The Project Gutenberg eBook of Famous Colonial Houses
    
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: Famous Colonial Houses

Author: Paul M. Hollister

Author of introduction, etc.: Julian Street

Illustrator: James M. Preston

Release date: March 9, 2022 [eBook #67591]

Language: English

Original publication: United States: David McKay Company, 1921

Credits: Charlene Taylor, Charlie Howard, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)


*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAMOUS COLONIAL HOUSES ***





Transcriber’s Notes


Table of Contents added by Transcriber.

Italics are enclosed in _underscores_.


CONTENTS

  Introduction                             9
  Monticello                              17
  The Haunted House, New Orleans          29
  Doughoregan Manor                       43
  The Jumel Mansion                       55
  Mount Vernon                            69
  The Quincy Homestead                    83
  The Timothy Dexter Mansion              95
  The Kendall House                      107
  The Longfellow House                   121
  Cliveden                               135
  The Wentworth Mansion                  145
  The Pringle House                      159
  Appendix                               169




[Illustration:

    © D.McK

MONTICELLO

“Mr. Jefferson,” said one of Rochambeau’s aides, “is the first American
who has consulted the fine arts to know how he should shelter himself
from the weather.” With no continental travel for background, with only
the meager pictorial record of the period to draw upon, he somehow
responded to the simplicity and useful beauty of the classics, and
translated it to his castle.]




[Illustration]

  FAMOUS
  COLONIAL
  HOUSES

  BY
  _PAUL M. HOLLISTER_

  Illustrated by
  _JAMES PRESTON_

  With an Introduction by
  _JULIAN STREET_

  [Illustration]

  DAVID McKAY COMPANY, Publishers
  _PHILADELPHIA, MCMXXI_




  Copyright, 1921, by
  DAVID MCKAY COMPANY


  _Illustrations especially engraved and printed by the
  Beck Engraving Company, Philadelphia_




  TO

  MARION




FOREWORD


There is no bibliography in this book. I confess freely to a
snapping-up of ill-considered trifles where I found them. Those that
rang true are here, those that proved false upon closer examination
are not. Some were gifts, some purchases, some thefts--the latter are
now shamelessly confessed, on the plea that as a citizen I have the
right of eminent domain to the story of my country. I cannot put the
volume out to shift for itself without blanket acknowledgment of the
generosity of the people who put me in the way of finding reliable
information. Several of them are the owners of the houses; some of them
have even read this manuscript.

                                        --_Boston, September, 1921._




INTRODUCTION


As I read in Mr. Hollister’s chapter on Mount Vernon of Washington’s
long absence from the home he loved and of the eagerness with which he
returned to it after the tumultuous years of the Revolutionary War, I
was caught by the fancy that lovers of books have recently gone through
a somewhat parallel experience. Dragged away by the Great War from the
books they cared for, plunged into continual war reading, they now
find, to their infinite relief, that they are getting home again--back
to Mount Vernon, as it were. And it seems to me the change could not
better be exemplified than in this charming, gentle book of Famous
Colonial Houses.

While we were fighting to preserve the heritage and the traditions left
us by Washington, Jefferson, Carroll of Carrollton, and other great
figures of their time, whom we find in these pages, we were too busily
engaged to give much thought to the origins of the things we fought to
save. Not that the forefathers of the nation were forgotten, but that
historic men were, in that time of stress, overshadowed by historic
principles laid down by them. We put them aside tenderly, as books are
put aside when the sword is taken up. Yet now that we have vindicated
in battle the freedom that they gave us, we find them more than ever
with us. For a just war fought through to victory sheds glory not only
upon the men who fought it and the nation for which they fought, but
also upon the nation’s ancient heroes, whose stature is increased with
that of their country. Wherefore this book, telling tales of old houses
in which early American history was made, and of men who made the
houses and the history, is even more welcome today than it would have
been before the Great War.

It is welcome, too, for another partially extrinsic reason.

In the face of mutterings of anarchy--that Russian importation which
is so much less satisfactory than the caviar--there is reassurance
in these sturdy calm old mansions which are the monuments of the
sturdy calm old patriots who raised them--men having a rare sense of
proportion which they exercised not only in building their houses but
in building the nation on lines equally clean, sound and beautiful.
Fancy a shaggy Bolshevik, his mouth full of broken English, his head
full of sophistry, and his heart full of greed for the possessions of
others, being led up Mount Vernon, Monticello or Doughoregan Manor!
Could any contrast make a picture more grotesque? Could there be
conceived a background more serenely sane, more perfectly American,
against which to display the distortion of this foreign madness?
Every stone and brick and timber of such houses preaches a sermon on
Americanism.

It is a sermon not only for aliens, but for all of us. We should all
see these houses, or if we cannot see them, we should know them as some
of them are made known to us in this book. Our land is a better land
for having them within its borders, and we will be better citizens for
an acquaintance with them.

The day on which I went to Monticello was beautiful, yet, save my
companion, no one else was there. I wonder how many of the politicians
who, with the _vox humana_ stop pulled out, acclaim the name of
Jefferson as founder of the Democratic Party, have made the short
pilgrimage from Washington to Charlottesville to visit the house he
lived in and the grave where he is buried.

In curious contrast to the large investment of the nation in National
Parks, is its apparent indifference in the matter of the homes of its
historic figures. Not one of the houses dealt with by Mr. Hollister in
this book is the property of the nation. Two of them are, to be sure,
houses which, though their story is interesting, are not involved
with national history; and some of the others are not of sufficient
importance, from the purely historical point of view, to make them
national monuments of the first order. But two are, on the other hand,
the homes of early presidents, and neither of these is owned by the
nation. For all practical purposes Mount Vernon is as free to the
public as though the nation did own it, but the fact remains that the
title to it is vested in a society; while as for Monticello, it is
owned by a private individual, not a descendant of Jefferson, into
whose hands it came by inheritance from a forebear said to have secured
it in a not too creditable way. It is difficult to understand why the
State of Virginia or the Nation has not bought the place, which, I am
told, the owner has declared his willingness to part with--at a price.

The census of the twelve houses described and pictured in this book is
worth completing. One, Mount Vernon, is, as I have said, owned by an
organization of patriotic women; two are owned by their municipalities
and are cared for by patriotic organizations; one only is the home of
a lineal descendant and namesake of the builder--though three others
belong to persons having in their veins blood of the first masters of
their houses. And one--a most interesting, but not historic house--is
a poor battered tenement. Seven of the houses are situated in Northern
States, one in a Border State, and four are in the South. The builders
of two of the houses, the first and third Presidents of the United
States, are buried on the grounds nearby, and in one case the builder
is buried under the chancel of a private chapel, a part of the house
itself.

These historic houses may well be regarded as taking the place with us
of the crown jewels of an empire. I am thankful to have seen eight of
the twelve. For, like one of Goldsmith’s characters, “I love everything
that’s old--old friends, old times, old manors, old books, old wine.”

Therefore I find myself particularly pleased at being associated
with this book, though in so slight a way. The two men who created
it--for in this case the author and the artist surely stand on equal
footing--are my old friends. Obviously, the book is one of old times
and old manors, and if that does not make it an old book, what could?
Only the old wine is lacking to complete the quintet. And even that may
some day be accessible again. Who knows?

                                                  --_Julian Street._

  NORFOLK, CONN.,
  _September, 1921_.




LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS


  Monticello              _Frontispiece._

                              Facing Page
  The Haunted House, New Orleans       28

  Doughoregan Manor                    42

  The Jumel Mansion                    54

  Mount Vernon                         68

  The Quincy Homestead                 82

  The Timothy Dexter Mansion           94

  The Kendall House                   106

  The Longfellow House                120

  Cliveden                            134

  The Wentworth Mansion               144

  The Pringle House                   158




MONTICELLO


Famous Colonial Houses


MONTICELLO


In Thomas Jefferson’s boyhood imagination the hill had seemed to
climb like Jack’s beanstalk to the infinite clouds. The view from
his Father’s dooryard across the Rivanna registered each day through
the clear lenses of his eyes upon the sensitive plate of his memory,
and so upon his heart. As a lad he staged mental melodrama upon its
symmetrical slopes and built an air-castle upon its summit. Every
engagement of Caesar’s conquests, every adventure of the pious Aeneas
found on Monticello a proper setting. If his schoolbooks had not been
burned in the fire at Shadwell we might expect to find, on the margins
of his Horace, a sketch of the castle of his dream, for Jefferson drew
rather well and probably sketched just as well during study hour as any
other boy of his age.

He was nineteen when his dream promised to materialize. That summer
and the next, when he was at home for the long holiday, he would cross
the Rivanna in his canoe and climb the slope to see how the workmen
were getting on with the levelling for his castle. As the boy had grown
towards manhood the hill no longer towered into the skies, but whatever
the picture lost in size, it gained in rich associations. It was still
_his_ mountain: _Monticello_--“little mountain”--he called it. “Our
own dear Monticello, where Nature has spread such a rich mantle under
the eye, mountains, forests, rocks, rivers. There is a mountain there
in the opposite direction of the afternoon’s sun, the valley between
which and Monticello is five hundred feet deep.... How sublime to look
down upon the workhouse of Nature, to see her clouds, hail, snow, rain,
thunder, all fabricated at our feet.”

In all weathers, under all trials, his heart took refuge on the hill.
He was admitted to the bar in 1767, made headway in his profession, and
was sent to the House of Burgesses, honors which only quickened his
impatient accomplishment, and his desire for a home upon his mountain.
In 1769 its plans were ready, and work began. Thirty years later it was
finished. During those years he wrote his country’s bill of divorce
from her harsh proprietor, and was nearly captured at Monticello by
British raiders. Monticello saw him ride down the winding road as a
Burgess, to ride up again as a member of the Continental Congress;
honored him as Governor of Virginia, and waved him Godspeed as he left
to succeed Benjamin Franklin as envoy to France; hailed him home as
Washington’s secretary of state, and then reluctantly surrendered him
to eight years in a new White House that stood in a sandy wilderness
somewhere down on the banks of the Potomac. But when his active life
was done, after he had not only written the Declaration of Independence
but prosecuted it, added half a continent to its jurisdiction, and
administered the doctrine that all men are created free and equal, he
came back to the mountain of his memory to gaze down upon the workhouse
of Nature.

“While it is too much to say,” writes Julian Street, “that one would
recognize it as the house of the writer of the Declaration, it is
not too much to say, that once one does know it, one can trace a
clear affinity resulting from a common origin--an affinity much
more apparent, by the way, than can be traced between the work of
Michelangelo on St. Peter’s at Rome, on the ceiling of the Sistine
Chapel, and in his ‘David.’

“The introductory paragraph to the Declaration ascends into the body
of the document as gracefully as the wide flights of easy steps ascend
to the doors of Monticello; the long and beautifully balanced paragraph
which follows, building word upon word and sentence upon sentence into
a central statement, has a form as definite and graceful as that of
the finely proportioned house; the numbered paragraphs which follow,
setting forth separate details, are like rooms within the house, and--I
have just come upon the coincidence with a pleasant start such as might
be felt by the discoverer of some complex and important cipher--as
there are twenty-seven of the numbered paragraphs in the Declaration,
so there are twenty-seven rooms in Monticello. Last of all there
are two little phrases in the Declaration (the phrases stating that
we shall hold our British brethren in future as we hold the rest of
mankind--‘enemies in war; in peace, friends’), which I would liken
to the small twin buildings, one of them Jefferson’s office, the
other that of the overseer, which stand on either side of the lawn at
Monticello, at some distance from the house.”

The house which inspired and witnessed the activities of so prominent a
figure could hardly lack distinction, and this, of course, Monticello
has. What is more, Monticello is a monument of technical architecture
which attracts the eager attention of every student of American
domestic building. The question they all ask, and the question that
cannot be answered, is: “Where could this farmer-lawyer boy have got
his expert training in architecture?” His library might have given us
a clue, but it was burned at Shadwell in 1770. We know he felt this
loss acutely, for, next to his house, Jefferson loved his books. He
asked anxiously of their fate. An old slave answered: “All burnt, my
young master, all burnt. But never mind, sir”--and his wrinkled face
broke into a broad smile--“we saved your old fiddle!” The new house
at Monticello was even then far enough along to take in his mother’s
family, evicted by the fire. The building continued. It was slow work,
on an extensive plan.

“Mr. Jefferson,” said one of Rochambeau’s aides later, “is the first
American who has consulted the fine arts to know how he should shelter
himself from the weather.” With no continental travel for background,
with only the meagre pictorial record of the period to draw upon,
he somehow responded instantly to the simplicity and useful beauty
of the classic, and translated it to his castle. By the Greeks, for
example, it was thought improper that a roof should indicate anything
but a glorification of the heavens; the idea that human feet might
be walking on the upper side of a ceiling was sacrilege. This (and
other more practical engineering reasons) dictated single-story
buildings. Jefferson’s eye for balance caught the pictorial advantages
of one-story construction, but he needed two stories for Monticello,
and by his shrewd planning both the pure classic tradition and pure
American comfort were reconciled.

At the end of a broad lawn, in full relief against the distant sky,
stands a red brick house with a clean, tall portico. The four gleaming
pillars stand guard like peace-time sentinels. A white balustrade
runs along the eaves of the building, tempering the irregularities
in the roof except where the smooth curve of a dome rises above the
center. The feeling is classic, and so suggests a single story, and the
length of the lofty windows flanking the portico seems to confirm the
impression that a single frame has been carried the full height of the
house. Closer examination, however, of the irregularities just remarked
in the roof reveals them as the gabled windows of an upper story.
In cold, unprofessional analysis, the compromise sounds thoroughly
impractical. Just the contrary is true, for Jefferson took up every
challenging problem with enthusiasm, and applied to its solution a
sure sense of balance and a hearty appetite for detail.

Indoors the one-story tradition is quite as respectfully acknowledged,
and as cleverly evaded. The entrance hall is a lofty room of great
dignity, almost so good that a job-lot of Victorian furniture has not
damaged its appearance, and unquestionably so good that even the most
critical architectural eye will not take offense at a balcony which
travels three of its sides. There is the balcony, but where, inquires
your classic eye, are the stairs? Concealed in a passage, where they
cannot break the form of the hall from which visitors are to gain their
first impression of the interior.

If the visitor in Jefferson’s day went further, as his uniform
hospitality required, he may have noticed as he passed to the
drawing-room that the portal between the two rooms had two pairs of
doors. There was a definite reason for them: the wall must be heavy to
support the octagon in which the drawing-room was situated, and over
which rose the dome. A single pair of doors would have made an ugly
recess in either room. Two sets of doors finished both rooms correctly,
but presented just twice as many nice problems of treatment. So the
first set was made of heavily paneled wood, and might be folded back
into an invisible pocket in the passage; the second set was a pair of
light casements, and if the visitor were to press a spring on either
one, both would close by a mechanism concealed overhead.

Throughout the building there were ingenious touches which disclosed
beneath their first impression of simple luxurious comfort the patient
scheming of the builder. The drawing-room was octagonal in order that
five windows might frame clear vistas in as many directions across
the sweeping valleys to the horizon. The floor there is of squares of
cherry wood, each with a liberal border of contrasting beech; both
woods were laid only after Jefferson had made painstaking experiment
in the color and in the wearing and joining qualities of various kinds
of flooring. The same note of formality which one feels in the Pringle
house of Charleston as he passes from room to room through heavily
pedimented doorways is sounded at Monticello; but where Miles Brewton,
in his Charleston house, held strictly to the “egg-and-dart” of the
classic mode, Thomas Jefferson embellished the friezes above the doors
of his drawing-room with a motive of tomahawks, scalping knives and
rosettes! He feared that the dining-room, with only two southerly
windows for ventilation, might become close toward the end of a long
meal, so he gave a slight dome-like concavity to the ceiling, and at
its focal center concealed under a grille the intake of a ventilator
which leads up through the roof. He built a recess for the sideboard
with the double effect of preserving the lines of the apartment and
of displaying a handsome piece of furniture to its best advantage. An
exquisite Adam mantel, with Wedgwood panels, stands between two of
the windows, and you would never guess that in one of its sides is
a door, and behind that door a dumb-waiter leading from the service
rooms below. He wanted his body-servant’s room conveniently near his
own, so a staircase to the valet’s quarters ascends through a spacious
closet off the master’s chamber. None of the liaison between art and
artifice would be remarkable today, perhaps. There are modern houses
as honestly built as men of taste can plan and men of wealth can buy,
to match Touraine for splendor, Italy for gilt, a highly organized
railway terminal for convenience and Sybaris for comfort. But given the
workmanship, the materials and the engineering of any period in our
domestic architecture, Monticello challenges them all to show a better
plan.

Long balustraded walks reach out to right and left from the house.
Someone has likened them to two friendly outstretched arms, holding
in each hand not a jewel, but a dainty summer-house. They are more
than decorative promenades--each is the roof of a subterranean arcade,
passing from the main building to the servants’ quarters. All of the
strictly domestic affairs were in the cellar-story, made habitable by
the fact that it was just a step down the hillside, and made by no
means the least interesting portion of the building by further evidence
of Jefferson’s genius. It is a veritable catacomb. He built there a
kitchen ventilated by long ducts which carried cooking odors to distant
outlets; he built cisterns, a large carriage court, cold-rooms, bins
for fruits, and wood, and cider; servants’ quarters so placed that they
were cool in summer and warm in winter. Like Mount Vernon, and every
other colonial estate of any size, Monticello was a self-maintaining
establishment, which supported the labor of several trades. But the
tailor-shop, the distillery, the smithy, the dye-house, the cobblery,
the weaver’s shop--all were set apart from the main house and concealed
from the general eye. Later architects thought enough of the treatment
of the arcade passages to the servants’ quarters to copy them for the
subterranean barracks at Fortress Monroe.

One wonders where Thomas Jefferson found the time for all this labor
and supervision. The answer must be that his house was his one
consuming avocation. It is almost a truism that the men upon whom are
made the heaviest demands find time to invite the greatest number of
demands. As Roosevelt loved his natural history, and made affectionate
excursions into botany, so Jefferson knew every tree and shrub on his
estate, and watched over it. Each week during his presidency a letter
was despatched from the White House to Captain Bacon, his overseer in
charge, directing transplanting, grading, repairs, improvements. Many
of the workmen on the estate were men whom he himself had trained in
their crafts. Some were slaves, whom he later freed to practise the
trades he had given them. Before he had stone cut and measured for
the building he tested the stone; he weathered various woods; he made
experiments in brick-laying which in some cases led him to strange
conclusions, but which, like everything else he undertook about the
building, had practical reasoning behind them. And yet, during all the
patient hours he spent in drafting and directing, the miles he walked
in surveying and landscaping, he never let the cloud of details eclipse
the artist’s star.

Jefferson has been much idolized for his directness, his logic, his
practicality. He undoubtedly gave the country what today would be
termed “a good business administration.” It is tempting to leave him
to posterity with that reputation, and with the Louisiana Purchase
as its brightest testimonial, the shrewdest real estate deal in our
history. But Monticello is so obviously the product of an artist and a
scholar that we learn with no hint of damage to his commoner reputation
that the man who had spent his life upon this estate had also spent
much more money than he possessed; that his generosity approached
extravagance; that his library of some seven thousand volumes, the best
then in America, was sold after his death to the government (to replace
the library the British destroyed at Washington in 1814) because it
had to be sold to meet his debts; and that Monticello itself finally
passed out of the hands of his family. With Jefferson gone Monticello
could never be wholly itself again. It must stand always as the finest
exposition of the heart of the artist who conceived the plan for the
University of Virginia at Monticello’s skirts, who found when he
visited Nîmes a Roman Temple which so fascinated him that he said the
peasants thought him a mad Englishman contemplating suicide in its
ruins, who copied that same temple for the Capitol of Richmond, and who
wrote to a Paris acquaintance: “Here I am gazing whole hours at the
_Maison Quarrée_ like a lover at his mistress.”

When Jefferson died he was buried on the estate. An army of human
rodents came to see to his grave and to nibble away most of the
memorial shaft, and it was only through the persistent efforts of his
grand-daughter, Miss Randolph, that the United States stepped in and
restored it. Meanwhile the estate had been sold under questionable
circumstances to a Captain Uriah Levy. In justice to him be it said
that he felt the responsibility of his charge, and bequeathed it at his
death to the people of the United States. But the Supreme Court decreed
that this definition was too vague, and after a prolonged debate among
Levy’s heirs, his nephew, Jefferson Levy, acquired for $10,500 the
title to the buildings and 218 acres of the little mountain.

Sporadic efforts have been made to buy the estate and rescue it from
the casual upkeep which is carrying Monticello steadily towards the
shadows of oblivion; one such movement, under the leadership of Mrs.
Martin W. Littleton, bade fair to succeed, and there were patriotic
women ready to assume its care as they have so admirably done at Mount
Vernon. The Governor of Virginia is silent on the subject, and the
Wilson government, which owed more perhaps to Jefferson than to any
other single preceptor, was otherwise engaged. With the return of peace
the renewal of the project is, to say the least, appropriate. Whether
it contains an appeal to the honor of citizenship in a nation in which
all men are free and equal, is for its citizens--and one of them is the
owner--to decide.




THE HAUNTED HOUSE,

NEW ORLEANS


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE HAUNTED HOUSE

That April-day crowd returned to Hospital and Royal Streets and sacked
the house from hall to belvedere, ripped down silk curtains, slashed
paintings, wrenched out chandeliers, dug up two skeletons from the
courtyard, pitched Madame Lalaurie’s precious possessions out of
windows and made bonfire of the wreckage in the street. Nor when inside
the stout old walls a new and finer residence was built in cheerful
defiance of the ghost, could the spirit of tragedy be banished.]


THE HAUNTED HOUSE, NEW ORLEANS


Far down in the _vieux carré_, the old French quarter of New Orleans,
where Hospital Street meets Royal, the drone of the modern city at work
comes faintly through the morning air. Back yonder, above Canal Street,
there are motor trucks, profanity and clangor; here there is hardly a
street-car, and if you hear loud voices they are filtered through the
shutters of a shabby dwelling where a hopeful candidate for the Opera
is practising her topmost. The old French Opera House, the scene of
Patti’s debut, departed this life only last year--a gay life, marked
by amours and appointments, triumphs and disappointments, dances and
duels. Presently there will be gaps in the circle of musicians who
always settle about the focal point of an opera house, and you will
hear no more the manifold outpourings of their several souls, throats
and fiddles.

Their passing will deepen the twilight of an antiquity which New
Orleans has cherished with more sympathy than all the rest of our
American cities. Rigid modern buildings with Louis XVI fronts and
O’Shaughnessy backs will rear their ventilators, tanks and pent-houses
where, once upon a time, warm walls and climbing cupolas, odd contours
and vine-like wrought-iron railings melted into a strangely complex and
beautiful composition. Even now, as the fitful trolley-car clanks past
the corner of Hospital and Royal, a tremor shakes a few more crumbling
grains from the arches of the old Spanish Barracks. Soon they will be
returned to earth. You will forget that France gave New Orleans to
Spain to pay for her help in the English wars; that Napoleon, sitting
in his bath-tub and quarreling with his brothers, maintained stoutly
that since he had just forced Spain to give Louisiana back to him, he
had a perfect right to re-sell; that he splashed them into agreement;
and that he did re-sell the territory to the new United States. But
Napoleon’s legions have followed Andrew Jackson’s Kentucky riflemen
into the twilight.

The passing of the old order has a hundred conspicuous manifestations
in New Orleans, perhaps because there is a legend for every old house,
a tragedy for every shadow, a romantic blood-stain on every pavement.
The Absinthe House takes in lodgers. The Cabildo, the ancient Spanish
city hall, is a museum. An order of Catholic sisters now occupies the
building which once witnessed the quadroon balls. There is African
ragtime in New Orleans, as there is in every city and town where
squeals the talking-machine, but in Beauregard Square you will not hear
today the thumping of the voodoo chant, nor see the _bamboula_ danced,
as you might have in the days when it was Congo Square. Ashes unto
ashes, dust to--reinforced concrete.

Nowhere, perhaps, is there more graphic evidence of the change than
right here at Hospital and Royal Streets. Inspect the house before
you. The days of its grandeur are past. The concièrge says a hundred
and eighty people live there now--surely it was not intended for so
many. But it is a lodging-house, and the task of cleaning up after the
lodgers must make them seem to the concièrge like a hundred and eighty
or more.

From the street corner diagonally opposite your eyes take in a spacious
square building, three stories high, of cement-colored stucco. It
has a flat roof, and its architecture suggests that the daughter of
a Florentine palace became the bride of a small but snappily dressed
United States Post Office. It stands flush with the _banquette_, and
wears a frill of balcony clear round its two street sides, under whose
tempering shade you may distinguish the faded red of the lower story,
and the entrance to a mysterious tunnel which is in reality a deeply
arched doorway.

Under its modern exterior you will detect hints of its great age. There
is, for example, a note of caprice in the red wrought-iron railings
of the balcony. They may have been made, as were many in the _vieux
carré_, at the very forge of Jean Lafitte, the pirate-blacksmith who
commanded the marauders of Barataria, and whose pirate four-pounders
helped out the rifles at the battle of New Orleans. Generations of
idlers have worn smooth and rusty brown the peacock tints on the iron
columns that support the balcony. There are touches of vermilion and
lavender in the sharp green of the shutters at the second-floor windows.

The architecture is Italo-American, and so are the urchins popping from
the doors to stare at you as you wait for admittance. Their faces are
soiled, and so is the black-and-white marble floor behind the heavy
spiked gates. Note, above you, the coffered and embossed ceiling,
appraise the graceful fan-light over the door, examine the elaborate
carving of the door itself, for these are relics which indicate the
grand manner in which this house once welcomed its guests. Forget
that the ceiling is blistered, that two panes are gone from the side
windows, and that night-blooming lodgers have kicked the haunches off
the carved steeds of Phoebus Apollo on the door. A century ago a slave
would have swung wide the portal with great ceremony, and you would
have mounted the winding stair to an upper hall which was notable for
its elegance; today you find it dingy, uninspiring and forlorn. Not a
ghost in sight anywhere.

Comes the concièrge and swears and deposes that in the year of Our
Lord 1919 she did see with her own eyes a headless man march up these
stairs, and that she has accordingly caused the house to be sprinkled
with holy water. Did he look like Louis Philippe? Well, he looked
something like him, and yet differed from him--the light wasn’t good,
and besides (and this _was_ a happy thought) the figure had no head,
and resemblances are hard to establish under those conditions. Louis
Philippe is believed to have slept here, though Mr. George W. Cable
doubts this, on the ground that in 1798, the year of the royal visit,
no such high buildings were erected for fear they would sink into the
soft ground. No, the headless man was not Louis Philippe, but some
other character in the lurid history of the building.

That history began in the first year or two of the century, when the
Baron de Pontalba, a stanch old Bonapartist who did as he pleased,
did it with exceptionally good taste and built this mansion. Soft
ground or no soft ground, the Pontalbas were a vigorous family, who,
when they wanted houses, built them. Gossip said the Baron and his
daughter-in-law never got on well together. There may have been some
truth in it, for years later they found the Baron dead in his room at
Mont l’Eveque, and daughter-in-law in her own room badly wounded by
pistol shots. True, however, to the tradition of hardihood which ran in
the family, she recovered, and lived through the Franco-Prussian War,
carrying the bullets in her body to her grave.

The Baron had earnestly advised Napoleon to sell Louisiana to
Jefferson. Oddly enough, the Purchase which he advocated brought about
a change in New Orleans which attacked the very identity of such
families as the Pontalbas. An invasion of uncultured Americans from the
north swept down the valley, settled in the city, and beat against the
social barriers of the French and Spanish circles in the _vieux carré_.
Hitherto they had dictated the life of the city, and it was disturbing
to those who dated from the “_filles de la cassette_” and the grandees
of the Spanish Main to contemplate this immigration of a new race,
unancestored and, from a Latin standpoint, uncivilized. It was more
than disturbing, it was electro-chemical, and although there was at
first little fraternity between the races, it produced shortly a lively
society.

The Duke of Saxe-Weimar is responsible for an interesting picture
of its customs and habits in 1825. During a visit to New Orleans
he was entertained at the home of a famous gambler, the Baron de
Marigny (he who had entertained the princes of Orleans in ’98), where
he admired, not without cause, a set of chinaware decorated with
portraits of the French royal family and its palaces. The winter
was gay, and he made the rounds of dances, masques and theatres. He
frequented coffee-houses, he danced with the ladies, whom he found
“very pretty, with a genteel French air,” and when “the gentlemen,
who were far behind the ladies in elegance, did not long remain, but
hastened away to other balls,” he was among those also-hastening,
for the naughty young gentlemen were on their way to a quadroon
ball. On another occasion he called upon the august lawyer Grymes,
who figured prominently in the notorious case of Salome Mueller, a
white slave-girl. Grymes was a “foremost citizen” in that society, so
was Miller, Salome’s claimant, who probably knew she was white and
therefore entitled to freedom. A foremost citizen, even in our own
enlightened and prohibited day, can do no wrong--if he has the right
lawyer. The Duke found the city magnificent in her unbridled emotion,
charming in her graces, attractive if perverse in her ethics, and
altogether capable of making a stranger’s head spin.

Thus, when there came to New Orleans in 1825 a benevolent middle-aged
gentleman of France, the Marquis de Lafayette, the city gave him a
superlative welcome. In the light of recent Franco-American exchanges
it is pleasant to think of him as the recipient of every token of
hospitality the city could offer, from triumphal arches to dinners
of state. It suits our specific purpose to watch him chatting in the
drawing-room of the Pontalba house, to peep through the shutters of the
great windows and see the street below filled with bobbing lanterns
of the crowd that has collected to see the great man step into his
carriage, to turn back again into the drawing-room and see that he has
no intention of leaving, for he is the center of a sparkle of wit that
matches the crystal chandelier for brilliance. Here he discoursed, up
yonder he passed the night. With his departure in the morning, the
chronicled glory of the house ends, and its tragedy begins.

Among the old court records there is an entry which establishes the
fact that at the height of the interesting social period marked by
Lafayette’s visit the Pontalba house changed hands. On August 30,
1831, it was bought by Madame McCarty-Lopez-Blanque-Lalaurie, a woman
of more than ordinary magnetism and the wife of Dr. Louis Lalaurie.
Her establishment was quite up to the standards of Créole society. The
touch of her expert hand was evident in the decoration of the house,
and the choice and disposition of the furniture and paintings were a
compliment to her taste. Her ten slaves were more than enough to care
for its needs. She drove out along the Bayou road of an afternoon
behind fine horses, her coachman was coveted as a correct and desirable
servant. What the world calls fine people came to her house with as
keen an appetite for the intellectual cocktails of the hostess as for
the creature hospitality they anticipated at her table.

Like most ladies of social pursuits she had pronounced likes and
dislikes, and she got herself talked about. Being a pure-blood Créole
she resented the nouveau-riche American invasion of the city. “Let
them come,” she said. “There are some things they cannot buy”--and her
good opinion was one, her invitations another. Some of “them” resented
the fact that they would never be bidden to enter the deep-arched
vestibule, nor see the ponderous door swing wide to them as guests, nor
ascend the graceful winding stair. So they railed, and Madame Lalaurie
tossed her head. They muttered unpleasant things, and she sniffed. Then
they cried scandal, to which she was deaf.

A susceptible young Créole attached to the office of the district
attorney was sent one day to call upon Madame Lalaurie and to bring
to her attention the annoying rumor that she had been unkind to her
slaves. He went away with his copy of Article XX of the Old Black Code
unrecited, and his addled young head full of impatience that such
slander could have been perpetrated against a person so obviously
kindly as Madame Lalaurie had just shown herself to be. He had been, in
fact, charmed, and he admitted it.

There is no telling how long the matter might have carried on if it had
not been for a chance glimpse through a window. The unsubstantiated
scandal persisted. But there happened to be a small staircase window in
a neighbor’s house which gave on Madame Lalaurie’s courtyard, and which
commanded not only the screened courtyard-galleries of the house itself
but those of the slave quarters, which stood at right angles to the
house.

The neighbor was going upstairs when she heard a piercing shriek.
From the window she saw a little negro girl fly screaming across the
courtyard, with Madame Lalaurie in close pursuit, the lady armed with a
whip. Into the shelter of the house fled the child, then out again upon
the lower latticed balcony. Although the neighbor could not penetrate
the lattice, she followed the progress of the chase by a crescendo of
terrified cries, as the child raced up the outside stairs to the next
gallery, then to the next. In a moment she emerged upon the roof, her
last frantic bid for sanctuary. There were seven different angles of
pitch to that roof, and it was covered with shiny tiles. The child
slipped, clutched, fell to the courtyard and was killed.

Madame Lalaurie buried her that night in a shallow grave in the
courtyard. The neighbor saw that, too. Then, and not until then, she
reported the whole episode. The authorities came and found the grave,
corroborated the story, and punished Madame Lalaurie by selling all her
slaves. The purchasers were her relatives, and she promptly bought all
her slaves right back.

“She starves them,” said Rumor, sitting on the eaves of a house across
the way. “She whips them, she beats them,” the story ran, gaining
momentum.

“But see how fat and cheerful is her coachman,” replied Reason. “Does
he look like the victim of cruelty?” “He is a spy upon the others,”
hissed Rumor. “_Eh, bien_,” said New Orleans, and yawned lightly, “She
serves such dinners!”

The slave who cooked those dinners was a radical. She tired of
practising her arts with a twenty-four-foot chain clamped to her ankle.
On the afternoon of April 10, 1834, after extraordinary provocation,
she became desperate and set fire to the house.

The townsfolk swarmed to the fire, and were greeted at the door by the
gracious Madame Lalaurie. She directed her friends in their efforts
to remove her costly furniture from the house. When someone suggested
seeing that there was no human life still endangered in the building
she said that it was quite empty, and that there was no necessity of
visiting the slave quarters. Judge Canonge took it upon himself to
investigate, but the smoke drove him back. There were some in the
crowd, however, who were neither her friends nor her well-wishers,
and who insisted that the slaves had not been removed. In the face of
swelling clouds of blinding smoke and the lady’s angry remonstrances,
a man finally groped his way into the slave wing which stood at right
angles to the house.

Within a few moments he was outside, shouting. Volunteers ran back
with him into the slave quarters. In the tiny cubicles which served as
living-space for those humble lives were seven negroes, some locked in
while the fire crept toward them, others chained to the walls. Their
emaciated bodies bore witness to famishing hunger, and cruel sores told
the story of their confinement. They were carried to the street, and
the crowd, having helped to put out the fire in the house, took fire
itself and charged the door. Madame Lalaurie deftly slammed it in their
faces.

Her resourcefulness rose to the situation. By subtle management her
carriage picked its way through the crowd a few hours later and drew
up at the entrance. Before the growing throng of people detected the
maneuver, she and her husband were inside the equipage and rattling
round the corner, “driven up Chartres Street in a close carriage which
I saw speeding at a furious rate” (so Henry C. Castellanos wrote in
1895). The afternoon parade of society was idling along the Bayou Road;
her skilful driver wove his way through the stream of carriages and
gained fast on the pursuit which had risen, howling at her flight. The
Lalauries gained the shore of Lake Pontchartrain, put off in a skiff,
boarded a schooner for Mandeville--up sail, and safe away!

The coachman began his return journey to town, and ended it when he met
the pack of pursuers, for they destroyed him. The chase was deferred
just long enough for the lady to effect her escape to Mobile, and
thence to Paris. There rumor followed, and she was avoided by society.
Three years later word came back in the ships that Madame Lalaurie was
dead of wounds received in a boar-hunt. She had probably hunted as hard
as she had lived.

We cannot surrender her to the savage credulity of the ages, however,
without suggesting that the story of her life, although generally
regarded as authentic, may have been gilded here and there by
intervening generations of highly-colored imagination. A New Orleans
man writes:

“I happen to know one of the descendants of Madame Lalaurie very well,
and I have seen a marble bust of this self-same lady whose alleged
record as a slave murderer is indignantly repudiated by the self-same
descendants. As a matter of fact, those stories are pretty much of a
piece with those which were in vogue in regard to throwing negro slaves
into the furnaces of the Mississippi River steamboats and feeding
piccaninnies to alligators. This would be pretty much as if you or
I stood at the foot of the Battery and chucked _all_ of our money,
_diamonds_, and worldly possessions into New York Bay.”

That April-day crowd in New Orleans had no such sober judgment. After
the coachman had been murdered they returned to Hospital and Royal
Streets and sacked the house from hall to belvedere, ripped the silk
curtains, slashed the paintings, tore out the chandeliers, dug up two
slave skeletons from the courtyard, pitched Madame Lalaurie’s precious
possessions out of the windows and made bonfire of the wreckage in the
street. They drank and looted and terrorized the neighborhood until a
detachment of regulars appeared under the sheriff’s command and put an
end to the orgy.

The shell of the house stood abject and battered for a number of years,
its broken windows telling its ugly story to all who came that way.
On a moonlight night an impressionable girl passing the house could
readily have seen the ghost of a woman’s form leaning imploringly from
the belvedere--one girl did see it, and not even her later confession
that the ghost was a fabric of moonbeams has been sufficient to rid the
building of its name--The Haunted House. Nor, when inside the stout old
walls a new and finer residence was built in cheerful defiance of the
ghost, could the spirit of tragedy be easily banished. We shall hear
one more story--a brief one--and then we may judge.

The war came and passed and left New Orleans dominated politically
by those who had been their slaves. The pendulum swung so far to the
extreme that a public school for both white and black children was
ordained and, by coincidence or cunning design, was established in
the Haunted House. It was of course an unfortunate move, and served
no purpose except to whet racial antagonism. There came, finally,
the breaking point. A white political organization which had been
recuperating in strength sent a delegation one afternoon to call
at the school. They were met by the teachers, to whom they issued
a command to muster the school for roll-call. One of the pupils, a
girl of exceptional beauty, heard the commotion from the upper hall,
and peering over the banisters realized the significance of the
roll-call--that the white pupils were to be segregated from the black.
She leaned far over, to catch every word, when a shell comb fell from
her hair and shattered on the marble floor below. She burst into tears
and fled to an upper room.

The roll-call ended. All pupils who had negro blood were ordered from
the house. When the slight flurry had subsided, and the delegation had
left, the principal and one of the teachers found Marguerite upstairs
in a paroxysm of grief. “The comb was my mother’s,” she sobbed, and
when the teacher tried to comfort her, became hysterical. The principal
drew the teacher outside. “It is not on account of the comb,” she said.
“Marguerite’s mother was an octoroon; she married a white sea-captain.
He loved her so much that in order to marry her he opened his wrist
and let a few drops of her blood into his own, so that he might swear
that he had African blood in his veins and get a marriage license. Only
Marguerite and I and one or two others knew her story--and no one would
have suspected, for she is so beautiful. She is engaged to be married,
and her fiancé didn’t know. But the roll-call--now she will leave
school, and he must learn of it.”

Which was the greater tragedy--the brutality of slave torture, or the
death of the exquisite school-girl’s romance? It may be you will find
the answer from the ghost, if ten years of children’s lessons, and the
arpeggios and trills of a conservatory of music, and subsequent vapors
of lodging-house cooking have not frightened the ghost herself away. Go
and see. Far and down in the old quarter of New Orleans, where Hospital
Street meets Royal, you will scarcely hear the drone of the modern city
at work. In the _vieux carré_ one may converse easily with ghosts. You
will find no answer here.




DOUGHOREGAN MANOR


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

DOUGHOREGAN MANOR

There are three ghosts at Doughoregan Manor. One is the shade of an
ancient housekeeper, whose quiet tread may be heard in the corridors,
and whose keys tinkle faintly when the house is still. Another is the
spectral coach--its wheels grind on the driveway when death rides to
claim a member of the household.... The third is no gruesome phantom,
but the warm lively pervading spirit of the Signer himself, Charles
Carroll “_of Carrollton_.”]


DOUGHOREGAN MANOR


You may come up a long straight aisle of locust trees, or you may
wind through Gothic arches of elms along a skilfully engineered road
which picks its way through the estate for a half-mile or more. Either
course will bring you before a wide low house of yellow brick, with
green blinds and white woodwork and English ivy. Directly ahead of
you, across the circle of the driveway, the square main section of the
house, capped by a tower, rises above a bright portico. To left and
right the house throws out long extensions of even height, terminating
in wings set endwise to you, like double-faces in the game of dominoes.
Your first impression will be one of unusual size, your next of flatly
rectangular simplicity. Your eye will be caught momentarily by a
cross-tipped bell-tower of the right wing, where Charles Carroll built
the only private chapel in America because England would not let him
worship in peace. You will know that you have never seen such a house
in America, and you will probably not suspect that it is a monument to
several great Americans.

A lad of four or five is playing on the grass circle of the driveway
before the great house. The undulating Maryland countryside is not
half as absorbing as the game in hand, though his great-grandfather
was governor of all those miles. If you were to ask him the way to
Annapolis he would probably indicate the double file of venerable trees
which stand sentinel along the tapering avenue, smile courteously if
you thanked him, and then scurry off on an important engagement. He
wouldn’t tell you that in his grandfather’s great-grandfather’s day
Annapolis was the national capital, nor that that gentleman was one of
the bold spirits who made a national capital possible.

There is no reason why he should know of it, or be interested. If,
with your heavy wisdom, and your rhapsodies on the pride of race, and
your generally affable tourist behavior you succeed in alarming the
lad until he retreats to the shelter of the portico, know, stranger,
that you have aroused the suspicions of Charles Carroll, the Ninth in
America, and the seventh heir of that name to Doughoregan Manor.

Ancestors can be lived up to or lived down, and there is no particular
point or prowess in bragging about them. To me there is glorious
romance in the fact that this youngster of five is romping on the
ground that was granted to his ancestor by a King of England. Perhaps
it is glorious and romantic because it is fact, but I prefer to believe
that the real reason may be found in a verse in the book of Exodus,
which reads:

                  “Honor thy father and thy mother.”

They were worth honoring; they have been duly honored even unto the
eighth and ninth generations.

Charles Carroll the First, like many another Irishman since, went
west. He came to Baltimore in 1688 with the ink hardly sanded on his
commission as attorney-general of Maryland. As a Roman Catholic he
found the commission suddenly nullified by revolution in England, and
it was four years before a Royal government was set up in the colony
restoring and protecting its proprietary rights. His wife had died
childless during that period, and he married again. Of ten children
of his second wife, the eldest died on the voyage home from school
in Europe. Back at St. Omer’s in French Flanders he left a younger
brother, Charles Carroll the Second, and presently the plodding
ships bore back to him the news of Henry’s death and the heritage
of responsibility and affection which devolved upon him. In 1723 he
came back to his own people, married in his turn, and in 1737 Mistress
Elizabeth Brooke Carroll bore him a son. The precedent for the name
Charles was already strong, Charles was a good name, and so was
christened Charles Carroll the Third.

In the archives of the State Department at Washington you will find his
signature. It is hidden from the light, but reproductions of it and the
pledge to which it is attached have already made it familiar to every
American. The story runs that in the congress at Philadelphia when
the Declaration of Independence was presented, John Hancock turned to
Carroll and offering him a quill, asked “Will you sign?”

“Most willingly,” was the reply. And he signed, in an easy clear hand,
with less flourish, perhaps, than Franklin’s or Hancock’s, but no less
sincerity--and Carroll, the richest man in America, had more to lose
than either.

“There goes two millions with the dash of a pen!” a bystander remarked.
“Oh, Carroll, you will get off,” said another. “There are so many
Charles Carrolls.” At which Charles Carroll Third took the pen and
jabbed “of Carrollton” under his signature, that George Third of
England might make no mistake and punish any other of the same name.
There is some cherry-tree flavor in the story, and precious historians
maintain that he invariably signed his full title; but, if it can
accomplish by example what the cherry-tree fable has accomplished, let
it stand.

What circumstances carried this patriot, whom we left a moment ago
as a baby, to the front rank of his country’s champions? The best of
schooling then was to be had abroad. An ardent father and mother put
aside their fierce attachment to their only child in order that he
might become a proper heir to the estate which Charles Carroll the
Second was accumulating. Just as the young Pinckneys and Rutledges and
Middletons of Charleston in pre-Revolutionary days went to the mother
country for their cultural training, so the youths of the middle states
whose families could afford the excursion were dispatched to France,
or England, or Flanders. One day in 1748 saw Charles Carroll, a boy
of eleven, take ship with his cousin John for Europe. What pangs his
mother experienced at the loss of her only chick are faintly reflected
in a passage from the correspondence between the two: “You are always
at heart my dear Charley and I have never tired of asking your papa
questions about you. I daily pray to God to grant you his grace above
all things, and to take you under his protection.” “With your mother,”
his father wrote in 1753, “I shall be glad to have your likeness in the
compass of 15 inches by 12”--and directed him to have the specified
portrait done by a good painter. But the mother was not well, and in
1761, when the baby who had sailed away was a grown man, a student of
Law in the Temple in London, and nearly ready to return to the warmth
of his mother’s adoration, she died.

Such a beau as he would have made her! Heredity gave him an active mind
and bearing of real charm, and just as the Manor house back in Maryland
took on through the years extensions and embellishments which multiply
its effect of useful luxury, so each addition to Charles Carroll’s
intellect only seemed to make him more companionable and genuinely
attractive. Even during his student period his sensitive spirit was
not altogether proof against affairs of the heart, and if it had not
been for her meddlesome sister, Miss Louisa Baker would have gone back
to Maryland as his bride, as mistress over 68,000 acres. Instead, the
catch of the commonwealth returned at twenty-nine under a cloak of
melancholy from the shelter of which he wrote, dourly, “Matrimony is
at present but little the subject of my thoughts.”

Persons familiar with the laws of gravity and more particularly with
the physics of the rebounding heart will not be surprised to learn that
within a few months he was again engaged to be married, this time to
Miss Rachel Cooke. He wrote to London for her trousseau--such intimate
finery as he hardly dared describe, things to turn even the Babylonian
fiancée of today as green with envy as the Doughoregan meadows. But the
Brussels lace was not for her, for Rachel Cooke fell ill of a fever,
and died, and her miniature and a lock of her tresses were hidden away
in a secret partition of Charles Carroll’s writing desk.

Undiscouraged, he found serious distraction in the fermenting affairs
of the colonies. From provincial grievances such as his father had
related from time to time in his letters dwelling on the oppression of
the rights of Catholics, the problems of the colonists had overflowed
greater areas. Like a flood swelling over the landscape, the minor
swirls of flow and eddy were merged into a common misfortune of drab
color and threatening proportions. It was Charles Carroll’s first
chance for constructive citizenship. At the writing-desk where Rachel’s
miniature lay hidden he wrote a program of letters which may be said
to constitute the brief for independence. And by the time his heart
had healed, and he had fallen in love with Miss Mary Darnell, whom
he preferred, he said, “to all the women I have ever seen, even to
Louisa,” and had married her, he was caught in the flood himself. There
was no turning back even if he wanted to--and he did not want to turn
back.

His town house at Annapolis and the manor of Doughoregan (it is
pronounced _Dooráygan_, and it means the house of the king, because a
thousand years or so ago the O’Carrolls were Irish kings) opened their
doors with special welcome to those who were prepared to resist the
oppression of a king. “A warm, firm, zealous supporter of the rights
of America, in whose cause he has hazarded his all,” wrote John Adams,
Carroll’s “all” at that time yielding an income of some ten thousand
pounds a year. When, in 1773, an outraged importer set fire to his
cargo of taxed tea in Annapolis, Charles Carroll was his chief legal
counsel. When the Continental Congress met in Philadelphia the next
year, he was a member. When the Congress sent a delegation to Canada to
enlist support for the Revolution, it seized upon his French training
as an asset in Charles Carroll, as it chose Benjamin Franklin for his
practical judgment, Father John Carroll (later the first Archbishop of
Baltimore) for his ecclesiastical influence, and Samuel Chase for his
legal ability. The mission failed; Canada would not help; we must work
alone. So to indicate that he welcomed the opportunity Charles Carroll
signed the Declaration of Independence.

Years later he wrote this summary of his career:

“On the breaking out of the Revolution I took a decided part in the
support of the rights of this country; was elected a member of the
Committee of Safety established by the Legislature; was a member of the
Convention which formed the Constitution of the State. The Journals
of Congress show how long I was a member of that body during the
Revolution. With Dr. Franklin and Mr. Samuel Chase I was appointed a
Commissioner to Canada. I was elected a member of the Senate at the
first session of Congress under the present Confederation.... The mode
of choosing the Senate was suggested by me....”

That was all he found to write. It ought to be enough to qualify him
for the emphasis which, in the eminent line of Charles Carrolls, we
have placed upon him. But if, after you have followed him through the
Revolution, you inquire just what connection the details of his career
have with Doughoregan Manor, listen to a short recital of what he was
too modest to write.

In 1780 his father, Charles the Second, was standing on the veranda of
his Annapolis house and peering through a spy-glass at a sail in the
Bay. He made a misstep, pitched heavily from the porch, and was killed.
Mary Darnell Carroll, his daughter-in-law, saw him fall. Her health,
already taxed by her devotion to Mrs. Carroll II during her last
illness, gave way at “Breakneck” Carroll’s tragic death, and she died
within a fortnight, leaving to her husband a son and two daughters. The
son, of course, was Charles Carroll the Fourth. The Signer saw him go
to Liége to school, return, as his father had returned before him, the
idol of a gay countryside, court Nellie Custis at Mount Vernon, marry
Harriet Chew of Cliveden, and rejoice with pride at the advent in 1801
of Charles Carroll the Fifth.

Charles the Fourth, of Homewood, has been described by a contemporary
as follows: “Nothing in Greek art surpasses the perfect symmetry of his
figure.” No less a person than Washington had asked Harriet Chew to
remain in his presence while he sat for his portrait to Gilbert Stuart
in order that his own face might “wear its most agreeable expression.”
Therefore if the baby Charles the Fifth was not handsome it was neither
the fault of his parents nor of the distinguished grandfather who
immediately became his devoted slave.

The concerns of the estate, and the larger questions of the nation, had
the Signer’s first attention. His avocations were to ride his lanes
and woodland, to read Greek and Latin in the original--he was reading
Cicero’s “De Senectute” at ninety-three; to preside over a growing
flock of grandchildren at Homewood with his son, at Brooklandwood,
where Mary Carroll Caton was bringing up the three stunning daughters
whom society called the “American Graces”; and to spend much time in
the company of his daughter Kitty’s husband, Robert Goodloe Harper.
From time to time he was called upon to step into his earlier character
as Signer. In 1824 he was invited, with Jefferson and Madison, the
only survivors of that great company who fixed their names to the
Declaration, to attend the anniversary of the surrender of Cornwallis
at Yorktown. His age forced him to decline, but he compromised by
meeting Lafayette at Fort McHenry and lunching with him in a tent which
had been Washington’s, and by attending a ball given in Lafayette’s
honor at Colonel Howard’s “Belvedere.”

Few men of eighty-seven have shown such activity as was his; most
men of his years would have given way to the misfortunes which now
trooped out of the shadows. Charles Carroll the Fourth died; General
Harper, the beloved son-in-law, followed. In the next year John Adams
and Thomas Jefferson died on the same day, and it was the sad duty of
Charles the Third to mourn at their funeral. He was now the last of the
Signers. At eighty-nine he signed a copy of the Declaration which is
now held in the New York Public Library--and signed it in a handwriting
as firm as it had been fifty years before; at ninety he laid the
foundation stone of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad; at ninety-three
the cornerstone of St. Charles’ College, near Doughoregan Manor. And
by this time the patriarch had seen born into his grandson’s family a
sixth Charles Carroll.

There are three ghosts at Doughoregan Manor. One is the shade of an
ancient housekeeper, whose quiet tread may be heard in the corridors,
and whose keys tinkle faintly when the house is still. Another is the
spectral coach--its wheels grind on the driveway when death rides to
claim a member of the household--the coach which swung up to the
door on a still November day in 1832 when the Signer went to join his
fathers. It is hardly dignified to call the third a ghost. A warm,
lively, pervading spirit it is--that of the Signer himself, smiling
down from his portrait on the walls. It beamed on Charles the Sixth
through a long and active life until it beckoned to him in 1895. To the
son of Charles Carroll VI, John Lee Carroll, it nodded: “Well done, my
boy,” when he became Governor of Maryland, and to the seventh Charles
it told again all that its cumulative history could convey of the
philosophical guidance and binding parental attachment that has made
Doughoregan Manor something more than a home. Charles Bancroft Carroll,
the Eighth, “carries on” and injects typical enthusiasm into farming
twenty-four hundred acres of the grant you will see in the hall on a
map the first Charles Carroll drew.

You will feel the spirit strongly as you contemplate the Signer’s
place of burial in the chapel where the countryside gathers each
Sunday for services. You will sense the alliance between devotion to
God and to profoundly national ideals, and recall the sympathetic
correspondence between the Signer and his father, as you enter the
Cardinal’s room, a gorgeous chamber decorated in red, containing a
great mahogany bed where Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop John Carroll, and
the Marquis de Lafayette have slept. In a mellow library are the books
he read. Trophies over the door of a panelled dining-room, cups won
at yachting, a friendly hound from the present master’s hunting pack
at your feet--remember that the Signer believed that a clear mind was
most likely to be found in a sound body. We may fairly conceive that
when the house was to be renovated, as it has been four times in its
history, the Signer laid a gentle hand upon the sleeve of the workmen
and cautioned them so: “Paint, if you like. Replace, where the old
has given all its service. But remember, sirs, this is and must be a
home.” And in the fullest connotation of the word, it is a home, with
old chairs to fit you, bright cretonnes at the windows, and friendly
things about you to rest your eyes upon--the sort of a home that a lad
like Charles Carroll the Ninth, who isn’t much interested in ancestors,
likes to take refuge in when strangers grow inquisitive.




THE JUMEL MANSION


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE JUMEL MANSION

Alone in its brittle modern neighborhood, this lovely anachronism
stands on the highest point of Manhattan, untroubled, unruffled, and
undisturbed except by Sunday idlers to whom its orchards are just
another breathing spot. Though it was Heath’s headquarters, then housed
Washington, later was captured by Howe, and was one of the smartest
suburban estates of Colonial New York, it will never be forgotten
as the home of a person of no military or aristocratic consequence,
yet of caprice, beauty, ambition, impropriety, common sense and
eccentricity--yes, a woman.]


THE JUMEL MANSION

A little over a hundred years have passed. Much sea-water has pressed
up the Harlem on the incoming tide, boiled and eddied in the narrow
pass of Spuyten Duyvil, and slipped away again to the Atlantic,
diluted by the contribution of mountain streams in the Catskills
and Adirondacks, tainted by the factory waste of busy cities up the
Hudson and the Mohawk. Men threw giant bridges across its ebb and
flow, tunneled under its current, bit and blasted and scratched at its
Hell Gate channel. The placid, austere heights that stood above the
stream “nine miles from New York City” bear now the unromantic name of
Coogan’s Bluff, and are as many miles within the city’s northern limits.

The camera had not been invented when Roger Morris built the house for
his young wife. To the westward, where his acreage touched the Hudson,
apartment houses have risen and cut off the Palisades; to the south,
where once he could see far down Staten Island, a tangle of bridges
and shipping is half screened by the battlements of more apartment
buildings; only to the east and north, over the sunny throat of the
Sound and the far blue profile of the Long Island hills, has the
prospect its former grand, pure simplicity. A fan of railway tracks are
at the Harlem where once was “Fishing, Oystering and Clamming,” and
from the very skirts of the estate rises each afternoon the roar of
fifteen or twenty thousand “busy Americans” who are totally unoccupied
except with the baseball game in process on the Polo Grounds.

It is hard, without photographic record, to reconstruct the picture.
Alone in its brittle modern neighborhood this lovely anachronism is the
only fragment of the composition left to us. It stands on the highest
point of York Island, untroubled, unruffled, and for the most part
undisturbed, except by Sunday idlers to whom its orchards are just
another breathing spot.

It may be unjust to the Jumel Mansion to compare it with the lady
in one of Leonard Merrick’s stories who “had outgrown her sins,
but remembered them with pleasure,” but the spirit of Madame Jumel
haunts the air so persistently that the suggestion is not altogether
out of place. Despite the fact that when the British were advancing
across Long Island in 1776 it was General Heath’s headquarters, that
it housed Washington for six weeks, and that fifteen minutes after
he had left it on the day Fort Washington was taken General Howe
established his own headquarters there--despite its standing as one
of the smartest suburban estates of Colonial New York, the house
will never be forgotten as the home of a person of no military or
aristocratic consequence, yet a person of caprice and beauty, ambition
and impropriety, common sense and eccentricity. She was no sort of
person to talk about, and therefore talked about; a kaleidoscopic
contradiction--in short, a woman.

Though General Washington probably never heard of the lady, the house
which she occupied was strangely related to important moments in his
own career. When he was an athletic officer of twenty-five, neither
Betsy Bowen nor her mother, Phebe Kelly of Providence, knew of him
or cared about him, for they were both yet unborn. Of his restrained
sentimental interest for Polly Philipse, the Yonkers heiress, they
could not know, nor had they comment to offer when Colonel Roger
Morris, a gallant of the colonial forces, crowded the young Virginian
out of her affections and married her. In 1760 when Washington
himself married Martha Custis, Phebe Kelly was three years old; at
the age of eighteen, in the same month when Washington was appointed
commander-in-chief of the American army and rode to its head at
Cambridge, Phebe Kelly Bowen of Providence gave birth to her second
daughter, and called her Betsy.

Ten years before, Roger Morris had built a lovely house for his wife
and their growing family on the topmost point of Manhattan; the wailing
baby in Providence in that turbulent July, 1775, scarcely suspected
that one day she would be the mistress of that house, or that a month
ago Roger Morris, a Tory, too peaceful to fight, had fled to England
for refuge. But there began the chain of events which finally landed
his estate in Betsy Bowen’s hands.

The city of Providence was so named because its founders had supreme
confidence in its namesake. With the advent of a pathetic little atom
of humanity called Betsy Bowen, Providence the power, through the
agency of Providence the city, undertook to show off. “Her father was
a seafaring man of no account; her mother of less,” said the town.
“It looks bad. It probably is. If not, it ought to be. In any case,
Providence shall be appeased.” Betsy’s mother was presently arrested
and thrown in jail, and Betsy, with her sister Polly, then a child of
fourteen, was first locked up in the workhouse and later sent to live
with a more respectable family. John Bowen, the father, was knocked
overboard by the boom of a sloop and drowned; his widow and her second
husband were allowed out of jail long enough to be ordered out of town;
they returned and were shortly expelled at the expense of the town,
to carry on a wretched existence in a hut on the Old Warren Road.
As the daughters matured they moved to a less respectable family.
In 1794 a son was born to Betsy Bowen, and its father’s name being
either unknown, undesirable or Jones, the baby was christened George
Washington Bowen. Three years later her mother and her step-father,
once more expelled from Providence, made their way to the North
Carolina mountains, got sufficiently acquainted with their neighbors to
start a lawsuit, and then were shot by a squirrel rifle in the hands of
one or more of the defendants. Providence the town had forgotten them,
Providence the power had accomplished a _tour de force_.

The divine lightnings were apparently spent. Betsy Bowen left her baby
in the hands of a friend and fled from the mockery of her native city.
She began six obscure years of adventure as Betsy Bowen, reappeared in
New York for a fleeting glimpse as Madame De la Croix, and emerged as
Eliza Brown, the mistress of the wealthy Stephen Jumel. From 1800 to
1804 she occupied this prosperous French merchant’s house at the corner
of Whitehall and Pearl Streets, near the lower tip of Manhattan. He
came home one day to find her apparently on her death bed, explaining
faintly, through the medium of her physician, that she wanted nothing
more than to leave a sorry world as his wife. To Jumel, who was
deeply touched, it was an irresistible appeal, and the clergyman who
had come to pray for her married the pair. No hypodermic has since
been discovered by a vaulting medical science which ever had such
magical powers of restoration, for two days later Betsy Bowen-de la
Croix-Brown-Jumel was riding out behind Stephen Jumel’s smart horses as
Stephen Jumel’s lawful, gleeful, wedded wife. Her program, after a bad
start, was fairly begun.

She craved social prominence. She wanted to hob-nob with such folk as
the Philipses, the rich Astors, the Van Cortlandts, the Lows, and the
Livingstons, none of whom would have much to do with her. The leverage
of owning one of the great estates evidently did not occur to her just
yet, though there was one to be had. In a letter from Aaron Burr to
his daughter Theodosia, then married and living in the Pringle house
in Charleston, he wrote: “Roger Morris’s place, the large handsome
house on the height beyond Mrs. Watkins, is for sale. I can get it for
Richmond Hill with _four_ acres. Shall I exchange? R. M.’s has one
hundred and thirty acres. If I leave Richmond Hill, however, had I not
better buy in town, that you may have a resting place here?”

He evidently rejected the idea. He could not foresee that within a few
months he would retire from the vice-presidency of the United States,
bully Alexander Hamilton into a duel on the Palisades, kill him; nor
that he would then organize an invasion of Mexico and a revolution in
the new Louisiana Purchase only to be caught in the act and be tried
for treason; nor that the year 1810 would find him abroad, disgraced,
and still plotting to capture Mexico.

In that year Stephen Jumel, who had taken his wife’s trick-marriage in
good part, bought the Roger Morris house and transferred his family
to the heights, to install his wife in a style of living to which
she hoped to become accustomed. Nothing was nearer her heart than
the social prestige which her position as the chatelaine of a fine
estate would afford, nothing farther from her mind than a lonesome
ex-vice-president who had once speculated on buying this very house.
The God of Coincidence made a mental note of this, and laid his plans.

Although frequent changes of ownership and lack of care had tarnished
the house, it was intrinsically the same fine honest mansion that Roger
Morris built, with two-foot outer walls lined with English brick, and
supporting timbers of enduring oak. Madame Jumel entered her new home
through a lofty portico to a main hall which runs through the center
of the building from front to rear. This hall leads, as at Monticello,
to an octagonal annex which is the only departure from a rather
simple Georgian plan. To her left a reception room, to her right the
dining-room, ahead in the octagon, a drawing-room which commanded
nearly the full circle of that far-reaching panorama. Here had been
held the Revolutionary courts-martial. The room north of the reception
room had been the commander-in-chief’s office; the southeast bedroom
had been his, and from its window he could see the smoking embers of
the fire set by his troops when they evacuated the city in ’76--the
night Nathan Hale was caught there as a spy.

With Roger Morris a fugitive in London and the house in debatable
ground, Polly Philipse Morris had resorted to the Manor at Yonkers for
safety. When Washington was driven out, and the house became British
headquarters, the army paid rent, but when the Revolution ended, the
families of Morris and Philipse, their properties confiscated, went
back to England. The mansion was sold and resold, but no one held it
for long. It failed as a tavern, and was doubtless expensive to run as
a home.

Jumel was a great admirer of Washington, as well as a man of taste,
and he combined the two qualities to restore the house implicitly to
its earlier condition. It meant a lot to him that Washington, the
president, had dined a brilliant company there in 1790, when New York
was the national capital, and he equipped the room with fine furniture
brought from France in one of his packets. He had the wall-paper in the
octagon copied and rehung, respected the simplicity of the mantels,
and chose his decorative “remarks” with a nice eye. When his work was
done we may fancy that he rubbed his hands and said to his pretty wife:
“_Voilá!_ A house worthy of its guests. Let them come, my dear.”

They didn’t come. Everything domestic a woman could crave Betsy Jumel
had, even the company of her step-sister’s little daughter, to take
the part of the daughter she never had. It was not enough. Five years
of it made her despise the place. So the Jumels packed up and sailed
for France.

It was no expeditionary force against a new stronghold of society,
but an innocent visit to relatives, and perhaps that is why her luck
turned. Family tradition has it that in Bordeaux they met the fleeing
Napoleon, and offered him the Jumel ship. In return he gave them his
carriage, for which he had no further use, and they drove in it to
Paris.

Such credentials opened every door of the Bonapartist royalty.
Everything Madame Jumel would have wished to be in New York she became
in Paris--a turn of fortune which has come to many a socially ambitious
American woman since. New avenues of association opened, and she
tried to cajole Louis XVIII into giving Stephen a title. What Stephen
would have liked better was money for two ships the French government
stole from him, for the demands of his expensive establishment in the
Place Vendome and a few strokes of ill luck in trading were reducing
his funds. When his position grew embarrassing his wife left him and
returned to New York.

Two years later--in 1828--Stephen Jumel followed her. Dark rumor says
that it was very late when he drove out from town, and that as he
approached the mansion he passed Aaron Burr, who was leaving it. He
entered, and found that his wife, with the expert legal assistance of
Alexander Hamilton, Jr., had transferred the property from her name to
his. Four years later he fell from a hay-cart, and in a few days died
of his injuries, and whoever took the bandage off those injuries and
let him bleed to death will answer for that crime elsewhere, for it is
not known in this world.

On a midsummer night of 1833, presided over by the God of Coincidence,
Aaron Burr came to the mansion to play whist with the widow. “Madame,”
he said, “I offer you my hand; my heart has long been yours.” If
you will believe her own version of this proposal from a veteran of
seventy-eight, she made no reply. He came the next night, with a
priest. She fled upstairs. He overtook her at the landing, “saying
the priest was old, and it was nearly midnight, and I must not detain
him--and he was so handsome and brave and I allowed him to keep my
hand and I stood up there ... and like a fool was married to him! The
wretch, but he did not stay here long.”

A few days he stayed, and left her, after a wedding trip in the course
of which she sold some stock in Hartford and scornfully bade the
purchaser “pay the money to my husband.” Months later he was persuaded
to rejoin her, but it could not last. A divorce ensued, and Aaron Burr
died.

There really ends the career of Madame Jumel. But she lived through
the Mexican and the Civil wars. Here and there in the city, now at
Saratoga, once in Europe, she “lived around” with relatives of sorts,
but most of the time she spent in the great house. Its corners grew
less and less neat as age crept over her. Still, however, the active
physique her sea-faring father and her tomboy mother had given little
Betsy Bowen held on grimly to life and activity, and the social mania
which had consumed her thoughts lighted up her memory with fantasies,
as a sputtering lantern creates half-authentic figures among the
shadows of a dusty, neglected stage. Outside the house she had no
friends except those who wanted her money or stole her firewood and
livestock, indoors life was a perpetual pageant. For twenty years a
feast table, fully set, with dust in the crystal wine glasses, and
mould on the petrifying candies, stood in a closed room: this, she
related, was the table at which she had entertained Joseph Bonaparte
when he came over to marry her and her riches and had to climb over the
back wall to gain entrance. She took pity on him then, she said, for
it didn’t look just right to have the King of Spain in the kitchen.
The truth is that she never entertained Joseph Bonaparte (though she
offered him the estate in 1820); nor did the Duke of Palermo offer
to marry the “Vice-Queen of America” as she styled herself (although
she inspected the ducal palace in Palermo); she was in Paris when
Lafayette visited America in 1825, but she honestly believed that she
had been his hostess on the Heights. Some recollection of a name, a
face, a romantic anecdote out of her vivid past popped up, or she ran
across one of the dingy, pathetic dance favors or trinkets or ribbons
of a dead affair, and presto!--her feverish mind whirled away in a
jumbled drama, unlimited in its romantic action, and delicious in its
inaccuracy.

If the public saw her it was under circumstances that magnified
all the erratic tales that were--and still are--current about her
history. One winter she took a group of penniless Frenchmen under
her wing, quartered them in the barn, which had once held American
prisoners, armed them from the arsenal she kept in the house, organized
them into a military outfit, and would ride proudly at their head
over her estate. From France she brought home green livery for her
postilions--though she had no postilions, and when taunting reached her
ears she dressed the gardener and his boy in the livery and rode to
town with them. Her face to the world was as haughty and as tinctured
with rouge as if she were Eliza Brown of Whitehall Street, her dress
as shabby-genteel as she fancied it was fashionable, her intellect
as tragically aflame with the mad dance of Might-Have-Been as it was
fixed, cold, and shrewd in financial matters. _Grande dame_ she had
set out to be, _grande dame_ she had become, and mercifully to the
poor little shrunken creature with the powdered cheeks and the soiled
finery who was finally carried upstairs to the Washington room to die,
_grande dame_ in her mind she died.

It was a signal for the jackals. No less than twenty law-suits sprang
up to break the will and seize the property. Some of the claims seem
just, others less so, and all of them, in the course of fifty years,
have gone through the mill of the courts and been ground exceeding
fine. Of them all, the most interesting fragment is the attempt made by
George Washington Bowen, Betsy’s deserted baby in Providence, to own
his mother’s home. For thirteen years the old man pursued his case,
even to the Supreme Court, lost it, and died, though the claim is still
cherished by his own connections. The estate could not hold out long
against the march of the city, and parcel by parcel it was split up,
until in 1894 the house and its dooryard came into the hands of General
F. P. Earle.

The city owns it now, and four capable chapters of the Daughters
of the American Revolution have formed the Washington Headquarters
Association, and have brought the mansion out of neglect and oblivion.
They opened the windows Madame Jumel kept sealed and let in air and
sunlight; they consigned the Eastlake-and-gimcrack whatnottery of its
most recent tenants to the exceedingly efficient ash-removal department
of the City of New York, which is equipped to handle just such
situations, and from the four corners of our country they assembled
and installed in the house as much of its historic equipment as they
could find. There is much of it, of course, which has no special
significance, and there is so great a quantity of relics there that the
house is in no sense a home, but rather an interesting and valuable
museum. Next best of all, they opened the doors to the public in a city
where sorely-needed Americanization may well begin at home. And best
of all, they installed as curator William Henry Shelton, as gracious
a story-teller as the humble history-seeker may ply with questions.
It is to him largely that the excellent administration of the house
is due. It is he who can bid you close your eyes, make a few passes,
and translate you into the presence of Mary Philipse, or bring you to
attention before George Washington, or open a secret panel that you may
peep at Madame Jumel. In his book, “The Jumel Mansion,” he has done
just this, and it is from that source with his permission that the
greater part of this story is drawn, and so, gratefully acknowledged.




MOUNT VERNON


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

MOUNT VERNON

Here on a hill in Fairfax County, Virginia, we may catch glimpses of
the man George Washington liked to be.]


MOUNT VERNON


The First President once wrote a letter to a Charleston gentleman named
Thomas Pinckney, who was then American ambassador at the British court.
His words were for Thomas Pinckney, not for posterity, so posterity
finds it refreshing to see a president writing a specific letter to
his envoy under the pitiless light of publicity. Its chief interest
here is not his report of the Senate’s action on a proposed treaty with
Great Britain, nor his anxiety over Lafayette’s imprisonment in Olmutz,
though both are subjects upon which he dwells at some length. The
note for us is the fact that after long diplomatic instruction to his
ambassador, Washington says:

    “Before I close this letter permit me to request the favour
    of you to embrace some favorable opportunity to thank Lord
    Grenville in my behalf, for his politeness in causing a special
    permit to be sent to Liverpool for the shipment of two sacks
    of the field peas, and the like quantity of winter vetches,
    which I had requested our Consul at that place to send me for
    seed, but which it seems cannot be done without a special order
    from Government. A circumstance which did not occur to me, or I
    certainly should not have given it the trouble of issuing one
    for such a trifle.

                    “With very great esteem and regard
                                  “I am, dear Sir,
                                    “Your obedt. Servant,
                                            “G. Washington.”


A treaty with Great Britain, Lafayette to be got out of prison,
two sacks of field peas and some winter vetch--and there is George
Washington. Our national heroes march down the ages without time
to change costumes. While they live we call them everything under
the sun; they die, and we endow them with a certain type-quality
which they must wear forever to the exclusion of other and equally
interesting qualities which they possessed in equal quantity. Unless
some circumstance rescue those qualities from oblivion, a large part of
the inspiration of their lives has been unnecessarily sacrificed. We
have seen the first manifestation of such a process with the death of
Colonel Roosevelt, and we wonder how frequently our children’s children
will think of Roosevelt on the tennis-court, at Sagamore, in Montana,
in Rock Creek Park, or facing death in Brazil. The nation loses a man,
to mourn a saint. So in a lesser degree with our lesser heroes: Hale
becomes the lay-figure of Loyalty, Franklin, of Common Sense, Grant,
of Military Patience. Here, on a hill in Fairfax County, Virginia, in
and about a great white house, we may catch glimpses of the man George
Washington liked to be--glimpses denied us in the popular Washington
legend.

He was a boy of three when his father first brought him there. He
was seven when his father’s house burned, and the discouragement and
loneliness of the wilderness plantation on the Potomac sent the young
family to Fredericksburg to live. He was fifteen when he came back to
live on the Potomac estate, now the property of his brother Lawrence.
Lawrence was of no mean importance in his young brother’s eye--a
veteran of the West Indian naval exploits of Admiral Vernon, and so
full of them that he named the estate after his chief--altogether a
rare big brother. And there were rare neighbors to be cultivated: like
Lord Fairfax, an Oxford graduate and contributor to Mr. Addison’s
_Spectator_, who took a fellow riding, and now and then rode after a
fox.

As the boy broadened into self-reliance in such company as Lawrence’s,
and into a degree of education by association with Fairfax, he fell
heir to certain of their responsibilities. Fairfax sent him to survey
his vast holdings. Lawrence developed tuberculosis, and his military
duties devolved upon George. At twenty he was master of Mount Vernon,
at twenty-one a lieutenant-colonel and fighting for the English against
the French on the Ohio. Thackeray has pointed, in this episode,
the caprice of fate: “It was strange that in a savage forest of
Pennsylvania a young Virginian officer should fire a shot and waken up
a war which was to last for sixty years, which was to cover his own
country and pass into Europe, to cost France her American colonies, to
sever ours from us, and create the great Western Republic; to rage over
the Old World when extinguished in the New; and, of all the myriads
engaged in the vast contest, to leave the prize of the greatest fame
with him who struck the first blow!”

The next year he was a part of Braddock’s disastrous expedition, and
news went home that he had been killed. John Augustine Washington made
alarmed inquiries, to which George replied with a wit equal to Mark
Twain’s under similar circumstances: “As I have heard, since my arrival
at this place, a circumstantial account of my death and dying speech, I
take this early opportunity of contradicting the first, and of assuring
you that I have not as yet composed the latter.” He became a member of
the legislature, and then, when he was twenty-six and a full colonel,
he married Martha Dandridge Custis, who was by all odds the most
accomplished and probably the wealthiest young widow in Williamsburg.
It was time now to renew his neglected acquaintance with Mount Vernon.

During the period of their engagement, while Washington was absent
at the frontier, and later, while he was attending the session of
the House of Burgesses at Williamsburg, Mount Vernon, which had
been so long neglected, was taking on a new dress. The activity on
the plantation was contagious. It spread down river, to Belvoir, to
Gunston Hall, and through the countryside to the other estates where
Washington was intimately known, and where his earlier and generous
attentions to attractive daughters did nothing to dampen their interest
in his bride. Their swift coach-ride homeward bound from Williamsburg
was like a triumphal entry. She added to his holdings of twenty-five
hundred acres at Mount Vernon, and as many over the mountains, some
fifteen thousand acres of her own. She found the house rebuilt, its
exterior strengthened by new brick burned on the estate, new boarding
and sheathing, new windows and a new roof; inside was new plaster, new
flooring, and plenty of new closet-room, which probably touched her
woman’s heart as inexpressibly thoughtful.

“I am now I believe fixd at this seat with an agreeable Consort for
Life,” he wrote to a friend in England. “And I hope to find more
happiness in retirement than I ever experienced amidst a wide and
bustling World.” Few realize how wide and bustling was the world
surveyed from Mount Vernon, nor to what extent he exerted himself to
make use of the talents he had been given. Remember that there were no
neighboring shops, no groceries, no service stations--not one, in fact,
of the multitude of helping hands which science reaches out today to
perform every conceivable task; and remember too that in his custody
were, and upon his wise management depended, not only the happiness of
his wife and her two children, but that of a company of several hundred
others on the estate.

Husband and wife shared in an informal copartnership not unlike that
of a manufacturer and a retail store-manager of today. It was her duty
to anticipate the living demands of the estate, his to supply them.
When she requisitioned cloth, he built a spinning-house and hired
labor which in one year spun fourteen hundred yards of textiles, from
broadcloth to bed-ticking. Convenient to the house, and flanking the
serpentine drive, were his little factories: a smokehouse for meats, a
laundry, a tailor-shop, a shoemaker’s shop, a carpenter’s, a smithy;
here he wrought his raw materials to the needs of his establishment.
And it was when he put on his “plain blue coat, white cassimer
waistcoat, black breeches and boots” to visit the fields and the mill,
his usual custom in the forenoon, that he was most truly the producer,
and most contented.

The estate he divided into five farms, each under an overseer
responsible to the manager of the estate, and each equipped with the
necessary complement of labor, buildings and stock. Through the manager
the reports of progress from the five farms were passed up to the
master in the big house every Saturday morning, and with scrupulous
precision he transcribed and classified them. Washington never heard
of a microbe, nor studied chemistry, yet in these reports and his own
conclusions will be found exhaustive experiments in inoculating the
soil and rotating crops. He balanced his cultivation so as to produce
sufficient food for his people and stock, and the utmost yield of
negotiable grains. “Our lands,” he wrote, “were originally very good;
but use and abuse have made them quite otherwise”--and so he sent
abroad for new seeds to try out. Selected quantities of his grains
he set aside for experiment upon the diet of his livestock. Although
he was a host of lavish hospitality within the house, every move he
made as a farmer was a lesson in conservation. His woodcutters got
explicit orders to select the timber they cut; his overseers were told
not to try to squeeze the land for high crop yield at the expense of
upkeep; each new herd of cattle must be better stock than the last; the
mill was re-engineered to grind more meal from each bushel of corn; a
stone deposit became a quarry; the waters of the Potomac gave up “a
sufficiency of fish for my own people” in the first catch, and beyond
that a great supply for salting and sale in the winter market; every
by-product of the estate was developed and applied. Jefferson sat at
Monticello above nature’s workshop as at a play; Washington took off
his plain blue coat and tinkered with the machinery to increase its
efficiency.

In his admirable work on Mount Vernon, Paul Wilstach has hit upon the
secret of its master’s enthusiasm:

“Mount Vernon was eventually brought to a state of high productiveness,
but the scale of life there was such that rarely did the farms show a
balance wholly on the right side of the ledger. Washington had to look
to his estate for other assets than appeared in the physical valuation
of its produce. He found its true and largest asset in the fulfilled
ideal of private life; in solving the interesting problems of the
planter; in mental health and physical strength; and in the enjoyment
of the easy and graceful social life of the colonial country gentleman,
of which Mount Vernon became a veritable example.”

A vigorous life is easy and natural to a man of Washington’s physical
power. He was six-feet-three-inches high, rose with the sun, and went
to bed at nine unless there were guests. His routine during the sixteen
years preceding the Revolution was varied on this day to ride “Valiant”
or “Ajax” after the hounds, on that to dine at Belvoir or Gunston Hall,
or Belle Aire; now up-river to a dance at Alexandria, now down-river
shooting ducks; this week to Annapolis and the races, next to
Williamsburg on affairs of the legislature. A never-ending procession
of guests arrived and departed, from parsons to British naval officers,
and found a uniformly perfect welcome--even extending to the gentleman
who “contrary to all expectation” held Washington motionless for three
sittings while he painted his first portrait, and charged him slightly
more than £57 for effigies of himself, Mrs. Washington, Martha and Jack
Custis.

To the refurnished home Mrs. Washington had brought many objects of her
own to add to its luxury, which was further enhanced from time to time
by orders upon his London agents for furniture and ornaments. On one
occasion he wrote for busts of Alexander, Caesar, Charles XII of Sweden
and the King of Prussia, fifteen inches high; Prince Eugene and the
Duke of Marlborough, somewhat smaller; and “Wild Beasts, not to exceed
twelve inches in height nor eighteen in length.” He received instead:

    “A Groupe of Aeneas carrying his Father out of Troy, with four
    statues, viz. his Father Anchises, his wife Creusa and his son
    Ascanius, neatly finisht and bronzed with copper           £3.3”

    “Two Groupes, with two statues each of Bacchus & Flora, finisht
    neat & bronzed with copper                                 £4.4”

and “Two Lyons after the antique Lyons in Italy,” also “finisht neat,”
with the following apology:

    “There is no busts of Alexander ye Great (none at all of
    Charles 12th of Sweden), Julius Causar, King of Prussia, Prince
    Eugene, nor the Duke of Marlborough, of the size desired; and
    to make models would be very expensive--at least 4 guineas
    each.”

With other orders the agents had better luck, for it was neither
difficult nor distasteful to satisfy a Virginia gentleman who merely
described the articles ordered (if he described them at all) as either
“good” or “neat” or “fashionable.” He bought the best, rarely specified
price, and paid in the best tobacco--a fair deal all round, and a very
agreeably furnished home Mount Vernon became.

There came a day when he was called to command the army in the north.
For eight years thereafter Mount Vernon saw him but twice, and then
for fleeting visits: once on his way southward from Dobbs Ferry to
Williamsburg, during the march on Yorktown; once on his return to
the north. Those years had seen his ascent to the height of public
veneration. On December 4 of 1783 his officers bade him a frankly
tearful good-bye at Fraunce’s Tavern in New York, and the chief “walked
in silence to Whitehall, followed by a vast procession ... and entered
a barge ... on his way to lay his commission at the feet of Congress at
Annapolis.” His progress to Mount Vernon was a succession of popular
demonstrations. And when on Christmas Eve he went up the hill and
pandemonium broke loose to see the master returned, in his mind were no
thoughts of consulates or dictatorships, empire or world-domination,
but only profound relief that he had come at last into sweet and
voluntary exile from affairs.

He had served without pay through the war, and his first concern
now was to put the estate on its feet. He took up the flags of the
eastern piazza, reinforced the foundations of the house, “removed two
pretty large and full-grown lilacs to the No. Garden gate,” combed the
neighboring forest for handsome trees to transplant, amplified his
orchards, stocked a deer park, and made his daily rounds of the farms.
The man who had lately dictated terms to the best soldiers out of
Europe got from his gardener a promise to stay sober most of the time
on consideration of “four dollars at Christmas, with which he may be
drunk four days and four nights; two dollars at Easter to effect the
same purpose; two dollars at Whitsuntide to be drunk for two days; a
dram in the morning and a drink of grog at dinner at noon.”

If there had been visitors before the war, double their number flocked
to him now. One night he was routed out of bed to receive a young
French sculptor, sent by Jefferson and Franklin in Paris to make his
statue for the capitol at Richmond. A Mount Vernon tradition says
that a few days later Washington was called out to look at a pair of
horses offered for sale. He asked the price, and was told “a thousand
dollars.” He drew himself up in indignation, for a thousand dollars
was an outrageous price for a horse and was likewise a tenth of his
whole year’s living expense. Houdon, the sculptor, had been dogging
Washington’s footsteps for days, studying his subject. He caught the
general in the fine glow of dignified wrath, cried out, “I ’ave him! I
’ave him!” and set to work at once to make the pose immortal. With a
life mask, sketches, and full measurements he returned to Paris, and
there, with Gouverneur Morris posing for the standing figure, he made
the composite statue which stands at Richmond today.

There came a youngster of twenty, very quiet and abashed at an audience
with the great general. This boy’s name was Robert Fulton, he who later
invented the steamboat. There came Noah Webster, who was to write the
great American dictionary; there came Jedediah Morse, who wrote the
first American geography. Lafayette, the “French boy,” was always
welcome, and he spent nineteen days there in the autumn of 1784. Others
were not so welcome: “My house may be compared to a well-resorted
tavern,” wrote Washington. He had to summon young Laurence Washington
to Mount Vernon to carry its social burden after candle-light, when he
withdrew to his study to answer letters, or to taste the human pleasure
of postponing answers “until tomorrow evening,” as he confessed to his
former secretary of war. But, welcome or uninvited, they all came, for
the country was to have a new government, and Washington was not only
to help build it, but to run it. With the same modest misgivings of his
own capacity for the post that he had frankly confessed in 1775, he
went out again in 1789 to serve his country, and put aside again the
labor that was nearest to his heart.

For eight years more his sight of Mount Vernon was limited to visits
borrowed from public affairs, but he never lost his grip on its minute
arrangements, directing, advising, correcting in his letters to his
managers. In one downright homesick moment he said flatly that he would
rather be at home with a friend or two than to be attended at the seat
of government by the officers of state and the representatives of every
power in Europe. John Adams, after his inauguration in 1797, wrote a
letter to his wife, who had not been there to enjoy the greatest moment
of his life. “It was made more affecting to me,” he said, “by the
presence of the General, whose countenance was as serene and unclouded
as the day. He seemed to enjoy a triumph over me. Methought I heard
him say, ‘Ay, I am fairly out and you fairly in! See which of us will
be the happiest!’” Everything on that bright March day in Philadelphia
sang “Home!”

Presently he was there, admiring the new setting of the fine furniture
and silver and glassware and china brought down from the Presidential
Mansion in the Capital, some of which is in the house today. Sixty-five
years old, with the western world at his feet, and he saw only the
broad reaches of the Potomac down below the ha-ha walls. Sixty-six, and
to see a young lad named Charles Carroll from Maryland courting his
favorite grand-daughter made a man feel young himself. Sixty-seven,
forty years married, the favorite grand-daughter to be married (though
not to Charles Carroll), and life seemed perennial. One December
morning he caught cold riding the farms, and two days later was dead.

Nothing short of the domestic enthusiasm of George Washington could
have kept Mount Vernon in order. For sixty years it yielded gradually
to the advance of time. Then, through the truly heroic zeal of Miss
Ann Pamela Cunningham of Laurens, S. C., and the eloquence of Edward
Everett, and the fine spirit of Miss Cunningham’s Mount Vernon
Ladies’ Association of the Union, the estate was purchased, and with
searching fidelity to the wishes of its master, restored to the
state in which he would have had it. Too fulsome praise can hardly
be expressed--certainly not here--for the good sense, discrimination
and good organization which combine to maintain the estate. It is as
if a hand had touched it lightly on a spring morning in the brightest
year of its occupancy, and had held it, fixed forever in the pose,
like the castle of the sleeping princess. No prince will come to
rouse the place. But better than that, after sixty years of care and
a century and a half of life, it re-creates each year to thousands of
pilgrims the crises and victories that wrote our creed as a nation.
And fortunately no landholder on this great farm of ours will leave
Mount Vernon without a deep sense of relief that it is first and last a
perfect monument to a country gentleman.




THE QUINCY HOMESTEAD


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE QUINCY HOUSE

which sheltered, among other delicate ornaments, three successive
Dorothy Quincys. There are ever so many things in the house today to
call up a Quincy tradition, for if you scratch almost any chapter
of New England history you will find a Quincy tradition underneath.
Take away its Hoars, Lowells, Holmeses, Adamses, Wendells, Hancocks,
Sewalls--to mention only a few of the Quincy connections--and what,
indeed, becomes of New England?]


THE QUINCY HOMESTEAD


It is perhaps impolite to compare a Massachusetts family tree to a
banyan instead of the conventional elm, but no prowler among her old
houses can come away without a feeling that almost everything in New
England is related to almost everything else. Chicago glances over
Boston’s shoulder and finds her reading the Monday _Transcript’s_
genealogy page; Chicago howls with laughter and turns to _Vanity Fair_
to see what is going on in New York. Boston is momentarily interrupted,
doesn’t know quite what Chicago is laughing at, returns a well-bred
smile of complete detachment, and plunges back into the genealogy page.

This business of keeping track of marriages and deaths, cousinships
and children-by-the-second-wife is serious, though bred of no spirit
of arrogance, no desire to find a coat of arms for the door of the new
town-car. There is brisk mental exercise in chasing an obscure ancestor
to his lair and finding that he was what you thought he was when you
started out, and not his own grand-nephew-twice-removed. Further,
reasons Boston, unless you know to whom a person is related, how can
you know to whom that person is related? By this sound process of logic
a personal news item in a Boston newspaper worth six agate lines of
white paper is so interestingly overgrown with eighteen or twenty lines
of genealogical wistaria that the outsider has some trouble peering
through the vines to the item itself. He will never understand the
irrelevant matter until he understands that it is not irrelevant, that
the ever-present landmarks of tradition are bristling with precedents,
and that the respect for those precedents is so congenital that they
guide the footsteps of New Englanders more than even New Englanders
suspect.[A]

    [A] I am told by Mr. George Stephenson, of the _Transcript_,
        that the bulk of special subscription to the genealogical
        issues comes from the Middle West. Again brutal statistics
        blunder in to shatter a pleasant theory. I repeat this to a
        Boston beldame; she says, “Why of course--those subscribers
        are from families who migrated west to make money, and
        _now_, of course--” and leaves me to fill out the sentence.
        My theory stands, and defies the lightnings.

If the foreigner from beyond the Hudson or the Delaware or the
Mississippi will do himself the favor of visiting the Quincy house, he
will sense the point, and be paid in full measure by the contemplation
of a house with a varied and engaging story.

It began life as a Puritan farmstead, by a brookside in the town of
Braintree. Sixteen years after the first settlement at Plymouth, and
therefore nearly three centuries ago, William Coddington built three
rooms on a kitchen. Bigoted public opinion soon broke up the trio
of liberals who used to sit and talk free worship before the great
fireplace in that kitchen--Coddington fled, Sir Harry Vane went other
ways, and Anne Hutchinson was banished from the colony. Edmund Quincy,
the new owner, came out from Boston, with a retinue of six servants.
Such a staff was a rare luxury in those ascetic days. It is partially
explained by the fact that in an age of large families Edmund Quincy’s
was no exception, and four children wanted a lot of looking after. He
enlarged the house to accommodate his growing tribe, and about 1685
gave up the Coddington structure to his slaves, while he built a new
house a few rods away. (It was this Edmund’s sister who married the
master of the Mint, John Hull; he named Point Judith after her, and
their daughter Hannah was the maiden who was given in marriage with a
dowry of her weight in pine-tree shillings--one hundred and twenty-five
pounds avoirdupois and five hundred sterling.)

Another Edmund, the third of the American line and the second in
possession of the estate on Quincy Brook, fell heir to it when his
father died in 1698. Through his grandmother Edmund was already related
to the line which was presently to bring forth John Adams. His thirteen
brothers and sisters and numerous cousins connected him by marriage
with nearly all the families of the settlement, and out of one of those
ceremonies is left to us a glimpse of tragedy: Judge Sewall records in
his diary that just after “Cousin Daniel” was being married to Mrs.
Shepard, when the guests were singing in the hall, one of them dropped
dead. Her body was carried to the room which was to have been the
bride’s, “the Bridegroom and Bride ... going away like Persons put to
flight in Battel” to spend their honeymoon at a neighbor’s house.

Edmund the Third was a man not only of fortune but of discrimination,
which he showed by marrying Dorothy Flynt--the first “Dorothy Q.” In
1706 he invited the whole countryside to the estate by the brook,
and around and above the old Coddington house the whole corps of
neighbors, abetted by hard cider, raised the huge timbers of a new
mansion, the one which stands there today restored to its full
dignity. It was a suitable dwelling for a man of eminence in the
colony, a man big enough to quarrel with Benning Wentworth over the
boundary of New Hampshire. On the rear of the new home he built an
extension containing a bedroom and a study, where “Tutor” Flynt,
Mrs. Quincy’s brother, could find rest from his duties in Harvard
College, and there Tutor Flynt spent most of a crusty, tobacco-perfumed
bachelor life as a sort of paying guest, driving down to Braintree
from Cambridge in a calèche for week-ends and the longer holidays.
(Tutor Flynt, by the way, is the earliest recorded user of the
“If-you-are-going-to-Heaven-I-don’t-want-to-go-there” joke, though
genuine research would doubtless reveal that Shem made the same remark
to Japheth one afternoon when the Ark lay becalmed.)

The light of the household was Dorothy Q, and the source of her
radiance was her family of growing children. Three of them claim our
attention: Edmund (the Fourth), who inherited the Homestead; Josiah
(the first of a series of notable Josiahs); and a second Dorothy, whom
her grandson, Oliver Wendell Holmes, described in this way:

     “O Damsel Dorothy! Dorothy Q!
      Strange is the gift that I owe to you;
      Such a gift as never a king
      Save to daughter or son might bring,--
      All my tenure of heart and hand,
      All my title to house and land;
      Mother and sister and child and wife
      And joy and sorrow and death and life!

     “What if a hundred years ago
      Those close-shut lips had answered No,
      When forth the tremulous question came
      That cost the maiden her Norman name
      Should I be I, or would it be
      One-tenth another to nine-tenths me?”

Dorothy Q the Second was a dear child, carrying at fifteen the cares
of the household, and apparently pointed down the path of a winsome
spinsterhood. But within a few weeks, in the summer of 1737, her
grandmother, her mother, and then her father died, and she married
Edward Jackson and went to live in Boston, where her husband was a
ship-owner in partnership with her brother Josiah.

One of their vessels, the _Bethell_, with thirty-seven men and fourteen
guns, fell in with the _Jesus Maria and Joseph_, a Spaniard with
110 men and twenty-six guns. The _Bethell’s_ skipper gambled on the
gathering twilight, set up six wooden dummy guns, hung sailors’ caps
and hats in the rigging to suggest a numerous crew, and then demanded
the Spaniard’s surrender. Down came her ensign! The Spanish crew was
set ashore at Fayal, and the _Bethell_ brought back to Josiah and
Dorothy one-hundred-and-sixty-one chests of silver, and two of Spanish
gold.

With the prize money safely banked, Josiah was able to retire from
business at the age of forty. He moved to Braintree, taking up his
residence in the Hancock parsonage, across the way from the Homestead.
Brother Edmund, the lantern-jawed parson, who had been living in Boston
and spending his summers in Braintree, moved to the Homestead in his
turn, lost most of his share of the prize money in artless speculation,
and turned to farming.

Life in the two families presented diversion aplenty--most of the
eligible young men of Boston and Braintree were courting Edmund’s five
daughters. A sober young man named John Adams was running perilously
close to the charms of Hannah, Josiah’s daughter. He was a marked man
when her cousins, Esther and Susan, suddenly “broke in upon Hannah
and me and interrupted a conversation that would have terminated in a
courtship that would have terminated in a marriage which might have
depressed me to absolute poverty and obscurity to the end of my life.”
He veered, took a deep breath, went away from there, and two years
later was married to Abigail Smith, who alone of American women was
the wife and the mother of an American president. Important guests
occasionally penetrated the swarm of suitors--such men as Admiral
Warren and Sir William Pepperrell, the heroes of Louisburg; or Benjamin
Franklin, who sent Squire Quincy cuttings of Rhenish grapevines and
a new stove which he had invented; or Sir Harry Frankland, who gave
the Squire a fine pear-sapling--the same Sir Harry who married Agnes
Surriage, whom he had first seen barefoot, scrubbing floors in a tavern
in Marblehead.

And the youngest of all was Dorothy Q the Third, with four big brothers
and three boy cousins to pay her court, and four elder sisters to
study. Through all the bitter period that followed the Boston Massacre,
when her cousin Josiah Junior and John Adams were defending the
British captain, and her cousin Samuel was appearing for the Crown,
Dorothy Q was on the fringe of the excitement, coquetting with all
of the earnest youths who were polishing their arms, but engaging
in entangling alliance with none. Not until she was twenty-seven
did she make her choice, and then it was John Hancock, the chief
figure of pre-revolutionary days in Boston, a vigorous patriot who
defied the Crown and became a member of the Committee of Safety.
Most of the winter of 1774–75 she spent with his aunt in the Hancock
mansion, where came Revere, and Warren, and Samuel and John Adams.
By March of ’75 she was back in Quincy, gathering her trousseau, and
superintending the application of a new French wall-paper to the walls
of the north parlor, where a company of conventional blue Venuses
and Cupids, garlanded with delicate flowers, was to preside over the
wedding ceremony. The untroubled Homestead presented a strong contrast
to the one she had left in Boston: a loyalist rabble stormed the
Hancock house, tore down the fence, broke the windows and wrecked the
coach-house, and the prospective bridegroom, threatened with arrest,
was obliged to escape with little dignity and all possible speed.

He turned up at Concord for the meeting of the Provincial Congress on
April 15, and after its adjournment he was joined by Dorothy, Madame
Hancock and Samuel Adams at the Rev. Jonas Clark’s house in Lexington.
Quietly, in the evening of the eighteenth, British troops assembled in
Boston for a march to destroy the stores at Concord. As quietly, Paul
Revere rowed across the mouth of the river to Charlestown, slipped by
the guard, and rode hell-bent into the sleeping country. He pulled up
at the Clark parsonage and called for Adams and Hancock. “Don’t make
so much noise,” said a minute-man on guard. “_Noise!_” shouted Revere,
“You’ll have noise enough before long--the regulars are coming!”--and
he delivered Joseph Warren’s warning to Adams and Hancock to get out
of the neighborhood at once. Against their will they fled to Woburn,
while Dorothy slept no more that night. At dawn she saw Pitcairn and
his scarlet column tramp to the Lexington common and set fire to the
Revolution. Then she joined her lover in Woburn, and when he tried to
forbid her to go back to Boston, the strain of a sleepless night and
the horrors of the day broke the bridle on her tongue and she tossed
her head and retorted: “Recollect, Mr. Hancock, I am not under your
control yet. I shall go to my father tomorrow!”

Having spoken her mind, she exercised a woman’s privilege in changing
it--and did almost as he had asked: set out at once for a safe refuge
at Fairfield in Connecticut.

She was still somewhat piqued. She found at Fairfield, in the person of
her host’s nephew, an eager listener to her narrative of the skirmish
at Lexington--a Princeton graduate who was studying law. He probably
gained her confidence at once by asking her just what she thought he
ought to do, and by offering to join the colors for her sake. Aaron
Burr was very accomplished at that sort of thing, and considered
it good exercise, for he was carrying on two other affairs and an
anonymous sentimental correspondence at the same time. To Hancock’s
affectionate letter from Philadelphia Dorothy made no reply. For
the peace offering of silk stockings he sent her she said not even
“thank-you.” Then either Madame Hancock or Dorothy’s own conscience
stepped in and settled the quarrel. Burr left for Cambridge to enlist,
and Hancock came to Fairfield and married the lady.

They took up their home in Boston on the heels of the British
evacuation, and until Hancock went back to Braintree to die in 1793 her
life was a brilliant panorama of illustrious society. When Washington
came to Boston in 1789, Hancock, who was governor of the Commonwealth,
invited him to be a guest in the fine house on Beacon Street opposite
the Common. Washington declined and the governor offered him an
invitation to dinner. On the assumption that within his own state a
governor’s position was sovereign to that of the President, he did not
call upon Washington before dinner. The hour came, but no President,
and Hancock sent a messenger to apologize to Washington for not
having paid his respects, and to plead that sudden illness prevented.
Washington guessed that the illness was sour-grape poisoning and ate
his dinner at home. Later in the evening the lieutenant-governor and
two councilmen appeared to repeat Hancock’s apology. “I informed them,”
Washington writes in his diary, “that I should not see the governor
except at my own lodgings.” The next day Hancock bent his stiff neck to
the president, apologized, and the two became friends again.

The Squire had long since sold his rights in the old Homestead, though
the family continued to occupy it until his death in 1788. It passed
successively through the families of Black, Greenleaf, and Woodward,
and then into the hands of the town of Quincy, which was now formally
detached from Braintree. For thirty years it was held by the town as
part of a trust fund Ebenezer Woodward left to found a girl’s academy
to match the boy’s school started by John Adams.

Even before the Squire’s family had dispersed from the house, its
earlier liveliness was somewhat dimmed by the crescent line of able
Quincys in another Quincy house built by the first Josiah, and now
known as the “later Quincy Mansion.” From its windows he recorded
the sailing of the British from Boston in 1775; from those windows
his children saw the _Constitution_ sail in victorious over the
_Guerriere_. There lived Josiah the Second, agent of the provincials at
London, who died off Marblehead as the firing at Lexington began, while
his wife and the third Josiah were fleeing from a threatened naval
attack on Braintree. Josiah the Third grew up to be mayor of Boston
and president of Harvard, and if no other distinction remained to him
except this passage from his speech in Congress on the embargo in 1808,
it would be a proud enough monument for any American:

    “But I shall be told, ‘This may lead to war.’ I ask, ‘Are we
    now at peace?’ Certainly not, unless retiring from insult be
    peace--unless shrinking under the lash be peace. The surest
    way to prevent war is not to fear it. The idea that nothing
    on earth is so dreadful as war is inculcated too studiously
    among us. Disgrace is worse. Abandonment of essential rights is
    worse.”

Is it any wonder that Daniel Webster, Lafayette, and the Adamses,
father and son, came often to the home of Josiah, or that, given his
heredity and achievement, he had such sons as Josiah the Fourth,
another mayor of Boston and an able economist, and Edmund, the stanch
abolitionist?

The older house by the brook was leading a humble and retired old age
when the Colonial Dames took over its custody. Their restoration not
only has made the utmost of the material they found, but has brought
to the house a collection of articles which are uniformly good and are
in some instances rare and beautiful. The long hall has tall spotless
wainscoting and hunting paper, a carven balustrade and newel post;
in a low-studded dining-room a set of 1770 Dutch chairs surrounds an
Empire table, in a corner stands a buffet whose builder died a century
and a half ago; at the fireplace are Delft tiles nearly as aged as the
fireplace itself, and there is an odd Chinese paper on the walls. In
the parlor is the Venus-and-Cupid paper hung for Dorothy Q’s wedding,
in the window frames is glass made by a Quincy in the first glassworks
in America. You may read in one of those panes the initials “J H” as
you may find the writer’s full name on the Declaration of Independence,
and in the pane below, in the same hand, “You I love, and you alone.”
You will be interested in Tutor Flynt’s bed, built in a recess of the
brookside bedroom. You may be mildly thrilled by the Indian-proof
shutters, mystified by the secret staircase which follows the course of
the chimney, and delighted with the kitchen William Coddington built,
with its eight-inch beams, Dutch oven, churn, spinning-wheel, and a
musket over the mantel for inviting Indians to dinner.

There are ever so many things in the house today to call up a Quincy
tradition, for if you scratch almost any chapter of New England history
you will find a Quincy tradition underneath. Take away its Hoars,
Lowells, Holmeses, Adamses, Wendells, Hancocks, Sewalls--to mention
only a few of the Quincy connections--and you have left hardly enough
to make a Monday _Transcript_.

And yet their generic importance was the least of their concerns.
“Could I ever suppose,” wrote John Adams, “that family pride were in
any way excusable, I should think a descent from a line of vigorous
independent New England farmers for a hundred years was a better
foundation for it than a descent through royal or noble scoundrels ever
since the flood.”




THE TIMOTHY DEXTER MANSION


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE TIMOTHY DEXTER MANSION

Over in a corner of the garden stood an Indian chieftain, next to him
William Pitt, and beyond the two the martial figure of General Morgan.
The Goddess of Fame, Louis XVI, John Jay, the King of Russia, Solomon,
Venus, the Governor of New Hampshire--these were a few of the forty
“immortals” in his garden of celebrities. In a prominent position stood
a portrait in pine of Lord Dexter himself, labeled “I am the greatest
man in the EAST.”]


THE TIMOTHY DEXTER MANSION

      Lord Dexter is a man of fame;
      Most celebrated is his name;
      More precious far than gold that’s pure,
      Lord Dexter shine for evermore.

                         --_Jonathan Plummer._


Yes, Jonathan Plummer wrote that jingle. It is from the only survivor
of a gross of eulogies he wrote of Lord Dexter. And quite proper
that he should. He was Lord Dexter’s poet laureate, hired, clothed
and fed to produce eulogies on demand. His poetry was awful, and the
tragedy is that he knew it. Said he didn’t like to read too much good
verse because it made his own look sorry. But when a man has given up
peddling fish and racy European pamphlets in order to study for the
ministry, and neither the ministry nor the melodrama pays, he can’t
be blamed, especially if he has the appetite of an ox and the soul of
a poet, for going to work for anyone as poet laureate. Lord Dexter
outfitted him in a long black cloak with gold stars on the lapels, and
fringe, and a black under dress, a huge cocked hat, and a gold-headed
cane. There was a great row about the fringe: Jonathan refused to wear
it, Lord Dexter pooh-poohed. _Pooh-poohed a poet laureate!_ Still,
Maecenas was Maecenas: Jonathan wore the fringe.

Timothy Dexter was a leather-dresser, born in Malden in 1743. Treating
leather to simulate “morocco” was a new art, which he mastered, and
which, on account of the demand for “morocco” for women’s shoes,
built him a nice fortune. He married a thrifty widow, who had a
little huckster business of her own. They emerged from the period of
the Revolution with a son and daughter, and a few thousand dollars.
Continental money had dropped to two-and-sixpence on the pound, and the
securities of Massachusetts issued to support the money had tumbled to
the same depths. John Hancock and Thomas Russel, Bostonians of large
fortunes, bought in many of these securities to oblige their friends
and to hearten the public’s morale, which was as low as its money.
Timothy Dexter heard of it, and risked every loose dollar he had in the
same investment. Then Hamilton’s funding system went into operation and
made him a wealthy man, who need never dress another hide as long as he
lived.

He had gambled that the United States Constitution was a fixture, and
he had won. He played more money on the same color, and won again and
again. Charlestown, still convalescing from a severe fire, was not to
the liking of this new-laid magnate. He moved to Newburyport, after
Salem and Boston the busiest port in the Commonwealth. He bought two
fine estates, occupied one for a short time, and then moved to the
other. As the property of a prominent merchant it had been one of
the fine houses of a community of steady, prosperous people, whose
philosophy was drawn from the Old Testament, education from the Three
R’s, and deportment from a rigid Puritan ancestry. Into its complacent
calm Timothy Dexter came bellowing like a bull in a china shop, and
proceeded to build the china shop about him.

You may have wondered about the source of the iron-dog-and-Diana
tendency on the lawns of our captains of industry. It dates from Lord
Dexter, and in justice to him it should be said that he set a mark
that neither posterity nor Adolphus Busch nor Carl Hagenbeck nor
Ex-Senator Clark could begin to approach. They may have paid more for
their cupolas and summer-houses and plaster-of-Paris bubchen, but
Timothy Dexter, the self-made lord, leather-dresser, landscape gardener
and architect, finished the race with a permanent world’s record
before they were born. He took a square colonial house of straight and
dignified proportions, polished it with bright paint, and set gilt
balls and railings and minarets upon its roof, till from the sea it
looked like a Christmas tree gone mad. There was a magnificent garden
between the house and the highway, full of flowers and fruit that were
the envy of a community of husbandmen, but mere nature was not allowed
to go on unassisted.

“Hear me, good Lord,” he wrote. “I am agoing to let your children know
now, good Lord, what has been in the world a great ways back--not old
Plymouth, but stop to Adam and Eve.”

Accordingly there rose in the garden clusters of single columns, and
groups of wooden arches, about fifteen feet high, and presently the
astonished natives of Newburyport saw them capped with wooden effigies.
Before the main doorway was a Roman arch, and upon it, reading from
left to right, John Adams, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson--all
life size, with John Adams uncovered because Dexter would not permit
anyone to stand at Washington’s right with his hat on. Jefferson
he thought was a trifle obscure, so he engaged an artist to paint
“Declaration of Independence” upon the scroll in its author’s wooden
hand. The artist had lashed himself to the column, had spaced the
lettering, and had painted the letters “DEC-,” when Lord Timothy,
squinting up from below, remarked:

“That’s not the way to spell ‘Constitution’!”

“You don’t want the Constitution,” called the artist. “You want
‘Declaration of Independence’!”

“I want ‘Constitution’!” roared Dexter, “and ‘Constitution’ I will
have!”

His recollection of the Declaration of Independence was foggy, but he
knew that he had made most of his money by the adhesive properties of
the Constitution, and he was not going back on his talisman now. The
artist refused to make the statue ridiculous, and Dexter charged into
the house, charged out with a loaded pistol, and as the artist left
across-country, fired, missed the artist--but hit the house.

Over in a corner of the garden stood an Indian chieftain, next to him
William Pitt, and beyond the two the martial figure of General Morgan.
Morgan was not quite satisfactory, so a few coats of paint made him
over into Bonaparte. The Goddess of Fame, Louis XVI, John Jay, the
King of Russia, Solomon, Venus, the Governor of New Hampshire--these
were a few of the forty “immortals” in his garden of celebrities.
In a prominent position stood a portrait in pine of Lord Dexter
himself, labeled “I am the greatest man in the EAST.” Four lions, two
_couchant_, two _passant_, stood guard beside him to prove it. This
caption originally included the North, South and West, and what sudden
access of modesty caused him to censor it is a buried secret. When the
hurricane of 1815 toppled most of the figures from their pinnacles,
they were sold at auction. Pitt brought one dollar, Fame five, the
Traveling Preacher fifty cents, the Indian chief was set up in a
cornfield to scare crows, and Lord Timothy, the greatest man in the
East, found no bidders. That is fame.

His gallery was the product of expert wood-carvers in Newburyport and
Salem, men who were turning out creditable work for the figureheads
of the vast merchant fleet that made Salem a port known round the
world. It cost him not a cent less than $15,000, twice the price he
paid for the estate. Upon the interior of the house he lavished the
same attention, and imported from France the last word in flamboyant
furniture, voluptuous draperies, and generally meretricious _objets
d’art_. His agents had more taste than he, to be sure, but if a worthy
piece found its way into the house, it was sure to be stained and
damaged in the next carouse. In his business dealings with Hancock
and Russel he had caught glimpses of their libraries, and it occurred
to him that the greatest man in the East should own fine books, so he
bought them by the linear yard in costly bindings. He rarely read them,
and guests relieved him of the finer engravings with which they were
illustrated. In the same way he filled the house with paintings, which
were so bad that not even his guests cared to steal them. The dearest
of all his hobbies was a collection of clocks and watches. Once a week
they were set running and regulated; each day he visited them all, and
gave a word of encouragement or censure to each, from the great Dutch
fellow who prophesied approaching rain, to the daintiest enameled
chronometer in the hilt of a French fan. The fruits and blossoms of his
garden were as keen a source of satisfaction to him as they were to
the maidens and urchins of the town. After a few experimental visits
had revealed the clumsy vulgarity of his attentions to all women, nice
girls never went to see Dexter’s museum. To the small boy, however,
he was the personification of all that was grand and fantastic;
furthermore, they could scent his berries and plums and melons for a
radius of five miles, no matter which way the wind blew.

It is quite right to assume that even a successful speculation
in government paper could hardly finance the upkeep of such an
outrageously extravagant menâge. Where did the money come from?
Everyone in New England, as his notoriety spread, asked the same
question. The most picturesque reply is from his own pen--a chapter
from a tract called “Pickle for the Knowing Ones,” which he wrote and
published, and which, with a few italicized explanatory notes, follows:

HOW DID TIMOTHY DEXTER GET HIS MONEY ye (_he_) says: bying whale
bone for staing (_staying_) for ships . in grosing (_gross_) three
hundred & 40 tons--bort all in boston, salum and all in Noue york,
under Cover . oppenly told them for my ships; they all laffed. so I
had at my oan pris. I had four Counning men for Rounners; thay found
the horne, as I told them to act the fool . I was full of Cash . I had
nine tun of silver on hand at that time--all that time the Creaters
(_creatures_) more or less laffing. it spread very fast . here is the
Rub--in fifty days thay smelt a Rat--found where it was gone to Nouebry
Port--spekkelaters swarming like hell houns--to be short with it I made
seventey five per sent--one tun and a halfe of silver on hand and over--

one more spect--Drole a Nuf--I Dreamed of warming pans three nites;
that they would doue in the west inges (_Indies_) . (_He did not dream
this, but was put up to it by the chaffing of a group of mischievous
ship-clerks about the Port. Warming pans were about as necessary in
the West Indies as coals in Newcastle._) I got no more than fortey two
thousand--put them in nine vessels for difrent ports. that tuck good
hold. (_It did: to the astonishment of New England, the warming pans
were found to be excellent utensils in which to roast coffee, and the
lids equally useful in skimming hot sugar syrup._) I cleared sevinty
nine per sent . the pans thay made use of them for Coucking--blessed
good in Deade (_indeed_) missey (_monsieur_) got nise handel--very
good masser (“_Massa_”) for Coukey (_cooking; he here reproduces the
dialect of the French and British West Indian negroes._) Now burn my
fase the best thing I Ever see in borne days. I found I was very luckky
in spekkelation.

I Dreamed that the good book was Run Down in this Countrey nine years
gone, so low as halfe prise and Dull at that--the bibel I means. I had
the Ready Cash. by holl sale I bort twelve per sent under halfe pris:
thay cost fortey one sents Each bibbel--twentey one thousand--I put
them into twenty one vessels for the west inges and sent a text that
all of them must have one bibel in every family, or if not thay would
goue to hell--and if thay had Dun wiked, flie to the bibel and on thare
Neas and kiss the bibel three times and look up to heaven annest (_and
ask_) for forgivnes, my Captteins all had Compleat orders--here Coms
the good luck: I made one hundred per sent & littel over, then I found
I had made money anuf. I hant (_haven’t_) speckalated sence old time,
by government secourities I made forty seven thousands Dolors--that is
the old afare. Now I toald the all, the sekrett. Now be still, let me A
lone; Dont wonder Noe more houe I got my money, boaz (_boys_).

If there were space it could be devoted to his successful corner of
the opium market, to his land speculations, and to other sounder
investments, such as the Essex Merrimack bridge, which kept his coffers
full. But there is not, if we are to have a glimpse of the motley
crew who fawned about him and lived at his expense. Plummer, the poet
laureate and jingle-monger we have seen, Plummer, who told Dexter that
the Druids crowned their laureates with mistletoe, and whom Dexter duly
crowned, amidst great ceremony, with parsley, there being no mistletoe
in the garden. Then there was a Newburyport schoolmaster who fell out
of the graces of the town because he took his pupils to walk in the
fields and taught them the names of the birds and flowers, used charts
and globes in geography lessons, performed simple chemical experiments
which the parents soundly suspected were tricks, and believed in
the lecture system more than in the birch rod. With a smattering of
astronomy and a fertile imagination this man attached himself to Dexter
in the capacity of astrologer and chief confidant. He was probably in
league with Madam Hooper and Moll Pitcher, two seeresses of rich local
reputation, for Dexter often called upon them to solve his future.
There was Burley, called Dwarf Billy, a giant wrestler who stood
six-feet-and-seven-inches in his socks when he wore them; Dexter hired
him as a sort of watchman, porter and body-guard, to do his fighting
for him. It was Dwarf Billy whom Dexter called upon to put a tipsy
sea-captain off the place, after he had wagered that no two men Dexter
had could put him out. Looking up to Burley’s summit, the sailor put
his guinea in his lordship’s hands, saying: “By Jupiter, if this is
your dwarf, how big are your giants?”

Hogarth never drew a stranger company. It was downright Elizabethan in
its romantic depravity. Barred from the company of intelligent, modest
people by the pride which would not permit him to play the hypocrite,
Dexter brought his society to him, and cared very little about its
ancestry, so long as it gave him adulation and echoed his tipsy
amiability. The house was infested with shady adventurers and blowzy
females from the ports, come to gather a little money and pass on; no
fine day went by but travelers came to see this remarkable man at close
hand, to flatter him, to hear him tell the story of conferring upon
himself the title of “Lord”; to carry some souvenir of his tireless
eccentricity back to the folks at home, and you may believe that it
lost nothing in the telling. The riff-raff of the town attended a
funeral which he advertised in his honor, and which he watched from
behind the curtains of an upper window while a heavy mahogany coffin he
had bought was borne to the summer house where he expected some day to
rest. He was annoyed that his epileptic son, being drunk enough to weep
lavishly, was the only one who mourned, and that Plummer did not put
enough genuine fire into the funeral oration.

Once in a while a visitor crossed him, and he rushed to the house for
a pistol; one such adventure cost him a term in the Ipswich gaol,
though his aim was so poor that he never hit anyone. For a time he held
public office, that of “informer of deer,” which carried the duty of
arousing the town when deer were seen in the vicinity. Even the beasts
of the wilderness laughed at him--no deer ever ventured near during
his term. With books to read but no mind to read them with, his wife
long since fled from his home, his son half-mad and his daughter wholly
so, Dexter, feigning a feverish interest in affairs of which he knew
absolutely nothing, became an object of contemptuous amusement even to
the gypsies of Dogtown who passed his house to peddle berries. Today
the rankness and the nearness of him has passed, and it is hard to find
for Timothy Dexter any emotion beyond that of profound pity.

He died in 1806 and was buried in a simple grave in a public cemetery.
A sensible, methodical will disposed of his property, and the house
passed into other hands, which cleared out his forest of statuary, tore
down the gilt balls, and took the masquerade costume off the building
whose dignity he had so unceremoniously insulted. In the process
Timothy Dexter, “Lord” by his own acclamation, has been sunk without
trace. The house today is quite the most imposing in a town unusually
blessed with Colonial homes, but it is not Dexter’s. Dexter is wholly
dead.

His greatest work, the “Pickle for the Knowing Ones,” must never die.
Superlatives can damn it here forever, and any attempt to dissect
its philosophy must await the collaboration of a specialist in the
psychology of insanity, a student of Chaucerian spelling, and an
apostle of tolerance. When those three meet, we shall understand the
man. Meanwhile, the “Pickle” is worth reading.

To his second edition he added this postscript:

fouder (_further_) mister Printer the Nowing ones complane of my book
the fust edition had no stops I put in A Nuf here and thay may pepper
and salt it as thay plese


[Illustration:

  ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

  :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

  ......................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.......................

  ...........................!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............................

  ...............................!!!!!!................................

  ..................................!..................................

  ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  ........................??????????????????????.......................
]




THE KENDALL HOUSE


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE KENDALL HOUSE

Here Washington and Rochambeau planned the Yorktown campaign. From the
upper windows you may look over the roofs of the town where André and
Arnold plotted to betray the United States. Across the Hudson you may
see the faint outlines of the village of Tappan, where André was held
prisoner, and where Washington shared his breakfast with the convicted
spy. At the foot of the hill below you is the landing where British
dignitaries came to plead for André’s life.]


THE KENDALL HOUSE


A white house with solid vertigris blinds stands comfortably beside the
Post road. There is a little old cannon on the lawn, a sad bell-mouthed
field piece with its jaw jutted fiercely out to bark at any British
man-o’-war that presumes to come back up the Hudson. A green ridge
rises behind the house, setting it off like Wedgwood ware, and a gentle
brook idles down the slope toward the river.

Set in a jog of the stone wall at the highway is a memorial tablet
which has evidently gone unnoticed by the gentlemen who write histories
for primary schools--who are supposed to watch the fires on our
national shrines, and to toss a bright epithet, an apt name, or a bit
of patriotic tinder on the coals. In missing this Dobbs Ferry house
they are clearly guilty of neglect of duty. It has a story that goes
clear down to the stuff every American believes he is made of. If we
borrow a stock phrase from the supply of the school historian and call
this house the “Birthplace of Victory” we shall not be far from the
fact, nor serving ill a spot which recalls with rich significance the
travail in which our nation was born.

In 1780 there were three invading British armies rooted on the Atlantic
coast: Clinton had driven Washington off Manhattan island in 1776 and
had already held the city for four years; Cornwallis made Yorktown a
base for expeditions into Virginia and the Carolinas, and Tarleton held
Charleston. For four years the enemy had hoped to effect a junction
between his forces in Canada and those in New York, and the Hudson
was to be his highway. For four years Washington had hovered like
an eagle over the river, wheeling now into Westchester, now swooping
upon Jersey. Inadequately equipped, he dared not take the offensive.
He had to be content to wait for the time when Clinton might relax his
vigilance upon the city, then to strike, brilliantly and savagely,
but the sum of these maneuvers was only to harass the enemy, not to
unseat him. Twice since Washington’s time has his fortitude been
matched in our history: once by Lincoln, and once by Lee. Once, in our
own lifetime, it has been equalled by the French nation. It was from
France, in 1780, that our relief ultimately came.

After four years of war, with British patrols making frequent raids
through Yonkers and over the upper acres of the Philipse estate,
with British warships plying up and down the Hudson at will past the
silenced batteries of Forts Washington and Lee, with the Cowboys and
Skinners of both armies making life wretched throughout the neutral
ground in which Dobbs Ferry lay, the village was in ill temper. It lies
opposite the northern end of the Palisades, and while the British held
New York it was the most southerly ferry safe for American despatch
riders from Westchester County to Jersey and the south--a vital link in
the chain of communication between the scattered states. So Dobbs Ferry
saw plenty of skirmishing. Earthworks were thrown up in the village;
the remains of an ancient redoubt may be discovered today after
patient search near Broadway and Livingston Avenue, and the Livingston
mansion, the most pretentious house in town, asked neither exemption
nor privilege and surrounded itself with trenches. No one knew when
the enemy might advance in force up the Albany Post Road, and in Dobbs
Ferry’s 1780-temper, no one proposed to let him march without a fight.

Word had gone through the states that Lafayette, the gay French lad
who came over to fight with Washington, had gone home. “He’s young,”
men said. “It was only a lark for him. He’s had enough. ‘Leave of
absence’ was it! ‘French leave,’ more likely.” Lafayette was young,
but he had not had enough. How a youth of twenty-two petitioned the
court of France for an army, a fleet and a generous loan for the
states we need not inquire. He got everything he asked and came back
to tell General Washington so and to confer upon him Louis Sixteenth’s
commission as lieutenant-general of the Armies of France and admiral of
His Majesty’s Navy.

In 1918 the United States transport Leviathan, seven days out of New
York, made the harbor of Brest and set ten thousand fighting men
ashore. In the harbor of Newport, Rhode Island, on July 11, 1780 eleven
French warships and thirty-two transports, three months out of Brest,
set six thousand fighting men of France upon American soil. Ponder
on those figures: six thousand men are the complement of two modern
regiments, the half of a bitter day’s casualty list; six thousand men
were the Army of France, the Army of Deliverance. After they had thawed
a cool reception, they were welcomed as such, and while the Comte de
Rochambeau, at their head, was fêted by the dignitaries of Newport, his
disciplined troops pitched their tents in the Rhode Island orchards,
and as their commander proudly reported to their King, never even
robbed the fruit-trees!

Cumulative bad luck camped down simultaneously on the American cause.
Scurvy among the French troops prevented their moving to attack New
York. Clinton made a demonstration against them at Newport until
Washington frightened him back indoors. Rochambeau found difficulty in
conveying his ideas of strategy to American headquarters in Jersey,
and it took all of Lafayette’s tact to keep the forces in contented
alliance. At last, when the summer was nearly gone, Washington arranged
a council of war at Hartford.

The operations of the allied armies planned at that conference hinged
upon the co-operation of a second French land force and the French
fleet. The land force was even then bottled up in Brest by British
warships, the French admiral was in the West Indies and showed no
signs of coming north. To make matters worse, there was brewing
over on the Hudson a plot which Washington later called “one of the
severest strokes that could have been meditated against us.” It was
so well known among the British that it now seems incredible that no
hint of warning had filtered through the Neutral Ground to American
headquarters. London gossip predicted openly throughout the summer a
_coup_ which would shortly bring this upstart rebellion to its knees.

One morning in late September four farmer boys from Westchester
undertook to watch the Albany post-road north of Tarrytown, and to
see that no Tory patrols drove stolen cattle southward. They halted a
well-dressed civilian and searched him. In his stockings they found a
plan of the fortifications at West Point, an inventory of ammunition,
full directions for attacking _and taking_ the forts, and a résumé
of General Washington’s most recent statement of the condition and
prospects of the American cause. It was suspicious enough to find these
papers on an unknown civilian, but when he proved to be Major John
André, adjutant-general of the British Army, and when inspection showed
that the last two documents were in the handwriting of Benedict Arnold,
an American major-general in command at West Point, the matter smelled
rankly of treason.

Washington was returning from Hartford to headquarters when he was
diverted to West Point. An unexplainable bit of stupidity had allowed
Arnold to learn of André’s capture, and when Washington arrived at
Arnold’s headquarters opposite West Point he found the traitor’s young
wife in a state of collapse and Arnold himself fled to the British
frigate “Vulture,” which was already dropping downstream out of range.

From the upper windows of the Livingston house, in Dobbs Ferry, you may
look northwest over the roofs of the town where André and Arnold had
secretly met and plotted to betray the United States. Across the river
you may see the faint outlines of the village of Tappan, where André
was held prisoner, and where George Washington shared his breakfast
with the convicted spy. At the foot of the hill in Dobbs Ferry you may
see the landing where a group of British dignitaries came to plead
with General Green for André’s life. If you had been in Tappan the
next morning you might have seen André walk to the gibbet, adjust the
noose firmly about his own neck, and heard him say: “It will be but
a momentary pang.” With a record that included secret service during
the siege of Charleston, André was undoubtedly a spy, but if you had
watched dry-eyed as this man met death you would have been lonesome,
for there were plenty of honest tears from the American officers who
stood by and saw him hang.

With the plot exploded, Arnold a turncoat, André dead, the cause
at least was safe. “Whom can we trust now?” asked Washington, and
proceeded to find out. In spite of a wide-spread feeling of contempt
for Arnold, his desertion made an impression upon the faint-hearts
in both armies. In an effort to stiffen the morale of his men, and
somewhat stung by the vengefulness of Arnold’s threat in a letter
presented at the Dobbs Ferry conference that he would make reprisals if
André was killed, Washington conceived the idea of kidnapping Arnold
in New York. The sergeant-major detailed for this bold stroke had the
worst possible luck, missed Arnold by a half-hour, and landed on board
a transport filled with a corps of deserters, bound for Virginia, and
commanded by the traitor himself.

By June of 1781 the French army was ready for action. They marched
across Connecticut, and pitched their tents upon the Westchester hills.
That lively, attractive young aide-de-camp who danced with the girls
of Westchester was a chap named Berthier, destined to become field
marshal under Napoleon and Prince of Wagram; the tall, gallant Saxon
aide was the Count de Fersen, later commander of the Swiss body-guard
of Louis XVI. Custine commanded the Saintonge regiment--Custine who had
served under Frederick the Great; on the ridge east of the Nepperhan
were the Viomênil brothers--Count and Baron, soldiers both; over on the
hill above White Plains was the charming Lauzun--he was guillotined a
few years later. “Gentleman rankers out on a spree,” and leading as
gay an army of crimson- and white- and pink- and yellow- and blue- and
green-clad troops as Europe could put in the field. What shortcomings
they found with the entertainment their American allies offered, what
irritation they felt at being served beef, potatoes, lamb and chicken
on one plate, they forgot in the real comradeship that sprang up. New
days were coming. New York, the stronghold, was to be beaten down by
these keen French, and these dogged Americans, and Henry Clinton might
well beware.

Washington moved his headquarters into the Livingston house at Dobbs
Ferry. There on July 6, 1781 Rochambeau met and joined him and for the
first time the armies were formally allied. The two commanders sat late
over the plans for the effort which was presently to make Henry Clinton
shout to Cornwallis and Tarleton for help. In the back of Washington’s
mind was a shrewd manoeuvre, and he kept it in the back of his mind,
for if a plan was to be good enough to fool the enemy, it should be
good enough to deceive his own men. Clinton was to be thoroughly scared
by a demonstration by the combined armies against New York. If he
called for reinforcements from the south, good; if they came, better
yet. For it was not Clinton in New York whom Washington wanted, nor
Tarleton in Charleston, but Cornwallis at Yorktown, the link between
the two. And Washington knew that this was to be his last gamble with
fate.

On July 18 Rochambeau accompanied him on a reconnoissance of the
enemy’s positions north of New York. What they saw led them to throw a
protective cordon of troops across the peninsula of Westchester, from
the Sound to the Hudson, to keep the British patrols from leaking out.
Ten days later Washington heard that three British regiments from South
Carolina had been sent to Clinton’s relief. Back of his calm eyes his
brain was humming with excitement. He wrote letters about his plans
for attacking New York and then saw to it that those letters fell into
the enemy’s hands. When the British approached the American lines they
found them preparing for battle. Washington allowed his engineers to
survey camp sites and build brick ovens within sight of the enemy’s
scouts. And then, on August 3, a travel-worn messenger arrived with a
letter from Lafayette.

“DeGrasse is sailing with the French fleet from Santo Domingo for
Chesapeake Bay” was its message. The moment had come.

To the Livingston house he summoned Robert Morris, who had never failed
before, and who must not fail now; and with him Richard Peters, the
acting Secretary of State. Washington demanded men. Turning to Peters,
he asked: “What can you do?”

“With money, everything. Without it, nothing,” replied the Secretary
of State, and looked questioningly toward Morris. The banker produced
a loan of $30,000. To Washington it was as good at that moment as a
million, for it meant pay and food for his men, a promise of more men,
and supplies for a forced march. And the forced march was imminent.
Rochambeau came down from his headquarters up over the hill and the two
laid their plans. On the eleventh 3000 Hessians from Cornwallis’ forces
arrived to defend New York. On August 25 all but 3000 men of the entire
American army and the whole French force crossed the Hudson and were
half-way to Philadelphia before Sir Henry Clinton knew that he had been
tricked.

Two months later Cornwallis surrendered to the Allied armies, and there
was no more British army between New York and Charleston. The plan
which first saw daylight in the Livingston House at Dobbs Ferry ended
the Revolution.

It was poetic justice, therefore, that in this house eighteen months
later should occur the formal evacuation of the United States by the
British. On the afternoon of May 6, 1783, two barges landed at the
Ferry. In one was George Washington, Commander-in-Chief; in the other
Governor Clinton of New York State. Presently a sloop-of-war appeared,
and from it landed General Sir Guy Carleton, Commander-in-Chief of the
British Expeditionary Forces. The three men met in the front room of
the Livingston House, and at a sturdy round walnut table which stands
in the house today General Sir Guy Carleton signed on the dotted line,
renouncing a claim upon America which was first staked out by Sir
Walter Raleigh. Good Queen Bess would have sworn like a lady at the
spectacle; Guy Carleton, instead, marched out between four companies of
American infantry at present-arms, saluted the flag, invited General
Washington and Governor Clinton to dine aboard his sloop, and after an
exceedingly good dinner fired a seventeen-gun salute for the guest who
throughout the war had been scornfully referred to by Parliament as
“Geo. Washington, Esqre.”

From Philip Livingston, its Revolutionary occupant, the house passed
into the hands of Peter Van Brugh Livingston, a rich, righteous and
rigid citizen who was a member of two legislatures, and who acquired
most of the real estate in Dobbs Ferry. A small parcel of this real
estate he gave to the Episcopal Church. When a local tavern-keeper
applied for admission to the church Van Brugh Livingston’s influence
and indignant protests almost kept the boniface out of reach of
salvation. The house was purchased from Livingston by Stephen Archer,
a gentle Quaker. His wife at her death-bed promised him that if he
would build a bay window in the house and sit at that window on a
Friday night, she would return to him. He built the bay window and
every Friday night for twenty years sat peering out, straining his
eyes to distinguish her ghostly form from the shadows of the ancient
horse-chestnut tree. This is a true story of spiritualism: _she never
came back_. Stephen Archer’s daughter married a Dr. Hasbrouck and the
house became his property upon her death. His fourth wife succeeded in
outliving him, and in the light of Van Brugh Livingston’s prejudice
against tavern-keepers, it is interesting to recall the latest episode
in the possession of the ancient dwelling.

Messmore Kendall, a lawyer of New York, was driving down Broadway one
morning when he saw a sign in the dooryard of the Hasbrouck house
advertising it for sale. He stopped. Inquiry from a woman who answered
his knock brought out the information that financial stress had forced
the sale of the house to a brewer who proposed to open a road house
within its sacred walls. Mr. Kendall went on to the city. He learned
from the real-estate brokers that the title was to be transferred to
the brewer at 12 o’clock of the following day. At 12 o’clock there was
no brewer in sight. At 1 o’clock Mr. Kendall had bought the house. At
5 o’clock of the same afternoon the brewer appeared, but the house had
been saved forever.

So, instead of the clash of weapons of a dance orchestra, the
Livingston House today hears the call of the birds from the garden.
Instead of a coat of scarlet paint, a swinging tavern-sign, and the
installation of new “service facilities” the house has undergone a
complete restoration to its early beauty.

Where a less knowing eye would have altered for the sake of altering,
he has directed changes only as they would preserve the feeling of
self-effacing Colonial occupancy. Where the austerity of the period
might easily have been made inelastic, he has made you sense the vital
nearness of the glorious immortals who were there. Where the old frame
of the building settled back after a century of service and gave an
informal tilt to the door-frames, instead of replacing them with new he
has tailored the old doors a trifle. He has left the old floors, for
flooring such as men laid in those days was not to be disciplined for
little irregularities. Between the drawing room and the study hangs the
original front door, with a lock three hands broad, and the great key
that turned on the invader’s last good-bye. Even electricity came into
the house in a quiet disguise. If it is candle-light, and you should
peer into the low-studded dining-room, with its musket and pewter, and
its great fireplace, you will be forgiven if your fancy pictures a
Continental cavalryman bolting his supper at the end of the long table.
Perfectly sane people have heard Lafayette’s light step on the stair.

Given far less to work with than the Jumel Mansion a few miles
away, the restorer of the Livingston house has avoided the error of
formalizing the restoration. For years he had been collecting rare
furniture for just such an emergency. Out of the storage warehouse and
into the drawing room came a pair of sofas and a little table from the
shop of Duncan Phyfe; two of Thomas Chippendale’s mirrors; a pair of
girandoles of unusual grace; a very early and tinkly American piano;
and a dozen other things, each wearing a veil of antiquity over her
charms. Like a group of delightful reunited old ladies they fell to
chirruping and whispering, agreeing that this was so like home, when
one--and it was probably one of the mischievous girandoles, who give
back your reflection askew--suggested with a sparkle in her eyes:
“Let’s pretend we have always been here!” A whisper of assent fled
from one to another. The Dutch clock in the hallway chimed agreement,
the Queen Anne sofa on the landing heard and sighed happily, and one
of Washington’s own chairs in the study, which had left Mount Vernon
a century ago, remarked that he had always regarded Dobbs Ferry as a
comfortable asylum.

They will hush their chatter when you come in, and you cannot surprise
them at it. But on a June night you may sit outside and watch the moon
rise through the tracery of an old wistaria on the south portico.
Listen sharply: when a white parrokeet waddles in from the blue shadows
of the garden, and a voice is singing, and there is the lightest
feather of air moving, it will bring their whisper through the window
to you. The illusion is yours; they are at home, among their own.




THE LONGFELLOW HOUSE


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE LONGFELLOW HOUSE

It has the requisite dignity of its poet and its general, the
well-dressed air of its Tory merchant, the scholarly simplicity
of its lexicographer, the open-armed hospitality of its rich
apothecary-general, and the grace of the lady who is its present
chatelaine.]


THE LONGFELLOW HOUSE


“The moonlight poet,” a clever Frenchman called him, “having little
passion, but a calmness of attitude which approaches majesty.” In a
single deft pass of verbal legerdemain he conjures about the venerable
head of Longfellow all the cool alluring mystery that veils a far-away
mountain peak at night. He waves the magic word “moonlight” and the
sun puffs out. In one stroke he has drawn a caricature which is not a
character. The brightness of words tempted him into an error of drawing
at which he would have paused if he had visited the poet’s house.

For it is a yellow citadel stormed by sunlight from morning to
night--sunlight pouring down upon its southerly wall and dancing off
the terrace to ripple over the lawn, splashing in minor torrents
through the tall windows of Martha Washington’s room, and of the poet’s
red-curtained study opposite, slanting its mellow shafts at acute
angles into the rooms on the north side, and breaking up at last into a
carnival of color in the garden.

No such crisp epigram as the Frenchman’s will dismiss the house. True,
he would have found himself at home in the midst of gay colorings and
an orderly clutter of interesting and precious garnitures, furniture,
books and _objets d’art_. But as his critical faculties were trained
upon the interior, as he began to retrace the history of this building,
obviously so colonially American, and yet become so definitely of
another period without losing its colonial flavor, he would have
groped in vain for a bright phrase to polish off his impression.

The Longfellow house is “typical” of nothing, and we may thank heaven
for that. It borrows here and there from architectural convention,
improves vastly upon it here and there, accepts easily the change in
fortunes, in family and in comforts of its successive owners. It has
the requisite dignity of its poet and its general, the well-dressed air
of its Tory merchant, the scholarly simplicity of its lexicographer,
the open-armed hospitality of its rich apothecary-general, and the
grace of the lady who is its present occupant. The composite of these
qualities is a picture which is almost as familiar and as dear to
America as Mount Vernon.

Out of that picture troops a story more varied in human incident than
that of Washington’s own home. It begins in 1759, when a Colonel
Vassall built a splendid new house on Tory Row, the vulgar name for the
_Via Sacra_ of Cambridge, now called Brattle Street. Within a radius
of a quarter-mile one might take tea with the Lees, dine with the last
of the King’s foresters, discuss politics with Richard Lechmere, or
theology with the Reverend East Apthorp, without canvassing more than a
small group of the sociable colony of royalists whose residences gave
the street its nickname. Administrations change, the Tory “keynote”
is perennial, and if your visit to Cambridge had been timed in the
early seventies of the Eighteenth Century, the chances are that the
prevailing topic of conversation in Tory Row would have been politics,
and the keynote would have been--as today--“What are we coming to?”

At that particular season they came to an April forenoon of ’75. A line
of red-coats marched out from Boston at the double, past the college,
and on into the country toward Lexington, where there was trouble.
A few hours later they returned, also at the double, because there
had been trouble in the country. On the tail of the British column
came the men of Acton and Billerica and Carlisle and Concord, and of
every village along the line of pursuit. Four civilians were killed
at the corner of Dunster and Winthrop Streets--perhaps because they
tried to oppose with well-aimed half-bricks the further retreat of a
much-irritated British soldiery. The air of Cambridge became suddenly
unhealthy for royalists, and darkness in the fine houses on Tory Row
told its own story of the hurried departure of their owners.

The Vassalls fled to Halifax. Cambridge was becoming an armed camp,
with incoming militia quartered where they saw fit to alight. The
men of Marblehead made themselves very comfortable on the Vassall
estate. The battle of Bunker Hill on June 17th, with heavy loss and
no tangible advantage to either side, threw the camp into utter
confusion and swelled the number of volunteers to fourteen thousand.
They swarmed down in a great semi-circle to sever the Boston peninsula
from the mainland, while the British retired into the city to await
reinforcements. Congress met, chose as commander of the army a young
soldier-farmer from Virginia who had shown great intelligence in
discussing military plans, and on July 3d he rode down Tory Row from
Watertown, made one of the shortest public speeches on record, and took
command of his army.

After a fortnight in the residence on Harvard Square, now known as
Wadsworth House, he ordered the men of Marblehead out of the Vassall
house to make room for his staff and headquarters. For ten months it
was his base of operations, the longest period during which he occupied
any headquarters during the Revolution. He came there the authorized
commander of an undisciplined, inexperienced mob. He left only after
he had transformed that mob into an army, fed it, clothed it, armed it,
guarded it from small-pox, and finally, with its valor and enthusiasm
and skill, ejected the British from Boston for a more hospitable
battleground to the southward.

The southeast room was his office. One day in the early winter of ’75–6
an out-rider came in with good news, and presently Martha Washington
“arrived in great ceremony, with a coach and four black horses, with
postilions and servants in scarlet livery.” She was installed in the
sunny room across the hallway, the room from whose walls look down
today the interesting faces of Sir William Pepperrell’s children, and
the same room in which you may find an exquisite onyx and metal goblet
from the studio of that delightful international scamp, Benvenuto
Cellini.

As chatelaine of headquarters she presided over a modest celebration
of their wedding anniversary, although, Miss Alice Longfellow says,
“the General had to be much persuaded by his aides.” And there was a
“Twelfth Night party” which is a tradition in the Longfellow family.
On rare occasions since it has been repeated, once by a group of
youngsters of all ages who impersonated in costume the guests of
Washington, and some of those latter-day guests were direct descendants
of the earlier dignitaries. On another winter night the Longfellow
children dressed in the characters of the successive occupants of the
house, and the sword of General Craigie clanked about the boots of a
certain Boston lawyer until, as he says “I was no longer Dana; I felt
like a regular profiteer!”

For the end of the Revolution was the beginning of a large period
of hospitality in the life of General Andrew Craigie. He had been
apothecary-general to the Continental army, and in the light of the
recent war, it must be evident that purveying to any victorious army
is profitable. The Vassall House, during the seventeen years after
Washington’s departure, had been occupied by two good patriots:
Nathaniel Tracy, who gave a hundred ships to the government during the
war, and Thomas Russel, the same who set Timothy Dexter an example for
making a fortune. Then Andrew Craigie (General, if you like) bought the
house, and it bears his name as commonly today as that of the poet.

Hawthorne, the quiet, handsome young writer who used to visit the
house years later, should have known General Craigie. For all his
garden parties at Commencement time, with their distinguished guests,
like Talleyrand, and Admiral d’Estaing, and Prince Edward (the father
of Queen Victoria), for all the refinishing and painting he did in
the house, for all the splendor of the organ which he installed in
the northeast room between two fine Corinthian columns, and the rare
girandole in the study, and the Adam mantels--for all his creature
magnificence, he had a scenario or two concealed about his person.

Hark!

“I am the ghost of Madame Craigie. I loved an impetuous youth from the
south, then a student. We parted, for my family forbade me. But we
swore to write each other. He did not write; I pined; then, desperate,
obeyed my parents’ mandates, and married General Craigie. And as we
sat at table in his great house, a letter came to me, in my maiden
name--the name, ah me! now forfeit--saying ‘I have no word of you, no
word since I went away. Why do you not write?’ And _then_ I knew that
they had kept his letters from me, and mine from him! And from that day
I never spoke to my husband save on matters of essential business.”

Hawthorne could have made something out of that.

Or this: the poet was surprised one morning as he came downstairs
to see lying on one of the lower treads a letter. It was a fervent
letter, with no clue to the addressee nor to its source. Inquiry
disclosed nothing from any member of the household. The next morning
another letter--also fervent. When it happened again and still again,
he set himself to solve the mystery. And it was no mystery, for in the
Craigie dynasty there had been an affair, which Andrew was only too
anxious not to pile on his wife’s already considerable grievance. So
he walled the letters up under the stairs, and thought them safe. But
as the sea gives up her dead, the gradual settling of the staircase
and the tapping of feet upon it slowly and inexorably provoked a crack
through which revenge fed the letters, one by one, confiding the story
piecemeal, to a poet.

Capricious investments sent Craigie to his grave in 1818 a poor man. If
Madam Craigie was in the slightest degree relieved at his departure,
her obligation to him was diluted by the fact that she must now support
herself. By “taking in boarders” she could manage to live on in the
old house, and make ends meet. For those who could pass her rather
rigid inspection it offered accommodation far better than the average.
Naturally such folk as Edward Everett and his bride, and President
Jared Sparks of Harvard and Josiah Worcester, who wrote a dictionary,
needed no references. With strangers it was different. A gentle young
fellow with light hair and deep-set eyes, and a clean, aquiline
profile, appeared one afternoon in 1837 and asked for lodgings. She
said she had none vacant. In the temporizing dialogue which followed it
developed that his name was Longfellow and that he was the author of
a book she had quite recently been reading, and her manner thawed so
readily that he got the room.

He was not much trouble, really--only a polite young man from Maine
who had lost his wife a year or two before, and who had just been
made professor of modern languages in the College. He was usually up
in his room writing at night, while Mrs. Craigie read Voltaire or
Madame de Sevigné down in the library, or played an old song on an
old pianoforte. Another paying guest was a Miss Sally Lowell, whose
talented nephew, James Russell Lowell, was beginning to be heard from;
a third was the lexicographer Worcester, who was so taken with the
house that he later bought it. For Longfellow’s part, they were amiable
neighbors, but not so exacting as to interrupt the absorbing routine of
a man of thirty embarking upon a full professorship.

For nearly twenty years he served the College in this capacity. The
College was thrifty, and anxious to get the most out of his teaching;
Longfellow’s health was not good, and the duties of his position
asked more of him than he could sometimes give. He had resolved as a
youth to become an eminent man of letters, just as determinedly as
any man in business ever set his face toward the height of power. He
kept a diary of progress, as scrupulous a record in its own line as
the balance sheets of an industry, and he never allowed himself to be
diverted by praise or ill-health from the pursuit of his ambition.
Steadily and smoothly there came from his pen an output toward which
the public looked with growing anticipation. Now it was experimental,
now political, now religious. The best of it came from the warmest
corner of a warm patriotic heart, where he kept a great treasure of the
legends of his own country.

When _Hiawatha_, _Evangeline_, and _The Courtship of Miles Standish_
had appeared, his fame had crossed boundaries and oceans. Word-mongers
say they are not his finest work, but they went straight, from his
heart to the heart of plain people everywhere. His enthusiasm for the
Indian tradition that is our only native folklore found utterance in
_Hiawatha_; the story of Evangeline he got from Hawthorne; the romance
of John Alden and Priscilla Mullins he picked from his own family tree.
As a poet he gave the lie to the precious though fashionable complaint
that nothing real in art need be expected from America until she had
had a century or two of sandpapering. His enthusiasm of race drew
occasional outbursts of a greater quality--the thing that made him a
great citizen as well as a great national artist--the immortal spirit
which went into such majestic songs as _The Building of the Ship_.
“In neither case,” observes Higginson, “was this Americanism trivial,
wasteful, or ignoble in its tone.” Will the professional hucksters of
100-per-centism please copy?

Contrary to persistent tradition, a poet is not a sulky hermit plucking
ideas from empty air and full bottles. Longfellow had about him a
laboratory full of elixirs of association, to which his sensitive
spirit was a quick reagent. His second marriage gave him a beloved
wife, his wife’s father gave Mrs. Longfellow the Craigie house to live
in always, and Mrs. Longfellow gave her husband the children who were
the Alpha and Omega of his affection for children in general. The
familiar portrait of the children hangs in the dining-room; a pretty
picture, painted by Reed, the same who wrote “Sheridan’s Ride.”

Harvard activities supplied him with a circle of friends which spread
like ripples in a pond with every new literary production he cast
forth. Come into his study and meet the best of them. A fine white
room on the front of the house, high ceiling, tall windows, bright
turkey-red curtains falling from borders scalloped like a flounce
from Godey’s _Ladies’ Book_. An orange-tree flourishing in a tub at a
sunny window--as it was when he stood at his high desk and wrote of
Spain. Most of his writing was done at a round Duncan Phyfe table,
whose graces are hidden under a faded green felt cover. On its dusty
self-pattern of ivy leaves are the articles he left there as he died:
_item_, a miscellany of books; _item_, an ornate ink-well of Coleridge
which Longfellow treasured; _item_, a historic ink-well which had
been the successive property of Moore and Crabbe, which Longfellow
venerated; and, _item_, a little tupenny glass ink-bottle which
Longfellow himself used! Even the quill pens are there with which he
formed that calm, round graceful handwriting.

You came to see his friends. You shall. Here is a spare young man with
a sensitive, kindly smile about the eyes--from Concord he is, and his
name is Emerson. Over in that extraordinarily long armchair by the
hearth sits (on his shoulder-blades) a handsome chap, the only man
who fits the chair--six feet and more of Charles Summer. On the walls
are the crayon portraits customary as gifts before the days of the
camera: here is Felton, whom Dickens called “the heartiest of Greek
professors”; here that fascinating Agassiz, always shuttling between
Cambridge and some tropic or other; here Hawthorne’s grave dark eyes.

Picture him later in life chatting before the fire with Lowell, Holmes,
John Lothrop Motley, or Whittier. Shift the scene to a Boston tavern
with the same company, and three or four more of their stature, engaged
in starting _The Atlantic Monthly_, and ask yourself where a poet could
seek more inspiration. Gossips who knew this group only from outside
called it the “Mutual Admiration Society,” and you may find in the
Boston Athenaeum a review of _Evangeline_ written by Felton on which
some scoffing contemporary has pencilled “_Insured at the Mutual_.”
There is good authority for picturing Longfellow and a pair of younger
cronies returning under the moon from a good dinner at Porter’s,
singing in harmony--“I am a Rajah!! Putterum!” And in the years when
the Saturday Club was flourishing, the poet was a regular attendant,
and a modest, dry-spoken commentator on discussions in which the
Olympians matched wits.

Every eminent visitor to Boston paid him court and even Oscar Wilde
paid him a patronizing call. Many came who were not eminent, and the
poet often invited aimless tourists in to see the house. To one such
couple he exhibited the Coleridge ink-well, explaining helpfully
that Coleridge had written _The Ancient Mariner_. “Oh,” said the
bridegroom, and nodded. Then, puzzled, he said: “Say! who done the
_Old Oaken Bucket_?” There were memorable evenings spent in the Howe
tavern at Sudbury with Ole Bull, the fiddler, and an ingenious group of
story-tellers whose yarns took shape in “The Tales of a Wayside Inn.”

Longfellow in his later years was the chief figure of Cambridge.
Great men and women came to pay him tribute and to find his modesty
unimpeached. When the undergraduates started a mutiny over in the
College and riotous language was echoing from the red brick of old
“Mass.” hall, it was quieted when one youth cried: “Let’s hear what Mr.
Longfellow has to say about it--he’s fair, at any rate.” And when the
spreading chestnut tree over Dexter Pratt’s smithy fell, the children
of Cambridge gave their pennies to fashion him an armchair of its wood,
and used to traipse fearlessly into the Longfellow house from time to
time to call on the poet and see that the chair gave him good service.
Without question it is one of the homeliest chairs in the world--and
one of the finest.

One cannot leave the house without a glance at his other friends, his
closer intimates, nor enter the house without remarking them. Books,
books, books--heavy Italian walnut cases of them, white shelves of
them, heaps of them, in the study, the halls, the dining-room, the
drawing room, a vault full of the rarest of them in the east entry.
I have not visited the pantry, but I will make a small wager that
there are books on the cake-box. It is a judicious collection by a man
who was a hungry reader and a lover of beautiful volumes. There are
ranks of Italian folios, Tasso and Ariosto in white vellum--and of
apparently everything else in equally rich costume, for the years of
the poet’s great public appreciation built for him a formidable library
of handsomely bound presentation copies and he was no mean purchaser
himself.

They are where the poet left them, and so they will stay. When the
actual tenancy of the house by the Longfellow heirs comes to a period,
it will be held securely in trust just as it is, just as he left it one
March day in 1882. Those generous and tactful heirs have already given
the city of Cambridge the park which affords the house a clear vista to
the Charles, and have given Longfellow land across the Charles to make
up most of Soldiers Field, the great playground of Harvard. Now they
have wisely provided that the house shall not become a museum, but that
it shall remain the home of whose atmosphere and influence they cherish
so acute an appreciation.

Longfellow’s bust stands in Westminster Abbey, the first American so to
be honored. It is made of marble, and is a good likeness. Longfellow’s
soul lives in Cambridge, in his home. The house is a better likeness
than the bust, and of warmer stuff. His children’s trust will
perpetuate their generosity for our children’s children.

       *       *       *       *       *

A dignified old clock stands on the stairs, and ticks:

     “_Forever--never
      Never--forever._”




CLIVEDEN


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

CLIVEDEN

One of Maxwell’s six-pounders spoke, and a ball passed in the front
window of the Chew house, through four partitions and heaven knows
how many British, and out a rear window. The battery hammered at the
steps, the windows and the door, while snipers fired at the flash of a
rifle from the upper stories. Infantry charged across the lawn and was
beaten back, artillery punctured but did not dislodge. Reed was all
for chasing the rest of the retreating British toward the city, but
Knox said it was against the rules to leave an enemy fort in the rear.
“What!” Reed exclaimed, “Call this a fort and lose the happy moment?”]


CLIVEDEN


A daughter of the Quincy house saw the beginning of the Revolution.
Mount Vernon was the home of its chief figure. From the Jumel Mansion
he retreated to Westchester when the Continental army suffered its
first major reverse. In the Kendall house at Dobbs Ferry he conceived
the campaign which was to end the war, and there finally he saw the
British evacuate the United States. Five houses in America punctuate
the Revolutionary career of Washington, and the fifth is the house
where the cause of freedom entered the dark hours, the period of
terrible ordeal.

Cliveden was built in 1761 on “the worst road in America,” the main
street of Germantown. The village, whose houses dotted some three
miles of the street, was already becoming a fashionable summer
retreat for prominent Philadelphians, and William Chew, the attorney
general of the province, made Cliveden large enough for a family that
totalled fourteen children, with the appropriate retinue of servants
and household pets. The house is three stories high, as severely
rectangular as a mill, with a plain extension built to the rear, and a
further detached addition connected only by an underground passage. It
might easily have been commonplace, but the dapple-gray native stone
of which it is built is interesting, the doorway, to which you ascend
by a flight of six stone steps, is dignified and inviting, and dormer
windows, fat chimneys, and stone urns strike notes of real character
on an otherwise plain roof. It makes no great bid for beauty, but its
aspect of substance is as honest as a Philadelphia lawyer--and that is
what William Chew was.

Although he became chief justice of Pennsylvania under the crown,
he was no more of a loyalist than his position required. As a model
of astute straddling, where can you cite a statement which quite
compares with his decision, rendered in answer to the question: What
is to become of those who meet the mandates of the crown with armed
resistance?

“I have stated,” he answered, “that an opposition by force of arms to
the lawful authority of the King or his Ministry is high treason, but
in the moment when the King or his Ministers shall exceed the authority
vested in them by the Constitution submission to their mandate becomes
treason.” The same tolerance he showed toward the uprising of the
colonies he showed to their leaders in Philadelphia, and you may take
it from John Adams’ diary that he was a rare and upright judge of food
as well as of treason.

“Thursday. Dined with Mr. Chew, Chief Justice of the Province, with all
the gentlemen from Virginia ... and many others. About four o’clock
we were called down to dinner. The furniture was all rich. Turtle
and every other thing, flummery, jellies, sweet-meats, of 20 sorts,
trifles, whipped sillabubs, floating islands, fools, etc., and then
a dessert of fruits, raisens, almonds, pears, peaches, wines most
excellent & admirable. I drank Madeira at a great rate & found no
inconvenience in it.”

However much the members of the Continental Congress enjoyed his
hospitality in 1775, they could no longer endure his presence as
chief justice in Philadelphia in 1777, and in August of that year he
and Governor John Penn were arrested and escorted to Burlington, New
Jersey. Within a month Washington had met the British in force at the
Brandywine in a doubtful effort to check their march on Philadelphia,
and had been defeated. For a fortnight he played hide-and-seek with
Howe on the banks of the Schuylkill, and if the countryside had been
as communicative to him as it was to the enemy, the enemy would not
have marched, as he presently did, unmolested into Philadelphia. Howe
placed his major force at Germantown, and Washington came in as near as
he dared and sat down to watch and wait. Strategically, the Revolution
was a distinctly suburban war. With Philadelphia, the national capital,
in the hands of the British, and winter coming on, American morale was
quoted at .001, with no sales.

On the night of October 2–3, the American forces marched quietly
down the main road toward Germantown, with flanks thrown out, on the
right to the Wissahickon ravine, on the left to the old York pike.
Dawn brought Sullivan of Maine into contact with the enemy. The
enemy retreated, gaining speed as he scampered down Mount Airy into
Germantown, with Sullivan, Conway and Reed at his heels. Colonel
Musgrave, of the Fortieth Regiment of the British, saw the retreat
coming, and with one hundred and twenty men swarmed into Cliveden,
closed the shutters on the lower floor, barred the doors, and prepared
to stand. Washington himself was in the pursuit, and he ordered
Maxwell and four cannon to the ground across the street from Cliveden,
where Upsala now stands. A thick fog had gathered, making it nearly
impossible to determine where the enemy was, or in what strength. The
utmost confusion prevailed. One of Maxwell’s six-pounders spoke, and
a ball passed in the front window of the Chew house, through four
partitions and heaven knows how many British, and out a rear window.
The battery hammered at the steps, the windows and the door, while
snipers fired at the flash of rifles from the upper stories. Infantry
charged across the lawn and were beaten back, artillery punctured, but
did not dislodge. Reed was all for chasing the rest of the retreating
British toward the city, but Knox said it was against the rules to
leave an enemy fort in the rear. “What!” Reed exclaimed, “call this a
fort and lose the happy moment?”

It was in effect a fort, but it was as truly the happy moment to leave
the fort to be cleaned out later and press the British retreat. For the
American wings had not driven the British back (the American left wing
failed because General Stephen was drunk), and the British, unopposed,
marched obliquely toward the center of the fighting at Cliveden. Thus
the battle became, instead of the conflict of bow-shaped forces, the
meeting of two great arrowheads, and the point where the arrows met and
the sparks were flying thickest was the lawn of the Chew house. Smith
of Virginia, a colonel, set out for the house with a flag of truce to
demand Musgrave’s surrender, and was shot from a window. Major White,
one of Sullivan’s aides, tried to set fire to the house, and a shot
from a cellar window killed him. Musgrave hung on. Every minute that
passed brought British troops nearer, and increased the odds against
the Americans.

Our army left five hundred dead and wounded in Germantown and then
retreated to Whitemarsh. The King’s forces, reduced by five hundred
dead and wounded, remained in the bloody fog of the village. The
townsfolk began to come out of their cellars and examine the damage.
A field hospital was set up at Wyck, a fine old house down Germantown
Road. At Johnson House you can see today the hole in a window-frame
through which a frantic pet squirrel, forgotten in the flight to the
cellar, gnawed his way to freedom. Stray bullets pierced every house
within a quarter-mile, and of all the houses within that radius,
Cliveden, its center, took the worst punishment.

Five carpenters worked all that fall and winter repairing the damage.
Holes gaped through the inner walls, hardly a pane of glass was
intact, statues were chipped, mirrors splintered, furniture reduced
to expensive kindling. What was not stained with blood was streaked
with smoke, and the second floor ceilings were sprayed with bullets
by Continentals who dashed into the shelter of the building and fired
through the upper windows.

Across the span of the years we can still hear the echo of an outraged
protest--the hymn of hate of the daughters of William Chew, sung
with all the cordial detestation that could be uttered by a group of
sisters who came out to Germantown under British escort and found
their lovely home in ruins at the hands of the army that had already
made their father a prisoner. None can blame them for the gayety with
which they entered into the social life of that winter in the occupied
city, with never a thought for Washington’s men shivering in the snow
at Valley Forge. Knyphausen, Cornwallis, and the two Howes picked out
comfortable quarters in the deserted houses of the patriots who had
fled, and Major André settled down with a “rapacious crew” in the home
of Benjamin Franklin. When Franklin’s daughter returned after the
British evacuation the next June she reported to him in Paris: “They
stole and carried off with them some of your musical instruments, viz.,
a Welsh harp, ball harp, the set of tuned bells which were in a box,
viol-de-gamba, all the spare harmonica glasses and one or two spare
cases.” Tuneful was the life of the army of occupation.

André was paying diligent court to Peggy Chew. He was her champion in
the fête of Mischianza, and her gallant protector when a marauding
force of ragged Continentals marched down from Valley Forge and
broke up the party. He wore her ribbon, with the legend “No Rival,”
presented her with an aquarelle of himself in costume, wrote an account
of the affair in verse, and filled in his spare hours by inditing to
her rhapsodies inspired in the orchard at Cliveden, in apple-blossom
time. Then came the parting; within a few short years

     “The youth who bids with stifled pain
      His sad farewell tonight”

was dead with a rope around his neck, and although Peggy married a
soldier of the Republic, she remembered the enemy gallant. She was
never so impishly amused as when she could say a kind word for André,
for it guaranteed an explosive protest from her husband. “Major André,”
said Peggy, demurely, with a certain dangerous sadness in her eyes,
“was a most witty and cultivated gentleman,” and Colonel Howard,
seizing a visitor’s arm, exclaimed “He was a damned spy, sir! Nothing
but a damned spy!”

The house had been restored only two years when William Chew sold it
to Blair McClenahan, but in 1787 he bought it back. In August of 1787
Washington, then president of the Constitutional Convention, rode out
to see the encampment at Whitemarsh to which he had retreated ten
years before, and dined with McClenahan in the Chew house. Despite his
Royalist relations, the close of the Revolution restored Benjamin Chew
to good standing in his community and the judicial profession, and he
served as justice of the High Court of Errours and Appeals until its
abolishment in 1808. During the period when the Federal Congress sat
in Philadelphia it was no infrequent thing to see the Father of His
Country in company with the father of Peggy and of Harriet, who was
soon to marry a Carroll of Doughoregan.

It was at Germantown that Stephen’s drunkenness left his division
without a commander, and opened a vacancy for Lafayette’s assumption
of an active command as major-general. Naturally, therefore, when
Lafayette returned to America in 1825, he could not ignore Germantown.
He was received with a military escort and drawn “in an open barouche”
to Cliveden. Let Miss Ann Johnson, of Upsala, across the way, carry on
the story as she did in a letter to her mother:

“Last 4th. day morn I had the honour of breakfasting with Lafayette
at Mr. Chew’s. I wish you had been here--the house both up and down
stairs was crowded with men, women and soldiers--and around the house.
Mrs. and two of the Miss Morris’s and myself were the only invited
ladies that sat down to Breakfast--about 16 sat down at first, and when
they had finished others took their place, and so on till I believe
nearly all the soldiers had breakfast--those that did not come in had
something in the kitchen. I heard that they eat everything they had
till at last the cook had to lock the doors.

“I was introduced to LaFayette twice and shook hands with him three
times. Ann Chew regretted M. was not there to enjoy the scene--it was
quite delightful to see anything so animated in G--pp. There was so
much noise that I could not hear a word the General said; every person
seemed so anxious to see him eat that a centinal had to keep guard at
the door with a drawn sword--it was very fine indeed. When he departed
the shouts of the multitude and the roaring of the cannon was almost
deafening. A. L. Logan said I could give you a very fine description
of it--but I told him I would have to leave it to your imagination, it
would be impossible for me to describe everything.”

Mrs. Samuel Chew is the present owner of the estate, and an
appreciative custodian of its legend. Hers are the Washington letters;
the portraits of illustrious Chews who have been eminent in the law,
medicine, and public affairs since John Chew sailed into Jamestown in
the _Charitie_ in 1621; the shot-holes, the stains of the powder-kegs
on the floor; the immaculately carved columns and stair rail of the
hallway, and the hundred other fragments of the Cliveden story.
Cliveden is hers--its story is the nation’s.




THE WENTWORTH MANSION


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE WENTWORTH MANSION

    I like to think of the house as a family group of all the
    Wentworths, each little excrescence on the original nucleus
    being one of the useful but obscure members posed kneeling
    or sitting on the outskirts of the family as it pyramids up
    to the bulk of the council-room Benning Wentworth built,
    the council-room being in my mind’s eye none other than the
    formidable, homely, well-fed and hard-drinking Benning himself.
]


THE WENTWORTH MANSION

     “These tales you tell are one and all
      Of the Old World,” the Poet said,
     “Flowers gathered from a crumbling wall,
      Dead leaves that rustle as they fall;
      Let me present you in their stead
      Something of our New England earth, ...”

                             --_Lady Wentworth._


It was almost as original in Colonial New Hampshire to be a Wentworth
as it is today to be a Biddle in Philadelphia. The descendants
of Samuel Wentworth, the first of his name in the province, were
conspicuously numerous in the small population of their community. As
individuals they were energetic, persevering, and not without a certain
amount of dignity. To say that they were politicians is to say that
they were business men. Individually they were better than average
citizens, collectively they contributed enough to the progress and the
story of New Hampshire to invite a glimpse into the house which is
today the chief memorial to the family.

Except for its size you might pass it by in a countryside full of
rambling buildings silvered by the weather. It has neither the warm,
open-armed welcome of Doughoregan Manor, nor the smug comfort of
Cliveden, nor the exalted location of Monticello, nor the decorative
dignity of its rival, the Pepperrell House across the harbor. A plain
man built it somewhere back in the seventeenth century, built it
close by the bright water of Little Harbor because there were codfish
there as sacred to New Hampshire revenue as any goldfish that ever
inspired faith in Massachusetts. Built it out of big timber to cut the
northeasters whipping in over the Isles of Shoals, built a sharp roof
to shed snow. Built it to live in. Another generation, with perhaps a
larger family, wanted more room, and built on. When Mark Hunking owned
it he did the same. In the south our colonies’ increased demands upon
the facilities of a growing estate were met by outbuildings set well
apart from the great house, but in this sharp climate outbuildings
raised the unpleasant prospect of wading to and fro through
shoulder-high drifts, and involved separate heating-plants and no end
of inconvenience. So gradually the house sprouted a plain ell here and
a humble jog there, a shed around the corner, and enough additions to
effect a total of nearly fifty rooms. I like to think of the house
as a family group of all the Wentworths, of each little addition to
the original nucleus as one of the useful but obscure members posed
kneeling or sitting on the outskirts of the family as it pyramids up
to the great bulk of the council-room Benning Wentworth built, the
council-room being in my mind’s eye none other than the formidable,
homely, well-fed and hard-drinking Benning himself.

To paint for yourself the picture of the prime of the house you
must recall certain facts about the Portsmouth of the beginning of
the eighteenth century. Twenty miles inland Indians scalped white
men and women, and white men scalped Indians. As many miles to the
eastward, and more, the men of Portsmouth sailed in ships for fish and
returned with a catch to pay the storekeeper’s bill for groceries and
clothing--a bill which always seemed just out of reach, and which kept
these men sailing until they died, while the merchants prospered. From
the outer world came small-pox. Over on Great Island, at the Walton
place, there were genuine witches; if you don’t believe this you may
read it in a pamphlet published in London in 1698, whose title says it
is

    “an Exact and True Account of the various actions of infernal
    Spirits, or (_Devils Incarnate_) Witches, or both; and the
    great Disturbance and Amazement they gave to _George Walton’s_
    Family at a place called _Great Island_ in the Province of
    _New Hampshire_ in New England, chiefly in throwing about (by
    an Invisible hand) _Stones_, _Bricks_, and _Brick-bats_ of
    all sizes, with several other things, as _Hammers_, _Mauls_,
    _Iron-Crows_, _Spits_, and other domestick utensils, as came
    into their Hellish Minds, and this for the space of a Quarter
    of a Year.”

The Province, though a royal property as distinguished from a chartered
colonial settlement, was not encouraging to the farmer, not ready for
the miller. Its governorship was for the king’s favorite candidate, and
in size and importance it was a homely stepsister of the well-to-do
colony of Massachusetts to the southward.

John Wentworth bought the lieutenant-governorship and made it
profitable until he died. From his widow, Mark Hunking’s daughter,
Benning Wentworth inherited the Mansion at Little Harbor. As a young
graduate of Harvard who had brought home a Boston bride, and as the
owner of a prosperous business and a fine house, he was popular
enough, and his path was paved into politics. The Assembly applauded
his protests against the Governor of Massachusetts who also governed
New Hampshire. As a member of the council his youthful oratory soon
moderated to the whisper of the boss who is learning how to do things
smoothly, for there was much to be gained if London could be persuaded
to appoint a distinct governor for New Hampshire who would not be
responsible to Massachusetts. In 1744 the opportunity came to prove his
point.

Benning Wentworth sold a cargo of lumber to an agent of the King
of Spain. When it reached Cadiz the agent had resigned, and his
successor refused the cargo. On the return voyage the ship foundered,
and Wentworth and a handful of sailors counted themselves lucky to be
rescued. He went at once to London to beg the government to enforce his
claim on Spain. With similar complaints from other British merchants
a bill was presented at Madrid which Spain honored but did not pay,
and under economic pressure England declared war upon her. At home,
meanwhile, Governor Belcher had fallen into every trap his enemies set
for him, and was removed, but not before the King had been prevailed
upon to separate Massachusetts and New Hampshire once and for all,
re-survey their boundaries, and set up a new governor not only in
Boston but in Portsmouth.

Theoretically, John Thomlinson, the agent of New Hampshire in London,
brought this about, but, as a matter of fact, it was Thomlinson’s good
aim and Benning Wentworth’s timely cartridges which shot Governor
Belcher’s support from under him. What more natural, therefore,
than that Benning Wentworth return to Portsmouth as governor of New
Hampshire. He was received with cheers, and made a hearty address to
his Assembly, suggesting that they make him a guaranteed annual grant
of salary. The Assembly replied with fulsome cordiality and said they
would grant him whatever they found themselves able to pay. It proved
to be £500 a year, and to this Thomlinson presently managed to add
the job of Surveyor of the Woods, which he bought from the previous
surveyor for two thousand pounds and turned over to Wentworth for a
consideration not mentioned. In order to accept the post the Governor
had to surrender his claims for $56,000 against the Court of Spain,
and the prospects were so bright in his new position that he was glad
enough to do it in favor of additional income of £800, and to settle
down to a smooth program of political patronage.

It happened that he was not to be allowed to forget the Court of
Spain, nor to get rich without making enemies. England’s war with
Spain dragged France in, and Governor Shirley of Massachusetts, full
of enthusiasm for his new charge, looked on a map for the nearest
French stronghold, found it to be Louisburg, on Cape Breton Island, and
shouted for money, arms, and men for an expedition. Benning Wentworth,
who liked Shirley and often asked his advice, heard the cry, and
offered New Hampshire help. Shirley took the help, and appointed a
rival merchant in Portsmouth, William Pepperrell, as general in command.

Here was a delicate situation. Shirley, having securely appointed
Pepperrell, wrote: “It would have been an infinite satisfaction to
me, and done great honor to the expedition if your limbs would have
permitted you to take the command.” Wentworth was so charmed with the
idea that he forgot his gout and volunteered! To this Shirley replied,
with more truth than tact, that “any alteration of the present command
would be attended with great risque, both with respect to the Assembly
and the soldiers being entirely disgusted.” “You was made General,”
wrote a friend to Pepperrell, “being a popular man, most likely to
raise soldiers soonest. The expedition was calculated to ESTABLISH
Shirley and make his creature Wentworth Governor of Cape Breton, which
is to be a place of refuge for him from his creditors. Beware of snakes
in the grass and mind their hissing.” About four thousand men rallied,
a fleet of a hundred vessels assembled, and the voyage began, planned
by a Governor, and commanded by a merchant, to storm a citadel called
the “Gibraltar of America.”

Contemporaries called it a “Cambridge commencement,” and without
a wild sort of undergraduate enthusiasm it must have failed. An
enthusiastic preacher gave Governor Shirley a plan for investing the
fortress which he had worked out himself. Another amateur gave him
a model of a flying bridge to be used in scaling the walls--it only
needed twelve hundred feet of rope to operate, and a thousand men
might pass over it in four minutes. Shirley took his own counsel, drew
his own beautifully-timed plans, and designed his own scaling ladders
and pikes. The men were growing restless when George Whitefield, the
eminent Newburyport counterpart of our own Billy Sunday, devised a
motto “nihil desperandum Christo duce,” and the expedition sailed like
fanatic crusaders out of Boston Harbor, unscathed by a severe epidemic
of small-pox in the port.

Every plan Shirley made went wrong. The fortress, instead of being
surprised by the fleet, woke up the morning of April 29 to see it
lying off the harbor. Yet on June 17 the well-scared commander of the
citadel hauled down the French flag. The Yankees took the city, hauled
the Tricolor up again, and lured several valuable prizes into port in
this way. Pepperrell was made a Baronet, Commodore Warren an Admiral.
England forced France to make peace, and gave Louisburg back. Do you,
perhaps, see now why they called it a Cambridge commencement?

Governor Wentworth, though not a participant, shared vicariously in the
glory of the expedition, and kept busy at home directing the fighting
in the west against French Indians who raided the frontier stockades
from the New York lakes. Gradually and thoroughly he installed his
relatives in lucrative positions of the provincial government. An
occasional quarrel with his Assembly brought forth a protest to the
King to remove him and place Pepperrell in his stead. Unruffled, he
would call his council to the mansion at Little Harbor, set out an
enormous punch-bowl on the council-room sideboard, and conduct the
affairs of state as swiftly as a governor should who wants to move on
to the card-rooms for a friendly game.

From his office above he could keep a weather eye on the ships out for
the West Indies with lumber and livestock and fish and oil, and could
tick off those inward-bound with molasses and coffee and rum. Toward
town he could glimpse the stocks where more ships were building to tie
his wilderness province, with its twenty miles of seacoast, to the
outside world. If the Assembly lost its manners and had to be attended
to, he stepped to the landing at the council-room door, and was
royally wafted away to town in his official barge. His aims were not
all selfish by any means. He gave a grant of land in the Connecticut
valley on which to build Dartmouth College, he drew from the Assembly a
grant of 300 pounds to restore a part of the burned library of Harvard.
If his wife and his son had been spared to him, his life would have
been very happy. But they were not spared, and thus innocently they
contribute to the story of the house its most entertaining episode.

The kindly poet in the Craigie House told it in the _Tales of a Wayside
Inn_. Shorn of its poetic embellishments, it is this: The Governor
grew lonely in the great house. He had lost his wife, his boy, his
figure. A maid of Portsmouth caught his eye, but she loved a sailor,
and would have none of the Governor and his city ways. Accordingly,
the sailor was caught by a press-gang and shipped to sea. Benning
Wentworth grew lonelier, until one day he summoned to his house a
number of guests, among them the Reverend Arthur Brown. After a good
dinner he fixed a firm eye upon the dominie; and said: “You are here,
sir, to marry me.” The company was astounded, and asked for the bride,
whereupon the Governor turned and introduced as his blushing betrothed
a maid-of-all-work in the house, Martha Hilton. And so, as so often
happens, they were married.

     “The rector read the service loud and clear:
      ‘Dearly beloved, we are gathered here,’
      And so on to the end. At his command
      On the fourth finger of her fair left hand
      The Governor placed the ring; and that was all:
      Martha was Lady Wentworth of the Hall!”

The son of the present owner of the house, Mr. J. Templeman Coolidge,
tells me that marrying Martha did not necessarily indicate a loss
of caste on the Governor’s part, for it was customary in those days
for girls of good families to work in the households of other good
families. Further, there are none of the poet’s “stacks of chimneys
rising high in air,” nor oaken panels and tapestries. Further still, it
is doubtful whether Martha, as a barefoot child about the streets of
Portsmouth, ever resolved that some day she would marry the

     “... portly person with three-cornered hat,
      A crimson velvet coat, head high in air,
      Gold-headed cane, and nicely powdered hair
      And diamond buckles sparkling at his knees,
      Dignified, stately, florid, much at ease.”

But so many inaccurate legends have been edited to make dull facts that
it is a real pleasure to concede the Hall to Martha, and Martha to her
husband.

It was a fine house, there is no gainsaying that. Its fifty rooms must
have pleased her, for they outranked in number any house in the whole
countryside. There were queer proportions to them, and unexpected
turns, one went up two steps into this room, and down three into that.
A secret staircase led from the main portion of the house down to the
water, which may have been built so that the Governor could escape
an angry populace, or not, as you prefer. There was a big pantry to
warm any woman’s heart, and a still to make rum to warm any man’s. It
is a temptation to visualize the interior as filled with an oriental
profusion of decorative objects, but the probability is that although
Benning Wentworth had a florid taste for the creature comforts, and
the ships handy to import them, he was still a native of New Hampshire
and restrained in his notions of decoration. A guess--and it must be a
guess, for no record exists--is that the house has much the same aspect
today, with good portraits, like Copley’s of Dorothy Quincy, good
Windsor chairs, good Sheraton, good china, good wall-paper--and not
too much of any ingredient to leave you surfeited. In the council-room
we know that there was a heavily carved mantel which was strong and
handsome, for it is so today; that the guns of the governor’s guard
were racked there, for they are there still; that there were paneled
doors and wainscoating fit for a room in which to entertain Washington,
as Martha Hilton Wentworth did entertain him here in 1789.

In 1766 Benning Wentworth resigned the governorship. He had seen
the Stamp Act committed and repealed, and although he had treated
with political daintiness the unpopular measures which were breeding
trouble, he had held office longer than any other provincial governor,
and had served his people in a way which encouraged their commercial
growth. The office passed to his nephew, John Wentworth. In 1770
Benning Wentworth died, leaving Martha to marry Colonel Michael
Wentworth, and a daughter, Martha, whom Governor John Wentworth married.

Five years later the storm broke at Lexington. The news sped to
Portsmouth and every man armed himself and began drilling. Governor
John was powerless to resist the tendency. He tried to pack the
Assembly with favorable delegates from new towns, and the Assembly
angrily threw them out. When one of them insulted the Assembly, the
Assembly chased him until, breathless, he slammed the three-inch
door of the Wentworth mansion in their faces. The crowd brought a
field-piece, pointed it at the door and demanded his surrender. He
gave himself up, and the Governor, outraged at the affront, fled to
the fort. His last official act was to prorogue the Assembly. Royal
government in New Hampshire came to an end, and in John Wentworth
the people lost a leader who had been energetic in the extension of
learning, in the building of good roads, and in the development of
agriculture. He lived on at Little Harbor until Martha Hilton died in
1805, and then went to England, and the house passed out of the family.

Its history for the past century has not been eventful. A critic
who has traveled over certain of New Hampshire’s roads may suggest
that Governor John Wentworth was the last man who improved them, but
that is neither here nor there, and such comment is only likely to
call down upon the scoffer’s head one of the ghosts without which no
American colonial mansion is properly furnished. Jack Coolidge, as a
boy, used to lie up in the loft and moan like a regulation ghost when
disagreeable tourists asked to be shown about the house, and any one
of them will tell you that the place is haunted. Infrequent ships
still pass the house like phantoms from the great days, outward bound
in lumber, and pass in with coffee and molasses. But no rum, and if
Benning Wentworth knows, he is where he cares not. There is still some
codfish--but it is dry, and salty.

When Washington came to Portsmouth he was of course entertained and
fully instructed on the resources of the section. A part of the
ceremonial of his reception was a fishing expedition. In his diary
he complains of his luck. A band was blaring in his honor, and every
fish in that portion of the Atlantic had retreated beyond the Isles of
Shoals. A rod and line was handed to the general, and instantly he felt
a tug. Up came twelve pounds of glittering cod. Huzzas from the crowd,
congratulations for the chief, uproar from the band.

A canny fisherman, before yielding the rod to Washington, had quietly
attached the fish to the hook. Was there ever nicer hospitality?




THE PRINGLE HOUSE


[Illustration:

    © D.McK

THE PRINGLE HOUSE

    Royal governors have visited here; invading generals have made
    the house headquarters in two wars; it was twice besieged; a
    famous beauty left its doors and was lost at sea; and even
    Josiah Quincy was impressed by its hospitality. But there are
    new roses every springtime on the garden wall....
]


THE PRINGLE HOUSE


If tradition has any influence upon its own children, your true
Charlestonian should be a violently proud person, who votes with a
flourish, as a Signer would vote; who looks aloft--not at the sun--but
at the spires of St. Michael’s and St. Philip’s, and seeing them in
their proper places in Charleston’s profile, knows that the world again
revolves; who makes horrid faces regularly in the direction of Fort
Sumter; who cheers “Huzza!” at the lightest mention of General Francis
Marion; in short, who conducts himself generally in an extremely
historic manner.

He has none of these gestures. He dines at mid-afternoon, goes amiably
about his affairs, is aristocratic to a degree and in the same degree
is gracefully hospitable. In the center of one of our country’s most
fertile areas of dramatic action he is not theatrical. It bothers
you, for example, if he happens to be a Prioleau and you are passing
the Huguenot church which a Prioleau founded in 1685, that he has no
appropriate expression of Seventeenth Century piety.

If Charleston really knew what was expected of her in dramatic ritual
she would do all those things. Happily Charleston does not know, or she
might exploit and become odious. Instead she watches the cloth-of-gold
roses climb the courtyard wall and is much more concerned with the
forthcoming blossoms than with the ancestor who planted the roots.
She has a back-drop as glorious as an old tapestry, but it is hung
where it belongs--back. She attends St. Michael’s and St. Philip’s
for today’s devotions and tomorrow’s salvation, which are the richer
for yesterday’s haunting footsteps. And only Charleston can truly
appreciate--though the rest of the nation may admire and cherish--the
old square house in King Street whose red-brick walls and shining white
portico are framed by ancient trees at the curbing; the house Miles
Brewton built; the house Charleston knows as the “Pringle House.”

Miles Brewton was not primarily a soldier. His father and his
grandfather had been for forty years custodians of gunpowder in Charles
Town, but the colony’s preliminary fighting had mostly been done by
that time. When the combined forces of the Kings of France and Spain
were driven out of the harbor forever in 1706, the colonists settled
back to a half-century of peaceful commerce. The powder magazine on
Cumberland Street was not often called upon to repel the invader,
and the powder receiver’s duties, though honorable service, were not
over-exacting.

So Miles came into the dual inheritance of a quiescent military
tradition and an active fortune. Naturally enough, since he had just
married Miss Mary Izard, his thoughts turned on building a house; his
taste suggested a beautiful house; his wealth permitted a house which
Josiah Quincy described as “superb, ... said to have cost him 18,000
sterling.”

Josiah Quincy, though a Bostonian, believed in seeing America first.
He had a most illuminating journey. He had never realized that Charles
Town, in the Carolinas, was the richest city south of Philadelphia,
nor that here he was to find a spirit of resentment against British
injustice as acute as that of his own people. “This town,” he wrote,
“makes a beautiful appearance as you come up to it and in many respects
a magnificent one. I can only say in general that in grandeur, splendor
of building, decorations, equipages, numbers, commerce, shipping, and
indeed everything it far surpasses all I ever saw or ever expect to
see in America.” From a Quincy of Massachusetts this was the perfect
tribute.

What prompted it? In his diary of March 8, 1773 he writes: “Dined with
a large company at Miles Brewton’s, Esq., a gentleman of very large
fortune.... At Mr. Brewton’s sideboard was very magnificent plate. A
very fine bird kept familiarly playing about the room under our chairs
and the table, picking up the crumbs, and perching on the window and
sideboard.” The bird was evidently the crowning touch to a panoply
of culture and luxury such as he had scarcely anticipated among the
outlanders. You may picture him, if you like, rising comfortably
fortified with good cooking, at the end of a whole afternoon at the
five-yard table; identifying with shrewd appraisal the excellent
furniture which his host and hostess had picked up in England five
years before; running a furtive proving finger over the carved woodwork
which had also come across the Atlantic; knowing that the portrait of
Miles Brewton on the wall was _good_, and knowing that another reason
why it was good was because Sir Joshua Reynolds had done it. Though
there were slaves in Boston at that time, you may conjecture that
he tacitly disapproved of the substantial slave quarters across the
courtyard--for he was the ancestor of a brilliant abolitionist. But for
the architectural excellence of the interior, its carved woodwork, and
its furnishings, he could have nothing but praise. And at the risk of
invading the visitor’s privacy you may follow him to the King Street
gate as he departs, and you may perhaps catch the emphatic wag of his
head, and hear his conclusive whisper: “These people know how! They
have _atmosphere_! I am amazed!” He carried back to Boston the warm
friendship of Miles Brewton and the firm conviction that Charles Town
could be relied upon.

Miles Brewton had for ten years been a member of the Commons House
of the Colonial legislature. He had watched the smouldering of a
spirit which would break out in flame the next spring, had given wise
counsel to the hot-heads, yielded nothing to injustice from London.
Then Charles Town heard the shot fired round the world. The Provincial
Congress met, voted to raise three regiments and a million dollars.
Into the uproar sailed his Majesty’s Ship _Scorpion_, bearing Lord
William Campbell, to be the new colonial governor, apparently for
no special qualification except that he had married Sarah Izard,
of Charles Town. Miles Brewton made his wife’s cousin and her
governor-husband his guests at once, and when the Provincial Congress
promptly stuck its verbal bayonets under the uncomfortable young
Campbell’s nose, His Lordship stayed up half the night wondering what
he could do, and then called Miles Brewton out of bed to help settle
the question.

A Committee of Safety presently supplanted the Provincial Congress, and
Brewton became a member. We know of his value to the colony in trying
to preserve equilibrium. Of what his service in war might have been
we can never know. Josiah Quincy had been urging upon his friend the
courtesy of a return visit. With Mrs. Brewton and the children he took
ship to Philadelphia--and Miles Brewton and his family were lost at
sea. Josiah Quincy lost a friend and the cause a level-headed patriot.

Although its builder was gone, and his direct line wiped out, the
Brewton house remained. It was left jointly to his sisters, Mrs.
Charles Pinckney and Mrs. Jacob Motte. It was Mrs. Motte’s home
while Parker and Clinton hammered at the city gates in 1776, and it
requires no documentary evidence to conceive how that “very magnificent
plate” on the Brewton sideboard shone at dinner the night of August
second--the night when the battered British fleet had sailed away,
and the night when Captain Barnard Elliott read the Declaration of
Independence to the soldiery and the cheering townsfolk.

There came a day, however, four years later when Sir Henry Clinton
cut off the peninsula from the mainland, and forced the city to
surrender. A conqueror likes to be comfortable, and Sir Henry and his
staff camped down upon Mrs. Motte’s thoroughly comfortable house. You
will find, scratched into one of its white marble mantels, a crude
sketch of a British frigate, and a portrait of the conqueror himself,
done by a staff-officer. Mrs. Motte, at the commander’s request,
presided at table, but the lady was as wise as she was tactful--her
three attractive daughters were behind barred doors in the garret--a
knowing precaution against the notorious tendencies of Lord Rawdon, who
succeeded Sir Henry Clinton. Other homes in the town fared less well:
Mrs. C. C. Pinckney and her family were turned out bodily, and the
families upon whom were quartered certain of the lesser invaders were
made wretched indeed.

Charles Town endured and waited. In pleasant weather the enemy staff
lounged in the deep-walled garden which reaches back of the Motte
house to Legare Street; when winter forced them indoors there were gay
dinners in the high-panelled dining-room, dinners attended by those of
the citizenry who had “played safe” and England to win. The patriots
wore brave smiles and old dresses. If you had been a sentry during
those days you might have challenged a charming young woman with a pass
through the lines to visit her plantation. If you had been a dutiful
sentry you would have glanced into her carriage, to make sure she
carried no contraband. If you had been an impertinent sentry you might
have seen that she wore heavy boots--but if she had smiled at you
you would not have been impertinent. And naturally when she returned
through the lines two or three days later and smiled graciously upon
you as an old friend, how could you know that those boots were men’s
boots, and that they were now in the stirrups of some cavalier serving
under Marion, the Swamp Fox? Or read behind her smile the secret that
Marion’s men that night would ride the harder, harass the British
patrols outside more bitterly, make foreign tenure of the city less and
less comfortable? That was the secret of the women of Charles Town.

A British officer caught Colonel Isaac Hayne after a brilliant capture
he had effected within five miles of the city. They brought him in and
condemned him to death as a spy, which he was not. The drawing-room of
the Motte house saw another phase of Charles Town’s women: heard their
pleading for Hayne’s life; saw Rawdon refuse. Then imprisoned Charles
Town saw Martyr Hayne hanged and bitterness crystallized to hate. The
same Mrs. Motte who had been an unwilling hostess to the British in
town went in 1780 to her plantation “Mount Joseph,” on the Congaree.
The British seized and fortified it the next year and she was moved to
a nearby farmhouse, so that Marion and “Light Horse Harry” Lee could
lay siege to the property. When Lee suggested to her the destruction of
her own home by fire-bearing arrows, she agreed heartily, and herself
brought forth an East-Indian bow and arrows of great range. The good
lady then watched the marksmanship of Marion’s men set fire to her own
plantation house, applauded its surrender, and when the fire was out
presided over captor and captive at her own table!

A watchman’s cry put an end to the poverty and distress in which the
besieged city found itself slowly mired. Cutting through the rain
it brought candle-light to life in every house as the news spread:
“Half-past-twelve of a stormy night and Cornwallis has surrendered!”
It meant victory, an end to suffering, reunited families. In 1782
Moultrie led his troops into the city, past “the balconies, the doors
and windows crowded with the patriotic fair, the aged citizens and
others congratulating us on our return home, saying, ‘God bless you,
gentlemen! You are welcome home, gentlemen!’ Both citizens and soldiers
shed mutual tears of joy.”

For ten years the Motte house followed the city’s returning prosperity.
Of the three girls who had been hidden in the attic during the wretched
Rawdon’s incumbency, one, who married Thomas Pinckney, died young; the
second, whose first husband died, married Pinckney and lived to see him
the first American ambassador to England and a candidate for president.
The third, Mary Brewton Motte, married William Alston, a colonel in
Marion’s Brigade.

It was natural, therefore, when President Washington journeyed to
South Carolina in 1791, he should stop at Clifton, Colonel Alston’s
plantation, and marvel at the luxurious cultivation of the fields
of young rice. If Mary Motte Alston had her mother’s character and
charm--as she probably did--it is no wonder the President who was also
a good farmer told her the plantation “looked like fairyland.” In
his journal he wrote: “Went to a concert where were 400 ladies, the
number and appearance of which exceeded anything I had ever seen.” And
later this: “Was visited about two o’clock by a great number of most
respectable ladies in Charleston, the first honour of the kind I had
ever experienced, as flattering as singular.” Nor can we omit the fact
that Commodore Gillon solved the delicate problem of where to seat the
President at the state dinner by placing him opposite the loveliest
lady in Charleston, and _next_ to the wittiest.

In 1791 Colonel Alston bought the Motte house. As the Alston house it
presided over the rise of an Alston to the governorship of the state.
Its gate swung wide at the arrival in Charleston of Joseph Alston’s
second wife, Theodosia Burr. Theodosia sailed for New York in 1813
in the swift privateer, _Patriot_, to join her lonely father Aaron.
Four weeks later Joseph Alston sat down at a French secretary in the
drawing-room and wrote Burr, “I have in vain endeavored to build upon
the hope of long passage. Thirty days are decisive. My wife is _either
captured or lost_. What a destiny is mine!” The ship was never heard of
again. Mrs. St. Julien Ravenel in her excellent volume, “Charleston,
the Place and Its People,” tells of the death-bed confession of an old
sailor thirty years later, who had been one of a crew of pirates who
had captured the ship and made the passengers walk the plank, and some
color is given to this solution by an anonymous note found in a volume
of Burr’s letters, saying “Some account appeared in the New Orleans
papers about 1848 of the deposition of a coloured woman--‘in relation
to the death of Mrs. Alston occasioned by Pirates.’”

The eldest daughter of the Alston house, born to the purple, justified
her claim to it by marrying Robert Y. Hayne, some time Governor of
South Carolina, United States Senator, and proprietor of the loser’s
share of a magnificent debate with Daniel Webster. That rare old
gentleman, William Alston, lived until 1839. He was a practical planter
who believed “that in the management of slaves the true interests
of the planter were in exact accordance with the dictates of an
enlightened humanity.” He loved horses, maintained a good stable on the
King Street place, and raced them in lively competition; this leads Mr.
Huger Smith, in his neighborly story of the Alston house, to “wonder
whether Washington’s well known interest in such things led to the
presence, at Colonel Alston’s plantation in 1799, of _Great Plenipo_,
sired ‘by _Royal Gift_, a Jack Ass presented to the late President
Washington by the King of Spain.’--_Georgetown Gazette, April 17,
1799._” Certain it is that he owned _Betsy Baker_, who defeated Colonel
William Washington’s _Rosetta_ in a stirring race, and _Gallattin_, and
_Alborae_--famous turf names all.

His children made him happy, and he endeared himself to an army
of friends, not the least of whom was Thomas Jefferson. It was
Jefferson, the founder of the political party which has since committed
prohibition, who wrote Colonel Alston in 1818:

    “I have therefore made up a box of a couple of doz. bottles
    among which you will find samples of the wines of White
    Hermitage, Ledanon, Rousillon (of Riveralto). Bergasse, claret,
    all of France and of Nice, and Montepulciano, of Italy.”

The visitor who penetrates to that cellar today will find it empty.

But on the drawing-room walls he will find another letter from
Jefferson--as he will find one from George Washington, both addressed
to John Julius Pringle, and asking him to be attorney-general of the
United States. Those letters hang there because John Julius Pringle, a
great lawyer, had a son, William Bull Pringle, and because fate married
him to Mary Motte Alston, and because she inherited the house--and
the letter--from the fine old Colonel in 1839. His brother, Robert
Pringle, was in Paris when the royal family abdicated, and had the
opportunity to buy the chairs from Louis Philippe’s palace which are
such an ornament to the house today. Those letters from two presidents
of the United States were cherished possessions of the family when
another Robert Pringle was killed at Battery Wagner on Morris Island
in the defense of his city against the United States. The teardrops
of the crystal chandelier in that same drawing-room tinkled at the
shock of two hundred and eighty days’ firing upon Fort Sumter, while
the harassed family lived through a bitter repetition of the siege
of eighty-odd years before, and when the Federal troops occupied the
city in 1865 history repeated itself as they made headquarters in the
Pringle house. Fifty thousand suns have not faded the Indian dyes in
the silk damask curtains Miles Brewton imported for his new house,
nor have the sea-fogs dulled the French secretary that was Rebecca
Motte’s. Her high-boy is there today, so is a graceful and inviting
old sofa. Time apparently cannot affect them--except as it makes these
possessions infinitely more precious to the present gracious owners,
Miss Susan Pringle Frost and her sisters. A seven-yard table cloth,
for example, would be an exploit in linen even if it were dated 1921;
dated, in scarlet cross-stitch, “Alston, 1797,” Miss Frost’s seven-yard
table cloth is beyond price.

I have no doubt that when, in 1918, there were rumors of an enemy
submarine base in the West Indies, and the possibility of raids upon
Charleston seemed more than mere fancy, the Spirit of the House
smiled, and whispered: “I recollect Miles Brewton’s father telling of
Blackbeard, the pirate. He was going to raid Charles Town, but thought
better of it. Then Stede Bonnet--we _caught_ him. There have been a
lot of them, trouble-makers of one kind and another. Admiral Cervera
and the Spanish had some such notion. Submarines? M-m-m, perhaps.
Who knows? I’m going to take a little nap now, but if you want me,
Charleston, let me know. I’ll be about anyway when they commence to
shell the town.”




APPENDIX


Those who find in the stories of Mount Vernon and The Quincy Homestead
a stimulus for the preservation of other famous American residences
will naturally inquire into the successful methods of the organizations
of patriotic women who now carry on that work in a manner so perfectly
suited to the charge.

To answer those inquiries, and more particularly to record the identity
of those who are now “carrying on,” there follows a list of the current
officers of the Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association of the Union.

                 _Regent_
  Miss Harriet Clayton Comegys    On the Green, Dover, Delaware

                 _Hon. Vice-Regent_
  Mrs. Elizabeth B. A. Rathbone   Michigan

                 _Vice-Regents_
  Miss Alice M. Longfellow        Massachusetts
  Mrs. Charles Custis Harrison    Pennsylvania
  Mrs. Thomas S. Maxey            Texas
  Mrs. Robert D. Johnston         Alabama
  Mrs. Eugene Van Rensselaer      West Virginia
  Mrs. John Julius Pringle        South Carolina
  Mrs. William F. Barret          Kentucky
  Mrs. Henry W. Rogers            Maryland
  Miss Mary F. Failing            Oregon
  Mrs. Eliza F. Leary             Washington
  Mrs. J. Carter Brown            Rhode Island
  Mrs. James Gore King Richards   Maine
  Miss Mary Evarts                Vermont
  Mrs. Antoine Lentilhon Foster   Delaware
  Miss Annie Ragan King           Louisiana
  Miss Jane A. Riggs              District of Columbia
  Mrs. Horace Mann Towner         Iowa
  Mrs. Thomas P. Denham           Florida
  Miss Harriet L. Huntress        New Hampshire
  Mrs. Charles Eliot Furness      Minnesota
  Mrs. Benjamin D. Walcott        Indiana
  Mrs. Lucien M. Hanks            Wisconsin
  Miss Annie Burr Jennings        Connecticut
  Mrs. Willard Hall Bradford      New Jersey
  Mrs. Charles Nagel              Missouri
  Mrs. George A. Carpenter        Illinois
  Miss Mary Govan Billups         Mississippi
  Mrs. John V. Abrahams           Kansas
  Mrs. Margaret Busbee Shipp      North Carolina
  Mrs. Horton Pope                Colorado
  Mrs. Charles J. Livingood       Ohio
  Mrs. Randolph Anderson          Georgia
  Mrs. Celsus Price Perrie        Arkansas
  Mrs. Horace Van Denenter        Tennessee
  Mrs. Charles S. Wheeler         California

The restoration and custody of The Quincy Homestead is in the hands
of a committee of the Massachusetts Society of Colonial Dames. The
promoting and sustaining figure in the work is the present chief
executive of the Society, Mrs. Barrett Wendell, of Boston.




Transcriber’s Notes


Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a
predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they
were not changed.

Incorrect accent marks and archaic / dialect spellings were not changed.

Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced quotation
marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and otherwise left
unbalanced.

Page 100: Mid-sentence periods were printed that way.



*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FAMOUS COLONIAL HOUSES ***


    

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.


START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.”
    
    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
        works.
    
    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    
    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
    

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.