Transcriber’s Note:

Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).

An additional Transcriber’s Note is at the end.

       *       *       *       *       *

Multum in Parvo Library.

Vol. I. NOVEMBER, 1894. _Published Monthly._ No. 11.




Book of Detective Stories


  _Smallest Magazine in the World. Subscription
  price, 50 cts. per year. Single copies, 5 cents each._

  PUBLISHED BY
  A. B. COURTNEY,
  671 Tremont Street, Boston.

       *       *       *       *       *

DETECTIVE STORIES.

From the Diary of a New York Detective.

EDITED BY FRANK PEMMON.




Betrayed by a Dog.


Animals, especially dogs, have played an important part in the affairs
of men. There is now in Chicago a dog that has become the companion and
assistant of a policeman, and really does help his friend to detect and
ferret out thieves and other evil doers. I was once concerned in a case
in which a dog played a most important part, and led finally, through
no fault of his own, however, to the detection of his master.

The store of John Camden had been broken into and the safe blown open
and robbed of a large sum of money. The cash had been received that day
too late to be deposited in the bank. Next morning it was gone, and no
trace of the thief was to be found. At least, Mr. Camden and his clerks
and the police officials found no trace of him. Not so with me. I was
sent to look up the affair. I found the office in a state of confusion.
The door of the safe had been blown off and the contents lay scattered
over the floor. I asked Mr. Camden if he had disturbed anything. He
said he had not, except to satisfy himself that the money was gone.

Near by was a cat, dead, her throat cut evidently by a hatchet that
lay close at hand. This seemed to me to be the basis of a clue. Why
had the cat been killed? It is not necessary to kill cats in order to
prevent them from telling tales. I examined the unfortunate feline more
carefully. In addition to the ugly cut on the throat there were other
and more significant marks upon the back. A saucer, evidently having
recently contained milk, stood near by. Also an overturned can from
which pussy’s supply of milk had evidently been obtained. The contents
of this had been consumed. Mr. Camden informed me that this can had
been filled with milk only the previous evening. Among the papers
scattered upon the floor was one that attracted my attention. It was a
portion of a note written in French. I was aware that Mr. Camden did
not write or speak French. I questioned him about it. He could give me
no information. He had never seen it before.

“Did any one know you had a large sum of money in the safe?” I asked.

“Yes, a number of people knew of the fact. I had been expecting to
receive the money for the past two weeks.”

“Who are those who know you had it?”

“My wife, brother, the man I sold the property to (that is how I came
to have such a large sum at one time) and the real estate dealers
through whom I sold it.”

“Any one else?”

“Oh, yes, a friend, my daughter’s music teacher. He it was who found me
a purchaser for the property.”

“He is a Frenchman, is he not, and is invariably accompanied by his
pretty little dog?”

“Why, yes; do you know him?”

“No--never saw him. He knew you had a large sum of money in the safe?”

“Yes; he saw me deposit it there.”

“When did he give your daughter her last music lesson?”

“Last evening, but he complained of being ill and went away earlier
than usual.”

“Did he have his dog with him?”

“Yes; he claims the dog is his only friend.”

“Have you a specimen of his handwriting at hand?”

“Yes; I have several acknowledgments of money received.”

He produced them. I compared the writing with that of the note I
had found near the safe. They were, as far as I could determine,
identically the work of the same person.

Satisfied that I was on the right track, I caused a watch to be put
upon the music teacher with the result that he was arrested as he was
about to leave the city. He made a full confession.

“How did you guess it was a Frenchman who robbed my safe, and that he
was accompanied by a pretty little dog?” inquired Mr. Camden.

“I found the cat had been killed by a dog, and his master afterward cut
her throat with the hatchet to ward off suspicion from the dog; the
dog drank the milk which had been provided for the cat. I found a note
written in French and evidently dropped by the thief near the safe, and
his dog was a pretty little animal because his master’s patrons, like
yourself, would not tolerate the presence of any other kind, and you
told me the dog always accompanied his master.”




The Key to the Mystery.


The most puzzling case upon which I ever worked was that of the murder
of John Long. The facts are briefly these: Mr. Long, a wealthy,
retired merchant, living at the home of his nephew, failed to answer
the dinner-bell one day. He was a man who always prided himself upon
his punctuality, and his failure to appear at dinner at the usual
hour caused no little surprise. A messenger was sent to his room to
call him. No response came to repeated knocks upon his chamber door.
The door was locked. Fearful that something had happened to him, Mr.
Brant--the old gentleman’s nephew--set about breaking down the door.
This was no easy task, as the door was made of oak and fastened by a
ponderous lock and large brass hinges. After considerable effort the
door yielded to their blows and fell in. A horrible sight met the gaze
of the anxious family. Mr. Long lay across the bed, cold and still in
death, with his throat cut from ear to ear.

Had the old man been murdered? If so, how had the murderer entered the
room? The old man was known always to keep his door locked. Besides,
there did not appear to be anything missing. If it was a case of
suicide, what had become of the implement with which the deed had been
done? It was nowhere to be found. The old man always seemed in the best
of spirits, and had every thing to live for.

If not suicide, then it was, of course, murder. Who, then, was the
murderer?

It was my good fortune to be assigned to work up the case. I say good
fortune because I like a difficult job, the more difficult the better,
and this was one of the most difficult of all I had ever undertaken.

I examined the premises, and questioned the family and the servants
in order to learn all I could about the murdered man, his habits, his
financial affairs, etc. In particular I examined the room in which
the foul murder had been committed. One of the windows was partially
opened. This suggested the theory that the murderer might have gained
access to the room by means of the window, but it was impossible for
him to have done this in broad daylight, and the window was over 20
feet from the ground.

One of those who seemed most eager to believe that Mr. Long had
committed suicide was Thomas Brant, a scapegrace nephew of the old man.

“If he committed suicide,” said I, “where is the implement with which
he did the deed?”

“Perhaps he used his razor and then threw it out of the window,”
suggested Thomas.

“Impossible. The jugular vein was cut and death must have been almost
instantaneous.”

Nevertheless, I examined the grass under the window (which opened over
the orchard) and found the old man’s razor. There was, however, no
blood upon it.

The most peculiar thing in the room was the lock on the door and the
key belonging to it. It was a large lock, much larger than those
made at the present time, and the key was a large, heavy, brass one
weighing several pounds. I was informed that this lock had done duty
in the door of the store in which Mr. Long started in business, and
when the building was demolished, Mr. Long preserved the lock and key
(which, by the way, he had designed himself). Furthermore, as soon as
he entered his room it was his custom to lock his door, remove the key
from the lock and hang it upon a nail on the wall. Here it had been
found on the day of the murder. There was believed to be but one such
key in existence. I believed otherwise, and made a tour of all the
lock-smith’s shops in the city in order to verify my suspicions. At
last my search was rewarded. I found one who admitted, although at
first unwilling to do so, that he had made a key similar to the one I
carried. He had made it for a young man who answered to the description
of Thomas Brant. This much gained, the next step was to connect Brant
with the murder of his uncle. This was soon done. Brant was sent to
prison for life, as it was not proved that he had entered his uncle’s
room for the purpose of murder, but simply of robbery.




The Missing Finger.


Red Joe was an industrious young man. He worked early and late at
his profession. While others slept he toiled upward in the night; in
fact, night was his favorite time for toiling. He didn’t exactly make
hay while the sun shone because he didn’t do any work while the sun
was shining on his side of the earth. He was willing to put his hand
to almost anything that did not belong to him, and which he could
dispose of without fear of detection. Red Joe was a burglar, and a most
successful one. That is to say, he succeeded so well at the burglary
business that he spent the greater part of his time behind prison
walls. He was concerned, either alone, or in company with others of his
ilk, in some of the most important “breaks” that the police have any
record of. Whenever a big burglary was committed, the police invariably
tried to connect Red Joe with it, providing that gentleman didn’t
happen to be “otherwise engaged” at the time. This was the case in the
burglary of which I have to tell. The facts are as follows:

The home of Mr. Reed, the rich banker, had been broken into and a
quantity of silver plate, valued at $5,000, stolen. It had occurred
during the absence of the family. The affair was reported to the
police, and a large reward offered for the detection and conviction
of the guilty parties. The police at once set about unearthing and
following up clues. But all their labor was in vain. The burglar had
carefully covered up his tracks, and left no clue as to his identity.
Nobody had seen him enter or leave the house. There was no one in the
house at the time of the robbery. The family had gone off for the
night, and the butler who had been left in charge took advantage of
their absence to visit some of his friends. During his absence--which
he averred did not extend over two hours--the burglar had come, seen
and conquered. He entered a poor man and went away comparatively rich.
At first the butler was suspected and arrested, but he established a
satisfactory alibi and was soon released from custody.

The police did all in their power to bring the guilty ones to justice,
but failed. The affair was then placed in my hands. The solution of the
mystery seemed hopeless. The thief had left no clue as to his identity,
and none of the booty had been disposed of at any of the pawn shops
in the city or surrounding cities. I did not despair, however. I went
to the scene of the robbery and made a most thorough examination of
the premises. I found nothing. I was about to give up when I came upon
something that promised to be a clue. I inquired from the master of the
house whether there had been any repairs made in the house recently.
There had. The whole interior of the house had been repainted and
repapered just previous to the robbery. In fact the finishing touches
had been given the very day the burglary had been committed. Good. Then
getting the address of the painter and other workmen, I went to them
and made certain inquiries which were answered to my satisfaction.
Then I reported at headquarters. Two days later, Red Joe was arrested
and charged with the robbery. His premises were searched and most of
the stolen plate recovered. The clue I had discovered was this. On the
door frame near the safe, was the imprint of fingers in the then fresh
varnish. The imprint of only the thumb and three fingers appeared.
One finger was missing--the one next to the little finger. This was
a peculiarity of Red Joe’s right hand. This discovery might mean a
good deal for me, possibly nothing. You know the result. Red Joe was
watched, and his suspicious actions furnished sufficient grounds for
the issuing of a warrant for his arrest. He is now “doing time.”




A Grave Robbery.


One of the most peculiar cases with which I have ever had to deal was
that of a grave robbery. The grave--or rather the vault, in which the
remains of Mr. L----, a wealthy Russian (I do not give his name for
reasons which will presently appear), had been deposited was found
disturbed two days after the burial. Examination proved that the lid
of the casket had been removed with the apparent intention of robbery.
But, strange to say, no robbery had been committed. The gold rings
on the fingers of the dead man had not been touched, and these were
the only valuables the body contained. Why had the grave been opened?
Nobody could offer an explanation, least of all I who had been detailed
at the desire of the family of the dead man to sift this strange affair
to the bottom, and discover, if possible, who had dared to desecrate
the grave of their relative. Nothing had been taken from the body as
far as the family of the dead man knew; yet the thief or thieves had
plenty of time in which to rob the body if they so desired. They had
not been frightened off. They had carefully covered up the grave and
gone away evidently unmolested.

It was impossible to arrive at a conclusion as to _why_ the grave had
been opened. It now lay with me to find out _who_ had done it. It
had rained during or previous to the time of the grave robbery, and
the footprints of those concerned in it--three different persons it
appeared, were plainly discernible in the soft ground. The signs of
carriage wheels were also present. This was my only clue upon which
I had to work. I questioned the superintendent, whose office and
residence was at the entrance to the cemetery. He had been away on
the evening of the robbery, and could give me no information. He was
confident no carriage had entered the cemetery after 10 o’clock, at
which hour he had returned and locked the cemetery gates. There was
only one carriage entrance to the cemetery. I had an impression at the
time that the man was unnecessarily nervous in answering my questions,
and seemed relieved when I got through.

A month passed and an event occurred which threw considerable light
upon the mystery. The will of the late Mr. L---- had been opened and
read. Among the many bequests was the following most peculiar one:
“I bequeath to John Johnson, the dentist (with address), a certain
gold-capped tooth in my lower jaw, and request that he extract this
and preserve it according to the terms of an agreement made between
us many years ago.” This not only threw light upon, but complicated
the mystery. Perhaps the grave had been opened to allow the dentist to
claim his strange legacy. Once more the body was disinterred by the
friends of the dead man. The gold-capped tooth was missing from the
lower jaw.

I next called upon John Johnson, the dentist. Despite his American
name I could see that he was a foreigner--a Russian, I was certain.

I mentioned the occasion of my visit. “Did you open the grave of Mr.
L---- and remove a certain gold-capped tooth from the mouth of the dead
man?” I asked, point blank.

Mr. Johnson seemed at a loss how to reply. At last, he said “No.”

“Then the cemetery superintendent was wrong. You did not drive in
with two companions in a carriage, and this is not your card which I
picked up near the grave of Mr. L----?” said I, showing him one of his
business cards which I had surreptitiously obtained. “You might as well
confess. You were only getting your rights, after all, but why did you
go about it in such an underhanded way?”

“I don’t understand you.”

“Are you not acquainted with the contents of Mr. L----’s will, the
gold-capped tooth and all?”

“Did he put that in the will?” inquired the dentist in a surprised tone.

“Then you do know something about it?”

“Yes; it is a strange story, and if you will promise--nay, swear--never
to reveal it, I will tell it to you. Do you swear?”

Something in the manner and bearing of the man told me that he was
no thief, and I readily promised what he asked, and he told me the
following strange story:




A Strange Story.


Mr. Johnson conducted me into an inner room, closed and locked the door
and bade me be seated.

“My name,” he began, “is not John Johnson. I am living under an assumed
name for reasons of a political nature. I am a Russian by birth, and a
Nihilist by thought and training. I deplore the condition of my unhappy
country. I have done my part and am still willing to do it, to help
bring about her freedom from the terrible despotism under which she
suffers. I am acquainted with the horrors of Siberian prison-mines.
I was sentenced to Siberia for life, for complicity in a Nihilistic
plot. My brother was sent there soon afterward. Together we planned
escape. I succeeded. He fell. Shot down by an officer of his Despotic
Majesty. I managed to reach England, where I found many friends. In
London I became acquainted with the late Mr. L----. He was also a
Nihilist, and a victim of Alexander’s wrath. He, too, was an exile from
his country. For either of us to return meant instant capture at the
hands of the Czar’s well-trained police--or worse than that, Siberia.
I lived in London five years. There I learned the trade of a dentist.
Upon my banishment to Siberia, my property had been confiscated to the
government.

“At the end of five years I came to the United States, where I have
lived ever since. Mr. L---- came here soon after I did. He was a rich
man. Just previous to his arrest, he had managed to convert most of
his property into money which he deposited in a London bank. This had
been used to effect his escape from Siberia. He had relatives in this
country with whom he lived up to the time of his death. Soon after
coming to this country, he imparted to me a secret which had been in
his keeping for thirty years, it having been transmitted to him by his
father. He was then a man of sixty. One day, ten years ago, he came
into my office--this very room--and said he wished to speak with me
upon a most important matter, one concerning our beloved country.

“‘Do you see this tooth,’ he inquired, pointing to a large, gold-capped
molar in his lower jaw.

“‘Yes,’ I replied.

“‘That tooth,’ he continued, after having made sure that we were
alone, ‘that tooth holds, has held for thirty years, a secret of the
utmost importance to you and me, and to all liberty loving Russians.
I tell you this because I know you will guard the secret as you would
your life. In the cavity of that tooth, under the gold cap (here he
lowered his voice) is a piece of parchment which contains the plans of
a secret underground entrance to the Czar’s palace at St. Petersburg,
an entrance which, as you will readily understand, will prove of the
utmost importance to our friends when the time is ripe to use it.
This plan has been in the possession of our family for hundreds of
years, having been drawn originally by an ancestor of mine, one of
the designers of the palace. I am the last male member of my family,
and now bequeath this secret to you. Upon my death, I desire that you
extract the tooth, and preserve or dispose of the plan in whatever
way seems best to you. You know its importance. I can rely upon your
judgment. The dentist who inserted it in my tooth, thirty years ago in
Russia, is now dead. You and I alone now hold the secret. Do you accept
the trust?’

“‘I do,’ I answered.

“That was Mr. L----’s story.

“When he died I happened to be out of the city. On my return I hastened
to obtain possession of the tooth in the manner that seemed best to
me. I was not aware that the matter was mentioned in Mr. L----’s will,
which it would appear he had intended to make public before his death,
but was unable to do so. The plan which I found in the cavity of the
tooth is now in safe hands in Russia, and the world may yet learn
whether the well-guarded secret is destined to be utilized.

“I tell you this because I know you are an American, a lover of
liberty, and will not divulge the secret I have told you.”

Mr. Johnson died many years ago, and now I give this story to the
world, confident that even its perusal by the Russian officials cannot
in any way endanger the secret of the gold-capped tooth.

       *       *       *       *       *

Transcriber’s Note:

Punctuation has been made consistent.