The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Geology of Mt. Mansfield State Forest This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook. Title: The Geology of Mt. Mansfield State Forest Author: Robert A. Christman Release date: May 8, 2020 [eBook #62053] Language: English Credits: Produced by Stephen Hutcheson and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net *** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE GEOLOGY OF MT. MANSFIELD STATE FOREST *** Produced by Stephen Hutcheson and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net The Geology of MT. MANSFIELD STATE FOREST _By_ ROBERT A. CHRISTMAN DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND PARKS Perry H. Merrill, _Director_ VERMONT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Doll, _State Geologist_ 1956 [Illustration: Cover photo: Smugglers Notch looking northeast from the top of Mount Mansfield.] GEOLOGY OF MOUNT MANSFIELD STATE FOREST _By_ ROBERT A. CHRISTMAN INTRODUCTION Included within Mount Mansfield State Forest are Mount Mansfield, Smugglers Notch and a number of the mountains of the Green Mountain range to the northeast and southwest of these famous landmarks. Because much of the area is easily accessible by trails, ski lifts, and roads (see the index map of Figure 1), the visitor has ample opportunity to observe the minerals, rocks, and mountains. Undoubtedly, these observations have provoked questions which, for lack of sufficient information, have gone unanswered in the mind of the observer. In the hopes of remedying this situation—a very grievous situation in the eyes of a geologist—this brief geologic pamphlet has been written to help the visitor to the State Forest obtain a greater appreciation of the handiwork of nature. To begin with, _geology_ can be defined as the study of the history of the earth as recorded in the rocks. It includes the study of minerals, rocks, fossils, the structure of the rocks, and the forms of the land. Although only a few have been fortunate enough to choose this subject as a profession, the field is wide open for amateurs. This report is divided into four sections. The first describes the rocks; the second deals with the detailed structure of the rocks and the mountains; the third treats the glacial history of the area; and the fourth part describes the geology that may be seen at various localities within the park. DESCRIPTION OF THE ROCKS _Introduction_ With a few exceptions, the rock found in Mount Mansfield State Forest is a mica-albite-quartz schist. This name indicates that it is a metamorphic rock[1] of a particular composition and texture as described in the following paragraphs. The schist forms the cliffs at Smugglers Notch and the bare-rock faces exposed along the crests of the mountains and elsewhere. It varies slightly in appearance because of variation in the proportions of the different mineral constituents. [Illustration: Figure 1. Index mapping showing location of Mount Mansfield State Forest.] _Origin of the schist_ An understanding of the origin of the schist is fundamental to understanding the geology of the Mount Mansfield area. Many million years before the formation of the Green Mountains, northwestern Vermont was covered by a shallow sea into which fine-grained sediments were transported by the ancient rivers. As these sandy and shaly deposits accumulated on the bottom of the sea, they were buried by progressively younger sediments of different types. Many of these sedimentary layers contained shells of the animals that lived and died in these seas, with the shell remains of the older generations occurring in the bottom layers. By the time the sea had retreated, the older sediments were deeply buried beneath the younger sediments. During a period of mountain-making, these materials were subjected to high pressures and high temperatures. Physical-chemical changes took place within the sediments causing recrystallization to form the mica-albite-quartz schist. In other words, under conditions of heat and pressure the rocks became plastic and the elements which were dispersed through the sediments as sand and clay minerals reorganized into different and larger mineral grains. It is probable that some material was added to the rocks and some was removed by hot solutions migrating through the rocks. The overlying younger sediments were also converted to metamorphic rocks. Because the crystallization of the minerals occurred under the influence of pressure, platy minerals developed with their long dimensions at right angles to the pressure. Thus, the resulting rock developed a layered appearance by the parallel arrangement of the minerals. Where this layering or banding, which is called _foliation_, is coarse, the metamorphic rock is a _gneiss_; where it is fine but pronounced, the rock is called a _schist_. If the original rock was a limestone or sandstone, the metamorphic product is marble or quartzite, respectively. In the process of, or following the formation of the schists, the rocks were crumpled and folded by continued pressure. During the 380 million years following the metamorphism and folding, this area has been above sea level and has been subjected to erosion. At various times the area was uplifted vertically which resulted in continued erosion of progressively older rocks until the present day when the overlying rocks have been removed to expose the mica-albite-quartz schist. _Age of the mica-albite-quartz schist_ Some readers may wonder how the age of metamorphism can be stated so specifically—380 million years seems like a long period to be determined beyond a guess. Such a determination is based on a number of different factors. Sedimentary rocks can be placed in their general age sequence by their physical relationships—the rocks deposited on top must be the youngest. A study of the fossils of successive layers shows that they occur in a definite sequence with the simpler forms in the oldest layers and generally the more complex ones in the youngest layers. On the basis of the fossil evidence and the physical relations, the geologic sequence of the layers can be established for any given area and their relative age can thus be indicated on the geologic time scale. Usually such sequences are established for rather large areas as, for example, northern Vermont or eastern New York State. In addition, actual age determinations can be made for some rocks. Many igneous rocks contain traces of uranium which has been decomposing at a known rate since its formation. By comparing the remnants of uranium with the decomposition products, one can assign an approximate age in terms of years to the igneous rock. By observing the relationship between the dated igneous rock and any sedimentary rocks in contact with it to determine their relative ages, it may be possible to assign an approximate age to the sedimentary rock and the fossils contained within it. The general age of the original constituents of the mica-albite-quartz schist of the Green Mountains can be determined only by comparison to other rocks that can be dated. Any fossils present originally were destroyed during metamorphism. Igneous rocks containing uranium do not occur with the schist. However, elsewhere in Vermont, one can determine that the schist lies beneath rocks containing fossils of Ordovician age and lies above pre-Cambrian rocks known to be more than 500 million years old. The Cambrian and Ordovician periods on the geologic time scale are the oldest periods containing abundant fossils. The period of the metamorphism is based on evidence at other localities where unfolded rocks of known age lie over folded rocks. On the geologic time scale the mica-albite-quartz schist on Mount Mansfield is said to be Cambro-Ordovician in age, which may be from 380 to 500 million years ago. In order that the geologist can talk about the sequences of rocks, layers having a similar age and appearance are assigned a formation name. The schists on Mount Mansfield closely resemble schists in southern Vermont which belong to the Pinney Hollow formation. However, because they can not be traced directly, it is possible that the two sequences are not exactly equivalent. For this reason some geologists assign the rocks in this area to the Camels Hump formation which has been named after their abundant occurrence on Camels Hump Mountain, south of the Mount Mansfield State Forest. Although it would be geologically correct to use these formational names, they will be omitted in favor of continued use of the name “mica-albite-quartz schist.” The formation which lies over the mica-albite-quartz schist may be seen in the vicinity of the village of Stowe where the rocks are either a black, shiny schist or a fine-grained green schist. The formation which lies under the mica-albite-quartz schist is not exposed in the Mount Mansfield area. _Description of the schist_ As the name implies, the mica-albite-quartz schist contains the minerals mica, albite, and quartz. These mineral constituents are found in all the schists in the area. Other minerals may be locally abundant or present in small amounts. When the schist is examined without a hand lens or microscope, _mica_ appears to be the most abundant mineral. It occurs as small colorless to white flakes which sparkle and shine in the sunlight. You may recognize this mineral as the one that is sometimes sold as artificial snow at Christmas time. Its species name is muscovite, and it has a chemical composition of KAl₂(AlSi₃)O₁₀(OH)₂. _Muscovite_ is found in various proportions in most of the rocks in the area. It is a deceptive mineral upon which to make a percentage estimate because it appears to be more abundant than it actually is. In most of the rocks it comprises less than 50 per cent of the minerals. _Biotite_ is the other important member of the mica group and is distinguished from muscovite by its black or dark brown color. Biotite occurs in minor proportions in the rocks of the area, being most abundant on the western slope of Mount Mansfield. Like muscovite, biotite occurs as small flakes with smooth flat surfaces. The orientation of the mica flakes accounts for the pronounced layering of most schists. All of the flakes are parallel and when folded and crumpled they give the rock its structure. Where the muscovite is most abundant, breakage along planes rich in mica produces smooth, shiny surfaces which may give the rock a slippery appearance. The layers rich in mica may show in a rather perfect manner the small-scale folding of the schist. Albite and quartz are also important constituents of the schists. Together they are more abundant than mica in the average schist on Mount Mansfield but because they are not so “showy” they are more easily overlooked. Both minerals are white and granular. Quartz, which consists of silica or SiO₂, is the principal constituent of most beach sands. In the typical mica schist, quartz is glassy in appearance and occurs as small rounded or irregular grains without plane surfaces. _Albite_ is a variety of plagioclase feldspar having the composition of NaAlSi₃O₈. It has a white chalky appearance and occurs in small equidimensional grains bounded by flat surfaces which break along plane surfaces that reflect light in certain positions. On the west side of Mount Mansfield some of the rocks contain so much albite and so little mica that the rock is granular in appearance. _Chlorite_, variety pennine, is an important mineral constituent of some of the schist. Chlorite is characterized by its green color and small amounts are responsible for giving a greenish cast to much of the schist. Like mica it occurs as thin sheets which reflect the folding of the schist. Garnet and magnetite are locally abundant minerals in the schist. _Garnet_ occurs as pink to red grains ranging from pin point to pea size. Most of the grains are rounded although a few occur as equidimensional crystals which have twelve equally developed faces. Garnet has a semitransparent, glassy appearance and is harder than a knife blade. _Magnetite_ occurs as bluish-black metallic masses with about the same size range as the garnet. Although most are rounded masses, crystal faces are developed on some. Perfectly developed crystals occur as _octahedrons_ which is the form consisting of eight faces, as two four-sided pyramids with their bases together. The larger grains of magnetite have sufficient magnetic power to attract or deflect a compass needle. The garnet and magnetite usually do not occur together, but each may form localized concentrations as lenses or layers in the schist. In smaller amounts, usually visible only with a hand lens or microscope, the schist also contains a green mineral called epidote, a white mineral apatite, and an elongated black mineral called tourmaline. Locally, as on the Nose Dive ski run above the Toll Road on Mount Mansfield, slender needles of tourmaline are visible in the schist. When a piece of rock is sawed and ground to a thickness of 0.03 millimeters, many of the minerals that appear opaque are found to be transparent. By their color and their optical properties the minerals can be accurately identified. On the basis of the amount of each present the mineral and chemical composition of the rock can be determined. Figure 2 shows the appearance of a thin section of the mica-albite-quartz schist from the Forehead of Mount Mansfield. The parallel orientation of the mineral grains is apparent even though the photomicrograph represents a very small area of the schist. [Illustration: Figure 2. Photograph taken through a microscope at a thin section of the schist. The white and gray grains are quartz and albite and the dark colored elongate grains are either muscovite or chlorite. The magnification is about one hundred times normal size. Even at this scale, the layering of the minerals is clearly visible.] Other varieties of the schist occur less abundantly in the area. These contain the same minerals as the mica-albite-quartz schist but in different proportions. If the mica is most abundant, as it is locally on Mount Mansfield, the schist may be smooth or highly crinkled and have a very shiny appearance. If the albite is most abundant the schist is more uniform and granular in appearance and the rocks are more massive. Small scale folding is usually absent. Such albite schists occur on the west side of Mount Mansfield, particularly along the lower part of the Maple Ridge Trail and in the cliffs south of the Forehead along the Long Trail. If the quartz is most abundant, but mica and albite are present in considerable quantities, the rock may have a granular, layered appearance. Locally some of the rocks consist almost entirely of quartz and are classified as quartzite. These rocks have a dense, fine-grained, sugary appearance and generally are gray to bluish gray in color. They are hard rocks and often form minor ledges in cliff exposures or are the resistant rock at the top of small waterfalls in some of the creeks. Most of the quartzite in the area occurs in narrow layers less than a foot thick. Although these layers cannot be traced, they are most abundant on the east side of Mount Mansfield at various localities about one-third of the way up the mountain. At places, vein-like masses of glassy, milky white quartz occur in the schist. In these, the quartz is massive and without evidence of individual grains and is often fractured unevenly. The quartz occurs as localized lenses in the schist, particularly at the noses of the folds. The small, white boulders of quartz of this type are conspicuous along some of the trails. A special and somewhat unique type of rock occurring at Sterling Pond is described in the description of Spruce Peak and Sterling Pond. _Structure of the mountain and the rocks_ The position of the Green Mountains is a function of the structure of the rocks and their resistance to erosion. At the same time that the mica-albite-quartz schist was being developed under conditions of heat and pressure the region was tightly folded by the same forces. It is likely that this folding continued after the metamorphism during the declining stages of mountain-making. This period of mountain-building probably raised the rocks to a higher level but it was the later repeated uplifts and erosion of the overlying rocks which finally produced the present mountain topography. It is postulated that the folding and crumpling of the schists were accompanied by a westward movement of large masses of rock. That is, segments of the earth’s crust are believed to have been pushed westward by pressure from the east. Thus, it is believed by many geologists that the rock which now occurs in the Green Mountains may have been derived in early times from an area ten to forty miles to the east. The basic structure of the Green Mountains is an anticlinorium, a large complex fold. An _anticline_ is an upward fold in which individual rock layers if traced through the _structure_ have a shape similar to that of an arch; the opposite structure is a syncline in which the individual layers are shaped like a trough or basin. An _anticlinorium_ is a large anticline upon which are superimposed many smaller anticlines and synclines. Figure 3 is a diagrammatic sketch showing the relation of the topography to the structure of the rocks in the Mount Mansfield area. The structure of the rocks is reflected in the topography of Mount Mansfield, but such correspondence is not necessary, for the form of any hill or mountain is a function of its erosional history and resistance of the rock to erosion. In some folded areas, the rock in the trough of a syncline is so resistant to erosion, that it persists in hills or mountains after neighboring anticlines have been more deeply eroded to form valleys. [Illustration: Figure 3. Diagrammatic sketch showing the relation between the topography and the structure of the Green Mountains in the Mount Mansfield area. The section has been drawn to approximately pass through The Chin, Smugglers Notch, Spruce Peak and Sterling Pond, and looking N 20° W.] THE CHIN SMUGGLERS NOTCH SPRUCE PEAK STERLING POND The smaller folds are like “little fleas on bigger fleas on bigger fleas” in that many little folds may be superimposed on larger ones. These anticlines and synclines range in amplitude from fractions of an inch to thousands of feet. Many are miniature anticlinoria themselves and could be used as scale models of the structure of the entire mountain range. The small folds, or crenulations, in the schist have weathered differentially so that the more resistant layers stand out in relief, emphasizing the shape of the folds. The photograph in Figure 4 shows the small-scale folding. It will be noted that the anticlinal folds are asymmetrical with the west side dipping more steeply than the east side. If a comparison is made between the structure of the mountain and that of an asymmetrical arch, to carry the simile one step further, it may be imagined that the axis of the arch may be either horizontal or inclined. The chances that it is inclined are much greater than the chance that it is exactly horizontal. Thus, most anticlines or anticlinoria are inclined along their axes and the amount of the dip of the line connecting the points along the crest of the fold is called the _plunge_. Most of the folds in the Mount Mansfield area plunge about ten degrees to the south. This plunge is expressed in the dip of the crests of the minor folds, particularly in the crenulation of the mica layers. Viewed at a distance the trace of the fold-crests form a series of parallel lines on the smooth mica-rich surfaces. This type of structure is called the _lineation_ and is expressed on the geologic map by small arrows. The dominant lineation is north-south. Although Figure 5 is a sketch of a small fold showing the different structural elements, it might be taken as a diagrammatic sketch of the regional structure. Evidence that the structure of the rocks is even more complex is shown locally by the presence of east-west lineations. The intersection of this secondary lineation with the dominant south lineation produces a checker board appearance on some rock surfaces. A system of east-west trending folds is traced by some of the quartz lenses. The significance of the east-west structures is hypothetical, but they are believed to have been mostly obscured by the younger structural features. [Illustration: Figure 4. Folding and crenulations in the mica-albite-quartz schist near the Chin on Mount Mansfield. As the photograph is looking to the north, it may be noted that the folds are asymmetrical with axial plane of the folding dipping east.] With the description of the rocks completed, the question which arises next is how to represent these three-dimensional contortions on the map. Figure 6 illustrates how the attitude of a particular layer may be expressed in terms of dip and strike. It is apparent that the _dip_ of the rock layer may vary from 0° to 90° and is measured as the angle between its plane and a horizontal plane. Also, it is apparent that the trend of the bed, or the _strike_, may correspond to any direction of the compass and can be measured as the intersection of that plane and a horizontal plane. The maximum dip is always at right angles to the direction of the strike. [Illustration: Figure 5. Diagrammatic three dimensional sketch illustrating the relations between outcrop patterns of folds on vertical planes perpendicular and parallel to the trend of the folding (front and sides of the block) and on a horizontal surface (top of block). Cut-away section of the block shows the folds and lineation lines on a given foliation surface. These folds can be more clearly visualized if the upper portion of the diagram is covered.] The dip and strike are used to measure the position and attitude of the layers of the rocks. In the case of the mica-albite-quartz schists these planes are called _foliation_ planes. If the structure of the rock is an anticline, most of the strikes of the foliation are parallel, but the dips are in different directions on either side of the crest. At the crest of the fold the foliation is horizontal if the fold is not plunging. On Mount Mansfield where the plunge is about ten degrees to the south, foliation along the crest strikes about east-west and dips about 10° south. Away from the crest, the dip of the sides of the anticline begin to be expressed in the readings so that the strike directions “swing back” toward the north-south direction. The majority of the layers on the east side of the mountain strike northeast and dip to the east with the angle of dip increasing away from the crest of the anticlinorium. On the west side of the mountain they trend to the northwest and dip to the west with the dips becoming steeper away from the crest. In addition to these variations in the dip and strike over the anticlinal crest, the smaller folds give local abnormal readings. For these reasons many of the dips and strikes shown on the geologic map represent the averages of a number of readings, and those of the minor folds and crinkles have been omitted in order to simplify the picture. [Illustration: Figure 6. Three dimensional diagrams showing variations in dip and strike. Plane in A strikes N 45° W and dips 45° SW; B strikes north-south and dips 60° east; and the plane in C strikes N 45° E and dips 30° SE.] Another structural feature of the schists is the breakage of the rocks along definite plane surfaces called _joints_. These usually occur in systems formed by a number of parallel joints. The joints formed as a result of stress and strain operating on the rocks during periods of mountain-making and vertical uplifts. Information as to the nature of these forces might be obtained if all the joints were carefully recorded and plotted on a map. On Mount Mansfield some of the prominent topographic features appear to be controlled by joints. Much of the north-facing cliff on the Nose is controlled by a joint trending N. 65° W., and a similar face on the Lower Lip is controlled by a joint trending N. 60° W. Along the crest of Mount Mansfield a number of joints trend about north-south. Joints of this system in the steep cliffs on either side of the crest of Mount Mansfield have been separated further by the tendency of the rocks to creep down slope under the force of gravity. These joints form the canyons or narrow passageways which are traversed by some of the trails. On Maple Ridge at about 3300 foot elevation the trail crosses a joint trending N. 50° E. which is conspicuous for its four-foot width and the extent and the straightness of the break. A number of joints belonging to this system are found along Maple Ridge. GLACIAL HISTORY OF THE AREA _Introduction_ The geologic time division previous to the present one is called the Pleistocene or the “ice age.” During this time, large continental glaciers advanced over the northern part of North America several times. The cause of the ice age is not known with certainty and whether geologic history will repeat itself is a matter of conjecture. However, it is established that these vast ice sheets covered New England and that the last ice sheet melted back from the Mansfield area about 12,000 years ago. If one stands on the crest of Mount Mansfield and looks westward over the Champlain Valley, it is difficult to visualize this entire valley completely filled with ice of the continental glacier. Yet, the evidence shows that the ice sheet was so thick that it completely covered Mount Mansfield at one time. _Evidences of glaciation_ Two types of evidence, glacial striae and erratics, show that Mount Mansfield was over-ridden by the continental glaciation. _Striae_ are scratches in the bedrock which were produced by the sharp edges of rocks protruding from the sole of the moving glacier. These scratches show the direction in which the glacier was moving at a particular spot and the average of many readings gives an accurate value as to the overall direction of movement of the ice sheet. On the Long Trail between the Mount Mansfield Hotel and the Chin on Mount Mansfield, striations may be observed at a number of places. Some of the positions where readings were made are indicated on the map by the triangular-pointed arrows. Faint striae may be seen near the entrance of the Mount Mansfield Hotel and more conspicuous ones are visible on the west side of the roadbed of the secondary road that intersects the Toll Road just below the Hotel. Figure 7 shows a photograph taken at Drift Rock in which the striae are clearly visible. The average trend of the striae on Mount Mansfield is about N. 50° W. The movement of the ice is presumed to have been nearly north-south down the Champlain Valley which was deepened by the erosive action of the ice. These facts seem to suggest that the movement of ice over Mount Mansfield was marginal and nearly 45° to the axis of the main ice tongue. _Erratics_ are boulders moved and deposited by glaciers. Often these boulders are found in environments foreign to them. On the high parts of Mount Mansfield, a few boulders other than the mica-albite-quartz schist are found which have reached their present position by glacial transportation. A particularly interesting erratic is Drift Rock. One may note by referring again to Figure 7 that the glacial striae pass beneath the large boulders indicating that the boulders were not at their present position when the striae were formed. Thus, these boulders are aptly named for they must be considered erratics even though their composition is the same as the surrounding rocks. As a logical speculation it is probable that they were plucked out of the bedrock just a short distance to the northwest of their present position and it is possible that these were the very boulders that formed the striae. Other evidence of glaciation is the presence of _cirques_ which are the high mountain basins in which mountain glaciers originate. Small mountain glaciers probably existed on Mount Mansfield, particularly in the east side of the mountain where the topography has the suggestive form of cirque-like walls and basins. Melting of a continental glacier causes deposition of the sand and gravel scooped up and transported by the glacier. Some of this material is plastered beneath the moving glacier, some is simply let down as a blanket and terminal accumulations, and some is transported by streams of melt water to form deposits in which the sands and gravels are somewhat sorted in size by the action of the water. [Illustration: Figure 7. Drift Rock, glacial erratics along the Long Trail on Mount Mansfield. Note the glacial striae trending away from the viewer and passing beneath the boulders.] The blanket type of glacial deposits probably were present over much of the Mount Mansfield area at one time, but have been removed from the upper mountain slopes by erosion. Such deposits are present at lower elevations but are only rarely discernible because of the heavy vegetation and soil cover. Sand and gravel deposits derived from post-glacial streams are located in some of the lower valleys as, for instance, along the highway north of Barnes Camp. North of the old road and northeast of the camping area along one of the main streams on the west side of Mount Mansfield, fine-grained, sandy lake deposits occur at an elevation of about 1900 feet. The nature of the deposits indicates that they were formed in ponds marginal to the ice sheet when the continental glacier occupied the Champlain Valley but did not extend over the crest of Mount Mansfield. DESCRIPTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL LOCALITIES _Spruce Peak and Sterling Pond_ Spruce Peak is the mountain on the east side of Smugglers Notch. It may be reached by several trails or the ski lift. An excellent view of Smugglers Notch and the surrounding country is obtained from the summit. Near the summit along the access road to the ski lift, unweathered mica-albite-quartz schist is exposed and the folding can be clearly seen. Sterling Pond lies to the northeast of Spruce Peak in a shallow depression along the divide of the mountain. This location is anomalous for a pond because the amount of higher land around it is so small that only a limited amount of drainage area is available for the accumulation of rain and snow. Yet, the outflow of water is almost continuous during the summer. The basin occupied by the pond was probably scoured out by the glacier. The Sterling Pond area contains talc deposits which probably would be commercial if they were not so inaccessible for mining. These deposits have been studied by A. H. Chidester of the United States Geological Survey and a report is obtainable from the U. S. Government. The occurrence of the talc, as mapped by Chidester, is shown in the sketch of Figure 8. Talc has the composition of Mg₃Si₄O₁₀(OH)₂ and is a soft flaky white mineral. The talc-bearing rocks in this area are white, light gray, or light green and usually are irregularly stained yellow-brown by the weathering of an iron-bearing mineral that occurs with the talc. Because of its extremely soft nature, the talc does not form prominent rock exposures. As shown by the figure, the talc can be most easily observed along the shore of Sterling Pond, south of the Green Mountain Club cabin, or along the trail to Smugglers Notch near the top of the first rise from the pond. Here the talc is exposed in the trail as low, rounded, slippery knobs of “messy looking” yellow-brown rock. As part of the pond is underlain by talc, it is probable that the softness of the talc was a factor in the differential erosion of the basin by the continental glacier. The talc is believed to have originated by the alteration of a body of _ultramafic_ igneous rock, which is characterized by having a low silica content and a high magnesium content. Sometime during the mountain-building period, the ultramafic igneous rock invaded the pre-existing rocks from an unknown source within the earth’s crust. It is believed that at a later date the original minerals in the igneous rock were altered to talc and other minerals by the action of hot ascending solutions composed principally of water. [Illustration: Figure 8. Sketchmap showing the location of the talc-bearing rocks at Sterling Pond.] MAP OF THE STERLING POND AREA FOREST BOUNDARY Green Mountain Club cabin STERLING POND To Smugglers Notch EXPLANATION Talc-bearing rock Solid areas are positions of exposures Postulated boundary of talc body beneath pond Trail To Spruce Peak From report by A. H. Chidester The Long Trail passes by Sterling Pond, where the Green Mountain Club has erected a small cabin overlooking the pond. Figure 9 is the picturesque view of Mount Mansfield taken from the cabin. _Smugglers Notch_ All of the rocks exposed at Smugglers Notch (Figure 10) are the mica-albite-quartz schist which locally contains garnet. The large rock boulders in the Notch were derived from the cliffs forming the walls of the Notch. The gradual processes of weathering and breaking up by freezing cause large slabs of the rock to become loose and eventually break off the cliff faces to careen down the mountainside to the valley below, just as King Rock did within historical time. At the north end of the Notch, the large accumulations of such boulders form a _talus slope_, the name for rock accumulations at the base of a cliff. The irregular stacking of these rocks have formed Smugglers Cave. Smaller openings extend further back under the “rock pile” to where the ground is considerably colder and where the heavier cold air has sunk. Drafts of this air escaping at the foot of the talus is noticeably cool. The Smuggler’s Face, Elephants Head, the Singing Bird, and the Hunter and His Dog are freaks of nature and a product of man’s imagination. Their existence is due to the haphazard nature in which the rocks on the cliff faces have broken along joint surfaces. The origin of the Notch is not completely known. The steep walls and the narrowness of the Notch suggest that it could not have been formed by the headward erosion of two streams or by glacial action. It seems most likely that it was formed by the erosive action of an ancient river that once flowed through the area. Because of the high elevation, the only time when such a river could have existed is when the Champlain Valley was filled with ice on the west side of Mount Mansfield, so that the normal drainage of water to the west was blocked by the ice. It is possible that the conditions were such that the water supplied by the melting glacier could only drain to the south through the Notch. After the ice retreated the drainage system was abandoned in favor of lower outlets and eventually the drainage was developed to Lake Champlain in the west. The Notch was modified by the headward erosion of the present small streams. Except for the shape of the Notch, the only evidence for this hypothesis is the occurrence of a weakly-bedded, well-sorted deposit of sand at the north end of the Notch at an elevation of 2050 feet. Such a deposit of sand is characteristic of standing water, which occurring at this elevation indicates that some vastly different drainage system must have existed in the past. [Illustration: Figure 9. The Chin and Bear Head on Mount Mansfield viewed from Sterling Pond.] [Illustration: Figure 10. View of Smugglers Notch and Spruce Peak from ski slope on Mount Mansfield.] _Big Spring_ On the south side of the Smugglers Notch road at an elevation of about 1800 feet is the Big Spring which furnishes a tremendous output of cold spring water. The source of the water is not known although it is likely that, like most springs, it is derived from an underground drainage system. The spring probably originates by the seepage of water derived from the winter snows and rainfall in Spruce Mountain through a joint system within the mountain. No buried stream channels could be located between the spring and the base of the massive overhead cliffs. The belief that the spring is related to Sterling Pond is unfounded. It is unlikely that surplus water could be drained from Sterling Pond because it already maintains a delicate balance between the supply of water from rain and snow and the output to the stream flowing to the north. _Mount Mansfield_ The summit of Mount Mansfield when viewed from a distance has the resemblance of a face with an exaggerated distance between the nose and upper lips. Accordingly, these peaks are named, from south to north, the Forehead, Nose, Upper Lip, Lower Lip, Chin, and Adam’s Apple. All these points are readily accessible by the Long Trail and the area of the Nose may be reached by the Toll Road or the Ski Lift. From all the points along the crest an excellent view may be obtained. On clear days Lake Champlain and the Adirondack Mountains in New York State may be seen to the west, and Mount Washington in New Hampshire may be seen to the east. Of the local structures, good exposures of the mica-albite-quartz schist occur along the crest with magnetite and garnet locally abundant. The rocks on Sunset Ridge, which extends west from the Chin, can be seen clearly to be dipping at gentle angles to the west. The Chin has an elevation of 4393 feet, which is the highest point in Vermont. Most of the schist in this area is nearly horizontal or dipping slightly to the west. However, minor folds are present everywhere and an average reading is difficult to obtain. At the summit much of the schist contains large black grains of magnetite. The summit is reached by the Long Trail along the crest of the mountain from the Toll Road, by the Long Trail from Barnes Camp via Taft Lodge, or from the west by the trail up Sunset Ridge. An excellent view of the Lake of the Clouds and the Adam’s Apple is obtained a short distance north of the summit of the Chin. [Illustration: Figure 11. “Subway” formed by separation of the rocks along a joint on west slope of Mount Mansfield.] Lake of the Clouds which lies north of the Adam’s Apple and Bear Pond which lies north of Bear Head Mountain are both small shallow bodies of water. The slight depressions in which they occur were probably scooped out by the erosive action of the glacier. [Illustration: Figure 12. Cave of the Winds. Mount Mansfield, as seen from the east slope of the Chin. The Mount Mansfield Hotel and the Nose are in the distance. The rocks in the foreground show the beginning stages of downhill slippage of a large mass of rock away from the joint.] Between the Chin and Mount Mansfield Hotel are a number of interesting trails. The Subway and Canyon trail on the west side of the mountain follow, for part of the way, joints in the rock which have been enlarged by the downhill slippage of the western block. Figure 11 shows the nature of one of these passageways. On the east side of the mountain, the Cliff trail passes through a similar joint called “Wall Street.” The Cave of the Winds, reached by a trail just north of the Lower Lip, has formed along another north-south joint. The block which has moved downhill has tilted into the mountain and rubble has filled the gap at the top to form the cave. Figure 12 shows the appearance of the cave as seen from the eastern slope of the Chin. This photograph shows smaller joints on the Chin which have just begun to be enlarged by slippage of the downhill block. It is possible that some of these open joints date back and partially owe their origin to glacial erosive action. Drift Rock which is located along the Long Trail south of the Upper Lip has already been described as an erratic boulder moved by the glacier. The glacial striae may be seen in the bedrock northwest of the boulders. Garnet crystals are very abundant in these boulders and specimens of the small red garnets may be obtained here. The Nose is easily reached along the trail from Mount Mansfield Hotel. From the summit the view is excellent to the south towards Camels Hump, which is one of the prominent peaks of the Green Mountain range. The mica-albite-quartz schist on top of the Nose has many small folds and crenulations. South of the Forehead along the Long Trail, cliffs of an albite-rich variety of the mica-albite-quartz schist form obstacles which have been surmounted cleverly by the Green Mountain trail-markers. In the southern part of Mount Mansfield State Forest the Long Trail passes through Nebraska Notch in the vicinity of Taylor Lodge. This notch also was formed by the erosive action of an ancient river that flowed across the mountain at this point, but which has long since been abandoned. [Illustration: The cliffs at Smugglers Notch as seen looking south from the west wall of the Notch.] FOOTNOTES [1]Rocks are classified as being either igneous, sedimentary, or metamorphic. _Igneous_ rocks form by the solidification of molten material; _sedimentary_ rocks form by the accumulation of sediments derived from older rocks; and _metamorphic_ rocks form by recrystallization of older rocks under conditions of high temperatures and pressures. [Illustration: MOUNT MANSFIELD STATE FOREST] Transcriber’s Notes —Silently corrected a few typos. —Retained publication information from the printed edition: this eBook is public-domain in the country of publication. —In the text versions only, text in italics is delimited by _underscores_. *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE GEOLOGY OF MT. MANSFIELD STATE FOREST *** Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed. Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution. START: FULL LICENSE THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license. Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works 1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. 1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. 1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others. 1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States. 1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: 1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed: This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook. 1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. 1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. 1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™. 1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License. 1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. 1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. 1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that: • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.” • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works. • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work. • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works. 1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. 1.F. 1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. 1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. 1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem. 1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. 1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. 1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause. Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™ Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life. Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org. Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws. The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS. The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate. While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate. International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate. Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org. This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.