Music as a Human Need

                A PLEA FOR FREE NATIONAL INSTRUCTION IN
                                MUSIC.

                                  BY

               Alma Webster Powell, A.M., Mus.B., LL.B.

          Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements
                For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
                                in the
                     Faculty of Political Science
                         Columbia University.

                               NEW YORK
                                 1914




           This work is gratefully dedicated to my husband,
                         Mr. A. Judson Powell


                Copyright, 1914, by Alma Webster Powell




                           TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    PAGE

  Preface                                                           5-17


  PART I.--THE THESIS.

  CHAPTER I.

  Music as a Human Need                                               19


  CHAPTER II.

  Music and Motion                                                    31


  CHAPTER III.

  Group and Individual Reaction to Music                              41


  CHAPTER IV.

  Toneurology: A New Branch of Study                                  56


  PART II.--THE INTER-REACTIONS OF MUSIC AND NATIONAL LIFE.

  CHAPTER V.

  Italy (1800-1913)                                                   61


  CHAPTER VI.

  England (1800-1913)                                                 68


  CHAPTER VII.

  Germany (1800-1913)                                                 71


  CHAPTER VIII.

  France (1800-1913)                                                  81


  CHAPTER IX.

  United States (1800-1913)                                           91

  APPENDICES.

  Appendix A.--Questionnaire                                          97

  Appendix B.--Sources of Statistical Material                        99

  Appendix C.--Tabulation of Foreign State Subventions               101

  Appendix D.--Notes on the Tabulation of Foreign State
  Subventions                                                        103

  Appendix E.--Communications                                        112

  Appendix F.--Bibliography                                          138

  Vita                                                               143

  Index                                                              144




                                PREFACE


It will be observed that in the following pages political and economic
events are presented in their aspect of emotion-producing forces in
social pressure, with but scant attention to their other values. An
artificially selective process must also be acknowledged in that, of
those events only such as seem to have produced a direct emotional
reaction upon a people have been considered. Those long continued
economic movements which produced no sudden changes have not been
taken into account, because what may be termed their disturbing
effects were too gradual to allow of their being included among
specific emotion-making forces[1]; slow changes are not sensed by whole
peoples. Uneducated masses, especially, do not become conscious of
progressive movements until their effects are so apparent as to require
consideration by reason of aroused emotional reaction. The history of
a slow transition, therefore, may be for the scientific purposes of
this investigation unimportant as compared with the somewhat dislocated
perturbance, which resulted at the moment when the events under
consideration were happening, and calling forth a reaction definitely
emotional. Moreover, at such a precise moment, the events may have
been raised to social consciousness, not as they appear to us in the
clear afterlight of scientific attitude and historical accuracy, but as
popular concepts of the moment, having power to arouse intense national
emotional reaction; similar recent popular waves of feeling, due not
to facts as they are, but to popular conceptions of such facts, will
readily occur to each reader.

With this warning that not the dignity of history, but the intensity
of public emotionalism is within the purview and area of our
investigation, we may proceed to a statement of the method and of the
general thesis.

The method to be pursued, is to examine contemporaneous and concurrent
public events and emotion products, as expressed in Music.

The results indicated may be given a preliminary statement as follows:

 1. Agitation is a cause of pulse disturbance.

 2. Sufficient agitation produces fatal disturbance of bodily rhythm.

 3. All strong emotions are disturbers of rhythmic motion throughout
 the body.

 4. Rhythmic motion, too often disturbed, leads to abnormal mental and
 physical conditions.

 5. Civilization constantly “disturbs” the bodily rhythm.

 6. The political and industrial troubles of a nation are signs of
 national “disturbance” of rhythm.

 7. Music, closely expressing the emotional life of each period, is
 the unconscious application of a remedy to a human need of rhythmic
 stimulus.

These points are part of the general thesis, which may be stated in the
following terms: MUSIC IS A HUMAN NEED, INCREASING AND DECREASING WITH
SOCIAL PRESSURE.

The tendency of a group in each stage of human development, is to
produce Music fitting the character of the social disturbances of
its time, and communities which most fully meet this need of rhythm
by national culture of Music, tend to preserve for longer periods,
the serenity of the public mind. Thus it will be seen that national
control and support of Music may be assumed to be a national duty. This
control and support will aid in the preservation of a healthy state of
the public mind. Such a condition will make more effective all other
efforts for the abolition of discontent, disease, vice and criminality.

National culture and support of Music are effective means of exercising
social control, because of the calming influence of Music upon
disturbed thought. Such an influence is a most necessary one at the
present stage of mental agitation. Established within disturbed zones,
national institutions for free musical instruction would place a check
upon strained intellectualism, with its brood of idea-monstrosities,
since Music would cause a relaxation of mental concentration. It is a
matter of experience, that relaxation of tension generally accompanies
the yielding of the excited mind to musical rhythm.

Furthermore, there are other and not inconsiderable arguments for
the national support of Music. On account of the great expense of a
musical education, much promising American talent is now deprived
of cultivation. To all persons evidencing marked musical ability,
and showing themselves worthy of aid, this rich country should give
national support.

American national instruction in Music is also a duty to American
industry because such instruction would open the employment field in
Music to American wage earners. Some idea of the amount of private
business along this line may be gained from the following:


                         MUSIC IN THE WEST.[2]

 If music seems a needless luxury to some, what will they think of
 the cold economic fact of Chicago spending $30,000,000 in one year
 for musical instruments of all kinds, sheet music, music-books,
 musical supplies, and music lessons? This figure is “based on reliable
 information,” says Mr. D. A. Clippinger, in _The Musician_ (Boston),
 and he intimates that this yearly expenditure of one Western city
 is only typical of what the great expanse of our country beyond the
 Appalachians is doing. It will be observed that this sum does not
 include what is spent to hear music, but to gain instruction in it.

At present America is obliged to depend both for her best Music and
musical instruction largely upon foreign talent. With national support
of her own talent, this deplorable condition would soon cease. This
would also free Americans from absolute dependence upon private
institutions.

Music has also become an important industry, employing a vast number
of agents. It is high time that this employment were placed within
reach of American labor. Such an end can be attained only by furnishing
adequate training for this skilled work. At present foreigners are the
agents for the satisfaction of this need for rhythm in orchestras,
bands, hotels, restaurants, church choirs, studios, clubs, steamships,
operas and at social functions. An important wage earning occupation is
thus out of reach of our own talent.

It may be argued that considerable expense is already incurred by
municipalities and states, for training in musical appreciation in the
form of concerts, public school instruction, park bands, etc. These
expenses are admittedly very large and yet what is their productive
value along the line of musical instruction? What is the real value,
for instance, of the many thousands of dollars annually expended upon
public Music in a city like New York? The educated listener finds the
programs faulty, falling far short of a true expression of a composer’s
idea, while to the uneducated hearer, it is principally a diversion
of his attention, without teaching him anything. The establishment of
musical departments in colleges will never be able to meet this crying
need. The majority of the institutions which depend even in part upon
tuition-fees received from their pupils, reach the least needy of our
people, and sometimes the least talented. Where the industrial shoe
pinches the hardest, there is where the national social or political
danger lies, and there is where the need is greatest. Where the social
pressure is most felt, there is formed a mine of musical diamonds.
Neither the city nor the state can so control musical development, as
to produce a national type in musical composition. Music is a universal
need, passionately craved by the nation’s children. Hence our federal
government should attend to this demand, which is becoming more and
more insistent every day, indicative of a national want. We venture the
not idle prophecy, that the whole American nation would cheerfully
bear a tax, for so good a work as the establishment of national free
schools of Music all over our land. That European countries have
recognized this need is shown by the statistics which will be found
below.[3] These statistics were very difficult to procure, and are
rather surprising in content.

A copy of the questionnaire sent out will be found in Appendix A.
The nations from whom we expected the least expenditure for musical
culture, were found to be the most lavish. The United States stands
apart from the world’s array of musical patrons. The recent interest in
Indian and Negro Music may, however, prove an entering wedge to a wider
cultivation of our national musical resources. Our State universities
and our public schools are institutions of which the nation is justly
proud. Why not open your arms a little wider, generous America, and
take into your embrace your own fair musical child, now so weak and
puny, but full of promise for the future? The hope of the writer is,
that this cry will be heard by the nation’s head.

With such national support in view, we have gathered our statistics.
City ventures are not considered; park bands, military bands,[4] new
buildings for national musical academies, in short, all outlays for
Music not tending to contribute directly toward the musical education
of the people under consideration, are omitted. Thus the large
contributions of cities for public entertainments are left out of our
calculation entirely. The United States has not fallen into line with
European countries in national culture of Music, but probably this is
simply because the attention of our nation has not hitherto been called
to Music as a health measure. Too much ink has flowed in describing
Music as a diversion, as an amusement, as an ideal, as a superfluous
luxury, whereas no greater physical and mental need exists, than the
unconscious physical need of rhythm, the conscious physical need of
Music.

The world, it is true, may not at once accept the theory of “rhythm”
herein set forth. An investigation of it, however, would bring about
some new and interesting discoveries, in regard to unsuspected effects
of Music upon the nervous system. In any case, Music is a wonder worker
which should now occupy the attention of sociologists, psychologists,
and physicians.

Music has been generally regarded as the language of the emotions, but
it has never been determined why these emotions, having art, poetry,
the dance, and many other means of partial expression, so insistently
require sound for complete self-realization. The beat of the pulse
and the measure in Music are similar rhythmic expressions, but the
close relation of one to the other has heretofore been ignored. Yet
groups have a pulse; history has a pulse; the phenomena of the physical
universe have a pulse; all life manifestations are demonstrations of
pulse action.

What becomes of the countless millions of musical sound vibrations sent
into space by the orchestral performances in a great city? Are they all
impotent, reaching only to the auditory organs, and dying there? Or
do they actually enter the human system and set to their own perfect
rhythm, all of the discordant motions therein encountered? Do they not
“act as stimuli on the sensitive psychoplasm and effect changes in its
molecular composition?”[5]

All rhythm, however divided, is perfect motion. Rhythm, acting upon
a disturbed motion, tends to impose its own motion upon the discord,
if stronger than the disturbance encountered. This theory not only
imputes a higher mission to Music than has heretofore been realized,
but also accounts for phenomena of organized sound vibrations, and for
the craving of all human life for Music. This passionate desire for
Music is an established fact, and it remains but to show the need of
this inspiring sound stimulus, in order to place Music in the list of
recognized national necessities.

The willing response of Austria, Bavaria, Belgium, Denmark, England,
Equador, France, Holland, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Russia, Saxony,
Sweden and the United States to the author’s request for musical
statistics merits special mention. Prussia alone of the nations applied
to for statistics appeared either unwilling, or unable to furnish the
same regarding her national support of Music. The author shared the
general opinion that Prussia led the world in this field. But although
requested through proper official channels, from several influential
quarters, no response was obtained. A cable from the United States
Consul in Berlin says that the musical “statistics are unavailable.”
The letter from the Minister of Saxony may give some insight into the
real condition of German musical support, and as such it is added in
Appendix E.[6]

The Appeal in this work is for a system of public musical instruction
upon the principles governing our public school management. This would
be a step in advance of the systems of governmental support of musical
institutions, as represented in the statistics included in this work,
which systems generally place a small charge upon those pupils who are
able to pay. All of these institutions admit to full privileges free
of any charge, the exceptionally talented among the poor. The object
of each such institution as we advocate, should be the support, by
the government, of native musical talent, without regard to profit or
loss in the management. Music is one of those sciences which do not
attract the untalented to their study, and, this being the case, little
loss of instruction is involved. The proper study of Music includes so
many of the regular public school studies, and so much of the elements
of higher education, as Psychology, Biology, Sociology, Physics,
Economics, Social Legislation, History, Languages, Literature, Physical
Training, Self-Control, to say nothing of the mathematical studies
included in such branches as orchestration, harmony, counterpoint,
etc., that a model musical college would furnish an education and
culture, far more beneficial to individuals and the group, than is
offered by some of the present systems of education. The immediate
cost would be immense, but the author is convinced that this outlay
would bring quick returns, in decreasing costs for the protection of
the native individual, from many of the effects of nerve derangement
in children and in adults, in lessening discontent, riots, antagonism
between labor and capital, and many manifestations of partial insanity.
In short, such a system is a prime factor in social control, to the
lack of which may be ascribed in some measure the present peril to
civilization.

We take this opportunity to express our indebtedness for the statistics
furnished in each case to the following gentlemen, who, either in
their official or in a private capacity, replied to the questionnaire
submitted, and whose co-operation has been invaluable in our attempt
to present the most recent conditions of State-aided Music abroad:
Wilhelm Bopp, Director of the Imperial and Royal Academy of Music
and Fine Arts, Vienna, Austria; M. Steiner, Minister of the Interior
for Religion and Schools, Bavaria; M. Phillis, Minister of Arts and
Sciences, Belgium; J. Clan, Danish Consul-General in New York, and
Cornelius Rübner, head of the Music Department of Columbia University;
Olmedo Alfaro, son of the President of Equador, and the Directors of
the Conservatory of Quito, Equador; A. W. Twenlyman, of the English
Education Board, London, England; I. Philipp of the Paris Conservatory;
Th. Heemskerk, Minister of the Interior, Holland; Luigi Credaro,
Minister of Public Instruction, Rome, Italy; Ole Olesen, Military
Inspector of Music, Norway; Wm. Thackara, American Consul-General,
Berlin, Germany; Alexandre Lyssakovsky, First Secretary of the Russian
Embassy, Washington, D. C.; (Graf) Vitzhum von Eckstaedt, Minister of
the Interior, Saxony; Bror Beckman, of the Royal Conservatory of Music,
Stockholm, Sweden; L. A. Kalbach, Chief Clerk of the United States
Bureau of Education, Washington, D. C.; Mr. Wm. H. Taft, ex-President
of the United States; Naray-Szabo, Secretary of State, Hungary, and Dr.
Paul Majewsky, Chief of the Fine Art Section of the Royal Hungarian
Ministry of Public Worship and Education, Budapest.

Gratitude is due also for the inspiration found in the courses
of studies pursued under the direction of the following Columbia
professors: Dr. F. H. Giddings in Sociology, Dr. Henry Seager in
Economics, Dr. S. McC. Lindsay in Social Legislation, Dr. E. R. A.
Seligman in Economics, Dr. J. B. Clark, Dr. A. A. Tenney in Sociology,
Dr. R. E. Chaddock in Statistics, Dr. C. Ruebner in Music, and Dr.
V. G. Simkhovitch in Economics. Not one of these courses has proved
superfluous in the present dissertation, and we are proud indeed that
Music, so long considered as a luxury, can show the relations to the
interests which they represent. Especially great is our obligation to
Professors Giddings, Seager, Chaddock, Lindsay and Ruebner.

Our sincere thanks are due, in the gathering of these statistics to
Commendatore Eugenio di Pirani, President of the American Philharmonic
Academy.


FOOTNOTES:

[1] Long labor movements which are conceded to be slow emotion-making
forces are not included.

[2] The _Literary Digest_, January 10, 1914.

[3] Appendix E.

[4] Reference is to hired bands, not made up of musicians trained for
the purpose by the Federal Government. Such training, as in England,
constitutes an important form of vocational training.

[5] Riddle of the Universe, by Ernst Haekel, p. 110.

[6] The highly prized originals of the foreign ministerial letters are
preserved and in the writer’s possession.




                                PART I.

                              THE THESIS.




                              CHAPTER I.

                        MUSIC AS A HUMAN NEED.


Our thesis contemplates a new phase in psychological and sociological
study, one wherein we must endeavor to estimate the part played in
mental and environmental development, by vibration as the acting force.

In whatever direction we turn, Music is met with in one form or
another. The undoubted fact that Music is not confined to the human
species, but is a part of bird and other animal life, is strongly
indicative that there is something more in Music, than its apparent
pleasurable quality, and that beneath its array of superficial forms,
there must lie some great fundamental necessity for its existence and
functioning. Upon it may depend the preservation of the life of certain
complex living organisms.

Darwin’s theory as expressed in “The Descent of Man”[7] seems to us
not to touch the real source of the phenomenon, and in Spencer’s
“Illustrations of Universal Progress,” the latter’s theory of the
Origin and Function of Music[8] seems to us to omit the greatest
factor in Music. Spencer’s idea is that all Music is an idealization
of the natural language of passion, but the nature of passion does
not in reality lend itself to Music, because passion’s spontaneity of
action forever forbids the exercise of that control which is needed
in the performance of Music. Wallaschek, in “Primitive Music,”[9]
claims that Music is the result of the original rhythmical impulse
in man. This last mentioned theory approaches more nearly the theory
advanced by us in the present work, namely, that Music originates in
man’s _need_ of rhythmical sound-vibrations, for the re-establishment
of rhythmical motion in his own nervous system, disturbed by the
evolutionary increase of mental action not rhythmically employed.[10]
In order to view the subject fully, and in all its implications, we
must retrace the path of evolution to that point, where the living
thing which later developed into the man of today, first found itself
in possession of locomotion agencies and prehensile appendages, and
first began to move about in search of energy materials, with which
to satisfy an inward need of integration. The first thing that moved
began to dissipate its motion, and to “need” corresponding integration.
Rhythm marked this primitive inward action, undisturbed by ideas;
rhythm also governed the external stimulus. This prehistoric atavus ate
when hungry, or when he could get food, his need being rhythmical, at
the time when fruit and nuts offered easy satisfaction of a rhythmic
hunger; he awoke at daybreak, and slept with the sun; rhythmic at all
times.

Now, therefore, this early man’s circulation and pulse must have been
relatively rhythmic, yet there is no record of Music as an invention,
until a new factor arose in his environment.[11] The needs of life
began to suggest partnerships, children cemented parenthood groups,
family groups met and associated with other family groups, still
others were added and the Tribe was formed. Much of the Tribal life
of prehistoric times is a matter of conjecture, but enough can be
learned from the _mores_ of later tribes, to suggest with reasonable
probability some of the earliest tribal customs. Music is a late
invention, but the elements out of which Music is fashioned--rhythm,
motion and sound--constitute the first impulses, the first responses
to stimuli in themselves rhythmic; and the oldest peoples exhibit
traces of the love of sound in rhythmic action. The probability is that
association, with man as with birds, developed a need of communication;
from this need originated the acoustic formation of speech, and speech
in turn brought the first conscious interchange of ideas. Intense
mental action causes disturbed physical rhythm. Physical functions
are not yet adapted to the physical disturbance caused by such mental
action. The organs for the assimilation of the terrific stimuli of
modern life, are still imperfectly developed, as is illustrated by the
inability of the body to cope with increasing intellectuality, and the
consequent alleged increase of insanity in modern times. As the eye has
evolved from the sense of touch to its present power, and may progress
to a capacity for still clearer vision, so has the nervous system
evolved from its single cell, to its present cell multiplicity, and may
develop new cell formations, with which to support changing degrees of
added stimuli.

A departure from established belief will be noted at this point.
Ideas were wonderful and powerful stimuli to the primitive mind. That
extreme tension which causes modern minds to become unbalanced, is
not proportionately more intense, than must have been the reaction
of the primitive mind, to the very first question and answer of
primitive speech. A new stimulus acting upon a new organ produced a new
disturbance--a disturbance of a life heretofore purely rhythmic; and a
part of the internal organic family became separated for independent
motion, became differentiated with a rhythm of its own, differing
as a matter of course, from that old established rhythm of the most
ancient physical life. Right at this point of development, the need of
more or less conscious readjustment was instinctively felt. Internal
rhythm had been disturbed, and man immediately invented an artificial
producer of rhythmic vibration: i. e.--percussion. This sent into his
nervous system uncounted thousands of rhythmic impulses, which tended
to reestablish his disturbed rhythmic motion. To hold that the first
rhythmic inventions are to be looked for in war songs, in religious
rites, or in festal diversions, seems to us to ignore, not only all
of the immensely important prior steps by which such comparative
complexity has been attained, but also to leave the phenomenon of
rhythm-craving, before the invention of the most primitive instrument,
entirely unaccounted for. When the war element enters into tribal life,
there has already been some growth of institutionalization. Home life,
marriage, inheritance, government--these we find already in a certain
stage of development, in the very earliest tribes of which we have
any positive knowledge. The life of these tribes, so similar in all
parts of the world, produced certain disturbances within the original
rhythmic bodily motion. The reaction to such disturbance was exactly
expressed, in the rhythm producers instinctively devised at each stage.
War was the only great disturber of habitual rhythm for ages, and
consequently Music of a character to meet the need of this element was
early invented.

For domestic rhythm-disturbing crises, Music--sound--was often employed
by the tribes. The ancient Chinese[12] used to “sound” the house of a
newly wedded couple, under the impression that in this way the bride
and groom would enter a home “cleared of evil demons”. Here we have
a sub-conscious recognition of the actual driving force of rhythmic
vibration. So, in ancient Japan, war songs were the old expressions of
national agitation. These, accompanied as they invariably were, by high
sentiments of loyalty and patriotism, steadied the rage of war-fever
to a good fighting point, and prevented impulsive, or too reckless
charging.

The Hindus[13] believe their musical scale is an inspiration from
Heaven. Their Music is an expression of religious rather than military
agitation.

When we think of how primitive man at first must have wondered at
all the unknown forces about him, is it not possible to believe that
religious, rather than warlike emotion, was the first to intensely
agitate all early tribes?

The ancient peoples of Aryan stock seem to have been highly gifted
musically. Probably because of their roving habits, their warlike
spirit, or their pursuit of culture, the Aryans developed early and
highly, this greater need of rhythmic stimulus in percussion.

Persian agitation took the form of occultism, as is shown in the
devices on the walls of their fire temples. Their Music was held to be
symbolic. They believed, for example, that Music was like a tree, and
that its tones were representative of fire, water, air and earth, of
the signs of the zodiac, of the planets and even of day and night.[14]

Music becomes combined with ideas in the expression of rhythm, in
direct proportion to the development of ideas in the culture of
the several races. When war ceased to be the chief factor in the
disturbance of bodily rhythm, and still later, when periods of rest
became usual between long wars, the impetus already given to tribes
by the decisive occupations of warfare, and the consequent increased
molecular motion of the organs, turned tribal attention in times of
rest to thoughts of love, decoration and poetry, but chiefly to the
thought of recording the stirring deeds of their heroes in music of
some kind. The Indians have probably sung their deeds ever in rhythm,
though often with an instrumental accompaniment in a differing rhythm,
which common practice must have filled the need of a mental state
“disturbed” by the stimuli of ever present danger.[15]

Rhythmic music considered as a creation of mind and as a need of
the body, the measurement of the effect of musical vibrations upon
human action, is sure to lead the way to a surprising fund of new
knowledge. The number of vibrations caught by the ear in the simplest
drum performance must be enormous, and when it is realized that these
vibrations represent a live force striking the tense nerves, and that
the effects are quantitatively measurable in a psycho-physiological
laboratory, a significant development of psychiatry may be confidently
predicted. It would be interesting to study the differing results of
the same musical environment, upon the nervous reactions of partially
deaf, and of normal beings, to find out how far the subjective and
conscious awareness of certain sounds, affects the objective physical
results of the vibratory force producing them.

Animals are known to be sensitive to the sounds of Music, and birds
even create that which is called Music; this creation on the part
of birds, seems to us nothing more than their instinctive effort to
re-establish disturbed internal rhythmic action.[16] At any rate,
vibration is the fundamental element of Music as of life, and where
Music exists there has ever been an antecedent excitement of some sort.

Complicated intellectual stimuli being absent in tribal life, the
general rhythm was at most periods moderately easy to maintain. Events
of sufficient newness to be exciting were rare. Tribal wars were felt
to be the usual occupation of ordinary existence. So that whether
polygamy or monogamy characterized the marriage relation, whether
woman or man ruled the home life, whether human or animal sacrifices
were offered to one or to several gods, the stimuli met in daily
experiences were very similar in their monotony, and very much the
same in all tribes. Customs were handed down from one generation to
another, and carried from one part to another of the earth’s surface,
but ordinary experiences varied little until, under the stimulation of
steam-driven engines and machines, nations developed the industrial
fever, which seems to characterize modern times. Even today in
localities where newspapers and railroads do not penetrate, life tends
to revert to primitive ideals. The interests of the tribes lay in the
raising of cattle, in the birth of male offspring, in the division
of labor into the search for, and the preparation of, food, and in
the unification of a strong group hostile to all other groups. These
occupations coexisted with a simplicity of environment, unexciting to
the reposeful sense organs, amid a scenic surrounding ever untouched
by artificiality; where village scenes of little variety took place;
where no reason existed to cause abnormal quickness of eye movements;
where occurred only rare shocks to the regular rhythm of the nerve
cell motions. Thus there was little or no need of complicated rhythm
in Music. It will be remembered that Music is a need for that part of
humanity or of any living organism which through reason of its prior
reception of irregular stimuli, has disturbed the natural internal
and independent rhythmic motion, imparted by the mother in the birth
process. An augmented heart action is not harmful at times, even if
it be above the normal, but a heart action which is ever changing its
beat, now fast, now slow, now weak, now strong, tends to derange the
normal rhythmic life motion of the cells, a result caused by modern
multiplicity of irregular stimuli, and observable in modern civilized
man. Great multiplicity of stimuli the tribal man rarely experienced.
His percussive Music was not complex, because the life stimuli were
not complex; the nervous system of the savage was disturbed by but few
mental processes--the simple results of the few and unvarying stimuli
offered by his tribal life.

Approaching modern times, let us see what role was assumed by Music
in the tribal life of the early Germanic races. In those times of war
excitement, when tribes fought like wild animals, and the war spirit
held full sway, the Germans on their march to battle, helmets decorated
with the heads of animals, their big bodies clothed in the simple
_sagum_, chanted their war songs, and kept up a rhythmic beating upon
their shields. This ever visible trend toward rhythmic sound indicates
a subconscious need of it, a need which often annoys us in our
children’s craving for the noise of percussion,--a noise, it may have
been observed by long-suffering parents, which they love beyond all
other diversions. So long as war and religion alone occupied mankind,
and before the human need of rhythmic sound became so pronounced, as
to create the very complicated idea of producing vibratory impulse,
from pleasurable sound intervals, combined with word pictures of human
emotions--so long was mere rhythm in Music sufficient to re-establish
disturbed internal motion.

The Gauls advanced a step beyond the Germans toward musical
organization, by their maintenance of “bands of barders,” who were
described by Tacitus as accompanying the Gallic armies in order to
cheer the warriors.


FOOTNOTES:

[7] Part II, p. 375: “The true song however of most birds and various
strange cries are chiefly uttered during the breeding season, and serve
as a charm, or merely as a call-note to the other sex.”

[8] Vol. II, Chap. 19.

[9] Chapter 9.

[10] If, as Haekel says in “The Riddle of the Universe,” p. 116, “When
the mimosa roots are shaken by the tread of a passerby, the stimulus
is immediately conveyed to all the cells of the plant,” may not the
far stronger stimulus of musical sound be similarly transmitted to the
human cells not directly concerned in hearing?

[11] The octave of half-tones sung by the Hylobates Syndactylus is
merely an effort at speech.

[12] American History and Encyclopedia of Music.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Ibid.

[15] It will be noted that the reference to ideas as “disturbances of
purely physical, molecular rhythm” is used throughout this book, for
it is here claimed that just as the unconscious cessation of breathing
for a few seconds during the writing of an idea, expresses the check
of mental action upon heart action and the circulation of the blood,
so also does the continual reception of new impressions into the mind,
affect the original regular rhythmic movement of the entire body. Hence
thought is a real disturber of rhythm within the body. Similarly, any
burst of anger, fear, or joy is immediately registered in the pulse.

[16] We are aware that Darwin stresses the element of sexual selection
in the bird’s song.




                              CHAPTER II.

                           MUSIC AND MOTION.


Music, a recognized but still undirected agent for rhythm maintenance,
is sought and produced in accordance with the disturbance of a
body politic or of a body individual. The musical products of a
nation mirror that nation’s history far better than pen and ink can
laboriously spell it out. Music reaches down into physiological and
psychological needs, and tends to reestablish rhythmic equilibrium,
whether applied to physical organs, or to members of a national body.
And as the aggregates of matter and motion in human bodies combine all
of their unequal, complex, and yet distinct rhythms under one mean
rhythm, which becomes the characteristic rhythm of the whole, so do the
musical products of a nation, during a given time or age, combine their
unequal motions under a mean motion or characteristic, which includes
all rhythmic products and which we see as a characteristic “color,” or
“temperament” in the national Music of that period. And as the mean
governing rhythm or pulse of one being, individual or national, cannot
be mistaken for the mean of any other combination than its own, so
the “color” or “temperament” of the musical products of one country,
is clearly distinguishable from that of the Musical products of other
countries.

In like manner, humanity, that larger aggregate of human molecules,
shows a mean color in the united products or motions of its parts,
the nations. The “tone” of the Music of the Nineteenth century, is
more complex than that of the Eighteenth century, although Spain still
re-establishes her Eighteenth century disturbances with Eighteenth
century Music. England, with few deeply disturbed emotions is satisfied
with doses of early Nineteenth century Music. France applies her own
vivid intellectual sound pictures to her psychological and political
disturbances. Germany finds the panacea for her disturbances in
colors of soul tragedy and strong sentimentality. Italy, until her
recent steps toward modern methods in stimuli productions, sipped her
delightful comedy and her flowery tragedy, from graceful old-fashioned
musical cups. Nineteenth century musical productions in England,
France, Germany and Italy are, we may say, pictures of their several
national “disturbances,” and exact quantitative measurements of the
depth to which the mean national rhythm was disturbed. All of these
musical productions again react upon humanity’s aggregate, and are
combined under what is known as the Nineteenth century mean rhythm, or
age characteristic.

As has been noted above, there are too few data indicative of the
habits of primitive man, for us to learn aught of his Music, but
it is safe to assume that its comparative simplicity or complexity
corresponded with the comparative simplicity or complexity of his
mental and physical life. Undoubtedly, the earliest group complexity
arose with roving habits, the entrance into new environments, and
the subjection of man’s psycho-physical system to new “strains” of
disturbing stimuli.

According to this theory we must define “disturbances” as, such
responses to varying stimuli as unduly accelerate or retard bodily
pulse motion, changing the _normal_ rhythm of the pulse. Examples
are to be found in sudden migrations, outbursts of enthusiasm, wars,
revolts, and even in certain eager intellectual pursuits.

Music is a phase of the evolutionary process. Musical evolution has
also its order: (a) in appreciation,[17] when the primitive human
mind becomes conscious of existing rhythm, of sound combinations;
(b) in utilization, when its seemingly magical effect suggested
its association with the festivities and rites of worship; (c) in
characterization, when it stands on a pedestal of its own, recognized
as a human necessity perfectly adapted to its environment; and (d) in
socialization, when its end as an agent in self-realization shall be
entirely comprehended. Characterization is the mode which Music has
reached today. Socialization is just beginning, and is yet more fully
to be developed with greater understanding.

Again in Musical Evolution there has been an ideo-motor stage of
development.[18] This forceful, aggressive, persistent motor stage was
shown in the rude drums and other rough-hewn instruments of early man.
In its convivial imaginative aspect it has answered to the need of the
ideo-emotional type. The dogmatic emotional need has drawn forth from
that type’s resources the austere musical products of master genius.
Do we not find today in France, Germany and in modern Italy a national
rhythm disturbed by critically intellectual[19] stimuli, which in
turn call forth critically intellectual Music of the most distinct
complexity? Music is both a social and a socializing force, which,
although created by society, reacts upon its creator.

Reviewing the stages of Musical Evolution do we not discern concerted
volition? Does not the mean tone of national musical types show
concerted acceptance of that which answers to national tastes and
needs? The very applause which establishes the modern type, is the
outward sign of an inward intent to embrace that product. Cool and
restrained judgment precedes _that_ acceptance. Any audience manifests
resembling sensations of resembling individuals in that oneness of
criticism so generally exhibited. Clearly indeed in this latter case
do we perceive that reflective sympathy which shows us how like to our
neighbor we are. Then there is the evidence of organic sympathy which
establishes that liking or disliking for certain Music, according
as the mean motion or the rhythm of the Musical sound vibrations,
correspond to a similar combination of motions and rhythms in our
own systems. And is not the affection for a rhythm similar to our
own, stronger than is our liking for one dissimilar? Can a dogmatic
emotional[20] type experience a true affection for, or feel a sincere
need of, ragtime ditties? Could Italy in the early part of the
Nineteenth century feel affection for the Music of a von Weber? Could
Germany in the fever of Franco-Prussian emotionalism feel affection for
the works of Verdi? Paris disliked Wagner’s operas until very recently.

Lest this should seem like an attempt to stretch sociological
terminology to cover territory other than its own, let us continue
our examination. Even in the progress from the homogeneous to
the heterogeneous, Music, in its national parts, though highly
heterogeneous like the integrated parts of the body, is yielding to
the social passion for homogeneity. This is indicated by the increasing
similarity of its ideals. Even Italy in her new awakening is reaching
out toward musical equality with the most complex modern ideals,
illustrating the tendency of all inequality toward final equality.

The Music which answered to the needs of an Ethnic Society could not
possibly re-establish the disturbed rhythm of political groups. The
“gentile family” system for a long time successfully counteracted
the effects of heterogeneous motion attacks upon the calm nervous
structure, by a Music suited to its needs. Only with the decay of
the patriarchal system did groups come to demand complexity in the
re-establishing agency, Music.

Internal disturbances must have been rare in all clan life, surrounding
stimuli being relatively homogeneous, simple and diffused. Paleolithic
man, with his unchanging external environment, had little reason
for internal disturbance. What slight disturbances he suffered were
probably remedied by simple rhythmic composition of some kind: even
babies create a pronounced sound rhythm with any instrument at hand,
and indicate real pleasure derived from what to us seems mere noise.

Sounds produced by non-human beings are mere discharge of surplus
energy, in a creation of rhythmic stimulus, and not conscious sound
combinations in song. Music is a “natural” product of _human_ society.
It must be as old as those integrations of parts in the human body,
which became aggregates of matter and motion, to take care of new
stimuli colliding with the motions already contained. Through lower,
middle, and upper savagery,[21] even before the beginning of speech,
Music must have been at hand, although in its simplest conceivable
form. Music kept pace with the comparatively simple external stimuli of
each period.

With the use of fire and of the bow and arrow in upper savagery, came
a new heterogeneity in the stimuli entering the organism; disturbances
were still simple, but with the domestication of animals, with the
cultivation of plants by irrigation, with the use of adobe brick and
stone in architecture, Music must have gradually increased in its
complexity in order to cope with the new disturbances of bodily motion
consequent upon those changes in man’s reaction to his environment.
Then, with the use of iron in upper barbarism, Music began anew to
exhibit its needed usefulness, as in the Grecian tribes of the Homeric
Age, and in the German tribes of Caesar’s time.

By these times Music had passed well out of the stages of
“appreciation,” into those of “utilization.”[22] Strongly rhythmic,
it contributed to the recreation (re-creations indeed) of bodily
equilibrium! It calmed intense inward motion, or stimulated
flagging circulation in its union with religious rites. From such
accomplishments of later barbarians as poetry, mythology, fine
temple architecture, walled cities, ship building, wine manufacture,
woven fabrics, implements for grinding corn, the side hill furnace
for smelting ore, and many other early mechanical contrivances,[23]
civilization evolved its phonetic alphabet and its literary records,
building the rhythm-disturbing stimuli of civilization. In the
meanwhile the family develops to the point of monogamy, and individual
property rights usher in a new political system. An advanced form of
municipal life in fortified cities having already created the ideal of
city treasure to be protected, the step was ultimately taken from this
to individual property rights distinct from those of the gens.

The fact that Music as we first encounter it is already somewhat
complex, is not surprising when we regard it in terms of motion,
duplicating in principle the construction of the human body. The latter
may also be regarded in terms of motion; for what are bodily organs
but integrations of molecules in motion? The rhythm of a bodily organ
is like a note composed of periodic motions.[24] The various organs of
differing masses and motions, acting together under one chief rhythm,
are but chords of various notes, while that average of averages, the
pulse, registers the governing rhythm of all of these together, as does
the _time_ in music.

With the differentiation of the Aryan race from those barbarians
who were not active in making and utilizing new inventions, certain
re-arrangements of bodily motions resulted which could not fail
to “disturb” old life habits. With artificial rhythm already at
hand, instinct alone would be sufficient to prompt its application.
Appreciation of Music at this stage would mirror only the satisfaction
derived from the hearing of rhythmic sounds, sufficiently varied to
inflame or calm inward motion, without carrying it too far from the
norm. The “gens” system as found in Greece, Rome, and among American
aborigines, as also among the Irish sept, and Scottish clan, would tend
to restrain complex emotions. Such gentes, being consanguine bodies,
descended from the same common ancestor, and having a gentile name,
and held together by actual or fictitious ties of blood, were compact
bodies with institutions comparatively simple. They were like primitive
bodily forms, consisting of motions contained within an outer crust,
and with few distinct inward integrations.

Music, as simple rhythm agreeable to the ear, would fulfill all
disturbance needs of that time, and would itself be a mere contained
motion, with few integrated parts. Only with the beginning of
“rational” thinking or the “interposition of new ideas between
stimulation and the consequent muscular action,”[25] does such
complexity of mental effort induce the integration of new parts with
new motions in order to meet the added strain.


FOOTNOTES:

[17] Giddings’ Descriptive and Historical Sociology, pp. 186 to 212.

[18] Giddings’ Descriptive and Historical Sociology, p. 237.

[19] Otherwise known as rationalistic.

[20] Giddings, op. cit. pp. 238-239.

[21] Morgan: Ancient Peoples.

[22] Giddings’ Descriptive and Historical Sociology, pp. 186 to 212.

[23] Morgan’s Ancient Peoples.

[24] Helmholtz, Sensations of Tone, Part I, p. 8.

[25] Giddings’ Descriptive and Historical Sociology, p. 346.




                             CHAPTER III.

                GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL REACTION TO MUSIC.


                   _A Brief Record of Experiments._

Music tranquillizes human agitation. We believe that enough of musical
vibration will tranquillize all agitation, whether it be such as is
manifested in abnormal mental, or abnormal physical movements. Music
acts differently upon those low states of motion represented by the
phlegmatic temperament and rural communities. Here music excites more
than it does when colliding with agitated nerve motions. These two
marked effects of music were noticed by the author in the following
experiences which extended over a period of many years, among all of
the classes which compose the civilized group:

 From Concerts through Canada and Western U. S.

 From three successive tours of the Baltic Province of Russia, with
 audiences of the Ideo-Emotional and Dogmatic-Emotional types.

 From Concert and opera tests in Germany and England.

 From Concert and opera tests in the Eastern States of U. S.

 From Concert and opera tests among the revolutionary elements of
 New York City, including Coney Island tent life for five months,
 lower East Side social work for five years, Brooklyn Working Girl
 tests, church, political, and society study among actual audiences
 represented by these classes.

More than two hundred thousand people were observed during these tests
as to the effects of music, and the results suggested the following
needs, which the author believes may be extended to the treatment
of many diseases of the mind. Abnormally heightened or abnormally
lowered bodily agitation, or inward motion, “needs” rhythmic stimulus
from highly agitated motion, as in music; the _like_ state of highly
agitated motion in the body responds to the stimulus in calmed motions;
the abnormally lowered bodily agitation responds to the _unlike_
stimulus in the highly agitated motions of music, in excitation: a
perfectly normal body “needs” no music (but such do not exist).

(1) Those social and individual bodies manifesting abnormal states of
agitation “need” contact with such a body of rhythmic musical vibration
as will calm and impose a normal rhythmic motion upon the disturbed
motion represented by the agitation.

(2) Those social and individual bodies manifesting abnormal states of
phelgma “need” contact with such a body of rhythmic musical vibration
as will _excite_ the low motion states, and impose a normal rhythmic
motion upon the sub-normal motion represented by the phlegmatic states.

Above conclusions are offered as a result of the following types of
experiments.


       _Experiments Upon the Ideo-Motor to Ideo-Emotional Type._

Desiring to try the effects of music combined with lectures of a
political character, among the lower elements of Coney Island dwellers,
we set up a 60 × 90 ft. tent at the foot of Ocean Parkway, in May, 1909;
600 chairs, a decorated platform, a grand piano and gay flags of all
nations were distributed in their proper places. The subject of all
lectures was _Woman’s Suffrage_, a theme most unpopular at that time
and especially distasteful to a Coney Island mind. The prevailing
religion of the district was Catholicism. The first week was devoted
to suffrage lectures without music. Crowds filled the floor space of
our big tent each night, and from the beginning we distinctly felt
the murmurs of intended trouble. Our speakers were men high in public
favor, but one of these made the following unfortunate remark:

“Catholicism is the curse of the laboring class.”

Then a workingman stood up and hurled uncomplimentary epithets at us
for trying to destroy the laboring man’s only blessing--his faith. A
woman added tears for her beloved church, and a socialist added oil to
the flame by a bitter attack upon religion in general. Before we could
make ourselves heard, a fight ensued which attracted a large outside
crowd. Several policemen finally dispersed the excited audience. Our
broken chairs bore mute witness of the damage, but no intention of
giving up was entertained. The certainty of serious trouble for the
following evening hastened our institution of music in the program.
During the afternoon following our mishap, we were informed by the
police that trouble was brewing for the “tent folks.” With some
trepidation we entered the tent that evening. A large crowd of the
“rowdy” element had gathered by eight o’clock. Four policemen guarded
the entrance, but many very rough looking men crawled under the canvas
at the sides and cast knowing glances at acquaintances.

Our artists for this first program had been carefully chosen, a
soprano, delicate in voice and personality, a genial looking baritone,
an excellent “cellest,” one of our best known violinists, and a pianist
of world-wide renown. We all “held our breaths” in anticipation of
what might happen. The speaker began. Immediately cat-calls and horns
drowned her voice. The air was filled with foul epithets. Suddenly some
one threw a stone which struck the speaker on the cheek. The meanness
of the insult quieted the mob, and an officer removed the offender.
Then in a few words the people were asked to reserve judgment until
after the musical program.

A trio performance for violin, “cello” and piano was given. Whispering
and excited murmurs continued all through this long number, but
when the soprano sang the old love aria, “Ah, fors’ e lui,” from “La
Traviata” by Verdi, a sudden hush fell upon the audience. At the close
of this aria, emotional, tuneful and simple in construction, a storm of
applause broke forth. Encores of ballads followed, and when “The Last
Rose of Summer” was given, with the emotional addition of a genuine red
rose, whose petals were scattered in compliance with the text, women
wept, and men settled down sullenly in their seats. The irritation of
the preceding three days had been reduced to normal rhythmic motion, in
less than one hour of musical treatment. The rest of that evening was
in every way a success.

This was not an unique experience. Musicless lectures were always more
excitable in effect than were those combined with music. So certain
were the results of our combination, that before the end of the summer,
we could discuss any “views” with a mob element, by alternating an
exciting subject with an artistically rendered musical selection. At
every step, music proved its power to soothe, and showed how great is
the human need of its vibratory mission.

Instances of similar effect of music upon mental agitation were
observed in other situations. During a trip across the Atlantic on
the old vessel “Trava,” a dangerous accident occurred during a severe
storm. A panic threatened. The first officer whispered to the author
to sing a song. She started the national hymns, inviting the passengers
to show their patriotism and nationality by joining. First the “Star
Spangled Banner” brought out a few voices, then the “Wacht am Rhein”
swelled the chorus; the “Marseillaise” was then responded to, and when
“The Wearing of the Green” brought forth one lusty Irish brogue, such
a laugh ran round the dining saloon as completely broke the strained
condition and re-established normal rhythmic pulse motion.

The tension of nerve during strikes was reduced several times by
musical “benefits.” Dangerous excitement at political meetings was
often converted into harmless emotionalism under evenings of Eighteenth
century comedy opera tests on the East Side of Manhattan. The
establishment of The Working Girls Club in Brooklyn in 1912 afforded
an excellent opportunity for testing the reviving effects of music
upon tired brains and bodies. One hundred and forty young and healthy
working girls from department stores, telephone offices and factories,
used the club house dedicated to their use and at first evidenced
pleasure and benefit from the classes instituted. But presently
a depressing weariness of aspect appeared, a “trying to learn”
expression, which promised little for energetic application. The law
class dwindled to two members; the millinery class could not attract
more than six students, the cooking class began with thirty-five
and ended with four, the dress-making class held but three pupils:
the class in simple science was not attractive, the language classes
began well, but the girls were too tired to study. Finally we gave
them what they wanted, and what they needed--music. What a change came
over the mental attitude! Monday, Wednesday and Friday nights, singing
individually and in chorus was taught. Three hours of music swept away
all traces of weariness, and sparkling eyes and rosy cheeks exhibited
anew the need of music. All through the year 1912-13 for twelve months,
the opera “Martha” by Flotow was rehearsed, and never was there
occasion to complain of poor attendance, wandering attention, or lack
of interest. A public performance was given in the Spring of 1913 at
Labor Lyceum, Brooklyn. Notwithstanding long days of labor, the girls
did great credit to their leaders’ work in training.

Turning to individual experiments, an instance of the strangely
normalizing effects of music upon abnormal nervous conditions comes to
our mind. A noble minded woman, lately deceased, devoted her life to
the Sittig Christmas Tree Celebration, which annually gave a Christmas
feast of presents, candies, books and entertainment to about seven
thousand of Brooklyn’s poor children. She was so deaf that she heard
with great difficulty, even with the aid of electrical devices. Yet
she could hear softly spoken words, _provided the speaker kept playing
softly upon the piano during the conversation_. “I do not need any
artificial aid in hearing any sound audible to a normal ear, while
music is in the air,” she once told us. Another woman, affected with
continual trembling of the hands, became perfectly quiet and normal in
action while riding in a carriage. In reply to our question as to the
reason for this phenomenon, she replied, “The noise of the carriage
wheels resolves itself into regular ‘beats’ which I cannot help trying
to imitate.” It may be that this is but another illustration of the
“need” of disturbed or unrhythmic motion for “regular beats” or
rhythmic motion. A friend in Berlin was painfully deaf, yet he heard
the slightest whisper over the telephone. His similar normality when
listening to music, suggested to the author to class all rhythmic
co-operated vibrations producing a _continuous sensation_ in the ear,
under the name of musical rhythmic vibrations. This would extend the
realm of musical need to many highly active motions not generally
included in the term “music.” Telephones, railway motion sounds,
moaning of winds, continuous washing sounds of waves, do in fact
produce results strangely similar to those seen in the application of
music. Excitable people are quieter at sea-side resorts, and restless
in isolated mountain districts. We have closely observed the types
of individuals at water resorts in Europe and America. Everywhere the
same type prevails. It is the highly strung temperament which needs and
seeks the “highly strung” atmosphere. We have observed like instances
in nervous university students, who study and memorize best in the
street cars.


                       _Ideo-Emotional Groups._

In our German experience, the music which elicited the largest response
seemed to be that which impressed emotional pictures upon the mind.
Schuman lieder are of this character: they are full of chivalric
example, suggestion, symbol, shibboleth, and tend to awaken emotional
reactions. In the home circles, the sentiment in music is strongly
expressed. No true German will allow you to heighten the seat at the
piano with a volume of Beethoven Sonaten. You cannot sit upon Beethoven
in a loyal German house.

Even in the grand opera audiences of Germany, the public persists
in manifesting a love for those musical ideas which awake emotions
rather than cool critical judgment. The simple Kinder Lieder can be
counted upon to bring the emotions to view, and unrequited love, the
romantic woes of a god-like hero, or the dainty texts of sentimental
ballads, are as effectual now as they ever were. Russian audiences
are still more responsive to the emotional element in music, but their
temperaments have a strong dash of the Ideo-motor in them.

All through Canada and the Western part of the United States, the
Ideo-Emotional type of music awakens quickest response. Old ballads
like “Coming Through the Rye,” “Home Sweet Home,” “Annie Laurie,” will
bring applause during the preludes, and only in the most complicated
environment is there a genuine response to the relatively complicated
works of Wagner.

In a concert test upon the stone-working Italians at Wappingers Falls,
N. Y., the home-sick Italians were so affected by “Santa Lucia” that
they all closed their eyes and joined the singer, weeping as they sang.
It was reported dangerous for a woman to go alone among these men, but
they sang song after song for us, and escorted her five miles to the
railroad station.[26]


                      _Dogmatic-Emotional Types._

The Greek Church music and the music of the Catholic Church acts
specially upon the Dogmatic-Emotional types. It is a curious sight
to Americans to watch Russian peasants and officials praying in
the railroad stations before rough altars and highly gilded images.
The candles, always burning, suggest the strength of that command,
authority, dogma, belief, which lies so heavily upon Russian minds.
Under such a burden, the type of music must come within the restricted
range of comprehension permitted to this type of mind. Yet this
enforced religion does not act more sternly upon the choice of music in
Russia, than does the free Dogmatic-Emotionalism seen in Ocean Grove,
N. J. Here you find response to the same musical type that satisfied
Russian audiences of a Dogmatic-Emotional character. Ocean Grove
inhabitants do not pray in public stations, but no car runs on Sunday;
no wagons deliver goods on the Sabbath, the rules which govern conduct
and musical production in Russia, are not more strictly obeyed than are
those which frown upon Sunday amusement in Ocean Grove, or dictate its
musical supply. Strange to note, the Catholic element is more open in
its “desecration” of the Sabbath, than is the Protestant element. This
may be accounted for by the larger degree of Ideo-Motor activity among
Catholic groups, notwithstanding the strength of the Church hold upon
the fidelity of its members.

The Dogmatic-Emotional groups “need” a music to correspond to their
type, and only such music is successful with them. Many years in church
circles have proved to us the real desire or “need” of hymns and
sacred songs, as a satisfaction of this type’s yearnings.


                      _The Rationalistic Group._

Now we come to a class of comparatively few representatives. It
presents a nearer approach to symmetry in its curve of mental and
physical poise. It responds to stimuli appealing through knowledge
to the higher intellectual processes. Ideals are stronger than their
physical manifestations; the idea is more important than the model;
the type is less affected by common stimuli; it secludes itself in
contemplation, in more cool investigation of its own responses; it
seeks food for mental labor, with time for detailed analysis of that
work. All this means a more normal equilibrium between periods of
high motion and rest; it means that a smaller chance of “disturbance”
is encountered by this type, and consequently a smaller “need” of
_rhythmic_ music. The problem opera will satisfy it. In less need of
marked rhythm, the analysis of new musical form will occupy these
minds, regardless of the lack of either rhythmic or harmonious
effects. The smallness of the Rationalistic group is indicated by the
unpopularity of rationalistic composition. Opera managements produce
the new “rationalistic” works, but they make up their financial losses
by the Ideo-Emotional works like Faust, Carmen, Cavaleria Rusticana,
Madam Butterfly and most of the beloved works of the popular operatic
repertoire.

Thus we see that if music is a human need, it is a need greatest among
the Ideo-motor and Ideo-Emotional types, or among the lower and middle
classes chiefly. The Dogmatic-Emotional type needs a music of its own,
and never fails to produce it. The Rationalistic type, also needs its
music, because its rationalism has not yet extended to an absolute
perfection of equilibrium between dissipation and integration of bodily
forces, and wherever abnormality of pulse exists, there musical rhythm
is “needed.” Even were this theory of musical need not admitted, the
genuine love of music constitutes a need. So intense a yearning,
unsatisfied, cannot be beneficial to the human system. Whether we
admit music as a necessary part of human pleasure, or as a necessary
stimulus to human rhythm of bodily motions, its “need” will scarcely be
denied in the face of its constant demand and supply. Music reinforces
human energy, aids in the control and order of the mind, elevates the
conception of life, and furnishes repose for the overstimulated nerves
of urban communities. Placing music then where you will, it belongs
among those “better materials for storing, conveying and transforming
energy”[27] and its wise application may lead to surprising results,
in the conservation of faculties, now doomed to decay under the law of
diminishing returns.

That some change in the bodily molecules takes place as a result of
musical indulgence is believed by the author. The change in the pulse
rate before and after a musical performance indicates an effect upon
the circulation. The same time spent in listening to a lecture, shows
less freedom from tension. This was shown in the 84 experiments with
working girls. The 103 benefit tests upon revolutionary audiences
showed marked effects in calming power: ten years’ experience in church
choirs, showed the vast superiority of service with music, over service
without music, in calming excitable congregations and in rousing
phlegmatic ones; ninety-one consecutive experiments at Coney Island
demonstrated that music can calm revolt, and change irritation to
tranquillity; over three hundred concert studies in Russia and in the
United States have shown marked increase in the normality of expression
in audiences, after an evening of music, and twelve years of experience
in teaching music, have shown so decided results in greater health and
happiness in pupils, that music as a human “need” appears to us to be
established beyond doubt.

The Federal government of our United States may not be able under its
Constitution to institute Schools of Music, but the states should begin
to give more consideration to State Schools of Music. If the U. S.
Government is constitutionally unable to maintain National Schools of
Music, any comparison with European governments so licensed by their
constitutions, would be unjust and misleading. The statistics given are
intended merely to show what the various governments are doing along
the line of national support of musical culture, and no comparison is
attempted. Our States and cities are expending vast sums upon music.
The contention of the author, however, is that State Musical Colleges
will not produce a national type of music, and that the highest ideal
rests in a Federal control of musical culture. When music can be
regarded as a national need, and not merely as a social diversion,
the Federal government may see its way clear to a Federal support of
musical education. Music as an important measure in social control,
and as an equally important factor in individual health, belongs under
the eye of the national head. With the faint hope that this place will
sometime be granted to music, we submit this work.


FOOTNOTES:

[26] An atrocious murder had been committed by one of this group during
the week and the Mission Superintendent warned us by telegram of
serious revolt and danger.

[27] Professor Giddings’ “Law of Increasing and Diminishing Returns”
would apply here as elsewhere.




                              CHAPTER IV.

                  TONEUROLOGY: A NEW BRANCH OF STUDY.


Humanity then must maintain its pulse in a
rhythmic-stimulation-and-repose-for-distribution system. This can
best be done by the greater exercise of the emotional nature, and by
the indulgence of romantic ideals, for emotions are pulse-lifters,
dragging the stagnant life motions up to a normal mean rhythm. The
man or nation, whose pulse is kept most constantly keyed up to the
normal, is the man or nation which achieves the finest results.
Our four national examples, England, France, Germany, and Italy,
demonstrate these emotional products. Germany leads in her quality of
musical (or emotional) output, because she led during the century in
her sufferings, prepared, as they were, by so much of heart breaking
experience during the preceding century. France comes next. Her
national emotions have been weakened in tragic elements by the love
of the spectacular, by the intellectual need of vivid pictures and
colors, and by the assertiveness and pride of an ancestral supremacy,
hard to subdue to the state of tender romance and heart tragedy, which
characterized Germany’s strong and sentimental temperament. After
France comes Italy, emotional, poetic, merry-hearted, making a farce
of tragedy because her century’s life produced so little national
sadness. Only in recent years has it come to be felt that the mean
rhythm of Germany can become like the mean rhythm of any nation, even
of Italy, if the depths or motions are sounded as were Germany’s.
England brings up the rear, her century’s mean rhythm being far below
the high water mark. This is shown by the delicate comedies, and naive
sentimentalism of her music, which are the fit measure of her national
pulse rate of emotionalism.

Music, as a human need, carries us deep into the secrets of life, and
will in time open the way for a new science. Music is not the name for
this new branch of knowledge, as the study would involve an exhaustive
investigation of nervous reactions in their social and individual
relations to sound vibrations. We would suggest the name “Toneurology”
because tone is understood in all modern languages, and “neuros” has
the same advantage. This study would involve research along entirely
new lines, such as an investigation of motions in bodily organs;
mathematical estimation of the vibration value of each pulse beat, and
of the sums of tone vibrations in chords, upon one instrument and upon
many, as in an orchestra; the rate of increase or decrease of the pulse
after contact with tonal force, with approximate computation of the
time that the latter can maintain a normal pulse, and the necessary
frequency of its application. The research student in this new science
must have a working knowledge of physics, biology, psychology,
sociology, harmony, counterpoint, musical history, political history
and physiology, with a new study of the Human Will. We should thus add
a new science to the group of exact concrete sciences.

It is with no little diffidence that we suggest this as a new branch
of study. There are indications that universities adopting Music into
their lists of studies, recognize the need of Music’s closer touch
with scientific courses. If Music is ever to outgrow its swaddling
clothes of sentimental and frivolous superficiality, and mere amusement
conception, it must clearly manifest its scientific dignity, and its
inseparable connection with physics, sociology, biology and psychology.
It must take its place among those studies which encourage scientific
tests and lifelong research. It must leave its hitherto “divine aspect”
on the rubbish heap, along with the “divine rights” of kings, magic,
ancestor worship, and ghost theories. We believe some secrets of life
preservation will be found in Toneurology.

The curious effect of Music upon groups suggests a possible counterpart
of such reaction upon individuals. Music, once regarded in terms
of motion, with laws of motion likewise applied to the bodily
integrations, the path opens out clear and true.

The fact that men, in spite of all the great scientific discoveries,
harden and fade with age, tends to prove that the human body has not
been completely envisaged by any or all of them. We offer here a study
which includes many of the abstract and concrete sciences but directed
towards a new combination, _i. e._, tone and nerve, to be tested and
quantitatively measured under the laws of motion instead of under the
laws of perception and of appreciation. We take Music out of the field
of ideals entirely, and place it upon a level with rhythm establishers,
incident forces, and pulse fillers. Our statistics[28] show the
sub-conscious appreciation of Music as a human need by the countries
represented, and those governments show a larger proportion of
internal unrest where musical provision is small. This test, although
indicative, is far from satisfactory, since no provision, adequate to
act constantly upon the life forces, has as yet been made.


FOOTNOTES:

[28] See page 102.




                               PART II.

            THE INTER-REACTIONS OF MUSIC AND NATIONAL LIFE.




                _Introductory Note to Chapters V-VII._


The following outlines of musical productions during the Nineteenth
century in Italy, England, Germany, France, and the United States, are
intended to show how precisely the depth and nature of disturbances are
measurable by the Music of each country. Each musical type pictures the
“need” of the nation in question, and is peculiar to the character of
each human aggregate.

The statistics received by us and presented later in this work,[29]
indicate not only the extent to which Music is now regarded in its
utility aspect by different nations, but also show the protection given
to this as-yet-misunderstood force. In this day of general culture,
the reader’s acquaintance with the main outlines of the political and
economic history of these peoples may be assumed. The Music of each
nation will be seen to picture closely the national emotions consequent
upon the national stimuli.


FOOTNOTES:

[29] The statistics upon which these conclusions are based will be
found in Appendix C and E.




                              CHAPTER V.

                          ITALY (1800-1913).


National Music is the language of national emotion. The latter is
the result and reflection of economic stimuli. The Music of a period
exhibits the characteristics of national disturbances at every point in
economic history.

Italy, subjected to a much lighter form of stimuli than
England or Germany, has not yet ceased to manifest her
short-duration-excitability, her love of the merely sensuous in beauty,
which shows that the ancient intense disturbances of her real depths
have not been repeated in recent times.

The period from 1800 to 1848 presents a mental state of little
disturbance, the Italian social mind having not yet awakened from its
Eighteenth century submissiveness and inaction. It will be interesting
to analyze emotions of this period and their expression in Music.

Was tragedy the dominant factor in economic life? No. The social
pressure of this period was light, even merry, with the lightness of
lazy enjoyment in an unambitious mind. Curiosity was awakened but it
was in its wonder stage, acting slowly upon hints received from the
cynicism of France, from the power of labor ideas from England, and
from the disrespect for Papal authority coming from Germany. Like a
mirror for the reflection of the sharp but shallow emotions produced
by these stimuli, were the musical works of Rossini constituting
the public emotional valves. The “Barbiere di Sevilla,” with its
witching humor, its delicate satire, its political allusions, and its
portraits of the life of the nation, was a constant source of delight
to unreflecting Italian thought. Rossini’s skill in the opera-buffa
was marked. For the party of the Catholic faith he composed his
“Stabat Mater,” equally fine, but picturing even in these more serious
emotion-valves, those superficial moulds in which the public thought
was cast. The works of Donizetti were no less bewitching and no less
trivial, while the soft and sentimental character of Bellini’s genius
found answering echoes in every Italian ideal. Dramatic passion was not
lacking in “Norma,” but the atmosphere of even this glimpse of future
depth in Italian emotionalism, was never quite free from the weak
traits of Bellini’s school. Vocalism extraordinary was the demand of
the opera, and the display in voice technique was remarkable. This was
not, however, out of place in comedy opera, where depth of sentiment
never reached the modern ridiculous spectacle of vocalized heart
breakings, tuneful murders, and death gasps upon assigned tone pitches.
The over-dressed orchestrations of present day operas, the senseless
howling of a single voice above the combined vibrations of a hundred or
more active instruments, the absurd idea of profound _vocal_ passion,
had not yet distorted the original operatic idea, which still dwelt in
the true realm of its effectiveness, namely, that of the presentation
of the lovely, the gay, the pathetic, the comic. The supremacy of the
human voice as a vehicle of expression was in no way endangered by the
abnormal taste of our own day. Toward the middle of the Nineteenth
century, as the spirit of the time deepened in intensity, operas of a
more serious nature held their share of public attention. Donizetti’s
“Lucrezia Borgia” was presented in 1844, after several others of
dramatic color, among which Rossini’s “William Tell” and “Othello” were
works of real dramatic power.

For several centuries the State had exercised control over musical
education in Italy. In Rome, from its earliest days, institutions of
Music had existed. Music was regarded as a necessity rather than as a
luxury. Such will be the attitude assumed toward Music in the future,
when psychologists and sociologists shall have studied more deeply into
the relations of artificially created rhythm to bodily rhythm, and also
into the need of re-establishing disturbed bodily rhythm, manifested in
the abnormal pulse during emotional states of mind.

During the Eighteenth century each of the large towns of Italy
supported its own opera house and one cannot estimate to what extent
these emotion valves were instrumental in the easy subjugation of the
people.

Were Music to be banished from any one of the civilized countries
today, anarchy might very shortly result. Who can say that the frenzied
license which followed Cromwell’s suppression of musical indulgence,
was not due in part to the closing of England’s emotion valves?

The present craze for the violent action dances, represented in
the turkey-trot and the tango, is, in the opinion of the author, a
natural expression of the human need of pronounced rhythm. It is
a sub-conscious effort to supply the lack of pronounced rhythmic
stimulus in economic life. The late tendency in musical composition
has also been away from the old rhythmic accent and in the direction
of disturbed harmonies, and lack of restful melodies. Thus the
over-stimulated nerves of humanity have been exposed to an unchecked
abnormality of their motions. The dances above mentioned partly remedy
this defect in bodily action, and restore relative equilibrium--hence
the craze for this form of amusement. Notice, however, that people
will not take part in either of these dances for a moment, _without
the Music_. The movement alone is not the need; the Music is the
chief factor, the rhythm of which is merely accented and accentuated
by the movements. These dances may be saving the sanity of countless
thousands. Why then the suggested ban on this human need? If these
dance forms are not desirable, then sweep away the present musical
abominations and bring melody and--above all--_marked rhythm_ within
reach of the masses.

We shall now proceed to take up the thread of Italian musical life
at 1848 when social pressure was assuming a darker hue, acute even
in its short-lived terrors, as befits the Italian temperament. This
temperament, unlike that of Germany under tragic conditions, must
either die in despair or recover quickly. It is ever in short runs
between sobs and a jest, ever in fiery moments and merry half-hours,
ever child-like at heart, yet marvellously gifted, beauty-loving and
sentimental. Italy might not live through a “Thirty Years War,” but
with the inspiration of the right leaders, she might create a new
Roman Republic, under the forceful stimulus of oft-relieved bursts of
enthusiasm.

The strenuous years from 1848 to 1860, sufficiently aroused the Italian
spirit to produce much that has since developed to the credit of the
country. A deeper tone had been struck in Italian ideals, though not
sufficiently deep to revolutionize completely the nation’s taste for
those old forms of Music, so essentially a part of the melody loving
race.

Still tragedy shadowed the public mind, and Verdi pictured these gloomy
years in the operas “Rigoletto” (1851), “La Traviata” (1853), “Il
Trovatore” (1853), and “Aida” (1871). Verdi was the idol of the people,
because his genius fitted into the conditions of his time, illustrating
the theory of the present investigation.

The ignorance of the Italians, patricians and peasantry alike, made
the functioning of Italy’s really great literary works during the
Nineteenth century, impotent as stimuli productive of national and
contemporaneous reactions. Of late, however, a new educational impulse
has been given by the establishment of the public school. This is
certain greatly to increase stimuli products in the Italian nervous
system, and the Italian need for a corresponding complexity in its
Music is even now being manifested.

With the installation of transport facilities to the new world, a
fresh and somewhat romantic stimulus has been given to the Italian
people. The letters of absent relatives reflect world news, and widen
mental views for whole villages. Besides, railroads have opened up new
intercourse between the various parts of Italy, and the telegraph,
electric light, new home inventions, industrial occupations, factories
and so forth, each in turn--or at times all together--have disturbed
the bodily rhythm by increased stimulation, so that the late demands
for realism in France and Germany did indeed find partial echo in
Italy, in “The Cavalleria Rusticana” of Mascagni, a spectacular but not
profound opera, which aroused amazing enthusiasm by its characteristic
presentation of familiar forms. These were new in their realistic
color, yet old in Italian life, and they pictured in their dramatic
action, the stronger taste of the day. Puccini mirrored the still
deeper stimulus of his time, in his “Manon Lescaut” (1893), “La Boheme”
(1896), “La Tosca” (1900) and “Madam Butterfly” (1904), the latter
inconsistent in its mixture of tragedy with soft Italian tunefulness,
for even Puccini fails to discard the characteristic tunefulness of
his race, in his too evident striving for such discordant effects, as,
however, unintentionally represent the discordant elements in Italy’s
modern civilization.

These works show that Italy has awakened from her lazy sleep under the
rule of foreigners, and that she is now beginning to feel the stir
of larger economic disturbances, in those depths of the social mind,
already so thoroughly stirred and active in France and Germany.

The care given to the musical needs of Italy by her central authorities
is shown later in this book.[30]


FOOTNOTES:

[30] See Appendices C and E.




                              CHAPTER VI.

                         ENGLAND (1800-1913).


The history of England during the Nineteenth century presents but
little disturbance at home, along lines calculated so to move mental
depths, as to produce complicated re-establishing forms in musical
rhythm. Labor troubles harassed the national thought in their usual
superficial manner, rarely causing the loss of a night’s sleep, or
the disturbance of appetite, and the many reforms in the interest of
trade, affected but slowly the depths of emotionalism. It has ever
been a noticeable fact, that impersonal or distant calamities but
slightly arouse the national emotions. People read and comment upon
the slaughter of women and children, and at the same time pleasurably
partake of a good dinner. The fact is, that emotions are not easily
aroused by distant stimuli, and people also respond with ever
decreasing force to unchanging present stimuli.

Present day labor agitations have already passed the boundaries of mild
stimulation, and are fast becoming emotional forces which are evidently
driving headlong into governmental change. Capitalism has run its
oppressive course, and for the near future a genuinely soul-tearing
agitation is preparing, which, if allowed to rip open the veins of the
nation, will produce the stimuli, that eventually will endow English
Music with a richness and depth, superior to that of any other country.
British emotions have been sleeping deeply under two centuries of mild
emotional stimuli, but when they do stretch their strong fibres for
action, then one may indeed tremble for the old systems of English
government; and then also the great musical triumphs of Belgium and
Germany may be surpassed. Considering the mental attitude of the
British community during the Nineteenth century, and at the present
day, it was to be expected that Balfe’s “Lurline” should represent
the nation’s rhythmic need up to 1870, and that the musical works of
Benedict (“The Lily of Killarney,” and the oratorios of “St. Peter”
and “St. Cecilia”), should have found popular appreciation up to
1885. But the composer who best illustrates England’s characteristic
activity,--that of colonization,--its military and political aspects,
the clean minded and religious attitude of Victoria’s rule, and the
general lightly disturbing characteristics of Nineteenth century
economic stimuli, was Sir Arthur Sullivan in his charming works, “The
Mikado,” “Pinafore,” “The Pirates of Penzance,” “Patience,” “The Yeoman
of the Guard,” “Iolanthe” and “The Sorcerer.” England did much in this
century to advance the culture of Music within her borders. The Royal
head was patron of such institutions as The Royal Academy of South
Kensington, The Royal College of Music, The Guildhall School of Music
and Trinity College. These are in general supported by government
grants, donations, and subscribing patrons.[31] The national faith is
still strongly expressed in the extensive cultivation of the oratorio,
while the secular ideal has not yet become sufficiently abnormal to
genuinely encourage Music of the present French and German schools.
This is probably because England’s emotions are not in need of such
representations, since they are still adequately reflected in the
lighter works of Italian genius, as expressed by Verdi[32] and in
her own lovely light operas. It seems more than a coincidence that
the Music of a country so marvellously reflects the character of the
economic stimuli of its period, as does Great Britain’s.

That England has a genuine care for the development of musical culture
in her realm is shown by the letter from the Board of Education,
Whitehall, London.[33]


FOOTNOTES:

[31] “American History and Encyclopedia of Music,” volume on Foreign
Music, p. 206.

[32] We leave out of account his “Falstaff.”

[33] See Appendix E.




                             CHAPTER VII.

                         GERMANY (1800-1913).


The world today is still perceiving in Germany’s Music, the intensity
of Germany’s emotions, as aroused during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth
centuries.

Let us see if Germany’s tragic emotionalism has produced its likeness
in Music, thus wisely furnishing an outlet for revolutionary energy,
and at the same time wielding a powerful and tranquillizing wand over
a growing restlessness of spirit. Let us see whether the great tragic
depths of emotional life through which Germany has passed, during
at least two-thirds of the Nineteenth century, support our thesis
by having resulted in the creation of a deep and tragic Music, with
revolutionary harmony at its summit.

Ludwig von Beethoven’s genius was such as greatly to influence the
entire Nineteenth century Music. He reigned supreme in the symphony
and sonata fields, where dignified composition found its most fitting
musical forms. The public was, at the close of the Eighteenth century,
actively supporting its own musical market through publishing houses
and public concerts, so that the exclusive patronage of the nobility
could be largely dispensed with by composers, to their own infinite
advantage, by making possible a wider psychic expression in their
works, and in the production of Music of more pronounced national
color. Pensions were still granted to noted composers, but these did
not fetter them as completely as they had formerly done. That Germany,
at that time, could produce a character so simple and noble, as was
manifested by Beethoven’s life, suggests the religious stimuli which
acted upon his parents. All of his early works exhibit this chaste
adherence to the established ideals in Music. Beautiful depths are
revealed everywhere, and a solemn earnestness pervades his lightest
productions. We love and revere Beethoven, unconsciously feeling some
strong, pure and noble influence which was awakening in the German
mind.[34]

The early years of the Nineteenth century brought, with their political
disturbance, a taste for the old knightly ballads. These were, with
the “Lieder,” which so closely pictured the newly rising fearlessness
of the people, beautifully expressed in the genius of Franz Schubert.
At this time the social position of the nobility was as insecure
as was the political peace of all Europe. The rise of the people’s
voice was shown in the importance given to the “folk-song.” Great
emphasis was now laid upon the texts of these songs themselves, thus
again subjecting Music to poetry, the people’s speech, as opposed to
what was the rule in the Eighteenth century, when texts meant nothing
to the empty-headed aristocracy, and sensuous tones and bewildering
technique held sway. Yet rhythm still remains marked, and the tunes
are still full of sentimental suggestion. Song is not the vehicle of
intense emotion, and indeed at this period, emotion had not yet reached
a point of intensity in German economic life. The great emotional
possibilities of Germany were still subdued by petty powers, and the
“Lied” sufficiently expressed the social pressure of the time, when
the people did not care much who ruled them, so long as there was
enough to eat, and so long as good beer accompanied their merriment.
Tragedy was in action, but had not yet dug her claws into the depths
of German emotion. It was not the time for deep dramatic opera. The
prevailing taste craved the romantic quality suggested by war heroes of
the Napoleonic type. Napoleon’s almost unvarying triumph embellished
his reputation with god-like, impossible attributes. Finally his
romantic sway and sad end awakened echoes of ancient chivalry in the
thoughts woven about his name. As a matter of fact, Schubert’s works
were not published before 1821, because the German musician was still
dominated by the Italian school. The disturbed period before this date
was unproductive of nationalism in any form. The mental color of 1821
was essentially lyrical, and Schubert’s songs struck the right note in
public feeling from this date on. New forms were arising on every hand.
Classic themes had had their day. Schiller and Goethe had inspired art
and literature with new ideals. Carl von Weber exhibited new methods in
his epoch marking German opera “Der Freischutz,” in 1821. This opera
sounded the death knell of the reign of Italian Music in Germany.
In this work von Weber dared to picture the real life of the German
people, and to give the folk-song a prominent position, though he
weakened the presentation by the introduction of supernatural effects.

Note the public mind in this success! Germany wanted its own texts,
its own life, its own style represented in the Music it was to enjoy.
When had the Germans ever dared to show so strange a tendency before?
Then came the “heroic” opera with its silly plot, sustained musical
invention, new method of treating the recitative as part of the melody,
and greater richness of orchestral effects, in which one sees the
first touches of real dramatic instrumental treatment. Von Weber was
the flag-pole for the banner of Wagner, and his genius is a true
reflection of Germany’s social pressure. Up to 1859 Spohr exerted a
serious and dignified influence upon the violin art of Germany, but his
heavier works did not reach the importance of von Weber’s, which had
truly illustrated the mental tendency of the time. In works of great
beauty and merit Kreutzer, Lortzing and Nicolai represented different
phases of this social mind.

Robert Schumann did not contribute to the actual need of the people
until 1840-1841 when he produced a large number of exquisite songs.
His piano works, however, exhibit more originality and greater
strength and depth; they indicate a greater mastery of the classic
ideal, show extended chord effects, and present broadness of idea.
A new feature here was the syncopated accent.[35] This was the
beginning of that breaking of the rhythmic effect which, to our mind,
has not only been detrimental to the beneficial results of Music as
a rhythm-re-establisher, but which has also been the forerunner of
our American “craze” for “ragtime” Music. It was an “out-of-order”
effect, and came from an “out-of-order” mind, for poor Schumann died
insane at Bonn in 1856. Schumann, more than any other composer of his
time, connected economic stimuli with emotionalism, and the titles he
gave his piano works, revealed his belief that Music could be made
to express definite conceptions. Schumann not only felt the need of
rhythmic works, but he also produced them, and the richness of his
harmony is more pronounced in effect than Schubert’s. Yet even Schumann
did not sound the depths of German tragedy, because the social pressure
was not yet charged with tragic stimuli. The century had not yet
wrung the German heart. It was still submissive, although in fearful
contemplation of its possibilities, nor had it as yet been aroused
into active fury for national unity. Tragedy alone could fully move
those much tried Teutonic depths. The interest manifested in Schumann’s
musical periodical “Die Neue Zeitschrift für Musik” proved that the
growth of musical knowledge in public culture was keeping pace with
the increasing complication of economic life, and with the growing
intensity of its emotion-producing influences. As complicated as the
forces which succeed in arousing national emotions, are the musical
constructions which are contemporaneous with such forces. Mendelssohn
reflected the reactionary feeling of one part of public thought, but
he did not dominate in his field as did von Weber and Schumann. Bach
and Händel influenced his work, and lent it the chief beauty evident
in his many charming productions. His own life of ease and wealth
prevented his being subjected to those harrowing experiences, so
necessary to the soil of genius. For these reasons he cannot represent
more than a certain phase of that whole social mind, which found
its complete reflection in Schumann. During the period before 1849,
it is significant that the waltz and the operetta should have begun
their shallow but necessary existences in German life. Progress and
prosperity had given a kind of careless capacity for enjoyment to the
people, and a tendency toward unhealthy sluggishness of the national
pulse. But we must notice that the public demanded the most pronounced
rhythm as a means of imparting to the body an _excitation_ of a higher
degree of rhythmic motion. This was supplied perfectly in the waltz.
Was this the first step backward to Grecian rhythmic exercises? The
dance is as old as human life, but the waltz is peculiarly sensuous
and suavely rhythmic, and its development by Johann Strauss came at an
extraordinarily receptive moment in social desire. One must attempt to
place one’s own consciousness in the imaginary body of a person living
in those times, in order to feel the need of the waltz. As our own time
is near enough in stimuli similar to that period before 1848, the feat
may not be impossible. The younger Strauss reflected most perfectly the
restful period, which followed the unification of the Germans.

But Richard Wagner marks the highest point of German social pressure.
This master did not defeat our thesis in the least degree, even in
his early works, which were as conservative as any others of the
times. Until 1842 his life was unsettled and his career doubtful.
“Rienzi,” given at Dresden in this year, proved a great success, and
in 1843 is “Fliegende Hollender” showed the first positive adoption
of _revolutionary ideas_ in Music, although “Rienzi” contained some
significant references to freedom and to the power of the people.
Wagner certainly held the radical convictions of the time, and his
later works were undoubtedly inspired by the stirring stimuli of then
existing social pressure. In 1850 “Lohengrin” was produced with great
success. Many trials tormented the spirit of Wagner until 1861, when
his “Tannhäuser” was produced in Paris amid the howling of radical
mobs, who literally forced it into failure. All this time his operas
had been a part of Germany’s operatic repertoire, but his greatest
strokes in musical revolution were yet unfelt. Humiliation and poverty,
malice and active enmity, assailed him at every point. Yet bravely
defiant, _truly reflecting the German temper of that period_, he
succeeded in gaining the patronage of King Ludwig II of Bavaria, and in
1865 “Tristan” was produced. This was a work which entirely _overturned
the traditional structure of operatic ideals_ and made it possible
for his enemies to deprive him of his hoped-for refuge in the King’s
favor. But in 1868 “Die Meistersänger” was performed at Munich. This
work presented a genuine plea for _greater freedom_ in art creations
and exhibited a perfection of musical treatment, combined with _daring
innovations_, which to this day constitute a lasting charm. After many
misfortunes, but with a consciousness that his works had established
German opera upon a new and ideal basis, Wagner realized his dreams
in the production of “Der Ring des Nibelungen” in his own theatre
at Bayreuth, in August, 1876. Note how close in time was Wagner’s
climax, in his activity of _revolutionary Music_, and the triumph of
united Germany over the disdainful powers of Europe! At one and the
same period (1876), we see Wagner established as the German emotional
dictator, and German solidarity in Prussia’s settled supremacy. At this
time also, after a most distressing period of bloody warfare and mental
torture, all Europe was at comparative peace. Does not our thesis hold
good?

Now in the years of progress and peace from 1876 to 1882, what happens
to the mind of Wagner, as we behold him finally freed from toil,
poverty, enmity and humiliation? The same thing that happened to the
social mind under the suave influence of constitutional government,
headed by a wise and good king. Stimuli became softer, and the social
mind became more complicated in sense-perceptions, more sentimental,
with a dramatic expression less colored by earthly strife and blood,
more refined by spiritual and intellectual habits, and lo! in 1882
“Parsifal” marks the last production of the mighty Wagner. This work
presents a decided falling back from the standards he had created in
spontaneity and thematic development. The fact and the cause are plain.
The cause of the “falling off” is to be found in the absence of deeply
stirring economic stimuli, in the social pressure of the quiet years
during which this work was in preparation. Let the historical facts
speak for themselves. Assuredly the day will come, when sociologists
and psychologists will recognize as a scientific phenomenon, and one
admitting of quantitative psychiatric measurement, the relation between
social nerve disturbance in emotion, and social tranquillization in
Music, with its uncountable millions of vibrations which strike the
nerves, and act in ways now seemingly mysterious, upon the life of a
group.

With Wagner’s death, attention descends the mount of achievement along
emotional lines in Germany. Brahms, Strauss, Bruch, Bruchner and other
recent composers, all cling to the robe of Wagner. Here and there these
composers attempted alterations which distorted his idea, but succeeded
only in picturing the milder intellectual stimuli which now ruled
German thought.


FOOTNOTES:

[34] Even Beethoven illustrates the progressive idea of the time,
in the evolution of free initiative in new forms, exhibited in
his symphonies, which are progressive steps in greater freedom of
treatment, from the first, to the revolutionary introduction of
choruses in the ninth.

[35] Beethoven’s exquisite works for stringed instruments show
syncopation effects, but the hard, syncopated “accent” seems first
evident as sharp contrasts, in the works of Schumann.




                             CHAPTER VIII.

                          FRANCE (1800-1913).


France, as a most progressive nation, presents a splendid musical
system and a correspondingly good product of musical culture. The
French national mind is peculiarly sensitive to modern social pressure.
Let this pressure be relieved by musical rhythm and France will bound
ahead in musical paths as she has in so many other lines. In money
expenditure, she stands high, but this expenditure is made largely in
Paris. Culture in a State must be considered in its relation to all of
its inhabitants, and while France shows a large absolute expenditure,
her _per capita_ expenditure is relatively low. This expenditure,
however, is independent of private donations, which have no place in
State control, and which are a detriment rather than a benefit to the
general public, representing as they do, a control by the princely
“fads” of a ruling class. National musical genius is expressed in the
degree to which the national emotions are aroused by national stimuli.
Had France reacted to her social pressure in the same manner as did
Germany with practically the same stimuli, our history might have
properly closed with Germany’s triumph. But France had received quite
a different mental preparation from that which tortured the German
heart in the 18th century, and the nature of French emotionalism was
both far less sincerely tragic, and far more highly intellectual at
every phase, than was Germany’s. The common people of France were
indeed subjected to genuine misery before the downfall of the monarchy,
but they were ever arrayed in the glory of a conquering nation,--a
leading power, conscious of its own supremacy in European affairs,
although the peasantry were ground down with taxes, and made to be
the overburdened supporters of a vicious royalty; yet the tone of the
public mind, while somewhat critical, was chiefly domineering, and
capable of great enthusiasm. Free thought was still in the freshness of
youth, so that oppressions, as they came, were analyzed and denounced
even while endured. Germany had never thought of doing this until 1848.
The troubles of France were a direct consequence of the desires of
the common people, and were not so much brought upon them by outside
forces, as they were voluntarily encountered and even created, by
themselves, in their conscious development of a new idea of popular
rule. France wanted to do great and new deeds before she was mentally
ready for such achievements, and her trials were of her own making.
This fact does not lessen her emotional response to her social
pressure, but it does color it with a certain control even in its
deepest action. Thus it was with France, Napoleon draining her soil of
its best blood, but crowning the nation with laurels. The philosophical
spirit aroused by the genius of Voltaire did not weaken even under this
glory, and the French mind, although wearied by the revolution, rested
only a moment in the re-actions under Napoleon. The reckless Republic
was but the first sign of the new national temper, and--although all
Europe united to subdue it, and Napoleon’s Empire patted it into
momentary quiet with an encouragement of all forms of progress--the
national mind had tasted freedom and the old tolerance of royalty
was dying. During the fourteen years of his reign, Napoleon gave
substantial benefits to France. Continental Europe bent in submission
at his feet. Although the French people hated the old idea of monarchy,
they could not deny the advantages which France received from his
powerful genius. His death in 1821 left his former subjects in a bad
way, the people striving for constitutional government, against the
allies in favor of absolutism. But little by little, certain advances
were made by the people, in a gradual assertion of their opinions.
Revolution was a constant menace in the social pressure of the half
century following Napoleon’s downfall.

The rebellious fanaticism underlying each and all of civilized
manifestations, is certain to strike new and staggering blows at the
commercialism of our times. We feel as though terror and its causes in
religion were lurking very near the surface of the world politics today.

Along many lines France has not lost her old ascendency in leadership,
but her discipline has perhaps been too weak in the direction of dogged
persistence. Her actions possibly have been governed at home and in
her colonization efforts, by too much of a fatalistic policy, to give
strong promise of any continuous establishment of power under the
people’s rule. Yet much is to be expected, from the daring courage,
enthusiasm, and intellectual splendor of the French mind.

The whole country has furnished a strange contrast to German social
reaction, for under the same stimuli the one wept while the other
laughed. During the first forty years of the Nineteenth century, the
piano virtuoso, with his superficial flourishes of finger technique
reigned supreme over instrumental Music in France. The sonata, so
representative of dignity and noble sentiment, was accorded only an
obscure position during this superficial period, and the short piano
piece took its place. On the other hand, performers gave stimulus to
improvements in piano manufacture, as well as to composition of piano
works. Liszt and Thalberg dazzled the Parisians, and the public mind
demanded no deeper expression of its emotional disturbance than that
which was represented in pianistic display. After 1831 Chopin lived in
Paris, and his works continued to express the French love of the dance,
of ornamental display, and of delicate sentimentality. But in 1830 the
romantic movement had made itself felt in Music under Berlioz, who
produced a Music which suited perfectly the hot-headed revolutionary
tendencies of this time. Orchestration attained a tone-color, a new
technical possibility under Berlioz’s manipulation, and the bizarre
aspects of the then economic life were exactly reflected in his
_revolutionary effects_. His book on instrumentation, published in
1844, became an authority, and he influenced musicians to attempt new
forms, however these might be opposed to classical traditions. Berlioz
desired to invent astonishing instrumental effects, and did so, but his
efforts did not win him lasting popularity, although he is the real
founder of modern French Music.

But it is in the field of grand opera that we must look for those
amazingly accurate reflections of economic and social pressure, as
evidenced in the Music of France during the nineteenth century.
Cherubini contributed an earnest musicianship to French opera seria,
but he exhibits strong influences of foreign models. Napoleon
encouraged only the most trivial of the Italian operas; his attitude
was naturally disadvantageous to serious attempts in this field.
Opera-comique began to exhibit dramatic color under Mehul but it
remained for Spontini to reflect the Napoleonic regime, in opera which
glorified the heroic in all its splendor. His French works “La Vestale”
(1807), “Fernando Cortez” (1809), and “Olympie” (1819), reflect the
mental attitude of the time, but true to this reflection, also show
the lack of real depths of emotions not yet touched in France by the
social pressure of the time. The opera-comique more truly represented
public sentiment in the works of Boildieu, in “Le Calife de Bagdad,”
and “La Dame Blanche” which manifest a more serious tone and refinement
than had as yet been known in this field. Auber, however, knew best how
to call forth French admiration. His fame commenced about 1820, when
ideals were beginning to be colored by a darker hue of seriousness,
and his “Fra Diavolo” and “Le Domino Noir” exhibit his fine gift of
characterization. Herold’s “Zampa” presented new orchestral elements,
and is still very popular in America and England. Grand opera of the
heroic character received a strong impulse at the hands of Rossini,
(who lived at Paris after 1824), in his French work “Guillaume Tell”
(produced in 1829). Dramatic expression finds here some scope, although
without any great depth, and Auber’s “La Muette de Portici” (1828),
more nearly expresses the revolutionary feeling of the people, for the
subject of the Music is _popular revolt against tyranny_. The works of
Meyerbeer carry French grand opera to its highest point; his “Robert le
Diable” (1831), and “Les Huguenots” (1836) fit into the expression of
those years admirably, while his last work “L’Africaine” (1864), shows
all of that ferment in French thought which was so inevitably leading
up to the Franco-Prussian War of 1870.

The dramatic events of French Nineteenth century history had produced
the genuine histrionic instinct in musical composition; and the
complication of orchestral effects, was a natural expression of
the multiplicity of stimuli accompanying every economic impulse.
_Consistency_ in Meyerbeer’s Music was as conspicuous by its absence as
it was in the French economic world, where the abnormal, sensational,
religious and absurd were so inconsistently jumbled up with plans
for a stable constitutional government, and peaceful relations with
Europe. Simplicity was not to the taste of the time. Glaring colors
and noisy effects much more nearly reflected the social mode, and
Meyerbeer responded as the musician in him should have done, to the
prevailing social pressure. The greatest development was exhibited in
the orchestral dramatic expression, and the action in a scene began
to take a superior place above vocalization, in the formation of the
Music drama. This departure may be said to mark the beginning of the
degeneration of the real purpose of the opera.

With the reign of peace after the Franco-Prussian war, a new element
entered the musical productions of the time. Orchestral concerts
abounded. Church Music by Dubois, Gounod and Franck was of an excellent
character, in line with the increasing agitation over religious
questions. France needed rhythm, as a hungry man needs bread, and she
found it in a partial return to Bach, and to the still earlier masters
of sacred Music. Popular concerts were instituted for the benefit of
the people in 1861. These have continued their useful mission to the
present day. France has demanded that life shall be actually pictured
in her Music. This impossible demand is leading French Music far from
the relative characterizations as presented in Guonod’s “Faust” and
Bizet’s “Carmen,” and into the ridiculous “tonal tears” region, where a
printed program is needed to inform the hearers, that the staccati of
the piccolo are meant to indicate the rain drops on my lady’s brow, and
not intended to announce the squeal of a pig. Without the program, who
would know?

Towards the close of the century, there is a decline in the sensuous
and mystical elements, both in economic and in musical affairs.
Gounod’s “Faust” in 1859 had reflected these qualities of the social
mind, and his “St. Cecilia Mass” in 1856 expressed the religious
attitude of the people. But the rise of the present Republic gave
the sceptre into sterner hands, and the skillful use of Music in
characterization was vividly expressed, in so far as it could be,
in Bizet’s “Carmen” in 1873. Saint Saens and Massenet show the
intellectual refinement of the period now ushered in, with its strong
suggestions of dramatic feeling so exquisitely expressed, yet clinging
to ancient models in melodic construction, and avoiding the harsh and
bizarre effects lately manifested in French tendencies. Cesár Franck,
in his beautiful oratorio, “Les Beatitudes” (produced in 1891),
demonstrates the real depth of religious sentiment existing under the
intellectual adornments of the French mind at this period, and the
great depth, and musical value of this work exhibit a fund of religious
sentiment, which we do not believe has been crushed by the recent
separation of Church and State, and which will show itself in revolt at
no distant period.

The very latest operatic works of French composers are exhibiting a mad
desire for an expression of a national Music, which looks more like an
effort to root out the musical supremacy of Germany, than like a plan
to establish a genuine progression in French art. France would like to
have a Music all its own, be it ever so ugly, distorted, or bizarre.
She wants to lead in musical art, to tear up old models, to force a
new-old scale upon her half distracted people, and to over-dress the
misshapen things in absurd orchestral exaggeration, which so drowns
the poor human voice, that the helpless vocal organ is obliged to
shout dramatic phrases to a deafened audience, over the countless
unrestrained vibrations of a hundred or more madly ringing instruments.
What a farce it is! A grand opera presenting a modern girl of Paris, in
a modern shirt-waist, yelling common-place remarks to the accompaniment
of a monster band! But it must change. The human voice will come into
its own again, when the over-excited modern mentality shall have calmed
itself down to the normal. The orchestra will shrink to its diminutive
and correct position, as a mere suggestor of the harmony which supports
the voice, and the emotions of life will find their true relief in
accentuated rhythm, soothing melody, and noble harmonies. France is
still passing through, and she certainly will not come out of, her
transition period with the thing she is now trying to call “Music.”

French pride in musical accomplishment is well exhibited in the aid
extended to this culture by State activity.[36]


FOOTNOTES:

[36] The statistics will be found in Appendix E.




                              CHAPTER IX.

                            UNITED STATES.


It is a matter for surprise and deep regret that the United States
Federal Government should show a lack of interest in musical education.
But our young country is not likely to remain for long behind smaller
lands. Our hope is secure in the fundamental generosity and wisdom
of our national mind, which now squanders vast sums upon musical
diversion, but spends nothing at all for the free musical education of
its gifted citizens.

We have in this country a strange mixture of races and of ideals,
all contributing something of Old World conditions, and combining
to form a new type. The people who struggled so bravely through the
Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries were of various origins, but all
came to the struggle with tragedy of some kind or other implanted in
their mental composition. Emotions beat the pioneers into their one
refuge, the Church; even the ballad, simple as it was, found but scant
room where the prayer book lay. Pioneer life gave little ground for
complication of stimuli, until the Nineteenth century opened the gates
of our country to the industrial inventions, and to the discontent
of foreign labor. A subdued and almost religious atmosphere stifled
emotions during the first half of the Nineteenth century, but the waves
of reform sweeping over Europe found their way even here by 1861, and
the Great Civil War would have stirred us to our depths, had not the
mighty currents of feeling within us been kept in subjection by our
Church habits. The few valves of relief permitted to our people in the
primitive vaudeville and theatre productions, were not sufficient to
offset the irritation of quickly complicating economic stimuli. At this
period our immigrant population came from England, Ireland, Scotland,
Wales, Denmark, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, Norway and Switzerland.
These immigrants generally possessed cool heads, and were of fine
stern characters, skilled in various crafts, and they came to stay
permanently. They became one with our people, and our struggles were
their struggles. Italian opera and the higher intellectual diversions
were later additions to the pleasures of the rich, but the masses
rarely shared in such amusements, and the old-fashioned ballads, and
the splendidly developed hymnal Music furnished our only relief for
emotional disturbance. Yet this was endurable because of the beautiful
hymnal exercise, until the gold-fever and the oil-madness, united
with the agitation of the Southern States, set our emotional depths
to new movements, and the cry of the laborer for liberty and of the
manufacturer for more power, added fear and rage to our every-day
emotions. The rapid rise of our national power, the enormous strides
in public education, and the incredible multiplication of stimuli upon
every side, twisted and stretched our national nerves until we now see
ourselves confronted with an abnormal type, which must soon find its
normal calm in rhythmic pulse action, or else go to pieces under the
strain. Nowhere have we any outlet or re-establishing agency, except
in the dance, and in such cheap shows as permit of but a partial
relief. The class of foreign labor arriving since 1883 is from the
south of Europe, illiterate, fiery, adding another element of danger
to our tense nationality, and still our blind government has not
opened musical safety valves, for the steam that is fast rising to the
bursting point. Our musical talent is of the finest order, but, not
having any governmental aid in free instruction, is obliged to go to
Europe, there to learn to compound a German, French or Italian medicine
for an American disease, when our peculiar social pressure demands a
particular American remedy. Private schools, having only their own
financial gains in mind, are farcical agents for carrying out any truly
social functions. The land cries out for its own musical culture, as
strongly in rural districts as in urban. Cannot the government see
that musical employment in America is already covering a vast field?
Scarcely any function is conducted without Music. Restaurants, hotels,
clubs, opera houses, plays, churches, funerals, weddings, social
events, parades, steamboat service, labor union meetings, support
hundreds of thousands of professional musicians. Yet practically all
of this employment is given to foreign-born talent, because only the
well-to-do in America can study Music, and the common people who may
possess the best talent, and who may both love it and need it the most,
are denied this means of making a living, while municipal governments
spend useless thousands upon concerts, and a few park bands which but
whet the public appetite, while our rich musical talent among the poor
lies dying and neglected.[37] No wonder revolution knocks at the door!
The government is giving the eye-openers in its free educational plan,
so aiding the disturbance of human rhythm by sensational newspapers,
noisy streets, high prices and too quick life, yet closes the door to
free musical instruction which would tranquillize the mind, and restore
equilibrium of pulse. The churches nail down the natural impulses, and
society frowns upon “new” forms, but nature will generate her energy
nevertheless, and pent up in the human system it will boil over at a
certain point.

The United States is by no means lacking in prosperity, sufficient for
the maintenance of public musical instruction for the culture of a wage
earning occupation. Our financial reports speak for themselves. In
comparing our prosperity and our neglect of musical culture with the
activities along this line as carried on by other countries, great and
small, the following letter from ex-President Taft may be of interest:

  The White House,      July 3rd, 1909.
      Washington.

  My dear Sir:--

 I have your letter and I do not think it possible to secure from the
 American government any appropriation for the promotion of musical
 schools. This must be done by private munificence if at all.

                                                       Sincerely yours,

                                                           WM. H. TAFT.

America is mad for Music. The moving-picture shows are saving our
sanity with their rhythmic combinations of light and sound waves,
their daily audiences amounting to 5,000,000 people in 14,000 picture
theaters, and 4,000 subjects annually placed upon the American
market.[38] By this means we retain our rhythm, but the higher remedies
of the orchestral concert, opera and chamber Music performances are
denied the people who have no wealth, while the hundreds of thousands
of paying positions in the bodies which compose these forces, are
likewise prohibited to our native talent, because there are no free
schools in which such talent can be developed. Only the well-to-do may
study Music in the United States and, strangely enough, our real talent
often lies not in this class, but outside of this charmed circle, down
among the elements of our foreign-born and the natives of foreign-born,
whose ancestral nerves have been fed upon nationally provided musical
rhythm.

United States gold should be showered over the health-giving and
joy-bestowing field of National Music, so fondly loved by the people,
and so necessary to mental and physical relaxation from the maddening
strain of modern life. A bright star will adorn the administration of
the first President to take this need in hand.


FOOTNOTES:

[37] The value of the musical instruction as given in public schools
is not worth consideration beyond its diversion aspect. The singing is
a menace to correct voice placement and the remaining exercises are
insignificant.

[38] American Industries, January, 1913.




                              APPENDIX A.

                            QUESTIONNAIRE.


The exact form of the American questionnaire employed in the gathering
of statistics is given below. The inquiries sent abroad followed the
same plan and had the same scope, but were couched in somewhat more
indirect and formal terms, and of course each separate set of questions
was sent out in the language of the country to whose officials it was
directed.

For a statistical work I need some official information in regard to
the following queries:

 1. How much does the American Government expend annually upon public
 conservatories for free tuition of pupils?

 2. How much do the single states contribute annually for the same
 purpose?

 3. Is there any subvention for Grand Opera from the American
 Government or from the States?

 4. Is there any subvention for Orchestra organizations, or for Choral
 Societies?

 5. Are there any prizes granted annually from the State for musical
 achievements to composers, singers, players?

 6. Are there any endowments from the American Government or from the
 States to enable young gifted musicians to complete their musical
 education in America or abroad?




                              APPENDIX B.

                   SOURCES OF STATISTICAL MATERIAL.


The sources of the statistics in this appendix are indicated in the
first table below.

Gladly I take this opportunity again to express my appreciation of the
invariable courtesies extended in answer to my inquiries. Elsewhere[39]
will be found the names of the officials whose painstaking and
often detailed reports made it possible for the author to convey to
the reader a picture of the relative support given to music by the
governments of foreign states.

                _Official or Institution_      _Communication_
  _Country_       _Furnishing Statistics_            _Dated_

  Austria    Imperial Academy of Music and      Dec. 13, 1912
               the Fine Arts.
  Bavaria    Minister of the Interior for       Apr. 21, 1913
               Religion and Education.
  Belgium    Minister of Arts and Sciences.     Feb. 4, 1913
  Denmark    Danish Consul-General in New       May 8, 1913
               York.                            May 13, 1913
  Equador    Quito Conservatory of Music.       Aug. 31, 1913
  England    National Education Board,          Dec. 24, 1912
             Whitehall, London, England.
  France     Paris Conservatoire.               Feb.  9, 1913
  Holland    Minister of the Interior.          Mar. 19, 1913
  Hungary    Secretary of State, Budapest.      Mar. 23, 1913
  Italy      Minister of Instruction.           Mar. 10, 1913
  Norway     Royal Inspector of Music in        Dec. 15, 1912
               Christiania.
  Prussia    Consul-General of the United       Mar. 10, 1913
               States in Berlin.
  Russia     First Secretary to the Russian     May 28, 1913
               Embassy, Washington, D.C.
  Saxony     Minister of the Interior.          Apr. 8, 1913
  Sweden     Royal Conservatory of Music,       Jan. 4, 1913
               Stockholm.
  United     Chief Clerk, United States         Mar. 15, 1913
  States       Bureau of Education.


FOOTNOTES:

[39] See pages 16-17.




                              APPENDIX C.


These figures are merely intended to give an idea of foreign activities
in national annual support of musical culture. Comparisons, without
more detailed statistics would be misleading and unjust. Therefore per
capita calculations have been purposely omitted.

All Military Band expenses and appropriations have been deducted from
the statistics received. Saxony and Bavaria as mere states, do not
belong to above list, but the praiseworthy achievements of Bavaria are
shown in her total expenditures of 703,030 Marks annually.

                                  _Square_       _Foreign_    _American_
  _Countries_    _Population_[40]  _Miles_         _Money_     _Dollars_
  Austria         28,568,000       115,903  1,730,084 Kronen    351,207
  Belgium          7,317,561        11,373    641,275 Francs    123,766
  Denmark          2,775,000        15,582     20,600 Kronen      5,520
  Equador (1913)   1,400,000       116,000     28,500 Sucre      13,879
  France          39,252,000       207,054  1,971,118 Francs    380,425
  Great Britain   45,947,000       121,510      4,600 Lbs        22,385
  Holland          5,858,000        12,648     32,000 Florins    12,864
  Hungary         20,851,000       125,430  1,126,033 Kronen    228,584
  Italy           34,565,000       110,659    851,340 Lire      164,308
  Norway           2,393,000       124,130     15,700 Kronen      4,207
  Russia         142,585,000     2,217,929    139,900 Roubles    72,048
  Sweden           5,476,000       172,876    313,017 Kronen     83,888


FOOTNOTES:

[40] _Scientific American_ of 1913.




                              APPENDIX D.

                         NOTES ON TABULATION.


The foregoing tabulation may be considered fairly representative,
because the relative resources of each country, and the relative cost
of sustaining musical institutions tend to equalize the sum of their
actual benefits to the people. Bavarian and Austrian institutions
charge small rates for instruction to native talent, but much larger
sums to strangers. France and Belgium charge merely entrance fees to
natives, but strangers pay a comfortable sum, and must pass a difficult
examination. The letter from the celebrated violinist and teacher,
Ovid Musin, given in Appendix E, shows that there are two classes of
students, native students who pay a very small fee, and foreign paying
students. The letter was a reply to our inquiry as to tuition fees
charged by French and Belgian musical conservatories under governmental
control. Italy also charges a small yearly sum for instruction of
natives, but all of her institutions teach exceptional talent free of
charge, if inability to pay on the part of the applicant be proved.

Italy’s distribution of her culture in Milan, Naples, Palermo,
Parma, Florence and Rome, presents an area most creditable to her
governmental care of Music. Considering Italy’s position in the
commercial world, her figures represent a high proportion of attention
to musical needs. This we would naturally expect of that grand old
Mediterranean race, which has never failed in all of its wondrous
history, to uphold its loftiest ideals despite its calamities. Her
musical genius has always found national protection. Italy has thus
shown her wisdom.

The density of France’s population brings down her _per capita_
expenditure.

The difference in the charges to native students may depend upon the
varying cost of support in different countries. For instance in Vienna,
$40.00 per year is one charge, while at Brussells the charge to natives
is but $1.00 per year.

Even were free tuition not given, the governmental institutions
charging for instruction would still be great aids to the advancement
of musical culture in their respective states, as the small sums
charged are within the reach of those who can have their days free
for study. How far would $40.00 go in musical education in the United
States? In America, vocal and piano teachers charge from $2 to $5
per lesson, to maintain their position among so-called first class
teachers. Car fares, Music, instruments, clothes, tickets for concerts,
operas, etc., would exhaust $40.00 in a month; and while an ambitious
brick-layer could easily pay $40.00 per year, for his child’s musical
education in a governmentally supported college, $40.00 per month would
represent the full wages of two of his girls, working all day long in
a department store. “Free Schools of Music” would not be nearly so
successful as “National Schools of Music,” because our people do not
like anything which tends to divide those who can pay, from those who
cannot. The wise among our well-to-do American parents now send their
children to our public schools, in preference to private academies,
knowing well the superior advantages thus gained. When it becomes known
that National Schools of Music are on a par with State universities,
offering the world’s best instruction and the very best advantages,
then graduation from such institutions will be a matter of pride to
anyone, rich or poor.


                        _The Question of Fees._

As we have said, the small sums required as entrance or tuition fees
by some of the musical institutions under governmental support, do not
detract from the value of such institutions; but it would scarcely
be just to place all of the conservatories so conditioned, upon a
par of public spiritedness with those which take no fees whatsoever
for tuition of native pupils, unless some superiority of educational
advantages in the former tend to equalize their benefits. It is
impracticable to judge of the merits of each institution, and such
a critical examination is not the purpose of this work; but mention
of the systems employed by a few countries showing special care of
national musical culture, may not be out of place here. Belgium has
produced much of the world’s genius, giving us from her conservatory
at Liege alone, such splendid artists as Martin Marsick, Ovid Musin,
Ysaye, Cesar Thomson and Remy. Liege charges no fees to native talent.
In his reply[41] to our request for information concerning fees in the
French, Belgian and Holland conservatories, Ovid Musin attributes the
marked artistic results of the Belgium conservatories to the fact that
the remuneration of the professors is such as to enable them to devote
their entire time to their conservatory pupils; foreigners pay 200
francs a year, but native students receive free tuition.

In response to a similar request concerning fees in Italian
governmental schools of Music, Signor Gatti-Casazza, director of the
Metropolitan Opera House of New York, replied that there were both free
and paying pupils.

The question of fees in all government schools of Music, would involve
an exhaustive research into the ideals behind the founding of each such
school, and into the resources upon which their maintenance depends.
Undoubtedly, the highest ideal in such undertakings is that which
animates the Belgian system, and insures its wonderful success. A close
study of Belgium’s management of her conservatories would be surely
illuminating and inspiring to our own country. This little country is
to be congratulated, as the holder of the musical laurels of both the
past and the present in national support of native talent. Her efforts
are signs of the live musical genius of Belgium, and show great state
care of musical culture. Belgium has always been a leader in musical
culture, and the world owes her a debt of gratitude for her products
of genius, only to be fully appreciated when the present abnormal
stage shall have passed, and the saner musical school be once more
established.

America owes much of her rarest pleasure to the varied genius presented
in Russian Music. May the lesson of Russia’s governmental care for
her subjects’ need of Music not be lost, in the prosperity of our too
commercialized United States of America.

Were it not for the excellent total of the Bavarian expenditures for
public education in Music, Germany as a whole would present a very
poor figure, for Saxony stands low, and the Prussian statistics were
“unavailable.”[42] Saxony, with the wonderful musical output, which
so delights the musical world is evidently in the hands of private
business, in which governmental protection and state cultivation
of Saxon talent as yet play but a small role. This is surprising,
considering the examples around Saxony, but her resources and history
must be taken into account in the judgment of her generosity.

Norway’s population is scarcely equal in number to that of one of
our medium sized American cities; hence her figures represent a true
love and care for Music, and the products of her musical genius fully
justify the support accorded. She holds her own in musical protection.

Denmark has enriched our American life with the strong free blood of
the North, and her Music, with its sweet sadness, has left its impress
upon American musical culture.

The Music-loving, and Music-needing Austrians will find the reason
of their care of national rhythm in the sorrows of their history,
for no other countries have suffered from the double tyranny of war
and religion as have Austria and Hungary, whose emotions have been
the harp upon which other powers have played continuously. Austria’s
position has not seemed sufficiently stable in history to include it
as a leading power separate from German influence, and though it is so
closely allied to Italy in temperament, its language and customs are
German and its recent history is closely analogous to that of Germany.
Yet Austria’s government is devoted to the musical interests of its
gifted subjects. This musical race has produced some of the noblest
talent, for her past sorrows and responsive temperament _needed_ Music
in a marked degree. Austria, standing so high among the large states
in musical culture, is to be congratulated for her brilliant example.
Austria’s figures as they stand, and without taking into consideration
the size of her population, would have placed her in the lead.

Swedish musical talent had taught us to expect much from Sweden, and
we are justified in this faith. The showing made by Sweden in a graph
of State care of musical culture, will find its cause likewise in its
history, for Sweden’s emotions have not been left to harden for lack
of use, and her acute sufferings have been manifested in a fineness
of musical talent, and in a love for the noble in Music, equal to the
progressiveness of her national mind. In comparative peace for 90
years, soothed by her “rhythm-giving” Music, who shall determine the
result of that noble tranquillity, which has been aided by her parental
care of the musical needs of her people? Sweden sets a splendid
example for the United States, since despite a comparative lack of
wealth, cold climate and seeming cheerlessness of environment, she
nevertheless nourishes the lovely flower of national Music. This shows
a progressiveness and care doubly commendable, when one considers
in addition to the above mentioned fact, the smallness of both her
population and her resources as compared with other countries.

The work of the Conservatory of Quito, Republic of Equador, deserves
high praise for the completeness of its outfit and evident success.
It is refreshing indeed to feel that Music holds so large a share of
public attention in this brave little Republic of the south. The study
of her musical statistics in Appendix C suggests very strongly that the
Latin races may have found in their Music, an antidote for the chilling
commercialism of modern civilization.

Holland, from whom we expected little in governmental support of Music,
presents a very good standing. We Americans, who are proud that Dutch
blood flows in our veins, could not do better than to take this small
nation as an example in national duty. She shows a praise-worthy care
for national musical culture. It is with pride in the showing made by
this distinguished little state that we call attention to her national
culture of music.

Hungary deserves high praise for the care of her musical talent as
represented in her statistics. Hungarian composition has ever possessed
a special charm for Americans. Much may be expected of a nation which
so cares for the musical need of its humblest members as to support
a symphony orchestra for the purpose of giving concerts for young
workmen in provincial towns, and for the propagation of artistic music
and culture.


FOOTNOTES:

[41] The communication will be found in Appendix E.

[42] See page 127.




                              APPENDIX E.

                            COMMUNICATIONS.


These letters are presented in condensed form for convenience.

  January 2, 1914.

Tuition for strangers in European conservatories is two hundred francs.
Entrance is dependent upon the proved musical ability, before an
examination committee, of the student to do serious work, since the
number of students in each class is limited to ten. Native students pay
only five francs.

                                                            OVID MUSIN.

       *       *       *       *       *

“The French and Belgian National and Royal Conservatories are not
only supported, but were founded and are managed by their governments
under their National and Royal Commissioners for the cultivation of
the Art of Music, _for the Art’s sake_. Instruction is without cost
to natives, but foreigners are taxed two hundred francs per year.
This money goes to the government, not to the professors.... The only
conservatory in France which is supported by the government is the
“Conservatoire national” of Paris. The Royal conservatories of Holland
and Belgium are unique, and entirely different in scheme from those
in any other country.... The difference between the government music
schools of France and Belgium lies in the fact that the remuneration
of the Director, professors and other officers is sufficient in the
case of Belgium to enable these ‘functionaries’ of the government to
devote their time exclusively to their office. In fact, the professors
are on the same plane as those of the Universities, whereas in France
the remuneration is quite small, and the professors of this National
Conservatory do not rely upon their salaries in order to live, as
in Belgium, and for that reason the artistic results of the Paris
Conservatory cannot be compared to the conservatories of Belgium.”

                                                       MRS. OVID MUSIN.

       *       *       *       *       *

“I believe that at the Conservatory of Milan there are two classes
of pupils. One is admitted to the courses in a fixed number, free of
charge, the other by payment.”

                                                         GATTI-CASAZZA,

                              _Director of the Metropolitan Opera House
                                                          of New York_.


                               AUSTRIA.

  Vienna, December 13, 1912.

Enclosed please find the governmental report and statistics for 1913
showing Austria’s appropriation for music.

                                                          WILLIAM BOPP,

                                    _Director of the Imperial and Royal
                                    Academy of Music and Plastic Arts_.

       *       *       *       *       *

                                                        _Crowns_
  State Conservatories, annually                         699,026
  Subventions to private musical schools                 332,208
  Subventions to orchestra, chorus, and other musical
      societies                                          135,850
  Prizes for Composers                                     7,000
  For other musicians                                     17,000
  State competitions for composers                         3,000
  Other expenses for music                               114,000
  Music Instruction in Public Schools                    302,000
  Singing Instruction in the Public Schools              120,000
  Extraordinary expenses in the years 1911-1913 for
      the new building of the Royal and Imperial
      Academy of Music                                 2,000,000
                                                      ----------
      Total                                            3,730,084


                               BAVARIA.

  Munich, April 21st, 1913.

  ROYAL MINISTER OF STATE,
  INTERIOR AND
  EDUCATION IN BAVARIA.

  _Concerning Music Expenditures in Bavaria._

In Bavaria there are two Music Institutions which are directed and
supported by the State. So far their income is not sufficient to cover
expenses. These institutions are the Royal Academy of Music In Munich
and the Royal Conservatory of Music in Wuerzburg.

The contribution of the State for the year’s budgets 1912-1913 is,
yearly:

                                                       _Marks_
  For the Royal Academy of Music in Munich              67,370
  For the Royal Conservatory in Wuerzburg               72,660

The expenditures for Music Instruction in Schools of the State are
yearly:

  For the Humanistic Gymnasiums and Real Gymnasiums    157,000
  For the Progymnasiums, Latin Schools, High Real
      Schools and Real Schools                         120,000
  For the Teacher Institutes (for both sexes)          286,000
                                                    ----------
                                                       703,030

The State does not contribute any sum for expenditures in the Royal
Theatres in Munich.

Also there is no endowment from the state for scholarships. There are
special private endowments for this purpose.

                                                               STEINER.


                               BELGIUM.

  Brussells, February 4th, 1913.

  MINISTRY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES.

  FINE ARTS OFFICE. SECTION NO. 31042.

The four Conservatories are State Institutions and the funds are
contributed from the State, the Province and the cities.

The subvention from the State is as follows:

                                                             _Francs_
  Conservatorium in Bruxelles                                 190,500
        ”         ” Liege                                     104,835
        ”         ” Gand                                       66,750
        ”         ” Anvers                                     65,190
  Annual subvention for Music schools                         130,000
  Annual subvention for symphonic and choral organizations     28,800
  Subventions to gifted composers, singers, players
      (subject to change) last year                            20,000
  (Concours de Rome) Annual scholarship award                   4,000
  Bureau of Studies                                            14,200
  Subvention to composers who represent their Opera
      in a Belgium Theatre, annually                            6,000
  Subvention for the publication of old Belgian composers,
      annually                                                 11,000
                                                           ----------
      Total of annual State subvention                        641,275

                                                            M. PHILLIS.


                               DENMARK.

  CONSULATE OF DENMARK.

  8-10 Bridge St.

  JNR. A.F. & I. 9/13.

  New York, May 8, 1913.[43]

  My Dear Sir:--

In further reference to your letter of March 19, I beg to inform you
that the sum of 10,000 Kroner has been granted to the Royal Music
Conservatory and of 1,000 Kroner to the so-called “Palace Concerts,”
besides this, various small amounts have been given to singers and
musicians to enable them to gain further experience abroad.

Hoping that this information will be of asistance, I am,

                                                      Yours very truly,

                                                               J. CLAN,
                                                      _Consul-General_.


                               ENGLAND.

  Telegrammes:--
  _Renseigne, London._

  BOARD OF EDUCATION.

  WHITEHALL, LONDON, S. W.

  December 24th, 1912.

No part of the grant paid by the Board of Education to schools, or
other educational institutions where music is taught is ear-marked for
the instruction of music.

An annual grant of £500 each is made by the State to the Royal Academy
of Music and the Royal College of Music. A similar grant of £300 per
annum is made to the Royal Irish Academy of Music.

The Army Estimates for the financial year 1912-1913 include sums of
£21,700 in aid of band expenses in the Regular Army and £3,300 in aid
of the Army School of Music. Singing and music are taught in some
establishments for military education, but the expenditures in these
subjects can not be separated from the rest of the expenditures.

There is no State subvention of opera.

                                                      Yours faithfully,
                                                       A. W. TWENLYMAN.

This presents English musical expenditures as follows:

 Annual Grants by State to:--

                                       _Pounds_
  Royal Academy of Music                   500
  Royal College of Music                   500
  Irish Academy of Music                   300
  Army Band expenses in Regular Army    21,700
  Schools of Music                       3,300
                                        ------
          Total                         26,300




                               EQUADOR.

  August 31st, 1913.

The National Conservatory of Music was founded April 26th, 1900, by
Executive-Judicial Decree.

_Initial Government Subventions._

                    1900               _Sucres_
  Installation Funds                   2,000.00
  Salaries                            12,000.00
  Musical Instruments and Music        3,510.30
                   1903-5.
  Musical Instruments and Music       35,000.00
  Maintenance                         58,780.00

_Annual Government Subventions since 1905._

                    _Sucres_
  1906                23,000
  1907                23,000
  1908                22,000
  1909                25,380
  1910                27,540
  1911                31,500
  1912                28,500
  1913                28,500

The first year’s class, 1900, numbered ninety-three men and thirty-one
women. The class of 1913, included two hundred and twenty-six men and
two hundred and thirteen women.

                                                         THE DIRECTORS,
                                      _National Conservatory of Music_,
                                                        Quito, Equador.


                                FRANCE.

  February 9, 1913.

Here are all the official statistics--obtained this very morning.

                                                            I. PHILIPP,
                                       _Professor, Paris Conservatory_.

                                                  _Francs_
  Music Inspectors, annually                        14,200
  Travelling expenses                                3,000
  French Academy in Rome, one-fifth of total        29,195
  National Conservatory: Professors                197,300
                         Material                   41,350
                         Indemnities                41,223
                         Branch Institutes         156,500
  National Theatres, Subventions                 1,225,000
  Music Library of the Opera House                   6,000
  Popular Concerts                                 133,500
  Subventions to Musical Societies                   7,100
  Palace of the Trocadero, for the Music Hall       13,000
  Subventions to musicians                         103,750
                                                ----------
          Total annually                         1,971,118


                               HOLLAND.

  MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR, NO. 733.

  Afdeeling K. W. Ministerie Van
  Binnenlandsche Zaken Gravenhage,

  March 19, 1913.

                                                          _Florins_
  1. Subsidizing of Conservatories                          27,000
  2. Subsidies for poor, young, gifted musicians of both
        sexes, as help in their studies                      5,000
  3. For military bands                                    186,000

                                                         TH. HEEMSKERK,
                                          _Minister of the Interior and
                                         Secretary-General of Holland_.


                                NORWAY.

  Christiania, Dec. 15, 1912.

Our theatres have no governmental subsidy. Music in the public schools
is a local not a federal matter.

We have no conservatories of the usual European type but there are
smaller music schools and schools for organists which are in part
subventioned by the State.

What the State spends for purposes of music can be described as follows:

                                         _Crowns_
  Military Music annually                160,000
  Subvention to composers                  5,200
  Subvention to other musicians            6,000
  Music schools                            4,500
                                       ---------
        Total, annually                  175,700

                                                     Most respectfully,

                                                            OLE OLESON,
                                             _Army Inspector of Music_.


                                ITALY.

  Rome, February 14, 1913.

  MINISTRY OF INSTRUCTION.

  GENERAL OFFICE
  OF THE DIRECTOR
  OF ANTIQUITIES & FINE ARTS.

  Posiz. 21 aff. gen.
        N. di.

  PROT. 339. SUBJECT: STATISTICAL INQUIRY.

The Italian Government appropriates 440,500 Lire for professional
salaries and 146,400 Lire for administration expenses in connection
with the five national conservatories of music among which the former
amount is apportioned as follows:

                                            _Lire_
  Milan Conservatory of Music              102,000
  Naples      ”       ”   ”                107,000
  Palermo     ”       ”   ”                 80,000
  Parma       ”       ”   ”                 71,500
  Florence Musical Institute                80,000

There is an additional appropriation approximately 30,000 Lire for
extraordinary or temporary compensation to the personnel of these
various schools.

  Instruments, etc.                                      131,440
  Annual Government Subvention to the City Conservatory
        of Music at Rome                                 101,000
  Annual subvention to pupils                              2,000

                                                       (LUIGI) CREDARO,
                                      _Minister of Public Instruction_.


                               PRUSSIA.

  AMERICAN CONSULATE GENERAL,
  BERLIN, GERMANY.

  March 10, 1913.

I acknowledge receipt of your letter of February 9, 1913, relative to
expenditures of the Prussian Government for the benefit of musical art.

I am informed by the Prussian Statistical Bureau that no definite
figures are available as to expenditures in this branch of education.
The Prussian Minister of Education has also been unable to inform me of
the amount utilized in this particular branch. He adds that the amount
so expended varies from year to year.

Aside from the Prussian Government various municipalities within the
Kingdom occasionally make money grants for the encouragement of musical
students. Last year, for example, the City of Berlin voted Marks 60,000
($14,280.) in order that the Philharmonic Orchestra might be retained
in the city during the summer months instead of visiting sea shore and
other resorts. In consideration of this subsidy, the orchestra played
popular concerts at certain large halls at a nominal rate of admission.

The German Emperor in his private capacity is a liberal contributor
to musical art. He makes money grants annually for the support of the
Royal Opera in Berlin, the amount varying with each year’s needs. The
amount of this contribution is not made public.

The foregoing is the most definite information obtainable on this
subject. I hope it may be of some service to you.

                                               Very respectfully yours,
                                                           M. THACKARA,
                                             _American Consul General_.


                               HUNGARY.

The following list of governmental institutions for musical culture
in Hungary were kindly submitted by Dr. Paul Majouszky, Chief of the
Fine-Art Section, and Naray-Szabó, State Secretary.

                                                              _Crowns_
  The Musical Academy of Budapest receives a yearly
        sum of (from Budget of 1913)                           385,233
  School Fees amount to                                         54,440
  Yearly subventions to Music Schools maintained by
        provincial towns and associations                       56,000
  Assistance to musicians, especially to composers for
        studies in foreign countries and for publishing
        musical compositions                                     8,000
  For general musical aims, orchestras, concert subventions
        of musical works                                       122,000
  For maintenance of Philharmonic Society formed by
        members of the Royal Hungarian Opera, and
        the Symphonic Orchestra founded by the State
        in order to give concerts for the young workmen
        in provincial towns                                    120,000
  For the maintenance of the Royal Opera Orchestra
        and the payment of its Director                        343,500
  For the Choral Society of the Budapest Royal Hungarian
        University                                                 700
  For the Choral Society of the Joseph Polytechnical
        High School                                              1,000
  And for its Orchestra                                          1,500
  Toward salaries of Music Teachers in schools                  88,100
  For Military Music Bands                                      76,000
                                                           -----------
                                                             1,202,033


                                RUSSIA.

  IMPERIAL RUSSIAN EMBASSY.

  WASHINGTON, D. C.

  Washington, May 28, 1913.
  No. 193.

The exact sum spent annually in subventions to music by the Imperial
Ministry of the Interior is 139,900 Roubles per annum.

                                                 ALEXANDER LYSSAKOVSKY.
                                      _First Secretary of the Embassy._


                                SAXONY.

  Dresden, April 8th, 1913.

  Königlich-Sächsisches
  Ministerium des Innern.

  No. 627 III. F.

There are no State Conservatories or State Schools for musical
education in Saxony.

The institutions for musical education under control of the ministerial
department are various private undertakings.

For artistic development in music the undersigned Ministry allows 5,000
marks a year. This support is for part or whole tuition for unusually
gifted and studious men and women students who belong in Saxony.

                                         (Graf) VITZTHUM VON ECKSTAEDT,
                              _Royal Minister of the Interior, Saxony_.


                                SWEDEN.

Royal Conservatory of Music.

  Stockholm, January 4th, 1913.


The yearly subventions of the Swedish Government for music according to
the latest available sources:

                                                         _Crowns_
  Annual subvention from the State for the Royal
      Academy of Music and the Royal Conservatory       85,649.67
  Subvention to the Royal Opera House                   60,000.00
  Subventions to Swedish Composers                      15,000.00
  Musical Instruction in public schools                124,367.50
  Military orchestras                                1,027,424.10
  Two orchestras                                        28,000.00
                                                     ------------
      Total of annual subvention                     1,340,441.27

                                                           BR. BECKMAN.


                            UNITED STATES.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF EDUCATION,

  Washington, D. C., March 5, 1913.


1. The American government does not make any appropriation whatsoever
for the instruction of pupils in public conservatories.

2. So far as known to this office, none of the states contribute sums
for the same purpose.

3. The American government does not make any subvention for grand
opera. In so far as this Bureau has been able to obtain information, no
such subvention is made by any state.

4. So far as known to this Bureau, there is no subvention for orchestra
organizations or choral societies.

5. So far as known to this Bureau there are no prizes granted by the
State for musical achievements to composers, singers or players.

6. There is no endowment by the federal government to enable young
gifted musicians to complete their musical education in America or
abroad.

I may say that instruction in music is given in some of the Indian
schools maintained by the federal government and such schools also
have musical organizations. No specific appropriation for instruction
in music, however, is made by the federal government. This statement
applies also to state-aided institutions.

                                                          Respectfully,
                                                         T. A. KALBACH,
                                                         _Chief Clerk_.


                               HUNGARY.

  ROYAL HUNGARIAN MINISTRY
  OF PUBLIC WORSHIP AND EDUCATION
  BUDAPEST
  N. 13577

  TRANSLATION.

I have the honour to give you the information you asked in your letter
from the 11th January, 1913. There is only one musical school, a
high-school, of the state in Hungary: the Music Academy in Budapest.
The budget of the present year provides the sum of 385.233 crowns for
the maintenance of that institute. After deducting the school fees
of 54.440 cr. the state has to spend yearly 333.793 cr. The state
gives also to the music schools maintained by provincial towns and
associations a yearly subvention of 56.000 cr. that is increasing
from year to year. To the purpose of assisting musicians, especially
composers to make studies in foreign countries, and of publishing
musical compositions and a collection of popular songs, the budget
provides 8,000 cr. For general musical aims, (orchestras, concerts,
subventions of musical works, etc.) 122.000 cr. are destined, specially
120.000 cr. to the maintenance of the philharmonic society formed by
members of the Royal Hung. Opera and the Symphony Orchestra founded
by the state in order to give concerts for the young workmen, etc. in
provincial towns and to the propagation of artistic music and culture.
The maintenance of the Royal Opera Orchestra and the payment of its
dirigent require 343.500 cr. The capital Budapest maintains a course
of music, and number of provincial towns maintain music schools and
orchestras without any assistance of the state. As for the costs of
military bands I shall have the honour to give you subsequently the
necessary information.

Budapest, the 23d March 1913.

                                                      For the minister:
                                                  (Signed) NARAY-SZABO,
                                                     _State Secretary_.

       *       *       *       *       *

  ROYAL HUNGARIAN MINISTRY
  OF PUBLIC WORSHIP AND EDUCATION
  BUDAPEST
  N. 124655

I have the honour to give you the supplementary information I promised,
when answering (N. 13577, 12th April) your letter from the 11th
January. The Hungarian State at present gives an annual subsidy of 700
crowns to the choral society of Budapest Royal Hungarian University,
1000 crowns to the choral society and 1500 to the orchestra of the
Joseph Olytechnical High School. In the middle schools (Colleges and
Real Schools) the musical teaching is not yet perfectly organized, the
fees for the courses are paid by the pupils, the state contributes to
the salaries of music teachers. The annual costs of the said teaching
amount (including a salary of 6400 cr. for the inspector) in girl
schools to 74,500, in medico-pedagogical institutes to 13,600 cr.,
those for the maintenance of military music-bands in the regular army
76,400 crowns.

Budapest, the 24th July, 1913.

                                              By order of the Minister,
                                            (Signed) DR. PAUL MAJOWZKY,
                                       _Chief of the Fine-Art Section_.


FOOTNOTES:

[43] Another letter dated May 13, 1913, adds “9,600 Kroner to the
different concert associations,” bringing Denmark’s annual expenditure
for musical education up to a total of 20,600 Kroner.




                              APPENDIX F.


                             BIBLIOGRAPHY.


AMERICAN HISTORY AND ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MUSIC THE.: Irving Square, New
York.

BAILEY, L. H.: Country Life Movement, 1911, MacMillan Co.

BRYCE, JAMES: The American Commonwealth, 1911, MacMillan Co.

BULFINCH, THOMAS: Age of Fables, John D. Morris & Co., No. 122 of
Edition de Luxe.

CAESAR, JULIUS: De Bello Gallico.

CARHART, H. S.: University Physics, Part I, Allan & Bacon, Boston.

DARWIN, CHARLES: Descent of Man, 1909, Appleton & Co., Second Edition.

DEFURSAC, J. ROGUES: Manual of Psychiatry, 1908, John Wiley & Sons, New
York.

DICKINSON, EDWARD: The Study of the History of Music, 1912, Chas.
Scribner’s Sons, New York.

ELLIS, HAVELOCK: Studies in the Psychology of Sex, 1906, F. R. Davis
Co., Philadelphia.

ELLIS AND HORNE: The Story of the Greatest Nations, Niglutsch.

GALTON: Hereditary Genius and English Men of Science.

GIBBINS, H. DE B.: Industry in England, 1907, Charles Scribner’s Sons,
New York.

GIBBONS, ED.: Roman Empire, Hurst & Co., New York.

GIDDINGS: Democracy and Empire, 1912, MacMillan Co.; Principles of
Sociology, 1911, MacMillan Co.; Descriptive and Historical Sociology,
1909, MacMillan Co.; Inductive Sociology, 1909, MacMillan Co.; Elements
of Sociology, 1898, MacMillan Co.; “Sociology,” a lecture published in
1908 by the Columbia Press.

GROTE, GEORGE: Greece, Peter Fenelon Collier & Son, New York.

GUMMERE, FRANCIS B.: Germanic Origins, 1892, Chas. Scribner’s Sons, New
York.

GUMPLOVICZ, LUDWIG: Rassenkampf, 1909, Innsbruck, Wagnersche univ.
buchhadlung.

GURNEY, EDMUND: The Power of Sound, 1880, Smith, Elder & Co., London.

HADDON, A. C.: The Wandering of Peoples.

HARRISON, JANE ELLEN: “Themis.”

HAWEIS, REV. H. R.: Music and Morals, 1876, Harper & Bros., New York.

HAWES, C. H. AND H. B.: Crete, The Forerunner of Greece, 1911, Harper &
Bros.

HELMHOLTZ, HERMANN L. F.: Sensations of Tone, 1912, Longmans, Green &
Co.

HAEKEL, ERNST: Riddle of the Universe, Harper & Bros., N. Y. and London.

HERVEY, ARTHUR: Masters of French Music, 1896, Chas. Scribner’s Sons.

HISTORICAL PUBLISHING CO., THE, London, Philadelphia. The Drama.

HOUGH AND SEDGWICK: The Human Mechanism, Ginn & Co.

HOWELL, WILLIAM H.: Text-Book of Physiology, 1907, V. B. Saunders Co.,
New York.

HUEFFER, FRANCIS: Half a Century of Music in England, 1889, Gebbie & Co.

JANET, PIERRE: The Major Symptoms of Hysteria, 1907, MacMillan Co.

JENCKS AND LAUCK: Immigration Problem, 1912, Funk & Wagnalls Co.

KEANE, A. H.: The World’s Peoples, 1908, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York.

KITTO, JOHN: Palestine, Peter Fenelon Collier & Son, New York.

KRAEPELIN, DR. EMIL: Clinical Psychiatry, 2nd Edition, William Wood &
Co., 1906.

LANSON, GUSTAV: Histoire de la litterature francaise, 1894, Hachette &
Co., Paris.

LAVIGNAC, ALBERT: Music and Musicians, 1899, Henry Holt & Co., New York.

LETOURNEAU, CHAS.: Property, Its Origin and Development, 1896, Charles
Scribner’s Sons, New York.

MAINE, HENRY SUMNER: Lectures on the Early History of Institutions.

MAITLAND, FULLER: Masters of German Music, 1894, Osgood, McIlvaine &
Co., London.

MARX, DR. KARL: Capital, 1909, Chas. H. Kerr & Co., Chicago.

MORGAN, LEWIS H.: Ancient Peoples.

MYRES, J. L.: The Dawn of History, 1911, Williams and Norgate, London.

OCHEA: Tesoro del Teatro Espanol, Tomo IV, 1898, Garnier Hermanos,
Paris.

REINSCH, PAUL S.: American Federal Government, Ginn & Co.

RIPLEY, WILLIAM G.: The Races of Europe.

ROUSSEAU, J. J.: Du contrat social, Ernest Flammarion, Paris.

RUTHERFORD, E.: Radio Activity, 1905, Cambridge, University Press.

SCHOPENHAUER, ARTHUR: The World as Will and Idea, 1907-9, K. Paul,
Trench, Trubner & Co., London.

SEAGER, HENRY ROGERS: Social Insurance, 1910, The MacMillan Co., Amer.
Social Progress Series.

SEEBOHM, FREDERICK: Tribal Customs in Anglo-Saxon Law, 1902, Longmans,
Green & Co., New York.; The Tribal System in Wales, 1904, Longmans,
Green & Co., New York.

SPENCER, HERBERT: First Principles.; Synthetic Philosophy, 1900, D.
Appleton & Co.; Principles of Biology, 1900, D. Appleton & Co.

STANDARD AMERICAN ENCYCLOPEDIA, THE.

STEINER, EDWARD A.: On the Trail of the Immigrant, 1906, Fleming H.
Revell Co.

STORRING, GUSTAV: Mental Pathology and Normal Psychology, 1907, Swan,
Sonnenschein & Co., London.

STREATFIELD, R. A.: The Opera, 1907, George Routledge & Sons, Limited,
London.

SUMNER, WILLIAM J.: Folk Ways, 1907, Ginn & Co., Boston.

SYMONDS, JOHN ADDINGTON: Renaissance in Italy, 1907, Chas. Scribner’s
Sons, New York.

TACITUS: Germania, 1911, G. Bell & Sons, London.

TAYLOR, ISAAC: The Origin of the Aryans.

THOMAS, WILLIAM J.: Source Book for Social Origins, 1909, The
University of Chicago Press.

THOMSON, J. ARTHUR: Darwinism and Human Life.

THORNDIKE, EDWARD A.: Educational Psychology, 1903, The Science Press,
New York.

TILLEY, ARTHUR: The Literature of the French Renaissance, 1904,
Cambridge, at the University Press.

WALLASCHEK, RICHARD: Primitive Music, 1893, Longmans, Green & Co.

WARD, LESTER: Applied Sociology, 1906, Ginn and Co.

WEBB, SIDNEY AND BEATRICE: Industrial Democracy, 1911, Longmans, Green
& Co., London.

WILLEBY, CHAS.: Masters of English Music, 1893, Jas. R. Osgood,
McIlvaine & Co., London.

WOOLDRIDGE, H. E.: The Oxford History of Music, 1901, Oxford, at the
Clarendon Press.




                                 VITA.


The writer was graduated from New York University in 1900 with the
degree of Bachelor of Laws. She entered Columbia University in 1907
where she received the degrees of Bachelor of Music in 1910, and of
Master of Arts in 1911.

She is the author of “The Advanced School of Vocal Art,” and of various
operatic libretti, and the translator of numerous published poems from
the French, German, Italian and Spanish.

During 1902-1904, she was a contributor from Russia to “The Brooklyn
Daily Eagle,” and, in 1912, to various periodicals. During 1904-1913,
she was one of the four directors of The Powell and Pirani Musical
Institute of Brooklyn, New York.

In 1909, she was one of the incorporators of “The Public Good Society
of New York City,” and was elected its president, which position she
still holds.

In 1912 she was elected honorary member of the American Philharmonic
Society.




                                 INDEX


  _A_

  Abnormality in Modern Life, 64

  Accident at Sea, 45

  Adaptation of physical functions, 22

  Adequate training, 9

  Age of Music, 36

  Agitation, 6

  Agitation tranquillized, 41

  American craving for rhythm, 95

  American industry, 8

  American talent, 8

  American type of music, 93

  Animals and musical sound, 27

  Appeal of the work, 14

  Appreciation in music, 33

  Aryan appreciation, 39

  Aryan disturbances, 39

  Aryan talent, 25

  Auber and the social mind, 87

  Austria, 114

  Awakening in Italy, 67


  _B_

  Barbarism and its music, 37

  Barders of Tacitus, 30

  Bavaria, 115

  Belgium, 117

  Bellini and the social mind, 62

  Berlioz and the social mind, 85

  Bibliography, 138

  Boildieu and the social mind, 86

  British emotions, 69


  _C_

  Canada and its type of Music, 50

  Catholicism and the ideo-Motor element, 51

  Characterization in music, 30

  Characteristic Italian composition, 67

  Children and Sound, 29

  Chinese use of music, 24

  Chopin and the social mind, 85

  Church influence and the ballad, 91

  Church Choirs, 54

  Church pressure in the United States, 94

  Civilization and bodily disturbance, 7

  Civilization and rhythm disturbances, 37

  Classes reached by musical schools, 10

  Complexity in social pressure, 93

  Complexity in music, 32-36

  Complications in Orchestration, 85-87

  Concerted volition in music, 34

  Concert Tests in Coney Island, 41

  Concert Tests in England, 41

  Concert Tests in Germany, 41

  Concert Tests in Russia, 41

  Concert Tests in United States, 41

  Concert Tests upon Italian Stone Cutters, 50

  Coney Island response to Musical Stimulus, 43

  Contrasts in French and German re-actions, 84


  _D_

  Dancing a need, 65

  Darwin’s theory of music, 19

  Dawn of musical history, 38

  Deafness and carriage motion, 48

  Deafness and music, 48

  Deafness and the telephone, 48

  Decay of the Gens, 36-37

  Denmark, 118

  Depression and Musical stimulus, 46

  Desire for music, 14

  Development of ideas, 25

  Development of internal integrations, 23

  Disturbance expressions, 24

  Disturbance of bodily rhythm, 6

  Disturbances defined, 32

  Dogmatic emotional need, 51

  Donizetti and the social mind, 62


  _E_

  Economic movements, 5

  Effects of rhythmic stimulus, 42-46

  Emotional forces, 5

  Emotional products in music, 56

  Emotions and sound, 13

  England, 119

  English composition, 69

  English support of musical culture, 70

  Equador, 121

  European recognition of Musical need, 10

  Evolution Stages (a) Appreciation, 33
    (b) Utilization, 33
    (c) Characterization, 33
    (d) Socialization, 33

  Evolution of the Eye, 22

  Ethnic music, 36

  Excitable natures, 48

  Experiments, 43


  _F_

  Fees, 105

  First responses to stimuli, 22

  First inter-change of ideas, 22

  First rhythmic inventions, 23

  Foreign talent, 94

  France, 81-122

  Franck and the social mind, 89

  French intellectualism in music, 56

  French opera, 85

  French re-actions, 81


  _G_

  Gens system and emotionalism, 39

  Gentile family, 36

  German folk spirit, 74

  German grand opera, 49

  German lieder, 49

  Germanic tribal music, 29

  Germany, 71

  Giddings note, 34

  Greek Church type, 50

  Gounod and the social mind, 89

  Group re-action to music, 41

  Group tendency in music, 7


  _H_

  Haeckel’s note, 21

  Heart action and modern stimuli, 29

  Heroic opera, 74

  Hindus and the musical ideal, 24

  Holland, 123

  Human liking for like musical motion, 35

  Hungary, 129-135

  Hylobates syndactylus, 22

  Hymnal music, 92


  _I_

  Ideo emotional groups, 49

  Indebtedness for statistics, 16

  Individual experiments, 47

  Inspiration in Columbia College courses, 17

  Intellectual stimuli of tribal life, 27

  Italian Ideals, 65

  Italian life and papal authority, 62

  Italy, 125


  _J_

  Japan’s use of music, 24


  _K_

  Knightly ballad taste, 72


  _L_

  Laws of motion and the body, 58

  Laws of need, 42

  Lectures with music, 45

  Lectures without music, 45

  Life preservation and music, 58

  Live force in musical vibrations, 26


  _M_

  Massenet and the social mind, 89

  Mascagni and the social mind, 67

  Mean rhythm of aggregates, 31

  Measurement of musical effects, 26

  Mental attitude of 1821, 74

  Mendelssohn and the social pressure, 76

  Meyerbeer and the social mind, 87

  Milder stimuli and musical expression, 80

  Mission of music, 13

  Music and Motion, 31

  Music as a health measure, 55

  Music as a national need, 28

  Music and national disturbances, 60

  Music as an incident force, 59

  Music and social control, 16

  Music for rhythm maintenance, 31

  Music as an industry, 9

  Music in Colleges, 10

  Music taxation, 11

  Music of birds, 27

  Music in carriage motion, 48

  Musical employment field, 8-94

  Musical madness, 89

  Musical statistics, 12

  Musical tone in railway motions, 48

  Musical tone in telephones, 48

  Musical tone in wash of waves, 48

  Musical tone in winds, 48

  Musical valves for American emotionalism, 95


  _N_

  Napoleon’s influence on music, 83

  National control of music, 7

  National stimuli, 60

  National type of music, 10-55

  Nature and music, 19

  New combination of tone and nerve, 59

  New organs for new stimuli, 37

  Normal pulse action, 56

  Normalizing effect of music, 48

  Northern immigration, 92

  Norway, 124


  _O_

  Ocean Grove mental type, 51

  Opera comique under Mehul, 86

  Orchestral complexity, 85


  _P_

  Paleolithic man and percussion, 36

  Panic calmed by National songs, 46

  Partially deaf re-actions to music, 27

  Passion for homogeneity, 36

  Peace and Parsifal, 80

  Peace and religious agitation, 88

  Periodic Motions, 39

  Phlegmatic natures, 48

  Pioneer life and social pressure, 91

  Popular waves of feeling, 6

  Primitive man’s rhythmic life, 21

  Primitive speech as rhythmic disturber, 23

  Proper study of music, 15

  Prussia, 127

  Public emotionalism, 6

  Public school musical instruction, 94


  _R_

  Rational thinking and Gidding’s definition, 40

  Rationalistic group, 52

  Rationalistic music, 52

  Real elements of music, 22

  Rebellious fanaticism, 83

  Recent absurdities in musical form, 62

  Recent immigration, 93

  Realm of musical need, 53

  Reflective Sympathy and music, 35

  Response of the masses, 5

  Registration of rhythm, 39

  Religious atmosphere in U. S., 92

  Revolutionary character of Tristan 1865, 78

  Rise of industrial complications, 92

  Rossini and the social mind, 62-86

  Russia, 130

  Russian audiences, 49


  _S_

  Saint-Saens and the social mind, 89

  Savagery and its music, 37

  Saxony, 131

  Schumann and the social mind, 49

  Science and musical study, 15

  Schubert and the social mind, 72

  Separation of church and state, 89

  Social want, 10

  Social welfare, 15

  Social mind in France, 82

  Sociological terminology in music, 35

  Sources of conclusions, 41

  Sources of statistics, 74-99

  Spencer’s theory of music, 20

  Spontini and the Napoleonic regime, 86

  State and Municipal expenditure, 10

  Strenuous years 1848 to 1860, 65


  _T_

  Tension in strikes, 46

  Tests among revolutionary elements, 54

  Tendency toward musical equality, 36

  Theory of rhythm, 12

  Thesis, 7

  Toneurology, 56

  Tragedy element in Italian life, 61

  Tribal life and rhythmic disturbances, 23


  _U_

  United States, 91-133

  Untalented citizens, 15

  Universal craving for music, 53

  Utility aspect of music, 33


  _V_

  Value of New York expenditures, 10

  Value of percussion, 23

  Value of music with the dance, 64

  Verdi and the social mind, 65

  Vibratory impulse, 30

  Vita, 143

  Vocalism extraordinary, 62

  Von Weber and the social mind, 74


  _W_

  Wagner and the social mind, 50

  Wallascheks, 20

  Waltz, social significance of, 77

  War factor in music of tribes, 25

  Wave (the) of emotionalism 1861, 92

  Western music, 9

  Working girl’s tests, 41-54

  Working girl’s club, 46




Transcriber’s Notes

Errors in punctuation have been fixed.

Page 19: “there mnst lie” changed to “there must lie”

Page 24: “sub-conscions recognition” changed to “sub-conscious
recognition”

Page 27: “same muscial environment” changed to “musical environment”

Page 39: “held togther” changed to “held together”

Page 46: “the “Marsellaise”” changed to “the “Marseillaise””

Page 58: “pyschology” changed to “psychology” in two locations

Page 73: “Eightenth century” changed to “Eighteenth century”

Page 75: “paino works” changed to “piano works”

Page 87: “musical composiiton” changed to “musical composition”

Page 92: “the agitaiton of” changed to “the agitation of”

Page 94: “thousands of professioanl” changed to “thousands of
professional”

Page 148: “Primitive speach” changed to “Primitive speech” “Sources of
satistics” changed to “Sources of statistics”

Page 150: “life and rhythmis” changed to “life and rhythmic”