The Project Gutenberg eBook of Are these Things So? (1740) The Great Man's Answer to Are These things So: (1740) This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook. Title: Are these Things So? (1740) The Great Man's Answer to Are These things So: (1740) Author: James Miller Editor: I. R. F. Gordon Release date: December 11, 2011 [eBook #38275] Language: English Credits: Produced by Tor Martin Kristiansen, Sharon Vaninger, Joseph Cooper and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net *** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARE THESE THINGS SO? (1740) THE GREAT MAN'S ANSWER TO ARE THESE THINGS SO: (1740) *** Produced by Tor Martin Kristiansen, Sharon Vaninger, Joseph Cooper and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net [Transcriber's Note: Apparent printer's errors retained.] THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY Are these Things So? 1740 THE GREAT MAN'S ANSWER TO Are these Things So? (1740) _Introduction by_ IAN GORDON PUBLICATION NUMBER 153 WILLIAM ANDREWS CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 1972 GENERAL EDITORS William E. Conway, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library George Robert Guffey, University of California, Los Angeles Maximillian E. Novak, University of California, Los Angeles David S. Rodes, University of California, Los Angeles ADVISORY EDITORS Richard C. Boys, University of Michigan James L. Clifford, Columbia University Ralph Cohen, University of Virginia Vinton A. Dearing, University of California, Los Angeles Arthur Friedman, University of Chicago Louis A. Landa, Princeton University Earl Miner, University of California, Los Angeles Samuel H. Monk, University of Minnesota Everett T. Moore, University of California, Los Angeles Lawrence Clark Powell, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library James Sutherland, University College, London H. T. Swedenberg, Jr., University of California, Los Angeles Robert Vosper, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library Curt A. Zimansky, State University of Iowa CORRESPONDING SECRETARY Edna C. Davis, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Jean T. Shebanek, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library INTRODUCTION The two pamphlets reproduced here belong to the fierce heightening in the pamphlet campaign against Robert Walpole that took place at the end of 1740. They represent only two efforts within a brief but furious encounter that gave rise to the publication of no fewer than nine separate poems. On Thursday, 23 October 1740, Thomas Cooper, "one of the most prolific printers and publishers of the pamphlet literature of the eighteenth century,"[1] published a savage denunciation of Walpole called _Are these things so?_[2] This pamphlet, which took the fictional form of an open letter from Alexander Pope, "An Englishman in his Grotto," to Robert Walpole, "A Great Man at Court," set off a round of verse writing among the party hacks of the day that vividly illustrates the close relationship between literature and politics in the first half of the eighteenth century. Within the space of two months eight further pamphlets directly related to this pamphlet and to Walpole's position as First Minister were published. Such a spate of literary activity is only remarkable, however, when compared with other ages. While it is inconceivable that the publication of any poem in our own day, even by a major writer, should arouse such a response, it is reasonably typical of the first half of the eighteenth century that the publication of an occasional poem by a minor, indeed anonymous, writer should do so. On Saturday, 8 November, two weeks after the opening blast, Cooper delivered a second volley, an equally fierce (although largely repetitive) denunciation of Walpole entitled _Yes, they are:_.[3] A week later still, on Saturday, 15 November, the first pro-Government riposte, called _What of That!_, was published,[4] followed three days later, on 18 November, by a second reply, _The Weather-Menders: A proper Answer to Are these things so?_[5] The second edition of _What of That!_ was published on the following Saturday, 22 November,[6] and a third pro-Walpole poem entitled _They are Not_, was also published at about this time.[7] At the end of November, or early in December, a reply to all three of these defences of Walpole appeared carrying the title, _Have at you All_.[8] On Tuesday, 2 December, the pro-Walpole forces returned to the attack again with a poem entitled _What Things?_[9] This was followed on Saturday, 6 December, by the second edition, "corrected, with the addition of twenty lines omitted in the former impressions" of _Are these things so?_,[10] and on Thursday, 18 December, by yet another anti-Walpole poem, _The Great Man's Answer_[11] purporting to be "by the author of _Are these things so?_." But the pro-Walpole forces were still not silenced and two days later on Saturday, 20 December, published _A Supplement to Are these things so?_,[12] an attack on the Patriot opponents of the Ministry. A month later still, on Friday, 23 January 1741,[13] the third edition of _They are Not_ was published. Hereafter this particular controversy seemed to burn itself out, although an anonymous poem entitled _The Art of Poetry_, published on 17 March 1741, contains a long attack on _Are these things so?_. This confused battle is most easily summarized by saying that four separate pamphlets (not counting second and third editions) were published which attacked Walpole, and five which defended him. The poems attacking Walpole are far more poetically versatile than those defending him and it is the two most interesting of these attacks that are reproduced here. Taken together, this series of nine pamphlets forms a separate battle within that much larger and continuing war waged by Lord Bolingbroke and the various supporters of the Patriot Opposition against Sir Robert Walpole and the defenders of his Whig Ministry. From the first publication of _The Craftsman_ on 5 December 1726 to the final resignation of the "Great Man" on 11 February 1742 it is probably true to say that no English politician has ever been so continuously and so virulently attacked by so eminent an assemblage of literary persons. Gay, Swift, Pope, Arbuthnot, Chesterfield, Lyttleton, Thomson, Fielding, and Johnson each entered the fray at various stages. The fact that Walpole rode out these attacks for so long is more of a comment on the disorganized nature of the opposition politically and on the astute manoeuvring of Walpole himself, than on the ineffectiveness of the attacks. During the protracted span of this campaign there were only two periods during which the supporters of the Patriot cause had any real chance of toppling Walpole. The first came in 1733 when sustained opposition forced Walpole to drop his proposed Excise Scheme, while the second occurred five years later in 1738 and sprang from a new deterioration in Anglo-Spanish relations. Although Walpole did not finally resign until 11 February 1742 his fall from power was a direct result of this deterioration. His position in the House of Commons, and in the country at large, was never as assured in the last four years of his "reign" as it had been in the first seventeen. The pamphlets reproduced here deal with Walpole's declining reputation and especially with his handling of Spanish policy. The causes of the English differences with Spain go back to 1713 and the Treaty of Utrecht in which the South Sea Company had been granted, amongst other privileges, the right to send one trading vessel a year to the Spanish possessions.[14] This right had been grossly abused by English merchants eager to make large profits and a great number of English trading ships annually smuggled goods to Spanish America. The Spanish governors were only too pleased to accept such contraband trade for by it they avoided payment of duties to the King of Spain. In order to defend themselves against this illegal traffic the Spanish authorities established a fleet of _guarda-costas_ to intercept, search, and, if necessary, punish the English ships. The _guarda-costas_ did this with great effect and, on occasion, with considerable cruelty. The most notorious example concerned the capture, near Jamaica in 1731, of Captain Robert Jenkins' ship, the _Rebecca_, and the ensuing removal of one of Jenkins' ears. It was with Jenkins' presentation of this ear, which "wrapt up in cotton, he always carried about him,"[15] before the House of Commons seven years later in March 1738 that Anglo-Spanish differences came to a head. The Patriots demanded war and revenge: Walpole, however, was committed to a policy of peace. Accordingly, he spent the rest of the year trying to patch things up and the ill-fated Convention of Pardo concluded on 14 January 1739 was the result. The Convention involved compromise on both sides. England claimed that Spain owed her £343,277 by way of reparation for damages done to English vessels, and Spain claimed that England owed her £180,000 by way of arrears on duties due to the King of Spain. This left a balance of £163,277 and England agreed to accept £95,000 as a total discharge in return for payment within four months.[16] On 1 February Walpole laid this Convention before Parliament, and, despite vociferous opposition, it was eventually ratified on 9 March by a vote of 244 to 214. As a result of this ratification a considerable section of the opposition, under the leadership of Sir William Wyndham, immediately seceded from Parliament. Feelings had never been higher. On 15 May, one day after the payment had fallen due, Benjamin Keene, the British Minister in Madrid, was officially informed that the £95,000 would only be paid if Admiral Haddock removed his fleet from the Mediterranean. England had no intention of recalling Haddock, for both Gibraltar and Minorca would then remain defenceless, and Spain clearly had no real intention of paying the money. From this point on war became inevitable and on 19 October 1739 the declaration was made "and was received by all ranks and distinctions of men with a degree of enthusiasm and joy, which announced the general frenzy of the nation."[17] It was on hearing the church bells pealing at the news that Walpole made his famous remark: "They now ring the bells, but they will soon wring their hands."[18] One month later, on 22 November, Admiral Vernon captured Porto Bello, the port in which the _guarda-costas_ had been fitted out. The news of this victory did not arrive in England until nearly four months later on 13 March 1740, but it brought with it great public excitement and jubilation. Thus by the end of 1740 the revenge on the Spanish had begun. Those who had demanded war seemed justified and Walpole had been discredited. This is the political background against which these pamphlets are set. * * * * * Both pamphlets have been attributed to James Miller, but the evidence for such attribution is cumulative rather than definitive.[19] _Are these things so?_ has been far more frequently attributed to Miller than _The Great Man's Answer_. The earliest attribution is found in D. E. Baker's _Biographia Dramatica_ which, although it was not published till 1812, was originally compiled by Baker sometime before 1764.[20] Robert Watt also lists _Are these things so?_ as Miller's work in his _Bibliotheca Britannica_, Edinburgh, 1824.[21] The entries under Miller in the _CBEL_ and _DNB_ both accept these attributions as does the _British Museum Catalogue_. The evidence for attributing _The Great Man's Answer_ to Miller is far more slender and rests largely on the publisher's claim on the title page, which may well have been made for the sake of promotion, that it is "By the Author of _Are these things so?_". James Miller, 1706-1744, is better known as a comic dramatist than as a poet. He was the son of a clergyman from Upcerne in Dorset, and was educated at Wadham College, Oxford, where he wrote a comedy, _The Humours of Oxford_, which was successfully performed at Drury Lane in January 1730. On leaving Oxford he had been expected by his relations to go into business, but "not being able to endure the servile drudgery it demanded," he took holy orders and continued to write plays "to increase his finances."[22] From 1730 until his death in 1744 he wrote ten plays, several of which were performed with considerable success.[23] But it is as a poet that we are primarily interested in Miller. He was the author of several occasional poems of which his _Harlequin Horace, or the Art of Modern Poetry_, 1731, was the best known. This poem, yet another imitation of Horace's _Ars Poetica_ is an attack on John Rich, the manager of Lincoln's Inn Fields and Covent-Garden. The poem is ironically full of perverse modern advice on how to write poetry. Miller adopts the persona of a modern Grub Street poet who scorns the classical values. Consequently Pope, who insists on standards of excellence, is seen by the persona as the great enemy of modern poets. At the same time it is quite clear that for Miller himself Pope is the greatest of poets. The poem includes an attack on Walpole (ll. 209-216), and perhaps it was this that led the agents of the Ministry to make him the large offer referred to in the biography of Miller found in Cibber's _Lives_. But, as the anonymous writer of this life goes on to point out, Miller "had virtue sufficient to withstand the temptation, though his circumstances at that time were far from being easy."[24] A second verse satire in the manner of Horace, _Seasonable Reproof_, 1735, has also been attributed to Miller. The poem is a general satire on Britain's "State of Reprobation," and only makes a passing glance at Walpole. London has been so forsaken by people all rushing to the Italian opera that By _Excisemen_, it might now be taken, And great Sir _Bob_ ride through, and save his Bacon (ll. 6-7). But more significant in our context is that, as Maynard Mack has shown, the author creates a speaker "who by his careful echoings of the _Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot_ seems to labor to be mistaken for Pope."[25] If Miller was the author of both _Seasonable Reproof_ and _Are these things so?_ his fascination with the persona of the poet in his grotto emerges as no sudden whim of wit, but as a continuing concern with the symbolic significance of Pope's actual life. Furthermore, the poet who attacked Walpole so violently in October 1740 emerges as no upstart Patriot cashing in on Walpole's current unpopularity, but as a consistent and courageous opponent of Walpole since at least 1731. * * * * * In _Are these things so?_ Pope is imagined to be speaking throughout, although he in turn imagines what Walpole might say at various points. The poem is full of allusions and references intended to support the pretense that Pope is speaking. In line eight the speaker says his luxury is "lolling in my peaceful Grot"; in lines fifteen and sixteen he echoes Pope's famous claim in _To Fortescue_ that he is "TO VIRTUE ONLY and HER FRIENDS, A FRIEND,"[26] when he says: Close shut my Cottage-Gate, where none pretends To lift the Latch but Virtue and her Friends; and in lines seventeen and eighteen he shows that he knew Walpole had once visited Pope at Twickenham.[27] These allusions to Pope's actual life have been carefully chosen by the author in order to give dramatic credibility to his chosen spokesman rather than to persuade the reader that Pope was the real author. The impersonation of Pope is meant to be transparent: the poet is demonstrating his versatility at imitating Pope and has considerable fun in doing so. The only evidence that could be brought in to support an interpretation that stressed the author's serious intent to make Pope seem the real author concerns a Dublin reprint of the poem that actually carried Pope's name as author on the title page. But it is extremely unlikely that the true author had anything to do with this since the Dublin publisher did not even bother to incorporate the corrections and additions that the poet had made to the second edition. To point out that the device of creating a spokesman is meant to be seen through is not the same thing, however, as saying that the author could afford to admit his authorship. There were good reasons why the author of a poem that was primarily an attack on the First Minister, and who was himself probably without any great influence or reputation, should need to hide the fact of his authorship. For such a person the choice of Pope as spokesman could hardly have been more appropriate.[28] In May and July 1738 Pope had published his devastating attacks on the state of the country known as _The Epilogue to the Satires_. On 31 January 1739 Paul Whitehead published his attack on the artificialities and disguises of Walpole's Ministry and the Court favourites in a poem (which Boswell refers to as "brilliant and pointed"[29]) called _Manners: A Satire_. At this point the government decided that it was time they attempted to stop, or at least stem, these attacks. They were not keen to confront Pope himself, but Whitehead presented a less formidable opponent.[30] Consequently, in February 1739, he and his publisher Robert Dodsley were summoned before the bar of the House of Lords to account for the attacks on named individuals in _Manners_. On Monday, 12 February, the poem "was voted scandalous, etc. by the Lords, and the author and publisher ordered into custody, where Mr. Dodsley, the publisher, was a week; but Mr. Paul Whitehead, the author, absconds."[31] Whitehead anticipated this summons when he wrote in the poem: _Pope_ writes unhurt--but know, 'tis different quite To beard the lion, and to crush the mite. Safe may he dash the Statesman in each line, Those dread his satire, who dare punish mine (p. 15). Pope was then the ideal spokesman for our author's purposes: the mite must dress up as the lion. It was admittedly almost two years since Whitehead's original summons, but the incident was well enough remembered to spur a gossip columnist writing in _The Daily Gazetteer_ on 11 November 1740 to suggest that Whitehead was the author of _Are these things so?_ Whitehead, too, evidently felt the danger of the situation for he deemed it necessary to publish a denial four days later.[32] In choosing Pope for his spokesman the author of _Are these things so?_ showed a full awareness of the political realities. He also showed a detailed familiarity with Pope's life and work. There is nothing, however, to indicate that such knowledge was reciprocal, or even to indicate that Pope knew of the poem's existence. The only evidence that Pope knew anything about Miller's work, if indeed Miller was the author, comes in a letter Pope wrote to Caryll on 6 February 1731 in which he praises _Harlequin Horace_ although he does not seem to know the author's name.[33] _Are these things so?_ opens with Pope challenging Walpole to explain why Britain has fallen as low as she has and why France and Spain have been allowed "to limit out her sea." Walpole is then imagined defending his measures, especially the Excise Scheme, the Convention of Pardo, Placement and the Secret Service. In the second half of the poem the satirist repeats the charges and invites Walpole to turn his eyes inward and imagine that he dies guilty. Pope then begs Walpole to resign and, failing that, begs the King to intervene. The poem closes in a positive way by turning from Walpole and listing other persons (all members of the Opposition) that George II might appoint to a new Ministry. In the first edition (23 October) these persons were given fictitious names. The second edition (6 December) not only substituted their real names but also added twenty lines at the end which included Cobham and Argyle in the list of worthies. It is this edition, which carries an Advertisement explaining these changes, that we have reproduced here. Finally it seems helpful to append a few notes to help identify some of the allusions. In line 63 (p. 4) the "ONE more noble than the rest" is presumably Henry St. John, Viscount Bolingbroke who was stripped of his title by Act of Attainder in 1725. In line 73 (p. 5) the "brave and honest _Adm'ral_" is Vernon who captured Porto Bello on 22 November 1739. The "_sturdy Beggars_" mentioned in line 100 (p. 6), was the appelation used by Walpole in referring to the mob outside the door of Parliament on 14 March 1733, and was taken up by the Opposition as pertaining to all the merchants and individuals opposed to the Excise.[34] In line 129 (p. 8) the "C--n----n" is the Convention of Pardo described earlier in this introduction. In line 139 (p. 8) the "BROTHER" referred to is Horatio Walpole who was a frequent ambassador abroad for Robert Walpole's government. In line 218 (p. 12) "HE whose _Fame_ to both the Poles is known" is George II. The persons named at the end of the poem as possible replacements for Walpole are all persons who were at one time members of the Whig party but who had joined the opposition because of their dislike for Walpole. John Carteret, Earl Granville (ll. 231-236, p. 13, and referred to as Camillus in the first edition), had a long struggle with Walpole for control of the Whig party and joined the Opposition Whigs after he returned from the lord lieutenancy of Ireland in 1730. It was Carteret who was to move the unsuccessful resolution on 13 February 1741, requesting the King to remove Walpole from his "presence and counsels for ever." William Pulteney, Earl of Bath (ll. 237-242, p. 13, and referred to as Demosthenes in the first edition) was also an early ally of Walpole's who later broke with him to form the Patriot party. He became one of the editors of _The Craftsman_. Philip Stanhope, Earl of Chesterfield (ll. 243-245, p. 13, and referred to as Atticus in the first edition) was also a lifelong Whig who joined Carteret in leading the opposition to Walpole in the Lords. Hugh Hume, Lord Polwarth and Earl of Marchmont (ll. 246-257, p. 14, and referred to as "that fam'd _Caledonian Youth_" in the first edition), had been a persistent and relentless opponent of Walpole in the Commons, but on the death of his father in February 1740 had acceded to the Earldom of Marchmont and been unable to get elected as a representative peer. Although twenty years younger than Pope (he was only 32 in 1740) he became a close friend and was appointed an executor of his will. Pope refers to his friendship in his _Verses on a Grotto_: "And the bright Flame was shot thro' MARCHMONT'S Soul."[35] Sir Richard Temple, Viscount Cobham (ll. 258-261, p. 14), was also a staunch Whig who broke with Walpole and joined the Patriots. He, too, was an intimate friend of Pope's who addressed the first moral essay to him and praised his famous gardens at Stowe in the fourth. John Campbell, Duke of Argyle (ll. 262-265, pp. 14-15) was a distinguished soldier who joined the Opposition during the discussion of Spanish affairs. Both Pope and Thomson had celebrated his eloquence, and ll. 262-263 here are a direct recollection of lines 86-87 in Pope's _Epilogue to the Satires: Dialogue II_: ARGYLE, the State's whole Thunder born to wield, And shake alike the Senate and the Field. With the exception of Carteret each of the persons named at the end of the poem was either an acquaintance or a close friend of Pope's. We have here one last example of the remarkable degree to which the author of this pamphlet had assimilated the true facts of Pope's life into his fictional re-creation. * * * * * According to the title page, _The Great Man's Answer_ is by the same author as _Are these things so?_. Once again the setting is Pope's grotto, but this time the poet engages Walpole in a direct dialogue. The poem begins with the poet being disturbed in his retreat by someone "thundering at the gate." It is Walpole who has come to answer the questions asked in _Are these things so?_. He maintains that Britain has not fallen as low as Pope claims and that the Honour of the Fleet is still intact. He defends his handling of Parliament, his fiscal policies, his appointment of Placemen and Pensioners, his attitude to Commerce, and the self-aggrandisement involved in many of his contracts. These defences, which only bring out a severer irony in Pope, lead up to Walpole's version of his own epitaph in contrast to that given him in _Are these things so?_. Where Pope had stressed his role as the grave-digger of British Liberty, Walpole sees himself as the healer of factions. Finally he falls back on his ultimate weapon of bribery. But his offers of money, pension, place, title, and honour are turned down by the poet with increasing scorn, and the poem ends with appropriate focus on Pope' incorruptibility. The following notes are offered to help with the topical allusions.[36] The poem opens with Pope directing his servant, John Serle (l. 7, p. 1), to see who is thundering at his gate. This is a playful allusion to the famous opening of _An Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot_ where Serle had been urged to an exactly opposite course of action. The "_Gazetteer_ Abuse" scornfully mentioned by Pope (l. 37, p. 3) is a reference to _The Daily Gazetteer_, a pro-Government newspaper which ran from 30 June 1735-20 June 1745. The incomplete words, "Se--s" (l. 66, p. 4) and "P------ts!" (l. 79, p. 5) refer to Senates and Parliaments respectively. Walpole's claim (l. 89, p. 5) that "_Gin_ would then be drank without control" refers to the government's Gin Act of 1736, which placed an excise of five shillings a gallon on gin. His later claim that there would be "No _License_ on the _Press_, or on the _Stage_" (l. 98, p. 6) refers to the Stage Licensing Act of 1737, which placed the theatre under the control of the Lord Chamberlain. For Pope's ironic application of the epithet "sturdy" (l. 164, p. 9) to the London Merchants see the notes to _Are these things so?_. Pope's mention of "_Angria_" (l. 204, p. 11) is a comparison of Walpole to a Mahrattan pirate chief of the early part of the century. Walpole's introduction to his own epitaph, "They _best_ can speak it, who will _feel_ it most" (l. 223, p. 12) is an allusion to Pope's _Eloisa to Abelard_ (l. 366): "He best can paint 'em who shall feel 'em most." UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO London, Ontario, Canada NOTES TO THE INTRODUCTION [1] H. R. Plomer, _A Dictionary of the Printers and Booksellers Who Were at Work in England. 1726-1775_ (Oxford, 1932), p. 61. [2] _The London Daily Post and General Advertiser_, 23 October 1740. "This Day is Published. Are these things so? The previous question from an Englishman in his Grotto, to a Great Man at Court." [3] _The London Daily Post and General Advertiser_, 8 November 1740. "This Day is Published. Yes, they are: Being an answer to Are these things so?" [4] _The Daily Gazetteer_, 15 November 1740. "This Day is Published. What of That! Occasioned by a Pamphlet intituled Are these things so? And its Answer, Yes, They are:" [5] _The London Daily Post and General Advertiser_, 17 November 1740. "Tomorrow will be published. The Weather-Menders. A proper Answer to Are these things so? By Mr. Spiltimber." [6] _The Daily Gazetteer_, 22 November 1740. "This Evening will be Published; The Second Edition of What of That!" [7] I have been unable to find an advertisement for this pamphlet, but it must have been published at the end of November or very early in December since _Have at you All_ (see following footnote) lists it as one of the pamphlets it is replying to. [8] _The London Magazine_, December 1740. The Monthly Catalogue. Item 13. "Have at you all. By the Author of Yes they are." This listing can only be taken as giving a terminal date. The pamphlet may well have been published in late November. _Are these things so?_, for example, is listed in the Monthly Catalogue for November. [9] _The London Daily Post and General Advertiser_, 1 December 1740. "Tomorrow, at Noon, will be published. What Things? or, An Impartial Inquiry What Things are so, and What Things are not so. Occasion'd by two late Poems, the one entitled Are these things so? And the other entitled Yes, they are." [10] _The Daily Post_, 6 December 1740. "This Day is Published. (The Second Edition, corrected; with the Addition of twenty lines omitted in the former Impressions) Are these things so? The previous question from an Englishman in his Grotto to a Great Man at Court." [11] _The Daily Post_, 18 December 1740. "This Day is Published. The Great Man's Answer. In a Dialogue between his Honour and the Englishman in his Grotto. By the author of Are these things so?" [12] _The London Daily Post and General Advertiser_, 20 December 1740. "This Day is Published. A Supplement to a late excellent Poem, entitled Are these things so?" [13] _The Daily Post_, 23 January 1741. "This Day is Published. The Third Edition. They are Not." [14] At the same time the South Sea Company agreed to pay a duty of 25% on all profits to the King of Spain. It was the question of the payment of this duty for illegal trips that became the basis of Spain's later claim for reparation. These details are taken from William Coxe, _Memoirs of the Life and Administration of Sir Robert Walpole, Earl of Orford_, 3 vols. (London, 1798), I, 589. [15] Coxe, I, 579. [16] These figures are taken from H.W.V. Temperley, "Chapter II, The Age of Walpole and the Pelhams," _The Cambridge Modern History_, ed. A. W. Ward, G. W. Prothero, and Stanley Leathes (Cambridge, 1909), VI, 66. [17] Coxe, I, 617. [18] Coxe, I, 618 _n_. [19] I have been unable to do any more to settle the authorship and have had to be content here with presenting the evidence. [20] D. E. Baker, I. Reed, and S. Jones, _Biographia Dramatica_, 3 vols. (London, 1812), I, ii, 512-515. [21] Robert Watt, _Bibliotheca Britannica_, 4 vols. (Edinburgh, 1824), II, 670. [22] Most of the details in this brief biography, including these quotations, are taken from "The Life of the Revd. Mr. James Millar," _The Lives of the Poets of Great-Britain and Ireland_, By Mr. Theophilus Cibber, and other hands (London, 1753), V, 332-334. [23] One of these, _The Man of Taste_, 1735, has sometimes been mistakenly confused with a pamphlet written three years earlier, _Mr. Taste, The Poetical Fop_, which viciously attacked Pope. See James T. Hillhouse, "The Man of Taste," _MLN_, XLIII (1928), 174-176. There is no evidence that Miller ever attacked Pope and, indeed, his political and literary sympathies put him strongly on Pope's side. [24] Cibber, p. 333. [25] Maynard Mack, _The Garden and the City_ (Toronto, 1969), p. 190. Mack is the first critic to pay any attention to these pamphlets and this reprint is largely offered to supplement his illuminating and suggestive book. [26] A. Pope, _The First Satire of the Second Book of Horace Imitated_ (London, 1733), l. 121. It is perhaps interesting to note that according to J. V. Guerinot, _Pamphlet Attacks on Alexander Pope 1711-1744_ (London, 1969), p. xlviii, "No other line more infuriated the dunces, it was for them Pope's ultimate hypocrisy." [27] Walpole visited Pope sometime in the summer of 1725. See Pope's letter to Fortescue, 23 September 1725. _The Correspondence of Alexander Pope_, ed. G. Sherburn (Oxford, 1956), II, 323. [28] For a full account of the ways in which Pope's actual retired life in his Twickenham villa, garden, and grotto became, in the 1730's, emblematic of the ideal of cultivated virtue, see Maynard Mack, _The Garden and the City_, especially Chapter VI. According to Mack, Pope becomes "spiritual patron of the poetical opposition to Walpole" (p. 190). [29] James Boswell, _Life of Johnson_, ed. R. W. Chapman (Oxford, 1953), p. 91. [30] This assumption is based on Johnson's comment in his life of Pope that "the whole process was probably intended rather to intimidate Pope than to punish Whitehead." S. Johnson, _Lives of the English Poets_, ed. G. Birkbeck Hill (Oxford, 1905), III, 181. [31] _The Gentleman's Magazine_, IX, 104. [32] _The London Daily Post and General Advertiser_, Saturday, 15 November 1740. "WHEREAS it has been generally reported that I am the Author of a Poem, lately publish'd, entitled ARE THESE THINGS SO? I think it necessary to assure the Public, that the said Report is without any Foundation, being entirely a Stranger both to that Piece and the Author of it. P. Whitehead." [33] "There is just now come out another imitation of the same original [_Ars Poetica_], _Harlequin Horace_, which has a good deal of humour." Sherburn, III, 173. [34] See _Fog's Weekly Journal_, 14 April 1733. [35] For an account of the publication of these verses see Mack, p. 70, _n_. 1. [36] It should be noted that the pamphlet is full of typographical errors. Lines 104-106, p. 6, should be prefixed by "G.M.," since Walpole must be the speaker, as should the last two lines in the poem, lines 251-252, p. 13. Page ten mistakenly carries the number twelve at the top of the page. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE The facsimiles of _Are these things so?_ (1740; the Second Edition, corrected; 163.n.57) and of _The Great Man's Answer_ (1740; 11630.h.50) are reproduced from copies in the British Museum by kind permission of the Trustees. Are these Things So? THE PREVIOUS QUESTION, FROM AN ENGLISHMAN in his GROTTO, TO A GREAT MAN at COURT. _Lusisti Satis, edisti Satis, atque_[A] _bibisti_, TEMPUS ABIRE TIBI----Horat. The Second Edition corrected: With the Addition of Twenty Lines omitted in the former Impressions. _LONDON:_ Printed for T. Cooper, at the _Globe_ in _Paternoster-Row_. MDCCXL. [A] Some great and erudite Criticks, instead of _Bibisti_, read Bribisti in this Place. Which of the two is the most applicable, our Querist does not pretend to determine. [Illustration: Decoration] Are these Things So? The Second Edition. With great Additions and Corrections. [Illustration: Decoration] (Price One Shilling.) ADVERTISEMENT. The first Publication of the following Poem having been entrusted to the Care of the Printer, it came, thro' either his Ignorance or Timorousness, extremely mutilated, and incorrect from the Press. The twenty last Lines were left out, which made the Conclusion very abrupt, and in a great measure destroy'd the Intention, as well as Unity, of the whole Piece. The Characters of some great Personages were entirely omitted, and fictitious Names placed to others, instead of the real ones inserted by the Author, who was always of Opinion, that deserved Praise, as well as just Satire, should disdain a Mask. As to the Pointing, it was false in almost every Line, and there were many Words either mis-plac'd or mis-spell'd in almost every Page. Notwithstanding its appearing under these many Disadvantages, the Public were pleas'd to shew their Approbation of it in general, and to give it such a generous and uncommon Reception, that a large Number were obliged to be printed off, to supply the present Demand, before there was Leisure to restore or correct any thing. The following Edition was at length undertaken by the Author Himself, and is entirely agreeable to the Manuscript which he at first put into the Hands of the Printer. [Illustration: Decoration] Are these Things So? THE PREVIOUS QUESTION, From an ENGLISHMAN in his GROTTO, To a GREAT MAN at COURT. Dead to the World's each Scene of Pomp or Care, Wrapp'd up in Apathy to all that's there; My sole _Ambition_ o'er myself to reign, My _Avarice_ to make each Hour a Gain; My _Scorn_--the Threats or Favours of a Crown, A Prince's Whisper, or a Tyrant's Frown; My _Pride_--forgetting and to be forgot; My _Lux'ry_--lolling in my peaceful Grot. All Rancour, Party, Pique, expung'd my Mind, Free or to _laugh_ at, or _lament_ Mankind; Here my calm Hours I with the Wise employ, And the great _Greek_, or _Roman_ Sage enjoy; Or, gayly bent, the Mirth-fraught Page peruse, Or, pensive, keep a _Fast-Day_ with the Muse. Close shut my Cottage-Gate, where none pretends To lift the Latch, but Virtue and her Friends; Tho' pardon me--a Word, Sir, in your Ear, Once, _long ago_, I think I saw You here. Yet to the World, all Hermit as I live, From all its vain Regards a Fugitive; Still in my Breast my _Country_ claims a Part, And Love of _Britain_ clings about my Heart: Then tell me, Sir, for You, 'tis said, best know, Is She, as Fame reports her, _fall'n so low_? Is _She_, who for so many Ages rode _Unquestion'd_ Monarch of the _Water-Flood_; Whose freighted Barks were hail'd in ev'ry Zone, And made each _India's_ envy'd Wealth her own; Protected still by such a Guardian Force, That were they e'er molested in their Course, Sure _Vengeance_ on th' Aggressor straight was pour'd, Unless _Seven-fold_ was for the Wrong restor'd? Is She now sunk to such _low Degree_, That _Gaul_ or _Spain_ must _limit_ out her _Sea_? That She must ask _what Winds_ her Sails shall fill, And steer by _Bounty_ who once steer'd _at Will_? Whilst the vast _Navies_ rais'd for her Support, _Nod_ on the _Main_, or _rot_ before the _Port_; With Hands _ty'd up_ vain _Menaces_ retail, Or try by meek _Perswasion_ to prevail? And is there--_What!_--So many _Millions_ gone, So _many_,--Heavens! yet nothing, _nothing_ done? Do then her Pow'rs this drowsy Sabbath keep? Is there no Trump will rouse 'em from their Sleep? Are they, quite lost to Empire and Renown, Bemus'd at Home, or sunk in _foreign Down_? Or, is it true, what Fame pretends to say, That You, Sir, are the _Author_ of To-day? That You're the fatal Cause of _Britain_'s Shame, The _Spend-thrift_ of her Freedom and her Fame? That _Albion_'s Sons are, by your Arts, become The _Dupes_ of Foreigners, and _Slaves_ of Home; That her fam'd S--te, on whose sage Debate, And _free_ Resolves, depended _Europe_'s Fate, Now meanly on your Nod _dependent_ sit, And _Yea_ or _No_ but just as you think fit; Nay, that the _Chiefs_ of even _Levi's Tribe_, Bow down to you, the _Converts_ of a _Bribe_? Whilst our trim _Warriors_, deaf to Honour's Call, Now wage no War but in the Senate-Hall; There wait your _Generalissimo_ Command, To fight _your_ Battles 'gainst the Patriot Band? And that should One more noble than the rest, Disdain to truckle to your high Behest, Speak what he thinks, and freely plead the Cause Of _Britain's_ Commerce, Liberty, and Laws; Exert his Pow'r to check Corruption's Swing, And serve, at _once_, his Country and his King, His _dang'rous_ Virtues are discarded straight, As sure as they are Vertues of your Hate; Stripp'd of all Honour, Dignity, and Rule, To cloath some _Kindred_ Oaf, or _Titled_ Tool. Or should a brave and honest _Adm'ral_ dare To make one Conquest tho' in Time of War, Without _your Leave_ to risk a vig'rous Blow, And shew what _Britons_, if they _might_, could do, Whilst ev'ry raptur'd Voice resounds his Praise, And grateful Hands triumphal Columns raise, Your venal Scribes are order'd all they can To _lessen_ and _prophane_ the _godlike Man_. That thus the _Fountain_ of _Britannia's_ Health, _Source_ of her Grandeur, Liberty, and Wealth, Polluted by your _all-corrupting_ Hand, With rank Infection deluges the Land; Parent at once of _Want_ and _Luxury_, Of open Rapine and dark Treachery; The Knaves _Elixir_, and the Just Man's _Bane_, _Food_ to the _Locust_, _Mildew_ to the _Swain_; Pouring on those who once in _Goshen_ dwelt; More deadly Plagues than _Ægypt_ ever felt, And _worse_ than _Israel's heaviest_ Task inflicts Tho' _gone_ our _Straw_ yet claiming _double Bricks_ Whilst _Commerce_ flies before th' oppressive Weight, And seeks in _Gaul_ a more indulgent Fate; Where, Shame to _Britain_! the fair Stranger Guest Is hail'd with Raptures, and her _Wrongs_ redress'd. "What then?" I'm told you say, "we nothing lose, "If they've our Commerce we've their wooden Shoes; "And since our _Merchants_ are so _fancy_ grown, "'Tis Time to pull _sturdy Beggars_ down; "They mutiny'd for _War_, and _War_ they have, "But _such a one_ that soon a _Peace_ they'll crave; "_Peace_ shall be Theirs, but _such a Peace_, that then "They'll curse their Prayers and wish for War again; "Thus pois'ning to 'em what they ask as best, "I'll ruin 'em by _granting_ their Request. Are these Things so? Or is it Fiction all? A _sland'rous Picture_ drawn in Soot and Gall? Offspring of Disappointment or Disgrace, Of Those who _want_ or who have _lost_ a _Place_? If so, why lives the Scandal? up for Shame, Confront your Foes, and vindicate your Fame; For, trust me Sir, to wink at such Offence, Rather proclaims a _Fear_ than _Innocence_; "No one is guilty 'till he's guilty prou'd---- Come then, be this wild Clamour strait remov'd; In _conscious Justice_ cloath'd assert your Right, Shake off this Load of Obloquy and Spite, Like _Samuel_ dauntless cry, _Lo here I am_! "Witness against me if I'm ought to blame. "Before the Lord and his Anointed say "Whose _Rights_ or _Honours_ have I ta'en away? "Whom, speak, have I _defrauded_ or _oppress_'d, "Or ever pilfer'd _Forage_ from whose Beast? "Of what vile _Contract_ was I e'er the Scribe, "Or of whose Hands have I receiv'd a _Bribe_? "What _Scheme_ did ever I at Home propose "But whence some _nameless_ Profit would have rose? "Or what _C--n----n_ e're devise abroad "But such as _Britain_'s Se--e did applaud? "What of my _Country_'s Money e'er bestow'd "Except in _secret Service_ for her Good? "Or what _Incumbrance_ on her _Commerce_ laid, "But for th' Increase of _our_ Revenues made? "In my dear Country's Service now _grown gray_ "_Spotless_ I've walk'd before you to this Day "My Thoughts laid out my precious Time all spent "In the hard _Slavery_ of _Government_; "My Brother too the _fruitless_ Bondage shares, "And all your _Peace_ is owing to his Cares, "Girding his Loins he Travels far and near "And brings home some _rare Treaty_ ev'ry Year. "You have my Sons too with you who bow down "Beneath the weighty Service of the Crown; "My Cousins and their Cousins too--hard Fate! "Are _loaded_ with the Offices of State; "And not _one Soul_ of all my Kindred's free "From _sharing_ in the Public Drudgery: "Why then these Shafts of Calumny you throw, "This groundless _Odium_ cast on all I do? "Speak out with Freedom what you have to say, "Aside all _Influence_, _Pow'r_, and _Skreen_ I lay, } "And put my Conduct on the Proof To-day. } This Sir, if you dare stand the Inquest, do, And then if you've but _Samuel_'s _Answer_ too, If all this heavy Charge is void of Ground, And by the _publick Voice_ you're _guiltless_ found, Resume your Power, with Terrors arm'd go forth, And blast the Villains that traduc'd your Worth; Who basely durst your Righteous Course Arraign, And Soil the Glory's of great _Brunswick_'s Reign. But if you _know_ your Cause is not the _best_ Know that you have Defrauded and Oppress'd, That you have ta'en and giv'n many a Bribe, And of a _wicked Contract_ been the Scribe. That you _have_ pilfer'd _Forage_ from the Beast, And with the _Publick Wealth_ your _own_ encreas'd; That a dire _Scheme_ you laid t' _Excise_ the Land, And to a vile C--v----n set your Hand; That you've _Monopoliz'd_ each Post and Place, To aggrandize your self and _Mushroom_ Race, That all your Kindred--Brother, Sons, and Cousins, Have _Titles_ and _Employments_ by the _Dozens_; And for as many _Sidesmen_ as are wanted, _New Places_ are contriv'd, _new Pensions_ granted. If you are travell'd in these _crooked_ Ways With a long Train of black _et Cetera's_; Whilst the _whole Nation_ loaths your very Name, And Babes and Sucklings your _Dispraise_ proclaim; Turn your Eyes inward, on yourself reflect, Think what you _are_, then what you're to _expect_: Pass a few Years the _Sisters_ cut your Thread, And rank you in the Number of the Dead; But of what _Dead_? not those whose Memory, Bloom with sweet Savour through Posterity. Those deathless Worthies, who, as Good as Great, Or rais'd a fall'n, or prop'd a sinking State; Or in the breach of Desolation stood, And for their Country's Welfare pledg'd their Blood. No! with the _Curs'd_ your Tomb shall foremost stand, The GAVESTON'S and WOLSEY'S of the Land. Your Epitaph--_In this foul Grave lies HE_, _Who dug the grave of_ British _Liberty_. Since then your Glass has but few Hours to run, Quit quit the Reins before we're quite undone. Why should you torture out your Dregs of Life, In publick Tumult, Infamy and Strife? To the last gasp maintain a baneful Power Only to see your Country die before? If not for _us_--for your _own_ Family, And as you've made 'em _Great_, pray leave 'em _Free_. But if there's nothing that can bribe your Will, From this perverse Propensity to Ill; If to the Grave you are on Mischeif bent. By growth in Crimes too harden'd to Repent. If, whilst _perhaps_ you may, you _won't Retreat_, Resolv'd the Nations _Ruin_ to compleat, On _Britain_'s Downfall to erect a Name, And trust to an _immortal Guilt_ for Fame, May'nt the _Just Vengeance_ of an injur'd Land, Thus greatly urg'd, exert a glorious _Stand_? Drive not the _Brave_ and _Wretched_ to Despair, For though of Freedom, Wealth and Power left bare, The Plunder'd still have _Tongues_--and they may rear, Their loud Complaints to reach their _Sovereign's_ Ear, Lay, with one Voice, their _Wrongs_ before the _Throne_, Whilst HE whose _Fame_ to both the Poles is known, All Europe's Arbiter, all Asia's Theme, Affrick's Delight, America's Supreme; HE who does still express his Royal Care, His loving Subjects Injuries to repair; To their _Addresses_ graciously attends, And above all their _Liberty_ defends, Who is as Wise as Pious, Mild as Great, And whose sole Business is to nurse the State; _May_ judge their Cause and, greatly rous'd, command, The _Staff_ of _Power_ from thy _polluted_ Hand, And to some _abler Head_ and _better Heart_, His long _dishonour'd Stewardship_ impart. Perhaps to Thee! great _Carteret_, who can'st boast. Talents quite equal to the arduous Post; A keen Discernment; strong, yet bridled Thought, One Natures Dow'r, one by just Learning taught: Calm Fortitude, unwarp'd Integrity, And Flame divine to keep thy Country Free. Or to thy Conduct, _Pultney_! whose just Zeal, Is still exerted for the publick Weal; Whose boundless Knowledge and distinguish'd Sense, Flow in full Tides of rapid Eloquence; And to the native Treasures of whose Mind, We see form'd Worth, and wide Experience join'd. With these the darling _Chesterfield_ may sit An _able_ Partner--if his _rebel Wit_ } Can to such _Pains_ and _Penalties_ submit. } And that fam'd _Caledonian Youth_, whose Morn Propitious Skies, and Noon-tide Rays adorn, Who rose so _early_ in his Country's Cause, Shone, though so Young, _so bright_, that our Applause Was lock'd in Wonder--gazing Senates hung On the divine Enchantment of his Tongue; Hark with what Force he pleads in our Defence! How just he speaks an injur'd People's Sense! _Half_ lost to _Britain_ now, He chides his Fate, For stealing him, _by Titles_, from the State; Whilst we, lov'd _Polwarth_! with thy Titles _more_, As might such Virtues to the State restore. Then too the noble _Cobham_, first of Men! May leave his Garden for the Camp again; Call'd, like old Rome's Dictator from the Plough, To plant once more the Laurel on his Brow. And Brave _Argile_, who's form'd alike to wield The Rhet'rick of the Senate and the Field, So tun'd whose Eloquence, whose Breast so Mann'd, None can the _Speaker_ or the _Chief_ withstand. Yet feign Methink's I'd hope that you were clear From this _high Charge_ that eccho's in my Ear; Trust that some Demon envious of my Rest With visionary Wrongs distracts my Breast, Or that this Blazon of enormous Crimes Springs from the wanton Licence of the Times. Therefore I put this _Question_ to your Heart,---- Speak, Culprit--_Are you Guilty_? Nay, don't Start, This is a Question all have right to ask, To answer it with _Honour_ is your Task; That, If you dare unbosom, I expect, Till when, _I'm Yours, Sir, with all_ due _Respect_. _FINIS_ [Illustration: Decoration] THE GREAT MAN's ANSWER TO Are these Things So? [Illustration: Decoration] (Price One Shilling.) THE GREAT MAN'S ANSWER TO Are these Things So? IN A DIALOGUE BRTWEEN His HONOUR and the ENGLISHMAN in His GROTTO. _Qui capit_---- By the Author of _Are these Things So?_ _LONDON:_ Printed for T. Cooper, at the _Globe_ in _Paternoster-Row_. MDCCXL. [Illustration: Decoration] THE GREAT MAN's ANSWER TO Are these Things So? _E.M._ HAIL blest _Elizium_! sweet, secure Retreat; Quiet and Contemplation's sacred Seat! Here may my Life's last Lamp in Freedom burn, Nor live to light my Country to her Urn: Die 'ere that huge _Leviathan_ of State Shall swallow all.--Who thunders at my Gate! See _John_--But hah! what Tempest shakes my Cell? Whence these big Drops that Ooze from ev'ry Shell? From this obdurate Rock whence flow those Tears? Sure some _Ill Power_'s at hand--Soft! it appears. _E. M._ What's That approaches, _John_? _J._ Why Sir, 'tis He. _E. M._ What He? _J._ Why He Himself, Sir; the _great_ HE. _E. M._ Enough. _G. M._ Your Slave, Sir. _E. M._ No Sir, I'm _your Slave_, Or soon shall be.--How then must I behave? Must I fall prostrate at your Feet? Or how-- I've heard the _Dean_, but never saw him _Bow_. _G. M._ Hoh! hoh! you make me laugh. _E. M._ So _Nero_ play'd, Whilst _Rome_ was by his Flames in Ashes laid. _G. M._ Well, solemn Sir, I'm come, if you think fit, To solve your Question. _E. M._ Bless me! pray, Sir, sit. _G. M._ The Door! _E. M._ No Matter, Sir, my Door won't shut: Stay here, _John_; we've no _Secrets_. _G. M._ Surly Put! How restiff still! but I have _what_ will win him Before we part, or else the Devil's in him. _E. M._ I wait your Pleasure, Sir. _G. M._ Why _Fame_, you say, Reports that I'm the Author of To-Day: I am--But not the Day that you describe, Black with imagin'd Ills--Your Patriot Tribe, Those growling, restless, factious Malecontents, Who blast all Schemes, and rail at all Events; Whom Ministers, nor Kings, nor Gods can please; Whose Rage my Ruin only can appease; That motley Crew, the Scum of ev'ry Sect, Who'd fain destroy, because they can't direct; Wits, Common-Council-Men, and Brutes in Fur, Knights of the Shire, and of the Post.--_E. M._ This, Sir, Is _Gazetteer_ Abuse. _G. M._ These Miscreants dire Apply the Torch themselves, then cry out Fire; In Rhime, in Prose, in Prints, and in Debate, They falsly represent the Nation's State. Go forth, and see if _Britain_'s fall'n _so low_; Fly to her Coasts, and mark the glorious _Show_: See Fleets how gallant! See _Marines_ how _stout_! } That wait but till the _Wind shall turn about_. } _E. M._ What a whole _Twelvemonth_! _G. M._ Pray Sir, hear me out. } See all their Sails unfurl'd, their Streamers play; You'd think old _Neptune_'s Self kept Holiday: These shall protect our Commerce, scour the Main, The Honour of the _British_ Flag maintain; Pour the avenging Thunder on the Foe, } And--_E. M._ Mighty well; but when are they to go? } _G. M._ When? Psha! why look'ee, Sir, that _Time_ will show. } Next view the martial Guardians of the Land: Lo! her gay Warriors redden all the Strand: _Cockade_ behind _Cockade_, each Entrance keep, Whilst in their Sheaths ten thousand Falchions _sleep_. _E. M._ But, Sir, 'tis urg'd that these are needless quite, Kept only for Review, and not for Fight: That Fleets are _Britain_'s Safety--_G. M._ Stupid Elves! Why these, Sir, are to _save you_ from _yourselves_: Ye're prone, ye're prone to murmur and rebel, And when mild Methods fail, we must compel: Besides, consider Sir, _th' Election_'s near-- _E. M._--O, Sir, I'm answer'd--Now the _Case_ is _clear_. _G. M._ Ay,--I shall answer all the rest as well. _E. M._ I doubt it not. _G. M._ On _Se--s_ next you fell: Fie! that was paw--_Se--s_ are _sacred_ Things, And _no more_ capable of _Ill_ than--_Kings_. _E. M._ 'Tis granted. _G. M._ Yet at them your Gall is spit; You're told they _Yea_ and _No_ as I think fit; And that if some brave _One_ Rebellious prov'd, From his Lord's Banquet he was strait remov'd; Cast into utter Darkness, like the Guest, Who was not in a _Wedding Garment_ Dress'd. Well, What of that? should not the _Blind_ be led? Should not so vast a _Body_ have a _Head_? And if _one Finger's gangreen'd_, sure 'tis best To lop it off 'ere it infect the rest. _Free_ P----ts! mere stuff--What would be done? Let loose, five hundred diff'rent Ways they'd run; They'd Cavil, Jarr, Dispute, O'return, Project, And the great Bus'ness of _Supply_ Neglect; On _Grievances_, not _Ways_ and _Means_ would go; Nor one round _Vote of Credit_ e're bestow: The _sinking Fund_ would _strangely_ be apply'd, And _secret service Money_ quite denied: Whilst _Soap_ and _Candles_ we _untax_'d should rue, And _Salt_ itself would lose it's _Savour_ too: Ev'n _Gin_ would then be drank without controul, And the poor _civil List_ be ne're _lick'd whole_. Down go all _Pensioners_, all _Placemen_ down. Those lov'd and trusty Servants of the Crown, Who're always ready at their Chief's Command, Would have no _Vote_ to save the _sinking_ Land: Ev'n _Levy_'s Bench might lose it's sacred _Weight_, Remov'd, O _sad Translation_! from the State. Then Pen's like yours would _freely_ vent their Rage, No _License_ on the _Press_, or on the _Stage_; Whilst loyal _Gazetteer_'s, tho' ne're so witty, No more might chasten the Rebellious _City_: No more sage _Freeman_ trumpet out my Fame, Nor _unstamp'd Farthing-Posts_ my worth proclaim. _E. M._ Indeed--such dire _Calamities_ attend! O worse, Sir, worse--Heav'n knows where it might end. Perhaps _Ourself_ and our dear _Brother_ too, No longer might our Country's Business do-- _E. M._ That, Sir, you've done already--rather, then, _Your_ Business would be done. _G. M._ Ungrateful Men! We that have serv'd you at such vast Expence, } And gone thro' thick and thin. _E. M._ There's no Defence, } Would serve your Purpose--Hence, then, good Sirs, Hence; } Fly, for the Evil Days at Hand, Pray fly-- _G. M._ What leave my Country to be _lost_?--Not I; The Danger's yet but in Imagination, I hope one _Seven Years more_ to _save_ the Nation. In vain you Patriot Oafs pronounce my Fall, Like the great LAUREAT, _S'Blood I'll stand you all_. What tho' you've made the _People_ loath my Name, I live not on such slender Food as Fame; And yet that _People_'s _mine_--My Will obey, } Implicit Bow beneath my sovereign Sway, } Whilst these my _Messengers_ prepare my Way; } These all your Slanders will at Sight refute, They're sterling Evidence which none dispute. For these, Content, or to be Damn'd or Sav'd-- _E. M._--Nay if they will, why let 'em be enslav'd: If they will barter all that's Good and Great, For present Pelf, nor Mind their future State; If none Thy baleful Influence will withstand, Go forth, _Corruption_, Lord it o'er the Land; If they are Thine for better and for worse, On Them and on their Children light the Curse. _G. M._ _Corruption_, Sir!--pray use a milder Term; 'Tis only a Memento to be _firm_; The Times are greatly alter'd--Years ago, A Man would blush the World his _Price_ should know: Scruple to own his _Voice_ was to be bought; And meanly minded what the Million thought; Our Age more _Prudent_, and _Sincere_ is grown, The Hire they _wisely_ take, they _bravely_ own; Laugh at the Fool, who let's his _Conscience_ stand, To barr his Passage to the promis'd Land; Or, sway'd by Prejudice, or puny Pride, Thinks _Right_ and _Int'rest_ of a different Side. _E. M._ _O Nation_ lost to Honour and to Shame! So, then, Corruption now has chang'd its Name: And what was once a paultry _Bribe_, to Day Is gently stil'd an _Honourable_ Pay. Blessings on that great Genius who has wrought This strange Conversion--Who has bravely bought Our Liberty from Virtue--Pray go on. _G. M._ Of Commerce next you talk--pretend 'tis gone, To _Foreign_ Climes--_Amen_, for what I care, Perdition on the Merchants--They must dare! To thwart my Purpose--I detest them--_E. M._ How! _G. M._ Yes--And I think I'm _even_ with 'em now. They would not be _convention'd_, nor _excis'd_, But they shall feel the Scourge themselves advis'd; They shall be swingingly _bewarr'd_, I'll swear; And since they'd not my _little Finger_ bear, My _Loins_ shall press 'em 'till they guilty plead, And sue for Mercy at my Feet. _E. M._ Indeed! _G. M._ Aye, trust me, shall they----_E. M._ But don't tell 'em so; } For they're a stubborn _sturdy_ Gang you know, } _G. M._ O! they'll be _supple_ when their Cash runs low. Their _Purse_, which makes them proud and insolent, A trav'ling with their Commerce shall be sent-- _E. M._ Take Care they don't send _you_ a trav'ling first; _G. M._ No, Sir, I dare 'em now to do their Worst. _Seven Sessions_ more I am at least secure-- _E. M._ Nay then you'll crush 'em quite?--But are you sure, There is a _Spirit_, Sir? _G. M._ What Spirit pray? A _Spirit_ that the _Treasury_ can't lay. _E. M._ I'm answer'd Sir,--_G. M._ Next, Friend, one Word about Those spiteful Innuendoes you throw out, That squint at _Contracts_, _Forage_, and what not, 'Tis _more_ than Time that those Things were forgot. You should not link the _present_ with the _past_-- _E. M._ Yes when they make one _glorious Whole_ at last; When, tho' _Times differ_, _Actions_ still _agree_, And what Men _were_ they _are_--What they _will_ be, We safely may pronounce--_G. M._ Well, Sir, but why On my dear Family and Friends this Cry? Suppose they've Places, Wealth, and Titles too, _Merit_ like Ours should surely have its _Due_. That _squaemish_ Steward's of all Fools the worst, That lays not up for his _own Houshold_ first; Nor takes a _proper_ Care of those _staunch_ Friends, By whose _good Services_ he gains his Ends. Besides, who'd drudge the _Mill-Horse_ of the State; Curst by the Vulgar, envy'd by the Great; In one fastidious Round of Hurry live, And join, in Toil, the _Matin_ with the _Eve_; Be hourly plagu'd 'bout Pensions, Strings, Translations, Or, worse! that _damn'd Affair_ of _Foreign_ Nations. Make _War_ and _Treaties_ with alternate Pain: First sweat to build, then to pull down again. Who'd cringe at _Levees_, or in _Closets_--Oh! Stoop to the _rough_ Remonstrance of the _Toe_? Did not some Genius whisper, "That's the Road "To Opulence, and Honours bless'd Abode; "Thus you may aggrandize yourself, and Race; "_Pension_ this _Knight_, or give that _Peer_ a _Place_." _E. M._ So _Angria_, Sir, as justly might declare, He _plunder'd_ only to _enrich_ his _Heir_; Nor longer would his _Piracies_ pursue, Than 'till he had _provided_ for his _Crew_. _G. M._ Your Servant, Sir, I think you're pretty _free_-- } _E. M._ Why Truth is Truth, Sir, and will out, you see; } _G. M._ Yes, s'death! but _couple Angria_ with _me_! _E. M._ I'll say no more on't--_G. M._ No you've said _enough_; And what you next advise, is canting Stuff. _Turn my Eyes inward_! not quite so devout; They've Task sufficient to look sharp _without_: And should the fatal Sisters cut my Thread Some _score Years_ hence--I trouble not my Head } _Where_ I'm entomb'd, or number'd with _what_ Dead; } I want no _Grave-Stone_ to promulge my _Fame_, Nor trust to _breathless Marble_ for a _Name_, BRITANNIA'S self a _Monument_ shall stand Of the _bless'd Dowry_ I bequeath my Land: Her Sons shall hourly my _dear Conduct_ boast; They _best_ can speak it, who will _feel_ it most. But if some grateful Verse _must_ grace my Urn, Attend ye _Gazeteers_--Be this the Turn-- _Weep_, Britons, _weep_--_Beneath this Stone lies He, Who set your Isle from dire Divisions free, } And made your various Factions all agree_. } _E. M._ That's right, _G. M._ You'd have me quit too--No, I'll still Drive on, and make you happy '_gainst your Will_. As for your _may_ and _may_, Sir,--_may be Not_, Can my _vast Services_ be _There_ forgot? As for those _lauded Successors_ you name, If once in Pow'r, they'd act the very _same._ _E. M._ That's Cobweb Sophistry--Did they not fill The noblest Posts? And had they not, pray, _still_, But that they greatly scorn'd to _league_ with those, Who were at once their King's and Country's Foes? _G. M._ Well, Sir, as there is nothing I can say Will with your starch'd unbending Temper weigh; My last _best_ Answer I'll in _Writing_ leave; Pray mark it--_E. M._ How! May I my Eyes believe? _G. M._ You may--I thought I should convince you, _E. M._ Yes, That Fame for once spoke Truth--And as for _This_-- _G. M._ Furies! My _thousand Bank_, Sir, _E. M._ Thus I Tear, Go, blend, _Corruption_, with _corrupting_ Air. _G. M._ Amazing Frenzie! Well, if this won't do, What think you of a _Pension_? _E. M._ As of _You_. _G. M._ A _Place_--_E. M._ Be gone, _G. M._ A _Title_--_E. M._ is a _Lie_ When ill conferr'd _G. M._ A _Ribband_--_E. M._ I defie Farewell then Fool--If you'll accept of _Neither_, You and your _Country_ may be _damn'd_ together. _FINIS_ WILLIAM ANDREWS CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES * * * * * THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY PUBLICATIONS IN PRINT THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY PUBLICATIONS IN PRINT * * * * * =1948-1949= 16. Henry Nevil Payne, _The Fatal Jealousie_ (1673). 17. Nicholas Rowe, _Some Account of the Life of Mr. William Shakespear_ (1709). 18. Anonymous, "Of Genius," in _The Occasional Paper_, Vol. III, No. 10 (1719), and Aaron Hill, Preface to _The Creation_ (1720). =1949-1950= 19. Susanna Centlivre, _The Busie Body_ (1709). 20. Lewis Theobald, _Preface to the Works of Shakespeare_ (1734). 22. Samuel Johnson, _The Vanity of Human Wishes_ (1749), and two _Rambler_ papers (1750). 23. John Dryden, _His Majesties Declaration Defended_ (1681). =1951-1952= 26. Charles Macklin, _The Man of the World_ (1792). 31. Thomas Gray, _An Elegy Wrote in a Country Churchyard_ (1751), and _The Eton College Manuscript_. =1952-1953= 41. Bernard Mandeville, _A Letter to Dion_ (1732). =1962-1963= 98. Selected Hymns Taken Out of Mr. Herbert's _Temple_ ... (1697). =1964-1965= 109. Sir William Temple, _An Essay Upon the Original and Nature of Government_ (1680). 110. John Tutchin, _Selected Poems_ (1685-1700). 111. Anonymous, _Political Justice_ (1736). 112. Robert Dodsley, _An Essay on Fable_ (1764). 113. T. R., _An Essay Concerning Critical and Curious Learning_ (1698). 114. _Two Poems Against Pope_: Leonard Welsted, _One Epistle to Mr. A. Pope_ (1730), and Anonymous, _The Blatant Beast_ (1742). =1965-1966= 115. Daniel Defoe and others, _Accounts of the Apparition of Mrs. Veal_. 116. Charles Macklin, _The Covent Garden Theatre_ (1752). 117. Sir Roger L'Estrange, _Citt and Bumpkin_ (1680). 118. Henry More, _Enthusiasmus Triumphatus_ (1662). 119. Thomas Traherne, _Meditations on the Six Days of the Creation_ (1717). 120. Bernard Mandeville, _Aesop Dress'd or a Collection of Fables_ (1740). =1966-1967= 123. Edmond Malone, _Cursory Observations on the Poems Attributed to Mr. Thomas Rowley_ (1782). 124. Anonymous, _The Female Wits_ (1704). 125. Anonymous, _The Scribleriad_ (1742). Lord Hervey, _The Difference Between Verbal and Practical Virtue_ (1742). =1967-1968= 129. Lawrence Echard, Prefaces to _Terence's Comedies_ (1694) and _Plautus's Comedies_ (1694). 130. Henry More, _Democritus Platonissans_ (1646). 132. Walter Harte, _An Essay on Satire, Particularly on the Dunciad_ (1730). =1968-1969= 133. John Courtenay, _A Poetical Review of the Literary and Moral Character of the Late Samuel Johnson_ (1786). 134. John Downes, _Roscius Anglicanus_ (1708). 135. Sir John Hill, _Hypochondriasis, a Practical Treatise_ (1766). 136. Thomas Sheridan, _Discourse ... Being Introductory to His Course of Lectures on Elocution and the English Language_ (1759). 137. Arthur Murphy, _The Englishman From Paris_ (1736). =1969-1970= 138. [Catherine Trotter], _Olinda's Adventures_ (1718). 139. John Ogilvie, _An Essay on the Lyric Poetry of the Ancients_ (1762). 140. _A Learned Dissertation on Dumpling_ (1726) and _Pudding Burnt to Pot or a Compleat Key to the Dissertation on Dumpling_ (1727). 141. Selections from Sir Roger L'Estrange's _Observator_ (1681-1687). 142. Anthony Collins, _A Discourse Concerning Ridicule and Irony in Writing_ (1729). 143. _A Letter From A Clergyman to His Friend, With An Account of the Travels of Captain Lemuel Gulliver_ (1726). 144. _The Art of Architecture, A Poem. In Imitation of Horace's Art of Poetry_ (1742). =1970-1971= 145-146. Thomas Shelton, _A Tutor to Tachygraphy, or Short-writing_ (1642) and _Tachygraphy_ (1647). 147-148. _Deformities of Dr. Samuel Johnson_ (1782). 149. _Poeta de Tristibus: or, the Poet's Complaint_ (1682). 150. Gerard Langbaine, _Momus Triumphans: or, the Plagiaries of the English Stage_ (1687). Publications of the first fifteen years of the Society (numbers 1-90) are available in paperbound units of six issues at $16.00 per unit, from the Kraus Reprint Company, 16 East 46th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017. Publications in print are available at the regular membership rate of $5.00 for individuals and $8.00 for institutions per year. Prices of single issues may be obtained upon request. Subsequent publications may be checked in the annual prospectus. * * * * * THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY WILLIAM ANDREWS CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 2520 Cimarron Street (at West Adams), Los Angeles, California 90018 * * * * * _Make check or money order payable to_ THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARE THESE THINGS SO? (1740) THE GREAT MAN'S ANSWER TO ARE THESE THINGS SO: (1740) *** Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed. Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution. START: FULL LICENSE THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license. Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works 1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. 1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. 1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others. 1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States. 1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: 1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed: This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook. 1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. 1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. 1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™. 1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License. 1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. 1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. 1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that: • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.” • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works. • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work. • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works. 1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. 1.F. 1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. 1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. 1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem. 1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. 1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. 1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause. Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™ Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life. Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org. Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws. The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS. The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate. While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate. International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate. Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org. This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.