Produced by Larry B. Harrison, Martin Pettit and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)






SLAVERY:


BY

J. L. BAKER.

AUTHOR OF "EXPORTS AND IMPORTS," "MEN AND THINGS," &c.

PHILADELPHIA:

JOHN A. NORTON,

1860.




SLAVERY.


The recent attempt of John Brown to incite an insurrection at Harper's
Ferry has created no little excitement throughout the country. Strange
and desperate as the movement was, it seems to have been the natural and
necessary result of the long twenty years' war, waged in the free States
upon the institutions of the South, the culminating point, it is to be
hoped, in a reform based on no sound principle, and which, like an
epidemic, has swept over the land, fruitful only in bitter words, harsh
recrimination, sectional hostility, and ending, like the last act of a
tragedy, in violence and murder.

The scene that has been enacted at Harper's Ferry will perhaps have the
effect to open the eyes of the nation, so that they can see fully the
yawning gulf, the brink of which they have at last reached, and lead
them to examine the ground on which they stand; inquire what they have
been doing, and what good cause can be served by a course of action
which has led to such fatal results. Many lives have been sacrificed. A
whole family has been ruined, and an old man has been led out to suffer
the last and most terrible infliction of the law. He has been but an
instrument in the hands of others, who have acted, with the exception of
some political leaders, from honest convictions.

The time has now come, however, for them to inquire, and for all to
inquire with the utmost seriousness, if these convictions of duty have
been just and commendable, or if they have been mistaken, and therefore
to be condemned. Zeal without knowledge is a dangerous weapon, as all
history has proved, and it is incumbent upon all, not only to do right,
but to think right. It is an old maxim that ignorance of the law excuses
no man, and it is equally true that we are not at liberty to follow our
blind impulses, but are bound to inform ourselves, and to _know_ whether
a particular course of action, however well intended, is such as will
not defeat the very purposes we have in view, while it brings misery
and ruin to thousands of our fellow beings.

Liberty has been in all ages of the world a most fruitful theme for the
poet and the orator, and still its true nature and conditions are but
imperfectly understood. Constitutional liberty, such as that of England
and the United States, is possible only to a race that has a physical
temperament that fits it for self-control or self-government, and to
such a race only is it a blessing. But few such races have been known in
history. One of them was the Grecian, and afterwards the Roman, but both
became degenerated, and lost the capacity of self-government.

In modern times the English nation has exhibited the same capacity,
which belongs also to ourselves, who are of the same blood. No other
people have those constitutional traits which fit them for
self-government, which is but another name for self-restraint. The
Frenchman is volatile, fickle, and fond of glory, and less free to-day
than he was under Louis the Sixteenth. He has a government which answers
to his wants and his genius, which exactly represents his condition, and
contributes, therefore, most to his happiness. Should he, in the course
of centuries, become changed in his physical and mental constitution, he
will find, necessarily, a government that corresponds to the progress he
has made. Governments are but the agents and representatives of the
people. They reflect very nearly the condition of the governed, and
change to meet the changes of those they represent. No mortal power can
prevent any people from taking and enjoying that degree of freedom they
are capable of enjoying, and which would, therefore, contribute to their
happiness. What is true of France, is true of the other European
nations, and of all nations; so that we never deceive ourselves more
completely than when we talk of political liberty as something equally
applicable to all, and attainable by all.

Such liberty the Anglo-Saxon finds contributing to his happiness; but it
may be the greatest curse, as it has often proved to those who have
different blood in their veins, who have not the same capacity of
self-control, and who enjoy, therefore, as much, if not more, under
governments suited to their peculiar temperaments. An Italian Republic
exists only in the dreams of Mazzini and Garibaldi, and yet if the sum
of human happiness could be measured, there may be as much happiness in
Italy, and perhaps more than is to be found in the two nations that are
able to live under a constitutional government.

It often happens, that among those nations which require a strong
government, we find a larger amount of social freedom, than among those
who are politically more free. A man is more free to express an opinion
in Paris, upon any matter of science or religion, or other topic,
excepting politics, than he is in Boston. He stands less in awe of his
neighbors, feels less the pressure of public opinion, than do we, on
whom government bears lightly, but who are, to a corresponding extent,
the slaves of Public Sentiment. Where laws bear lightest, Public Opinion
takes their place, and becomes, often, a dreadful tyrant, as is seen
frequently in our western States, and on the borders of civilization. On
the other hand, where there exists the least political freedom, we find
the largest social liberty, as though one was incompatible with the
other, which is probably the case, and for the reason that man must be
governed to a certain extent in some way, and if he becomes politically
more free, he becomes by necessity, socially, more enslaved.

We shall find, if we look at the different nations of the world, that
each enjoys that degree of liberty, either political or social, which
most contributes to its happiness. If this were not the case with any
nation, it is certain that its condition would be changed at once, to
correspond to its wants and capacities. No government, however despotic,
could for a moment prevent such a result; nor is it at all safe to judge
of the real condition of a nation, by the excited harangues of such
enthusiasts as Kossuth and Mazzini.

As fast as a people become capable of self-control or self-government,
just so fast the government becomes modified to meet their wants; for
they are in fact the government, and rulers are but their
representatives.

This view of liberty will be considered, I am aware, by many as very
heretical and not at all in accordance with the facts of history or the
nature of man. To some it will, no doubt, appear new as well as strange,
and very doubtful. That what we call constitutional liberty, however,
depends mainly upon the peculiar physical and moral temperament of a
people, I cannot doubt. Self-government is constitutional in more senses
than one. Such at least is the result of my reflections upon the
subject. The lesson I learn from history is, that no amount of physical
or mental culture can materially change the peculiar temperament which
belongs to each race. A nation may be educated to excel in all the arts
and all the sciences, in oratory, philosophy, poetry, music, and
painting, but not in the art of self-government, which implies a natural
gift bestowed upon a very small portion of the human race. To judge of a
people in this respect we must also witness their capacity at home, and
not be deceived by what happens to individuals or small communities when
thrown into the midst of a self-controlling or self-governing race. Such
is the case with our German population which constitutes an intelligent,
useful, law-abiding portion of our citizens, and to all appearance
capable of exercising the functions of self-government. But we must
consider that they exist here surrounded and entirely controlled by our
own people, and in some parts of the Union have been born and brought up
under our institutions. If we wish to know the capacity of their race
for self-government, we must go to Germany, and if possible find it
there. The German race comes nearest to our own and excels it in some
respects, though wanting the necessary political elements with which we
are gifted. For many years the profoundest scholars and the greatest
musical composers have been found in Germany, which has also produced in
Goethe and Schiller, names worthy to rank with the greatest of modern
times. We come from the same stock and the same northern hive, but have
pursued different courses, and have not now the same blood in our veins.
One race takes naturally to politics, for which it has an aptitude and
capacity, the other as naturally to music and painting, to science and
philosophy. In the lapse of centuries, the physical constitution of both
may change. The English may lose by admixture the peculiar qualities of
blood which now distinguish them, and so lose their capacity of
self-control. They may become degenerated, like the Romans, by the
enervating influence of luxury, and like that nation lose their
constitutional liberty. So on the other hand, Germany may, in the
progress of time, undergo changes equally great and in precisely the
opposite direction. A union of the different races of that vast kingdom
may produce a new result. A new race may arise which shall excel the
present race of Englishmen, in the capacity of self-government. The
present English race is the work of centuries, and contains the blood of
Saxons, Danes, and Normans, blended in due proportion for the production
of a certain result, and such a result as can nowhere else be witnessed.

If the theory of human liberty, which I have thus so briefly and
imperfectly suggested, is the true one, and is supported by the facts of
history, then it will furnish us with a key to unlock some of those hard
problems in human life and destiny which have so puzzled mankind, and
which have resisted all attempts at solution.

If we regard all nations as moving on in the sphere designed by
Providence, each seeking and finding its happiness in its own
way,--some less capable of self-restraint than others, some enjoying a
high degree of political liberty, and some, on the other hand, in
possession of a high degree of social freedom; their happiness dependent
not so much on the peculiar forms of their government as upon its
adaptation to their peculiar wants and capacities,--we shall be relieved
of much of that commiseration and misplaced sympathy which we have
bestowed upon others, and which was, perhaps, more needed by ourselves.
Viewed in the light I have suggested, and also in connection with the
great facts, moral and physical, of which I am about to speak more
particularly, the problem of negro slavery in the United States is not
one so difficult of solution as has been generally supposed. The recent
outbreak in Virginia brings home to us, with renewed and redoubled
force, the question, What must become of the millions of slaves in our
Southern States, could they be set free by some such movement as that of
John Brown, urged on by those who have been for many years engaged in
agitating the subject?

This is the important matter for our consideration, or rather it should
have been the matter to have been considered many years ago. This is the
problem which should have been solved by those who have been so long
dealing in such extravagant language and "glittering generalities" about
the natural rights of man. They should have informed us what is to
become of those millions, suddenly let loose from restraint and thrown
upon their own resources, no longer to be protected by the white race,
but to be met by competition, by undying prejudice, extreme social
hardship, and the "irrepressible conflict" of incompatible races.

Those of us who have attained to middle age have been taught by
experience that no portion of those millions could exist for any length
of time on the soil of Massachusetts. But for the occasional emigration
from the South, a negro would now be a sight as rare in this State as
that of a wild Indian, hardly a remnant being left of the families which
we knew in our boyhood.

From statistics gathered by the late Dr. Jesse Chickering, it appears
that the blacks die in Massachusetts in a ratio of three to one as
compared with the whites. This state of things is the result of both
moral and physical causes. The depressing influence of extreme social
hardship, which no philanthropy can alleviate, accounts in a great
measure for this unequal mortality; while physical causes operate,
perhaps, still more to the same effect. Of the latter, we may learn
something from a paper read a few years since before the Boston Society
of Natural History, by Dr. Samuel Kneeland, Jr., from which the
following is an extract:--


     "The mulatto is often triumphantly appealed to as a proof that
     hybrid races are prolific without end. Every physician who has seen
     much practice among the mulattoes knows that, in the first place,
     they are far less prolific than the blacks or whites,--the
     statistics of New York State and city confirm this fact of daily
     observation; and in the second place, when they are prolific, the
     progeny is frail, diseased, short-lived, rarely arriving at robust
     manhood or maturity. Physicians need not be told of the
     comparatively enormous amount of scrofulous and deteriorated
     constitutions found among those hybrids.

     "The Colonization Journal furnishes some statistics with regard to
     the colored population of New York city, which must prove painfully
     interesting to all reflecting people. The late census showed that,
     while other classes of our population in all parts of the country
     were increasing in an enormous ratio, the colored were decreasing.
     In the State of New York, in 1840, there were fifty thousand; in
     1850, only forty-seven thousand. In New York city, in 1840, there
     were eighteen thousand; in 1850, seventeen thousand. According to
     the New York City Inspector's report for the four months, ending
     with October, 1853:--


          1. The whites present marriages,    2,230
             The colored   "      "              26
          2. The whites    "    births,       6,780
             The colored   "      "              70
          3. The whites    "    deaths about  6,000
                (exclusive of 2,152 among 116,000 newly-arrived
                  emigrants, and others unacclimated.)
             The colored exhibit deaths,        160


     giving a ratio of deaths among acclimated whites to colored persons
     of thirty-seven to one; while the births are ninety-seven whites to
     one colored. The ratio of whites to colored, is as
     follows:--Marriages, 140 to 1; births, 97 to 1; deaths, 37 to 1.
     According to the ratio of the population, the marriages among the
     whites, during this time, are three times greater than among the
     colored; the number of births among the whites is twice as great.
     In deaths, the colored exceed the white not only according to ratio
     of population, but show one hundred and sixty-five deaths to
     seventy-six births, or seven deaths to three births,--more than two
     to one.

     "The same is true, of Boston, as far as the census returns will
     enable us to judge. In Shattuck's census of 1845, it appears that
     in that year there were one hundred and forty-six less colored
     persons in Boston than in 1840; the total number being 1842. From
     the same work, the deaths are given for a period of fifty years,
     from 1725 to 1775, showing the mortality among the blacks to have
     been twice that among the whites. Of late years, Boston, probably,
     does not differ from itself in former times, nor from New York at
     present. In the compendium of the United States census for 1850, p.
     64, it is said that the 'declining ratio of the increase of the
     free colored in every section is notable. In New England, the
     increase is now almost nothing;' in the south-west and the Southern
     states, the increase is much reduced; it is only in the north-west
     that there is any increase, 'indicating a large emigration to that
     quarter.' What must become of the black population at this rate in
     a few years? What are the causes of this decay? They do not
     disregard the laws of social and physical well-being any more than,
     if they do as much as, the whites. It seems to me one of the
     necessary consequences of attempts to mix races; the hybrids cease
     to be prolific; the race must die out as mulatto; it must either
     keep black unmixed, or become extinct. Nobody doubts that a mixed
     offspring may be produced by intermarriage of different races,--the
     Griquas, the Papuas, the Cafuses of Brazil, so elaborately
     enumerated by Prichard, sufficiently prove this. The question is,
     whether they would be perpetuated if strictly confined to
     intermarriage among themselves? From the facts in the case of
     mulattoes, we say unquestionably not. The same is true, as far as
     has been observed, of the mixture of the white and red races, in
     Mexico, Central and South America. The well-known infrequency of
     mixed offspring between the European and Australian races, led the
     Colonial government to official inquiries, and to the result, that,
     in thirty-one districts, numbering fifteen thousand inhabitants,
     the half-breeds did not exceed two hundred, though the connection
     of the two races was very intimate.

     "If any one wishes to be convinced of the inferiority and tendency
     to disease in the mulatto race, even with the assistance of the
     pure blood of the black and white race, he need only witness what I
     did recently, viz.: the disembarkation from a steamboat of a
     colored pic-nic party, of both sexes, of all ages, from the infant
     in arms to the aged, and of all hues, from the darkest black to a
     color approaching white. There was no _old mulatto_, though there
     were several _old negroes_; many fine-looking mulattoes of both
     sexes, evidently the first offspring from the pure races; then came
     the youths and children, and here could be read the sad truth at a
     glance. The little blacks were agile and healthy-looking; the
     little mulattoes, youths and young women, farther removed from the
     pure stocks, were sickly, feeble, thin, with frightful scars and
     skin diseases, and _scrofula_ stamped on every feature and every
     visible part of the body. Here was hybridity of human races, under
     the most favorable circumstances of worldly condition and social
     position."


Such are the results of an unfavorable climate and the mixture of the
blood of two races that can never intermarry. The union of such races
produces the results described by Dr. Kneeland. Similar results are
observed when the two races differ less and where marriage is possible,
as for instance in Mexico and Central America, which are in ruins from
the union of the Spanish and native blood. Union of different races is,
on the other hand, often highly beneficial, our own blood being a
fortunate result of such a union, but such races must be similar and not
like those of Europe, Africa, and the natives of this country, wholly
dissimilar or repugnant. At the South, the free black would suffer less
from the effects of climate; but much more from the extreme prejudice
existing there towards the black, when he assumes the position of an
equal. To suppose he could exist under such a state of things is to
ignore all experience, and the observation of every day. In Jamaica, the
English Government have troops to protect the freed slaves from the
encroachments of their old masters; but there it is stated, on the
authority of the London Times, that the blacks are not only falling
below the point of civilization attained during their servitude, but in
many cases actually returning to their native barbarism, and the worship
of idols. We have no such standing army here, but the slave, when free,
must be left to the tender mercies of his former master. What would be
the fate of the slave is as certain as is the fate of the North American
Indian, the difference being that the Indian flies from civilization,
which destroys him, while the imitative and mild-tempered African
cling-to civilization which as certainly destroys _him_. How far he may
rise in the scale of civilization if left to himself, whether the
African is a self-sustaining and progressive race, or whether it will
lose, when left to itself, what has been gained, and fall back in a
state of barbarism, are questions not settled as yet by experiment. The
attempt is making in Liberia, and it is to be hoped successfully, to
solve this question in favor of the negro; but sufficient time has not
yet elapsed, nor is the testimony which comes from the West Indies by
any means such as could be wished.

From some of our Western States the colored man has been entirely
excluded. This is a wise provision, and a merciful one, to the blacks,
who come into the free States only to drag out a few years in some
menial employment, and then disappear with their families, if they have
any, leaving no trace behind. If history and experience teach us
anything, it is this, that two races constituted like the Anglo-Saxon
and the African, can never co-exist in a state of equality, which means
competition. So long as the inferior race is in a dependent condition,
and can claim support and protection from the white, it remains, with
rare exceptions, contented and happy, the great burden of such a
relation falling, in fact, upon the master, and not upon the slave. The
moment that relation is changed, the negro thrown upon his own
resources, and exposed to the withering and blasting effects of that
ineradicable antipathy which exists towards all of African descent, that
moment his fate is sealed; he perishes like the autumn leaves when comes
a killing frost, and, in course of a very few generations, not a vestige
remains to show that he has ever existed.

This is a truth which experience and observation have taught us, and
which could not have been taught in the same manner to Mr. Jefferson,
and other founders of our government, whose opinions are quoted in favor
of the abolition of slavery. That slavery was an evil, they knew, and we
know it also, but that the evil is mainly to the white, and that the
black could never co-exist with his master in a state of freedom, they
did not know, because the experiment had not been tried. Sufficient time
has now elapsed to settle that question, and in a manner which would
seem to leave but small chance for doubt to a rational mind.

Such, I suppose, to be the immutable law of Providence, regulating the
intercourse of those races which he has made, and given to one a white
skin, and to the other a dark one. The Creator of all things could,
doubtless, have made all white, or all black, but, for some purpose
which we cannot fathom, he has chosen not to do so. He has created some
races near akin to each other, and some entirely incompatible and
repugnant, and it is not for us to say that he has done wrong. If
possible, we should ascertain what are the laws, physical and moral,
which _he has established_, and then we shall do well to acquiesce in
them as being right, without attempting to repeal or improve upon them,
or to set up in opposition our own notions about what we call _abstract
right_. Right is not an abstraction, but a reality, and, to find out
what it is, we have to consult our experience, observation, revelation,
expediency, divine laws and human laws, and every source from which we
can gather the means of directing our limited capacities to the
formation of just conclusions.[1]

Some may say, perhaps, better let them perish then, than remain in
slavery. As the slaves do not say so themselves, I do not, for one, feel
warranted in saying it for them. They may, in the designs of Providence,
have an important mission to perform,--that mission being, for aught we
know, to carry back from their long sojourn in a land of bondage the
seeds of civilization to benighted Africa, the home of their fathers.
Whatever may be their ultimate fate, I do not feel warranted in
hastening and deciding it by exterminating them, or, in other words,
dissolving the tie that binds them to those whose duty and interest it
is to protect them. A heavy burden lies upon the backs of the masters,
which they cannot throw off at will, and with which we are not burdened.
They have a sad and perplexing duty to perform, and why should we, by
our interference, increase those burdens which we can do nothing to
lighten? All such interference is a positive injury to the slave, and
insulting to those with whom we have formed a copartnership, and with
whom we must live as one family, so long as we continue to be a free
people.

One who has a true respect for the colored man and a just regard for his
interests, will not, I think, wish to see him placed in a false
position, such as he occupies in the free States, hanging for a short
time upon the skirts of a community which disowns him, and then sinking
into the grave leaving no trace behind. For the negro there is,
socially, no hope in the free States, and those who flatter him with
such a prospect do him a most grievous wrong. A few of partly African
descent and possessed of considerable intellectual endowments have been
thus deceived, as they will no doubt have occasion to realize most
fully.

As lovers of their race how can they wish to see it occupy its present
position in the free States? If they would improve its condition, why
not lead out a colony to its native land, where it can live and not die,
where it can be relieved from the destroying influence of the
Anglo-Saxon, and stand up on its own ground, conscious of no superior,
feeling its own dignity, and with ample opportunity for the development
of all the faculties with which it has been endowed. Such a work would
be worthy of the best intellect and the highest powers that have been
bestowed on either black or white; but those of the colored race who are
content with delivering anti-slavery lectures, or writing for
anti-slavery papers, so far from elevating their race are engaged in a
work which can end only in ruin, to the blacks certainly, in the loss of
life and entire extinction, and to the whites in the loss it may be of a
Union which no art can restore to its original beauty and perfection
when once destroyed. As the true friend of the negro, I would not
flatter him with delusive hopes and false expectations that can never be
realized as has been too often and constantly done by very excellent
men, and with the very best intentions; but, I would endeavor, as far as
possible, to tell him the truth, however unpalatable, in the full belief
that in the end such truth will operate for the best interest of all,
black and white, bond and free.

The diversities and repulsions of race which have been ordained, no
doubt, for some wise purpose, are intended, perhaps, only for this state
of existence. Another life may present a new order of things in which no
such distinctions exist. Men have been created to differ from each other
physically, morally, and intellectually, but still all are equal before
the Creator of all, entitled to an equal share in his bounty, and to the
enjoyments of life best suited to the genius and capacity of each. In
another world the genius and capacity of all may be alike, all finding
happiness in the society of all--and in a mutual pursuit of the same
objects, whether of knowledge or of taste, of study or of worship.

It is much to be hoped that this subject will ere long be treated in a
very different manner from what it has been for the last fifteen or
twenty years. It is simply a question of races, and all the violent and
bitter harangues that have been uttered have advanced not one step
towards ameliorating the condition of the slave, or solving the problem
of negro slavery in this country. Such harangues have only served to
stir up strife and jealousy, to set one portion of the people against
another portion, array in opposition members of the same family, and
finally, when acting upon such fiery spirits and undisciplined minds as
that of John Brown, to bring us to the brink of civil and servile war.

In offering the above suggestions, it may be proper to say, that I have
done so with entire respect for the personal character and motives of
many of those who have been prominent in promoting and bringing upon us
the present state of things. I have the best reason to know that some of
them have acted from a high sense of duty, and such no doubt is the case
with those colored men to whom I have referred. I yield to no one in my
regard and sympathy for the colored man, wherever he may be found, and
would therefore see him placed in a true position, not in a false and
impossible one.

Those who have been so long agitating this subject, however honestly,
may still have done so under a mistaken sense of duty, and the time has
now come when the subject should be viewed in every aspect and in all
its relations, so that, if possible, we can know the ground whereon we
stand. No attempt, however humble, to throw light on a subject of such
momentous importance should be discouraged, and I cannot therefore feel
that any apology is due from me for laying before the community some
considerations which may present the subject, to many, in a somewhat new
light. If it is true that the two races can never co-exist, in a state
of freedom, it is a truth of the utmost importance, and should,
therefore, be fully known and understood by all.[2] If that proposition
is not true, its fallacy can no doubt be shown, or at any rate
demonstrated by the lapse of time. In my judgment, time has, thus far,
proved and confirmed it. The reader will judge from his own experience
and observation, and the evidence here presented, how far my conclusion
is a just and reasonable one.

When we consider that the slave is supported from birth until he can
labor, and from the time when he can no longer work until he dies, and
also that at best his services are not worth more than one-third as much
as those of free labor, it is very easy to see that he is the best paid
laborer in the world, as it is certainly true that a more happy and
contented laboring population is not to be found among civilized or
uncivilized nations. With rare exceptions, the relation of master and
slave in our Southern States is a very happy one, at least to the slave.
Kindness and indulgence are the rule, while cruelty and harsh treatment
are the exception. Our Northern patience would no doubt soon be
exhausted, were we compelled to deal with and provide for a similar
class of laborers.

At the same time, the slave is subject to occasional hardships. This is
the fate of all, under whatever social system they may live. In some
form or other, all men are called on to pay for the privileges they
enjoy, nor could it be expected that the slave would be an exception to
this general rule. If the marriage bond could be legalized and rendered
more sacred, and families not allowed to be separated by sale, many
cases of hardship would be prevented. This is a matter for the serious
consideration of the slaveholder, if he would manifest to the world a
desire to place the dependent race in the best possible condition,
consistent with its safety.

Of the possibility of such reforms, they are the best judges, however,
who have the burden upon them, and are best acquainted with the wants
and capacities of the African race. It is easy for those at a distance
to give advice, in regard to a social system, the practical working of
which they are quite ignorant of, but those who are born and bred under
such system can only know the difficulties that lie in the way of
reform, especially when those difficulties are aggravated by
interference from abroad.

Slavery may finally come to an end in the United States, by the
operation of natural causes, such as the rapid increase and constant
encroachment of free labor, and the fact that slave labor is so
expensive and tends so greatly to the impoverishing of the soil. As
Slavery dies out, the colored race will disappear from the scene
forever. It is not for us, I think, to hasten that time by revolution
and servile insurrection, to put torches and pikes into the hands of
such a population to be used against the whites, in re-enacting all the
horrors of a St. Domingo massacre, and at the same time sealing its own
fate as suddenly and as rapidly as the dew disappears before the rising
sun.

Public sentiment has undergone a marked change in England, on the
subject of Slavery, within the last few years. The Anti-Slavery
sentiment, like an epidemic, swept over the whole length and breadth of
Great Britain, and in its course swept away Slavery in the British West
Indies. The natural and inevitable re-action has already taken place in
England, and happy will it be for us if it comes in this country before
it is too late. That such a re-action is already taking place in the
United States, hastened by the foray of John Brown, there is great
reason to believe.

The following extracts from the London Times are very significant:--


     EFFECT OF EMANCIPATION ON THE AFRICAN RACE.--There is no blinking
     the truth. Years of bitter experience; years of hope deferred; of
     self-devotion unrequited; of poverty; of humiliation; of prayers
     unanswered; of sufferings derided; of insults unresented; of
     contumely patiently endured,--have convinced us of the truth. It
     must be spoken out loudly and energetically, despite the wild
     mockings of "howling cant." The freed West India slave will not
     till the soil for wages; the free son of the ex-slave is as
     obstinate as his sire. He will not cultivate lands which he has not
     bought for his own. Yams, mangoes, and plantains--these satisfy his
     wants; he cares not for yours. Cotton, sugar and coffee, and
     tobacco--he cares but little for them. And what matters it to him
     that the Englishman has sunk his thousands and tens of thousands on
     mills, machinery and plants, which now totter on the languishing
     estate that for years has only returned beggary and debt. He eats
     his yams, and sniggers at "Buckra."

     We know not why this should be, but it is so. The negro has been
     bought with a price--the price of English taxation and English
     toil. He has been redeemed from bondage by the sweat and travail of
     some millions of hard-working Englishmen. Twenty millions of pounds
     sterling--one hundred millions of dollars--have been distilled from
     the brains and muscles of the free English laborer, of every
     degree, to fashion the West Indian negro into a "free and
     independent laborer." "Free and independent" enough he has become,
     God knows; but laborer he is not; and, so far as we can see, never
     will be. He will sing hymns and quote texts; but honest, steady
     industry he not only detests but despises. We wish to Heaven that
     some people in England--neither Government people nor parsons nor
     clergymen, but some just-minded, honest-hearted and clear-sighted
     men--would go out to some of the islands (say Jamaica, Dominica, or
     Antigua)--not for a month or three months, but for a year--would
     watch the precious _protege_ of English philanthropy, the freed
     negro, in his daily habits; would watch him as he lazily plants his
     little squatting; would see him as he proudly rejects agricultural
     or domestic services, or accepts it only at wages ludicrously
     disproportionate to the value of his work. We wish, too, they would
     watch him while, with a hide thicker than that of a hippopotamus,
     and a body to which fervid heat is a comfort rather than an
     annoyance, he droningly lounges over the prescribed task on which
     the intrepid Englishman, uninured to the burning sun, consumes his
     impatient energy, and too often sacrifices his life. We wish they
     would go out and view the negro in all the blazonry of his
     idleness, his pride, his ingratitude, contemptuously sneering at
     the industry of that race which made him free, and then come home
     and teach the memorable lesson of their experience to the fanatics
     who have perverted him into what he is.

          *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *

     The Abolitionists in America would have the population of the
     Southern States turned into a mixed race, whites, blacks, and
     mulattoes being on terms of equality, and constantly intermarrying;
     but if one thing more than another has tended to give to the
     Anglo-Saxon race in the New World the victory over the Spanish, it
     is that it has kept itself apart from the red and negro races, and
     lodged power constantly in the hands of men of European origin. It
     has been fully proved, not only on the American continent, but in
     our own colonies, that the enforced equality of European and
     African tends, not to the elevation of the black, but the
     degradation of the white man. We cannot find any sympathy for
     those who would try, in the United States, the plan of a half-caste
     Republic, and we trust that the Federal Government and the
     right-thinking part of the community will protect the South from
     the repetition of such outrages as that at Harper's Ferry.


Our own race is boastful as well as intolerant and aggressive. This is
especially true of the New England type, and hence it is that we are
prone to regard ourselves in many, if not all respects, superior to the
people of the South. In some respects, undoubtedly, we have the
advantage of those who have been born and educated under a very
different social system; but, on the other hand, according to the law of
compensation, we lack much that is valuable in the Southern character
and mental constitution.

The nature of our climate and more especially of our institutions, has
given to our English blood a new and most powerful stimulus, so that we
develope an immense amount of intellectual energy and activity, which
constantly seeks vent, and which constantly tends to run into some
extreme or excess. Having lived for many years in a state of great
material prosperity, we are prone to wax fat and kick. We have known no
real evils, no invasion from without, or civil war within, and for want
of any real danger we conjure up those that are imaginary. We torment
ourselves with evils which have no existence but in our own brain. I
think it was Judge Marshall who speaks of those imaginary evils, which
as they are without cause, are also without remedy.

The Southern mind is less active and more conservative, sometimes
erratic, but generally disposed to take a common sense and rational view
of things, and is, in some respects, more reliable than our own. It
forms an admirable check in our political system, and preserves us from
a natural tendency to run into the extreme of radicalism, and that
spirit of agrarianism which has destroyed all former Republics.

The constant tendency in a Republic is to remove all constitutional
checks intended for the security of individual rights, and reduce
everything to the rule of the majority. It is obvious that the Senate of
the United States and the Supreme Court, though intended as checks upon
popular impulse and outbreaks, are yet but very imperfect barriers when
opposed to what is termed the will of the people. It requires but a few
years to change the political character of the Senate so that it shall
reflect the prevailing sentiments of the day, and the same is true of
the Supreme Court. In some of our States the judges are already elected
from year to year, and must become to a greater or less extent
political partizans. When these checks are removed and the rights of
the individual are dependant on the bare will of the majority, then we
have a pure democracy, which is pure despotism, and a despotism so
dreadful that it soon gives way to despotism of a milder form in the
person of a military Dictator. We have no landed aristocracy which, in
England, stands between the people and the throne, keeping each from
encroaching upon the other, nor any real check in our system of
government, unless it is the fixed fact of a large number of States,
whose population is naturally and necessarily conservative, and which
stands like a rock against the surging waves of popular excitement of
agrarianism and radicalism from whatever quarter they may come. The
assertion that Slavery was the corner-stone of American liberty, made
some years ago by a statesman from South Carolina, was looked upon with
amazement as a most absurd paradox, but time may show that it contained
a truth which we have as yet failed to see and comprehend.

The Southern character is more impulsive, but also more open and genial
than our own. If it shows a hasty spark, it is also soon cold and
rational again. It is not brooding and intolerant, nor easily led away
into excesses, such as too often befall us of a more Northern clime. One
prominent cause for such difference is, no doubt, to be found in the
fact that, while we, at the North, live in towns and cities where men
are in a constant state of action and reaction upon each other, and the
masses can be suddenly and extensively roused and excited, the Southern
Planters live remote from each other, and, in many cases, in almost
entire seclusion. Such a population is less in danger from these moral
epidemics that from time to time sweep over communities, because it is
sparse, and therefore not so much exposed to exciting causes; thus,
while it loses many good influences which flow from a more compact
society, escaping also many serious evils to which the latter is
subject. It is not France, but Paris, the great centre of population,
the seat of all that is luxurious and refined, of science and of art, of
everything in short which can serve to adorn and embellish social life;
it is this Paris alone that makes and unmakes kings and emperors, that
overthrows one dynasty during the night and sets up another the next
morning, and then gives the law to the nation which stands looking on.
Some editor or some orator touches that sympathetic telegraphic chord
which passes through each individual of this vast living mass, and in an
instant, as it were, the gutters run with blood, a ferocious mob rushes
through every avenue, seeking vengeance for wrongs, which, if they have
no existence, in fact, exist not the less really in the excited and
inflamed imagination. Then comes a satiety of blood, then a re-action,
and then a state of things too often far worse than the first. Our own
city of New York is considered by many to have become incapable of
intelligent self-government, and to exhibit those evils which,
especially under a government like our own, flow from the collection of
a very large population at one point. A sparse and widely scattered
population, which is also by necessity highly consecutive, may supply
the very check we most need and which is not to be found in paper
constitutions, courts or senates.

In the gradual progress of time, free labor will doubtless overrun the
more Northern Slave States, bringing fertility to the soil, and
improving in many respects the condition of the white race, though
fraught with ruin to all of African descent. My sympathies are with the
latter as well as the former, and I cannot wish to see our swelling,
aggressive, Northern Anglo-Saxon tide, overflowing the Southern States,
sweeping away perhaps the most conservative and useful element in our
republican system, and at the same time utterly destroying in its course
that helpless race which, in the providence of God, has been cast upon
our shores. There is room enough for us all to live together in peace
and harmony. The two races can co-exist in their present relative
condition, but in no other way. This is the great lesson of history,
experience, statistics, and the observation of every day.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Our English common law is said to be the perfection of human wisdom.
It is founded in right, and its object is to ascertain and establish the
right. The sources from which it is drawn have been thus enumerated.
"The law of nature; the revealed law of God; Christianity, morality, and
religion; common sense, legal reason, justice, natural equity,
humanity."

[2] Since the above was written, I find that the same theory is advanced
by Mr. Buckle, in his History of Civilization, a very obvious theory, it
would seem, and the result of the most common observation, viz: that
where two distinct races come together there can be no amalgamation, but
the inferior must die out in presence of the superior.