Produced by An Anonymous Volunteer





THE CROWN OF THORNS

A TOKEN FOR THE SORROWING


by E. H. Chapin




PREFACE.


One of the discourses in this volume--"The Mission of Little
Children"--was written just after the death of a dear son, and was
published in pamphlet form. The edition having become exhausted sooner
than the demand, it was deemed advisable to reprint it; and accordingly
it is now presented to the reader, accompanied by others of a similar
cast, most of them growing out of the same experience. This fact will
account for any repetition of sentiment which may appear in these
discourses, especially as they were written without any reference to one
another.

To the sorrowing, then, this little volume is tendered, with the
author's sympathy and affection. Upon its pages he has poured out some
of the sentiments of his own heartfelt experience, knowing that they
will find a response in theirs, and hoping that the book may do a work
of consolation and of healing. If it impresses upon any the general
sentiment which it contains,--the sentiment of religious resignation and
triumph in affliction; if it shall cause any tearful vision to take the
Christian view of sorrow; if it shall teach any troubled soul to
endure and hope; if it shall lead any weary spirit to the Fountain of
consolation; in one word, if it shall help any, by Christ's strength,
to weave the thorns that wound them into a crown, I shall be richly
rewarded, and, I trust, grateful to that God to whose service I dedicate
this book, invoking his blessing upon it.

E. H. C.

May, 1860




CONTENTS.


     THE THREE TABERNACLES
     THE SHADOW OF DISAPPOINTMENT
     LIFE A TALE
     THE CHRISTIAN VIEW OF SORROW
     CHRISTIAN CONSOLATION IN LONELINESS
     RESIGNATION
     THE MISSION OF LITTLE CHILDREN
     OUR RELATIONS TO THE DEPARTED
     THE VOICES OF THE DEAD
     MYSTERY AND FAITH




THE THREE TABERNACLES


And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to
be here: and let us make three tabernacles, one for thee, and one for
Moses, and one for Elias. MARK ix. 5.


Caught up in glory and in rapture, the Apostle seems to have forgotten
the world from which he had ascended, and to which he still belonged,
and to have craved permanent shelter and extatic communion within the
mystic splendors that brightened the Mount of Transfiguration. But it
was true, not only as to the confusion of his faculties, but the purport
of his desire, that "he knew not what he said." For even "while he yet
spake," the cloud overshadowed them, the heavenly forms vanished, they
found themselves with Jesus alone, and an awful Voice summoned them from
contemplation to duty,--from vision to work.

Peter knew not what he said. He would have converted the means into an
end. He and his fellow-disciples had been called to follow Christ not
that they might see visions, but had been permitted to see visions that
they might follow Christ. Just previous to that celestial interview,
Jesus had announced to them his own painful doom, and had swept away
their conceit of Messianic glories involved with earthly pomp and
dominion, by his declaration of the self-denial, the shame, and the
suffering, which lay in the path of those who really espoused his cause
and entered into his kingdom. They needed such a revelation as this,
then, upon the Mount of Transfiguration, to support them under the
stroke which had shaken their earthly delusion, and let in glimpses of
the sadder truth. It was well that they should behold the leaders of the
old dispensation confirming and ministering to the greatness of the new,
and the religion which was to go down into the dark places of the earth
made manifest in its authority and its source from Heaven. It was
well that they should see their Master glorified, that they might be
strengthened to see him crucified. It was well that Moses and Elias
stood at the font, when they were about to be baptized into their
apostleship of suffering, and labor, and helping finish the work which
these glorious elders helped begin. But that great work still lay before
them, and to rest here would be to stop upon the threshold;--to have
kept the vision would have thwarted the purpose. Upon a far higher
summit, and at a far distant time--with fields of toil and tracts of
blood between--would that which was meant as an inspiration for their
souls become fixed for their sight, and tabernacles that should never
perish enclose a glory that should never pass away.

You may have anticipated the lessons for ourselves which I propose to
draw from this unconsidered request of Peter. At least, you will readily
perceive that it does contain suggestions applicable to our daily life.
For I proceed, at once, to ask you if it is not a fact that often we
would like to remain where, and to have what, is not best for us? Do not
illustrations of this simple thought occur easily to your minds? Does
not man often desire, as it were, to build his tabernacles here or
there, when due consideration, and after-experience will convince him
that it was not the place to abide; that it was better that the good
be craved, or the class of relations to which he clung, should not be
permanent? In order to give effect to this train of reflection, let
me direct you to some specific instances in which this desire is
manifested.

Perhaps I may say, without any over-refinement upon my topic, that
there are three things in life to which the desires of men especially
cling,--three tabernacles which upon the slope of this world they
would like to build. I speak now, it is to be remembered, of desires of
impulse, not of deliberation,--of desires often felt, if not expressed.
And I say, in the first place, that there are certain conditions in life
itself that it sometimes appears desirable to retain. Sometimes, from
the heart of a man, there breaks forth a sigh for perpetual youth. In
the perplexities of mature years,--in the experience of selfishness, and
hollowness, and bitter disappointment; in the surfeit of pleasure; in
utter weariness of the world,--he exclaims, "O! give me back that sweet
morning of my days, when all my feelings were fresh, and the heart was
wet with a perpetual dew. Give me the untried strength; the undeceived
trust; the credulous imagination, that bathed all things in molten
glory, and filled the unknown world with infinite possibilities." Sad
with skepticism, and tired with speculation, he cries out for that faith
that needed no other confirmation than the tones of a mother's voice,
and found God everywhere in the soft pressure of her love; and when his
steps begin to hesitate, and he finds himself among the long shadows,
and the frailty and fear of the body overcome the prophecies of the
soul, and no religious assurance lights and lifts up his mind, how he
wishes for some fountain of restoration that shall bring back his bloom
and his strength, and make him always young! "Why have such experiences
as decline, and decay, and death?" he asks. "Is it not good for us to be
ever young? Why should not the body be a tabernacle of constant youth,
and life be always thus fresh, and buoyant, and innocent, and confiding?
Or, if we must, at last, die, why all this sad experience,--this
incoming of weakness,--this slipping away of life and power?"

But this is a feeling which no wise or good man ever cherishes long,
for he knows that the richest experiences, and the best achievements of
life, come after the period of youth; spring out of this very sadness,
and suffering, and rough struggle in the world, which an unthinking
sentimentality deplores. Ah, my friends, in spite of our trials,
our weariness, our sad knowledge of men and things; in spite of the
declining years among which so many of us are standing, and the tokens
of decay that are coming upon us; nay, in spite even of our very sins;
who would go back to the hours of his youthful experience, and have the
shadow stand still at that point upon the dial of his life? Who, for the
sake of its innocence and its freshness, would empty the treasury of his
broader knowledge, and surrender the strength that he has gathered in
effort and endurance? Who, for its careless joy, would exchange the
heart-warm friendships that have been annealed in the vicissitudes of
years,--the love that sheds a richer light upon our path, as its vista
lengthens, or has drawn our thoughts into the glory that is beyond the
veil? Nay, even if his being, has been most frivolous and aimless, or
vile,--in the penitent throb with which this is felt to be so, there is
a. spring of active power which exists not in the dreams of the
youth; and the sense of guilt and of misery is the stirring, of a life
infinitely deeper than that early flow of vitality and--consciousness
which sparkles as it runs. Build a tabernacle for perpetual youth, and
say, "It is good to be here?" It cannot be so; and it is well that it
cannot. Our post is not the Mount of Vision, but the Field of Labor; and
we can find no rest in Eden until we have passed through, Gethsemane.

Equally vain is the desire for some condition in life which shall be
free from care, and want, and the burden of toil. I suppose most people
do, at times, wish for such a lot, and secretly or openly repine at the
terms upon which they are compelled to live. The deepest fancy in the
heart of the most busy men is repose--retirement-command of time and
means, untrammeled by any imperative claim. And yet who is there that,
thrown into such a position, would find it for his real welfare, and
would be truly happy? Perhaps the most restless being in the world is
the man who need do nothing, but keep still. The old soldier fights all
his battles over again, and the retired merchant spreads the sails of
his thought upon new ventures, or comes uneasily down to snuff the air
of traffic, and feel the jar of wheels. I suppose there is nobody whose
condition is so deplorable, so ghastly, as his whose lot many may be
disposed to envy,--a man at the top of this world's ease, crammed
to repletion with what is called "enjoyment;" ministered to by every
luxury,--the entire surface of his life so smooth with completeness that
there is not a jut to hang, a hope on,--so obsequiously gratified
in every specific want that he feels miserable from the very lack of
wanting. As in such a case there, can be no religious life--which never
permits us to rest in a feeling of completeness; which seldom abides
with fulness(sic) of possession, and never stops with self, but always
inspires to some great work of love and sacrifice--as in such a case
there can be no religious life, he fully realizes the poet's description
of the splendor and the wretchedness of him who


    " * * built his soul a costly pleasure-house
    Wherein at ease for aye to dwell;"

and who said

    " * * O soul, make merry and carouse
    Dear soul, for all is well.

    * * * * * * *

    Singing and murmuring in her feastful mirth,
    Joying to feel herself alive,
    Lord over nature, lord of the visible earth,
    Lord of the 'senses five

    "Communing with herself:, 'All these are mine,
    And let the world have peace or wars,
    'T is one to me,' * * * * *

    * * * * * So three years
    She throve, but on the fourth she fell,
    Like Herod, when the shout was in his ears,
    Struck through with pangs of hell."


The truth is, there is no one place, however we may envy it, which would
be indisputably good for us to occupy; much less for us to remain in.
The zest of life, like the pleasure which we receive from a work of art,
or from nature, comes from undulations--from inequalities; not from
any monotony, even though it be the monotony of seeming perfection. The
beauty of the landscape depends upon contrasts, and would be lost in
one common surface of splendor. The grandeur of the waves is in the deep
hollows, as well as the culminating crests; and the bars of the sunset
glow on the background of the twilight. The very condition of a great
thing is that it must be comparatively a rare thing. We speak of summer
glories, and yet who would wish it to be always summer?--who does not
see how admirably the varied seasons are fitted to our appetite for
change? It may seem as if it would be pleasant to have it always
sunshine; and yet when fruit and plant are dying from lack of moisture,
and the earth sleeps exhausted in the torrid air, who ever saw a summer
morning more beautiful than that when the clouds muster their legions to
the sound of the thunder, and pour upon us the blessing of the rain?
We repine at toil, and yet how gladly do we turn in from the lapse of
recreation to the harness of effort! We sigh for the freedom and glory
of the country; but, in due time, just as fresh and beautiful seem to
us the brick walls and the busy streets where our lot is cast, and
our interests run. There is no condition in life of which we can say
exclusively "It is good for us to be here." Our course is appointed
through vicissitude,--our discipline is in alternations; and we can
build no abiding tabernacles along the way.

But, I observe, in the second place, that there are those who may
discard the notion of retaining any particular condition of life and yet
they would preserve unbroken some of its relations. They may not keep
the freshness of youth, or prevent the intrusion of trouble, or shut out
the claims of responsibility, or the demands for effort;--they may not
achieve anything of this kind; and they do not wish to achieve it; but
they would build a tabernacle to LOVE, and keep the objects of dear
affection safe within its enclosure. "Joy, sorrow, poverty, riches,
youth, decay, let these come as they must," say they, "in the flow of
Providence; but let the heart's sanctuaries remain unbroken, and let us
in all this chance find the presence and the ministration of those we
love." And, common as the sight is, we must always contemplate with a
fresh sadness this sundering of family bonds; this cancelling(sic) of
the dear realities of home; this stealing in of the inevitable gloom;
this vacating of the chair, the table, and the bed; this vanishing of
the familiar face into darkness; this passage from communion to
memory; this diminishing of love's orb into narrower phases,--into a
crescent,--into a shadow. Surely, however broad the view we take of the
universe, a real woe, a veritable experience of suffering, amidst this
boundless benificence, reaching as deep as the heart's core, is this old
and common sorrow;--the sorrow of woman for her babes, and of man for
his helpmate, and of age for its prop, and of the son for the mother
that bore him, and of the heart for the hearts that once beat in
sympathy, and of the eyes that hide vacancies with tears. When these
old stakes are wrenched from their sockets, and these intimate cords are
snapped, one begins to feel his own tent shake and flap in the wind that
comes from eternity, and to realize that there is no abiding tabernacle
here.

But ought we really to wish that these relations might remain unbroken,
and to murmur because it is not so? We shall be able to answer this
question in the negative, I think,--however hard it may be to do
so,--when we consider, in the first place, that this breaking up and
separation are inevitable. For we may be assured that whatever in the
system of things is inevitable is beneficent. The dissolution of these
bonds comes by the same law as that which ordains them; and we may be
sure that the one--though it plays out of sight, and is swallowed up in
mystery--is as wise and tender in its purpose as the other. It is very
consoling to recognize the Hand that gave in the Hand that takes a
friend, and to know that he is borne away in the bosom of Infinite
Gentleness, as he was brought here. It is the privilege of angels, and
of a faith that brings us near the angels, to always behold the face of
our Father in Heaven; and so we shall not desire the abrogation of this
law of dissolution and separation. We shall strengthen ourselves to
contemplate the fact that the countenances we love must change, and the
ties that are closest to our hearts will break; and we shall feel that
it ought to be, because it must be,--because it is an inevitability in
that grand and bounteous scheme in which stars rise and set, and life
and death play into each other.

But, even within the circle of our own knowledge, there is that which
may reconcile us to these separations, and prevent the vain wish of
building perpetual tabernacles for our human love. For who is prepared,
at any time, to say that it was not better for the dear friend, and
better for ourselves, that he should go, rather than stay;--better for
the infant to die with flowers upon its breast, than to live and have
thorns in its heart;--better to kiss the innocent lips that are still
and cold, than to see the living lips that are scorched with guilty
passion;--better to take our last look of a face while it is pleasant
to remember--serene with thought, and faith, and many charities--than
to see it toss in prolonged agony, and grow hideous with the wreck of
intellect? And, as spiritual beings, placed here not to be gratified,
but to be trained, surely we know that often it is the drawing up of
these earthly ties that draws up our souls; that a great bereavement
breaks the crust of our mere animal consciousness, and inaugurates a
spiritual faith; and we are baptized into eternal life through the cloud
and the shadow of death.

But, once more, I remark, that there are those who may say, "We do not
ask for any permanence in the conditions of life; we do not ask that
even its dearest relationships should be retained; but give, O! give
us ever those highest brightest moods of faith and of truth, which
constitute the glory of religion, and lift us above the conflict and
the sin of the world!" No truly religious mind can fail to perceive the
gravitation of its thoughts and desires, and the contrast between its
usual level and its best moments of contemplation and prayer. And it.
may indeed seem well to desire the prolongation of these experiences; to
desire to live ever in that unworldly radiance, close to the canopy
of God,--in company with the great and the holy,--in company with the
apostles and with Jesus,--on some Mount of Transfiguration, in garments
whiter than snow, and with faces bright as the sun; and the hard, bad,
trying world far distant and far below. Does not the man of spiritual
sensitiveness envy those sainted ones who have grown apart, in pure
clusters, away above the sinful world, blossoming and breathing
fragrance on the very slopes of heaven?

And yet, is this the complete ideal of life? and is this the way in
which we are to accomplish its true end? I think we may safely say that
even the brightest realizations of religion should be comparatively
rare, otherwise we forget the work and lose the discipline of our mortal
lot. The great saints--the men whose names stand highest in the calendar
of the church universal--are not the ascetics, not the contemplators,
not the men who walked apart in cloisters; but those who came down from
the Mount of Communion and Glory, to take a part in the world; who have
carried its burdens in their souls, and its scars upon their breasts;
who have wrought for its deepest interests, and died for its highest
good; whose garments have swept its common ways, and whose voices have
thrilled in its low places of suffering and of need;--men who have
leaned lovingly against the world, until the motion of their great
hearts jars in its pulses forever; men who have gone up from dust, and
blood, and crackling fire; men with faces of serene endurance and lofty
denial, yet of broad, genial, human sympathies;--these are the men who
wear starry crowns, and walk in white robes, yonder.

We need our visions for inspiration, but we must work in comparative
shadow; otherwise, the very highest revelations would become monotonous,
and we should long for still higher. And yet, are there not some whose
desire is for constant revelation? Who would see supernatural sights,
and hear supernatural sounds, and know all the realities towards which
they are drifting, as well as those in which they must work? They would
make this world a mount of perpetual vision; overlooking the fact that
it has its own purposes, to be wrought out by its own light, and within
its own limits. For my part, I must confess that I do not share in
this desire to know all about the next world, and to see beforehand
everything that is going to be. I have no solicitude about the mere
scenery and modes of the future state. But this desire to be in the
midst of perpetual revelations argues that there is not enough to fill
our minds and excite our wonder here; when all things around us are
pregnant with suggestion, and invite us, and offer unfathomed depths for
our curious seeking. There is so much here, too, for our love and our
discipline; so much for us to do, that we hardly need more revelations
just now;--they might overwhelm and disturb us in the pursuit of
these appointed ends. Moreover, the gratification of this desire would
foreclose that glorious anticipation, that trembling expectancy, which
is so fraught with inspiration and delight,--the joy of the unknown, the
bliss of the thought that there is a great deal yet to be revealed.

We do need some revelation; just such as has been given;--a glimpse of
the immortal splendors; an articulate Voice from heaven--a view of the
glorified Jesus; a revelation in a point of time, just as that on the
mount was in point of space. We need some; but not too much,--not all
revelation; not revelation as a customary fact. If so, I repeat, we
should neglect this ordained field of thought and action. We should live
in a sphere of supernaturalism,--in an atmosphere of wonder,--amid
a planetary roll of miracles; still unsatisfied; still needing the
suggestion of higher points to break the stupendous monotony.

And I insist that work, not vision, is to be the ordinary method of our
being here, against the position of those who shut themselves in to a
contemplative and extatic piety. They would escape from the age, and its
anxieties; they would recall past conditions; they would get into the
shadow of cloisters, and build cathedrals for an exclusive sanctity.
And, indeed, we would do well to consider those tendencies of our time
which lead us away from the inner life of faith and prayer. But this
we should cherish, not by withdrawing all sanctity from life, but by
pouring sanctity into life. We should not quit the world, to build
tabernacles in the Mount of Transfiguration, but come from out the
celestial brightness, to shed light into the world,--to make the whole
earth a cathedral; to overarch it with Christian ideals, to transfigure
its gross and guilty features, and fill it with redeeming truth and
love.

Surely, the lesson of the incident connected with the text is clear,
so far as the apostles were concerned, who beheld that dazzling,
brightness, and that heavenly companionship, apart on the mount.
They were not permitted to remain apart; but were dismissed to their
appointed work. Peter went to denial and repentance,--to toil and
martyrdom; James to utter his practical truth; John to send the fervor
of his spirit among the splendors of the Apocalypse, and, in its calmer
flow through his Gospel, to give us the clearest mirror of the Saviour's
face.

Nay, even for the Redeemer that was not to be an abiding vision; and he
illustrates the purport of life as he descends from his transfiguration
to toil, and goes forward to exchange that robe of heavenly, brightness
for the crown of thorns.

What if Jesus had remained there, upon that Mount of Vision, and himself
stood before us as only a transfigured form of glory? Where then would
be the peculiarity of his work, and its effect upon the world?

On the wall of the Vatican, untarnished by the passage of three
hundred years, hangs the masterpiece of Raphael,--his picture of the
Transfiguration. In the centre, with the glistening raiment and the
altered countenance, stands Jesus, the Redeemer. On the right hand and
on the left are his glorified visitants; while, underneath the bright
cloud, lie the forms of Peter, and James, and John, gazing at the
transfigured Jesus, shading their faces as they look. Something of the
rapture and the awe that attracted the apostles to that shining spot
seems to have seized the soul of the great artist, and filled him with
his greatest inspiration. But he saw what the apostles, at that moment,
did not see, and, in another portion of his picture, has represented the
scene at the foot of the hill,--the group that awaited the descent of
Jesus.. The poor possessed boy, writhing, and foaming, and gnashing
his teeth,--his eyes, as some say, in their wild rolling agony, already
catching a glimpse of the glorified Christ above; the baffled disciples,
the caviling scribes, the impotent physicians, the grief-worn father,
seeking in vain for help. Suppose Jesus had stayed upon the mount, what
would have become of that group of want, and helplessness, and
agony? Suppose Christ had remained in the brightness of that vision
forever,--himself only a vision of glory, and not an example of toil,
and sorrow, and suffering, and death,--alas! For the great world at
large, waiting at the foot of the hill--the groups of humanity in
all ages;--the sin-possessed sufferers--the caviling skeptics; the
philosophers, with their books and instruments; the bereaved and frantic
mourners in their need!

So, my hearers, wrapped in the higher moods of the soul, and wishing
to abide among upper glories, we may not see the work that waits for us
along our daily path; without doing which all our visions are vain. We
must have the visions. We need them in our estimate of the world around
us,--of the aspects and destinies of humanity. There are times
when justice is balked, and truth covered up, and freedom trampled
down;--when we may well be tempted to ask, "What is the use of trying
to work?"--when we may well inquire whether what-we are doing is work
at all. And in such a case, or in any other, one is lifted up, and
inspired, and enabled to do and to endure all things, when in steady
vision he beholds the everliving God,--when all around the injustice,
and conflict, and suffering of the world, he detects the Divine
Presence, like a bright cloud overshadowing. O! then doubt melts away,
and wrong dwindles, and the jubilee of victorious falsehood is but a
peal of drunken laughter, and the spittings of guilt and contempt no
more than flakes of foam flung against a hero's breast-plate. Then one
sees, as it were, with the vision of God, who looked down upon the old
cycles, when a sweltering waste covered the face of the globe, and huge,
reptile natures held it in dominion;--who beholds the pulpy worm,
down in the sea, building the pillars of continents;--so one sees the
principalities of evil sliding from their thrones, and the deposits
of humble faithfulness rising from the deep of ages. Our sympathy, our
benevolent effort in the work of God and humanity, how much do they need
not only the vision of intellectual foresight, but of the faith which,
on bended knees, sees further than the telescope!

And alas! for him who, in his personal need and effort, has no margin of
holier inspiration--no rim of divine splendor---around his daily life!
Without the vision of life's great realities we cannot see what our work
is, or know how to do it.

But such visions must be necessarily rare and transient, or we shall
miss their genuine efficacy. We must work in comparative shadow, without
the immediate sight of these realities; and only in the place of our
rest,--rest for higher efforts and a new career,--only there may we have
their constant companionship, and build their perpetual tabernacles.




THE SHADOW OF DISAPPOINTMENT.

     But we trusted that it had been he which should have
     redeemed Israel.    LUKE xxiv. 21.


In the accounts of the disciples, contained in the New Testament, there
is no attempt to glorify them, or to conceal any weakness. From the
first to the last, they think and act precisely as men would think and
act in their circumstances;--they are affected just as others of like
culture would be affected by such events as those set forth in the
record. And the genuineness of their conduct argues the genuineness of
the incidents which excited it. The divine, wonderworking, risen Jesus,
is the necessary counterpart of the amazed, believing, erring hoping,
desponding, rejoicing fishermen and publicans. This stamp of reality is
very evident in the instance before us. The conduct and the feelings of
the disciples are those of men who have been involved in a succession of
strange experiences. For a little while they have been in communion with
One who has spoken as never man spoke, and who has touched the deepest
springs of their being. He has lifted them out of the narrow limits
of their previous lives. From the Receipt of Customs, and the Galilean
lake, he has summoned them to the interests and awards, the thought and
the work, of a spiritual and divine kingdom. At first following him,
perhaps they hardly knew why, conscious only that he had the Words of
Eternal Life, the terms of this discipleship have grown into bonds of
the dearest intimacy. Their Master has become their Companion and their
Friend, and their faith has deepened into tender and confiding love. But
still, theirs has been the belief of the trusting soul, rather than the
enlightened intellect. From the fitness of the teaching, and the wonder
of the miracle, they have felt that he was the very Christ; and yet,
from this conviction of the heart they have not been able to separate
their Jewish conceits. Sometimes, it may be, the language of the Saviour
has carried them up into a broader and more spiritual region; but
then, they have subsided into their symbols and shadows;--only,
notwithstanding the errors that have hindered, and the hints that have
awed them, they have steadily felt the inspiration of a great hope, the
expectation of something glorious to be revealed in the speedy coming
of the Messiah's kingdom. And now, does not the account immediately
connected with the text picture for us exactly the state of men whose
conceptions have been broken up by a great shock, and yet in whose
hearts the central hope still remains and vibrates with mysterious
tenacity?--men who have had the form of their expectation utterly
refuted and scattered into darkness, but who still cherish its spirit?
Christ the crowned King,--Christ the armed Deliverer,--Christ the
Avenger, sweeping away his foes with one burst of miracle,--is to
them, no more. They saw the multitude seize him, and no legions came to
rescue;--they saw him condemned, abused, crucified, buried; and so,
in no sense of which they could conceive, was this he who should
have redeemed Israel. And yet the suggestion of something still to
come,--something connected with three days,--lingered in their minds.
And, in the midst of their despondency, striking upon this very chord,
the startling rumor reached them that Christ had risen from the dead. It
was in this mood that Jesus found the two disciples whose words I
have selected for my text;--faith and doubt, disappointment and hope,
alternating in their minds; their Jewish conceit laid prostrate in the
dust, and yet the expectation of something, they knew not what, now
strangely confirmed. See how these feelings mingle in the passage before
us. "What manner of communications," said the undiscerned Saviour, "are
these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad?"-"Art thou
only a stranger in Jerusalem," says one of them, "and hast not known
the things which are come to pass there in these days?" What things?
"Concerning Jesus of Nazareth," replied they, "which was a prophet
mighty in deed and word before God and all the people: and how the chief
priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have
crucified him. But we trusted that it had been he which should have
redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to-day is the third day since
these things were done. Yea, and certain women also of our company made
us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre; and when they found
not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of
angels, which said that he was alive. And certain of them which were
with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had
said: but him they saw not."

My hearers, I think we see, in this instance the minds of these
disciples working as the minds of men might be expected to work under
like conditions. And to me this casts a complexion of genuineness upon
the transactions which, as stated in the record, account for these
mental alternations. The entire passage is alive with reality. The
genuine emotions of humanity play and thrill together, there, in the
shadow of the cross and the glory of the resurrection.

But, if these feelings are thus natural, the experience itself indicated
in that portion of this verse which constitutes the text is not entirely
removed from our ordinary life. The incident which occasioned these sad
words was an extraordinary one; but its moral significance, as it now
comes before us, illustrates many a passage in man's daily course.
The language, as we read it, appears to be the language of
disappointment;---it was under the shadow of disappointment, though
alternating with hope, that these disciples spoke; and it is to the
lessons afforded by disappointment in the course of life that I now
especially invite your attention.

And the precise point in the text, bearing upon this subject, is the
fact, that while the disciples seemed to feel as though all redemption
for Israel was now hopeless, that process of redemption for Israel,
and for the world, was going on through the agency of those very events
which had filled them with dismay. Even as they were speaking, in tones
of sadness, about the crucified Christ, the living Christ, made perfect
for his work by that crucifixion, was walking by their side. Looking far
this side of that shadow of disappointment which then brooded over
them, we see all this, that then they did not see; but now is it with
ourselves, under the frequent shadows cast by more ordinary events? This
suggestion may afford us some profitable thoughts.

I need hardly say, in the first place, that man is continually inspired
by expectation. Every effort he makes is made in the conviction of
possibility and the light of hope. This is the heart of ambition and
the spring of toil. It is the balm which he applies to the wounds of
misfortune. It is the key with which he tries the wards of nature. And
from the morning of life to its last twilight he is always looking.
forward. The saddest spectacle of all--sadder even than pain, and
bereavement, and death--is a man void of hope. The most abject people
is a hopeless people, in whose hearts the memories of the past, and the
pulses of endeavor, and the courage of faith are dead, and who crouch by
their own thresholds and the crumbling tombstones of their fathers, and
take the tyrant's will, without an incentive, and without even a dream.
The most intense form in which misery can express itself is in the
phrase, "I have nothing to live for." And he who can actually say,
and who really feels this, is dead, and covered with the very pall and
darkness of calamity. But few, indeed, are they who can, with truth, say
this.

But if hope or expectation is such a vital element of human experience,
so does disappointment have its part in the mechanism of things, and,
as we shall presently see, its wise and beneficial part. For, after all,
how few things correspond with the forecast of expectation! To be sure,
some results transcend our hope; but how many fall below it,--balk
it,--turn out exactly opposite to it! Among those who meet
with disappointments in life, there are those who are expecting
impossibilities,--whose expectations are inordinate,--are more than the
nature of things will admit; or who are looking for a harvest where
they have planted no seed. They carry the dreams of youth in among the
realities of the world, and its vanishing visions leave them naked and
discouraged. The light of romance, that glorified all things in the
future, recedes as they advance, and they come upon rugged paths of
fact--upon plain toil and daily care,--upon the market and the field,
and upon men as they are in their weakness, and their selfishness, and
their mutual distrust. Or they belong, it may be, to that class who
are too highly charged with hope; whose sanguine notions never go by
induction, but by leaps; who never calculate the difficulties, but only
see the thing complete and rounded in imagination;--men with plenty
of poetry, and no arithmetic; whose theories work miracles, but whose
attempts are failures. It is pleasant, sometimes, to meet with people
like these, who, clothed in the scantiest garments, and with only a
crust upon their tables, at the least touch of suggestion, mount into a
region of splendor. Their poverty all fades away;--the bare walls,
the tokens of stern want, the dusty world, are all transfigured with
infinite possibilities. Achievement is only a word, and fortune comes in
at a stride. The palace of beauty rises, fruits bloom in waste places,
gold drops from the rocks, and the entire movement of life becomes a
march of jubilee. And they are so certain this time,--the plan they now
have is so sure to succeed! I repeat, it is pleasant, sometimes, to have
intercourse with such men, who throw bloom and marvelousness upon
the actualities of the world, from the reservoirs of their sanguine
invention. At least, it is pleasant to think how this faculty of
unfailing enthusiasm enables them to bear defeat, and to look away from
the cold face of necessity;--to think that, while so many are trudging
after the sounding wheels and the monotonous jar of life, and lying down
by the way to die, these men are marching buoyantly to a tune inside.
And yet this is pleasant only from a hasty point of view. These people
meet with disappointment, of course; and it is sad to think how many
lives have come to absolutely nothing, and are all strewn over, from
boyhood to the grave, with the fragments of splendid schemes. It is sad
to think how all their visionary Balbecs and Palmyras have been reared
in a real desert,--the desert of an existence producing no substantial
thing. And among these vanishing dreams, and on that melancholy waste,
they learn, at last, the meaning of their disappointment. And from
their experience, we too may learn, that we are placed here to be
not merely ideal artists, but actual toilers; not cadets of hope, but
soldiers of endeavor.

But there are disappointments in life that succeed reasonable
expectation; and these are the hardest of all to bear. I say the
expectation is reasonable; and yet, very possibly, the bitterness of the
disappointment comes from neglecting to consider the infirmity of all
earthly things. It is hard when, not dreaming, but trying our best, we
fail. It is hard to bear the burden and heat of the day, through all
life's prime, and yet, with all our toil, to earn no repose for its
evening hours. It is hard to accumulate a little gain, baptizing every
dollar with our honest sweat, and then have it stricken from our grasp
by the band of calamity or of fraud. It is hard, when we have placed our
confidence in man's honor, or his friendship, to find that we are fools,
and that we have been led in among rocks and serpents. And hard indeed
is it to see those who were worthy our love and our faith drop by
our side, and leave us alone. This dear child, the blossom of so many
hopes,--hard is it to see him die--to fold all our expectation in his
little shroud, and lay it away forever. We thought it had been he who
should have comforted and blessed us,--in whose life we could have
retraced the cycle of our own happiest experience,--whose unfolding
faculties would have been a renewal of our knowledge, and his manhood
not merely the prop but the refreshing of our age. This companion of our
lot,--this wedded wife of our heart,--why taken away now? She has shared
our early struggles, and tempered our anxiety with cheerful assurance.
She has tasted the bitterness; we thought she would have been a partner
of the joy. She has borne our fretfulness, and helped our perplexity,
and shed a serene light into our gloom; We thought she would have been
with us when we could pay the debt of faithfulness; when the cares of
business did not press and disturb us so. We thought it was she whose
voice, sweet with the music of old, deep memories, would have consoled
us far along; and that, in some calm evening of life, when all the
tumult of the world was still, and we were ready to go, we should
go--not far apart--gently to our graves.

Such are the plans that we lay out, saying of this thing and of that
thing, "We trusted that it would have been so." But the answer has been
disappointment. The old, ay, perhaps the most common lesson of life, is
disappointment.

And now I ask, is it not an intended lesson? Evidently it comes in as
an element in the Providential plan in which we are involved. For we
see its disciplinary nature,--its wise and beneficial results in harmony
with that Plan. Consider whether it is not the fact, that the entire
discipline of life grows out of a succession of disappointments. That
youthful dream, in which life has stretched out like a sunny landscape
with purple mountain-chains--is it not well that it is broken up, and we
strike upon rugged realities? Does not all the strength of manhood, and
the power of achievement, and the glory of existence, depend upon these
things which are not included in the young boy's vision of a happy
world. Welcome, O! disappointment of our hope that life would prove a
perpetual holiday. Welcome experience of the fact that blessing comes
not from pleasure, but from labor! For in that experience alone was
there ever anything truly great or good accomplished. We can conceive no
possible way by which one can be made personally strong without his
own effort;--no possible way by which the mind can be enriched and
strengthened where it is lifted up, instead of climbing for itself;--no
way, therefore, in which life could be at all a worthy achievement,
if it were merely a plain of ease, instead of holding every ward of
knowledge and of power under the guard of difficulty and the requisition
of endeavor.

And it is equally true that the greatest successes grow out of great
failures. In numerous instances the result is better that comes after a
series of abortive experiences than it would have been if it had come at
once. For all these successive failures induce a skill, which is so much
additional power working into the final achievement. Nobody passes at
once to the mastery, in any branch of science or of industry; and when
he does become a master in his work it is evident, not only in the
positive excellence of his performance, but in the sureness with which
he avoids defects; and these defects he has learned by experimental
failures. The hand that evokes such perfect music from the instrument
has often failed in its touch, and bungled among the keys. And if a man
derives skill from his own failures, so does he from the failures of
other men. Every unsuccessful attempt is, for him, so much work done;
for he will not go over that ground again, but seek some new way. Every
disappointed effort fences in and indicates the only possible path of
success, and makes it easier to find. We should thank past ages and
other men, not only for what they have left us of great things done,
but for the heritage of their failures. Every baffled effort for freedom
contributes skill for the next attempt, and ensures the day of victory.
Nations stripped and bound, and waiting for liberty under the shadow of
thrones, cherish in memory not only the achievements of their heroes,
but the defeats of their martyrs; and when the trumpet-voice shall
summon them once more, as surely it will,--when they shall draw for
the venture of freedom, and unroll its glittering standard to the
winds,--they will avoid the stumbling blocks which have sacrificed the
brave, and the errors which have postponed former hopes. In public
and in private action, it is true that disappointment is the school of
achievement, and the balked efforts are the very agents that help us to
our purpose.

And, if life itself--life as a whole--seems to us but a series of
disappointments, is not this the very conviction we need to work out
from it, through our own experience? Do we not need to learn that this
life itself is not sufficient, and holds no blessing that will fill us
completely, and with which we may forever rest? The baffled hopes of our
mortal state;--what are they but vain strivings of the human soul, out
of the path of its highest good? The wandering bird, driven against
the branches, and beaten by the storm, flutters at last to the clear
opening, by which it mounts above the cloud, and finds its way to its
home. This life is not ordained in vain;--it is constituted for a grand
purpose, if through its lessons of experience we become convinced that
this life is not all. In the outset of our existence here, and merely
from the teaching of others, we cannot comprehend the great realities of
existence.

How the things that have grown familiar to our eyes, and the lessons
that have sounded trite upon our ears, become fresh and wonderful, as
life turns into experience! How this very lesson of disappointment lets
us in to the deep meanings of Scripture, for instance! The Christ of
our youth,--a personage standing mild and beautiful upon the
Gospel-page,----a being to admire and love; how be develops to our later
thought! how solemnly tender, how greatly real, he becomes to us, when
we cling to him in the agony of our sorrow, and he goes down to walk
with us on the waters of the sea of death! As traditional sentiment,--as
a wholesome subject for school-composition,--we have spoken and written
of the weariness of the world-worn heart, and the frailty of earthly
things. But, O! when our hearts have actually become worn, and tried;
when we begin to learn that the things of this life are evanescent,--are
dropping away from us, and we slipping from them,--what inspiration of
reality comes to us in the oft-heard invitation, "Come unto me, all ye
that labor and are heavy-laden, and I will give you rest!" What a depth
of meaning flowing from the eternal world, in the precept we have read
so carelessly,--"Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where
moth and rust doth corrupt, and thieves break through and steal!" Thus
the best results of life come from the defeats and the limitations that
are involved with it.

And, in all this, observe how disappointment is the instrument of higher
blessings. See how thus life itself suggests a higher good than life
itself can yield. And so the attitude of the disciples, after the
crucifixion, illustrates many experiences of our earthly lot. Those
incidents which perplexed and grieved them were securing the very
results they seemed to prevent. So, in our ordinary life, the things
that appear most adverse to us are often the most favorable.

 I may say, indeed, that to any man who is rightly exercised
by it, disappointment always brings a better result. But this statement
requires that I should say, likewise, that the result of disappointment
depends upon the level and quality of a man's spirit. "One thing happens
alike to the wise man and the fool." But how different in texture and
substance is the final result of the event! Disappointment breaks down
a feeble and shallow man. There are those, again, whom it does not make
better,--in fact, whom nothing, as we can see, makes better. Everything
glides easily off from them. Now, it is a noble thing to see a man rise
above misfortune,--a moral Prometheus, submissive to the actual will of
God, but defying fate. But there are men whose very elasticity indicates
the superficiality of their nature. For it is good sometimes to be
sad,--good to have depth of being sufficient for misfortune to sink
into, and, accomplish its proper work. But the man who rightly receives
the lesson of disappointment, and improves by its discipline, bent as
he is on some great or good work, is impelled by it only to a change
of method,--never to a change of purpose; and the disappointment
effectually serves the purpose. But the fact before us is most clearly
seen when we contemplate the results of disappointment upon a religious
and un-religious spirit. A man is not made better by disappointment to
whom this world is virtually everything;--to whom spiritual things are
not realities. To him life is a narrow stream between jutting crags, and
its substance flows away with the objects before his eyes. Nay, some men
of this sort are made worse by the failure of earthly hopes, and their
natures are compressed and hammered by misfortune into a sullen and
granitic defiance. But he who sees beyond these material limits, looking
to the great end and final relations of our being, always extracts from
mortal disappointment a better result. In the wreck of external things
he gathers that spiritual good which is the substance of all life;--that
faith, and patience, and holy love, which, when all that is mortal
and incidental in our humanity passes away, constitute the residuum of
personality.

Our hopes disappointed,--our plans thwarted and overthrown; but out
of that disappointment a richer good evolving than we had conceived;
something that tends more than all our effort to produce the real object
of life. My friends, what do we make out of this fact? Why, surely this,
that life is not our plan, but God's. Consider what we, often, would
have made out of life, and compare this with what Providence has made
out of it. Contrast the man's achievement with the boy's scheme;
the dream of care with the moral glory that has sprung from toil
and trouble. Contrast the idea of the Saviour in the minds of those
disciples with the actual Saviour rising victorious from the conditions
of shame and death.

Life is God's plan; not ours. We may find this out only by effort; but
we do find it out.

We are responsible for the use of our materials, but the materials
themselves, and the great movement of things, are furnished for us.
Let us fall into no ascetic view of life. Out of our joy and our
acknowledged good the Supreme Disposer works his spiritual ends. But,
especially, how often does he do this out of our trials, and sorrows,
and so-called evils! Once more I say life is God's plan; not ours.
For often on the ruins of visionary hope rises the kingdom of our
substantial possession and our true peace; and under the shadow of
earthly disappointment, all unconsciously to ourselves, our Divine
Redeemer is walking by our side.




LIFE A TALE


     We spend our years as a tale that is told.  Psalm xc.9.


We bring our years to an end like a thought, is the proper rendering of
these words, according, to an eminent translator. But as the essential
idea of the Psalmist is preserved in the common version, I employ it
as peculiarly illustrative and forcible. It will be my object, in
the present discourse, to show the fitness of the comparison in the
text;--to suggest the points of resemblance between human life and a
passing narrative.

I observe, then, in the first place, that the propriety of this simile
is seen in the brevity of life. What more rapid and momentary than a
story? It is heard, and passes. Though it beguiles us for the time,
it dies away in sound, or melts from before, the eye. And this I say,
strikingly illustrates the brevity of life. The brevity of life! It is
a trite truth, and yet how little realized! Probably there is nothing,
more common, and yet there is nothing, more pernicious, than the habit
of virtual dependence upon length of days. Thus the best ends of our
mortal being are lost sight of; the solemn circumstances, the suggestive
mysteries of life, are misconstrued. The heavens, which give a myriad
hints of worlds beyond the grave, are, to many, impenetrable walls,
shutting them in to mere pursuits of sense,--the upholstery of a
workshop or bazaar; and this earth, which is but a step,--a filmy
platform of our immortal course,--is to them the solid abiding place of
all interest, and of all hope.

It is well, then, to break in upon this worldly reliance,--to consider
how fleeting and uncertain are the things in which we garner up so much.
Therefore, in order that we may more vividly realize the brevity of
life,--how like it is to a passing tale,--let us consider the rapidity
of its changes, even in a few short years. We are, to some degree, made
aware how fast the current of time bears us on, when we pause and remark
the shores; when we observe how our position to-day has shifted from
what it was yesterday; how the sunny slopes of youth have been changed
for the teeming uplands of maturity; yea, perhaps, how already the
stream is narrowing, and rushing more swiftly as it narrows, towards
those high hills that bound our present vision, upon whose summits
lingers the departing light, and around whose base thickens the solemn
shadow.

This rapidity of change is most strikingly illustrated when, after a few
years' absence, we return to the scenes of our youth. We plunged into
the current of the world, buoyant and vigorous; our thoughts have been
occupied every hour, and we have not noticed the stealthy shadow of
time. But we come back to that early spot, and look around. Lo! The
companions of our youth have grown into dignified men,--the active and
influential citizens of the place. Care has set

     "Busy wrinkles round their eyes."

They meet us with formal deportment, or with an ill-concealed
restlessness, as though we hindered them in their work,--work! Which,
when we parted with them, would have been flung to the winds for any
idle sport. How quickly they have changed into this gravity and anxiety!
On the other hand, those who stood where they stand now,--whose names
occupied the signs and the records which theirs now fill,--have passed
away, or, here and there, come tottering along, bent and gray-headed
men. Those, too, who were mere infants-those whom we never saw-take up
our old stations, and inspire them with the gladness of childhood. And
exactly thus have we changed to others. We are a mirror to them and they
to us.

From this familiar experience, then, let us realize that the stream of
life does not stop, nor are we left stationary, but carried with it;
though our condition may appear unchanged, until we lift up our eyes,
and look for the old landmarks. The brevity of our life! my friends.
Amid our daily business,--in the sounding tumult of the great mart, and
the absorption of our thoughts,--do we think of it? Do we perceive how
nearly we approach a goal which a little while ago seemed far before
us? Do we observe how quickly we shoot by it? Do we mark with what
increasing swiftness the line of our life seems reeling off, and how
close we are coming to the end? Time never stops! Each tick of the clock
echoes our advancing footsteps. The shadow of the dial falls upon it
a shorter and shorter tract, which we have yet to pass over. Even if a
long life lies before us, let us consider that thirty-five years is high
noon with us,--the meridian of that arc which comprehends but threescore
years and ten!

But we may be more vividly impressed with the fact of the brevity of
life, if we adopt some criterion wider than these familiar measurements.
The narrative, the story, engages our ears, in the pauses of care and
labor. We listen to it in the noonday rest, and around the evening fire.
It is a slight break in the monotony of our business,--an interlude in
the solemn march of life. And thus, in some respects, is life itself.
It is so, if we take into view a long series of existence, such as the
succession of human generations, or, still more, the periods of creative
development, and the computations of time as applied to the forms and
changes of the material universe. In this vast train of being, our
individual existence, however important to ourselves, is but an
interlude-a tale. Let us, then, for a while, lay aside any conventional
method of estimating our life,--a method in which that life fills a
large space, simply because it is brought near to the eye,--and let us
endeavor to take a view of it, as it were, from the fixed stars, or from
the elevation of the immortal state.

Compare, then, if you will, this life of yours or mine, not with the
personal standard of threescore years and ten, but with the whole course
of human history; and instantly we appear but as bubbles in the stream
of ages. But, again, consider how history itself is as "a tale that is
told;" and then, indeed, what a mere incident in it all is your life
and mine! If we stand off at the distance of a few centuries, so that we
have no present interest in them, it is strange how the proudest empires
assume an empty and spectral aspect. Their growth and decline occupied
ages; but what a brief achievement it appears now! Why puzzle ourselves
about their origin, or seek to disengage the true from the fabulous in
their history? Why strain laboriously to settle names, and dates, and
dynasties? What mere point they have occupied in the processes of
the great universe! Their hieroglyphic pillars, their gray old
pyramids;--what are they to the age of Uranus, or the new planet? Each
of these empires fulfilled its mission, and relatively that mission was
a great one; but in the long sweep of God's providence, and among the
phenomena of absolute being, what a brief link, a subordinate climax, it
was! The huge ribs of the earth, and the coral islands of the sea were
longer in building; and even these are transitory manifestations of
God's purposes, which stream around us through constant change
and succession. And what, then, are these nations-these epochs of
humanity-but waves rising and breaking on the great sea of eternity?
Mysterious Egypt, haughty Assyria, glorious Greece, kingly Rome;--how
spectral they have become. They stand out in no relief. As we recede
from them, they sink back, flat and inanimate on the horizon. Each is a
tale that has been told. Surely, then, if such is the life of nations,
I need not labor to impress upon you a sense of the brevity of our
individual existence.

But, for a moment, turn your thoughts to estimates that far exceed the
periods of history, and confound all our ordinary measurements. What is
our mortal existence, into which we crowd so much interest,--over the
anticipated length of which we slumber,--into whose uncertain future
we project our lithe plans so confidently,--compared to the age of the
heavens,--the lifetime of worlds?--compared to their march, from the
moment when they obeyed the creative fiat to that when they shall
complete their great cycle? It takes three years for light to travel
from the nearest fixed star to the earth; from another it takes twelve
years; while, on its journey from a star of the twelfth magnitude,
twenty four billions of miles away, it consumes four thousand years. And
yet we speak of long life! Why, when the light that wraps us now shall
be changed for the light that is just leaping from that distant star,
where in the gray bosom of the past shall we be? Sunken, forgotten,
crumbled to imperceptible atoms; the ashes of generations-the dust of
empires-heaped over us! And when we compare those wide estimates to
that divine eternity that evolves and limits all things, how does our
individual existence on the earth dwindle and vanish!--a heart-throb
in the pulses of the universal life,--a quivering leaf in the forest of
being,--"a tale that is told"!

And yet, my friends, our realization of existence is so intense,--the
horizon of the present shuts us in so completely,--that it really
requires an effort for us to pause and remember that we are such
transitory beings. It cannot be (we may unconsciously reason), that we
to whom this earth is bound with ligaments so intimate and strong; whose
breathing and motion-whose contact and action here-are such realities;
whose ears hear these varying sounds of life; whose eyes drink in this
perpetual and changing beauty; to whom business, study, friendship,
pleasure, domestic relations, are such fresh and constant facts; to whom
the dawn and the twilight, the nightly slumber and the daily meal, are
such regular experiences; to whom our possessions, our houses, lands,
goods, money, are such substantial things;--it cannot be that we are
not fixed permanently here,--that the years like a swift river, sweep us
nearer and nearer to a point where we must sink and leave it all,--that
the corridors of the earth echo our footsteps only as the footsteps of
a successive march-myriads going before, and myriads coming after us-and
soon they will catch no more murmurs of our individual life; for that
will be as "a tale that is told."

The whole train of thought I am now pursuing strikes us with peculiar
force, in reading the biographies of men who have lived intensely, who
have realized the fulness of life, who have mingled intimately with its
varied experiences, and occupied a large place in it. We see how to them
life was, as it is to us, an absorbing fact,--how they have planned, and
thought, and acted, as though they were to live forever; and yet we have
noticed the premonitions of change, the dropping away of friends, the
failing of vigor, the deepening of melancholy shadows, and the coming
of the end; the business closed, the active curiosity and intermeddling
ceased, the familiar haunts abandoned, the home made desolate, the
lights put out, the cup fallen beneath the festal board, and all the
earnest existence stopped forever. And this, too, so quick,--filling so
small a space in absolute time! From their illustration let us, then,
realize that our life, too, amid all these real conditions, is unfolding
rapidly to an end, and is "as a tale that is told."

But life is like a tale that is told, because of its comprehensiveness.
It is a common characteristic of a narrative that it contains a great
deal in a small compass. It includes many years, and expresses many
results. Sometimes it sweeps over different lands, and exhibits the
peculiarities of various personages. In one word, it is characterized by
comprehensiveness. And this, I repeat, is also a characteristic of human
life. When the consideration of the brevity of our mortal existence
excites us to diligence it is well; but when we make it an argument for
indolence, disgust, and despair, we should be reminded of the fact I
am now endeavoring to illustrate,--the fact that even the briefest life
contains a great deal, and means a great deal; and that, if we estimate
things by a spiritual standard, a man's earthly being may contain more
than all the cycles of the material world. From the best point of view,
life is not merely a term of years and a span of action; it is a force,
a current and depth of being. Indeed, considered in its most literal
sense, as the vital spark of our animal organism, it is something more
than a measurement of time;--it is a mysterious, informing essence. No
man has yet been able to tell us what it is, where it resides, or how
it acts. We only know that when we gaze upon the features of the dead
we see there the same organs that pertained to the living; but something
has gone,--something of light, power, motion; and that something we call
life.

But it is chiefly in a moral sense that I make the remark that life is
something more than a term of years or a span of action. In fact, life
is a sum of spiritual experiences; and thus one act, or result, often
contains more than a century of time. Who does not understand the fact
to which I now refer? Who has not felt something of it? Has not each one
of us, at times, realized that he lived a year in a single day,--in
a moment,--in an emotion or thought? Nay, could that experience be
measured by any estimate of time? And if we should compute the length of
any life by such experiences, and not by a succession of years, would
it not be a long life? At least, would it not be a full and immeasurable
life?

But, while every man's history will furnish instances of what I mean,
let us, for the sake of clearer illustration, consider some of the
experiences which are common to all. Defining life to be depth and
intensity of being, then,--a current of spiritual power, and not a mere
succession of incidents,--how much we live when we acquire the knowledge
of a single truth! What an inexhaustible power!--what an immeasurable
experience it is! We are made absolutely stronger by it; we receive more
life with it,--a new and imperishable fibre of being. Fortune cannot
pluck it from us, age cannot weaken it, death cannot set limits to
it. And now, with the fulness of this one experience as a test, just
consider our whole mortal experience as filled up with such revelations
of truth. Suppose we improve all our opportunities; into what boundless
life does education admit us, and the discoveries of every day, and the
ordinary lessons of the world! Tell me, is this life to be called merely
a brief and worthless fact, when by a little reading, for instance, I
can make the experience of other men, and lands, and ages, all mine?
When in some favored hour, I can climb the starry galaxy with Newton,
and pace along the celestial coast to the great harmony of numbers and
unlock the mighty secret of the universe? When of a winter's night,
I can pass through all the belts of climate, and all the grades of
civilization on our globe; scan its motley races, learn its diverse
customs, and hear the groaning of lonely ice-fields and the sigh of
Indian palms? When, with Bacon, I can explore the laboratory of nature,
or with Locke, consult the mysteries of the soul? When Spenser can lead
me into golden visions, or Shakespeare smite me with magic inspiration,
or Milton bathe me in immortal song? When History opens for me all the
gates of the past,--Thebes and Palmyra, Corinth and Carthage, Athens
with its peerless glory, and Rome with its majestic pomp?--when kings
and statesmen, authors and priests, with their public deeds and secret
thoughts are mine? When the plans of cabinets, and the debates of
parliaments, and the course of revolutions, and the results of battle,
are all before my eyes and in my mind? When I can enter the inner
chamber of sainted souls, and conspire with the efforts of moral heroes,
and understand the sufferings of martyrs? Say, when all these deep
experiences-these comprehensive truths-may be acquired through merely
one privilege, is life but a dream, or a breath of air? Thus, too,
do immeasurable experiences flow in to me from nature,--from planet,
flower, and ocean. Thus, too, does more life come to me from contacts
in the common round of action. And, I repeat, every truth thus gained
expands a moment of time into illimitable being,--positively enlarges
my existence, and endows me with a quality which time cannot weaken or
destroy.

Consider, again, how much we really live in cherishing good affections,
and in performing noble deeds. We have the familiar lines of the poet,
to this point:

     "One self-approving hour whole years outweighs
      Of stupid starers and of loud huzzas."

It is true. There is more life in one "self-approving hour,"-one act of
benevolence,--one work of self-discipline,--than in threescore years and
ten of mere sensual existence. Go out among the homes of the poor, lift
up the disconsolate, administer comfort to the forlorn; in some way, as
it may come across your path, or lie in the sphere of your duty, do a
deed of kindness; and in that one act you shall live more than in a year
of selfish indulgence and indolent ease,--yea, more than in a lifetime
of such. The poet, with his burning, immortal lines, while doing his
work, lives all the coming ages of his fame. From every marble feature
he chisels, the sculptor draws an intensity of being that cannot be
imparted by a mere extension of years. The philanthropist, in his walks
of mercy and his ministrations of love, lives more comprehensively
than another may in a century. His is the fathomless bliss of
benevolence,--the experience of God. The martyr, in his dying hour, with
his face shining like an angel's, does not live longer, but he lives
more than all his persecutors.

Consider, too, the experiences of religion, of worship, of prayer. In
the act of communion with God, in the realization of immortality, in the
aspirations and the idea of perfection, there is a depth and scope of
being from which all sensual estimates of time drop away.

Our mortal life, then, is very comprehensive. If we measure it, not by
its length of years, but by its spiritual results, be they good or evil,
it is a full and large life. It then appears, like the immortal state,
not as a fact of succession, but of experience. Christ has defined
eternal life as such a fact. "Eternal life," he says, "is to know thee,
the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent." The life of
the blessed in heaven is not marked by years and cycles; it is not so
much protracted being, as a power of knowledge,--a depth of glad and
holy consciousness,--a constant pulsation of harmony with God.

Again, every life may be compared to "a tale that is told," because it
has a plot. In the narrative there is a combination of agencies
working to a crisis. There is a main-point with which all the action is
involved. And so every human life has its main-point.. I will not
now take up time to carry out this illustration minutely. The mere
suggestion that each one is working out a peculiar destiny invests even
the meanest life with a solemn dignity, and counteracts any disparaging
argument drawn from its brevity.

But still I would urge, that the propriety of this comparison between
the peculiar tendency of an individual life and the plot of a story, is
seen in the fact that every man is accomplishing a certain moral result
in and for himself. This is inevitable. We may be inactive, but that
result is forming; the mould of habit is growing, and the inward life
is unfolding itself, after its kind. We may think our career is
aimless, but all things give a shape to our character. And does not this
consideration make our mortal life of deep consequence to us?

All circumstances and experiences are chiefly important as affecting
this result. One of the highest views we can take of the universe is
that of a theatre for the soul's education. We are placed upon this
earth not to be absorbed by it, but to use it for the highest spiritual
occasions. We are placed among the joys and sorrows of our daily lives
to be trained for immortal issues. Our business, our domestic duties,
and all our various relations, constitute a school for our souls. Here
our affections and our powers are acted upon for good or for evil.
Grief strengthens our faith and elevates our thoughts; joy quickens
our gratitude, our obedience, and our trust; temptation forms in us an
exalted and spontaneous virtue, or enfeebles and enslaves us. Chiefly,
then, should we be solicitous about character, the plot of our life;
and in this solicitude our earthly existence rises to the highest
importance.

Let us, then, feel that our mortal career is not vague and aimless. Let
us realize that each life is a special history. The poorest, the most
obscure, has such a history; and although it may be unnoticed by men,
angels regard it with interest. The merchant, every day, in the dust,
and heat, and busy maze of traffic, unfolds a history. The beggar by the
way-side, it may be, outrivals kings in the grandeur and magnitude of
his history. In sainted homes,--in narrow nooks of life,--in the secret
heart of love, and prayer, and patience,--many a tale is told which
God alone sees, and which he approves. The needy tell a tale, in their
unrelieved wants and unpitied sufferings. The oppressed tell a tale,
that goes up into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth. The vicious tell a
tale of wo, and misspent opportunity, and wasted power. Let us think of
it, I beseech you! Each one of us in his sphere of action is developing
a plot which surely tells in character,--which is fast running into a
great fixed fact.

Once more, we may compare every life to "a tale that is told," because
it has a moral. Any story, good or bad,--the most pernicious work of
fiction, the most flimsy narrative, as the grandest history,--has its
significance. So it is with the life of a man. As all his conduct
he is building up the intrinsic results of character for
himself,--establishing in his own soul a fabric of welfare or of wo,--so
is he furnishing a lesson for others, and accomplishing an end by which
they are affected. The purpose for which any one has lived, the point
which he has attained, the personal history which he has unfolded,
constitute the moral of his life.

For instance, here is a man whose life is frivolous,--divided between
aimless cares and superficial enjoyments. He has no resources in
himself, no fountain of inward peace and joy. His spirit leaps like new
wine in the whirl of exciting pleasure, but in the hour of solitude and
of golden opportunity, it is "flat, stale, and unprofitable." He marks
off the year by its festivals, and distributes the day into hours of
food, rest, and folly. In short, he holds no serious conception of life,
and he is untouched by lofty sentiment. The great drama of existence,
with its solemn shifts of scenery and its impending grandeur, is but a
pantomime to him; and he a thoughtless epicurean, a grinning courtier,
a scented fop, a dancing puppet, on the mighty stage. And surely, such
a life, a life of superficiality and heartlessness, a life of silken
niceties and conventional masquerade, a life of sparkling effervescence,
has a moral. It shows us how vain is human existence when empty of
serious thought, of moral purpose, and of devout emotion.

Another is a skeptic. He has no genuine faith in immortality, in
virtue, or in God. To him, life is a sensual opportunity closing up with
annihilation and to be enjoyed as it may. It is a mere game, and he who
plays the most skilful(sic) hand will win. Virtue is a smooth decency,
which it is well to assume in order to cover and artful selfishness;
and it is a noteworthy fact, too, that, in the long run, those who have
trusted to virtue have made by it. At least, vice is inexpedient, and it
will not do to make a public profession of it. Religion, too, he says,
is well enough; it does for the weak and the ignorant; though shrewd
men, like our skeptic know that it is all a sham, and, of course,
scarce give it a serious thought. What is religion to a keen-minded,
hard-headed, sagacious man of the world? What has it to do with
business, and politics, and such practical matters? Pack it away for
Sunday, and then put it on with clean clothes, out of respect for
the world; but if it lifts any remonstrance in the caucus or the
counting-room, why, like a shrewd man, laugh it out of countenance. What
has our skeptic to do with the future world or with spiritual relations?
Keep bugbears to frighten more timid and credulous persons. But only see
how he uses the world, and plays his scheme, and foils his adversary and
twists and bends his plastic morality, all because he is not troubled
with scruples, and has no faith in God or duty!

And yet, to the serious eye, that scans his spiritual mood, and looks
all around his shrewd, self-confident position, there is a great moral
in the skeptic's life. It teaches us, more than ever, the value of
faith, and the glory of religion. That flat negation only makes the
rejected truth more positive. The specimen of what existence is without
God in the world, causes us to yearn more earnestly for the shelter
of His presence, and the blessedness of His control. From the dark
perspective of the skeptic's sensual view, the bleak annihilation that
bounds all his hopes, we turn more gladly to the auroral promise of
immortality, to the consolations and influences of a life beyond the
grave. Yes, in that tale that is told, in that skeptic history, there
is indeed a great moral. It shows how meaningless and how mean, how
treacherous and false, is that man's life who hangs upon the balance
of a cunning egotism, and moves only from the impulses of selfish
desire-without religion, without virtue, repudiating the idea of
morality, and practically living without God.

Or, on the other hand, suppose we call up the image of one who has well
kept the trusts of family, and kindred, and friendship;--one who has
made home a pleasant place; who has filled it with the sanctities
of affection, and adorned it with a graceful and generous
hospitality;--before whose cheerful temper the perplexities of business
have been smoothed, and whose genial disposition has melted even the
stern and selfish;--who, thus rendering life around her happier and
better, attracting more closely the hearts of relatives, and making
every acquaintance a friend, has, chief of all, beautifully discharged
the sacred offices of wife and mother; encountering the day of adversity
with a noble self-devotion, enriching the hour of prosperity with wise
counsel and faithful love; unwearied in the time of sickness, patient
and trustful beneath the dispensation of affliction; in short, by
her many virtues and graces evidently the bright centre of a happy
household. And now suppose that, with all these associations clinging
to her, in the bloom of life, with opportunities for usefulness and
enjoyment opening all around her, death interferes, and suddenly
quenches that light! Is there not left a moral which abides a sweet and
lasting consolation? That moral is-the power of a kind heart; the worth
of domestic virtues; the living freshness of a memory in which these
qualities are combined.

Thus, then, in its brevity and its comprehensiveness, with its plot and
its moral, we see that each human life is like "a tale that is told."
To you, my friends, I leave the personal application of these
truths. Surely they suggest to each of us the most vital and solemn
considerations. Surely they call us to diligence and repentance,--to
introspection and prayer. What we are in ourselves,--what use we shall
make of life;--is not this an all important subject? What lesson we
shall furnish for others,--what influence for good or evil;--can we be
indifferent to that? God give us grace and strength to ponder and to act
upon these suggestions!

Finally, remember under whose dominion all the sorrows and changes
of earth take place. Let your faith in Him be firm and clear. To Him
address your grief;--to Him lift up your prayer. Of Him seek strength
and consolation;--of Him ask that a holy influence may attend every
experience. And while all the trials of life should quicken us to
a loftier diligence, and inspire us with a keener sense of personal
responsibility, surely when our hearts are sore and bleeding,--when our
hopes lie prostrate, and we are faint and troubled, it is good to rise
to the contemplation of the Infinite Controller,--to lean back upon the
Almighty Goodness that upholds the universe; to realize that He does
verily watch over us, and care for us; to feel that around and above all
things else He moves the vast circle of his purpose, and carries within
it all our joys and sorrows; and that this mysterious tale of human
life-this tangled plot of our earthly being-is unfolded beneath His
all-beholding eye, and by His omnipotent and paternal hand.




THE CHRISTIAN VIEW OF SORROW


     "A man of sorrow, and acquainted with grief" Is. Iii. 3.


There is one great distinction between the productions of Heathen and of
Christian art. While the first exhibits the perfection of physical form
and of intellectual beauty, the latter expresses, also, the majesty
of sorrow, the grandeur of endurance, the idea of triumph refined from
agony. In all those shapes of old there is nothing like the glory of the
martyr; the sublimity of patience and resignation; the dignity of the
thorn-crowned Jesus.

It is easy to account for this. In that heathen age the soul had
received no higher inspiration. It was only after the advent of Christ
that men realized the greatness of sorrow and endurance. It was not
until the history of the Garden, the Judgment-Hall, and the Cross had
been developed, that genius caught nobler conceptions of the beautiful.
This fact is, therefore, a powerful witness to the prophecy in the text,
and to the truth of Christianity. Christ's personality, as delineated
in the Gospels, is not only demonstrated by a change of dynasties,--an
entire new movement in the world,--a breaking up of the its ancient
order; but the moral ideal which now leads human action,--which has
wrought this enthusiasm, and propelled man thus strangely forward,--has
entered the subjective realities of the soul,--breathed new inspiration
upon it,--opened up to it a new conception; and, lo! The statue dilates
with a diviner expression;--lo! The picture wears a more lustrous and
spiritual beauty.

The Christ of the text, then,--"A man of sorrows, and acquainted with
grief,"-has verily lived, for his image has been reflected in the minds
of men, and has fastened itself there among their most intimate and
vivid conceptions. Sorrow, as illustrated in Christ's life, and as
interpreted in his scheme of religion, has assumed a new aspect and
yields a new meaning. Its garments of heaviness have become transfigured
to robes of light, its crown of thorns to a diadem of glory; and
often, for some one whom the rich and joyful of this world pity,--some
suffering, struggling, over-shadowed soul,--there comes a voice from
heaven, "This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased."

I remark, however, that Christianity does not accomplish this result by
denying the character of sorrow. It does not refuse to render homage to
grief. The stoic is as far from its ideal of virtue as the epicurean.
The heart of the true saint quivers at pain, and his eyes are filled
with tears. Whatever mortifications he may deem necessary as to the
passions of this poor flesh, if he imitates the example of Christ he
cannot deny those better affections which link us even to God; he
cannot harden those sensitive fibres which are the springs of our
best action,--which if callus we become inhuman. He realizes pain; he
recognises sorrow as sorrow. Its cup is bitter, and to be resisted with
prayer.

There is nothing more wonderful in the history of Jesus than his keen
sense of sorrow, and the scope which he allows it. In the tenderness of
his compassion he soothed the overflowing spirit, but he never rebuked
its tears. On the contrary, in a most memorable instance, he recognized
its right to grieve. It was on the way to his own crucifixion, when
crowned with insult, and lacerated with his own sorrows. "Daughters of
Jerusalem," said he, to the sympathizing women, "weep not for me, but
weep for yourselves and for your children." As though he had said, "You
have a right to weep; weep, then, in that great catastrophe which is
coming, when barbed affliction shall pierce your hearts, and the dearest
ties shall be cut in sunder. Those ties are tender; those hearts are
sacred. Therefore, weep!"

But Christ did more than sanction tears in others. He wept himself.
Closest in our consciousness, because they will be most vivid to us
in our darkest and our last hours, are those incidents by the grave of
Lazarus, and over against Jerusalem; the sadness of Gethsemane, and
the divine pathos of the last supper. Never can we fully realize what
a tribute to sorrow is rendered by the tears of Jesus, and the dignity
which has descended upon those who mourn, because he had not where to
lay his head, was despised and rejected of men, and cried out in bitter
agony from the cross. He could not have been our exemplar by despising
sorrow-by treating it with contempt; but only by shrinking from its
pain, and becoming intimate with its anguish,--only as "a man of
sorrows, and acquainted with grief."

But, on the other hand, Christianity does not over-estimate sorrow.
While it pronounces a benediction upon the mourner, it does not declare
it best that man should always mourn. It would not have us deny the
good that is in the universe. Nay, I apprehend that sorrow itself is
a testimony to that good,--is the anguish and shrinking of the severed
ties that have bound us to it; that it clings closest in hearts of the
widest and most various sympathies; that only souls which have loved
much and enjoyed much can feel its intensity or know its discipline. In
the language of another, "Sorrow is not an independent state of mind,
standing unconnected with all others...It is the effect, and, under
the present conditions of our being, the inevitable effect, of strong
affections. Nay, it is not so much their result, as a certain attitude
of those affections themselves. It not simply flows from the love of
excellence, of wisdom, of sympathy, but it is that very love, when
conscious that excellence, that wisdom, that sympathy have departed."
They, then, who deem it necessary for man's spiritual welfare that he
should constantly feel the pressure of chastisement, and be engirt with
the mist of tears, do not reason well. Jeremy Taylor reasons thus, when
he says in allusion to certain lamps which burned for many ages in a
tomb, but which expired when brought into open day: "So long as we are
in the retirements of sorrow, of want, of fear, of sickness, we are
burning and shining lamps; but when God lifts us up from the gates
of death and carries us abroad into the open air, to converse with
prosperity and temptations, we go out in darkness; and we cannot be
preserved in light and heat but by still dwelling in the regions of
sorrow." "There is beauty, and, to a certain extent, truth in this
figure," says a writer, in reply; "but it by no means follows that
continuous suffering would be good for man; on the contrary, it would
be as remote from producing the perfection of our moral nature as
unmitigated prosperity. It would be apt to produce a morbid and
ghastly piety; the 'bright lamps' of which Taylor speaks would still
be irradiating only a tomb." (Edinburgh Review No 141 The article on
Pascal) We may doubt whether there is more essential religiousness
in this seeking of sorrow as a mortification,--in this monastic
self-laceration and exclusion,--than in the morbid misery of the
hypochondriac. Neither comprehends the whole of life, nor is adapted to
its realities. Christ was "a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief;"
but he was also full of sympathy with all good, and enjoyed the charm
of friendship, and the light of existence. Around that great Life gather
many amenities. Below that face of agony beats a heart familiar with the
best affections of human nature; otherwise, we may believe, the agony
would not appear. The sadness of that last supper indicates the breaking
up of many joyful communions and the history which closes in the shadow
of the cross mingles with the festival of Cana, and lingers around the
home at Bethany.

But I remark, once more, that while Christianity neither despises nor
affects to desire sorrow, it clearly recognizes its great and beneficial
mission. In one word, it shows its disciplinary character, and thus
practically interprets the mystery of evil. It regards man as a
spiritual being, thrown upon the theatre of this mortal life not merely
for enjoyment, but for training,--for the development of spiritual
affinities, and the attainment of spiritual ends. It thus reveals a
weaning, subduing, elevating power, in sorrow.

The origin of evil may puzzle us;--its use no Christian can deny. A
sensual philosophy may shrink from it, in all its aspects, and retreat
into a morbid skepticism or a timid submission. If we predicate mere
happiness as "our being's end and aim," there is no explanation of evil.
From this point of view, there is an ambiguity in nature,--a duality in
every object, which we cannot solve. The throne of infinite light and
love casts over the face of creation an inexplicable shadow. If we were
made merely to be happy, why this hostility all around us? Why these
sharp oppositions of pain and difficulty? Why these writhing
nerves, these aching hearts, and over-laden eyes? Why the chill of
disappointment, the shudder of remorse, the crush and blight of hope?
Why athwart the horizon flicker so many shapes of misery and sin?
Why appear these sad spectacles of painful dying chambers, and weary
sick-beds?--these countless tomb-stones, too-ghastly witness to death
and tears? Explain for me those abrupt inequalities,--the long train of
necessities, poverty and its kindred woes, those fearful realities that
lie in the abysses of every city,--that hideous, compressed mass which
welters in the awful baptism of sensuality and ignorance,--the groans of
inarticulate woe, the spectacle of oppression, the shameless cruelty of
war, the pestilence that shakes its comet-sword over nations, and famine
that peers with skeleton face through the corn-sheaves of plenty. Upon
this theory of mere happiness no metaphysical subtlety can solve
the fact of evil;--the coiled enigma constantly returns upon itself,
inexplicable as ever.

But when we take the Christian view of life, we discover that not
happiness merely, but virtue, holiness, is the great end of man; though
happiness comes in as an inevitable consequence and accompaniment of
this result. And in the light reflected from this view, evil assumes
a powerful, and, I may say, a most beautiful office. It is just as
necessary for the attainment of virtue as prosperity, or any blessing.
Nay, in this aspect, it is itself a great blessing, and

    "Every cloud that spreads above
     And veileth love, itself is love."

It is evident that, without the contact of sin and the pressure of
temptation, there might be innocence, but not virtue. Equally evident
does it seem that, without an acquaintance with grief, there would soon
be but little of that uplifting tendency-that softening of the heart,
and sanctifying of the affections-which fit us for the dissolution of
our earthly ties, and for the communions of the spirit world. Beautiful
is this weaning efficacy of sorrow. By the ordinance of God, youth is
made to be content with this outward and palpable life. The sunshine and
the air-the flow of animal pleasures, encircled mysteriously with the
guardianship of parents, and the love of friends-are sufficient for the
child. But as we grow in years, there springs up a dissatisfaction, a
restlessness, of which we may be only half conscious, and still less
know how to cure. With some, this may subside into merely a fearful
and worldly discontent; others may heed the prophecy and lay hold on
a celestial hope, an immortal possession as the only remedy. In this
secret sense of want, which neither nature nor man can fill they will
hear already that low, divine voice,--"Come unto me, all ye that labor
and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." But generally another
and more emphatic missionary is necessary. It is the veiled angel of
sorrow, who plucks away one thing and another that bound us here in ease
and security, and in the vanishing of these dear objects indicates the
true home of our affections and our peace. Thus, by rupture and loss we
become weaned from earth, and the dissatisfaction and discontent which
sorrow thus induces are as kind and providential as the carelessness of
youth.

Who does not see that it is so,--that as we journey on in life there
are made in our behalf preparations for another state of
being,--unmistakable premonitions of that fact which the author of
the Epistle to the Hebrews so eloquently states, that "here have we no
continuing city"? The gloss of objects in which we delighted is worn off
by attrition,--is sicklied o'er by care; the vanity of earthly things
startles us suddenly, like a new truth; the friends we love drop away
from our side into silence; desire fails; the grasshopper becomes
a burden; until, at length, we feel that our only love is not here
below,--until these tendrils of earth aspire to a better climate, and
the weight that has been laid upon us makes us stoop wearily to the
grave as a rest and a deliverance. We have, even through our tears,
admired that discipline which sometimes prepares the young to die;
which, by sharp trials of anguish, and long days of weariness, weans
them from that keen sense of mortal enjoyment which is so naturally
theirs; which, through the attenuation of the body, illuminates the
soul, and, as it steals the bloom from the cheek, kindles the lustre of
faith in the eye, and makes even that young spirit look, unfaltering,
across the dark river, and, putting aside its earthly loves and its
reasonable expectations, exclaim, "Now I am ready!" But it would appear
that equal preparation, though in different forms, is provided for most
of us, in the various experiences of sorrow which we are called upon to
know, and which, if we would but heed them, have a celestial mission,
seeking to draw us up from this lower state, to induce us to lay up our
treasure where neither moth nor rust corrupts. And in the Christian view
of man as an heir of the spiritual word, does not sorrow, in this its
weaning tendency, receive a most beautiful explanation?

And, because it accomplishes this work, may be the reason why sorrow
always wears a kind of supernatural character. It is true that
blessings, equally with afflictions, come from Heaven; but this truth is
not so generally felt. A sharp disappointment will suddenly drive us to
God. The mariner of life sails, unthinking, over its prosperous seas,
but a flaw of storm will bring him to his prayers. And religion, reason
as we will, is peculiarly associated with affliction. And does not
sorrow possess this supernatural air, not merely because it interrupts
the usual order of things, but because, more than joy, it has a weaning
and spiritual tendency,--is sent, as it were, more directly from God
for this specific purpose? At least, after the sanctifying experience of
sorrow, we hold our joys more religiously.

There are other tendencies of sorrow akin to this, upon which I might
dwell, and which show the explanation that it receives in the Christian
light. The humbling effect that it has upon the proud and hard-hearted;
the equalizing result which it works, making the rich and poor, the
obscure and the great, stand upon the level of the common humanity,--the
common liability and dependence. I might, expanding the topic already
touched upon, speak of the influence which sorrow sheds abroad,
chastening the light, at tempering the draught of joy, and thus keeping
our hearts better balanced than otherwise. But I have sufficiently
illustrated its mission. I have shown its use, even its beauty, in
the Christian view. I have shown why Christianity, as the universal
religion, is rightly styled the "religion of sorrow," and why Christ, as
the perfect teacher and example, was "a man of sorrows, and acquainted
with grief."

Let us all, then, recognize the fact that life itself is a discipline.
That for each of us sorrow is mingled with joy in order that this
discipline may be accomplished. No one reaches the noon of life without
some grief, some disappointment, some sharp trial, which assures him, if
he will but heed it, that life is already declining, and that his
spirit should train itself for a higher and more permanent state. In the
failure of mortal excellence let him recognize the proof of an immortal
good, and from the bitterness that mingles with these earthly waters,
turn to drink of the celestial fountain. Of all things, let us not
receive sorrow indifferently, or without reflection. Its mission is
for discipline, but we feel it to be discipline only by recognizing
its source and its meaning; "it yieldeth the peaceable fruits of
righteousness" only "to them that are exercised thereby." Otherwise,
it may come and go as the storm that rends the oak, or the drenching
tempest that glides off as it falls. It may startle us for a moment,--it
may hurt us with a sense of pain and loss,--it may awe us with its
mystery; but unless it rouses us to solemn thought upon the meaning
of life, to self-communion and prayer, to higher and holier action, it
availeth little. It should not smite the heart's chords to wring from
them a mere shriek of distress, but to inspire it with a deeper and more
elevated tone, and by the element of sadness which it infuses make a
more liquid and exquisite melody.

But while we are thus taught to chasten our views of life, and to hold
even our joys with seriousness, and with wise forethought, let us not
look upon things with any morbid vision, or cast over them a monotonous
hue. Let us not live in gloom and bitterness. The Christian, of all
others, is the best fitted for a cheerful and proper enjoyment of
life, because he wisely recognizes the use of things, understands their
evanescent nature, and sees the infinite goodness that has so ordained
it. He is not surprised by sudden terrors. He is prepared for sorrow,
and thus can rest in peace with the good that he has; while those who
bury heart and soul in the present enjoyment, and know nothing but
sensual good, are broken down by calamity. The sudden change, like a
thunder-gust, puts out their light, and darkens all their life; and it
is they who are apt to fall from the summit of delight into a morbid
gloom; while the Christian, with his balanced soul, inhabits neither
extreme.

Finally, let us remember that it is not the object of sorrow to
overcome, but to elevate; not to conquer us, but that we, by it, should
conquer. It converts the thorns that wound us into a crown. It makes
us strong by the baptism of tears. The saint is always a hero. This
explains that grand distinction between Heathen and Christian art, of
which I spoke in the commencement; that expression of power blended with
agony,--of celestial beatitude refining itself upon the face of grief.
Christianity has made martyrdom sublime, and sorrow triumphant. Christ
is "the Captain of our salvation,"-the leader of "many sons unto glory;"
for he was "a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief."




CHRISTIAN CONSOLATION IN LONELINESS


     "And yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me."
     John xvi.32.


These words are found in the farewell address of Jesus to his disciples.
They were uttered in the dark hour of coming agony, and in the face of
ignominious death. Because Christ was divinely empowered, and possessed
the spirit without measure, let us not suppose that to him there was no
pain or sorrow, in that great crisis. With all his supernatural dignity,
he appears to us far more attractive when we consider him as impressible
by circumstances,--as moved by human sympathies. He is thus not merely a
teacher, but a pattern for us. In all our trials he not only enables us
to endure and to triumph, but draws us close to himself by the affinity
of his own experience. We see, too, how the best men, men of the
clearest faith, may still look upon death with a shudder, and shrink
from the dark and narrow valley; not because they fear death as such,
but because of the agony of dissolution, the rupture of all familiar
ties, and the solemn mystery of the last change.

But death and suffering, as Jesus was now to meet them, appeared in no
ordinary forms. He was to bear affliction with no friendly consolations
around him; but alone!--alone in the wrestling of the garden, and amid
the cruel mockery. Not upon the peaceful death-bed, but upon the bare
and rugged cross, torn by nails, pierced with the spear, crowned with
thorns, taunted by the revilings of the multitude, the vinegar and the
gall. He must be deserted, and encounter these trials alone. He must be
rejected, betrayed, crucified alone. And as he spoke to his disciples
those words of affection and holiness-those words so full of counsel and
sublime consolation-he remembered all this; he remembered that they who
now clung to him, and listened in sorrow to his parting accents, would
soon be scattered as sheep without a shepherd, and leave him to himself
in all that shame and agony. But even as he foretold it there gleamed
upon his spirit the sunshine of an inner consciousness,--a comfort that
no cloud could darken; and instantly he added, "And yet I am not alone,
because the Father is with me."

Having thus considered the circumstances in which these words were
spoken, I now proceed to draw from them a few reflections.

I would say, then, in the first place, that the great test which proves
the excellence of the religion of Christ is its adaptation to man in
solitude,--to man as a solitary being; because it is then that he
is thrown upon the resources of his own soul,--upon his inner and
everlasting life. In society he finds innumerable objects to attract his
attention and to absorb his affections. The ordinary cares of every
day, the pursuit of his favorite scheme, the converse of friends, the
exciting topics of the season, the hours of recreation, all fill up his
time, and occupy his mind with matters external to himself. And looking
upon him merely in these relations, if we could forget its great social
bearings, and the harmonies which flow from its all-pervading spirit out
into every condition of life, we might, perhaps, say that man could get
along well enough without religion. If this world were made up merely of
business and pleasure, perhaps the atheist's theory would suffice,
and we might feel indifferent whether controlled by plastic matter or
intelligent mind. We will admit that happiness, in one sense of the
term, does not essentially depend upon religion. Nay, we must admit this
proposition. A man may be happy without being religious. Good health,
good spirits;--how many, possessing these really enjoy life, without
being devout, or religious according to any legitimate meaning of that
term.

But change the order of circumstances. Remove these external
helps,--substitute therefor sorrow, duty, the revelations of our own
inner being,--and all this gayety vanishes like the sparkles from a
stream when a storm comes up. The soul that has depended upon outward
congenialities for its happiness has no permanent principle of
happiness; for that is the distinction which religion bestows. He who
cannot retire within himself, and find his best resources there, is
fitted, perhaps, for the smoother passages of life, but poorly prepared
for all life. He who cannot and dare not turn away from these outward
engrossments, and be in spiritual solitude,--who is afraid or sickens at
the idea of being alone,--has a brittle possession in all that happiness
which comes from the whirl and surface of things. One hour may scatter
it forever. And poorly, I repeat, is he prepared for all life,--for some
of the most serious and important moments of life. These, as I shall
proceed to show, we must meet alone, and from within; and therefore, it
constitutes the blessedness of the Christian religion that it enables
man when in solitude to have communion, consolation, and guidance. In
fact, it makes him, when alone, to be not alone,--to say, with glad
consciousness, "I am not alone, because the Father is with me."

To illustrate this truth, then, I say, that so far as the communion and
help of this outward world and of human society are concerned, there are
many and important seasons when man must be alone. In the first place,
in his most interior and essential nature, man is a solitary being. He
is an individual, a unit, amid all the souls around him, and all other
things,--a being distinct and peculiar as a star. God, in all the
variety of his works, has made no man exactly like another. There is an
individual isolation, a conscious personality, which he can share with
no other; which resists the idea of absorption; which claims its own
distinct immortality; which has its own wants and woes, its own sense of
duty, its own spiritual experiences. Christianity insists upon nothing
more strongly than this. Piercing below all conventionalisms, it
recognizes man as an individual soul, and, as such, addresses him with
its truths and its sanctions. Indeed, it bases its grand doctrine of
human brotherhood and equality upon the essential individuality of each
man, because each represents all,--each has in himself the nature of
every other. It demands individual repentance, individual holiness,
individual faith. One cannot believe for another. One cannot decide
questions of conscience for another. One cannot bear the sins or
appropriate the virtues of another. It is true, we have relations to the
great whole, to the world of mankind, and to the material universe. We
are linked to these by subtle affinities. We are interwoven with them
all,--bound up with them in arterial unity and life. They have all
poured their results into our souls, and helped to form us, and do now
support us; and we, in like manner, react upon them, and upon others.
This truth is a vital one, not to be neglected. But a deeper truth than
this and one upon which this depends, is the individual peculiarity of
each,--his integral distinctiveness, without which there would be no
such thing as union, or relationship; nothing but monotony and inertia.

The great fact, then, which I would impress upon you is, that,
essentially as spiritual beings, we are alone. And I remark that there
are experiences in life when we are made to feel this deep fact; when
each must deal with his reason, his heart, his conscience, for himself;
when each is to act as if the sole-existent in the universe, realizing
that he is a spirit breathed from God, complete in himself, subject
to all spiritual laws, interested in all spiritual welfare; when no
stranger soul, though it be that of his dearest friend, can intermeddle
with all that occupies him, or share it.

Such experiences we have when reflection binds us to the past.
Memory then opens for us a volume that no eye but God's and ours can
read;--memories of neglect, of sin, of deep secrets that our hearts have
hidden in their innermost folds. Such experiences sometimes there
are when we muse upon the external universe; when we reflect upon the
vastness of creation, the littleness of human effort, the transciency
of human relations; when our souls are drawn away from all ordinary
communions, and we feel that we are drifting before an almighty will,
bound to an inevitable destiny, hemmed in by irresistible forces. Then,
with every tie of association shrinking from us; then, keeping the
solitary vigil; then with cold, vast nature all around us, we are alone.
Or, there is a solitude which oppresses us even in the heart of the
great city;--a solitude more intense even than that of naked nature;
when all faces are strange to us; when no pulse of sympathy throbs from
our heart to the hearts of others when each passes us by, engaged with
his own destiny, and leaving us to fulfil ours. In this tantalizing
solitude of the crowd, in this sense of isolation from our fellows, if
never before, do we feel, with sickness of heart, that we are alone.
There is a solitude of sickness,--the solitude of the watcher or of the
patient,--a solitude to which, at times, duty and Providence call us
all. There are, in brief, countless circumstances of life when we shall
realize that we are indeed alone, and sad enough will be that solitude
if we have no inner resource,--no Celestial companionship;--if we cannot
say and feel as we say it, that we are not alone, for the Father is with
us.

But, while I cannot specify all these forms of solitude, let me dwell
upon two or three of the experiences of life in which we are peculiarly
alone.

First, then, I would say, that we must be alone in the pursuit of Truth
and the work of Duty. Others may aid me in these, but I must decide and
act for myself. I must believe for myself. I must do right for myself;
or if I do wrong, it is also for myself, and in myself I realize the
retribution. By my own sense of right and wrong-by my own standard of
truth and falsehood-I must stand or fall. There is in this world
nothing so great and solemn as the struggles of the solitary soul in its
researches after the truth,--in its endeavors to obey the right. We may
be indifferent to these vital questions,--it is to be feared that many
are; we may glide along in the suppleness of habit, and the ease
of conventionalism; we may never trouble ourselves with any pungent
scruples; we may never pursue the task of introspection, or bring to
bear upon the fibres of motive and desire within us the intense focus
of God's moral law; we may never vex our souls with tests of faith, but
rest contented with the common or hereditary standard;--but he who will
be serious in the work of spiritual discipline, who will act from a
vital law of duty, must endure struggles and conflicts than which, I
repeat, there is nothing more solemn under the sun. He will often find
himself opposed to the general current of human faith and action. His
position will be singular. His principle will be tried. Interest will
direct him another way; his strictness will be ridiculed, his motives
questioned, his sincerity misunderstood and aspersed. Alone must he
endure all this,--along cling to the majestic ideal of right as it rises
to his own soul. And thus he must wage a bitter conflict with fear and
with seduction,--with sophistries of the heart, and reluctance of the
will.

Often, too, must he question his own motives with a severer judgment
than that of the world, as his scrutiny is more close, and his
self-knowledge more minute. He knows the secret sin, the mental act, the
spiritual aberration. He knows the distance between his highest effort
and that lofty standard of perfection to which he has pledged his
purposes. Alone, alone does the great conflict go on within him. The
struggle, the self-denial, the pain, and the victory, are of the very
essence of martyrdom,--are the chief peculiarities in the martyr's
lot. His, too, must be the solitude of prayer, when, by throwing by all
entanglements,--in his naked individuality,--he wrestles at the Mercy
Seat, or soars to the bliss of Divine communion. In such hours,--in
every hour of self-communion,--when we ask ourselves the highest
questions respecting faith and duty, it is the deepest comfort to the
religious soul to feel and to say, "I am not alone, for the Father is
with me."

Again; there are experiences of Sorrow in which we are peculiarly alone.
How often does the soul feel this when it is suffering from the loss
of friends! Then we find no comfort in external things. Pleasure charms
not; business cannot cheat us of our grief; wealth supplies not the
void; and though the voice of friendship falls in consolation upon the
ear, yet with all these, we are alone,--alone! No other spirit can
fully comprehend our woe, or enter into our desolation. No human eye can
pierce to our sorrows; no sympathy can share them. Alone we must realize
their sharp suggestions, their painful memories, their brood of sad
and solemn thoughts. The mother bending over her dead child;--O! what
solitude is like that?--where such absolute loneliness as that which
possesses her soul, when she takes the final look of that little pale
face crowned with flowers and sleeping in its last chamber, with
the silent voice of the dead uttering its last good night? What more
solitary than the spirit of one who, like the widow of Nain, follows to
the grave her only son?--of one from whom the wife, the mother, has been
taken? The mourner is in solitude,--alone, in this peopled world;--O,
how utterly alone! Through the silent valley of tears wanders that
stricken spirit, seeing only memorials of that loss.

Indeed, sorrow of any kind is solitary. Its deepest pangs, its most
solemn visitations, are in the secrecy of the individual soul. We labor
to conceal it from others. We wear a face of unconcern or gayety amid
the multitude. Society is thronged with masked faces. Unseen burdens of
woe are carried about in its busy haunts. The man of firm step in the
mart, and of vigorous arm in the workshop, has communions in his chamber
that make him weak as a child. Nothing is more deceitful than a happy
countenance. Haggard spirits laugh over the wine-cup, and the blooming
garland of pleasure crowns an aching head. For sorrow is secret and
solitary. Each "heart knoweth its own bitterness."

How precious, then, in the loneliness of sorrow, is that faith
which bids us look up and see how near is God, and feel what divine
companionship is ours, and know what infinite sympathy engirds us,--what
concern for our good is, even in this darkness, shaping out blessings
for us, and distilling from this secret agony everlasting peace for the
soul. How precious that faith in the clear vision of which we can say,
"I am not alone, for the Father is with me."

Finally, we must experience Death alone. As I said in the commencement,
the best, the most pious soul, may naturally shrink from this great
event. We may learn to anticipate it with resignation, to look upon it
with trust; but indifference respecting it is no proof of religion. It
would be, rather, a bad sign for one to approach it without emotion; for
however his faith may penetrate beyond, the religious spirit will, with
deep awe, lift that curtain of mystery which hangs before the untried
future. That is a fact which we must encounter alone. Friends may gather
around us; their ministrations may aid, their consolations soothe us.
They may be with us to the very last; they may cling to us as though
they would pluck us back to the shores of time; their voices may fall,
the last of earthly sounds, upon our ears; their kiss awaken the last
throb of consciousness; but they cannot go with us, they cannot die in
our stead; the last time must come,--they must loosen their hold
from us, and fade from our vision, and we become wrapt in the solemn
experience of death, alone! Alone must we tread the dark valley,--alone
embark for the unseen land. No, Christian! not alone. To your soul, thus
separated in blank amazement from all familiar things, still is that
vision of faith granted that so often lighted your earthly perplexities;
to you is it given, in this most solitary hour, to say, "I am not alone
for the Father is with me!"

I repeat, then, in closing, that the test which proves the excellence
of the religion of Christ is the fact that it fits us for those solemn
hours of life when we must be alone. Mere happiness we may derive from
other sources; but this consolation not all the world can give,--the
world cannot take it away.

Let us remember, then, that though we seldom look within-though our
affections may be absorbed in external things-these solitary seasons
will come. It behoves us, therefore, as we value true peace of mind,
genuine happiness, which connects us to the throne of God with golden
links of prayer,--it behoves each to ask himself, "Dare I be alone? Am
I ready to be alone? And what report will my soul make in that hour of
solitude? If I do wrong, if I cleave to evil rather than the good, what
shall I do when I am alone, and yet not alone, but with the Father? But
if I do right, if I trust in Him, and daily walk with Him, what crown
of human honor, what store of wealth, what residuum of earthly pleasure,
can compare with the glad consciousness that wherever I rest or wander,
in every season and circumstance, in the solitary hours of life, and the
loneliness of death, God is verily with me?"

Surely no attainment is equal to that strength of Christ, by which,
when approaching the cross, he was able to say, "I am not alone, for the
Father is with me." By this strength, he was able to do more than to
say and feel thus. He was able to strengthen others,--to exclaim, "Be of
good cheer, I have overcome the world." So we, by spiritual discipline,
having learned of Christ to be thus strong, not only possess a spring
of unfailing consolation for ourselves, but there shall go out from us
a benediction and a power that shall gladden the weary and fortify the
weak,--that shall fill the solitude of many a lonely spirit with
the consolations of the Father's love, and the bliss of the Father's
presence.




RESIGNATION


     "The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink
     it?" John xvii.11.


The circumstances in which these words were uttered have, doubtless,
often arrested your attention,--have often been delineated for you
by others. Yet it is always profitable for us to recur to them. They
transpired immediately after our Saviour's farewell with his disciples.
The entire transaction in that "upper room" had been hallowed and
softened by the fact of his coming death. He saw that fact distinctly
before him, and to his eye everything was associated with it. As he took
the bread and broke it, it seemed to him an emblem of himself, pierced
and dying; and from the fulness of his spirit he spoke, "Take, eat, this
is my body, broken for you." As he took the cup and set it before
them, it reminded him of his blood, that must flow ere his mission
was fulfilled, and he could say, "It is finished." And then, when the
traitor rose from that table to go out and consummate the very purpose
that should lead to that event, as one who had arrayed himself in robes
of death, and was about to declare his legacy, he broke forth in that
sublime strain commencing, "Now is the Son of man glorified, and God
is glorified in him;"-that strain of mingled precept, and promise, and
warning, and prayer, from which the weary and the sick-hearted of all
ages shall gather strength and consolation, and which shall be read in
dying chambers and houses of mourning until death and sorrow shall reign
no more.

Laden, then, with the thought of his death, he had gone with his
disciples into the garden of Gethsemane. There, in the darkness and
loneliness of night, the full anguish of his situation rushed upon his
spirit. He shrank from the rude scenes that opened before him,--from
the mocker's sneer and the ruler's scourge; from the glare of impatient
revenge, and the weeping eyes of helpless friendship; from the insignia
of imposture and of shame; and from the protracted, thirsty, torturing
death. He shrank from these,--he shrank from the rupture of tender
ties,--he shrank from the parting with deeply-loved friends,--his soul
was overburdened, his spirit was swollen to agony, and he rushed to his
knees, and prayed, "Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from
me." Yet even then, in the intensity of his grief, the sentiment that
lay deep and serene below suggested the conditions, and he added,
"Nevertheless, not my will, but thine, be done." But still the painful
thought oppressed him, and, though more subdued now, he knelt and prayed
again, "O, my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me except I
drink it, thy will be done." And once more, as he returned from his
weary, sleeping disciples, and found himself alone, the wish broke
forth-yet tempered by the same obedient compliance.

And here I pause to ask, if, in all that scene of agony, anything is
developed inconsistent with the character of Christ? If we would have it
otherwise? If these tears and groans of anguish are tokens of a weakness
that we would conceal from our convictions,--that we would overlook, as
marring the dignity and the divinity of the Saviour? For one, I would
not have it otherwise. I would not have the consoling strength, the
sympathizing tenderness, the holy victory that may be drawn from
thence,--I would not have these left out from the Life that was given us
as a pattern. Jesus, we are told, "was made perfect through suffering."
This struggle took place that victory might be won;--this discipline of
sorrow fell upon him that perfection and beauty might be developed. By
this we see that Christ's was a spirit liable to trial,--impressible by
suffering; and from this fact does the victory appear greater and more
real. In this we see one striving with man's sorrow,--seeking, like man,
to be delivered from pain and grief, yet rising to a calm obedience,--a
lofty resignation. Had Jesus passed through life always serene, always
unshrinking, we should not have seen a man, but something that man is
not, something that man cannot be in this world; and that calm question,
"The cup that my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?" would
lose its force and significance. Otherwise, why should not Jesus be
as resigned as before? He had betrayed no sense of suffering, no
impressibility by pain; why should he not be willing, seeing he was
always able to meet the end? But O! when that deep, holy calmness has
fallen upon a soul that has been tossed by sorrow, and that has shrunk
from death,--when the brow has come up smooth and radiant from the
shadow of mourning,--when that soul is ready for the issue, not because
it has always felt around it the girdle of Omnipotence, but because,
through weakness and suffering, it has risen and worked out an
unfaltering trust, and taken hold of the hand of God by the effort of
faith,--then it is, I say, that resignation if beautiful and holy,--then
do we wonder and admire.

So it was with Jesus. A little while ago we saw him bowed with sorrow,
his eyes lifted with tears to heaven. We saw that he keenly felt the
approaching pain, and shame, and death. A little while ago, the still
night air was laden with his cry, "Father, if it be thy will, let this
cup pass from me." And now, as one who is strong and ready, he says
calmly to Peter, "The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not
drink it?" Truly, a battle has been fought, and a victory won, here; but
we should not be the better for it, were it not for that very process
of suffering in which that battle was waged, and from which that victory
was wrung. Now, when we sorrow, we know who also sorrowed; we remember
whose agony the still heavens looked upon with all their starry
eyes,--whose tears moistened the bosom of the bare earth,--whose cry of
anguish pierced the gloom of night. Now, too, when we sorrow, we know
where to find relief; we learn the spirit of resignation, and under what
conditions it may be born. Thank God, then, for the lesson of the lonely
garden and the weeping Christ-we, too, may be "made perfect through
suffering."

Such, then, were the circumstances that illustrate the words of the
text. Scarcely had Jesus risen from his knees, and wakened the drowsy
disciples, when the light of lanterns flashed upon him, and Judas came
with a multitude to bear him to that death from which, but now, he
shrunk with agony. But he shrank no more. The trial was over,--the
darkness had vanished,--an angel had strengthened him; and when the
impetuous Peter drew his sword and smote off the servant's ear, his
master turned to him, with the calm rebuke, "Put up thy sword into his
sheath; the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?"
Yes, cold and bitter as that cup was, pressed next to his very lips, he
had learned to drink it. God had given him strength, and no more did
he falter, no more did he groan-save once, for a moment, when, upon the
cross, drooping, and racked with intense pain, he cried out, "My God, my
God, why hast thou forsaken me?" But that passed away in the triumphant
ejaculation, "It is finished!"

Such was the resignation of Jesus; a trait in his character which, like
all the rest, is not only to be admired, but imitated;--not an abstract
virtue, manifested by a being so perfect and so enshrined in the
sanctity of a divine nature that we cannot approach it, and in our
mortal, work-day trials can never feel it; but a virtue which should
be throned in every heart, the strength and consolation of which every
suffering soul may experience. Nay, if there is one virtue which is more
often needed than any other, which lies at the base of true happiness,
and than which there is no surer seal of piety, it is this virtue of
resignation. And let me proceed to say, that by resignation I mean not
cold and sullen apathy, or reckless hardihood, but a sweet trust and
humble acquiescence, which show that the soul has submitted itself to
the Father who knows and does best, and that it meets his dispensations
with obedience and his mysteries with faith. The apathy and hardihood
to which I have alluded are very far from the trust and piety of a
religious spirit. The fatalist acquiesces in the course of things
because he cannot help it. He has reasoned to the conclusion that his
murmuring and weeping will not alter matters and he has resolved to take
things as they come. But here is no resignation to the will of God, but
to the necessity of things. Here is no faith that all things are wisely
ordered, and that sorrow is but the shadow of the Father's hand. No;
here is the simple belief that things are as they are, and cannot be
altered,-that an arbitrary law is the eternal rule, not a benevolent
and holy purpose; and the philosopher would be just as resigned if he
believed all things to be under the guidance of a blind fate, whose iron
machinery drives on to level or exalt, unintelligent and remorseless,
whether in its course it brings about good or evil,-whether it gladdens
human hearts or crushes them. Such resignation as this may be quite
common in the world, manifested in various phases, and by men of
different religious opinions. Do we not often hear the expression,
"Well, things are as they are,-we do best to take them as they come;"
and here the matter ends? No higher reference is made. The things
alluded to may issue from the bosom of material nature, may be sent into
the world by chance, or may come from the good Father of all; but the
minds of these reasoners reach not so far. Now I repeat, there is no
religion and no true philosophy in this method; certainly it is not
such resignation as Jesus manifested. In fact, it indicates total
carelessness as to the discipline of life, and will generally be found
with men in whose thoughts God is not, or to whose conceptions he is
the distant, inactive Deity, not the near and ever-working Controller. I
cannot admire the conduct of that man who when the bolt of sorrow falls,
receives it upon the armor of a rigid fatalism, who wipes scarcely a
tear from his hard, dry face, and says, "Well, it cannot be helped;
things are so ordered." Below all this there is often a sulky,
half-angry sentiment, as though the victim felt the blow, but was
determined not to wince,-as though there was an acknowledgment of
weakness, but also a display of pride,-a feeling that we cannot resist
sorrow, yet that sorrow has no business to come, and now that it
has come the sufferer will not yield to it. This, evidently, is not
resignation, religious resignation, but only sullen acquiescence, or
reckless hardihood.

In a certain sense it is true that we do well to take things as they
come,-that we cannot help the eternal laws that control events. But we
must go behind this truth. Whence do events come, and for what purpose
do they come? What is life, and for what end are all its varied
dispensations? Religion points us up beyond the cloud of materialism,
and behind the mechanism of nature, to an Infinite Spirit, to a God, to
a Father. All things are moved by infinite Love. Life is not merely
a phenomenon, it is a Lesson. Its events do not come and go, in a
causeless, arbitrary manner; they are meant for our discipline and our
good. In whatever aspect they come, then, let their appropriate lesson
be heeded. This is the religious view of life, and is wide apart from
the philosophy that lets events happen as they will, as though we were
in the setting of a heady current, and were borne along among other
matters that now help us, now jar and wound us,-that happen without
order and without object; all, like ourselves, driven along and taking
things as they come. In the religious view, all things stream from God's
throne, and whatever sky hangs over them, the infinite One is present;
prosperity is the sunshine that he has sent, and Faith, as she weeps,
beholds a bow in the clouds.

The religious man takes things as they come, but how? In a reverent and
filial spirit, a spirit that obeys and trusts because God has ordained.
He refers, behind the event, to the will that declares it. And yet, this
will be no formal lifeless resignation. He will not be stripped of his
manhood, or become unnatural in his religion. His resignation will not
be the cold assent of reason, or the mere rote and repetition of the
lips. No, it will be born in struggling and in sorrow. Religion is not
a process that makes our nature callous to all fierce heats or drenching
storms. Neither is he the most religious man who is calmest in the keen
crisis of trouble. I say in the crisis of trouble-for to human
vision there always is a crisis. We cannot penetrate to the secret
determinations of God, and in the season of care and affliction there
is a time when the issue is uncertain,-when we cannot say it is sealed.
What shall we do then? Is human agency nothing? Grant that we are
driving down a stream,-can we use no effort? Is there not a time when
deeds, struggles, prayers, are of some avail?-when the spirit, in its
intense agony, with swollen strength and surging tears, heaves against
the catastrophe, if yet, perchance, it may ward it off? Truly, there
is such a time, and the humblest disciple of Christ may weep as he also
wept. But let him also strive as Christ strove. Let him not dash his
grief in rebellious billows to the throne; let not his groans arise in
resentful murmurs; let the remembrance of what God is and why he does,
be with him, and let the filial, reverent trust steal in,--"Not my will,
but thine be done." That reference to God, that obedience to him, rising
from the very depths of sorrow, and clung to without faltering, is
RESIGNATION. It shall bestow peace and victory in the end. O! how
different from that sullen fatalism that lets things come as they
will. To such a soul things do come as they will, and it hardens under
them,-they do come as they will, but it sees not, cares not, why they
come. No thought goes up beyond the cloud to God,-no strength is born
that shall make life's trials lighter,-no love and faith that will seek
the Father's hand in the darkest hour, and shed an enduring light over
the thorny path of affliction, and upon the bosom of the grave. Look at
these two. Outwardly, their calmness may be the same. Nay, the one may
evince emotion and tears, while the other shall stand rigid in the hour
of calamity, with a bitter smile, or a frown of endurance. But in the
one is strength, in the other rigidity; in the one is power to triumph
over sorrow, in the other only nervous capacity to resist it. The one
is man hardened to indifference, sullen because of irreligion, upon whom
some sorrow will one day fall that will peel him to the quick, and he
will not know where to flee for healing. The other is man contending
against evil, yet not against God,-man with all the tenderness and
strength of his nature, impressible yet unconquerable, walking with feet
that bleed among the wounding thorns, and a heart that shrinks from the
heavy woe, yet, all lacerated as he is, able to walk through, because he
holds by the hand of Omnipotence. The one is the unbending tree, peeled
by the lightning and stripped by the North wind, lifting its gnarled
head in sullen defiance to the storm, which, when the storm does
overcome it, shall be broken. The other also is rooted in strength,
and meets the rushing blast with a lofty front. But as "it smiles in
sunshine, so it bends in storm," trustful and obedient, yet firm and
brave, and nothing shall overwhelm it.

I trust I have succeeded in impressing upon you the difference between
Christian resignation and mere hardihood, or indifference. Resignation
is born of discipline, and lives only in a truly religious soul. We
have seen that it is not incompatible with tenderness; nay, it is more
valuable, because it springs up in natures that have thus suffered and
wept. To see them become calm and pass with unfaltering step through
the valley of affliction, when, but now, they shrunk from it, is a proof
that God indeed has strengthened them, and that they have had communion
with him. The unbeliever's stubbornness may endure to the end, but no
human power could inspire this sudden and triumphant calmness.

And even when the crisis is past, when the sorrow is sealed, it is not
rebellion to sigh and weep. Our Father has made us so. He has opened the
springs of love that well up within us, and can we help mourning when
they turn to tears and blood? He has made very tender the ties that bind
us to happiness, and can we fail to shrink and suffer when they are cut
asunder? When we have labored long in the light of hope, and lo! It goes
out in darkness, and the blast of disappointment rushes upon us, can we
help being sad? Can the mother prevent weeping when she kisses the lips
of her infant that shall prattle to her no more; when she presses its
tiny hand, so cold and still,-the little hand that has rested upon her
bosom and twined in her hair; and even when it is so sweet and beautiful
that she could strain it to her heart forever, it is laid away in the
envious concealment of the grave? Can the wife, or the husband, help
mourning, when the partner and counsellor is gone,-when home is made
very desolate because the familiar voice sounds not there, and the
cast-off garment of the departed is strangely vacant, and the familiar
face has vanished, never more to return? Can the child fail to lament,
when the father, the mother,-the being who nurtured him in infancy,
who pillowed his head in sickness, who prayed for him with tears on
his sinful wandering, who ever rejoiced in his joy and wept in
his sorrows,-can he fail to weep when that venerable form lies all
enshrouded, and the door closes upon it, and the homestead is vacant,
and the link that bound him to childhood is in the grave? Say, can we
check the gush of sorrow at any of life's sharp trials and losses?
No; nor are we forbidden to weep, nor would we be human if we did not
weep,-if, at least, the spirit did not quiver when the keen scathing
goes over it. But how shall we weep? O! Thou, who didst suffer in
Gethsemane, thou hast taught us how. By thy sacred sorrow and thy pious
obedience thou has taught us; by thy great agony and thy sublime
victory thou has taught us. We must refer all to God. We must earnestly,
sincerely say, "Thy will be done." Then our prayers will be the source
of our strength. Then our sorrowing will bring us comfort. "They will
be done;" repeat this, feel this, realize its meaning and its relations,
and you shall be able to say, with a rooted calmness, "The cup which my
Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?"

"The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?" Who
shall be able to say this as Jesus said it? They who struggle as he
struggled,-who obey as he obeyed,-who trust as he trusted. There are
those upon earth who have been able to say it. It has made them stronger
and happier. There are those in heaven who have been able to say it.
They have gone up from earthly communions to the communion on high. Do
you not see them there, walking so serenely by the still waters, with
palms about their brows? Serenely-for in their faces nothing is left of
their conflict but its triumph; nothing of their swollen agony but the
massy enduring strength it has imparted. They have ceased from their
trials, but first they learned how to endure them. They submitted, but
they were not overwhelmed. When sorrow came, each pious soul struggled,
but trusted; and so was able to meet the last struggle,-was able to say
as the shadow of death fell upon it, "The cup which my Father hath given
me, shall I not drink it?" They were resigned. Behold-theirs is the
victory!




THE MISSION OF LITTLE CHILDREN


     "And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in
     the midst of them."  Matthew xviii.2.


Everything has its mission. I speak not now of the office which each
part of the great universe discharges. I speak not of the relation
between these parts,--that beautiful ordinance by which the whole is
linked together in one common life, by which the greatest is dependent
upon the least, and the least shares in the benefactions of the
greatest. In this sense, everything has, strictly, its mission. But I
speak of the influence, the instruction, which everything has, or may
have, for the soul of man. The flower, and the star, the grass of the
field, the outspread ocean, are full of lessons; they perform a mission
to our spiritual nature, if we will receive it. We may pass them by as
simply material forms, the decorations or conveniencies(sic) of this
our natural life. But if we will come to them in a religious spirit, and
study all their meaning, they will be to us ministers of God, impressive
and eloquent as human lips, and filled with truths instructive as any
that man can utter.

Jesus illustrated his teachings by these objects. He made everything
that was at hand perform a mission for the human soul. The lilies of the
field were clothed with spiritual suggestion, and the fowls of the air,
as they flew through the trackless firmament, bore a lesson of truth and
consolation. As if to show that there is nothing, however small, that
is insignificant, and that has not its mission, he selected the falling
sparrow to be a minister of wisdom, and dignified the wayside well as a
clear and living oracle of the divinest truth.

In the instance before us, the object selected was a little child. In
reply to the question, "Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?"
Jesus set this little one in the midst of his disciples and said,
"Verily I say unto you, except ye be converted, and become as little
children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven." Thus did he
rebuke their sensuous ideas of greatness by a spiritual truth, and make
a little child the teacher of profound and beautiful wisdom. I do not
propose, however, at this time, to dwell upon the precise doctrines
which Christ taught in the instance, but having, as it were, the little
child set in our midst, to draw from it further lessons that may do us
good. In one word, I propose to speak of the mission of little children.

In using this term "mission," I wish to have no obscurity about my
meaning. I refer, by it, to the influence which little children may
exert upon us,--to the effects which they may produce,--rather than to
any direct object which they can have in view, or for which they set
themselves to work. They may be unconscious missionaries; indeed, to a
great extent, they are so. But so are the lilies of the field and the
birds of the air. Yet if we believe that God is the ordainer of all
wisdom and of all good, that he uses an object or event in numberless
ways, and makes it the unconscious instrument of many of his plans,
then we may say that children are sent by him for the express purpose of
producing these effects, and in that sense have a mission.

I pass to consider some of the modes in which that mission is
accomplished.

I. Little children give us a sincere and affectionate manifestation
of human nature. I know that even a child will soon become artful,
and imbibe the spirit of dealing and of policy. But in a strongly
comparative sense, the child is artless. The thoughts of the heart leap
spontaneously from the lips. The bubbling impulse is closely followed
by the action. Its desire, its aversion, its love, its curiosity,
are expressed without modification. The broken prattle, those
half-pronounced words, are uttered with clear, ringing tones of
sincerity. There is no coil of deceit about the heart. There are no
secrets chambered in the brain. The countenance has put on no disguise.
There is no manoeuvring with lips or actions, no suspicion or plotting
in the eyes. It is simple human nature fresh from the hands of God, with
all its young springs in motion, trying themselves in their simplicity
and their newness. The eyes open upon the world, not with speculation,
but with wonder. To them, the ancient hills and the morning stars are
just created, new phenomena burst upon them every moment, and nature in
a thousand channels pours itself into the young soul. And how soon it
learns the meaning of a mother's smile, and the protection of a father's
hand! How soon the fountains of affection are unsealed and the mystery
of human love takes possession of the hear! But the tides of that love
are controlled by no calculation, are fettered by no proprieties, but
flow artlessly and freely.

Humanity soon runs into deceit, and the sincerest man wears a mask.
We cannot trust our most familiar friends, to the whole extent. We all
retain something in our inmost hearts that nobody knows but we and
God. The world bids us be shrewd and politic. We walk in a mart of
selfishness. Eyes stare upon us, and we are afraid of them. We meet as
traders, as partisans, as citizens, as worshippers, as friends-brothers,
if you will-but we must not express all we think, we must school
ourselves in some respects,--must adopt some conventionalities. There is
some degree of isolation between ourselves and every other one. But
from the world's strife and sordidness, its wearisome forms and cold
suspicions, we may turn to the sanctity of home, and if we have a child
there, we shall find affection without alloy, a welcome that leaps from
the heart in sunshine to the face, and speaks right from the soul;--a
companion who is not afraid or ashamed of us, who makes no calculation
about our friendship, who has faith in it, and requires of us perfect
faith in return, and whose sincerity rebukes our worldliness, and makes
us wonder at the world. And if all this makes us better and happier,
if it keeps our hearts from hardness and attrition, if it begets in us
something of the same sincerity, and hallows us with something of
the same affection, if it softens and purifies us at all, then do not
children, in this respect perform a mission for us?

And shall we not learn from them more confidence in human nature, seeing
that "the child is father to the man," and that much that seems cold and
hard in men may conceal the remains of childhood's better feeling? And,
also, shall it not make us deplore and guard against those influences
which can change the sincere and loving child into the deceitful and
selfish man-that cover the spring of genuine feeling with the thick rime
of worldliness, and petrify the tender chords of the heart into rough,
unfeeling sinews? The man should not be, in all respects, as the child.
The child cannot have the glory of the man. If it is not polluted by his
vices, it is not ennobled by his virtues. But in so much as the child
awakens in us tenderness, and teaches us sincerity, and counteracts our
coarser and harder tendencies, and cheers us in our isolation from human
hearts, by binding us close with a warm affection, and sheds ever around
our path the mirrored sunshine of our youth and our simplicity, in so
much the child accomplishes for us a blessed mission.

II. Children teach us faith and confidence. Man soon becomes proud with
reason, and impatient of restraint. He thinks he knows, or ought to
know, the whole mystery of the universe. It is not easy for him to take
anything upon trust, or to lie low in the hand of God. But the child is
full of faith. He is not old enough to speculate, and the things he sees
are to him so strange and wonderful that he can easily believe in "the
things that are unseen." He propounds many questions, but entertains no
doubts as to God and heaven. And what confidence has he in his father's
government and his mother's providence!

I do not say, here, that a man's faith should be as a child's faith. Man
must examine and reason, contend with doubt, and wander through mystery.
But I would have him cherish the feeling that he too is a child, the
denizen of a Father's house, and have sufficient confidence in that
Father to trust his goodness; and to remember, if things look perplexed
and discordant to him, that his vision is but a child's vision-he cannot
see all. Indeed, there is a beautiful analogy between a child in its
father's house and man in the universe, and much there is in the filial
sentiment that belongs to both conditions. Beautifully has it been shown
by a recent writer how the natural operation of this sentiment in the
child's heart, and in the sphere of home, stands somewhat in the place
of that religion which man needs in his maturer conditions. "God
has given it, in its very lot," says he, "a religion of its own, the
sufficiency of which it were impiety to doubt. The child's veneration
can scarcely climb to any loftier height than the soul of a wise and
good parent...How can there be for him diviner truth than his father's
knowledge, a more wonderous world than his father's experience, a better
providence than his mother's vigilance, a securer fidelity than in their
united promise? Encompassed round by these, he rests as in the embrace
of the only omniscience he can comprehend." (Martineau)

But O! my friends, when our childhood has passed by, and we go out to
drink the mingled cup of life, and cares come crowding upon us, and
hopes are crushed, and doubts wrestle with us, and sorrow burdens our
spirits, then we need a deeper faith, and look up for a stronger Father.
A kind word will not stifle our grief then. We cannot go to sleep upon
our mother's arms, and forget it all. There is no charm to hold our
spirits within the walls of this home, the earth. Our thoughts crave
more than this. Our souls reach out over the grave, and cry for
something after! No bauble will assuage this bitterness. It is spiritual
and stern, and we must have a word from heaven-a promise from one who is
able to fulfill. We look around us, and find that Father, and his
vary nature contains the promise that we need. And as the child in his
ignorance has faith, not because he can demonstrate, but because it
is his father, so let us, in our ignorance, feel that in this great
universe of many mansions, of solemn mysteries, of homes beyond the
earth, of relationships that reach through eternity, of plans only a
portion of which is seen here; so let us look up as to a Father's
fare, take hold of his hand, go in and out and lie down securely in his
presence, and cherish faith. If children only teach us to do this, how
beautiful and how great is their mission!

III. Children waken in us new and powerful affections. Nobody but a
parent can realize what these affections are, can tell what a fountain
of emotion the newborn child unseals, what chords of strange love are
drawn out from the heart, that before lay there concealed. One may
have all powers of intellect, a refined moral culture, a noble and
wide-reaching philanthropy, and yet a child born to him shall awaken
within him a depth of tenderness, a sentiment of love, a yearning
affection, that shall surprise him as to the capacity and the mystery of
his nature.

And the relation of a mother to her child; what other is like it?
Without it, how undeveloped is the great element of affection, how small
a horn of its orb is filled and lighted! What was she until that new
love woke up within her, and her heart and soul thrilled with it, and
first truly lived in it? Of all the degrees of human love, how amply is
this the highest! In all the depths of human love, how surely is this
the nethermost! When illustrations fail us, how confidently do we seize
upon this! The mother nurturing her child in tenderness, watching over
it with untiring love! O! that is affection stronger than any of this
earth. It has a power, a beauty, a holiness like no other sentiment.
When that child has grown to maturity, and has gone out from her in
profligacy and in scorn; when the world has denounced him, and justice
sets its price upon his head, and lovers and companions fall off from
him in utter loathing-we do not ask, we know, there is one heart that
cannot reject him. No sin of his can paralyze the chord that vibrates
there for him. No alienation can cancel the affection that was born at
his birth, that pillowed him in his infancy, centred in him its life,
clasped him with its strength, and shed upon him its blessings, its
hopes, and its prayers.

And no one feels the death of a child as a mother feels it. Even the
father cannot realize it thus. There is a vacancy in his home, and a
heaviness in his heart. There is a chain of association that at
set times comes round with its broken link; there are memories of
endearment, a keen sense of loss, a weeping over crushed hopes, and a
pain of wounded affliction. But the mother feels that one has been taken
away who was still closer to her heart. Hers has been the office of
constant ministration. Every gradation of feature has developed before
her eyes. She has detected every new gleam of intelligence. She heard
the first utterance of every new word. She has been the refuge of his
fears; the supply of his wants. And every task of affection has woven a
new link, and made dear to her its object. And when he dies, a portion
of her own life, as it were, dies. How can she give him up, with all
these memories, these associations? The timid hands that have so often
taken hers in trust and love, how can she fold them on his breast, and
surrender them to the cold clasp of death? The feet whose wanderings she
has watched so narrowly, how can she see them straitened to go down
into the dark valley? The head that she has pressed to her lips and her
bosom, that she has watched in burning sickness and in peaceful slumber,
a hair of which she could not see harmed, O! how can she consign it
to the chamber of the grave? The form that not for one night has been
beyond her vision or her knowledge, how can she put it away for the long
night of the sepulchre, to see it no more? Man has cares and toils that
draw away his thoughts and employ them; she sits in loneliness, and all
these memories, all these suggestions, crowd upon her. How can she bear
all this? She could not, were it not that her faith is as her affection;
and if the one is more deep and tender than in man, the other is more
simple and spontaneous, and takes confidently hold of the hand of God.

Thus, then, do children awaken within us deep and mighty affections; and
is it not their mission to do so? Do we not see many beautiful offices
created and discharged by these affections--tender and far-reaching
relationships into which they run? Do we not see how they win the heart
from frivolity and selfishness, and make it aware of duties, and quick
with sympathies? I shall not enter into detailed considerations of the
results of this affection thus awakened in us by children. A little
reflection will render them obvious to you. Let me simply say, that in
awakening these affections children discharge an important and beautiful
mission.

IV. I might speak of other offices discharged by little children; of the
influence upon us of their purity and their innocence; their importance
in the social state; of the benefits conferred upon us by the very
duties which we exercise toward them. But merely suggesting these, I
will speak at this time of but one more mission which they perform
for us, and this, my friends, is performed through sadness and through
tears. The little child performs it by its death. It has been with us a
little while. We have enjoyed its bright and innocent companionship by
the dusty highway of life, in the midst of its toils, its cares, and its
sin. It has been a gleam of sunshine and a voice of perpetual gladness
in our homes. We have learned from it blessed lessons of simplicity,
sincerity, purity, faith. It has unsealed within us this gushing,
never-ebbing tide of affection. Suddenly, it is taken away. We miss the
gleam of sunshine. We miss the voice of gladness. Our homes are dark and
silent. We ask, "Shall it not come again?" And the answer breaks upon
us through the cold gray silence, "Nevermore!" We say to ourselves again
and again, "Can it be possible?" "Do we not dream?" "Will not that life
and affection return to us?" "Nevermore!" O! nevermore! The heart is
like an empty mansion, and that word goes echoing through its desolate
chambers. We are stricken and afflicted. But must this, should this, be
always and only so? Are we not looking merely at the earthly aspect of
the event? Has it not a spiritual phase for us? Nay, do we not begin to
consider how through our temporal affection an eternal good is wrought
out for us? Do we begin to realize that in our souls we have derived
profit from it already? Do we not begin to learn that life is not a
holiday or a workday only, but a discipline,--that God conducts that
discipline in infinite wisdom and benevolence,--mingles the draught,
and, when he sees fit, infuses bitterness? Not that constant sweet
would not please us better, but that our discipline, which is of more
importance than our indulgence, will be more effectual thereby. This is
often talked about; I ask, do not we who are called upon to mourn the
loss of children realize it,--actually realize that that loss is for
our spiritual gain? If we do not, we are merely looking upon the earthly
phase of our loss. If we do not realize this spiritual good, we may.

Yes, in death the little child has a mission for us. Through that very
departure he accomplishes for us, perhaps, what he could not accomplish
by his life. These affections which he has awakened, we have considered
how strong they are. They are stronger, are they not, than any
attachment to mere things of this earth? But that child has gone from
us,--gone into the unseen, the spiritual world. What then? Do our
affections sink back into our hearts,--become absorbed and forgotten?
O, no! They reach out after that little one; they follow him into the
unseen and spiritual world,--thus is it made a great and vivid reality
to us,--perhaps for the first time. We have talked of it, we have
believed in it; but now that our dead have gone into it, we have, as
it were, entered it ourselves. Its atmosphere is around us, chords of
affection draw us toward it, the faces of our departed ones look out
from it--and it is a reality. And is it not worth something to make it
such a reality?

We are wedded to this world. It is beautiful, it is attractive, it is
real. Immortality is a pleasant thought. The spiritual land is an object
of faith. But the separation between this and that is cold to think of,
and hard to bear. It needs something stronger than this earth to draw us
toward that spiritual world; to break some of the thousand tendrils
that bind us here. My friends, though many powerful appeals, many solid
arguments, cannot break our affections from this earth, the hand of a
departed child can do it. The voice that calls us to unseen realities,
that bids us prepare for the heavenly land, that says from heights of
spiritual bliss and purity, "Come up hither;"--that voice that we loved
so on earth, and gladly can we rise and follow it.

Behold, then, what a little child can perform for us through its death!
It makes real and attractive to us that spiritual world to which it has
gone, and calls our affections from earth to that true life which is the
great end of our being, which is the object of all our discipline, our
mingled joy and suffering, here upon this earth. That little child, gone
from its sufferings of early,--gone

     "Gentle and undefiled, with blessings on its head,"--

has it indeed become a very angel of God for us, and is it calling us
to a more spiritual life, and does it win us to heaven? Is its memory
around us like a pure presence into which no thought of sin can readily
enter? Or is it with us, even yet, a spiritual companion of our ways?
From being the guarded and the guided, has it risen in infant innocence,
yet in the knowledge and majesty of the immortal life, to be the guard
and the guide? Does it, indeed, make our hearts softer and purer,
and cause us to think more of duty, and live more holy, thus clothing
ourselves to go and dwell with it? Does it, by its death, accomplish all
this? O! most important, most glorious mission of all, if we only heed
it, if we only accept it. Then shall we behold already the wisdom and
benevolence of our Father breaking through the cloud that overshadows
us. Already shall we see that the tie, which seemed to be dropped and
broken, God has taken up to draw us closer to himself, and that it
is interwoven with his all-gracious plan for our spiritual profit and
perfection. And we can anticipate how it will all be reconciled, when
his own hand shall wipe away our tears, and the bliss of reunion shall
extract the last drop of bitterness from "the cup that our Father had
given us."




OUR RELATIONS TO THE DEPARTED


     "She is not dead, but sleepeth."  Luke viii.52

A Great peculiarity of the Christian religion is its transforming
or transmuting power. I speak not now of the regeneration which
accomplishes in the individual soul, but of the change it works upon
things without. It applies the touchstone to every fact of existence,
and exposes its real value. Looking through the lens of spiritual
observation, it throws the realities of life into a reverse perspective
from that which is seen by the sensual eye. Objects which the world
calls great it renders insignificant, and makes near and prominent
things which the frivolous put off. Thus the Christian, among other men,
often appears anomalous. Often, amidst the congratulations of the world,
he detects reason for mourning, and is penetrated with sorrow. On the
contrary, where others shrink, he walks undaunted, and converts the
scene of dread and suffering into an ante-chamber of heaven. In this
light, the Apostle Paul speaks of himself and others, "As sorrowful, yet
always rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and
yet possessing all things." Indeed, all the beatitudes are based upon
this peculiarity; for the true blessing, the inward, everlasting riches,
are for those who, in the world's eye, are poor, and mourning, and
persecuted. Jesus himself weeps amid triumphant psalms and sounding
hosannas, while on the cross he utters the prayer of forgiveness, and
the ejaculation of peace.

No wonder, then, that the believer views the ghastliest fact of all in
a consoling and even a beautiful aspect; and death itself becomes but
sleep. Well was that trait of our religion which I have now suggested
illustrated at the bed-side of Jairus' daughter. Well did that noisy,
lamenting group represent the worldly who read only the material fact,
or that flippant skepticism which laughs all supernatural truth to
scorn. And well did Jesus represent the spirit of his doctrine, and its
transforming power, when he exclaimed, "She is not dead, but sleepeth."

Yes! beautifully has Christianity transformed death. To the eye of flesh
it was the final direction of our fate,--the consummate riddle in this
mystery of being,--the wreck of all our hopes,--

     "The simple senses crowned his head,
         Omega! thou art Lord, they said;
         We find no motion in the dead."

Ever, though with higher desires and better gleamings, the mind has
struggled and sunk before this fact of decay, and this awful silence of
nature; while in the waning light of the soul, and among the ashes of
the sepulchre, skepticism has built its dreary negation. And though the
mother could lay down her child without taking hints which God gave her
from every little flower that sprung on that grassy bed,--though the
unexhausted intellect has reasoned that we ought to live again, and
the affections, more oracular, swelling with the nature of their great
source, have prophesied that we shall,--never, until the revelation
of Christ descended into our souls, and illuminated all our spiritual
vision, have we been able to say certainly of death, it is a sleep.
This has made its outward semblance not that of cessation, but of
progression--not an end, but a change--converting its rocky couch to a
birth-chamber, over-casting its shadows with beams of eternal morning,
while behind its cold unconsciousness the unseen spirit broods into
higher life. "He fell asleep," says the sacred chronicler, speaking
of bloody Stephen. "Our friend Lazarus sleepeth," said Christ to his
disciples; and yet again, as here in the text, the beautiful synonyme is
repeated, "She is not dead, but sleepeth."

But I proceed to remark, if the Christian religion thus transforms
death, or, in other words, abolishes the idea of its being annihilation,
or an end, then it gives us a new view of our relations to the departed.
What are these relations? The answers to this question will form the
burden of the present discourse.

I. There is the relation of memory. It is true, we may argue that
this relation exists whether the Christian view of death be correct or
not;--so long have those who are now gone actually lived with us,--so
vivid are their images among the realities of the soul,--though the
grave should forever shut them from our communion. But this relation
of memory has peculiar propriety and efficacy when associated with a
Christian faith. If the dead live no more, what would memory be to us
but a spectre and a sting? Should we not then seek to repress those
tender recollections,--to close our eyes to those pale, sad visions of
departed love? Should we not invoke the glare and tumult of the world
to distract or absorb our thoughts? Would we not say, "Let it come, the
pleasure, the occupation of the hour, that we may think no more of the
dead, plucked from us forever,--let us drive thoughtlessly down this
swift current of life, since thought only harrows us,--let us drive
thoughtlessly down, enjoying all we can, until we too lie by the side
of those departed ones, like them to moulder in everlasting
unconsciousness." I don not say that this would always be the case
without religious hope, but it is a very natural condition of the
feelings in such circumstances,--it is the most humane alternative that
would then be left. At least, no one so well as the Christian can go
into the inner chambers of memory, feel the strength of its sad yet
blissful associations, and calmly invoke the communion of the dead.

I speak not now of what occurs in those first bitter days of grief, when
the heart's wound bleeds afresh at every touch,--when we are continually
surprised by the bleak fact that the loved one is actually dead. But I
speak of those after seasons, those Indian summers of the soul, in which
all the present desolation is blended with the bloom and enjoyment of
the past. Then do we find that the tie which binds us so tenderly to the
departed is a strong and fruitful one. We love, in those still retired
seasons, to call up the images of the dead, to let them hover around us,
as real, for the hour, as any living forms. We linger in that communion,
with a pleasing melancholy. We call up all that was lovely in their
character, all that was delightful in their earthly intercourse. They
live again for us, and we for them.

In this relation of memory, moreover, we realize the fact, that while
the departed were upon earth we enjoyed much with them. This is a truth
which in any estimate of our loss we should not overlook. Do we mourn
that the dead have been taken from us so soon? Are we not also thankful
that they were ours so long? In our grief over unfulfilled expectation,
do we cherish no gratitude for actual good? So much bliss has God
mingled in our cup of existence that the might have withheld. He lent it
to us thus far; why complain, rather, that he did not intrust us with it
longer? O! these fond recollections, this concentrated happiness of past
hours which we call up with tears, remind us that so much good we have
actually experienced.

In close connection with this thought is the fact, that, by some
delicate process of refinement, we remember of the dead only what was
good. In the relation of memory we see them in their best manifestation,
we live over the hours of our past intercourse. Though in extraordinary
instances it may be true that "the evil which men do lives after them,"
yet even in regard to the illustrious dead, their imperfections are
overlooked, and more justice is done to their virtues than in their own
time. Much more is this the case with those around whom our affections
cling more closely. The communion of memory, far more than that of life,
is unalloyed by sharp interruptions, or by any stain. That communion
now, though saddened, is tender, and without reproach.

And even if we remember that while they lived our relations with them
were all beautiful, shall we not believe that when they were taken away
their earthly mission for us was fulfilled? Was not their departure as
essential a work of the divine beneficence as their bestowal? Who knows
but if they had overstayed the appointed hour, our relations with them
might have changed?--some new element of discontent and unhappiness
been introduced, which would have entirely altered the character of
our recollections? At least, to repeat what I have just suggested,
what Christian doubts that their taking away--this change from living
communion to the communion of memory--was for an end as wise and kind as
were all the love and intercourse so long vouchsafed to us?

Vital, the, for the Christian, is this relation which we have with the
dead by memory. We linger upon it, and find in it a strange and
sweet attraction, and is not much of this because, though we may be
unconscious of it, the current of faith subtilely intermingles with
our grief, and gives its tone to our communion? We cannot consider the
departed as lost to us forever. The suggestion of rupture holds a latent
suggestion of reunion. The hues of memory are colored by the reflection
of hope. Religion transforms the condition of the departed for us, and
we consider them not as dead, but sleeping.

II. There is another relation which we have with the dead,--the relation
of spiritual existence. We live with them, not only by communion with
the past, by images of memory, but by that fine, mysterious bond which
links us to all souls, and in which we live with them now and forever.
The faith that has converted death into a sleep has also transformed the
whole idea of life. If the one is but a halt in the eternal march,--a
slumbrous rest preceeding a new morning,--the other is but the flow
of one continuous stream, mated awhile with the flesh, but far more
intimately connected with all intelligences in the universe of God. What
are the conditions of our communion with the living--those with whom we
come in material contact? The eye, the lip, the hand, are but symbols,
interpretations;--behind these it is only spirit that communes with
spirit, even in the market or the street. But not to enter into so
subtle a discussion, of what kind are some of the best communions which
we have on earth? We take up some wise and virtuous book, and enter into
the author's mind. Seas separate us from him,--he knows us not; he never
hears our names. But have we not a close relation to him? Is there not
a strong bond of spiritual communion between us? Nay, may not the
intercourse we thus have with him be better and truer than any which we
could have from actual contact,--from local acquaintance? Then, some icy
barrier of etiquette might separate us,--some coldness of temperament
upon his part,--some spleen or disease; we might be shocked by some
temporary deformity; some little imperfection might betray itself. But
here, in his book, which we read three thousand miles away from him, we
receive his noblest thoughts,--his best spiritual revelations; and we
know him, and commune with him most intimately, not through local but
through spiritual affinities.

And how pleasing is the though that not even death interrupts this
relation. Years, as well as miles--ages may separate us from the great
and good man; but we hold with him still that living communion of the
spirit. Our best life may flow to us from this communion. Some of our
richest spiritual treasures have been deposited in this intercourse of
thought. Some of our noblest hopes and resolutions have been animated by
those whose lips have long since been sealed,--whose very monuments have
crumbled.

A dear friend goes away from us to a foreign land. We watch the
receeding sail, and feel that that is a bond between us, until it fades
away in the far blue horizon. Then it is a consolation to walk by the
shore of that sea, and to realize that the same waters lave the other
shore, where he dwells,--to watch some star, and know that at such an
hour his eye and thought are also directed to it. Thus the soul will not
entertain the idea of absolute separation, but makes all those material
objects agents for its affinities. But how much nearer does that absent
one come to us, when we know that at such an hour we both are kneeling
in prayer, and that our spirits meet, as it were, around the footstool
of God!

Thus we see that even in life there are spiritual relations which bind
us to our fellows, and that often these are dearer and stronger than
those of local contact. Why should we suppose that death cuts off all
such affinities? It does not cut them off. It only removes the loved
from our converse and our sight; but if, when absent in some distant
land of this earth, we are conscious of still holding relations to them,
do we not retain the same though they have vanished into that mysterious
and unseen land which lies beyond the grave? "She is not dead, but
sleepeth." Christianity has taught us to look away from the ghastly
secrets of the sepulchre, and not consider that changing clay as the
friend we mourn, but as only the cast-off and mouldering garment. It has
kindled within us a lively appreciation of the continued existence of
those who have gone from us; taught us to feel that the thoughts, the
love, the real life of the departed, all, in fact, that communed with
us here below, still lives and acts. And our relations to them are
relations which we bear, not to abstractions of memory, to phantoms
of by-gone joy, but to spiritual intelligences, whose current of being
flows on uninterrupted, with whose current of being our own mingles.
I know not how it is with others, but to me there is inexpressible
consolation in this thought.

But I would suggest that, as spiritual beings, we bear even a closer
relation to the departed. I said that Christianity has transformed the
whole idea of life. It has shown that we are essentially spirits, and
that our highest relations are spiritual. If so, it seems an arrogant
assumption to deny that any intercourse may exist between ourselves
and the spiritual world. Possessing as we do this mysterious nature,
throbbing with the attraction of the eternal sphere, who shall say that
it touches no spiritual confines,--that it has communion only with
the beings that we see? It is a dull atheism which repudiates all such
intimations as superstitious or absurd. To speak more distinctly, I
allude to the consoling thought which springs up almost intuitively,
that the departed may, at times, see us, and be present with us, though
we do not recognize them. For wise and good reasons, our senses may so
constrain us that we cannot perceive these spiritual beings. But the
same reasons do not exist to shut them from beholding and visiting us.
The most essential idea of the immortal state is that it yields certain
prerogatives which we cannot possess in our mortal condition. May it
not be, therefore, that while it is our lot to be restricted to sensuous
vision, and to behold only material forms, it is their privilege, having
received the spiritual sight, to see both spiritual and material things?

Nor need we imagine that immortality implies distance from us,--that
change of state requires any great change of place. Looking through
this earthly glass, we see but darkly; but when death shatters it we
may behold close around us the friends we have loved, and find their
spiritual peculiarity is not incompatible with such near residence.
The homes of departed spirits may be all around us,--these spirits
themselves may be ever hovering near, unseen in our blindness of the
senses. At all events, we deem it one of the grand distinctions of
spirit that it is not confined to one region of space, but may pass,
quick as its own intelligence, from sphere to sphere. And while I would
rebuke rash speculation, I would also rebuke the cold materialism which
unhesitatingly rejects an idea like this which I have now suggested.

I maintain, moreover, that such speculation is not all idle. It serves
to quicken within us the thought of how near the dead may be to us, to
purify that thought, and to breathe upon our fevered hearts a consoling
hope. And when I combine its intrinsic reasonableness with the spirit
and spiritualism of Christianity, and that intuitive suggestion which
springs up in so many souls, I can urge but faint objection to those
who entertain it, and would, if possible, share and diffuse the comfort
which it gives. Nearer, than, than we imagine--close as in mortal
contact, and more intimately--may be those whom we, with earthly vision
behold no more; visiting us in hours of loneliness, and affording unseen
companionship; watching us in the stillness of slumber, and reflecting
themselves in our dreams.

But, whether we indulge this notion or not, let us realize the relation
which we have with the departed by the ties of mutual spirituality. Let
us not coldly restrict or weaken this relation. If the material world is
full of inexplicable things,--if we cannot explain the secret affinities
of the star and the flower,--let us feel how full of mystery and how
full of promise is this spiritual universe of which we are parts, and
whose conditions we so little know. Let us cherish that transcendent
faith, that quick, spiritual sympathy, which says of the departed, "They
are not dead, but sleeping."

III. Finally, we have with the dead the relation of discipline. Though
we should see them only in the abstractions of memory,--though it should
be true that they have no spiritual intercourse with us,--yet their
agency in our behalf has not ceased. They still accomplish a work for
us. That work is in the moral efficacy of bereavement and sorrow. In
their going away they lead our thoughts out beyond the limits of the
world. They quicken us to an interest in the spiritual land, as one who
looks upon a map, and listlessly reads the name of some foreign shore,
so, often, do we open this blessed revelation not heeding its recital of
the immortal state. But as, when some friend goes to that distant coast,
that spot on the map becomes, of all places, most vivid and prominent,
so when our loved ones die, the spiritual country largely occupies our
thoughts and attracts our affections. They depart that we may be weaned
from earth. They ascend that we may "look steadfastly towards heaven."
If this is not our everlasting home, why should they all remain here
to cheat us with that thought? If we must seek a better country, should
there not be premonitions for us, breaking up, and farewells, and the
hurried departure of friends who are ready before us? I need not dwell
on this suggestion. We are too much of the earth, earthy, and bound
up in sensual interests. It is often needful that some shock of
disappointment should shake our idea of terrestrial stability--should
awake us to a sense of our spiritual relations--should strike open some
chasm in this dead, material wall, and let in the light of the unlimited
and immortal state to which we go. We need the discipline of bereavement
in temporal things, to win us to things eternal. And so, in their
departure, the loved accomplish for us a blessed and spiritual result,
and instead of being wholly lost to us, become bound to us by a new and
vital relation.

But these loved ones depart, no merely to bind our affections to another
state, but to fit us better for the obligations of this. Perhaps, in the
indulgence of full communion, in the liquid ease of prosperity, we have
scantily discharged our social duties. We have not appreciated love,
because we have never felt its absence. We have shocked the tenderest
ties, because we were ignorant of their tenderness. We have withheld
good offices, because we knew not how rare is the opportunity to fulfil
them. But when one whom we love passes away, then, realizing a great
loss, we learn how vital was that relation, how inestimable the
privilege which is withdrawn forever. How quick then is our regret
for every harsh word which we have spoken to the departed, or for any
momentary alienation which we have indulged! This, however, should not
reduce us to a morbid sensitiveness, or an unavailing sorrow, seeing
that it is blended with so many pleasant memories; but it should teach
us our duty to the living. It should make our affections more diligent
and dutiful. It should check our hasty words, and assuage our passions.
It should cause us, day and night, to meet in kindness and part in
peace. Our social ties are golden links of uncertain tenure, and, one by
one, they drop away. Let us cherish a more constant love for those who
make up our family circle, for "not long may we stay." The allotments of
duty, perhaps, will soon distribute us into different spheres of action;
our lines, which now fall together in a pleasant place, will be wide
apart as the zones, or death will cast his shadow upon these familiar
faces, and interrupt our long communion. Let us, indeed, preserve this
temper with all men--those who meet us in the street, in the mart, in
the most casual or selfish concerns of life. We cannot remain together a
great while, at the longest. Let us meet, then, with kindness, that when
we part no pang may remain. Let not a single day bear witness to the
neglect or violation of any duty which shall lie hard in the heart when
it is excited to tender and solemn recollections. Let only good-will
beam from faces that so soon shall be changed. Let no root of bitterness
spring up in one man's bosom against another, when, ere long, nature
will plant flowers upon their common grave. "Let not the sun go down
upon our wrath," when his morning beams may search our accustomed places
for one or both of us, in vain.

Thus, if the dead teach us to regard more dutifully the living, they
will accomplish for us a most beautiful discipline. Their departure may
also serve another end. It may teach us the great lessons of patience
and resignation. We have been surrounded by many blessings, and yet
perhaps, have indulged in fretfulness. A slight loss has irritated us.
We have chafed at ordinary disappointments, at little interruptions in
the current of our prosperity. We have been in the habit of murmuring.
And now this great grief has overtaken us, that we may see at what
little things we have complained,--that we may learn that there is a
meaning in trouble which should make us calm,--that we had no right to
these gifts, the privation of which has offended us, but that all
have flowed from that mercy which we have slightly acknowledged, and
peevishly accused. This great sorrow has stricken us, piercing through
bone and marrow, in order to reach our hearts, and touch the springs of
spiritual life within us, that henceforth, we may look upon all sorrow
in a new light. Little troubles have only disturbed the surface of our
nature, making it uneasy, and tossing it into fretful eddies; this heavy
calamity, like a mighty wind, has plunged into the very depths, and
turned up the foundations, leaving us, at length, purified and serene. I
believe we shall find it to be the general testimony that those who have
the least trouble are the loudest complainers; while, often, the souls
that have been fairly swept and winnowed by sorrow are the most patient
and Christ-like. The pressure of their woe has broken down all ordinary
reliances, and driven them directly to God, where they rest in sweet
submission and in calm assurance. Such is the discipline which may be
wrought out for us by the departure of those we love. Such, and other
spiritual results, their vanishing may secure for us, which we never
could have gained by their presence; and so it may be said by some
departing friend,--some one most dear to our hearts,--in a reverent
sense, as the Master said to his disciples, "It is expedient for you
that I go away; for if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto
you."

As I have already touched upon the region of speculation, I hardly dare
drop a hint which belongs here, though it grows out of a remark made
under the last head. But I will say that it is not unreasonable to
suppose that the departed may perform a more close and personal agency
than this which I have just dwelt upon. Often, it may be, they are
permitted messengers for our welfare; guardians, whose invisible wings
shield us; teachers, whose unfelt instructions mysteriously sway us.
The child may thus discharge an office of more than filial love for the
bereaved parents. The mother may watch and minister to her child.
The father, by unseen influences, win to virtue the heart of his
poor prodigal. But whether this be so or not, certain are we that the
departed do discharge such an agency, if not by spiritual contact with
us, or direct labor in our behalf, by the chastening influence that
their memory sheds upon us, by uplifting our thoughts, by spiritualizing
our affections, by drawing our souls to communion with things celestial
and with God.

Let us see to it, then, that we improve this discipline; that we quench
not the holy aspiration which springs up in our sorrow; that we neglect
not the opportunity when our hearts are softened; that we continue the
prayer which first escaped our lips as a sigh and a call of distress;
that the baptism of tears lets us into the new life of reconciliation,
and love, and holiness. Otherwise, the discipline is of no avail, and,
it may be, we harden under it.

And, finally, let me say, that the faith by which we regard our
relations to the departed in the light that has been exhibited in this
discourse, is a faith that must be assimilated with our entire spiritual
nature. It must be illustrated in our daily conduct, and sanctify every
thought and motive of our hearts. We should not seek religion merely for
its consolations, and take it up as an occasional remedy. In this way
religion is injured. It is associated only with sorrow, and clothed, to
the eyes of men, in perpetual sadness. It is sought as the last resort,
the heart's extreme unction, when it has tried the world's nostrums
in vain. It is dissociated from things healthy and active,--from all
ordinary experiences,--from the great whole of life. It is consigned to
the darkened chamber of mourning, and the weary and disappointed spirit.
Besides, to seek religion only in sorrow,--to fly to it as the last
refuge,--argues an extreme selfishness. We have served the world and our
own wills, we have lived the life of the senses, and obeyed the dictates
of our passions so long as they could satisfy us, and now we turn to God
because we find that he only can avail us! We seek religion for the good
it can do us, not for the service we can render God. We lay hold of it
selfishly, as something instituted merely for our help, and lavish our
demands upon it for consolation, turning away sullen and skeptical,
it may be, if these demands are not immediately answered. Many come
to religion for consolation who never apply to it for instruction,
for sanctification, for obedience. Let us learn that we can claim its
privileges only by performing its duties. We can see with the eye of its
clear, consoling faith, only when it has spiritualized our entire being,
and been developed in our daily conduct. Affliction may open religious
ideas in the soul, but only by the soul's discipline will those ideas
expand until they become our most intimate life, and we habitually enjoy
celestial companionship, and that supersensual vision of faith by which
we learn our relations to the departed.

That faith let us receive and cherish. If we live it we shall believe
it. No sophistry can steal it from us, no calamity make us surrender it.
But the keener the trial the closer will be our confidence. Standing
by the open sepulchre in which we see our friends, "not dead, but
sleeping," we shall say to insidious skepticism and gloomy doubt, in the
earnest words of the poet,

     "O! steal not thou my faith away,
         Nor tempt to doubt a lowly mind.
     Make all that earth can yield thy prey,
         But leave this heavenly gift behind.
     Our hope is but the seaboy's dream,
         When loud winds rise in wrath and gloom;
     Our life, a faint and fitful beam,
         That lights us to the cold, dark tomb;

     Yet, since, as one from heaven has said,
         There lies beyond that dreary bourn
     A region where the faithful dead
         Eternally forget to mourn,
     Welcome the scoff, the sword, the chain,
         The burning waste, the black abyss:--
     I shrink not from the path of pain,
         Which leads me to that world of bliss.

     Then hush, thou troubled heart! be still;--
         Renounce thy vain philosophy;--
     Seek thou to work thy Maker's will,
         And light from heaven shall break on thee.
     'Twill glad thee in the weary strife,
         Where strong men sink with falling breath;--
     'Twill cheer thee in the noon of life,
         And bless thee in the night of death."




THE VOICES OF THE DEAD


     "And by it he being dead yet speaketh."  Hebrews xi. 4.


Much of the communion of this earth is not by speech or actual contact,
and the holiest influences fall upon us in silence. A monument or symbol
shall convey a meaning which cannot be expressed; and a token of some
departed one is more eloquent than words. The mere presence of a good
and holy personage will move us to reverence and admiration, though he
may say and do but little. So is there an impersonal presence of such an
one; and, though far away, he converses with us, teaches and incites us.
The organs of speech are only one method of the soul's expression; and
the best information which it receives comes without voice or sound. We
hear no vocal utterance from God, yet he speaks to us through all the
forms of nature. In the blue, ever-arching heaven he tells us of his
comprehensive care and tender pity, and "the unwearied sun" proclaims
his constant and universal benevolence. The air that wraps us close
breathes of his intimate and all-pervading spirit; and the illimitable
space, and the stars that sparkle abroad without number, show forth his
majesty and suggest infinitude. The gush of silent prayer--the sublimest
mood of the spirit--is when we are so near to him that words cannot come
between; and the power of his presence is felt the most, felt in the
profoundest deep of our nature, when the curtains of his pavilion
hang motionless around us. And it is so, I repeat, with all our best
communions. The holiest lessons are not in the word, but the life. The
virtues that attract us most are silent. The most beautiful charities
go noiseless on their mission. The two mites reveal the spiritual
wealth beneath the poor widow's weeds; the alabaster box of ointment is
fragrant with Mary's gratitude; the look of Christ rebukes Peter into
penitence; and by his faith Abel, being dead, yet speaketh.

Yes, even the dead, long gone from us, returning no more, their places
left vacant, their lineaments dimly remembered, their bodies mouldering
back to dust, even these have communion with us; and to speak of "the
voices of the dead" is no mere fancy. And it is to that subject that I
would call your attention, in the remainder of a brief discourse.

"He being dead yet speaketh." The departed have voices for us. In order
to illustrate this, I remark, in the first place, that the dead speak to
us, and commune with us, through the works which they have left behind
them. As the islands of the sea are the built-up casements of myriads
of departed lives,--as the earth itself is a great catacomb,--so we who
live and move upon its surface inherit the productions and enjoy the
fruits of the dead. They have bequeathed to us by far the larger portion
of all that influences our thoughts, or mingles with the circumstances
of our daily life. We walk through the streets they laid out. We inhabit
the houses they built. We practise the customs they established. We
gather wisdom from books they wrote. We pluck the ripe clusters of their
experience. We boast in their achievements. And by these they speak to
us. Every device and influence they have left behind tells their story,
and is a voice of the dead. We feel this more impressively when we enter
the customary place of one recently departed, and look around upon his
work. The half-finished labor, the utensils hastily thrown aside,
the material that exercised his care and received his last touch, all
express him, and seem alive with his presence. By them, though dead, he
speaketh to us, with a freshness and tone like his words of yesterday.
How touching are those sketched forms, those unfilled outlines in
that picture which employed so fully the time and genius of the
great artist--Belshazzar's feast! In the incomplete process, the
transition-state of an idea from its conception to its realization, we
are brought closer to the mind of the artist; we detect its springs
and hidden workings, and therefore feel its reality more than in
the finished effort. And this is one reason why we are impressed at
beholding the work just left than in gazing upon one that has been for
a long time abandoned. Having had actual communion with the contriving
mind, we recognize its presence more readily in its production; or else
the recency of the departure heightens the expressiveness with which
everything speaks of the departed. The dead child's cast-off garment,
the toy just tossed aside, startles us as though with his renewed
presence. A year hence, they will suggest him to us, but with a
different effect.

But though not with such an impressive tone, yet just as much, in fact,
do the productions of those long gone speak to us. Their minds are
expressed there, and a living voice can do little more. Nay, we are
admitted to a more intimate knowledge of them than was possessed by
their contemporaries. The work they leave behind them is the sum-total
of their lives--expresses their ruling passion--reveals, perhaps, their
real sentiment. To the eyes of those placed on the stage with them, they
walked as in a show, and each life was a narrative gradually unfolding
itself. We discover the moral. We see the results of that completed
history. We judge the quality and value of that life by the residuum. As
"a prophet has no honor in his own country," so one may be misconceived
in his own time, both to his undue disparagement, and his undue
exaltation; therefore can another age better write his biography than
his own. His work, his permanent result, speaks for him better--at least
truer--than he spoke for himself. The rich man's wealth,--the sumptuous
property, the golden pile that he has left behind him;--by it, being
dead, does he not yet speak to us? Have we not, in that gorgeous result
of toiling days and anxious nights,--of brain-sweat and soul-rack,--the
man himself, the cardinal purpose, the very life of his soul? which we
might have surmised while he lived and wrought, but which, now that it
remains the whole sum and substance of his mortal being, speaks far
more emphatically than could any other voice he might have used. The
expressive lineaments of the marble, the pictured canvas, the immortal
poem;--by it, Genius, being dead, yet speaketh. To us, and not to its
own time, are unhoarded the wealth of its thought and the glory of its
inspiration. When it is gone,--when its lips are silent, and its heart
still,--then is revealed the cherished secret over which it toiled,
which was elaborated from the living alembic of the soul, through
painful days and weary nights,--the sentiment which could not find
expression to contemporaries,--the gift, the greatness, the lyric power,
which was disguised and unknown so long. Who, that has communed with
the work of such a spirit, has not felt in every line that thrilled his
soul, in every wondrous lineament that stamped itself upon his memory
forever, that the dead can speak, yes, that they have voices which
speak most truly, most emphatically when they are dead? So does Industry
speak, in its noble monuments, its precious fruits! So does Maternal
Affection speak, in a chord that vibrates in the hardest heart, in the
pure and better sentiment of after-years. So does Patriotism speak, in
the soil liberated and enriched by its sufferings. So does the martyr
speak, in the truth which triumphs by his sacrifice. So does the great
man speak, in his life and deeds, glowing on the storied page, so does
the good man speak, in the character and influence which he leaves
behind him. The voices of the dead come to us from their works, from
their results and these are all around us.

But I remark, in the second place, that the dead speak to us in memory
and association. If their voices may be constantly heard in their works,
we do not always heed them; neither have we that care and attachment for
the great congregation of the departed which will at any time call them
up vividly before us. But in that congregation there are those whom we
have known intimately and fondly, whom we cherished with our best love,
who lay close to our bosoms. And these speak to us in a more private and
peculiar manner,--in mementos that flash upon us the whole person of the
departed, every physical and spiritual lineament--in consecrated hours
of recollection that upon up all the train of the past, and re-twine its
broken ties around our hearts, and make its endearments present still.
Then, then, though dead, they speak to us. It needs not the vocal
utterance, nor the living presence, but the mood that transforms the
scene and the hour supplies these. That face that has slept so long
in the grave, now bending upon us, pale and silent, but affectionate
still,--that more vivid recollection of every feature, tone, and
movement, that brings before us the departed just as we knew them in the
full flush of life and health,--that soft and consecrating spell which
falls upon us, drawing in all our thoughts from the present, arresting,
as it were, the current of our being, and turning it back and holding it
still as the flood of actual life rushes by us,--while in that trance
of soul the beings of the past are shadowed--old friends, old days, old
scenes recur, familiar looks beam close upon us, familiar words reecho
in our ears, and we are closed up and absorbed with the by-gone, until
tears dissolve the film from our eyes, and some shock of the actual
wakes us from our reverie;--all these, I say make the dead to commune
with us as really as though in bodily form they should come out from
the chambers of their mysterious silence, and speak to us. And if life
consists in experiences, and not mere physical relations,--and if love
and communion belong to that experience, though they take place in
meditation, or in dreams, or by actual contact,--then, in that hour of
remembrance, have we really lived with the departed, and the departed
have come back and lived with us. Though dead, they have spoken to us.
And though memory sometimes induces the spirit of heaviness,--though it
is often the agent of conscience, and wakens u to chastise,--yet, it is
wonderful how, from events that were deeply mingled with pain, it
will extract an element of sweetness. A writer, in relating one of
the experiences of her sick-room, has illustrated this. In an hour of
suffering, when no one was near here, she went out from her bed and her
room to another apartment, and looked out upon a glorious landscape of
sunrise and spring-time. "I was suffering too much to enjoy this picture
at the moment," she says, "but how was it at the end of the year? The
pains of all those hours were annihilated,--as completely vanished as if
they had never been; while the momentary peep behind the window-curtain
made me possessor of this radiant picture for evermore." "Whence came
this wide difference," she asks, "between the good and the evil? Because
good is indissolubly connected with ideas,--with the unseen realities
which are indestructible." And though the illustration which she thus
gives may bear the impression of an individual personality, instead of
a universal truth, still, in the instance to which I apply it, I believe
it will very generally hold true, that memory leaves a pleasant rather
than a painful impression. At least, there is so much that is pleasant
mingled with it that we would not willingly lose the faculty of
memory,--the consciousness that we can thus call back the dead, and hear
their voices,--that we have the power of softening the rugged realities
which only suggest our loss and disappointment, by transferring the
scene and the hour to the past and the departed. And, as our conceptions
become more and more spiritual, we shall find the real to be less
dependent upon the outward and the visible,--we shall learn how much
life there is in a thought,--how veritable are the communions of spirit;
and the hour in which memory gives us the vision of the dead will be
prized by us as an hour of actual experience and such opportunities will
grow more precious to us. No, we would not willingly lose this power
of memory. One would not say, "Let the dead never come back to me in a
thought, or a dream; let them never glide before me in the still
watch of meditation; let me see, let me hear them no more, even in
fancy;"--not one of us would say this; and, therefore, it is
evident, that whatever painful circumstance memory or association may
recall,--even though it cause us to go out and weep bitterly,--there
is a sacred pleasure, a tender melancholy, that speaks to us in these
voices of the dead, which we are willing to cherish and repeat. It makes
our tears soft and sanctifying as they fall; it makes our hearts purer
and better,--makes them stronger for the conflict of life.

I remark, finally, that the dead speak to us in those religious
suggestions--those consolations, invitations, and hopes--which the
bereaved spirit indulges. Our meditations, concerning them naturally
draw us more closely to these spiritual realities which lie beyond the
grave, and beget in us those holier sentiments which we need. That such
is the tendency of these recollections experience assures us. They
open for us a new order of thought; they bring us in contact with the
loftiest but most neglected truths. Even the hardest heart feels this
influence. It is softened by the stroke of bereavement and, for the time
being, a chastening influence falls upon it, and it always thinks of
the dead with tenderness and awe. They speak to our affections with an
irresistible influence; they soothe our turbulent passions with their
mild and holy calmness; they rebuke us in their spiritual majesty for
our sensuality and our sin. They have departed, but they are not silent.
Though dead, they speak to us. Sweet and sanctifying is their communion
with us. They utter words of warning, too, and speak to us by the silent
eloquence of example. By this they bid us imitate all that was good in
their lives, all that is dear to remember. By this, too, they tell us
that we are passing swiftly from the earth, and hastening to join their
number. A little while ago, and they were as we are;--a little while
hence, and we shall be as they. Our work, like theirs, will be left
behind to speak for us. How important, then, that we consider what work
we do! They assure us that nothing is perpetual here. They bid us not
fasten our affections upon earth. In long procession they pass us by,
with solemn voices telling of their love and hatred, their interests
and cares, their work and device;--all abandoned now and passed away, as
little worth as the dust that blows across their graves. Upon all that
was theirs, upon every memorial of them, broods a melancholy dimness and
silence. They recede more and more from the associations of the living.
New tides of life roll through the cities of their habitation, and upon
the foot-worn pavements of their traffic other feet are busy. Their
lovely labor, or their stately pomp, is forgotten. No one weeps or cares
for them. Their solicitous monuments are unheeded. The companions of
their youth have rejoined them. The young, who scarcely remembered them,
are giving way to another generation. The places that knew them know
them no longer. "This, this," their solemn voices preach to us, "is the
changeableness of earth, and the emptiness of its pursuits!" They urge
us to seek the noblest end, the unfailing treasure. They bid us to find
our hope and our rest, our only constant joy in Him, who alone, amid
this mutability and decay, is permanent,--in God!

Well, then, is it for us to listen to the voices of the dead. By so
doing, we are better fitted for life, and for death. From that audience
we go purified and strengthened into the varied discipline of our mortal
state. We are willing to stay, knowing that the dead are so near us, and
that our communion with them may be so intimate. We are willing to go,
seeing that we shall not be widely separated from those we leave behind.
We will toil in our lot while God pleases, and when he summons us we
will calmly depart. When the silver cord becomes untwined, and the
golden bond broken,--when the wheel of action stands still in the
exhausted cistern of our life,--may we lie down in the light of that
faith which makes so beautiful the face of the dying Christian, and has
converted death's ghastly silence to a peaceful sleep; may we rise to a
holier and more visible communion, in the land without a sin and without
a tear; where the dead shall be closer to us than in this life; where
not the partition of a shadow, or a doubt, shall come between.




MYSTERY AND FAITH


     "For we walk by faith, not by sight."  II Corinthians v. 7.

It needs only common experience, and but little of that, to convince us
that this life is full of mystery, and at every step we take demands of
us faith. For at every step we take we literally walk by faith; in every
work we do we must have confidence in something which is not by sight,
in something which is not yet demonstrated. Skepticism carried to its
ultimate consequences is the negation of everything. It closes up the
issues of all knowledge, and sunders every ligament that binds us
to practical life. We must have faith in something or we stand on
no promises; we can predicate nothing. It may be said that in the
experience of the past we have a guide for the future; but then, must we
not have faith in experience? Do we not trust something which is not
yet demonstrated when we say "This cause which produced that effect
yesterday will produce a similar effect today or tomorrow?" How do we
know--positively know, that it will produce that effect, and what are
the grounds of our knowledge? This boasted "cause and effect," this
"experience," what right have we to rely upon it for one moment of
the future? Not for that moment has it demonstrated anything;--it
demonstrated for the time being, and the time being only; and our
confidence that it will do so again is faith, not sight--faith in
cause and effect, faith in experience, but faith after all. Hume, the
philosopher, has illustrated the positions which have now been taken.
"As to past experience," says he, "it can be allowed to give direct
and certain information of those precise objects only, and that precise
period of time which fell under its cognizance; but why this experience
should be extended to future times, and to other objects, which for
aught we know may be only in appearance similar; this is the main
question on which I would insist. The bread which I formerly ate
nourished me; that is, a body of such sensible qualities was, at that
time, endued with such secret powers; but does it follow that other
bread must also nourish me at another time, and that like sensible
qualities must also be attended with like secret powers? The consequence
seems nowise necessary." And yet we eat our bread, day by day, without a
doubt or a fear. We sow the grain and we reap the wheat, but for all the
work is done in faith, and the whole process is steeped in mystery.
In that scattering of the golden seed, what confidence is expressed
in elements that we cannot see, in beneficent agencies that we cannot
control, in results that are beyond our power, and that in their growth
and development are full of wonder exceeding our wisdom. Give up faith;
say that we will act only upon that which is demonstrated and known,
say that we will walk only so far as sight reaches, and we completely
separate the present from the future, and stop all the mechanism of
practical life.

But if we take a wider view of things, and consider this material
universe in which we live, the great fact of mystery and the need of
faith will be urged upon us by a larger and more impressive teaching.
The more we learn of nature the more clearly is revealed to us this
fact--that we know less than we thought we did; positively, we know
more, but relatively we know less, because as we have advanced nature
has stretched out into wider and wider relations. The department that
was unknown to us yesterday is explored to-day. Yesterday, we thought
it was all that remained to be explored, but the torch of investigation
that guided us through it now flares out upon new regions we did not
see before. Like one who goes with a candle into some immense cavern,
presently a little circle becomes clear, the shadows vanish before him,
and undefined forms grow distinct, he thinks he is near the end, when
lo! what seemed a solid boundary of rock dissolves and floats away into
a depth of darkness, the path opens into an immense void, new shapes of
mystery start out, and he learns this much that he did not know before,
that instead of being near the end, he is only upon the threshold. We do
not mean to imply by this that we have no positive knowledge, or that
we do not increase in knowledge. With every new discovery we positively
know more and more. But the new discovery reveals the fact that more is
yet to be known; it lays open new regions, it unfolds new relations that
we had not before suspected.

We follow some tiny thread a little way, and hold it secure, but it is
connected with another ligament, and this branches out into a third; and
instead of exhausting the matter, we find ourselves at the root of an
infinite series, of an immense relationship, upon which we have only
just opened; and yet what we have is positive knowledge, is something
more added to our stock. The circle of the known has positively widened,
but the horizon of the unknown has widened also, and, instead of being
to us now, as it seemed some time ago, a solid and ultimate limit, it
is only an ethereal wall, only to us a relative boundary, and behind are
infinite depths and mystery. Our scientific knowledge at the present day
reaches this grand result--it clears up the deception that the system
of nature is mere flat, dead materiality, a few mechanical laws, a few
rigid forms. It shows that these are only the husks, the outer garments
of mighty forces of subtile, far-reaching agencies; and the most common,
every-day truths, that seemed stale and exhausted, become illuminated
with infinite meaning, and are the blossoms of an infinite life.

The wider our circle of discovery, the wider our wonder; the more
startling our conclusions, the more perplexing our questions. We have
not exhausted the universe;--we have just begun to see its harmony of
proportion and of relations, without penetrating a fathom into its
real life. How and what is that power that works in the shooting of
a crystal, and binds the obedience of a star; that shimmers in the
northern Aurora, and connects by its attraction the aggregated universe;
that by its unseen forces, its all-prevalent jurisdiction, holds the
little compass to the north, blooms in the nebula and the flower, weaves
the garment of earth and the veil of heaven, darts out in lightning,
spins the calm motion of the planets, and presides mysteriously over
all motion and all life? And what is life, and what is death, and what
a thousand things that we touch, and experience, and think we know all
about? O! as science, as nature opens upon us, we find mystery after
mystery, and the demand upon the human soul if for faith, faith in high,
yes, in spiritual realities; and this materialism that would shut us in
to death and sense, that denies all spirit and all miracle, is shattered
like a crystal sphere, and the soul rushes out into wide orbits and
infinite revolutions, into life, and light, and power, that are of
eternity,--that are of God!

Thus the scale is prepared for us to rise from things of sense to things
of spirit, to rise from faith in nature to faith in Revelation, from
the faith of LaPlace to the faith of Paul. No one who has studied nature
will reject Christianity because it reveals truths that he cannot
see with his naked eye,--because it speaks of things that he cannot
comprehend. No one who has considered the shooting of a green blade
will dogmatically deny its miracles. No one who has found in the natural
world the intelligent wisdom that pervades all things, will wonder that
he discovers a revelation of perfect love in Jesus Christ. "We walk by
faith, not by sight," said Paul. So says every Christian; and it is of
all things the most rational. Faith in something higher and greater
than we can see, faith in something above this narrow scene, faith in
something beyond this present life, faith in realities that are not of
time or sense; from all that we have now considered we claim such faith
to be most rational, most natural. God, spirit, immortality, instead
of being inconsistent with what we know, are what we most legitimately
deduce from it,--what we might expect from the light that trembles
behind the curtain of mystery which bounds all our sensuous knowledge.
We do believe, the veriest skeptic believes in something behind that
curtain of mystery; nor can he withhold his faith because it attaches to
that which is unseen and incomprehensible, without, as has already
been shown, cutting every nerve that binds us to practical life, and
smothering every suggestion that speaks from outward nature. If he do
not believe in a God, then, or in Christ, or in immortality, let him not
sneer at others because they walk by faith and not by sight; for he also
must do so, though his faith be not in such high truths, such spiritual
realities.

The Christian's faith is an Infinite Father and an immortal life, and
though he cannot see them, cannot come in material contact with them, he
believes them to be the greatest of all realities, and he sees them by
faith, a medium as legitimate as that of sight. They are mysteries,
but everything contains a mystery; they demand of him what every day's,
every hour's events demand of him--faith. Let us understand, however,
that faith is not the surrendering of our minds to that which is
irrational and inconsistent. These terms should not be confounded with
the mysterious and the incomprehensible. That the earth moves and yet
stands still is not a proposition that demands faith. It is in the
province of reason to say that it cannot move and stand still at the
same time. It is an inconsistency. But how the earth moves on its axis,
what is that law that makes it move, is an incomprehensibility. An
incomprehensibility is one thing, an inconsistency is another thing.
The one conflicts with our reason, the other is beyond it. In that which
conflicts with our reason we cannot have faith, but as to that which is
beyond it we exercise faith every day; for we literally walk by faith
and not by sight.

Who shall say, then, that God, immortality, and those high truths
revealed by Jesus, are inconsistent? Do they not conform to the highest
reason? Do not our deepest intuitions demand that these revelations
should be true? Consult your nature, examine your own heart, consider
what you are, what you want, what you feel, deeply want, keenly feel,
and then say whether the Revelation of a God, a Father, and an immortal
life, satisfies you as nothing else can. Take them away, and would there
not be a dreary and overwhelming void? And because you have not seen
God, because you have not realized immortality, because they reach
beyond your present vision, because the grave shuts you in, because they
are high and transcendent truths, will you reject them? Do so, and try
to walk by sight alone. With that nature of yours, so full of love, with
that intellect of yours so limitless in capacity, you are apparently a
child of the elements, a thing of physical nature, born of the dust,
and returning to it. With desires that reach out beyond the stars, with
faculties that in this life just begin to bud, with affections whose
bleeding tendrils cling around the departed, wrestle with death, and say
to the grave, "Give up the dead! they are not thine, but mine; I
feel they must be mine forever," with all these desires, capacities,
affections, you walk--so far as mere sight helps you--among graves and
decay, with nothing more enduring, nothing better, than three-score
years and ten, the clods of the valley, the crumbling bone, and
the dissolving dust! Because God and immortality are mysterious,
incomprehensible, reject them, and walk only by sight? The humblest
outpouring of human affection rebukes thy skepticism; the most narrow
degree of human intellect prophesies beyond all this; the darkest heart,
with that spark of eternal life, the yearning that moves beneath all
its sensualities, and speaks for better, for more enduring things,--that
rebukes thee; and in man's moral nature, in his heart and his mind,
there is that which only can be satisfied, only can be explained by
God and immortality. They alone, then, are rational, they alone have
comprehensive vision, who walk by faith, and not by sight.

Mystery and faith, then; let what we have said concerning these be not
alone for the skeptic, but for the Christian who has faith but cannot
fully justify and confirm it, or who feels it faltering under some heavy
burden, or who is overwhelmed by the magnitude of the truths to which
it attaches, or who wishes, with a kind of half-doubt, that these things
might be seen and felt. They are great, they are incomprehensibly great;
but are they therefore untrue? Does not your heart of hearts tell you
they are true? Does not that Revelation of Christ steal into your soul
and feed it, satisfy it, as nothing else can, with a warm, benignant
power, that makes you know its truth?

Mysteries are all about us, but faith sees light beyond and around them
all. Have you recently laid down the dead in their place of rest? Cold
and crushing, then, is that feeling of vacancy, that dreary sense of
loss, that rushes upon you, as you look through the desolate chambers
without,--through the desolate chambers of the heart within. But will
not He who calls out from the very dust where yon sleepers lie the
flowers of summer, and who, in the snows that enwrap their bed,
cherishes the germs of the glorious springtime, will not He who works
out this beautiful mystery in nature bring life back from the tomb,
and light out of darkness? It is truly a great mystery; but everything
within us responds to it as reasonable; and though it demands our faith,
who, who, in this limited and changing world, can walk by sight alone?