HOW TO WRITE
  THE HISTORY OF A PARISH.




  HOW TO WRITE
  THE HISTORY OF A PARISH.

  BY
  J. CHARLES COX,

  AUTHOR OF “NOTES ON THE CHURCHES OF DERBYSHIRE,” ETC.

  “Every man’s concern with the place where he lives, has something
  more in it than the mere amount of rates and taxes that he
  has to pay.”--_Toulmin Smith._

  LONDON:
  BEMROSE & SONS, 10, PATERNOSTER BUILDINGS;
  AND DERBY.
  1879.




ENTERED AT STATIONERS’ HALL.





  TO THE
  REV. THOMAS PRESTON NOWELL BAXTER, M.A.,
  (LATE FELLOW OF ST. CATHARINE’S COLL., CAMBRIDGE.)
  RECTOR OF HAWERBY, AND RURAL DEAN,
  WHO FIRST SUGGESTED
  THE WRITING OF THIS LITTLE HAND-BOOK,
  THESE PAGES
  ARE RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED.

  [Illustration]




[Illustration]

PREFACE.


Some of the Clergy of the Diocese of Lincoln are responsible for the
issue of this booklet. A much-needed county history of Lincolnshire is
now being projected, upon the basis of separate parochial histories.
A circular put forth in one of the rural deaneries was good enough to
refer in laudatory terms to the introduction to the first volume of
my _Notes on the Churches of Derbyshire_. This led to my being asked
to re-publish that introduction; but it applied so peculiarly to
Derbyshire that I felt it would be of small avail to those outside the
county. Hence I decided to put together some hints that might prove a
help to those who may be desirous of undertaking parochial history in
any part of the kingdom, whether manorial, ecclesiastical, or both. In
the first part of these pages I am indebted to Thomas’s “Handbook to
the Public Records,” and more especially to Sims’s invaluable “Manual
for the Topographer and Genealogist;” but I have not referred to any
class of documents with which I am not in some measure personally
conversant.

Those who have been engaged in any literary work are well aware how
large a portion of time is often spent in merely learning the titles
and somewhat of the contents of those books that treat of the different
branches of the subject selected. Various books connected with
parochial history, especially those that have been proved by experience
to be the best hand-books, are therefore mentioned in these pages to
facilitate reference. Space only has prevented me from considerably
adding both to their number and description, but any further knowledge
that I may have gleaned on topographical literature is heartily at the
disposal of any _worker_ who may privately apply to me.

I shall be grateful for any correction of errors, or for any suggestion
as to deficiencies.

[Illustration]




[Illustration]




[Illustration]

ABBREVIATIONS.


P.R.O.--For the Public Record Office. Almost the whole of our national
records, which were until recently in upwards of half-a-dozen different
buildings, are now under one roof in Fetter Lane, Fleet Street. All
documents mentioned in the following pages must be understood to be at
the Public Record Office, unless it is otherwise stated. Several of
the earlier folio publications of the Record Commissioners, to which
reference is herein made, are out of print, but they are to be found in
most of our public libraries.

B. M.--For the Library of the British Museum.

B.--For the Bodleian Library, Oxford.

C.--For the University Library, Cambridge.

[Illustration]




[Illustration]

HOW TO WRITE THE HISTORY OF A PARISH.




Etymology.


Not only should the etymology of the name of the parish be carefully
considered, and its various forms of spelling be collected, from
Domesday Book downwards, but a list should be made of the whole of the
names of the physical features, such as hills, streams, and lanes, and
especially of the field-names. Field-names--which will often establish
the sites of disused chapels or manor-houses, of Celtic burials or
Roman roads, as well as help to decide the nationality of the colonists
that predominated in the district--can be sometimes gleaned from old
private estate maps, or other exceptional sources, but the “Award”
maps of Inclosure Commissioners from 1710 downwards, or the Tithe
Commutation maps of 1836, are the chief and most reliable sources.
These maps should be in most parish chests, but they have often
illegally strayed into the private hands of solicitors, churchwardens,
etc. When lost or difficult of access, the original maps can usually
be seen at the offices of the Copyhold Inclosure and Tithe Commission,
3, St. James’s Square, on payment of 2s. 6d.; but under certain Acts
the originals will be found, or rather ought to be found and to be
accessible, at the Clerk of the Peace’s office for the county.

The best hand-books on local etymology are--Taylor’s “Words and
Places,” and Edmund’s “Names of Places.” Leo on “The Local Nomenclature
of the Anglo-Saxons,” Charnock’s “Local Etymology and Derivative
Dictionary,” and Ferguson’s “River Names,” and “Teutonic Name System”
may also be consulted with advantage.




“Prehistoric” Remains.


If there are any so-called “Druidical” (almost invariably a complete
misnomer) or other “prehistoric” remains of that class, not a word
should be written respecting them until Fergusson’s “Rude Stone
Monuments” has been thoroughly digested. Though published in 1872, not
one of the old-fashioned antiquaries has made any serious attempt to
refute its conclusions.

The best work on tumuli, or barrows, is Canon Greenwell’s “British
Barrows.” See also Bateman’s “Ten Years’ Diggings in Celtic and Saxon
Grave Hills.” The two last essays of Sir John Lubbock’s “Scientific
Lectures” give a popular account of that branch of prehistoric
archæology which deals with the palæolithic and neolithic periods,
_i.e._, with the races who respectively used the chipped and ground
weapons of stone.




History of the Manor.


THE ANGLO-SAXON CHRONICLE, and other Old English chronicles, should
be consulted for possible early mention of the parish. Most of these
have been cheaply printed in an English dress in Bohn’s Antiquarian
Series. In Kemble’s “Saxons in England” will be found a good list of
the old tribal divisions into “marks.” Thorpe’s _Diplomatarium Anglicum
Ævi Saxonici_ is an admirable collection of early charters (with
translations); some of the wills contain many place-names; the volume
is indifferently indexed.

THE DOMESDAY BOOK, compiled in 1085-6, is preserved at the Chapter
House, Westminster. It gives particulars of all the different manors
throughout England, excepting those of Northumberland, Cumberland,
Westmoreland, and Durham. It was printed in two large volumes in 1783,
and a third volume of indexes and introductory matter added in 1811.
A most valuable “General Introduction” was published in 1833, by Sir
Henry Ellis. The Ordnance Survey have recently brought out a fac-simile
edition of the Domesday Book, produced by Photo-zincography, which can
be obtained in separate counties. The extended text and translation of
most counties can also be procured.

The Book of Exeter and the Book of Ely are of the same date, and
no doubt copied from the same returns as Domesday Book itself, but
they contain many more details. The former, preserved at Exeter
Cathedral, comprises the counties of Wilts, Dorset, Somerset, Devon,
and Cornwall; the latter, now in the British Museum, relates to
Cambridge, Hertford, Essex, Norfolk, Suffolk, and Huntingdon. The Book
of Winchester (Society of Antiquaries) relates to that borough; it was
made in 1148. The Boldon Book is a survey of the county palatinate of
Durham, taken in 1183; there are three copies, two at Durham, and one
at the Bodleian. These four minor Surveys were published by the Record
Commissioners in one volume in 1816.

KNIGHT’S FEES. When England was subdivided by the Conqueror among his
vassals, the feudal custom of supplying the crown with a certain number
of knights was imposed upon them. The number of knights that had to be
furnished was specified in the infeoffment. These knights, in their
turn, held lands from the immediate tenants of the crown, which were
owned by homage, fealty, and a great variety of tenures, as well as by
direct payments in money. Some tenures were merely nominal, such as
a grain of cummin, or a red rose; others were of more or less value,
such as a pair of white gloves, a tun of wine, a gold spur, or a silver
salver; and others by such service as holding the lord’s stirrup,
keeping a pack of hounds, etc., etc. See Blount’s “Ancient Tenures.”
The lands of these knights were termed “Fees,” and composed the barony
of a crown vassal. A knight’s fee was supposed to be so much land as
would suffice to maintain him, and to enable him to present himself and
his retainers ready equipped for the field in times of emergency. Hence
a “Knight’s Fee,” as applied to land, represents no definite quantity,
but a variable amount, generally between one and five hundred acres of
cultivable land. The term is also sometimes used for the rent paid to
the lord for the fee.

It is easy, then, to see that it became essential to the Crown, both
for monetary and judicial purposes, as well national as local, to know
from time to time the exact position of their vassals and sub-vassals.
Hence, Inquisitions were held up and down the country before local
sworn juries, and the barons made returns of that which they held,
and which was held under them. These returns are among the earliest
of our national records; and though brief, are invaluable, from their
absolute authenticity, to the genealogist and local historian. The
chief documents of this class are the _Black Book of the Exchequer,
temp._ Henry II., the original of which is in the P. R. O., but three
manuscript copies are in the B. M., C., and B. respectively, and it was
published (but imperfectly, and not from the original) by Hearn, in
two vols., 8vo., last century; the _Scutage_ and the _Marshall Rolls,
temp._, Edw. I. & II., P. R. O.; various lists of Tenants in Capite
in our different public libraries; and, most important, the _Testa de
Neville_. The last-mentioned of these documents consists of two ancient
volumes compiled _temp._ Edw. II., now in the P. R. O. They consist
of Inquisitions, taken _temp._ Henry III. and Edw. I., respecting the
Fees held immediately or otherwise of the King, throughout the whole
of England, excepting the counties of Cambridge, Cheshire, Durham,
Lancashire, and Monmouthshire. These records were officially printed
in one vol., folio, in 1807; there are many errors in the spelling of
place-names, but these can for the most part be readily detected by any
one having local knowledge. Another folio volume, printed in 1802, is
the _Nonarum Inquisitiones_; it is of some value, and may, perhaps, be
fairly included under the head of “Knight’s Fees.” It consists, in the
main, of the finding upon oath by the parishioners, of the value of
the ninth lamb, fleece, and sheep, and in cities and boroughs of the
ninth of goods and chattels, which by an Act 14 Edw. III. were to be
levied as a tax for two years towards the expenditure in the Scotch and
French wars. The rolls abound in the names of jurymen, commissioners,
and landowners. The published volume only contains the returns from
twenty-seven counties, but the Nona Rolls for most of the missing ones,
_e.g._, Derby, Hertford, Northumberland, and Warwick, have since been
found. MS. indexes of these will be found in the small books lettered
“Exchequer Subsidies” in the search room of the P. R. O.

ROTULI. Under the general head of “Rolls,” some of the most important
of our national documents have to be briefly considered.

The Great Rolls of the Exchequer, otherwise called the _Pipe Rolls_,
are all but perfect from 2 Henry II. to the present time; and there is
one roll of 31 Henry I., the oldest national document now extant after
the Domesday Book. They relate to the revenues of the Crown, digested
under the heads of the several counties. They are of much interest and
utility in early pedigrees, and relate to a far wider range of subjects
than Crown lands, as the Crown revenues come from so great a diversity
of sources. The originals are in the P. R. O., but most of the rolls
are in duplicate at the B. M. Several volumes of transcripts are in the
B. M. and B. The Rolls for the 31 Henry I.; 3 John; 2, 3, and 4, Henry
II.; and 1 Richard I., have been published by the Record Commissioners.

The _Patent Rolls_ commence with 3 John, and are fairly perfect
up to the present time. On them are entered all grants of lands,
offices, honours, pensions, and particulars of individual or corporate
privileges, etc., etc. These invaluable Rolls are unfortunately not
indexed. A folio calendar of those from John to 23 Edward IV., was
printed in 1802, but it is only a capriciously made selection. Those
from the 3rd to 18th John have since been printed in full, with an
admirable introduction. In the B. M. are many volumes of selections
and extracts for particular periods. Manorial grants of “free warren”
in these rolls will often supply a missing link in the history of a
manor.

The difference between the documents entered on the _Close Rolls_,
and the Patent Rolls, is that royal letters patent were delivered
_open_, with the Great Seal appended, and were supposed to be of a
public nature and addressed to all the king’s subjects; whilst the
Close Rolls contain entries of such instruments as were despatched
_closed_ or sealed up, and were of a more private nature. These
rolls begin in 1204. From that time to 11 Henry III., they have been
printed in full in two folio volumes. There are various copies and
transcripts of particular parts in the B.M., B., and C., and in the
libraries of Lincoln’s Inn and Inner Temple. The rolls are of infinite
variety and importance. Among the subjects treated of are--Royal
Prerogatives, Homage, Fealty, Knight’s Service, Treasure Trove, Gold
and Silver Mining, Bail and Pardons, Livery of Lands, Assignment of
Dowers, Wardship of Minors, Repairs of Bridges, etc., etc. They often,
therefore, contain unexpected fragments of local history connected with
apparently insignificant parishes, and are even more fruitful than the
better known Patent Rolls.

The _Charter Rolls_ contain a good deal of duplicate matter to that
on the Patent Rolls. They chiefly consist of grants of privileges to
religious houses, cities, and towns, and grants of markets, fairs, and
free warren to individuals. Charters, like Letters Patent, passed under
the Great Seal; but a charter differed from a patent inasmuch as the
former was witnessed by the council or by such persons as were present
at its execution, and the latter was solely executed by the king. The
Charter Rolls extend from 1199 to 1483. A complete calendar of these
rolls, well indexed, was published in 1803, and the rolls themselves
of the reign of John, were also published by the Record Commissioners
in 1837.

The _Fine Rolls_ contain accounts of fines paid to the Crown for
licenses to alienate lands, for freedom from knight service, or being
knighted, for renewals of various charters, etc., etc. They begin
in the time of Richard I. The Fine Rolls of John, and extracts from
those of Henry III., have been published by the Commissioners in three
8vo. volumes. They are to be distinguished from the important _Pedes
Finium_, subsequently explained.

The _Originalia_ are described in the Public Records Report as “the
Estreats transmitted from the Court of Chancery into this (Exchequer)
office, of all grants of the Crown inrolled on the Patent and other
Rolls, whereon any rent is reserved, any salary payable, or any service
performed.” These rolls commence early in the reign of Henry III.
An abstract, in two folio volumes, of the Originalia from 20 Henry
III. to the end of Edward III., was published by the Commissioners
in 1805. Similar abstracts from 1 Richard II., to end of James II.,
were prepared for printing, but never published; the MS. of this work
is in the B. M. An index to the Originalia was published in 1793, by
Mr. Edward Jones, in two folio volumes. Those who have had occasion to
use Mr. Jones’s index know that the judgment “very useful, but very
imperfect,” is true in each particular.

The _Hundred Rolls_ will often prove to be of the greatest interest for
one period of manorial history. During the turbulent reign of Henry
III., the Crown revenues had been much diminished by the Tenants in
Capite alienating lands without license, and by powerful ecclesiastics
and laymen usurping the rights of holding courts, and committing other
encroachments. The people, too, had been greatly oppressed by exactions
and oppressions at the hands of sheriffs and other officers, and by
false claims to free warren and illegal tolls. One of the first acts
of Edward I., on his return from the Holy Land, at his father’s death,
was to remedy these abuses. The circuit of the itinerant justices was
only usually made once in seven years, therefore the king appointed
Special Commissioners for inquiring into these grievances throughout
the realm. These rolls are the result of the inquisitions taken in
pursuance of this commission. They afford evidence, upon the oath of a
jury of each hundred and town of--all demesne lands and manors then or
formerly in the hands of the Crown--all tenants in capite and tenants
in ancient demesne--alienations to the Church--rights of free warren,
fisheries, etc.--oppressions of nobility and clergy--exactions of
excessive toll--unlawful trading--encroachments on highways, etc., etc.
The whole of these rolls were published by the Record Commissioners in
1812-18, in two large folio volumes, but are not now to be purchased.
“The genealogist may estimate the assistance these volumes are capable
of affording, when it is mentioned that the Indices of Names contain
references to about 70,000 persons.” The mis-spelling of place-names
is sometimes a little misleading, but ordinary care will rectify this,
as the returns are arranged in counties. The rolls, as printed, may
be fairly relied on for historical purposes, without the trouble of
collating the originals.

PLACITA. The pleadings of our several courts, with the judgments
thereon, have been for many centuries entered on rolls. The greater
part of these are termed Placita, or pleading Rolls. Their important
bearing on manorial history is obvious. There is scarcely a manor in
the kingdom that had not occasion, on an average of at least once a
century, to put in an appearance in one or other of the courts on some
matter involving litigation.

Under our Norman kings, all pleadings were originally heard _Aula sive
Curia Regis_, in the hall or court of the king’s palace. In aid of the
King’s Court, itinerant justices were first appointed _temp._ Henry I.,
and were finally established 22 Henry II. Towards the end of the reign
of Richard I., the Curia Regis was subdivided into courts of Exchequer
and Chancery, whilst the king’s court still retained pleas immediately
touching the Crown, and also common pleas, both civil and criminal. The
Magna Charta, 17 John, separated the Common Pleas from the royal court,
after which the Curia Regis continued to be the superior court of law
for criminal matters, and early in the reign of Edward I. lost its more
ancient title and became known as the Court of King’s Bench.

The _Rotuli Curia Regis_ have been printed in full, from 6 Richard I.
to 1 John, by the Record Commissioners, in two 8vo. volumes. The same
rolls, in addition to those of the King’s Bench, down to the end of
the reign of Edward II., were, in 1811, elaborately calendared and
indexed by the Commissioners in a valuable folio volume, under the
title--_Placitorum in Domo Capitulari Westmonasteriensi asservatorum
Abbreviatio_, but the rolls are now in the P. R. O. The abstract has
been made after a fickle fashion, some pleadings are given in full,
whilst many others of more importance are condensed into a couple of
lines; and there is nothing in the volume to tell the student whether
they are abbreviated or not.

The earliest provincial courts were those of the Itinerant Justices, or
Justices in Eyre (from the Norman-French word _erre_, a journey); they
held criminal and common pleas, and also pleas of the forest. These
justices afterwards gave way to Circuit Judges, and the Justices in
Eyre then became only another name for the _Justices of the Forest_.
If there is or has been any royal Forest or Chace within the parish
under consideration, special search should be made for its records.
Most of the early proceedings relative to forests are entered on the
Patent Rolls; a considerable number of the ancient perambulations and
inquisitions have been printed in various reports made at different
dates. Copies of these reports, bound in two large volumes, can be
consulted at the P. R. O. Extracts from the rolls, relative to the
forests, for special periods may be found both at the P. R. O. and the
B. M. The forest perambulations for the reigns of Henry III. and Edward
I. have been completely indexed.

Those rolls that may properly be termed _Records of Assize_ commence 6
Richard I., and end with the reign of Edward IV. In the B. M. are many
MS. volumes of _Placita Itinerum_ pertaining to different reigns and
different counties.

In 1818 the Record Commissioners published an important folio volume,
entitled _Placita de Quo Warranto temporibus Edw. I., II., III._,
which forms an interesting sequel to the Hundred Rolls. The Hundred
Rolls, as already mentioned, gave a great mass of sworn information as
to abuses. Those persons thus charged were summoned to answer “_Quo
Warranto_” such and such things were done or left undone? or by what
right such and such manors, etc., were held? This volume contains
a full transcript of the roll of the pleadings in answer to these
summonses, and the judgments thereon. Its utility in manorial history
cannot be exaggerated, as the descent of the manor is often traced back
in these pleadings to the time of John or even earlier. The rolls are
arranged under counties, and include the whole of England, with the
exception of the palatinate of Durham.

The earliest records of the _Court of Chancery_ are of the 17th year
of Richard II., the previous documents having been destroyed in the
Wat Tyler rebellion. There are no petitions extant to the Chancellor
of the reign of Henry IV., and but few of Henry V., but from the
beginning of the reign of Henry VI. they seem to have been kept with
much regularity. Calendars of the Chancery proceedings of the reign
of Elizabeth were published in three volumes folio, 1827-32. In the
introduction to this work are many examples of the earlier proceedings
of that court from Richard II. downwards. It is hardly necessary to add
that the bills of complaint, and their answers, filed in this court,
often contain abundant information as to manorial descent. Numerous MS.
volumes of indexes to Chancery proceedings are at the service of the
searcher in the P. R. O.

The volumes known as the _Year Books_ contain reports in Norman-French
of cases argued and decided in the Courts of Common Law. They form the
basis of the “_lex non scripta_” of English jurisprudence, and are
worthy of attention on account of the historical information and the
notices of public and private persons which they contain. The frequent
disputes about heirship cause them often to be of value in manorial
history. These Reports begin in 1220, and an account of the different
books, their dates, etc., may be found in Worrall’s “_Bibliotheca Legum
Angliæ_,” 1788. Serjeant Maynard published an edition of early Year
Books, in eleven volumes, in 1679. Several of those of the reign of
Edward I. have been edited by the Record Commissioners. Lincoln’s Inn
Library, and the University Library, Cambridge, have a great number of
MS. Year Books. A work of much research, by Mr. Bigelow, has just been
published, entitled “_Placita Anglo-Normannica_,” it is a history of
the litigation and legal procedure of the temporal courts during the
period from the Norman Conquest to the middle of the reign of Richard
I. If there has been any early dispute about the manor or manorial
rights, this volume should certainly be consulted.

INQUISITIONES. _Inquisitiones post mortem_, are not unfrequently termed
“Escheats,” from the writs being directed to the county official called
the Escheator; but the term is incorrect, and should never be used, for
there is a class of documents correctly called _Escheat Rolls_, which
differ altogether from these inquisitions, and refer to the escheator’s
accounts of lands and property escheated to the crown from various
causes, and the profits and value of the same at different periods.
The _Inquisitio post mortem_, on the contrary, was an inquiry held on
oath by a jury of the district, summoned by virtue of a writ directed
to the county Escheator, on the death of every tenant in capite. The
jury had to inquire (1) of what lands the person died seized, (2)
by what rents or services the same were held, and (3) who was his
next heir and of what age; they had also to ascertain whether the
tenant was attainted of treason, or an alien, in which case the lands
reverted to the crown. The return of the jury, together with the writ
authorising the inquiry, were returned to the King’s Chancery, whence
a transcript was sent to the Exchequer, so that the proper officers
might be able to levy the duties and services thereupon due; for on
the death of each tenant in capite, a tax termed a “relief” was due
to the crown, and the heir could not take possession until the relief
was paid and homage done. Moreover, if the heir was a minor, the crown
administered the estates until he could make proof of his legal age
and perform homage. The Exchequer transcripts of these Inquisitions,
together in most cases with the writ, are still extant from the time
of Henry III. down to the end of the reign of Charles I., that is,
until the feudal land system was finally overthrown. Calendars, or
short abstracts of these Inquisitions, carefully indexed, have been
printed in four folio volumes by the Record Commissioners, 1806-1828,
up to the end of the reign of Richard III. These calendars, which are
invaluable for reference, must be used with caution, and should never
be quoted as proving the death of any person by a particular date, for
unfortunately not a few inquisitions that are not _post mortem_, but
_ad quod damnum_, are included amongst them. There are also many errors
in nomenclature, and in assigning manors to special counties; it is
therefore wisest to make the rule of never quoting these inquisitions,
unless the original has been seen, or a full transcript obtained. The
inquisitions subsequent to the time of Richard III. have not been
calendared. Private enterprise has more than once announced that such
a work would be taken in hand, and subscribers names obtained, but
up to the present time (1879) there seems no immediate prospect of
publication.

The Record Commissioners have also published a Calendar to the
Inquisitions of this class, pertaining to the Duchy of Lancaster, from
the time of Edward I. to Charles I.

Extracts and abstracts from these Inquisitions, covering particular
periods, or for particular counties, are numerous in our public
libraries; for lists of such MSS., see Sims’ _Manual_, pp. 125-8.

Another form of inquisition was the _Inquisitio ad quod damnum_,
which was a judicial inquiry, held by virtue of a writ directed
to the Escheator of the county, when any license of alienation of
lands, or grant of a market, fair, or other privilege was solicited.
A local jury was sworn to inquire whether if the claim was granted
it would interfere with any vested right, or be to the detriment of
the crown or some of its subjects--hence the name _ad quod damnum_.
These inquisitions, especially with relation to alienating lands to
religious houses, are often very valuable to the local historian, for
the jury in such cases had to state the amount, value, and nature of
the remainder of the lands of the intended donor. A calendar of these
records from 1 Edward II. to 38 Henry VI., was officially published
in 1803, and is bound up with the previously mentioned calendar of
the Charter Rolls. It should be remembered, as already stated, that
many inquisitions _ad quod damnum_, particularly the earlier ones, are
wrongly catalogued and arranged among the _post mortem_ inquests.

PEDES FINIUM. The _Pedes Finium_, or “Feet of Fines,” must be clearly
distinguished from the previously mentioned Fine Rolls, which are quite
a different class of record. The Fine here signified is no mulct of
money, but is so called because it is the _final_ agreement between
persons concerning any lands or rents or other matters whereof there
is any suit between them. The fine, or solemn contract recorded
before a competent judge, is described as having five parts--(1) the
original writ taken out against the cognisor, (2) the license of the
crown giving the parties liberty to accord, (3) the concord itself, (4)
the note of the fine, which is an abstract of the original concord,
and (5) the _foot of the fine_, which always began thus--“Hæc est
_finalis_ concordia facta in curia Dom. Regis apud Westm” etc. This
foot of the fine, which was the official summary of the concord, was
cut off in an indented line (hence the word _indenture_), so as to
tally with the part delivered to the suitor and prove its authenticity,
and retained by the court. There is no class of documents that has
been so continuously preserved in uninterrupted succession as these
Feet of Fines. No manorial history can be considered satisfactory
until these records have been carefully consulted, for they contain
the proceedings which have been adopted to convey estates, as well as
to free them from their entailment to issue, or from the dower of
wives. The earliest of these documents, viz., from 7 Richard I. to 16
John, have been officially published in two 8vo. volumes, under the
title--“_Fines, sive Pedes Finium; sive Finales Concordiæ, in Curia
Domini Regis_.”

Having thus run through the chief classes of documents bearing, with
more or less directness, on manorial history, it may be added that
further information should be sought in Mr. Thomas’ “Handbook to the
Public Records.” It may also be well to mention, that those who require
accurate transcripts of any of the records in Fetter Lane, need not
apply for officially certified copies; for reliable transcribers can
readily be met with who will do the work for less than half the sum
required for certified copies. If the amateur searcher does not know
any transcribers, the courteous gentlemen in charge of the Search Room
will probably make no difficulty about giving their address.

Those who may be desirous of gaining some knowledge of the character or
handwriting of ancient records, which can only be efficiently learnt by
practice, are recommended to consult Wright’s “Court-Hand Restored.”
It not only gives numerous alphabets and plates, illustrative of the
different styles in vogue at different periods, but has valuable lists
of abbreviations, of ancient place-names, and of debased Latin words
that are only to be found in legal or monastic documents. Each of the
earlier reigns appears to have had a set or uniform character of its
own; but in the reign of Elizabeth and subsequently, this clerical mode
seems to have been to a great extent abandoned, and each scribe to have
written after his own fancy. It is hence very noticeable that, as was
remarked by a late keeper of the Records, “the English records of the
16th and 17th centuries are in general more difficult to be read than
the Latin records of preceding ages.”




Civil or Domestic Architecture.


Any British, Roman, Danish, or Anglo-Saxon remains that there may be
in the parish, had, perhaps, better be described before the manorial
history is given. Every earthwork, mound, or ancient roadway should be
carefully noted. It is not possible to refer to any one, or even three
or four, satisfactory books on such subjects. Fosbrooke’s “Encyclopædia
of Antiquities” is out of date, but we know of no better compendious
work of reference. The two volumes of Wright’s “Essays on Archæological
Subjects,” will be found of much general use. Worsae’s “Primeval
Antiquities of Denmark,” translated and applied to the illustration
of similar remains in England, by W. J. Thoms, may be read with
advantage, but with the recollection that the hard and fast “ages” of
Danish antiquaries are, with greater knowledge, becoming exploded.

But all description of civil or domestic architecture, of the Norman
or subsequent periods, should be deferred until after the history of
the manor has been written, because that history will very likely throw
light on any such architectural remains.

If there is a castle, or its relics, within the parish, the probability
is considerable that it has already been well described by a county
historian, or in one or other of the numerous journals of our
Archæological societies. But it is equally probable that its history
has not been thoroughly written, and special search should be made with
that object at the P. R. O., beginning with the indexes to the printed
calendars already enumerated. There is no one efficient volume treating
of our mediæval castles that corresponds with Viollet-le-Duc’s
“Military Architecture of the Middle Ages,” but a translation of this
French work has been published by Parker, and it would be well to read
either that or the original.

Every effort should be made to identify the old manor-house, or its
site (often marked by a grass grown moat), and this should of course
be done with each manor, where, as is usually the case, the parish
has contained more than one. Oral tradition, in this as in other
particulars, will often be found a useful handmaid. Should the exterior
of the reputed manor-house be altogether unpromising, that should not
check further investigation. Several instances are known to us in
which modern brick casing or sash windows are but a screen to some of
the oldest domestic architecture extant, which may be found in the
back premises or outbuildings, or contain fine old chimney-pieces,
carved oak panelling, or ceilings of elaborate pargetting. Nor should
attention be only directed to manor-houses. All old domestic work
is worth chronicling, so rapidly is it disappearing both in town and
country; and the annalist of a parish should not be above transcribing
all the initials and dates so frequently seen on lintel stones.
As a rule, every house or cottage, not obviously modern, that has
stone buttresses, a moulded wall-plate or string-course, or bevelled
stone mullions to the windows, is worthy of careful examination.
Many interesting details, such as the site of chantry-houses, may be
thus brought to light, and the history in stone, and the history on
parchment, be found to tally in unexpected ways.

Domestic architecture should always be described by the century, and
not by the “periods” into which ecclesiastical architecture is usually
divided. The only book worth purchasing on the subject, is the somewhat
costly but admirable four volume edition of Parker’s “Mediæval Domestic
Architecture.” For the general “History of Architecture,” both
civil and religious, of all ages and countries, nothing can surpass
Fergusson’s last edition in four volumes, published by Murray in 1874.




Personal History.


The pedigrees and brief particulars of the Nobility can be readily
found. The most useful standard works are Dugdale’s “Baronage,”
Collins’ “Peerage and Baronetage,” Banks’ “Dormant and Extinct
Baronage,” and the “Baronagium Genealogicum,” or pedigrees of English
Peers, in five folio volumes, by Joseph Edmondson. Burke’s “Landed
Gentry” gives much information with respect to the principal families
of commoners, but the earlier genealogical statements that he prints
are often purely mythical. Several indexes to the many thousands of
printed pedigrees that are scattered up and down in topographical
and other works have been published, of a more or less faulty and
incomplete description, but a work of this class, now (1879) in the
press, entitled “The Genealogist’s Guide,” by Mr. George W. Marshall,
promises to be all that can be desired.

But a large portion of family history and pedigree, which will often be
essential to the elucidation of the monumental history of a parish, to
completing the links in lists of the lords of the manor, or furnishing
particulars with regard to smaller landholders, yet remains in MS. The
most accurate of such MSS. are at the College of Arms, and are not
ordinarily accessible except on payment of fees; but there is a fine
collection of heraldic visitations at the B. M., the chief of which are
among the Harleian MSS.

HERALDS’ VISITATIONS are said to have commenced in the reign of Henry
IV., but it was not until 20 Henry VIII. that a commission proceeding
from royal authority was issued. From then until the latter half
of the seventeenth century, visitations were made every twenty-five
or thirty years. The register books, kept by the heralds and their
assistants, contain the pedigrees and arms of the gentry of the
respective counties, and are often also illustrated by copies and
excerpts from charters and private documents. Many of these books are
lost, and the rest scattered throughout public and private libraries.
The archives of the College of Arms have the most important collection,
and next comes the B. M. There are a large number at the B., fifty-four
volumes in the library of Caius College, Cambridge, and forty in
that of the Queen’s College, Oxford. The earliest heralds’ registers
for the counties of Cornwall, Dorset, Gloucester, Hampshire, Kent,
Notts, Oxford, Surrey, Sussex, Wilts, Worcester, and Yorks, are of
the year 1530; for Berks, Devon, and Somerset, 1531; for Cheshire and
Lancashire, 1533; for Essex and Herts, 1552; for Suffolk, 1561; for
Lincoln, 1562; for Leicester, Norfolk, Stafford, and Warwick, 1563; for
Hunts, and Northampton, 1564; for Beds, and Bucks, 1566; for Derby,
Hereford, and Salop, 1569; for Middlesex, 1572; for Cambridge, Durham,
and Northumberland, 1575; for Cumberland and Westmoreland, 1615; and
for Rutland, 1618. The last visitation of several counties was taken
in 1634, but the majority were visited in 1662-4; and the last of all
was that of the county of Southampton, made by Sir Henry St. George,
in 1686. The general genealogist and antiquary cannot but long for
the issue of another royal commission, whereby the heralds might be
empowered, as of old, to destroy all false and self-assumed arms,
whether on carriages, plate, or monuments.

Sims’ “Index to the Pedigrees and Arms” contained in the Heralds’
Visitations in the B. M., is an accurate and useful book of reference.
The “Manual for the Topographer and Genealogist,” by the same
gentleman, is quite indispensable. Careful lists of family histories,
of all the principal topographical works, and of all MSS. of worth in
public libraries, are therein classified under the different counties.

WILLS are too obvious a source of information to need a word of
comment. At Somerset House is the most important and largest
collection, viz., those of the province of Canterbury. The original
wills in this office begin in 1404, and the transcripts in 1383. They
are complete only from December, 1660. In the office at York, for that
province, the wills begin in 1590, and the transcripts in 1389. Owing
to the probate privileges enjoyed by the various ecclesiastical courts,
there were not only registries for wills in every diocese, but numerous
peculiar and exempt jurisdictions in each diocese. The dates at which
wills begin in the different minor registries are so very varied, and
their condition and facilities, or even possibilities, of search so
multifarious, that it is impossible to give any useful abstract. The
Report on Public Records for 1837, and Sir Harris Nicolas’ “Notitia
Historica,” should be consulted. The power of probate was taken away
from the ecclesiastical courts by the Act of 1857.

The little-known RECUSANT ROLLS of the time of Elizabeth, give
information as to the humblest as well as the wealthiest parishioner
who refused to attend the services of the Established Church. These,
and many other similar class of documents, relative to the fining and
other grievous penalties attached to profession of the Roman Catholic
faith, extending up to a recent date, are to be found at the P. R. O.

Records of ATTAINDERS, FORFEITURES, SEQUESTRATIONS, and PARDONS, some
from the time of Edward II., will also be found at the same office,
and may be consulted with advantage by those tracing personal history,
if there is any cause to suspect their complicity in any of the
multitude of baronial feuds, rebellions, or religious persecutions that
led to the existence of so large a class of offenders. Sims’ “Manual”
should be consulted for exhaustive lists of this class of documents,
as well as for numerous lists of GENTRY and FREEHOLDERS of different
dates, pertaining to their respective counties.

MUSTER ROLLS, which give the names, rank, dwelling, and often other
particulars, of those able to bear arms in each county, may be of
interest to the local historian. The earliest of these returns, now
at the P. R. O., are of the reign of Henry III.; there are great
deficiencies up to the time of Henry VIII., but from that reign to
the time of Charles II, they are very voluminous. Lists of SHERIFFS,
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, and MAYORS OF BOROUGHS, have been printed for
almost every county from an early date, and can readily be found at
public libraries. The names of lords of the manor, or other individuals
connected with the special parish treated of, should always be collated
with such lists, in order to see if they held any of these important
offices.

COUNTY RECORDS. The various documents that are or ought to be in charge
of the Clerk of the Peace, relative to all the multifarious business
transacted at Quarter Sessions, contain much that is of value relative
to personal or local history. But it would only be tantalising to
enumerate the different class of records that should be in the custody
of the county officials, for in the great majority of cases they are
in so much confusion as to be practically useless for any literary
purpose. Among the exceptions may be mentioned Leicestershire and
Derbyshire, in the latter of which counties they have been recently
admirably arranged; and also, to a certain extent, Devonshire, the
salient points of whose records have lately been published--see
“Quarter Sessions from Queen Elizabeth to Queen Anne,” by A. H.
Hamilton, a volume that aptly illustrates local government, and which
is useful as showing the class of information that may be gleaned from
such documents. They do not, as a rule, extend further back than the
time of Elizabeth.

BOROUGH RECORDS. These are in many instances of great antiquity; some
charters going back to the time of John. But their condition and value
are much varied, and there is no trustworthy general report. It is
hoped that a “Borough Records Society” will soon be formed for the
publication of our Municipal Archives.

In the six Reports already issued by the Historical Manuscripts
Commission the Archives of the following English boroughs have been
reported on:--Abingdon, Axbridge, Berwick-on-Tweed, Bridgewater,
Bridport, Cambridge, Coventry, Dartmouth, Faversham, Folkestone,
Fordwich, High Wycombe, Hythe, Kingston-on-Thames, Launceston, Lydd,
Morpeth, New Romney, Norwich, Nottingham, Rye, St. Albans, Sandwich,
Tenterden, Totnes, Wallingford, Wells, Weymouth, Winchester, and York.

The Report of the Municipal Corporation Commissioners, 1835, gives
certain information, more or less meagre, of all boroughs. See also
Merewether and Stephen’s “History of the Boroughs and Municipal
Corporations of the United Kingdom.”

Under the head of WORTHIES it may be worth while to consider whether
the parish has ever had amongst its residents, or on its baptismal
registers, the names of men of marked celebrity in any walk of life.
Nuttall’s edition of Fuller’s “Worthies of England,” published in
1840, in three vols. 8vo., Wood’s “Athenæ,” and any good Biographical
Dictionaries (_e.g._ Chalmers’), should be consulted.




Parochial Records.


Foremost under this head come PARISH REGISTERS. Burn’s “History of
Parish Registers in England” is the standard work on this subject.
The first mandate for keeping registers of baptisms, marriages,
and burials, in each parish was issued in 1538, but it is quite
the exception to find registers of this early date. This mandate
was repeated in more rigorous terms on the accession of Elizabeth,
1558, but not being regularly observed, it was ordained in 1597 that
parchment register books should be purchased at the expense of each
parish, and that all the names from the older books (mostly of paper)
should be therein transcribed from 1558; hence it happens that so many
parish registers begin with that year. It was at the same time ordered
that copies of the registers should be annually forwarded to the
episcopal registrar, to be preserved in the episcopal archives. This
injunction, however, was so imperfectly carried out, and the duplicates
when forwarded were so carelessly kept, that the diocesan copies of
registers are mere fragments of what they should be, and are in several
cases still in such confusion as to be practically inaccessible. The
earliest transcripts at Lincoln begin in 1587, and at Gloucester in
1571, but there are few dioceses that have any earlier than 1660.

Many parishes have lost their early registers, and they are usually
deficient or wanting during the Commonwealth. Official inquiries were
made of all the clergy in 1831, as to the exact date, condition, and
number of the parish registers in their custody, and abstracts of their
replies were published in a Blue Book in 1833. But it is not generally
known that the returns themselves, often containing more information
than was printed, are at the British Museum (Add. MSS. 9,335, etc.).
The dates there given are not, however, to be implicitly relied upon,
as unfortunately some registers have been lost or stolen since that
date, whilst others of an earlier date have happily, in some cases,
been restored or discovered in the like period.

Registers should be carefully looked through, not only for the purpose
of extracting the names of prominent or interesting families, but also
for the purpose of gleaning the innumerable little scraps of local
information that were not unfrequently interpolated in the earlier
pages, such as notes pertaining to excommunication, licenses for eating
flesh in Lent, penance, remarkable or eccentric characters, storms, and
weather observations, inventories of church goods, visitations of the
plague or sweating sickness, national events, etc., etc.

Many of the clergy and others find a difficulty in reading the earlier
registers. Reference has already been made to Wright’s “Court-Hand
Restored,” but the greatest help in deciphering them will be the
recollection that most of the letters of the ordinary hand of Elizabeth
and the Stuarts, which differ from those now in use, are the same as
those of the present German written characters, _e.g._, the letters
“h” and “r.” A few days’ steady practice in transcribing old writing,
beginning with the letters and words that can easily be read, ought to
be sufficient to master the stiffest hands in parochial records.

In case there are any old Meeting Houses, or congregations of
Independents, Presbyterians, Quakers, or other nonconformists in the
parish, it will be well, with regard to these registers, to consult
a Blue Book issued in 1841, called “Lists of Non-parochial Registers
and Records in the custody of the Registrar-General,” wherein a county
classification is observed; also a “Report on Non-parochial Registers,”
issued in 1857, wherein are enumerated those registers of the sects
that were still in private custody.

CHURCHWARDENS’ ACCOUNTS, giving particulars of rates, receipts, and
payments for church purposes, are often highly interesting, and should
be carefully preserved. Sometimes they are found entered in bound
volumes, but more often tied up in bundles or tumbled in confusion in
the parish chest. Still more often they are altogether missing. They
can occasionally be recovered from the private dwellings of present
or past churchwardens. The earliest with which we are acquainted, are
those of All Saints’, Derby, which begin in 1465, but they rarely are
found prior to the Restoration.

The CONSTABLES ACCOUNTS, and the ACCOUNTS OF THE OVERSEERS OF THE POOR,
will also sometimes be met with, beginning from a comparatively remote
date, and will amply repay close attention. They throw a similar light
on the secular history of a parish to that thrown on the religious
history by the Churchwardens’ Accounts. The thorough overhauling
of the parish chest, or other receptacles of parish papers, and the
classification of their contents is strongly recommended, even where it
seems to be most unpromising of results. There is no reason why even
such apparently trivial things as the indentures of parish apprentices
(which have the seals and signatures of Justices of the Peace), should
not be preserved, neatly arranged, and docketted. Every scrap of paper
of past generations, showing the inner working of parochial life,
possesses some interest of its own; and future generations will thank
us for their preservation. Moreover, a careful arrangement of parish
papers often meets with more immediate reward. We have ourselves found
missing portions of 16th century registers, highly interesting deeds
as early as the 14th century, royal proclamations and special forms of
prayer, _temp._ Elizabeth and James I., in parochial litter put aside
as valueless.

Of what can be gleaned from these parish annals when tolerably perfect,
we may be permitted to quote that which we have elsewhere written
respecting the records of Youlgreave, a Derbyshire village, that have
recently been classified with some care:--

“The future historian of this parish will find a vast stock of material
ready to hand; and if such a work was ever accomplished it would once
more be seen how the history of even a remote village is but the
history of the nation in little; how national victories were announced
on the church bells, and national disasters by the proclamation of a
form of prayer; how local self-government became gradually developed
in the office of justice, constable, and overseer of the poor; how the
press-gang worked its cruel way to man the ships and fill the regiments
of the Georges; how the good folk of Youlgreave sent forth a spy to
watch the movements of Charles Edward in 1745; and how they prepared
to defend themselves by giving their constable a new bill-head, and
repairing his old one; how unmerciful was the treatment of lunatics:
and how free was the consumption of ale, on the smallest possible
provocation, at the parish’s expense; these, and a thousand other
minutiæ, all of them possessing some point of interest, can be gleaned
from these annals of a parish, to say nothing of the perfect genealogy
of nearly every family, together with an account of their varying
circumstances, that might be constructed by their aid.”

The fullest and best information respecting the parish as a unit of the
national life, with much that pertains to the history of its various
officers from the earliest times, will be found in Toulmin Smith’s “The
Parish; its powers and obligations.” The second and best edition was
published in 1857 by H. Sweet, Chancery Lane.

The history of the village and village officers have not hitherto
received the attention they deserve, for all our municipalities have
developed out of village communities, and their various officials are
but those of the petty rural parish adapted to the needs of an urban
population. It will be well on this point to refer to the useful “Index
of Municipal Offices,” with an historical introduction, recently
published by G. Laurence Gomme.

Lists of parochial CHARITIES are sometimes found in the parish chest,
and more frequently on bequest boards in the church; but the local
annotator should not consider that he has got a perfect or correct list
until the elaborate reports of the Charity Commissioners, compiled
some fifty years ago, have been consulted. In 1843, a most useful Blue
Book was published for each county, being an analytical digest of the
voluminous reports arranged under parishes. Topographical booksellers
can generally procure copies of these, by which a great saving of time
will be effected. There are later Reports with regard to Endowed
Schools.




History of the Church.


The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, or pre-Norman charters, occasionally give
definite information of a church in a particular parish or district,
but as a rule the earliest mention of the parish church will be found
in the previously described DOMESDAY BOOK. But the Commissioners, not
being specially instructed to make returns of churches, acted on their
own judgment, and in some counties omitted them partially, and in
others altogether.

TAXATIO ECCLESIASTICA P. NICHOLAI IV.--Pope Nicholas IV. (to whose
predecessors in the See of Rome the first-fruits and tenths of all
ecclesiastical benefices had for a long time been paid) granted the
tenths, in 1288, to Edward I. for six years, towards defraying the
expenses of a Crusade; and that they might be collected to their full
value, the King caused a valuation roll to be drawn up, which was
completed in 1291, under the direction of John, Bishop of Winchester,
and Oliver, Bishop of Lincoln. There are two copies of this Roll at
the P. R. O., both of which appear to have been written in the reign
of Henry IV., and there is a third, which is by far the oldest, among
the Cottonian MSS. of the B. M. These three copies were collated and
printed in a folio volume by the Record Commission in 1802. There are
one or two other old copies of this Roll in private libraries; one in
the Chapter Library, Lichfield; and another, in excellent condition, in
the muniment room of Lincoln Cathedral.

VALOR ECCLESIASTICUS. The taxation of 1291 held good, and all the
taxes from the benefices, as well to our Kings as to the Popes,
were regulated by it until 27 Henry VIII., when a new survey was
completed. Henceforth the first-fruits and tenths ceased to be
forwarded to Rome, and were transferred to the Crown. In 1703 the
receipts were appropriated, under the title of Queen Anne’s Bounty,
to the augmentation of the smaller livings. The original returns of
the King’s Valor are at the P. R. O. They were officially published in
six folio volumes between the years 1811 and 1834. In the latter year
an “Introduction” of no little value, was also published in an 8vo.
volume, written by the Rev. Joseph Hunter.

CERTIFICATES OF COLLEGES AND CHANTRIES. About ten years after the
completion of his ecclesiastical survey, Henry VIII. decided on
appropriating the revenues belonging to Collegiate Churches and
Chantries. As a preliminary measure to their sale, he appointed a
commission, in the 37th year of his reign, to re-value this property,
and to take an inventory of the chattels. The whole subject of the
suppression of the Chantries, as conceived by Henry VIII. and finally
carried out by Edward VI., is ably and exhaustively treated in the
introduction to the volumes of the Cheetham Society, which treat of
the Lancashire Chantries. The reports, or “Certificates,” furnished
by Henry’s Commission with respect to the different chantries, are
preserved at the P. R. O., and are entered on rolls arranged in eight
parallel columns, in answer to a like number of queries. There are also
abridged rolls on paper of some counties. Further information about
chantries may be sometimes gleaned from certain MS. volumes at the P.
R. O., entitled “_Particulars for the Sale of Colleges and Chantries_.”
In the B. M. (Add. MSS. 8,102) is a valuable roll of Fees, Corrodies,
and Pensions, paid to members of the suppressed chantries and religious
houses, out of the Exchequer, 2 and 3 Philip and Mary. The pensions for
the different counties are on separate skins, so that it is easy of
reference.

INVENTORIES OF CHURCH GOODS. There are various Inventories of Church
Goods in the P. R. O., taken by Commission at the beginning of the
reign of Edward VI., some on detached slips of parchment, others
in paper books. The inventories are not absolutely perfect for all
parishes in any one county; in several counties the churches of one or
more Hundreds are missing; for others, such as Somerset, Sussex, and
the North Riding of Yorkshire, there are none extant. Nor are there
any for Lincolnshire; but there is a MS. return of Church Furniture
and Ornaments of 150 churches of that county, taken in 1566, in the
Episcopal Registry at Lincoln. This was published in 1866, by Edward
Peacock, F.S.A. There are also some special Inventories connected with
other dioceses, which space forbids us to mention.

GUILDS AND FRATERNITIES. Guilds and Fraternities of a more or less
religious character, and usually directly connected with a special
altar at the parish church, will naturally come under the history
of the Church, provided any can be detected in connection with the
particular parish. It used to be supposed that these guilds were only
found in cities or boroughs, but later researches show that they also
occasionally existed in quite small villages. The Parliament of 1381
directed writs to be sent to the sheriffs of each county, calling upon
them to see that the Master and Wardens of all Guilds and Brotherhoods
made returns to the King’s Council in Chancery of all details
pertaining to the foundation, statutes, and property of their guilds.
A large number of the original returns (549) still remain in the P.
R. O., where they are known as “Miscellaneous Rolls, Tower Records,
Bundles cccviii. ix. x.” For some counties there are none extant, and
for others only those from a single Hundred. More than one hundred of
these returns have recently been printed or analysed, by Toulmin Smith,
in a volume of the Early English Text Society, entitled “English Gilds.”

HERALDIC CHURCH NOTES. In the different heraldic visitation books,
especially those _temp._ Elizabeth, which have been previously
described, there often occur interesting church notes, which not only
detail heraldic glass in the windows and arms on the monuments, but
also occasionally give inscriptions that have long since disappeared.
These can only be found by a careful inspection of the heralds’
register books of the county in which the parish is situated.

COMMONWEALTH SURVEY. In pursuance of various ordinances of the
Parliament, a complete survey of the possessions of Bishops, Deans,
and Chapters, and of all benefices, was made in 1650, by specially
appointed Commissioners. These interesting returns, filling twenty-one
large folio volumes, are in the library of Lambeth Palace, and numbered
in the catalogue of MSS. from 902 to 922. These surveys have hitherto
been singularly overlooked by county historians and ecclesiologists,
though occasional extracts have been published from a much-abbreviated
and inaccurate summary, based on these documents, which forms No. 459
of the Lansdowne MSS. in the B. M.

The Record Books of the Commonwealth Commissioners for augmenting
Rectories and Vicarages (MSS. 966-1,021); the original Presentations to
various benefices from 1652 to 1659 (MSS. 944-7); and Counterparts of
leases of Church Lands, made by authority of Parliament from 1652 to
1658 (MSS. 948-50), are also in Lambeth Library.

BRIEFS. Royal Letters Patent, authorising collections for charitable
purposes within churches, were termed “Briefs.” Lists of them,
from the time of Elizabeth downwards, are often to be found on the
fly-leaves of old register books, or in churchwardens’ accounts. The
repair or rebuilding of churches in post-Reformation days, until nearly
the beginning of the Catholic Revival, was almost invariably effected
by this method. About the middle of last century, owing to the growing
frequency of Briefs, it was ordered that they should only be granted on
the formal application of Quarter Sessions. Much information as to the
condition of the fabrics and other particulars relative to churches can
be gathered from the petitions to Quarter Sessions, in those counties
where the documents are accessible. The Briefs themselves were issued
from the Court of Chancery, so we suppose they would be attainable at
the P. R. O. At the B. M. is a large collection of original Briefs,
from 1754 down to their abolition in 1828. They were presented to the
Museum in 1829, by Mr. J. Stevenson Salt.

ADVOWSON. The history of the advowson, if the living remained a
rectory, was almost invariably intermixed with that of the manor or the
moieties of the manor. Consequently it will be found, that, in the case
of rectories, various particulars as to the owners of the advowson, and
its value, at different periods, can be gleaned from the Inquisitions,
and from the Patent and Close Rolls to which references have already
been made; or, in the case of litigation, from the Plea Rolls and Year
Books. If the living became at any time a Vicarage, care should be
taken to look through the particulars given by Dugdale and Tanner, of
the religious house to which the big tithes were appropriated, and more
especially to carefully search the chartularies of that establishment,
if any are extant. There is an excellent list of the various monastic
Chartularies, _i.e._, ancient parchment books, containing transcripts
or abstracts of the charters of the different houses, in the first two
volumes of Nichols’ “Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica,” and a
shorter one in Sims’ “Manual.”

The Ordination of a Vicarage, _i.e._, the official appropriation
of certain parts of the endowment for the sustentation of a vicar,
required episcopal confirmation; and these ordinations will usually be
found in the Episcopal Registers, if they are extant for the date when
the rectory was formally appropriated. These ordinations often contain
information of great interest, and have hitherto been very rarely
searched for, and still more rarely printed.

The terms used in these documents for different sorts of tithes, for
the various produce of the soil, etc., etc., will be sought for in
vain in any ordinary Latin Dictionary; for their explanation it will
be necessary to consult a Glossary of mediæval or monastic terms. The
most handy and accurate is the abridged edition of the Glossaries
of Du Cange, Du Fresne, etc., in six vols. 8vo., published at Halle,
between 1722-1784. Some such work will also be found indispensable in
consulting the monastic Chartularies and many of the Records and Rolls.
The majority of the terms will be found in the last two editions of
Cowel’s “Interpreter,” 1708, and 1737, which can much more readily be
met with than the larger glossaries; but there is great need for a
one volume compendious glossary, and it is hoped that such a work may
shortly be published.

LISTS OF INCUMBENTS. Lists of rectors and vicars, giving the date of
their institution, and the names of their respective patrons, are
indispensable to a complete parochial history. They are, for the
most part, to be obtained from the diocesan registers. This work,
in several dioceses, will be found to involve no small labour, for
Bishop’s registrars were not always particular to separate institutions
from other Episcopal acts, and occasionally placed them in precise
chronological order for the whole diocese, without any regard to
archdeaconries and other minor divisions. But the trouble will be
amply repaid by the numerous quaint and interesting little details
that the searcher will be almost sure to discover. Many of our
episcopal registers, or act books, are of supreme interest, and yet
they are perhaps less known than any class of original documents. The
dates at which these registers begin average about the year 1300.
We give, for the first time in any manual, their respective initial
years:--Canterbury, 1279; London, 1306; Winchester, 1282; Ely 1336;
Lincoln, 1217; Lichfield, 1296; Wells, 1309; Salisbury, 1296; Exeter,
1257; Norwich, 1299; Worcester, 1268; Hereford, 1275; Chichester, 1397;
Rochester, 1319; York, 1214; and Carlisle, 1292. The old registers
of Durham are mostly lost, that of Bishop Kellaw, 1311-18, being the
oldest. None of the Welsh Cathedrals have any registers older than the
16th century.

Gaps are not unusual in the episcopal registers for some time
subsequent to the Reformation, when the books were often kept in a
slovenly fashion. These deficiencies can be generally supplied from the
lists of institutions in the Augmentation Books at the P. R. O.

It is scarcely necessary to say that no list of incumbents should be
considered complete, until it has been carefully collated with the
parish registers.

Catalogues of all the English Bishops are to be found in Canon
Stubbs’s “_Registrum Sacrum Anglicanum_;” and similar lists of Deans,
Prebendaries, and minor dignitaries, in Hardy’s edition of Le Neve’s
“_Fasti Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ_.” Both of these works may probably be
useful when drawing up the list of parish priests.

Lists of priests appointed to the more important chantries can usually
also be extracted from the diocesan registers, for, except in peculiar
circumstances, they required episcopal institution.

Any facts of interest or importance that can be ascertained respecting
the successive incumbents should be chronicled. For the time of the
Commonwealth, Walker’s “Sufferings of the Clergy” on the one hand, and
Calamy’s “Ejected Ministers” on the other, should be consulted. They
both make mention of a very great number of the clergy.

DEDICATION. The dedication of the church should never be taken for
granted from county gazetteers or directories. Dedications to All
Saints, and to the Blessed Virgin, should be viewed with some suspicion
until firmly established, for in the time of Henry VIII. the dedication
festivals, or “wakes,” were often transferred to All Saints’ Day, or
Lady Day, in order to avoid a multiplicity of holidays, and hence by
degrees the real dedication became forgotten. Ecton’s “_Thesaurus
Rerum Ecclesiasticarum_” (1742), and Bacon’s “_Liber Regis_” (1786),
should be consulted for dedications. Occasionally the patron saints
of the different churches are mentioned in the institutions in the
episcopal registers, and more often in monastic chartularies; but the
surest of all references, in the case of a doubtful dedication, is to
look up the pre-Reformation wills of the lords of the manor or other
chief people of the parish. These wills almost invariably contain an
early clause to this effect:--“I leave my body to be buried within the
church of St. ----.” The time of the wakes or village feast is a good
guide to the dedication, but one which, from the reason stated above,
as well as from other causes, must not be implicitly relied upon.

Another point worth remembering with regard to dedications, is that
re-consecration was not of unfrequent occurrence. Murder and some other
crimes within the church, as well as special violations of the altar,
rendered re-consecration imperative; and it was also often resorted to
when the fabric was altogether or considerably rebuilt, or even when
a new chancel was added. At the time of these re-consecrations, it
occasionally happened that the name of the patron saint was changed,
not from mere caprice or love of novelty, but because relics of that
particular saint were obtained for inclosure in the chief or high
altar. This should be borne in mind when a discrepancy is found in the
name of the patron saint of the same church at different epochs.

The chapter of Parker’s “Calendar of the Anglican Church,” entitled “A
few remarks on the dedication of English Churches,” is worth reading.
This book is also valuable for the brief account of the saints most
frequently met with in England, both in dedications and otherwise. The
first half of the book has been re-published once or twice, under the
title of “Calendar of the Prayer Book,” but it leaves out the chapters
here mentioned, and is comparatively valueless as compared with the
edition of 1851. Harington “On the Consecration of Churches,” published
by Rivington in 1844, should also be read.




Description of the Church.


Having finished the history of the Church, it will be best to follow it
up by a description of the fabric of the Church, and of all its details.

STYLES OF ARCHITECTURE. In deciding as to the different “periods”
under which to classify the various styles into which almost every
parish church is more or less divided, it is perhaps wisest to confine
oneself to the simple and generally accepted divisions of English
architecture, originally adopted by Mr. Rickman, viz. (1) the Saxon,
from 800 to 1066; (2) the Norman, from 1066 to 1145; (3) the Early
English, from 1145 to 1272; (4) the Decorated, from 1272 to 1377; and
(5) the Perpendicular, from 1377 to 1509. Some competent writers always
speak of three periods of Transition, covering the reigns of Henry
II., Edward I., and Richard II.; whilst others, and this may be well
adopted, speak of only one regular “Transition,” meaning by that term
the period between the Early English and Decorated, or the reign of
Edward I. (1272-1307).

These divisions are generally accepted as sufficing for popular
purposes; but of the more detailed and technical divisions of later
writers, there are none so correct in nomenclature, and so accurate in
separation of style, as the seven periods of Mr. Edmund Sharpe. The
first and second of his periods are the same as given above, but the
third is styled the Transitional, from 1145 to 1190; the fourth, the
Lancet, from 1190 to 1245; the fifth, the Geometrical, from 1245 to
1315; the sixth, the Curvilinear, from 1315 to 1360; and the seventh,
the Rectilinear, from 1360 to 1550. See Sharpe’s “Seven Periods of
English Architecture,” with its excellent series of plates.

There are numerous architectural manuals, but Parker’s “Glossary of
Gothic Architecture” has not been surpassed, and is very comprehensive.
The best edition is the fourth, with the two additional volumes of
plates.

Before classifying the different parts of the building according to the
various periods, a most careful inspection should be made of both inner
and outer walls, when fragments of mouldings, pertaining possibly to an
earlier church than any now standing, may not unfrequently be detected.

MONUMENTS. Inscriptions on monuments now missing, or partly
obliterated, may sometimes be recovered from the Church Notes of
Heraldic Visitations, or other MS. note books of ecclesiologists of
past generations, in which some counties are peculiarly fortunate.
For a list of MSS. of this description, that may be found in our
public libraries, arranged under counties, see Sims’ “Manual.” It may
also be useful to refer to two printed works--Le Neve’s “_Monumenta
Anglicana_,” 5 vols. 8vo. (1717-1719), and Weever’s “Ancient Funerall
Monuments,” the latest edition of which, with additions, is a 4to.
vol. of 1767. The former gives inscriptions on monuments of eminent
persons who deceased between 1600 and 1718, the latter treats generally
of all monuments in the dioceses of Canterbury, Rochester, London,
and Norwich. Bloxam, on “Monumental Architecture” (1834), is a useful
handbook on the general subject of monuments.

Cutts’ “Manual of Sepulchral Slabs and Crosses” is the only book
dealing with the interesting subject of early INCISED SLABS. It is
well done, but much more has come to light on the subject since it was
written (1849), and a new manual is much wanted. In some counties,
where stone abounds, remains of this description are found in most
churches. If any part of the church is being rebuilt, the debris
should be most carefully looked over; and a minute inspection of the
existing masonry will often detect more or less perfect specimens of
incised crosses that have been utilised in the masonry by the church
restorers of past generations. The lintels of the windows (especially
of the clerestory and of the tower), the inner side of the parapets or
battlements, the stone seats of the porch, and of course the whole of
the flooring, should be critically scanned for these relics. See also
Boutell’s “Christian Monuments.”

Haines’ “Manual of Monumental BRASSES” (2 vols. 8vo., 1861) is the best
book on that class of memorials. The second volume consists of a fairly
exhaustive list of brasses throughout the kingdom.

There is no good handbook dealing exclusively with STONE EFFIGIES, a
great desideratum; the big illustrated folios of Gough’s “Sepulchral
Monuments,” and Stothard’s “Monumental Effigies,” may be consulted
with advantage. For the details of ARMOUR, Hewitt’s “Ancient Armour
and Weapons in Europe” (3 vols) is the most exhaustive work; for the
details of COSTUME there are several expensive works, but the best
handbook is Fairholt’s “Costume in England,” to which is appended an
illustrated glossary of terms.

In connection with stained or painted GLASS, Winston’s “Hints on
Glass Painting” (2nd edition, 1867) should be read, wherein the
different styles of successive periods are critically distinguished and
illustrated.

For the important item of HERALDRY, both in glass and on monuments,
the best of the numerous manuals (and there are several very trashy)
is Cussan’s “Handbook of Heraldry.” Burke’s “General Armoury,” of
which a new and extended edition was published in 1878, is a dictionary
of arms classified under families. Papworth’s “Dictionary of British
Armorials” is arranged on the opposite principle, viz., the blazonry
or description of the arms is given first, and the name of the family
or families to which it pertains follows. It is an expensive work, but
indispensable in the identification of arms. It will also be found to
be far more accurate than Burke, and gives references to the various
rolls and other MSS. from which the arms are cited.

FONTS are almost a speciality in themselves. Simpson’s “Series of
Ancient Baptismal Fonts,” 1825, has a large number of beautifully
finished plates of the more remarkable examples. Paley’s “Baptismal
Font,” 1844, has illustrations and critical descriptions of a great
number, arranged alphabetically. See also the “Archæologia,” vols. x.
and xi.

BELLS have now a literature of their own. Ellacombe’s “Bells of the
Church,” and Fowler’s “Bells and Bell-ringing” are admirable works.
The inscriptions, etc., on the church bells of the majority of English
counties have already been published, and most of the remainder are
now in progress. North’s “Bells of Leicestershire,” and “Bells of
Northamptonshire,” are the best books of their class, but the “Bells
of Derbyshire,” now in course of publication in the “Reliquary,” and
chiefly contributed by St. John Hope, are being yet more thoroughly
treated, both in description and illustration.

Church PLATE should always be inspected, and the date, character,
inscription, or arms on each piece carefully recorded. Chaffers’ “Hall
Marks on Plate” gives the fullest description of the different marks,
and how the precise date can be thereby ascertained. The fifth edition,
published in 1875, is a considerable improvement on its predecessors.

INVENTORIES OF CHURCH GOODS often need explanation, or remains of
various ancient church furniture may make some description necessary.
There is no one book that can be thoroughly recommended on this
subject; but, perhaps, the most satisfactory in some respects is
Walcott’s “Sacred Archæology,” a popular dictionary of ecclesiastical
art and institutions. Jules Corblet’s “Manuel Elémentaire d’Archéologie
Nationale” may be consulted with advantage; it is a better done
work than anything of the size and scope in English, and is well
illustrated. For the various details of Church worship and ceremonies,
reference should be made to Rock’s “Church of our Fathers,” and to
Chambers’ valuable work, “Divine Worship in England in the Thirteenth
and Fourteenth Centuries, contrasted with and adapted to that in the
Nineteenth.”

Before beginning the description of the Church, it will be well, in
the first place, in order to ensure clearness and accuracy, that some
general PLAN OF PROCEDURE should be adopted. We give the following
skeleton of a suggested outline, that has been proved to be useful and
orderly, but it can, of course, be altered or expanded or re-arranged
in any direction.

1. Enumeration of component parts of structure, remarks as to its
general or special characteristics.

2 Ground plan, _i.e._, dimensions of area of chancel, nave, etc.,
different levels, and number of chancel and altar steps.

3. Description of parts of the permanent structure that are (_a_)
Saxon, (_b_) Norman, (_c_) Early English, (_d_) Transition, (_e_)
Decorated, (_f_) Perpendicular, (_g_) Debased, (_h_) Churchwarden, and
(_i_) Restored. Some definite order should be observed under each head,
otherwise it is likely that some details may escape, _e.g._ doorways,
windows, piers, arches, etc., of chancel, nave, aisles, porches,
transepts, tower, and chapels.

4. External details--parapets, gurgoyles, niches, stoup, arms,
inscriptions, “low side windows.”

5. Internal details--[Stone] altar or altar stone, piscina,
almery, hagioscope, Easter or sepulchral recess, niches, brackets,
roof-corbels, and sedilia of (_a_) chancel, (_b_) south aisle, (_c_)
north aisle, and (_d_) chapels or transepts; also groined roofs,
doorway or steps to roodloft, and stone screens--[Wood] altar table,
altar rails, reading desk, lectern, pulpit, pews, benches, poppy-heads,
panelling, roofs, doors, galleries, rood or chancel screen, other
screens or parcloses, parish or vestment chests, alms boxes--[Iron or
other metal]--any old details.

6. Font--(_a_) position, (_b_) description, (_c_) measurements, (_d_)
cover.

7. Monuments--beginning with early incised stones, and carefully
following them down in chronological order, an order which should not
be broken except for the purpose of keeping a family group together.
Arms should be correctly blazoned, and inscriptions faithfully copied.

8. Stained glass, according to age.

9. Encaustic tiles--pavement generally.

10. Fresco paintings, black-letter texts, patterns on roof or
elsewhere, royal arms, charity bequest boards.

11. Bells--(_a_) number, (_b_) inscription and marks, (_c_) frame,
(_d_) remarkable peals, or bell-ringers rhymes, (_e_) legends; also
sanctus bell, or bell cote on nave gable.

12. Parish registers and other documents; church books, or library.

13. Church plate.

14. Church yard, (_a_) cross, (_b_) remarkable monuments or epitaphs,
(_c_) yew tree, (_d_) lychgate, (_e_) sundial.

15. More recent fittings or ornaments, such as altar appurtenances,
organ, etc.; the previous headings being supposed to be confined to
older details possessing some historic value. But if the date, or
probable date, is given of each particular, it might perhaps be as well
to describe everything (if a complete account up to date is desired)
under its proper head; thus a modern altar cross and candlesticks might
be mentioned under the 5th head.

A few words on church “RESTORATION” may be here introduced; for
it cannot surely be inappropriate to include a sentence or two in
these pages (whose object it is to further the preservation of local
records), that may possibly have some small influence in preventing
the needless destruction of any part of those noble buildings round
which the history of each English parish so closely clusters. From the
standpoint of a local annalist nothing has been more painful in the
“restorations” of the past forty years than the wanton way in which
monuments, and more especially flat tombstones, of all ages, have been
often treated.

It is necessary to enter a warm protest against the notion that any
honour can be paid to God, or respect to the memory of those that He
created in His own image, by burying inscribed gravestones beneath many
inches of concrete in order to stick therein the glossy tiles of recent
manufacture. The effacing or removal (wherever it can be avoided) of
the memorials of the dead should in all cases be strongly resisted,
no matter what be the eminence of the architect that recommends it.
There are not many unrestored churches left in the country, but there
are some of much value and interest for whose fate we tremble. When a
“restoration” (the term is a necessity for the lack of a better) is
contemplated, let it be recollected that all work--beyond the removal
of galleries, and modern fittings, the opening out of flat plaster
ceilings, above which good timber roofs often lie concealed, the
scraping off the accumulated layers of whitewash and paint, the letting
in of light through blocked-up windows, the allowing of feet to pass
through doorways closed in recent days by the mason or bricklayer, and
the making strong of really perishing parts--all work beyond this is
in great danger of destroying the traces of the historic continuity
of our Church, and of doing a damage that can never be repaired. And
in preserving this historic continuity, let it not be thought that
any service is being rendered to history or religion by sweeping
clean out of the church all fittings of a post-Reformation date. The
sturdy Elizabethan benches, the well-carved Jacobean pulpit, or the
altar rails of beaten iron of last century, should all be preserved
as memorials of their respective periods; in short, everything that
our forefathers gave to God’s service that was costly and good, should
be by us preserved, provided that it does not mar the devout ritual
ordered by the Common Prayer, or in other respects interfere with
the Church’s due proclaiming of her Divine mission to the nineteenth
century. The reaction against over-restoration is now happily setting
in, but a word of caution is also necessary lest that cry should be
adopted as the cloak of a lazy indifferentism, or be used as an excuse
for regarding the parish church as a local museum illustrative of
byegone times, to be carefully dusted and nothing more. Where much
new work, or any considerable extent of refitting, seem absolutely
necessary, it is best to hasten slowly, and to do a little well rather
than to aim at a speedy general effect. Thus, if one of our old grey
churches requires fresh seating, how much better to fill a single aisle
or one bay of the nave with sound and effectively carved oak, and only
repair the remainder, rather than to accomplish the whole in sticky
pine. The best material and the best art should surely be used in God’s
service, and not reserved to feed our pride or minister to our comfort
in private dwellings. It has often been noticed how far better the work
of redeeming the interior of our churches from that state of dirt and
neglect that had degraded some at least below the level of the very
barns upon the glebe, has been carried out where money has come in
slowly, and at intervals, rather than where some munificent patron has
readily found the funds to enter upon a big contract.




Religious Houses.


If the parish includes within its boundaries the remains or the site of
any abbey, priory, hospital, monastic cell, or other religious building
otherwise than the parish church, the history and description of such
places must of course be separately undertaken. And let not the local
historian consider it is needless for him to explore into a subject
that has probably been treated of with greater or less detail in the
original edition of Dugdale’s “_Monasticon_,” or with more precision
in the expanded English edition. The English abbeys or priories, whose
history can be said to have been exhaustively written, could certainly
be counted on the fingers of both hands.

Should any one desire to thoroughly search into the history of a
religious house, it will be best in the first place to ascertain
whether there is any chartulary or chartularies extant (to printed
lists of which we have previously referred) for Dugdale and subsequent
writers have often only quoted some two or three out of a hundred
charters, or ignored them altogether. Secondly, the numerous references
to national records, all now to be found at the P. R. O., which are
given in Tanner’s “Notitia,” or in the big Dugdale, should be referred
to seriatim. Thirdly, the indexes and calendars to the various Rolls,
etc., at the P. R. O., which have been mentioned under the manorial
history, should be looked through for those more or less frequent
references that are almost certain to have been omitted by Tanner.
Fourthly, the Augmentation Books, and other likely documents of the
time of the Suppression of the Monasteries, should be overhauled.
Fifthly, special MSS. dealing with the order to which the house
pertains, should be sought after; _e.g._, if of the Premonstratensian
order, a store of unpublished matter is almost certain to be found
in the Peck MSS. of the B. M., and in the Visitation Book of the
B., numbered Ashmole MSS. 1519. Sixthly, search should also be made
through the indexes of the various Blue Book Reports of the Historical
Manuscript Commission, and inquiries set on foot as to local private
libraries. Seventhly, and though last, this suggestion will often be
found to be of great value, questions should be asked through the pages
of that invaluable medium between literary men--_Notes and Queries_.

It may also be found of use to study the precise statutes and
regulations of the particular order. They will be found in full in
the bulky folios of Holstein’s “_Codex Regularum Monasticarum et
Canonicarum_,” 1759. Dugdale only gives an abstract of the majority of
them.




General Topics.


Under this head we may classify the more general and modern subjects
that should not be left out of any complete parochial history, but
which it is sufficient just to indicate without further comment, only
premising that the annalist should keep constantly before him that it
is the history of a parish, and not of a county or country, on which he
is engaged, and that the more sparing he is of general disquisitions
the more likely he is to please his readers.

The value of a thorough study of the field-names, of which we spoke
in the first section of this manual, will now also become apparent.
Some names will tell of a change of physical features, of swamps and
islands, where all is now dry and far removed from water, or of forests
and underwood, where the blade of corn is now the highest vegetation;
whilst others will point to the previous existence of the vast common
fields, and their peculiar cultivation (concerning which Maine’s
“Village Communities” should be read). Some will indicate the foolish
ways in which special crops were attempted to be forced by law upon
the people, for it is few parishes that have not a “Flax Piece” as a
witness to the futile legislation of 24 Henry VIII.; whilst others tell
of trades now extinct, or metals long since worked out. Some speak of
those early days when the wolf or the bear roamed the woods and fields,
the beaver dammed up the streams, or the eagle swooped down upon its
prey; whilst others tell of the weapons whereby these fauna were
rendered extinct, for scarcely a township can be found where some field
is not termed “the Butts,” names that certainly date back as far as
Edward IV., when it was enacted that every Englishman should have a bow
of his own height, and that butts for the practice of archery should
be erected near every village, where the inhabitants were obliged to
shoot up and down on every feast day under penalty of being mulcted a
halfpenny.

It will, of course, be a matter of taste whether the topics here
enumerated should precede or follow the manorial and ecclesiastical
history.

I. Situation--extent--hill and river--caverns and springs--scenic
character--climate and temperature.

II. Geology--mineral workings--quarries.

III. Special vegetable productions, past and present.

IV. Special Fauna--mammalia--birds--fish--reptiles--insects.

V. Agriculture, past and present. Inclosures of different
dates--Inclosure Acts; for the mostly sad effects of these most selfish
Acts, which profited the rich at the expense of the poor, for lists of
inclosures from time of Queen Anne, and for other valuable information
on this topic, see “General Report on Enclosures,” drawn up by the
Board of Agriculture in 1808. The Board of Agriculture, in the first
quarter of this century, drew up most valuable Surveys of Agriculture
for the different counties, many of which are replete with varied and
interesting information. On the economic and antiquarian side of this
question, read Professor Rogers’s “History of Agriculture and Prices in
England.”

VI. Trades and manufactures, past and present.

VII. Fairs and markets.

VIII. Roads, canals, railways, and bridges--past and present. Care
should be taken in tracing out disused roads, bridle paths, or
pack-horse tracks.

IX. Folk-lore. Under this head will come customs and ceremonies
relating to childbearing, churching, christening, courtship,
betrothal, marriage, death, and burial--public-house
signs and their meaning--customs and superstitious
pertaining to wells and streams--used and disused sports
and games--obsolete punishments, such as ducking-stool or
stocks--omens--witchcraft--ghosts--charms--divinations--and other
quaint or original customs. Several books have lately been published on
this subject, but they are mostly instances of book-making, and none
come up to or surpass Ellis’s edition of “Brand’s Popular Antiquities.”
A most useful publication society has been recently started, termed
“The Folk Lore Society,” which has already begun collecting and
publishing. The Hon. Sec. is G. Lawrence Gomme, Esq., Castelnau, Barnes.

X. Dialect. On this subject see the invaluable publications of the
“English Dialect Society,” now (1879) in the seventh year of its
existence. The hon. secretary is J. H. Nodal, Esq., The Grange,
Heaton Moor, Stockport. One of their publications, price 6s. to
non-subscribers, is “A List of Books relating to some of the counties
of England.” Halliwell’s “Dictionary of Archaic and Provincial Words”
will be found very useful.

XI. Poor Law and general Rating, history and statistics.

XII. Population, inhabited houses, and other census details at
different periods.

[Illustration]




INDEX.


  Advowson, 76.

  Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 16.

  Armour, 89.

  Attainders, 53.


  Bacon’s “Liber Regis,” 82.

  Banks’ “Dormant and Extinct Baronage,” 48.

  Bateman’s “Ten Years Diggings,” 15.

  Bells, 91.

  Bigelow’s “Placita Anglo-Normannica,” 35.

  Black Book of the Exchequer, 20.

  Blount’s “Ancient Tenures,” 19.

  Bloxam’s “Monumental Architecture,” 87.

  Bohn’s “Antiquarian Series,” 16.

  Boldon Book, 18.

  Book of Ely, 17.

  Book of Exeter, 17.

  Book of Winchester, 18.

  Borough Records, 56.

  Boutell’s “Christian Monuments,” 88.

  Brand’s “Popular Antiquities,” 107.

  Brasses, 88.

  Briefs, 74.

  Burke’s “Armoury,” 89.

  Burke’s “Landed Gentry,” 48.

  Burn’s “Parish Registers,” 58.


  Calamy’s “Ejected Ministers,” 81.

  Chaffers’ “Hall Marks,” 91.

  Chalmers’ “Biographical Dictionary,” 57.

  Chambers’ “Divine Worship,” 92.

  Chantries, 69.

  Charities, 66.

  Charnock’s “Local Etymology,” 14.

  Charter Rolls, 25.

  Church Details, 93-6.

  Church, Description of, 84.

  Church, History of, 67.

  Churchwardens’ Accounts, 62.

  Close Rolls, 24.

  Collins’ “Peerage and Baronetage,” 48.

  Commonwealth Survey, 73.

  Constables’ Accounts, 62.

  Corblet’s “Manuel Elémentaire,” 92.

  Costume, 89.

  County Records, 55.

  Court of Chancery, 33.

  Cowel’s “Interpreter,” 78.

  Cussan’s “Heraldry,” 89.

  Cutts’ “Incised Slabs,” 87.


  Dialect, 108.

  Dedication of Church, 81.

  Domesday Book, 16, 67.

  Domestic Architecture, 44.

  Dugdale’s “Baronage,” 48.

  Dugdale’s “Monasticon,” 101.


  Ecton’s “Thesaurus,” 82.

  Edmondson’s “Baronagium Genealogicum,” 48.

  Edmund’s “Names of Places,” 14.

  Ellacombe’s “Bells of the Church,” 91.

  Ellis’ “Introduction to Domesday Book,” 17.

  English Dialect Society, 108.

  Episcopal Registers, 79.

  Etymology, 13.


  Fairholt’s “Costume,” 89.

  Feet of Fines, 40.

  Ferguson’s “River Names,” 15.

  Ferguson’s “Teutonic Name System,” 15.

  Fergusson’s “Rude Stone Monuments,” 15.

  Fergusson’s “History of Architecture,” 48.

  Feudal Tenure, 18.

  Field Names, 13, 104.

  Fine Rolls, 26.

  Folk Lore, 107.

  Folk Lore Society, 108.

  Fonts, 90.

  Forfeitures, 53.

  Fosbrooke’s “Encyclopædia of Antiquities,” 44.

  Fowler’s “Bells and Bell-ringing,” 91.

  Fuller’s “Worthies,” 57.


  General Topics, 103-8.

  Glass, 89.

  Gomme’s “Index of Municipal Offices,” 66.

  Gough’s “Sepulchral Monuments,” 89.

  Greenwell’s “British Barrows,” 15.

  Guilds and Fraternities, 72.


  Haines’ “Brasses,” 88.

  Halliwell’s “Archaic Dictionary,” 108.

  Hamilton’s “Quarter Sessions,” 56.

  Heralds’ Visitations, 49.

  Heraldic Church Notes, 73.

  Heraldry, 89.

  Hewitt’s “Ancient Armour,” 89.

  Historical MSS. Commission, 56.

  History of the Church, 67.

  Holstein’s “Codex,” 103.

  Hundred Rolls, 27.


  Incised Slabs, 87.

  Inclosure Acts, 106.

  Inclosure Commissioners, 14, 106.

  Incumbents, Lists of, 78.

  Inquisitiones ad quod damnum, 39.

  Inquisitiones post mortem, 36.

  Inventories of Church Goods, 71, 92.

  Itinerant Justices, 31.


  Justices in Eyre, 31.

  Justices of the Forest, 31.


  Kemble’s “Saxons in England,” 16.

  Knight’s Fees, 18.


  Le Neve’s “Fasti,” 80.

  Le Neve’s “Monumenta Anglicana,” 88.

  Leo’s “Local Nomenclature,” 14.

  Local Etymology, 13.

  Lubbock’s “Scientific Lectures,” 15.


  Maine’s “Village Communities,” 104.

  Manorial History, 16.

  Maps, 14.

  Marshall’s “Genealogist’s Guide,” 49.

  Marshall Rolls, 20.

  Mayors of Boroughs, 54.

  Members of Parliament, 54.

  Merewether’s “History of Boroughs,” 57.

  Monuments, 86.

  Muster Rolls, 54.


  Nichols’ “Collectanea,” 77.

  Nicolas’ “Notitia Historica,” 53.

  Nonarum Inquisitiones, 21.

  Nonconformist Registers, 61.

  “Notes and Queries,” 103.

  North’s “Bells of Leicestershire and Northamptonshire,” 91.


  Originalia, 26.

  Overseers of the Poor, 62.


  Paley’s “Fonts,” 90.

  Papworth’s “Armorials,” 89.

  Pardons, 53.

  Parish Registers, 58.

  Parker’s “Calendar,” 84.

  Parker’s “Domestic Architecture,” 47.

  Parker’s “Glossary of Architecture,” 86.

  Parochial Records, 58.

  Patent Rolls, 23.

  Pedes Finium, 40.

  Personal History, 48.

  Pipe Rolls, 22.

  Placita, 29.

  Placita Itinerum, 32.

  Plate, 91.

  Prehistoric Remains, 15.


  Quo Warranto Rolls, 32.


  Re-consecration, 82.

  Records of Assize, 32.

  Recusant Rolls, 53.

  Re-dedication, 83.

  Religious Houses, 100.

  “Reliquary,” 91.

  Report on Enclosures, 106.

  Report on Municipal Corporations, 57.

  Report on Public Records, 53.

  Restoration, 96.

  Rock’s “Church of our Fathers,” 92.

  Roger’s “History of Agriculture,” 106.

  Rotuli Curiæ Regis, 30.


  Scutage Rolls, 20.

  Sequestrations, 53.

  Sharpe’s “Seven Periods,” 86.

  Sheriffs, 54.

  Simpson’s “Fonts,” 90.

  Sims’ “Index to Pedigrees,” 52.

  Sims’ “Manual,” 39, 52, 54, 77, 87.

  Stone Effigies, 89.

  Stothard’s “Monumental Effigies,” 89.

  Stubb’s “Registrum Sacrum,” 86.

  Styles of Architecture, 84.


  Tanner’s “Notitia,” 101.

  Taylor’s “Words and Places,” 14.

  Taxation of Pope Nicholas, 67.

  Testa de Neville, 20.

  Thomas’ “Handbook,” 42.

  Thorpe’s “Diplomatarium Anglicum,” 16.

  Tithe Commutation Maps, 14.

  Toulmin Smith’s “English Guilds,” 73.

  Toulmin Smith’s “Parish,” 65.


  Valor Ecclesiasticus, 68.

  Village Officers, 66.

  Viollet-le-Duc’s “Military Architecture,” 46.


  Walcott’s “Sacred Archæology,” 92.

  Walker’s “Sufferings of the Clergy,” 81.

  Weever’s “Funerall Monuments,” 87.

  Wills, 52.

  Winston’s “Glass Painting,” 89.

  Wood’s “Athenæ,” 57.

  Worrall’s “Bibliotheca Legum Angliæ,” 35.

  Worsae’s “Primeval Antiquities,” 44.

  Wright’s “Archæological Essays,” 44.

  Wright’s “Court-Hand Restored,” 43, 60.


  Year Books, 34.

  Youlgreave Parish Records, 64.

[Illustration]


BEMROSE AND SONS, PRINTERS. LONDON AND DERBY.




BY THE SAME AUTHOR.


NOTES ON

The Churches of Derbyshire.


_Four Volumes, handsomely bound in Cloth, profusely Illustrated, red
edges, Royal 8vo._

  VOL. I.   HUNDRED OF SCARSDALE. _Price 15s._

  VOL. II.  HUNDREDS OF HIGH PEAK AND WIRKSWORTH.
              _Price 21s._

  VOL. III. HUNDREDS OF APPLETREE, AND REPTON
              AND GRESLEY. _Price 21s._

  VOL. IV.  HUNDRED OF LITCHURCH AND MORLESTON;
              BOROUGH OF DERBY; General Appendix;
              and General Index to the 4 vols.
              _Price 25s._

  _Or £3 15s. 0d. for the whole Series._


“A MAGNIFICENT WORK.”--_Times._

“An excellent work of the most comprehensive and minute
kind.”--_Athenæum._

“A rare example of thoroughly conscientious work, and a perfect
treasury of ecclesiological information.”--_Academy._

  LONDON:
  BEMROSE & SONS, 10, PATERNOSTER BUILDINGS;
  AND IRONGATE, DERBY.




TO AUTHORS, CLERGYMEN, &c.


Bemrose & Sons desire to call attention to the special facilities which
they can offer for the production of County or Parish Histories, and
high-class Bookwork generally.

Estimates and specimens on application.


[Illustration: LETTERPRESS PRINTING.]

An extensive office, with a varied stock of old style and other types,
affords a selection of such type as harmonises with the character and
size of the work to be executed.

The staff of employés is large and experienced, while the best and
latest mechanical and other appliances combine to ensure excellence and
dispatch in the issue of all printing.

Sermons, Reports, Bills, Circulars, and other Parochial Printing, at
the shortest notice.

[Illustration: ILLUSTRATIONS AND ILLUMINATIONS.]

Special Artists are employed for the numerous branches of Art in
connection with Typography, hence Illustrations, either on Wood
or Steel, to any design, and in accord with any style or period.
Archæological Illustrations by several new processes. Artists are sent
out to make Sketches and Drawings when required.

Illuminated Addresses on vellum for Presentation in the highest style
of the art. Heraldic Work of all kinds. Pedigrees and Coats of Arms
copied with accuracy.

[Illustration: BINDING.]

In every style--plain and strong for Parish Libraries, neat and uniform
for Private Libraries, and superbly extra finished for Presentation and
the Drawing Room Table.




BEMROSE & SONS’

PROCESS OF FAC-SIMILE PRINTING.


The process, briefly described, is as follows. The Instantaneous or
Fac-Simile Printing Ink is made in sticks, to be rubbed like Indian
Ink, as well as in a liquid state in Bottles, price One Shilling each.
The ink should be used on ordinary paper, of a good quality, and for
very elaborate Drawings, Whatman’s drawing paper is recommended. The
paper must be kept free from finger touches and grease; and while the
drawing is in progress, it is well to have a piece of loose paper under
the hand, which serves to keep the paper clean and to try the pen on
after each supply or dip of ink. The lead pencil may be used and left
on the paper, as the strokes will not interfere with the printing; and
the _Ink_ Drawing must on no account be smeared or rubbed with India
Rubber, &c.

For Circulars, Fac-Similes of old MSS., and Commercial purposes, the
ordinary pen will do; but for Drawings, a fine steel pen or crow-quill
should be used.

Drawing or writing executed with the ink should be sent flat, or round
a roller, to Messrs. Bemrose & Sons, who will then print from it any
required number of copies in exact fac-simile.




TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES:


  Italicized text is surrounded by underscores: _italics_.

  Obvious typographical errors have been corrected.

  Inconsistencies in hyphenation have been standardized.

  Archaic or variant spelling has been retained.