Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Sven Pedersen and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net









INTRODUCTION.


I have been asked by the publishers to write a few lines introducing this
book to American Christians. I count it a privilege to be allowed to do so.

_The one thing needful_ for the church of Christ in our day, and for every
member of it, is to be filled with the spirit of Christ. Christianity is
nothing except as it is a ministration of the Spirit. Preaching is nothing,
except as it is a demonstration of the Spirit. Holiness is nothing except
as it is the fruit of the Spirit. These truths are so little taught or
emphasized as they should be, and the blessings they speak of are so little
experienced that one gladly welcomes every voice that draws attention to
them.

It is known that all do not perfectly agree as to the best answer to the
question: How to be filled with the Spirit? Some press that aspect of truth
which reminds us that the Holy Spirit _has been given_ to the church and
that He dwells in every believer, a fountain of living water. As there have
been fountains clogged by stones and earth, and only needing to be cleared
and opened up, so we have only to remove the hindrances, to yield ourselves
in perfect surrender to the Spirit in us, and the filling will come. We
must not ask God for more of the Spirit. God asks for more of us that the
Spirit may have us wholly.

Others, while admitting fully that the Spirit is in the believer, and that
He asks for a more entire surrender, yet urge that it is from God direct
that the filling of the Spirit must ever still be asked and received. God
cannot give His spiritual gifts apart from Himself, once for all. As the
divine and everlasting One, He gives unceasingly. The Spirit has not been
given as if He had left heaven. He is in God and in the church. It is from
God Himself that larger measures of the Spirit must ever be sought and
received.

Among those who hold this latter view, there is again somewhat of a
diversity in the representation of truth. On the one hand we are reminded
that it is "_by faith_" we receive the Holy Spirit, and that faith often
has to rest and to act without any conscious experience--has to walk in the
dark. Souls that are _fully surrendered_ to God are invited to claim the
promise and then to go and work in the full assurance that the Spirit is in
them, and will in His fullness work through them. On the other hand stress
is laid on the words "_we receive_ the Spirit" by faith. The difference
between believing and receiving is pointed out, and we are urged to wait
until we receive what we claim, and know that God has anew filled us with
His Spirit. "To be filled with the Spirit" is offered us as a definite,
conscious experience.

With still other Christians there is to be found what may be regarded as a
combination of these different views. They believe that a very definite,
conscious filling of the Spirit been received by some, and may be had
by all. Though from their own experience they cannot testify of it, they
still look for God to do for them above what they have asked or thought.
Meantime they know that God's Spirit is in them, and seek grace to know Him
better, and to yield themselves to Him more undividedly. They believe that
the Spirit within them is Himself leading them on to the Lord above them,
whose it is to fill with the Spirit. They have claimed in faith the
fullness; they have placed themselves to be filled; they look to their Lord
to fulfill His promise. Whether it comes in one swift moment or more
gradually, they know it is theirs.

I have written this with an eye to those who may not entirely agree with
the way in which the truth is presented in this little book. I wish to urge
all, especially ministers of the gospel, to give it a prayerful reading. I
feel confident it will bring them help and blessing. It will deepen the
conviction of the great need and absolute duty of being filled with the
Spirit. It will point out the hindrances and open up the way. It will stir
up faith and hope. And it will, I trust, bring many a one to feel that it
is at the footstool of the throne, in the absolute surrender of a new
consecration, that the blessing is to be received from God Himself.

And may this book stir up all its readers, not only to seek this blessing
for themselves, but to cry earnestly, "praying exceedingly day and night,"
"_for all Saints_," that God may throughout His whole church give the Holy
Spirit in power. It is when the tide comes in, that every pool is filled,
and all the separate little pools are lost in the great ocean. It is as all
believers who know or seek this blessing begin to pray as intensely for
each other and all their brethren, as for themselves, that the power of the
Spirit will be fully known. With the prayer that this Spirit-filled book
may be greatly blessed of God, I commend it to the study of His children.


  ANDREW MURRAY.

  _London, Dec. 1, 1895._





  CONTENTS.




                                                                    PAGE

  Introduction--Andrew Murray                                         3

  Author's Preface                                                    9

  Introduction to first Australian edition                           13


  CHAPTER I.

  The Starting Point                                                 17


  CHAPTER II.

  Every Believer's Birthright                                        19


  CHAPTER III.

  A Command to be Obeyed                                             21


  CHAPTER IV.

  Something different from the new Birth--Proved from the Case of
      (1) The Apostles--(2) The Samaritans--(3) Saul of Tarsus--(4)
      The Ephesians--Unclaimed Deposits                              23


  CHAPTER V.

  Everybody's Need                                                   29


  CHAPTER VI.

  Preventive Against Backsliding                                     31


  CHAPTER VII.

  How long Between the New Birth and the Filling?                    34


  CHAPTER VIII.

  Other New Testament Names for "Being Filled with the Spirit"--(1)
      Baptized with the Holy Ghost--"Baptized into One Body,"
      What it means--(2) Rivers of Living Waters--(3) The Promise
      of the Father--(4) Pouring Forth--(5) The Gift--(6)
      Receiving--(7) Falling--(8) Coming--(9) Sealed                 36


  CHAPTER IX.

  How Obtained?--(1) Cleanse--(2) Consecrate--(3) Claim              47


  CHAPTER X.

  Wrong Motives                                                      48


  CHAPTER XI.

  Cleansing--A "New Heart" not necessarily a "Clean Heart"--What is
      a Clean Heart?--Not Sinlessness--Blameless, not Faultless--"I
      was alone in the Twilight"--Cleansing a Crisis, not a
      Process                                                        49


  CHAPTER XII.

  Consecration: What is it?--(1) Sanctification--(2) Surrender--(3)
      Transference of Ownership--(4) Enthroning Christ               72


  CHAPTER XIII.

  Claiming--(1) Prayer--(2) Laying on of Hands--Claiming and
      Asking--Through Faith the Blessing Made Ours--Objections
      Against This                                                   87


  CHAPTER XIV.

  How Does it Come?--Aorist Tense: "Were Filled," Refilled, A
      Crisis--Imperfect Tense: "Were being Filled," A
      Process--Present Tense: "Full," the Normal Condition--Deacons
      "Full of the Holy Ghost"--Illustration of Water
      Trough--Illustration of Service Pipe                           91


  CHAPTER XV.

  Its Effects--(1) Courage--(2) Fruit of the Spirit--(3) Reach the
      Masses--(4) Persecution                                       104


  CHAPTER XVI.
  May One Know that he is Filled?--(1) From the Testimony of the
      Word--(2) The Witness of the Spirit--(3) Signs
      Following                                                     117


  CHAPTER XVII.

  May One Say that He is Filled?--Testifying to
      Forgiveness--Testifying to Full Salvation                     120

  CHAPTER XVIII.

  May One Lose the Blessing?--By Disobedience--By Neglect of the
      Word--It will be Found Where it was Lost                      122





  THE

  SPIRIT-FILLED LIFE


  BY THE LATE

  REV. JOHN MACNEIL, B. A.


  INTRODUCTION BY THE

  REV. ANDREW MURRAY

  _Be filled with the Spirit_--Eph. v. 18




  Chicago

  THE BIBLE INSTITUTE COLPORTAGE ASSOCIATION

  250 LA SALLE AVENUE



  _Copyright 1896 by
  Fleming H. Revell Company._




PREFACE.


I have written only for the "babes." The "full-grown," the "perfect," who
may read will kindly bear this in mind. A wide and more or less intimate
acquaintance with the Churches of Australasia has shown me the need for a
simple, homely talk, such as this little book professes to be. Many, oh! so
many of God's dear children are living on the wrong side of Pentecost,
living on the same plane as that on which the disciples were living before
they "were filled with the Holy Ghost;" and thus by their lives practically
making the sad confession, "We did not so much as hear whether the Holy
Ghost was given," or "whether there be any Holy Ghost." The object of this
little work is to call their attention to their Birthright, to the fact
that the Fullness of the Spirit is the Birthright of every believer. God
wants us to be living _this_ side Pentecost, not the _other_ side.

The substance of the following pages has been occasionally delivered as a
series of afternoon Bible Readings in connection with my Mission Services.
The frequent request that those who heard them might have them in a more
permanent form, coupled with the hope that the great blessing that has most
graciously been vouchsafed to them when spoken, might not be withheld from
them when being read, has induced me to commit them to writing.

I gratefully acknowledge help received from many sources, both in preparing
the Bible Readings, and in preparing them for publication; especially do I
owe a debt of gratitude to my beloved "fellow-worker in Christ Jesus," who
has now for many years been "a succorer of many, and of myself also," the
Rev. H. B. Macartney, M. A., Incumbent of St. Mary's, Caulfield. He has
most kindly revised my MS., penned an introduction, and encouraged me to
publish.

In "much fear and trembling," because of its inadequateness, but with
earnest and unceasing prayer to Him who has been pleased before to-day to
"choose the weak things of the world to confound the things which are
mighty"--with the prayer that He would graciously do so again, I send this
little messenger forth on its mission, trusting that the reading of it may
be as great a blessing to every reader as the writing of it has been to the
writer.

  JOHN MACNEIL.



THE BIBLE INSTITUTE COLPORTAGE ASSOCIATION

(D. L. MOODY, PRESIDENT.)

Was founded for the purpose of issuing good sound Christian literature at
low prices. The work is purely undenominational in its character, and the
sympathy and co-operation of all Christians is invited to help along the
work of counteracting the influence of the vicious literature now being so
widely circulated.

Send stamp for pamphlets regarding the work of the Association, and for
complete catalogues, which include books on many topics,--all helpful and
all at specially reduced prices.

Special terms to Colporters and for free distribution. Colporters and
canvassers wanted in every community. Liberal terms.

Supplies of the Moody Colportage Library books can be obtained at the
following depots:

  GENERAL EASTERN DEPOT: East Northfield, Mass.

  NEW YORK CITY: 112 Fifth Avenue.

  BOSTON: 7 Tremont Place, and Room 6, Tremont Temple.

  PHILADELPHIA: 2131 Bainbridge Street.

  NASHVILLE, TENN.: Barbee & Smith, agents.

  HALIFAZ, NOVA SCOTIA: The British-American Book and
  Tract Society.

  TORONTO: 142 Yonge Street.

And direct from headquarters by addressing

  A. P. FITT, SUPT.,
  THE BIBLE INSTITUTE COLPORTAGE ASSOCIATION,
  250 La Salle Avenue, CHICAGO.




INTRODUCTION

_To First Australian Edition._


Christian reader, I pray that before you finish this little book you may
become so eager, so intense in your longings after God, that you will not
be satisfied until you are really and actually "FULL" of Him, "filled" with
the Holy Ghost.

When the Lord asked Job, in chap. xxxviii. 34, "Canst thou lift up thy
voice to the clouds, that abundance of waters may cover thee?" he would
undoubtedly have answered, No. We, on the other hand, with all humility,
but without the slightest hesitation, can answer, Yes. "Abundance" is the
Father's will; "abundant" are the Stores of Life in Jesus; "abounding" for
ever and ever is the Stream of the Spirit's energies.

We have only _to reflect a little_ till the truth flashes, and _then_ the
victory is all but won. We have only to consider, WHO was it that first
loved us, and called us to be His own children, when we were wandering in
sin's desert? WHO was it that first crossed the wild with a cup of living
water to slake our dying thirst? WHO now crosses that desert a second time
on our behalf with great camel loads of wine and milk? What did it cost Him
to draw that water from Salvation's well, or to buy those luxuries for
growth and power? What will one healing, stimulating draught accomplish in
us and others? How will He grieve if we decline to "buy," or hesitate to
"drink"? What, above all, will be the consequences to His glory? Oh, let us
arise! Let us "shake ourselves from the dust!" Let us drink abundantly,
Beloved! There is just now an unutterable need for "something more." Single
souls are drooping, though divinely planted. Churches are full of bones,
"very many and very dry." The world is a jungle, a forest ready for the
fire. Men, women and children form one vast continent of feeling, of
ever-increasing sensibility, with an ever-deepening, an ever-aching void.
Even the Teachers of High Truth themselves are not "abundantly satisfied"
with the fatness of God's House; they do not drink deep enough from the
"River of God's pleasures." Yes, there is a thirst not quenched; and I am
persuaded that we can only quench Immanuel's thirst when _in Him_ we quench
our own. Then let us make haste to God; let us hurry to the Stream that is
"full of water." We cannot know what the "Infilling of the Spirit" means
until we are infilled. It is a new experience. God is not thereby better
seen than before by nature's eye, but He is better understood, better
loved, better leaned on; that is what He wants, and that is enough.

Perhaps, dear reader, the pathway between you and blessing is somewhat
hidden, or your eyes are dim, or your heart is only beating with a faint
desire. If so, then carefully read this little book; read it beside an open
Bible; read it in prayer. It may be, through infinite compassion, that it
may prove a key into the "wealthy place;" it may rend the veil, scatter the
darkness, lead you to joy unspeakable, and--to power!

I have known the author long, and love him much. He is thoroughly trained
in theology; he is a first-rate preacher; his gospel for sinners is as
"clear as crystal;" and when you have read a little further, you will say
the same of his gospel for saints! He has penetrated far into the "Secret
of the Most High," and so can speak from a rich experience of his own, to
which, however, he never refers.

I cannot but express the hope that this little treatise on the
"Spirit-filled Life," may not only be widely circulated in Australia, but
also in England and America. It is fresh, it is homely, it is temperate,
it is timely, it is scriptural, it is splendid. It sets forth a Promise to
be claimed, a Gift to be received, a Command to be obeyed; and it portrays
the sequel--more liberty, more peace, more devotion, more fellowship with
the Son of God in His rejection by man, in His fellowship with the Father.

  H. B. MACARTNEY, JR.

  _St. Mary's, Caulfield,
  Victoria, July 12, 1894._




THE SPIRIT-FILLED LIFE.




CHAPTER I.

_THE STARTING POINT._


Reader, are you a B. A.? This little book is only for those who possess
that degree from the King's College. If you are not "Born Again," please
put it aside, for this is our starting point in considering the Fullness
of the Spirit as the birthright of every believer. If you have not been
born again you have no right by birth to this, the chiefest of New
Testament blessings. Your first concern is to become one of the children
of God, and then you may enquire as to your inheritance. If you _are_
born again, ask that you may read with the anointed eye and with an
unprejudiced mind, for the amount of prejudice that exists against this
subject is saddening in the extreme. In nothing that he ever wrote does
John Bunyan's masterful genius flash forth more clearly than when, in
"The Holy War," he places that old churl, Mr. Prejudice, with sixty deaf
men under him, as warder of Eargate. Nothing that even Emmanuel may say
can reach Mansoul while Prejudice and his deaf men keep that gate. "There
is nothing about this in the Standards of our Church." "I have not met
with this truth in my favorite authors." "It is quite new to me, and I
never will believe it," etc., etc. These and such like, are illustrations
one meets with of how well Prejudice keeps his ward! In the name of the
Lord let us displace him, and determine to give what of God's truth may
be set forth in the following pages a fair field, no favor being asked
for. Deep-rooted prejudice is one of the causes of the appalling
spiritual poverty that abounds--yes, appalling when we consider the
treasures within our reach!




CHAPTER II.

_EVERY BELIEVER'S BIRTHRIGHT._


On every hand a lack of _something_ is being felt and expressed by God's
people. Their Christian experience is not what they expected it would be.
Instead of expected victory, it is oft-recurring, dreaded defeat; instead
of soul satisfaction, it is soul hunger; instead of deep, abiding heart
rest, it is disquiet and discontent; instead of advancing, it is losing
ground. Is this all Christ meant when He said, "Come unto Me"? Is this
life of constant disappointment the normal life of the Bible Christian?
To these sad questionings the Divine Word answers with an emphatic "No,"
and the testimony of an ever-increasing number of God's children answers
"No."

For this widely felt, though sometimes inarticulate demand, the Divine
supply is _the fullness of the Spirit_; and this Fullness is the
birthright of _every_ believer, his birthright by virtue of his new birth.
Sometimes we hear it said that to be filled with the Spirit is the
Christian _privilege_; but _birthright_ is a stronger word. Reader, it is
your birthright to be filled with the Spirit, as Peter was filled, as
Stephen was filled, as the one hundred and twenty men and women in the
upper room were filled (Acts ii. 4, and i. 14, 15), as the men and women
in Cornelius' house were filled (Acts x. 44-47). "And ye shall receive
the gift of the Holy Ghost, for to you is the promise, and to your
children, and to all that are afar off" (Acts ii. 38, 39). What have you
done with your birthright? Have you claimed it? _Are you living at this
moment in the possession and enjoyment of it?_ Or, are you, Esau-like,
"despising your birthright"? (Gen. xxv. 34). Or, if not despising, are you
neglecting it? Esau's eyes were ultimately opened to his folly in parting
with his birthright for "one mess of meat," and he then desired to inherit
the blessing, seeking it "diligently with tears;" but alas! his awaking
came too late (Heb. xii. 16, 17). May every reader of these lines have the
desire graciously awakened (if it has not yet been awakened and satisfied),
to inherit their birthright blessing, while place of repentance is to be
found. May the prediction be fulfilled in our glad experience: "The house
of Jacob shall _possess their possessions_" (Obad. 17).




CHAPTER III.

_A COMMAND TO BE OBEYED._


But lest some one should think, "It is optional with me whether I claim
my birthright or not; no doubt it would be a very fitting thing for some
people to be filled with the Spirit, but _I_ need not trouble about
it"--in case any one should be tempted to speak and act like this, let us
learn that "Be filled with the Spirit" (Eph. v. 18) is a command to be
obeyed, a duty to be done. Many of God's people are acknowledging that
they did not know that "Be filled with the Spirit" was a command; _but it
is_, and there is no excuse for not knowing. You will notice that in Eph.
v. 18 there is a double command, a negative, "Be not drunk," and a
positive, "Be ye filled." The positive command is as authoritative as the
negative, and was binding on _just as many_ of those Ephesian Christians
as was the negative command. Now what was true for those believers there
in Ephesus in the long-ago is equally true for all believers on God's
footstool to-day. Is it a sin for a believer to-day to disobey the
command, "Be not drunk"? and is it then a virtue to disobey the equally
authoritative command, "Be ye filled"? If it is a sin for a Christian to
be drunk, it is just as surely, truly, really, _a sin_ not to be filled.
We are commanded and expected to live a Spirit-filled life, to be filled,
not with wine, the fruit of the vines of earth, but with the new wine of
the kingdom, the fruit of the "true Vine."

Reader, if you are asked, Do you obey the command, "Be not drunk with
wine," what is your answer? If it is, "Yes," that is obedience. Now, if
you are asked, Do you obey the command, "Be filled with the Spirit," what
is your answer? If it is, "No," that is disobedience; you are guilty of
breaking one of God's plainest commandments. You have no more license to
break _this_ command than you have to break any command in the Decalogue.
Before you read further, had you not better confess your sin, and tell
the Master that you purpose in your heart new obedience?




CHAPTER IV.

_SOMETHING DIFFERENT FROM THE NEW BIRTH._


This being "filled with the Spirit" is a definite blessing, quite distinct
from being "born of the Spirit." It is objected by some that every
Christian has the Spirit; quite true, for "if any man have not the Spirit
of Christ, he is none of his" (Rom. viii. 9); and "no man can say Jesus
is Lord, but in the Holy Spirit" (1 Cor. xii. 3); but to "have the Spirit"
and to be "filled with the Spirit" are two different things. "Egypt always
has the Nile," as some one has said, "but Egypt waits every year for its
overflow;" having the Nile is one thing, but having the Nile overflowing
is quite another. Now it is the Nile's overflow that is Egypt's salvation,
and to overflow it must first be filled. So it is the Christian's overflow
that is the world's salvation, and in order to the overflow there must
first be the filling.

As far as God is concerned, there is no reason why this filling should
not take place at the hour of conversion, of the new birth. See the case
of Cornelius and his friends, in Acts x. 44-48. They believed, were
saved, "received the Holy Ghost," and were baptized with water the same
day. But it were a fatal blunder to assert that _all_ men on believing
received the Holy Ghost in a similar manner, or were thus filled with the
Spirit. Most certainly in Bible times it was not so.


_1. Take the case of the Apostles themselves._

In Acts ii. 4 we read, "They were all filled with the Holy Spirit," all
in the upper room, men and women, including the twelve apostles. Now
these men had the Spirit before. When Christ called them to follow Him,
when they were converted, they received the Spirit. After His
resurrection, but before His ascension, Christ breathed on them and said,
"Receive ye the Holy Ghost" (John xx. 22), and of course they did
"receive" the Spirit then; but it is never said of them that they were
"filled with the Holy Spirit" till that morning in the upper room, for
the simple reason that it _could_ not be said of them, or "the Spirit was
not yet given" (John vii. 39). Yet these men were Christians before that
morning.


_2. Take the case of the Samaritans._

In Acts viii. 5-13 we find that under the preaching of Philip the
evangelist there was a work of grace in the city of Samaria, the people
believed and were baptized. These people, then, were Christians, but they
were not "filled with the Spirit" till Peter and John came down and
prayed for them, thus perfecting the work Philip had been doing (Acts
viii. 15-17).


_3. Take the case of Paul himself._

Saul was converted when the omnipotent, omnipresent Christ, standing as
Picket-guard for that little church at Damascus, unhorsed him, and took
him prisoner on the Damascus road. "Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do?"
That question sounds like conversion, surely. For three days he lay in
darkness in Damascus, a surrendered, believing man, and therefore a
Christian man; but it was not till Ananias came to him that he was
"filled with the Holy Ghost" (Acts ix. 17). And who was this Ananias
through whom this man Saul, destined to prove himself the truest, bravest,
grandest servant the Lord Jesus ever had--through whom even Saul received
the greatest of the New Testament blessings? He was an obscure obedient
believer, of whom we know nothing else than that he did this service for
Saul. Here is the ministry of the saints. So it may be to-day, some big
Paul may be blessed through the ministry of some little Ananias.


_4. Take the case of the Ephesians in Acts xix. 1-6._

Here were twelve men who were disciples, they had been believers for some
time when Paul found them; in other words, they were saved, they were
Christians. But Paul's first question to them was, "Have ye received the
Holy Ghost since ye believed?" Plainly showing that Paul thought it
possible for them to have been believers and yet _not_ to have received
the Holy Ghost. Indeed, in this case, what Paul deemed a possibility
turned out to be a fact; they had _not yet_ "received" the Spirit. Of
course, in a _certain_ sense, they had the Spirit; it was by the Spirit
they had believed, and if they had not the Spirit of Christ, they were
none of His; but for all that, they had not yet "received" the Spirit in
the Pentecostal sense of the word, in the sense in which Paul meant it.
They had not yet come to _their_ Pentecost. In the R. V., Paul's question
is rendered, "Did ye receive the Holy Ghost when ye believed?" Proving
(1) that it is possible to "receive" the Holy Ghost at the moment of
believing, and (2) that it is possible to believe without "receiving," as
has already been pointed out from the rendering of the A.V. After Paul
had instructed them more fully in the word and way of the Lord, we read
that "the Holy Ghost came on them." From this we gather that these men of
Ephesus obtained a blessing subsequent to their conversion, spoken of
here as "receiving" the Holy Ghost, as the Holy Ghost "coming" on them.
This is in strict accord with what Paul himself says of this event when
writing to the Ephesians in Eph. i. 13, "After that ye believed, ye were
sealed with that holy Spirit of promise." First they "believed," and
then, some time after "believing," they were "sealed," they "received,"
they were "filled." From these four cases--(1) Apostles, (2) Samaritans,
(3) Saul, (4) Ephesians--we conclude that in New Testament times men
actually lived as Christians, were saved, converted men, and yet knew
nothing of the "Filling" with the Spirit--this knowledge, this blessing
coming to them some time after their being born again. Yet this is the
very thing some to-day deny! Whom are we to believe? These objectors or
the Sacred Record? The Divine Word declares it, and there is then no room
or need for argument. So we affirm that it is equally possible for
believers, for saved, converted men, to live in our own time, as well as
in Bible times, without the "Fullness;" nay more, it is possible for them
to live for years, then die and go home to Heaven to be there for ever
with the Lord, and to have known nothing on earth of what it was to be
"filled with the Spirit." But what a loss they have suffered! Eternal,
irreparable loss! So we conclude it is abundantly plain from Scripture,
that for the regenerate soul there is in Christ another blessing over and
above the being born of the Spirit, spoken of as "the Fullness of the
Spirit." "I am amazed at a man like you going to these Conventions," said
a man to his minister once. "What new thing can these Convention speakers
tell you? it is all in the New Testament." "Yes," he replied, "that's the
trouble; and we have left these things in the New Testament; whereas we
want to get them out of the New Testament; and into our hearts and lives."
In Jesus Christ, God's Treasury, our share of Pentecost's blessing has
been deposited for each of us by our Father God. Have we claimed and
received our share? Not likely, if we are not aware that there _is_ such
a blessing for us; but once we recognize the fact that it is there, we
surely will not rest till we have made it our own. The Scottish bankers
have published the fact that they have lying in their vaults a sum of
£40,000,000 in unclaimed deposits. Some of those who owned a share of
this money may have died in the workhouse; some of them may be living to
this moment in direst need, and they might have their money for the
claiming; but they do not know that it is theirs. What vast unclaimed
deposits are lying in God's Treasury, Christ! Some of His people have
died spiritually poor; some are living to-day in spiritual penury, a
hand-to-mouth existence, with such "untrackable riches" lying "at call,"
at deposit in their name. What have we done with _our_ deposit? We are
responsible for its use and disuse. Remember! the reckoning day is coming
(Matt. xxv. 19).




CHAPTER V.

_EVERYBODY'S NEED._


Some have the idea that this blessing of the Fullness is only for a
favored few, for such as have some special work to do for God, but not
for ordinary folk, "for auld wives and wabsters" in their homespun. Surely
this is one of the devil's champion lies! Alas! alas! that it has found
such credence! The Infilling is what makes this promise true, "He that is
feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David
shall be as God" (Zech. xii. 8), so that "one man of you shall chase a
thousand" (Josh. xxiii. 10). This means defeat for the devil, so no
wonder that he strives to keep us back from the "Fullness"! We are here
on earth that through us Christ may be glorified; but there is only One
Person that can glorify Christ, and that is the Holy Ghost. "He shall
glorify Me" (John xvi. 14). To the glorifying of Christ as He ought to be
and might be glorified, the filling with the Spirit is necessary. Mothers
in the home, "with thronging duties pressed," need the "Fullness" to
enable them to glorify Christ as surely as the apostles needed it; the
washerwoman needs it as well as the pastor; the tradesman as well as the
evangelist. To live the Christ-glorifying life in the station in which
God has placed us, we individually need to be filled with the Spirit.
"They were _all_ filled" (Acts ii. 4), men and women, the one hundred and
twenty in the upper room, the rank and file as well as the apostles. "Ye
shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost, for the promise is unto you,
and to your children, and to _all_ that are afar off" (Acts ii. 38, 39).
From Acts viii. 17 we gather that _all_ the converts in Samaria, without
any favor or distinction, "received the Holy Ghost." From Acts x. 47 we
gather that _all_ in the house of Cornelius "received the Holy Ghost"
while Peter was speaking. From Acts xix. 6 we gather that "the Holy Ghost
came on" _all_ the disciples to whom Paul was speaking. They _all_
received because they _all_ needed. Do not we _all_ need? why then should
we not _all_ receive? And if we do not receive we will suffer loss, the
Church will suffer loss, the world will suffer loss, and, above and
beyond all, Christ will suffer loss.




CHAPTER VI.

_PREVENTIVE AGAINST BACKSLIDING._


It is most instructive to note how exceedingly anxious the early
Christians were, that, as soon as a man was converted, he should be
"filled with the Holy Ghost." They knew no reason why weary wastes of
disappointing years should stretch between Bethel and Peniel, between the
Cross and Pentecost. They knew it was not God's will that forty years of
wilderness wanderings should lie between Egypt and the Promised Land
(Deut. i. 2). When Peter and John came to the Samaritans, and found that
they were really turned to God, their _first_ concern was to get them
filled with the Holy Ghost (Acts viii. 15). When Ananias came to the
newly-converted Saul of Tarsus, his _first_ word was, "Jesus ... hath
sent me, that thou mayest ... be filled with the Holy Ghost" (Acts ix.
17). When Paul found certain disciples at Ephesus, his first business
with them was to find out if they had "received the Holy Ghost" (Acts
xix. 2). These early teachers did not wait for a few months or years till
the young converts had become thoroughly disheartened because of the
disappointments of the way, thoroughly demoralized by encountering defeats
where they had been led to expect that they would come off "more than
conquerors;" neither did they wait until the novices had become more
established or more fully instructed in the things of God; but
straightway, at once, they introduced them to Fullness of blessing, taught
them the open secret of the overcoming, ever-victorious life, and they
did not leave them until the secret was their very own. Has modern
practice been in accord with apostolic practice in this respect? The only
possible answer is in the negative. Have we improved then on the
apostolic method? Scarcely. But our modern method is very largely
responsible for the large percentage of backsliding that one meets with
in the Church to-day. Many of these backsliders were soundly converted to
God, but unfortunately for them, no Peter or John, no Ananias or Paul,
met them in the beginning of their Pilgrimage to compel their attention
to the "one thing needful" for the people of the Pilgrimage; so they
started out but ill provided, and after a longer or shorter time they
became thoroughly dispirited; and then asking, "Is this all that is in
it?" they threw their profession overboard; and one can scarcely wonder
at it. Prevention is better than cure. Let our young converts be fully
instructed and fully equipped with the glorious Fullness provided for
them by the gracious Father, and we will hear less about backsliding. Do
you know why Peter and John, Ananias and Paul, spake of the Fullness of
the Spirit? Because _they_ possessed and enjoyed the blessing themselves,
and they could not _but_ speak of the blessing that had done so much for
them. Do you know why we have not spoken of it to our converts and young
Christians? Because _we_ did not know of it ourselves! If we "receive"
the Spirit we will "minister" the Spirit; and if we do not "minister,"
why is it?--but because we have not "received."




CHAPTER VII.

_HOW LONG BETWEEN?_


It is often asked what time must elapse between the regenerating by the
Spirit and the filling with the Spirit? for be it remembered the Filling
is as real and distinct and definite a blessing as the regenerating. Many
people know the moment of their new birth; they were conscious of the
change; so also many know when they were "filled with the Holy Ghost;" it
was a blessed, bright, conscious experience, and it is as impossible to
argue them out of the one experience as out of the other. On the other
hand, some people do not know the time when they were born "again;" they
simply have come to know by many infallible signs that the great change
has taken place; so in like manner some do not know when the Fullness
came to them, but they have been gently awaked to the fact that "Jesus
came, He filled my soul;" and such people may be as truly "filled with
the Spirit" as those who can tell when and where and how the blessing
came to them. Now as to the period intervening between the two blessings,
we know that in the case of the apostles in Acts ii. 4, three or three
and a half years elapsed between the day when they heard the "Follow Me,"
and the day when they were "filled;" in the cases of the Samaritans in
Acts viii. 17, and of the Ephesians in Acts xix. 1-7, some weeks; in the
case of Saul in Acts ix. 17, three days. But as we have already noticed
in the case of Cornelius and his household in Acts x. 44, they were
regenerated and filled the same day. From this we gather that, as far as
God is concerned, there is no needs-be for any intervening period, but
that the believer _may_ be "filled" as soon as he is "born again;" the
"Life" almost as soon as we get it may blossom into "Life abundantly." If
we did not "receive the Holy Ghost _when_" we believed, and if we have
not "received" Him _since_ we believed, and are not living _now_ the
Spirit-filled life, at whose door then does the blame lie?




CHAPTER VIII.

_OTHER NEW TESTAMENT NAMES FOR "BEING
FILLED WITH THE SPIRIT."_


That we may see how full the New Testament is of this blessing, and that
we may the better understand what it is and how it is obtained, let us
just glance at some other terms used by the Holy Ghost when speaking of
it.


_1. "Baptized with the Holy Ghost."_

"Ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence" (Acts i.
5). See also Acts xi. 16, Matt. iii. 11, Mark i. 8, Luke iii. 16, John i.
33. Now, though "baptized" and "filled" are sometimes convertible terms,
it is instructive to note that they are not always so. The promise in
Acts i. 5, "Ye shall be baptized," was fulfilled in Acts ii. 4, "And they
were all filled," where "filled" is used for "baptized." In Acts iv. 8 we
read, "Peter filled with the Holy Ghost," and in ver. 31, "They were all
filled with the Holy Ghost;" where the word "baptized" could _not_ be
used instead of the word "filled." The difference is this: the "baptism"
is received but once; it is, so to speak, the initiatory rite to the life
of Pentecostal service, and fullness, and victory. Life begins at the
Cross, but service begins at Pentecost. If there has been no Baptism,
there has been no Pentecost; and if no Pentecost, no service worth the
name. "Tarry until ye be clothed with power," said the Master (Luke xxiv.
49); "Wait for the promise" (Acts i. 4); "Ye shall be baptized with the
Holy Ghost not many days hence" (Acts i. 5); "Ye shall receive power when
the Holy Ghost is come upon you" (Acts i. 8). And we see that, in
compliance with the commands of their Master, no service of any kind did
these men attempt till "the day of Pentecost was fully come" (Acts ii. 1).

  "Theirs not to make reply!
  Theirs not to reason why!"

Their business was simply to _obey_. With the promised "Baptism" they
entered upon a new phase of life, experience, and service, and this
"Baptism" need not be repeated; but not so the "Filling." Peter was
"filled" in Acts ii. 4, again in Acts iv. 31. The "Filling" may be, and
ought to be, repeated over and over and over again; the "Baptism" need be
but once. In support of this, note how frequently the word "filled" is
used in the Acts and Epistles compared with the word "baptized." The
Baptism which we are considering here must not be confounded with the
baptism in 1 Cor. xii. 13, the "Being baptized into one body." Paul is
speaking there of every believer having been quickened from the dead by
the agency of the Holy Spirit, and thus made a member of Christ's
mystical body. This is a Pauline way of stating the being "born again" of
John iii. 7. It was to those who already had been "baptized into one
body" that Christ gave the promise, "Ye shall be baptized with the Holy
Ghost" (Acts i. 5). In view then of this word of Christ, "Ye shall be
baptized," and of the word of John the Baptist, recorded in John i.
29-33, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world
... the same is He that baptizeth with the Holy Spirit" (the same
promise is also recorded by Matthew, Mark, and Luke), it surely cannot be
unscriptural for a believer--painfully conscious that as yet this word
has not been fulfilled in his experience, that for him as yet the day of
Pentecost has not fully come--to pray "Lord Jesus, baptize me with the
Holy Ghost!" Why should this be regarded as unscriptural, when in view of
the word, "Be filled with the Spirit," the prayer, "Lord, fill me with
the Spirit," is considered to be in accord with Scripture? Surely the one
prayer in its proper place is as scriptural as the other! To know Christ
as the Sin-bearer is but _half_ salvation; to know Him also as the great
Baptist is _full_ salvation. How many there are who know Christ as their
Sin-bearer who have no experimental acquaintance with Him as the Baptizer
with the Holy Ghost! One cannot think that it would be grieving to the
Holy One that such people should cry for the promised Baptism; but
then, when it has been received, let us bear in mind the
difference, already pointed out, between "baptized" and "filled;" that
now that "the day of Pentecost has fully come," and that he has been
baptized with the Spirit, he must not continue praying for the baptism,
for that cannot be repeated; whereas he may ask and obtain a fresh
filling, a refilling with the Holy Ghost every day of his life.


_2. "Rivers of living water."_

"He that believeth on Me, as the Scripture hath said, out of his belly
shall flow rivers of living water. But this spake He of the Spirit,
which they that believed on Him were to receive: for the Spirit was not
yet given; because Jesus was not yet glorified" (John vii. 38, 39). One
may ask, what is it to be "filled with the Spirit"? The Teacher Himself
makes answer: It is to have "rivers of living water flowing" from one's
soul. See the universality of the promise, "He that believeth on Me;"
_no_ believer, even the weakest, obscurest, is outside its
magnificent sweep, unless by his unbelief he puts himself there. This is
not a promise for the Spiritual aristocracy of the Church, as some, with
more heat than sense, maintain. Let us have done with whittling away the
vast Godlike promises of the Divine Word, till they come within the
cramped limits of our poverty-stricken experience, and let us set to work
in earnest to bring our experience abreast of God's promises. This
promise is for _you_. Has it then been verified in your life and
experience? If not, why not? Is there not a cause? But note more closely
its hugeness, its Godlike vastness, "Rivers!" not a tricklet, or a
babbling brook--by its babbling proclaiming its shallowness--or a stream,
or a river, but Rivers! What Divine prodigality! It is the Brisbane, the
Clarence, the Hawkesbury, the Murray, the Murrumbidgee, the Tamar and the
Derwent all rolled into one--_Rivers_! By the widest, wildest stretch of
imagination could it be said of you that "Rivers of living water" are
flowing from you--"flowing," mind you, "flowing"? See the freshness, the
freedom, and the spontaneity of the service; no force-pump work about the
flowing of the Rivers; none of the hard labor of the "soul in prison"
(Ps. cxlii. 7). When the "Rivers" begin to flow the worker may sell his
force-pump; his prayer has been answered, "Bring my soul out of prison."

It is worth noting the gradation in John iii., iv., vii. In John iii. 7
we have "Life" in its beginnings--the new birth. In John iv. 14 we have
"Life abundantly"--"a well of water springing up." The secret of the
perennial upspringing is in the word "drink-e-t-h;" "he that
drinketh"--not takes a drink, but drinks and drinks and keeps on drinking,
is in the habit of drinking--that man never thirsts; for how can a man's
soul be dry and thirsty with a well of water in it? Many people are
living in the third of John,--they have "Life," but it is not strong and
vigorous; they are suffering from deficient vitality,--when Jesus wants
them to be in the fourth, enjoying "Life abundantly." The difference
between the two experiences is well illustrated in the case of Hagar. In
Gen. xxi. 14 we read that Abraham gave Hagar "a bottle of water" and sent
her away. As she wandered in the wilderness "the water was spent in the
bottle" (ver. 15). But in ver. 19 "God opened her eyes, and she saw a
well of water." There are "bottle" Christians, and there are "well"
Christians. 'Tis a painful experience wandering in the wilderness with an
empty bottle and a dying child! Alas! that there should be so many
acquainted with the pain, when all the time God wants us to be
independent of any bottle, to be abundantly satisfied with a well of
water within us, fed from the hills of God. He wants us to be independent
of all but Himself. The "well" is in every Christian, though it is not
"springing up" in every one that has it. The very well, on the side of
which Jesus, weary with His long journey from Eternity, once sat, has
to-day no thirsty men or women coming to it with their empty pitchers,
for the well is dry. How? why? Because so much rubbish has fallen in that
the well is choked. Clear out the well, and the water will spring up
again as in Christ's day. So with many a child of God. The water is
within them, the well is there, but it is choked; the water is not
springing up, and so they are reduced to dependence on a bottle! Oh! for
an anointed eye in our head to see the rubbish, and for grace in our
hearts to deal with it, to judge it and to cast it out; and then we would
soon have an eye to "see the well of water." May He break every "bottle,"
and open every eye to see "the well." Now let us contrast the "well" of
the fourth chapter with the "rivers" of the seventh. The "well" is for
the supply of all possible _local_ needs; but since the Christianity of
Jesus is essentially an unselfish thing, He has made ample provision for
the supply of _surrounding_ needs; "out of him" in whom is the
"well"--"out of him" who is abundantly satisfied with Christ--"shall
flow rivers of living water," bearing life and satisfaction and gladness
into the abounding death and destitution and dreariness that exist on
every hand; for "everything shall live whithersoever the river cometh"
(Ezek. xlvii. 9). Does your Church, your neighborhood feel the
vivifying, fructifying, refreshing influences of your presence? Most
certainly, if John vii. 38 is your experience; in other words, if you
have been "filled with the Spirit." But remember we must go through the
fourth of John to get into the seventh! In John iii. we have the
Indwelling, in John iv. the Infilling, and in John vii. the Overflowing.


_3. "The Promise of the Father."_

"Wait for the promise of the Father" (Acts i. 4). See also ii. 33, ii.
39, Gal. iii. 14, Luke xxiv. 49. There are many promises in the Divine
Word given us by the Father; but there is only one promise spoken of as
"_The_ promise," giving it a pre-eminence among all the other "exceeding
great and precious promises." What that "promise" was is ascertained by
comparing Acts i. 4, "Wait for the promise," with Acts i. 5, "Ye shall
be baptized," and Acts ii. 4, "They were all filled." To whom does "the
promise" of the Father belong? surely to all the Father's children
without favor or distinction. Since then "the promise is unto _you_," the
question for "you" to settle is, Have you "_received_" the promise? A
promise never made use of is like a check never cashed, and is of little
use to the one who gets it. Have you cashed the check? If not, why not?
the fault is with the child and not with the Father.


_4. "Pouring Forth."_

"I will pour forth of My Spirit upon all flesh" (Acts ii. 17). See also
Acts ii. 18, Joel ii. 28, 29, Isaiah xliv. 3, Acts ii. 33, Acts x. 45.
From this expression we may learn still more clearly the copiousness of
the blessing.


_5. "The gift."_

"And ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost" (Acts ii. 38). See also
Acts viii. 20, Acts x. 45, Acts xi. 17. From this expression may we not
learn the freeness of the blessing? In this connection ponder carefully
the "how much more" of Luke xi. 13.


_6. "Receiving."_

"And they received the Holy Ghost" (Acts viii. 17). See also, "Ye shall
receive power" (Acts i. 8); "Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye
believed?" (Acts xix. 2); Acts viii. 15, John xx. 22, Gal. iii. 14.
Floods of light will be thrown upon the whole subject if we grasp clearly
the full force of this expression, "receive." "Receiving" is the
correlative of "The Gift." A gift will not profit one until it is
received. It is just here, at the _appropriating_, that we have come
short. God has not failed in His "giving," but we have failed in our
taking, in "receiving." "Receiving" is a distinct, definite act on our
part. Have we "received"? If not, why not? God is "giving."


_7. "Falling."_

"For as yet he was fallen upon none of them" (Acts viii. 16). See also
Acts x. 44, Acts xi. 15. From this expression may we not learn the
"_suddenness_" with which the blessing sometimes comes, and comes
consciously, too? Compare Acts ii. 2, "And suddenly there came from
heaven a sound."


_8. "Coming."_

"The Holy Ghost came on them" (Acts xix. 6). See also Acts i. 8, John xv.
26. John xvi. 7, 8, 13. From this expression may we not learn the
_personality_ of the Holy Ghost? "Christ Jesus _came_ into the world,"
and "the Holy Ghost _came_ on them," are two parallel expressions. If
Christ is here a person, why should the Holy Ghost be a mere influence?


_9. "Sealed."_

"Ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise" (Eph. i. 13). See also
2 Cor. i. 22. This "sealing" in Eph. i. 13, is the "receiving" of Acts
xix. 2; the "coming on them" of Acts xix. 6; for here, in this epistle,
Paul is evidently referring to the incident related in Acts xix. 1-7. In
Eph. i. 13, "In Whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of
truth, the gospel of your salvation: in Whom also after that ye believed,
ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise," we see the successive
stages through which the Ephesians passed in their spiritual history. (1)
There was a time when they had not heard the Gospel; they were living in
the darkness of heathenism. (2) Then came the day when they "heard the
word." (3) Then they "believed." (4) Succeeding this they were "sealed,"
"_after_ that ye believed ye were sealed;" a very distinct and definite
blessing this for the Ephesians, as definite as their salvation when they
believed. And yet, in face of this, some will affirm that there is no
such thing as a Christian receiving a new distinct blessing after his
conversion! If these Ephesians had this experience, why may not believers
still?

When a Christian is "sealed" by the Holy Ghost, "sealed" as the property
of his Master, there will be no need to ask, "Whose Image and
superscription is this" upon the "sealed" one? The King's, of course. Any
one can see the Image. Of what use is a "seal" if it cannot be seen? Is
the King's Image visibly, permanently stamped upon us? It is on every
Spirit-filled "sealed" believer.




CHAPTER IX.

_HOW OBTAINED?_


We come now to the practical side of our subject. Surely the unprejudiced
reader, if he has not already "received the Holy Ghost," has at least
come to the conclusion that there _is_ such a blessing mentioned in the
New Testament, and lying in God's Treasury, Jesus Christ, for all New
Testament believers, and therefore for him--_for me_. Until it dawns on
one's consciousness that there _is_ such a blessing as "being filled
with the Spirit," it is not likely that he will trouble about seeking it,
and therefore will never obtain it. In all fairness these terms which we
have just been considering--"Filled," "Baptized," "Rivers," etc.--mean
_something_. There is _some_ blessing represented by the terms, some
substance at the back of the shadows. God the Holy Ghost knows what that
blessing is. "Have I got _that_?" Is there anything in my life and
experience to correspond with _that_? Now comes the question, "How am I
to get it?" The Bible answer may be summarily comprehended in three
words--CLEANSE, CONSECRATE, CLAIM.




CHAPTER X.

_WRONG MOTIVES._


But before proceeding to consider these words, it is absolutely necessary
that we be on our guard against desiring this so needful a blessing from
wrong motives. We must seek it for one supreme reason--for the glory of
God. If self is at the root of our motives at all, God will most surely
block our way to Fullness of blessing. If we are thinking in our heart of
hearts that it would be a good thing for us to get this blessing for our
own happiness or satisfaction, or even that we might be more useful, or
that in any way we might have the pre-eminence, our eye is not single,
our whole body is not full of light (Matt. vi. 22). There is therefore
need for the refining fire to go through our heart. God _must_ be Alpha
and Omega in the matter. "For God's glory, and for God's glory alone"
must be our watchword as we proceed with our search after the Fullness
of the Spirit.




CHAPTER XI.

_CLEANSING._


As there are conditions requiring to be complied with in order to the
obtaining of salvation, before one can be justified, _e. g._, conviction
of sin, repentance, faith; so there are conditions for full salvation,
for being "filled with the Holy Ghost." Conviction of our need is one,
conviction of the existence of the blessing is another; but these have
been already dealt with. "Cleansing" is another; before one can be
filled with the Holy Ghost, one's heart must be "cleansed." "Giving them
the Holy Ghost, even as He did unto us; and He made no distinction
between us and them, _cleansing_ their hearts by faith" (Acts xv. 8, 9).
God first cleansed their hearts, and then He gave them the Holy Ghost.
How can we be filled with the Holy Ghost if we are filled with something
else? The heart must _first_ be emptied and cleansed. The milkman has
called on his morning round, and the housewife hears his call. There is a
jug standing beside her on the table; it is her own, for she purchased it
only last week. She picks it up, and looks into it to see if it is clean;
she finds it is not. Now she would never think of taking that dirty jug
for the milk; but she empties it and rinses and cleanses it, and then,
having wiped it dry to her satisfaction, she takes it out for the morning
allowance. Indeed, if she brought it out dirty to the milkman, he would
positively refuse to put his sweet new milk into it. So a heart may
belong to God, that is, it may be the heart of a Christian man, and yet
not a "clean" heart, but until it is cleansed God will refuse to put
into it the precious deposit of the "water of life clear as crystal."


_A "New Heart" not necessarily a "Clean Heart."_

But some one objects, "I thought that when one became a Christian, and
was made a partaker of the Divine nature, he had a clean heart?" Not
necessarily. Many, many a one is born again, is pardoned and justified,
and yet has not a "clean heart." "Forgiveness" is one thing, "Cleansing"
is another, and one may possess the former without possessing the latter.
For instance, take the case of David in Ps. li. He was one of God's
people, a restored backslider, when he wrote that Psalm. "The Lord also
hath put away thy sin" (2 Sam. xii. 13), said Nathan to him. But
forgiveness, great and sweet as that gift was, was not enough for
Israel's now so deeply-taught and penitent King. "Create in me a _clean_
heart" (Ps. li. 10), he cries. This is something over and above being
"born again," over and above and beyond and deeper even than "forgiveness"
(compare Ps. li. 2 and Jer. xxxiii. 8). See also the New Testament
teaching on this point in 1 John i. 7, "The blood of Jesus Christ His Son
_cleanseth_ us from all sin;" and 1 John i. 9, "He is faithful and just
to forgive us our sins, and to _cleanse_ us from all unrighteousness." Is
the "cleansing" of verse 7 the same as the "cleansing" of verse 9? Most
certainly not. The "cleansing" of verse 7 has to do with the _guilt_ of
sin, with sin after it has been committed; this is the only sense in
which the Blood of Jesus "cleanses," it washes white as snow from the
guilt and stain of _actual_ transgression; that "cleansing" is
retrospective. Now, this "Cleansing" of verse 7 is the "forgiving" of
verse 9; both these words bear on a sinner's Justification. But the
"cleansing from all unrighteousness" of verse 9 is something different
from, something over and above the "forgiving" of verse 9, or the
"cleansing" of verse 7; else, if they mean one and the same thing, would
not the author be guilty of tautology? The "cleansing" of verse 9 is
prospective, and refers to holiness of life, to our being saved from sin,
from sinning. And you will notice that it is not the Blood of Jesus that
does this, but Jesus _Himself_ by the exercise of His Almighty power.
There is a great deal of confusion on this point in many minds, a
confusion fostered, if not begotten, by some of our hymns. Powers are
sometimes attributed to the Blood of Jesus, to the Death of Christ, which
belong to Jesus Himself, to the living Christ. We are saved from sin's
condemnation by the Blood, cleansed from the guilt of all sin, forgiven
on the ground of the Blood; and in this connection we cannot possibly
make too much of the Blood, too much of the Death of the Son of God--but
we are saved from sin's power by Jesus Himself. "Himself (lit.) shall
save His people from their sins" (Matt. i. 21). "We shall be saved _by His
life_" (Rom. v. 10). "_He_ is faithful and just to cleanse us from all
unrighteousness." The Blood "cleanses" in the sense of washing the sin
away after it has actually been committed; He "cleanses" in the sense of
preventing, restraining from sin. He keeps us back from _sinning_. He
"makes us more than conquerors" over sin; and in this so blessed sense
"prevention is better than cure." How often does a mother say to her
child when putting on a clean snow-white pinafore in the morning, "Now,
my darling, do keep it clean!" "Yes, mother," and she intends to do so;
but alas for her intentions! At dinner-time she comes home with her
pinafore about as dirty as she can make it. Now, the mother can wash it
and make it clean again, as white as ever; but it is weary, wearing work,
this everlasting washing. So the Blood of Jesus can cleanse from all sin
the garments that are brought to it for cleansing, and what a deal of
cleansing it has to do for some of us!

But wouldn't it be just splendid for many a hardworking mother if she
could put some power or other into her child--her own self, for
instance--by which the child would be kept from making the pinafore dirty
at all, so that it would not need washing? Wouldn't this be a vast
improvement, even on making it clean after it has been made dirty? This
is just what Jesus does. He puts a power within the child that trusts
Him--that power is Himself, by which the believer is kept from defiling
his garments by any known sin, so that they do not need washing. This is
to be "cleansed from all unrighteousness." But there are whole battalions
of God's saved, forgiven, and "cleansed" people ("cleansed" in the sense
of verse 7), who are not "cleansed" in this sense ("cleansed" in the
sense of verse 9), who are not yet saved from the power of some besetting
(that is, upsetting) sin or other. Have we not known some Christian men
who, as has been well said, are like well-supplied cruet-stands? take
them which side you like, you will get something either hot or sour,
peppery or vinegarish from them! And yet one can scarcely doubt their
conversion to God! What are we to say of these cross-grained or fretful,
or worldly-minded, or covetous, or pleasure-loving professors of religion?
One would fear to judge some of them and say they were utter strangers to
God's regenerating grace; no, but one will say that what they sorely need
is the "clean" heart.


_What is a Clean Heart_?

The question then arises, What is it to have a "clean heart"? what is it
to be "cleansed from all unrighteousness"? It is to be "saved from our
sins," according to Matt. i. 21. It is to translate 1 John iii. 9 into
practice, "Whosoever is begotten of God doeth no sin; ... and he cannot
sin, because he is begotten of God." It is to have a "conscience void of
offense" (Acts xxiv. 16). It is to "know nothing against myself" (1 Cor.
iv. 4). It is--in the words of another--to be "saved from _all known_,
_conscious_ sin." But, it is objected, "That is perfection!" (It is
amazing how frightened some people are of being perfect! It were well if
they were equally afraid of being imperfect; for it is imperfection that
grieves God. This dread of perfection has been called by some one, "a
scarecrow set up by the devil to frighten away God's people from the very
finest of the wheat.") "That is perfection!" Yes and no. It _is_ the
perfection which is not only allowed, but commanded in the Word of God.
But it is not _absolute_ perfection; it is not sinlessness. Let us look
carefully at the expression, "From all known, conscious sin;" "From all;"
yes, all, not some or nearly all, but from "all known sin"--known, that
is, to us, though not from all known to God; from "all known, conscious
sin," so that one might be able to say, in the language of the lowliest
of the apostles, "Herein do I also exercise myself to have a conscience
void of offense toward God and men alway" (Acts xxiv. 16); and "I know
nothing against myself" (1 Cor. iv. 4); or, in the language of the
disciple whom Jesus loved, "We keep His commandments, and do those things
that are pleasing in His sight" (1 John iii. 22). To have a clean heart,
then, is to be saved "from our sins," saved from sinning, saved by JESUS;
note it well! not saved by our own efforts, by our watching and praying,
and wrestling and fighting and struggling, but by Jesus. So it is not a
question of what _we_ can do, but of what _He_ can do. "Is anything too
hard for the Lord?" (Gen. xviii. 14.) Can He not "guard from stumbling?"
(Jude 24.) Can He not save from sin, from sinning? Is not this what is
meant when it is said, "He is able to save to the uttermost"? (Heb. vii.
25.) "Able to save," as Matthew Poole puts it, "to perfection, to the
full, to all ends, from sin, in its guilt, its stain, its power." Yes, He
is just as complete, as perfect a Saviour from the _power_ of sin, as He
is from its guilt and stain. He is equally powerful in each department of
His saving work. But after all is said and done, and one is being saved
from all known, conscious sin, saved from sinning, that is not to say
there is no sin remaining. We are face to face with the inspired
statement, "If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves" (1 John i. 8).
How much sin may there be in us of which we are entirely unconscious, but
which is naked and open to those "Eyes like unto a flame of fire!" (Rev.
ii. 18).

"I know nothing against myself," cries Paul in 1 Cor. iv. 4, "yet am I
not hereby justified; but He that judgeth (examineth) me is the Lord."
God may, and does, know much against me when I know nothing against
myself; and it is just here that our constant need of the cleansing Blood
comes in. If the Bible doctrine of the clean heart meant the eradication
of sin, a state of sinlessness, that is, absolute perfection, what need
would we then have of the cleansing Blood at all? Though Jesus Christ may
have "cleansed us from all unrighteousness," so that we "have a conscience
void of offense," so that we "know nothing against ourselves," yet we need
the Blood to cleanse from the sins which our eyes fail to detect, and of
which our conscience takes no cognizance. It is failure to see this that
has led many astray at this point. Having been cleansed and having "no
more conscience of sins" (Heb. x. 2), they imagine they _have_ no more
sin. How superficial is some people's idea of sin! How little conception
have they of the Pauline doctrine of sin! He speaks of sin as "exceeding
sinful." How subtle it is! how far-reaching! In their daring ignorance
some have actually taken the penknife, like Judah's foolish king, and cut
a whole petition out of the prayer which the Lord taught His disciples. He
taught them to pray, "Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors;" but
these modern lights in their darkness are correcting their Teacher, and
have cut out that petition, and thrown it away. "No need have we to
confess our sin, for we have none to confess, and therefore we have no
debts to be forgiven." Poor mistaken people! never more need of confession
and forgiveness than when they are speaking thus! The holiest of men are
the men who lie the lowest before the Holy One, confessing that which
they know only too well (because the truth is in them), that they "have
sin," offering the sacrifices with which God is ever well pleased, "a
broken spirit, a broken and a contrite heart" (Ps. li. 17). The nearer we
get to Him "whose head and whose hair are white as wool, white as snow"
(Rev. i. 14), to the Ancient of days "whose garment is white as snow"
(Dan. vii. 9), the more conscious are we of the dullness of our whiteness,
of the vast difference between our whitest and His whiteness; and this
consciousness humbles one. "What is it to have sin? What is sin?" asked a
great leader once, and he answered his own question thus: "It is to come
short of the glory of God; and in this sense we sin every moment of our
lives in thought, word, and deed." Is there a man on earth who can stand
before the infinitely Holy One and say, "I do not come short of Thy
glory"? Should we speak thus, "we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not
in us."

We may be helped here by observing the difference between the two New
Testament words "blameless" and "faultless." "I pray God your whole spirit
and soul and body be preserved _blameless_ (without blame, unblameworthy),
unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Thess. v. 23). "To present
you _faultless_ (flawless, blemishless) before the presence of His glory"
(Jude 24). Now a person or work may be "blameless" and yet not be
"faultless." This is not verbal hair-splitting--by no means. Suffer a
personal illustration. I have lying on the table beside me a letter,
which will illustrate the point at issue. I received it when I was away
in New Zealand on a mission tour, in 1891. It was from my eldest daughter,
then a child of five years of age. It reads: "Dear father, I wrote all
this myself. I send you a kiss from Elsie." The fact of the matter is,
that it is not writing at all, but an attempt at printing in large
capitals, and not one of the letters is properly formed; there is not as
much as one straight stroke on the page. Why is it that I prize this
letter and keep it laid up among my treasures? Fathers who are as much
away from home as I am will understand when I say that it was my child's
first attempt at letter-writing. Now, this letter which I prize so dearly
is certainly not a "faultless" production; it is as full of faults as it
is full of letters, but most assuredly it is "blameless." I did not blame
my child for her crooked strokes, and answer with a scold, for I judged
her work by its motive. I knew it was the best she could do, and that she
had put all the love of her little heart into it. She wanted to do
something to please me, and she succeeded. By the grace of the indwelling
Christ (for you will perceive that it is His work, "Faithful is He that
calleth you, who also will do it"--1 Thess. v. 24), this is what our daily
life, our daily life-work may be, viz., "blameless;" and He can tell us
that it is so, even as I told my child; we may have this testimony, that
we are "pleasing God," as Enoch had (Heb. xi. 5). Oh, the joy! Oh, the
inspiration of this God-given testimony! But what a sad mistake for any
who may by grace have been made "blameless," to think that they are
"faultless," a condition which is to be found only "before the throne."
For it is to be noted that the Greek word translated "without blemish,"
"without fault," (_amomos_) is never used of God's people on earth. It is
used once of the Lamb "without blemish and without spot" (1 Pet. i. 19).
Elsewhere of the saints.

  In Rev. xiv. 5, "Without fault before the throne of God."

  In Jude 24, "Before the presence of His glory without blemish."

  In Eph. v. 27, "That it should be holy and without blemish," when in
      the sweet by-and-by He will "present the Church to Himself."

  In Eph. i. 4, "Even as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the
      world, that we should be holy and without blemish before Him in
      love;" chosen in the past eternity that we should be "holy and
      without blemish" in the coming eternity, not here, but there; not
      now, but then; for the word translated "before" is the same Greek
      word (_katenopion_), translated in Jude 24 "before the presence of."

  In Col. i. 22, "To present you holy and without blemish, and
      unreprovable before Him." Here he is speaking again of our future
      standing, for the word translated "before" is the same as in Eph.
      i. 4.

"Without blemish" then is sinlessness, having no sin. "And if we say (here
on earth) we have no sin (are sinless--blemishless--faultless--flawless),
we deceive ourselves (but no one else!), and the truth is not in us" (1
John i. 8). He that has the truth in him knows only too well that he has
sin in him, though "cleansed from all sin" by the blood, and though
"cleansed from all unrighteousness" by the might of the uttermost Saviour.
It is most instructive and humbling to notice how the Spirit of truth has
placed that "If we say we have (present tense) no sin, we deceive
ourselves," in between His two statements about the "cleansing from all
sin" and the "cleansing from all unrighteousness."

But though we will never be able on earth to say with the truth in us
that "we have no sin,"--that we are without blemish, yet the whole Bible
teaches us that we may, in this life, be saved "from our sins." (Note the
difference between "sin" and "sins.") We may be saved from sinning.
"These things write we unto you, that ye sin not" (1 John ii. 1); and
this is the condition described as "blameless," "unreprovable," "without
reproach."

See 1 Cor. i. 8; 1 Tim. iii. 10; Tit. i. 6, 7; where the Greek word
_anegkletos_ (unreprovable) is used.

Also 1 Tim. iii. 2; 1 Tim. v. 7; where the Greek word is _anepileptos_
(without reproach).

Also Matt. xii. 5, where _anaitios_ (guiltless) is used.

Also 2 Pet. iii. 14, where _amometos_ (blameless) is employed.

Also Luke i. 6; Phil. ii. 15, and iii. 6; 1 Thess. ii. 10, iii. 13; and
v. 23, where _amemptos_ (without blame) is the word used.

These words describe a state or condition of heart and life which is not
only attainable here, but imperative; and the passages we have just been
reading prove that it _has_ been attained. This is what is meant by a
clean heart, to be "blameless," not "faultless."

  "I was sitting alone in the twilight,
    With spirit troubled and vexed,
  With thoughts that were morbid and gloomy,
    And faith that was sadly perplexed.

  "Some homely work I was doing
    For the child of my love and care;
  Some stitches half wearily setting
    In the endless need of repair.

  "But my thoughts were about the building,
    The work some day to be tried,
  And that only the gold and the silver,
    And the precious stones should abide.

  "And remembering my own poor efforts,
    The wretched work I had done,
  And even when trying most truly,
    The meager success I had won:

  "'It is nothing but wood, hay and stubble,'
    I said; 'it will all be burned;
  This useless fruit of the talents
    One day to be returned;

  "'And I have _so_ longed to serve Him,
    And sometimes I know I have tried;
  But I'm sure when He sees such building,
    He will never let it abide.'

  "Just then as I turned the garment,
    That no rent should be left behind,
  Mine eye caught an odd little bungle
    Of mending and patchwork combined.

  "My heart grew suddenly tender,
    And something blinded mine eyes
  With one of those sweet inspirations,
    That sometimes make us so wise.

  "Dear child! she wanted to help me,
    I knew 'twas the best she could do;
  But oh! what a botch she had made of it,
    The gray mismatching the blue!

  "And yet, can you understand it?
    With a tender smile and a tear,
  And a half compassionate yearning,
    I feel her grow more dear.

  "Then a sweet voice broke the silence,
    And the dear Lord said to me,
  'Art thou tenderer for thy little child
    Than I am tender for thee?'

  "Then straightway I knew His meaning,
    So full of compassion and love;
  And my faith came back to its refuge,
    Like the glad returning dove.

  "So, I thought, when the Master Builder
    Comes down this temple to view,
  To see what rents must be mended,
    And what must be builded anew;

  "Perhaps as He looks o'er the building
    He will bring my work to the light;
  And seeing the marring and bungling,
    And how far it is all from right;

  "He will feel as I felt for my darling,
    And will say as I said for her,
  'Dear child! she wanted to help me,
    And love for Me was the spur;

  "'And for the great love that is in it
    The work shall seem perfect as Mine;'
  And, because it was willing service,
    Will crown it with plaudit Divine.

  "And there, in the deepening twilight,
    I seemed to be clasping a Hand,
  And to feel a great love constraining,
    Far stronger than any command.

  "Then I knew by the thrill of sweetness,
    'Twas the Hand of the Blessed One
  Which should tenderly guide and hold me,
    Till all the labor is done.

  "So my thoughts are never more gloomy,
    My faith is no longer dim,
  But my heart is strong and restful,
    And mine eyes are unto Him."

A clean heart then does not mean sinlessness, the eradication of sin,
that sin is taken out of us; for though sin is taken out of the _heart_
that is cleansed--for a clean heart must be clean!--yet "the flesh," the
self-life, remains in the _man_, "latent if not patent," ready to manifest
itself should the counteracting power of the indwelling Christ the Saviour
even for a moment be withdrawn. This "flesh" is evil (Rom. vii. 18) and,
therefore, while "the flesh" is in us "sin" is in us, and hence our
constant need of the cleansing Blood. As we trust for continuous cleansing
we get it. "The Blood ... _cleanseth_"--resent progressive tense--goes on
cleansing, therefore guilt is never allowed to gather, for as sin appears
the Blood cleanses it away and so keeps us clean. Blessed present tense!
Thus it is possible for us _always_ to walk in the Light.

Then as Christ exercises His counteracting power over "the flesh" we are
being "cleansed from all unrighteousness," delivered from doing the "not
right," and, by continuous trust in our omnipotent Saviour, we may know
continuous deliverance, continuous victory over sin; we need never know
defeat. A Christian mother had just kissed good-night to her little
daughter, and was busy in the dining-room arranging the table for dinner,
when she heard little feet on the stair. Wondering what was the matter,
she slipped into the window recess and hid herself behind the curtains,
and waited. Presently the little one came into the room, and going
straight up to some peaches that were on the table, she took one of them
away with her! Oh, the agony in that mother heart! She did not speak to
her child, but standing where she was, she spoke to God her Father, and
asked _Him_ so fervently to speak to her child. God heard that cry, and
in a little while the sound of the pattering feet was heard on the stair
again. The child came into the room, not knowing her mother was there,
and going on tip-toe over to the table she put the peach in the place
from which she had taken it. As she turned away with a radiant face,
rubbing her hands with delight, her mother heard her say, "Sold again,
Satan! Sold again, Satan!" That's victory! Yes, the cleansing means that
and more than that. "We are _more than_ conquerors," for when Jesus
cleanses the heart, He cleanses the springs of action and being, so that
our very desires are purified; the desire to sin, the "want to," is taken
clean away. This is coming off "more than conquerors through Him that
loved us" (Rom. viii. 37). Glory to His name! The man now "wants to" do
the will of God. He "likes" what God likes. "I thought you could do what
you liked," was the taunt hurled by a young man at a friend of his who
enjoyed full salvation on his refusing to go to the theater. "I thought
you told me you could do what you liked?" "So I can." "Why, then, won't
you come with me as I asked you?" "Because I don't like," was the
rejoinder. The only men on earth who enjoy perfect freedom are the men
who have clean hearts, for they not only know that they _ought_ to do the
will of God, but they _want_ to do it and they _like_ to do it and
moreover they have a power that _enables_ them to do it. On the other
hand, in our jails and hospitals you will find people who thought that
they could do as they liked, but they have discovered that they were
mistaken.


_Cleansing: a Crisis_

But how am I to get this clean heart? Peter answers, "Cleansing their
hearts _by faith_" (Acts xv. 9). Cleansing is God's work, and the
condition on which God will do His work is "faith" on our part. There is
only one way of getting anything from God, and that is by faith. One
obtained forgiveness and the new birth by faith, and one obtains
cleansing of the heart by faith too. You may, you will, get "cleansing"
the moment you definitely _trust_ Christ for it. "We aye get what we gang
in for" was one of Duncan Mathieson's favorite expressions; and along the
line of God's revealed will how true it is! If you will only venture _now_
on Christ for "cleansing from all unrighteousness," He will do it for you
_now_. "Wilt thou not be made clean? when shall it once be?" (Jer. xiii.
27.) Why not _now_? for "cleansing" is a _crisis_ and not a _process_;
but, as Principal Moule, of Cambridge, has very tersely put it, "Cleansing
is a crisis with a view to a process." It is just here that multitudes of
God's people miss the track. "Sanctification is the _work_ of God's free
grace."[1] Of course it is; it is a "growth," a gradual process; but
"cleansing" is not "sanctification." The latter, in the sense in which it
is being used here, is a theological term embracing all the Spirit's work
in the believer between the cross and the crown; but "cleansing" is an
_act_. While sanctification is a "growth," "cleansing" is one of the
conditions of growth, and the very reason why some who hold most
tenaciously by the gradual theory of sanctification are "growing in grace"
so very slowly, is that they have not attended to one of the most
essential conditions of growth, viz., this "cleansing." "But," some one
objects, "this is not in the Standards of our Church?" That may be; but
it is in the Bible. To quote the words of the saintly Dr. Andrew Bonar in
another connection, "I believe all that is in our Standards, for I find
all that is in our Standards in the Bible; but I believe _more_ than is
in our Standards, for I find some things in my Bible that are not in the
Standards;" for the simple and very obvious reason that you cannot get a
quart into a pint measure. While every honest Churchman believes that all
that is in the Standards of the Church to which he belongs is in the
Bible, no one in his sane senses believes that _everything_ in the Bible
is to be found in the Standards. The doctrine of a "clean heart" is one
of these things.

[1: Shorter Catechism, No. 35.]

In support of the statement that "cleansing" is a crisis, an act,
something done in a moment, just as conversion is, and not a "process"
drawn out indefinitely before one can reach a state of "cleansing," let us
ponder well David's prayer, in Psalm li. 10, "Create in (margin, for) me
a clean heart." Is _creation_ an "act" or a "work"? Is it a "crisis" or a
"process"? All the Creator had to do was to speak the word and David's
prayer was granted; he then could turn his prayer into thanksgiving; "I
thank Thee for having created in me a clean heart;" but he could not thank
God for what he had not received. Giving thanks for the clean heart would
prove that it was in his possession. Note also that heart "cleansing" is
God's work alone. We are exhorted to "cleanse _ourselves_ from all
filthiness of the flesh and spirit" (2 Cor. vii. 1), which simply means
"separation" from all the palpable, manifest evils Paul had just been
enumerating, such as "yoking with unbelievers," "unrighteousness,"
"darkness," "Belial," "infidel," "idols," "unclean things" (_vide_ 2 Cor.
vi. 14-17). In reference to all such things God says "cleanse yourselves."
The aorist tense is used in the original, denoting a definite, decisive
act; "separate from these things at once and be done with them." And where
are we to get the enabling power? In effect, God says, "Draw a check on ME;
draw on My resources for all you need," for all God's commandings are God's
enablings. But when it comes to be a question of cleansing the "heart,"
the inner being, the springs of action, that part of the man where the
affections and the will are seated, God undertakes that Himself; He says,
"Bring that to Me." If this work were left to us it would indeed be a
"process" slow and tedious, and progress might be made, as it so often is,
alas! backward. But now the question is,--not what can the believer do by
his efforts to overcome indwelling sin, but what can the Almighty God do?
It is not a question of our power, but of His.

  "'Twas most impossible of all,
  That here sin's reign in me should cease;
  Yet shall it be! I know it shall:
  Jesus, look to Thy faithfulness:
  If nothing is too hard for Thee,
  All things are possible to me."

He is able and willing to "cleanse." Are we willing to be cleansed?

Another mistake to be carefully guarded against is this, making
"cleansing" to be an _end_ instead of a _means_ to an end. "Cleansing" is
not the blessing that we are seeking; it is only a means. The end is the
"Filling of the Holy Ghost." "Cleansing" is a negative blessing, the
separating from sin; but we can only be satisfied with a positive blessing.
When the housewife cleans the house, does she then go out and live in the
yard? Not so. She cleans the house that it may be the more fit for her to
inhabit. God cleanses, "empties, sweeps, and garnishes" (Matt. xii. 44),
that He may come in to dwell; and if He, the Holy One, does come in and
take up His abode, He will _keep_ His dwelling place "clean." This
"cleansing" of which we have been speaking is one of the steps into the
Blessed Life; but there is not much likelihood of any one living the Life
unless they first take the necessary steps into the Life. It is a Life of
Purity, and it is lived, as it is entered upon, by faith in the Son of God;
hence the name by which the Spirit-filled Life is sometimes called--the
Life of Faith.




CHAPTER XII.

_CONSECRATION: WHAT IS IT?_


The second step that must needs be taken by those of us who have been
living without the Fullness, before it can be obtained, is Consecration,
a word that is very common and popular; much more common and popular, it
is feared, than the thing itself. In order to be filled with the Holy
Ghost one must first be "cleansed," and then one must be "consecrated".
Consecration follows cleansing, and not _vice versa_. Intelligent
apprehension of what consecration is, and of what it involves, is
necessary to an intelligent consecration of oneself.


_1. Sanctification._

Consecration is another word for sanctification. Many people have a
confused idea as to what sanctification really is. It must be borne in
mind that we are not considering the theological term sanctification, but
the use of the New Testament word "sanctify," "sanctification." No one
would confound "consecration" with "cleansing," and yet many confound
"sanctification" with "cleansing." To "sanctify" is to purify, to cleanse,
to make holy, they tell us. But the idea of purification, of cleansing,
of separating from sin, is not in the N. T. word "sanctify" at all. "The
very God of peace _sanctify_ you wholly" (I Thess. v. 23). That does not
mean "purify" you, separate you from sin, as a glance at two other
passages, in which the same word occurs, will show. "For their sakes I
_sanctify_ Myself" (John xvii. 19). "_Sanctify_ in your hearts Christ as
Lord" (I Pet. iii. 15, R. V.), where it cannot mean purify, separate from
sin. In these passages its true meaning is very apparent--to "set apart
for a holy use," to "separate to God," to "consecrate." To "cleanse" is
to separate _from_ sin, but to "sanctify" is to separate to God, to set
apart for God that which has already been separated _from_ sin. We cannot
set apart to a holy use (consecrate) that which is not cleansed. Hence we
see why it is that "cleansing" must precede sanctification or consecration,
"that He might sanctify it, having cleansed it" (Eph. v. 26, R. V.).
"Sanctification" is not identical with "cleansing," but it is its
complement. "We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of
Jesus Christ once for all" (Heb. x. 10). "Wherefore Jesus also, that He
might sanctify the people through His own blood, suffered without the
gate" (Heb. xiii. 12). From these passages we gather that it is by the
Blood of Jesus we are sanctified, set apart to God. This is another
function of the precious Blood, in addition to the one we have already
been considering, viz., cleansing from the guilt of sin.


_2. Surrender._

"In conversion," says Dr. Chalmers, "God gives to me, but in consecration
I give to God." Every one knows that conversion should have experimental
acquaintance with consecration.

  "In full and glad surrender,
  I give myself to thee."

Consecration, then, involves surrender--total, absolute, unconditional,
irreversible. This is Paul's teaching in Romans: "I beseech you therefore,
brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present _your bodies_ a living
sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service"
(Rom. xii. 1). These people had already given their souls to God, and now
the apostle insists on their giving their "bodies" too. "Yield (R. V.,
Present) yourselves unto God as those that are alive from the dead" (Rom.
vi. 13). Life first, then sacrifice. Have we life in Christ? Then it is
imperative that we "yield," "present" ourselves unto God. It is not a
matter of individual choice or taste or convenience; but every one that
has been quickened from the death in trespasses and sins is commanded,
_yes, commanded_, to "present himself to God." Have _you_ obeyed this
command? If not, why not? God excuses no one. Had it not better be
attended to now? Yes, before you read another line!

It follows as a corollary that if we yield ourselves, we yield everything
else to God; nothing is withheld. What loss we suffer because we will hold
back some little thing! A little child was one day playing with a very
valuable vase, when he put his hand into it and could not withdraw it. His
father, too, tried his best to get it out, but all in vain. They were
talking of breaking the vase, when the father said, "Now, my son, make one
more try; open your hand and hold your fingers out straight, as you see me
doing, and then pull." To their astonishment the little fellow said, "Oh
no, pa; I couldn't put out my fingers like that, for if I did, I would
drop my penny." He had been holding on to a penny all the time! No wonder
he could not withdraw his hand. How many of us are like him! Drop the
copper, surrender, let go, and God will give you gold.

Now let us note that the verb translated "yield" (Rom. vi. 13) and
"present" (Rom. xii. I) is not in the present tense in the original, as if
Paul said "be yielding," "keep presenting," but it is in the aorist tense,
the general force of which is a definite act, something done and finished
with. So that when the command, "Present yourself to God," is complied
with as far as one's light goes, the person is entitled to regard the
transaction as a completed act, and to say, "Yes, I have presented myself
to God." Then Faith presses on the heels of that statement and says, "God
has accepted what I have thus _presented_." It is absolutely necessary
that Faith be in lively exercise on this point, for what will be the
practical outcome of all my presenting if I do not believe that God takes
what I give? "Him that cometh unto Me I will in nowise cast out" is just
as appropriate to the saint seeking full salvation as to the sinner
seeking pardon. It is failure here, failure to apprehend by faith the fact
that God receives what I present, that has blocked progress for so many
of God's people who are truly desirous of living consecrated lives. From
this it will be seen that consecration is a crisis in the life of the
believer, just as cleansing is, and not a process; but it, too, "is a
crisis in order to a process."


_3. Transference of Ownership._

Consecration implies and involves transference of ownership. Many a
Christian is living to-day as if he were his own; but the consecrated
heart endorses the statement of the Divine Word: "Ye are not your own,
for ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body and in
your spirit, which are God's" (1 Cor. vi. 19, 20). The consecrated man
looks upon himself as the absolute property of the Lord who bought him,
and his whole life is lived in the light of this fact.


_4. Enthroning Christ._

Consecration involves the "glorifying" of Christ, the "enthroning" Him,
the crowning of Jesus "Lord of all" in our own heart and life. "Crown Him,
crown Him, Lord of all;" "and," says Dr. Hudson Taylor, "if you do not
crown Him Lord _of all_, you do not crown Him Lord _at all_." This view
of consecration, with its accompanying results, is beautifully illustrated
for us in John vii. 38, 39, "He that believeth on me, as the scripture
hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water. But this
spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him were to receive:
for the Spirit was not yet given; because Jesus was not yet glorified."
The flowing forth of the rivers--just the outflow, the overflow of the
infilling Spirit--was dependent on Jesus being "glorified." Jesus had not
yet reached the throne, and so the Spirit had not yet been given. The
reason why they had not come to Pentecost was that as yet there was no
Ascension. Ascension preceded Pentecost. Let us learn it by root of heart,
that every Pentecost since the first has, in like manner, been preceded by
an Ascension. Do we know Pentecost experimentally for ourselves? If not
the reason is close at hand. Jesus has not been "glorified" by us, not
enthroned in _our_ hearts. He may be in the heart, He may even be in the
throne room, but He has not been placed upon the throne! There has never
been a coronation day in our lives, when "in full and glad surrender" we
placed the crown on the many-crowned Head, crying, "Crown Him, crown Him,
Lord of all!" "And he showed me a river of water of life, bright as
crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and _of the Lamb_" (Rev.
xxii. 1). When Christ reached the throne at the Father's right hand, from
underneath His throne the river began to flow, the Holy Ghost was given,
His Church received her Pentecost. "Being by the right hand of God
exalted ... he hath poured forth this" (Acts ii. 33). So when Christ is
"exalted," "enthroned," "glorified" in the believer's heart, from
underneath His throne will the rivers begin to flow according to promise;
but, no Ascension, no Pentecost; and let us remember, as has been already
stated, that though life begins at the Cross, service does not begin till
Pentecost. No Pentecost, no service worthy of the name!

We need not be concerned as to how the rivers are flowing from us, or
troubled as to what channels they are flowing in. They flowed from Peter
in one way, and from Paul in quite another, and from Barnabas in yet
another; there are infinite "diversities" of ways. We need not trouble at
all about the rivers, and the direction of their flow; our concern is to
"glorify Jesus," to see that He is on the throne; and it becomes _His_
business then to see that the rivers are flowing; and there is not the
slightest danger that the blessed business with which He charges Himself
will be neglected!

There are other aspects of consecration in the Divine Word which have not
been touched upon, but enough has been said for our purpose to show what
it is, and what its blessed results will be. Our life and service will be
enriched beyond telling by enthroning Christ. This, of course, involves
the breaking of all our idols, for He will not share His throne with any.
When Mahmoud, the conqueror of India, had taken the city of Gujarat he
proceeded, as was his custom, to destroy the idols. There was one, fifteen
feet high, which its priests and devotees begged him to spare. He was deaf
to their entreaties, and seizing a hammer he struck it one blow when, to
his amazement, from the shattered image there rained down at his feet a
shower of gems, pearls and diamonds--treasure of fabulous value, which had
been hidden within it! Had he spared the idol he would have lost all this
wealth. Let us not spare _our_ idols. It is to our interest to demolish
them. If we shatter them there will rain about our hearts the very
treasures of Heaven, the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit; but if we
spare our idol we will miss riches unsearchable.

The consecrated life is a Christ-centered life, the only truly-centered
life; every other life is eccentric: yet how often do we hear worldly
people or worldly-minded Christians (what a contradiction in terms!)
criticising some devoted Spirit-filled man or woman as "so eccentric,"
simply because of their loyalty to Christ their King! when all the while
it is the critics that are "eccentric,"--off the true center. Indeed, so
eccentric did the first Spirit-filled band appear, that "others mocking
said, they are filled with new wine;" _so they were_ "full of new wine,"
the "new wine" of the kingdom. And in God's sight these drunken, eccentric
men were the only truly-centered spiritually-adjusted men in the throng.




CHAPTER XIII.

_CLAIMING._


Having considered the two conditions necessary to being filled with the
Spirit, viz., the cleansing of the heart, and the consecration of the
cleansed heart to God, we come now to the very practical question--How is
this Fullness to be obtained by the cleansed and consecrated believer?
Before proceeding to consider the answer, "Claim it," let us notice what
the Divine Word has to say about (1) prayer and (2) laying on of hands in
connection with the obtaining.


_1. Prayer._

"How much more shall your Heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them
that ask Him?" (Luke xi. 13.) This promise is given to God's children. It
is the dearest wish of the great Father-heart of God that His children
should be filled with His Spirit. Who has a fathoming line long enough to
sound the depths of that "how much more"? You "ask;" Father "gives." What
is the next step? Why, of course, you "receive!" else all Father's "giving"
will be of no avail.

"When they had prayed ... they were all filled with the Holy Ghost" (Acts
iv. 31).

"Prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost" (Acts viii. 15).

"Tarry" (Luke xxiv. 49). "Wait" (Acts i. 4)--not idling, but praying,
pleading the promise. "These all with one accord continued steadfastly in
prayer" (Acts i. 14).

"They were all with one accord in one place, and suddenly" the answer
came! (Acts ii. 1.) So in obtaining the blessing of the Fullness, prayer
has its place.


_2. Laying on of hands._

"Then laid they their hands on them and they (Samaritan converts) received
the Holy Ghost" (Acts viii. 17).

"Then when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they
sent them away" (Acts xiii. 3). Barnabas and Saul were men who were
already full of the Holy Ghost, but by the laying on of hands (it is
probable that hands had been laid on these men before this) they received
a fresh anointing of the Holy Ghost, a fresh equipment for special
service, and thus they were set apart for the work to which the Holy Ghost
was calling them.

"And when Paul had laid his hands upon them (the men of Ephesus), the Holy
Ghost came on them" (Acts xix. 6).

"They laid their hands on them" (the deacons) (Acts vi. 6).

"Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy,
with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery" (1 Tim. iv. 14).

"Stir up the gift of God, which is in thee through the laying on of my
hands" (2 Tim. i. 6). It is quite evident that laying on of hands was no
meaningless ceremonial in the primitive Church. Is there any reason why it
should ever be an empty, barren form in our own day?

We come now to examine the answer given to the question--How is the
Fullness of the Spirit to be obtained?--viz., "Claim it." It must be borne
clearly in mind that we are dealing now with a cleansed and consecrated
soul. If you are not "cleansed," attend first to the cleansing. If you are
not consecrated, attend at once to the consecrating, and then (but not
till then) will you be able to profit by what will be said about the
claiming of the blessing. Do we appreciate the immense difference between
"claiming" and "asking"? I "claim" that which is mine own; I "ask" for a
favor. For instance, if a man has a credit balance of $250 in his current
banking account, and draws a check for $50, he does not require to go to
the manager and "ask" for $50; he presents his check and "claims" it, for
it is his own. But supposing that same man is in need of an advance of
$500; he goes into the manager's room, and "asks" for the favor of a loan.
No "claiming" now! So it is often with the Christian and his God. When God
gives him a definite promise for some definite blessing, it is the
Christian's privilege to "claim," to "receive" by faith the thing
promised. If God tells him a certain blessing is his by virtue of his
sonship, it is his to "claim," to "receive" what through grace has been
made his own. There is no "asking" needed here, that is "asking" in the
sense of saying--"Lord, _if_ it be Thine holy will, give me this." Where
is the room for an "if"? Has not God told him it _is_ His will?--has He
not promised it?--has He not given it to him? Why, then, should he mock
his Lord by saying, "If it be Thy will"? But supposing, on the other hand,
that that man wants something which God has not expressly promised to give,
something in reference to which He has _not_ revealed His will; all the
Christian can do in this case is to "ask"; he cannot "claim;" and God
_may_ give him what he asks, or He may see that it will be for the best
to refuse His child's request. A Christian may want $250, and may "ask"
his Father to send it to him, and God may give or withhold. But if a
Christian man wants to be filled with the Holy Ghost, he need be in no
doubt as to the issue here, he may "claim" the Fullness, for has not God
promised it? Is not this blessing his very own? His birthright by virtue
of his new birth? Let us learn then clearly to distinguish between
"claiming" as an act of faith based on an express promise in the Word,
and "asking" as a request in prayer. That the Fullness of the Holy Ghost
is one of the blessings which it is our privilege to "claim," to "receive"
by a simple act of faith, is abundantly clear from the Book of God.
"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse
for us; for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus
Christ; that we might receive the promise of the spirit _through faith_"
(Gal. iii. 13, 14). The double purpose of Christ's redeeming work, of His
being made a curse for us, is here plainly stated. He was "cursed" that
we might be blessed with a double blessing--(1) with "the blessing of
Abraham," that is, righteousness, justification; and (2) with "the
promise of the Spirit." How many of God's children forget the second
blessing!--they think that if they are saved from wrath and justified,
that that is all!--but that is only half salvation; full salvation
consists in receiving the promise of the Spirit in _addition_ to being
justified. Have _we_ overlooked this fact? Have we been stopping short at
half salvation? Those who are not living the "Spirit-filled life" are
making void to a most alarming extent, as far as they are concerned, the
work Christ accomplished on the tree. Christ died that we might be made
the righteousness of God, _and_ that we might be filled with God. As God
holds the sinner guilty who neglects so great salvation, and rejects the
offered righteousness, so He holds the justified believer guilty who
neglects the second blessing which Christ purchased with His Blood, viz.,
the offered "promise of the Spirit."

But note well how Paul tells us this latter blessing is to be made ours;
it becomes ours "_by faith_." No one doubts how we receive the blessing
of Abraham (righteousness, justification); all are agreed that it is "by
faith." "Being justified by faith" (Rom. v. 1). But how blind we are to
see, how slow to take it in, in spite of the plain declarations of
Scripture, that "the promise of the Spirit" is in like manner received "by
faith!" The Holy Ghost is the "gift" of the Father, and of the Son (Luke
xi. 13). This "gift" is received "by faith." There is the whole matter in
a nutshell. Of all the sublime things in God's sublime Book there is
surely not a sublimer than this, that a cleansed and consecrated believer
may by simple faith _here_ and _now_ claim and receive the Fullness of
the Spirit--the greatest gift that even the exalted Christ has in His
power to bestow upon His people. "Be filled with the Spirit," saith the
Holy Ghost. Note that the command is in the passive voice, "Be filled,"
that is, "Let yourself be filled." The Fullness is pressing in upon you,
only let it in! Receive it, and it is yours! _Have you got it?_ If not,
deal with the Lord about it at once, somewhat after this manner, "Lord
Jesus, Thou dost command me to be filled with the Spirit. I take Thy
command and make it my prayer, 'Lord, fill me with Thy Spirit.' Thou hast
told me that 'all things whatsoever ye pray and ask for, believe that ye
have received them, and ye shall have them' (Mark xi. 24). It is Thy
desire to fill me; it is my desire to be filled. I have made, 'Lord, fill
me,' the prayer of my heart. I claim the Fullness. I believe for it. I
receive it now by faith. I _have_ received it. I have it. It is mine.
Lord, I thank Thee for filling me, even me, with Thine Holy Spirit." And
the blessed business is done! It is yours to believe, to receive. It is
_His_ to fill. Go on your way now, reckoning that you are filled, and God
will make the reckoning good. It is _yours_ to _keep believing_. It is
God's to _keep you filled_. Stagger not at the promise of God through
unbelief, but be made strong in faith, giving glory to God. Some object
to this quick, almost instantaneous, and easy way of receiving this
greatest of the New Testament blessings. But every objection urged against
receiving the Fullness of the Spirit in this way, applies with equal, if
not greater force to a sinner receiving the pardon of his sins when he
comes to God at the first. It is always in grace that God deals with the
sinner, and justifies him the instant he believes in Jesus. It is always
in grace that God deals with the justified one, and fills him with the
Holy Ghost the moment he receives the Fullness by faith. Eternal life is
the gift of God, and all the sinner has to do is to take it. The Holy
Ghost is a gift, and all God's child has to do is to take it. But some
will still object, and say that it is necessary to spend some time
"waiting" on God for the Fullness before we can get it. A night of prayer,
or a half night at least, a more or less protracted season must thus be
spent before we can hope to receive the blessing we desire. Of course not
one word can be uttered against spending seasons of prayer by day or by
night in waiting upon God. We have the example of the Man of Prayer
Himself before us in this. But this much must be said, that many a one has
spent whole days and nights and weeks in earnest crying to God for the
infilling of the Holy Ghost, and all in vain. All in vain? Why? How?
_Because of unbelief._ If you want to fill a corked bottle with water,
and take it to a running tap, but neglect to remove the cork, how long
will you have to wait holding it under the tap before it is filled?
Remove the cork, and the bottle is running over in a few seconds! Many a
one has cried and waited, and waited and cried for the Fullness of the
Spirit, but the stopper of unbelief has been in their empty hearts, and
so no wonder that they did not get what they wanted! Of what avail will
all God's "giving" be if a man does not "receive"? God cannot _give_ and
_receive_ too! But some one may still object, and, in proof of his
contention that we must "wait" for the filling of the Holy Ghost, point
to the case of the disciples, who continued in prayer for ten days,
waiting for the promise of the Father. Quite true that they "waited;" but
it must be remembered that that prayer meeting was ante-pentecostal; _we_
live in post-pentecostal days; _they_ were waiting for the Spirit to come
from Heaven. "The Spirit was not yet given." We have not so to wait. He
_has_ come, He _has_ been given, and all we have to do is to receive Him.
We have read of Christ's coming into the world and of His leaving it. We
have read of the Spirit's descent, but we do _not_ read of _His_
ascension. A Christian man came to me once and said--expecting a word of
encouragement and approval--"I have been seeking that blessing for over
thirty years." "Brother, it's nearly time you got it then!" was the swift
rejoinder. For all these years during which the man was crying, "Give,
give, give!" God was saying, "Take, take, take! Receive, receive! for I
_do_ give!" If I heard my little girl of three years old crying piteously
for a piece of bread, knowing that she must be very hungry, and having
the bread by me would I tell her to cry on for another hour and that then
I might attend to her wants? "How much more," oh! "_How much more_ will
your Heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask Him?" But what
if, in spite of her crying and of my offering, she would not take the
bread I offered, but still went on with her crying, "Father! oh, father!
do give me a piece of bread, I am so hungry!" You silly child! Oh, how
many silly children has the Father in His family, crying year in and year
out, "Give, give!" and Father all the while yearning over them and saying,
"Take, take, My child!" Let some of us give over crying and set to work
"receiving." Take and thank! Receive and thank! "That we might receive
the promise of the Spirit _through faith_."




CHAPTER XIV.

_HOW DOES IT COME?_


How does the Filling of the Spirit come? "Does it come once for all? or
is it _always_ coming, as it were?" was a question addressed to me once
by a young candidate for the Baptism of the Holy Ghost. There are many
asking the same question. We have considered how the Fullness is obtained,
but now we proceed to consider, How does the Fullness come? In speaking
of the blessing of being filled with the Spirit, the New Testament
writers use three tenses in the Greek--the Aorist, the Imperfect, and the
Present. Each of these tenses has a different shade of meaning. The
inspiring Spirit has employed these different tenses for a purpose, and
it will be to our profit to try and get at that purpose, to note the
differences, and to learn His meaning.

  (1) The Aorist tense--a tense to which the English language is a
      stranger--denotes generally "a sudden, definite act of the past,"
      "something done and finished with"--"They were filled"--as in Acts
      ii. 4.

  (2) The Imperfect tense, denoting, as in English, just what its name
      implies--"They were being filled" (literally)--as in Acts xiii. 52.

  (3) The Present tense, also denoting, as in English, just what its name
      implies--"Full," the normal condition--as in Acts xi. 24.

The following are the passages in the Acts in which the various tenses
are found:--

  (1) _Aorist_:--

  Acts ii. 2, "It filled all the house."

  Acts ii. 4, "They were all filled."

  Acts iv. 8, "Peter filled with the Holy Ghost." Peter was already
      "filled," in ch. ii. 4.

  Acts iv. 31, "And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost." Peter was
      again amongst them. Peter received an "Aorist" filling in ch. ii. 4,
      again in ch. iv. 8, and yet again in ch. iv. 31. So that an "Aorist"
      filling may be repeated and repeated again and yet again. On both
      occasions--ch. iv. 8 and ch. iv. 31--there was special need, and to
      meet this special need, Peter received a fresh and special and
      definite "filling" of the Holy Ghost. From this we learn that to
      equip us for every new important or difficult service to which we may
      be called, the Lord Jesus is prepared to grant us a fresh Infilling,
      a "refilling" of the Holy Ghost; and that these "refillings" may be,
      and ought to be, repeated just as often as the need arises. We see
      it reported twice in one chapter that Peter was "refilled." It will
      be noted that for the reasons already mentioned,[2] the expression
      "a fresh Infilling of the Holy Ghost," or "refilling," is used
      instead of "received a fresh Baptism of the Holy Ghost."

[2: Page 39.]

  Acts ix. 17 (Saul), "And be filled with the Holy Ghost." Saul was not
      to begin his life work until "baptized"--"filled with the Holy
      Ghost." He must receive the very same blessing and equipment as the
      other apostles received at Pentecost. This was Saul's Pentecost,
      and for him, as for others, service began at Pentecost.

  Acts xiii. 9, "Paul filled with the Holy Ghost." The man who was filled
      in ch. ix. is "filled" anew in this passage, the "Aorist" blessing
      is repeated, fitting him for the special work on hand, viz.,
      administering that scathing rebuke to Elymas the Sorcerer. In all
      these passages the blessing is spoken of as a crisis, not as a
      process.

  (2) _Imperfect_:--

  Acts xiii. 52, "And the disciples (lit.) _were being filled_ with joy
      and with the Holy Ghost." This is the only passage in the Acts where
      the Imperfect tense is used. It is not the Aorist "were filled," but
      the Imperfect "were being filled," implying the inflow, not only to
      make up for, but to sustain, the outflow. The same idea of the
      "Imperfect" is seen in Eph. v. 18, "Be filled with the Spirit,"
      where Principal Moule points out that the Greek verb rendered "be
      filled," may with equal correctness be rendered "Be ye _filling_
      with the Holy Ghost." The preceptive verb "is in the Present or
      continuing tense; it enjoins a course, a habit," so that in this
      sense "the Fullness" is _always_ coming, it is spoken of as a
      process, not as a crisis.

  (3) _Present_:--

  Acts vi. 3, "Look ye out therefore, brethren, from among you seven men
      of good report, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we may
      appoint over this business," men whose normal condition was "full"
      of the Holy Ghost. It is well worth noticing the business for which
      these "deacons" were wanted; they were to look after temporal
      affairs, to feed a few decent old Greek widows; and yet even for
      this business the men must be "full of the Holy Ghost!" None other
      need apply. How far has the Church of to-day strayed from apostolic
      practice! When an election of office-bearers is taking place
      nowadays, of men, say, to manage the temporal affairs of Christ's
      Church, who ever thinks of looking out for "men full of the Holy
      Ghost"? Many a man is elected to office in the Church of the Living
      God who "has not the Spirit of Christ" at all--who is therefore not
      a child of God, much less "full of the Holy Ghost." "He is a man of
      social position, a man of means; if he is not full of the Holy
      Ghost, he is at least full of this world's goods, and you know he
      will be a pillar in our Church." Yes, as some one has well remarked,
      he will be a _cater_-pillar! The Church of the New Testament does
      not need pillars of that kind. The Church of Jesus Christ and His
      apostles does not require to be propped up by children of the devil.
      What right have we to ask an "alien," a man who is "without Christ,"
      "having no hope and without God in the world," to assist in managing
      and controlling Father's House? Such was not apostolic practice. "Be
      ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers" (2 Cor. vi. 14).
      What an amount of unequal yoking there is in many of our Churches,
      although the Church's Lord expressly forbids it! "Thou shalt not
      plough with an ox and an ass together" (Deut. xxii. 10).

Who is responsible for this unequal yoking? Is it not the Church members
that elect these men and put them into office in the Church of God? Church
members, beware! next time offices are to be filled in your Church,
whether they have to do with the temporal affairs or with the spiritual,
remember apostolic advice, "Look ye out from among you men full of the
Spirit." When we get back in this matter to apostolic practice, we may
hope to get back apostolic blessing, but not till then.

  Acts vi. 5, "Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit." In
      those brave days of old it was a case of demand and supply.
      Wanted--seven men full of the Holy Ghost; and immediately they were
      forthcoming! Is the trouble nowadays in the demand or in the supply?
      In both. The demand for Spirit-filled men is very slack; but even
      if the demand revived to-morrow, how lamentably few in our Churches
      could be found bearing the trade mark as "up to sample!" Still there
      are not wanting signs of revival in both demand and supply. Let us
      remember that Stephen's companions were men full of the Holy Ghost,
      although Stephen is the only one of whom it is expressly stated. He
      was the most remarkable man of the seven, a man in whom the graces
      of the Spirit shone with conspicuous brightness. So mighty was his
      faith that special mention must needs be made of it. It is not
      sufficient to describe him as a man full of the Holy Ghost, but it
      must be stated that he was "a man full of faith _and_ of the Holy
      Ghost." Faith was his outstanding grace.

  Acts vii. 55, "He being full of the Holy Ghost." This was Stephen's
      normal condition right up to the very end of his life; it was true
      of him when we get our first glimpse of him, true also as he passes
      within the vail into the unspeakable glory.

  Acts xi. 24, Barnabas "was a good man and full of the Holy Ghost." A
      good man indeed, and so full of the Spirit of God that there was no
      room for self; for we read that he came into the midst of a great
      revival, in the bringing about of which he had no hand, and instead
      of being filled with envy at the divinely-chosen instruments,
      instead of picking holes in the work and depreciating the whole
      movement, he was filled with gladness; we read that he "was glad"
      (ver. 23). It goes without saying that _that_ man was "full of the
      Holy Ghost." How many there are nowadays who are not like Barnabas!

Having now considered the passages in which the various tenses are used,
we are able to answer the question--How does the blessing come? Does it
come once for all, or is it always coming? There are sudden definite
"fillings," repeated with more or less frequency; times when the believer
is conscious of being "filled," when he can say, "I was filled." Between
this experience--"filled" (which is an "Aorist" blessing)--and that which
should be the normal experience of every Christian, viz., "full" (which is
a "Present" blessing), it is evident that there is a great gap; but God
has graciously bridged the gap for us; the connecting link between the
"Aorist" _were filled_, and the "Present" _full_, is the "Imperfect"
"_were being filled_," so that the blessing is always coming. Does it
come once for all? A thousand times No!--if by that is meant that we are
reservoirs into which the Fullness is poured, so that once we are filled,
we are independent of fresh supplies from the Lord Jesus. That surely were
a curse instead of a blessing! What reservoir is there that does not need
replenishing? Some Christians say that at times after some piece of
service has been finished, they feel as if they were empty, as if their
souls had been quite drained, and now they are dry and thirsty. It need
not be so. It is not so with the Spirit-filled worker whose faith is in
lively exercise, for he is "being filled" all the time.

In driving between Melbourne and my home I often stop at a wayside trough
to give the horse a drink. I notice that the trough is quite full of water
and that there is a box in one end of it. As the horse drinks the water is
lowering, and presently I hear a sound as of a running tap. Yes, the sound
is coming from the box. That box is covering a piece of mechanism that
needs explaining. Within it there is a tap connected by pipes with the Yan
Yean Reservoir up in the Plenty Ranges. Attached by a lever to the tap is
a metal ball, which rests on the surface of the water. As the horse drinks,
the water on which the ball is floating is lowered, and thus the ball is
lowered; the lowering of the ball opens the tap and the Yan Yean begins
to pour in; so that, although the water is being withdrawn by the thirsty
animal, a fresh supply is being poured in, the trough is "being filled,"
so that it is always "full." Thus may it be with the soul of the believer.
No matter what the outflow into the surrounding emptiness may be, or the
withdrawals by thirsty, needy souls, there is the continual inflow, so
that there may be the constant "Fullness." Indeed the outflow depends
directly on the inflow; one can only give as he gets. It is ours to see to
the connection between us and the infinite Reservoir away up among the
hills of God being kept open, to see that the tap is kept in proper
working order by faith and prayer and meditation, and then, one might
almost say, automatically, the heart will be kept full, "filled with all
the Fullness of God," no matter what the spiritual drain upon us may be;
for now it is not a question of our capacity to contain, but a question of
God's infinite supply for all our needs. This too is the explanation of
the "overflow," the flowing "Rivers" of John vii. 38. It is the overflow,
and only the overflow, that blesses. There is not a drop for thirsty souls
till some one overflows. It is the overflow in the Sabbath School class,
and in the pulpit, and, for that matter, in every other sphere of
Christian service, that brings blessing; and this overflow is in direct
proportion to the inflow. "Rivers" cannot flow out unless "Rivers" first
flow in.

An ordinary service pipe in our domestic water supply may serve to
illustrate some of the points we have been considering. We take a bucket
to the tap for water, and lo! there is none. Something is wrong. Either
the authorities have cut off our supply because of some infraction of the
law on our part, or there is an obstruction in our service pipe, or the
pressure is insufficient to give us even a drop, or the supply is so
deficient that it has been shut off for a time from us that it may be sent
in another direction. Sometimes, alas! the "flowing" of the "living waters"
from the soul of the believer ceases; but the ordinary round of duty,
either in the district visiting, or in the Sabbath School class, or in the
pulpit, has not ceased; a ceaseless stream of _talk_ may still be flowing
on, but there is no "living water" in it all. Why? It is not that the
pressure aback of us, the pressure in the infinite Reservoir away up among
the hills of God, is insufficient, or that the supply is deficient, unable
to meet our needs because it is supplying needy ones elsewhere. God's
water supply never breaks down as we often find our city supply failing.
If the "flowing" has ceased, it is from one of two reasons: either God
has, in mercy and in judgment, cut off the supply, or there is an
obstruction in us, and _sin_ is at the bottom of both reasons. "Search me,
O God ... and see if there be any way of wickedness in me" (Ps. cxxxix.
23, 24). "Confession, cleansing" is the divinely-appointed method for
putting right what has gone wrong.

Sometimes on going to the tap we find that there is water, but such a
miserable dribble! either from insufficient pressure or some partial
obstruction in the pipe, or perhaps it is because we have not opened the
tap fully. What a wretched parody of the flowing "Rivers" of John vii. 38
are the life and service of many of the Christians of to day! Some of the
"living water" is doubtless coming from them, but it is only percolating
through, dribbling, trickling out of them. Why? Certainly not, as has been
already remarked, from insufficient pressure; the fault, the failure is
not on God's side, but there is some local obstruction--amounting in many
a case to almost entire obstruction,--some little idol or other in our
heart, if not a "sin," yet certainly a "weight" (Heb. xii. 1), and this
hinders the outflow. Confession and cleansing are still God's remedy. Or
the hindrance may be our unbelief, "limiting the Holy One of Israel;"
opening the tap but a little instead of opening it full; expecting little
when we were divinely authorized to expect much; refusing to obey the
command, "Open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it" (Ps. lxxxi. 10).
"Rivers" cannot flow through a heart full of unbelief.

Sometimes, again, on going to the tap we get a little water and a great
deal of air. What a noise! Now air is a very good thing in its own place,
but that is not in a water pipe; that is meant to convey water and nothing
else, and for the water pipe to do its work, it is necessary that it be
emptied and cleansed of everything else, even of air. Scripture hath said
that some things "puff up," and there is a good deal of "puff" in some
hearts through which the living water is supposed to be flowing. God be
merciful unto us! Such hearts, like our water pipe, need emptying and
cleansing.

Yet once more, on going to the tap, we find a splendid supply; the pipe
is clean, the pressure is good. Now before we open the tap the pipe is
full of water; when the tap is opened and the bucket filling, the pipe is
still full, for although the water is pouring out at the tap, it is
pouring in at the reservoir, so that the pipe is _kept full_, even though
the tap is open and the water streaming from it. When the tap is shut,
you cannot say any more about the pipe now than that it is still full of
water. Even so may it be with the believer who is spiritually adjusted.
When resting at his Master's feet he is full; when actively engaged in
service he is still full; his normal condition is, "full of the Holy
Ghost," because he has learnt how to obey the command, "Be ye filling
with the Spirit."




CHAPTER XV.

_ITS EFFECTS._


Among the effects and benefits which in this life accompany and flow from
being filled with the Holy Ghost, may be mentioned the following:--


_1. Courage._

"Oh, I could not do so and so--I have not the courage," is a reply
frequently made by Christian people when asked to undertake some piece of
service or other for the Master. The first point to be settled is, "Is
that the Master's will for me?" If so, lack of courage is a confession to
the lack of the "Fullness of the Holy Ghost." The Spirit-filled man knows
the fear of God and knows no other fear.

Acts ii. 14, "Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice and
spake forth." No fear of servant maids now! But _can_ this be the man who
quailed before the look of the waiting-maid who charged him with being
"with the Nazarene"? Can this be the man that "began to curse and to
swear, I know not this man of whom ye speak"? The very same, and yet not
the same; for the Baptism of the Holy Ghost has changed Peter the
craven-hearted into Peter the lion-hearted, so that he can stand before
that surging multitude, their hands dyed crimson in his Master's blood,
and without a tremor charge home upon them the awful crime, "Him ye did
crucify and slay."

Ch. iv. 13: "They beheld the _boldness_ of Peter and John."

Ch. iv. 31: "They spake the word of God with _boldness_."

Ch. v. 20: "Go ye and stand and speak in the temple." Taken out of prison,
and ordered to go and do again the very thing for which they had been
imprisoned! But _they_ were Spirit-filled men, and so we read in the next
verse, "they entered into the temple."

Ch. v. 29: "We must obey God rather than men."

Ch. v. 40-42: "Beaten ... departed rejoicing ... ceased not to teach."

Ch. xxi. 13: "I am ready not to be bound only, but also to die at
Jerusalem, for the name of the Lord Jesus." Courage-filled because
Spirit-filled!


_2. The fruit of the Spirit._

_The fruit of the Spirit will be manifest in the life_: Love, Joy, Peace,
etc. (Gal. v. 22, 23). How can one's life be filled with the fruit of the
Spirit, unless one's heart is first filled with the Spirit Himself? In
the primitive Church the men and women were filled with the Holy Ghost;
that was the rule; now, alas! it has come to be the exception--and as a
consequence we see how their lives were enriched by the fruit of the
Spirit.

_Love_: Acts iv. 32, "Were of one heart and soul ... had all things
common." This may be poor political economy, but it is good spiritual
economy, a simple Bible illustration of the Bible precept, "Lay up for
yourselves treasure in heaven" (Matt. vi. 20). If brotherly love were
abroad to-day, how soon the present distress would disappear! As the best
available commentary on this heavenly word "Love," study on your knees
the whole of 1 Cor. xiii.

_Joy_: Acts ii. 46, "They did take their food with gladness and singleness
of heart, praising God." Every meal was a sacrament. The same cause would
produce the same result to-day.

Ch. v. 41: "Rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer dishonor
for the Name," when some of us would have been bemoaning ourselves and
complaining of the hardness of our lot!

Ch. xiii. 50-52: "Stirred up a persecution ... and the disciples were
(being) filled with joy."

Ch. xvi. 25: "Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns unto God."
The heavier the tribulation the more their joy seemed to "overflow" (2
Cor. vii. 4), and of course the heavier the tribulation the more joy they
needed to sustain them. "For the joy of the Lord is your strength" (Neh.
viii. 10).

_Peace_: Acts vi. 15, "Saw his (Stephen's) face as it had been the face
of an angel."

Ch. vii. 59, 60: "They stoned Stephen, calling upon the Lord, and saying,
Lord Jesus, receive my Spirit, and he kneeled down, and ... fell asleep."

2 Cor, iv. 8, 9: "Troubled on every side, yet not distressed; perplexed,
but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not
destroyed."

Thus we might go through the heavenly list--long-suffering, gentleness,
goodness, faith, meekness, temperance--and see how richly in Bible times
the fruit flourished in the lives of those who were Spirit-filled. Before
passing on let us notice where it is that Joy grows. It grows between Love
and Peace. It is, as some one has well called it, a sheltered fruit. If
Love withers, Joy is exposed on that side, and it too will fade. If Peace
is interfered with, even though Love is vigorous, Joy is exposed on that
side now, and it will fade away and die. The only way to preserve Joy in
vigorous growth is to see that its sheltering fruits, Love and Peace, are
kept free from blight, and vigorous too.

In his letter to the Ephesian Church, to whom he addressed the command,
"Be filled with the Spirit," Paul points out very clearly what the
results of the Fullness will be.

(1) A singing heart (Eph. v. 19). This is what would bring us and our
lives up to concert pitch. We would no more go "flat." This would drive
away the leaden dullness.

(2) A thankful heart (ver. 20). Such a heart would not be finding fault
with Christ's government; will "find none occasion of stumbling in" Jesus
(Matt. xi. 6); will not be offended at Him, no matter how He may test and
try it. "Blessed is he" that has such a heart in his bosom!

(3) A submissive heart (Eph. v. 21), "in lowliness of mind each counting
other better than himself" (Phil. ii. 3). "The thing (once) impossible
shall be."

(4) Spirit-filled wives will be in subjection to their own husbands
(Eph. v. 22).

(5) Spirit-filled husbands will love their wives _as_ Christ loved the
Church (ver. 25).

(6) Spirit-filled children will obey their parents (Eph. vi. 1).

(7) Spirit-filled fathers will not provoke their children to wrath
(ver. 4).

(8) Spirit-filled servants (bond-slaves) will be obedient to their masters
(ver. 5).

(9) Spirit-filled masters will treat their servants as they (the masters)
would wish to be treated by _their_ Master (ver. 9).

Would not results (8) and (9) be the best possible solution of the
constantly recurring Labor and Capital difficulty, and render a labor war
impossible, because unnecessary?

(10) Spirit-filled men will be strong in the Lord, spiritual giants, not
sickly, hunchbacked dwarfs (ver. 10).

(11) Spirit-filled men will be warriors, clad in the whole armor of God;
if not Spirit-filled they could not carry it (ver. 11).

(12) Spirit-filled soldiers will not be warring against flesh and blood;
internal foes having all been subdued, the civil war has ceased; their
enemies are now external, and they are free to concentrate all their
attention and God-inspired energies on them. Their enemies are (1) in the
world--principalities and world-rulers, and (2) in the heavenlies--powers
and spiritual hosts of wickedness (ver. 12).

(13) Spirit-filled men will be praying always in the Spirit (ver. 18). In
order to this vigilance is necessary "watching thereunto."

Such are some of the results, on the positive side, of being filled with
the Spirit. The effects on the negative side are manifest in Gal. v. 16,
17, "Walk in (by) the Spirit, and _ye shall not fulfill the lust of the
flesh_. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against
the flesh; for these are contrary the one to the other: that ye (walking
by the Spirit) may not do the things that ye would" (if ye were walking
by the flesh). (See Gal. v. 19-21.)


_3. Reaching the masses._

Another effect of a Spirit-baptized Church would be that the _masses would
be reached_. See how the early Church--which was a Spirit-baptized Church,
and persistently kept that truth in the foreground--reached the masses,
and with what blessed results! They were not amused or entertained, but
they were converted, saved, turned to the Lord.

  "There were added unto them in that day about _three thousand_ souls."
      Acts ii. 41.

  "The number of the men came to be about _five thousand_." Acts iv. 4.

  "Added to the Lord _multitudes_ both of men and women." Acts v. 14.

  "The number of the disciples _multiplied_ in Jerusalem exceedingly, and
      a _great company_ of the priests were obedient to the faith." Acts
      vi. 7.

  "The _multitudes_ (in Samaria) gave heed with one accord unto the things
      that were spoken." Acts viii. 6.

  "And _all_ that dwelt at Lydda and in Sharon saw him, and they turned
      to the Lord." Acts ix. 35.

  "It became known throughout all Joppa; and many believed on the Lord."
      Acts ix. 42.

  "While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on _all_ them
      which heard the word." Acts x. 44.

  "And the hand of the Lord was with them: and a _great number_ that
      believed, turned unto the Lord." Acts xi. 21.

   "And the next Sabbath almost the _whole city_ was gathered together to
      hear the word of God." Acts xiii. 44.

  "And so spake that a _great multitude_ both of Jews and of Greeks
      believed." Acts xiv. 1.

  "And when they had preached the gospel to that city, and had made _many_
      disciples." Acts xiv. 21.

  "The churches ... _increased_ in number daily." Acts xvi. 5.

  "These that have turned _the world_ upside down are come hither also."
      Acts xvii. 6.

  "Crispus ... believed ... and _many_ of the Corinthians hearing
      believed." Acts xviii. 8.

  "So _mightily_ grew the word of the Lord and prevailed." Acts xix. 18-20.

We often hear of discussions on the "lapsed masses." "Why have the masses
of the people lapsed from the Churches?" Perhaps the more correct way of
putting it would be, Why have the Churches lapsed from the masses? The
answer is not far to seek--because they have lost the driving power which
alone could keep them abreast of the masses, even the Baptism of the Holy
Ghost. The conditions were just as unfavorable in the first century as in
the nineteenth, and yet we read, "So mightily grew the word of the Lord
and prevailed." It is positively painful to see the substitutes that are
being tried to-day for the power of the Holy Ghost. Miserable substitutes
are they all! One Church is trying this plan, another that, and not one of
them has found a new plan that is a permanent success. They are
floundering, and some of them are foundering, and no wonder. It will be
no loss to the kingdom of God if Churches which ignore the Holy Ghost
should founder. Let us get back to Pentecostal methods. The trouble is
that the Churches have lost their way to that "upper room." Let a Church
only find her way back there and obtain her Pentecost; let pulpit and pew
be baptized with the Holy Ghost _and with fire_, and the people will come
running in to see the burning. That Church will not need to cater for
amusements as a bait to catch the masses, but the people will come
crowding into her pews, climbing into them as Zacchæus climbed into the
branches of that sycamore tree when he wanted to see the Lord; for the
people still want "to see Jesus," and they have heard that He is "to pass
that way." We cannot improve on Pentecost's methods for reaching the
masses.


_4. Persecution._

Yet another effect of the Fullness of the Spirit must be mentioned, viz.,
_Persecution_.

  "Others _mocking_ said, They are filled with new wine." Acts ii. 13.

  "They laid hands on them and put them in ward." Acts iv. 3.

  "Let us threaten them." Acts iv. 17.

  "They laid hands on the apostles and put them in public ward." Acts
      v. 18.

  "And were minded to slay them." Acts v. 33.

  "They beat them and charged them not to speak." Acts v. 40.

  "And seized him and brought him into the council." Acts vi. 12.

  "And they stoned Stephen." Acts vii. 59.

  "And there arose on that day a great persecution." Acts viii. 1.

  "Haling men and women committed them to prison." Acts viii. 3.

  "Saul, yet breathing threatening and slaughter against the disciples
      of the Lord." Acts ix. 1.

  "Took counsel together to kill him." Acts ix. 23.

  "They went about to kill him." Acts ix. 29.

  "Killed James the brother of John with the sword." Acts xii. 2.

  "He put him (Peter) in prison." Acts xii. 4.

  "Stirred up a persecution against Paul and Barnabas." Acts xiii. 50.

  "Made them evil affected against the brethren." Acts xiv. 2.

  "To treat them shamefully and to stone them." Acts xiv. 5.

  "They stoned Paul." Acts xiv. 19.

  "Commanded to beat them (Paul and Silas) with rods." Acts xvi. 22.

  "Cast them into prison, ... and made their feet fast in the stocks."
      Acts xvi. 23, 24.

  "Set the city on an uproar." Acts xvii. 5.

  "Stirring up and troubling the multitudes." Acts xvii. 13.

  "Opposed themselves and blasphemed." Acts xviii. 6.

  "Rose up against Paul, and brought him before the judgment seat." Acts
      xviii. 12.

  "Speaking evil of the way." Acts xix. 9.

  "Filled with wrath." Acts xix. 28.

  "No small stir concerning the way." Acts xix. 23.

  "A plot was laid against him by the Jews." Acts xx. 3.

  "So shall the Jews at Jerusalem bind the man that owneth this girdle,
      and shall deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles." Acts xxi. 11.

  "And laid hands on him." (Paul was never free after this.) Acts xxi. 27.

  "As they were seeking to kill him." Acts xxi. 31.

  "Beating Paul ... bound with two chains ... into the castle." Acts xxi.
      32, 33, 34.

  "It is not fit that he should live." Acts, xxii. 22.

  "Bound themselves under a curse, saying that they would neither eat nor
      drink till they had killed Paul." Acts xxiii. 12.

  "They delivered Paul ... to a centurion." Acts xxvii. 1.

  "From henceforth let no man trouble me: for I bear branded on my body
      the marks of Jesus." Gal. vi. 17.

All this makes lively reading in this peaceful, easy-going day of ours;
and yet the world has not changed in its attitude or feeling towards God
and the things of God. But a most palpable change has taken place
somewhere. The change, alas! is in us, in the people of God; a change that
is not for the better. We have lost that which brought these men into
direct collision with the world, and with its ways, even the Fullness of
the Spirit. Only let a man in our day seek and obtain the blessing that
made these men mighty for God, and he will soon find that the world has
not changed, and that the "Pharisees" have not changed either; the
Fullness of the Holy Ghost makes a man the uncompromising friend of God,
and that certainly involves the enmity of the world. "Therefore the world
hateth you" (John xv. 19). It behooves those who are seeking the "Fullness
of the Spirit" to remember these facts, and to count the cost, for the
persecution may come from the most unlikely, unlooked-for quarters. To be
forewarned is to be forearmed. "In the world ye have tribulation: but be
of good cheer; I have overcome the world" (John xvi. 33).




CHAPTER XVI.

_MAY ONE KNOW THAT HE IS FILLED?_


The question is often asked--How am I to know when I am filled with the
Holy Ghost?


_1. You may know it from the testimony of the written Word._

"All things whatsoever ye pray and ask for, _believe that ye have
received_ them, and ye shall have them" (Mark xi. 24). From this you know,
that if you have, up to your light, fulfilled the conditions necessary to
the filling of the Holy Ghost, on praying and asking for the Fullness, it
is your privilege to believe that you have received what you have asked
for; nay, it is your bounden duty, in compliance with Christ's express
command, so to believe. If God gives, and you really receive, you may then
give thanks, and that proves that you possess, for you cannot truly give
thanks for what you do not possess! It will be noted that this answer is
precisely similar to the answer that would be given to the question--How
am I to know that I am saved? By simple faith on the testimony of the
Word. As multitudes have accepted salvation without any emotion, without
any feeling whatever, so many a one has accepted by faith the "Fullness
of the Holy Ghost," without any wave of emotion or feeling bearing witness
to the fact of the filling. But this is not to say that there is never any
feeling, that the emotions are never stirred; not so, for the feelings
will come in due course, in God's own time.


_2. Witness of the Spirit._

Again, one may know that the Fullness has come by the witness of the
infilling Spirit. Just as in multitudes of cases the blessed Spirit bears
witness with the Blood when it is applied at the moment of conversion, so
many a one knows in his inner consciousness the moment when the Fullness
of the Spirit was bestowed; they felt the Incoming and can date their
Baptism, as others have felt the regenerating change and can date their
conversion.

It should also be repeated here, that as many are ignorant of the date of
their conversion, though well assured of the fact, so many may be ignorant
of the date of their Baptism with the Holy Ghost, though well assured that
they have entered on the blessed life. If we are assured of the fact, that
we have received the Fullness of the Spirit, we need not worry as to dates.


_3. Signs Following._

Yet again, one may know whether the Fullness has come to his heart and
life by the signs following, by what "The Men" of the North of Scotland
would call "the marks." Christ's words used in another connection may
surely be applied in this, "By their fruits ye shall know them" (Matt.
vii. 20). "The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering,
gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance" (Gal. v. 22, 23). The
fullness of the fruit will surely be found where the Fullness of the
Spirit is. Quantity and quality will both be there. As this has already
been touched upon when considering the effects of the blessing, no more
need be added here. But this, however, must be clearly borne in mind,
that, while the Fullness of the Spirit is a _gift_, the fruit of the
Spirit is a _growth_. Fruit grows, and the fruit _will_ grow, if only we
see to it that the conditions are present which are favorable to growth.
That man does not manifest much wisdom who expects full growth without
attending to the conditions of growth.




CHAPTER XVII.

_MAY ONE SAY THAT HE IS FILLED?_


The question has been raised--Is it right for one to _say_ that he is
"filled with the Holy Ghost"? May this not savor of egotism? John said of
Jesus--"Behold the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world; ...
the same is He that baptizeth with the Holy Spirit" (John i. 29, 33).
Christ's twofold office here is to "take away sin," and "to baptize
with the Holy Spirit." Each one who knows Christ as the "Sin-bearer"
should have an experimental acquaintance with Him as the "Baptizer" too.
Indeed, this alone is _full salvation_. To have sin taken away is but
half salvation; to be "baptized with the Holy Spirit" as well, is to
possess full salvation. Now, if Christ has taken away a man's sin, may
that man not know it? Certainly. And if he knows it, may he not bear
witness to the fact? Nay, does Christ not expect him to confess?--to tell
what great things the Lord hath done for him? No right-thinking person
would regard it as wrong for a saved man to confess his Saviour, or would
regard his confession as egotism. By parity of reasoning, if Christ has
baptized a pardoned man with the Holy Ghost, may that man not know it?
Surely! and if he knows it, may he not bear witness to the fact? May he
not tell what still greater things the Lord hath done for him? Would this
be wrong? Must _this_ necessarily be egotism? At the same time, while it
is perfectly scriptural for a Spirit-filled man to testify, for Christ's
glory, as to the Infilling of the Holy Spirit when questioned upon it--for
we must be careful not to libel the grace of God that is in us, and not
to grieve the Holy Spirit by ignoring Him or His work within us--one
cannot be too careful lest he be found casting his "pearls before the
swine" (Matt. vii. 6), and as a rule it will be better in this matter to
let the life speak rather than the tongue. Indeed it will not often be
necessary for the Spirit-filled man to be questioned on the subject at
all; his speech will betray him, his manner of life, his fruitful service.




CHAPTER XVIII.

_MAY ONE LOSE THE BLESSING?_


The question trembles from many a lip--If I get the blessing, may I lose
it? Most certainly. But, glory be to God! He has made ample provision for
failure. There is no reason why we _should_ fail; God has made ample
provision _against_ failure; we must not expect to fail; _but_ in case we
do fail, provision has been made. The most prolific cause of loss is
disobedience--disobedience either to one of God's written commands, or to
the inward promptings of His Holy Spirit. "The Holy Ghost whom God hath
given to them that obey Him" (Acts v. 32). This all-glorious gift is not
only obtained but retained in connection with obedience. It is absolutely
necessary to maintain the attitude of complete self-surrender, for the
slightest act of disobedience--that is, the asserting of our own will in
opposition to His will--may cost us the loss of the blessing, such as,
neglecting to speak to a man about the great salvation, or, refusing to
give a tract to some one when we _knew_ God wanted us to do so. We must
learn to be obedient to the promptings of the Spirit. "Mine eyes are ever
toward the Lord" (Ps. xxv. 15) must be our constant attitude.

If we possess the blessing, and desire to retain it, there is another
matter of the last importance that must be attended to, viz., letting
"the Word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom" (Col. iii. 16).
The Spirit-filled man will be a Word-filled man. A neglected Bible is
responsible for much of the lost blessing from which many of God's
children are suffering to-day. If we would retain the blessing in its
fullness and freshness, we must feed _daily_ and feed _much_ upon Christ
as He is revealed to us in the Holy Scriptures. It is the function of the
indwelling Spirit to take of the things of Christ, and to show them unto
us (John xvi. 14). He does not speak from Himself or of Himself, but of
Jesus; and so He will be continually drawing us to the Word, that He may
have the opportunity of drawing our attention to fresh beauties in
Immanuel. There is much so-called reading of the Bible that is not
"searching the Scriptures" (John v. 39), not "delighting in the law of
the Lord," not "meditating in it day and night" (Ps. i. 2), not "letting
the Word of Christ _dwell in you richly_." You cannot live a Spirit-filled
life, and be content with a shallow, meager acquaintance with the Divine
Word. The Spirit-filled man gives God's Book its own proud place, the
premier place, in all his reading. It is instructive to compare the
effects of being filled with the Spirit and of being filled with the Word.
"Be filled with the Spirit; speaking _one to another in psalms and hymns
and spiritual songs, singing_ and making melody _with your heart to the
Lord_" (Eph. v. 18). "Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all
wisdom; teaching and admonishing _one another with psalms and hymns and
spiritual songs, singing_ with grace _in your hearts unto God_" (Col.
iii. 16).

Have we then, unhappily, through disobedience or neglect, lost the
blessing which once we possessed? Is there one saying, "Oh that I were
as in the months of old!"? (Job xxix. 2.) It may be "all joy" with you
again, for if you have lost the blessing, just go back and search for it,
and you will find it where you lost it! Just there and nowhere else. Have
you found the spot where your obedience failed? Yield and obey just there,
pick up your obedience where you dropped it, and there you may obtain the
blessing, again as you obtained it at the first; but _just there and
nowhere else_. An illustration of this is found in 2 Kings vi. The
Divinity Students of those days were going down to build a new Divinity
Hall on the banks of the Jordan, and they asked Elisha, the man of God,
to go with them. The story tells us that as one of the students "was
felling a beam, the axe-head fell into the water; and he cried and said,
Alas, my master! for it was borrowed. And the man of God said, Where fell
it? And he shewed him the place. And he cut down a stick, and cast it in
thither; and the iron did swim. And he said, Take it up to thee. So he
put out his hand and took it," and having re-fixed the axe-head on the
handle, he went on again with his felling (verses 5-7). Where was it that
the student got his lost axe-head? Where he lost it! in the very spot
where it fell into the Jordan's waters--it was just _there_ that he found
it. So if you lose the blessing, the only spot on earth where you need
look for it, if you wish to take it up to thee again, is _the very spot
where you lost it_. Let us all learn by root of heart what the student
did _not_ do. After the axe-head flew from the handle, he did not continue
at work chopping with an axe-handle. No; but as soon as he lost his
axe-head, he _stopped till he got it on again_. Oh that many a Christian
worker would read, mark, learn; and inwardly digest! Then some Sabbaths
there might be many a pulpit without a preacher, and many a Sabbath School
class without a teacher, and many a sphere of Christian labor without its
worker. Why? where are they? Away looking for their axe-heads! Away to the
banks of that river of disobedience, in whose sluggish waters they lost
them! Alas! that there should be so many to-day with an axe-handle, trying
in this way to fell beams for the house of our God! working with the
blessing lost! Hard labor this, and very little to show for it--except
earnestness! "And isn't it a fine thing to be in earnest?" Yes, but it is
a finer to have a little of that uncommon thing--homely common sense, at
the back of the earnestness, and the man who is hewing with an axe-handle
doesn't impress one as being overburdened that way! If we have enjoyed
and have lost the Fullness of the Spirit, let us confess, betake us to
the open fountain and obey, and He will put away our sin; and then, let
us start afresh, let us come to Him again for the Fullness, as at the
first, and we will find that "He abideth faithful: for He cannot deny
Himself" (2 Tim. ii. 13). For the sake of the Sacred Heart, for His Name's
glory, for the sake of souls, and for our own sake, we must not, we will
not try to live and labor without being "FILLED WITH THE SPIRIT."


THE END.

Transcriber's note: Obvious printer errors have been corrected without
comment.