E-text prepared by Turgut Dincer and the Online Distributed Proofreading
Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images generously made available by
Internet Archive (https://archive.org)



Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this
      file which includes the original illustrations.
      See 51328-h.htm or 51328-h.zip:
      (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/51328/51328-h/51328-h.htm)
      or
      (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/51328/51328-h.zip)


      Images of the original pages are available through
      Internet Archive. See
      https://archive.org/details/handphrenologica00lond


Transcriber's note:

      Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).

      A carat character is used to denote superscription.
      Characters following the carat and enclosed by curly
      brackets are superscripted(example: C^{aine}).





[Illustration: Plate 1.

Elementary Hand.]


THE HAND PHRENOLOGICALLY CONSIDERED:

Being a Glimpse at the Relation of the Mind
with the Organisation of the Body.







London:
Chapman and Hall, 186 Strand.

M.DCCC.XLVIII.


  “Les hommes ne peuvent en quelque genre que ce soit
  arriver à quelque chose de raisonnable, qu’après
  avoir en ce même genre, épuisé toutes les sottises
  imaginables.”—FONTENELLE.

  “Si la nature, au lieu de mains et de doigts flexibles,
  eut terminé nos poignets par un pied de cheval; qui doute
  que les hommes, sans arts, sans habitations, sans défense
  contre les animaux, tout occupés du soin de pourvoir
  à leur nourriture et d’éviter les bêtes féroces, ne
  fussent encore errans dans les forêts comme des troupeaux
  fugitifs?”—HELVETIUS, _Sur l’Esprit_.

  “Manus sunt artium organa; sicut lyra musici, et forceps
  fabri.”—GALEN.


London:
George Barclay, Castle Street, Leicester Square.




PREFACE.


Since the time of JOHN INDAGINE, who published his “Art of Chiromancy”
in 1563, but little progress has been made in the study of the hand
as an indication of the physical and mental peculiarities of the
individual. In our time, by the publication of the classical work of
Sir C. BELL “On the Hand,” public attention has been once more directed
to the form, structure, and uses of this important organ.

The varieties in the structure and conformation of the human hand which
are met with in different individuals have recently been investigated
with much success, both in France and Germany.

It is to D’ARPENTIGNY, a translation of whose work[1] is now in course
of publication in the “Medical Times,” that we are indebted for much of
the information we possess as to the mutual relation existing between
particular mental tendencies and certain definite forms of hand. By
Professor CARUS, of Dresden,[2] the views of D’ARPENTIGNY have been
in part verified, and at the same time considerably extended. He has
corrected much that was erroneous, and endeavoured to establish a
science of CHIROLOGY, founded upon the anatomy and physiology of the
hand.

I have availed myself freely of the materials collected by D’ARPENTIGNY
and CARUS, and have modified, corrected, or omitted their theories
and statements when not in accordance with my own experience. Much
new matter has been added, and the whole arranged in a form which it
is hoped may tend somewhat to contribute either to the amusement or
instruction of the Reader.

_June 1848._




THE HAND

PHRENOLOGICALLY CONSIDERED,

_&c. &c._




CHAPTER I.

  “The form and posture of the human body, and its various
  organs of perception, have an obvious reference to man’s
  rational nature; and are beautifully fitted to encourage
  and facilitate his intellectual improvement.”—DUGALD
  STEWART, _Moral Philosophy_.

THE BRAIN THE ORGAN OF MIND.


From the time of Thales and Pythagoras to our own day the opinions
of metaphysicians have been divided with respect to the mode in
which ideas take their origin. Some, with Descartes and Leibnitz,
have contended that the faculties of the mind are innate—that is,
that they originate solely from within; while others, with Locke and
Condillac, affirm that they are acquired, and in all cases derived,
from impressions received through the medium of the senses,—“Nihil est
in intellectu quod non prius fuerit in sensu.”

However it may be with respect to this controverted point, whether
ideas originate from without or from within, it is at least certain
that the manifestations of the mind, far from being independent
of, are, on the contrary, closely linked and connected with, the
conditions of matter. Hippocrates, when sent for by the Abderites to
cure Democritus of his supposed madness, found him busily engaged in
dissecting the brains of animals for the purpose of ascertaining the
organs and causes of thought. That the brain is the organ through
which the manifestations of mind are made known to us, was therefore
suspected by Democritus; and the accumulated experience of centuries
has rendered that a certainty which with him was but a mere conjecture.
In the language of an eloquent modern writer, “Where shall we find
proofs of the mind’s independence of the bodily structure,—of that mind
which, like the corporeal frame, is infantile in the child, manly in
the adult, sick and debilitated in disease, frenzied or melancholy in
the madman, enfeebled in the decline of life, doting in decrepitude,
and annihilated by death?”


MIND AND OUTWARD FORM IN HARMONY.

Admitting, then, that the brain is the organ of mind—the instrument
by which we are rendered cognisant of our own mental operations
and conceptions—it must be evident that, for the purpose of making
them known to others, of carrying them into effect, certain other
parts become necessary, the conception requiring instruments for its
execution. This important duty is intrusted to the care of the senses,
and for this reason they have been correctly termed the hand-maidens
of the intellect, as it is through their agency that the brain receives
and transmits impressions. Hence the manifestations of mind are
indicated and expressed by the outward form; for the senses can act
only through the medium of physical organs, and with these latter the
active phenomena of life must necessarily be in strict accordance.
Thus, from the external configuration of the body, or of some of its
parts, we can legitimately draw conclusions respecting the degree
and kind of mental power. Let us examine this proposition a little
more in detail. In his _Instauratio Magna_, Bacon relates that “when
he was a young man at Poictiers in France, he conversed familiarly
with a certain Frenchman, a witty young man, but something talkative,
who afterwards grew to be a very eminent man. He was wont to inveigh
against the manners of old men, and would say, that if their minds
could be seen as their bodies are, they would appear no less deformed;
he would also maintain that the vices of old men’s minds have some
correspondence and were parallel to the putrefaction of their bodies.
For the dryness of their skin, he would bring in impudence; for the
hardness of their bowels, unmercifulness; for the lippitude of their
eyes, an evil eye and envy; for the casting down of their eyes and
bowing their bodies toward the earth, atheism (for, saith he, they
look no more up to heaven as they were wont); for the trembling of
their members, irresolution of their decrees and light inconstancy;
for the bending of their fingers, as it were to catch, rapacity and
covetousness; for the buckling of their knees, fearfulness; for their
wrinkles, craftiness and obliquity.”

Now, without hoping to attain to the nice discrimination of this
ingenious young gentleman, we shall attempt to elucidate a few general
facts connected with this part of our subject.

With that spirit of observation for which they were so eminently
remarkable, the ancients had long since remarked the constant
connexion of certain peculiarities of outward form with particular
modes of thinking—a correspondence between the physical and mental
condition. It was in accordance with this view that Galen founded his
celebrated doctrine of temperaments. His distinction of the sanguine,
phlegmatic, choleric, and melancholic temperaments, was based upon
the notion of the Greek philosophers, that there were four primary
constituents of the human body corresponding to the four supposed
elements of nature, and that the presence of the one or the other of
these elements in excess occasioned the production of the different
temperaments. According to the definition of the able physiologist
Müller, the temperaments are peculiar, permanent conditions, or modes
of mutual reaction of the mind and organism, and they are chiefly
dependent on the relation which subsists between the strivings or
emotions of the mind and the excitable structure of the body. Even if
we may be disposed to contend that they are not absolutely _dependent_
on any particular constitution of the body, it must still be conceded
that they are at least _associated_ with certain peculiarities of
outward organisation, by which they may be readily recognised; so
that the physical structure, the mental tendency, and the character
of ideas, are always intimately connected. Thus persons of a sanguine
or sensitive temperament are, for the most part, of moderate stature
and _embonpoint_, with a smiling florid countenance, and light or
chestnut hair. Their ideas, like their physiognomy, are all _couleur
de rose_. Endowed with great excitability, they are easily moved; but
impressions are not durable, giving place quickly to other and newer
emotions. Hence their life is made up of transitions—now grave, now
gay; now happy, now miserable: their feelings are perpetually changing,
and impressions made upon their mobile minds become soon obliterated by
some fresh object of attention.

The phlegmatic, or elementary temperament, is characterised by a
persistence during adult existence of the physical structure proper
to early life. The body is loaded with cellular tissue and fat;
the muscles are large, but soft, and with indistinct outlines; the
countenance is pale; the physiognomy but little marked, and the
features not sharply defined. Such persons are unexcitable, their
sensations are dull, and the modes of reaction which they determine
slow and apathetic; their ideas are clear, but they possess neither the
quickness of conception and imagination of persons of the sanguine,
nor the energy of action and strong passions of those of the choleric
temperament. They love repose, and excel in occupations which demand
patience and attention, of which they are possessed in a remarkable
degree.

In individuals of the choleric, or motive temperament, the bony
frame-work of the body is strong and much developed; the articulations
are large and prominent; the muscles firm, with but little cellular
tissue and fat; the physiognomy decided, with sharply-chiselled
features. Such individuals are remarkable for promptitude and energy of
action; impetuous, passionate, and endowed with great determination,
opposition only increases their endurance, and excites a proportionate
effort to conquer it. In nature these temperaments are not frequently
encountered pure and free from admixture, but mostly more or less
mixed the one with the other. That must be held to be the most perfect
temperament in which they are all blended in such proportions that
neither is in excess; “in which moderate excitability is combined with
a due amount of energy of action; in which imagination is tempered by
reason, and the ideas and conceptions are regulated by judgment, and
rectified by reflection.” Impressions thus do not react upon all in the
same manner. In some they are like figures traced upon the sand of the
sea-shore, which are obliterated by the first advancing wave; they pass
away together with the ideas to which they give rise, without leaving
any, even the slightest evidence, of their existence. In others they
are as characters deeply graven upon metal; arousing the attention
with an irresistible force, they enchain and captivate the faculties,
ceasing but to leave behind them a powerful and lasting impression upon
the mind.


EFFECTS OF AGE, SEX, CLIMATE, ETC. UPON MIND.

By age, sex, locality, climate, and regimen the mental operations are
likewise powerfully influenced. By locality and climate we do not
mean air and temperature merely, but the sum total of all influences,
whether physical or moral, by which in every place we are surrounded.
The bodily structure is undoubtedly and materially influenced by
climate. Of this the modern Hungarians afford a most convincing proof—a
race of people of a fine physical conformation, and yet, as their
language and traditions attest, derived from the same stock as the
barbarous, deformed Ostiaks inhabiting the Uralian Chain, to whom,
as we learn from history, they bore no slight resemblance, on their
arrival in the countries in which they are at present located. Climate
may thus affect the mind in two ways, by modifying the structure of
the body, and by the more direct action which it exerts upon the
mind itself; and it is to these two causes that we must ascribe the
differences in the form and habits, the government and laws, the
superstitions and literature, of northern and southern nations.

To differences and modifications of structure constantly correspond
differences and modifications in ideas and passions. The physical form
and intellectual qualities are closely and mutually connected. Thus,
one individual may excel another in a given pursuit, this excellence
resulting rather from a peculiar aptitude for, than from a particular
devotion to, its cultivation.

This aptitude, in many cases at least, is to be mainly referred to some
peculiarity of structure in one or more of the organs of the senses;
it is original, and without the particular organic conformation could
never have been acquired by centuries of practice and experience.


BODILY SUFFERING DEPENDENT UPON ORGANISATION OF NERVOUS SYSTEM.

To differences in the degree of sensibility of the nervous system,
together with the varying amount of the peripheral ramifications
distributed to the external surface, must be ascribed the different
amount of suffering experienced upon the application of inordinate
stimuli to the nerves. The will is undoubtedly capable of exerting very
great control over the manifestations of feeling called forth by such
painful impressions upon sentient nerves. Of this Roman history affords
us many notable examples. But it seems probable that the Romans were
not endowed with a nervous system so delicately organised as that of
the more highly civilised Greeks; witness the general structure of
their language and their comparative inferiority in the fine arts.
Neither heroism, nor philosophy, nor even religion, can prevent some
organisations from exhibiting manifestations of great pain from
impressions upon nerves, which in others would occasion but a moderate
amount of suffering; a physical necessity compels them to manifest
evidences of intense feeling; and thus, by a rude shock inflicted
upon the nervous system, a mathematician may be at once recalled from
the contemplation of other spheres, or a metaphysician from the most
sublime speculations on the nature and essence of the Deity.

In the lowest grades of society the general nervous sensibility is
mostly obtuse; in the highest, on the contrary, it is frequently
morbidly acute: in the one case the mental manifestations are dull and
obscure; in the other they may be brilliant, but are frequently wanting
in strength and energy.

In his treatise on tropical diseases, Dr. Mosely observes, that
“Negroes are void of sensibility to a surprising degree. They are not
subject to nervous diseases. They sleep soundly in every disease, nor
does any mental disturbance ever keep them awake. They bear chirurgical
operations much better than white people; and what would be the cause
of insupportable pain to a white man, a Negro would almost disregard. I
have amputated the legs of many Negroes, who have held the upper part
of the limb themselves.”




CHAPTER II.

  “Sollt es wahr Sein....
   Dasz die Menschengestalt, von allen sichtlichen Dingen
   Ganz allein uns lügt, dasz wir, was edel und albern,
   Was beschränkt und grosz, im Angesicht zu suchen,
   Eitele Thoren sind, betrogne, betrügende Thoren.”

  GÖTHE.

COUNTENANCE INDEX OF MIND.


Talleyrand was wont to say, that speech was given to man for the
purpose of concealing his thoughts. Among mankind in general the
countenance may, with equal force, be said to represent a series
of hieroglyphics by which the internal emotions of the mind may be
readily deciphered. Observe a child thrown for the first time among
a number of strangers. To some it will immediately, and as it were
instinctively, attach itself, while to others it will manifest the
greatest repugnance and dislike. Such first impressions are not the
result of reasoning, they spring from the quickness of perception
peculiar to childhood; and the choice is in general not the less happy,
although the reason may have had no effect in determining it. With a
rapid glance a mere infant will seize the prevailing expression of
the physiognomy, and detect at once the mental constitution of those
by whom it is surrounded; for pride and impatience, and kindness and
benevolence, are written on the plastic countenance in broad legible
characters, though the many, with their blunted perceptions, may, to
a certain extent, have lost the key to their solution. Contrast the
expression of the physiognomy of some of the more celebrated among the
ancients, as exemplified in the collection of antique busts preserved
in the museum of the Capitol at Rome. Compare the broad open brow
and finely-chiselled features of Trajan, or the beauty, majesty, and
grace expressed in the countenance of either of the Antonines, with
the coarse, heavy, animal face of Vitellius, or the dull, morose
expression of Caligula or of Commodus,—

              ——“Without a ray
  Of mind, that makes each feature play
  Like sparkling waves on a sunny day.”

The difference is as striking as that which we know from daily
observation to exist between the face of a rogue and that of an honest
man; indeed, we are disposed to believe, with Benjamin Franklin,
“that if rogues knew the advantages attached to the practices of the
virtues, they would become honest men from mere roguery.” It was for
this reason, probably, that beauty of form and proportion were so
highly prized by the ancients; and when they prayed the gods to grant
them the beautiful with the good, was it not because by experience
they had found that in fact they were most frequently associated? In
support of this position, we may cite the authority of Bacon, who, in
his Essay on Beauty, remarks, “that Augustus Cæsar, Titus Vespasianus,
Philip le Bel of France, Edward IV. of England, Alcibiades of Athens,
and Ismael the sophi of Persia, were all high and great spirits, and
yet the most beautiful men of their time.” Again, the physiognomy of
the passions affords us further proof that the emotions of the mind
betray themselves by peculiar corporeal phenomena,—each having, as it
were, its own proper dialect. Notice the expression of the passions
which follow each other in such quick succession, and are so forcibly
depicted upon the mobile countenance of an infant, even before any
voluntary movements can be executed by the feeble and powerless limbs.
Look at a coward, his countenance blanched, and almost cadaverous,—the
heavy limbs drooping and powerless,—the instruments of life paralysed,
as though the fountain of existence were suddenly dried up. For grief,
take the testimony of Byron, where he describes its effects in producing

  “The intersected lines of thought,—
   Those furrows which the burning share
   Of sorrow ploughs untimely there,—
   Scars of the lacerated mind
   Which the soul’s war doth leave behind.”

Regard a man under the influence of a sublime or heroic thought, with
his head proudly elevated and nostrils dilated,—he raises himself to
his utmost height; while, at the idea of infinity, or the prospect of
a boundless expanse, the arms are involuntarily extended as though he
would soar away into unlimited space. The impress of pride is stamped
in the bold erect bearing, and that of fear in the drooping head and
timid step. So true is it that joy and sorrow, love and hate, pain
and pleasure, virtue and vice, all betray themselves by their organic
signs, that when any of these affections are habitual, or frequently
recur, their external manifestations become permanently marked in the
form; and it is in this sense that the habits and emotions of early
youth stamp the lineaments with a character never to be effaced,
or which, in _many cases_ at least, are destined to endure through
life. Are we not then justified in concluding, that the kind and
degree of mental developement,—the presiding thought,—the ruling
and predominating principle of life, is influenced by the physical
temperament and constitution, and that this latter is in its turn
reacted upon by the mind?

PARTICULAR PARTS OF ORGANISM INDICATIVE OF MODE OF LIFE AND MENTAL
TENDENCY.

We have next to inquire, whether that which is undoubtedly true with
respect to the whole does not also obtain with respect to a part?
whether, in fact, from the examination of a small portion of an
organism—an extremity, for example—we should be enabled to determine
the nature, mode of life, and mental tendency of the being to which it
belonged? For a satisfactory solution of this important question we
must appeal to the testimony afforded by the animal world.




CHAPTER III.

  “Bestimmt Die Gestalt die Lebensweise des Thieres
   Und die Weise zu leben sie wirkt auf alle Gestalten
   Mächtig Zurück.”—GÖTHE, _Metamorphose der Thiere_.

CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN FORMS AND HABITS OF ANIMALS.


The most simple observation renders at once apparent a correspondence
between the external form of animals, the general direction of their
tendencies, and their habits.

Let us examine this question at somewhat greater length. From the
age of Aristotle to the present time, zoologists have arranged
the almost countless tribes of animals into a number of groups or
divisions, more or less related in general habits and structure. All
the classifications which have been hitherto proposed may be referred
to one or the other of two general principles. Either the colour of
the blood (Aristotle), the conformation of the heart (Hunter), the
arrangement of the nervous system (Owen), or some other peculiarity of
_internal_ structure, has been selected as the basis of arrangement;
or the animal creation has been grouped according to certain definite
circumstances connected with outward form and configuration. As
regards their internal organisation, the variations in the structure
and arrangement of the nervous system affords by far the best means
of classifying animals, and the whole animal world has accordingly
been divided into five primary divisions. We have already endeavoured
to prove that the manifestations of mind are only made known to us
through the medium of corporeal organs, whatever may be the nature of
its essence. By the state of the nervous system volition is modified or
controlled, the operation of the senses accelerated or retarded, the
muscular movements rendered feeble and uncertain, or strong, vigorous,
and energetic; in fine, the chief manifestations of life, thought,
volition, and independent motion, are all regulated by the condition
and structure of the central nervine masses.


APPENDAGES TO THE TRUNK A KEY TO THE ENTIRE ORGANISATION AND HABITS OF
ANIMALS.

The appendages to the trunk, like the arrangement of the nervous
system, furnish also a leading peculiarity of structure, and they may
be selected as the basis of a classification founded upon outward form.
For the most part, destined either for the purposes of locomotion,
or to assist in the procuring of food, they must of necessity be in
perfect accordance with the nervous and nutritive systems. Hence
the capacities, powers, and general habits of an animal, must be in
correspondence with this part of its organisation; so that when we
are acquainted with the form and arrangement of the extremities of an
animal, a key is thereby afforded to its entire organisation. Both its
external configuration, its mode of life, and its internal structure,
must harmonise, and be in accordance with the arrangement of the
extremities. Its breathing and vascular apparatus, its nutritive and
generative systems, are thus all indicated to us; and from a knowledge
of one particular we may safely and surely predicate the nature of the
rest.

_Annelida._—Thus in the worms (_Annelida_), creatures exhibiting but
few of the higher manifestations of life, we find the appendages
to the trunk in their simplest form,—that of fine, minute bristles
attached to the several rings or segments of the body. In the sea-mouse
(_Aphrodita_), their bristles attain a somewhat higher developement,
each of them being connected with a distinct elevation, or mammillary
process, with which it is, as it were, articulated.

_Myriapoda._—In the Centipedes, the first evidence of a well-formed
extremity makes its appearance in the form of numerous articulated legs
terminated by simple points. These legs, rudimentary in the lowest
species (_Iulidæ_), in harmony with their retiring habits and vegetable
diet, are divided into distinct joints, and provided with proper
muscles, in the strong and carnivorous varieties (_Scolopendridæ_). In
these latter animals, the ventral nervous ganglia are also increased
in size, in a ratio proportioned to the higher and more complex
structure of the appendages to the trunk.

_Insects._—In insects, creatures distinguished by so many and such
admirable instincts, and endowed with such active powers of locomotion,
the appendages to the body, both legs and wings, are perfectly and
beautifully formed. The former, six in number, are attached to the
three first thoracic segments of the body, composed of distinct
articulations, connected by ligaments and muscles, and furnished
with a series of minute breathing tubes, or tracheal ramifications,
extending throughout their entire substance. The latter—the wings—vary
much in their number, form, and arrangement; and it is upon characters
furnished by them that the nearest approximation to a perfect
classification of insects—that of Burmeister—is based. Thus, the legs
are typical of the class, the wings characterise the orders.

_Arachnida._—In the spider tribe (_Arachnida_) the legs, in their
general structure, resemble those of insects; but they are eight in
number, and, in addition to them, these creatures are provided with
remarkable claw-like appendages to their jaws—mere organs of feeling
in the mites, but strong and powerful instruments of prehension in the
scorpion tribe.

_Crustacea._—The crab and lobster tribe (_Crustaceans_) are likewise
accurately characterised by the appendages to the trunk, the number and
disposition of these parts having been employed by Milne Edwards for
the purpose of dividing these creatures into a number of orders.

_Mollusca._—Among the mollusks, the classes are nearly all named from
the peculiarities in form or the position of the feet. We have the
barnacles (_Cirrhopoda_), animals with six pair of articulated flexible
arms, composed of a series of small pieces studded with minute hairs,
and which form, when they are extended, a species of net by means of
which the animal catches its prey. The _Branchiopoda_—creatures such
as the _Terebratula_—with two long fleshy arms placed near the mouth,
which are hollow, muscular, and disposed in spiral folds. We have the
_Tunicata_, such as _Ascidians_ and the _Conchifera_, as the oyster and
mussel, beings which are destitute of members, and all but incapable
of locomotion. The _Gasteropoda_, of which the slug and snail afford
familiar examples, and that are furnished with a locomotive apparatus
peculiar to the whole class, and termed the foot or ventral disc. The
_Pteropoda_, nearly allied to the _Gasteropoda_ in their internal
organisation, but differing from them in the possession of two broad
fleshy expansions, resembling fins, which are attached to the side of
the neck, and are well adapted for swimming. And, lastly, we have the
_Cephalopoda_, such as the nautilus and cuttle-fish, creatures with
numerous strong muscular arms attached around the head, and in some
species provided with sucking discs, by means of which they are enabled
successfully to attack and capture the strongest and most active prey.
In all these instances we clearly see that the appendages characterise
the class, and that, from an acquaintance with their number and
arrangement, a naturalist could readily come to a conclusion as to the
affinities, structure, and general habits of any animal in the series.

_Fishes._—The fishes are divided into two great natural orders—those
furnished with a bony skeleton and those in which the framework of the
body is cartilaginous. The former division are distinguished by the
possession of a swimming bladder, and by the nearly equal developement
of the parts corresponding to the extremities—the pectoral and ventral
fins. The pectoral fins, situated immediately behind the head, are
present in all the osseous fishes, traces of them being found even
where they might be supposed to be entirely wanting, as in the eel;
they do not, however, attain any very considerable size, rarely
equalling, and never surpassing, the magnitude of the ventral fins.
In the cartilaginous fishes, on the contrary, not only in those which
ordinarily remain quiet at the bottom of the water, as the skate, the
sole, the flounder, and other flat fishes, but even in the active and
voracious sharks we find no swimming-bladder. In these cases, its
place is supplied and its duty performed by the enormously developed
anterior member or pectoral fin, which greatly surpasses the ventral
fin in size; and it is by means of the active movements of this large
hand that these creatures raise themselves from the bottom of the water
to the surface.

_Reptiles._—In the class of reptiles the characters afforded by
the form of the extremities are not less important. Of the four
orders into which this class is divided, one—that of the serpents
(_Ophidia_)—is altogether destitute of members, with the exception of
the rudimentary traces of extremities met with in some few species
(_Anguis_, _Bimanes_, and _Seps_). In another order, that of amphibious
animals (_Batrachia_), as the frogs, toads, &c., the extremities
are still typical of certain peculiarities of organisation. Some of
these creatures may be said to remain in an imperfectly developed or
embryonic condition during their whole existence. Instead of breathing
in adult life by means of lungs, as do the more perfectly organised
of the _batrachia_, they retain throughout existence that peculiar
structure of the respiratory apparatus—the branchial tufts—which
in the latter are present but in the embryo condition. In those of
the amphibious animals which breathe by means of permanent branchia
(_Perenni-branchiata_), such as the _Lepidosiren_ and the _Proteus_,
the extremities are either mere filamentary appendages, or at most
but very imperfectly-formed organs, and always typical of their
comparatively inferior organisation; while, in the higher species,
that is, those provided with lungs, and losing their branchiæ in the
adult state (_Caduci-branchiata_), as the frog, the salamander, &c.,
the extremities are well formed and perfectly developed. The third
order of reptiles—that of the lizard tribe (_Sauria_)—is made up of
members very dissimilar both in their appearance and general habits. In
the aquatic crocodiles the toes are connected by means of a membrane;
like ducks and other aquatic animals, these creatures are web-footed.
The alligator, so nearly allied to the crocodile in structure and
habits, with the exception that it is more terrestrial in its nature,
is furnished with a foot the toes of which are only webbed in half
their length, the other half being free and unconnected by membrane,
their amphibious mode of life being indicated by their foot. If we
compare the foot of these creatures with that of the true lizards,
the difference of structure will be found to be considerable. The
foot of the true lizard is provided with five toes to both the fore
and hind members, while attached to the hinder members of crocodiles
and alligators we find but four toes. The toes of the lizard are not
connected by a membrane, but are separate, and armed with nails,
for these creatures live on land, and have need of well-constructed
locomotive organs to enable them to catch their active prey. Among
lizards, that remarkable animal the chameleon, that is provided with
a particular structure of the skin, whereby its change of colour
is effected, is distinguished by the possession of a member, the
structure of which is not less peculiar. The toes are arranged in
two packets, which are capable of being brought into opposition—a
structure admirably adapted to the mode of life of the animal—the
climbing of trees and shrubs in pursuit of insects. The ichthyosaurus
and plesiosaurus, creatures of the lizard tribe which have now become
extinct, are both characterised by the form of their extremities.
The former has four members like paddles, each composed of nearly a
hundred small bones of an irregular polygonal shape and arranged in a
pavement-like form. The latter has also four paddle-shaped extremities,
but the number of bones of which each is composed is much less than in
the ichthyosaurus—not above fifty, the pieces being at the same time of
a different shape, and not arranged in a tessellated form.

_Birds._—Among birds the foot is a most important organ, serving
at once for support, prehension, and locomotion. Its modifications
are accordingly very numerous, and ornithologists have employed the
characters presented by it as a basis of classification. Scopoli, in
his Introduction to Natural History (1777), proposed a systematic
distribution of birds into two divisions founded upon the form of the
scales covering the foot; thus, some are furnished with scales, small
and polygonal (_Retepedes_), while others (_Scutipedes_) have the
legs covered in front with unequal semicircular plates. So, again,
in the division of birds proposed by Nitzsch, viz. into the aerial,
terrestrial, and aquatic, the foot will at once serve to indicate the
different orders. We will proceed to examine the special characters
afforded by the foot of birds in each of the groups or orders, adopting
the classification of Kirby, one of the most recent.

In the first order, the birds of prey (_Raptores_), which includes the
eagle, the vulture, the owl, &c., for the purpose of striking their
quarry, and of securing it by a firm grasp, a strong muscular foot is
necessary, and we consequently find that the foot is provided with four
short muscular toes, three placed before, and one behind, all armed
with long, sharp, hooked talons, those of the thumb and innermost toe
being the longest, as the great duty of grasping is mainly performed
by them. The claws are also capable of being drawn back, they are
retractile like those of the cat; and the scales upon the upper surface
of the foot, as well as the skin covering it below, are strong and
tough for the purpose of protecting the member from the attacks of the
living prey upon which these creatures feed. The foot is also broadly
marked, the kind of marking and the size of the scales being especially
characteristic of the different genera and families. In the vultures,
which from their feeding on carrion do not require such strength of
foot, we find a notable deviation from this general character, the toes
becoming longer and slighter and the claws much weaker.

In the second order of birds, the perchers (_Passeres_ of Linnæus),
which comprehends sparrows, thrushes, larks, &c., the foot is
constructed for another and a very different purpose. Its chief office
is to support the bird in a horizontal position upon the boughs
and branches of trees and shrubs; hence the foot is long, the toes
slender, very flexible, and armed with long, straight, weak claws,
which are not at all retractile. All the birds of this order possess
four toes, one of which, the hind toe (_hallux_), is placed straight
out behind, the others being in front, and those situated externally
are connected to the middle ones at their bases. The scales covering
the foot are regularly disposed, and as they are not needed for the
purpose of defence, they are thin and tender, resembling ordinary scarf
skin. Even in the shrikes,—the birds of prey of this order, who feed
upon living creatures and use the foot for securing them, the claws
are not sharp, nor is the foot formed in such a manner as to ensure
a very secure grasp, and we accordingly find that they merely press
this organ upon their prey for the purpose of holding it. In a few
other families of this order, as the todies, the kingfishers, &c., the
foot is called upon to assist in feeding, and we consequently find
certain modifications of structure indicative of this office. In order
to strengthen the foot and to secure a firmer grasp, the external and
middle toes are united almost to the apex, and the strength of the hind
toe is considerably increased.

In the third order, the climbers (_Scansores_), or, as they have been
sometimes termed, the yoke-footed, to which the woodpecker and the
parrot tribe belong, the structure of the foot is modified for the
important purpose of enabling the creature to support itself in all
positions upon the stems and branches of trees. In order to effect
this the foot is made strong, short, and muscular, the claws sharp
and curved, and the toes are placed in a very different position to
that which they occupy in other orders, two of them being situated in
front and two behind. By such a disposition, a strong, secure grasp is
afforded; and thus it is that most birds belonging to this order are
enabled to climb in a vertical position, and to effect movements like
animals of the monkey tribe. In general these birds move very awkwardly
upon a level surface, but in one or two species the structure of the
foot is so modified that they can run upon the ground with great speed.
This is the case with the travellers’ friend of South America, and
with the ground parrot of New South Wales; and these creatures have
accordingly slender toes so constructed, that one of the two placed
behind can be brought in front at will, so that a larger and more
secure basis of support is thus afforded.

In the fourth order the scratchers (_Rasores_), to which the common
fowl, the pheasant, and the pigeon belong, the foot is adapted for
an instrument of active locomotion, as well as for the purpose of
procuring food by scratching in the earth. Hence we find it strong,
with a long muscular leg, and four toes, three before and one behind,
covered with broad scales and armed with short claws. The thumb, so
necessary for perching and climbing, is in birds of this order short,
rudimentary, and attached high up in the leg, so that the whole foot
being placed flat upon the ground, affords a very firm support to the
animal.

In the fifth order of birds, the runners (_Cursores_), to which the
ostrich, the emu, and the cassowary belong, the structure of the foot
is wholly that of a powerful instrument of locomotion. The leg is
long, the thigh strong and muscular, and the foot short and compact.
The toes which never exceed two or three in number, and of which
the second is the largest, are placed all in front, and armed with
very short claws, or, as in the African ostrich, with the outer toe
destitute of a claw. The scales are limited to the upper surface of the
foot, the under surface being flexible and occupied by an elastic pad
upon which the member rests. Such a conformation of limb, which would
be wholly useless for perching or climbing, is admirably fitted for
running—witness the swiftness of the ostrich—a creature equalling and
even surpassing the fleetest horse in speed.

In the sixth order, the waders (_Grallatores_), or stilt birds, as
the stork, the crane, the heron, &c., the leg is long and slender,
and the foot weak and covered with shield-shaped scales. The toes,
four in number, are long and straight, three being placed anteriorly,
and a shorter one (wanting in the plovers and lapwings) behind; they
are frequently palmated at their base, as in the stork; or, as in
the middle claw of the heron, toothed or notched like a saw; while
sometimes they have a narrow-winged appendage, running along the side,
as in the sandpipers. In search of their food, insects and small fish,
the individuals of this order frequent marshy places and shallow
waters, and many of them, as the stork and heron, are remarkable for
the unerring certainty with which they strike and seize their small
finny prey.

In the last order, the swimmers (_Natatores_), called also web-footed
birds, to which the goose, duck, and gull belong, the foot is modified
to assist in swimming. The legs are short; the four toes, all placed
in front, are united by a broad membranous expansion, and armed with
claws, the thumb being likewise brought in front, so that a greater
extent of surface may be given to this oar-like member. A foot
thus constructed would be wholly unsuited for perching, running, or
grasping, but it is well adapted to the wants and habits of these
aquatic birds.

_Mammals._—It is but in animals who suckle their young (_Mammalia_)
that the extremities attain their greatest state of developement, and
it is in the higher orders alone that they become useful as organs of
prehension, their office being limited in most of the lower tribes to
support and locomotion. In the lowest order of the series, or whale
tribe (_Cetacea_), the members, in the number of pieces of which they
are composed, bear a considerable resemblance to the fins of fishes,
though they are somewhat differently constructed, according as the
animal may be destined exclusively for an aquatic existence, like the
common sperm whale, or be more or less herbivorous, and consequently
terrestrial in its habits, like the dugong. In the former case, the
extremities are converted into broad paddles adapted for swimming, and
the feet are webbed; in the latter, the members are better developed,
the toes being free, and furnished with nails at their termination.

Of those orders of _Mammalia_ which are provided with four members—the
ordinary quadrupeds—some are furnished with a foot which appears to
be entirely without toes, their place being supplied by a mass of
horny tissue—the hoof. This is the case with the ruminants—animals
that chew the cud—as the cow, and with the horse; but in the latter,
as the name of the order implies (_Solidungula_), the hoof is solid,
while in the ruminants it is cleft; and hence by some naturalists these
latter animals have been termed _Bisulca_. Some slight differences
are perceptible in the construction of the feet of ruminants: thus
the chamois, the antelope, and other of the deer tribe, are furnished
with an additional toe, which, projecting backwards, affords a firmer
support to the body. In the thick-skinned animals (_Pachydermata_) the
toes can hardly be said to be free, being still partially enclosed in
the tough skin. It is from characters afforded by the foot that several
tribes of animals belonging to this order are mainly characterised:
thus the elephant has five toes to each foot, the rhinoceros three,
and the hog and hippopotamus four. Among those of the mammalia which
are characterised by the presence of four members with distinct and
separate toes and nails, but few are furnished with a true hand—that
is, a member with a thumb capable of being brought into apposition with
the other fingers. Carnivorous animals have either a foot with sharp
recurved and retractile claws, as the cat and tiger, or with straight
blunt claws, not retractile, as the bear; or the feet are small, almost
completely enveloped in the skin, and furnished with a membranous
expansion connecting the toes, as in the aquatic seal and walrus,
or river-horse: but in all these animals, although the fore-legs may
be more or less employed as instruments of prehension, they are not
used for the purpose of conveying food to the mouth. In some of the
gnawing animals, as the squirrel, the anterior extremity commences to
assume the function of a hand; and in a few of the kangaroo tribe,
such as the opossum, the hinder extremities are provided with a thumb
capable of being brought into apposition with the other toes. The hand
of bats, which serves these animals not merely for flying, but also
supplies the place of eyes and ears, enabling them to avoid objects
during the obscurity of night, is furnished with a sense of touch
extremely delicate. It is in man and the monkey tribe only that we
meet with a true and perfect hand. In the latter, both the fore and
hind extremities are constructed upon the same general principle as
the hand of man; and hence these animals have been styled four-handed
(_Quadrumana_).

“In man the upper members are disposed in a manner the most favourable
for the exercise of their functions as organs of prehension and of
touch: the fingers are long and flexible; they have all, with the
occasional exception of the ring-finger, separate movements, which
other animals (even those provided with hands) have not; the thumb,
which is apposable to these latter, is longer in proportion to the
fingers than in monkeys, and consequently can more readily apply itself
to the extremity of their palm or surface, and better seize small
objects. The nails, which are large and flat, cover the back part only
of the extremity of the fingers, so as to furnish a support to the
organs of touch without in the least depriving them of their delicacy.
The entire hand can execute rotatory movements the most extended; and
to the arm which supports it is afforded a solid attachment by means of
a large shoulder or blade-bone and a long collar-bone.” The statement
of Milne Edwards,[3] then, does not appear far removed from the truth,
“That the faculties of the _Mammalia_ are the more elevated in
proportion as their members are the better constructed for prehension
and for touch.”


USE OF A KNOWLEDGE OF THE FORM OF APPENDAGES TO TRUNKS IN GEOLOGY.

A knowledge of the form of the appendages to the trunk of animals is of
great service to the geologist, for it has been well and truly said,
that the organic remains imbedded in rocks are as medals struck in
commemoration of the great revolutions which the earth has undergone,
and so small a portion as the extremity of an animal is sufficient to
indicate its nature, and to enable us to ascertain the class and order
to which it belongs. Let us take a few examples. Some fossil bones
were discovered by General Washington near his seat in Virginia. Mr.
Jefferson, by whom they were examined, stated that they had belonged
to an enormous carnivorous animal, which from the size of its claws he
named the _Megalonyx_. Upon an examination more carefully conducted by
Cuvier, it was found that in the paw the second bone of the toe was
symmetrical, while in animal feeders furnished with retractile claws it
is curved, and not symmetrical; the first bone, too, was the shortest,
whereas in the lion and others of the feline tribe it is the longest.
Whence Cuvier was led to conclude that the creature in question was a
sloth of large dimensions, which fed only upon plants.

Upon another occasion, from a careful consideration of the form and
size of a toe found in the Palatinate, near Eppelsheim, Cuvier was able
to determine that the animal to which it belonged was of the edentate
tribe of _Pangolins_. It was from an examination of the hand that
Cuvier decided upon the nature of the _Pterodactylus_. This curious
animal partook of the nature of both the reptile and the bird. Like
the bird, it was furnished with a long neck and a horny beak, but in
its jaws and teeth it resembled the crocodile. It had not, however,
like the bird, feathered wings without fingers to strengthen them, nor
had it a wing in which the thumb alone is free, like that of the bat.
Instead of the bony pieces of all the fingers being equally prolonged,
the second finger only was extended to a great length, and from it the
wing spread out, the other fingers being short and furnished with nails
like the toes of ordinary animals. Collini, its discoverer, supposed it
to be of marine origin; Soemmerring contended that it was a mammal; but
its true place in the animal series was first assigned to it by Cuvier,
who has satisfactorily shewn that it is in fact intermediate between a
bird and a reptile.

A knowledge of the form of the extremities of animals has been of great
service to palæontology in another way—in proving the existence of
certain species of animals at given periods of the earth’s formation,
from the print of their footsteps left upon the sand or other
material of the strata while it was yet in a soft state. Such traces
were first observed by Dr. Duncan in Dumfries-shire. On examining a
sandstone quarry, he found these prints not on one only, but on several
successive layers of the stone; so that they must have been made at
periods distant from each other. Similar impressions have been since
observed in the Forest marble-beds near Bath, at Hessburg in Saxony, in
the State of Connecticut, and in some other parts of the world.

“The marks found in Dumfries-shire, of which there were as many as
twenty-four upon a single slab, formed as it were a regular track,
with six distinct repetitions of each foot, the fore and hind feet
having left different impressions, and even the marks of the claws
being discernible. They appear to have been made by some animal of the
tortoise kind. At Hessburg the impressions were discovered in quarries
of grey and red sandstone alternating; and the marks were both larger
and more distinct than those found in Scotland. In one the hind foot
measured twelve inches in length, and the fore foot always appeared
much smaller than the hind. From this circumstance, and from the
distance between the two being only fourteen inches, it is conjectured
that the animal was a marsupial like the kangaroo, and it has been
termed by Dr. Kaup _Chirotherium_, from the supposed resemblance of the
four toes and turned-out thumb to a hand. In the State of Connecticut,
near Northampton, footsteps differing exceedingly in size have been
found in inclined strata of sandstone. They were evidently made before
it assumed its present position. The marks are always in pairs, and the
tracts cross each other like those of ducks on the margin of a muddy
pond. One is of the length of fifteen or sixteen inches, and a feathery
spur or appendage appears to have been attached to the heel, eight or
nine inches long. The distance between the steps is proportioned to
their length, but in every case the pace appears to have been longer
than that of the existing species of birds to which they approach
nearest—the ostrich, and the animal must consequently have been
proportionably larger. How much larger he was than the ostrich may be
gathered from this, that the large African ostrich has only a foot ten
inches long, less than two-thirds that of this bird, and yet stands
nine feet high. These proportions would give a height of fourteen feet
to the extinct animal.”[4]

The characters afforded by the foot have recently enabled Mr.
Strickland to determine that the dodo, a bird now extinct, is not
related either to the gallinaceous birds,—the vulture or the ostriches
as some have conjectured,—but is closely allied to the pigeons.

From this cursory examination of the animal world we may gather the
important conclusion, that from the structure of an extremity we may
obtain a complete insight into the entire organisation of an animal;
and thus the paws furnished with sharp retractile claws of the lion
indicate at once to a naturalist its strong teeth, its powerful
jaws, and its muscular strength of limb; while from the cleft foot
of the cow, the complicated structure of its stomach, the definite
peculiarities of its jaws, and its vegetable diet, may with equal
certainty be predicated.

Thus, as Paley justly observes, “In the swan, the web foot, the spoon
bill, the long neck, the thick down, the graminivorous stomach, have
all a relation to one another, inasmuch as they all concur in one
design, that of supplying the occasions of an aquatic fowl, floating
upon the surface of shallow parts of water, and seeking its food at
the bottom. Begin with any one of these peculiarities of structure, and
observe how the rest follow it. The web foot qualifies the bird for
swimming, the spoon bill enables it to graze. But how is an animal,
floating upon the surface of pools of water, to gaze at the bottom
except by the mediation of a long neck? And a long neck is accordingly
given to it. Again, a warm-blooded animal, which was to pass its life
upon water, required a defence against the coldness of that element.
Such a defence is furnished to the swan in the muff in which its body
is wrapped. But all this outward apparatus would have been in vain if
the intestinal system had not been suited to the digestion of vegetable
substances.”[5]

And, again, of the mole: “The form of the feet fixes the character of
the animal. They are so many shovels; they determine its action to
that of rooting in the ground; and every thing about its body agrees
with this destination. The cylindrical figure of the mole, as well as
the compactness of its form, arising from the terseness of its limbs,
proportionally lessens its labour; because, according to its bulk, it
thereby requires the least possible quantity of earth to be removed for
its progress. It has nearly the same structure of the face and jaws
as a swine, and the same office for them. The nose is sharp, slender,
tendinous, strong; with a pair of nerves going down to the end of it.
The plush covering, which, by the smoothness, closeness, and polish of
the short piles that compose it, rejects the adhesion of almost every
species of earth, defends the animal from cold and wet, and from the
impediment which it would experience by the mould sticking to its body.
From soils of all kind the little pioneer comes forth bright and clean.
Inhabiting dirt, it is of all animals the neatest.”




CHAPTER IV.

  “Some animals have horns, some have hoofs, some talons,
  some claws, some spurs and beaks; man hath none of all
  these, but is weak and feeble, and sent unarmed into the
  world. Why?—a hand, with reason to rise it, supplies the
  place of all these.”—RAY.

FORM OF EXTREMITIES DIFFERS IN INDIVIDUALS OF THE SAME SPECIES.


Sir J. Barrow states of the Hottentot that there is not an animal among
the numbers that range the wilds of Africa, if he be at all acquainted
with it, the print of whose foot he cannot distinguish. The print of
any of his companions’ feet he would single out among a thousand.
That particular species of animals can be distinguished by their feet
appears, then, an undoubted fact; and it is not less true than that
modifications in the form of the extremities are met with among animals
of the same species. Thus the male frog is distinguished from the
female by the presence of a more fully-developed thumb and the addition
of a velvety, cushion-like substance to its outer surface, by means
of which he is enabled to grasp the latter more securely, and ensure
the fecundation of the eggs. The land-frog (_Hyla_) differs from the
common frog (_Rana_) in possessing a viscous disc at the extremity of
each toe, so that this animal can readily mount the branches of trees
in search of prey. The courage of the falcon is estimated by the form
and disposition of the wing feathers, and that of the fighting cock by
the conformation of his foot. But it is to the hand of man,—the emblem
of his vast superiority over all the lower animals, that we would more
particularly invite attention. The hand of man, like the appendages
to the trunk of animals, has a certain definite relation with his
whole organisation. As Sir C. Bell observes, “The possession of an
instrument like the hand implies that there must be a great part of the
organisation which strictly belongs to it concealed. The hand is not
a thing appended, or put on to the body, like an additional movement
in a watch; but a thousand intricate relations must be established
throughout the whole frame in connexion with it.”

The form of the hand, like that of the entire body, is materially
influenced by age, sex, and race; and it is not less affected by the
particular kind of organisation, the mental disposition, and the
temperament of the individual.

_Age._—In the minute germ, or embryo of a month, the form of the hand
resembles that of one of the lower animals. It puts on the appearance
rather of a respiratory organ than of an instrument of prehension,
and, being completely destitute of fingers, presents a great analogy
in form with the fin of a fish. As the little being increases in size,
the fingers become gradually developed. They at first appear as small
bud-like projections attached to the perfectly-formed palm. By degrees
the several pieces of the fingers become more and more elongated,
and at length attain their perfect length and shape; though, even at
birth, the relative size of the palm, compared with the fingers, is
considerably greater than in the adult. During infancy and childhood
the hand retains, to a certain extent, the same character, the hand
of the child being soft and thick, with a broad palm and short
rudimentary fingers. With the period of puberty it attains its perfect
developement, and acquires characters which it preserves throughout
manhood. As old age creeps on the hand loses its softness and pliancy,
it becomes hard and insensible, and its vigour, like that of the
mind, may be said to be gone. “Le cal de la main, presque toujours,
jette une ombre sur l’esprit,” says D’Arpentigny. Politics, science,
literature—whatever active intellectual pursuit the mind formerly
delighted in, commences at this period of life to lose its former
charm, to be succeeded by a love of quiet rural occupation. In the
language of the author just quoted, “It is when our stiffened hands,
become, as it were, ossified and nearly insensible, afford a faithful
image of our impoverished intelligence, that we are the most ruled by
this mania for agricultural pursuits.”

_Sex._—The sexes differ as much in the form of their hands as they
do in the figure of the skeleton, and in the general habit and
conformation of the entire body. As Carus observes, “He must be but a
superficial observer of mankind who could not at once recognise the sex
from a simple inspection of the hand. The hand of woman is smaller,
more delicate, and much more finely articulated than that of man; it
has a softer palm, and joints which are but slightly prominent. The
hand of man, on the contrary, is large, firm, and broad, is furnished
with strong projecting joints, and a hard wide palm, together with a
large thumb, with a strong convex ball or root.” Here, again, we find
the physical structure in harmony with the mental disposition—the firm,
strong, broad hand of man being indicative of his active, energetic,
reasoning mind; and the soft, narrow, delicate hand of woman,
symbolical of her sensitive, yielding, contemplative character.

_Race._—We have not yet obtained sufficient data to enable us to
ascertain any thing very definite respecting this part of our subject.
Whether the hand of races springing from the Caucasian stock presents
a form essentially different from that of people originating from the
Mongolian,—whether the hand of the Negro races resembles or differs
from that of the American tribes, must be determined by the future
investigations of intelligent and observing travellers. From the
few observations that have hitherto been made, it would appear that
in the American and Mongolian races the hand is characterised by a
preponderance of the motive element over the sensitive, the member
being large and coarse, with the bones, muscles, and joints, strongly
developed. As regards the dark-coloured races we know that they differ
somewhat from the white in the texture of their skin: it is coarse
in its structure, provided with a larger number of sebaceous glands,
and covered by a thicker layer of cuticle, so that the sentient
terminations of the nerves being less exposed its general sensibility
must be considerably less than that of the skin of white people.

But the hand not only affords us characters by which the age and sex
may be determined, it is likewise an index of the general habit of
body, of the kind of temperament, and of the mental tendency and
disposition.


HAND, INDEX OF HABIT OF BODY AND TEMPERAMENT.

The general habit of body, and the kind of temperament, we determine
from certain general signs deduced from the hand. We observe the
structure of the skin—whether it be fine or coarse in its texture,
whether it be hard and unyielding, or soft and elastic. We note
the quantity of fat and of cellular tissue; and this enables us to
form a judgment respecting the degree of _embonpoint_, and we have
already abundantly proved that a man of a soft, lax habit, with an
abundance of cellular and fatty tissues, differs in mental tendency and
disposition from one of firm, tense fibre, in whom the bones, muscles,
and articulations, are strong and prominent. Thus, a soft, thick hand,
loaded with fat, denotes little energy of character, and a soft,
yielding, inactive disposition; while, on the contrary, a thin, firm,
bony, or muscular hand indicates a rough, active, energetic nature.
With respect to the texture of the skin—a hand possessing a delicate
and highly-sensitive skin is accompanied by a similar structure of the
tegumentary envelope of the entire body, and is always associated with
an excitable organisation, with a highly sensitive, mobile disposition.
A coarse, dry texture of the skin denotes a preponderance of muscular
force over sensibility, and a character more remarkable for solidity
and resolution than for imagination or vivacity of conception. The
hand partakes of the nature of the whole body; when the latter is
gracefully and symmetrically formed, with its several parts in nice
adaptation and co-ordination, the former shares its perfection and is
constructed after the same general plan; and we accordingly find that
a powerful, athletic individual is furnished with a large hard hand,
with its joints or articulations strong and prominent, and a delicate,
sensitive person, with a small, narrow hand, with its joints small and
but slightly prominent.


HAND, FOUR PRIMARY FORMS OF, CONNECTED WITH PARTICULAR MENTAL
TENDENCIES.

In order correctly to determine the more particular signs of the mental
disposition which may be drawn from an examination of the hand, we
must first take into consideration the special physiological functions
of the organ. On the one hand, it is the most delicate instrument
of feeling,—the organ of touch, by means of which we judge of so
many properties of bodies; on the other hand, the finest and most
skilful instrument of motion and of prehension; and it may likewise be
regarded as the organ of art. A hand rather below the average size,
and of which the skin is soft and delicate, the fingers long, and
provided with numerous cuticular ridges, which are indicative of a
large number of the sentient papillæ of touch, the bony portion but
slightly developed, and the joints not prominent, is admirably adapted
for an organ of sensation, but by no means suited for an instrument
of motion; while, on the contrary, a size rather above the average,
together with a massive, bony, framework, strong muscles and tendons,
and large joints, are the characteristics of a powerful instrument of
prehension—of a hand in which sensation is sacrificed to motion.

In the former case, we may with certainty predicate a mind mobile,
imaginative, and inclined to abstraction,—a mind employed chiefly on
subjective phenomena; in the latter, the mind is rather objective in
its action than subjective, operating powerfully upon the external
world, whether by arms, agriculture, or the mechanical arts: the former
hand we term sensitive, the latter motive.

In the highest and most perfect form of hand, thin, delicate, conical
fingers are combined with a moderate-sized palm and a well-developed
thumb,—both the sensitive and motive parts are in nice and accurate
adaptation; the instrument being thus rendered capable of executing
whatever the intellect may desire: such a hand we term “psychical.”
In the lowest form of hand, the member retains throughout adult
life the character which it presented in infancy, and it strikingly
resembles the hand of those of the monkey tribe most nearly allied
to man in their organisation and outward form,—a hard, thick, palm
being joined to short, rudimentary fingers: such a form of hand we
style “elementary.” It is mostly associated with a crude, undeveloped
state of the intellectual powers. Thus, by tracing the normal
developement and the anatomy and physiology of the hand, we have
obtained four definite types of formation founded upon anatomical and
physiological characters, and corresponding to a certain extent to
the temperaments,—the psychical as the highest form, the elementary
as the lowest, and, as intermediate forms, the sensitive and the
motive. The sensitive is characterised by softness, delicacy, and a
rounded form,—by a member adapted by its structure for an accurate
discrimination of the external world, and for a delicate organ
of sensation; the motive, by great developement of the muscular,
tendinous, and osseous structures, and exercising its objective
influence by virtue of its active movements and its physical force; the
psychical uniting the perfections of both the sensitive and the motive
types, the elementary without the excellencies of either.

We pass on to a somewhat more detailed examination of the several parts
of the hand. It may be considered as made up of the palm, the thumb,
and the fingers.

_Palm._—As regards the palm, we have to notice its size, thickness,
and degree of hardness; its temperature, degree of dryness, and the
furrows by which it is marked. In all the lower animals the palm is
large, thick, and hard. Hence D’Arpentigny views the palm as indicative
of the physical appetites or animal propensities, and of the degree and
intensity of the mental affections to which they give rise. Thus, when
the palm is narrow and thin, the temperament is feeble, the imagination
without force, and the mind rather subtle than comprehensive; when its
size and thickness are in harmony with the proportions of the thumb and
fingers, sensual impressions easily excite the mind, but a salutary
control is exercised by reason and imagination; when it is large in
comparison with the fingers, sensuality and egotism predominate;
and lastly, when it is large, thick and hard, the animal faculties
preponderate over reason, and the passions, unrefined by imagination,
have full and uncontrolled sway. A moist, warm, rosy palm denotes
health, youth, delicate sensibility, and energy of the vegetative
functions. Thus Shakspeare in “Othello,” speaking of the hand of
Desdemona,—

  “This hand is moist, my lady.

        *       *       *       *

   This argues fruitfulness and liberal heart;
   Hot, hot, and moist. This hand of yours requires
   A sequester from liberty, fasting, and prayer,
   Much castigation, exercise devout;
   For there’s a young and sweating devil here
   That commonly rebels.”

In febrile diseases, the palm is hot and dry; and the same obtains when
the vegetative functions are languid, or in exhaustion from debauchery
or other causes. As Shakspeare has it in the “Twelfth Night,”—

  “_Maria._ Now, sir, thought is free: I pray you bring
  Your hand to the buttery bar, and let it drink.

  _Sir Andrew Aguecheek._ Wherefore, sweetheart? What’s
  your metaphor?

  _Maria._ It’s dry, sir.”

According to the old chiroscopists, the life-line—that is, the furrow
at the line of demarcation between the ball of the thumb and the
palm—measures by its length the term of existence; it is certainly
more strongly marked in strong and healthy than in weak and sickly
persons. A pallid or yellowish colour of the furrows marking the palm
is indicative of disease.

_Thumb._—The thumb deserves particular notice in treating of the hand.
It is the presence of a thumb that imparts to the hand of the higher
animals its character of superiority. It is the higher developement
and greater mobility of the human hand that render it so much more
perfect than that of the ape: “L’animal supérieur est dans la main,
l’homme est dans la pouce,” says D’Arpentigny. The thumb being,
then, the characteristic element of the human hand—the part last
developed and most strongly typical of its superiority over that of
the lower animals, the perfect formation of this part of the hand
must be regarded as a sign of the character of the species being well
marked,—of a strong, active individuality; while the reverse obtains
when it is small and rudimentary. The ball of the thumb is made up
of strong muscles, and in it the motor function of the hand is, as it
were, concentrated. It is the _mons Veneris_ of the old chiroscopists;
the expression of “la volonté raisonnée,” of decision, perception, and
the logical faculty, according to D’Arpentigny, who confirms the old
opinion above alluded to, remarking, “Aimer c’est vouloir, et vouloir
c’est aimer.” Persons with a small thumb are ruled by the heart,
those with a large by the head. The motive hand is always furnished
with a large thumb, and hence, probably, the origin of the term, from
_domare_, to rule (Italian), _Daumen_ (German); power and objective
force being imparted by it to the hand.

The Romans applied the term _pollex truncatus_ to a person who, for
the purpose of avoiding military service, cut off or mutilated his
thumb—hence our word _poltroon_. It was by the position of the thumb
that spectators determined the fate of conquered gladiators; if it were
raised, life was spared, if it were depressed, it was a sentence of
death. In the Anglo-Saxon laws, it is ordained that mutilation of the
thumb shall be punished by a fine of twenty shillings, and that of the
middle finger by a fine of four only. In La Vendée, a large thumb is
still thought to be indicative of a dabbler in the forbidden mysteries
of the black art. Biting the thumb was formerly held to be expressive
of insult and defiance; thus Shakspeare in “Romeo and Juliet,”—

  “_Samson._ I will bite my thumb at them; which is a
               disgrace to them if they bear it.”

_Fingers._—Having fully examined the palm and thumb, we have next to
direct our attention to the four fingers—to their length, their general
outline, the size of the joints, and the shape of the pieces of which
the fingers are made up,—the phalanges, more especially of the terminal
one.

Prominent joints evince great development of the bony and muscular
structures of the hand; they indicate a motive and prehensive organ.
Persons with such fingers, according to D’Arpentigny, are remarkable
for their love of order and arrangement, for a mind prone to analysis
and reasoning, and for actions regulated by the calm dictates of
judgment, and not impelled by the sudden inspiration of enthusiasm.
Smooth, even fingers, on the contrary, with a regular outline and
articulations but slightly prominent, denote that the nervous system
is more developed than the bony and muscular, and that the member is
endowed with fine sensibility. Such an individual will be more or less
swayed by imagination, will act rather from the impulse of the moment
than from reason and experience, will be rather disposed to view things
as a whole than to consider in detail their several parts,—in fact,
will be furnished with a mind with more of imagination and synthetical
talent than of reason or logical ability. The joints become more
distinctly marked as age advances. In fine, says D’Arpentigny, “Man
becomes the more orderly, the less credulous, and the more logical, in
proportion as the articular prominences become more strongly defined.”

The last phalanx, or terminal piece of the fingers, may terminate in
either of three ways. It may be rounded, cushiony, somewhat enlarged
as it were; it may be square and flattened; or it may be delicate,
tapering, and conical. The enlarged, rounded, cushiony-terminated
phalanx, characterises “the doigts en spatule” of D’Arpentigny, or, as
we shall term them, “sensitive fingers.” It indicates a great number
of the delicate papillæ of touch, and serves to denote a sensitive
hand. The square terminal phalanx mostly accompanies the motive and
elementary form of hand; and the tapering, conical extremity, the
psychical. It is a remarkable fact, that among all nations the figures
of saints, angels, and divinities, should have been invariably figured
with delicate, tapering fingers. The hands of witches, demons, and
sorcerers, have likewise been delineated with elongated fingers; but
they are rough, thin, and bony, and armed with long nails or claws,
like the toes of the lower animals.

_Nails._—We must say a few words upon the nails,—parts corresponding to
the horny skeleton of invertebrate animals. They are sometimes long and
narrow, as in the psychical hand: sometimes short and broad, as in the
elementary type; and sometimes square and strong, as in the motive, or
they may be brittle or thickened, or otherwise diseased. In consumptive
people they become curved, somewhat claw-like. If the characters which
they furnish be in accordance with those which are indicated by the
other parts of the hand, they are thereby doubly confirmed; if the
two differ, they mutually render each other less positive. Thus an
elementary hand with long, slender nails, must be looked upon as having
a decided tendency to assume a higher type of organisation, while if
the nails be broad and short like the fingers, the signification is
thereby the more confirmed.


FORM OF HANDS.

1.—_The Elementary Hand._ See Plate I.—Fingers thick, and without
flexibility, palm large, thick, and hard, thumb rudimentary, and
frequently bent somewhat backwards, skin coarse in its texture, nails
short and thick. In countries where such hands abound, the people
obey habit and instinct rather than reason. The sensations are dull
and inactive, the imagination is without force, and the character
apathetic; for the extremities of the nerves being deficient in
sensibility, the impressions conveyed to the brain are wanting in
intensity, and the ideas to which they give rise are consequently
neither clear nor vivid. “Aux mains élémentaires, en Europe le
labourage, le soin des étables et la longue suite des travaux grossiers
auxquels suffisent les confuses lumières de l’instinct. A elles la
guerre, en tant qu’il ne s’agit, que d’arroser machinalement de la
sueur un sol étranger. Enfermées dans le monde matériel elles ne se
rattachent guêre à l’ensemble politique, que par l’élément physique.
Les convictions se ferment en elles dans une sphère inaccessible au
raisonnement, et leurs vertus tiennent le plus souvent à des facultés
négatives.”

Elementary hands abound in the north of Europe. The individuals
characterised by them are always superstitious; witness the Lappes,
the Finns, and the Icelanders. By misfortune they are overwhelmed. In
India, where they do not naturally exist, they have been artificially
produced in a particular caste—the Parias—by political and social
institutions. They have been abundant among every people at the dawning
of their civilisation; they raised the pyramids in Egypt and the
Cyclopean structures in Italy, and are described as existing in a rude
state of society in the literature of various nations: witness the
Polyphemus of the Greeks, the Melibœus of the Latins, the Caliban
of Shakspeare, and the Sancho Panza of Cervantes. This form of hand
can unquestionably be produced by premature hard labour, but it is
found among the upper classes likewise, where manual labour cannot be
supposed to have given rise to it. Physiologically it must be looked
upon as an arrest of developement, its main bulk, like the member of
the lower animals and of the human fœtus, being made up of the solid
palm. It must hence be regarded as a primitive form of the member, as a
rudimentary, and consequently an imperfect organ.

Transitions from the elementary to other forms of hand are frequently
met with. Thus, when the fingers become elongated and somewhat
thinner, and the texture of the skin finer, the hand may be said to be
intermediate between the elementary and sensitive type, while long,
hard, bony fingers indicate an approach towards the motive type. And
thus it is that intelligence is more readily to be attained by persons
with elementary, than a fine sensibility by those furnished with a
motive hand, or great energy in objective action by those provided with
a sensitive.

2. _The Sensitive Hand_ (see Plate II.) is rather below than above
the average size, palm soft and narrow, fingers thin and delicate,
with the extremity plump, rounded, and cushiony, thumb thin and small,
skin fine and very vascular, nails narrow and semi-transparent. This
type of hand may be looked upon as essentially feminine. It denotes
a highly-sensitive frame, and a delicately-organised nervous system.
The nervous ramifications distributed to the surface of the body being
covered only by a thin layer of cuticle or scarf-skin, are easily
excited by impressions from without, and as readily transmit their
excitement to the central organs, thus occasioning a prompt and vivid
flow of ideas.

[Illustration: Plate 2.

The Sensitive Hand]

(_a._) _The Artistic Hand_ of D’Arpentigny is a variety of this type.
It is characterised by a moderately-developed palm, long tapering
fingers, very flexible, and a small thumb. It has for its object
the worship of material beauty, is disposed to view things through
a romantic medium, is fond of leisure, of liberty, and of change;
is at once bold and timid, humble and vain, exalted and depressed,
enthusiastic and desponding. The charms of a quiet, regulated, domestic
life possess but little attraction for such persons, who, with much
originality, have equal fickleness of character. “En France nos armées
sont pleines de mains artistiques de tout genre; elles leur doivent le
caractère de mobilité aventureuse, insouciante, pittoresque; cet élan
fulgurant et prime sautier, qui les distinguent. Elles s’accommodent de
tout et sont propre à tout. On les enlève par la parole.”

(_b._) A gradual transition is afforded from this to the motive type by
means of _the spathulate hand_, which partakes both of the motive and
sensitive character.

_The spathulate hand_, when fully developed, is furnished with smooth
fingers, with a rounded, cushiony termination, and a large thumb. It
denotes a love of corporeal movement, and of active occupation—of
horses, dogs, and field-sports; it prefers the useful to the
agreeable, and is not content, like the elementary hand, with the
merely necessary, but demands abundance. It is distinguished by an
appearance of simplicity and frankness of character, and likewise by
its chastity; so that Diana or Cyrus the Younger may be said to be
its representatives. It is a native of the North, is more common in
Scotland than in England, in England than in France, and in France than
in Italy or Spain. Wherever it is the prevailing type, as in England
and America, the political institutions are free. It is essentially
Protestant. “Amoureuses de l’art, de la poésie, du roman, des mystères,
les mains pointues veulent un dieu selon leur imagination; amoureuses
des sciences et de la réalité, les mains en spatule veulent un dieu
selon leur raison.” So that it may be truly said that the people of
the north are physically Protestant, and those of the south Catholic.
It must also be remarked, that before the revocation of the Edict of
Nantes the Protestants of France were likewise its chief manufacturers;
for the same spirit that led them to embrace Protestantism impelled
them to the cultivation of mechanical and scientific pursuits. It
prefers size and regularity to beauty, opulence to luxury, and that
which excites astonishment to that which pleases. In private life its
motto is, “Chacun pour soi.”

[Illustration: Plate 3.

The Motive Hand.]

_The Motive Hand_ (see Plate III.)—Above the mean size, fingers with
prominent joints, of an average length, and strong, thick, and bony,
with a square tip; palm of a mean size, hollow, and tolerably firm;
thumb large, with the muscular root strongly developed. This form
of hand cannot exist without a strong, massive developement of the
bony and muscular system. It is essentially the hand of man, as the
sensitive is that of woman. Hence, in the female sex, it indicates
a masculine energy of character: witness the hardy peasants of
Switzerland and the Tyrol. In both sexes it denotes a preponderance of
the masculine or reasoning mind over the imaginative faculties. Hence
it loves form and arrangement, possesses a strong instinctive feeling
for right and authority, and a profound respect for established forms;
prefers an aristocracy to a democracy, and the known to the unknown;
takes a delight in organising, in classifying, in systematising, in
subjecting thought to opinion, and man to his fellow-man. Devoid of
originality, and with but little imagination, it moves only in the old
beaten path, and its belief is limited to that which it is capable of
comprehending.

Partaking of the character of the motive and psychical type, we have
a mixed intermediate form, termed by D’Arpentigny “the philosophical
hand.”

(_a._) _The Philosophical Hand_ is somewhat smaller than the motive;
the fingers have large joints, and are somewhat tapering at their
tip; the palm is large and elastic, the thumb also large, with its
two phalanges nearly equal in length. Such was the hand of Locke, of
Condillac, of Descartes, Malebranche, and Leibnitz. It denotes a love
of absolute truth for its own sake, and of speculations respecting the
nature of life and the origin of things. It adopts opinions only upon a
careful investigation, and reason is its only recognised guide.

[Illustration: Plate 4.

The Psychical Hand.]

_The Psychical Hand_ (see Plate IV.) is at once the most beautiful
and the most rare. Compared with the stature it is small and delicate;
the fingers are thin, without articular prominences, and long and
tapering; the palm is of average dimensions, the thumb well formed and
but of moderate size. Persons with such a hand are led by ideality;
soul is for them every thing; great interests alone move them; in
religion and politics they are tolerant. In literature, Milton,
Klopstock, and Göthe, are their representatives. Loving the ideal and
the sublime, they oppose to the school of Voltaire and Hume that of
Lamartine and Chateaubriand. Among the Greeks, Plato is their type.

D’Arpentigny says of these hands: “Elles attachent, elles ajoutent,
aux œuvres du penseur, comme l’artiste à l’œuvre de l’artisan la
beauté, l’idéalité; elles les dorent d’un rayon de soleil, elles les
élèvent sur un piédestal, elles leur ouvrent le porte des cœurs;
l’âme, oubliée et laissée en arrière par les mains philosophiques,
est leur guide,—la vérité dans l’amour, et la sublimité leur but, et
l’expansion leur moyen.”

This form of hand is met with among all classes of society, but is
rarely the prevailing one among any people. In Asia, it is most common
in India; and in Europe, in Germany.

Thus to the spathulate and motive hands appertain matter and reality,
the useful and necessary arts, the action and theory of things, and the
knowledge of facts; to the sensitive and psychical hands the boundless
ideal world—the fine arts, sublime poetry, and abstract intellectual
philosophy.




FOOTNOTES:

[1] La Chirognomonie; ou, l’Art de Reconnaître les Tendances de
l’Intelligence, d’après les Formes de la Main. Par le C^{aine} S.
ARPENTIGNY. Paris, 1843.

[2] Ueber Grund und Bedentung der verschiedenen Formen der Hand in
verschiedenen Personen. By Dr. C. G. CARUS, Physician to the King of
Saxony, &c. &c. Stuttgart, 1846.

[3] P. 237.

[4] Brougham on Paley’s “Natural Theology.”

[5] Natural Theology: ch. on “Relations.”


London: George Barclay, Castle Street, Leicester Square.