books containing rules for binding
witches were in wide circulation. The practice and the opinion of
centuries substantiated these phantoms. And the recent excitement in
Sweden and England was certain to cause a ripple in America. Men’s
minds were thus prepared for an epidemic. As early as the year 1688,
a case of supposed witchcraft occurred in Boston. An old half-witted
Irish woman was charged with having bewitched the children of John
Goodwin, and she was soon hanged. The witches then quit Boston,
and in 1691-2 appeared at Salem. Children began to act oddly,
getting “into holes, creeping under chairs, and uttering foolish
speeches”—all of which were esteemed as tokens of bewitchment.
Inquiries were at once and everywhere made for witches. The children
accused at random. This woman was said to be a witch, and that
man. Salem was aghast. Startled women passed from house to house,
repeating and enlarging every idle tale. Soon the excitement was
unprecedented. Fasting and prayer failed to exorcise the “spirits.”
Then the witches were imprisoned, tried, condemned, executed. A reign
of terror commenced. All lived in fear; accusation was equivalent to
proof; there seemed no safety. Many, spurred by fear, acknowledged
themselves to be witches when accused, thinking thus to save their
lives; others hastened to complain that they were bewitched; and only
those who avowed themselves to belong to one of these two classes
could be sure of life. Still the panic spread. Andover was infected.
New England at large began to shudder. The executioner was busy.
And it was not until January, 1692, that the panic began to abate.
Nineteen persons had been hung; one had been pressed to death; many
had been condemned; hundreds had been imprisoned. So remorseless,
so cruel is panic. But the excess cured itself; the reaction was
great; men began to lament the part they had played; and some made
open confession in church of their grievous fault and weakness. The
infatuation grew perhaps from the tricks or the craziness of the
“bewitched” children; perhaps from the folly or the superstition of
their parents. Whatever its cause, its effects were sad, and they are
pregnant with warning.

It is sometimes said that these doings sprang naturally from the
theology and temper of New England. Rather, they were directly
counter to both. They were a weak and foolish importation from
Europe; and they prevailed in New England only for a short season.
Soon her sons outgrew such folly; and nowhere in Christendom was the
popular revolution against witchcraft so speedy and complete as in
the Puritan colonies.




  TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE

  Obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been
  corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within
  the text and consultation of external sources.

  Some accents and hyphens in words have been silently removed, some
  added, when a predominant preference was found in the original book.

  Except for those changes noted below, all misspellings in the text,
  and inconsistent or archaic usage, have been retained.

  Pg 7: ‘The Nansets’ replaced by ‘The Nausets’.
  Pg 106: ‘opprobious speeches’ replaced by ‘opprobrious speeches’.
  Pg 111: ‘to sow and hill’ replaced by ‘to sow and till’.
  Pg 117: ‘the earthern floor’ replaced by ‘the earthen floor’.
  Pg 124: ‘named Aspiret’ replaced by ‘named Aspinet’.
  Pg 124: ‘bade Aspiret a hasty’ replaced by ‘bade Aspinet a hasty’.
  Pg 125: ‘Squanto, Takamahamon’ replaced by ‘Squanto, Tokamahamon’.
  Pg 151: ‘passed in in 1632’ replaced by ‘passed in 1632’.
  Pg 174: ‘clams, and muscles’ replaced by ‘clams, and mussels’.
  Pg 191: ‘They had had been left’ replaced by ‘They had been left’.
  Pg 201: ‘sprang aleak’ replaced by ‘sprang a leak’.
  Pg 217: ‘malicious inuendoes’ replaced by ‘malicious innuendoes’.
  Pg 258: ‘seal of Soloomon’ replaced by ‘seal of Solomon’.
  Pg 312: ‘wise statemanship’ replaced by ‘wise statesmanship’.
  Pg 326: ‘both of Massachusets’ replaced by ‘both of Massachusetts’.
  Pg 339: ‘with sevral other’ replaced by ‘with several other’.
  Pg 373: ‘the evenging of’ replaced by ‘the avenging of’.
  Footnote 57, Pg 46: ‘March 1, 1864-5’ replaced by ‘March 1, 1625’.