The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Archives of Dentistry, Vol. VII, No. 4, April 1890
    
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: The Archives of Dentistry, Vol. VII, No. 4, April 1890

Author: Various

Editor: W. H. Eames
        C. S. Stockton

Release date: March 6, 2020 [eBook #61569]

Language: English

Credits: Produced by Brian Wilsden and the Online Distributed
        Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
        produced from images generously made available by The
        Internet Archive)


*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ARCHIVES OF DENTISTRY, VOL. VII, NO. 4, APRIL 1890 ***




Produced by Brian Wilsden and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive)





Transcriber's Note.

Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.




  [Illustration:
  THE
  ARCHIVES OF
  DENTISTRY]

  SUCCESSOR TO
  _Missouri Dental Journal, also Consolidated with New England Journal
  of Dentistry_.

  VOL. VII., NO. 4.]      APRIL, 1890.      [NEW SERIES.




Societies.


BLEACHING TEETH.

BY DR. K. M. FULLERTON, CEDAR FALLS, IOWA.

The bleaching of teeth has, from the first introduction of a positive
method, been met with remarkable indifference and, at times, positive
prejudice. Why this should be will remain a problem. The teeth that
require bleaching belong mostly to a class condemned for all purposes
except that of mastication. The process is generally only applicable
to the six anterior teeth, while possibly an occasional bicuspid may
be treated with advantage. When these anterior teeth, especially the
incisors, are discolored, they are such a positive disfigurement that
the operator has only the choice of evils—to bleach or to excise them,
and insert an artificial crown. It would seem no difficult matter to
come to a decision, or at least to determine to give the natural tooth
a chance for future usefulness.

The fear of re-discoloration, or annoying labor, should not be taken
into consideration. All operators are liable to meet with sudden
discoloration in the regulating of teeth by the strangulation of
the pulp at the apical foramen. When this occurs, it is one of the
most humiliating of accidents, as it is one of the most annoying to
patients. Discoloration is caused by decomposition, through a slow
disintegration of the organic material and the deposit of carbonaceous
matter. It therefore follows that the products producing color are not
_necessarily_ taken into the tubes by imbibition, though doubtless,
to a limited extent, this is the case, but are produced by local
degeneration through putrefactive processes. This change, though very
slow in producing results, eventually gives to the tooth the bluish
tinge, or to a tooth long affected by decomposed matter, the dirty,
bluish-yellow. It is unnecessary to enter minutely into the more remote
causes of discoloration, but we may summarize them as follows:

1st. When death of a tooth is caused by a blow, attacks of caries, too
rapid pressure in regulating teeth, etc., the death and devitalization
are followed by imbibition of coloring matter through the largest
diameter of the tubules and local discoloration of the tube contents
in the minuter anastomosing conduits. These changes may occur in teeth
affected by caries, or without any external evidence of disease.

2d. The more aggravated cases, when this color has changed to a
bluish-yellow, involving the entire structure of the dentine.

3d. Of the latter class, there may be a further subdivision, in which
these are complicated with periosteal lesions which more or less
interfere with efforts at restoration to original color.

The necessity of making some effort to restore the color of teeth
changed by devitalization was apparent to dentists very early in
the present century. The constant destruction of pulps with the
imperfect methods of practice then prevailing, necessarily increased
this unpleasant complication to such a degree that treatment of the
anterior teeth became, so far as appearances were concerned, of no
value whatever. Under the defective modes of treating pulp canals then
prevailing, discoloration was sure to follow the filling of teeth.
Any attempt to change color is necessarily dependent for success upon
preliminary measures. Without thoroughness _here_, all subsequent
efforts will fail. The early attempts at bleaching, before the settled
practice of filling root canals was established, was not a success, and
it must ever remain a failure unless the minuter structure of dentine
be carefully considered.

It has been demonstrated by artificial injection, and still better by
sudden congestions of the pulp, that coloring matter may be carried
nearly to the final distribution of the minute ramifications of the
tubuli. This is an important point, for, without this vascularity,
bleaching would be impossible. With it, the possibility exists of
extending the whitening process to the peripheral border of the
dentine; or, in other words, to its union with the enamel on the crown,
or the cementum on the roots.

The diameter of the tubuli is so minute, always decreasing in size
until lost in final distribution, that any agent used must necessarily
require considerable time before it can penetrate to the minute tubes,
therefore you must not expect to bleach rapidly and meet with good
success. The change, if any change be made at all, is simply on the
walls of the canal, and cannot penetrate to any depth of tissue. If
the discoloration is superficial, this mode will be effected, but not
otherwise.

Color can be changed by several of the acids: notably, oxalic and
nitric. The former destroys the color, and the latter changes dark-blue
to a yellowish tinge; but as both of these are very destructive, they
should never be used except in connection with an ant-acid. The first
named will be found to give better results when used in connection with
chlorinated lime.

_Chlorine_, free, or in some of its combinations, has been and is
to-day the main reliance for bleaching, and that it is the most
effectual has been demonstrated.

Failures have _usually_ been the result of defective manipulation.
It has great penetrating power, is a thorough bleacher, is readily
applied, and if handled with care, will prove harmless.

The possibilities of chlorine were early understood in connection
with the bleaching of teeth, but the result was not satisfactory for
the reason named, and also from the fact that no practical mode had
been devised for its use. To present free chlorine to a tooth was an
impossibility, owing to its irritating character and necessarily
superficial action; and no plan had been originated to free it from its
compounds, hence, all teeth suitable for bleaching were condemned to
remain a perpetual disfigurement. The first attempt to present chlorine
free to a tooth was made by Dr. James Truman, in 1862.

Chlorine is liberated from chlorinated lime by all the acids, but more
rapidly by some than by others.

It was found that, as rapid action was not desirable, those acids that
affected this were not satisfactory. Tartaric acid was one of these.
The conclusion arrived at was that a 50 per cent. acetic acid was the
best, although later investigation seems to indicate to the contrary.
The difficulty attending the use of chlorinated lime is due to the fact
that a good article is rarely to be found.

Good chlorinated lime is in the form of a dry powder; when moist, it
is worthless. It should have a strong odor of chlorine. A rough test
can be made by adding to a solution of indigo, in a test tube, a small
quantity of chlorinated lime; to this, add strong acid, and note the
rapidity of change in color. If this is very slow, or not accomplished
at all, the chlorinated lime is unfit for use, and should be discarded.

INSTRUMENTS.—These, though very simple, require special notice, for
neglect in this particular will involve total failure. _No iron or
steel instruments should be used in any connection with the agent
employed in bleaching._ This must be impressed on the mind of every
operator. The reason for this is, that the salts of iron formed
discolor the teeth very rapidly. It would be preferable not to use any
steel instruments at any stage of the operation, but this is difficult
to avoid in the excavation of the cavity. Instruments can be made of
hard wood that will serve the purpose, but ivory, platinum or gold
can be used in place of this—either of the latter materials making
efficient instruments.

Extreme care must be used not to produce any unnecessary irritation.
The removal of all remains of decomposed pulp from the canal is
of vital importance, but this must not be done in a rough, rapid,
careless manner. It is of great importance that no inflammation of
the periosteum should supervene, as that not only complicates the
operation, but renders it more doubtful of success. The removal of the
pulp should be followed by the usual treatment given to a tooth, and
no attempt should be made to change the color of the tooth until all
evidences of putrefaction have been removed, which will be manifested
in the absence of the odor of decomposition.

If this preliminary process has been satisfactorily conducted, the
next step will be that of filling the canal at its upper third. Gold
is claimed to be the best material for this. The question may be
asked, why fill the upper third? Because it is absolutely necessary
for success that the root should be bleached as well as the crown. It
must be remembered that the pulp chamber requires the same careful
treatment as that given to the canal. It must be thoroughly cleansed
of all debris to its fullest extent, and that, in the incisors and
cuspid teeth, is almost to the enamel line of the cutting edge. Having
proceeded thus far, the case is now prepared for the further process of
bleaching.

The next point to be considered is the insertion of the material.
Before this is attempted the canals and crown should be well washed
with a solution of ether, borax, sodium bicarbonate, or ammonia, to
remove fatty matter. It should then be well washed with distilled aqua.
The tooth is then dried, the rubber dam having been applied at the
beginning of the operation. There are several methods of bringing the
acid used in connection with the lime. This apparently simple matter is
really quite difficult. One process is, to saturate the entire canal
and pulp chamber with the acid before inserting the chlorinated lime.
Another is, to dip the instrument into the weak acid solution and then
into the lime, and pack rapidly into the cavity; and still another
is, to make a paste by the use of distilled aqua and pack this in the
tooth, and then apply a stronger acid by means of cotton wrapped around
the point used. There are difficulties attending all these modes. The
point desired must be kept constantly in view—that of having acid
sufficient and of proper strength to break up the compound and set free
the chlorine used, and to preserve as much as possible of the latter
for bleaching. Before commencing the packing, everything should be
ready, so the cavity can be sealed at once.

Convenience of adaptation must govern the choice of the material used
for closing the cavity. Gutta-percha, oxyphosphate or oxychloride of
zinc may be used with good results, but the zinc preparations are
harder to remove than the gutta-percha. After sealing the cavity, the
tooth must be left for a day or two. On the return of the patient,
remove all of the application, avoiding the use of steel instruments.
Syringe out the canal with distilled aqua. If the bleaching has not
gone far enough, a second application must be made, and this be
repeated until a satisfactory result is obtained. The importance of
using distilled water must be insisted upon. The reason for this
must be apparent, for in many waters the minerals held in solution,
especially those impregnated with iron, will defeat the desired object.

The immediate bleaching effect will be observed on the lower third of
the tooth where the dentine is the thinnest. In the majority of cases
this will be effected by one application. The greatest trouble will
be found at the gingival border. Here the dentine is very thick, and
it will be slow work, and in some cases end in failure, to restore
normal color. The great objection made to this operation is, that the
tooth will re-discolor, but if the subsequent operations are properly
performed, this danger will be reduced to a minimum. The fact that
dentine is permeated by pulp prolongations throughout the tissue,
increases the difficulty of bleaching, and also increases the liability
of a return of discoloration; but if the oxidation of the soft contents
of the tubes has been properly effected, and then an agent used to fill
the canal, and also act directly upon this microscopic tissue, there
is but little reason to fear a return of discoloration. The operation,
simple as it is, requires close attention to details and a clear
comprehension of possible results.

The tooth having been restored to a good color, the next consideration
is the proper filling to place in it. In this connection the before
mentioned fact still remains an important factor, that the tubuli are
still filled with decomposable matter. To allow this to remain without
attention to future contingencies, must result in eventual failure.
To effect any good results the antiseptic must not only operate in
the main canal, but penetrate deeply into the minuter conduits. This
quality is possessed in a remarkable degree by chloride of zinc,
and maintains the same effect when combined with the oxide of zinc,
forming the oxychloride of zinc. The canal and pulp chamber should
be thoroughly filled with this paste, or, it is better to line the
whole cavity with it, and then finish with the oxyphosphate, using
gutta-percha at the cervical margin.

Chlorine acts as a bleaching agent by reason of its strong affinity
for hydrogen. Vegetable and animal colors when brought in contact with
chlorine in the presence of water, is seized upon by the chlorine, and
the oxygen set free, oxidizes the color and destroys it. Chlorine in
this case acting indirectly as an oxidizing agent.

If you wish to try to bleach more rapidly, a solution of oxalic acid is
used to liberate the chlorine. Oxalic acid is more rapid than either
tartaric or acetic.

Sulphurous acid is said to be a good bleaching agent, and acts by an
entirely different method from chlorine. It is therefore of great
interest from a chemical point of view.

As before mentioned, chlorine acts as a bleaching agent by reason of
its strong affinity for hydrogen. Sulphurous acid, on the contrary, is
a reducing agent by reason of its affinity for oxygen, in combining
with which it becomes _sulphuric_ acid.

On the chemical character, therefore, of the coloring matter depends
the choice of the agent to be used.

Chlorine should be used when the color is an oxidizable compound,
or rich in hydrogen; while sulphurous acid should be used more
particularly in substances highly oxidized and capable of being reduced.

There are a great many different agents used for the bleaching of the
teeth, but I will not consume any more of your valuable time, as I find
that my paper is already quite lengthy.

       *       *       *       *       *

DR. W. N. MORRISON is very proud of his son, who carried off the gold
medal at the Missouri Dental College.


INCIDENTS AND ACCIDENTS OF OFFICE PRACTICE.[1]

BY H. H. KEITH, D.D.S., ST. LOUIS.

There are no more useful lessons than those contained in the incidents
and accidents of office practice. If we do not communicate the
knowledge gained, the event is limited to the individual. Not alone
should we record our successes and apparent achievements, that we may
stimulate the energy of the younger members of our profession, but as
faithfully read the story of our failures.

In 1877, “S. A.,” a boy of ten years of age was presented with a
mesial corner of the right superior central incisor broken in such
a manner that the pulp, though not exposed, had died. The tooth was
much discolored, abscessed, and very loose. A few days treatment
sufficed to bring the tooth into a comfortable condition, when the
boy's visits ceased. Some time elapsed: when he next came the tooth
was elongated fully one-half the length of crown. The gums presented
a most unfavorable appearance, and extraction was at once pronounced
as the only proper treatment. At the earnest solicitation of the boy's
mother this was deferred until the next day, and such treatment applied
as the case seemed to indicate. Just here it may be well to say that
exploration showed the root was not fully developed, the canal being
quite large and funnel-shaped. So marked was the improvement the next
day, that all idea of extraction was dismissed, and the root was
finally filled with gutta-percha. A temporary filling of oxyphosphate
was then introduced, and allowed to remain for two years. Then the
contour was restored with gold. This filling was again replaced six
years later with another of gold, which remained to within a short time
ago, when a porcelain faced crown took its place. Deferring extraction
to the next day has saved this tooth for thirteen years so far, with
prospects of many years valuable service yet.

The second case is that of a right inferior second molar, a root
filled with gutta-percha being allowed to fill pulp chamber, on which
was placed a gold filling, February 20, 1878. In 1887 the gentleman
complained of discomfort, but it was sometime before the cause was
ascertained. The tooth had been split through its antero-posterior
length, the fracture terminating nine-sixteenths of an inch below
the point of the crown, on the lingual side. The fractured piece was
removed, and the gum pressed out by means of gutta-percha, to give a
better view of the remaining root. It was finally decided to attempt to
restore the tooth by means of a band and crown. The fragment removed
was used as a model from which dies were made, on which was struck a
piece representing the lost part, having extensions sufficiently long
to encircle the remains of the crown. This, when adjusted in position,
was partly filled up on the inside with gutta-percha. A porcelain cusp
crown was then arranged to antagonize the superior teeth. For a time
everything seemed to go well. A little inflammation about the margin
of the gum upon the lingual side instead of decreasing, suddenly grew
worse, and pus was formed at the point of division of the roots.
This finally yielded to treatment, and now the tooth is apparently
in perfect health. The cause of this fracture appears to have been
elasticity of the gutta-percha, under the pressure of the gold filling.

Case 3:—E. W., a boy of nineteen years of age, had broken a point
off the right superior central incisor, not quite exposing the nerve,
which subsequently died. The accident occurred some five years previous
to his visit to me. The canal was found large and funnel-shaped, and
was treated in the following manner: The lower portion was enlarged a
trifle more than the diameter at the apex. A piece of lead was then
introduced, and found to extend to the top by accurate measurement. In
order to produce an accurate adaptation of the lead to the surrounding
walls at the apex, the lead was reduced with fine sandpaper, the
scratches of the sand being parallel to the long axis of the tooth.
When the lead was forced into place, these fine ridges could be seen to
be flattened when examined with a magnifying glass, and an adjustment
continued in this manner, until the lead was found to close the apical
foramen completely. The filling was completed with gutta-percha, and
a porcelain crown was mounted upon the root. This has remained in a
favorable condition up to the present time, about a year and a half.

Case 4, is that of a central incisor, pulp destroyed, canal filled, in
which a Howe screw-post was used as an anchor to secure a large contour
filling. Some time after, the tooth began to show a decidedly green
discoloration, near the neck, which gradually extended throughout the
crown. The filling was removed and replaced, however, using a screw
of silver and platinum instead. I have here two specimens of roots in
which the Howe post has been used, and have seen two other cases in the
mouth, the same green stain appearing in all.

When the Howe post was put upon the market by the White Manufacturing
Company, their agents refused to tell of what metal they were made, but
gave the impression that they were some form of platinum and iridium
alloy. They proved, however, to have been made of chrome steel. Besides
the disagreeable discoloration of all these roots, I am inclined to the
believe that the chrome salt formed, acts as a constant irritant to the
peridental or dental membrane, and will result ultimately in the loss
of the tooth.

Case 5:—In this case the left superior second bicuspid was devitalized
and became discolored. The gentleman who was the lady's dentist at
the time, desiring to improve the appearance of the tooth, removed
the dentine extensively on the labial surface, and proceeded to fill
with gold. When the tooth came into my hands for treatment, I found
the part of the filling against the lingual wall well condensed, but
that against the frail labial wall quite soft, and this portion of
the filling had leaked, and the tooth was again discolored, showing
that in order to avoid undue pressure on the thin enamel wall,
insufficient force had been applied to condense the gold. Would it not
have been better in this case, and in fact in all similar cases, to
have sacrificed somewhat the appearance of the tooth and made a more
permanent filling by the removal of all that portion of the enamel
which was liable to fracture.

Case 6, is one of those mistakes in diagnosis which are liable to occur
in almost any practice. Miss E. presented herself with every appearance
of an abscessed right superior second molar, a large sac protruding
into the mouth, opposite the palatine root. The tooth was so extremely
loose and so sore that the patient would not allow it to be opened.
The abscess sac was opened and syringed out, and two days later the
soreness of the tooth had sufficiently subsided to permit the removal
of the filling. Drilling toward the pulp chamber, a short distance,
developed the fact that the tooth contained a living nerve. The result
of this case showed that the abscess was caused by the lodgement of a
fragment of a wooden toothpick between the first and second molar.

Another case, in my own mouth. The second left superior molar had for
years stood alone, which facilitated a thorough cleansing upon all
sides: I was therefore somewhat surprised at what appeared to be the
development of a case of pyorrhoea alveolaris. The tooth continued
sore, becoming looser, until its removal was a necessity. Neuralgia,
and all the symptoms of a dying pulp had been present for three months.
On extracting the tooth the nerve was found to be alive, and not much
congested. The three roots were absorbed upon their inner surfaces.
Exploration of the socket revealed the fact that a portion of the
process enclosed by the three roots had been entirely absorbed. As the
socket did not close in the usual time, I made an examination, and the
probe revealed the presence of the missing wisdom tooth. The tooth has
still continued to come down, but has not yet reached the gum line.

Another case in my own mouth is of interest: the result of wearing a
wedge for three weeks between the first molar and the second bicuspid,
on the right side. Some time after the tooth was filled, the first
bicuspid became sensitive to heat and cold, and showed symptoms of
peridental inflammation. Had a patient come to me describing the
conditions of this tooth, I think I should have at once drilled into
it, and applied the arsenic, but as it was in my own mouth I did
nothing; and for fifteen months this tooth gave more or less trouble,
but finally these disagreeable symptoms subsided, and the tooth is now
apparently perfectly well.

       *       *       *       *       *

DR. G. L. CURTIS, of Syracuse, has been acting as Dr. Garrettson's
assistant in oral surgery this winter, in Philadelphia.


CAMPHO-PHENIQUE.[2]

BY J. W. DOWNEY, M.D., STATE CENTRE, IOWA.

  _Mr. President and Gentleman_:

Campho-phenique is a germicide and antiseptic or nothing,
therapeutically considered; and discussing its properties necessarily
opens the entire subject of germicides and antiseptics, a subject
fraught with peril to the writer or speaker, especially if he is not a
practical chemist, pathologist, and microscopist.

Nothing in pathology is better established than the fact that certain
microscopic germs cause disease, and no point in therapeutics is better
known than the fact that a few drugs will, within the limit of safety,
destroy these germs, and thus most effectually cure or prevent disease.

In deciding which germicide or antiseptic to use, the dentist should
enquire, 1st, which is the most effectual; 2d, which is the safest;
3d, which is the most agreeable to the patient. To answer the first
question we must inquire of the experimenter. Dr. Frank L. James,
editor of the _St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal_, a pathologist
and microscopist of large experience, has determined, by a series of
over eighty cultures carried on during the summer time, covering a
period of two months, that campho-phenique, pure, is equal to 1 to 85
of bichloride of mercury, which is six times as strong as it can be
used even on the unbroken skin, and about 25 times as strong as is
considered safe on cut surfaces.

I have purposely omitted comparison with other drugs of this class,
as the bichloride was by far the most effectual of any in general use
before the introduction of campho-phenique.

If these figures are correct, they answer the first question.
Certainly, if campho-phenique is from 6 to 25 times as effectual as
a safe solution of bichloride of mercury, then it should have the
preference in all cases where it is applicable. To the second point,
which is the safest germicide, we all should be competent witnesses.
The mercuric bichloride is known to be a virulent poison, and therefore
ranks lowest in this respect, with carbolic acid closely following it.
Campho-phenique is absolutely free from toxic or caustic properties.
This I have had frequent opportunity to prove, and no doubt many
gentlemen present have had a similar experience. Applied to the
unbroken skin it produces no sensation whatever. On cut surfaces
there is a slight burning sensation when first applied, followed by
anæsthesia.

Being non-poisonous, non-irritant, campho-phenique ranks first as a
safe germicide.

Now to the third point, which is the most agreeable. The brassy
metallic taste of the bichloride is intolerable, the taste and smell
of carbolic acid and creosote are disagreeable to most people, and the
odor and meagre antiseptic properties of iodoform should banish it from
the operating room. Campho-phenique has a pleasant odor and agreeable
taste, this should establish its claim as the most agreeable germicide.
I have yet to hear the first patient complain of its odor or taste.

From the foregoing data I am led to conclude—

1st. That when used pure and undiluted, campho-phenique is one of the
most efficient and reliable germicides and antiseptics.

2d. Being non-poisonous and non-irritant, it is perfectly safe.

3d. It is the most agreeable to the patient of any drug of its class.

I am glad to know that I am not alone in these conclusions. Prof.
J. Foster Flagg, writing on this subject in the July number of the
_Cosmos_, said, “When it is known that it is a notable germicide, an
efficient antiseptic, a non-irritant, a decided local anæsthetic,
non-poisonous, insoluble in water or glycerine, does not discolor or
stain, is possessed of an agreeable odor and no disagreeable taste,
and maintaining an unchanged integrity, it will at once be recognized
as wonderfully adapted to a large proportion of dento-pathological
conditions, from sensitivity of dentine through the varying conditions
of pulp irritation, pulp devitalization, pericemental irritation,
alveolar abscess, and caries and necrosis of contiguous osseous
structures, and that thus it must rank as one of the most, if not the
most valuable polychrest which dentistry possesses.”

It seems to me that this endorsement from a teacher and author of such
acknowledged ability as Dr. Flagg, ought to place campho-phenique in
the armamentarium of every dentist in the land. And now a word on its
special uses, and I am through.

First and foremost as a pulp canal dressing in the various pathological
conditions, from recent devitalization to alveolar abscess. Here it
will take the place of corrosive sublimate, carbolic acid, creosote,
oil of cassia, oil of cloves, iodoform, or any germicide heretofore
used, except peroxide of hydrogen. If thoroughly rubbed on the gum
or injected with a hypodermic syringe, it acts efficiently as a
local anæsthetic, not equal however to cocaine, but there are no
constitutional effects following its use, and there is no danger of the
tissues sloughing. It is quite efficient as an obtunder of sensitive
dentine.

The very disagreeable ache which sometimes follows the extraction of
abscessed teeth is almost instantly relieved by placing a pledget of
absorbent cotton saturated with campho-phenique deep in the painful
socket.

These are a few of the chief uses to which this new candidate for favor
can be applied; others will suggest themselves to each practitioner.
Before closing I want to mention its use for a condition which is not
in the realm of dental pathology, but which is a source of annoyance to
every dentist who uses plaster and hard water. I refer to the condition
generally known as chapped hands. It is one of the numerous forms of
eczema, and is greatly relieved by campho-phenique. I use the following
formula:

  ℞   Campho-Phenique, . . . . . . .
      Oil of Cade, . . . . . . . . . aa ʒi
      Rose Cosmoline,  . . . . . . . .  ℥i
  M.  Sig.—Apply frequently.

Campho-phenique should never be mixed with water or glycerine. It will
mix in all proportions with alcohol, ether, chloroform, and all fatty
substances. In dentistry it will seldom be necessary to dilute it at
all. Gentlemen, give it a trial, and when you have weighed it in the
balance of experience and found it wanting, we will assist you in
writing its fate upon the wall.


ETHER AS AN ANÆSTHETIC.[3]

BY DR. A. C. KELLOGG, DECORAH, IA.

For over a quarter of a century ether, as an anæsthetic, has stood
at the front of all anæsthetics, as the safest, most reliable agent
to use in all surgical operations. Being a faithful advocate of this
time-tried friend, which has done so much for humanity, a brief
description of its qualities and effects will constitute the theme of
this paper.

Sulphuric ether is prepared by distilling alcohol with sulphuric acid.
For many years after its first discovery the profession were not aware
of its anæsthetic properties, but looked upon it as a mere chemical
curiosity. Amusing incidents are related of many who inhaled it for the
exhilarating and intoxicating effects it produced. But to the late Dr.
Horace Wells is probably due the gratitude we truly feel for giving
to the profession its true anæsthetic properties, in the painless
performance of all surgical operations, no matter how severe. Since
that date it is used almost exclusively in all the leading hospitals,
medical and dental colleges throughout the land.

Very few deaths have been reported from its administration, and,
indeed, if that proper care and knowledge of the agent be used,
together with a pure article, and an intelligent understanding of the
pathological condition of the patient, the death rate would sink to a
minimum, and I doubt not that if a death should occur, after all these
precautions, its true reason might find an explanation in some other
cause.

If it is desired to anæsthetize a patient, the most important thing
to consider is the possession of a pure article of _ether_. There are
several reliable makes. Squibbs' sulphuric ether, for inhalation,
being one of the most reliable for uniform purity and freedom from
heavy oil of wine, acetic acid, fusel oil, sulphurous acid, or excess
of water and alcohol. Every operator should acquire the knowledge of
testing ether, if it contain any of these adulterations, using none for
inhalation but the purest article that can be procured. Just here it
might be well to state that pure sulphuric ether has a specific gravity
of 0.725°, boils at 96° and has a density of vapor 2.586. This latter
fact should be borne in mind, and when administered in the evening
the lamp or light should be kept away from the inhaling apparatus and
bottle, for ether is inflammable, several accidents being reported
where this precaution was not observed.

To insure the best results from ether, it should not be inhaled after a
full meal. Dr. Turnbull recommends a biscuit or cracker, and a glass of
wine or a tablespoonful of brandy, half an hour before, always avoiding
for several hours previously the annoyance of a full stomach. Serious
complications and deaths have resulted from lumps and particles of
indigested food becoming lodged in the trachea and glottis, from the
act of vomiting, as ether, with many people, produces vomiting, and a
recent meal is often reproduced.

The apparatus for administering ether is very simple, consisting in a
towel or newspaper folded in cone form, with a moistened sponge at the
apex to receive the fluid. During the first part of inhalation it is
well to hold the cone a little distance from the patient's face, that
the first few inhalations may be mixed with atmospheric air, otherwise
an oppressed, smothered feeling may possess the patient. This feeling
happily passes away in a few minutes, and the cone may be held close to
the face, bringing the patient under its influence as soon as possible;
better results are obtained, the after-effects pass away sooner, and
there is less danger of nausea than when administered slowly, taking a
long time to bring the patient under its influence.

It is well to observe that the temperature of the room be warm and well
ventilated, avoiding all draughts. The patient should be in a recumbent
position—better perfectly horizontal, all tight garments around the
waist and throat should be loosened, allowing perfect freedom to the
organs of respiration. With a finger on the pulse, an ear to the
breathing and an eye to the patient, the operator is to judge when
anæsthesia is complete.

The physiological action produced can be summed in a few words.
Observation shows that the functions of the cerebrum are affected
first; next, the anterior or motor centers soon fail to respond to
mechanical irritation, yet the functions of the medulla-oblongata (the
center of respiration) are performed. This is the proper stage to
appreciate, for, if the inhalation be still further carried on, the
sensory and finally the motor functions of the medulla-oblongata are
involved, and death ensues from paralysis of the respiratory centers.

In conclusion, I must not fail to observe that ether has a peculiar
and exciting effect on the genital organs, and a prudent operator will
not fail to have a third party present throughout all the period of
anæsthesia, otherwise his honor and reputation might be forever blasted
by the emphatic assertions of some female laboring under the unhappy
delusion of having been injured beyond reparation.


DISCUSSION OF DR. STODDARD'S PAPER: PORCELAIN FILLINGS.[4]

PRESIDENT BRIGGS:—Gentlemen, I think we all are paying more attention
to porcelain fillings than we formerly did. Since 1883 I have referred
to them in my lectures as one of the methods of preserving the teeth,
and have used them in my practice. One point particularly interesting
to me is the method Dr. Stoddard uses, of packing the clay into the
plaster impression, biscuiting it, then removing the surrounding
plaster and finishing the fusing. I presume it is because the carver I
have employed does not do this that he fails to give me good results
from irregular impressions. I imagine he tries to take them out while
they are in the clay, and of course, cannot, if the shapes are peculiar.

DR. SMITH:—My method of using porcelains is so similar to what
Dr. Stoddard has just presented that my remarks will be largely an
endorsement of his paper. I do only the operative part; the laboratory
part is done by my assistant, so I have only that part requiring the
shaping of the cavity and taking the impression. I have a number of
questions I want to ask Dr. Stoddard on working his furnace, but that
hardly comes in to what you would call discussion. I like the method
I have used, that is, taking an impression of the cavity, baking the
enamel and setting in cement or gutta-percha. I have also ground them
in, and, as Dr. Stoddard says, it is a very difficult thing to grind
them in entirely. Even a very large cavity will seem very small when
you get the porcelain between your fingers and attempt to grind it into
place. I think it is a much better way to take the impression and bake
the body and enamel it, as Dr. Stoddard has suggested. I would further
say, Mr. President, that I am using the porcelains where we find large
cavities in molars: for instance, dead teeth, where we have a compound
cavity, either the mesial or distal surfaces in connection with the
crown, and where amalgam is prohibited and the teeth too weak for gold.
I find that when an impression is taken of the cavity, and the filling
made as Dr. Stoddard says in his paper, and set in cement, that it
makes a very nice-looking filling, and one that wears exceedingly well.
I use the porcelain in that way a great deal and obtain from it success
and satisfaction.

DR. TAFT:—There is but little I can say on the subject before us, from
the fact that I have had no experience whatever in making porcelain
fillings; although so frequently do cases present themselves in my
practice, where porcelain tips and inlays would no doubt make not only
as durable but more artistic fillings, by far, than gold or any of the
plastics, that I feel encouraged to adopt this method after listening
to the interesting paper of the evening, and upon examination of the
specimens before us. In looking over the specimens I notice quite an
appreciable difference in color between the inlay and the tooth itself,
more so in some than in others. This may, of course, be due to the
fact that possibly the inlays were placed in some of them previous to
extraction. I do not yet quite understand how the doctor mixes his
material so as to get the color of the inlay as nearly like that of the
tooth as is possible, and should like to have him explain the point a
little more thoroughly.

DR. STODDARD:—I neglected to say that it was impossible to match
the color of these dry, dead teeth out of the mouth, but there is no
difficulty at all in the mouth. You have a baked sample of your body,
which you keep, and from which you select your color.

DR. BIGELOW:—Mr. President and gentlemen: I have never used any of
the porcelain fillings myself, but several cases have come under my
observation, and the greatest objection that occurred to me, at least
in those cases, was the well-defined line of demarkation between the
filling and the tooth itself; not but what the porcelain was good
color, but it was the material it was set in. A gentleman once opened
his mouth and showed me his teeth, and spoke of the great pleasure and
comfort that he had taken since his teeth were filled in that way. The
porcelain fillings were made for him by a dentist in New York City.
To me they were very much more unsightly than gold, possibly because
the material used in setting them was not a good match in color for
the natural teeth. I think I may have seen one of the cases that Dr.
Stoddard has spoken of in his paper. So far as the porcelain itself
was concerned, it was a very good match for the tooth, but the line of
demarkation was very distinct, almost as much so as if gold was used,
though perhaps the strength would be greater. I don't know, perhaps Dr.
Stoddard manufactures his own cements and gets his shades just right,
thereby overcoming this objection.

DR. TAFT:—There is one other place, Mr. President, where it seems
to me these porcelain tips or fillings may not be always practicable
that may be illustrated by a case in hand: namely, that of a patient
whose upper incisors upon examination were found to be filled with
fine fractures, extending along the surface of enamel from the biting
edge well up towards the margin of the gums. In the left superior
central I found what seemed at first to be a very small proximal
cavity, and started very carefully to excavate it from the palatal
side, when the corner of the tooth soon afterwards chipped off, and in
still further excavating,—hoping to fill with gold,—it continued,
in a most aggravating manner, to chip away more and more. To get the
smallest possible undercut or groove to retain the gold seemed an
utter impossibility, and the longer and more carefully I worked, the
more discouraging it became, until finally I was obliged to give up
altogether the attempt to fill the tooth with gold and to replace the
broken corner with oxyphosphate cement.

Now, here would have been an excellent opportunity for a porcelain
tip, provided a man had the requisite skill to get sufficient anchorage
for it without experiencing the same difficulty that I encountered in
attempting to make a gold filling. I should like to ask Dr. Stoddard
what his own experience has been with this class of teeth: if it is
possible to adapt porcelain tips in such cases, and if so, how long
they would be likely to remain. They are the most discouraging sort of
teeth, I think, we have to deal with, but fortunately, cases as bad as
the one just cited do not confront us very often.

DR. STODDARD:—I should think that that was a case where it would be
scarcely practicable to put in a porcelain filling, unless the tooth
could be backed with platinum and the filling held that way, rather
than by pins running into the tooth substance.

DR. ALLEN:—Mr. President and gentlemen: I have had no practical
experience with porcelain fillings, but I was much interested in
the paper just read. While I was abroad last summer I met Mr. Dall,
the gentleman referred to by Dr. Stoddard, and he showed me some
very beautiful specimens of porcelain fillings in teeth which he
had prepared out of the mouth. His method in dealing with proximate
cavities in superior front teeth, where the lingual, proximal and
labial edges are involved, is to build up the lingual, cervical,
and half of the proximal walls with gold, leaving a cavity for the
insertion of porcelain, which, when finished, is a great success from
an artistic point of view, as it does away with the objectionable
display of a large gold filling. Mr. Dall cuts his porcelain inlays
from teeth manufactured by C. Ash & Sons.

DR. MERIAM:—Mr. President, the body referred to is Ash's Tube tooth
body. Ash, I believe, has always refused to sell it in bulk. I know
that a number of American gentlemen have wished to experiment with it.
Either the Harwood or the Thompson blow-pipe will bake it; of course,
it would be very easy to bake in the Stoddard furnace. I do not know
that it has ever been imitated or reproduced in this country. Of
course, we often hear of Dr. Herbst's glass fillings.

There is one question I would like to ask Dr. Stoddard, which he can
answer after I have finished, and that is, how far his body corresponds
with the body usually used for the porcelain teeth of the shops? Does
it have to fuse at a lower heat, or is it substantially the same?

It seems to me that, going further than this, an effort should be made,
before they are entirely lost, to preserve the old formulas that are
in the hands of the older dentists. I believe that the most successful
manufacturers to-day are manufacturing teeth from the formulas of
these men, and if they are available they will be useful to add to
our directory, that they may go on record. I think this is a very
interesting study, and it is certainly carrying us back to the older
days of dentistry in some ways.

DR. ALLEN:—I have in my pocket a tooth which Mr. Dall prepared. He
takes one of Ash's inlay teeth, cuts a groove in it and cuts them off
in sections.

DR. STODDARD:—In reply to Dr. Meriam's question, the body that we
use is Dr. Daniel Harwood's, and is harder than the ordinary bodies.
There has been some effort, I believe, to preserve the old formulas.
Dr. Preston has presented his to the school, and Dr. Chandler has some
which he is preserving.

DR. MERIAM:—I think, seeing this specimen that Dr. Allen has passed
around, that some years ago in France a porcelain was made in the form
of a pencil, so that the end could be ground and fitted to a cavity,
and then cut off and polished. I also believe they use the long teeth
used for continuous gum work.

DR. SHEPHERD:—I noticed that some of the specimens, especially a tip
for a central, were a little larger than necessary. I would like to ask
Dr. Stoddard if the porcelain could be dressed down to give the proper
contour to the filling.

DR. STODDARD:—Yes, it can be ground down and polished; and when it is
wet in the mouth it looks just as well as English porcelain.

DR. CLAPP:—I have had very little experience in inlay fillings, but
I find that the process of grinding in the piece of artificial tooth,
when that is used, can be considerably facilitated by cementing the
piece of porcelain into the end of a small stick with cements the same
as is used by lapidaries who cut precious stones. I would like to ask
Dr. Stoddard about the Ash teeth, they being softer and more easily
fused than the bodies that we have, would it be possible to take those
teeth and pound them up the same as the body is made now, and then use
them as the body?

DR. STODDARD:—That never occurred to me, but I think very likely it
could be done. The only question it seems to me is in the coloring
material, whether it would bleach or not.

DR. MERIAM:—I think we should make a distinction between the Ash
ordinary tooth and the Ash Tube tooth. The tube tooth fuses at a
lower temperature, and in soldering this tube tooth I found that it
would change color and once, for a man with teeth very yellow, I took
advantage of that fact and secured a very good match.

DR. CLAPP:—I would like to mention a case that came under my
observation a short time ago. It was in the right superior lateral,
the mesial portion being turned outwardly a very little. I noticed
that there was a slight defect extending a little above and below the
enamel, but no decay. I think I examined this tooth two or three times
before I discovered that there was a porcelain inlay at that point.
On questioning the patient, I learned that it had been put in by Dr.
Rollins, eight or nine years ago. I find diamond disks the best for
grinding inlays.

DR. MERIAM:—I remember hearing of a dentist standing by the chair of
Dr. Perry, in New York, and his showing an operation he had done of
that kind; it is now probably seventeen or eighteen years ago. The
dentist pointed out that there was a check in his tooth, when it was a
tip Dr. Perry had put on.


PRESENTATION OF SPECIMENS.

DR. COOKE:—I wish to present a piece of steel which was sent me by Dr.
Wetzel, of Germany. He got it from Geneva. It is very thin, and is a
first-rate thing to use for a matrix, &c., and for passing in between
the teeth where something very thin is needed.

A method of casting a plaster model where you take a bite and desire
to get a model very quickly: First, cast one side, turn the impression
over, place a double piece of bibulous paper over the plaster that is
to form the tail piece and cast the other side. It comes apart without
any trouble, doing away with shellac and oil, and is done with one mix
of plaster.

DR. CLAPP:—A bit of vaseline will accomplish the same thing.

DR. COOKE:—I have never tried the vaseline. I have a rather
interesting case, an extensive piece of bridge and crown work which
the patient received some years ago from a firm who make a specialty
of this work. The bridge on the right side had broken away, several
abscesses had formed, and the condition of the mouth was far from
satisfactory.

DR. SMITH:—Mr. President, right here, after Dr. Cooke's remarks in
presenting this case of bridge-work, and knowing that he himself has
performed some operations in bridge-work, I would like to ask if the
result of his experience places him on record as universally condemning
bridge-work.

DR. COOKE:—Far from it. I simply presented that as a specimen of
bridge-work as performed in the nineteenth century. It was done by a
firm that makes bridge-work a specialty.

DR. MERIAM:—These instruments, I think, have never been made in
America. I had them copied by Mr. Schmidt. I present first the set of
groove cutters or chisels for molars and bicuspids. I think you will
find them about page 122, Appendix to Ash's Catalogue, 1886. They are
of the well-known chisel form, and I will send around with them two
made on my own curve. I like the Whitten Approximal Trimmers very much
as a trimmer and also as a scaler, but I wanted something with a little
suggestion of Dr. Lord's added to Dr. Whitten's, and in these the blade
is flat and passes easily between the teeth.

While I am on the subject, I will show some of Dr. Lord's excavators
that I have had made quite small, smaller than he has made himself, and
for a simple proximal cavity where only one instrument is to be used, I
think they are admirable. Dr. Lord only orders them in hatchet forms.
Here are some hoes that I directed Mr. Schmidt to make for me; some of
them have been rubbed down thinner.

  H. L. UPHAM, D.M.D.,
  _Editor Harvard Odontological Society_.

       *       *       *       *       *

Send subscriptions to the ARCHIVES to Dr. DeCoursey Lindsley, 321 N.
Grand Avenue, St. Louis, Mo.


DISCUSSION OF DR. PARR'S PAPER:

IMMEDIATE SEPARATION OF THE TEETH.[5]

DR. J. G. PALMER:—I do not think I have anything in particular to
say concerning rapid separation. I have the separator that Dr. Parr
describes in his paper, and I also have a set of Dr. Perry's. The
latter is, perhaps, the most nearly universal in its application of
any. I cannot say that I agree with the doctor in regard to separating
so rapidly in all cases: in some cases it is probably advisable to do
it, but I would rather follow the lead of Dr. Faught's paper, and go a
little slow. I think going slowly in separating teeth is as useful as
it is in some other cases cited in the paper.

DR. C. A. MEEKER:—I have used Dr. Parr's separator for three years,
and prefer it to any of the others that I have used.

DR. PINNEY:—Sometimes, when you have a couple of nice little teeth
to fill, and you want to get to work and get it done, and you know
your patient is going to be so nervous for a week after, if you put
rubber between the teeth, that you cannot treat them, it is a great
pleasure then to put on your separator and slowly and gradually get
those teeth apart, with just one little squeal, so that you can put in
your two fillings. This little instrument is one of the best things
we have: it does not work in all cases, but it will in nearly all. It
should be used carefully; you should not move the teeth in a second,
or in a minute, but work carefully with it and you will be surprised
to find how many times you can use a separator to advantage. Patients
are better satisfied to have their teeth separated in this way, than
be compelled to wear rubber or tape, or something of that kind, in the
mouth—they say those things tire them.

DR. FAUGHT:—I would like to say a word about that one little squeal
that has been spoken of. I do not think we dentists quite appreciate
what that one little squeal means. I think it means a feeling of fear
and distrust in our patients for years afterwards. I believe also that
when we avoid giving pain to a patient, or stop a slight pain, it pays
in our dealings with the patient in future years. They never forget
it, but we forget them because we see so many of them, but each patient
remembers that somewhere in his or her mouth there was one little turn
given that caused intense pain, and they remember that _you_ did it.
It always causes a feeling of dread when they sit in our chairs again
for another operation. I believe that we should, more than we do, try
to protect our patients from every annoyance, however slight, even at
the expense of a little more time. There are many cases where the use
of mechanical separators is unobjectionable, and when it facilitates
such work. I wish to call your attention to a method of separating
not my own. It is the use of a little piece of tape. I hand a little
piece of tape to my patient with instructions how to use it, and in
the course of four or five days the necessary space is obtained, and
quite painlessly. When they return the mouth is in condition for the
operation, and they do not seem to have hurt themselves, and _you_ have
not hurt them.

DR. PINNEY:—After you have gained the beautiful space by the use of
tape or some other appliance, do you not have sore teeth. One good
point in favor of the separator is, that after you get these teeth
separated, the pressure of the instrument is so positive that there is
no pain whatever during the operation of filling. But when you separate
them with tape, the teeth are loose and sore, and a little pressure
upon them causes intense pain. The pain is so much greater than that
which caused the little squeal in immediate separation, that almost any
one would prefer the squeal.

DR. FAUGHT:—I would suggest the use of a little cocaine just before
the operation.

DR. JENNISON:—I do not like to disagree with my friend, Dr. Parr,
because he has given us a great many valuable things. I have not had
much experience in the use of separators, for the reason that I cannot
get my patients to submit to them. The moment I put one on and begin
to turn the screw, the patient exclaims: “Take that off; I cannot
stand it,” and I am compelled to take it off. Then in the use of the
separator, I am always fearful of crushing the enamel, which I think
is a very important thing to consider. With regard to separating
immediately, it would be very desirable if we could do it under all
conditions, or even under some conditions. I would like to see a
separator of some sort for immediate use, and I have no doubt Dr. Parr
can devise one, having plates not made of metal, and which will do the
work of separating teeth without possible injury to the enamel. That,
to my mind, is a very important point, and I agree with the essayist
of the evening most emphatically that it is best to go slow in this
matter. It has been said that teeth are sometimes so situated that you
cannot pass anything through between them for the purpose of gaining
space. When I find teeth in that condition, I introduce a piece of
rubber dam; you can always get that in, and leave it there until the
next day, and then I am usually able to put in something else, such as
a bit of wood, which I generally use. I take time to separate. After I
get space, if the teeth are still sensitive, I fill with gutta-percha
and leave it for a few days, and soon the soreness is all gone.

DR. J. A. OSMUN:—I think it always best to be perfectly frank with
your patients. If you must inflict pain, tell them you are going to
do it, and why, but that you will be as careful as you possibly can,
and you will find they will stand an immense amount of pain, and be
satisfied when you are through.

DR. ADDLEBURG:—If you speak to the patients and tell them the
operations will be painful, but that by inflicting pain you can serve
them better, in most cases they will allow you to apply the separator,
and they say it is much preferable to the old way of separating. I have
some patients who will not allow me to use it, but most of them prefer
the separator. Ladies especially say they prefer it, rather than have
something between their teeth, when going into society; they would
rather bear the little pain than the annoyance. I have used it for two
years. After the teeth are separated I find them to be obtunded to such
an extent that there is little pain in excavating and filling.

DR. EATON:—I want to add a word in favor of quick separation. For
the last four or five years I have followed the practice of quick
separation. If the separator fits property, and you use it with care,
it does not cause much pain. As soon as you find you are inflicting
pain, stop and rest a minute or two, and then you will be able to gain
a little more space. The separator should not extend up to, or impinge
upon the gum. A little gutta-percha under the bows of the separator
will tend to keep it out of the gum and will also steady the separator.
In some cases, where it is very difficult to keep the separator on the
teeth, the placing of a little gutta-percha on the bows will overcome
the difficulty, and the separator will stay in place, you can gain
all the space required, and then the teeth are held firmly while you
perform the operation of filling. Another thing: I have a number of
dead laterals in my patients' mouths which I cannot account for in any
other way than by slow separation. The pulps were not exposed at the
time of filling, and yet a few months afterwards I found them dead. I
believe the blood vessels were strangulated by holding the teeth in one
position for so long a time.

DR. PALMER:—I fear I did not express myself very clearly in regard
to the different separators. I have frequently used Dr. Perry's
separators, and have taken them off and put on Dr. Parr's; and I want
to say, that while I do not find Dr. Parr's separator universal, as
claimed, it is more nearly so than any other: and I can do with it what
I cannot do with any other. But I have failed to find any patients
like those Dr. Pinney speaks of, who prefer the separator to slower
methods of separating. Many ask me never to use one again. I have found
best results from using pieces of rubber and keeping them there until
sufficient space is gained. I think the difficulty in Dr. Eaton's case
was that the teeth were not kept sufficiently solid: if they had been
held firmly, the difficulty would not have occurred.


TEETH A COMBINATION OF CONES.

At the usual monthly meeting of the Manchester (Eng.) Odontological
Society, on December 10th, Mr. W. A. Hooton showed a collection
of bones and specimens of ancient implements and pottery recently
discovered in a limestone cavern at Deepdale, near Buxton, including
remains of a brown bear, Celtic ox, deer, wild boar, fox, sheep, horse,
and other animals.

The skull of the bear, which was in fine preservation, was found
imbedded in a mass of stalagmite more than a foot thick. The specimen
was an old one, and the teeth had been subjected to very rough usage,
being excessively worn down and many of the pulp cavities exposed. The
canines had all been fractured and afterwards worn smooth, with the
exception of the right upper, which was of full length and encircled by
a band of erosion. There was no trace of the second premolars.

The skull of a Celtic ox (_bos longifrons_) showed portions of skin in
a petrified condition still adherent, and there was also half the lower
jaw of a calf.

In the clay were found portions of a stag's antlers of great size,
somewhat softened by exposure to moisture.

Although no human bones have so far been met with, the signs of man's
presence were conclusive, and that probably during the ancient British
and Roman periods. One antler had been divided, and the tip smoothed
and sharply-pointed; another was shaped, apparently for use as a spear
head; and close at hand a small carved bone ornament, much blackened,
and some bits of bronze were found.

We know that fires were made in the cave, for fragments of charcoal are
preserved in the stalagmite.

The specimens of pottery are unfortunately much broken, but examples
of Romano-British and also of Samia ware have been identified by Prof.
Boyd-Dawkins, also pieces of hand-made pottery.

Dr. Shaw said that what had been exhibited by Mr. Hooton referred us
back to that almost eternity of the past when the limestone was formed
in which these caves are now found—a time before the appearance of
vertebrate animals. And even when, inconceivable ages after it was
formed, the limestone had risen from the shallow seas and became a
part of the dry land, these caves must have been formed in it at a
date so remote as to be almost incomprehensible to our mental grasp.
And they had undoubtedly been, from a time of which we have no record
down to clearly historical times, the homes of animals—man included.
Many of these animals have, in only comparatively recent times, become
extinct. In many of these caves, however, are to be found remains that
show they have been the homes of animals now only to be found in hot
climates, but were able to roam far north of their present habitations
at that period when this island formed part of a great continent which
was connected with Africa, and possessed an altogether different
temperature than at present. The ruder kind of pottery to which Mr.
Hooton referred are probably of Neolithic origin. In regard to the
ornaments and better class of pottery found in these caves, it shows
they have been at some time inhabited by a race greatly superior to
the ancient riverdrift and cave-men, and their still later Neolithic
inhabitants; and there can be no doubt they were the places in which
the Celtic and Roman element sought refuge at the time of the fierce
Saxon invasion.

Referring to the inferior jaw of a wild boar in which there was, at the
extreme posterior portion, a fully-formed molar tooth which had not yet
erupted, and consequently, had not any of its cusps in the slightest
degree worn down by mastication, he (Dr. Shaw) said that he had read
a paper some years since before the Manchester Microscopical Society,
in which he had vaguely hinted at a theory which he had not since had
time to work out, but which he would now distinctly state and leave
it to younger men to consider. Mr. Hooton had also exhibited a most
interesting specimen of a young, partly-formed and unerupted horse
tooth in which also there had not been any wearing down of the cusps.
He (Dr. Shaw) had several specimens of the same sort. Now, this molar
horse tooth was in reality a combination of five teeth with projecting
cones of various heights. As soon as the tooth appeared in the mouth
these cones began to be worn down in mastication, and the tooth
eventually presented a flat surface with alternate layers of enamel,
dentine and cementum, so arranged that the occlusion formed a veritable
mill for grinding the food. Although the molars of the bear and boar
are not made up in the same way as those of the horse, the wearing down
can be seen to have taken place in the teeth of the bear and the boar
exhibited; and if gentlemen will kindly examine this unerupted tooth
at the extreme posterior portion of the inferior jaw of the boar, it
will be seen what this animal's molars are like when first formed, and
before they are put to any use. _They are ummistakably made up of a
great number of cones._ Therefore, it was his (Dr. Shaw's) opinion
that, while in the primitive manner dentine and eventually teeth first
appeared there were no signs of cones, when this form did, in the long
process of time, make its appearance, it became a starting point from
which has been derived, by a great variety of combinations, the forms
of the teeth of the higher animals.


THE TACOMA DENTAL SOCIETY.

We are in receipt of a copy of the constitution and by-laws of the
above Society, which indicates that the dentists of the new State of
Washington are abreast of the times.

“The object of this Society shall be to cultivate the science
and art of dentistry, to promote among dentists mutual improvement,
social intercourse and good feeling, and to collectively
represent and have cognizance of the common interests of the
dental profession in our city.”

We take pleasure in giving to our readers the code of ethics of this
new Society as being something new and original.


CODE OF ETHICS.

The members of the Tacoma Dental Society in the fulfillment of their
duties to the profession, to the public and to each other, declare
and accept as binding the following code of ethics as embracing
such principles of honor, fairness and gentlemanly bearing as every
gentleman of honor and self-respect should most willingly adopt.


ARTICLE I.

SECTION 1. It is the duty of every dentist to maintain the honor,
respectability and good name of the dental profession, and by a manly
and dignified bearing, by studious habits and mental improvement, as
well as by a conscientious earnestness in the employment of his skill
for the welfare of mankind, to aim at securing a general recognition of
the worthiness of the dental profession to rank among the honored and
learned professions.

SEC. 2. He should so practice his profession that the community will
esteem it above the art of a mere mechanican and above traffic wherein
shrewdness and cunning are an essential part of the stock in trade.

SEC. 3. He should therefore regard it as unprofessional and beneath
the dignity of his calling to offer the products of his skill in
competition at fairs, or to make sale of his services as does the
shop-keeper of his goods, or resort to public advertisement such as
cards, hand-bills, posters, or signs calling attention to peculiar
styles of business, lowness of price, special modes of operating, or to
claim superiority over neighboring practitioners, to go from house to
house soliciting or performing operations, or to do other similar acts;
but nothing in the above shall be so construed as to prevent any member
from inserting simply his or her name, occupation and place of business
in the public prints, or giving notice in the same of his removal,
absence from or return to business, or issuing appointment cards with
his fee bill thereon.


ARTICLE II.

SECTION 1. It is the duty of a dentist to treat the members of his
profession—not excluding those who are his competitors—with the honor
of a gentleman and the honesty of a true man; and when he has occasion
to examine the operations of a neighboring practitioner, to do so
without criticism.

SEC. 2. And when called upon to counsel concerning the utility of any
operation, it becomes him to excuse any perceived faults which may
justly be excused, and to make no attempt to undermine the confidence
of a patient in a reputable practitioner, or by under-bidding, attempt
to secure patronage that might go to another dentist.

SEC. 3. He should esteem it enough for honorable rivalry that the
patient of another practitioner should from voluntary preference seek
his professional skill. In short, he should treat every professional
brother as he would his own brother in the flesh engaged in the same
calling, or as a father would a SOD whose success he would not hinder.


ARTICLE III.

SECTION 1. A dentist should make his own personal advancement in the
literature and practice of his profession his chief aim, and be
determined to win success on the ground of merit. He should always
employ his best skill, and should endeavor to instruct his patients
candidly, knowingly and conscientiously in relation to their welfare as
connected with their teeth.

SEC. 2. He should consider it also his duty to regard the needs of the
poor in rendering gratuitous service, or by making such operations as
are needful to health and bodily comfort available at rates within
their means, ever regarding the wide difference between benevolently
reducing the price to the _known poor_ and selfishly reducing the price
to gain patronage that might go to another dentist.


OFFICERS AND MEMBERS.

F. P. Hicks, _President_; W. E. Burkhart, _Vice-President_; A. J.
Gustaveson, _Treasurer_; A. McCulley, _Secretary_; E. G. Case, C. Van
Winter, W. S. Conn, W. Chamberlain, —— Lamson, I. A. Chapman, J. R.
Kennedy, L. Eaton, W. H. Johnson.


IOWA STATE DENTAL SOCIETY.

The Iowa State Dental Society will hold its twenty-eighth annual
meeting at Dubuque, Iowa, May 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th, 1890. For purpose
of observing a great clinic and hearing read papers by the most noted
writers in dentistry, all are invited to come. The officers are: Dr.
F. M. Shriver, President; Dr. C. J. Peterson, Vice-President; Geo. W.
Miller, Secretary; Ben Price, Treasurer. Executive Committee: Jesse M.
Ritchey, C. J. Peterson, C. Thomas. Membership Committee: J. S. Kulp,
J. J. Littler, A. B. Cutler. Publication Committee: Geo. W. Miller, T.
A. Hallett, J. B. Entrikim. Vice-President Peterson is Superintendent
of Clinics.


ILLINOIS STATE DENTAL SOCIETY.

The twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Illinois State Dental Society
will be held at Springfield, beginning Tuesday, May 13th, and
continuing four days.

  GARRETT NEWKIRK,
  _Secretary_.


MISSOURI STATE DENTAL ASSOCIATION.

  MEXICO, MO., March 15th, 1890.

DEAR DOCTOR: We wish to call your attention to the next meeting of
the Missouri State Dental Association, which will be held at Pertle
Springs, July 8‒9‒10‒11, 1890.

No effort will be spared to make this meeting one of the largest and
most interesting in the history of the Association.

The American Dental Association will meet in Missouri next August, and
it is especially desirable that we have a large attendance at our next
meeting so that we may make proper arrangements to receive the members
of the American Dental Association in a manner that will reflect credit
upon the dentists of Missouri.

Now is the time to make your plans so that you may be able to be with
us, and we earnestly solicit your presence.

Fraternally yours.

[Illustration:

  J. H. McWilliams.

  W. L. Reed.

  N. H. Buckley.]

  _Executive Committee._


KANSAS STATE DENTAL ASSOCIATION.

The nineteenth annual meeting of the Kansas State Dental Association
will be held at Hotel Throop, Topeka, Kansas, commencing Tuesday, April
29th, and continuing four days. An interesting program is assured, and
the clinics will be a special feature. The hotel is first-class in
every particular, and has granted a reduced rate. One and one-third
fare has been granted by the railroads, on the certificate plan.
Members of the profession cordially invited.

  C. E. ESTERLY,
  _Secretary_.

Lawrence, Kansas.


FORTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY ASSOCIATION
OF DENTAL SURGEONS.

CINCINNATI. OHIO.

The Society met at Lincoln Club Hall, and was opened by prayer by
Dr. James Leslie. Dr. J. R. Callahan then delivered an address. He
said—“As I look back over the records of the past doings of this
Society, I can see where its founders builded better than they knew. I
imagine this Society in its earliest days had more to do with bringing
dentistry to its present high standing than most of us give her credit
for doing. * * * In the very beginning they put the seal of their
disapproval on charlatanism, amalgam fillings, advertising, derogatory
remarks about one another in regard to poor ability, etc.; in fact it
is hard to find anything that the most advanced of us to-day condemn,
that they did not speak of in no uncertain tone forty-six years ago.
Many are the good things done by this Society in early days; it has
sown seed that has produced an hundred fold; many of the dental
societies of to-day are offsprings of this old mother association.
Not the least among the good fruits of this Society are the _Dental
Register_ and Ohio Dental College. * * *

“The Society spent money freely, both in the practical and theoretical
of the profession; they gave prizes for papers to the value of $100;
gave medals—gold and silver—for improved appliances. They seemed to
be in great earnest in every way, and they did not forget to have good
times, too, as they went along. From the records, I find that they were
wont to gather about the festal board and break bread, crack chestnuts,
and have a good social time, and at the close have what they chose to
call interlocutory discussion. At one of the meetings, Dr. Somerby
remarked that he thought it not in accordance with true pathological
principles to retain a tooth in the mouth after the nerve had been
destroyed, and that the operation of plugging over an exposed nerve, by
capping or otherwise, would generally prove useless, and the idea of
repeatedly tickling the nerve to make it cover itself with new bone,
was more amusing than profitable. * * * *

“In the early years of this Society, it was truly _the_ dental society
of the Mississippi Valley. It drew its membership from all parts of
the great valley, and often dentists were in attendance from over the
Alleghenies. It was looked upon, and was truly _the_ dental society of
the West for many years; but in the forty-six years of its existence a
new state of affairs has come about, in almost every State there are
_local_, district societies, and State societies, and all auxiliary,
more or less to the American Dental Society. Under this arrangement the
Mississippi Valley Society is left somewhat isolated, and has lost much
of its prestige. It has become somewhat local in its management, and
it is with much difficulty that the programs are filled up each year.
Men who write papers say, I have to attend my local society so often,
I don't see how I can add another society to my already heavy burden,
and many of the workers in dental society affairs are saying quietly,
but with much significance, I wonder if the old Mississippi Valley
Dental Society has not outlived her usefulness. As for myself I will
not try to answer the question, it is a serious question and deserves
thoughtful attention.”


DISCUSSION.

DR. J. TAFT said the paper brought many recollections of the past to
mind, and was saddened when he found that nearly all the organizers had
passed away, among whom were the Taylors, Griffith, Talbot and others.
The work of this Society still has its influence upon modern dental
practice. Much attention was paid to appliances and instruments, and
many papers stand to-day, among which are those of Dr. Watt. The papers
received more discussion at that time than at the present. The Society
took the lead in all things.

DR. JAMES LESLIE, Cincinnati, Ohio, spoke of the influence of the old
Society, upon its future. The character of a society will be retained
forever. Many of the important discoveries were made in this Society,
and the ability of its members was equal to any in the world. The
Society will live forever.

DR. J. C. MCKELLOPS, St. Louis, said the Association could never die.
Often there is a small attendance because it is not properly announced
in the dental journals.

PROF. H. A. SMITH, Cincinnati. Ohio:—This is the first Society he ever
joined. The conditions are different now from what they were then, and
so new methods must be used—new blood.

PROF. C. M. WRIGHT, Cincinnati, thought the Society had passed its
period of youth, and naturally, was entering upon its old age, and
like a person looking in a mirror, he sees gray hairs which indicate a
decline.

PROF. J. TAFT stated that in 1855 the Society was at a very low ebb,
and its continuation was obtained by the election of two new members at
that moment.

PROF. J. S. CASSIDY, Covington, Kentucky, said the discussion was
premature (as it afterward proved to be), that the members have just
begun to come in.

After some discussion by Drs. Taft and Callahan, it was decided to
appoint special committees in conjunction with the executive committee
to adopt new methods.


Paper by Dr. Otto Arnold, Columbus. Ohio:

NON-METALLIC PLASTIC MATERIALS FOR FILLING TEETH.

* * * “The employment of the earlier dentists of gums, mastic and
sandarac, in etherial and alcoholic solutions for the stopping of
cavities of decay, is the first approach history records of plastic
fillings. About the year 1848, however, the first substantial progress
was made in this direction by the use of gutta-percha as a temporary
filling material. A little later, the well-known compound, Hill's
stopping, was introduced, which is a modification of gutta-percha by
the addition of certain mineral elements to make it harder, therefore
more available for permanent fillings.

* * * About thirty years ago, oxychloride of zinc was introduced,
the first of a now well-known class of filling materials, viz.: the
zinc plastics. Next in order came oxyphosphate of zinc, followed by
enumerable modifications and combinations. * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

“It cannot be denied that the introduction of gutta-percha and the zinc
plastics was the beginning of an era in operative dentistry that made
it possible to attain results never before brought about. Prior to that
time little, if anything, had been accomplished in the direction of
protecting pulps from the effect of thermal irritation. The solution
of this problem alone is of such intrinsic worth as to make any
material, capable of contributing to that end, of inestimable value.
All preparations of the zinc plastics, likewise gutta-percha, at least
so far as the writer has knowledge, are more or less non-conductors
of caloric, therefore valuable for this purpose, and it is almost an
unpardonable offense to ignore their use in all large cavities as a
protection to pulps. * * * Gutta-percha, however, unless in solution of
chloroform or other volatile solvent, is not wholly safe, unless the
greatest care is exercised to prevent its introduction into the cavity
in too heated a condition. This is a serious obstacle, as the minimum
degree of heat necessary to plasticity may, especially if the pulp
is near the surface, be sufficient to permanently injure this organ.
The pressure generally necessary to adapt this substance to place, is
another objection. So, nothing short of the greatest caution in its use
will give certain results. Gutta-percha as a filling material, compared
with the zinc plastics for inside use, and amalgam for outer surfaces,
has a limited sphere of usefulness. * * * The oxychloride cement has
an escharotic action on organized tissue, which makes it unsafe as a
nerve capping; but when used in connection with an intervening layer
of a non-irritant, it becomes useful for this purpose. It is decidedly
antiseptic, but readily soluble in oral fluids, and is distinguished
as “the most preservative, and at the same time the most perishable of
all filling materials.” The antiseptic quality is a valuable feature
for root fillings, and as these are supposed to be protected from the
fluids of the mouth, their solubility is unimportant.

“The zinc phosphates are less irritating in their action on organized
tissue, are denser in structure and less soluble in the oral fluids,
and for general purposes are preferable and in more general use than
the zinc chlorides.

“Briefly, then, to sum the matter up, what is the value of zinc
plastics in dental practice, and to what extent should they be used? *
* All large cavities should have a layer of this substance intervening
between metallic fillings and their deeper portions, if possible,
to protect the pulp from thermal irritation. * * * As a covering
contiguous to exposed pulps, the more neutral and non-irritating
of these preparations possess more good qualities than any other
substance, chiefly on account of their adaption without pressure and
the non-generation of heat.

“For filling root canals, zinc plastics are unsurpassed. The method
I have practiced for a long time with more satisfactory results than
any other, is to carry these to the apex on shreds of cotton of a
fineness suitable to the case in hand, using necessarily the non-sticky
variety. The facility and greater certainty with which the apex may be
reached, combined with the imperviousness and antiseptic properties,
make them the ideal root filling. For use in connection with crown and
bridge-work, we have nothing to compare with them, and can only say they
stand alone. For entire fillings in teeth that promise pathological
complications, or for obvious reasons require temporary operations, they
are a most valuable material. Taking them all in all, they occupy an
important place in dentistry, and we could illy afford to return to the
methods in vogue before their introduction. But like all good things,
zinc plastics are often abused and their use is not always followed by
the best results. * * I am opposed to temporary fillings as a substitute
for something better, except possibly in children's cases, or where
pathological or certain sexual conditions prohibit. The principal
provocation for criticism is the indiscriminate practice of prostituting
a good thing for uses other than its proper one. The outcome of such
practice can result only against the general good of the profession,
through the ultimate disappointment and loss to the innocent victim. The
remedy that suggests itself against such abuse is to be more explicit
in imparting advice on these matters. When temporary fillings must be
inserted, impress the patient forcibly as to their limited utility. If
such fillings are preferred on account of their inexpensiveness, or for
any other reason, be emphatic in calling them temporary fillings and
nothing more.”


DISCUSSION.

PROF. J. TAFT said he had never used amalgam as a filling material.
Oxyphosphate acts differently in different hands. Had seen an
oxyphosphate last eighteen years. It should not be used close to
the gum, or in proximal positions. Is one of the very best materials
for porcelain inlays. A _good_ oxyphosphate will last as long as an
_ordinary_ gold filling. He uses it very often as an intermediate
filling material. Much is due to the manner in which it is mixed. It
should be thoroughly mixed. Some will granulate when used immediately,
but if it is worked between the fingers, it becomes quite plastic and
in that condition it is better and easier used. Heat accelerates, while
cold retards setting.

DR. J. R. CALLAHAN asked if either the oxychloride or the oxyphosphate
hardened the dentine.

DR. J. S. CASSIDY said oxychloride would harden by dehydration;
much depends upon the healthy condition of the saliva. Mechanical
abrasion has little to do with its loss. Chemical action is its chief
cause. More loss takes place in mouths whose saliva is vitiated by
putrefaction than by fermentation.

PROF. TAFT said cleanliness is very important in mouths containing
cement fillings.

DR. H. J. MCKELLOPS spoke upon the oxyphosphates and their effect upon
the dentine. If inserted in cavities and allowed to remain a year or
so, when taken out the dentine will be found very hard and a gold
filling may be inserted. It is one of the best materials for filling,
and is especially applicable for children's teeth. Eructions from the
stomach are very destructive to phosphate fillings. He says oxychloride
is not the best root filling, especially in small roots. The mercury of
amalgam will render a pulpless tooth very brittle.

PROF. H. A. SMITH:—Good manipulation is requisite to success in
plastic fillings; the parts should be thoroughly combined. He had seen
a large crown oxyphosphate filling which had been inserted eight years
ago, in Germany. They were good filling materials, but had their place.

DR. L. E. CUSTER, Dayton. Ohio:—Before we can understand the action
of the oral fluids upon the cement, or the action of the cement upon
the tooth structure, we must first get an idea of what oxyphosphate
of zinc is. When the two portions are united, the powder has such an
influence upon the fluid as to cause it to crystallize, which in turn
incorporates the powder in it. It is a chemical reaction so far as
the liquid changes its form to a liquid of crystallization and also
liberates heat, but it is a mixture as the powder does not change its
form—it is still oxide of zinc. Being of this nature, it is easily
acted upon by external agents, and at the same time the free phosphoric
acid acts upon the tooth structure. He had found that alkalies acted
upon the cement by neutralizing the acid of crystallization, which
liberated the oxide of zinc as a precipitate. Strong acids overpower
the phosphoric acid and act upon the oxide, the latter disappearing
in the solution. So, as had been referred to by Dr. Cassidy, we will
find a more rapid loss in mouths in which putrefaction is going on,
because putrefaction being distinguished from fermentation only by the
presence of nitrogen, and it has been shown by Dr. Watt that one stage
in the formation of nitric acid was the formation of ammonia. Ammonia
disintegrates the cement by neutralizing the acid of crystallization.

DR. ARNOLD said he filled roots with oxychloride by using fibres of
cotton on a small broach.

DR. MCKELLOPS defied anyone to fill pulp canals with oxychloride
of zinc, as well as with a solution of gutta-percha. He said there
was often more than _one_ opening at the apex. He can tell when the
gutta-percha has reached the apex by watching the countenance of the
patient.

DR. GRAY said he enlarged the root canal and filled with iodoform and
oil of cassia.

DR. F. A. HUNTER, Cincinnati, Ohio, said he was never sure that he
filled but two roots perfectly, and those were where the gutta-percha
appeared at the opening of the sinus leading from the roots.

DR. W. H. SILLITO, Xenia, Ohio, asked if it was not the oxychloride of
zinc which had the therapeutic effect.

The annual election of officers ensued with the following result:
President. Dr. M. H. Fletcher, Cincinnati; First Vice-President, Dr. L.
E. Custer, Dayton; Second Vice-President, Dr. Otto Arnold, Columbus;
Corresponding Secretary, Dr. H. T. Matlack, Covington, Ky.; Recording
Secretary, Dr. H. T. Smith, Cincinnati; Treasurer, Dr. Frank A. Hunter.
Cincinnati.

(TO BE CONTINUED.)




Colleges.


MISSOURI DENTAL COLLEGE.

The commencement exercises of the Missouri Dental College were held in
Memorial Hall, on the evening of March 13th, 1890, in connection with
the St. Louis Medical College.

Prof. Alleyne, M.D., dean of the latter college, conferred the degree
of M.D. upon twenty-two graduates.

Prof. W. H. Eames, D.D.S., conferred the degree of D.D.S. upon the
following gentlemen:

  William H. Auer, Jefferson City, Mo.
  Thomas T. Baker, Litchfield, Ill.
  Walter M. Bartlett, St. Louis, Mo.
  Edward W. Bear, Sedalia, Mo.
  Albert G. Bowman, Monroe, La.
  Frank Henry Caughell, M.D., Morrison, Mo.
  William A. M. Cumming, Farmer City, Ill.
  John E. Deggendorf, Potosi, Mo.
  Warden B. Dennis. Jr., Effingham, Ill.
  Peter Henry Eisloeffel, 1102 Chouteau ave., St. Louis, Mo.
  Henry D. Field, 1551 Lafayette ave., St. Louis, Mo.
  John W. Forden, Springfield, Ill.
  John J. Greer, Lexington, Mo.
  Joseph Carter Goodrich, Wentzville, Mo.
  Edwin C. Hammen, Jefferson City, Mo.
  Guilford B. Housten, Carrollton, Mo.
  Frank A. Kimler, Leroy, Ill.
  Paul W. Keller, St. Louis, Mo. (College.)
  Frank M. Lowry, Farmer City, Ill.
  Marcus A. Mace, Belleville, Ill.
  Peter H. Morrison, St. Louis, Mo.
  Lorenz A. Naumann, St. Louis, Mo.
  Charles W. Ott, Gardner, Kas.
  Theodore L. Pepperling, Holstine, Mo.
  Thomas N. Perrine, Anna, Ill.
  Harry W. Pierce, Fort Wayne, Ind.
  James H. Prothrow, Monroe, La.
  Edward Schrantz, Warrenton, Mo.
  Benjamin Q. Stevens, Hannibal, Mo.
  David Riley Taggart, Campbell Hill, Ill.
  Thomas E. Turner, Carrelton, Mo.
  Edgar M. Whisett, Centerview, Mo.
  Frederick V. Waldron, Evans City, Pa.
  Francis W. Willard, Anna, Ill.

The prizes were awarded as follows:

THE ST. LOUIS DENTAL SOCIETY PRIZE, a Gold Medal, by Dr. Henry Fisher,
to Peter H. Morrison, D.D.S., who received the highest vote on final
examination.

THE J. WARREN WICK PRIZE, twenty-five dollars in gold, to James H.
Prothrow, D.D.S., who received next to the highest Vote on final
examination.

THE S. S. WHITE DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY'S PRIZE, a set of Varney
Pluggers, to Frederick V. Waldron, D.D.S., for excelling in operative
dentistry.

THE ST. LOUIS DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY'S PRIZE, a Laboratory Lathe,
to James H. Prothrow, D.D.S., for the best specimens of artificial
teeth.

A large and enthusiastic audience listened with pleasure to the music
and speeches. Prof. John P. Bryson delivered the valedictory in behalf
of the faculty.

The matriculants for the session were seventy-five, graduates,
thirty-four.


DENTAL DEPARTMENT S. U. I.

The eighth annual commencement of the Dental Department of the State
University of Iowa was held at the Opera House, Iowa City, on Monday
evening, March 10, 1890. The annual address was delivered by Hon. R. G.
Cousins, Tipton, Iowa. President Charles A. Schaeffer, Ph.D., conferred
the degree of Doctor of Dental Surgery upon the following named
gentlemen:

  T. G. Albin, St. Louis, Mo.
  J. V. Anderson, Cambridgeboro, Pa.
  F. J. Bethel, Denver, Col.
  A. D. Barker, Grinnell, Ia.
  Benton Bement, Lockport, N. Y.
  C. E. Booth, W. Superior, Wis.
  C. M. Cobb, Clear Lake, Ia.
  C. E. Coleman, Decorah, Ia.
  G. W. Cook, Hyde Park, Ill.
  Chas. Dorman, Manchester, Ia.
  Andrew Dingwell, DeWitt, Ia.
  J. H. Dorival. Caledonia, Minn.
  F. E. Davoll, Madison, Dak.
  J. W. Gluesing, Moline, Ill.
  Nathaniel Glasgow, Maxwell, Ia.
  C. H. Gibson, Chaska, Minn.
  R. H. Guy Huntley, Mason City, Ia.
  J. G. Hildebrand. Waterloo. Ia.
  J. W. Hubbard, Muscatine, Ia.
  Harriet Mabel Jones, Winterset, Ia.
  W. H. Jallings, Washington, Minn.
  Claude Kremer, Mabel, Minn.
  F. B. Kremer, Caledonia, Minn.
  R. E. Lamareaux, Ashland, Neb.
  F. H. Low, Waukon, Ia.
  W. B. Mandeville, Austin, Minn.
  Edward Morton, Iowa Falls, Ia.
  W. F. McDonald, Mt. Pleasant, Ia.
  Chas. B. McCandless, Davenport, Ia.
  W. E. Mabee, Sheldon, Ia.
  G. C. Marlow, Lancaster, Wis.
  E. H. Naumann, Oxford Junction, Ia.
  H. O. Rogers. Ottumwa, Ia.
  G. W. Schwartz, M.D.. Nebraska City, Neb.
  S. L. Seeley, Manchester, Ia.
  Richard Summa, St. Louis. Mo.
  W. H. Simpson. Bellevue, Ia.
  C. D. Tiffany, Mason City, Ia.
  E. A. Taylor, Villisca, Ia.
  P. L. Van Winter, Tacoma, Wash.
  H. Van Winter, Marshalltown, Ia.
  T. B. Wallace, Morrison, Ia.
  Hattie E. Wells, Perry, Ia.

Matriculants for the session, 120.




Correspondence.


EDITOR ARCHIVES:

In the discussion of Dr. Faught's paper, reported in your March number,
I am represented as saying: “The essayist remarked that the students
who had graduated from a dental college did not know that it is the
_acid_ secretions from the mucous follicles which destroy oxyphosphate
fillings.” I was quoting from a paper which I had heard read by Dr.
Shepard, of Boston. I regret to say that I have misquoted him by
inserting the word “_acid_.” His exact language, which I find in the
printed report of his lecture, is, “Nearly every graduate seemed to
be ignorant that there was any mucous follicles to contribute to the
fluids in the mouth, etc.” He does not say “_acid_.” I have therefore
misrepresented him, and wish to do him justice by this correction.
In further explanation, let me say that I had heard Dr. Shepard's
paper, and when at the Newark meeting, Dr. Faught said that _alkalies_
destroy oxyphosphates, a gentleman next to me whispered, “Dr. Shepard
said acids do,” upon which I seemed to recall that he had done so. I
mentioned it, meaning to bring up the point that we can scarcely expect
definite answers from students upon questions which have not been
definitely decided. In another paragraph I use the expression “_wash
out_,” in such a way that it sounds as though Dr. Shepard had used it.
He did; but it was as a quotation from the students under criticism.

I hope that you will give this space.

Respectfully.

  RODREGUES OTTOLENGUI.

  115 Madison Av., N. Y.


DR. WM. BARTLETT is demonstrator in charge at the Missouri Dental
College. He has made mechanical dentistry a specialty for a number of
years, but during the past two sessions has taken a regular course at
the college, and is now a full-fledged dentist.




Editorial.


DR. JOHN ALLEN.

Some seventy-five dentists met at Sherry's Banquet Hall, Fifth avenue,
on the evening of March 8th, to tender a complimentary dinner to John
Allen, who has rounded the fiftieth mile-stone of active practice.

New York, Brooklyn, Boston and New Jersey were represented. All seemed
delighted to do honor to the good doctor, who has reached the period
when age, rather than blood, tells. It is a good custom to thus honor
and cheer those who have been faithful workers in our ranks.

Four years ago they thus dined and honored Dr. John B. Rich, and it
cheered and warmed his heart. Three years ago Dr. W. H. Dwinell was
dined and wined, and he has been renewing his youth ever since. Two
years ago Dr. W. H. Atkinson rounded up the fifty years, and they dined
and wined him, and he is yet, we are glad to record, one of the boys.
This year it came Dr. John Allen's turn to be wined and dined, and we
all hope the good cheer and friendship manifested will cause him, too,
to rejoice yet these many years.

John Allen gave to dentistry the most cleanly and beautiful denture
ever put in human mouth, and he has given to humanity and the world a
character and life equally as clean and beautiful. Wherever dentistry
is known—known as it should be in its perfection—there continuous gum
is known, and there goes with it, always, the name of John Allen.

What a sweet thought and consolation it is to think and know that you
have done something for the world, and that it appreciates and thanks
you; to feel that our lives have not been lived in vain, and though we
may not have received all the dollars we wished for, yet, we are rich
in blessings and the good-will of all. If so, then John Allen is rich,
for all the world blesses him.


SOUTHERN DENTAL ASSOCIATION.

The Southern Dental Association will meet in Atlanta, Ga., on Tuesday,
the 15th day of July next, at 10 o'clock a.m.

A cordial invitation is extended to the profession to meet with us on
that occasion. Any cases in practice of unusual interest, I would be
glad to have reported.

From the number of papers and clinics promised, and the character and
high standing of the writers and operators, the meeting promises to be
one of unusual interest. Let none stay away from this feast who can
possibly attend.

  JOHN C. STOREY, Pres. S. D. A.


AMENDED DENTAL LAW.—The Mississippi legislature, just prior to
adjournment, Feb. 24th, so amended the dental law that, hereafter,
persons beginning the practice of dentistry in Mississippi, must pass
an examination by the board of examiners, whether they hold a diploma
or not.

JULIEN W. RUSSELL, M.D.S., of Brooklyn, N. Y., called on the profession
in our city recently. He was on his way to the Pacific Coast, combining
business and pleasure. The business is introducing his alloy and copper
amalgam; the main pleasure is a visit to his mother and sister in San
Francisco, Cal.

DR. KIRK, of Philadelphia has entirely recovered from his very severe
illness, and was heartily welcomed by the First District Society,
before whom he read a paper at the March meeting. Dr. Kirk's essays are
always so carefully prepared, that each one is a contribution to the
literature of the profession which will live.

THE DENTAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION.—This Association has a large
membership and a vast amount of testimony in regard to crown and
bridge-work, antedating all patents owned by the I. T. C. Co. The time
will soon be ripe for an increase in membership fee. Those who are not
members have but a brief period in which to get in on the ground-floor,
for the small fee of $10. If you wish to be protected, send your name
and $10 to Dr. J. N. Crouse, 2231 Prairie ave., Chicago, Ill.




Brief Mention.


DR. OTTOLLENGUI says that his instruments, which he originated for
implantation operations, “are just the thing” for necrosis.

DR. J. W. AIKIN is now located at 1032 Main St., Kansas City, Mo.
The doctor is the longest and thinnest dentist in the Missouri State
Association.

DR. J. H. KENNERLY, demonstrator in charge of the Infirmary of the
Missouri Dental College for the past two sessions, is now located in
Leadville, Col.

_The Southern Dental Journal_ came to hand a few days after the 15th
inst. Dr. H. H. Johnson, the new editor, starts out well. We wish him
every success.

DR. GARRETTSON is exhaustively revising his work on Oral Surgery. The
next edition will have much new material, including a number of new
illustrations.

THE MINNESOTA STATE DENTAL ASSOCIATION will hold its seventh annual
meeting in Minneapolis, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. July 9, 10 and
11, 1890.

  M. G. JENISON, Cor. Sec.

DR. T. R. ROSS, formerly of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, is now located at 3904
Indiana Ave., Chicago, Ill. The Iowa Association looses one of its most
efficient and active members by the above change.

PERIOSTEAL INFLAMMATION.—I have found, sometimes, after treating sore
teeth for several days without giving relief, and where the trouble
was somewhat obscure, and had probably been diagnosed as periosteal
inflammation, or something of a kindred nature, that a pill of calomel,
2 grains, soda bi-carb., 3 grains, taken just before retiring at night,
brought things all straight next day. Try it on your next patient with
a sore tooth. It certainly holds good in malarial districts.

  A. H. HILZIM.

DRS. A. G. BOWMAN AND J. H. PROTHROW have formed a partnership, for
the purpose of practicing dentistry in Monroe, La. We commend them to
the profession in Louisiana. Both are recent graduates of the Missouri
Dental College.

DR. C. W. LEWIS, Chicago, Ill., on account of overwork and partly
ill-health, has been taking a Southern trip, in order to recuperate,
taking in Chattanooga, Lookout Mountain, Atlanta, Jacksonville, across
the Gulf to New Orleans, then home.

THE WORLD TYPEWRITER.—We are glad to call attention to the fact that
at last a new typewriter has been invented that will fill the wants of
the professional men. For further particulars, address the advertiser,
H. M. Strader & Co., 608 Walnut St., St. Louis, Mo.

THE BROOKLYN SOCIETY has been “booming” things this winter. They
have held public clinics once a month, and the attendance has been
so gratifying that they have decided to continue them as a permanent
feature of their Society work. This is a good idea. The First District
Society of New York has become famous mainly in this direction. Other
societies should try it.

BRIDGE-WORK.—The most satisfactory form of sectional dentures
(bridge-work) secured by crowns are made of gold and platinum, “I”
or “L” bar, each end soldered to the crowns, and then a correct
articulation obtained and rubber teeth used; the space between the
crowns entirely filled with rubber, resting upon the gum, enveloping
the gold and platinum bar, and articulating against the occluding
teeth. I have used this form for many years.

  WM. N. MORRISON.

DENTAL LAW.—There is a bill before the legislature of the State of New
York, which provides that all diplomas granted to medical students,
shall be conferred by a State board of examiners, the colleges being
thus deprived of their present privilege. The board is to be appointed
by the Regents of the State (who control educational interests in
general), from candidates recommended by the State Medical Association.
If this law is passed, it will be a step toward a similar action, in
regard to the dental schools.

INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CONGRESS.—_Rates_: the Hamburg-American Packet
Co. will sell round-trip tickets by the Fast Line at a reduction of 10
per cent., and on the Mail Line at a reduction of 15 per cent., also
the steamer August Victoria will take passengers on the going trip for
a reduction of 25 per cent, on July 24th; the Wieland sailing on the
19th of July, will make a reduction of 15 per cent, on the going trip.
For further information, address the company at 37 Broadway, N. Y., or
P. O. Box 2567.

VICK—STATE FAIR, PEORIA, ILL., SEPTEMBER 29th, 1890.—James Vick,
seedsman, of Rochester, N. Y., offers $1000.00 in cash premiums, to be
awarded at the Illinois State Fair, by the Society's judges, for best
cabbage, celery, potatoes, cauliflower, tomatoes, musk melon, onions,
and mangel. Last year the prizes awarded at the New York State Fair
went to Pennsylvania, Michigan, Iowa and New York. All interested in
vegetables should send to Vick, of Rochester, for particulars regarding
this offer. No doubt it will be one of the principal features of
interest at the fair.

The Vicks will erect a separate building, or tent, in which they will
make a grand show of flowers with the vegetables, and will be on hand
to receive their friends.

HICKORY ROOT FILLING.—DR. WHITE protested against anyone condemning
a thing of which he knew nothing. He had filled straight roots with
hickory for eighteen or nineteen years. He does not fill the entire
canal—not more than one-eighth of an inch at the apex. The object
in using it, is to know that the foramen is closed; then you can
fill the root with anything desired. The method is to file a piece
of well-seasoned dense hickory almost to a point, then pass it up to
the apex. If there is the slightest indication of pain, withdraw the
wood, cut off a short piece from the end; again insert, mark at the
cutting edge of the tooth: then again withdraw, and with a sharp knife,
make a grove around it, about an eighth of an inch from the point, and
bend the end over without breaking it off. Insert for the last time,
the proper position being indicated by the groove, tap it home, and
twist off the point.


FOOTNOTES

[Footnote 1: Read before the St. Louis Dental Society, Feb. 18, 1890.]

[Footnote 2: Read before the Eastern Iowa Dental Society, Jan. 14,
1890.]

[Footnote 3: Read before the Eastern Iowa Dental Society, January 14,
1890.]

[Footnote 4: Read before Harvard Odontological Society, December 26,
1889. ARCHIVES, Vol. VII, page 110.]

[Footnote 5: Read before the Central Dental Society of New Jersey.
ARCHIVES, Vol. VII, page 49.]




       *       *       *       *       *

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES.

1. Silently corrected simple spelling, grammar, and typographical
   errors.
2. Retained anachronistic and non-standard spellings as printed.








*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ARCHIVES OF DENTISTRY, VOL. VII, NO. 4, APRIL 1890 ***


    

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.


START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.”
    
    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
        works.
    
    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    
    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
    

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.