HAVE YOU AN EDUCATED HEART?


_By_ GELETT BURGESS


Author of “Are You a Bromide?”
“The Maxims of Methuselah,”
“The Romance of the Commonplace,” &c.

BONI AND LIVERIGHT
Publishers :: New York City

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright, 1923,
By the Crowell Publishing Co.
----------
Copyright, 1923,
By Gelett Burgess

----------------------------------------------------------------------
   _Here the heart_
_May give a useful lesson to the head,_
_And Learning wiser grow without his books._
   Cowper: _The Task._
----------------------------------------------------------------------



THE EDUCATED HEART


NOW, Sadie, I knew, was temperamental. Sadie was sensitive. But surely
there wasn’t quite enough in that dull musical comedy, that afternoon,
to make anyone weep. But, as I had noticed Sadie dabbing at her eyes
with her handkerchief, off and on through the first act, when the
curtain went down, I demanded the reason.

Somewhat reluctantly Sadie handed me a letter. “Did you ever see
anything as heartless as that?” she asked. “It’s about a package I sent
to Eldora, last week.”

I read it. Then, uncertainly: “Why, I don’t know,” I replied; “seems
all right enough to me. ‘Ever so much obliged for the birthday package.’
What’s the matter with that?”

“Why, she might just as well have said, ‘Yours of the 16th at hand and
contents noted’!” And as Sadie snatched back the letter she was already
emptying the vials of her resentment.

A while ago, it appeared, when she was visiting Sadie in New York,
Eldora had raved over some fawn-colored gloves she had seen, with those
awfully wide black stitchings down the back. Though fairly weak after a
bad attack of the flu, poor Sadie had tramped through shop after shop,
from 34th Street to 56th Street last week, to find those particular
gloves; actually fighting for them, at the last, with a mob of wild
women at a bargain sale. Well, Sadie had gone and bought a fancy box.
Sadie had wrapped that package with neatness and with fondest care.
Sadie had walked twenty-one blocks (so she said) to a Post Office.
Sadie had stood there in line for half an hour, more or less, to have it
weighed and insured.

“And I just loved it all--I loved doing it for Eldora,” wailed Sadie.
“And now all she says is that she is ‘ever so much obliged’!”

“Oh, well,” said I loftily, “we oughtn’t to give things just for the
thanks, you know.”

“Never mind the thanks!” snapped Sadie, “but did she _like_ those
gloves? Good gracious, you want to know whether you’ve pleased a person
or not, don’t you? Were they the right shade? Did they match her gown?
Were they the size? Did they fit her? Has she worn them? Why, she might
have said _something_ about them!”

“Well, at any rate,” I offered in appeasement, “she answered you
promptly. That’s something. Why, loads of people don’t even
acknowledge gifts at all, nowadays.”

“Yes, and that’s just the point,” declared Sadie. “I’ve no doubt she
thinks she’s really quite polite and kind. Oh, she ‘means well,’ I
suppose--they all do. But the trouble with Eldora is simply that she
hasn’t got the Educated Heart.”

“The Educated Heart?” I queried, amused, “what d’you mean, the Educated
Heart?”




THE lady was growing a little calmer now. “Why, I’ve called it that to
myself so long that it seems as if anyone ought to understand. Well,
it’s this way. You know you can usually tell an educated man, can’t you?
There’s something about him that’s--oh, I don’t know--extra. Finish, it
is, perhaps. Distinction, or something. He knows how to--”

“But the Educated Heart!” I insisted, “prithee, the Educated Heart!”

“Why, it’s just the same with hearts as it is with heads,” quoth my
Mentor. “Some hearts seem to be self-made, you
know--rough-dry--unvarnished--amateurish. And then some hearts are just
as if they’d been to college, and been graduated in Kindness. They’ve
got their B.K., or D.K., even, sometimes. Yes, I know at least one
Doctor of Kindness. Why, I mean, oh, they have that extra touch of
consideration--thoughtfulness, you know--imagination--and--oh, dear, why
do we like to have flowers on the dinner table? They’re not necessary,
of course; but doesn’t that extra touch always make the soup taste
perfectly wonderful? It’s all the difference between just eating and
dining. Ever see a woman without style jam on a beautiful hat and make
it look like a waste-basket? Well, some people are like that, when they
try to be kind. Style--that’s what it is! It’s just style in kindness
that most people lack. Oh, it’s the rarest thing in the world--the
Educated Heart!”




THE Educated Heart! Late that night, alone, I pondered it . . .
midnight, and still it haunted me . . . the Educated Heart. . . .
Superkindness, she might have called it. She might have called it Tact.
Vainly, I tried to coin a new word for it. But at the end, Sadie’s
simple term stayed with me--the Educated Heart. And so, using that test,
I found myself at length classifying my friends.

And first of all came Crystabel. Last October, you see, I sent Crystabel
a book. She acknowledged it, and promptly. But, two months afterward,
hadn’t she--yes, she actually had--written me another letter, telling me
what she thought of that book; and she proved, moreover, that she had
read it--actually read it! Now, reader, I ask you: Isn’t that a strange
and beautiful experience in this careless world? Yes, Crystabel had
the Educated Heart.

Indeed, receiving, simply receiving, is one of the greatest tests of the
Educated Heart. To such as possess it, thanks are something like
mortgages, to be paid in installments. Why, after five years, Crystabel
often refers to a gift that has pleased her. Yes, and lies about it,
too, sometimes! Mind you, I didn’t say that Crystabel was always really
sincere. I said that she was really kind. She may dislike that gift
exceedingly; she may stick it up in the garret, or give it to her
laundress. But Crystabel, having the Educated Heart, appreciates
kindness in others. It is the motive for that gift she cares for, not
its value; and hence her tactful, iterated gratefulness. But the
others--oh, the thousand negligent others!




YOU give your friend a bottle of perfume. She thanks you, and pop it
goes immediately into a bureau drawer, and she begins to talk about
Harry’s wife. You give her a lovely veil, and, right before your
incredulous eyes, she wads it into a bunch, jams it into her bag and
takes another chocolate. That bunch of jonquils you brought the
invalid--haven’t you seen it carried off into some far corner, as if it
were deadly mandragora, or hustled into a miscellaneous mass of
wholesale offerings and the subject hurriedly changed?

Last month I visited my young cousin Frizia. “Why, what a pretty jet
necklace!” they all cried, at dinner. In pleased, self-conscious
expectancy I waited for Frizia to say, “Oh yes, my cousin brought it to
me.” Did she? No. Not a word except, “Oh, d’you like it?” I should
have been grateful, I suppose, that my little cousin even wore that
necklace.

Haven’t you, too, often moaned:

_I shot a present into the air;_
_It fell to earth, I know not where!_




WHY, there are innumerable ways of insulting the giver of a present.
Listen, for instance, to this acknowledgment, from Zeroine: “All my
life,” she wrote, “I have given away pink azaleas to my friends; and
this is the first time I ever received one.” How’s that for egoism?
Compared to her noble, extravagant and advertised generosity didn’t my
one gift loom pretty small?

Rather clever she is, that Zeroine, a positive genius, sometimes--you
know them--at making one wish one hadn’t tried to be nice to her. As
the bride of one of my confreres I met her first in Paris. To celebrate
her marriage I racked my brains for something charming enough with which
to greet a new friend. Something not costly, you know, yet perfect and
unique. Well, the loveliest things of that sort I had found, were the
marvelous ribbon roses made by the Comtesse de Laumont for the benefit
of the widows of officers. Every one is a work of art--a beautiful and
faithful portrait of some particular rose from her own garden on the
Marne.

To her house on the Avenue Malakoff I went (her only son, last of his
line, had just been killed at the front, but her work must go on), and
three exquisite William Allen Richardsons I picked out from all the
rest. Late that night, too impatient to wait, through the narrow,
shuttered, unlighted Paris streets I walked--no taxicabs in those war
days--over the river to deliver my initiatory tribute at Zeroine’s
hotel. And with it I left a letter telling her the roses’ pathetic
story.

This is what Zeroine replied:

“Yes, I know the De Laumont roses. They’re lovely. I saw the wife
of the Ambassador wearing one last week, and got the address. I have
been intending to buy some of them; but you have kindly saved me the
trouble.”




BUT for the most extraordinary misunderstanding of all that gifts should
mean, I think I must, after all, award the prize to Mrs. Hilking. The
Christmas tree that day at Mrs. Hilking’s was heavily hung with
presents--piled deep on the floor they were. Mrs. Hilking was happy--oh,
she was awfully happy! Didn’t she have good reason to be happy? “Why,”
gurgled Mrs. Hilking, so proudly, “baby has received so many, many
Christmas presents that I didn’t have to give him a single one myself!”
Selah!




DO you begin to see, now, what Sadie meant by style in kindness? Style
is what a smart hat has, isn’t it? It’s what an expensive motor car
has--or a beautiful dancer. It’s the perfect technique of any artist--a
successful clergyman, or a good novelist, or a clever burglar such as
Mr. Raffles. In short, style is a combination of good taste and
imagination. Then what is style in giving? To give what you’d like
yourself may be kindness. But the Educated Heart isn’t quite satisfied
even with the Golden Rule. It amends, or, rather, translates it thus:
“Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, _were ye such as they_,
do ye even so to them.”

But perhaps you don’t know what your friend wants. Ah, but the Educated
Heart makes it its business to know, to remember, or to find out. “A
man’s heart,” you know, “deviseth his way.”

One friend I have to whom I can’t express a taste or desire that isn’t
treasured up against need. If I happen to mention liking a Japanese
writing set, it is only a question of time when that set is mine.

I said to the Prandials once that I loved watercress, and lightly wished
that I might have it for every meal. Never a meal have I ever had at the
Prandials’ table, since then, without finding watercress bought
specially for me.




D’YOU think it’s easy, this business of giving? Verily, verily, I say
unto you, giving is as much of an art as portrait-painting, or the
making of glass flowers. There really ought to be a four years’ course
in the art of making presents in every college for those who are not
born intelligently generous.

In one’s freshman year one would be taught, perhaps, not to present an
$85 inlaid umbrella with a gold dog’s-head handle with rhinestone eyes
to a gentleman of culture like Mr. Richard Mansfield, for instance, as
was once done one Christmas by an ardent but unillumined friend. If a
lady has saved your son’s life, the Educated Heart doesn’t reward her by
offering her chastely appointed apartment a two-ton carved ebony chair
upholstered in red plush.

Oh, no, it’s not easy. People nowadays haven’t the artless gratitude
of that easily-satisfied girl who used to sing:

_“He promised to bring me a bunch of blue ribbons
To tie up my bonny brown hair!”_

The people I know usually prefer to select their own ribbons--and gloves
and boudoir caps and neckties--rather than have them chosen, however
expensively, by--well, by those who do sometimes have the audacity to
choose them for you.

Now taste, you will say, cannot be disputed. Each one has his own.
Perhaps it can’t even be educated. We’ll see, later.

But imagination surely can be brought to bear. Suppose we suggest a few
ways, in illustration.




ARE you sailing for Italy? Ah, it isn’t the basket of fine fat fruits
that brings the tears to your eyes, nor the flowers with trailing yards
and yards of red ribbon--all that’s mere kindness, ordinary everyday
kindness. Even the Vanderbilts can do that. But it’s the things--oh,
it’s the things Mr. Rockefeller never would think of--it’s that little
purse full of Italian currency, bills and small change all ready for
you when you first trip ashore at Genoa. It’s the little nest of spools
of colored silk Minnie made for you to catch up the first threatened
run in your stocking. I may, oh, yes, I may forget the three hundred
dollars you lent me that time I was broke; but the little corkscrew you
so thoughtfully added when you gave me that bottle of your pet malt
extract--that I shall never, never forget!

No, he didn’t have much style, I admit, to his dented, dusty derby, poor
old Westrose, but, God bless him, his heart was certainly up to date. He
may have got a lady’s coat upside down occasionally when he helped her
on with it--but he understood the Fourth Dimension of Kindness, all
right. Never a friend of his wife’s did he ever puffingly put aboard a
street car, but he’d tuck, apologetically, into her hand the nickel to
save her rummaging in her bag.

Real elegance, the gesture of inherent nobility, I call that. It’s like
the flourish to the signature of Charles Dickens. It’s kindness with a
kick to it. In short, it’s the manner and custom of the Educated Heart,
that makes you turn over at night and decide to add a codicil to
your will--why should brother Fred have it all?

Well knows the Educated Heart that the doctor’s clients usually pay
slowly, and itself therefore pays without delay. Which lover has the
Educated Heart--he who orders the florist to send, every day, five
dollars’ worth of flowers, or he who himself selects and presents a
single rose? Ask the sweetheart--she knows that

_“’Tis not so much the gallant who woos,
As the gallant’s way of wooing!”_

*   *   *   *   *

“I’m so sorry I couldn’t send you anything this Christmas,” said
Millicent, “but I’ve been awfully hard up!”

Too hard up, in fact, to afford two cents to stamp a letter, sending her
love!

*   *   *   *   *




AND now, I beseech you, consider the usual Christmas present. No one but
a boor would present a diamond wrapped in a scrap of newspaper, would
he? No; and so the most trivial of gifts, when sent by a civilized donor
on Christmas, is, by universal practice, carefully wrapped in a pretty
paper, red or gold, is tied with a fancy ribbon and decorated, mayhap,
with a sprig of holly.

Now, that’s what I mean by the Educated Heart. That package is
symbolical of what all friendly acts should be--_kindness performed with
style_.

Is it sufficient, then, simply to offer your seat in a street car to a
woman? The merely kind person does that. But he does it rather
sheepishly. Isn’t your graciousness more cultured if you give it up with
a bow, with a smile of willingness? Besides the quarter you give the
beggar, can’t you give a few cents’ worth of yourself, too?

So everything can be done beautifully by the Educated Heart, from the
lacing of a shoe so that it won’t come loose, to passing the salt before
it is asked for. Even if you say only “Good morning,” it can be done
pleasingly. Observe how the polished actor says it, with that cheerful
rising English inflection. But the ordinary American growls it out with
such surly downward emphasis that in London he is apt to be asked,
“What’s the matter, old chap--headache?”

Why, merely to speak distinctly is a great kindness, I consider. You
never have to ask, “What did you say?” to the Educated Heart. An old
maid I knew once confessed that the only proposal she ever received was
from a timid, low-voiced suitor, whose question she failed to hear.

“Lucky escape,” we all agreed. “You might have married him and been
tormented all your life by his mumbling!”




OF course you’ve heard that “he gives twice who gives quickly,” but how
about the giver who gives but half his gift? It isn’t the
procrastinator, I mean. The half-giver is one who “wearies in
well-doing,” stops part way on the road to kindness, with the goal
plainly in sight. If you want to have the Educated Heart you must dot
all the i’s and cross the t’s. Otherwise your gift is apt to be as the
grapefruit without the sugar.




HALF giving! Instances of such gold-plated parsimonious generosity I
could cite all day--from the old-fashioned “thrifty” housewife, who used
to cut all the buttons off the clothes before she gave them to the poor,
to sweet, sympathetic Oval, who visited an invalid.

“Oh, I’m so sorry,” she said, “I bought the loveliest bunch of roses for
you, but I forgot them--left them in the hotel.” And Oval, after that
(although the flowers of course never came), fully expected to be
credited with a kindness.

Oh, you know them. You must know them! The half-giver who invites his
party to supper after the theatre, but fails to reserve a table. How
surprised and apologetic he is to find all the places taken! The gent
who escorts his lady to the theater, too, and, when they come out,
exclaims: “Gee, doesn’t this fresh air seem good, after that stuffy
house! Let’s walk a way!” How bright his smile! Truly the heart, as well
as the clothes, can be shabby-genteel. That kind of liberality he has
that many women possess. Oh, yes, they insist upon paying for their half
of the dinner, but they always forget to share the tips!

You remember those Liberty Loan subscribers who used to say, “I’ll
subscribe one thousand if you’ll take another!” That’s the way these
half-givers usually leave you to complete their gifts or go and get them
or something--to pay some part of the price yourself, anyway, in trouble
or in work.

Dear Alfredine was kind enough to bring her friend from abroad several
pairs of earrings. But, alas! as they were made for those grandmothery
old pierced ears her friend had to pay a jeweler to have them fitted
with screw fastenings, just nine dollars, a sum she could ill afford--at
least for earrings.

*   *   *   *   *

“I’d rather not try, please,” said Alice. “I’m quite content to stay
here--only I _am_ so hot and thirsty!”

“I know what _you’d_ like,” the Queen said good-naturedly, taking a
little box out of her pocket. “Have a biscuit?”

*   *   *   *   *




KIND you may think you are, and never know you are not kind. And worse
than all the rest are those who force their presents on you.

My indulgent uncle, once, presented me with theatre tickets to see
Bernhardt. Now it so happened that day that at the last moment I had the
opportunity to meet a man, a famous man, whom I had long wanted to know,
and who proved to be of the greatest help to me.

When I told my uncle, was he pleased to hear of my good luck? Not at
all. Never did he forgive me for not using his tickets.

How many men who have taken the pains to secure a friend a good position
are pleased to hear that he himself has discovered a better one? Only
those with the Educated Heart. Like my uncle, most care more for
that self-flattering glow of kindliness than for another’s best
happiness.

Who ever really forgave you for being ill and missing a dinner
engagement? You had no right to be ill. You gave your kind hostess a
great deal of trouble and disappointment with that ptomaine poisoning of
yours!

“Be happy _my_ way!” says the parent “Marry this nice, rich man I have
chosen for you--not the poor fellow you love!” But no, putting a cushion
behind a man in an armchair isn’t kindness unless he happens to want it
there. It may make him uncomfortable.

And dear old country grandmother--who used to urge on us, nay, force on
us that third generous helping of pudding. Grandma’s heart was big
enough--but it wasn’t quite the right shape.




WHAT’S the rarest thing in all the world? Intelligent sympathy. Why?
Well, each one of us is working out his own evolution, I suppose, and
our own interests must be paramount and absorb us, or we lose in the
race.

Still, it is rather pleasing to recall, in pessimistic moods--upon
receiving a letter written in lead pencil, for instance, or one undated,
or with no address, or, most irritating of all, with an illegible
signature--it is even encouraging to recall that it isn’t always these
inconsiderate, unimaginative, egoistic people, after all, who succeed
most brilliantly in the world. Sometimes a good, plain writer, desirous
of making it easy for his reader, gets to the top, too, God bless him!
And my faith in kindness as a policy is restored, too, by the glaring
fact that of all my acquaintances the one least to be suspected of
an inferiority complex is the only one who begins a telephone
conversation by decently introducing himself:
  “B. Ganning talking!”
instead of peremptorily demanding _my_ name, like a census man breaking
in the door.

As many of our acquired habits, like walking, for instance, have been
passed from the domain of the conscious to the subconscious and become
automatic, so, perhaps, with the behavior of the Educated Heart. You set
it in the direction of true kindness and courtesy and it will function
without deliberate thought.

And, alas, _vice versa!_ It steers as well towards selfishness.




AND now, right there, before I find more fault, do, please, get my point
of view. Am I fastidious? Why, all I ask is an unadulterated drop of
your emotion. Am I querulous? Why should I be? No one is important
enough to hurt me. Surely the very inadequacy of their feelings proves
these skim-milk saints to be unworthy the time and energy it takes to
resent or protest. Am I ungrateful? Not if you have done the least
friendly act and done it wholly. Do I demand too much pay for my favors?
If I long for a little of the old-time courtesy to color life, must you
accuse me of preferring the glib, lace-sleeved, powdered-hair flattery,
of the French salons?

Not at all. These modern, downright, shirt-sleeved ways of ours,
open-air, golf-playing ways, man-and-woman, give-and-take
ways--making up the jocose and slangy warfare we call friendship,
nowadays--they’re well enough, so long as the thought beneath is honest.
But mere words, words, words--aren’t you, too, sick of them? Don’t you
want deeds or nothing?

Actions speak louder. . . .




FOR the fact is that such thoughtfulness, such consideration as I desire
is not merely decorative. It is the very essence and evidence of
sincerity. Without it all so-called kindness is merely titular and
perfunctory. Tact is what makes kindness real, makes it effective; just
as the perfume proves which is the genuine, and which is the artificial
violet.

Suppose I propose your name for membership in my club. Have I done
you (or my club) any real service, unless I also do my best to see that
you are elected? So then, if I go to every member of the committee, if I
urge all my friends to endorse you, is that a quixotic feeling for
punctilio?

I think not. It is merely the completion of my regard for you. It is
like salt--“it’s what makes potatoes taste bad, if you don’t put it on.”
It is a guarantee of my true feeling. It is the hug without which the
kiss means nothing.




NEITHER do I insist on obedience to custom. You may violate any of the
folk-ways, for all I care. If you refuse to take off your hat to ladies,
I shall think only that you do not feel yourself bound by the elaborate
rules of romantic love concocted by the lazy troubadours and sentimental
chatelaines of the Middle Ages. Offer your left hand to me, if you like,
I care not. We carry no daggers now. I know that most of us would prefer
to dine with a polite murderer than with an honest tinsmith who eats
with his knife. But, by that same token, I know that all such artificial
distinctions are not based upon kindness. They are merely the unwritten
laws of society.

But if you, however brilliantly, make fun of your wife, if you humiliate
an inferior, insult a debtor, if you promise and keep not your word,
if you fail to flavor your kindness with sincerity, if you give only the
counterfeit money of politeness--then I perceive that you have not the
Educated Heart. Indeed, the Educated Heart is rare enough anywhere; but
it is found quite as often among those who know not your artificial
social code, as it is with those of the six-fork dinner.




AHA! Now you think you have me in the old conventional corner by the
altruistic what-not, and the goody-goody seashells, eh? Copybook stuff.
Mass morality. Herd-minded optimism that finds good in everything and
why find fault--“it’s not constructive.’’ But, no--I’m not trying to
prove “’Tis only noble to be good,” but only that to be good, or even
pleasing, is a severe aesthetic problem. Well, I know that

_“Hearts just as pure and fair_
_May beat in Belgrave Square_
_As in the lowly air_
_Of Seven Dials,”_

but, at the same time, one of the highest orders of the Educated Heart,
I must tell you, is found in the criminal classes.

You stagger? Yes, I repeat: in the crook himself.

Doesn’t the confidence man, for instance, do everything in the power of
his trained imagination (in his first approaches, at least), to make his
victim happy? Doesn’t he study his come-on’s every whim and taste? Is
there anyone more tactful and polite, more considerate and anxious
to please than a shoplifter? Oh, charming, truly charming, thoughtful
and heart-wise must he be who marries eleven wives; even though
afterwards he murders them for the insurance money and buries them all
in the cellar. He knows how to anticipate his victim’s least desire.

Well, why not be as shrewd as the crook, then, yourself, to discover
what will please and satisfy the friend you love? Get-rich-quick
Wallingford had a perverted heart, ’tis true, but it had taken its
degree in the Art of Pleasing.

Not much like your millionaires who ask their poor relatives, “You don’t
mind sitting in front with the chauffeur, do you?” or give their country
cousins horrible little black hats with a stick-up in the back!




MUST you dance with all the wallflowers, then, and always be nice to old
ladies? Well, no--I won’t go so far as that, although that, too, would
certainly show an Educated Heart. It would prove that you had
imagination enough anyway to put yourself in another’s place.

No, all I ask is that, when you try to do a favor--to be kind--you do it
to the full length of the rope. Don’t send your telegram “collect,” or
in just ten carefully selected words. Economize elsewhere, but add those
few extra phrases that make the reader grin and perceive that you cared
more for him than you did for the expense.

No one with the Educated Heart ever approached a clergyman, or a
celebrity, or a long-absent visitor with the shocking greeting: “Oh,
Mr. Spoop, you don’t remember me, do you?” No, he gives his name first.
No one with the Educated Heart ever said, “Now do come and see me,
sometime!” Well he knows that that merely means: “Don’t come at all.”
The Educated Heart’s way of putting it is apt to be, “How about next
Wednesday?”

And strongly I doubt even if the Educated Heart is ever tardy at that
appointment. It knows that even if only two minutes late a person has
brought just that much less of himself. Oh, he came, yes--and we put
over the deal, after all. But forever you will remember that he made
you wait.




YOU understand, don’t you, that I’m not trying to discuss unkindness, or
even impoliteness? Nor merely legitimate half-kindness do I mean. It
would be absurd to assert that one shouldn’t say, “Here, you may have
this hat--I don’t like it.” But wouldn’t it be still more absurd to call
that sort of thing kindness?

No, what I impugn are thoughtless attempts to be kind. Slipshod
sentimentality masquerading as kindness. Near-sighted
benevolence--generosity run down at the heels, like the husband who
conceives himself to be liberal because he gives his wife money--though
she always has to ask him for it.




WHY, even in conversation there is plenty of chance for the Educated
Heart. Of course, unless you are a moron, you must have found out by
this time that very few people ever really listen. They are usually
merely waiting for a chance to say something themselves. It may be laid
down as an axiom, then, that no habitual talker can have the Educated
Heart. Even though these wordy pests go through all the motions of
listening, say “Oh,” and “Ah,” and “Really, is that so?” and “How
awful!” the moment you close your lips they pounce upon you with their
own narrative.

Or if, peradventure, they do listen, is the story of your trials or
disappointments heard with real sympathy? Not often. Your illness? Your
divorce? Your losses? You are merely providing them with a more or
less amusing entertainment.

Why, one of the best ways to make yourself popular--an infallible way--
is to tell a story upon yourself. Give yourself the worst of it, and
they’ll all roar.

But did anyone ever laugh with joy when you informed him that you had
made ten thousand dollars, or won a beauty prize? How faint, oh, how
pale are their congratulations! The lips move, but does the face really
glow? Tell them you fell down two flights of stairs, though, and you’ll
see a fine abandon of mirth. They’ll slap you on the back, by Jove, and
invite you to dinner, so that you can repeat it to the wife.




YOU think I’m fooling? Not at all. A psychological fact it is, that, in
nine cases out of ten, if you tell of an accident of which you’re the
victim, your hearer will instantly laugh. Just try it yourself, and see.

Oh, of course, if you paint a vivid enough picture, if you say “I had
three ribs and a shoulder blade broken and four others were killed,”
then possibly you may awaken their sympathy. But the ordinary tale of
suffering has pretty hard work getting more than half an inch inside
people’s ears. Women love to tell of their operations, I hear, but do
they love to listen? Doesn’t everyone smile when you say you haven’t
slept a wink all night? Yes, all, save the one with the Educated
Heart--and he’s your sweetheart, probably.

Queer, but the world, alas! is very hard of hearing. Unless people see
the blood actually streaming, every sufferer is considered merely as a
comedian. The banana-peel joke is still typical of our reactions to
another’s woes.




AND so, it is my fearful opinion that but seldom has the Educated Heart
a keen sense of humor. Didn’t an eminent mid-Victorian advise, “Be good,
sweet maid, and let who will be clever!” Aren’t you already thinking
over your own friends?

Am I not right? Is it the sparkling bright apostle of pleasantry to whom
you go to borrow that ten dollars, or to the serious, kindly dub who
never sees the point? Which dentist is most apt to drill that horrid
millimetre too far into a shrieking nerve--he who tells you diverting
anecdotes, the while, or the solemn conscientious drudge?

To whom do you tell your troubles-- the agile wit, or the
bromide-minded, solid, respectable Philistine, your uncle, with the
shoestring tie? No, no; oh, no, my friend, you can’t be too quick on
the comic trigger, if you would have the Educated Heart!

There is “a time to weep, and a time to laugh,” said the Preacher; the
Educated Heart knows well how to control his mirth.




YOU call once or twice at the hospital. Do you ever call again? Not
unless you have the Educated Heart. Yet the patient is still perhaps
quite as ill. The plain truth is, if you must know it, most people
really dislike illness. It bores them. It interferes with their
happiness and convenience. It thrusts upon them, too, a disagreeable
burden of sympathy.

But, one there was--d’you remember? will you ever forget?--who used to
bring that cute scrapbook, every morning, pasted in with funny newspaper
items of the day’s news. One there was who wrote you letters every day.
One who rescued the clock that _always_ had something in front of it, so
you couldn’t see the time, who was careful never to hit the bed, who
talked to you, yes, to poor sick _you_, instead of to the
distinguished caller who happened to be present.

But still I insist I don’t mean mere kindness. Others were kind to you.
They bought you things. But such acts as these required more thought and
invention than the others spent, when they sent the jelly and champagne.

And oh, what do these Uneducated Hearts do at your first brave smile
(though the effort kills you), at your first would-be, will-be cheerful
letter, or at your first timorous step on crutches? They beam. Oh, how
they beam! “Oh, you’re all right now, aren’t you!”

It may pain you for months to breathe, you may limp on that broken ankle
to your grave--but it’s much more convenient for them to have you well
again.

And so, isn’t it lovely you’re cured!




ASK any invalid. Ask poor Luraine. “I’m afraid I’ll have to wear
glasses,” wept poor Luraine, after that accident when her eye was
injured. “Well, my dear,” said her would-be comforter, “I do hope you’ll
get some of those smart tortoiseshell goggles--they’re so becoming!” And
that, ladies and gentlemen, is what often passes for sympathy.

Ask any partially deaf person who is the cruellest of her would-be
friends. Isn’t it that kind and thoughtless one who says, so sweetly:
“Why, I think you get along awfully well, you know. Really no one would
ever know you can’t hear!” No one but the Educated Heart ever knows or
cares for the tearful nights of wild revolt, the days and years of stoic
suffering that remain, just the same. Yes, just the same.




BUT let’s pass, now, to the last cage in our menagerie. Here’s a
dangerous galravaging beast--one of those terrible creatures who “mean
well,” even while they rend you. One historic remark of this emotional
reptile there is, that in the annals of mental torture, surpasses in
heartlessness all other expressions of good intent. Oh, I have said
it--you have, too, I suppose. May God forgive us both, for there are
those who never, never will!

Galna it was who has dramatized it for me best. A dreadful suicide it
was, no horror lacking. Galna, alone in the house--alone, save for her
maid and that shocking wreck of one she had loved. And in her anguish,
her despair, her bewilderment, the telephone bell rang. Lo, Mrs. Spick,
kind, effusive Mrs. Spick, had rung her up to coo conventional
condolence.

“And now, if there is anything I can do, Galna,” she concluded, “be sure
and let me know!”

Ah, my friend, sometime you, too, must have suffered--suffered and
known not where to turn; and, as sure as most hearts, alas, are
ignorant, sometime you, too, must have heard that frightful phrase--
that mockery of friendship. The very epitaph it is upon the grave of
affection: “_If there is anything I can do, be sure and let me know!_”

But as Galna, dazed, lonely, aching, staggered back to her room, behold,
upon her bed she saw an unfamiliar thing. Tear-blinded, she groped for
it. A hundred-dollar bill!

“Why, where did this come from?” she asked, wondering.

“Oh, Miss Felice left it there,” said her maid, “she thought perhaps
you might happen to be short of money.”

“Felice?”

“Yes, she’s downstairs now, helping wash the dishes and putting the
parlor to rights, and sending telegrams.”

Ah, Felice needed no one to “let her know” what to do. She had
imagination. She had the Educated Heart.

For the Educated Heart always knows. “He seeth with his heart.” The
language of suffering, ordinarily, can no more be learned without
experience than can the language of Mars; but upon some blessed few, in
this world, thank God, has fallen the Gift of Tongues.




TRULY, as Sadie said, nothing is so rare as the Educated Heart. And if
you wonder why, just show a kodak group picture--a banquet photograph--a
photograph of a class. What does every one of us first look at, talk
about? Ourself. And that’s the reason why most hearts are so unlearned
in kindness. Yet none of us likes himself to be forgotten or neglected.
Almost any wife, I verily believe, would prefer actual rudeness to
having a husband pass over her wedding anniversary unnoticed. Even a
blow would prove that she was of some importance in his life.

So it isn’t always the big, climactic misfortune that we suffer from
most. We can rally, after we’re stunned, and go on, somehow. But it’s
the little stings that we can’t forget. It’s because of the
Uneducated Heart that love-mad women kill.

“Why don’t you get a smart hat like Carrie’s, dear? She’s always so
well-dressed!”

Yes, and because of the Uneducated Hearts of their wives, husbands grow
seedy, silly and old.

Why, one can tell, almost, by the looks of a man--his posture, his very
clothes--whether or not his wife truly loves him. For many a wife,
dubbed by his undiscerning friends a shrew, a harridan, has proved her
real interest in him by so ballyragging him for his faults that he has,
despite himself, improved to meet her criticism, become ambitious,
become persevering and successful--while as many others have been
slowly kissed and praised into an intellectual apathy; most
affectionately murdered by the Uneducated Heart. Ah, ’tis not only
cats and lap dogs that are killed with kindness!

There is another side to the Mary and Martha story. I know them well,
those two sisters. Mary loves Martha well, she will tell you, and be
shocked at your question. But dear Martha is, before her time, an old
woman, round-shouldered, bowed down by caring for others. In the years,
has Mary ever said, “Straighten up, dear! You are growing crooked.”

Not once. Her own head high, she walks beside a sister almost
deformed--whom, with an Educated Heart, she could have saved from
ugliness.




AND by this time you’ll understand of course that the Educated Heart
isn’t really educated at all, in the sense that it has had to learn how
to be kind. It merely is wise. Its gesture is instinctive, its knowledge
innate. But, you ask, can’t the uneducated heart be instructed? Don’t
the churches and Sunday-schools teach How to be Good? How about the
books of Ethics? Ah, the trouble with them all is that they teach what
to do, but not how to do it.

And the trouble with this little study will be, perhaps, if you and I
don’t look out, that it will educate us as to others’ faults but lead us
to forget our own. It’s so easy to be petulant and critical; it’s so
easy to deny that we ourselves are morally round-shouldered. If you have
even the rudiments of a heart culture, long before this you will be
saying to yourself:

Have _I_ an Educated Heart?




SO, if you are not content with increasing your chest expansion or your
biceps, if you want to enlarge that mystic organ whence flows true
kindness, you must cultivate your imagination, you must learn to put
yourself in another’s place, think his thoughts. There is but one
substitute for imagination, and that is experience. If you have deeply
suffered, perhaps you may have found from your very pain, what real
kindness is. Like Confucius you may have learned politeness from the
impolite. And if you haven’t--well, I scarcely think it should be
necessary for you to break a leg or inoculate yourself with the
germs of typhoid. You might do a great deal, really, by exercising
just your common sense.

Take a little thought, therefore, upon what style really is. In costume,
you’ll see that style is not what most people, but what the best people,
wear. If you wished to be strictly up to date, then, you’d go to the
leading shops for your clothes, wouldn’t you? You’d haunt the Opera, the
smartest assemblies, the most aristocratic homes, to see what
fashionable people selected. If you wanted to learn modern surgery you’d
visit the clinic of the most eminent surgeon, wouldn’t you, to observe
his technique?




THEN, if you desire to be really kind, elegantly kind, artistically
kind, why not seek the highest authorities on kindness, and emulate
their expert taste and method? Wherefore, let me recommend to you the
greatest examples of altruistic love, past masters of sympathetic
consideration, whose kindness is directed by an inspired imagination.

Two perfect exponents of the Educated Heart there are--only two, but I
am sure you have known them. The mother, who sees her child as truly a
part of herself; and the true lover whose imagination is fired with
romance. In those two is most perfectly manifest the love which passeth
understanding. Forever, unconsciously, they demonstrate the radiant
truth:

“The heart hath its reasons, which the reason knoweth not of.”



THE END