Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive)






                 Account of the Skeleton of the Mammoth

------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                ACCOUNT

                                 OF THE

                                SKELETON

                                   OF

                             =The Mammoth,=

                             A NON-DESCRIPT

                           CARNIVOROUS ANIMAL

                                   OF

                            _IMMENSE SIZE_,

                          =Found in America.=

                               ----------

                          BY REMBRANDT PEALE,
                            THE PROPRIETOR.

                               ----------

                                LONDON:

           PRINTED AND SOLD BY E. LAWRENCE, NO. 378, STRAND;
                          AND TO BE HAD AT THE
                  EXHIBITION-ROOM, NO. 118, PALL MALL.

                                  ---

                                 1802.


------------------------------------------------------------------------




                       TO SIR JOSEPH BANKS, BART.
                  PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY, &c.


                                -------

Receive, Sir, as a small testimony of my high respect for a Character
rendered illustrious in the paths of Science, this plain recital of
Facts, and first publication, derived from authentic sources, on a
subject in which You have declared Yourself to feel the most lively
interest; and which must interest every thinking mind, delighting in the
investigation of physical causes, or disposed “to look through Nature up
to Nature’s God.”

                                                     Your much obliged,

                                                     And humble Servant,

                                                     REMBRANDT PEALE.

   London,
 October, 1802.

------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                ACCOUNT

                                   OF

                             =The Skeleton=

                                   OF

                              THE MAMMOTH.


                                -------

The curiosity of the scientific world has for a long time been justly
excited by the fossil remains of a non-descript animal, which have been
found in North America and Siberia, but generally in so mutilated a
condition as to give but very imperfect ideas either of the size or kind
of animal to which they must have belonged. The first account of them
which we can find, is in the fifth volume of Jones’s Philosophical
Transactions abridged, part second, page 159, in an extract of a letter
from Dr. Mather to Dr. Woodward, dated Boston, Nov. 17, 1712; in which
the Doctor gives an account of a large work in manuscript, intitled the
_Biblia Americana_. _This work Dr. Mather recommends to the patronage of
some Mecænas, to promote the publication of. As a specimen of it he
transcribes a passage out of it, being a note on that passage in
Genesis, chap. _vi._ verse _4_, relating to giants; and confirms the
opinion of there having been in the antediluvian world men of a very
large and prodigious stature, by the bones and teeth of some large
animals found lately in Albany in New England, which, for some reasons,
he thinks to be human; particularly a tooth brought from the place where
it was found to New York in _1705_, being a very large grinder, weighing
four pounds and three quarters; with a bone supposed to be a thigh-bone,
seventeen feet long. He also mentions another tooth, broad and flat like
a fore-tooth, four fingers broad; the bones crumble to pieces in the air
after they are dug up; they were found near a place called _Cluverack_,
about thirty miles on this side Albany. He then gives the description of
one which he resembles to the eye-tooth of a man: He says it has four
prongs or roots, flat and something worn on the top; it was six inches
high, wanting one-eighth as it stood upright on the root, and almost
thirteen inches in circumference; it weighed two pounds four ounces Troy
weight. There was another near a pound heavier, found under the bank of
Hudson’s River, about fifty leagues from the sea, a great way beneath
the surface of the earth, where the ground is of a different colour and
substance from the other ground, for seventy-five feet long, which they
suppose to be from the rotting of the body, to which these bones and
teeth did, as he supposes, once belong. It were to be wished he had
given an exact figure of these bones and teeth._

This account is only worth preserving, as it fixes the time at which
these extraordinary remains of antiquity were first discovered in
America, previous to their being found in Siberia. The supposition that
they were the bones of a giant was scarcely less probable than that they
should have belonged to a quadruped of which not the smallest vestige
could be traced.—Prepossessed, therefore, with the certainty of their
being human bones, a calculation was made of the height of the supposed
giant, very probably from a broken piece of thigh-bone, and a length of
seventeen feet was calculated in proportion to the thickness of that
which was subject to their examination; for take either half of these
thigh-bones, and nothing can more resemble that of the human leg, until
the whole is seen together, when, from its thickness, it is evidently
that of a quadruped, the human thigh being very long and slender. The
seventy-five feet of black earth, which they calculated to be the length
of a man whose thigh-bone was supposed seventeen feet, could have been
nothing but a small morass divested of its water; and hence the decayed
state of the bones.

It appears that about the year 1740, great numbers of bones, of a
similar kind, were found in Kentucky on the Ohio; but they were
collected with such eagerness, and forwarded to Europe so hastily, that
it shortly became impossible to distinguish one set of bones from
another, so as to ascertain their number, proportion, and kind; parts of
the same animal having been scattered over England, France, and Germany,
and there compared with similar ones from Siberia. Buffon[1] speaking of
one of these thigh-bones brought from the Ohio by the way of Canada,
which he describes as being the tenth of an inch shorter than one from
Siberia, and yet an inch thicker, says; “This disproportion is so great
as hitherto to deceive me with respect to this bone, though it otherwise
resembles, both in the external figure and internal structure, the femur
of the elephant (he should have said, the femur found in Siberia),
mentioned under the number DCDLXXXVII. The difference in thickness,
which appeared excessive, seemed sufficient to attribute this bone to
another animal which must have been larger than the elephant; but as no
such animal is known, recourse must be had to the pretended MAMMOTH, a
fabulous animal supposed to inhabit the regions of the north, where are
frequently found bones, teeth, and tusks of the elephant.” Here again
the word elephant is improperly introduced; Messrs. Buffon and Daubenton
having conceived an idea that all the Siberian and some of the American
bones belonged unquestionably to elephants, render their observations
almost unintelligible, from the confident use of the term elephant in
cases where it was at least doubtful, especially as it is now evident,
that the same animal was native in the north of both countries; with one
probable difference, that the bones of the American animal are
comparatively thicker than the Siberian; and with this striking
difference between them both and the elephant, that the thigh-bones of
the latter are round as well as slender, whereas those of the Mammoth
are much flattened, so as to stand obliquely in the animal. After
reciting the account given by Mr. Fabry, who states the place and manner
in which Mr. le Baron de Longueuil, Mr. de Bienville, and Mr. de Lignery
(lieutenant in Canada), found some of these bones and teeth on the Ohio
in 1740, he proceeds; “Mr. du Hamel, of the Royal Academy of Sciences,
informs us that Mr. de Longueuil had likewise brought, in 1740, some
very large grinders found in Canada, and perhaps with the tusk and femur
which I shall mention. These teeth have no characters in common with
those of the elephant, but greatly resemble the teeth of the
hippopotamus, so that there is reason to believe they may be part of
that animal; for it can never be supposed that these teeth could have
been taken from the same head with the tusks, or that it could have made
part of the same skeleton with the femur above-mentioned: In supposing
this, it would be necessary to suppose an UNKNOWN ANIMAL, which had
tusks similar to those of the elephant, and grinders resembling those of
the hippopotamus. (_Voyez les Memoires de l’Academie Royale des
Sciences, Année 1762_).”


[Footnote 1: Vol. XI. Page 169, No. MXXXV. Autre Femur d’Elephante.]


Here M. de Buffon, however unwillingly, has drawn a true picture of the
Mammoth, with some little variation, inasmuch as the tusks do resemble
those of the elephant, except in having a greater curve and spiral
twist, and as the teeth do resemble those of the hippopotamus, except
that in the latter there are never more than three prongs, or
blunt-pointed protuberances, on the grinding surface; whereas in this
animal the large teeth have five and six, and the small teeth three and
four prongs, very differently arranged from those of the former.

The elephant, which is a graminivorous animal, is armed with tusks, more
properly called by the French _defences_; but to me it appears nothing
inconsistent with the nature of a carnivorous animal that it should be
furnished with a similar weapon of offence and defence, and indeed from
their form somewhat better calculated to answer those objects; therefore
the number of instances in which these tusks and those carnivorous teeth
were found with bones resembling the bones of the elephant, though
larger, should have been taken as the strongest presumption that they
were the fragments of one animal, which, from its fossil remains
(accompanied with the most terrific and fabulous accounts), has been
distinguished, both in Russia and America, by the name of MAMMOTH.

Mr. Collinson, Member of the Royal Society, in a letter on this subject
to M. Buffon[2], after describing the situation of the salt lick on the
Ohio, where an amazing number of bones of the elephant, as he imagined
them to be, were found, together with teeth totally unlike those of the
elephant, concludes thus: “But the large teeth which I send you, Sir,
were found with those tusks or defences; others yet larger than these
shew, nay demonstrate, that they did not belong to elephants. How shall
we reconcile this paradox? May we not suppose that there existed
formerly a large animal with the tusks of the elephant and the grinders
of the hippopotamus? For these large grinders are very different from
those of the elephant. Mr. Croghan thinks, from the great number of this
kind of teeth, that is, the tusks and grinders which he saw in that
place, that there had been at least thirty of these animals; yet the
elephant never was known in America, and probably could not have been
carried there from Asia: the impossibility that they could have lived
there, owing to the severity of the winters, and where, notwithstanding
such a quantity of their bones is found, is a paradox which we leave to
your eminent wisdom to solve.” This determination M. Buffon gives us in
the following terms, although in direct contradiction to those passages
in which he labours to prove that the bones found in Siberia and America
were bones of the elephant: “Thus every thing leads us to believe that
this ancient species, which must be regarded as the first and largest of
terrestrial animals, has not existed since the earliest times, and is
totally unknown to us; for an animal whose species was larger than that
of the elephant, could hide itself in no part of the earth so as to
remain unknown; besides, it is evident from the form of these teeth
alone, from their enamel and the disposition of their roots, that they
bear no resemblance to the _cachelots_, or other cetaceous animals, and
that they really belonged to a terrestrial animal whose species
approached that of the hippopotamus more than any other.”


[Footnote 2: Buffon, Tome XIII. Notes justificative, Page 224.]


The world is now in possession of two undisputed skeletons of this
animal, found in such situations as leave no room for conjecture; each
skeleton being dug up in a separate place, without any intermixture of
foreign bones, and each bone exactly adapted to its corresponding points
of articulation. One of these skeletons is erected as a permanent
establishment at the Museum, Philadelphia; the other I have brought with
me, with an intention to travel through Europe, beginning with the
metropolis of England.

I shall here give a short account of the place and manner of finding
these.

In the spring of 1801, having heard that in the fall of 1799 many bones
of this animal had been found in the state of New York, in the vicinity
of Newburgh, which is situated on the Hudson or North River, about
sixty-seven miles from the capital, my father, C. W. Peale, immediately
proceeded to the spot, and through the politeness of Dr. Graham, who
lived in the neighbourhood, and had been present when most of the bones
were dug up, received every information with respect to what had been
done, and the most probable means of future success. The bones that had
been found were then in the possession of the farmer who owned the land,
heaped together on the floor of his garret, where they were occasionally
visited by the curious.

These my father was fortunate to make a purchase of, together with the
right of digging up the remainder; and immediately packing them up, sent
them on to Philadelphia: They consisted of all the neck, most of the
vertebræ of the back, and some of the tail; most of the ribs, in greater
part broken; both scapulæ; both humeri, with the radii and ulnæ; one
femur; a tibia of one leg, and a fibula of the other; some large
fragments of the head; many of the fore and hind feet bones; the pelvis
somewhat broken; and a large fragment, five feet long, of the left tusk,
about mid way. He therefore was in want of some of the back and tail
bones, some of the ribs, the under jaw, one whole tusk and part of the
other, the breast-bone, one thigh, and a tibia and fibula, and many of
the feet bones. But as the farmer’s fields were then in grain, the
enterprize of searching for the remainder was postponed for a short
time. Two or three weeks were spent in mending such bones as were
broken, and arranging the whole; but the deficiencies were such, that
very few of them could be put together.

Not willing to lose the advantage of the dry season, when the springs in
the morass of course were low, we proceeded on the arduous enterprize.
In New York every article was provided which might be necessary in
surmounting expected difficulties; such as a pump, ropes, pullies,
augers, &c.; boards and plank were provided in the neighbourhood, and
timber was in sufficient plenty on the spot.

The whole of this part of the country abounding with morasses, it is the
custom of the farmers to assist each other in turns with personal or
specific labour, each man giving a route or frolick on the occasion, in
order to obtain a large quantity of their contents for manure. Pits are
dug generally twelve feet long and five feet wide. It was in digging one
of these, on the farm of Mr. Masten, that one of the men, in thrusting
his spade deeper than usual, struck something which he imagined to be a
log of wood, but on cutting it to ascertain the kind, it was perceived
to be bone: it was quickly cleared from the surrounding earth, and
proved to be that of the thigh, three feet nine inches in length, and
eighteen inches in circumference in the smallest part. The search was
continued, and the same evening several other bones were discovered. The
fame of it soon spread through the neighbourhood, and excited a general
interest in the pursuit; and all were eager, at the expence of some
exertions, to gratify their curiosity, to see the ruins of an animal so
gigantic, of which few among them had ever heard. For the two succeeding
days upwards of an hundred men were actively engaged, encouraged by
several gentlemen, chiefly physicians, of the neighbourhood, and success
the most sanguine attended their labours; but unfortunately the habits
of the men requiring the use of spirits, it was afforded them in too
great profusion, and they quickly became so impatient and unruly that
they had nearly destroyed the skeleton; in one or two instances using
oxen and chains to drag them from the clay, the head, hips, and tusk,
were much broken; some parts being drawn out and others left behind. So
great a quantity of water, from springs in the bottom of the pit, rose
upon the men, that it required several score of hands to lade it out
with all the buckets they could collect in the neighbourhood. All their
ingenuity was exerted to overcome difficulties that every hour increased
upon their hands; they even made and sunk a large coffer-dam, and within
it found many valuable small bones. The fourth day so much water had
risen in the pit, that they had not courage to attack it again. In this
state we found it in 1801.

Confident that nothing could be done without having a perfect command of
the water, the first idea was to drain it by a ditch; but the necessary
distance of perhaps half a mile, presented a length of labour that
appeared immense. It was therefore resolved to throw the water into a
natural bason about sixty feet distant, the upper edge of which was
about ten feet above the level of the water. An ingenious millwright
constructed the machinery; and after a week of close labour, completed a
large scaffolding and a wheel twenty feet diameter, wide enough for
three or four men to walk abreast in: a rope round this turned a small
spindle, which worked a chain of buckets regulated by a floating
cylinder; the water emptied into a trough which conveyed it to the
bason; a ship’s pump assisted, and towards the latter part of the
operation, a pair of half barrels in removing the mud. The second day
the water was lowered so that they began to dig, and in a few hours were
rewarded with several small bones.

Every farmer with his wife and children, for twenty miles round in every
direction, with waggons, carriages, and horses, flocked to see the
operation; and a swamp always noted for being the solitary and dismal
abode of snakes and frogs, became the active scene of curiosity and
bustle; the greater part astonished at the whim of an old man in
travelling two hundred miles from his home, to dig up as a treasure, at
incredible risk, labour, and expence, a pile of bones, which, although
all were astonished to see, many imagined fit for nothing better than to
rot and serve for manure.

For several weeks no exertions were spared, and those the most
unremitting were required to insure success; bank after bank fell in;
the increase of water was a constant impediment, the extreme coldness of
which benumbed the workmen: Every day bones and pieces of bones were
found between six and seven feet deep, but none of the most important
ones. But the greatest obstacle to the search was occasioned by the
shell marle which formed the lower stratum; this, rendered thin by the
springs at the bottom, and by the weight of the whole morass, always
pressed upwards on the workmen to a certain height; which, without an
incalculable expence, it was impossible to prevent. Twenty-five hands,
at high wages, were almost constantly employed at work so uncomfortable
and severe, that nothing but their anxiety to see the head, and
particularly the under jaw, could have kept up their resolution. The
patience of employer and workmen was at length exhausted, and the work
relinquished without obtaining those interesting parts without which it
was impossible to form a skeleton.

Through the polite attention of Dr. Galatian, the next place we directed
our attention to was a morass, eleven miles distant from the former,
belonging to a Captain Joseph Barber, where, eight years before, four
ribs had been found in digging a pit. From the description which was
given of their position, and the appearance of the morass, which was a
small one, we began our operations with all the vigour a certainty of
success could inspire. Almost an entire set of ribs were found, lying
pretty much together, and very entire; but as none of the back-bones
were found near them, sufficient proof of their having been scattered,
our latitude for search was extended without limits; therefore, after
working about two weeks, we found nothing belonging to the head but two
rotten tusks (part of one of them is with the skeleton here), three or
four small grinders, a few vertebræ of the back and tail, a broken
scapula, some toe-bones and the ribs; these were found between four and
seven feet deep.

Our next place of search (about twenty miles west from the Hudson) was a
most dismal morass; the most awful silence reigned throughout it, and
not the smallest breath of air was felt; every step was taken on rotten
timber and the spreading roots of tall trees, the luxuriant growth of a
few years, half of which were tottering over our heads. It was almost a
dead level, and the holes dug for the purpose of manure, out of which a
few bones had been taken six or seven years before, were full of water,
and connected with others containing a vast quantity: so that to empty
one was to empty them all. Machinery was erected, pumps and buckets were
employed, and a long course of troughs conducted the water, among the
distant roots, to a fall of a few inches.

Here alternate success and disappointment amused and fatigued us for a
long while; until our pockets emptied, our spirits low, our workmen
languid, we were about to quit the morass with but a small collection,
though in good preservation, of ribs, toe and leg bones, &c. In the
meanwhile the ground was searched in various directions with
long-pointed rods and cross handles: after some practice we were able to
distinguish by the feel whatever substances we touched harder than the
soil; and by this means, in a very unexpected direction, struck upon a
large collection of bones, which were dug to and taken up with every
possible care. They proved to be a humerus, or large bone of the right
leg, with the radius and ulna of the left, the right scapula, the atlas,
and, the great object of our pursuit, a complete under jaw!

After such a variety of labour and length of fruitless expectation, this
success was extremely grateful to all parties, and the woods echoed with
repeated huzzas. “Gracious God, what a jaw! how many animals have been
crushed between it!” was the exclamation of all; a fresh supply of grog
went round, and the hearty fellows, covered with mud, continued the
search. The upper part of the head was found twelve feet distant, but so
extremely rotten that we could only preserve the teeth and a few
fragments. In its form it exactly resembled the head found at Masten’s,
but as that was much injured by rough usage, this from its small depth
beneath the surface, had the cranium so rotted away as only to shew the
form around the teeth and thence extending to the condyles of the neck;
the rotten bone formed a black and greasy mould above that part which
was still entire, yet so tender as to break to pieces on lifting it from
its bed.

This collection was rendered still more complete by the addition of
those formerly taken up, and presented to us by Drs. Graham and Post.
They were a rib, the sternum, a femur, tibia and fibula, and a patella
or knee-pan.

Some of the neighbours, with an eye to the certain prospect of profit,
began to think of finding a similar treasure in their morasses; and one
actually began his operations, but was quickly deterred by the rising
difficulties, although he had some reason to hope for success, eighteen
years before, several bones having been discovered in the same spot, and
by a German physician forwarded to England. We examined the place, and
were of opinion, as the morass had been since drained, that the
remaining bones must necessarily have decayed in consequence of their
exposure to the air, alternately wet and dry.

We visited every spot in the neighbourhood where any bones had ever been
found, and we knew of seven within ten miles square; but there appeared
no prospect of success adequate to the expence and difficulty: So that,
after a laborious campaign of three months, we carefully packed up, in
distinct cases, our venerable relics, and loading two waggons with them,
bade adieu to the vallies and mountains of Shawangunk.

After the laborious task of mending the ribs and other bones, and
putting together the fragments of the head (of which no other idea could
be formed than appears in the skeleton), it remained to determine the
number and situation of each kind. The three setts were kept distinct;
out of the two collections which were most numerous it was intended to
form two skeletons, by still keeping them separate, and filling up the
deficiencies in each by artificial imitations from the other, and from
counterparts in themselves. For instance, in the first skeleton the
under jaw was formed from this, which is the only entire one we have
ever heard of, although we have seen considerable fragments of at least
ten different jaws; while on the other hand, the upper jaw of this
animal, which was found in the extreme of decay, was completed, so far
as it goes, from the more solid fragment in the former skeleton. Several
feet-bones in this skeleton were made from that; and a few in that were
made from this. In this the right humerus being real, the imitation for
the left one was made with the utmost certainty; and the radius and ulna
of the left leg being real, those on the right side followed in course.
The collection of ribs in both cases was pretty entire; therefore,
having discovered from a correspondence between the number of vertebræ
and ribs in both animals, that there were nineteen pair of the latter,
it was only necessary in four or five instances where there was not a
complete pair, either to make an artificial counterpart, or to take the
same formed rib from the collection found at Captain Barber’s. In this
manner the two skeletons were formed, and are in both instances composed
of the appropriate bones of the animal, or exact imitations from the
real bones in the same animal, or from those of the same proportion in
the other: Nothing is imaginary, and what we do not unquestionably know,
we leave deficient; which happens in only two instances, the summit of
the head and the end of the tail.

The tusk which belongs to the skeleton at Philadelphia, I have brought
with me: in taking it from the ground it was broken into three pieces,
but they were carefully put together, and give the entire form, composed
of a strong arch and a spiral twist resembling an ox’s horn, ten feet
six inches in length and twenty-one inches in circumference. In the
Leverian Museum there is a fossil elephant’s tusk found in England,
about seven feet in length: On making a comparison between these it will
be observed, that in the Leverian tusk there is not the smallest twist,
and but a gentle curve; whereas in this animal they are much more
crooked in every respect; the consequence of which is, that as the
cavities for the reception of the tusks lie more horizontal (from a
similar direction between the teeth and the condyle of the neck), the
tusks are much more elevated, and the ends pointing backwards. It is the
opinion of many, that these tusks might have been reversed in the living
animal, with their points downwards; but as we know not the kind of
enemy it had to fear, we judged only by analogy in giving them the
direction of the elephant, especially as we know of no other carnivorous
animal with only eight grinders and two tusks: Neither the tusk itself,
nor the cavities for the reception of them, could assist in the
determination, as they were both very straight, and would equally answer
one way as the other.

There is one bone less in the neck of this animal than in the elephant;
and we are confident of having the whole, for two reasons; _1st_, The
neck-bones were found with the first skeleton all together, in their
natural positions, and the first bone of the back, with which the sixth
vertebræ of the neck articulated as exactly as it did with the fifth;
and, from the configuration of these bones, every anatomist knows this
could not be the case was there a bone wanting: This is strong
presumption, had we not the completely satisfactory proof of finding
them all together. And, _2dly_, Among the collections of bones which we
have seen, we have never met with a single bone resembling a seventh
vertebra of the neck.

It was a more difficult task to determine the number of dorsal and
lumber vertebræ, as those we dug up ourselves were not only found much
scattered, but several which had been dug up by the farmer were in the
possession of some of the workmen in the neighbourhood, to the distance
of seven miles round: these we collected with all possible care, and had
the satisfaction to find they agreed in number with those of the
elephant; still further corroborated by a perfect agreement between them
and the nineteen pair of ribs, leaving three vertebræ for the loins.

But in the head the great distinguishing characters are to be found. I
believe it has been well enough ascertained that the teeth of this
animal are perfectly carnivorous, as they have every quality of form and
substance that is required: the roots are not in such a massy body as
the elephant’s, and the teeth are composed of a bony substance
projecting into strong obtuse points to form the grinding surface, and
all this surface encrusted with a strong coat of enamel; whereas all
graminivorous animals have teeth whose grinding surface is flat, and
composed of an intermixture of bone and enamel; the enamel running in
laminæ or veins from the surface to the roots. In carnivorous animals
the surface of the enamel is constantly changing, and is finally worn
off and the teeth rendered useless; but in graminivorous animals the
veins of enamel always present the same figure, only that in youth they
are regularly protuberant, and in age regularly worn down by a
side-motion of the under jaw, which all of them have. The jaw of the
Mammoth was incapable of this motion, as is very evident from the
condyloid process, which is finished with an oblong head inserted into a
transverse groove; and from the teeth, which are worn, not horizontally,
but the lower front ones on the inside, the upper front ones on the
outside; the lower back ones on the outside in part, and the upper back
ones on the inside in part; in such a manner that they fit into each
other like the teeth of two saws, and when shut are immoveable; and
hence were certainly incapable of masticating, like graminivorous
animals, either grass or leaves. These teeth were supposed by some
writers, Buffon, Croghan and Collinson among others, to have been the
teeth of the hippopotamus, deposited in these places, together with the
remains of elephants, in the general deluge; but they are very different
from those of the hippopotamus, the largest of which have only three
obtuse points composing the surface, arranged triangularly; whereas the
smallest teeth in this animal have three rows of double points arranged
parallel to each other, and the largest ones four and five in the same
manner.

Although a simple comparison between the teeth of this animal and the
elephant be sufficient to prove that the former is as certainly of a
carnivorous as the latter of a graminivorous nature, yet the anatomist
in examining further, will find complete satisfaction, from the internal
structure of the jaw, as well as the position and growth of the teeth. I
shall only observe here, that in the jaw of this animal, like those of
all others of a carnivorous nature, the roots or fangs are inserted into
the mass of bone, which not only surrounds the roots, but divides one
tooth from the other; whereas in the elephant the grinders occupy one
large and uniform cavity, from which they are gradually protruded as
they are required for the purpose of grinding. To those who wish to
study this subject more profoundly, it will be well to read, in the
Philosophical Transactions for 1799, two learned papers by Mr. Corse and
Mr. Home.

Between the temporal bone of this animal and that of the elephant there
is a considerable difference in every part; I shall only observe, that
where the socket of the eye in the elephant appears scooped out of the
anterior projection of the temporal bone, in this animal there is not
the least appearance of such an orbit, but instead thereof, a great mass
of bone.

To those who have not seen the originals, words are inadequate to convey
a correct idea of the difference in form between the jaw of this animal
and that of the elephant. The under jaw of the elephant terminates in a
point, which in its direction corresponds with the tusks; the same part
in this animal is composed of a large projection of a foliated
appearance like the leaf of the mallard. And although the lip of the
elephant is large and powerful, in this there appears the origin of one
infinitely more so; perhaps a long and powerful assistant to the
proboscis which it probably had. There is no positive proof that it had
a proboscis, but from the shortness of the neck and magnitude of the
tusks, it is reasonable to suppose that it was furnished with some such
contrivance; that part in which it must have originated is deficient in
both skeletons; and although I have met with several accounts of the
distance between the orbits of the eyes in fragments of heads, they were
never accompanied with any mention of such place of insertion for a
proboscis.

The general form of the under jaw of this animal is made up of three
distinct angles; one horizontal, on which the jaw rests (when placed on
a table), from the front to the back, where a small corner appears cut
off, whence it rises perpendicularly to the condyle. The same view of
the elephant’s jaw exhibits very nearly a regular portion of a circle
without any angles. The arms of this animal’s jaw (composed of the
condyloid and coronoid processes and their bases), are short as well as
flat, adapted to the peculiar form of the upper jaw, which I shall
proceed to describe; whereas those of the elephant are comparatively
thick, and generally as long as, and frequently longer than, the body of
the jaw itself: This length is adapted to the great elevation of the
cavity for the condyloid process, taking the level of the teeth as a
base from which to measure. The angle from the teeth to the condyles of
the neck in the elephant is at least forty-five degrees, and sometimes
more; but in the Mammoth the same angle does not exceed ten or fifteen
degrees; hence the comparative disproportion of their jaws with respect
to length and height.

In the back of the elephant’s head there is a very deep cavity for the
reception of muscles from the spines of the back to support the head;
which cavity commences immediately from the condyle of the neck: The
back of this animal’s head presents a very different outline, for there
is scarcely any appearance of a cavity; and the whole of the back part
of the head is angular, in contradistinction to that of the elephant,
which is composed of two lobes receding forwards from the condyle of the
neck. I have been here particular, as in this respect the two animals
are vastly different, and it may lead to curious speculations concerning
the structure of the unknown parts and the habits of the animal.

The hips were somewhat broken, but the parts uninjured were sufficient
to shew a very different form from those of the elephant, which are high
in comparison with their breadth; and consequently the rump of this
animal was even more depressed than the elephant’s, in the manner of the
American bison or buffaloe. In the elephant the angles from the _ossæ
tabulæ_ to the lateral processes of the ilium, are very great; whereas
in the Mammoth they are almost on a straight line.

From all the drawings of elephants, and from such of their real ribs as
I have seen, I have observed one universal character; towards their
junction with the cartilage they are broad and more or less bent
sidewise in an undulating form; whereas those of the Mammoth are very
small in the same place, and in form without any lateral bend.

In the Mammoth the spinus processes are much longer and thicker, in
proportion with the rest of the animal, than they are in the elephant,
whose head is drawn up close to them by the ligaments attached to the
deep cavity in the back of the head before-mentioned; in the Mammoth
this cavity being situated higher from the condyle of the neck and
attached to much longer spines, must act with an advantage proportioned
to the magnitude of the head and the weight of the tusks or defenses.
Besides, these spines are so long, and the form of the ribs such, that
unless we suppose them covered with a superfluous quantity of flesh, the
back of the animal could not have been _round_ like that of the
elephant, but sharp like that of a hog.

As the inhabitant of a cold climate, it is probable the Mammoth was
clothed with hair or wool, which in most situations was quickly liable
to decay. The only instance of hair being found with the remains of this
animal, occurred in a morass belonging to Mr. A. Colden, in the
neighbourhood where this skeleton was found. The hair was coarse, long
and brown, a large mass of it together, and so rotten that, after a few
days exposure to the air, it fell into a powder.

The skeleton of the Mammoth[3], merely as a skeleton, is certainly
entitled to some attention; as the skeleton of a very large and
non-descript animal it becomes more interesting, to those in particular
who are disposed to think on the subject; whether its extirpation be
attributed to the power of man, the prevalence of famine, or the violent
and sudden irruption of water. There are many facts to support this
latter opinion, which I confess myself disposed to adopt.


[Footnote 3: Strahlenberg, in his Historico-Geographical Description,
observes, that the Russian name is _Mammoth_, which is a corruption from
_Memoth_, a word derived from the Arabic _Mehemot_, signifying the same
as the _Behemot_ of Job. This word is applied to any animal of
extraordinary size.]


Orange and Ulster counties in the state of New York, are situated
westward of the Hudson and northward of West Point; from the Shawangunk
mountain, which is a long ridge east of the blue mountains, they appear
as an immense plain, bounded on every side by stupendous mountains, the
situation of which certainly tend to confirm the authenticity of an
Indian tradition, which states them formerly to have been the boundaries
of a great lake; and it would now be a lake if the high mountains on
each side of the Hudson near West Point were united, as probably they
may have been. It is a fact that all over the country, the stones, which
in a curious manner are strewed over the ground, from the largest to the
smallest, have been worn round by long-continued friction, as if by the
agitation of water; more particularly in the lowest and flat situations,
where the stones are larger, and gradually becoming smaller in the
higher situations. The surface of the country, though by no means so
level as it appears from the mountains, is formed of single hills,
prominences, or swelling knolls, which have the appearance of having
been caused by the agitation of water. Many of the cavities between
these knolls are dry, others are in the state of ponds, but an infinite
number contain morasses, which must originally have been ponds, supplied
by springs which still flow at their bottoms, and filled, in the course
of ages, with a succession of shellfish and the decay of vegetables; so
that at present they are covered with timber, and have been so within
the memory of man. An old man, upwards of sixty, informed us, that all
the difference he could remark between these morasses now and what they
were fifty years ago, was, that then they were generally covered with
firs, and now with beech. This was verified by the branches and logs of
fir which we found in digging; many pieces of which had been cut by
beavers, the former inhabitants of these places when in the state of
ponds. Scarcely a fir is now to be found in the country.

On digging into these morasses you generally have to remove from one to
two feet of peat or turf; you then enter on a stratum, from one to two
feet thick, of what the farmers call the yellow marle, composed of
vegetable earth intermixed with long yellow roots; next the grey marle,
which resembles wet ashes, to the further depth of two feet; and finally
a bed of decayed shells, which they call shell-marle, the upper surface
of which forms a horizontal line across the morass, consequently it is
thicker in the center than at the edges; under this, forming the bottom
of the pond or morass, is found gravel and slate covering a thick
stratum of clay. It was in the white and yellow marle the bones were
generally found; those in the white in the highest preservation, less so
in the grey; and where an end happened to rise into the yellow stratum
it was proportionally decayed: One cause of this must have been the
accession of air when the springs in dry seasons were low.

The grey marle, in which most of the bones lay, by analysis was found to
contain seventy-three parts in the hundred of lime: when dried in the
sun it cracks into thin horizontal laminæ, and becomes extremely light,
as hard as baked clay, and brittle; in this state it burns with a bright
flame for a long while, and instead of leaving ashes, it remains a
strong black coal, apparently well adapted to the purposes of the arts.

These various strata are the production of a long succession of ages,
and, in my opinion, have been formed over the bones. In two of the
morasses there was not depth sufficient to have bemired an animal of
such magnitude and strength; and in the third the bones were lying near
the sloping edge, from which some of them had already been washed
farther in: The animals have either died or been destroyed generally
over the country, and only in these situations have been preserved; or
they have sought these cool places to die in; or perhaps both.

No calculation can be made of the length of time necessary to have
formed these morasses, although we are certain that, as in fifty years
past scarcely any change appears, it must have been proportionally
slower in the commencement; and a period has elapsed in which all
accounts of this animal have dwindled into oblivion, except a confused
Indian tradition.

In the neighbourhood of these morasses are found an infinite number of
petrifactions, a few specimens of which I have brought with me: they are
in strange and unknown figures, and appear to be generally marine
productions, as various species of coral and sea-urchins were likewise
found among them. Two revolutions in nature must have contributed to
this effect; one in which the petrifactions were formed by a copious
incrustation of calcareous matter, in a semifluid state; and a
subsequent one, in which the stones have been broken to pieces, worn
into a round shape, and finally deposited, an hundred miles from the
sea, and many hundreds from those seas where corals are produced.

Here a question of some importance arises; could this animal have been
destroyed in a deluge, which must have been sudden and powerful enough
to produce those great effects? And was the entire race of them thereby
rendered extinct? Certain it is that they are no where to be found, nor
their footsteps traced. Among the Indians of North America, from nation
to nation, the tradition has spread and prevails, which relates their
former existence and their sudden extirpation. I shall here give a
tradition, said to be in the very terms of a Shawanee Indian, as
published in Winterbotham’s History of America, which appears in an
embellished dress from an English pen, but founded on a real tradition.
I have questioned, through their interpreters, various and distant
nations of Indians, and have known of many others, and all their
accounts agree in the main story, though they vary in some of the
subordinate parts.


                           INDIAN TRADITION.

“Ten thousand moons ago, when nought but gloomy forests covered this
land of the sleeping sun; long before the pale men, with thunder and
fire at their command, rushed on the wings of the wind to ruin this
garden of nature; when nought but the untamed wanderers of the woods,
and men as unrestrained as they, were the lords of the soil; a race of
animals existed, _huge as the frowning precipice_, cruel as the bloody
panther, swift as the descending eagle, and terrible as the angel of
night. The pines _crashed_ beneath their feet, and the lake _shrunk_
when they slaked their thirst; the forceful javelin in vain was hurled,
and the barbed arrow fell harmless from their side. Forests were laid
waste at a meal; the groans of expiring animals were every where heard;
and whole villages, inhabited by men, were destroyed in a moment. The
cry of universal distress extended even to the region of peace in the
west; and the good Spirit interposed to save the unhappy. The forked
lightning gleamed around, and loudest thunder rocked the globe! The
bolts of heaven were hurled upon the cruel destroyers alone, and the
mountains echoed with the bellowings of death. All were killed except
one male, the fiercest of the race, and him even the artillery of the
skies assailed in vain. He ascended the bluest summit which shades the
source of the Monangahela, and, roaring aloud, bid defiance to every
vengeance. The red lightning scorched the lofty firs, and rived the
knotty oaks, but only glanced upon the enraged monster. At length,
maddened with fury, he leaped over the waves of the west at a bound, and
this moment reigns the uncontrouled monarch of the wilderness, in
despite of even Omnipotence itself.”

The idea of a carnivorous animal, which the Indians appear to have had
of it, corresponds with the teeth of this; and the name Bull, which they
give to it, might have been derived from the hornlike appearance of the
tusks; but it is perhaps still more probable, that in the course of time
the ideas of two distinct animals are confounded; for I have brought
with me a plaister cast from a bone presented last June to the
Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, by Major Brown, of Kentucky: it
is unquestionably a fragment of an animal of the ox kind, but of a most
stupendous magnitude. It consists of a large portion of one side of the
back part of the head, and part of the other; and the internal substance
or pith, which was covered by the horn, twenty-one inches in
circumference, and with the horn on it, must have been at least
twenty-four or twenty-five. This bone was found, in a creek which
empties into the Ohio, some years ago, and by the proprietors supposed
to have been part of the Mammoth. It is impregnated with ferruginous
earth, and in high preservation; and must have been broken with
violence, but no one knows of any other portion of it.

Various bones, generally pieces of the head of the oxen kind, have been
found in all parts of Europe and in Asia, having the same character
which distinguishes the one from which this cast was made, in the form
and direction of the horn; it descends backwards, and then rising,
points forwards. There are several specimens of these in the British
Museum, but none so large as this.

A few years since some large bones, of an uncommon kind, were found in a
cave in Virginia, highly preserved by lying in earth abounding with
nitre. They were sent to the Philosophical Society, and an account of
them published in the fourth volume of their Transactions: By permission
of the Society, I have made accurate casts of them.

Hence it appears that four animals of enormous magnitude have formerly
existed in America, perhaps at the same time, and of natures very
opposite: _1st_, The Mammoth, carnivorous; _2d_, An animal whose
graminivorous teeth, larger than, and different from, those of the
elephant, are sometimes found; _3d_, The great Indian bull; and, _4th_,
An animal probably of the sloth kind, as appears on comparison with the
bones found in Virginia, and a skeleton found in South America, and
preserved in the Museum at Madrid.

Mr. Jefferson, on the Mammoth bones, says, “To whatever animal we
ascribe these remains, it is certain such a one has existed in America,
and that it has been the largest of all terrestrial beings. It should
have sufficed to have rescued the earth it inhabited and the atmosphere
it breathed, from the imputation of impotence in the conception and
nourishment of animal life on a large scale; to have stifled in its
birth, the opinion of a writer[4], the most learned too of all others in
the science of animal history, that, in the new world, ‘_La nature
vivante est beaucoup moins agissante, beaucoup moins forte_:’ That
nature is less active, less energetic on one side of the globe than she
is on the other.”


[Footnote 4: Buffon.]


It was my intention to have closed this account with Dr. Dunter’s essay,
whose accuracy in the examination, and knowledge in the discrimination
of those few bones which were within his reach, had already given to his
opinion the weight of unquestionable authority; but as his paper was
somewhat long, and as the facts since he wrote are more numerous, and
subject in the skeleton which we have, to the examination of every one;
I shall only introduce his concluding sentence, that, “If this animal
was indeed carnivorous, which I believe cannot be doubted, though we may
as philosophers regret it, as men we cannot but thank Heaven that its
whole generation is probably extinct.”


                      DIMENSIONS OF THE SKELETON.

                                                          Ft. Inch.

     Height over the shoulders                             11     0
     Ditto over the hips                                    9     0
     Length from the chin to the rump                      15     0
     From the point of the tusks to the end of the tail,
       following the curve                                 31     0
     Length in a straight line                             20     0
     Width of the hips and body                             5     8
     Length of the under jaw                                2    10
     Weight of the same      63½ pounds
     Width of the head                                      3     2
     Length of the thigh-bone                               3     7
     Smallest circumference of the same                     1     6
     Length of the tibia                                    2     0
     Length of the humerus, or large bone of the fore-leg   2    10
     Largest circumference of the same                      3    2½
     Smallest ditto ditto                                   1     5
     Length of the radius                                   2    5½
     Circumference round the elbow                          3     8
     Length of the scapula, or shoulder-blade               3     1
     Length of the longest vertebra, or backbone            2     3
     Longest rib, without cartilage                         4     7
     Length of the first rib                                2     0
     Ditto of the breast-bone                               4     0
     Length of the tusks, defences, or horns               10     7
     Circumference of one tooth or grinder                  1    6½
     Weight of the same, 4 pounds 10 ounces
     The whole skeleton weighs about 1000 pounds.


                                 FINIS.

 Lawrence, Printer,
  No. 378, Strand.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          Transcriber’s note:

Page 16, ‘thursting’ changed to ‘thrusting,’ “in thrusting his spade
deeper”

Pages 24-25, all instances of ‘intire’ changed to ‘entire.’

Page 36, ‘beach’ changed to ‘beech,’ “and now with beech.”

Page 44, ‘les’ changed to ‘less,’ “active, less energetic on one”