Produced by Charlene Taylor, Chuck Greif and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)








[Illustration: PORTRAITS PAINTED IN WAX, FROM ROMAN MUMMIES, HAWARA.

_See page 97._]




                          TEN YEARS’ DIGGING
                               IN EGYPT

                               1881-1891

                                  BY

                         W. M. FLINDERS PETRIE

        AUTHOR OF ‘PYRAMIDS OF GIZEH,’ ‘HAWARA,’ ‘MEDUM,’ ETC.

                              WITH A MAP

               AND ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTEEN ILLUSTRATIONS

                       _SECOND EDITION, REVISED_

                      THE RELIGIOUS TRACT SOCIETY

             56 PATERNOSTER ROW, 65 ST. PAUL’S CHURCHYARD
                          AND 164 PICCADILLY

                                 1893


‘IN STUDYING HISTORY, IT MUST BE BORNE IN MIND THAT A KNOWLEDGE IS
NECESSARY OF THE STATE OF MANNERS, CUSTOMS, WEALTH, ARTS, AND SCIENCE AT
THE DIFFERENT PERIODS TREATED OF. THE TEXT OF CIVIL HISTORY REQUIRES A
CONTEXT OF THIS KNOWLEDGE IN THE MIND OF THE READER.’

_Sir Arthur Helps on History._




PREFACE


Although the discoveries which are related in this volume have been
already published, yet there is to be considered the large number of
readers who feed in the intermediate regions between the arid highlands
and mountain ascents of scientific memoirs, and the lush--not to say
rank--marsh-meadows of the novel and literature of amusement.

Those, then, who wish to grasp the substance of the results, without the
precision of the details, are the public for whom this is written; and I
trust that, out of consideration for their feelings, hardly a single
measurement or rigid statement can be found here from cover to cover.
Any one who wants detail can find it in the various annual volumes which
have already appeared. Several of the finest objects found appear here,
however, for the first time in illustration; for having been kept in
Egypt I only had photographs to work from, which were, as yet, unused.

The work described here is not by any means all that has occupied my
time in these years; much exploring has also been done, and dozens of
ancient towns have been visited, and their remains examined; but such
work is rather a basis for further results than a source of interest in
itself to the public. Besides this I have been occupied in Palestine.

I may as well remark that the first two years’ work were done entirely
as a private matter; though the Royal Society afterwards made a grant to
cover the greater part of the cost of its publication. The three
following years’ work was carried on for the Egypt Exploration Fund; but
as the management of that society was not what I had expected, I
preferred to withdraw, without personal unpleasantness; in fact, some
promoters of it have been more my friends since then than they were
before. For a year I rather explored than excavated, having indeed no
prospect of funds at my disposal for the purpose. But to my surprise,
two supporters of the subject appeared independently, Mr. Jesse Haworth,
and then Mr. Martyn Kennard; all expenses of excavation and transport in
the last four years’ work, have been at their charge; and the objects
found, and not kept for the Egyptian Museum, or retained for private
friends, have been presented by them to various public collections. Thus
three years have been private work, three years with the Fund, and four
years with other friends.

One of the pleasantest results of my work has been the number of
co-operators who have appeared, and the friendships that have resulted.
In fact an informal body of workers have come together, all attracted
by a real love of work, and not by publicity or the buttering and
log-rolling of societies. Without any parade of empty names, or
speechifying, we each know where to turn for co-operation, and how to
join hands to help in the work.

To many the interest of these researches will be the solidity and
reality which they give to what we only knew as yet on paper. When we
read of ‘Pharaoh’s house in Tahpanhes,’ and then see Defenneh explaining
the narrative,--when Ezekiel wrote of Javan being ‘merchants,’ and
‘going to and fro, occupied in the fairs’ of Tyre, and we see the
widespread trade of the Ionians as early as Gurob,--when we read in
Homer of the prehistoric civilization, and see the actual products of
those races brought to light,--we feel how real was the life of which
the outlines have come down to us across the ages.

I hope that among my readers there may be some who are not of the
superficial class, for whom the tender-foot directions of guide-books
are written, and the luxuries of hotels are provided as attractions; so
I have given some hints as to how a traveller may go about in Egypt
without the usual routine of coddling, and being led by the nose by a
dragoman. If the active tripper is thereby induced to take an active
trip in Egypt, and--contrary to the custom of most tourists--subordinate
the stomach to the intellect, I shall be very glad to make his
acquaintance there.




CONTENTS


      PAGE

CHAPTER I. THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZEH                                      11

II. TANIS                                                             29

III. NAUKRATIS                                                        36

IV. DAPHNAE--TAHPANHES                                                50

V. NEBESHEH                                                           64

VI. UP THE NILE                                                       71

VII. HAWARA                                                           81

VIII. ILLAHUN AND KAHUN                                              107

IX. GUROB                                                            128

X. MEDUM                                                             138

XI. FRESH LIGHT ON THE PAST                                          148

XII. THE ART OF EXCAVATING                                           156

XIII. THE FELLAH                                                     167

XIV. THE ACTIVE TRIPPER IN EGYPT                                     187

ADDENDA TO BAEDECKER’S VOCABULARY                                    196

INDEX                                                                197




LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS


                                                                    PAGE

_Frontispiece._--Portraits painted in wax, from Roman Mummies, Hawara.

_Map._--Position of Places in Egypt named in this Volume              10

1. The Pyramids of Gizeh                                              11

2. My Tomb at Gizeh                                                   12

3. Triangulation of Pyramids, Gizeh                                   15

4. Granite Casing Third Pyramid                                       17

5. Temple of Third Pyramid                                            18

6. Casing beneath Rubbish North of Pyramid. Arab Hole above it        20

7. Mace-head of Khafra                                                23

8. Pyramid Doors                                                      24

9. Pivot Hole of Door and Cutting of Roof; South Pyramid Dahshur      24

10. Sawn Basalt                                                       26

11. Tubular Drill Hole                                                26

12. Granite Drill Core                                                26

13. Graving in Diorite                                                27

14. Section of Bowl turned with Radius Tool                           27

15. Plummet of Khufu                                                  28

16. Gizeh Pyramids from the Desert                                    28

17. Temple of Tanis from East End; Pylon in distance                  29

18. Stele of Ptolemy II                                               31

19. Gold Ring                                                         33

20. Bakakhuiu                                                         34

21. Hieroglyphics, with Hieratic Form and Explanation                 35

22. Ruins of Fort, with Arab Cemetery                                 36

23. Cypriote Soldier                                                  37

24. Dedication of Statue to Heliodoros, by the Naukratites            38

25. Necking of Column, Apollo Temple                                  40

26. Oldest Ionic Dedication, 660? B.C                                 41

27. Naukratite Cup                                                    41

28. Examples of Dedications (transliterated) to Apollo, Aphrodite, Hera,
and the Dioskouroi                                                    42

29. Foundation Deposit Models                                         43

30. Dedication of Palaistra                                           44

31. Scarab Mould and Scarab                                           45

32. Coin of Naukratis                                                 45

33. Iron Tools                                                        46

34. Negro on Naukratite Vase                                          48

35. Naukratite Design                                                 48

36. Part of Embossed Gold Band. About 70 A.D                          49

37. Ruins of Daphnae, in the Desert                                   50

38. Restoration of the Fort, showing the Large Platform before the
Entry                                                                 52

39. Foundation Deposit                                                53

40. Greek Vase, imitated from form of Egyptian Metal Vase             55

41. Vase with different Patterns                                      56

42. Great Vase; Subjects, Boreas and Typhon                           57

43. Iron Tools                                                        58

44. Gold Handle                                                       59

45. Sealed Jar Neck, with name of Amasis                              60

46. Daphniote Gold Work                                               62

47. Silver Shrine, and Gold Figure of Ra                              63

48. Granite Shrine of Temple                                          64

49. Foundation Deposit                                                66

50. Sanctuary and Temples                                             67

51. Lykaonian Spearheads and Vases                                    68

52. Ushabti Figures, Twentieth Dynasty                                70

53. A Nile Morning                                                    71

54. Tablets of Kings, Fifth to Twelfth Dynasties                      73

55. An Inscribed Rock at Silsileh                                     74

56. Tablet of Antef and Mentuhotep III                                74

57. Animal Figures at Silsileh                                        75

58. Oldest Tool in Egypt                                              76

59. People of Pun, S. Arabia                                          76

60. Hanebu, Early Greek                                               77

61. Entrance of South Pyramid. Casing destroyed below it              78

62. North Pyramid, and Southern in Distance                           79

63. Way-marks on Fayum Road                                           80

64. Pyramid of Hawara                                                 81

65. Flint Knife                                                       82

66. Pedestals of Biahmu                                               83

67. Wall of Court                                                     83

68. Section of Court, with Statue                                     84

69. Plan of Pyramid                                                   87

70. Inscription of Amenemhat III                                      89

71. Altar of Neferu-ptah                                              89

72. Vulture and Cow, from Coffin Lid                                  95

73. Four Stages of Mummy Decoration                                   98

74. Cut-glass Vase                                                   101

75. Side of Ivory Casket                                             102

76. Sedan Chair, Terra Cotta                                         102

77. Roman Rag Dolls                                                  103

78. Building North of Birket Kerun                                   105

79. Interior of Building                                             105

80. Toy Bird on Wheels, Hawara                                       106

81. Pyramid of Illahun                                               107

82. Foundation Deposit                                               112

83. North side of Kahun, showing Line of Town Wall                   113

84. Steps to Upper Buildings on Hill                                 114

85. Basket with Tools                                                115

86. Castanets and Figure of Dancer                                   116

87. Ivory Baboon                                                     117

88. Flint Tools                                                      118

89. Plasterers’ Floats, and Brick-mould                              118

90. Agricultural Tools of Wood                                       119

91. Fire Apparatus                                                   119

92. Set of Tools, Vases, and Mirror                                  120

93. Clay Toys, Twelfth Dynasty                                       121

94. Objects from Maket Tomb                                          123

95. Flint Hippopotamus, Twelfth Dynasty                              127

96. Bronze Pans, Nineteenth Dynasty                                  128

97. Bronze Interlocking Hinges                                       129

98. Bronze Tools                                                     129

99. Coffin Head of Anen the Tursha Official                          130

100. Wooden Statuettes of a Priestess, and the Lady Res              131

101. Hittite Harper                                                  132

102. Phoenician Venus Mirror                                         132

103. Aegean Vases                                                    133

104. Blue and Yellow Glass Bottle                                    133

105. Blue-glazed Vases                                               134

106. Blue-glazed Bowls                                               135

107. Ivory Duck Box                                                  137

108. Pyramid of Medum                                                138

109. Court of Temple                                                 141

110. Section of Pyramid                                              142

111. Columns of Third Dynasty                                        143

112. Forms of Rubbish-heap, and of Ruins of Building                 157

113. Houses in the Delta, with Rain-proof Domes                      168

114. Houses in Middle Egypt                                          170

115. Houses in Upper Egypt                                           172




KINGS AND DYNASTIES NAMED IN THIS VOLUME


                                                             APPROXIMATE
DYNASTY.                                                        DATE B.C.

IV. Seneferu, Khufu, Khafra, Menkaura                          4000-3800

V. Ra-kha-nefer, Unas                                          3700-3500

VI. Rameri-Pepi                                                     3400

XI. Antef-aa II, Mentuhotep IV, Antef V, Sankhkara                  2800

XII. Amenemhat I, II, Usertesen II, III, Amenemhat III         2700-2500

XIV. Nehesi-Ra                                                      2300

XVI. Apepi                                                          1900

XVIII. Tahutmes III, Amenhotep III, IV, Khuenaten              1450-1350

XIX. Ramessu II, Merenptah I                                   1250-1150

XX. Ramessu III                                                     1100

XXII. Usarkon I                                                      950

XXV. Tirhaka, Amenardus                                              700

XXVI. Psamtik (Psammetikhos) I, II; Uahabra (Apries);
Aahmes II (Amasis)                                               666-526

Ptolemaic. Ptolemy II (Philadelphos)                             286-247

Roman period                                             30 B.C.-400 A.D.

Coptic period                                          about 400-700 A.D.

Cufic period                                          about 700-1000 A.D.

Arabic period                                        1000 A.D. to present

   (The last terms are used vaguely for general indications.)

[Illustration: POSITION OF PLACES IN EGYPT NAMED IN THIS VOLUME.]

[Illustration: I. THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZEH.]




CHAPTER I.

THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZEH.

1881-2.


When, in the end of 1880, I first started for Egypt, I had long been
preparing for the expedition; during a couple of years before that
measuring instruments, theodolites, rope-ladders, and all the
_impedimenta_ for scientific work, had been prepared and tested. To
start work under circumstances so different from those of any European
country, and where many customary appliances were not to be obtained,
required necessarily much prearrangement and consideration; though on
the whole my subsequent experience has been that of decreasing the
baggage, and simplifying one’s requirements.

The first consideration on reaching Egypt was where to be housed. In
those days there was no luxurious hotel close to the pyramids; if any
one needed to live there, they must either live in a tomb or in the
Arab village. As an English engineer had left a tomb fitted with door
and shutters I was glad to get such accommodation. When I say a tomb, it
must be understood to be the upper chamber where the Egyptian fed his
ancestors with offerings, not the actual sepulchre. And I had three
rooms, which had belonged to separate tombs originally; the thin walls
of rock which the economical Egyptian left between his cuttings, had
been broken away, and so I had a doorway in the middle into my
living-room, a window on one side for my bedroom, and another window
opposite for a store-room. I resided here for a great part of two years;
and often when in draughty houses, or chilly tents, I have wished myself
back in my tomb. No place is so equable in heat and cold, as a room cut
out in solid rock; it seems as good as a fire in cold weather, and
deliciously cool in the heat.

[Illustration: 2. MY TOMB AT GIZEH.]

I lived then, as I have since in Egypt, independent of servants. The
facilities of preserved provisions, and the convenience of petroleum
stoves, enable one to do without the annoyance of having some one about
meddling with everything. I had one of the most intelligent men of the
place, Ali Gabri, to help me with the work, and his nephew and slave
used to sleep in the next tomb (on the right of the sketch) as my guards
at night. Such was my first taste of sweet independence from
civilization.

The object in view for which the work was undertaken was to decisively
test the various theories concerning the pyramids, which were then being
widely discussed on very insufficient knowledge. If all, or any, of
these theories were correct, there were some very tough questions to be
picked over between different parties; but the first question to be
settled was whether the theories agreed with the actual facts of the
case, as if they did not there was no need of further discussion. They
must pass the test of fact before they could be further considered on
the grounds of their abstract probability or metaphysical coherence. One
of the most obvious of all the facts, and most deeply concerned in the
various theories, was the actual size of the great pyramid; yet this was
not known with any accuracy, the best measurements varying by several
feet. Most of the theories involved the notion of extreme accuracy of
workmanship, yet we were entirely ignorant of the amount of accuracy in
the form of the pyramid, and in most of its internal construction.

It may not be amiss here to point out what is the meaning of accuracy.
One often hears that something is ‘quite accurate.’ If I ask a workman
if his work is accurate, he will indignantly refer to his foot-rule to
prove it; but if you were to ask if his foot-rule is accurate he would
doubt your sanity. What is accuracy for one purpose is inaccuracy for
another. Children build castles on the sand, and make them perhaps tidy
enough; but their accuracy would not do for laying out a garden; nor
would the garden bed quite do to regulate the straightness of a tennis
court. When a house is planned, still further particularity is needed
for the accuracy of its squareness and straightness; and yet the joiner
needs a better straight edge than the bricklayer. In turn the joiner’s
ideas would never suffice for the accuracy of putting together a Forth
bridge, with its lengths of furlongs of steel, needed to exactly fit
into place. And even beyond that, the telescope maker, dividing his
circles, or polishing his object glasses, must attend to quantities
which are quite beyond the accuracies of the engineer. There are as many
kinds of accuracy as there are of cleanliness, from the cleanness of a
clean-swept path, up to the absolute lifelessness and chemical purity of
some tedious preparation in the laboratory.

There is, therefore, no such thing as absolute accuracy; what is called
accuracy in each business is that amount of inaccuracy which is
insignificant. If we want to understand what kind of precision the
ancients aimed at, our errors in examining their work must be so small
as to be insignificant by the side of their errors. If they went to the
nearest hundredth of an inch, we must go to the nearest thousandth, in
order to know what their ideas of accuracy were.

The main work of the first season, therefore,

[Illustration: TRIANGULATION OF PYRAMIDS, GIZEH 1: 1500]

consisted in making a very precise triangulation all over the hill of
Gizeh; including points around all the three pyramids, and on the
temples and walls belonging to them. A fine theodolite was used, by
which single seconds of angle could be read; and the observations were
repeated so many times, that if I finished the work at a single station
in one day I was well satisfied. The result of all this mass of checked
observations, after duly reducing and computing, was that there was
scarcely a point about which one quarter inch of uncertainty remained,
and most of the points were fixed to within one-tenth of an inch. These
points were, however, only arbitrary marks put on suitable spots of the
rock; and it needed a good deal of less elaborate work to connect these
with the traces of the ancient constructions near them. The second
season I obtained permission from Prof. Maspero to search for the
ancient casing and points of construction of the pyramids. Many points
were found easily enough; but some required long and dangerous work. To
reach the casing, which still remains at the middle of each side of the
great pyramid, was a hard matter; it was heaped over with broken chips a
dozen to twenty feet deep, and they lay so loosely that they soon fell
into any hole that we dug. It was needful therefore to begin with a very
wide space, and gradually taper the hole, walling the sides roughly with
loose blocks. Thus we succeeded in finding the casing on each of the
three sides, where it was as yet unknown; the north casing having been
cleared by a huge excavation of Col. Vyse over forty years before. These
holes were very ticklish places, make them as we would; the Arabs dared
not work them, and I had to get negroes to face the business. As it was,
we could not venture to knock a bit of the stone, for fear of the
vibration loosening the sides; and I was all but buried once, when--just
as I had come out of the bottom of the hole--many tons of stones went
pouring down the pit from the loose stuff above.

At the third pyramid the difficulty was varied; there the pyramid was
encumbered with loose blocks lying on a bed of sand. So soon then as we
dug into the sand, the blocks came sliding down into our hole. But here
the matter was settled by adding more stones, and so wedging all the
blocks around into a ring; thus they balanced around the hole, and kept
each other out.

The casing of the third pyramid has never been finished.

[Illustration: 4. GRANITE CASING THIRD PYRAMID.]

The outer sides of the granite blocks were left with an excess of stone,
in order to protect them in transport from Assuan, and this was never
removed by dressing down, as had been intended. Thus in some
examples--as above--the stone sticks out far beyond where the face was
to be. In the granite temple the same method was followed, but there the
wall was dressed, and hence each stone at the corners of the chambers
turns a little way round the adjacent walls, so that the corner is cut
out of solid stone all the way up.

The temple of the third pyramid is the most complete, and gives the best
notion of the enclosures around the cell or chamber, in which the
offerings to the deceased king were presented. This view is from the
top of the pyramid, looking down into it. At the end of its causeway are
a few trees, and a hill on the right, with remains of another causeway
leading from it to the plain.

[Illustration: 5. TEMPLE OF THIRD PYRAMID.]

Of the inside of the pyramids there were already numerous measurements
recorded, which showed that small differences and errors existed in the
work; but some fresh and more accurate methods of examination were
needed. Instead then of simply measuring from wall to wall, and
remaining in ignorance of where the discrepancies lay, I always used
plumb-lines for measuring all upright faces, and a levelling instrument
for all horizontal surfaces. By hanging a plumb-line in each corner of a
room, and measuring from it to the walls at many parts of the height,
and then observing the distances of the plumb-lines on the floor, it is
easy to find the dimensions of the room at any level, and to know
exactly where the faults of construction lie. The same principle gives
us the readiest way of examining a solid, such as a sarcophagus; and we
can thus, in a few hours, do more than in as many days’ work with
elaborate apparatus. Some thread, and a piece of wax to stick it on
with, are all that is needed beside the plain measuring rods.

The results of thus attacking the subject were, that on the one hand
most brilliant workmanship was disclosed, while on the other hand it was
intermingled with some astonishing carelessness and clumsiness. The
laying out of the base of the great pyramid of Khufu is a triumph of
skill; its errors, both in length and in angles, could be covered by
placing one’s thumb on them; and to lay out a square of more than a
furlong in the side (and with rock in the midst of it, which prevented
any diagonal checks being measured) with such accuracy shows surprising
care. The work of the casing stones which remain is of the same class;
the faces are so straight and so truly square, that when the stones were
built together the film of mortar left between them is on an average not
thicker than one’s thumb nail, though the joint is a couple of yards
long; and the levelling of them over long distances has not any larger
errors. In the inside of the pyramid the same fine work is seen: the
entrance passage joints are in many cases barely visible when searched
for; in the Queen’s chamber, when the encrusting salt is scraped away,
the joints are found with cement not thicker than a sheet of paper;
while in the King’s chamber the granite courses have been dressed to a
fine equality, not varying more than a straw’s breadth in a furlong
length of blocks.

[Illustration: 6. CASING BENEATH RUBBISH NORTH OF PYRAMID. ARAB HOLE
ABOVE IT.]

Side by side with this splendid work are the strangest mistakes. After
having levelled the casing so finely, the builders made a hundred times
the error in levelling the shorter length of the King’s chamber, so that
they might have done it far better by just looking at the horizon. After
having dressed the casing joints so beautifully, they left the face of
the wall in the grand gallery rough chiselled. The design was changed,
and a rough shaft was cut from the side of the gallery, down through the
building and the rock, to the lower end of the entrance passage. The
granite in the ante-chamber is left without its final dressing. And the
kernel of the whole, the sarcophagus, has much worse work in it than in
the building, or than in other sarcophagi of the same period. The
meaning of this curious discrepancy seems to be that the original
architect, a true master of accuracy and fine methods, must have ceased
to superintend the work when it was but half done. His personal
influence gone, the training of his school was not sufficient to carry
out the remainder of the building in the first style. Thus the base and
the casing around it, the building of the Queen’s chamber, and the
preparation of the granite for the King’s chamber, must all have had the
master’s eye; but the carelessness of the pupils appears so soon as the
control was removed. Mere haste will not account for egregious mistakes,
such as that of the King’s chamber level, which the skilful architect
would have remedied by five minutes’ observation. This suggests that the
exquisite workmanship often found in the early periods, did not so much
depend on a large school or widespread ability, as on a few men far
above their fellows, whose every touch was a triumph. In this way we can
reconcile it with the crude, and often clumsy, work in building and
sculpture found in the same ages. There were no trades union rules
against ‘besting one’s mates’ in those days, any more than in any
business at present where real excellence is wanted.

The results were decidedly destructive for the theories. The fundamental
length of the base of the pyramid does not agree to any of the
theoretical needs: and though no doubt some comfort has been extracted
from hypothetical lengths of what the pyramid base would be if continued
down to levels below the pavement (such as the different sockets), yet
no such bases ever existed, nor could even be guessed at or theorised
on, so long as the pyramid base was intact, as the sockets were entirely
covered by casing and pavement. Various other theories fare as badly;
and the only important one which is well established is that the angle
of the outside was such as to make the base circuit equal to a circle
struck by the height as a radius. See also the account of Medum.

The second pyramid was built by Khafra. His name was first found with it
on the piece of a mace-head of white stone, which I found in the temple.
The form is here completed from another head of the twelfth dynasty; and
drawings of maces from Medum show the head and stick entire. In accuracy
Khafra’s work is inferior to that of Khufu. The errors of the pyramid
length are double, and of angle quadruple that found in the earlier
work, and the bulk of its masonry is far rougher. But the sarcophagus in
it is of much better work, without any mistakes, and generally showing
more experience and ability. The third pyramid, of Menkaura, is again
inferior to the second, in both its outer form and internal work. It has
moreover been most curiously altered; originally intended to be of small
size, it has been greatly enlarged, not by repeated coatings, but at
one operation. The original entrance passage was abandoned, and the
chamber was deepened, another passage cut from the inside outwards so as
to emerge lower down, and another chamber excavated below the level of
the first, and lined with granite.

[Illustration: 7. MACE-HEAD OF KHAFRA.]

Some very usual fallacies with regard to the

[Illustration: 8. PYRAMID DOORS.]

[Illustration: 9. PIVOT HOLE OF DOOR AND CUTTING OF ROOF; SOUTH PYRMAID,
DAHSHUR.]

pyramids were also disposed of. The passages are commonly supposed to
have been blocked up by plugs of stone; whereas in both the great and
second pyramids there is proof in the passages that no such blocks ever
existed. The entrances are supposed to have been concealed by the solid
masonry; whereas at Dahshur, and in Strabo’s account of the great
pyramid, it is evident that a flap-door of stone filled the passage
mouth, and allowed of its being passed. The pyramids are supposed to
have been built by continuous additions during a king’s life, and ended
only by his death; whereas there is no evidence of this in any of them,
and it is clearly disproved by the construction and arrangement of the
interiors; the plan was entire originally, and the whole structure begun
at once. The sarcophagi are often supposed to have been put in to the
pyramids at the king’s burial, with his body inside; whereas in the
great and second pyramids they will not pass through the passages, and
must have been built in. The casing is supposed to have been all built
in the rough, and cut to its slope afterwards; whereas the remaining
blocks at the base slightly differ in angle side by side, proving that
they were dressed before building in.

Besides examining the pyramids, the remains of the temple of the great
pyramid were cleared, and the granite temple of Khafra was thoroughly
measured and planned. But perhaps the most interesting part of the
subject was tracing how the work was done. The great barracks of the
workmen were found, behind the second pyramid, capable of housing four
thousand men; and such was probably the size of the trained staff of
skilled masons employed on the pyramid building. Besides these a large
body of mere labourers were needed to move the stones; and this was
probably done during the inundation, when water carriage is easier, and
the people have no work. Herodotos gives the echo of this, when he says
that the relays of labourers only worked for three months at a time. It
would be quite practicable to build the great pyramid in the time, and
with the staff of labourers assigned by Herodotos.

[Illustration: 10. SAWN BASALT.]

[Illustration: 11. TUBULAR DRILL HOLE.]

[Illustration: 12. GRANITE DRILL CORE.]

Tools are needed as well as labour; and the question of what tools were
used is now settled by evidence, to which modern engineers cordially
agree. I found repeatedly that the hard stones, basalt, granite, and
diorite, were sawn; and that the saw was not a blade, or wire, used with
a hard powder, but was set with fixed cutting points, in fact, a
jewelled saw. These saws must have been as much as nine feet in length,
as the cuts run lengthwise on the sarcophagi. One of

[Illustration: 13. GRAVING IN DIORITE.]

[Illustration: 14. SECTION OF BOWL TURNED WITH RADIUS TOOL.]

the most usual tools was the tubular drill, and this was also set with
fixed cutting points; I have a core from inside a drill hole, broken
away in the working, which shows the spiral grooves produced by the
cutting points as they sunk down into the material; this is of red
granite, and there has been no flinching or jumping of the tool; every
crystal, quartz, or felspar, has been cut through in the most equable
way, with a clean irresistible cut. An engineer, who knows such work
with diamond drills as well as any one, said to me, ‘I should be proud
to turn out such a finely cut core now;’ and truth to tell, modern drill
cores cannot hold a candle to the Egyptians; by the side of the ancient
work they look wretchedly scraped out and irregular. That such hard
cutting points were known and used is proved by clean cut fine
hieroglyphs on diorite, engraved without a trace of scraping; and by the
lathe work, of which I found pieces of turned bowls with the tool lines
on them, and positive proof that the surface had not been ground out.
The lathe tools were fixed as in modern times, to sweep regular arcs
from a centre; and the work is fearless and powerful, as in a flat
diorite table with foot, turned in one piece; and also surpassingly
delicate, as in a bowl of diorite, which around the body is only as
thick as stout card. The great granite sarcophagi were sawn outside, and
hollowed by cutting rows of tube drill holes, as may be seen in the
great pyramid. No doubt much hammer-dressing was also used, as in all
periods; but the fine work shows the marks of just such tools as we have
only now re-invented. We can thus understand, far more than before, how
the marvellous works of the Egyptians were executed; and further insight
only shows plainer the true skill and ability of which they were masters
in the earliest times that we can trace.

[Illustration: 15. PLUMMET OF KHUFU. 1: 2.]

[Illustration: 16. GIZEH PYRAMIDS FROM THE DESERT.]

[Illustration: 17. TEMPLE OF TANIS FROM EAST END; PYLON IN DISTANCE.]




CHAPTER II.

TANIS.

1884.


After a year in England, for the working out and publication of the
survey at the pyramids, described in the last chapter, I undertook to
excavate for the Egypt Exploration Fund. And as great things were then
expected from Tanis, and a special fund of £1000 was in course of being
raised for its clearance, the most desirable course was to ascertain
what prospects really existed there. A preliminary exploring trip was
made to several places in the Delta, in course of which I discovered
Naukratis; and as soon as the marshes had somewhat dried I went in
February to Tanis. It is an out-of-the-way place, inaccessible except by
water during some months, twenty miles from a post or station; on three
sides the marshy plains stretch away to the horizon, only a little
cultivation existing on the south. When I arrived the mounds were almost
impassable for the mud, and continual storms threatened my tent. But
gradually I built a house on the top of the mounds, and from thence
looked down over the work on one side, and over the village on the
other.

Tanis is a great ring of mounds, around the wide plain in which lie the
temple ruins. And the first day I went over it I saw that the temple
site was worked out; the limits of the ruins had been reached, and no
more statues or buildings should be hoped for, by the side of what was
already known. But such were the large expectations about the site, that
I had to prove the case, by a great amount of fruitless trenching in all
directions. The only monuments that we unearthed were far out of the
temple, in a Ptolemaic shrine; this contained a fine stele of Ptolemy II
and Arsinoe, which was entirely gilt when discovered, and two or three
other steles, the recess containing the large stele being flanked by two
sphinxes. The main stele and sphinxes are now in the British Museum.

But though digging was not productive in the temple, yet I found two
important monuments which had been exposed by Mariette’s excavators, and
yet were never noticed by himself, De Rougé, or others who studied the
remains. One was a part of an obelisk of the thirteenth dynasty, with an
inscription of a king’s son, Nehesi, perhaps the son of the king
Nehesi-Ra. The other was the upper part of the well-known stele of
Tirhaka: this I found lying face up; and on searching every block of the
same quality for the remainder of it, I turned up the lower half, which
Mariette had hidden; thus the unknown led me to the known.

[Illustration: 18. STELE OF PTOLEMY II.]

There was, however, plenty of work to do in examining thoroughly, and
planning, all the remains, which--as we have just noticed--were but
scantily attended to before. The fallen blocks of the granite pylon
needed to be turned over, as they were all cut out of older sculptures;
and to do this without tackle, I dug a trench on one side of the heap of
blocks, and then rolled them over one by one into it, so as to turn
them. In this way I examined every block, and discovered the fragments
of the enormous colossus of Ramessu II in red granite, which must have
been about 80 feet high, and have towered far above the temple roofs,
amid the forest of obelisks which adorned the city. The toe alone is as
large as a man’s body. Some large statues were also found by the road
leading up to the temple. And every block of the hundreds which strew
the ground here was examined on all sides, by mining beneath it where
needful; every fragment of inscription was copied; and finally a plan
was made, showing the place of each block, with numbers affixed
referring to the inscriptions. Thus any one can draw their own
conclusions as to the arrangement of the place, and the positions of the
monuments, better in their arm-chair than by wandering over the chaos of
dilapidation in the plain of Zoan.

Finding that no great discoveries could reward me in the temple, I tried
the outskirts of the town, but only found a very late cemetery of no
importance. I tried also sinking pits, in hopes of reaching the early
town of the Ramessides or the Hyksos; but in vain, as the accumulation
of Greek and Roman remains blocked the way, after descending even thirty
feet. Then the houses of the Roman period on the surface were examined.
One yielded a jar in the corner of the cellar, in which the lady had
hidden away a large silver chain, a necklace of fine stones, and a gold
ring.

[Illustration: 19. GOLD RING. 1: 2.]

But the burnt houses were the real prize of the season, as the owners
had fled and left most of their goods; and the reddened patches of earth
attracted us usually to a profitable site. In one house there was a
beautiful marble term, of Italian work; and the fragments of a very
curious zodiac, painted on a sheet of clear glass over a foot square,
each sign or month having an emblematic head to represent it; unhappily,
it was broken in a hundred and fifty pieces, and as I uncovered them it
was cruel to see the gold foil work which was on them peel off on to the
earth, leaving the glass bare in many parts. A yet more heartrending
sight was the pile of papyrus rolls, so rotted that they fell to pieces
with a touch, showing here and there a letter of the finest Greek
writing. The next house, also burnt, was the best of all. Here we found
the limestone statuette of the owner, Bakakhuiu, inscribed in demotic on
the base; a sensible, sturdy-looking, active man, who seems to have been
a lawyer or notary, to judge by his documents. Many household objects of
pottery and stone were found, jars, mortars, &c., and a beautiful
blue-glazed jar, perhaps the largest such known, and quite perfect. The
rich result, however, was in his waste; for in a recess under the cellar
stairs had been five baskets of

[Illustration: 20. BAKAKHUIU.]

old papyri. Though many had utterly perished by being burnt to white
ash, yet one basketful was only carbonized; and tenderly undermining the
precious black mass, I shifted it out and carried it up to my house with
fear and reverent joy. It took ten hours’ work to separate safely all
the documents, twisted, crushed, and squeezed together, and all as
brittle as only burnt papyrus is; a bend, or a jerk, and the piece was
ruined. At last, I had over a hundred and fifty documents separated;
and, each wrapped apart, and put in tin boxes, they travelled safely.
They have now all been opened, and glazed; and two of them already prove
to be of the greatest interest. One is a book of hieroglyphic signs in
columns, followed by their hieratic equivalents, and the school-name by
which they were learned: the greater part of this is preserved, and
shows us, for the first time, the system on which the hieroglyphics
were arranged and taught.

[Illustration: 21. HIEROGLYPHICS, WITH HIERATIC FORM AND EXPLANATION.]

The other is a geographical papyrus, forestalling Brugsch’s great work
on the geography and the nome divisions of Egypt; though defective in
part all through, it is of the greatest value. Most of the other papyri
are in demotic, and still await reading, while some are in Greek. Of
course, being carbonized, the whole mass is black, and it is only by
reflected light that it is possible to read anything; when the
illumination is properly arranged, the duller surface of the ink can be
seen on the brighter face of the papyrus. It is seldom such a treasure
as this basketful of knowledge is so narrowly saved from destruction; a
little more air in the burning, a little less care in the unearthing,
the separation, the packing, or the opening, and these documents would
have disappeared. Of course, under the usual system of leaving Arab
overseers to manage excavations, all such discoveries are utterly
destroyed.

[Illustration: 22. RUINS OF FORT, WITH ARAB CEMETERY.]




CHAPTER III.

NAUKRATIS.

1885.


Before beginning work in the end of 1883 I visited Gizeh; and, as usual,
many small antiquities were offered to me by the Arabs. Among such was
the upper part of an alabaster figure of a soldier, wearing a helmet and
armlets, which was plainly of archaic Greek or Cypriote work. I at once
gave the man what he asked for it (never run risks in important cases),
and then enquired where he got it. ‘From Nebireh,’ was his answer, and
that was somewhere near Damanhur. So, a month or two later, I took an
opportunity of going down to that region, and, after some mistakes and
enquiries, I at last reached the place, in course of a twenty mile walk,
and having only half-an-hour to spare before going on to the train.
There I met a sight which I had never hoped for,--almost too strange to
believe. Before me lay a long low mound of town ruins, of which all the
core had been dug out by the natives for earth, thus baring the very
lowest level of the town all over the middle of it. Wherever I walked in
this crater I trod on pieces of archaic Greek pottery; soon I laded my
pockets with scraps of vases and of statuettes, and at last tore myself
away, longing to resolve the mystery of these Greeks in Egypt. Up to
that time no Greek remains earlier than the Ptolemaic age, and
Alexander, had been found in the country, and to step back two or three
centuries, into the days of black-figured and rosette-ornamented vases,
and archaic statuettes, was quite a new departure.

[Illustration: 23. CYPRIOTE SOLDIER.]

[Illustration: 24. DEDICATION OF STATUE TO HELIODOROS, BY THE
NAUKRATITES. 1: 6.]

That season’s work was already laid out, and I was bound to go to Tanis;
but the next season I returned to this curious site, determined to
understand its history. The only place that I could find to live in
about there was an old country house of a pasha; and, while looking at
it, I noticed two blocks of dark grey stone by the side of the entrance.
Turning one of them over, I there saw the glorious heading
ΗΠΟΛΙΣΗΝΑΥΚΡΑΤΙ ...; a decree of the city of Naukratis was before me,
and the unknown town now had a name; and that a name which had been
sought for often, and far from this place, and which was one of the
objects of Egyptian research to discover and truly assign. All that day
‘Naukratis’ rang in my mind, and I sprang over the mounds with that
splendid exultation of a new discovery, long wished for and well found.
In England, some hesitated, and some doubted, but none denied it; and
after the season’s work there was no longer any question. The next year
I continued the excavations along with Mr. Ernest Gardner, and was soon
able to leave the remainder of the clearing in his hands, while I moved
on to fresh discoveries, on the east of the country.

The origin of Naukratis was evidently entirely Greek; down on the flat
surface of Nile mud, which shows the level of the country when the city
was founded, the earliest remains are Greek potsherds. The date of its
foundation was certainly before Amasis; and the discovery of the fort of
Defenneh (Tahpanhes) the next year explained the origin of this city.
When Psamtik I, in 665 B.C., had wrested the throne of Egypt from the
dodecarchy, or local princes (who had assumed authority on the fall of
the Ethiopian rule of Tirhaka), he based his power on ‘the brazen men
from the sea,’ the Karian and Ionian mercenaries. But he knew too well
the temper of his countrymen to obtrude this strength needlessly; and at
the same time he needed special defence from Libya and from Asia. He
therefore planted his Greek troops in two great garrisons, one on his
Libyan frontier at Naukratis, the other on his Asiatic frontier at
Tahpanhes; at each place founding a large square fort and a walled camp
around it.

These Greeks brought with them their national worship; and of the
temples mentioned by Herodotos, those of Apollo, Aphrodite, and Hera,
have been found, and also one to the Dioskouroi, not recorded in
history. The temple of the Milesian Apollo appears to have been the
oldest: it stood in the centre of the town, outside of the fort, and was
first built of mud-brick, plastered over, and later on--about the fifth
century--of

[Illustration: 25. NECKING OF COLUMN, APOLLO TEMPLE.]

white stone, some pieces of which I found. The site had been nearly
cleared out by the native diggers; and I only came in time to get
fragments of the temple, and to open up the great rubbish trench, where
all the temple refuse was thrown. Very precious this rubbish was to me,
layer under layer of broken vases, from the innumerable small bowls to
the great craters of noble size and design; and most precious of all
were the hundreds of dedications inscribed on the pottery, some of them
probably the oldest examples of Greek writing known, and altogether far
outnumbering all our past material for the

[Illustration: 26. OLDEST IONIC DEDICATION, 660? B.C. 2: 5.]

[Illustration: 27. NAUKRATITE CUP. 1: 3.]

archaic alphabets. The temple of Aphrodite I found the next year, and
Mr. Gardner cleared it out, and unearthed three successive buildings,
one over the other. Though, perhaps, as old as that of Apollo, its
inscriptions are not so primitive; but it has a charm from the tale of
Athenaios about the mariners from Cyprus, who had a statuette of the
goddess a span high in their boat; and how they besought it in the
storm, and were soon at peace, and their boat bespread with myrtle
boughs; wherefore they dedicated the statuette in the temple of
Aphrodite at Naukratis, and the people of the city made myrtle wreaths
for many an age after. Fine vases were found here; and great quantities
of a particular kind of cup, which was apparently made on purpose for
offering here. It is a bowl with a very tall upright brim, deeper than
the bowl itself, and covered over with a white coat, on which delicate
painting in brown is sometimes added; that these were specially made
here we know from the name of Aphrodite being painted on one before the
baking. The temple of Hera has been entirely swept away, and we only
know of its place from some pieces of dedication on bowls found by Mr.
Gardner; these lay not far from the Apollo temple, in a great enclosure,
which I planned the first season. The Dioskouroi had a small temple near
that of Apollo; of which only some brick pillars, and flakes of
brilliant red and blue stucco, were found. But several pieces of
dedicated bowls showed the nature and early age of this shrine.

[Illustration: 28. EXAMPLES OF DEDICATIONS (TRANSLITERATED) TO APOLLO,
APHRODITE, HERA, AND THE DIOSKOUROI. 2: 3.]

The greatest and most celebrated building of Naukratis was the
Panhellenion, with the central altar of the Greek community in Egypt.
This was in the large enclosure around the fort, as all are agreed; but
the depth of earth there prevented my reaching any remains of the altar.
Herodotos expressly mentions that certain Greek towns were excluded from
the

[Illustration: 29. FOUNDATION DEPOSIT MODELS. IRON: 1, HOE; 7, MORTAR
RAKE. 2, ALABASTER PEG. BRONZE: 3, KNIFE; 5, AXE; 8, ADZE; 9, TROWEL;
11, CHISEL; 12, HATCHET. GLAZED: 4, CUP; 10, LIBATION VASE; 14, BLOCK.
6, NAME OF PTOLEMY II ON LAZULI. MATERIALS: 13, MUD-BRICK; 15-23,
TURQUOISE, JASPER, LAZULI, AGATE-GOLD, SILVER, LEAD, COPPER, IRON. 1: 4]

common participation in the Panhellenion, and that hence arose the
separate temples in the town. Now as the sanctuary and the fort were in
one, it seems readily explained how the mercenaries welcomed their
kinsmen and townsfolk in the camp to join at the common altar; while
those traders who came from other cities would be left outside, and
would found their own temples. If it were so, we may conclude that
neither Miletos, Samos, nor Aegina, furnished any of the mercenaries of
Psamtik. In the time of Ptolemy Philadelphos, as the old camp and
Panhellenion no longer needed defence, the entrance was widened and
occupied with a large building; of which the foundation deposits,
consisting of models of the iron and bronze tools, of the materials, and
of the libation vases, were discovered in each corner of the bed of sand
which was laid beneath the foundations. An avenue led up to this from
the west, and marble rams, a large granite sphinx, and a base of a
figure dedicated to Zeus of Thebes (i.e. Amen, identified with Zeus),
were found here.

[Illustration: 30. DEDICATION OF PALAISTRA. 1: 6.]

To turn now to the town; probably one of the most important buildings in
the fifth century B.C. was the palaistra, dedicated to Apollo by
Kleainetos, Aristothemios, and Maiandrios, according to the beautiful
marble inscription found here. Unfortunately we do not know the site of
it, as the inscribed block had been re-used in later times, and was also
dug up before I went to the place. It was shown to me one night in a
native hut, by a glimmering lamp; I instantly copied it, for fear of any
difficulty arising, and then laid down ten francs on it, and told the
owner to take which he pleased, the stone or the money; with a little
hesitation at having the pleasure of haggling so cut short, he picked up
the unexpected price, and I walked off behind the precious block to my
house. The natives had so cleared out the earth from the heart of the
town that all the Roman, Ptolemaic, and Persian houses and remains were
gone; and the floor of the crater thus dug out consisted of the oldest

[Illustration: 31. SCARAB MOULD AND SCARAB. 1: 1.]

[Illustration: 32. COIN OF NAUKRATIS. 1: 1]

town, underlaid by a bed of ashes, which apparently showed that the
first settlement outside of the camp was a cluster of mere booths. Here
I found a scarab factory, where they had made the scarabs of white and
blue paste, so well known in Greek cemeteries in Rhodes and elsewhere.
Hundreds of earthenware moulds and many scarabs were unearthed, and this
factory is the leading point for dating the early town. The work of the
scarabs is manifestly a Greek imitation of Egyptian style; and the names
of the kings upon them show the dates to come down to the time of
Uah-ab-ra (Apries), but not a single example of Amasis was found,
proving the factory to have been extinct before his time. Probably the
great defeat of the Greek troops by Amasis was a severe blow to Greek
work for the time; although Naukratis reaped the benefit of the
annihilation of the other Greek centres (such as Defenneh), by being
tolerated and having the exclusive privilege of trade. The first
autonomous coin of Naukratis yet known was found in the town; with heads
of Naukratis and of the hero Alexander.

[Illustration: 33. IRON TOOLS. 1, SICKLE; 2, 3, CHISELS; 4, AXE; 5, 6,
CHISELS; 7, AXE; 8, FISH-HOOK; 9, ARROW-HEAD; 10, HAMMER. 1: 8.]

The old town had been so laid bare by the native diggers, that it was
possible to form a tolerable plan of the streets and houses. The street
lines were distinguished by the rubbish thrown out, mostly remains of
food, shells, and bones; while in later times, from the fifth century,
the streets were regularly mended with limestone chips and dust; and
often one may trace the section of a puddle hole filled up with chips
and levelled. Among the houses many fine pieces of vases were found, and
a small hoard of early Greek silver coins and lumps of silver. But the
most interesting matter was the history of tools, shown by the variety
of iron tools; we here meet, for the first time, what may be looked on
as practically our modern forms of chisels, &c.; and we see what a debt
we owe to European invention, when we compare these with the bronze
tools of the Egyptians which preceded them.

The cemetery has not yet been entirely found; a portion of it, mainly of
the Alexandrine age, was cleared by Mr. Gardner, on a low mound to the
north of the town, alongside of the canal; but it was not rich, and the
principal objects were the Medusa heads, moulded in terra cotta, which
were affixed to the wooden coffins. Probably the greater part of it is
beneath the modern village.

The potteries of Naukratis were famous in the time of Athenaios, and
long before that also, as we see by the great heaps of burnt earth and
potters’ waste, and by the distinctive style of much of the early
pottery. On comparing the characteristic styles of this place with those
of Defenneh, also inhabited by Greeks of the same period, it is plain
that most of the vases found were made here by a local school of
potters. And though the clay is apparently of Greek origin, yet it would
be immeasurably easier to import a ton of clay as ballast in a boat,
than to move about a thousand brittle and bulky vases.

We will now sum up the results of this discovery, in its general
connection with other antiquities. The site now found fills a gap in
Egyptian geography; and it shows us how the Greeks were posted near the
capital of that age,--Sais, but toward the Libyan frontier, where
defence was needed; moreover they dwelt on a canal, which could be used
by Greek traders at all seasons of the year, and which kept them apart
from the Egyptians on the Nile. The plan of the town shows the fort,
which became the

[Illustration: 34. NEGRO ON NAUKRATITE VASE.]

[Illustration: 35. NAUKRATITE DESIGN. 1: 4.]

Panhellenion, with a settlement extending along the bank of the canal
for half a mile below it; amidst which stood the temples of the separate
external colonies of traders, Milesian, Samian, and Aeginetan. The
dedications found on the vases have been much discussed; but, viewed in
the light of the history of the town, they are generally agreed now to
be probably the earliest Ionic writing yet known. The styles of the
vases made here are now fixed, and those found in other places which
were exported from here can be identified; similarly we now know the
source of the paste scarabs of mock-Egyptian design, often found in
Greek tombs. The history of vase-painting is assisted by the successive
periods of the layers of the Apollo remains, which extend over what was
a doubtful age; and the history of tools and of Greek manufactures has
been much extended. On almost every side this fresh view of the early
sojourn of the Greeks in Egypt has consolidated and enlarged our
knowledge; and given for the first time an actual insight into three
centuries most important in their bearing on Greek development, and for
which we were entirely dependent hitherto on literature and tradition.

[Illustration: 36. PART OF EMBOSSED GOLD BAND. ABOUT 70 A.D. 1: 2.]

[Illustration: 37. RUINS OF DAPHNAE, IN THE DESERT.]




CHAPTER IV.

DAPHNAE--TAHPANHES.

1886.


When I was exploring in the marshy desert about Tanis, I saw from the
top of a mound--Tell Ginn--a shimmering grey swell on the horizon
through the haze; and that I was told was Tell Defenneh, or rather
Def’neh, as it is called. It was generally supposed to be the Pelusiac
Daphnae of Herodotos, and the Tahpanhes of the Old Testament; but
nothing definite was known about it, and as it lies in the midst of the
desert, between the Delta and the Suez Canal, twelve miles from either,
it was not very accessible. After working at Tell Nebesheh for some
time, I left it in Mr. Griffith’s hands, and told my men that I wanted
to work at Defneh; immediately I had more volunteers than I could
employ, and I went into the desert to the work with a party of
forty,--men, boys and girls,--and formed a settlement which enlarged up
to seventy. We pitched on the old Pelusiac branch, which is now rather
brackish, and it was sometimes difficult to drink the water: the people,
however, made the best of it, and I never had a pleasanter time with my
men than the two months I lived there, independent of all the local
authorities which are generally met with. No one was allowed about the
camp except the workers, and I never had the least trouble with them,
nor heard a single squabble.

On reaching the place I found a wide flat plain bordering on the river,
strewn all over with pottery, and with a mound of mud-brick building in
the midst of it. I asked the name of the mound, and was told _Kasr Bint
el Yehudi_, ‘the palace of the Jew’s daughter.’ This at once brought
Tahpanhes to my mind. Can there be any tradition here? I thought. I
turned to Jeremiah, and there read how he came, with Johanan, the son of
Kareah, and all the officers, and the king’s daughters, down to
Tahpanhes and dwelt there. We can hardly believe that the only place in
Egypt where a celebrated daughter of a Jewish king lived, was called in
later times ‘the palace of the Jew’s daughter’ by accident, especially
as such a name is only known here. Rather has this unique name clung to
the place, as so many names have lasted, as long or longer, in Egypt and
Syria. The next question was, if any reason could be found for its
possessing a Greek name, Daphnae. Soon this was settled by finding an
abundance of Greek pottery of the archaic period; and so many Greek
remains, and so little Egyptian, that it was evident a Greek camp had
been here. This then was the camp of the Ionians described by Herodotos
as having been founded by Psametichos I on the Pelusiac branch; and on
reaching down to the foundation of the fort, I there took out the
tablets with the name of Psamtik I as the founder. But Herodotos
relates a tale about Sesostris having been attacked here by treachery,
suggesting that buildings had existed here in Ramesside times; and
beneath some work of Psamtik I found part of a wall of baked bricks,
such as were used in tombs at Tell Nebesheh, not far from this, and only
in Ramesside times. Literature and discovery therefore go hand in hand
here remarkably closely.

[Illustration: 38. RESTORATION OF THE FORT, SHOWING THE LARGE PLATFORM
BEFORE THE ENTRY.]

This place then appears to have been an old fort on the Syrian frontier
guarding the road out of Egypt; and here Psamtik settled part of his
‘brazen men from the sea,’ and built a great fortress and camp, the twin
establishment to that of the rest of the Greek mercenaries at Naukratis,
on the Libyan side. The fort was a square mass of brickwork, with deep
domed chambers or cells in it, which were opened from the top; this
sustained the actual dwellings at about forty feet above the plain, so
that a clear view of the distant

[Illustration: 39. FOUNDATION DEPOSIT. 1: 2.]

towns and the desert could be seen over the camp wall, to some ten or
twenty miles. The camp was defended by a wall forty feet thick, and
probably as high; but this is now completely swept away down to the
ground by the winds and rains. Beneath each corner of the fort was
placed a set of plaques of various materials, both metals and stones,
with the name of Psamtik, and at the south-west corner were also the
bones of a sacrifice and other ceremonial deposits. This fort was
enlarged by chambers added to it during a couple of generations later;
and it must have been over that threshold which still lies in the
doorway that the Jewish fugitives entered, when Hophra gave them an
asylum from the Assyrian scourge. We cannot doubt that Tahpanhes--the
first place on the road into Egypt--was a constant refuge for the Jews
during the series of Assyrian invasions; especially as they met here,
not the exclusive Egyptians, but a mixed foreign population, mostly
Greeks. Here then was a ready source for the introduction of Greek words
and names into Hebrew, long before the Alexandrine age; and even before
the fall of Jerusalem the Greek names of musical instruments, and other
words, may have been heard in the courts of Solomon’s temple.

Another remarkable connection with the account given by Jeremiah was
found on clearing around the fort. The entrance was in the side of a
block of building projecting from the fort; and in front of it, on the
opposite side of its roadway, similarly projecting from the fort, was a
large platform or pavement of brickwork (see fig. 38), suitable for
out-door business, such as loading goods, pitching tents, &c.,--just
what is now called a _mastaba_. Now Jeremiah writes of ‘the pavement (or
brickwork) which is at the entry of Pharaoh’s house in Tahpanhes’ (chap.
xliii. 9, R.V.); this passage, which has been an unexplained
stumbling-block to translators hitherto, is the exact description of the
_mastaba_ which I found; and this would be the most likely place for
Nebuchadrezzar to pitch his royal tent, as stated by Jeremiah.

The Greek vases found here show us an entirely new type, derived from
the form of the Egyptian metal vases, but with the pointed base replaced
by a circular foot. The painting and style of these vases are also
unknown elsewhere, and were never found at Naukratis, so that it is
certain that they were made by Daphniote potters. Several other styles
of vases are found here, but it is very remarkable to note the total
difference from the pottery of Naukratis. If the vases had been mainly
imported to these settlements in Egypt, we should certainly find the
remains much alike in two towns both occupied by Ionians at the same
period, and probably trading with the same places; whereas every style
that is most common at either of these towns is almost or entirely
unknown at the other town. Such a widespread distinction shows how
largely the pottery was made by local schools of potters, at the place
where we find it, and how little of it was carried by trade.

[Illustration: 40. GREEK VASE, IMITATED FROM FORM OF EGYPTIAN METAL
VASE.]

The decoration of some of the vases is surprising, as showing at what an
early date some patterns were used. On one vase are two bands of design,
one of the archaic square volute, and the other of the lotus or
‘palmetto’ pattern, which would otherwise have been supposed to be a
century later.

[Illustration: 41. VASE WITH DIFFERENT PATTERNS.]

The greater part of the vase fragments were found in two chambers of the
out-buildings of the fort. These rooms had been standing unused by the
Greeks, and served for rubbish holes, so that when we cleared them out
every scrape of the earth brought up some painted fragments, and the
lucky workmen who had these places filled basket after basket each day.
The finest vase of all was found alone, in a passage on the north of the
fort, and nearly every fragment

[Illustration: 42. GREAT VASE; SUBJECTS, BOREAS AND TYPHON.]

was secured, ninety-nine pieces in all; it had been very probably a
present to the Egyptian governor, or possibly to the king on some visit
there, as it had traces of an inscription in demotic written on it with
ink.

[Illustration: 43. IRON TOOLS. 1, PICK; 2, 3, KNIVES; 4, AXE; 5, 6,
CHISELS; 7, COULTER?; 8, 9, HORSES’ BITS; 10, 11, CHISELS; 12, KNIFE;
13, FISH HOOK; 14, 15, ARROW-HEADS; 16, RASP. 1: 12.]

The ground of the camp also supplied us with a large number of things;
for although it would hardly be worth while to dig over so many acres
exhaustively, yet the ground had been so much denuded that the
surface-dust was rich in small objects. I therefore had it scraped over,
and found hundreds of arrow-heads of iron and bronze, iron scale armour,
swords, &c. One curious find was turned up the last afternoon of the
work; a large lot of cut-up lumps of silver, and a massive gold handle
off a tray, with lotus ‘palmetto’ design; it had been violently wrenched
off, and the question is where would a soldier have a chance of looting
such valuable gold plate of Egyptian design? It seems not unlikely that
it was part of the royal treasure of Apries, plundered on his overthrow
by Amasis. Another unusual object was picked up by one of the workmen
on the surface (see Fig. 47, end of chapter); it appeared to be a little
silver box with a sliding lid. The lid was slightly opened, and the feet
of a gold figure showed inside it. As it could not be opened more
without breaking it, I carefully cracked out one side, and took from it
a most beautiful little statuette of Ra, hawk-headed, and then restored
the case again. It had evidently been a shrine to wear on a necklace, as
there was a loop at the back of the box.

[Illustration: 44. GOLD HANDLE.]

Although all the stone buildings had been destroyed, and lines of chips
alone remained to show the sandstone and limestone of their
construction, yet the larger part of a great stele of sandstone still
lies there, bearing a long hieroglyphic inscription. It is evident
therefore that Egyptian interests were not neglected, and that there
must have been both Egyptian and Greek living side by side, together
with Phoenician and Jew. One curious class of Egyptian remains

[Illustration: 45. SEALED JAR NECK, WITH NAME OF AMASIS.]

has given us the dates of some parts of the building; for the plaster
sealings of the wine jars bear the cartouches of the king, and they were
most likely knocked off and thrown aside within a few years of being
sealed. One room seemed to have belonged to the royal butler, for dozens
of plaster sealings of Psamtik were found together there. A jar had been
fraudulently opened by boring through the plaster, and the pottery
stopper below it, and then stopping the hole with fresh plaster. The
prudent butler had struck off the whole neck of the jar, so as to
preserve the proofs of the theft entire. The particularity of the
sealing is remarkable; first the pottery bung was tied down, and the
string sealed on clay by six inspectors; then a plaster cap was put over
all that, and marked with the royal cartouche in several places.

The ruin of all this community came suddenly. Apries trusted to the
Greek mercenaries, and defied the old Egyptian party (if indeed he was
king at all according to Egyptian law); and Amasis, who had married the
royal princess (and who was therefore a legal ruler), took the national
side, and ousted his brother-in-law. Civil war was the consequence, and
the Greeks--though straining all their power--were completely crushed by
Amasis. He then carried out the protective policy of Egypt, and
depopulated Daphnae, and all other Greek settlements excepting
Naukratis, which latter thus became the only treaty-port open to Greek
merchants. Hence, as we can date the founding of Defenneh almost to a
year, about 665 B.C., when Psamtik established his mercenary camps, so
we can also date its fall to a year in 564 B.C. when Amasis struck down
the Greek trade. And this just accords with what we find, as there is a
sudden cessation of Greek pottery at a stage someway before the
introduction of red figured ware, which took place about 490 B.C.

It appears likely that as Naukratis was the home of the scarab trade to
Greece, so Daphnae was the home of the jewellery trade, and the source
of the semi-Egyptian jewellery so often found in Greek tombs. Much
evidence of the goldsmith’s work was discovered; pieces of gold
ornaments, pieces partly wrought, globules and scraps of gold, and a
profusion of minute weights, such as would only be of use for precious
metals.

[Illustration: 46. DAPHNIOTE GOLD WORK.]

We see then that Daphnae is the complement of Naukratis: they were twin
cities, and teach us even more by their contrasts than their
resemblances. We again reach back, as at Naukratis, through the
pre-Alexandrine period to the foundation of Greek power in Egypt. We
again find the interaction of Greek and Egyptian civilization. We again
see the rise of a local school of pottery, and have the great advantage
of its being confined to just a century, of which we know the exact
limits. On the Jewish side of the history the arrangement of ‘the king’s
house in Tahpanhes’ exactly explains the narrative; the very name of the
place echoes the sojourn of the fugitive heiresses of Judah; and a
valuable light is thrown on the early contact of the Hebrew race with
the language and thought of the Greeks with whom they here dwelt.

[Illustration: 47. SILVER SHRINE, AND GOLD FIGURE OF RA.]

[Illustration: 48. GRANITE SHRINE OF TEMPLE.]




CHAPTER V.

NEBESHEH.

1886.


While living at Tanis I heard of a great stone, and a cemetery, some
miles to the south of that place, and took an opportunity of visiting
it. The site, Tell Nebesheh, is a very out-of-the-way spot; marshes and
canals cut it off from the rest of the delta; and the only path to it
from the cultivated region is across a wide wet plain, on the other side
of which is a winding bank hidden among the reeds of the bogs, and only
to be found by a native. After leaving Naukratis I went to this place,
to try to clear up its history; and Mr. Griffith finished the work here,
after I had moved on to fresh discoveries. The great stone was seen to
be a monolith shrine, and therefore probably a temple lay around it. As
I walked over the mounds, I saw that the tufts of reedy grass came to an
end along a straight line, the other side of which was bare earth. This
pointed out the line of the enclosing wall of the temple, which I soon
tracked round on all sides. In the middle of one side the mound dipped
down, and a few limestone chips lay about. Here I dug for the entrance
pylon, and before long we found the lower stones of it left in position;
on clearing it out a statue of Ramessu II, larger than life, was found,
and fragments of its fellow; also a sphinx, likewise in black granite,
which had been so often reappropriated by various kings, that the
original maker could hardly be traced. Probably of the twelfth dynasty
to begin with, it had received a long inscription around the base from
an official (the importance of which we shall see presently), and later
on six other claimants seized it in succession. Outside of the pylon
there had been an approach, of which one ornament remained; this is an
entirely fresh design, being a column without any capital, but
supporting a large hawk overshadowing the king Merenptah, who kneels
before it. The sides of the column are inscribed.

The ground all around the monolith shrine was dug over by us. Directly
beneath the shrine the granite pavement and its substructure remains
entire; but over the rest of the area only the bed of the foundation can
be traced, all the stone having been removed. Near the place of the
entrance lay the throne of a statue of Usertesen III, probably one of a
pair by the door, and showing that a temple had existed as far back as
the twelfth dynasty. The foundation deposits in the corners I had to get
out from beneath the water; they were plaques of metals and stones, with
the name of Aahmes Si-nit, and pottery, showing that the temple had been
built in the twenty-sixth dynasty. Among the ruins was found part of
the black granite statue of the goddess Uati, which had doubtless stood
in the monolith shrine as the great image of the temple.

[Illustration: 49. FOUNDATION DEPOSIT. 1: 2.]

At the back of the shrine lay a black granite altar of Usertesen III,
which, like the sphinx, had received an inscription by an official at a
later time. These added inscriptions are of value, although they have
been nearly effaced by subsequent kings; they show that in the dark
times before the eighteenth dynasty (for by their rudeness they fall in
that age), certain royal chancellors could venture to usurp the
monuments of previous kings. This could hardly have been possible if the
king of that period cared for the monuments; and we probably see in
these chancellors the native viziers of the Hyksos kings, who were also
apparently reckoned by the Egyptians as their rulers, and entered with
ephemeral reigns of a year or two in the lists of the fourteenth
dynasty. It was this vice-royalty that was conferred on Joseph, when the
royal signet was given to him, and he had the honour of the second
chariot.

But it was evident that some temple had existed here before Aahmes, as
the monuments were of earlier ages; and on looking at the plan it is
seen that his temple is not in the middle of the enclosure, nor is it in
the line of the axis, but at right angles to it. I therefore searched
for the first temple about the midst of the area, but for a long time
nothing appeared besides chips. At last a mass of sand was found with a
vertical face, and this I at once recognised as the sand bed laid in the
earth, on which the walls of the temple had been founded. It was covered
with about twelve feet of dust and chips, but by sinking pits at
intervals it was traced all round the whole extent of the former temple.
The foundation deposits were unattainable, as they were too deep beneath
the water level, and the great sand bed collects the water so readily
that it could not be kept down more than three feet by baling.

[Illustration: 50. SANCTUARY AND TEMPLES.]

[Illustration: 51. LYKAONIAN SPEARHEADS AND VASES.]

The cemetery was the other object at this place. It proved to be of
tolerable extent, about half a mile long; but the earliest tomb found
was of Ramesside age. Most of the burials were of the twenty-sixth to
the thirtieth dynasties, and the rarity of earlier interments was
explained by the condition of those which remain. The tomb chambers were
all subterranean, yet most of them were found roofless, though level
with the ground; of some, only a few bricks remained at the sides; very
few were still complete with a brick vault. In fact they were in every
stage of removal, owing to the denudation of the sand ground in which
they were placed. The inference is only too evident, that the earlier
tombs have simply been denuded wholly away, below the last brick of the
walls. Many of the chambers were excavated, but only in a few of them
were any ushabti figures found. Some of them were sumptuous buildings of
limestone; but mostly they were of the mud bricks, both in the walls and
the arched roofing. The most interesting class were those of Lykaonian
mercenaries; most likely from an outpost of the Daphnae camp, stationed
here. In those tombs there were no ushabtis; the bodies lay north and
south, instead of east and west, as in the Egyptian tombs; there were
bronze and sometimes iron spear-heads, and curious forked spear-heads,
like that on a funeral stele at Iconium; and moreover, Cypriote pottery,
generally pilgrim bottles.

While working in the cemetery we found one unrifled tomb, containing
four mummies, with their sets of amulets intact. These I carefully took
off the bodies, noting the position of every object, so that I could
afterwards rearrange them in their original order exactly as found. But
the greatest discovery here in point of size was a great tomb formed by
a brick-walled yard or enclosure sunk in the ground. Within this were
two limestone sarcophagi inscribed, and a splendid basalt sarcophagus,
highly wrought, and with a long inscription; this was encased in a huge
block of limestone for protection, and it required much work to break
this away when Count D’Hulst removed it to London. These sarcophagi were
for a family who held offices in the Egyptian town of Am; another
sarcophagus found near these also named Am, and a piece of a statuette
from the temple gave the same name. From these many different sources it
appears that Am was the name of Tell Nebesheh; especially as Uati was
the goddess of Am, and hers was the statue of the great shrine and
temple here. This gives a fresh point in the geography of ancient Egypt,
and explains what Herodotos means by the Arabian Buto, in contrast to
the other Buto (or ‘Temple of Uati’) in the western half of the delta.

[Illustration: 52. USHABTI FIGURES, TWENTIETH DYNASTY. 1: 8.]

[Illustration: 53. A NILE MORNING.]




CHAPTER VI.

UP THE NILE.

1887.


When in the end of 1886 I went to Egypt, I had no excavations in
prospect, having bid good-bye to the Fund; but I had promised to take
photographs for the British Association, and I had much wished to see
Upper Egypt in a more thorough way than during a hurried dahabiyeh trip
to Thebes in 1882. To this end my friend Mr. Griffith joined me. We
hired a small boat with a cabin at Minia, and took six weeks wandering
up to Assuan, walking most of the way in and out of the line of cliffs.
Thus we saw much that is outside of the usual course, and spent
afterwards ten days at Assuan, and three weeks at Thebes, in tents. On
coming down the Nile I walked along the eastern shore from Wasta to
Memphis, but found it a fruitless region. Lastly, I lived several weeks
at Dahshur, for surveying the pyramids there.

Assuan proved a most interesting district, teeming with early
inscriptions cut on the rocks; and to copy all of these was a long
affair. Every day we went out with rope-ladder, bucket, and
squeeze-paper, as early as we could, and returned in the dusk; so at
last some two hundred inscriptions were secured, many of which were of
importance, and quite unnoticed before. These carvings are some of them
notices of royal affairs, but mostly funereal lists of offerings for the
benefit of various deceased persons. They abound most in the eleventh,
twelfth, and thirteenth dynasties, though some of them are later; and
one records queen Amenardus, and another Psamtik II, of the twenty-sixth
dynasty. Their main interest is in the great number of personal names
which they preserve, and the relationships stated. We see that the
father is often not named at all, and the father’s family is scarcely
ever noticed; while on the mother’s side the relations extend even to
second cousins. To decipher these records is sometimes a hard matter,
when they are very rudely chipped--or rather bruised--on the rough
granite rocks; and continually we used to consult and dispute about some
sign for long enough to copy all the rest of the inscription. Some of
them are, however, beautifully engraved, and quite monumental in style.
The most striking, perhaps, is a rock on the island of Elephantine,
which had never been noticed before, although in the pathway. It was a
sort of royal album begun by Ra-kha-nefer (fifth dynasty); followed by
Unas (fifth), who carved a handsome tablet. Then Ra-meri Pepi (sixth)
appropriated Ra-kha-nefer’s inscription; Ra-nefer-ka Pepi next carved a
tablet; in later times, of the eleventh dynasty, Antef-aa II followed
with another tablet; and lastly Amenemhat I (twelfth dynasty) placed the
sixth inscription here.

[Illustration: 54. TABLETS OF KINGS, FIFTH TO TWELFTH DYNASTIES. 1: 40.]

Not only were there these granite inscriptions to be copied, but also a
great number of _graffiti_ and travellers’ names on the sandstone rocks,
principally at Gebel Silsileh. Among these was a Phoenician inscription,
one of the very few known in Egypt; and some curious quarry records of
Roman age. The main inscription of this region is, however, one very
seldom seen, even by antiquaries as it is in a valley

[Illustration: 55. AN INSCRIBED ROCK AT SILSILEH.]

[Illustration: 56. TABLET OF ANTEF AND MENTUHOTEP III.]

where no one stops. It portrays Antef V and his vizier Khati worshipping
Mentuhotep IV and his wife. Near it is another, smaller, tablet with the
worship of the same king; and up the valley we discovered a tablet with
the worship of Sankh-ka-ra, all of the eleventh dynasty. All over this
district are many rude figures of animals, marked on the rocks by
hammering: they are of various ages, some perhaps modern, but the
earlier ones certainly before the eighteenth dynasty; and, to judge by
the weathering of the rock, it seems probable that they were begun here
long before any of the monuments of Egypt that we know. The usual
figures are of men, horses, and boats, but there are also camels,
ostriches and elephants to be seen.

[Illustration: 57. ANIMAL FIGURES AT SILSILEH.]

On the desert hills behind Esneh I found what is--so far--the oldest
thing known from Egypt. In prehistoric days the Nile used to fill the
whole breadth of the valley, to a depth of a couple of hundred feet, fed
with the heavy rainfall that carved back the valleys all along the river
by great waterfalls, the precipices of which now stand stark and arid in
the bleaching sun. Many parts of the valley are above the present river,
and are now desert, so that at Esneh the hills are several miles from
the Nile, and on a spur of one--where probably no man sets foot for

[Illustration: 58. OLDEST TOOL IN EGYPT. 1:2.]

[Illustration: 59. PEOPLE OF PUN, S. ARABIA.]

centuries at a time--I found lying a palaeolithic wrought flint. It was
about a couple of hundred feet above the Nile, and being clearly a
river-worn object, it had been left there in the old time of the Great
Nile. The flints found by General Pitt-Rivers at Thebes belong to a
later age, when the Nile had fallen to almost its present level. But
those are far older than any monuments known to us. We see then two
stages before the beginning of what we can call history.

[Illustration: 60. HANEBU, EARLY GREEK.]

At Thebes my main work was in obtaining casts and photographs of all the
types of foreign races on the monuments. For making ethnographical
comparisons we were, until then, dependent on drawings, which were often
incorrect. Now we have nearly two hundred photographs, all with the
same size of head, giving several examples of each race that was
represented by the Egyptians.

[Illustration: 61. ENTRANCE OF SOUTH PYRAMID. CASING DESTROYED BELOW
IT.]

In most cases it would have been difficult to photograph the sculptures
directly, owing to the difficulties of placing the camera, and the exact
time of the day required for the oblique sunlight. Paper squeezes were
therefore taken in preference, and a box of these, weighing a few
pounds, served as moulds for producing in England a set of plaster casts
which weighed a hundred times as much. By waxing the paper several
successive casts can be made from one mould, and from a set of the casts
I took photographs, which can be printed interminably, and which are
far more clear and distinct than if they were made directly from the
stained and darkened sculptures. The paintings were of course
photographed directly; where near the outer air enough light was
obtained by reflectors of tinned plate; but in distant interiors, such
as the tombs of the kings, an explosion of the proper amount of
magnesium powder, mixed with chlorate of potash, gave excellent results
for light.

[Illustration: 62. NORTH PYRAMID, AND SOUTHERN IN DISTANCE.]

Having finished the Theban work, I then went to Dahshur, and there made
a survey around the two large pyramids; but unfortunately I could not
obtain the permission to uncover the bases of the pyramids in time to
measure more than the southern one. This pyramid is interesting, as it
retains the original casing over most of it, and gives us some idea of
what the other pyramids looked like before the plundering by Arabs, and
perhaps older thieves. The outside is peculiar, as being of a steeper
angle below than above, and hence it is often called the ‘blunted
pyramid.’ The results of the survey were that it was all designed in
even numbers of cubits. The base was 360 cubits, the height 200, divided
into 90 cubits steep, and 110 cubits of flatter slope. The space walled
in around it was 100 cubits wide. Another small pyramid on the south of
it was 100 cubits square.

While at Dahshur I also found an interesting point about the ancient
roads. The road from Sakkara to the oasis of Ammon was marked out by
banks of gravel swept up on either side, leaving a clear space 50 cubits
wide. The other road from Sakkara to the Fayum was marked out by
milestones all along, there being a larger tablet at each _schoenus_, or
4 miles, while at each 1000 cubits, or third of a mile, was a lesser
pillar on a stone socket.

[Illustration: 63. WAY-MARKS ON FAYUM ROAD.]

[Illustration: 64. PYRAMID OF HAWARA.]




CHAPTER VII.

HAWARA.

1888.


When considering the places favourable for future excavations I had
named Hawara and Illahun, amongst other sites, to M. Grébaut; and he
proposed to me that I should work in the Fayum province in general. The
exploration of the pyramids of this district was my main object, as
their arrangement, their date, and their builders were quite unknown.
Hawara was not a convenient place to work at, as the village was two
miles from the pyramid, and a canal lay between; I therefore determined
to form a camp of workmen to live on the spot, as at Daphnae. For this
purpose I needed to recruit a party from a little distance, and began my
work therefore at the ancient Arsinoe or Crocodilopolis, close to
Medinet el Fayum. Here I cleared the pylon of the temple, of which a few
disturbed blocks remain, and found a second mention of Amenemhat II
beside that already known; but his work had all been altered and
rebuilt, probably by Ramessu II. Four or five different levels of
building and reconstruction could be traced, and the depth of rubbish
over the approach to the temple in the shallowest part of the mounds was
twenty-four feet. Within the great enclosure of mud-brick wall, the site
of the temple could be traced by following the bed of sand, on which the
foundations had been laid; but scarcely a single stone was left. One
re-used block had a figure of a king of the nineteenth dynasty, probably
Ramessu II; and this leads us to date as late as Ptolemy II the temple
which we can trace here. He doubtless built a large temple, as the place
received much attention in his time, and was dedicated to his
sister-wife Arsinoe; she was specially worshipped along with the great
gods, as we know from the stele of Pithom. The only early objects found
here were flint knives in the soil of the temple; these belong to the
twelfth dynasty, as we know from later discoveries.

[Illustration: 65. FLINT KNIFE.]

A short work of a few days at Biahmu resolved the questions about the
so-called pyramids there. So soon as we began to turn over the soil we
found chips of sandstone colossi; the second day the gigantic nose of a
colossus was found, as broad as a man’s body; then pieces of carved
thrones, and a fragment

[Illustration: 66. PEDESTALS OF BIAHMU.]

[Illustration: 67. WALL OF COURT.]

of inscription of Amenemhat III. It was evident that the two great piles
of stone had been the pedestals of colossal seated monolithic statues,
carved in hard quartzite sandstone, and brilliantly polished. These
statues faced northward, and around each was a court-yard wall with
sloping outer face, and red granite gateway in the north front. The
total height of the colossi was about sixty feet from the ground. The
limestone pedestal rose twenty-one feet, then the sandstone colossus had
a base of four feet, on which the figure, seated on its throne, rose to
a height of thirty-five feet more. Thus the whole statue and part of its
pedestal would be visible above the enclosing court-yard wall, and it
would appear from a distance as if it were placed on a truncated
pyramid. The description of Herodotos, therefore, is fully accounted
for; and it shows that he actually saw the figures, though from a
distance, as any person who visited them closely would not have
described them in such a manner.

[Illustration: 68. SECTION OF COURT, WITH STATUE.]

Having by this time formed and organised a good body of workmen, I moved
over to Hawara, with as many men as I wanted; and the only difficulty
was to restrain the numbers who wished to work. The pyramid had never
been entered in modern times, and its arrangement was wholly unknown;
explorers had fruitlessly destroyed much of the brickwork on the north
side, but yet the entrance was undiscovered. In Roman times the stone
casing had been removed, and as the body of the structure was of mud
bricks, it had crumbled away somewhat; each side was therefore
encumbered with chips and mud. After vainly searching the ground on the
north side for any entrance, I then cleared the middle of the east side,
but yet no trace of any door could be found. As it was evident then that
the plan was entirely different to that of any known pyramid, and it
would be a hopeless task to clear all the ground around it, I therefore
settled to tunnel to the midst. This work was very troublesome, as the
large bricks were laid in sand, and rather widely spaced; hence as soon
as any were removed, the sand was liable to pour out of the joints, and
to loosen all the surrounding parts. The removal of each brick was
therefore done as quietly as possible, and I had to go in three times a
day and insert more roofing boards, a matter which needed far more skill
and care than a native workman would use. After many weeks’ work (for
there was only room for one man), I found that we were halfway through,
but all in brick. On one side of the tunnel, however, I saw signs of a
built wall, and guessing that it had stood around the pit made for the
chamber during the building, I examined the rock-floor, and found that
it sloped down slightly, away from the wall. We turned then to the west,
and tunnelling onwards, we reached the great roofing beams of the
chamber in a few days. No masons of the district, however, could cut
through them, and I had to leave the work till the next season. Then,
after a further search on all the four sides for the entrance, the
masons attacked the sloping stone roof, and in two or three weeks’ time
a hole beneath them was reported; anxiously I watched them enlarge it
until I could squeeze through, and then I entered the chamber above the
sepulchre; at one side I saw a lower hole, and going down I found a
broken way into the sandstone sepulchre, but too narrow for my
shoulders. After sounding the water inside it, a boy was put down with a
rope-ladder; and at last, on looking through the hole, I could see by
the light of his candle the two sarcophagi, standing rifled and empty.
In a day or two we cleared away the rubbish from the original entrance
passage to the chamber, and so went out into the passages, which turned
and wandered up and down. These were so nearly choked with mud, that in
many parts the only way along them was by lying flat, and sliding along
the mud, pushed by fingers and toes. In this way, sliding, crawling, and
wading, I reached as near to the outer mouth of the passage as possible;
and then by measuring back to the chamber, the position of the mouth on
the outside of the pyramid was pretty nearly found. But so deep was it
under the rubbish, and so much encumbered with large blocks of stone,
that it took about a fortnight to reach it from the outside.

The pyramid had been elaborately arranged so as to deceive and weary the
spoiler, and it had apparently occupied a great amount of labour to
force an entrance. The mouth was on the ground level, on the south
side,

[Illustration: 69. PLAN OF PYRAMID.]

a quarter of the length from the south-west corner. The original
explorers descended a passage with steps to a chamber, from which
apparently there was no exit. The roof consisted of a sliding trap-door,
however, and breaking through this another chamber was reached at a
higher level. Then a passage opened to the east, closed with a wooden
door, and leading to another chamber with a trap-door roof. But in front
of the explorer was a passage carefully plugged up solid with stone;
this they thought would lead to the prize, and so all the stones were
mined through, only to lead to nothing. From the second trap-door
chamber a passage led northward to the third such chamber. From that a
passage led west to a chamber with two wells, which seemed as if they
led to the tomb, but both were false. This chamber also was almost
filled with masonry, which all concealed nothing, but had given plenty
of occupation to the spoilers who removed it in vain. A filled-up trench
in the floor of the chamber really led to the sepulchre; but arriving
there no door was to be found, as the entrance had been by the roof, an
enormous block of which had been let down into place to close the
chamber. So at last the way had been forced by breaking away a hole in
the edge of the glassy-hard sandstone roofing block, and thus reaching
the chamber and its sarcophagi. By a little widening of the spoilers’
hole I succeeded in getting through it into the chamber. The water was
up to the middle of my body, and so exploration was difficult; but the
floor was covered with rubbish and chips, which might contain parts of
the funereal vessels, and therefore needed searching. The rubbish in the
sarcophagi I cleared out myself; and then I set some lads to gather up
the scraps from the floor on the flat blade of a hoe (as it was out of
arms’ reach under water), and after searching them they threw them into
the sarcophagi. Thus we anxiously worked on for any inscribed fragments;
my anxiety being for the cartouche of the king, the boys’ anxiety for
the big bakhshish promised, at _per_ hieroglyph found, extra value given
for cartouches. The system worked, for in the first day I got the
coveted

[Illustration: 70. INSCRIPTION OF AMENEMHAT III.]

[Illustration: 71. ALTAR OF NEFERU-PTAH.]

prize, a piece of an alabaster vessel with the name of Amenemhat III,
proving finally to whom the pyramid belonged; and other parts of
inscribed vessels were found. Still there was a puzzle as to the second
sarcophagus, which had been built up between the great central one and
the chamber side. On clearing in the chamber which led to the sepulchre,
however, they found a beautiful altar of offerings in alabaster, covered
with figures of the offerings all named, over a hundred in all, and
dedicated for the king’s daughter, Neferu-ptah; near it were parts of
several bowls in the form of half a trussed duck, also bearing her name:
so doubtless the second interment was hers; and she must have died
during her father’s life, and before the closing of the pyramid. Of the
actual bodies I found a few scraps of charred bones, besides bits of
charcoal and grains of burnt diorite in the sarcophagi; also a beard of
lazuli for inlaying was found in the chamber. The wooden inner coffins,
inlaid with hard stone carving, had therefore been burnt. The chamber
itself is a marvellous work; nearly the whole height of it is carved out
of a single block of hard quartzite sandstone, forming a huge tank, in
which the sarcophagus was placed. In the inside it is twenty-two feet
long and nearly eight feet wide, while the sides are about three feet
thick. The surface is polished, and the corners so sharply cut that I
mistook it for masonry, until I searched in vain for the joints. Of
course it was above water level originally; but all this region has been
saturated by a high level canal of Arab times. Afterwards I had all the
earth removed from the pyramid passages as far as practicable, but
nothing further was found there. No trace of inscription exists on
either the walls or sarcophagi; and but for the funereal furniture, even
the very name would not have been recovered.

Though the pyramid was the main object at Hawara, it was but a lesser
part of my work there. On the south of the pyramid lay a wide mass of
chips and fragments of building, which had long been generally
identified with the celebrated labyrinth. Doubts, however, existed,
mainly owing to Lepsius having considered the brick buildings on the
site to have been part of the labyrinth. When I began to excavate the
result was soon plain, that the brick chambers were built on the top of
the ruins of a great stone structure; and hence they were only the
houses of a village, as they had at first appeared to me to be. But
beneath them, and far away over a vast area, the layers of stone chips
were found; and so great was the mass that it was difficult to persuade
visitors that the stratum was artificial, and not a natural formation.
Beneath all these fragments was a uniform smooth bed of _beton_ or
plaster, on which the pavement of the building had been laid: while on
the south side, where the canal had cut across the site, it could be
seen how the chip stratum, about six feet thick, suddenly ceased, at
what had been the limits of the building. No trace of architectural
arrangement could be found, to help in identifying this great structure
with the labyrinth: but the mere extent of it proved that it was far
larger than any temple known in Egypt. All the temples of Karnak, of
Luxor, and a few on the western side of Thebes, might be placed
together within the vast space of these buildings at Hawara. We know
from Pliny and others, how for centuries the labyrinth had been a great
quarry for the whole district; and its destruction occupied such a body
of masons, that a small town existed there. All this information, and
the recorded position of it, agrees so closely with what we can trace,
that no doubt can now remain regarding the position of one of the
wonders of Egypt.

The cemetery of Hawara was a great resource for discoveries, and it
proved to be one of the richest fields that I have found, although it
was entirely an unexpected prize. The oldest tombs, of the pyramid time,
had all been ruined ages ago, and the pits re-used for the nineteenth
dynasty, the Ptolemaic times, and crocodile burial of the Roman age. But
some slabs from the stone chapels on the surface had fallen down the
tomb shafts, and were thus preserved.

The oldest unravaged tomb was of about the end of the twenty-sixth
dynasty; and that was a treasury of amulets, being the funeral vault of
the family of a great noble, Horuta. It was half inundated, the water
being thigh deep, and though all woodwork and stucco was spoilt, yet the
amulets of stone, and some of pottery, were uninjured. The great
interment was that of Horuta himself. In a side chamber, branching from
the large chamber, a huge sarcophagus of hard and tough limestone had
been placed, containing three successive coffins of wood. This was built
in solidly with masonry all around it, filling up the whole chamber, so
that its very existence was hardly to be suspected by any one in the
large chamber. To clear this out in such a position was hard work; a
party of good hands were steadily labouring at it, mainly by contract,
for two or three months. Down a well, forty feet deep, and in a
pitch-black chamber, splashing about in bitter water, and toiling by
candle-light, all the work had to be done; and dragging out large blocks
of masonry in a very confined space in such circumstances is slow and
tedious. While thus mining the way to the expected burial, we lit on a
hole in the masonry filled with large ushabtis standing in rows, two
hundred in all, of the finest workmanship; and, before long, on the
other side of the sarcophagus, two hundred more were found in a similar
recess. But the sarcophagus itself was most difficult to open. The lid
block was nearly two feet thick, and almost under water. It was far too
heavy for us to move entire, so some weeks were spent in cutting it in
two. One piece was then raised, but it proved to be the foot end; and
though I spent a day struggling with the inner coffins, sitting in the
sarcophagus up to my nose in water, I yet could not draw them out from
under the rest of the stone lid. So after some days the men raised that,
enough to get one’s head in between the under side of it and the water;
and then I spent another gruesome day, sitting astride of the inner
coffin, unable to turn my head under the lid without tasting the bitter
brine in which I sat. But though I got out the first coffin lid, the
inner one was firmly fastened down to its coffin; and though I tried
every way of loosening the coffin, it was so firmly set in a bed of sand
that crowbars and mining with the feet were useless, and it was so low
in the water as to be out of arms’ reach. The need of doing everything
by feeling, and the impossibility of seeing what was done under the
black water, made it a slow business. A third day I then attacked it,
with a helpful friend, Mr. Fraser. We drilled holes in the coffin, as it
was uninscribed, and fixed in stout iron bolts. Then, with ropes tied to
them, all our party hauled again and again at the coffin; it yielded:
and up came an immense black mass to the surface of the water. With
great difficulty we drew it out, as it was very heavy, and we had barely
room for it beneath the low ceiling. Anxiously opening it, we found a
slight inner coffin, and then the body of Horuta himself, wrapped in a
network of beads of lazuli, beryl, and silver, the last all decomposed.
Tenderly we towed him out to the bottom of the entrance pit, handling
him with the same loving care as Izaak his worms. And then came the
last, and longed-for scene, for which our months of toil had whetted our
appetites,--the unwrapping of Horuta. Bit by bit the layers of pitch and
cloth were loosened, and row after row of magnificent amulets were
disclosed, just as they were laid on in the distant past. The gold ring
on the finger which bore his name and titles, the exquisitely inlaid
gold birds, the chased gold figures, the lazuli statuettes delicately
wrought, the polished lazuli and beryl and carnelian amulets finely
engraved, all the wealth of talismanic armoury, rewarded our eyes with a
sight which has never been surpassed to archaeological gaze. No such
complete and rich a series of amulets has been seen intact before; and
as one by one they were removed all their positions were recorded, and
they may now be seen lying in their original order in the Ghizeh Museum.
The rest of the family of Horuta lay in the large chamber, some in stone
sarcophagi, some only in wooden coffins. They also had their due
funereal wealth; and a dozen other sets of amulets rewarded our search,
some of them as fine a series as any known before, but not to compare
for a moment with those of the walled-in patriarch.

[Illustration: 72. VULTURE AND COW, FROM COFFIN LID.]

Of rather later age, perhaps Ptolemaic, was a large wooden coffin that
we found; the body and the lid were two equal parts, plainly
rectangular; and they lay where some old spoiler had left them,
separated, and afterwards buried under a heap of stuff thrown out in
digging later tombs. The whole surface of this sarcophagus was stuccoed,
inside and outside, top and bottom, and every part of it finely painted
and inscribed. The top of the lid had the deities of the district, the
hawk, the Osiris-crocodile, and the bennu, with inscriptions; the lower
part inside bore other animals, the vulture, the cow, and white
hippopotamus; the inside of the lid had the two crocodile-headed Sebeks
and the ape; and underneath the lower part, or body, was a long
inscription, partly biographical. I had a terrifying experience with
this coffin; when I found it much of the stucco was loose, and any
amount of trouble was worth while to preserve so beautiful and important
an object. I observed in copying it that parts had been waxed, to
heighten the colour, and this suggested to me to fasten down the stucco
by wax. I tried melting it on with a plate of hot iron, but could
scarcely do it without blackening it with smoke. In course of this I
poured a layer of wax over the surface; but what was my horror to see as
the wax cooled that it contracted into saucer-formed patches, lifting up
with it the stucco, and leaving bare wood beneath! To touch these wax
patches must irrevocably ruin all hopes of replacing the stucco; so I
covered it with sheets of paper, and thought on it for some days, a
spectre of dismal failure. I tried in vain to buy a brazier at Medinet;
so at last, making a grating of wire, I filled it with red-hot charcoal,
and supported it over part of the unlucky coffin. As I watched it, the
wax softened, flattened, and dropped exactly into place again; patch
after patch settled down, the wax melted and ran in under the stucco;
and at last I saw the whole surface completely relaid, and fixed so
firmly that even the fearful rattle of an Egyptian railway wagon, in the
long journey to Bulak, did not injure it.

But perhaps the greatest success at Hawara was in the direction least
expected. So soon as I went there I observed a cemetery on the north of
the pyramid; on digging in it I soon saw that it was all Roman, the
remains of brick tomb-chambers; and I was going to give it up as not
worth working, when one day a mummy was found, with a painted portrait
on a wooden panel placed over its face. This was a beautifully drawn
head of a girl, in soft grey tints, entirely classical in its style and
mode, without any Egyptian influence. More men were put on to this
region, and in two days another portrait-mummy was found; in two days
more a third, and then for nine days not one; an anxious waiting,
suddenly rewarded by finding three. Generally three or four were found
every week, and I have even rejoiced over five in one day. Altogether
sixty were found in clearing this cemetery, some much decayed and
worthless, others as fresh as the day they were painted.

Not only were these portraits found thus on the mummies, but also the
various stages of decoration that led up to the portrait. First, the
old-fashioned stucco cartonnage coverings, purely Egyptian, of the
Ptolemies. Next, the same made more solidly, and with distinct
individual differences, in fact, modelled masks of the deceased persons.
Then arms modelled in one with the bust, the rest of the body being
covered with a canvas wrapper painted with mythologic scenes, all purely
Egyptian. Probably under Hadrian the first portraits are found, painted
on a canvas wrapper, but of Greek work. Soon the canvas was abandoned,

[Illustration: 73. FOUR STAGES OF MUMMY DECORATION.]

and a wooden panel used instead; and then the regular series of panel
portraits extends until the decline in the third century. All this
custom of decorating the mummies arose from their being kept above
ground for many years in rooms, probably connected with the house.
Various signs of this usage can be seen on the mummies, and in the
careless way in which they were at last buried, after such elaborate
decoration.

Though only a sort of undertaker’s business, in a provincial town of
Egypt, and belonging to the Roman age, when art had greatly declined,
yet these paintings give us a better idea of what ancient painting was,
and what a high state it must have reached in its prime, than anything
yet known, excepting some of the Pompeian frescoes. Mannerism is evident
in nearly all of these, and faults may be easily detected; yet there is
a spirit, a sentiment, an expression about the better examples which can
only be the relic of a magnificent school, whose traditions and skill
were not then quite lost. A few indeed of these heads are of such power
and subtlety that they may stand beside the works of any age without
being degraded. If such was Greek painting still, centuries after its
zenith, by obscure commercial artists, and in a distant town of a
foreign land, we may dimly credit what it may have been in its grandeur.
The National Gallery now begins its history of paintings far before that
of any other collection; the finest examples left, after the selection
of the Bulak Museum, being now at Trafalgar Square.

The technical methods of these paintings have been much discussed.
Certainly the colours were mixed with melted wax as a medium, and it
seems most likely that both the brush and hard point were used. The
backing is a very thin cedar panel, on which a coat of lead colour
priming was laid, followed by a flesh-coloured ground where the face was
to come. The drapery is freely marked in with bold brushfuls of colour,
while the flesh is carefully and smoothly laid on with zigzag strokes.
In some portraits the boldness of the work is almost like some modern
romanticist’s; at a foot distance the surface is nearly
incomprehensible, at six or eight feet it produces a perfect effect.

Several of these pictures when found were in a perilous state; the film
of wax paint was scaled loose from the panel, and they could never be
even tilted up on edge without perishing. After finding several in this
tender state, and pondering on their preservation, I ventured to try the
same process as for the stucco coffin. The wire-grating was filled with
red-hot charcoal, and then the frail portrait was slid in beneath it, a
few drops of melted wax laid on it, and watched. In a few seconds the
fresh wax began to spread, and then at once I ladled melted wax all over
the surface; a second too long, and it began to fry and to blister; too
sharp a tilt to drain it when it came out, and the new wax washed away
the paint. But with care and management it was possible to preserve even
the most rotten paintings with fresh wax; and afterwards I extended this
waxing to all substances that were perishable, woodwork and leather, as
well as stucco and paint.

This custom, however, of preserving the mummies above ground, adorned
with the portraits, gave way about the time of Constantine, or perhaps a
little earlier, and immediate burial was adopted. Probably this was
partly due to the progress of Christianity.

[Illustration: 74. CUT-GLASS VASE.]

Instead, therefore, of finding the portraits of the persons, we have
their embroidered and richly woven garments; for they were buried in the
finest clothes they had when alive. And their possessions were buried
with them. In one grave was a lady’s casket made of wood inlaid with
ivory panels, on which figures were carved and coloured with inlaying.
The fine cut-glass vase from another grave is of the whitest glass, and
excellently cut with the wheel; perhaps the finest example of such work
from Roman times. The toys were also buried with the children, and
dolls, with all their furniture,--bedstead, mirror, table, toilet-box,
clothes-basket, and other paraphernalia--were placed with the little
ones who had died. Even more elaborate toys were laid here, such as the
curious _terra cotta_ of a sedan chair, borne by two porters, with a
lady seated inside; a loose figure that can be removed.

[Illustration: 75. SIDE OF IVORY CASKET. 1: 4.]

[Illustration: 76. SEDAN CHAIR, TERRA COTTA. 1: 4.]

In one instance a far more valuable prize accompanied a body; under the
head of a lady lay a papyrus roll, which still preserved a large part
of the second book of the Iliad, beautifully written, and with marginal
notes. A great quantity of pieces of papyrus, letters and accounts, of
Roman age, were also found scattered about in the cemetery. In a large
jar buried in the ground lay a bundle of title-deeds: they recorded the
sale of some monastic property, and were most carefully rolled, bound up
with splints of reed, to prevent their being bent, and wrapped in
several old cloths.

[Illustration: 77. 1:6. ROMAN RAG DOLLS. 1: 4.]

In yet another respect Hawara proved a rich field. In the coffins, in
the graves, and in the ruins of the chambers, were still preserved the
wreaths with which the dead had been adorned, and the flowers which the
living had brought to the tombs. These wreaths were often in the most
perfect condition, every detail of the flowers being as complete as if
dried for a herbarium. They illustrate the accounts of Pliny and other
writers about ancient wreaths, and the plants used for them, and show
what a careful and precise trade the wreath-maker’s was. Beside the
decorative plants there were many seeds, and remains of edible fruits
and vegetables, which had been left behind in the surface chambers of
the tombs after the funereal feasts. Altogether, the cemetery of Hawara
has doubled the extent of our list of ancient Egyptian botany, under the
careful examination given by Mr. Newberry to the boxes full of plants
which I brought away.

Few places, then, have such varied interest as Hawara; the twelfth
dynasty pyramid, the labyrinth, the amulets of Horuta, the portraits,
the botany, and the papyri, are each of special interest and historical
value.

In this year also I visited the other side of the lake of the Fayum, now
known as the Birket Kerun. There, at some miles back in that utter
solitude, stands a building of unknown age and unknown purport. It is
massively constructed, but without any trace of inscription, or even
ornament, which would tell its history. That it cannot be as late as the
Kasr Kerun, is probable from its being at a much higher level. There
would be no object in making a building at some miles distant in the
desert, as it now is; and we must rather suppose it to belong to the age
when the lake was full, and extended out so far. But where it comes
before the Ptolemaic age we cannot say. The front doorway leads into a
long court, which has a chamber at each end, and seven recesses in the
long

[Illustration: 78. BUILDING NORTH OF BIRKET KERUN.]

[Illustration: 79. INTERIOR OF BUILDING.]

side opposite the entrance. These recesses have had doors, of which the
pivot holes can be seen. There are no traces of statues or of
sarcophagi about; and the place has been keenly tunnelled and explored
by treasure-seekers.

[Illustration: 80. TOY BIRD ON WHEELS, HAWARA.]

[Illustration: 81. PYRAMID OF ILLAHUN.]




CHAPTER VIII.

ILLAHUN.

1889-90.


Having finished opening the pyramid of Hawara, the next attraction was
that of Illahun, a few miles to the east of it, in the Nile valley, at
the entrance to the Fayum. This pyramid differs from all others in that
the lower part is a natural rock cut into shape; upon that a mass of
mud-brick rises, like that of Hawara, and around the base lie the
fragments of the fine limestone casing which originally covered it. As
almost all the pyramids had their chambers built in a sort of well in
the rock base, I tried this pyramid on such an hypothesis, and therefore
cleared the edge of its rocky portion all round as far as possible, to
search for the cut into it, expected to lead to the excavation for the
chamber. At the south-east corner this was difficult, as the rock was
there deficient, and the core had been made up by layers of chips.
Still, for months we went on clearing the sides and searching. Much
other work was going on meanwhile, and by different sources I had found
that the pyramid belonged to Usertesen II, as we shall notice presently.
Amongst other work, I searched along a ledge in the rock at the base,
where the pavement had originally been placed. While doing this we found
a well, which I did not clear, as I was near the end of my season for
work; but, on Mr. Fraser coming to secure the place during my absence, I
commended this well to his notice as a possible entrance. He cleared it
out, and at forty feet deep found a passage leading up into the pyramid.
Then it was evident that no other external sign on the pyramid itself
was possible, for the passages and chambers were wholly cut in the rock,
and the pyramid merely stood on the surface, without any connection with
the sepulchre beneath it.

There were two well-entrances to the pyramid, close together. One beyond
the pavement was so carefully covered with rubbish that I could not have
found it unless I had made a great clearance; by this the sarcophagus
and large blocks of masonry were taken in. The smaller well was
evidently for the workmen to gain access to the lower side of the blocks
that were in course of being taken in: it was hidden by the pavement,
was found anciently, and served for spoilers to enter by, and lastly was
found again in my digging. Had it not been for this smaller well, I
believe the pyramid would have been still inviolate.

The passage in the inside is rough hewn in the soft rock, and was
smeared over with a coat of thin plaster originally, but without a trace
of ornament or inscription. It is wide, and high enough to walk upright
freely. At the end it opened into a chamber lined with blocks of
limestone, of which a large part has been removed, probably by the
Ramesside masons, when they plundered the pyramid and its temples for
stone. At the west end of this chamber, which runs east and west, is the
door to a red granite chamber, containing the sarcophagus. This second
chamber is roofed exactly like that of Menkaura’s pyramid at Gizeh, with
slanting blocks cut out in a curve below. The sarcophagus is one of the
finest products of mechanical skill that is known from ancient times. It
is of red granite, of a form not before met with, having a wide
rectangular brim. The surfaces are all ground flat, but not polished;
truth, and not effect, was sought for. And its errors of work in
flatness and regularity are not more than the thickness of a visiting
card. Its accuracy of proportion is also fine, as each dimension is a
whole number of palms, with a fluctuation of only one part in a
thousand. In front of the sarcophagus stood the alabaster table of
offerings, for the _ka_ of Usertesen II, now in the Gizeh Museum.
Strange to say, there is not a trace of a coffin, or a lid to the
sarcophagus; and, indeed, as this chamber is not under the middle of the
pyramid, it may be questioned whether the real interment is not yet to
be reached by some other passage.

From the north wall of this chamber a strange passage is cut in the
rock, first northwards, then west, then south, then east, and lastly
northwards again, opening into the limestone chamber; in fact, it
passes around the granite chamber. It was not a workman’s passage
intended to be closed up again, as the doorway of it has a bevelled edge
and is curved at the top. It rather looks as if intended to prove to any
spoilers that there was no other concealed passage leading out from the
granite chamber, and thus to check their destructive searchings. If so,
we may be tolerably certain that there is some other chamber containing
the real interment.

The chambers in the pyramid are to the east of the centre; and adjoining
the east face of the pyramid externally there stood a shrine, on the
walls of which were figured the tables and lists of offerings for the
_ka_ of Usertesen II. The sculptures were of beautiful work, and
brilliantly coloured. What process was used for fixing these coats of
colour we do not know; but still, from over four thousand years, after
being broken and thrown into heaps, these colours are firmly fixed on
the stone, and soaking and washing make no change in them. Only one
large piece was found, now in the Gizeh Museum, but hundreds of portions
of hieroglyphs were recovered among the chips. Who the destroyers were
we can guess by an inscription of Ramessu II, rudely painted on a block
of the stone. Among the ruins some chips of a black-granite seated
statue of Usertesen II, were found, showing that the shrine was
furnished like the earlier temples of the fourth dynasty.

The regular temple of the pyramid stood about half a mile to the east of
it, on the edge of the desert; and it has been destroyed like the
shrine, and by the same hands, as two cartouches of Ramessu II were
found on the blocks; several beads, &c., of the nineteenth dynasty occur
in the ruins; and I found the name of Usertesen II on a piece of a
granite pillar of Ramessu II at Ahnas, some miles to the south, showing
for what purpose Illahun had been plundered. The outline of the temple
can be traced by the thick brick wall which surrounded it. The plan is
square, and it seems to have consisted of brickwork externally, lined
with limestone masonry. But of the internal arrangement not a trace can
be recovered. Probably a shrine of granite stood at the west end of the
court, and objects of sandstone in the area, judging by the position of
the chips. Also a large basalt statue existed here, of which only one
fragment was found; the statue must therefore have been removed
(probably to Ahnas), and not broken up here. One interesting discovery
was made, however. In the middle of the area I noticed a slight hollow
in the rock surface, about two and a half feet square. I thought of a
foundation deposit, and examined this place. A block of stone lay fitted
into it; on breaking and raising this, a second block was seen; when
that was removed, we found plain sand. Scraping this out, we came on
much broken pottery, and then some bronze models of tools, and a large
number of carnelian beads. There were four sets of objects, thrown in
pell mell; but the strings of carnelian beads, all exactly alike, are a
puzzle. Is it possible that they were bead-money? They have the
requisites of an exchange standard, as well as gold; they need a regular
amount of labour to produce them, they are unalterable, and they serve
for ornament when not used for exchange. However that may be, we have
here far the oldest foundation-deposit known.

[Illustration: 82. FOUNDATION DEPOSIT. 1: 4.]

The great prize of Illahun was unknown and unsuspected by any one. On
the desert adjoining the north side of the temple, I saw evident traces
of a town, brick walls, houses and pottery; moreover, the pottery was of
a style as yet unknown to me. The town-wall started out in a line with
the face of the temple; and it dawned on me that this could hardly be
other than the town of the pyramid builders, originally called
Ha-Usertesen-hotep, and now known as Kahun. A little digging soon put it
beyond doubt, as we found cylinders of that age, and no other; so that
it was evident that I actually had in hand an unaltered town of the
twelfth dynasty, regularly laid out by the royal architect for the
workmen and stores, required in building the pyramid and its temple.
After a few holes had been made, I formed up the workmen in a line along
the outermost street, and regularly cleared the first line of chambers,
turning the stuff into the street; then the chambers beyond those were
emptied into them; and so line after line, block after block, almost
every room in the town was emptied out and searched. The only part not
quite cleared was where habitations had been formed in Roman times by
lime-burners, who had disturbed the place and destroyed the ancient
walls. Every chamber as it was cleared was measured and planned, and we
can see the exact scheme of the architect, and where he expanded the
town as time went on.

[Illustration: 83. NORTH SIDE OF KAHUN, SHOWING LINE OF TOWN WALL.]

The general outline was a square mass; walled on

[Illustration: 84. STEPS TO UPPER BUILDINGS ON HILL.]

the west, north, and east sides, but open on the south to the Nile
plain, and not fully built out in this direction. In this space were
buildings adjoining the wall all round; within them a main street around
three sides of a square block of buildings in the middle; and minor
streets subdividing the buildings. Then outside the wall on the west the
town was enlarged by a further space, also walled, and divided by a long
main street, and cross streets all the way along it. The larger houses
all have a court, or atrium, with columns around the middle of it, and
in the centre a small stone tank let into the ground with a square of
limestone around it five feet each way. These columns were sometimes of
stone, sometimes of wood; with a simple abacus, or with a carved palm
capital; octagonal, or fluted, or ribbed; but they always had large
circular stone bases, which mostly remain in place in the rooms. The
roofing was usually of beams, overlaid with bundles of straw, and
mud-plastered; but many arched roofs of brickwork remain, some entire,
others with only the lower part. The doorways were always arched in
brickwork, and we know now for certain that the arch was not only known,
but was in constant use by the early Egyptians.

[Illustration: 85. BASKET WITH TOOLS. 1: 7.]

In the rooms pottery was often found; and many parts of the town having
been deserted when the building of the pyramid was finished, the empty
rooms were used as rubbish holes by the inhabitants who remained; in
such places there might be even six or eight feet depth of broken
pottery, woodwork and other things. Tools

[Illustration: 86. CASTANETS AND FIGURE OF DANCER.]

were also found hidden in the dust which had lain in the chambers; and
one basket was found with a lid, marvellously fresh and firm, containing
copper hatchets and chisels, and a copper bowl, all as free from rust as
when they were buried. Beneath the brick floors of the rooms was,
however, the best place to search; not only for hidden things, such as a
statuette of a dancer and pair of ivory castanets, but also for numerous
burials of babies in wooden boxes. These boxes had been made for clothes
and household use, but were used to bury infants, often accompanied by
necklaces and other things. On the necklaces were sometimes cylinders
with the kings’ names; and thus we know for certain that these burials,
and the inhabitation of the town, is of the twelfth dynasty, from
Usertesen II onward. Lying on one box was a splendid ivory carving of a
baboon seated, of the most naturalistic work, comparable with the best
cinquecento Italian ivories. This of course is kept at the Gizeh Museum.
In the houses but little sculpture was found; far the finest piece being
a basalt statue of an official, now also at the Gizeh Museum.

[Illustration: 87. IVORY BABOON.]

The domestic remains were of great interest; beside the pottery there
were balls of thread, linen cloth, knives and tools of copper and of
flint, a mirror of copper (Group 92), fishing nets, and many wooden
tools, hoes, rakes, a brick-mould, plasterers’ floats, mallets, copper
chisels set in wooden handles, &c. Also games (Group 93) as whip-tops,
tip-cats, draught-boards, dolls, and a beautifully woven sling. Many
pieces of furniture were found, among them the greater part of a
finely-made slender chair of dark wood inlaid with ivory pegs.
Blue-glazed pottery was not unusual, several figures of animals and
pieces of bowls being found. Hitherto we had never known how the
Egyptians obtained fire, as there is no sign of this on the sculptures,
nor do they seem to have attached any significance to fire-making. In
this town I found several sticks with the burnt holes made by drilling
fire, as many races do at present: the Egyptians probably did this with
the bow-drill, with which they were so familiar, and of which specimens
were found here.

[Illustration: 88. FLINT TOOLS. 1: 6.]

[Illustration: 89. PLASTERERS’ FLOATS, AND BRICK-MOULD.]

[Illustration: 90. AGRICULTURAL TOOLS OF WOOD. 1: 20.]

[Illustration: 91. FIRE APPARATUS. 1: 10.]

[Illustration: 92. SET OF TOOLS, VASES, AND MIRROR. 1: 8]

Not only do we in this town drop into the midst of the daily life and
productions of this early age, but the documents of the time also
remain. In various chambers papyri were found; some carefully sealed up
and put by, such as the wills of Uah, and Antefmeri, but mostly thrown
aside as waste paper. One of the largest is a hymn of praise to
Usertesen III: some pages of a medical work, some of a veterinary
papyrus, and innumerable parts of letters, accounts, and memoranda make
up the collection. As only five papyri of this early date were known
before now, this is a wide addition to our resources.

Another subject has quite unexpectedly come to light. Marks of various
kinds are found on pieces of pottery-vessels here, some put on by the
maker before the baking, but mostly scratched by the owner. These marks
are many of them derived from the Egyptian workmen’s signs, corruptions
of hieroglyphics. But, as we shall see in the next chapter, the
discoveries at Gurob point to these having some kinship with the Western
alphabets. They are therefore the venerable first step in adopting marks
to represent sounds, irrespective of their primitive form and
significance.

[Illustration: 93. CLAY TOYS, TWELFTH DYNASTY.]

That these marks were known not only to Egyptians, but to foreigners
here as well, is probable from the discoveries of Aegean pottery in this
place. Intermixed with, and even beneath, the rubbish mounds of the
twelfth dynasty are pieces of pottery which appear to be the forerunners
of what we know as Greek pottery in later ages. The ware, the motives of
the decoration, belong to the Aegean, and not to Egypt; either Greece or
Asia Minor was their home, but long centuries before any specimens that
we yet know of from those countries. The weights found here also testify
to foreign influences, the greater part of them being on the Phoenician,
Aeginetan, and Hittite standards.

Some later times have left their traces in this place, although the bulk
of it is purely of the twelfth dynasty. A wooden stamp of Apepi was
found, probably of the Hyksos king; and if so, the only small article
yet known of that dynasty. A small papyrus of Amenhotep III was found,
rolled up, and placed in a pottery cylinder: also a splendid ‘hunting
scarab’ of that king, recording his slaying 102 lions, which is of
brilliant and perfect blue-green glaze. A broken papyrus of Amenhotep IV
was also left here. But the main prize was a family tomb, probably of
the end of the nineteenth, or early twentieth, dynasty. A cellar cut in
the rock, belonging to one of the houses of the twelfth dynasty, had
been found at this later date, and used as a sepulchre. More than a
dozen coffins were piled in it, each containing several bodies, all the
wrappings of which were reduced to black sooty dust. I stripped for the
work, and for hours was occupied in opening coffin after coffin,
carefully searching the dust inside each, cataloguing everything as I
found it, overhauling the pottery and stone vases heaped in the
chambers, and handing everything out to the one native lad whom I took
down to help me. At last I finished the place, and came out much like a
coal-heaver or a sweep, so that I had to go to the nearest pond to wash
all over. Though none of the interments were rich, yet there were
interesting

[Illustration: 94. OBJECTS FROM MAKET TOMB. 1: 10.]

objects, and some foreign; and above all we had the whole find
completely recorded, and the positions of things noted exactly as they
had been left by the interrers. A curious point is that though the
pottery, and the decoration of one of the coffins, precludes our dating
this earlier than the end of the nineteenth dynasty, yet all the scarabs
on the bodies are of the early part of the eighteenth dynasty, down to
Tahutmes III; excepting a few of the twelfth dynasty, doubtless found,
as we found so many, in this town. That all the decorations should be
heirlooms is a strange fact. In the richest coffin, the only one
containing a name, that of the lady Maket, were two musical reeds,
carefully slipped inside a larger reed for protection; the scale shown
by their holes is the major scale. The pottery here was remarkable; not
only are there none of the styles characteristic of the eighteenth and
nineteenth dynasties, so well known at Tel el Amarna and Gurob, but the
greater part is Phoenician, and not Egyptian, in its paste and its
forms; while among it is an Aegean vase, with an ivy leaf and stalk on
each side, the earliest style of natural decoration after the period of
geometrical. Some vases of green paste here are curious, one in the form
of a horn stopped at the wide end.

Of later date still was a large wooden door, which had been probably
brought from some other place in Roman times, and used here for a house.
It had been made by Usarkon I; and when the bronze head and foot-bands
were incised with his name, the wood beneath had received the
impression, which it retained after all the bronze had been removed. On
the middle of the door there had been a scene of Usarkon offering to
Neit and Horus, but this had been almost all chiselled away anciently.
This door is now in the Gizeh Museum.

The next period of importance at Illahun is from the twenty-second to
the twenty-fifth dynasties. The hills near the pyramid had been much
used for rock tombs and mastabas of the pyramid period; but these had
been plundered and destroyed in early times, and the excavations were
re-used during the later Bubastite and Ethiopian dynasties. These
interments are generally rude, the coffins seldom having any
intelligible inscription; but mostly sham copies of the usual formula,
put on by a decorator who could not read. The only fine tomb I found
here was that of a priestess, Amenardus; her sarcophagus has carved
inscriptions along the edges and down the corner-posts, and the coffin
and that of her father are finely painted: these are now at Gizeh. Many
of the mummies have bead net-works and patterns upon them, with figures
of winged scarabs, the four genii, the _ba_ bird, and other emblems, all
executed in coloured beads. As the threading is completely rotted, the
beads all fall apart with the slightest shake, and such work is
therefore never preserved when excavations are left to the native
overseers. When we entered a tomb, I opened the coffins in the gentlest
way, drawing or cutting out the pegs which fastened them; and then a
glance inside showed if any bead-work existed. If there were bead
patterns, the next step was to fetch a petroleum stove down into the
chamber, melt a batch of beeswax, and then when it was on the point of
chilling, ladle it out, and dash it over the bead-work. If the wax is
too hot it sinks in, and soaks all the mummy wrappings into a solid
mass; if poured on, it runs off the body in a narrow stream. When all
the beads were covered, and the wax set, I then lifted up the sheet of
wax with the bead-work sticking to it, flattened it out on a board, and
it was ready for fixing in a tray permanently, with the lower side
turned outward.

The amulets found in these tombs are all of the figures of deities,
specially Bast, and are of pottery covered with light olivey-green
glazes, quite different from those of the nineteenth or twentieth
dynasties. A revival of glazed work took place under the twenty-second
dynasty, of very delicate character, and fine glazing. But the amulet
system went into a very different stage in the twenty-sixth dynasty;
then in place of two or three, generally varying in size, we find dozens
all uniform in style, either of pottery or of polished stone, arranged
in rows on the mummy according to a system. Such was the plan of the
amulets at Hawara and at Nebesheh.

Yet a later period had left its remains at Illahun. In Coptic times,
about the sixth and seventh century A.D., the ground all about the
temple, and on a hill near the canal, was used for a cemetery. Though I
could not spend time on clearing such remains myself, the people of the
place readily grubbed up their forefathers, and disposed of their
garments to any one who would buy them. I thus obtained a large quantity
of embroideries and woven stuffs, the best of which are now at South
Kensington.

Illahun has then proved of great value to our knowledge of Egyptian
civilization; it has shown us a completely arranged town of the middle
kingdom; it has surrounded us with all the products and manufactures of
that age; it reveals the simultaneous use of finely wrought flint tools
with those of copper, when bronze was yet unknown; it provides us with
the writings of the period, including a will two thousand years older
than any known before; the pyramid proves to be of a design new to us,
and contains one of the finest examples of mechanical skill; while of
later ages we learn the date of Phoenician pottery, and of the earliest
figured Greek vases, and can trace the history of the use of amulets. Of
the blanks in the history of civilization, one more has been filled up.

[Illustration: 95. FLINT HIPPOPOTAMUS, TWELFTH DYNASTY.]

[Illustration: 96. BRONZE PANS, NINETEENTH DYNASTY.]




CHAPTER IX.

GUROB.

1889-90.


At the mouth of the Fayum, on the opposite side to Illahun, stood in
later times another town, founded by Tahutmes III, and ruined under
Merenptah; thus its history falls within about two-and-a-half centuries.
While I was working at Hawara some beads and ornaments were brought to
me from this place; I soon went to see it, and found that it was an
early site unmixed with any later remains. In the beginning of 1889 I
worked out part of the town, and the rest of it was cleared by Mr.
Hughes-Hughes in the end of that year, while I worked at Illahun. The
general arrangement of it was a large walled enclosure, within which
were two other enclosures side by side, one containing the temple, the
other a small town. The temple had been founded by Tahutmes III, and had
lasted through Khuenaten’s changes only to be destroyed soon after,
probably by Ramessu II, when he carried away the temples of Illahun.
That the town was ruined early in the reign of Merenptah is indicated by
the sudden end of the previous abundance of scarabs and rings with the
kings’ names at this point; of later times only one or two objects of
Ramessu III have been found.

[Illustration: 97. BRONZE INTERLOCKING HINGES.]

[Illustration: 98. BRONZE TOOLS. 1: 6.]

Of purely Egyptian objects many were discovered, but the main interest
of the place is in the remains of foreigners from the Mediterranean who
lived here. Of Egyptian work we may mention two funeral tablets (one
now at Gizeh); a lion’s head, probably the terminal to the side of a
staircase; two splendid bronze pans (Group 96), still bright and fresh
and elastic, most skilfully wrought (now at Gizeh); a beautiful wooden
statuette of a lady named Res, clad in the ribbed drapery of the
Ramesside age (also at Gizeh); a statuette of a priestess, and a figure
of a girl swimming holding a duck, carved in wood (at Gizeh); a wooden
box for papyri, inscribed (at Gizeh); and some necklaces found in the
town. Some bronze hinges, hatchets, chisels, and knives were also found,
one by one, in different rooms.

[Illustration: 99. COFFIN HEAD OF ANEN THE TURSHA OFFICIAL. 1: 16.]

The foreign inhabitants, although conforming to Egyptian ways in some
respects, have left many

[Illustration: 100. WOODEN STATUETTES OF A PRIESTESS, AND THE LADY
RES.]

[Illustration: 101. HITTITE HARPER.]

[Illustration: 102. PHOENICIAN VENUS MIRROR.]

traces here. Foremost is the coffin of a high official who was of the
Tursha race, the Turseni, probably, of the northern Aegean. The ushabti
figure of a Hittite, Sadi-amia, was found in an adjoining grave. A
wooden figure of a Hittite harper, wearing the great pigtail of his
race, was picked up in the town. A bronze mirror, with a Phoenician
Venus holding a dove as the handle of it, was found in a tomb. While
constantly Aegean vases, such as those of the first period of Mykenae,
are found in both the town and in tombs. The Greek custom of a funereal
pyre remained here in a modified form; although the body appears to have
been buried in Egyptian fashion (as I found light hair on some of the
mummies here), yet the personal articles were all burnt. Apparently on
the death of the owner a hole was dug in the floor of the room; into
this were placed the chair, the clothing, the mirror, combs, necklaces
and toilet articles, the glass bottles, the blue-glazed bowls and
vases, the alabaster dishes, the knife and other implements, and the
best pottery of the deceased.

[Illustration: 103. AEGEAN VASES. 1: 2.]

[Illustration: 104. BLUE AND YELLOW GLASS BOTTLE.]

All these were burnt; the fire was smothered with potsherds laid over
it; earth was then filled in, and the brick floor of the room was
relaid. No such custom is ever known among Egyptians, and this shows
again the foreign occupation of the place. We know from inscriptions how
the Mediterranean races, Libyans, Akhaians, Turseni, and others had
pushed into Egypt from the west, and that they had settled in the Nile
valley to even somewhat south of the Fayum. This place was evidently
then one of their settlements, and its sudden fall under Merenptah just
agrees to his expulsion of all these foreigners in the fifth year of his
reign. We have here then before our eyes the remains of that great
invasion which has always hitherto been a literary shadow without
material substance.

[Illustration: 105. BLUE-GLAZED VASES. 1: 6.]

As before mentioned, the marks on pottery so often found in the town of
the twelfth dynasty at Illahun, are also found at Gurob. The list of
signs used is somewhat different, but the greater part may be
identified; and it is impossible to deny that they are the same as a
whole, though naturally modified by alteration, addition, and omission,
in the course of a thousand years. Having now, therefore, this body of
signs in use in 1200 B.C. in a town occupied by people of the Aegean and
Asia Minor, Turseni, Akhaians, Hittites, and others, it will require a
very certain proof of the supposed Arabian source of the Phoenician
alphabet, before we can venture to deny that we have here the origin of
the Mediterranean alphabets.

[Illustration: 106. BLUE-GLAZED BOWLS.]

Besides these remains, Gurob proved to be a treasury of a later age. In
the Ptolemaic period some town had existed in this neighbourhood, the
inhabitants of which were buried here in the edge of the desert, apart
from the earlier town. Their mummies are destitute of amulets or
ornaments, and have all gone to black dust, their cartonnage coverings
are without names, and of the most conventional and uninteresting kind,
and their coffins are of prodigious rudeness, worthy of a savage of the
Pacific; while their tombs are rude holes scooped in the sandy soil. In
no respect would these burials seem worth notice, had not the cartonnage
makers used up old papyri as the cheapest material for their trade. But
what was worthless in the days of Philadelphos is a treasure now; the
soldiers’ wills appointing as executors the sovereigns, Philadelphos and
Arsinoe, the private letters, the leaves of Plato and unknown Greek
plays, the accounts,--all these can be unfolded from what looks like
hopeless rubbish. The cartonnage in the earlier examples was glued
together, and this has not only injured the writing, but almost always
served as a bait to worms, who have destroyed it; but later on the
makers found that simple wetting and moulding would suffice, and we can
now often peel apart sheet after sheet of writing as fresh as in the
days when Cleopatra was yet unborn.

Some remains of even later times are found here; and I obtained from
native diggers many Coptic embroideries, and a beautiful set of Roman
glass vessels.

The essential value of Gurob is in giving us a thoroughly fixed date for
the earlier stages of the civilization of Greece; in showing the races
of the Mediterranean at home in Egypt; and in explaining how far they
had imbibed Egyptian culture during their first sojourn on the Nile; and
what they may be expected to have borrowed from thence at this early
period.

[Illustration: 107. IVORY DUCK BOX. 1: 2.]

[Illustration: 108. PYRAMID OF MEDUM.]




CHAPTER X.

MEDUM.

1891.


After having sampled the civilization of each of the great periods of
Egyptian history, back to the twelfth dynasty, as described in preceding
chapters, I longed more than ever to discover the beginning of things.
For this Medum offered the best chance for reaching back. The
presumption was that it belonged to the beginning of the fourth dynasty;
and here we might perhaps find something still undeveloped, and be able
to gauge our way in the unknown. Could we there see the incipient
stages, or at least their traces? Could we learn how conventional forms
and ideas had arisen? Could we find Egypt not yet full grown, still in
its childhood?

I called together a selected lot of my old workers from Illahun, and we
went over and made a camp at the cemetery of Medum; there we lived over
four months, and I unravelled what could be traced on the questions that
await us. Broadly, it may be said, that we learned more of our ignorance
than our knowledge: the beginning seems as remote as ever, for nearly
all the conventions are already perfected there; but many new questions
have been opened, and we at least see more of the road, though the goal
is still out of view.

The first question to settle was that of the age of the pyramid and
cemetery. All the indications pointed to as early an age as we knew, but
not before Seneferu, the first king of the fourth dynasty, and
predecessor of Khufu. Yet the theory that the pyramids were built in
chronological order, from north to south, had led some to suppose that
this was of the twelfth dynasty.

The most promising means of ascertaining the age, was to search for any
remains of the pyramid temple; on the chance of inscriptions, such as I
had found of Khafra at Gizeh, and of Usertesen II at Illahun. But where
was the temple? No sign of such a building could be seen anywhere to the
east of the pyramid, and some holes I sunk in the space within the
pyramid enclosure showed nothing. I hesitated for some days, while other
work was going on, looking at the great bank of rubbish against the side
of the pyramid, rubbish accumulated by the destruction of its upper
part. At last I determined on the large excavation needful, for I felt
that we must solve the matter if possible. So, marking out a space which
would have held two or three good-sized London houses, and knowing that
we must go as deep as a tall house before we could get any result, I
began a work of several weeks, with as many men as could be efficiently
put into the area. At first it was easy enough, but soon we found large
blocks, which we could scarcely move; and these slipped away and rolled
down all the stages of our work, upsetting all our regular cutting. But
they all had to be got out of the way, by lifting, rolling or breaking
up. At last we had a hole that could be seen for miles off across the
valley, and so deep that the sides looked perilously high on either hand
when one stood in the bottom. The pavement was reached, and we found at
one end of our great excavation a wall, and one side of a large stele
just showing.

We needed then to lengthen the pit, and the falls from our fresh work
soon buried all that we had found. A fresh trouble came with a strong
gale, which blew away the sand, and let the loose stones come rattling
down from the rubbish which formed the sides of our hole. One great fall
came near burying us in the bottom of the work: and it was three weeks
before I again saw the building. At last we uncovered the court-yard,
and found two steles; and moreover instead of a mere court there
appeared a doorway on the east side, and crawling in I found a chamber
and passage still roofed over and quite perfect. We had, in fact, found
an absolutely complete, though small, temple; not a stone was missing,
nor a piece knocked off; the steles and the altar between them stood
just as when they were set up; and the oldest dated building in the land
has stood unimpaired amidst all the building and the destruction that
has gone on in Egypt throughout history.

The question about the age was settled indirectly. The original
construction had no ornament or inscriptions. But numerous mentions of
Seneferu, both during the ages near his own, and of the eighteenth
dynasty, showed plainly what the Egyptians knew about the builder.

[Illustration: 109. COURT OF TEMPLE.]

The pyramid of Medum differs from nearly all the others. It is really
the primitive tomb-building or mastaba, such as often is found with
successive coats added around it in the cemetery here; but this was
enlarged by seven coats of masonry, widening and heightening it, until a
final coat over all covered the slope from top to bottom at one angle.
It is thus the final stage of complication of the mastaba tomb, and the
first type of the pyramid. Later kings saved the intermediate stages,
and built pyramids all at one design, without any additions. This
architectural feature is another proof of the early age of this pyramid.
And it is remarkably akin to the pyramid of Khufu which follows it. Both
have the same angle; and therefore the ratio of height to circuit, being
that of a radius to its circle, holds good. The approximate ratio
adopted was 7 to 44; the dimensions of the pyramid of Seneferu are 7 and
44 times a length of 25 cubits; those of Khufu are 7 and 44 times a
length of 40 cubits. Hence the design of the size of the great pyramid
of Gizeh was made by Khufu on the lines of the pyramid of Medum, which
was built by his predecessor. Fragments of Seneferu’s wooden coffin were
found inside the pyramid; but the place had long since been plundered.

[Illustration: 110. SECTION OF PYRAMID. 1: 2000.]

The tombs at Medum proved of great interest.

[Illustration: 111. COLUMNS OF THIRD DYNASTY.]

One of the largest was built on a very irregular foundation; and below
the ground level I found the walls by which the builders had guided
their work. Outside of each corner a wall was built up to the ground
level; the sloping profile of the side was drawn on it; and then the
wall was founded and built in line between the profiles. But the most
attractive matter was the study of the inscriptions on the tombs, which
show us the earliest forms of the hieroglyphs yet known. To preserve and
examine their record I made a full-sized copy of the whole, and then
published that reduced by photo-lithography. The evidence is the most
valuable that we can yet obtain, on the earliest traceable civilization
of the Egyptians. We have no remains certainly dated older than these;
and the objects used as hieroglyphs here must have been already long
familiar for them to have been used for signs. They therefore lead us
back to the third dynasty, or even earlier times; and they show us
various objects which are as yet quite unknown to us till much later
ages.

We can thus estimate the architecture of the pre-pyramid period. There
were columns with spreading capitals and abaci, set up in rows to
support the roof. There were papyrus columns, with a curious bell-top on
the flower, the source of the heavier conventional form of later times;
these were probably carved in wood, and originated from a wooden tent
pole. There were octagonal fluted columns tapering to the top, and
painted with a black dado, a white ornamental band, and red above. There
was the cornice of uraeus serpents, which is so familiar in later times.
And the granaries were already built with sloping sides, as seen on
later tombs. In short, all the essentials of an advanced architecture
seem to have been quite familiar to the Egyptians; and we must cease to
argue from the simplicity of the religious buildings which we know--such
as the granite temples of Gizeh, or the limestone temple of Medum--for
deciding on the architecture of the fourth and third dynasties. We seem
to be as far from a real beginning as ever.

The animals drawn here show that the domestication of various species
was no uncommon thing; apes, monkeys, many kinds of horned cattle,
ibexes, &c., and various birds, all appear familiarly in this age. And
of the wild birds the eagle, owl, and wag-tail, are admirably figured,
far better than in later times. The Libyan race was already a civilized
ally of Egypt, using bows and arrows much as we see them subsequently.
The tools employed were of the established types; the adze and the
chisel of bronze; the sickle of flint teeth set in wood; the axe of
stone; the head of the bow drill--all these are shown us. And the
exactitude of the standards of measure was a matter of careful concern;
the cubit here does not differ from the standard of later times more
than the thickness of a bit of stout card. The draught-board was exactly
the same as that which is found down to Greek times.

Some matters, however, point to a stage which passed away soon after.
The sign for a seal is not a scarab, or a ring, but a cylinder of
jasper, set in gold ends, and turning on a pin attached to a necklace of
stone beads. Cylinders are often met with in early times, but died out
of use almost entirely by the eighteenth dynasty. This points to a
connection with Babylonia in early times. The numerals are all derived
from various lengths of rope; pointing to an original reckoning on
knotted ropes, as in many other countries. And some suggestion of the
original home of Egyptian culture near the sea, is made by the signs for
water being all black or dark blue-green. This is a colour that no one
living on the muddy Nile would ever associate with water; rather should
we suppose it to have originated from the clear waters of the Red Sea.

Another glimpse of the prehistoric age in Egypt is afforded by the
burials at Medum. The later people always buried at full length, and
with some provision for the body, such as food, head-rests, &c. Such
burials are found among the nobles at Medum. But most of the people
there buried in a contracted form, nose and knees, or at least with the
thigh bent square with the body and heels drawn up. And moreover, no
food-vessels or other objects are put in. Yet there was no mere
indifference shown; the bodies are in deep well tombs, often placed in
large wooden boxes, which must have been valuable in Egypt, and always
lying with the head to the north, facing the east. Here is clearly a
total difference in beliefs, and probably also in race. We know that two
races, the aquiline-nosed and the snouty, can be distinguished in early
times; and it seems that the aborigines used the contracted burial, and
the dynastic race the extended burial, which--with its customs--soon
became the national mode.

Is it likely that the bulk of the people should have resisted this
change for some 800 years, and then have suddenly adopted it in two or
three generations? Does not this rapid adoption of the upper-class
custom, between the beginning of the fourth dynasty and the immediately
succeeding times, suggest that the dynastic race did not enter Egypt
till shortly before we find their monuments? At least, the notion that
the stages preceding the known monuments should be sought outside of
Egypt, and that this is the explanation of the dearth of objects before
the fourth dynasty, is strengthened by the change of custom and belief
which we then find.

The mutilations and diseases that come to light are remarkable. One man
had lost his left leg below the knee; another had his hand cut off and
put in the tomb; others seem to have had bones excised, and placed
separately with the body. In one case acute and chronic inflammation and
rheumatism of the back had united most of the vertebrae into a solid
mass down the inner side. In another case there had been a rickety
curvature of the spine. To find so many peculiarities in only about
fifteen skeletons which I collected, is strange. These are all in the
Royal College of Surgeons now, for study.

Medum has, then, led us some way further back than we had reached before
in the history of Egyptian civilization; but it has shown how vastly our
information must be increased before the problems are solved.




CHAPTER XI.

THE FRESH LIGHT ON THE PAST.


It might seem as if the researches described in these chapters were,
though interesting in themselves, yet not of particular account in the
wider view of human history and civilization. It is to focus together
this new information, to show the results which flow from it, and to
give a connected idea of our fresh light on the past, that this chapter
is placed here. The application of scientific principles to archaeology,
the opening of fresh methods of enquiry, and the rigorous notice of the
period of everything found, have been as fruitful in the East as it has
proved to be in the West.

In Egypt, the oldest condition of the present country that is known--the
beginning of history as distinct from geology--is an age of great
rainfall and denudation; succeeding to the geological age, in which the
existing masses of surface gravels were laid down. This rain promoted
vegetation, as in a previous age of which remains are seen in the
various silicified forests, which occur where circumstances favoured
their preservation. The amount of water falling on the country swelled
the volume of the Nile to far beyond its greatest modern extent.
Between the cliffs on either hand it ran certainly hundreds of feet
higher than at present, probably in part as an estuary. The cliffs all
along the Nile are worn by water running at a great height; and the
_débris_ brought down from the side valleys is piled up in hills at the
mouths of the valleys, in a way that could only occur where they
discharged into deep water. That the rain sufficed to fill up such a
vast volume, we can believe, when we see the gorges cut back in the
sides of the Nile cliffs by the lateral drainage. These often run back
for some miles, ploughed out by receding waterfalls--small
Niagaras--which have each left at the valley head their precipitous fall
of polished rock, with a great basin below it hollowed by the force of
the torrent. Such was the source of the power which has scoured out the
whole Nile valley for a depth of over two hundred feet. High up on the
hills between the Nile and the Fayum, the very crest of the hill is
entirely of gravels and boulders, which can only have been deposited
when there was a dead level at that height across the Nile valley. All
the depths of the Nile below those hills have been scoured out by the
rainfall and the torrent of the stream, some miles in width, and
probably one to two hundred feet in depth. And the age of this is not
merely geological and beyond human interests. Man was there at this
time, as his rude flint implement, river-worn and rolled, high upon the
hills, now shows us. (See Chap. VI. Fig. 58.)

We come down an age later. The Nile had fallen to near its present
level, but still filled its whole bed to perhaps fifty feet deep.
Vegetation still grew on the hills; for we find traces of man at this
time, and he must have lived on something. Where he lived we can guess
by the flints which he fashioned, and which the heavy rains swept away
down the valleys, and bedded in the shoals of _débris_ in the reduced
and shallow river. These flints are now to be picked out from the sides
of later cuttings which the rain has made through its old river
deposits, now high and dry in air; and it is at the mouth of the valley
of the tombs of the kings at Thebes that these flints have been
collected.

After that, we know nothing more of man until we find that the country
was in its present state,--without any rainfall for practical purposes,
the hills all barren desert, the Nile only filling the bottom of its old
bed for a few months of the year, and meandering the rest of the time in
a channel cut in its own mud, and man cultivating the old bed of the
river when it is not overflowed. The civilization that we find before us
in the earliest known history appears elaborate and perfect. After that,
only slow changes of fashion and taste influenced it, and but few
discoveries of importance were made during thousands of years which
ensued. That this civilization was imported by an incoming race seems
most probable; and the dynastic Egyptians found already in the country
an aboriginal population, whose features, whose beliefs, and whose
customs, differed much from their own. The two races had not yet
amalgamated when we first come into their presence at Medum; but soon
after that all signs of difference cease.

This earliest civilization was completely master of the arts of combined
labour, of masonry, of sculpture, of metal-working, of turning, of
carpentry, of pottery, of weaving, of dyeing, and other elements of a
highly organized social life; and in some respects their work is quite
the equal of any that has been done by mankind in later ages. Though
simple, it is of extreme ability; and it is only in resources, and not
in skill, that it has ever been surpassed. Certain products were then
scarcely if at all known, and it is in the application of these that the
civilization of later times shows a difference. No metal was used except
copper, and hence flint was largely needed. And glass was probably
unknown, although glazes were in use. But in most other respects the
changes of later times are rather due to economy of production, and an
increased demand for cheap imitations.

The work of the great period of the twelfth dynasty differs mainly in
the freer use of writing, the greater quantity and poorer quality of the
sculptures or paintings, and the introduction of glass and of glassy
frits for colouring.

The next great period, the eighteenth to the nineteenth dynasty, is
marked by the use of bronze, and the disappearance of flint tools. The
art of glazing was much developed, and attained a brilliancy and variety
of colouring, and a boldness of design, which was never again reached,
unless perhaps by the mediaeval Orientals. But artistically the finest
work of this age scarcely reaches the perfection of the sculpture and
drawing which had already passed away.

The next serious change was the introduction of iron, of which there is
no satisfactory evidence until about 800 B.C. Iron may have been known
perhaps as a curiosity, just as one example of bronze occurs two
thousand years before it came into actual use; but it had no effect on
the arts. And shortly after came the Egyptian renascence, when the cycle
of invention was run through, and the Egyptians were reduced to copying
slavishly, and without the original spirit, the works of their
ancestors. The Western influence became predominant, and importations
instead of development govern the succeeding changes.

But it is rather in Europe than in Egypt that our interest centres. As
no European literature remains to us older than the sixth or seventh
century B.C. (except the oral poems), it has been too readily assumed
that no civilization worthy of the name could have dwelt here, and that
we are indebted to the East for all our skill. So far from this being
the case it now seems that we must almost reverse the view. We have in
the Egyptian records the accounts of a great European confederacy, which
smote Egypt again and again,--Greece, Asia Minor, Italy, and Libya, all
leagued together. We now know, from the objects found in Egypt, that
these peoples were dwelling there as settlers so far back as 1400 B.C.,
if not indeed before 2000 B.C. From the chronology of the arts now
ascertained, we can date the great civilization of Mykenae to about 1600
to 1000 B.C. (as I have stated in ‘Notes on Mykenae,’ _Journal of
Hellenic Studies_, 1891); and we begin to see a great past rising before
us, dumb, but full of meaning. Some of the metals were known in Europe
before they appear in use in Egypt: the use of bronze is quite as old
in the north as on the south of the Mediterranean; and the tin of Egypt
probably came from the mines of Hungary and Saxony, which most likely
supplied Europe at that time. Iron appears in use in Europe as soon as
in Egypt. The best forms of tools are known in Italy two or three
centuries before Egypt possessed them.

What then may be concluded as to Europe, from our present point of view?
That Europe had an indigenous civilization, as independent of Egypt and
Babylonia as was the indigenous Aryan civilization of India. That this
civilization has acquired arts independently, just as much as India has,
and that Europe has given to the East as much as it has borrowed from
there. As early as 1600 B.C., it appears that a considerable
civilization existed in Greece, which flourished in the succeeding
centuries, especially in alliance with Libya. Probably it was already
beginning in the period of the thirteenth dynasty, before 2000 B.C. By
about 1400 B.C. a great proficiency in the arts is seen; elaborate
metal-work and inlaying was made, influenced by Egyptian design, but
neither made in Egypt, nor by Egyptians. Glazed pottery painted with
designs was successfully made, and the arts of glazing and firing were
mastered. And by 1100 B.C. this civilization was already decadent.
Moreover this was not only in a corner of Europe; it had contact with
the North as well as with Italy and Africa, and is at one with the
culture of the bronze age, of which it is the crown and flower. Across
Europe, from the Greek peninsula to the Baltic, this civilization
stretches; and though in Greece it ripened to an early fall, and was
destroyed by the barbaric Dorian invasion, it retained its hardy power
in the North and in Italy. When we come down to about 800 B.C., we find
that the arts stood high in Northern Italy. The requirements of the
carpenters and joiners of that age had led them to invent the most
perfect forms of chisels; and our mortising chisel and flat chisel with
a tang have not received any improvement in the details of their form
for 2700 years. The bronze age is the source of the objects we now use.
Thence these types were carried into Egypt a couple of centuries later
by the Greeks. When we descend further we see this independent culture
of Europe prominent. The Saxons and Northmen did not borrow their
weapons, their laws, or their thoughts from Greece or Italy. The Celts
swamped the south of Europe at their pleasure; and, against the fullest
development of Greek military science, they were yet able to penetrate
far south and plunder Delphi. They were powerful enough to raid Italy
right across the Etrurian territory. When we look further east, we see
the Dacians with weapons and ornaments and dresses which belong to their
own civilization, and were not borrowed from Greece. In short, Greece
and Italy did not civilize Europe; they only headed the civilization for
a brief period. And the Italian influence, which was much the more
powerful, only lasted for a couple of centuries. From Caesar’s campaigns
to the end of the Antonines is the whole time of Italian supremacy.
After that there never was a Roman emperor, excepting a few ephemeral
reigns. The centre of power and authority in Europe was in the Balkan
peninsula. The emperors were mainly natives of that region; and the
northern Holy Roman Empire of Germany has its roots practically in the
third century. Civilization in Europe is, then, an independent growth,
borrowing from, and lending to, the East. In the van of this group of
races have come in turn Mykenaean Greece, then Etruria, Hellas, Rome,
Dacia and Pannonia, the Lombards, and the Northmen; and each in turn
have impressed their character on those peoples who were less advanced.
Our common belief in the overshadowing importance of Rome in all our
history is probably largely influenced by our literary history being
derived from Roman sources, and this Italian view being fed for
ecclesiastical purposes in the Middle Ages. In the broader view of the
history of civilization in Europe, the spread of law and Latin in
Southern Europe is perhaps Rome’s main result. But we must not forget
that the Italian supremacy was quite as brief, if more potent, than that
of other races who have led the way before and since.

We can now see somewhat of the wide results which have come to a great
extent from the study of Egyptian civilization recorded in these pages,
and the comparison of it with other countries. That vastly more remains
to be worked out is painfully seen. We are only yet on the threshold of
understanding the sources of the knowledge, the arts, and the culture,
which we have inherited from a hundred generations.




CHAPTER XII.

THE ART OF EXCAVATING.


Probably most people have somewhat the ideas of a worthy lady, who asked
me how to begin to excavate a ruined town--should she begin to dig at
the top or at the side? A cake or a raised pie was apparently in her
mind, and the only question was where to best reach the inside of it.
Now there are ruins and ruins: they may differ greatly in original
nature, in the way they have been destroyed, and in the history of their
degradation. The only rule that may be called general, is that digging
must be systematic; chance trenches or holes seldom produce anything in
themselves, they are but feelers. The main acquirement always needed is
plenty of imagination. Imagination is the fire of discovery; the best of
servants, though the worst of masters. A habit of reasoning out the most
likely cause, and all other possible causes, for the condition of things
as seen, is essential. If there is a slope of the ground, a ridge, a
hollow--Why is it there? What can have produced it? and Which cause is
the most probable for it? The mere form of the ground will often show
plainly what is beneath it. Is there a smooth uniform mound of large
size? Then a mass of house ruins of a town may be expected. Is there a
steep edge to it around? Then there was a wall, either of the town or of
some one large building which forms the whole ruin. Is there a ring of
mounds with a central depression? Then there was a temple or large
permanent building, with house ruins around it. Is there a gentle slope
up one side, and a sharp fall on the other? Then it is a rubbish mound.
Is the mass high above the general soil? Then several successive layers
of habitation may be expected. So, even from afar, some ideas may be
gleaned before setting foot on a ruined site.

[Illustration: 112. FORMS OF RUBBISH-HEAP, AND OF RUINS OF BUILDING.]

When we reach our town and walk over it, much more can be seen of what
is beneath. Very likely it seems all irregular, hillocky, dusty ground,
and who can say what it may cover? In one place, however, we find that
there are no chips or potsherds lying about: track around, and find the
space of this clearance, probably it runs along for some distance; you
are on the top of a mud-brick wall, denuded down to the level of the
rubbish in which it is buried. Follow the clear space, and you will
outline the fortifications of the city or its temple. Or perhaps you
notice a difference in the vegetation--no plants will grow on particular
ground; here is probably a mass of hard mud-brick or stonework, without
moisture or nutriment, and you will thus find the walls. Or there is a
hollow or old pit met with; here the modern natives have been digging
out stone masonry, and around it, or below, may be the rest of a
building. Some symmetrical form of the mounds can be detected, and we
are perhaps led at once to the temple, or to trace out the streets of
the town. Or a patch of ground is reddened with fire, showing that a
house has been burnt there, and probably stone and metal and pottery may
remain intact in the ruins. But our special notice must be given to the
potsherds lying strewn all over the surface. Pottery is the very key to
digging; to know the varieties of it, and the age of each, is the
alphabet of work. Not that it is more distinctive in itself than most
other products of various ages; but it is so vastly commoner than
anything else, that a place may be dated in a minute by its pottery on
the surface, which would require a month’s digging in the inside of it
to discover as much from inscriptions or sculptures. A survey showing
the form of the ground, and the position of every fragment or indication
that can be of use, is essential to understanding it; and will often
point out, by the probable symmetry of parts, what are the best spots to
examine first.

Having then made out as much as possible beforehand, we begin our
diggings. If there appear to be remains of a temple, or some larger
building, which should be thoroughly examined, we first make pits about
one edge of the site, and find how far out the ruins extend. Having
settled that, a large trench is dug along the whole of one side,
reaching down to the undisturbed soil beneath, and about six or eight
feet wide at the bottom, all the earth being heaped on the outer edge of
the trench. Then the inner side is dug away, and the stuff thrown up on
the outer side by a row of men all along the trench. Thus the trench is
gradually swept across the whole site, always taking from one side, and
throwing back on the other. Each block of stone or piece of building
found is surveyed, and covered over again if not wanted; sculptures or
inscriptions are either removed or rolled up on to the surface of the
stuff, or remain exposed in pits left in the rubbish. Thus the earth
does not cover over and encumber the surrounding ground, which may very
likely need to be excavated in its turn; the stuff is removed a minimum
distance, which means occupying a minimum of time and cost; and the site
is covered over again, to preserve from the weather and from plunderers
any foundations or masonry that may remain. Every ounce of earth is thus
examined, and all it contains is discovered. Town ruins may be treated
in the same way; all the chambers along one side of the town, or along a
street, may be cleared out and measured; then the next chambers inwards
are cleared, and the stuff all thrown into the first row of chambers;
thus gradually turning over every scrap of rubbish without destroying a
single wall, and leaving the place as well protected by its coat of
_débris_ as it was before the work.

The most fatal difficulty in the way of reaching what is wanted is when
an early site has been occupied in later times. A city may have been of
the greatest importance, and we may be certain that beneath our feet are
priceless monuments; but if there are twenty or thirty feet of later
rubbish over it all, the things might almost as well be in the centre of
the earth. Tanis was the Hyksos capital, but it would cost tens of
thousands of pounds to lay bare the Hyksos level. The town of the
twelfth dynasty at Illahun, on the contrary, yielded a harvest of small
objects and papyri, revealing all the products and habits of that remote
time, at a cost of two or three hundred pounds; simply because it was
unencumbered. The temple of Ephesos cost sixteen thousand pounds, and
almost a life’s work, to discover it, owing to its depth under the
surface. Naukratis and Defenneh, on the contrary, gave us the remains of
the archaic Greeks, merely for the picking up and a little grubbing,
both together not costing a thousand. It is plain enough that the main
consideration is an accessible site.

An excellent rule in excavating is never to dig anywhere without some
definite aim. Form at least some expectation of what may be found; and
so soon as the general clue to the arrangement is known, have clearly in
the mind what you expect to find, and what is the purpose of every
separate man’s work. One may be following the outside of a
fortification, another trenching across it to find its thickness,
another sinking a pit inside it to find the depth of the soil, another
clearing a room, or trenching to find the limits of the town, or
removing a rubbish deposit layer by layer. Unless just beginning work on
a very featureless site, the aimless trenching or pitting is merely an
excuse for a lazy mind. Far better have some theory or working
hypothesis, and labour to prove it to be either right or wrong, than
simply remain in expectancy. When you know what to look for, the most
trivial indications, which otherwise would seem to be nothing, become of
great importance and attract the eye. And the workmen should be
encouraged to know what to expect beneath the surface, as it prevents
their destroying the evidences. A vertical junction a few inches high,
clean sand on one side and earth on the other, will lead to tracing the
whole plan of a destroyed temple; a little patch of sand in the ground
will produce a foundation deposit to your hands, and give the age of a
building which has vanished; a slightly darker soil in a trench will
show you the wall of a town which you are seeking; some bricks laid with
mud instead of sand in a pyramid will point the way to the sepulchre. A
beginner is vastly disappointed that some great prize does not turn up
after a week or two of work; while all the time he is probably not
noticing or thinking about material for historical results that is lying
before him all the time. Perhaps in some place nothing whatever may be
found that would be worth sixpence in the antiquity market; and yet the
results from walls, and plans, and pottery, and measurements, may be
what historians have been longing to know about for years before.

It need hardly be said that the greatest care is required in making
certain as to exactly where things are found. Workmen should never be
allowed to meddle with each other’s lots of potsherds or little things;
and any man mixing up things from elsewhere with his own finds should be
dismissed. Men should be trained by questioning to report where they
found objects, at what level and spot in their holes; and the best men
may in this way be led up to astonishing intelligence, observing exactly
how they find things, and replacing them as found to illustrate the
matter. In order to encourage the men to preserve all they find, and to
prevent their being induced to secrete things of value, they should
always be paid as a present the market price of such things at that
place, and a trifle for any pottery or little scraps that may be wanted.
To do this properly it is needful to know the local prices pretty
closely, so as to ensure getting everything, and on the other hand not
to induce men to foist things into the work from other places. Wages are
paid by measure wherever possible, as it avoids the need of keeping the
men up to the work, and is happier for both parties. Some day-work
intermixed where measurement is impossible will often suffice.

It would be thought at first that nothing could be easier than to know a
wall when you see it. Yet both in Egypt and Palestine the discrimination
of mud-brick walls from the surrounding soil and rubbish in which they
are buried, is one of the most tedious and perplexing tasks. To settle
what is a wall and what is washed mud, and to find the limits and clear
the face of the wall, is often a matter of half-an-hour’s examination.
The two opposite ways of working are by trenching sections through the
wall, or by clearing the faces of it. The first is clumsy, but is
needful sometimes, especially if the wall is much like the soil, and the
workman cannot be trusted; as, if the face is cleared, the whole outside
may be cut away without leaving any trace. The light on the surface is
all-important, as any shadows or oblique lights mask the differences of
the bricks; either all in sunshine, or better, all in shade, is needful
to see the bricks. A distant general view will often show differences of
tint in the courses, yellow, red, brown, grey, or black, which prove
the mass to have been brickwork. The most decisive test is the
difference at a vertical joint between bricks, as that cannot be
simulated by natural beds of washed earth, as courses sometimes are. The
lines of mud mortar are also different in colour to the bricks, and show
out the courses. But yet all the question of joints is deceptive
sometimes, owing to fallen bricks lying flat, and even fallen lumps of
wall. In order to see the surface it must be fresh cut, or better, fresh
broken by flaking it with picking at the face; by chopping successively
back and back, each cut flakes away the mark of the previous blow, and
so leaves a clean fractured surface all over. It must be remembered that
bricks are often bent out of form by solid flow of the wall under great
pressure, so that they may be distorted almost like a glacial deposit.
In cleaning down the face of a wall it may often be traced by its
hardness, but this is not a test to be left to workmen, or they may cut
away at random; a very good plan is to let the man trench along a few
inches outside of the face of the wall, and then cut down the remaining
coat of rubbish oneself, to bare the face. Though pottery, stones, &c.,
often serve to show what is accumulated soil, yet they are found in
brick sometimes, and must not be relied on entirely. The texture of the
soil is important, as in accumulations all long bodies, bits of straw,
&c., lie flat; whereas in brick they are mixed in all directions. Also
washed-down earth almost always shows worm casts in it. Often a wall, if
in low wet soil, will show out distinctly when the cut surface has
dried, as cracks will form more readily along the joints. In many
cases, however, all of these tests hardly serve to unravel the puzzle;
especially where there are successive walls superposed, and only a small
height of any one to examine. To trace out the position of ancient walls
is, however, one of the first requisites in such work; not only do we
recover the plan of the town and its buildings, but we are led thus to
recognize what may be the most important sites for special excavation.

One of the most difficult questions always is to know what may be safely
thrown away. Most trivial things may be of value, as giving a clue to
something else. Generally it is better to keep some examples of
everything. No matter how broken the potsherds may be, keep one of each
kind and form, replacing it by more complete examples as the work goes
on. Thus the collection that is kept is always in process of weeding. It
need hardly be said that every subject should be attended to; the
excavator’s business is not to study his own speciality only, but to
collect as much material as possible for the use of other students. To
neglect the subjects that interest him less is not only a waste of his
opportunities, but a waste of such archaeological material as may never
be equalled again. History, inscriptions, tools, ornaments, pottery,
technical works, weights, sources of imported stones, ethnology, botany,
colours, and any other unexpected subject that may turn up, must all
have a due share of attention. And keeping up the record of where
everything has been found, and all the information that will afterwards
be needed, about the objects and the discoveries, the measurements and
details for publication, is a serious part of the work.

However much it may be desired to preserve some things, they almost defy
the excavator’s care. It is a simple affair to get an antiquity safe out
of the ground, but then begin its perils of destruction, and unless
carefully attended to, it may slowly perish in a few days or weeks. The
first great trouble is salt; it scales the face of stones, or makes them
drop off in powder; it destroys the surface of pottery; it eats away
metal. In all cases where salt exists it is imperative to soak the
objects in two or three changes of water, for hours or days, according
to the thickness. I have done this even with rotten wood, and with paper
squeezes. Another source of trouble is the rotting of organic materials,
wood, string, leather, cloth, &c. For all such things the best treatment
is a bath of melted wax. But innumerable questions arise as work goes
on, which can only be settled according to their circumstances: still,
the soaking bath and the wax pot are the main preservatives.

The excavator should always be ready to take squeezes or photographs at
once when required, and it is the best rule always to copy every
inscription as soon as it is seen. If only an hour had been spent on the
stele of Mesha, how much less should we have to regret! There is always
the chance of accidents, and no risks should be run with inscribed
materials. Even when the owner will not allow a copy to be made, the
most needful points may be committed to memory, and written down as soon
as possible, even under guise of making notes on other subjects. Another
matter in which it is essential that an excavator should be proficient,
is surveying and levelling: in order to understand a place and direct
the work, in order to preserve a record of what is done and make it
intelligible to others, a survey is always needed, and generally
levelling as well.

Lastly, what most persons never think of, a great deal of time and
attention is required for safely packing a collection. This part of the
business generally takes about a fifth of the time of the excavations;
and much care and arrangement has to be bestowed on the security of
heavy stones, or pottery, or fragile stucco, or glass, for a long
journey of railways and shipping. Packing with pads, with clothes, with
chopped straw, or with reeds, hay, or straw, is more or less suitable in
different instances. Finding things is but sorry work if you cannot
preserve them and transport them safely. Most people think of excavating
as a pleasing sort of holiday amusement; just walking about a place and
seeing things found: but it takes about as much care and management as
any other business, and needs perhaps more miscellaneous information
than most other affairs.




CHAPTER XIII.

THE FELLAH.


It is always difficult to realise the state of mind of another person,
even of one who is perhaps an equal in education, and who has been
reared amid the same ideas and surroundings as one’s own; but it is
impossible to really take the same standpoint as one of another race,
another education, and another standard of duty and of morals. We
cannot, therefore, see the world as a fellah sees it; and I believe this
the more readily because after living the most part of ten years among
the fellahin, and being accused of having gone some way toward them, I
yet feel the gulf between their nature and my own as impassable as ever.
One measuring-line may perhaps give some slight idea of their position.
The resemblances between Egypt of the present and mediaeval England are
enough to help our feelings in the matter. There is the same prevalence
of the power of the great man of the village; the same rough-and-ready
justice administered by him; the same lack of intercommunication, the
same suspicion of strangers; the absence of roads, and use of pack
animals, is alike; the lack of shops in all but large towns, and the
great importance of the weekly markets in each village, is similar
again; and the mental state of the people seems to be somewhat akin to
that of our ancestors.

[Illustration: 113. HOUSES IN THE DELTA, WITH RAIN-PROOF DOMES.]

The man who can read and write is the rare exception in the country;
perhaps two per cent. of the fellahin men can do so, but probably not
one woman in ten thousand. Of education there is but very little, for
the great majority of the people; in villages the children of the fellah
seldom go to school, and in large towns the scholars are but a minority
of the boys, while the girls are nowhere. In accounts they have some
sharpness, but their reckoning would amuse an infant scholar in England.
I overheard some quick lads, of about sixteen, anxiously discussing what
a man’s wages were at £3 a month: they pretty soon saw that it was £1,
or 100 piastres, every ten days, but how many piastres a day that was
puzzled them all. One fellow proposed eleven; he was contradicted by
another who said twelve; then another tried 9½; and at last, as a great
discovery, one sagely reminded them all that ten tens made a hundred,
and so a hundred piastres in ten days _must_ be ten piastres a day.
Egypt would almost satisfy Jack Cade.

The gross superstition, and the innumerable local saints, remind us
again of mediaeval times. Many--perhaps most--of the people wear charms,
written on paper, and sewn up in leather; they are worn around the neck,
on the purse or pouch, or on the top of the cap. Cattle are also
sometimes protected by them. It is common also for a man passing a
saint’s tomb to repeat a prayer in a low mumble, even without stopping;
while many go into the tomb-chamber to pray. These saints are anybody
who has died in an odour of sanctity, probably within this century or
the last--for few, I imagine, have a perennial reputation. Some of the
great saints are commonly appealed to in the slightest emergency, such
as lifting a weight or climbing an obstacle; and constant appeals are
made to _Ya Said, ya Bedawi, ya Tantawi_ (‘O Said, O Bedawi, O man of
Tantah’) or _Ya sitteh Zenab_ (‘O lady Zenab,’ the wife of the prophet);
while a Copt, if his legs are stiff in rising from the ground, will call
out, _Ya adrah Mariam_ (‘O virgin Mary’). The most absurd tales are
readily believed, and there is little or no discrimination or criticism
applied to them. At one village there lies a large number of rough
stones half hidden in the ground, scattered over an acre or so; probably
old remnants of building material, brought a century or two ago from the
hills. A great festival of a local saint is held at the village yearly,
and an intelligent fellow gravely told me that the saint had been
murdered there with all his followers, of whom a thousand were buried
under each of the stones. The total number, or the question of burying a
thousand men in a few square yards, did not seem to matter. I have also
heard the old tale of the man who stole a sheep and ate it: when
questioned, he denied the theft, whereat the sheep bleated in his
stomach. A station-master, who had been educated in England, told me in
English, in all sincerity, a tale about a Copt he knew, who got great
treasures from a hall full of gold in an ancient mound. The door of the
place only opened for five minutes once a week, on Friday noon, just
when all true believers are at mosque; then the Copt went and took all
the gold he could carry, before the door shut. One day, tarrying, the
door began to shut and wounded his heel before he could escape.

[Illustration: 114. HOUSES IN MIDDLE EGYPT.]

While naming the local festivals above, it may be noted that they
generally take place around a tall pole fixed in some open space by the
village. Some poles are stout masts thirty or forty feet high: around
this central point is the celebration of the _molid_ or birthdays of the
village saint. Some _molids_ are fairs for the whole district, lasting
nine days or even more, and attended by performers, shows, jugglers,
sweet-sellers, and as much riff-raff as any English fair.

Many visitors to Egypt see the dancing and howling derwishes, but few
know of the common and less obtrusive orgies of the same kind in the
villages. They are connected strictly with a devotional sentiment: a man
who has just joined in such excitement will tell you that it is ‘good to
see Allah’ in that way--much like the fervid and maddening religious
intoxication which yet finds a place in English civilization. These
derwish parties are formed from a few men and boys--perhaps a dozen or
twenty--who happen to live as neighbours: they are almost always held in
moonlight, generally near full moon, a point which may connect them with
some pre-Islamite moon-worship; and though often without any cause but
idleness, yet I have noticed them being held after a death in a village
where they do not occur otherwise. A professed derwish often leads the
party, but that is not essential. The people all stand in a circle, and
begin repeating _Al-láh_ with a very strong accent on the latter
syllable; bowing down the head and body at the former, and raising it at
the latter. This is done all in unison, and slowly at first; gradually
the rate quickens, the accent is stronger, and becomes more of an
explosive howl, sounding afar off like an engine; the excitement is
wilder, and hideously wild, until a horrid creeping comes over you as
you listen, and you feel that in such a state there is no answering for
what may be done. Incipient madness of the intoxication of excitement
seems poured out upon them all, when at last they break down from
exhaustion; or perhaps one or other, completely mad for the time, rushes
off into the desert, and is followed, for fear he may injure himself.
After a pause, some other phrase is started, and the same round is gone
through. After about half an hour of this they separate with a great
sense of devotional virtue, and wearied with excitement.

[Illustration: 115. HOUSES IN UPPER EGYPT.]

Some curious observances are connected with accidental deaths. Fires of
straw are lighted one month after the death, around the ground where the
body has lain; and where blood has been shed iron nails are driven into
the ground, and a mixture of lentils, salt, &c., is poured out. These
look like offerings to appease spirits, and the fires seem as if to
drive away evil influences. Funeral offerings are still placed in the
tombs for the sustenance of the dead, just as they were thousands of
years ago.

The very hazy notions about all foreign places, and the blankness of
ignorance concerning surrounding Nature, is a strong reminder of
mediaeval times. To say that the earth is round is flat heresy in
Egypt; and even the _ulema_ of Cairo--learned in all the wisdom of
Islam--walked out of the government examination room to which they had
been invited when a pupil was examined in geography. To listen to a
description of a round world was too atrocious an insult to them. The
dim ideas of Europe--some far-off heathenish land of infidels--and the
questions as to how many Muslims there are in our towns and villages,
show the peasant, even when intelligent, to be much on a level with the
audience of Sir John Mandeville. It is no wonder that in such ignorance
there is a mighty fanaticism. Islam is all in all to the fellah: the
unbelievers he looks on as a miserable minority; and it is only the
unpleasant fact that they cannot be crushed at present that prevents his
crushing them, and asserting the supremacy of Islam. A clever Arab once
remarked to me concerning a department which was mismanaged by European
direction, ‘How much better it would be to have an Arab over it!’ But on
my asking where he could find a native whose corruption would not be far
worse than the present rule, he could but reluctantly give in. This
fanatical feeling of dislike to the Nusrani, or Nazarene, was the
mainstay of Arabi’s revolt; and the very existence of such a feeling
shows how dangerous it might become if fed on success. The children
unintentionally reveal what is the tone and talk of the households in
private; they constantly greet the European with howls of _Ya Nusrani_
(‘O Nazarene’), the full force of which title is felt when your
donkey-boy urges on his beast by calling it, ‘Son of a dog! son of a
pig! son of a Nazarene!’ Any abuse will do to howl at the infidel, and
I have been for months shouted at across every field as _Ya khawaga
mafeles!_ (‘O bankrupt foreigner’), because I preferred walking to the
slow jolt of a donkey. The fact that dozens of the villagers were
depending on me for good pay all the time did not seem to weigh in the
youthful mind, compared with the pleasure of finding a handy insult.
This temper, if not held down, might easily rise in the arrogance of its
ignorance to such a height as to need a much sharper lesson than it has
ever received. That a massacre of the Coptic Christians was fully
anticipated by them when Arabi drove out the foreigners, is a well-known
matter of history, which should not be lightly forgotten.

This fanaticism is linked with an unreasoning ferocity of punishment. I
have seen a coachman suddenly seize on a street-boy, and, for some word
or gesture, lash him on the bare legs with the whip again and again with
all his might. Even a particularly good-natured and pleasant native
remarked with gusto how good it would be to take a certain family who
were of thievish habits, and pour petroleum over them--from the old
woman to the baby--and so burn them all up alive: he gloated over the
thoroughness of the undertaking, while all the time he was cheating his
own employer. It is a pity for their sakes that they do not believe in
witchcraft, the whole village would so much enjoy the festivity of doing
a ducking, in the fashion of our ancestors.

Akin to this fanaticism is the ruling view of everything as _kismet_,
the allotted fate. Perhaps no abstraction is so deleterious to a
character as this; as a man always can thus shut his eyes to the
consequences of his own actions, and refuse to learn by experience. I
never yet found a fellah who confessed to doing wrong, or to being sorry
for what he had done. He may sometimes stand and look aghast at the
consequences of his own carelessness; but he will do no more, and no
less, if the damage is the fault of someone else. He scarcely can, in
fact, express what one of ourselves would feel, as there is no word for
repentance in his vocabulary, except ‘good’; nor is there any word for
sorrow, except ‘angry’ or ‘annoyed.’ The very sentiment of remorse is so
unknown that there are no means of expressing it in any form. The
constant way of appeasing an injured party is for the offender to assure
him emphatically that it is of no consequence (_ma’alesh_); and the more
often he thus asserts that he has not done the other a wrong, the more
he considers he clears himself of it, until after sufficient of this
lying he goes away with a sense of virtue. If in consequence of some
very plain fault a man is punished by dismissal or otherwise, expressly
pointing out to him the causes of his punishment, he will sullenly shrug
his shoulders and say to his companions, _Kismet_; it is fated he is not
to work. That any blame attaches to him for his trouble seems not to be
_dangable_ into him by any means. This lack of belief in consequences is
also seen in the extreme carelessness often shown. After a harvest, a
large quantity of grain had been stored in a room beside a village,
covered with the most inflammable of roofing--durra straw: then, in
order to toast some bread, a blazing fire was lighted in the low room,
and allowed to flame up to the straw overhead. Of course it was soon
all in flames, and the whole of a large proprietor’s harvest was
destroyed. Even when it was blazing, within a hundred feet of the canal,
the only attempt to fetch water was by two or three women slowly filling
their great pitchers and carrying them up on their heads as usual; no
notion of a chain-gang ever seemed to occur to them. The same lack of
any co-operation is seen when robbers are about. I asked why, when a
house was attacked by thieves, the other villagers did not all come out
and seize the men, being ten or twenty to one. The reply was, ‘When any
one hears another house being robbed, he keeps as quiet as possible, and
does nothing, for fear of attracting the thieves to his own house.’

This belief in _kismet_, and lack of co-operation, tells favourably in
one way--the fellah is not revengeful. No matter whether he deserves
what ill befalls him, or is an innocent sufferer, he never goes about
for simple vengeance, but yields, and is ready to act as if no grudge or
ill-feeling rested in his mind. What might be the case in an affront to
their religion or family I would not say; but in all minor matters the
fellah may be dealt with regardless of an idea of revenge.

The cardinal principle to remember in dealing with Egyptians is that
they have no forbearance, and know no middle course. The notion of means
exactly meeting an end, is outside of the fellah’s sense. If he is
careless about a danger, he is so careless in many cases as to be
killed; if he thinks about it, he is so afraid that he will not face it
at all. If he has to make anything secure, no amount of surplus
security seems too great. If he knows that you have power, he cannot be
too submissive, and insists on kissing your hand, or at the least so
honouring the aroma of it where it has touched his own. But if he has
power himself, he gets all he can out of it; and the grasping and
overbearing nature of the village shekh is too generally well known to
those under him. Nothing seems to have astonished and disgusted Stanley
more than the scheming of the Egyptian soldiers, whom he expected to
follow him, in retreating. Yet the whole affair was characteristically
Egyptian: fleeing from the Mahdists; only too glad to find anyone so
foolish in their eyes as to be troubled about them; and then clumsily
plotting--without any regard to time--for making the best profit they
could out of the affair, by seizing whatever seemed to have come into
their power. It would have been nothing to them to make away with people
who were so indiscreet as to put ammunition within their grasp. The
scheme seems to be the natural course of things to anyone who has
watched the ways of Egypt. Peremptory orders are understood; and the
more peremptorily they are enforced the more cheerfully they are obeyed,
though roughness or harshness is seldom necessary: but if you do not
rule, you must submit to be ruled. And the fellah has a positive dislike
to having a choice of action left to him. In matters indifferent to me,
I often tell them to do what they please; and that generally ends in
their helplessly doing nothing, especially if they need to co-operate.
At last, seeing their trouble, I give a precise order, and every one at
once obeys it with thankfulness.

From this it follows that the fellah is one of the most easily managed
people in the world. When once he knows who is master, there is little
or no trouble. And if you can pick and choose your men, and keep them
well in hand, instantly dismissing any who may disobey, it would be
impossible to find a more cheerful, pleasant, well-disposed, and kindly
set of fellows. The only danger is that they may perceive too much of
your confidence in them. All the best men I have had have gone
lamentably to the bad when they found that they were at all trusted. The
temptation of having any credit of character is too great for them; they
hasten to commute it for instant advantage, as soon as they see that
there is anything to be made of it. The goose that lays golden eggs has
a short and perilous life in Egypt.

That there is scarcely any sense of honour as to truthfulness need
hardly be remarked. The idea of truth for its own sake does not weigh
appreciably against either present advantage or serving the interest of
another. The most respectable fellahin I have known would lie readily
and unlimitedly, if they thought it beneficial. One very good fellow
came to tell me one day what he had heard, prefacing it by saying how he
had not two minutes before obtained the information by solemnly
promising never to tell me about it. That he avowed the most unblushing
and deliberate lying never seemed to occur to his mind as anything
noticeable, but rather a virtuous attention to my interests. Another
superior fellow lost some letters, which were entrusted to him to post:
when he came back he mentioned the loss, without any regret, and
immediately went on to praise himself for the great virtue he had shown
in acknowledging it, and the elevation of his moral standpoint above the
sinners around him. It was, perhaps, a triumph of candour for an
Egyptian.

From all that we have just noticed it will be plain that Egypt is a land
of bribery. Every person who wants anything pays for it; time,
attention, favour, facilities, screening, and escaping, all have their
price. And it is the length of this price that is the deterrent from
crime, and the dread of those who get into trouble over any affair. I
reported a case of a villager throwing a dead buffalo into the canal. A
policeman visited the shekh to enquire; a sovereign changed hands, and
he returned stating that it was all a mistake, and that no dead buffalo
ever existed there. But a few weeks later another policeman in search of
prey rode round; and, finding a dead dog, pocketed a dollar for his
acuteness. And the policeman is the fellah in trousers, armed, and in
authority. A good false accusation will sometimes do, and is even
occasionally worked on a wholesale scale for small bribes. Briefly, it
may be stated that the working of petty jurisdiction is, that the law
lays down what are offences, and attaches certain penalties to them;
these penalties, then, roughly are the maximum limits to which the
police can reward themselves by the discovery of such offences. The
system works all right in the long run, as well as any system could in
so corrupt a country: it is part payment by results to the police, with
a minimum daily wage secured to them, and the pickings in proportion to
their acuteness. Of course all this is profanity to the ears of High
Officials, who never have a chance of hearing the quiet doings in the
villages. The European dignitaries, and many of the natives also, duly
and diligently administer justice when an affair comes to their ears;
but the little minor assaults and thefts and squabbles are adjusted on a
rougher and readier system, which had better be left alone if it cannot
be improved away altogether.

The barrier which exists between the fellah and the European official is
almost insurmountable. Not many officials visit the country districts at
all; when they do they stop at the shekhs’ houses, and are always
attended by servants, before whom no man would speak if he could avoid
it, as they would talk about him to the natives in the offices. Then the
fellah is timid, dreads men who go about on prancing horses, and wear
riding-boots and spurs--all that means police and terrorism to him.
Unless therefore there is something very seriously amiss, the fellah in
general will not fly to the European official, on the rare occasion when
he sees him in the distance, and get himself into the fire by trying to
put some one else into the frying-pan. If any one wanted to learn what
was going on, and what was the state of affairs, let him go on foot
occasionally and tramp through some villages, chat to the people by the
way, avoid the shekhs like poison; and, while not at all disguising who
he was in conversation, move about in as different a manner to the
ordinary official as he possibly can. Some wiseacres have even said,
‘Well, let them petition if there is anything amiss.’ Petition, indeed!
from people who cannot write, and have no knowledge in general of who
is the proper official to appeal to, or where he is! If they go to one
of the clerks at the wayside--where they sit about the office doors,--he
will at once inform the natives in the very office which may be in
fault: if they go to the village scribe, he is generally a right-hand
man of the shekh, who may be the very defendant in question. No!
European administration, except in important or flagrant cases, scarcely
touches the life of the fellah directly.

When I first met the fellah, I had always impressed upon me by an old
Arab that no one ever did anything rightly unless they were heartily
afraid; and though this may be a harsh way to state it, the fact is true
at bottom. There is no need to terrorise or to bully, and with most
Egyptians perfect suavity is the best course; but if a man transgresses
in any way he must be met by sternness, and emphatically put into his
right place. One of the most effective of minor rebukes is to raise a
laugh at the transgressor among the bystanders: to make a man’s doings
ridiculous to his neighbours crushes him more than any expostulations.
The fellah has a good sense of the ludicrous, though he very seldom
originates a joke. I have known little comparisons or nicknames that I
have given, taken up all round by the people with a relish, and be
repeated sometimes for days afterwards. Nothing smoothes matters more
than getting them into a cheerful mood; and I have often watched the
faces when a discussion or difference has occurred, and by just throwing
in a remark when a passing smile appeared, to bring it out into a laugh,
the scale has been turned and business settled. The native in general
squabbles over a difference with his fellows, shouts, and insists, shows
fight, seizes the garments of his opponent, and threatens to tear them;
all for, perhaps, a pennyworth of advantage one way or other. They think
equally that persistent worrying will wear out the determination of the
European; and, until they learn by long experience, they will try that
method. I have known a shekh stand facing me for over half an hour
persisting that I should employ certain men to work for me; and, though
my refusals increased in strength, it was not until he was wearied out
that he ceased: it is a simple battle of endurance in such cases. He
knew that his position would prevent direct personal ejection by force,
and he accordingly used up that forbearance as so much leverage for his
request.

Two principles of the fellah nature which Europeans cannot realise at
first are that they cannot exercise forbearance, as we have noticed; and
secondly, that they cannot stand long-continued temptation. Residents
sometimes say that the native is incurably bad; that he may serve you
for years, and rob you at the end. But such cases are really the fault
of the employer, who has no more right to tempt people to rob him than
to tempt them to murder him. To reconcile such a view of the fellah with
the astonishing honesty and particularity that I have often found, may
seem difficult. But time is the source of the difference. A man who will
at once correct his accounts against himself, or bring you some trifle
that you have overlooked or forgotten, will be quite incapable of even
far less honesty, if the temptation is before him for months. Their
impulses are generally sound and honest; but if they begin to look on
anything as being in their hands, they drift easily into regarding it as
their own. It is only a more rapid application of what may be seen in
England regarding long trusts, charities, tenant-right, &c. The
straightforward honesty that I have found on most occasions when an
immediate temptation was before the fellah, has surprised me, and makes
it needful to remember that this must not be strained and tried by
continual temptation, the exposure to which will almost certainly spoil
the character, and oblige one to cast aside a man who might otherwise
have been useful and honest. Knowing this, I regard these failings of
the fellah as lying quite as much at his employer’s door as at his own.

One of the pleasantest points of the Egyptian character is the genuine
and unfeigned hospitality so often met with. If in walking through a
village I happen to pass the shekh sitting at his door, he will usually
press the stranger to come in and have coffee, and hardly take a
refusal. When pitching tent for the night, it is well to avoid coming
under the shekh’s notice, or probably he will insist on your stopping in
his house: and in the larger towns the shekhs have sometimes excellent
guest-chambers, with European furniture. This is hospitality for which
no return is expected, or would be accepted. Even with poor people it is
the custom for them to press one to stay, and to have coffee or food
with them. An Egyptian travelling in England would think it very brutal
that neither the squire nor any of the inhabitants of a village should
press him to stay for a meal or for the night with them: he would set us
down as shamelessly mercenary, and without any sense of propriety or
generosity.

It is certain that the perceptions of an Egyptian are far less keen than
ours. Their feeling of pain is hardly comparable with our own: with bad
injuries, such as torn or crushed fingers, they do not seem at all
distressed; and a boy said to me that it was no wonder I healed quickly,
as I did not disturb a wound, ‘whereas an Arab would pull a cut open to
look at it inside.’ With pain, so with the senses in health. They cannot
distinguish one person from another by the footstep; they do not easily
distinguish a voice; they seldom respond or seem to perceive any words
when called from a distance, unless the attention is aroused by loudly
calling the person’s name; they never notice slight or distant sounds,
and seem to suppose that you will never perceive a whisper from one to
another. That the sense of smell is not much developed is only too
evident from the fearfully filthy condition of the village surroundings,
which are sometimes poisonous to an European.

Unfortunately the result of education is rather to spoil than to develop
natural ability. Of the very few peasants I have met with who had been
taught to write, two were fools in other matters, all common sense and
ability appearing to have been crushed out of them. Nor is this at all
surprising, when we know that the cardinal part of Muslim education is
the learning of the pointless prolixities of the Koran by heart, as a
pure matter of rote, without the use of the reason or intellect. To
burden a child’s mind with such a fearful task is enough to ruin it, if
not strong. It is a sad sight to see the whole of the coming intellects
of a town rocking themselves to and fro while they gabble through _sura_
after _sura_ of the Koran in a gusty sing-song voice without pause or
point; and then to reflect that this is the end and aim of nearly all
their education. The native Coptic schools are the only encouraging
sight of indigenous training; and the ability shown by some of their
boys is astonishing.

What then can we look forward to as the hope of improvement of such a
people? In the first place, a strong and just government, with a
sufficient amount of an incorruptible European element to crush out
bribery and ensure justice; this, in a couple of generations, would go
far to alter the national character. To trust one’s money to the care of
the government at the post-office, is the idea which astounds a fellah
more than anything else he can learn of England. An education in which
the Koran is but incidental, and not a crushing load on the memory, is
another necessity. A spread of some sanitary ideas, and a cheap supply
of some staple medicines for the commonest ailments, would be a great
step: the utter ignorance and lack of all common sense in such matters
is appalling. Probably improved dwellings, on some large estates, would
be the most powerful means for changing their notions; only such must
not be Europeanised, but thoroughly native houses reasonably arranged as
to ventilation, dryness, and disposal of all refuse; thus they might
lead to imitation; and a small premium on well-built houses would push
the subject. The only class yet appreciably affected for the better by
foreign influence is the Coptic community; and in that the energy of the
American missionaries, and the good example of their followers, has
produced a healthy awakening amid the body of the race, which is perhaps
the most promising sight in the country at present. The enterprise of
the Copt in education and improvement, with the advantage of the higher
standard of Christianity above the ethics of the Koran, may now develop
a better moral fibre in the nation, without which its advance is
hopeless. The great snare to be avoided is the foreign character of
improvements; so long as speaking a foreign language, wearing foreign
clothes, and aping foreign manners are thought to be the objects of a
change, we cannot expect to see a real progress in the character of a
nation. That English influence has a vast field for philanthropic
enterprise in this six millions of people is obvious; but the best
intentions may be too easily nullified by ignorance of the conditions of
the case, and by the incapacity and resistance of the average native
official, by whom it is useless to expect any serious change or solid
advance to be carried out to order.




CHAPTER XIV.

THE ACTIVE TRIPPER IN EGYPT.


So much is Egypt the resort of the invalid, that the guide-books seem
all infected with invalidism; and to read their directions it might be
supposed that no Englishman could walk a mile or more without an
attendant of some kind. In reality, Egypt is one of the most delightful
countries for a walking tour, as regards circumstances. For three months
from the middle of November there will never be a day too warm for
active exercise; there will be hardly any rain above Cairo, nor as much
in the Delta as during the summer in any European country. There is the
same safety as in England or France: in very lonely places, as upon the
desert, an occasional robbery may be committed, but I have never been
molested by either fellahin or Bedawin. Of course, the native language
is as much needed as in any foreign country; but a sufficient amount of
colloquial Arabic can be learned in a few weeks. Three friends of mine
have come out with only what could be briefly learned in England, and
each has been able in a week or two to make his way sufficiently. Learn
first of all what you want in Baedecker’s vocabulary; refer to Murray,
or better, to a dictionary, for any further words you want; and absorb
the addenda of very common words which come at the end of this chapter;
then a week or two in Cairo, talking to the natives as much as possible,
would quite suffice to float the active tripper. The main trouble is to
catch what is said to you; and for this there is no better practice than
listening to short sentences heard in the streets, and analysing them.

Many would-be trippers think of Egypt as so vastly expensive that they
dare not attempt it. I will therefore be explicit as to means as well as
ways. The P. & O., Orient, &c., are a needless cost. If a long voyage is
no objection, Moss’s line from Liverpool to Alexandria will provide all
sufficient comfort, for £14, or £24 return ticket; this is a favourite
way of despatching the families of English officials, to save the
trouble and cost of the Overland route. For quickness and cheapness the
Messageries from Marseilles to Alexandria is best; the second class is
excellent, as good as the first on some lines; cost about £14, from
London in six days. But all except hand baggage should be sent to
Alexandria by long sea route. From experience I can say that for all
expenses from London for three or four months and back again, from £50
to £100 will suffice, according to the amount of travelling in Egypt,
&c., including food and wages.

The great difference between Egypt and more civilized countries is the
lack of inns. Alexandria and Cairo abound with hotels, and there are two
or three at Luxor. Regular inns are to be found at most of the main
towns in the Delta, and at Assuan, Assiut, Medinet el Fayum, and other
large places, though mostly of a rough kind. Below these there are the
Greek wine-shops in most towns, where some sort of shelter can be had.
The country station-masters are often very obliging, and will allow a
traveller to sleep in the waiting-room; and--in the Delta at least--the
village shekhs are very hospitable, and generally have a good
guest-room, sometimes with European furniture. Some good pocket-knives,
silver spoons, and such articles, should be taken for presents, if this
accommodation is needed. Also, if going to places where rock tombs
abound, excellent quarters can be had in them; no dwelling is so warm at
night and so cool in the day. But for any extended journey it is best to
take a small tent, if not travelling by boat. Convenient little tents,
seven feet square, with two poles, weighing altogether only about 30
lbs., can be had in Cairo for about twenty-five shillings: such an one
can be pitched or packed in a few minutes, and goes on a donkey with all
the other baggage.

Some servant is needful to look after the things when one is absent; a
grown-up donkey-boy will be useful, if the traveller does not speak
Arabic easily, as he will have a smattering of English; but he will be
perhaps a doubtful character, and will want about 3 francs a day. Far
the best is to get an unsophisticated fellah from some village; he will
be more trusty, and will be glad of 1 or 1½ francs a day without food.
If there was no other means convenient for finding a man, I should go to
some country station, and ask the station-master or postmaster to
recommend some fellah whom they knew; there would thus be a hold upon
him; and an advance of wages could be left with his guarantor, to
satisfy him of one’s good faith in the bargain. For going about away
from the railway or Nile steamers, a donkey must be hired for the
baggage; there is no difficulty in getting one anywhere, and with the
boy or man 1½ to 2½ francs a day is plenty in the country, though 3 or 4
francs is the Cairo rate. If by any chance one is wanted for riding,
remember that though there are native saddles, there are no stirrups in
the villages.

As to food, if constantly moving about, not much can be taken in the way
of stores. But fowls (4-5 piastres), eggs (twelve to twenty-four a
piastre), rice and lentils can be bought anywhere. Bread is not always
eatable, as some villages only make dirty little pats of maize; but good
(though heavy) flap bread is made at nearly all towns and most villages
(four to eight flaps a piastre), and a day’s supply in advance should be
carried. If staying for some weeks at one place, or going in a boat, it
is best to order out from England assorted boxes of stores, each box to
contain all that is wanted for three weeks or a month; tinned tongues,
soups, salmon, jams, cocoa, tea, biscuits, &c. Otherwise some tinned
goods (sardines, peas, &c.) can be got in most large towns; and some
canisters should be taken for sugar, salt, pepper, tea, and coffee; the
latter can be made in the cup as wanted. The essential articles of
canteen are:--Petroleum stove (‘Hero’ size is most useful), with
saucepan, kettle, and frying-pan, and a tin can with cork to carry
petroleum (_gaz_, Arabic), as the stove must be emptied when travelling.
_Gaz_ can be bought in any large village, and if constantly moving, the
kettle and frying-pan are not needful: the stove may be bought in Cairo,
but perhaps not the best size. Cups, plates, spoons, forks, candles,
matches, dusters, and galvanised pail can be got in any large town. For
sleeping, a mattress is a mistake, as the same weight of blankets are as
soft, more easily aired and packed, and can be used for warmth if
needful. Take six blankets, laid one on the other and then folded over
down the middle, and there are twelve thicknesses, of which three or
four will serve for warmth above, and eight or nine for softness below,
and the wind cannot get in on the turned-over side. To pack these, roll
them tightly, with the crockery in the midst, and lash round with two
cords; then wrap in a sheet of oiled cloth, large enough to spread
between the blankets and the ground when sleeping, and rope up the
bundle. All this may be bought in Cairo.

For medicines not much is needful; but in case of emergencies take
sulphate of zinc (1 per cent. solution) for the eyes; quinine (5-10 grs.
for fever, ½ p. c. sol. alone, or mixed with the previous, for eyes);
carbolic acid (1 to 3 of oil for scrapes and cuts, &c.), and any special
remedies needed. In general, diet is the main matter; aperients are
needless with plenty of native bread and cooked tomatoes; and, on the
other hand, if necessary, live on rice (very well boiled with a large
amount of water), and avoid fat and sugar. The less clothing is used by
day, and the more at night, the better; the clear nights are usually
down to freezing in the winter, even far up the Nile, while the day may
be 70° to 80°. The main matter is to avoid being out at sunset; or at
least keep moving then, and avoid any chill, as fever is generally
caught at that time. All drinking water should be boiled thoroughly;
excepting perhaps when taken from the middle of the Nile, and not just
below a town.

For a trip up the Nile the most thorough way is to take a small native
boat, with a cabin on it, entirely to yourself, or with only a
like-minded companion. Such a boat can generally be found at the main
towns, Cairo, Minia, Assiut, &c.; when more pretentious, with several
cabins, it ranks as a _dahabyieh_. The boat should be hired with a
written English, French, or Italian agreement in duplicate, some
European shopkeeper known to the boatman serving as his translator, to
assure him of the terms. The actual terms of a boat I hired at Minia
were ‘A. B. agrees to hire a boat with cabin from C. D., with a reis,
two sailors, and boy, at ten francs per day. Ten days’ hire guaranteed;
after that by the day. To be discharged anywhere below the first
cataract (Assuan) without any return pay. No food provided. Payments to
be made as demanded, taking receipts.’ If they dawdle, and it is needful
to push on quicker, a promise, of say 50 francs on reaching the terminus
by a certain day, less 5 francs a day for all time after that, will be
effectual. Always stay for the night above a town or village, for the
sake of cleaner water.

If only the principal places are to be visited, the postal steamer will
suffice, taking tent, blankets, &c., to stay where desired. From Assiut
to Assuan costs £5, without food; the cabins holding two or four, well
fitted; and if all places are taken it is quite practicable to go on
deck, sleeping in blankets (only 85 piastres). Passage can be taken
between any two stations at proportional rates. When pitching tents,
always stay by a village, and the shekh is responsible for your safety;
look out for one of the little huts in which the village guards stay at
night, and pitch ten or twenty yards in front of it; thus the guards
will not come and sleep by the tent, for if they do their incessant
talking or snoring will prevent any sound sleep. At Thebes the best
camping ground is in the Ramesseum (the guards’ head-quarters) and under
a tree by the pylon of Horemheb; and at Assuan in the bay above the
town.

There is no need to carry much money about, as the post-offices serve
for banks; and the regular bankers and agents generally charge (by
exchange, &c.) nearly or quite the 1 per cent. of the post. Postal money
orders should be taken in England for £10 each, one or more as probably
required, on each of the main towns visited. The best address for
receiving the actual Egyptian orders (for English forms are useless) is
Poste Restante, Alexandria, as any enquiries about them should be made
there. The money is paid in English gold at the offices. All accounts
are, however, paid in piastres, at 97½ to the sovereign.

In case of taking luggage about by train or steamer, remember that
nothing goes free except what is carried. All heavy things must be
weighed, paid for, and a receipt obtained before the train leaves; and
baggage is only given up in exchange for the receipt (= _bolicy_ Arab.).
Exactly the same must be done for goods, which are usually despatched
within twelve hours by goods train, at half the rate of passenger train.
There is no delivery of goods; everything must be claimed with the
_bolicy_ and fetched away. Carts cost about 1 to 2 francs the hour, and
a bargain should be made with the driver for the whole business. If
passenger luggage is left at stations the charge is heavy (3 p. each day
or part for each parcel), but the station cleaner will look after things
for a few hours. Goods are charged 1 p. per parcel per day at Cairo and
Alexandria, but Sundays and 24 hours after arrival, free. At country
stations the charges are next to nothing, and things may be sent by
goods train and left for a week or two if necessary. Receipts are always
given for every legal charge, however trifling; but see that the amount
asked for is what is written.

The above details are of course only supplementary to the usual
guide-book information. But there is no real difficulty likely to be met
with in roughing it thus; and in case of emergencies the station-masters
or post-masters can be appealed to, as they all understand English or
French. Many of them have been in Europe, and I may say that I have
received much kindness and friendliness from these excellent officials,
who are largely Coptic Christians. They are above the common greed for
petty bakhshish; though of course kindness may be recognized by a book,
photographs, or other presents, as to a European official. In most
bargains for services, as with donkey-boys, camel-men, boats, guides,
&c., it should be remembered that 5 to 10 per cent. extra is expected as
bakhshish in a lump at the end, subject to good behaviour; and this
gives an excellent hold on the people.




ADDENDA TO BAEDECKER’S VOCABULARY


Station, _mahatta_; ticket, _tezkereh_, _waraḳ_, _bilieto_; 1st class,
_brimo_; 2nd class, _secondo_; (does) this go to Cairo? _deh raih al
Masr?_ train, _ḳattr_; engine, _wabur_ or _babur_; carriage, _arabiyeh_;
goods, _buda’a_; goods train, _ḳattr el buda’a_; baggage-receipt,
_bolicy_ (pronounced _bolīse_); storage charge, _ardiyeh_. I (will) beat
the telegraph (= I will telegraph), _ana adrob et telegraphia_; the
wire, _es silk_.

(The dots in the following words separate the elements, which are here
translated literally.)

Show·me the snake, _warri·ni el hanesh_. Not showed·I to·him the fowl,
_ma warr·et l·u·sh el farkha_ (_sh_ like French _pas_, untranslated).
Not·thou·leave·it, _ma·t·khalli·u·sh_. He opened·it, _Huweh fatah·u_.
Thou camest from where? _Ente git min ayn_. From the desert (hill or
plain), _min el gebel_. Thou goest where? _Ente raih fen_. Northwards,
_bahri_. The engine it·leaves when? _el wabur ye·safir emta?_ at·the
sunset, _fi·l maghreb_. Atest·thou five pounds in·the four·months,
pound·and·quarter for the month, _kal·t khamast értal fi·l arbat·úsher,
rotl·u·rub bi·sh shahr_ (accent strongly as marked). Two cubits length
(pair cubits) for two piastres (dual), _gozet ídra bi ḳirshēn_.
Finished, _khalás_. I am very tired (I bad·ed entirely), _ana batlan
khálas_. Finished entirely, _Khalás khálas_. (It) was cold very
in·the·morning before the sun(rise), _kan bard ḳowi fi·’s subh ḳabl esh
shems_. The peasants (are) foolish like cattle, _el fellahin maganin
zeyeh behaim_. A lucky day for you (literally, day·thy, milk) _neharak
leben_. By life (of) the prophet, _wa hyat en nebi_. By life (of)
father·thy, _wa hyat abu·k_. Bless me! (oh peace·my) _ya salam·i_
(really a title of the Deity).

Village night guard, _ghafir_, pl. _ghofera_.




INDEX

(_Including a reference to each Illustration_.)


Accuracy, meaning of, 14;
  of Khufu’s pyramid, 19;
  of Khafra’s pyramid, 22;
  of Usertesen’s coffin, 109.

Aegean confederacy, 152;
  pottery, 121, 124, 132-3.

Agricultural tools, 119.

Alabaster cups, 120.

Alphabetic marks, 121, 134.

Altar of offerings, 89.

Alterations of design in pyramids, 21, 24.

Am, now Tell Nebesheh, 69.

Amasis, destroys Daphnae, 61.

Amenardus, priestess, 125;
  queen, 72.

Amenemhat II, 81;
  III, 83, 89.

Amenhotep III, 122;
  IV, 122.

Amulets, found on mummies, 69, 92-4;
  history of, 126.

Anen, the Tursha head of, 130, 132.

Animal figures on rocks, 75.

Antef V, tablet of, 74.

Apepi, stamp of, 122.

Apries and Amasis, war of, 61.

Arabic, amount needful, 187.

Arch early in use, 115.

Arsinoe, work at, 81-82.

Assuan, inscriptions of, 72.


Babies buried in boxes, 116.

Baboon of ivory, 117.

Bakakhuiu, statue of, 34.

Barracks of pyramid workmen, 25, 113.

Basalt statue of Si-sebek, 117.

Bead-work patterns, 125.

Biahmu, pedestals, 83;
  statues at, 84.

Birket Kerun, building at, 104-5.

Boreas and Typhon vase, 57.

Botany of ancient Egypt, 104.

Bowl, turned in diorite, 27;
  of blue-glaze, 135.

Bribery omnipotent, 179.

Brick mould, 118.

Bronze, hinges, 129;
  introduction of, 151, 153;
  pans, 128, 130;
  tools, 129.

Burial, directions of, 69;
  with portraits, 97;
  in clothing, 101;
  of burnt objects, 132;
  at Medum, 145.

Buto, Arabian and western, 69.


Care needed for papyri, 34-5.

Casing of great pyramid, 20, 25;
  of third pyramid, 17;
  of Dahshur pyramid, 78.

Casket of ivory, 102.

Castanets, ivory, 116.

Chair, 117.

Chisels, 43, 46, 58, 112, 120, 129, 154.

Civilization of Egypt, early, 144, 150;
  of Europe, early, 153-5.

Cleanliness, kinds of, 14.

Climatic changes, 148.

Coin of Naukratis, 45.

Colossus of Amenemhat III, 84;
  of Ramessu II, 32.

Colours firmly fixed, 110.

Column supporting statue, 65;
  of third dynasty, 143.

Copper tools, 115, 117, 120.

Crocodile burials, 92.

Crown drills, 26.

Cylinder seals, 145.

Cypriote pottery, 68;
  soldier, 37.


Dahshur, casing of pyramid, 78;
  door of pyramid, 24, 78;
  pyramids, 79.

Dancer, figure of, 116.

Daphnae, ruins of, 50;
  restoration of, 52;
  destruction of, 61.

Dates of dynasties, 9.

Dedications, 38, 41, 42, 44.

Demotic inscription on vase, 58.

Denudation of Nile valley, 149;
  of tombs, 68.

Derwishes in villages, 171.

Diseases, ancient, 146.

Dolls, Roman, 103.

Doors of pyramids, 24.

Draught-board, 145.

Drill, 119.

Dynasties, dates of, 9.


Education in Egypt, 168, 184.

Egypt, earliest state of, 148;
  civilization in, 151;
  modern, 167.

Elephantine, royal names at, 72.

Embroideries, Coptic, 126, 136.

Esneh, prehistoric flint, 76, 149.

Europe, early civilization of, 152-4.

Excavation, system of, 158;
  scope of, 164.


Fallacies regarding pyramids, 24.

Fanaticism, Muslim, 173.

Festivals in villages, 170.

Flint hippopotamus, 127;
  knife, 82, 120;
  prehistoric, 76, 149, 150;
  sickles, 119; tools, 118.

Flower wreaths, 103.

Forbearance unknown to fellahin, 176.

Foreigners at Gurob, 129-134;
  at Illahun, 121, 123;
  confederacy of, 152;
  represented, 77.

Foundation deposits, Daphnae, 53;
  Illahun, 112;
  Naukratis, 43;
  Nebesheh, 66.

-- laying out of, 143.

Funereal customs, 132, 146.


Gardner, Mr. Ernest, 39, 41, 42, 47.

Geographical papyrus, 35.

Gizeh, work at, 11.

Glass vase, coloured, 133;
  cut, 101.

Glazed, bowls, 135;
  vases, blue, 134;
  work in XVIII dyn., 151;
  work in XXII dyn., 126.

Gold band, Naukratis, 49.

-- finger ring, Tanis, 33.

-- handle, Daphnae, 59.

-- Ra, 63.

-- work at Daphnae, 62.

Graffiti, of Medum, 141;
  Phoenician, 73;
  of Silsileh, 73.

Granite casing, dressing of, 17;
  core of tube drill, 26.

Graving of diorite, 27.

Greek, early portrait of, 77;
  mercenaries, 37, 39, 43, 51, 68;
  trade, 43, 45, 48, 61;
  (see _Aegean_, _Foreigners_, _Vases_).

Griffith, Mr. F. Ll., 50, 64, 71.

Gurob, 128.


Hanebu, head of, 77.

Harper, Hittite, 132.

Hawara cemetery, 92;
  pyramid, 81, 87.

Herodotos visited Fayum, 84.

Hinges, interlocking, 129.

Hittite harper, 132;
  Sadi-amia, 132.

Horuta, amulets of, 94;
  tomb of, 92.

Hospitality in Egypt, 183.

Houses, modern, 168, 170, 172.

Hyksos kings, 32, 66.


Illahun cemetery, 124;
  pyramid, 107.

Iron, age of, 152;
  tools, 46, 58.

Italy, influence of, 154.

Ivory casket, 102;
  duck box, 137.


Jeremiah at Daphnae, 51, 54.

Jewellery, Greek, 61-3.

Jew’s daughter, palace of, 51;
  refuge at Tahpanhes, 53.

Jews meet with Greeks, 54.

Joseph, vice-royalty of, 66.


Kahun, 112.

Khafra, mace of, 23;
  pyramid of, 22.

Khufu, pyramid of, 19-22;
  plummet of, 28.

Kings, list of, 9.

Kismet, 174.


Labyrinth, great extent, 91;
  site of, 91.

Law in modern Egypt, 179.

Lykaonian spear-heads, 68.


Mace head of Khafra, 23.

Maket tomb, 122-4.

Means of work, 6.

Measurement, means of, 15, 19.

Medum pyramid, 138, 142;
  tombs, 143.

Medusa heads, 47.

Menkaura, pyramid of, 17, 23, 109.

Merenptah at Gurob, 128, 134;
  statue of, 65.

Mirror, 117, 120, 132.

Monolith chamber of Hawara, 90.

Moulds for scarabs, 45.

Mounds, forms of, 156.

Mummies, amulets intact, 69, 92;
  decoration of, 98;
  earliest, 146;
  with bead-work, 125.

Musical reeds, 124.

Mykenae, civilization of, 152.


Naukratis, cemetery, 47;
  coin of, 45;
  dedication at, 38;
  discovery of, 36-8;
  fort of, 36-9;
  Greek origin of, 39, 45;
  Panhellenion, 42;
  temples, 39.

Naukratite vases, 41, 47, 48.

Nebesheh, cemetery, 68;
  first temple, 67;
  shrine, 64;
  temple of Aahmes, 65.

Nebuchadrezzar, 54.

Necking of columns, 40.

Neferu-ptah altar, 89.

Negro on vase, 48.

Nehesi, obelisk of, 31.

Nile, exploring, 71;
  formerly high, 75, 148-9.

Numeral signs, from ropes, 145.


Obedience natural to fellahin, 177-8.

Officials isolated from fellahin, 180.


Palaistra of Naukratis, 44.

Palmetto pattern, age of, 56.

Panhellenion at Naukratis, 42.

Papyrus deeds, Byzantine, 103;
  of Amenhotep III, 122; IV, 122;
  of XII dynasty, 120;
  Ptolemaic, 136;
  of Iliad, 103;
  rolls burnt, 34-5;
  rotted, 33.

Patterns on vases, 56.

Perceptions of fellahin, 184.

Phoenician inscription, 73;
  pottery, 124;
  Venus, 132.

Photographing with magnesium, 79.

Plummet of Khufu, 28.

Portraits on mummies, 97-9.

Pottery, importance of, 158.

Preservation of bead-work, 125;
  of wood, &c., 165.

Psamtik I, camp for mercenaries, 39, 52;
  founder of Daphnae, 52;
  II, 72.

Ptolemy II, steles of, 30, 31.

Pun, people of, 76.

Pyramid excavations, 16, 140;
  from the desert, 28;
  of Biahmu, 83;
  of Gizeh, 11-28;
  of Hawara, 81, 87;
  of Illahun, 107;
  of Medum, 132, 142.


Races, two in Egypt, 146, 150.

Racial portraits, 77-8.

Rainfall, great anciently, 148.

Ramessu II, colossus of, 32;
  statue of, 65;
  at Arsinoe, 82;
  at Gurob, 128;
  at Illahun, 110, 111;
  III, 129.

Relationships on tablets, 72.

Res, statuette of, 130, 131.

Roads, ancient in desert, 80;
  way-marks on, 80.

Roofing, 115.

Ruins, varieties of, 156.


Saints of Muslims, 169.

Sankhkara, tablet of, 75.

Sarcophagus, basalt, inscribed, 69;
  painted wood, 95.

Saws for stone, 26.

Scarab moulds, 45.

Sealings of wine jars, 60.

Sedan chair, 102.

Seneferu at Medum, 139, 142.

Senses of the fellah, 184.

Sham inscriptions, 125.

Shrine of amulet, 59, 63;
  of Nebesheh, 64, 66;
  of pyramid of Usertesen, 110.

Sickles of flint in wood, 119.

Silsileh, tablets of, 74.

Sling woven, 117.

Sphinx, often reappropriated, 65.

Stairs at Kahun, 114.

Superstition in Egypt, 169.

Surveying at Dahshur, 79;
  at Gizeh, 15;
  at Tanis, 32.


Tablets at Elephantine, 73.

Tahpanhes (see _Daphnae_), 50.

Tahutmes III, 128.

Tanis, houses of, 33-5;
  ruins of temple, 29-32.

Temple of Amenemhat III, 91;
  of pyramids, 25;
  of Seneferu, 140;
  of Tanis, 29-32;
  of third pyramid, 18;
  of Usertesen II, 110.

Temptation too much for fellah, 182.

Theories about great pyramid, 22, 142.

Thread, balls of, 117.

Tirhaka, stele of, 31.

Tomb dwelling, 11;
  of Horuta, 92;
  of Maket, 122.

Tools, bronze, 129;
  copper, 115, 117, 120;
  flint, 76, 82, 118-120, 149, 150;
  iron, Daphnae, 58;
  iron, Naukratis, 46;
  wood, 117-119;
  models of, 43, 112;
  of pyramid builders, 25-8.

Torque of copper, 120.

Toys and dolls, 102-3, 106, 121.

Trap doors in Hawara pyramid, 87.

Travelling in Egypt, 188.

Triangulation at Gizeh, 15.

Truth, lack of, in Egypt, 178.

Tubular drills, 26.

Tunnelling Hawara pyramid, 85.

Turning in stone, 27.

Tursha, coffin of Anen, 130.

Typhon and Boreas vase, 57.


Usarkon I, 124.

Usertesen II, 108;
  III, 65, 66, 120.

Ushabti figures, 70, 93.

Usurpation by viziers, 66.


Vases, blue-glazed, 134;
  Greek, derived from metal, 55;
  made locally, 55;
  of Daphnae, 54, 57;
  of Naukratis, 41, 48;
  of Nebesheh, 68.

Villages, modern, 168, 170, 172.


Walking trip in Egypt, 187.

Walls, tracing out, 162.

Wax as preservative, 96, 100, 125, 165;
  paintings, 100.

Wills, 120, 136.

Wooden tools, 117-9;
  statuettes, 131.

Workmanship of great pyramid, 20, 21;
  methods, 25-8;
  of Usertesen II, 109.

Workmen, system of ancient, 25;
  treatment of, 161.

Wreaths of flowers, 103.


Zodiac of Tanis, 33.


                               THE END.

                                Oxford

                HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY

                  *       *       *       *       *

                     WORKS BY MR. FLINDERS PETRIE


     =Inductive Metrology=, 8_s._ 6_d._ _Stanford._

     =Stonehenge=: Plans, Descriptions, and Theories. 3_s._ 6_d._
     _Stanford._

     =The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh.= Cheap and Revised Edition. 8
     plates. 6_s._ _The Leadenhall Press._

     =Tanis.= Part I. 19 Plates. 25_s._ _Kegan Paul & Co._

     =Tanis.= Part II. Nebesheh and Defenneh (Tahpanhes). 64 Plates.
     25_s._ _Kegan Paul & Co._

     =Naukratis.= Part I. 45 Plates. 25_s._ _Kegan Paul & Co._

     =Hieroglyphic Papyrus from Tanis.= 15 plates. 5_s._ _Kegan Paul &
     Co._

     =A Season in Egypt.= 1887. 32 plates. 12_s._ _The Leadenhall Press._

     =Racial Portraits.= 190 photographs from Egyptian monuments. 45_s._
     _Harman, High Street, Bromley, Kent._

     =Historical Scarabs=, Drawings of 2,220. 68 plates. 8_s._ _Nutt._

     =Hawara, Biahmu, and Arsinoe.= 30 plates. (Out of Print.)

     =Kahun, Gurob, and Hawara.= 28 plates. 16_s._ _Kegan Paul & Co._

     =Illahun, Kahun, and Gurob.= 33 plates. 16_s._ _Nutt._

     =Tell el Hesy= (Lachish). 10 plates. 10_s._ 6_d._ _Alexander Watt._

     =Medum.= 36 plates, many coloured. 24_s._ _Nutt._